THE CONDENSATION OF SOME OF THE DIPHENYL ALKYL CARBINOLS WITH PHENOL IN THE PRESENCE OF ANHYDROUS ALUMINUM CHLORIDE fcy Richard Ives Jackson A THESIS Submitted to the Graduate School of Michigan State College of Agriculture and Applied Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY" Department of Chemistry 1940 ACKNOWLEDGMENT To Dr* R* G* Huston, tiio author wish© to express his thanks for his invaluable aid and advice in the accomplishment of this work. TABLE OF CONTENTS page I Introduction 1 II Historical 2 III Discussion (1) Preparation of the Diphenyl Alkyl Carbinols 5 (2) Condensation of the Diphenyl Alkyl Carhinols and the Diphenyl Alkenes with Phenol (3) Preparation ofDerivatives 10 17 (4) Identification of Compounds and Proofs of Struct\ire 20 (5) Interpretationof Results 25 IV Experimental 32 V Summary 39 VI Bibliography 40 -1- I Introduct ion In 1916, Huston and Friedeman (1) condensed benzyl alcohol with benzene in the presence of anhydrous alum­ inum chloride. This work was followed, in 1924, by the condensation of benzyl alcohol with phenol by Huston (2). In 1927, Huston, Lewis and Grotemut (3) condensed benzohydrol, methyl phenyl carbinol, and ethyl phenyl carbinol with phenol. Attempts to condense diphenyl ethyl carbinol, di1 T>V*o«Tr1 n - n v rW t± n/w l 0r n a 1 w UkX V dbMW * •| onH rl 1 1 a n - n v n njp* wl W w binol with benzene were carried out in 1933 and 1934 — by Huston and Wilsey (4) and Huston and Hradel (5). No condensation resulted, but the carbinols underwent de­ hydration. The condensation of diphenyl methyl carbinol with phenol in the presence of anhydrous aluminum chloride was reported by Welsh and Drake (6 ) in 1938. To investigate further the use of anhydrous alum­ inum chloride as a condensing agent, the author has con­ densed the following diphenyl alkyl carbinols with phen­ ol: diphenyl ethyl carbinol, diphenyl n-propyl carbinol, diphenyl iso-propyl carbinol, diphenyl n-butyl carbinol, diphenyl iso-butyl carbinol, diphenyl sec-butyl carbin­ ol, diphenyl tert-butyl carbinol, and diphenyl n-amyl carbinol. -2- II Historical The condensation of alcohols with phenol has been accomplished by the use of numerous condensing agents, a few of which are anhydrous aluminum chloride, zinc chloride, magnesium chloride, alkali bisulfites, sulfur­ ic acid, phosphoric acid, and perchloric acid. The first condensation of alcohols with phenol was reported by Liebmann (7) with the use of zinc chloride as condensing agent. The first use of anhydrous aluminum chloride as a condensing agent for alcohols and aromatic compounds was in 1897 when Nef (8 ) mentioned the forma­ tion of diphenyl methane from benzyl alcohol and benzene. Huston and Friedeman (1) repeated this work and report­ ed a 30$ yield of diphenyl methane. Huston and Friedeman (9) later condensed aromatic secondary alcohdls and mixed aliphatic-aromatic secondary alcohols with benzene, and Huston (2) oondensed benzyl alcohol with phenol, anisole, and phenetole. In 1926, Huston and Sager (10) attempted to conden­ se the following primary alcohols with benzene: methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, n-butyl, iso-butyl, iso-amyl, phenyl ethyl, phenyl propyl, and allyl. With the exception of allyl alcohol, which gave a 16$ yield of allyl benzene, no condensation resulted. Allyl alcohol was condensed with phenol by Huston and Newmann (11). Triphenyl methane was the only product isolated -3 from the attempted condensation of triphenyl carbinol with benzene by Huston and Davis (12) in 1927. In 1924, Huston and Goodemoot (13) condensed cyclobutyl, cyclo-pentyl, and cyclo-hexyl carbinols with ben­ zene. As expected, cyclo-butyl carbinol showed the greatest reactivity. Only dehydration of the carbinols resulted when Huston and Wilsey (4) and Huston and Hradel (5) and Huston and Macomber (14) attempted to condense diaryl alkyl carbinols and dialkyl aryl carbinols with benzene. Up to this time, the investigations in this field had indicated that, if an alcohol is to be successfully condensed with benzene or phenol in the presence of an­ hydrous aluminum chloride, its alpha carbon must be un­ saturated, that is, double bonded or a member of a ben­ zene ring or strained alicyclic ring. The formation of cumene from iso-propyl alcohol and benzene by Huston and Hsieh (15) in 1936 was the first successful condensation involving a saturated aliphatic alcohol. Huston, Hsieh, and Fox (15),(16) later condensed the tertiary butyl, amyl, and hexyl al­ cohols with benzene and phenol. Subsequently, some of the tertiary heptyl and octyl alcohols were condensed with benzene and phenol by Huston and co-workers (17). Results similar to those of Huston, Hsieh, and Fox were obtained by Tzukervanik and co-workers (18) in 4- their condensations of some of the simple secondary and tertiary aliphatic alcohols with benzene and toluene. In 1938, Welsh and Drake (6 ) reported the conden­ sation of diphenyl methyl carbinol with phenol. However, none of the diphenyl alkyl carbinols used in this in­ vestigation have been condensed with phenol. -5- III Discussion (1) Preparation of the Diphenyl Alkyl Carbinols Diphenyl ethyl carbinol has been prepared from eth­ yl magnesium iodide and benzophenone by Klages (19), Hell and Bauer (SO), Sabatier and Murat (21), from di­ ethyl mercury, benzophenone and sodium by Schorigen (22), from ethyl propionate and phenyl magnesium