| THS | THESIS pe enene8 ee! DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF POWER PLANT MARQUETTE CEMENT MFG. CO. Pu one tae GEO. W. WILLIAMS 1909 THESIS ~- a a - 1 A, THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A POYER PLANT for the MARQUETTE CEMENT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, La Salle, Illinois. A THESIS presented to The Faculty of the Michigan Agricultural Collese. by. ~ we George W! williams For the Degree of Mechanical Engineevry. June 1909. THESIS STIAWEYE COO OOOTE L141 10 Te ONNY SMUOM LNAW AO ANVILUYUOd ALLA IDM VIN In choosing this subject for a thesis, it is not with the idea of being able to present anything new or of great magnitude, but rather to bring out the numer- ous problems involved in the design and construction of a modern power olant as encountered in actual practice. In this particular case, however, there were features involved in the location and arrangement seldom encountered in the average plant and it was these that made it seen of suf- ficient interest to warrant its description. As industries are constantly being develop- ed, the requirements for motive power are being increased and to economically keep pace with these conditions, the matter of careful engineering becomes of more and more in- portance. In the summer of 1905, the business of the Marquette Cement Mf'g. Company had reached such proportions that radical alterations in and extension to their plant became necessary and to meet the constantly increasing de- mand for cement coupled with the keen competition bstween Manufacturers, the matter was one calling for thorough con- sideration and planning. The Company's plant is located near La Salle, Illinois, in the valley of the Vermillion river, on a nar- row strip of land between it and a range of rock bluffs paralleling its course. The average elevation of the strip is about thirty feet above the river at this point, while ~]— the bluffs are forty feet higher at their edge, rising to. a height of one hundred and fifty feet above the river some four hundred feet farther back. A line of the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad follows along the river on the lower level, while a branch of the Illinois Central runs along the top of the bluff. The product of this Company is made from a natural cement rock quarried from a mine in the bluff adja- cent to the mill. From the mine the rock is hauled in dump cars by an electric locomotive to the crushers where it is broken into small pieces, then conveyed by means of a belt to storage bins over the grinders. The grinders, or ball mills as they are called, reduce the rock to a powder which is fed into the rotary Kilns, where it is burned with pulverized coal blown into the Kilns by specially designed fans. This burning produces what is Known as a cement clinker which, after cooling, is crushed and reground to an impalpable powder and passed on to the storage bins where it is allowed to age or season before packing. The process is a continuous one and the plant is in operation twenty-four hours a day during the whole year with the exception of about ten days when it is shut down for general repairs. At the time mentioned the mill was grinding about one thousand barrels of cement per day and the exist- ing market conditions and outlook for the future were such —~2- ‘ that it seemed advisable to double its capacity and, at the same time, provide for future growth. Such an increase in capacity would necessitate a complete overhauling of the plant and its operation from the mining of the raw material to the storing and shipping of the finished product. Up to the time of remodeling, the plant had been served by only one of the railroads, namely, the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy, although the branch of the Tllinois Central ran close by. To get the latter to run a spur onto the property would open a way to other sources of fuel supply and points of disposal for the finished pro- duct and would materially affect the cost of plant operation as will be later explained. To bring this about required the purchase of additional property and the usual amount of time consumed by railroad companies in such cases, but both of these matters were, in due time, satisfactorily settled and the attention of the Company was turned to the main problem, that of remodeling the plant. The general requirements and plans for the changes in the mill proper were taken in hand by the Com- pany themselves, who were guided by the experience gained in the operation of the old one, and assisted in the engi- neering features by the builders of the apparatus entering into its make-up. While the process itself is a simple one and standard apparatus had been developed to carry it out, a -3- large amount of power is constantly required for each of the various steps and upon the reliability of its source | depends, in a large measure, the successful operation