DOCTORAL DISSERTATION SERIES PUBLICATION: 5277 AUTHOR: Eric R, Baber, Ed. D., 1953 Michigan State College TITLE : A CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF INTERNSHIP THEORIES AND PRACTICES RELATING TO THE PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATORS University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1953 A C R I T I C A L A P P R A I S A L OF I N T E R M S H I P T H E O R I E S AND P R A C T I C E S R E L A T I N G T O T H E P R O F E S S I O N A L PREPARATION OF E D U C A T I O N A L A D M I N I S T R A T O R S By Er i c R. Baber A T HE SI S Submitted to the S chool of G ra duate St u d i e s S tate C ollege of M i c h i g a n in p a rtial f u l f i l l m e n t of the r e quirements for the degree of D O C T O R OF E D U C A T I O N School of E d uc a t i o n 1953 A C R I T I C A L A P P R A I S A L OF I N T E R N S H I P T R S O R I E S A N D P R A C T I C E S R EL A T I N G T O THE P R O F E S S I O N A L P RE P A RA T IO N OF E D U C A T I O N A L A D M I N I S T R A T O R S By Eric It. Laber AN A B S T R A C T S u b m i t t e d to the S c h o o l of G r aduate S tu d i e s State C ol l e g e In p a r t i a l f u l f i ll m en t of the r e q u i r e m e n t s for the de g re e of D OC T OR O F E D U C A T I O N S chool of E d u c a t i o n 1953 Approved of Mic higan Eric h. Baber A b st r a c t Th is study w a s status of s e le c t e d a dministration; i n t e r n s h i p pr o gr a ms and issues inherent In e d u c a t i o n a l in p r o g r a m s to s y n t h e s i z e the o pi nions leading e d uc ators selected of of twenty to se rv e as a jury of experts c o n c e r n i n g d e s i r a b l e programs; to a s ce r ta i n the to ma ke a c r i t i c a l a p p r a i s a l of the major assump ti o ns internship; undertaken and to f o r m u l a t e characteristics s pe cific of such c o n c l u si o ns and r ec o mm endations r e l a t i v e to a c c e p t a b l e procedures In the p r o f e s s i o n a l p r e p a r a ­ and p r a c t i c e s Inter ns h ip tion of e d u c a t i o n a l a d m i n i s t r a t o r s . The n o r m a t i v e - s u r v e y methods of e d u c a t i o n a l r e s e a r c h w e r e p rocurement topic. and t r e a t m e n t Inqu iry as sumptions employ e d of d a ta p e r t i n e n t instruments q ue s t i o n n a i r e c o n c e r n i n g members and s u r v e y - a p p r a l s a l co n si s t e d of (1) in the to the a i n t e r n s h i p o bjectives, and c r i t e r i a , w h i c h was su b mi t t e d to of the jury of e x perts, c o n c e r n i n g the status (2) a questionnaire of eight se l ected pr ograms, whic h was s u bm i t t e d to c o ll e ge p r o f e s s o r s those prog rams, (3) and an directing i n t e r v i e w eh ec k-llst, w h i c h was used as a guide f o r i nt e rv i ew s w i t h officials respon s ib l e for Internship programs colleges and u n i v e r s i t i e s s In the f o l l o w i n g Ball State T ea c h e r s Eric R. Baber Abstract Collage, New York University, Southern Illinois and O h io State U n i v e r s i t y , University, Teachers College Columbia University, of G e orgia, 2 University of Ch i ca g o, University U n i v e r s i t y of Maryland. T h e n u m b e r of I n te r ns h ip s and the n u m b e r of I n s t i t u ti o ns offering programs of i n t e r n s h i p are Increa s in g . F o l l o w i n g the pa t t e r n of an e x p a n d e d p r o g r a m of off-canqpus s tudent t e a c h i n g at the u n d e r ­ g ra d u a t e level, g r a d u a t e s ch o ol s are s e e k i n g a d d i ­ t ional o p p o r t u n i t i e s for su i table p l a c e m e n t of Interns In e d u c a t i o n a l a d m i n i s t r a t i o n . growing weight e x p r e s s e d by organisations T h e r e appears to b e a of op inion f a v o r i n g Interns h ip s , l e a d i n g e d u c a t or s and p r o f e s s i o n a l In the field of educat io n . Representative, v ar y s i g n i f i c a n t l y a mo n g e du c a t o r s on-going internship programs In t h e i r or g a n i s a t i o n , supervisory procedures. There scope, Is also d i vided as to Just w ha t co n s t i t u t e s c o n c e r n i n g w h i c h types have p r o v e n to be most s at i s f a c t o r y . with lay-cltlsens, organised and Is little ag r ee m en t " I n t e r n s h i p 1* In e d u c a t i o n a l a d m i n i s t r a t i o n . staffs as c om m un i ty an Opinion of I nt e rn s hi p s In g e neral, w o r k groups, school and s t u d e n t s appe ars t o be f a v o r e d over w o r k with budgets, r ec o rd s , a d m i n i s t r a t i v e forma, and office Kric R. B abe r Abstract 3 routine. Results of the s tudy is in some r e s p e c t s in d icate that in t e r n s h i p s u p e r i o r to a s er i es of b rief, d i s c o n n e c t e d fi e ld e x p e r i e n c e s b e c a u s e It p r o v i d e s the intern w i t h o p p o r t u n i t i e s to d e v e l o p a "feel*1 fo r the Job In Its e n t i r e t y . The w e a k n e s s e s c enter around the d i f f i c u l t i e s s u p e r v is i on and the of I n t e r n s h i p I n v o l v e d In o f f - c am p us la ck of p r o p e r r e l a t i o n s h i p s between e x t e n d e d field e x p e r i e n c e s and the on-campus programs of i n s t r u c t i o n i nt e rn s hi p (1) gu i d e s and r es e a r c h . the In terms promotes d e s i r a b l e g r o w t h of the of pr a ct i ce , Intern I nt e rn s hi p In c lu d e the f o l l o w i n g * (2) toward c o m ­ of p r og r am s Internship of (1) la rgely of s i g n i f i c a n t a d m i n i s t r a t i v e w o r k necessary program, and leader sh i p. C r i t e r i a for the e v al u a t i o n cons ists its best, intern to a b e t t e r u n d e r ­ standing of t h e o r y petent d e m o c r a t i c At to the w e l l - b e i n g of an o n - g o i n g e d u c a t i o n a l (2) p r o v i d e s s u b s t a n t i a l o p p o r t u n i t y for creative t h o u g h t and action on the p a r t of the Intern, (3) makes p r o v i s i o n for c o n t i n u i n g t hr e e - w a y p l an n i n g , action, and e v a l u a t i o n by the Intern, his co l le g e adviser, and the local a d m i n i s t r a t o r school-community, and In the c o o p e r a t i n g (4) makes p r o v i s i o n for Eric K. Baber flexibility n ee d s and In types inter e st s * Abstract 4 of a s s i g n m e n t s to meet individual AC KKOW LED GM3 NT S T he w r i t e r is deeply indebted to those individuals who, by their inspiration, and guida nce, especially made this study possib le. He is indebted to P r o f e s s o r Clyde M. C a m p b e l l , Head of the D e p a r t m e n t and S up e rv i si o n, College, c o o p e r at i on , of E d u c a t i o n a l A d m i n i s t r a t i o n S c h o o l of E d uc a ti o n, Mi c h i g a n S t a t e for constant e n c o u r a g e m e n t and h e l p f u l c r i t i c i s m so g e n e r o u s l y given. T o M i c h i g a n State College P r o f e s s o r s V. Millard, T r o y L. Stearns, W il l i a m R. Sur, valuable the w r i t e r s uggestions M il o sh Muntyan, Cecil and is very g r at e f u l for and counsel. E. R. B T A B L E OF C O N T E N T S C HA PTER I. PA GE INTRODUCTION 1 Introductory Statement ...................... 1 Pu rpose of the S t u d y ........................ 2 Proble ms 3 of the S t u d y ........................ Sources of Data. Procedures Meth ods ...................... 4 .................................... 5 ............ 6 of the S t u d y ................... 10 of T r e a t m e n t Limitat i on s . . . . . S e l e c t i o n of Programs. II. . . . . . . . . . . 11 D e f i n i t i o n s .................................... 14 O r i e n t a t i o n to the S t u d y ................... 19 A T A B U L A T I O N A N D E X A M I N A T I O N OF C O L L E C T E D OPI N I O N S A ND J U D G M E N T S C O N C E R N I N G PR O G R A M S OF I N T E R N S H I P IN E D U C A T I O N A L ADMINISTRATION III. ............................... 28 O b j e c t i v e s .................................... 28 C r i t e r i a ...................................... 33 A s s u m p t i o n s .................................... 56 F ut u re P r o g r a m s ............................... 