e. e ws = oe — i 24 Pr rod 4 £ ef i HESIS Telemed Cee mi ms!) aan C.F. MEANWELL C,J. MO LEAN 1920 A Study of the Permeability of Concrete A Thesis Submitted to The Faoulty of Michigan Agricultural College by Cc. F. Meanwell C. Je MoLean Candidates for the Degree of Bachelor of Science June, 1920 INTRODUCTION. The study of the permeability of concrete has been quite a common form of researoh work. The results so far have shown that concrete cannot hold water under pressure. In this thesis a concrete that is theoretically considered to be the densest possible has been used. The densest conorete is the strongest and should be the most imperveous. Upon this hypothesis we are testing the densest conorete possible for its property of holding water under pressure and if it fails it can be assumed that a concrete without the aid of a water-proofing compound is not water-proof. To get the densest concrete possible, the gravel was tested by Sieve Analysis and with the help of Taylor and Thompson's Ideal Curve, a proportion of sand, gravel, and cement was determined that would give the densest concrete. It was decided to test four different cements and a composite cement s0 that average results oould be obtained. The concrete was made into 6" diameter and 2" high discs and tested under heads of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 150 feet. MATERIALS Cement. The cements used in these tests were secured from local dealers in Lansing. Four Michigan 102681 cements were used and a composite cement composed of equal parts of the other four was made. Some of the sements used were rook cements and some were merl cem nts. The cenents used were denoted as follows: A Burt Cement (rook) B Peninsular Cement (rock) C Michigan Cement (marl) D Wolverine Cement (mari ) E Composite Cement Burt cement is a very dark almost biack cement while Peninsular cement also a rook cement is very light colered. The two marl cements were about the same oolor being a medium light slate gray. Sand and gravel. The sand and gravel used in these tests was secured from a pit in the northeastern part of the city of Lansing and wes of a very good grade having a good sharp sand mixed with well graded stone. No stone larger than one half inch was used however. TESTS OF MATERIALS. 1. Specific Gravity Test. Sixty five grams Of each cement was carefully weighed and the volumes of these samples were determined by placing them in bottles containing bensel and noting the change in volume. From the weight and the volume the speoifio gravity of each cement was determined. These tests were carried on all at the same time and under the same conditions so that a constant temperature was maintained. fhe following results were obtained: CEMENT WEIGHT QF CHMENT VOL. CHANGE SPECIFIC GRAVITY A 65 gms. 20.75 GeG- 5.133 B 65 gms. 20.80 «a.c. 3.126 C 65 gms. 20.88 o.0. 3.112 D 65 gms. 20.90 a.a. 3-110 E 65 gms. 20.90 a.0. 5-110 The average of cements A, B, C, and D is 3.120 and this compares with the oomposite Cement E. Standard specifications require that the specifio gravity be 3.10. The results obtained above are sufficiently close to standard and the cements are therefore up to standard specific gravity. 2. Bolling Test for Soundness. Neat cement pets useing 25% water was made of each kind of cement. Two pats of this neat cement were made for each cement on glass plates. These pats were placed in moist air for 24 hours and then in e steam beth for 5 hours following. when the pats were removed from the steam bath they showed no signs of having raised at the edges or of having cracked on the surface. These tests showed the cements to be sound. 3. Fineness Test. Kech oement was tested for fineness by placing exactly 50 gms. of the cement on a number 200 screen and shaking for 10 minutes in an automatio shaker. The residue remaining on the soreen was carefully weighed and the per- cent caloulated. ‘The following results were obtained: CEMENT WEIGH? OF RESIDUE % OF THE TOTAL WEIGHT 6 A 9.56 15.12 B 10.77 21.6 C 15.83 27.7 D 6.56 135.1 E 9.61 | 19.23 Standard specifications for the fineness of cement require that not more than 22% by weight shall remain on the No. 200 screen. (See Hool end Johnson's Handbook page 833). An allowable variation of 1.5% is permitted however but all cements testing within this limit should be reported as 22%. All the cements tested met the standard specifications except cement C and this was very mah below standard. Cement C was heated at a temperature of 212 degrees Fahrenheit for one hour and then retested. The results after heating were no different. Cement C wes not rejected however but the tests with it were continued. 