bromide by Masson (23), and from propionyl chloride and phenyl mag­ nesium bromide by Gilman, Fothergill, and Parker (24). Diphenyl n-propyl carbinol has been prepared from ethyl butyrate and phenyl magnesium bromide by Masson (23), Sabatier and Murat (21), Scraup and Freundlich (25), and Schlenk and Bergmann (26). Klages and Heilmann (27) claim to have prepared it from n-propyl magnesium iodide and benzophenone. However, Scraup and Freundlich (25) and Schlenk and Bergmann (28) claimed that his product was benzohydrol resulting from the reduction of the benzophenone by the Grignard reagent. Sabatier and Murat (21) reported a very small yield of the carbinol from n-propyl magnesium chloride and benzophenone; the principal product was benzohydrol. Diphenyl iso-propyl carbinol has been prepared from ethyl iso-butyrate and phenyl magnesium bromide by Sabatier and Murat (21), Levy (29), Ramart-Lucas and Salmon-Legagneur (30), Schlenk and Bergmann (28)r and from iso-propyl magnesium iodide and benzophenone by -6- Sabatier and Murat (21). In this laboratory (31) an at­ tempt to prepare it from iso-propyl magnesium bromide and benzophenone gave benzohydrol as the principal pro­ duct. Diphenyl n-butyl carbinol has been prepared from ethyl n-valerate and phenyl magnesium bromide by Schlenk and Bergmann (26). Diphenyl iso-butyl carbinol has been prepared from methyl iso-valerate and phenyl magnesium bromide by Sabatier and Murat (21) and von Auwers (32). Diphenyl sec-butyl carbinol has not been prepared as far as the author has been able to determine. Diphenyl tert-butyl carbinol has been prepared from trimethyl acetophenone and phenyl magnesium bromide (33) by Ramart-Lucas (34), and from the ethyl ester of trimethyl acetic acid and phenyl magnesium bromide by Schlenlc and Racky (35) and by Bateman and Marvel (36). Diphenyl n-amyl carbinol has been prepared from ethyl caproate and phenyl magnesium bromide by Masson (23) and Schlenk and Bergmann (26). For this investigation, the diphenyl alkyl carbin­ ols, with the exception of diphenyl ethyl carbinol, were prepared from phenyl magnesium bromide and the coresponding acid chlorides, the method of Gilman, Fothergill, and Parker (24). 2 CgHgMgBr-^- RC0C1 > (C6H 5 )2C (R )OMgBr - h MgBrCl (C6H5 )2C(R)0MgBr -f- HOI > (C6H5 )2C (R)OH -H MgBrCl -7 Diphenyl ethyl carbinol was prepared from ethyl propion­ ate and phenyl magnesium bromide. In addition, diphenyl n-propyl carbinol, diphenyl iso-propyl carbinol, and diphenyl n-amyl carbinol were prepared from the corresponding esters and diphenyl npropyl carbinol was prepared from butyrophenone. The yields of the carbinols from the acid chlorides and es­ ters were 65$ to 80$. Diphenyl sec-butyl carbinol was prepared from methyl ethyl acetyl chloride and phenyl magnesium brom­ ide in 65$ yield. It is a light yellow, viscous liquid. Its structure was proved by dehydration and oxidation of the resulting hydrocarbon with chromic acid. Benzo­ phenone and methyl ethyl ketone were isolated, the lat­ ter as its semicarbazone, M.P. 143* (37). C6H5 H 0-C-CH(CH,) (C2H5) C6H5 C6H 5 ------ » C=C(CH3) (C2H5) -f- HsO c6h5 C6H5 C5H5 CrC(CH3 )(C2H5 )-*-Na2Cr2C>7 -t*HAo— * C=0 4-0=C(CH3) (C2H5 ) Cq Rq CgHs -8- Physical Constants of th© Diphenyl Alkyl Carbinols Compound_____________________ M.P.______________ B.P. diphenyl ethyl carbinol 94-5° 128-9°/ 1 ram. diphenyl n-propyl carbinol diphenyl iso-propyl carbinol 128-30°/ 2 mm. 52-3° 125-6°/ 1 ram. diphenyl n-butyl carbinol 133-4°/ 1 mm. diphenyl iso-butyl carbinol 129-30°/ 1 mm. diphenyl sec-butyl carbinol 126-7°/ 1 ram. diphenyl tert-butyl carbinol 124-5°/ 1 mm. diphenyl n-amyl carbinol 46-7° 142-3°/ 1 ram. Physical Constants of the Dehydration Products of Compound M.P. B.P. 1,1 diphenyl 1-propene 51-2° 94-5°/ 1 mm. 1,1 diphenyl 1-butene 115-6°/ 2 mm. 1,1 diphenyl 2 methyl 1-propene 101-2°/ 1 ram. 1,1 diphenyl 1-pentene 112-3°/ 1 ram. 1,1 diphenyl 3 methyl 1-butene 110-2°/ 1 mm. 1,1 diphenyl 2 methyl 1-butene 108-9°/ 1 ram. 2,2 diphenyl 3 methyl 3-butene 102-3°/ 1 ram. 1,1 diphenyl 1-hexene 130-1°/ 1 mm. -9- B.P. Sp. G. Index of Refract ion 177-8°/ 16 ram. 178-9°/ 15 ram. 1.0428 .5727 191-2®/ 15 ram. ||o1.0478 njf’l .5658 184-5°/ 15 mm. If!1.0430 n§5°l .5682 185-6°/ 15 ram. ||I1. 0445 a§5*l .5664 185-6°/ 14 mm. H ? 1.0546 178-9°/ 15 ram. .5731 204-5°/ 15 ram. the Diphenyl Alkyl Carbinols B.P. B.P. Sp. g . Index of Refract ion 151-2°/ 16mm. 281-2°/ 743mm. 164-5°/ 15mm. 288-9°/ 743ram. 25* 1.0096 n£° 1.5950 155-6°/ 15mm. 285-6°/ 743ram. 1.0004 ng5°1.5962 180-1°/ 19mm. 300-1°/ 743mm. ||ri.0022 n^5°i.5942 169-70? 18mm. 292-3®/ 743ram. |^0.9813 n^5°1.5816 165-6°/ 18mm. 0.9944 n^5°1.5822 156-7®/ 15mm. f 5l 0.9790 n§5°1.5759 180-1°/ 17mm. 305-7®/ 738mm. P5® gg*0.9987 n^5*1.5968 -10- (2) Condensation of the Diphenyl Alkyl Carbinols with Phenol in the Presence of Anhydrous Aluminum Chloride The eight diphenyl alkyl carbinols were conden­ sed with phenol by the following procedure: Anhydrous aluminum chloride is added, with stir­ ring to a mixture of phenol and diphenyl alkyl carbinol dissolved in petroleum ether. After standing three to four days, the mixture is decomposed with ice and HC1, extracted with diethyl ether, and the ether removed. mV> A xuo ^ A M a1 A }jxx^ iasj± sz yjx 4 * 5M u u io %wA “ ■ » 1 — 4 .■ » A iu a u u i c « " *M A a i o A AM A *M A 4 »A A o c p a x a u o u A«M i x u iii ^ V *A uno M AM xavjii.