of the whole plant. When the matter of providing for the power was reached, it became necessary to call in outside engi- neering assistance and Mr. George M. Brill was selected to carry on that feature of the undertaking. The conditions then existing together with the general requirements for the new plant were made a subject for an investigation which resulted in a report setting forth the recommendations cover- ing a new power installation. The old plant was being operated both elec- trically and mechanically, but experience and common prac- tice indicated the advisability of complete electrification in the new one. This is more easily understood when it is considered that the process is carried on by units of mills, grinders, rotary Kilns, etcetera, each requiring a large amount of power and so arranged that to drive them by mechan- ical transmission would necessitate the use of long lines of heavy shafting, gears, chains and belts, which, in such a gritty atmosphere, would consume a large amount of power and entail considerable expense for maintenance and loss due to break-downs. The old power plant was located in one end of the mill proper and as the latter was hemmed in by the —4— railroad and bluff on its sides and the entrance to the mine and the storage bins on its ends, this space was not only valuable for other purposes, but actually required to carry out the plans for the new arrangement. There was, however, sufficient space available at one end of the pro- perty for the erection of a new power plant, and as the power was to be electrical, the small extra distance to the center of distribution was immaterial. In the majority of power plants using coal as a fuel, hand labor or special apparatus are required for unloading and storing the coal and disposing of the ashes, these conditions being looked upon as fixed and the neces- sary charges or costs resulting therefrom borne and con- sidered as a matter of course. The natural conditions which existed at this particular site, meke it possible and practical, without un- due expense, to so locate, design and equip a boiler plant that the common source of annoyance and expense in handling the coal and ashes could be almost eliminated and gravity employed to deliver coal to the boilers and remove the ashes from them. With the Illinois Central spur extended onto the property to a point above the proposed power plant, coal could be delivered in drop—bottom cars to a storage bin above the boilers, from which it could be drawn through chutes to the grates which in turn would discharge the ashes into suitable hoppers underneath. These hoppers could be —5— Placed at a height that would permit of cars on the Burlington track being placed under them for the purpose of conveying the ashes away from the plant. By the use of properly constructed chutes and ash hoppers, regulated and operated by the boiler room attendants, the coal could be passed from the cars to the grates and the ashes removed with practically no hand labor or power operated apparatus. The difference in the cost of operating such a boiler plant and one built along the lines of the old one, where hand labor was emoloyed, is shown by the following calculations. Assuming that 2000 boiler horse power would be the average capacity in use and burning coal at the rate of 4.5 pounds per boiler horse power per hour, 9000 pounds of coal per hour or 108 tons per day of twenty-four hours would be required and if the ashes amounted to 15%, there would be 16.2 tons of them per day. HAND METHOD. Unloading 108 Tons of Coal at 744 =$8.10 Firing 108 Tons of Coal at 156 =16.20 Removing 16.2 Tons of Ashes at 12¢ = 1.94 Total : $26.24 GRAVITY METHOD. Unloading Coal and Dumping Ashes $1.75 Firing Boilers, two shifts at $3.00 = 6.00 Total $7.75 TI | ALIN, » ee ae ae Nii ~ 4, i) 4 ts ~y s s SK ape oh SECTION THRU POWER PLANT OF THE MARQUETTE CEMENT MFG CO With a gravity system and automatic stokers, the coal could be delivered to the plant in drop—hottom cars which would make it possible for one man or his equivalent to unload the coal and dispose of the ashes, and one man in eacn shift could care for the firing of the boilers. TO realize this it might require an extra expenditure of $10,000, but even so, the saving affected would in a few years pay off the extra first cost. With the river close by, a sufficient quanti- ty of water for the operation of the plant could be obtained with but a small expsnse for pumping. The location relative to the mill, the loca- tion of railroads, the elevations and the nature of the soil all contributed to conditions practically ideal for the pur- pose of a power plant and with proper design of the build- ing or buildings and the selection of equipment, properly. in- stalled, there should result a plant of exceptional economy in operation and maintenance. Without going into the detailed requirements for increased power at that time, we were given to understand