4. Normal Consistency Test. The Vicat test for normal consistency was used. 500 gms, of cement was taken in each oase with a measured quantity of water. The cement and water were mixed for one half minute with a trowel ed then thoroly mixed and kneaded by hand into a thick paste. The mass was then passed 6 times from hand to hand and then pressed into the large end of a tapered hard rubber ring. The ring was placed on a glass plate and the top of the cement was smeothed off by a single cut with a trowel. .The glass plate and the ring were placed under a rod having a diameter of 1 om. and weighing 300 gms. The penetration in 30 sec. was determined by a scale graduated in millimeters. For normal consistency the penetration should be 10 mm for 30 seo. The results of the tests on each cement are showm in Table [. 5. Tension end Compression Tests. Standard briquettes 1 inch thick and with a@ cross- sectional area of one square inch at the center were made for all tension testa. Neat Cement. Sight briquettes of neat cerent of nermal consistency were made for each cement. Three were tested at the end of 7 days, two were tested at the end of 14 days and three were tested at the end of 26 days. The forms containing the test pieces were placed in TAOLE I TABLE of SYorertaa. Corrisistavcr. Cement BS es Bie Vay satel eg| hea Ae a he a a Tec. Burt a) Faney JOO Royce) FO bd 47 Ze ok are) 2OlM., 177. 30 2 a) 28 Se Po} Lat as Ase GO a os | 2s Kero) Nae ela) Peninselar\ 3 oo Pe los~) 9.577.777.) BO 9 3 ae 300 41 .0P RM 2] Maa sa Sy Ao & Neola] PAO haan FO ae ae Fok ole a) oe JO v9 ray Pa ole eee) S6.577.772. GO id ey Pte ea O) Vea AEA FO Pe) Ve Page & Yale) Acne JO ad oi 23. role) arate Go lai ehataiels Oo Pe Tara) aaa So Composite! & om .F00 AIM mM Jo o* L pag em Zoo “ee neae BO Fesu.ts or Conereession TESTS of Cuses. AEM Cement- Cue em aha “so. | we “gn a #750 eho L ooh 4 Pry ca <1 tae Wee VEE ae ch ood VOW Aa ie Evaro Va B Z2Z50 FIOO Velma} bala ey ad ya) fe tele) VEWeXe) 7 FEIT Fase. a Crem ees ae cS ¥OOO 4/200 o ea Veer en fa) Crm ee oe a eee oO PER ie ee Vx Cram Ea ‘ E 4975 | 5333 | /2/9 | 7933 i Pigs ceo | EE GL7 27/4 dp a GEEZ ey 7A ae S2P oe oh a ele arg (oy aa (7a a oS ae ea SIP oye OS | (7d eyay~) eyoe EZ bd OLE | BE27 | GZ wea Wap cass ord (eee aw GS? fae a) LOE | S77 |-oe2 Cae. el | ge i tt Ly 47) 002 O07 On aa Bria eo Ae Co AeA — — | OLS | meee 44 Way, Or“ c24 AL) leyrsay BAY leyncay tt il baled eee eee Med sey Te dee A cnc Ao ee Ae IL 7 aw be/sq/ poor| qi bs/sq/ aE TOM aA a ameter neal a BO ‘sPOOD2 lem aa yaa FE 6a 92 a Ee] ee LLY © —$____ Sete sss eles XYO BF 9 ‘P/ Y Yoav VOLVOLS C:/ P UAE eh: FOS LOSL MACNZ MICHIGAN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE fy i ew a COLLEGE MICHIGAN AGRICULTURAL ae) 77a mmm Ty r G, oe poacorenss mane: Tad moist air for 24 hours and them the forms were removed and the briquettes were placed in water at a temperature approximately 70 deg. Fahrenheit until tested. The results obtained from the tests are tabulated in Table III and comparative curves are show in Graph I. All the results of these tests were compared with the average results obtained by the Technologic Branch of the United States Geological Survey at the Structural Materials Laboratory at St. Louis, Mo. These results are shown on graphs in Hool and Johnson's Concrete Engineers Handbook pages 217 to 219. The results for neat cement in tension obtained by the U. S. G. S. are as follows: 7 days 655 lbs per sq. in. 14 days 700 " _ " 28 days 780 =" " " " It will be noticed fromthe table that, for 7 days, all cem@ts used tested below these results except cemnt C. For 14 days the samples all tested abeve except cemnt B. The 28 day test showed that the cements C & D and the composite cement E were well above the average while the