64 A C R I T I C A L A N A L Y S I S OF M A J O R ISSUES A N D A S S U M P T I O N S I N H E R E N T IN P R O G R A M S OF I N T E R N S H I P IN E D U C A T I O N A L AD M IN I S T R A T I O N , A S T H E Y R E L A T E TO T H E T O T A L P R E P A R A T O R Y P R O G R A M ...................................... 70 iv CHAPTER PAGE I nt e rn s hi p Re d uc e s T he o r y the D u a l i s m B e t w e e n and P r a c t i c e .......................... I n t e r n s h i p Has as Its Ce n t r a l P ur p o s e P r o f e s s i o n a l Pr e p a r a t i o n I n t e r n s h i p Promotes Com p et e n c e of the 70 the In te rn .. 83 Professional in A d m i n i s t r a t i v e R e l a t i o n s h i p s w i t h Students, Staff, Laymen, and C om m u n i t y G r o u p s ........... I nt e rn s hi p Re q uires the 98 I n t e r n ’s R e a d i n e s s in G e n e r a l and P r o f e s s i o n a l E d u c a t i o n . .• 113 . 121 I n t e r n s h i p Provides F l e x i b i l i t y and I n d i v i d ua l iz e d Instruction Ne e d e d in the T otal P r e p a r a t o r y P r o g r a m ................ IV. A D E S C R I P T I O N OF E I G H T S E L E C T E D P R O G R A M S OF IN T E R N S H I P IN E D U C A T I O N A L A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 129 Ball State Teachers C o l l e g e ................ 129 New Y o r k U n i v e r s i t y ........................... 133 Ohio S tate Unive r si t y. 138 ................... S o u t h e r n Illinois U n i v e r s i t y ............... Tea c he r s College, C o l u m b i a U n i v e r s i t y . .. 146 154 University of C h i c a g o ........................ 158 University of G e o r g i a ........................ 161 University of M a r y l a n d .............. 162 V CHAPTER V. PAGE A C O M P A R I S O N OF C E RT A IN C H A R A C T E R I S T I C S OF S E L E C T E D P R O G R A M S OF I N T E R N S H I P IN EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION T he . . ............ I n t e r n s h i p P r o g r a m ...................... The Intern . . . . . ........................ The C ol l e g e A d v i s e r ............................. VI. X75 175 188 192 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING I N T E R N S H I P P R A C T I C E S IN T H E P R O F E S S I O N A L P R E P A R A T I O N OF E D U C A T I O N A L A D M I N I S T R A T O R S 197 G e n e r a l C o n c l u s i o n s .......................... 197 R e c o m m e n d a t i o n s ........................... 209 B I B L I O G R A P H Y ........................................... 216 A P P E N D I X E S ............................................. 222 A p p e n d i x A. Survev-Appraisal Q u e s t i o n n a i r e .................................... A p p e n d i x B. Status-Survey Questionnaire . A p p e n d i x C. I n t e r v i e w C h e e k - L i s t ............ 223 231 238 LIST OP T A B L E S TABLE PAGE 1. E v a l u a t i o n of O bj e ct i ve s of I n t e r ns h ip s , • 2. I n te r n s h i p Sh o u l d N o t C o n s i s t of ’'Made11 W o r k ..................................... 3. I n t e r n s h i p I nv o lv e s A s s u m p t i o n 33 of A d m i n i s t r a t i v e R e s p o n s i b i l i t y ........ 4. I n te r n s h i p as S t a t u s - L e a d e r s h i p 29 34 in G ro u p P rocesses. 37 5. I nt e rn s h ip as C r e a t i v e T h o u g h t and Ac t io n . 6. C o r r e l a t e d R e a d i n g and S t u d y In I n t e r n s h i p P r a c t i c e ................................ 7. V i s i t a t i o n at the HS c e n e 39 41 of A c t i o n ” by the Co l le g e A d v i s e r .................... 8. Joint P la n ni n g, Ac t io n , and E v a l u a t i o n 9. In t er n s h i p S h o u l d be Ne ar 43 • • 45 the E n d of F o r m a l T r a i n i n g ......................... 46 10. Period of T i m e In v o l v e d in I n t e r n s h i p . 11. F l e x i b i l i t y in Ti me A l l o t m e n t .......... 50 12. Flexibility 51 13. Conduct in Type . • of A s s i g n m e n t ..... of I n t e r n s h i p Pr o gr a ms to Meet A c c r e d i t i n g S t a n d a r d s .............. • • • • 14. I n t e rn s hi p S h o u l d Not S tatus 48 52 Je op a r d i z e the of the R e g u l a r S t a f f . ........... 54 vii TABLE 15. PAGE Selected Characteristics of C i t y - S c h o o l S u p e r i n t e n d e n t s by C i t y - S i z e G r o u p s 16. Comparative Enrollments . • 100 in I n t e r n s h i p P r o g r a m s ...................................... 17. Years in W h i c h I n t e r n s h i p E x p e r i e n c e s Are No r ma l ly P r o v i d e d ................. .. IS. 176 . 177 Time Bases Up o n W h i c h I n t e r n s h i p s Are O r g a n i z e d ................................. 19. 178 N umber of D i f f e r e n t S c h o o l - C o m m u n i t i e s (Locations) Used by S i x T r a i n i n g I ns t it u ti o ns for t h ei r Pr o gr a ms of I n t e r n s h i p .............................. 20. Distance 179 of C o o p e r a t i n g S c h o o l - C o m m u n i t i e s f r o m the T r a i n i n g I n s t i t u t i o n ........ 21. F ac tors I n f l u e n c i n g Choice 180 of C o o p e r a t i n g S c h o o l - C o m m u n i t i e s Used for Internship Purposes by S i x T r a i n i n g I ns t i t u t i o n s . 22. Types of A d m i n i s t r a t i v e P o s i t i o n s Interns H a v e Ser ved 23. Satisfactory and U n s a t i s f a c t o r y Ty p es 183 of as R e p o r t e d by S i x T r a i n i n g I n s t i t u t i o n s ............. 24. Fa c t o r s his 182 in w h i c h 1 9 4 9 - 1 9 5 2 ........ Internship Experiences . In f l u e n c i n g C ho i c e 187 of Intern for I n t e r n s h i p ..................... 191 viii TABLE 25. PAGE What R ec o r ds Is the Intern Re q uired K ee p D u r i n g h i s 26. Responsibilities to I n t e r n s h i p ............... X92 of the Int ern's C o ll e ge A d v i s e r ...................................... 196 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION I ntroductory S t a t e m e n t A nationv.'iae m o b i l i z a t i o n of p ro fessional, ist rational and i n s t i t u t i o n a l r e so u rc e s con tinued improvement of e d u c a t i o n a l f o c u s e d upon the a d m i n i s t r a t i o n has en v e loped since 1949 w i t h the o r g a n i z a t i o n of the C o o p e r ­ ative Program in E d u c a t i o n a l A d m i n i s t r a t i o n , by the Ke llogg F o un d at i on . The CP EA has active p a r t i c i p a t i o n and support tional a d m i n i s tr a to r s groups An important sp o ns o r e d e n l i s t e d the of t h ou sands of e d u c a ­ and r e p r e s e n t a t i v e p r o f e s s i o n a l in a c o m p r e n e n s i v e r el a ti n g to all phases adrnin- action-research program of e d u c a t i o n a l a dm i ni s tr a ti o n. part of the study being c a rr i ed on by the CPEA and other p r o f e s s i o n a l groups deals w i t h the p r o f e s s i o n a l p r e p a r a t i o n tors. its This po r ti o n initial impetus of e d u c a t i o n a l a d m i n i s t r a ­ of the n a t i o n - w i d e two years study r e c e i v e d prior to the f or m at i on of the CPEA. In 1947 me m be r s of Professors of E d u c a t i o n a l A dm i ni s t r a t i o n , Ithaca, New York, of the N a t i o n a l Confer e nc e p ro f es s io n al p r e p a r a t i o n study, in i n s t i t u t e d a c o n t i n u i n g st u dy and r e s e a r c h p r o g r a m d e d i c a t e d to the improv e me n t This meeting of the of school a d m i n i s tr a to r s. c o r r e l a t e d w i t h the w o r k of the CPEA since 2 1949, has in ma ny led to the m o d i f i c a t i o n of t r a i n i n g pr o gr a ms i n s t i t u t i o n s - - a n d w i l l d ou b tl e ss b e c o m e more ef f ec t iv e in the years of the p r e p a r a t o r y p r o g r a m tional a d m i n i s t r a t i o n ) The w r i t e r hopes this It is w i t h one phase internsiiips thesis in e d u c a ­ concerns itself. i nv e st ig a ti o n m a y s u p p l e m e n t and groups leader­ and serve to c la r if y issues re l a t i v e to the nature of i n te r ns h ip ex p er i en c es the actively interested of the q u a l i t y of e d u c a t i o n a l ship in the U n it e d States, and thoughts (i.e. that this work, of other individuals in the i m p r o ve m en t ahead. even and d e s i r a b i lity in the p r o f e s s i o n a l p r e p a r a ­ tion of e d u c a t i o n a l adminis tr a to r s. Purpose of the S t ud y It is the purpose 1. of this st u dy to: A s c e r t a i n the present i n t e r n s h i p programs status of s e l e c t e d in e d u c a t i o n a l adm in- is t r a t i o n • 2. A n a l y z e the m a j o r assump t io n s inherent in programs and issues of i n t e r n s h i p in e d u c a t i o n a l administration. 