De NAY ese ir Ne See ar or We aA OF wn rth “4 Eee THESIS. My x 2*¥- en ~ Rg VAS 0) ne aa Dao A ee ee Peat ae aL Oe ae CN 0 Robert BG. dT, Buek. i806 Kee SE SPRINTS REINO i 4 pina eee tae fe ee Aiea OM te SNe ass ce. dee A AeA Re A A Rar) $ pe OS TS RD oe Opes eee es. he i ee a “Se THESIS One WY orp anroaltre, LUNN 293 10351 1410 31 “ey ik LIBRARY 7 Michican State 4 Urivervcy a i : i "AR SRE IR Lo ees ae meappanyeck THESIS One a 3 10351 1410 3 129 LIBRARY Michican State + Univepeiey ‘ we * 9 . vat ¢ 3 ~ a grey EL E94, a wel? lighted dairy room. New pressed tin pans avout tw. anda half inches deep, holding about eisht pounds of milk were “used. These were placed upon a shelf about four feet from the floor supported at either end. It is safe to state that any orcinar jar about the building cid not disturtr the milk within the pans. The milk was vroupht directiy from the milkroom at the barn to,the dairy room and turned into these shallow vessels, seven of which were necessary for seach milking. These pans were undisturbed for 36 and 24 hours, and then the miik was skimmed. The cream as in the other methods was placed in a Wilson Creamer and the soured milk weighed after a sample had peen taken to determine the per cent of fat not obtained. Great caution was observed in ski:ming to procure al? the cream. In the first trial the milk was allowed to re..ain in the pan 36 hours before skimming, in the otier subsequent trails 24 hours was the length of setting. The latter did not allow the milk to sour so thorourhly or become loppered, the cream was also more readily separated in these last cases. The temperature of the room in which the settings were made varied somewhat, the average being about 71°. Following is the the table that gives in full the figures ootained in ti is method, f 4e Pen | ® | Temp | Pea ¥E TOTAL | + Xe {\o) of CENT oX of CENT Far + Bort Far Ren Mii | Far) Beg Mick! Fat.) Lost Fat | Mir | Ost UTTER lOvee.i5| 54, |.05/| 52-| 72 | .005|,2600 - 1b] 55. | 098) 471 PF | .006/) .2987' 645) - | 55.5] .046| 49 | 9 | oo4st .2/60 | - \$| 53.51.0975 $8 | 99 | 0/55) 2640 $09 10,5 | .068| 10.57 - 1b) 55.25 .078| ¥9.25 72 | 008) 38h0 - 27FL6 0485 #5) 93. 013) 5785 ~ 99) 5525 .0v8 #8. | 93 | .008T 4560 162d 1651 11.5) 043] 7.43 Tora. 2.9598 S180 18.39 22, | ./// | 13.00 L oes | oe ee —_ — SS That nothing of value may be omitted I reporduce here my churn chart which includes the dataof the eight churmningse It will be noted that the loss throughout wiih -be exceedingly siall. table(No.6) immediately following the churn cuart , This is best shown in the extensive — Bwrkeor Chart — Nave. Sous ed Hoon an Reet Timer Foi aie iy tlre _— Zreaw| Hours ATURE) Fat |Chucoing Putter Cor . cal Sav. [Burter| SLAM Are tt] U2 ‘ 33.2] S/ | ad. | /-37| 65 | 3851 627) 7 14.98] Seer, Apc\t| 26 ie 44 | 52 | 17,55| 1-2 | 245] .076| 7, 7 | 5// | C.deer Aperd) 22,75] 24-76) 262) 5S | 37 | -52| 105} 650) /2.5 | 7 | 10,57| 8. Paw. Aerts 9.5 |72-9b6| #2. | 5F | 1/76 | -38 | 28, 095| 5.75| 7 | SI¥ ‘Cer or tt] 19 | 48-72] 21. | 56 {27 | -27| 7/38. | .250)6.75] 7 | 6. |SeeR Rec] 205°} 48-76) 28. | 5/7 | 33.3 | /-27| 15. | $00) /025| 7 | 9.5 | Seer Werd0 19. | 46-76) 42.6 | $0 | 37 | -97) 5 | 375; 8.5 | 7 | 748 she Met] 70.5 | 72-1201 47.6 | 58 | 16. -3/ | 245 |ence.