rook cements A & B were far below the average of the cements tested by the U. S. G. S. The general average of these results is very good however. Cement mortar 1:3. Eight briquettes of 1:3 cemnt mortar were made and these tested on 7, 14 and 28 day periods as above with the neat cement. The results are given in Table III and oOmparative ourves show in Graph II. ‘These briquettes were seasoned as the neat cement briquettes above. The results of these tests were sompared with the results obtained with 1:3 cement mortar by the U. S. G. 8S. which are as follows: 7 days 265 lbs per sq. in. 14 days $15 * _ 8% " 28 days 425 " "_ FK Cement D is the only cement that comes above these results for 7 days, the rest fall below. For 14 days cement B falls slightly below the U. S. average but the rest are all well above the standard. The 28 day tests show that the marl cemnte C & D and the composite censnt E ere above the U.S.G.S. average while the rock cements A & B are below. These tests bear out the results obtained with the neat cement above and the general average is very good. Compression tests of 1:3 Cement mortar. Two inch oubes were made of 1:35 cement mortar and tested at the end of 26 days. Three cubes were made of each cement and the average results taken. The results are tabulated in Table II. , oe 12.60 68.00 JI2Z.00 en elh (oil el FF. SZ owe) FESO PALS) ae eee yd oo hoo Pes SE.GE A118 volo ALi Fak) otek 2/4 ola 40d. ele de /O0 pe Rm § ae 4 G7. 75 225 aN oo key ot Yao te) Se (WS lashed fey) (aNeler Se 200 #/oO lo Me k pote dal Lay A loa lolas ae Over 200 I-00 ioe 1) FS. 74 WA Sample I VE, (a) Ma Lek haa shied lg /_) a ane Screen |Amovat Caught \Vanount-weu/d Vimoont would \ Size of oe retained | pass. Se ava dtd Ve ed Eibek Wo A rd teed ws fe) Oo fe) 100.0 ome a 25.29 | 28.40 cere W602.) O25" cm Le /3, 08 Pye 5892 | 0.125" a Re Yom od LA 4779 IZ. L/ 0.065" ZO 6°.77 J.00 55.77 a 0032" IO a 12.50 (oA ae F.7/ | 0.0/98" a VE Mh GIF ai Ox Pd A) ro Wo) poxe 50 Vea ee oe ptt ae Views 2.0//0" SO Cet ee esd GS. 56 $44 | 0.0069" foo STRAE 48/ G 7.37 £63 0.0058" ah] Ro dh 0.78 aoe ia ee 0.004/"* Zoe AIP O.5F od tl Ve Pa Yee SL a Crer 200. et My fro hee) 62 ra By / mr a Eee] eK ee ioe ad : pela ih P | Screen |Amount Caught \fmovunt would eee shedtah te we g% nal Sieh 7 ATS ' : i. S| 9 | - =. ae MSY asx fe OQ s ve. : : rd Oc r A? r & . . «; beate, ; 7 493 g iio ae 76.60 £3240 OO TO IO 86.05 ee re SEO a oe ‘oN ol agom i eh odted 750. | F550 eres eAerek ta Vee a4 ha Aas mined ca tera /5O 6.00 0. 80 98.26 {73 eloyo. tae ; ye a Aotes ISE Neg 98.76 ; ficdoter gate. = oA 0.GO IGG S56 | m ad a AT Data Yor Ldeal Curve dae ede of Three samp/es) Ave. foto! wh* 7527 9ms3 (Oe gta (alee a aA ee ale, ee ee plot a al —4) ge Amount Caug la adeeb Grigiirs lei ahel ea la ; wadld be retin eee Jcree IW? Jns % 4 % (sJo le Tee koe a O oO . 400.0 Pe We Tad Gg | vdeo | és? 367 | oes” oi . hed a a ea : / edd | , is a x SO8. S7/ eh eel alan & e) OF fae =e aa S e) BS 2 Eye /O SZOZ (2.902 Peele) 67, 5¢ oe Zo ae ate) Pot had 7F.FO c eo) 97978 J | 4 | ode So Ti (aM lh, = ie . 4 . Pe 76.50 | /6.78 y didi Macidadl 3O raf ae, V/s Mele, i P | c eae Es eae Fee er 567 | 20069’ ere) i note Sioyd haan ida te ekoroky- Ma 450 ee ao FE.6T /. $- eNoler y | <0o alot O87 aera Rae AE ae a Ia ole) eo Me Tot aA A are Me oO | AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE i /- | EE tela eee tA if the total i. : his per- ste for or 25.4%. fap cheat ebebeeaes teeta Aineen Saetooe r dises 6 e moulded nit drawing. > monlds ove in termined Pape ea Oe er siguraits nears rao Sf ae ois -Gussesee Seas Sees eee Fea Be pone Gs 7278 ate eaaaected Sees Fa) ba Pissss': © Bssesssaee 5 asset aaesapeeesie Eimear neta : | the water was rater end Hae ee dies eetetees | foc dgnarsazssssanasonsesogad laeetgead caase ezad Seatageeta sates Mecd in eeu ua / nee ae / . aap gel sessile eee eee eee Hsien Meet 8, and 89%. Ste te He Siena Ba | | | ter and : | as of an ae five parts sand and gravel by weight or 16.7% of the total weight of the dry materinis should be cement. This per- cent was used in the proportioning of the oonorete for the tests. The sand used was 42.1% minus 16.7% or 25.4%. The cearse aggregate used was 57.9% pO | The