As a country frequented by natural disasters, Japan has robust disaster management systems that can be employed quickly to mitigate human, environmental, and economic harm and losses. However, these systems tend to be most effective when handling small-scale localized disasters. In the face of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake which decimated the northeastern communities of the Tohoku region, Japan's disaster management system collapsed, unable to handle such large scale and widespread damage. In the ten years since the disaster many rural communities have contended with a variety of social and economic problems, often left unremedied despite on-going government intervention. In this context, this dissertation will explore the complex problems in Minamisanriku, Miyagi-a rural coastal community decimated by the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. By engaging and collaborating with organizations in this community, I assess the connections between disaster management and post-disaster recovery outcomes through various applications of social capital and power. I first investigate how historical legacies of national government policies influenced recovery outcomes in the Tohoku region and how have these processes influenced economic restructuring and social development in Minamisanriku during reconstruction. Next, I consider how governance structures within Miyagi prefecture influenced the social and economic development of Minamisanriku during reconstruction. Lastly, I look to how disaster management affects the ability of residents to handle locally-identified and in turn, how residents utilize their social capital to driver social and economic recovery. I assess several key ideas on the connections between forms and theories of social capital and how they affect long-term disaster recovery outcomes through the disaster management process. The dissertation is situated to improve our understanding of how social capital affects rural communities' ability to respond to these troubles and to craft context specific solutions to them. It also offers a variety of policy recommendations about how to improve community-centered recovery within disaster management frameworks.
Read