3. Present the opinions tors c o nc e r n i n g of s e l e c t e d e d u c a ­ objectives c o n s i d e r e d imp ortant and c r i t e r i a in su c h programs. 5 4. R e c o m m e n d d e s i r a b l e pr o ce du r e an d p ra c t i c e for pr o grams of i n t e r n s h i p in e d u c a t i o n a l ad m in istration. Problems of the St u dy This study undertakes 1# to: D e s c r i b e eight tive programs established, representa­ of i n t e r n s h i p in e d u c a t i o n a l administration sissippi River. l o c a t e d east of the M i ss i These programs are c o n d u c t e d b y the f o l l o w i n g instit u ti o ns of h i g h e r education: 1 Ball State Teache rs College New Y o r k U n i v e r s i t y Ohio State U n i v e r s i t y S ou t he r n Illinois University Teachers College, Co l um b ia U n i v e r s i t y U n i v e r s i t y of Ch icago U n i v e r s i t y of G e orgia U n i v e r s i t y of M a r y l a n d Bas e d l a rg e ly upon the findings of W h ea ton*s study of 1950 (see p. 11 ): Wheaton, G crdon A., A Status Study of I n t e r n sh ip Programs in S chool A d m i n i s t ra t io n ( t ypewritten d o c t o r a l p r o j e c F X New York: T e a c h ­ ers College, C o l u m b i a University, 1950. 2. C o m p a r e ce r tain characteristics o n - g o i n g pr o g r a m s of these of i n t e r n s h i p w i t h c r i t e r i a a pp r ov e d by a jury of e x pe r ts , 3, A n a l y z e the m a j o r as s um p ti o ns inher en t in pr o g r a m s and issues of i n t e r n s h i p in e d u c a t i o n a l a d mi n i s t r a t i o n , as they r e l a t e t o the total p r e p a r a t o r y progr am , 4„ Synthesize the opinions of t w en t y s e le c t e d e du c ators r e l a t i v e to o bjectives, tions, gr ams and cr i t e r i a for e v a l u a t i o n assump­ of p r o ­ of i n t e r n s h i p in e d u c a t i o n a l a d m i n ­ i stration . 5, Conclude, u p o n the basis of d a t a p r e s e n t e d this study, w h i c h in t e r n s h i p p r o c e d u r e s practices are most desirable in and in the p r o f e s ­ s ional p r e p a r a t i o n of e d u c a t i o n a l a d m i n i s t r a t o r s Sources of D a t a 1. A s t a t u s - s u r v e y q u e s t i o n n a i r e p r e p a r e d for presentation to officials r e s p o n s i b l e for c o n d u c t i n g the eight s e le c t e d p r o g r a m s of int ernship, 2* An i n t e r v i e w check-list p r e p a r e d for g u i d i n g interv i ew s w i t h officials r e s p o n s i b l e for c o n d u c t i n g the eig ht s el e ct e d p r o g r a m s internship. of 3, A survey-appraisal questionnaire prepared f o r p r e s e n t a t i o n to a jury of t w e n t y s e l e c t e d experts. 4. Available professional l i te r a t u r e and other w r i t t e n ma t er i al s d e a l i n g d i r e c t l y w i t h administrative about internships the t r a i n i n g needs and a s s u m p t i o n s and p r o c e s s e s of l e a r n i n g i n volved in s u c h p ro g r a m s . Pro c ed u re s 1. R e v i e w of availa b le p r o f e s s i o n a l r e l a t i n g d i rectly to the to p ic 2. Preparation of the three listed u n d e r 3. "sources li t er a t u r e of the study. in q uiry i n st r um e nt s of d a t a . " D i s t r i b u t i o n of s t a t u s - s u r v e y and survey- a p p r a i s a l q ue s ti o n n a i r e s . 4. I n t e r v i e w s w i t h officials r e s p o n s i b l e for c o n d u c t i n g those pr ograms s e l e c t e d for d e t a i l e d study. 5. Collection 6. C r i t i c a l a pp r ai sa l of data. 7. F o r m u l a t i o n of co nclusions tions • and t a b u l a t i o n of data. and r e c o m m e n d a ­ Me thoas of T r e a t m e n t This st u d y makes use of the n o r m a t i v e - s u r v e y and the s u r v e y - a p p r a i s a l methods the p r o c u r e m e n t of e d u c a t i o n a l r e s e a r c h in and tr e at m e n t of da ta p e rt i n e n t to the topic• The f o r m a t i v e - S u r v e y M e t h o d This m e t h o a seeks to answer the question, "what are the re al facts wi t h r e g a r d to the ex i sting conp a it l o n s ? " By the use of questi on n ai r e, i n v e s t i g a t i o n and interview, "normative" it (i.e. "surveys'1 and gathers no r ma l or typica l) prev ail in a group of cases da ta r e g a r d i n g c o nd i ti o ns w h i c h s el e ct ed for study. The S u r v e y - A p p r a i s a l M e t h o d This p r o c e d u r e involves dir ect jud gment and r a t i n g or c l a s s i f i c a t i o n a c c o r d i n g to s ub j ec t i v e values. while it is not e n t i r e l y s a t i s f a c t o r y f r o m a s ci e nt i fi c standpoint, it is perhaps the most p r a c t i c a l a p p r o a c h to p ro b le m s d e a l i n g wi t h h u m a n relations. A p p r a i s a l leans more h e a v i l y upon the h u m a n element than do o b je ctive sciences, for a p p r a i s a l is u n d e r ta k en for the specific p u r p o s e of i n c l u d i n g the h um an el e me n t . ^ ^ Good, C ar t er V., - Barr - Douglas, of E d u c a t i o n a l R e s e a r c h , New York: C e n t u r y Co., T935. Tp^ 286) 3 I b i d . , p. 411. The M e t h o d o l o g y D. A p p l e t o n - 7 E d u c a t i o n a l science points tices is r e p r e s e n t e d b y the v i e w ­ of e d uc a ti o na l p r o f e s s o r s in the field. the field The as w e l l as b y p r a c ­ improvement is in part d e p e n d e n t upon of p r a c t i c e s the in sights in and p er s pe c ti v es held by the p r o f e s s i o n a l group. The two are i nterrelated and it is that logical to s u ppose surveys w h i c h b r i n g the b e st of e d u c a t i o n a l th o ug h t to bear upon p r a c t i c a l p r o b l e m s may make some c o n t r i b u t i o n to ed u ca t io n al s c i e n c e — and thus I n fl u e n c e fu t u r e practices. A le gitimate use of the q u e s t i o n n a i r e v ie w is to obtain information or i n t e r ­ c o n c e r n i n g the a t ti t u d e or opinion of persons q u e s t i o n e d t o w a r d v a r i o u s pr o bl e m s , conditions held or issues. The f o l l o w i n g point of v i e w is in r eg a rd to opinion s ur v e y s : The h a s t i l y expressed o pi n io n s of a large n umber of judges of v a r y i n g merit are p ro bably of less value than the ma t u r e judgment of one or two e xp e r t s w h o h a v e the question cl early in mind and who are able to qualify their an swers a p p r o p r i a t e l y .4 In a ccordance w i t h this t h ou g ht the w r i t e r de ­ cided to question a g r o u p of twenty e d u c a t i o n a l leaders of na t io n al repute, rather than to s ubmit q u e s t i o n s to a larger number. These t we n ty p e r s o n s w e r e s e l e c t e d ^The Q,uest l o n n a l r e . R e s e a r c h Bu l le t in of the Natio na l E du c a t i o n A s s o c i a t i o n , Vol. VII I, No. 1, January 1930. p. 18. 8 as a jury of experts on the basis of th e ir r e p r e s e n t a ­ tive p os i ti o ns and f i r s t - h a n d k n o w l e d g e of i n t e r n s h i p programs. jury includes of e d u c a t i o n a l The p ro f es s o r s administration, p r a c t i c i n g a a m i n i s t r a t o r s , off icials of p r o f e s s i o n a l organizations, programs, ities directors of i n t e r n s h i p and other indivi du a ls b e l i e v e d to be a u t h o r ­ on in te rnships: 1. A n d e r s o n , 'waiter A. P r o f e s s o r of E d u c a t i o n and Chairman, D e p a r t m e n t of A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ana Supervision, S c h o o l of Education, N ew York University. 2. A r n o l d , W i l l i a m E. P r o f e s so r of E d u c a t i o n a l Ad m in i s t r a t i o n , S ch o ol of Education, U n i v e r s i t y of P e n n ­ sylvania. 