that an installation of 2400 horse power of water tube boil- ers, equipped with automatic stokers, and the same horse power of cross-compound condensing engines direct connected to gonerators of suitable capacity would satisfactorily meet the requirements. Two ways of providing for this capacity were open for consideration, One was to purchase new boilers, _7— engines anc generators of the type mentioned for the whole equipment; the other was to use the old horizontal tubular boilers and the belted engine-generator units then in ser- vice as far as they would go and supplement them with new apparatus. The water tube type of boiler would be in larger units than the tubulars, somewhat more economical in the production of steam, more easily and therefore cheaply operated and less expensive to maintain. More important, however, was the fact that the old boilers were built to carry pressures not to exceed 110 pounds, while the water tube type could carry 150 pounds or more with a consequent material improvement in the engine economy. While the old engines might have been con- tinued in service in the new plant, they were in units of 400 horse power, rather small for use in a new plant of the proposed size. Aside from this and the low pressure for which they were designed, they were far less economical than first class cross-—compound units. If the old apparatus were used, the building would have to be considerably larger to house it on account of the greater space required by the low pressure tubular boilers and the belted engine-generator units. There would be the expense of moving it, somes repairs would doubt- less be necessary and sooner or later it would have to give way to apparatus of the more modern type considered for ~8- the balance of the equipment... Continuous operation during the period of changing over was also an important factor, as each day's shut-down involved a loss of profits amounting to approxi- mately one thousand dollars, and by leaving the old equip- ment intact until the new plant could be started, this loss could be avoided. Considered from every standpoint, if the new plant was to be made strictly first class, it would be better to install such new apparatus throughout as might be necessary to properly meet ths requirements and thereby gain the extra efficiency from the start. The first plan considered was to erect two separate buildings to house the boilers and engines, locating them at different elevations. The boiler house would be Placed on the top of the bluff, which would bring it at such a height that a larver hopper holding a car or more of ashes could be cut in the rock under the boilers and the cars run under it through a tunnel cut in from the side of the bluff. Practically all of the oxcavated material could be used in the manufacture of cement so that the ex- pense of excavation chargeable to the power plant would be small. The engine room would be located at a lower level and nearer the plant. Upon further consideration this plan was abandoned and it was decided to place all of the apparatus in one building with the boilers and enginos’ on the same ~9- level. The floor would be at such a height that cars could be switched into the boiler room basement and clear the ash hopvers, one of which would be provided for each boiler. This latter plan was by far the better one as the first cost and operating expense would be much less than would be the case were separate buildings provided and the appara- tus spread out over a larger area. When the general location of the power house had been fixed, a survey was made and levels taken covering the area under condideration from the river to the top of the bluff including the floor line of the old mill and the Burlington and Illinois Céntral roads where they passed the plant. From these levels a profile was prepared to serve in determining the exact location and elevation of the new power plant and its apparatus. As a large quantity of water would be re- quired for the plant, the means of economically supplying it from the river was an important consideration. Two methods of dcing this presented themselves, one being that of locating the pumping apparatus at the river,which was about 150 feet away. The other was to place the apparatus in the power house and bring water to it by means of an in- take. As the river during high periods reached en elevation from eighteen to twenty feet above normal, it would be nedessary, were the first method employed, to place the ap- paratus at the extreme elevation to insure it from flood. -~10- This would necessitate lifting the water this height during the greater portion of the year which, added to the necessary discharge head and the friction of the long discharge line, made it the least economical from an operating standpoint. Again, isolated apparatus is liable to receive little atten- tion and under such circumstances may become a source of much expensive