— phenolic compounds by the use of alcoholic KOH and pet­ roleum ether. The phenolic and non-phenolic fractions are separately fractionally distilled. For the discussion of the products, the condensa­ tions of the eight diphenyl alkyl carbinols with phenol are divided into three groups involving the condensa­ tions of (1 ) the diphenyl primary-alkyl carbinols, (2 ) diphenyl secondary-alkyl carbinols, and (3) a diphenyl tert-alkyl carbinol. (1) Products from the Condensations with Phenol of the Five Diphenyl primary-Alkyl Carbinols: Diphen­ yl Ethyl Carbinol, Diphenyl n-Propyl Carbinol, Di­ phenyl n-Butyl Carbinol, Diphenyl iso-Butyl Carbin­ ol, and Diphenyl n-Amyl Carbinol. From the fractional distillation of the non-phen­ olic fractions, two types of compounds were obtained, -11- diphenyl alkenes, resulting from the dehydration of the carbinols, and small amounts of high-boiling, viscous materials distilling over wide ranges ( 180-250*/ 3 mm*). These latter materials probably contained dimers of the diphenyl alkenes but were not investigated because they occurred in amounts too small to permit their purifica­ tion. The principal products isolated from the phenolic fractions were, besides unused phenol, the condensation products ( p-hydroxy triphenyl primary-alkyl methanes ). Small amounts of higher boiling materials ( above 230° at 3 mm. ) were obtained. Because they could not be crystallized, or distilled without decomposition, they were not investigated. They may consist of disubstituted phenols or products resulting from the condensation of the unsaturated dimers of the diphenyl alkenes with phenol. Their solubility in aqueous KOH indicates that they are not disubstituted phenols. The diphenyl alkenes, 1,1 diphenyl 1-propene, 1,1 diphenyl 1-butene, 1,1 diphenyl 1-pentene, 1,1 diphenyl 2 methyl 1-butene, and 1,1 diphenyl 1-hexene resulting from the dehydrations of diphenyl ethyl carbinol, diphen­ yl n-propyl carbinol, diphenyl n-butyl carbinol, diphen­ yl iso-butyl carbinol, and diphenyl n-amyl carbinol re­ spectively, were also condensed with phenol with the formation of the same products as from the condensations of the corresponding carbinols with phenol. -12- The p-hydroxy triphenyl primary-alkyl methanes were obtained, for the most part, in yields of 30$ to 40$, (2) Products from the Condensations with Phenol of the Two Dinhenyl sec--Alkyl Carbinols: Diphenyl iso-Propyl Carbinol and Diphenyl sec-Butyl Car­ binol, From the fractional distillation of the non-phenolic fraction, obtained from the condensation of diphenyl iso-propyl carbinol with phenol, were isolated iso­ propyl benzene, 1,1 diphenyl 2 methyl 1-propene ( from the dehydration of the carbinol ), and a small amount of a viscous liquid ( B.P. 200-50°/ 3 mm.). This vis­ cous material was not investigated. From the phenolic fraction were isolated unused phenol, p-benzyl phenol, p-hydroxy triphenyl iso-propyl methane, and a small amount of higher boiling material ( above 220°/ 3 mm.) which decomposed on distillation. The yields of p-hydroxy triphenyl iso-propyl methane varied greatly ( from 9$ to 73$ )• Identical products were obtained from the conden­ sation of 1,1 diphenyl 2 methyl 1-propene with phenol. From the condensation of diphenyl sec-butyl ce.rbinol with phenol were obtained, in the non-phenolic fraction, sec-butyl benzene, 1,1 diphenyl 2 methyl 1butene, and a small amount of high boiling, viscous ma­ terial, and, in the phenolic fraction, phenol, p-benzyl -13 phenol, p-hydroxy triphenyl sec-hutyl methane, and a small amount of higher boiling material. The yields of p-hydroxy triphenyl sec-butyl methane were 12# and 13#. Because it could not be obtained in sufficient amounts, 1,1 diphenyl 2 methyl 1-butene was not conden­ sed with phenol. In two condensations of diphenyl iso-propyl carbin­ ol and diphenyl sec-butyl carbinol with phenol, where the condensation mixtures were decomposed with ice only and the phenolic and non—phenolic fractions immediately separated with the use of alcoholic KOH and petroleum ether, small alounts of the carbinol were recovered in the non-phenolic fractions. Apparently, in the presence of HC1, the temperature necessary to remove the diethyl ether is sufficiently high to cause dehydration of the carbinols. (3) Products from the Condensation of Diphenyl tert-Butyl Carbinol with Phenol The attempted condensation of diphenyl tert-butyl carbinol with phenol, by the procedure used for the other carbinols, gave only phenol, 2,2 diphenyl 3 methyl 3-butene, and 2,2 diphenyl 3 chloro 3 methyl butane. When a mixture of phenol and diphenyl tert-butyl car­ binol, dissolved in petroleum ether, was added dropwise, with stirring, to anhydrous aluminum chloride suspended in petroleum ether, a 6# yield of 2,2 diphenyl 3 (p-hydroxy phenyl) 3 methyl butane was obtained. The conden­ -14- sation of P.,2 diphenyl 3 methyl 3-hutene , the dehydra­ tion product of diphenyl tert-hutyl carbinol, with phen­ ol gave a 15% yield of 2,2 diphenyl 3 (p-hydroxy phenyl) 3 methyl butane. In the condensations with diphenyl tert-butyl carbinol and 2,2 diphenyl 3 methyl 3-butene, only very small amounts of higher boiling materials were formed. -15- Pro&uots of the Condensation of the Diphenyl Alkyl Carbinols with Phenol Condensation Product B.P. B.P. p-hydroxy triphenyl ethyl methane 198-199°/ 1 ram. 259-260°/ 15 ram. p-hydroxy triphenyl n-propyl methane 196-197°/ 