3. A u r a n d , 0. H. Pro f es s or of E d u c a t i o n a l A d m i n i s t r a t i o n and C o o r d i n a t o r of Internships, S c ho o l of E d u c a ­ tion, State College, Fe n ns 2/rl v a n i a . B o r g e s o n , Fritz C. P r o f e s s o r of Education, and C o o r d i n a t o r of Internships, School of Ed ucation, Ne w Y o r k University. 5. B u t t e r w o r t h , J ulian E. P r o f e s so r of Ed ucation, S chool of Education, Corn ell University, (retired) 6. C a m p b e l l , Clyde M. Pro f e s s o r of E d u c a t i o n and Head, D e p a r t m e n t of E d u c a t i o n a l A d m i n i st r at i on , School of Education, Michig a n State College. 9 7. C a m p b e l l , R o a l d P. A s s o c i a t e P r o f e s s o r of E d u c a t i o n and C o o r d i n a t o r of Internships, S c h o o l of E ducation, Ohio State University. 8. C o c k i n g , b a i t e r D. Editor, 9. The S chool E x e c u t i v e magazine* C o o p e r , Pan H. A s s o c i a t e P r o f e s s o r of E d u c a t i o n a l A d m i n ­ i stration, S ch o ol of Ed ucation, State U n i v e r s i t y of Iowa* 10. E l l i o t t , L lo y d E. A s s o c i a t e P r of e s s o r of E d u c a t i o n a l A d m i n ­ istration, S c h o o l of Ed ucation, Co r ne l l Uni v e r s i t y . 11. P i s c h e r , John E. - :uty S u p e r i n t e n d e n t of Schools, faitimore, Maryland, and fo r me r C o o r d i n a t o r of I n t e r n ­ ships, Teac hers College, C o lumbia University. 12. Holms ted t , Rale igh P r o f e s s o r of Education, I nd i an a University. 13. E i s n e r , Paul c_. Superintendent 14. S chool of Ed ucation, of Schools, llencoe, Illinois. U e w e l l , C la r en c e E. P r o f e s s o r of E d u c a t i o n a l A d m i n i s t r a t i o n and C o o r d i n a t o r of In ternships, Coll ege of Education, Unive rsity of Maryland. 15. P i e r c e , T r uman M. P r o f e s s o r of E d u c a t i o n and director, Center, C-eorge Pe a body College. CPEA 10 16. Re h ag e , K e n n e t h jr. A s s o c i a t e P r o f e s s o r of E d u c a t i o n , and staff member C P E A Ce n ter, U n i v e r s i t y of Ch i ca g o. 17. R e u t t e r , E. E d m u n d A s s o c i a t e P r o f e s s o r of E d u c a t i o n a l A d m i n i s ­ t r at i on and C o o r d i n a t o r of In ternships, T ea c h e r s C ol l eg e , C o l u m b i a U ni v er s it y . 18. R o g e r s . V i r g i l M. S u p e r i n t e n d e n t of Schools, B a tt l e Creek, M ichigan, and Preside n t, A m e r i c a n A s s o c i a t i o n of S c h o o l A d m i n i s t r a t o r s . 19. T h u r s t o n , Lee M. S u p e r i n t e n d e n t of Public I n s t r uc t io n for the State of Michigan, f o r m e r P r es ident of Chi ef State S c h o o l Of f ic i al s o r g a n i z at i on , and De a n - e l e c t , S c h o o l of E du c at i o n , M i c h i g a n State College. 20. Y e a g e r . W i l l i a m A. P r o f e s s o r of E d u c a t i o n and D i r e c t o r of courses in S c h o o l A d m i n i s t r a t i o n , U n i v e r s i t y of Pittsburg. Limitat i on s 1. of the Study This study does not a t t e m p t to make hensive examination The eight p ro g r a m s be r e p r e s e n t a t i v e p. 11) poses of all I n te r ns h ip p ro g rams. se l e c t e d are b e l i e v e d to (see S e l e c t i o n of this type of tr a ining, of an alysis t o p r o v i d e of the p r ob lems, tun i t i e s a compre­ of P r o g r a m s . and for p u r ­ a f a ir s a m p l i n g c ha r ac t e r i s t i c s of all su ch pr o gr a ms . and o p p o r ­ 2. This study is r e s t r i c t e d to i n t e r n s h i p e x p e r i en c es in ed u ca ti o na l a d m i n i s t r a t i o n at the g r ad u a t e school level, 5. The data obtained, in nature, while la r ge l y s u b j e c t i v e are similar in type to da ta used in m a n y r e c o g n i z e d studies d ea l i n g w i t h e d u c a t i o n a l problems Sel e ct i on of Programs W h e a t o n ’s study t er n ships c o nc er n in g che status in e d u c a t i o n a l a d m i n i s t r a t i o n s ur v ey e d 152 colleges. were operating; what inducing and practices. nine Se venteen in 1949-50'-, of these c ol leges they termed in t er n s h i p programs, colleges where only one or two ships we re b e i n g served in 1949-50. intern­ The f o ur i n s t i t u ­ tions w h i c h s p o n s or e d the larger numbers i nternships of in- of s uc h in 19 4 9- 5 0 were: program started U n i v e r s i t y of G eo r g i a 13 interns 1947 Ball State Teachers 10 interns 1949 7 interns 1947 7 interns 1949 Teach er s College, College Colum bi a New Y o r k U n i v e r s i t y The U n i v e r s i t y of haryland, only two i n te r ns h ip s in 1949-50, wh i le sponsoring was re p orted to h a v e W h e a t o n , Gordon A., A Status S tudy of I n t e r n s h i p Proprams in S c h o o l A d m i n 1 s t r a t i o n , ^typewritten d o c t o r a l p r o j e c t ) N e w York: Teachers College, C o lu m b i a Un iv ersity, 1950. 12 t ra ined a t o t a l of nine interns since the p r o g r a m was s tarted in 1947. The U n i v e r s i t y of Chicago, two interns h ip s in 1949-50, also s p o n s o r i n g only h a d s t arted the i n t e r n s h i p program .."prior to 1940" a c c o r d i n g to the V.heaton report, and l is t ed an a p p r o x i m a t e total of 150 interns as h a v i n g p a r t i c i p a t e d in the p r o g r a m since its be g in n in g . total of 150 is c o n s i d e r a b l y g r e a t e r This than the totals listed fo r the o t he r i n s t i t u t i o n s - - 3 3 fo r U n i v e r s i t y of Georgia, sity, 26 for Teachers College, Co l u m b i a U n i v e r ­ 10 fo r Ball State Teach er s College, and 7 f o r New Yo r k U niversity. S ou t he r n Illinois p rogram in 1949-50, d uring that year, University, w h i c h s t a r t e d its and s p o n s o r e d five i n ternships seemed to be r e p r e s e n t a t i v e two or three s m a l l e r instit u ti o ns of the o p e r a t i n g such programs. Ohio State University, w h i c h s tarted its p r o g r a m too r e c e n t l y to be In c l u d e d in the W h e a t o n report, included in this its study b ec ause i n t e r n s h i p program. This of the unique nature is of i n s t i t u t i o n ,p ro v id e s f o r a b e g i n n i n g i n t e r n s h i p ex p er i e n c e at the m a s t e r ’s degr ee level, ate level. an d an a d v a n c e d i n t e r n s h i p at the d o c t o r ­ 13 The eight colleges and u n i v e r s i t i e s above were se lected for de t ai l e d study. and They r e p r e s e n t consideration i n s t i tu t io n s in this of va r y i n g locations, where the gr e ater n u m b e r programs mentioned of sizes interns in of internship re c ei v e the most experi e nc e , a c c o r d i n g to obtainable reports. A l l pr o grams the M i s s i s s i p p i River w h i c h have b e e n three or more years, of six or more and w h i c h have interns, in this study. The eight p r ograms n e c e s s a r i l y the best progra m s in op e ra t i o n for s po n s o r e d are b e l i e v e d east of a total to be r e p r e s e n t e d s el e c t e d in c urrent are not operation. Mo attempt h a s been made to judge t h e i r e x c e l l e n c e eff e ct i ve n es s , have or as compared w i t h n e w e r p r o g r a m s w h i c h s p ru n g into b e i n g since 1949-50. However, basis of W h e a t o n ’s r eport tion, it seems r e a s o n a b l e to assume that the p ro g r a m s r e fl e ct some, and other a v a i l a b l e if not most, tho u gh t and action connected w i t h on the informa­ selected of the better the o p e r a t i o n of p ro g ra m s of i nternship in e d u c a t i o n a l a d mi n i s t r a t i o n . In addition to the eight c ol leges and u n i v e r s i ­ ties selec t ed for d e tailed suty, r e f e r e n c e this thesis as those to other excellent conducted D uk e U n i v er s it y . is made i n t e r n s h i p progr a ms at P e n n s y l v a n i a State C ol l eg e in such and 14 DEFINITIONS M a n y words writi ng s c o m m o n l y u se d in e d u c a t i o n a l are subject to some v a r i a ti