ane PN tM lh | 60 Ion | LC O aa a 1 1 MEIC k- moll Spraying Substances en Oh) io] Oa HESIS “PRAY TnG SUn SATAN C Flovd ‘". Qven, 7 My =a «- 6 e v2 Cleass '02, yHESIS 10821 “PRAY ING SUESTA mT 2 ty i) Flovd “', Owen. Spraying consists in covering plants, or parts of plants, with a thin uniform film of liquid capable of destroving or preventing an attack of some particular parasitic organism. A spraying substance must possess poisonous, caustic or offensive qualities and should possess a suitable physical structure. ‘he first nemned properties have received much attention; the last named have received little cr none. The Object of this study is to discover the most suitable physical structure of one class of spraving substances--the arsenites. “More definitely the materials with which Ii have worked are: White arsenic, Faris green, pure arsenite of lime, Londen purple, and a few ersenoids. The method of work with each was:--To examine the prysical structure under a compound microscope; to measure tne diameter of the particles with a microewmillimeter scale; and to determine the time of suspension in water. In the case of the arsenoids, chenical analvses for white arsenic were alsc made. In testing the times of suspension, 1.295 frs. -~2.. of an average sample of the material to be tested was added to 25 ce of water ina tall graduate. After vigor- ous shaking, tne mixture was allowed to rest until all of the sediment had reacned the botitom, tne time required tnen being noted. Several ordinary samples of each sub= stance were examined in the ways mentioned, and by repeat- ing tests of each one, quite accurate comparisons were Obtained. Sarmles of white arsenic and paris freen were pulverized in a glass mortar, in order to compare the time of susrension of the smaller particles with that of the ordinary material, An inquiry as to the relation existing between the diameters of small particles and their times of sus- pension, brought the following from the U. S. Department Of Agriculture, Division of Soils: "ine theoretical rate of settling of small particles of spherical form in water would be, with the conditions the same, directly as the radii of the particles. You will see that this would follow from the fact that the mass varies as the cube of the radius, while the effec- tive surface--in this case the cross=sectiocn of the sphere through the center--varies as the square of the radius. Consequently, if one particle was twice the diameter of tne second, it would settle twice as fast. This relation does not hold, however, for irregular particles and it has not been possible to obtain a definite relation between the mean diameter of the particles and the rate of settling. ~-2.- of an average sarinle of the material to be tested was added to 25 ce of water ina tall graduate. After vigor- ous shaking, the mixture was allowed to rest until all of the sediment had reacned the botitom, the time required tnen being noted. Several ordinary samples of each sub= stance were examined in the ways mentioned, and by repeai- ing tests of each one, quite accurate comparisons were Obtained. Sarples of white arsenic and paris freen were pulverized in a glass mortar, in order to compare the time of susrension of the smaller particles with that of tne ordinary material. An inquiry as to the relation existing between the diameters of small particles and their times of sus- pension, brought the following from the U. S. Department Of Agriculture, Division of Soils: "The theoretical rate of settling of small particles of spherical form in water would be, with the conditions the same, directly as the radii of the particles. You will see that this would follow from the fact that the mass varies as the cube of the radius, while the effec- tive surface--in this case the cross-section of the sphere through the center--varies as the square of the radius. Consequently, if one pazsticle was twice the diameter of tne second, it would settle twice as fast. This relation does not hold, however, for irregular particles and it has not been possible to obtain a definite relation between the mean diameter of the particles and the rate of settling. tre variations in surface conditions is undcubtedly lar; ely responsible for the irrerularities that are observed." meen eC - - ~ - - - - - -- = _ = . ~ - - se - - ae -— = ~- utr mY m1 Ts SPST EG Ts “nis ordinarily cecurs as a clear, white, tasteless, odorless powder, slightly soluble in water and cormosed of sinell octahedral crvstals whose chenical composition is AS, 0,» Under the microsccrne, I fcund the particles to be of variaile forms and sizes; to have a semi-transparent arrearance; and to ran:i.e in their diameters from 0.0033 mm. to 0.033 mm., the averare heinr 0.0266 rm. The susrension of an ordinary sample tested as above described, was three minutes; of a pulverized sample, 5.9 to 6 