1 mm. 256-257®/ 15 ram. p-hydroxy triphenyl iso-propyl methane 198-199*/ 1 mm. *245-255°/ 16 mm. p-hydroxy triphenyl n-butyl methane 182-183°/ 1 ram. 237-238°/ 13 ram. p-hydroxy triphenyl iso-butyl methane 196-197°/ 1 mm. 261-262°/ 15 ram. p-hydroxy triphenyl sec-butyl methane 195-196°/ 1 mm. #p-hydroxy triphenyl tert-butyl methane 205-206°/ 1 mm. 2,2 diphenyl 3 methyl 3 (p-hydroxy phenyl) butane p-hydroxy triphenyl n-amyl methane 195-200°/ 1 mm. 183-184°/ 1 mm. 256-257°/ 15 ram. * The distillation of p-hydroxy triphenyl iso-propyl methane at 16 mm. resulted in noticible decomposition. # The p-hydroxy triphenyl tert-butyl methane was pre­ pared from diphenyl tert-butyl chloro methane and p-anisyl magnesium bromide. -16 Molecular ------ ... x-w* 113-3.5° * * * Calculated — a ----- Determined C2lH 220 87.46% 6.99% 87.21% 7.22% C32HS2° 87.37% 7.33% 87.30% 7.40% C22H22° 87.37% 7.33% 87.25% 7.32% C23H24° 87.30% 7.64% 87.30% 7.75% C23h 24° 87.30% 7.64% 87.15% 7.75% °23H24° 87.30% 7.64% 87.18% 7.62% C23h 24° 87.30% 7.64% 87.38% 7.36% 0 23324° 87.30% 7.64% 87.55% 7.84% °24H 26° 87.22% 7.90% 87.20% 7.98% * These compounds were crystallized but, due to their great viscosities and low melting points, they failed to lose their crystalline form when heated above their melting points. -17 (3) preparation of Derivatives The preparation of solid derivatives of the p-hydroxy triphenyl alkyl methanes and of 2,2 diphenyl 3 (phydroxy phenyl) 3 methyl butane was exceedingly diffi­ cult and not very successful. The derivatives attempted were: phenyl urethanes, alpha naphthyl urethanes, di­ phenyl urethanes, aryloxy acetic acids, p-nitro benzyl ethers, bromo derivatives, nitro derivatives, and the benzene sulfonyl, p-bromo benzene sulfonyl, benzoyl, p-anisoyl, 3,5 dinitro benzoyl, p-ohloro benzoyl, and p-bromo benzoyl esters. The derivatives that were suc­ cessfully prepared are described, in tabular form, on pages 18 and 19. -18- Derivatives of the p-Hydroxy Triphenyl Alley1 MethButane Parent Compound_______ Derivat ive____________ M.P. p-hydroxy triphenyl ethyl methane benzoyl ester p-hydroxy triphenyl ethyl methane p-bromo benzene sulfonyl ester p-hydroxy triphenyl n-propyl metheme 3,5 dinitro benzoyl ester 133-4° p—hydroxy triphenyl n-butyl methane p—chloro benzoyl ester 158-9° 2,2 diphenyl 3 (p-hydroxy phenyl) 3 methyl butane p-hydroxy triphenyl tert-butyl methane p-chloro benzoyl ester p-chloro benzoyl ester 106-6.5° *121®( needles *129°( cubes ) 183-4° 169-70° * The derivative crystallized in two crystalline forms* The analyses of halogen were carried out by the l^arr bomb method. The analysis of nitrogen was by the micro Dumas method. anes and 2,2 Diphenyl 3 (p-Hydroxy Phenyl) 3 Methyl Molecular Analyses Formula____________ Calculated___________ Determined C28h 24°2 C-85.67# H-6.16# C-85.55% H-6.29# C27H2303SBr Br-15.75# Br-15.61% c 29H24°6N 2 N-5.64$ N-5.80# C30H27°2C1 Cl-7.79% Cl-7.75^ C30H2702C1 Cl-7.79$ Cl-7.90^ C30H27°2C1 Cl—7•79$ Cl-7.62$ -20- (4 ) Identification of Compounds and Proofs of Structure The compounds, other than the condensation prod­ ucts, which were isolated from the condensations of the diphenyl alkyl carbinols with phenol, were identified as follows: 1.1 Diphenyl 1-propene was identified by its melt­ ing point. 1.1 Diphenyl 1-butene, 1,1 diphenyl 2 methyl 1-propene, 1,1 diphenyl 1-pentene, 1,1 diphenyl 3 methyl 1butene, 1,1 diphenyl 2 methyl 1-butene, and 1,1 diphenyl 1-hexene were identified by their physical constants ( boiling points, densities, and indices of refraction ). 2.2 Diphenyl 3 methyl 3-butene was identified by converting it to 2,2 diphenyl 3 chloro 3 methyl butane by the method of Bateman and Marvel (36). 2,2 Diphenyl 3 chloro 3 methyl butane was identified by its melting point, 108-9°(34). Diphenyl iso-propyl carbinol was identified by its melting point. Diphenyl sec-butyl carbinol was identified by its physical constants. p-Benzyl phenol was identified by its melting point and by its mixed melting point with a sample of p-benz­ yl phenol prepared from benzyl chloride, phenol, and aluminum chloride. Iso-propyl benzene and sec-butyl benzene were iden- -21- tifled by the melting points of their p-acetamino der­ ivatives (106* and 126°), prepared by the method of Ipatieff and Schmerling (38). The proof of structure of the condensation product of diphenyl methyl carbinol and phenol was accomplished by Welsh and Draice (6) by allowing the chloride of the carbinol to react with p-anisyl magnesium bromide and by subsequent conversion of the methoxyl group to a hydrox­ yl. The compound, p-hydroxy triphenyl methyl methane, was also prepared by Julian and Gist (39) from fuchsone ( diphenyl methylene quinone ) and methyl magnesium iodide and they prepared the corresponding methoxy com­ pound from p-anisyl diphenyl chloro methane and methyl magnesium iodide. The method of Welsh and Drake was not thought to be generally desirable, except for the synthesis of phydroxy triphenyl tert-butyl methane, for the following reasons: The chlorides of the diphenyl primary-alkyl and diphenyl seoondary-alkyl carbinols are difficult to prepare. They eliminate HC1 at room temperature to form the diphenyl alkenes. The point of attachment of the chlorine atom is not prooved. Their use involves the as­ sumption that the OH of the carbinol is replaced direct­ ly by Cl or, in case the reaction takes place by prelim­ inary dehydration