o ns in m ea n in g s. To a void m i s u n d e r s t a n d i n g and m i s i n t e r p r e t a t i o n , far as possible, the f o l l o w i n g terms as are d e f i n e d a c c o r d i n g to their i n t e n d e d meanings in this investi­ gation. Field Experience This is a comprehensive, to i n clude all types flexible term i n te n de d of e d u c at i on a l e x p e r i e n c e s the s p o n s o r s h i p of the tr a in i ng i n s t i t u t i o n inserv ice posit ion) F i e l d e x pe r i e n c e as d e f i n e d her e to in c lu d e observation, survey work, v is i ta t i o n p ar t ic i p a t i o n , or any c o m b in a ti o n of these. f ield ex p er i e n c e (or in an w h i c h occ ur In o n - g o i n g sc h oo l or c o m m u n i t y situations. is meant u nder or The term is e q u a l l y a p p l ic a bl e to a 6 0 - m i n u t e in the state d e p a r t m e n t of ed ucation; o b s e r v a t i o n of a t e a c h e r s ' meeting; a d m i n i s t r a t i v e position. an or a f u l l - t i m e F i e l d e x p e r i e n c e does n o t imply an y p a r t i c u l a r l e n g t h of time, type of e d u c a t i o n a l experience, or any p a r t i c u l a r o t he r than It m u s t inf volve an o n - g o i n g s c h o o l - c o m m u n i t y si t ua t io n a n d person' nel not e x c l u s i v e l y c o n n e c t e d w i t h the trainee's cl assmates and I n structors. F i e l d experience, in 15 general, serves the p ur p os e college classro o ms of p l a c i n g stuaents to see a n d / o r take part e ducati o na l pr ograms. It u s u a l l y carries tion of some e d u c a t i o n a l s u p e r v i s i o n out of in other the c o n n o t a ­ in connec t io n wi t h the experience. F i e l d Pr a ctice This is a type of f i e l d ex p er i en c e w h i c h involves some p a r t i c i p a t i o n of the trainee. (other than observa t io n ) It may be a very on the part l imited ki n d of participation, or it m a y involve m a j o r r e s p o n s i b i l i t y in a f u ll -time position. Internship I n t e r n s h i p is a type of f i e l d practice eng aged In near the end of the t r ai n ee ' s f or m a l p r e p a r at i on p ro g ra m w h i c h involves or a series a continu o us f i e l d experi e nc e of cl o se l y r e l a t e d e xperiences in r e s p o n ­ sible p a r t i c i p a t i o n in any o n -g o i n g s c h o o l - c o m m u n i t y situation. This p r e s u p po s es a su f fi c i e n t length of time to d i s t i n g u i s h It f r o m a f i e l d tr i p or visitation. The exact l ength of time Is a m a t t e r of controversy. Clarence A. Ne w e l l defines i n t e r n s h i p in this manner: . . . an i n t e r n s h i p (in e d u c a t i o n a l a d m i n i s ­ tration) may be d e f i n e d as a phase of pr o f e s s i o n a l 16 ed ucation in w h i c h a s t udent n e a r i n g the complet i on of his f o rm a l p r e p a r a t i o n works in the f i e ld under c o mp e t e n t s u p e r v i s i o n for a considerable b l o c k of time for the p u rpose of d e v e l o p i n g c o mp e t e n c e in c a r r y i n g a d m i n ­ i s t r a t iv e r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s . 8 O ther au thorities time element, h al f -time s ta t i n g that i n t e r n s h i p m u st as to the involve or f ul l -time w o r k for a q u a r t e r or a s e me s t e r or a school year. who ha ve de f i n e d time are more e x p l i c i t F or the m o s t part, however, i n t e r n s h i p seem content those to leave the ele ment as a variable. E a r l i e r references less r e s t r i c t i v e programs to i n t e r n s h i p seem to be c o n c e r ni n g the time labelled internship. to be spent in One wr i t e r says: The i n te r n s h i p p r o b l e m a student underta k es may be a n y t h i n g of a d m i n i s t r a t i v e s i g n i f ic a nc e --an a ge - grade study, a survey, the m a k i n g of the annual budget, a s y s t e m of records, etc. He might go into the s chool s y s t e m for one d ay per w e e k for a p eriod of t i m e - - o r perhaps eve ry day for a full q u a r t e r . 8 8 Newell, Clarence A., H a n d b o o k for the D e v e l o p ­ ment of I n t e r n s h i p Progra ms in E d u c a t i o n a l A d m i n i s t r a t i o n , New York: CFEA, Teachers College, C o l u m b i a University, 1S52, p. 4. 7 Fo r more specific element, see p. 49. i n fo r ma t io n on the time 8 Haggerty, M. E., T r a i n i n g the Superintendent of S c h o o l s , Bulletin of the U n i v e r s i t y of Mi nnesota, Vol. XXVIII, No. 17, April, 1925. 17 More recent d i s c u s s i o n s .of i n t e r n s h i p i nd icate somewhat b e t t e r a g r e e m e n t a m o n g educators as to the length of time w h i c h sh ou ld be d e v o t e d to i n te r ns h ip . YV. S. V i nc e n t ® contends needs to be that the time t ested b y practice, one se mester sh o u l d give the but issue still that six weeks intern c o nf i de n ce enter the field as a p r a c t i c i n g a d m i n i st r at o r. pattern in present p r actice M a x i m u m time to The seems to be a f u l l - t i m e i nternship exper i en c e for at least semester. to one q u ar t er or one in ge neral usage is f u l l - t i m e i nt e rn s hi p for one school year. Some e d u c a t i on a l writers ma ke no specific m e n ­ tion of the time n e c e s s a r y for a s a t i s f a c t o r y i n t e r n ­ ship* The i nt e rn s h i p for the s u p e r i n t e n d e n c y co n sists in a p p r e n t i c i n g school a d mi n i s t r a t i o n students, either c u r i n g their final year of pr e se r v i c e tra ining or i m m e d i a te l y aft er its completion, to assist some active superintendent, to w o r k under his a i r e c t i o n and supervision, as well as under that of the t r ai n in g i n s t i t u t i o n . 10 For purposes of this study, i n t e r n s h i p in e d u ­ c ational a d m i n i s t r a t i o n may be r e g a r d e d as continu o us f ield practice i n v o l vi n g a d m i n i s t r a t i v e tasks and ® Vincent, V.. S., "Experience School for A d m i n ­ istrators", School Executive, Vol. LXVIII, March. 1949, pp. 37-40. 10 Fittenger, Benjamin ?., Local Public Sc h o o l A o m i n i s t r a t i o n , Mew York: M e O r a w - H i l l Book Company, Inc., 1951. o. 103 18 responsibilities u n de r the t ra i n i n g i n s t i t u t i o n community, months joint s u p e r v i s i o n of the and the c o o p e r a t i n g sc hool- for a p e ri o d of time r a n g i n g from three to a year. W o r k P ra c t i c e These terms or P r ac t i c e W o r k are us ed in their common meanings, and are d i s t i n g u i s h e d f r o m f i e l d p r ac t i c e only in the sense that p r ac t i c e w o r k may involve w or k of a p r a c t i c a l nature in the t r ai n i n g institution, as we ll as in the field. Cooperating School-Community This ity term refers (or both) to the local in w h i c h the intern It is sometimes school or c o m m u n ­ serves his used in the sense of a single internship. school or school s y s t e m as a c o m m u n i t y in i t s e l f - - a n d at other times it refers to the local c o m m u n i t y in general. is b r oadly i n t e r p r e t e d to mean the It o n -g o i n g ed u ca t io n al pr ogram or s i t u a t i o n to w h i c h the Intern is assigned, and includes any e d u c a t i o n a l a g e n c y (such as the state d ep a rt m en t of ed ucation) w h i c h cooperates w i t h the tr aining i n s t i t u t i o n in p r o v i d i n g a suitable and loc ation for i n t e r n s h i p experiences. si t uation 19 S u p e r v i s l n g - A d m i n is trat or This in the t e r m refers to the p r a c t i c i n g a d m i n i s t r a t o r c o o p e r a t i n g s c h o o l - c o m m u n i t y w h o di rects supervi ses the w o r k of the intern In the and local s it u at i o n . College-Advlser This t e r m refers to the college s t af f m e m b e r assign ed by the t r a i n i n g i n s t it u ti o n to p e r s o n a l l y directly s up e rv i se and and sponsor the field p r a c t i c e p r o g r a m of the Intern. It is the r e s p o n s i b i l i t y to coordinate c o l l e g e - a d v i s e r *s the s tu d en t 's Internship