| 7, 7 19 3¥ uae Table No. 5 Rew Ceyt of Fo w — Pounds | Temp: Dake rive | MMe] Woele | Ser | Creams | eyttey a BOY, 22 45.00/| 94 5.00! .100 36 .0 0335 7 12 49.70/| 94 4.75| .075 36.0 2335 4,98 ® 21 54.9 93 4.865) .25 " 22 56.7 92 5.05] .125 27.0 2250 6.00 " 238 55.5 94 4.90| .150 ® 24 56.0 95 4.75| trace 8 25 51.6 92 4.45| .020 33.3 2300 9.50 SEPARATOR — 20. Apr. 13 57.3 92 4.55), .55 ° 14 50.5 91 4.90] .50 17.55] .075 5.11 " 19 49.5 93 4,90) .55 " 20 52.5 91 4.95; .60 19.8 2075 5.14 . 29 57.75 | 92 4.45; .55 " 30 58.75 | 90 4.60) .60 May a 61.25 | 91 4.70} .25 15.0 trace 8.34 Corp Deer — 18.69 Apr. 15 59.0 2 6.10; .50 8 18 55.0 94 4.8 61 # 17 55.5 94 4 60| .465 " 18 53.5 93 4.75| .65 89.0 65 10.57 ® 26 55.25 | 92 4.80| .80 " 27 |-61.6 | 93 |.4,55/1,.30 " 23 55.25 | 93 4.80] .95 31.0 2375 7.43 SHAWOW PAN — 18.00 -~ o- a- =- to .- — ~ *. « od 7 -I-* From the Toresoing. tables I tm #hnie to deduct results much more in favor of the centri-ugal machine than wezs those obtained from the Ontario collere by H.H.Dean,—- the latter's trial coverins several months found no marked advantare as to butter returne by the use of the cream separstor, A prief couparasion of results shows that at M.A.C.by separator it requires 18.184 of milk to produce one pound of butter, by shallow pan 21.74;, and by cold deep method 20.40¥, the averare per cent of fat being 4.76 while at Ontario with an averages test of 3.66 it requireéa, 23.91 pounds of milK vs 18,18 by separator at M.A.C. 24 47 s " " vs 20.40 By Cold deep at M.A.C. 25.05 " " " vs 21.74 by shallow pan at M.A.C. to produce one pound of butter. The per cent of fat was less by far in the cream and a much greater per cent was lost. (See table 6) as shown in the brief table. Method Per cent of Fat in Skim milk cream »vbuttermilk Beparator 2093 22438 e135 Ontario Cold deep setting .290 19.12 2196 Experiment Shallow pan setting .3138 18,34 e240 Our investigation of 21 days curing which no pains wero spared in giving each method the best trail possible we optained figures upon whch our conclusions are based: “ #fat # fat lost # vdutte>. 3689.4 lbs milk by separator gave 17.61 03927 20.48 377.565 * " *" cold deep * 17.724 1.56545 8.59 886,10 " " " shallow pan * 18.32 2.5700 8.00 If experiments are of any value in arriving at the worth of any method, and we have no other way to determine the value of a system, the cream separator is a great saving in butter making. The cold desp method is preferable to the shailow pan by a slight vain in butter product and in amount of labor expended, . ' ~ / ‘ . t ; te ue =? . é . ¢ : ~ > » . e e ° ° ° A , & 7 “ e . oan ‘ ee By means of separator 100 # of milk vave 5.5 pounds butter " " " cold deep 100 # 1 " " 64.9 " u" " " " shallow pan 100 a4 of " 4.8 i tt or a gain of nearly 1/20 in the first method over the last’ named. From this conclusion it is evident that wherever a farmer has six to twelve cows or more his gain in butter product will soon repay the outlay for a separator, beside thege wiil be a great saving in labor- say nothing of the econveniencs and satisf:ction experienced. ROB = Ori USE GLY ‘Nati SS we ) an 's - - =