minutes, PARIS GREE. Under the microsccpe, Paris frreen was found to he cormosed of smeil, auite uniform rreen spheres with a diemeter ranging from 0.0135 mm. to 0.025 mm. Of ten samples which I examined, all contained a quantity of small, semietransrarent particles, a snail rortion of which was impurity. In a few sarmles crystals of free white arsenic could he distinruisned, thouph tne microscope was net fourd to he reliable in determinin: very accurately whether the arount was injurious or not. -~-4-- A nicroscopic cormarison of lime and the immurity found in most of the arsenites indicated that free lime was fre- quently present. There was also often seen particles of avery finely divided raterial which did not resemble Paris green spheres, and yet may be a form of aceto- arsenite of copper in which the chemical action was not quite complete. This is easily mistaken for impurity. Aside from a chemical analysis--really the only conclusive teste-the most satisfactory method proved to be the compound microscope which almost certainly decid-~ ed a sammle to be pure or adulterated, and with some experience, an approximate estimation of the quantity and quality of the impurity could be made. By this means crystals of water=- soluble arsenic were detected, and anything not pure Paris green was readily seen. Different lots of this substance, however, were found to vary a great deal in their structure, so that the size of the spheres was never the same, and yet, uniformity toa high degree in any one sample can be expected. The suspension of the ten samples was examined in the way indicated and found to vary from 3.5 to 4 minutes; of a sample pulverized to a condition in which the color was midwav hetween white and the freen of the Ordinary substance+-the particles averaging half the diameter of those of the original material--the time was 6.5 to 7 minutes. Cne freat fault of Paris green is its shcert time of suspension, end were it necessary, tne mater- tal could he pulverized in a mill, thereby losin, its 2 ee oe eye woe -_ ow green cclor and becoming white. Rut correspondence with manufacturers indicated that it is not cnly possible but is much easier for them to make a product of much smaller particles than thcse of the ordinary size, and that it is only customary to produce the larger crvstals--such material having a deeper, richer green, and being, they say, what the trade demands. Such a peris green would certainly possess the advantages of the ordinary, and yet oe capatle of remaining a longer time in suspension. It Would be fur easier to apply, and more effective, uniform and economical in its results. PURE ARSRUILTE OF LIME, Sarples of this were made by boiling white arsenic, One part, and unslaked lime, two parts by Weight. ‘These were tested by acidifying with hydrocloric acid and then subjecting to hydrogen sulphide, any trace Of free arsenic being precipitated as the yellow sulphide Of arsenic. Frrom tie tests, I found that both should be hoiled torether and for at least a half hour as the lime in dissolving combines with the arsenic and forms a very poisonous, but insOluble, and sc a perfectly safe spreving compound, A dry sample of the pure arsenite of lime is a fine, grayish white powder. which , microsccpically, was seen to be Of simple structure, the particles bein: granular, scmewhat transparent, exceedinzgly variable in size, and irregular in shape. Measurements were fcund impracticable. An examination showed its time of sus- pension to be five minutes. ee eee mmm me Fight sarmlies of London purple were collected from various dealers, and examined. Highly magnified, tne purest sample was seen to consist of irregularly shared bodies of mostly small though widely different sizes, the surface of the larrer particles beinr rough and uneven. Sone had merely a dull purple color, while Other masses--under a certain focus--were reddish purple and had a brilliant metallic lustre. All samples contain- ed foreign matter in varying anounts, much of which exist- ed as very fine particles with no resemblance to London purple, but corresponding to some of the impurity found in Paris green. Small, rectangular or stick-shaned bodies which were transparent were also occasionally detected. ‘Measurements proved impracticable, une susvension of tne samples ranged frcm twelve to fifteen minutes, which fact accounts for the little apitation this substance requires and its consequent ease Of application,--the probable explanation of the popularity London purple held for a time rerardiess of its frequent injury to foliare. The buoyancy of the particles is evidently due to their extraordinary irregul- arity and large surface for a small bulk, these combined, providing the material with a floatins power. AR SA® "OID -«, Six or tre so-called "Arsenoids", manufactured by the Adler Color and Chemicel Works of New