annoyance. To carry out the second method, it would be necessary to sink a shaft in the power house to a depth corresponding with low water in the river and by means of a tunnel connect the latter with the former. Pumps could then be placed in the shaft with their water ends submerged and with their power ends, whether steam or elec trical, located at such an elevation as to be overated from the basement floor. This method would eliminate the suction lift, the friction of a long discharge line, the cost ofr the line and the pump house, and place the apparatus where it could receive prover care without extra effort. If baro- metric condensers were used this shaft would serve a second purpose by affording space below ground for their discharge legs, thereby materially reducing the height of the condenser heads and consequently the lift of the condensing water. Estimating the cost of installing the first method, exclusive of the pumping apparatus, as $3000.00 and that of the second as $5000.00, the initial expenditure favored the former, but when considered from an operating standpoint, the latter was the more economical. The amount —l1— of water required to condense the steam from 2400 horse power of ensines using fourteen pounds of steam per horse power hour and thirty pounds of water per pound of steam would equal 2400 x 14 x 30 or 16,800 pounds of water per minute. 60 By a reduction in head of twenty feet a saving of 16800 x 20 33000 or say ten horse power would be affected, which, at $25.00 per year, would equal $250.00 por year, considerable more than the interest at five percent on the difference in first cost and enough to warrant the construction of the shaft and tunnel. The use of barometric condensers, already mentioned, had been considered from the start as they had successfully served in the old plant. Experience there had demonstrated them to be by far the best type for the service, owing to their ability to operate with water containing much foreign matter and scale producing constituents. A surface condenser,with its numerous small tubes, would soon become clogged with dead leaves or scale and rendered useless, a condition calling for continual attention and expense to Keep it in working order. With an almost inexhaustable supply of water close by, jet condensers could be operated without this trouble and the barometric type, owing to the high lift and the absence of moving parts, would be the most economical and simple to operate. The electrical current in use in the old plant was 220 volt, direct and was originally adopted on account -12- of the use of variable speed motors driving the rotary kilns and the mine locomotive. While the use of direct current. motors is unusual in modern ceinent plants, owing to the gritty atmosphere in wiich they must operate, this Company had gradually increased the amount of such apoaratus and, strange though it may seem, their experisnce with it had been entirely satisfactory. A record of maintenance ex- pense had been carefully Kept covering a period extending over several years and this failed to furnish any evidence to their discredit. To discard the old motor equipment and re- Place it with alternating current machines would mean the sacrifice of a greater portion of its cost to say nothing of the more serious loss in the time required for changing over. The need for some direct current for the kiln motors and the locomotive would still remain when the plant was re- modeled and this, together with the loss involved were the Old equipment replaced, were strong arguments in favor of con- tinuing its use. The extra first cost of generators and transmission line, using the low voltage direct current, was thoroughly considered, out even this was not sufficient to bring about the change. The old engines, which were belted to jacx- shafts, were indicated and the motors throughout the plant tested to determine the power being used and to this was added that necessary to operate the extra apparatus which would be installed in the new arrangement. -13- TEST OF ENGINES. Compound (Corliss) Three Tube Mills One Ball Mill One Counter Snaft Hlevators and Conveyors Simple (Bates Corliss) Three Tubs Mills Counter Shaft Elevators, belt driven from jacx-shaft, Electrical Load, 950-1000 Amperes Simple (Allis Corliss) alectrical Load, 1100 Amperes Total Full Load TEST OF MOTORS. Location Use Size H. P. Coal House Coal Crusher 25 " Conveyor 15 " Dryer LO " Speeder 6 " Elevator 5 Quarry Locomotive 40 Raw End Rock Crusher 75 " Belt 15 " Fan 10 " Conveyor 25 Grit Mills 125 Ball Mill 190 Blower Fan 10 #1 Kiln 10 #2 Kiln 10 #3 Kiln 10 #4 Kiln 10 #5 Kiln 10 —~14- ee ee ee a 545 H.P. 554 H.P. 550 H.P. 1249 H.P. Amperes 97.5 57.0 39.5 25.0 23.0 135.0 250.0 58.0 38.5 97.5 450.0 700.0 97.5 39.2 59.2 39.2 39.2 39.2 2262.5 TEST OF MOTORS (con't) Location Use Size H.P. Aiperes Brousht Forward 2262.5 Finish End Pan Conveyor 5 21.0 Clinker Pit Fan 10 38.0 Cooler Fan 35 