learning e x p e r i en c es w i t h the total p r e p a r a t o r y pro gram; to foster and coordinate de s ir a b l e relationships between the t r ai n i n g i n st i tu t io n and the c o o p e r a t i n g sc h oo l community; and to guide d ur i ng the period of his and e v a l u a t e the i n t e r n s h i p — all of the i nt ern's ef f ec t iv e g r o w t h intern's w o r k in the i n te r es t s in a d m i n i s t r a t i v e knowle dge and ability. Orient a ti o n to the S tudy Educational ized p r o f e s si o n. adminis t ra t or s a g r ow i ng sense and p r o c e d u r e s istrators. a d m i n i s t r a t i o n Is a h i g h l y In dividuals over and groups special­ of e d u c a t i o n a l a peri od of years h a v e e n t e r t a i n e d of concern r e g a r d i n g the b as i c issues in the p r e p a r a t i o n of e d u c a t i o n a l a d m i n ­ T h e y be l ie v e that e d u c a t i o n a l l ea d er s h i p 20 of the right k i n d Most to change, ed ucators and that that change. thought is im portant to a d e m o c r a c y . agree that s o c i e t y wi l l education can continue in some m e a s u r e d ir e ct But there are at least two schools c o n c e r n i n g types in the traini n g programs and degrees of or emphases n e e d e d or p r o s p e c t i v e administrators, in order that these persons might be p r o p e r l y p r e p a r e d to assume r u n c t i o n a l e du c at i on a l world. s t a t u s - l e a d e r s h i p roles These two schools by no means m u t u a l l y exclusive istics, T here is, in the Tirst instance, the more la r g e l y as the a p p l i c a t i o n educational of’ s e l e c t e d skills a n d techniques drawn r r o m the T u n d e d prol'essional k n ow l e d g e and e xp e ri e nc e itseir. or view w h i c h or h a u c at i on a l A d m i n i s t r a t i o n school or thought w h i c h views administration knowledge, points in some respects. Concepts t raditi o na l or t h o u g h t are in all t h ei r c h a r a c t e r ­ a l t h o u g h th ey do re present are diver g en t in the hithin this concept, or the p r o r e s s i o n the content and m e t h o d ­ o lo g y or the p r e p a r a t o r y pr o g r a m is b a s e d upon o c c u p a t i o n a l analysis, ence has and a study or wh a t past e x p e r i ­ proven to be or value in a d m i n i s t r a t i v e proced u re s and practices. Persons w ho subscribe to this concept ad v oc a te 21 a t ho r o u g h k n o w l e d g e of the s pe cific has been judged to be most h e l p f u l ing a d m i n i s t r a t o r s problems. in e n a b l i n g p r a c t i c ­ to cope s u c c e s s f u l l y w i t h their T h ey r e co gnize trie tr ainee i n formation w h i c h the in a p r a c t i c a l i mportance of p l ac i ng s i tu a t i o n where he can w a t c h and f o l l o w the ex ample of a s u c c es s fu l a d m i n i s ­ trat or in the field, and they ap p r o v e of i n t e r n s h i p on an a p p r e n t i c e s h i p basis. In the second instance, school of thought w h i c h puts the se l ec t e d techniques compri se that emphasis for various cedures. less Proponents is e me r g i n g a of a p r e m i u m upon and p r e s c r i p t i o n s the bulk of m a ny e xi s t i n g places more reasons there curricula, upon an u n d e r s t a n d i n g administrative of this point if e du c at i on a l a d m i n i s t r a t i o n which and of the pr a ctices an d p r o ­ of vi e w b e li e ve Is to be an i n s t r u ­ m e n t a l a ge n cy in e d uc ation for socia l change and adaptation, it must s ho u ld be cone. what things become concern Itself more w i t h w h y things O t he r wi s e the t r a d i t i o n a l patterns of to do and h o w to ao them will tend to c r y s t a l l i z e d in the a d m i n i s t r a t i v e process, as i nd e ed they h a ve a l r e a d y cone in m a n y places. This seco nd school of thought seems to conceive of e d u c a ti o na l a d m i n i s t r a t i o n as b e i n g d e mo c r a t i c l e a d e r s h i p in r e l e a s i n g the p e r s o n a l i t y p ot e nt i al and 22 coo perative ability of each indiv id u al . consider a d m i n i s t r a t i o n as a u t h o r i t y application of a set of a r b i t r a r y a ready- ma d e m e c h a n i s m r e s p o n s i b l e but rather as a means f o r the It does not alone, re g ul a ti o ns , of c r i t i c a l or as only to i t s e l f — I m p r o v e me n t of e d u c a t i o n a l service t h r o u g h d e m o c r a t i c g r o u p p ro c e s s e s application or as the and the I n t e l l i g e n c e t o the p r o b l e m at hand. In this frame of r e f e r e n c e , istration as a le a de r sh i p pr o c e s s tional service makes use It directs f r o m the standpoint the c on c e r n e d w i t h e d u c a ­ of the m e t h o d and democr a ti c g r o u p t ec h ni q u e s action. educational admin­ of i n t e l l i ge n ce in e v o l v i n g plans c a r r y i n g- o ut of t h e s e plans of s t a t u s - l e a d e r s h i p , tation of g r ou p will. It f o s t e r s of or r e p r e s e n ­ group dy n a m i c s In c on t in u in g study and effort to adapt to c h a n g i n g conditions; to br i n g ab out b e t t e r to evaluate services. Administration be develo ped or b r o u g h t stances and is s o m e t h i n g to out of the e d u c a t i o n a l c i r c u m ­ in a p a r t ic u la r time par t ic u la r individual, co ordination; and place, and of a gro up or community. c on s ta n tl y b e i n g r e f a s h i o n e d w h i c h emerge as a r e s u l t It is In the light of facts of d e m o c r a t i c g roup pr o ce s se s , and which h e l p In c o n t r o l l i n g th e situation. This suggests that more a t t e n t i o n should be given to 23 activities d ir ectly r e l a t e d to the major c o nc e rn s sc h o o l - c o m m u n i t y living, of and to the r e l a t e d d i s c i p l i n e s and s ub j ec t - m a t t e r f ields w h i c h can w e l l c o nt r i b u t e to the s ol ution of p r o b l e m s S u c h a co ncept in ev e r y d a y living. does not tend to m in i m i z e importance of field e x p e r ie n ce s ships) (inclu d in g i n t e r n ­ in the p r o f e s s i o n a l p r e p a r a t i o n a d m i n i s t r a t o r s — but of e d u c a t i o n a l ra th er to e m ph a si z e a type of tr a in i ng w h i c h puts the the n e e d for the t r ai n e e in dire ct contact w i t h actual a d m i n i s t r a t i v e p ro b le m s and h e lp s h i m to use his r e so u rc e s in creati ve solution It is w i t h i n the m a t r i x of these of e d u c a t i o n a l de sirable ways u ndertakes and r e a s o n i n g of those proble ms. and o v e r l a p p i n g thought s the nature of k n ow l e d g e conflicting and viewpoints concerning a d m i n i s t r a t i o n and the most of p r e p a r i n g for it, that this to investigate and examine study that p o r t i o n of the p re p ar a to r y p r o g r a m which, d u r i n g the p as t three years, has begun to make its impact fe lt the to t al p r e p a r at o ry p r o g r a m — n am e ly , upon internships. Repre se n t at lve Q,uot at ions C o n c e r n i n g Intern sh i ps A r e v i e w of r e ce n t p r o f e s s i o n a l deal ing w i t h p r e p a r a t o r y pr o gr a ms literature in e d u c a t i o n a l a dm i n i s t r a t i o n reveals f r eq u en t mention of the w o r d 24 i n t e r n s h i p as a desirable type for pi’ospecti ve a dm i n istrators education. E or example, of train ing e x p e r i e n c e in the fi e l d Clyae L. C am pbell of public 11 s ay s : The next s t e o after observe tion sh o ul d be actual e x p e r i e n c e do i ng the tasks the students expect to g o later in a real job situation. This m a y be a f or m of i nt e rn s hi p l a s t i n g a yea r or part of a year, or perhaps just a cay, d e p e n d i n g upon the k in d of e xp e ri e n c e the stuc.er.ts need. At the Sixth An n ua l P r e s i d e n t s ’ C o n f e r e n c e the A m e r i c a n A s s o c i a t i o n in Chicago, Ap r il 1952, Professionalization of of School A d m i n i s u r a t o r s h e l d the Committee of f u r t h e r of the Superintenc.ency r e p o r t e d as follows: ..e be l ieve this. . . (pr o fe s si o na l training). should include i n te r ns hi p and pr a ct i ca l exper ie n ce in the field. The h.