and addition of HC1 to the resulting double bond, the assumption that the chlorine atom is -22- directed to the position previously held hy the hydrox­ yl group. This latter assumption is supported by Markownikoff*s rule for the chlorides of the diphenyl pri­ mary-alkyl carbinols but not for the chlorides of the diphenyl secondary-alkyl carbinols. The chloride of di­ phenyl tert-butyl carbinol is readily prepared, stable, and its structure has been established by Ramart-Lucas (34). The synthesis of the p-hydroxy triphenyl alkyl methanes from p-anisyl diphenyl methyl halides and al­ kyl magnesium halides ( one of the methods of Julian and Gist ) was tried without success. The reactions of p-anisyl diphenyl chloro methane with ethyl magnesium bromide and of p-anisyl diphenyl bromo methane with sec-butyl magnesium bromide both gave p-anisyl diphenyl methane instead of the desired products, p-anisyl di­ phenyl ethyl methane and p-anisyl diphenyl sec-butyl methane. Apparently this method is successful only when the Grignard reagent used is incapable of exhibiting any reducing action. Two attempts to prepare fuchsone by the method of Bistrzycki and Herbst (41) were unsuc­ cessful. The structure of the condensation product of di­ phenyl n-butyl carbinol and phenol was proved by the following method: p-Anisyl diphenyl carbinol was prepared from -23- p-anisyl magnesium bromide and benzophenone and from p-anisoyl chloride and phenyl magnesium bromide. It was condensed with malonic acid ( and the product decarboxylated ) by the method of Fosse (42) to give 3,3,3 panisyl diphenyl propanoic acid. The acid chloride was prepared with the use of thionyl chloride and allowed to react with ethyl magnesium bromide. The resulting ketone, 1,1,1 p-anisyl diphenyl 3-pentanone, was red­ uced by the Clemmensen method (40) and the methoxyl group changed to hydroxyl by the procedure of Welsh and Drake (6). The p-chloro benzoyl esters of the condensa­ tion product and the synthesized product melted at 158-9 , mixed melting point 158-9 . In an attempt to establish the structure of the condensation product of diphenyl iso-propyl carbinol and phenol, diphenyl iso-propyl chloro methane, prepared from the carbinol and dry HC1 gas, was allowed to re­ act with p-anisyl magnesium bromide. The product was converted to p-hydroxy triphenyl iso-propyl methane ( or 1,1 diphenyl 2 (p-hydroxy phenyl) 2 methyl propane) by refluxing with conc. HBr and phenol. No solid der­ ivatives of this product or of the condensation pro­ duct could be prepared. p-Hydroxy triphenyl tert-butyl methane, the expect­ ed condensation product of diphenyl tert-butyl carbinol and phenol, was synthesized from p-anisyl magnesium -24 bromide and diphenyl tert-butyl chloro methane (34), with subsequent demethylation by the usual procedure. The condensation product was compared with it and found to be different. The condensation product was found to be identical, by mixed melting points of the p-chloro benzoyl esters, with the product obtained from the con­ densation of 2,2 diphenyl 3 methyl 3-butene with phenol. It was therefore assumed to be 2,2 diphenyl 3 (p-hydroxy phenyl) 3 methyl butane. To establish its structure more definitely, attempts were made to condense 2,2 di­ phenyl 3 chloro 3 methyl butane (36) with phenol in the presence of aluminum chloride, with sodium phenolate in toluene solvent, and with p-anisyl magnesium bromide. All three attempts were unsuccessful. -25- (5) Interpretation of Results In the condensation of tert-alcohols with phenol in the presence of aluminum chloride, two of the mechan­ isms advanced have been, (1) direct elimination of water from the OH of the carbinol and the para H of the phen­ ol, and (2) dehydration of the carbinol followed by ad­ dition of phenol to the resulting c6H5 (1) CH3CH2C-joH ethylenic double bond. ^ H jC6H 40H c6H5 > CHgCHgC-CgH^OH C6H5 C6H s C*H5 C6H5 (2) CH3CH2C0H-------- >CH3CH=C CgHg CH3CH“—OCa H r \ i h ~ c 6h 4 o h HgO 4 - - H20 C6H5 96^5 > CH3CH2c-CrHaOH 3 The ’direct* condensations of the diphenyl primary-alkyl and dipheny secondary-alkyl carbinols with phenol would be expeoted to give the same products as would the condensations of the carbinol*s dehydration pro­ ducts. Thus, the fact, that the carbinols and the cor­ responding diphenyl alkenes both condense with phenol to give identical products, demonstrates only that the second mechanism is a definite possibility. In one condensation of diphenyl ethyl carbinol with phenol, in which less than the theoretical amount of aluminum chloride ( The theoretical amount is assum­ -26- ed to be one mole of aluminum chloride to three moles of the carbinol.) was added to the solution of the carbinol and phenol in petroleum ether, a small yield (19$) of p-hydroxy triphenyl ethyl methane was obtained. If com­ plete dehydration of the carbinol were necessary before any condensation could take place, no condensation pro­ duct would have been formed. This evidence, though far from being conclusive, favors the first mechanism. In the condensation of diphenyl tert-butyl carbin­ ol with phenol, ‘direct1 condensation would be expected to give p-hydroxy triphenyl tert-butyl methane. Conden­ sation by the second mechanism, as well as condensation of the dehydration product ( 2,2 diphenyl 3 methyl 3butene ) with phenol, would be expected to give 2,2 di­ phenyl 3 (p-hydroxy phenyl) 3 methyl butane. The