153.0 Kent Mill 30 113.0 Kent Mill 30 113.0 Cément Belt 15 58.0 Sacking 5 21.0 sacking 5 21.9 sacking 5 21.0 sacking 5 21.0 Emery Wheel 6 21.0 2863.5 Lights 200.0 Total 3063.5 The requirements of the extra apvaratus which was to be installed were as follows: One Tube Nill in coal room 360 Amp. Two #8 Ball Mills with Dryer and Elevator(raw end)350 " Three 5 x 22 Tube Mills (raw end) 1080 Three 5 x 22 Tube Mills (finish end) 1800 " Three Kent Mills (finish end) 480 "1 Extra Separators, Conveyors and Elevators 150 "* Four Cooler Fans 480 +" Sacking Motors 50 " Uxtra power for Rock Crushers 100 "* Extra lighting in Quarry and Mill 100 " Total 4950" Adding the total amperes obtained from the individual motor readings to the total required by the extra apperatus, we have 8013.5 amperes, which at 220 volts is equal to 2363 H.P. Deducting the electrical load of 610 H.P. from the total of the enzine tests, wa have left a —~15- mechanical load of 639 H.P. Adding these results, we have a total of 3002 H.P. By comparing the collective electrical load as shown by the engine tests and the total of the in- dividual readings, we find the collective load is about two— thirds that of the total individual. In view of the above, it was decided to pro- vide 1800 electrical horse power in two equal units for the first installation and arrange the building and auxiliary ap-— paratus to care for an additional installation of 900 H.P. As the load would be steady, large units, all of a size, would make the best arrangement and with machines designed to carry a fair overload, one unit could be temporarily shut down if necessary. The current was to be carried from the power house to the mill on nine circuits arranged as follows: 800 Amperes to Coal Room. 600 " " Crushing House and Locomotive - 1000 " " Ball Mills. 1800 " Raw Grit Mills. 800 " " Rotary Kilns and Fan. 600 " " Kent Mills. 1800 " " Finish Grit Mills. 300 " " Sacking Platform. 300 " " Lights. The lines supplying current for the raw grits, rotary Kilns and fan were to be connected to the old switch- board in the mill where the power would be divided and dis-— tributed over the old circuits. The boiler equipment was planned in the same manner as the engines and divided into three batteries with —~16- two 400 H.P. boilers in each, making a total of 2400 H.P,, 1600 H.P. of which was to be installed at first. On account of their being out of service more often for cleaning and the requirements of the auxiliary apparatus for steam, the total horse power of the boilers was made nearly equal to that of the engines, although the latter would require but half the steam that the former could produce. Next came the matter of providing sufficient draft for the boilers and,under ordinary circumstances, this could best be accomplished with a chimney of moderate height. In this case, however, it would be necessary to build a chimney much higher than usually required to obtain the de- sired unbalanced atmospheric conditions, owing to the proximi- ty of the bluff. Induced draft was being employed in the old plant for this purpose and as the apparatus was in first class condition, it would answer for part of such an installation in the new plant. The new apparatus could be installed first and arranged to do the work until the old plant could be dismantled and the old apparatus moved. If run with engines, most of the heat in the steam would return to the boiler by way of the heater so that the expense of operating it would not be great and its first cost would be abcut half that of a suitable chimney. The use of economizers in connection with the induced draft apparatus naturally sugzested itself as an ideal arrangement from the standpoint of economy. Of course —]7— this point was solmewhat offset by the fact that there was sufficient exhaust steam from the auxiliary apparatus to heat all the boiler feed water. Again as the water was very bad considerable trouble would doubtless be experienced in the tubes. These facts coupled with the first cost of the apparatus made the installation of economizers seem unwar- ranted. Samples of water taken from the river for analysis were found to contain the following substances: Silica 0.28 grains per gallon Iron Oxide and Alumina 0.12 "of " Calcium Sulphate 16.58 yo i" Calcium Carbonate 2.04 n off i" Magnesium Carbonate 10.81 a n Sodium Sulphate 7.08 " of tt Sodium Chloride 3.85 wt i" Organic Matter 0.93 "oom i" This analysis shows a large percentage of sulphate which would not be separated from the water by temperatures found in heaters, although a large portion of the carbonate would doubtless be precipitated. To render the water suitable for voiler feed purposes would require the installation of chemical purifying apparatus and it was possible to find such apparatus on the marxet, the makers of which would guarantee its successful operation at the nominal cost of two and one-half cents per thousand gallons of water treated.