-~-.o.A. 1052 Y e a r b o o k states: . . 12 The f ur t he r u ev e lo p me n t of the i n t e r n s h i p in e d u c a t i o n a l a d m i n i s t r a t i o n wi ll be f a c i l i t a t e d by a conti n ue d willingness on the part of all c on c er n ed to exper iment wi th new a p p r oa c he s and to evaluate objec t iv e ly the re s ul t s w h i c h are observed. Campbell, Clyde i. . , P r ac t i c a l A p p l i c a t i o n s of d e m o c r a t i c A d m i n i s t r a t i o n , New Yorx: H a r p e r and Brothers, 1952. p. 299. 1^ c A m e r i c a n A s s o c ia t io n of S c ho o l A d m i n i s t r a ­ tors, 'The A m e r i c a n S chool S u p e r i n t e n d e n c y ( Thirtieth Y e a r b o o k ) Washington, D.C., N at i on a l E d u c a t i o n A ssociation, 1952. p. 397. 25 Ques t ions for C o n s i d e r a t i o n 1. Is one re ajreeoent c onstitutes 2. How among educators as to what Internship? no re presentative, ongoing vary as to t he i r content, i n t e r n s h i p programs organization, scope and s v p e r v is i on ? 3. ‘..hat are sooe t er n s h i p 4. S h ou l d of the more d e s i ra b le what of i n ­ experi en c es ? interns have e xp er i e n c e or in a n um b er 5. types of locati ons? are the m ajor assum ptions in pro trams in one location, of internship, and issues inherent and h o w do they relate to the total p r e p a r a t o r y program? 6. H o w m u c h can we learn f r o m books experience, the two, 7. Wh a t and what and now m u c h f ro m is the r e l a t i o n s h i p b et w ee n as far as in t er n sh ip is conce r ne d ? is the da n g e r of " e x p l o i t a t i o n ” in i n t e r n ­ ships ? 8. Is there d a n g e r that interns may imitate the p r a c t i c i n g a d m i n i s t r a t o r and pe rhaps b e t t e r the things 9. learn to do they s h o u l d n ’t be doing at all? H o w can the i nt e rn s hi p be a creati ve l e a r n i n g e xp e ri e nc e ? type of 26 10. H o w Is It p o s s i b l e fo r the intern to as su me a d m i n i s t r a t i v e r e s p o n s i b i l i t y , when moral responsibility legal and lie w i t h the p r a c t i c i n g administrat or ? 11. Can the kinds of le a rn i ng found most easily in tern s hi p p r o g r a m s be b r o u g h t In Into the more f o r m a l i z e d c ampus p r o g r a m ? 12. W h a t cr i te r ia are most a cc ep t a b l e In e v a l u a t i n g i nternship p r o g r a m s ? As a first step in c o n s i d e r i n g these and other quest i o n s , Chapter II p r e s e n t s the r e s u l t s s ur v ey - a p p r a l s a l q u e s t i o n n a i r e concerning programs interns h ip In e d u c a t i o n a l a d m i n i s t r a t i o n . was favored w i t h a 100 per leaders of The w riter cent r e s p o n s e to this questio n na i re w h i c h was d i s t r i b u t e d tion al of a to t we n ty e d u c a ­ se lected to serve as a jury of e x p e r t s . 13 The items of the q u e s t i o n n a i r e r e l a t e to obje ctives, c ri teria and assump ti o ns of Intern sh i p p r o g r a m s In g e n e r a l •^ Cha p t e r III u n d e r t a k e s a c r it i ca l analysis certain major Issues in pr o gr a ms 13 See pp. 8, of of internship, w h i l e 9, 10 for m e m b e r s h i p list. 1^ See A p p e n d i x A, p . 223 for copy of s u rveyapp r alsal qu e st i on n ai r e. z ers _ :ro e i "h t A) er rec. 7 ' ‘; V T ; j r ^ c T ' r"> i± i ~ * 'resents '7^npr» ons as :roi e s s ■aris )nal :renaration CHAPTER II A T A B U L A T I O N A N D E X A M I N A T I O N OF C OL L E C T E D OPINIONS AND J U D G M E N T S C O N C E R N I N G PR O GRAMS OF I N T E R N S H I P IN ELUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION A. Objectivea In r e s p o n s e to the question, e va l ua t e the fo l lo w i n g objectives program?" the r e p l i e d as twenty members An e x a m i n a t i o n the experts jectives agree of this 100 per cent are either of an i n t e r n s h i p of the i n d i ca t ed in Table "How do y o u jury of ex perts I. tabula t io n that are that two of the o b ­ "very important" or These two jjrime objectives shows "important". (a) to guide the Intern in b e t t e r u n d e r s t a n d i n g and e v a l u a t i n g t h e o r y in terms of practice, administrators and (b) to d e v e l o p b e t t e r than could be d e v e l o p e d in an on-campus p r o g r a m of l a r g e l y theore ti c al training. s i g n i f ic a nc e may be a tt a ch ed to the fact cent Som e that 80 per of the experts rate b o t h these o bj e ct i v e s as "very important". By w a y of fu rther co mm ent upon the first these two prime objectives, Lee Ivl. T h u r s t o n of says, The intern, like the f ie l d administrator, like the professor, couples action w i t h an d Responses 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. To make a gradual transition from prepara­ tion to full-time administration To put the ideal of "learning by aoing" into practice at the graduate school level To guide the intern in better understanding and evaluating theory in terms of practice To instil in the intern an acceptable inter­ pretation of a code of professional ethics very important important not very important 8 8 4 9 10 1 16 4 0 4 12 4 11 6 3 To help the intern develop desirable pro­ fessional habits, interests and ideals To test whether more training is needed be­ fore the intern begins full-time administration To provide practical work experience with lay-citizens in an ongoing educational program 5 12 3 11 8 1 To develop better administrators than could be developed in an on-campus program of largely theoretical training 16 4 0 30 thought. The es s e n c e of the internship, as I see it, is to unite in his life the thrust of the campus, w h i c h is p r o f o u n d l y t h o u g h t ­ ful, and the impulsions of the a d mi n i s t r a t i v e life, w h i c h are k i n e t i c and. passive . Thus he is h o p e f u l l y a r me d w i t h t h e o r y to grapple w i t h ea ch n o v e l p r o b l e m of action, and is h o p e f u l l y h a b i t u a t e d to act and to refrain f r o m a c t i n g in a c c o r d a n c e w i t h thought. Similarly, im portant" 95 per cent or " important" to two other objectives, w or k wi th la y-citizens gram, and ag r ee m e n t as to "very is in ev i de n ce w i t h r e spect (a) to pr ov i de p ra c ti c al in an o n g o i n g e d u c a ti o na l p r o ­ (b) to put the ideal of into practice at the gradu a te "learning by doing" school level. However, only 55 per cent and 45 per cent r e s p e c t i v e l y rate these points objectives as "very important", and Dr. Th u rs t on out that, The "ideal of 'learning by d o i n g ’" has b ecome a cliche and has a l r e a d y led too m an y wellm e a n i n g people astray. All l e a r n i n g comes by aoing. Reading, reflecting, conversing, judging, speculating, ap prehending, judging people and events, ch o o s i n g the best line of acti on am id b a ff l i n g c i rc u mstances, standing s teady against the r e s i s t a n c e s of u lt e r i o r forces, all these are ma t te r s of "doing". A l t h o u g h 85 per cent of the experts rate two other objectives as e i t he r "very import an t " or " i m p o r t a n t ”, it is i n t e re s ti n g to no t e that 55 per cent agree that the ob j ective of h e l p i n g the intern to d e v e l o p d e si r ab l e p r o f e s s i o n a l habits, and ideals is "very i m p o r t a n t " — while interests only 25 p e r cent 31 agree that it is "very i m p o r t a n t " to test w h e t h e r mo re t r ai n in g is needed, prior to the time when the intern begins f ul l - t i m e a d m i n i s t r a t i o n . Even less agreem ent to the two objectives of sition from prepar a ti o n and is in e v i d e n c e w i t h respect (a) m a k i n g a gradual t r a n ­ to f u l l - t i m e administration, (b) instill i ng in the intern an a c c e p t a b l e inter­ pretation of a code of p r o f e s s i o n a l ethics. T w en t y per cent as of the experts rate both o b je c ti v es "not very important", and only 20 per cent put the latter ob