Making of the Test Pieces. The test pieces were made in the form of discs 6 inches in diameter and 2 inohes thick. They were moulded ty in wrought iron rings which were tapered to permit drawing. By experiment the amount of material to fill two moulds was determined. From the percents determined above in the sieve analysis the weighs to be used were determined and they are as follows: Cement 756 gms. - 16.7%: Send 1200 gma. - 25.4% Gravel 25765 gmp. - 57.9% The materials were thoroly mixed before the water was added. ‘The dry mixture was then formed into a crater and the water added. The average amount of water used in each batch was about 400 oc. which wee between 88% and 89... The materials were yvradually worked into the center and then thoroly mixed with a trowel until the mess was of an even consistency. The moulds were well oiled and oiled papers were Placed on the glass plates upon which the discs were moulded. The concrete was added in thin layers and well rammed. When the mould was full it was jarred until water appeared on the top. The mrface was then smoothed eff by means of a trowel. Seasoning of Test Pieces. All disos were placed in vats ever water and allowed to remain in this meist air for 24 hours. The wrought iron rings were then removed by jarring the forms. Each disc was marked with its letter and the date on which it was made. They were then placed in damp sand, about ene inch of sand being belew the concrete and the whole covered by an inoh of the damp sand. They were allowed to remain in this condition for the rest of the 28 day period, the temperature remaining fairly censtant at about 70 degrees F. The object of the damp sand was to give the discos all the water necessary for a complete harden- ing and also approach as nearly as possible the subsurface oonditions that would be encountered in practice in ocon- orete construction. At the end of the 28 day period the disos were removed from the sand and tested. fests of the Specimens. Percent of water in the disos at the time of testing. 13 An extra diso was made of composite cemént and this disco was made and cured in the same manner as the ether discs. At the emi of the 28 days the diso was broken and three pieces weighing appreximately 100 grams each were secured. These were carefully weighed to the nearest one hundredth of a gram. The pieces were then heated over a gas flame for two hours and then re- weighed. The difference in weight was the free or un- combined water in the sample. The percentage was computed in each case and the average of the three Samples taken as the peroentage of free water in the test specimens at the time of the beginning of the tests. The following are the results obtained: Sample Weight before Weight after Difference % of water heating heating 1 92.11 86.07 6.04 6.556 2 94.64 89.11 5.49 §.801 3 88.19 83.09 5.10 5.783 Average percent 6.05 Description of the Apparatus. The water pressure used in these tests was obtained from the pressure tank in the hydraulic laboratory of the College. Dise ww ows CP £20 ft. head Weight before test 2300 gms. 2381 gms. 2545 gms. 2553 gms. 2350 gms. SO ft. head Weight before test £374 gms. £342 gms. 2340 gms. 2386 gms. 2391 gms. 40 ft. head Weight before test £564 gme. 2592 gms. 2590 gms. 2390 gms. 2506 gms. Weight after test 23585 gms. 2341 gms. 2327 gms. Weight after test 2570 gms. 2534 gms. 2335 gms. 2380 gms. £390 gms. Weight after test 2360 gms. 2387 gms. £383 gms. £2384 gms. 23501 gms. Permeation in 4 heurs Cracked Cracked-65 co. 00 oa. Cracked 00 oa. Permeation in 4 hours 00 ac. 00 oc. 00 oa. OO ec. OO oc. Permeation in 4 hours Crackeé-85 oc. Cracked-3 oc. Crackeé-6 ac. 00 oo. OO aa. 17 50 ft. head Disa Weight before weight after Permeation in test test 4 hours A 2581 ge. Not weighed 00 oc. B 2426 gms. " " Cracked C 2545 gms. " " 00 oo. D 2399 gms. " " 00 oc. E 2502 gms. " " 00 «ac. At the end of the four hours the diso B was changed for a new one and the test on the discs at the same pressure was centinued for 92 more hours making a total of 96 heurs for discs A. C. D. and E& At the emd of the 96 heurs there was no trace of water coming thru any of the discs. In order to determine the compressive strength of the concrete discos