pro­ ducts obtained from the condensation of the carbinol and of its dehydration product were proved to be iden­ tical, Therefore, at least in the case of diphenyl tert-butyl carbinol, the condensation takes place by the second mechanism. The failure of 2,2 diphenyl 3 chloro 3 methyl butane to condense with phenol elimin­ ates the chloride as a possible intermediate. The formation of p-benzyl phenol and iso-propyl benzene and p-benzyl phenol and seo-butyl benzene re­ spectively from the condensations of diphenyl iso­ propyl carbinol and diphenyl sec-butyl oarbinol with -27- phenol was first thought to result from the breakdown ( with hydrogenation ) of the condensation products under the influence of aluminum chloride. CgH5 RCH( CH3 )C C g H ^ H 2 H — ► C6H5CH2C6H 40H C6H5CH (CH3 )R Ce«5 The isolation of p-benzyl phenol from the products formed when p-hydroxy triphenyl iso-propyl methane is distilled, with decomposition, at 15 mm. pressure, sup­ ported this idea. However, when p-hydroxy triphenyl iso-propyl methane was dissolved in ligroin and treated with aluminum chloride, no p-benzyl phenol or iso-prop­ yl benzene could be isolated. The products isolated, in addition to undecomposed p-hydroxy triphenyl iso-propyl methane and higher boiling materials, were phenol and 1,1 diphenyl 2 methyl 1-propene. Thus, it appears that p-benzyl phenol and the sec-alkyl benzene are formed during the process of condensation and not by decompo­ sition of the condensation product. The hydrogen donor was not determined. -28- Condensations with Phenol Carbinol Phenol grams moles grams moles diphenyl ethyl carbinol 106 1/2 94 1 diphenyl ethyl carbinol 106 1/2 94 1 diphenyl ethyl carbinol 53 1/4 47 1/2 diphenyl ethyl carbinol 53 1/4 24 1/4 diphenyl n-propyl carbinol 45 1/5 40 diphenyl iso-propyl carbinol 113 1/2 73 3/4 diphenyl iso-propyl oarbinol 113 1/2 73 3/4 diphenyl n-butyl carbinol 120 1/2 73 3/4 diphenyl iso-butyl carbinol 120 1/2 73 3/4 diphenyl sec-butyl carbinol 120 1/2 73 3/4 diphenyl tert-butyl carbinol 120 1/2 73 3/4 diphenyl tert-butyl carbinol 60 1/4 37 3/8 127 1/2 73 3/4 diphenyl n-amyl carbinol A1C13 grams moles Condensation Product grams % yield 35 1/4 57 40 35 1/4 126 87 10 1/14 14 19 35 1/4 10 14 26 46 15 p-Benzyl Phenol Alkyl Benzene 35 1/4 14 19 15 g. 10 g. 35 1/4 110 73 15 g. 10 g. 35 1/4 48 30 35 1/4 63 40 35 1/4 21 13 33 g« 10 g. 35 1/4 no condensation 18 1/8 4 6 55 1/4 46 30 -30- Condensations with Phenol Compound grams moles 1,1 diphenyl 1-propene 64 1,1 diphenyl 1-butene 90 1/3 Phenol grams moles 40 47 1/2 1/2 1,1 diphenyl 2 methyl 1-propene 105 1/2 47 1,1 diphenyl 2 methyl 1-propene 85 2/5 55 1,1 diphenyl 1-pentene 75 1/3 35 1/3 1,1 diphenyl 3 methyl 1-butene 75 1/3 35 1/3 1,1 diphenyl 3 methyl 1-butene 55 1/4 35 1/3 2,2 diphenyl 3 methyl 3-butene 40 1/6 35 1/3 1,1 diphenyl 1-hexene 80 1/3 35 1/3 2,2 diphenyl 3 chloro 3 methyl butane 65 1/4 47 1/2 -31 AlClrj Condensation Product p-Benzyl Alkyl grams moles grams jo yield______ Phenol_____Benzene 5 54 56 20 50 42 5 17 11 _ _ — 20 57 47 3 g. 40 36 5 15 14 15 14 18 8 15 5 4 25 25 1/6 1/6 5 25 1/6 no condensation ---------- 5 g. -32- IV Experimental Preparation of the Diphenyl Alkyl Carbinols In a dry 3 L. 3 neok round bottom flask, fitted with separatory funnel and CaClg tube, reflux condenser and CaClg tube, and mechanical stirrer with glycerol seal, place 60 g. magnesium, a few crystals of iodine, and 10 g. bromo benzene dissolved in 100 cc. anhydrous ether. Heat the mixture on the water bath until the re­ action begins. Remove the water bath and then add, with stirring, a solution of 377 g. bromo benzene in 1 L. an­ hydrous ether at such a rate that the mixture refluxes gently. Continue stirring for one hour after addition is complete. To the Grignard reagent, add dropwise, with cool­ ing and stirring, one mole of acid chloride or ethyl ester ( or two moles of phenyl alkyl ketone ) dissolved in 500 cc, anhydrous ether. Decompose the mixture with ice and add sufficient conc. HC1 to barely dissolve the basic magnesium salts that are formed. Separate, and extract the aqueous lay­ er twice with 300 cc. portions of ether. Dry the combin­ ed ether solutions with a mixture of anhydrous NagS04 and anhydrous Na2C03 . After removal of the ether (steam bath), the remaining liquid is cooled and allowed to crystallize or is fractionally distilled at 2-3 mm. pressure. The yield is 65-90% of the theoretical, based -33- on the aoid chloride, ester, or ketone. Condensation of the Diphenyl Alkyl Carbinols ( and Diphenyl Alkenes ) with Phenol In a 1 L, 3 neck round bottom flask, fitted with mechanical stirrer and glycerol seal, and CaClg tube, place 70 g. phenol, 1/2 moles diphenyl alkyl carbinol ( or diphenyl alkene ), and 100 cc, petroleum ether. To the mixture, with stirring, add 35 g. anhydrous alum­ inium chloride in small portions over a period of two hours. Continue stirring for 4-6 hours and allow the mixture to stand for 3-4 days. Decompose the mixture with ice and HC1, separate the petroleum ether layer, and extract the aqueous lay­ er twice with 50 cc. portions of diethyl ether. Combine the ether solutions and remove the ether ( steam bath ), To the residue add 500 cc. alcoholic K0H ( 1 g, K0H / 5 g. HgO / 4 g. methyl alcohol ) and extract the mix­ ture twice with 100 cc. portions of petroleum ether. The petroleum ether extracts are combined, dried with anhydrous NagS04 , the