York, were examined. The first--"lo. 2"--is a whitish green powder. Under the microscope, the particles were very smail (some were barely visible) and adherent, forming small masses. Mxcept for the presence of some free arsenic, very littic impurity was seen. The suspension of this arsenoid was six minutes. A chemical analysis fave 23,457% of total AS, 05 » the mest of which was combined with copyer, a smai1 tnougn injurious portion being free. "Yo. 3" arsenoid microscopically contained two principle substances. Tne first consisted of small, transparent, dJrregulariy shaped particles, some of which were grantilar; the second of darr colored bodies but Otherwise like the first. Some crvstals resembliny those of paris green were also seen and as the cnemical exeamina- tion showed ccpyer to be present, true Paris green was believed to be an ingredient. No free white arsenic was distinguished. Tre arsenoid's time of suspension was e > e aA on four minutes. An analysis showed only 14.9277, of As, 0; none Of Wnich Was free, a quantity of lead, and a trace cf coprer and bisriutn. Arsenoid "Vo. 4" had a distinct freenish tinre, and under the microsccre, consisted cr the sare smatil, irrecular particles es the anove. Some soluble blue--round blue bodies of variable sizes--and a quantity of ¢reen material, evidently Paris freen, were noted. This sample remained in suspension six minutes. Chenically it contained 56.491 o> totel arsenic, some copper, and the nost free arsenic of amv sample. Besides the small sized perticles above mentioneg mo. O" contained a larre amount or Teris frreen ora Similar arsenite or copper. Its time or susnension was the lonrest of all, being, seven minutes. 64,727% of total AS, Cg were found, entirely too much being free however. Copper was also present. The last arsenoid , "io. 6", differed from the above only in beinrs of a lighter color, containing less copper and less free arsenic, and havin: a total content of 65.6937 of As,0,,--entirely too much of the latter heing free. Its time of suspension was 6.5 minutes. "Green Arsenoid" is a@ plain arsenite of co ty ITeY, chernically resembling Paris rreen except that the acetic acid is eliminated. Jticrosconpically it was found to he «a very finely divided material, almost free from foreirn matter. Its susrension was eight minutes--more than twice In conclusion IT hone to rave shown thet the value of a spravin,g substance depends somewhat upon its physical struccure and tne size cof its particles, and how much attention this snould raceive from both manufacturer and sovrayer. We are in great need or cheap and reliable arsenites--tnose made up of very minute particles and having a sufficiency of combined arsenic, a long time of Suspension, absolute insolubility in water and a freedom from free arsenic and other impurities. Lastivy I wish to acknowledse many valuable sursestions in the work from Professor U. P. Hedrick Cf the Collese. So UM ™*A RY, I. The physical structure of spraying: substances is very important and in great need of inmmrovenent. Il. Spraying substances with particles of much finer divisicn would favor: 9 In tne manufacture--especially of paris green. ry e In original cost to the sprayer. 1. HKeonom. Less bulk required for a given surface to be covered. ue required afitation and trouble from cloceead macninery. In applicetion--by lesseninz; the NNO TE ONTOS ONO e a9 Lonser suspension insures preater uniformity in strensth of filn. ps \— e 2. hffectiveness. omiller particles insure a more conplete distribution of poison for a siven anount. O) onaller particles adhere better to foliare. I ey yf ~-19-- nO T MN. The physical structure and time of sus- pension of Bordeaux Mixture made under verious conditions wes studied put the results were not conclusive. --= o- Ce ee ee ed - - - - - - - -_ = -= - - = -_ «= The following sets forth crephiecilvy a compari- son of the examination: EEE Comosition Substance'Susrensi- 'tAver.dia. TTotal MOther inrredients ‘on in min.'of partic."As 0 ' ns i Te “2 Te ee Write ' ' ' ’ arsenic ' 3. 1.0266 mi. T1005 ’ ' ? ’ : “nite Ars! ' ' ' pulver, ' 5,5 Mreas.irmr.' " ’ t t t q Paris ' ' ' , erzen ' 0O--4 ',018 rm, ' 58.455 "Oud = 31.29;0 4 Cy ' ve ido 2 ? t t t Paris er.' ' ' ' pulver. ' 6.5--7 'lieas. impr! ’ " " f ’ t t Arsenite ' ’ ’ ' of lime ' 5. ro " ' Cal. arsénite. f ? ! t London ' , ' ' purple r1e.--15. ' " " ' Cal.ars.} arsenite and ' ' ' ' residues. t ? t t "ITO. oN ? f g f arsenoid ' 6. ‘ "153.45", rou. f 8 t t "To. jf t t t t t ! ? ? arsencid ' 4. ro" nm 914.9275, *' Ph. Cu. Pi. f f ’ t WO e 4 ! t g ! arsenoid ' 6G. ro "156,491". ' Cu. t ? t g MITO, 5" ? t t t arsenoid ' 7. ro "964,727, ' Cru. t Y t ! "ITO. G6" t ? ? t : a 4 arsenoid ' 6.5 rou " 163.6935 !' Cu. 1 t t t "orcen 9 ? f a arsenoid"™’ 8, ro "ot ' rlain arsenite | of conrer, | a > >= — wT 3 =———e —" =r oS —nr & ——= wt | 3 IM