used, a diso was embedded in Plaster of Paris on the Riehle testing machine in the testing laboratory and a load of 3000 lbs applied for 30 min. te permit a set. The pressure was then continued up to the fall capacity of the machine or 100,000 lbs. with no signs of failure in the concrete. This is equivalent te a pressure of 3540 lbs. per sq- in. which is very high for commeroial conorete. L& CONCLUSIONS From the tests preformed it is to be conoluded that water-proof concrete is a practical possibility if the proper care is exeroised in the selection and grading of the materials and in placing the concrete. The proportions used in the making of the test pieces were theoretical and were obtained by the use of Taylor and Thompson's rules in connection with the Ideal Curve as outlined above. However it is entirely possible to analyse and grade stook gravel in the field and with the proper mupervision amd care in the mixing, the laboratory conditions can be very olosely duplicated. With oonarete made in this way there is every reason to believe that 1% would be water-proof for any heads under which it would be necessary to use it, even up to 160 ft. The elight permeation thru the oonorete made with the cement © oan probably be accounted for by the coarseness of the cement. It will be observed that this cement was very far below standard in the test on it for fineness. That such a method of proportioning concrete is entirely possible is Glearly proven by the fact that large construction ooOmpanies have followed it, not as a meens of making a water-proof concrete, but as an economical measure in the making of strong dense concrete. APPENDIX I The follewing is a list of the books, articles and papers covering work en concrete from which meh valuable information was obtained in the preparation ef this thesis. l. Professional Memeirs VYol. 7 Percdlation and upward pressure of water on concrete dams. / 2. Standard Specifications and Tests for Portland Cement of the American Society for Testing Materials. 3. Proportiening of Concrete Mixtures. Portland Cement Association. 4. Concrete Engineers Handbeok. Hool and Johnson. §. Reenforeed Concrete Vol. I G. Ae Hool. 6. Effect ef Vibration, Jigging, and Pressure on Fresh Concrete. Duff A. Abrams. 7. Maseny Construction. I. O. Baker. el ND ease. -- : we ce APPENDIX II The following is a ooOpy of the outline of the plan fer the work on this thesis submitted previous to the beginning of the work. Outline of \Work. 1. Materials 1. Four different cements are to be used and a mixture ef equal parts of the four cements forming a composite cement, making a test of five cement mixtures. 2. Gravel to be a good grade of sharp bank gravel. 3. Water to be tap water from the college mains. II. Mixtures 1. All mixtures of cenorete are to be determined by a sieve analysis of the gravel used. 2. An analysis is to be made of the sand passing the ene eighth inch screen and also of the stene passing the one half inch screen and remaining on the one eighth inch soreen. ITI. Tests, 1. Conorete a. Two discs are to be tested at each head for each mixture. Tests te be made at the end ef 28 days. (This part revised). be Pension briquettes for tests at the end of 7, 14 and 28 days are to be made. co. Compression cubes will be made for tests of each mixture at the end of 28 days. 2. Heads. Heads from 10 te 60 ft. in increments of 10 ft. will be used in making the tests. (Later this was changed to inolude 150 ft.) KUOM USE ONLY aa = yp f SH BER REERE ES & ee tl _ - rome a ~ — ; I mg = ~ — ae 7 SS y } F “Sa 9 ‘ - “ iH £ 7 \ we : aa pt ; od TIP Ne ends i 2) i ae 1 EA St | Si SSS Se MICHIGAN STATE UN ry 3 12 93 03169 2654 a - ~~“ 3 Lae ret sn _ ee. ee éo- i rh —_ =n TED OP ge 4 & at er = : — 7 -——-+—. ttt PB NS 9 - ean. ee Aer os - + ~% es = LIBRARIES (i Mic HIGAN STATE UNIVERSIT | | | 1293 03169 2 | ; a = ene é =e ot ; mae ‘ = SR ~ pa : ; - + a i 4 7 ‘| . vs " ara ———— = em - MICHIGAN 3 = & > i oe 7 . —e — inten = 5 .. . : ee ne i me ‘ & ; eae . . _ " aa 7 ~ 9 s - - : 3 4 t WAP ec sis _— sae for Se a ee eo re —?/ MICHIGAN STATE UNIV LIBRARIES i HIN 4 ii iii 3 1293 031 ™* & _— ttle. ' — — =e ty = ie : ee ty By ae _. _—_—— ~—-—-— 4 awe gv «_ — _~ . — “= ee ~