ether removed ( steam bath ), and the residue subjected to fractional distillation. The alcoholic K0H layer is acidified with 1-1 HC1 and twice extracted with 100 cc. portions of diethyl ether, the ether removed ( steam bath ), and the residue fraction­ ally distilled. The condensation product, which occurrs -34- in this fraction, boils in the neighborhood of 190 to 230°/ 3 mm. pressure. Condensation of Diphenyl tert-Butyl Carbinol with Phenol In a 500 cc. 3 neck round bottom flask, fitted with mechanical stirrer and glycerol seal, CaCl2 tube, and separatory funnel, place 20 g. anhydrous aluminum chloride and 100 cc. petroleum ether. Add dropwise, with stirring, a solution of 60 g. diphenyl tert-butyl carbinol and 37 g. phenol in 100 cc. petroleum ether, over a period of one hour. Continue stirring for 4-6 hours and allow the mixture to stand 3-4 days. The re­ maining procedure is identical with the preceding one. Synthesis of p-Hydroxy Triphenyl n-Butyl Methane In a 1 L. 3 neok round bottom flask, fitted with mechanical stirrer and glycerol seal and condenser set for downward distillation, place 290 g. malonic acid and 115 g. p-anisyl diphenyl carbinol. Heat on an oil bath, with stirring, at 120-30° for six hours and then raise the oil bath temperature to 170-80® for an addi­ tional hour. Discard the distillate, which consists of water and acetic acid, cool the remaining liquid, and add 300 cc. 20°Jo alcoholic K0H and reflux for two hours. Cool the mixture, dilute it with an equal volume of water, and extract it with 100 cc. ether. The ether -35- layer, which contains p-anisyl diphenyl carbinol, is discarded. To the alooholio KOH layer, add sufficient cono. HC1 to make the solution acid to Congo Red paper, cool, and extract the solution twice with 100 cc. por­ tions of ether. Combine the extracts and dry with anhyd­ rous NagS04 . Distill off the ether ( steam bath ) and remove the last traces of ether and malonic acid by heating on an oil bath at 180° under reduced pressure. The yield of crude 3,3,3 p-anisyl diphenyl propanoic acid is 85 g. To the crude acid, add 50 g. thionyl chloride and reflux the mixture for three hours. Remove the excess thionyl chloride by distillation. The last traces of it are removed by heating on an oil bath at 180° under red­ uced pressure. Crude 3,3,3 p-anisyl diphenyl propanoyl chloride is a dark red, glassy, non-crystalline solid. In a 250 oc. erlenmeyer flask fitted with reflux condenser and CaCl2 tube, place 1.5 g. magnesium and a few small crystals of iodine. Add 50 cc. anhydrous eth­ er and 1 oc. ethyl bromide and warm the flask ( water bath ) until the reaction begins. Add, in small portions, 6 g. ethyl bromide dissolved in 75 cc. anhydrous ether, allowing the reaction to subside after each addition. In a 500 cc. erlenmeyer flask fitted with a reflux condenser, place 20 g. 3,3,3 p-anisyl diphenyl propan­ oyl chloride dissolved in 200 cc. anhydrous ether. In -36- the top of the condenser, place a 250 oc. separatory funnel held in place by a notched cork. Through the separatory funnel, add dropwise, with cooling and agi­ tation, the solution of ethyl magnesium bromide. Decom­ pose the mixture with ice and HC1 and extract it with 400 oc. ether. Wash the ether layer with 10$ Na^COs solution and remove the ether ( steam bath ). The resi­ due is crude 1,1,1 p-anisyl diphenyl 3-pentanone, yield, 18 g. The 1,1,1 p-anisyl diphenyl 3-pentanone is reduced to p-anisyl diphenyl n-butyl methane by the Clemmensen method (40) and the latter is converted to p-hydroxy triphenyl n-butyl methane by the method of Welsh and Drake (6). Synthesis of p-Hydroxy Triphenyl iso-Propyl Meth­ ane and p-Hydroxy Triphenyl tert-Butyl Methane In a dry 1 L. 3 neck round bottom flask fitted with reflux condenser and CaClg tube, mechanical stir­ rer and glycerol seal, and separatory funnel, place 6 g. magnesium and a few crystals of iodine. Add a solution of 2 g. p-bromo anisole in 50 cc. anhydrous ether and warm ( water bath ), with stirring until the reaction begins. Add dropwise, with stirring, a solution of 48 g. p-bromo anisole in 100 cc. anhydrous ether at such a rate that the mixture refluxes gently. After addition is complete, continue stirring for 2-3 hours. -37- To the p-anisyl magnesium bromide thus prepared, add slowly 30,5 g, diphenyl iso-propyl chloro methane ( or 32 g, diphenyl tert-butyl chloro methane ) dissol­ ved in 100 cc, anhydrous ether. The flask is then trans­ ferred to the steam bath, the ether removed, and the residue heated at 90-100° for 6-8 hours. The residue is decomposed with ice and HC1 and extracted with ether. The ether is removed ( steam bath ) and the residue is distilled under reduced pressure. The fraction boiling at 180-220° / 3 mm, is crude p-anisyl diphenyl iso-propyl methane { or p-anisyl diphenyl tert-butyl methane). The p-anisyl diphenyl iso-propyl methane and p- anisyl diphenyl tert-butyl methane are converted to p-hydroxy triphenyl iso-propyl methane and p-hydroxy triphenyl tert-butyl methane by the method of Welsh and Drake (6), Diphenyl iso-propyl chloro methane was prepared from diphenyl iso-propyl carbinol and dry HC1: In a 100 cc. separatory funnel, plaoe 28 g. diphen­ yl iso-propyl carbinol dissolved in 25 cc. benzene, and 10 g. CaClg. Surround the separatory funnel with icewater and bubble dry HC1 gas through the solution of the carbinol, at the rate of 4-5 bubbles a