"This dissertation reconstructs aspects of the history of Zulu martial heritage through the prism of the amabutho (regiments, age-grades) in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, from the era of Shaka Zulu (ca. 1816) to the present. Based on archival research and oral history interviews, this study argues that despite being outlawed by the British colonial regime in 1879, Zulu chiefs continued to form amabutho, but for different purposes. Regiments became youth structures for commercial labor recruitment and British military conscription; they enabled indigenous leaders to access martial discourse and metaphors for political mobilization; expressed cultural forms of resistance to state racism; and nurtured the sustenance of Zulu identities in a changing South Africa. Exploring the amabutho's links to the Zulu monarchy also helps to shed light on the evolving role and status of the Zulu Royal House. While both the white-run Natal and Union governments feared the influence that Shaka's successors held among Zulu-speaking Africans, the authorities also relied on Paramount Chief Solomon to recruit black volunteers from Natal and Zululand for World War I. In the apartheid era (1948-1994), the invocation of the Zulu nation's warrior legacy endured. As migrant laborers, Zulu men recreated their martial identities and manifestations of the amabutho became more abstract, emerging in society, culture, and politics in unexpected ways. As the struggle against apartheid intensified, the continued relevance of this martial heritage mobilized Zulu communities, bringing them in conflict with first the African National Congress and later the United Democratic Front. In the post-apartheid period (1994-present), the rhetoric, symbolism, and practices of Zulu regiments continues to resonate and evolve. In the case of "high politics," Zulu political leaders turn to martial metaphors to engender support, while, on the ground, local authorities throughout the province struggle to maintain the traditions that give these metaphors meaning. The historiographical significance of this dissertation is threefold. First, it extends earlier studies to consider Zulu martial masculinity over two centuries. Second, it uncovers how amabutho shaped, and have been shaped by, white anxieties about Zulu men's "violent potential" as well as a need for cheap labor. Third, this dissertation reconsiders the shifting role of chiefs and kings in South Africa since 1800."--Pages ii-iii.
Read