second, for one hour. Immediately transfer the separatory funnel to the flask containing the p-anisyl magnesium bromide and add the solution of diphenyl iso-propyl chloro methane to the Grignard reagent, ( Diphenyl iso-propyl chloro meth- -38- an© is very difficult to prepare because it spontaneous­ ly gives off HC1, at room temperature, to form 1,1 di­ phenyl 2 methyl 1-propene. Its preparation was attempted unsuccessfully five times before it was finally obtained. Diphenyl tert-biityl chloro methane was prepared from diphenyl tert-butyl carbinol and thionyl chloride. The excess of thionyl chloride was removed by heating at 60 under reduced pressure. Preparation of the p-Chloro Benzoyl Esters In a 6 in. pyrex test tube, place 1.5 g. of the phenol and 1 g. of p-chloro benzoyl chloride. Heat the mixture gently with a very small flame until HC1 fumes cease to be evolved. Reflux the mixture very gently for an additional five minutes, cool, and add 5 g. solid NagCOg and 20 cc. water and heat the mixture ( steam bath ) for 4-5 hours to hydrolise the excess acid chlor­ ide. Cool the tube, place its contents in a 250 cc. sep­ aratory funnel, and dissolve the ester with 100 cc. ether. Wash the ether solution with 1 0 % Na2C03 solu­ tion, dry with anhydrous Na2S04 , and evaporate the ether solution to dryness. Recrystallize the ester from ligroin. -39- V Summary (1) Five of the diphenyl primary-alkyl carbinols have been condensed with phenol to give the expected p-hyd­ roxy triphenyl primary alkyl methanes. (E) Two of the diphenyl secondary alkyl carbinols have been condensed with phenol to give the p-hydroxy tri­ phenyl secondary-alkyl methanes, p-benzyl phenol, and secondary alkyl benzenes. (3) Diphenyl tert-butyl carbinol has been condensed with phenol to give E,E diphenyl 3 (p-hydroxy phenyl) 3 meth­ yl butane. (4) p-Hydroxy triphenyl tert-butyl methane has been synthesized. (5) The structure of one of the p-hydroxy triphenyl pri­ mary alkyl methanes has been established by synthesis. (6) A new alcohol, diphenyl sec-butyl carbinol, has been prepared, its structure established, and some of its physical constants determined. -40- VI Bibliography (1) Huston and Friedeman, J. Am. (2) Chem. Soo. 38, 2527 (1916) Huston, J. Am.Chem. Soc. 46, 2775 (1924) (3) Huston, Lewis, and Grotemut, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 49, 1365 (1927) (4) Huston and Wilsey, M.S. Thesis, Michigan State College (1933) (5) Huston and Hradel, M.S. Thesis, Michigan State College (1934) (6) Welsh and Drake, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60, 58 (1938) (7) Liebmann, Ber. 15,152 (1882) (8) Nef, Ann. 298. 255 (1897) (9) Huston and Friedeman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 40, 785 ( 1918) (10) Huston and Sager, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 48. 1955 (1926) (11) Huston and Newmann, M.S. Thesis, Michigan State College (1933) (12) Huston and Davis, M.S. Thesis, Michigan State College (1933) (13) Huston and Goodemoot, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 56, 2432 (1934) (14) Huston and Macomber, M.S. Thesis, Michigan State College (1935) (15) Huston and Hsieh, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 58. 439 (1936) (16) Huston, Fox, and Binder, I. Org. Chem. 3, 251 (1938) -41- (17) Huston and co-workers: Huston and Hedrick, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 59, 3001 (1937) Huston and Guile, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 61, 69 (1939) Huston and Anderson, M.S. Thesis, Michigan State College (1936) Huston and Schulati, M.S. Thesis, Michigan State College (1936) Huston and Breining, M.S. Thesis, Michigan State College (1938) Huston and Cline, M.S. Thesis, Michigan State College (1939) Huston and Wasson, M.S. Thesis, Michigan State College (1939) Huston and Langdon, M.S. Thesis, Michigan State College (1940) Huston and Snyder, M.S. Thesis, Michigan State College (1940) (18) Tzukervanik and others, J. Gen. Chem. U.S.S.R. 5, 117 (1935) 5, 764 (1935) 2, 633 (1937) (19) Klages, Ber. 35, 2647 (1902) (20) Hell and Bauer, Ber. 37, 230 (1904) (21) Sabatier and Tfurat, Ann. chim. 4, 296 (1915) Compt. Rend. 156. 1430 (1913) (22) Schorigen, Ber. 41, 2717 (1908) -42 (23) Masson, Compt. Rend. 135. 533 (1902) (24) Gilman, Fothergill, and Parker, Rec. trav. chim. 4 S f 748 (1929) (25) Scraup and Freundlich, Ber. 55B. 1073 (1922) (26) Schlenk and Bergmann, Ann. 479. 42 (1930) (27) Klages and Heilmann, Ber. j37, 1447 (1904) (28) Schlenk and Bergmann, Ann. 465, 45 (29) Levy, Bull. soc. chim. 2£, 882 (1921) (1928) Compt. Rend. 172, 383 (1921) (30) Ramart-Lucas and Salmon-Legagneur, Bull. soc. chim. 45, 718 (1929) (31) Evert, Sr. Problem, Michigan State College (1937) (32) von Auwers, Ber. 62£, 693 (1929) (33) Haller and Baur, Compt. Rend. 147. 824 (1908) 148. 70 (1909) (34) Ramart-Lucas, Ann. chim. phys. 30, 349 (1913) Compt. Rend. 150, 1058 (1910) (55) Schlenk and Raoky, Ann. 594, 202 (1912) (36) Bateman and Marvel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 49, 2914 (1927) (37) Veibel, Bull. soc. chim. 41, 1410 (1927) (38) Ipatieff and Schraerling, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 59. 1056 (1937) (39) Julian and Gist, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 5^7, 2030 (1935) (40) Clemmensen, Ber. 47, 51 (1914) (41) Bistrzycki and Herbst, Ber. 35,3140 (1902) (42) Fosse, Bull. soc. chim. 49, 159 (1931)