jective "very i mp o rt a n t " An expres si o n in the was made that the ethical a dministration, and that class. Imper a ti v e governs all if the in te rn aoes not have a w e l l - d e v e l o p e d et hical sense to begin with, he s h o u l d n ’t be a d mi t te d to an internship. Obviously such an expression of the is not t hi n ki n g of all experts this objective as characteristic smce "important". The request to state i nterns h ip programs br ought f r o m members SO per cent e v aluate other o bjectives the f o l l o w i n g replies of the jury: John H. Fischer: "To give o p p o r t u n i t y f or the intern to w o rk closely w i t h the p ec i a l l y in of group projects for the school p r o g r a m . ” ' t e ac h in g staff, the improvement es­ of 32 Truman Li, Pierce: way for p r of e ss o rs continue "To provide one r e a l i s t i c of e d u c a t i o n a l a d m i n i s t r a t i o n to their own p r o f e s s i o n a l g r o w t h and d e v e l o p ­ ment .,f E. E d m u n d Reutter, systems (a) "To h e l p s chool and p r a c t i c i n g a d m i n i s t r a t o r s w it h new ideas versa. Jr.: ke e p in touch e m an a ti n g f ro m the co llege a nd vice The intern can serve as a sort of li aison betw een the college and the school system, and b o th the college and the system should p r ofit." (b)uThe i n t e r n s h i p pr o g r a m must no t be an apprent i ce s hi p . experience, It s hould not be a trial an d error but r ather p r o f e s s i o n a l p ra c t i c e of sound theory." C la rence E. Newell: "To h e l p the Intern det e r m i n e f r o m p r a c t i c a l e xperience w h e t h e r he r e a l l y wants to be an administrator; pos ition for w h i c h an intern appraise interns, to a i s c o v e r the k i n d of is best suited; to and to stop persons who h a v e no p ot e nt i al a b i l i t y for a d m i n i st r at i on b e f o r e th e y a c t u a l ­ ly get into an a d m i n i s t r a t i v e Clyde Li. Campbell: of sc hools and communities the school are f u r t h e r i n g In other words, position." "To make a cr i ti c al study to see if the p ra c t i c e s the needs we have two goals of of the community. in E d uc a t i o n : goals 33 f u r t h e r i n g the needs the needs of individuals situations cepts. of so ciety and goals f u r t h e r i n g the within the society. intern s h ou l d reject more It is n a tu r al and even more i mp o r t a n t he s h o u l d r e c o g n i z e that his abilities w o u l d not be the same as is working. In the p reparation capaci ties and procedures B. that and in c l i n a t i o n s the a d m i n i s t r a t o r u n d e r w h o m should be to show the intern how unique than h e a c ­ that he s h ould be in d i s a g r e e m e n t w i t h the admini strator, he In most program, the to d e v e l o p his task own r ather than to imit ate t e c h n i q u e s of someone else." C r it e r i a R e p l y i n g to the question, "How a c c e p t a b l e do y o u find the f o l l o w i n g criteria for e v a l u a t i n g i n t e r n ­ ship p r o g r a m s ? " the twenty experts a n s w e r e d as indicated in the f o l l o w i n g tables. Table I n t e r n s h i p should not The 2 consist of "made w o r k " I n te r ns h ip should consist sig n if i ca n t l a r g e l y of a d m i n i s t r a t i v e w or k n e c e s s a r y to the w e l l ­ b e i n g of an on-go in g ed u ca t io n al p r o g r a m — not "made" work. so-called 34 Re sponses fully accept able 19 a cceptable w i t h r e s e r v a t i o n s 1 not accep t ab l e R esponses ve ry important 14 important not very 3 important (no response) W i t h 95 per cent ag r ee m e n t is f u l l 5’ acceptable clude that as stated, (3) that this it seems safe to c on ­ it should be placed h i g h on any criteria for the ev a lu a ti o n of programs w o r k situations are not It is evident of item rate that identified with f u n c t i o n i n g of internship p r og r a m s . list of internship. Seventy per cent of the r e sp o n s e s to this it as "very im portant." c r it e ri o n artificial the proper ' Table 5 I n t e r n s h i p involves as s um p t i o n of admin is trative r e s p o n s i b i l i t y The as sumption i n te r ns h ip should involve of real and continuous r es p on s i b i l i t y for the w o r k he administrative does legally and/or mor ally po s sible, the i n t e r n ’s and, in so far as for the res ults of 55-36 his work. Responses f u 11 y a c c e p t.a b 1 e 14 acceptable w i t h r e s e r v a t i o n s 5 not acceptable (no response) (1) R e s r ons e s very important 15 impor tant 3 i:o t v o r y I.mp ore a 1 1 1 (no response) '..here a 3 70 acceptable, £5 cor cent John PI. H i s c h e r traced says, seqnen tially, s responsibility points cent him; out that the period was a;ree this criterion fully to it v.ith r e s e r vations • "Provided the tasks to avoid the of feet too soon." "this would at least E vidences (2J a s s i g n e d are of too heavy Raleigh Vi. Holms tedt Involve d i f f i c u l t y unless a year in length." are apparent tions to the amount and degree that there are limita­ of admin i s t r a t i v e r e s p o n s i b i l i t y an intern may assume, the nature of his assignment. d e p e n d i n s upon Iikev;ise, that his r e s p o n s i b i l i t y for the results it is clear of his work 37 must be in some m ea s u r e time he serves of c h anges services, influe nc e d by t h e in a given situati o n. made in record systems, or as a result l e n g t h of T h e t o t a l effect b ud g e t s , of c om m unity su r v e y s to improved e d u c a t i o n a l p r o g r a m s and b e tt e r plant f a cilities, after the may not be felt f o r one intern h a s immediate r e a c ti o ns p a r t i c u la r ly coor dinating, the everyday consensus practice left the situation. and r esults in re g a r d and years However, more in ev i de n c e - program. po r t i o n s The of ge n e r a l in the same m anner that can assume so can school or more are u s u a l l y a d m i n i s t e r i n g certain seems to be that p on s ib i li t ie s , le a di n g to s h o r t -r a ng e planning, school-community teachers guidance very real t e a c h i n g r e s ­ interns assume v e ry real r e s p o n s i b i l i t y for s el ected a d m i n i s t r a t i v e a s s i g n m en t s. Table 4 I nt e rn s hi p as s t a t u s - l e a d e r s h i p in group p r o c e s s e s The in t er n sh i p should p r o v i d e n u m e r o u s tunities for the intern to serve In d em o cr a t i c g r o u p p r oc e s s e s students, p ar ents, and other oppor­ as a s t a t u s - l e a d e r i nv o lv i ng te a ch e r s , lay-cit izens. 38 1 fully Responses accepta b le 11 accept a bl e w i t h r e s e r v at i on s 9 not accept a bl e Responses very important 8 important not v e r y 11 important (no response) This c ri t erion appears F o r t y - f i v e per cent (1) to be controversial. of th e r es p on s es ind icate acceptance w i t h reser v at i on s . Comments that group p r o c e s s e s i n vo l ve m en t in democratic u ni f o r m l y desir able, but e xe r ci s ed that c a ution in the i n t e r n ’s a ssumption i nd i ca t e is should be of status- leadership roles. E. E d m u n d Reutter, Jr., r e p o r t s be taken not to give the intern mor ale that must be c o n s i d e r e d . ’1 too m u ch status . de pe nd on w h e t h e r St a ff intern to serve as a s t a t u s - l e a d e r , but otherwise the Truman "Care must W a l t e r A. A n d e r s o n says it is not necessary for the important . that c ri t er i on P ierce c om m en t s or not the intern that is able is very it ’’should to qu a li f y as a s t a t u s - l e a d e r - - i . e ., can he d i s c h a r g e this 59 rescons 1 cility v.it ho ut c a n j e r to iris ov;n security?" .John H. r i s c h e r calls a tier: tier rrrfer.ee r.ust be e x e r c i s e d II 4U% reasons: | .xell sistes i that, that ivinc e r o j r e s s i v e l y aae intern*- -Koala o'. - T r ir. to che fact +- ■ "perrsps he can net be a s t a t u s ­ es :.:pletely. ” fite v,riter r.ctes administrative uuties tis ' ' “ ' to d i s a s s o c i a t e and restonsi oilities f r o m the s ts t u s - _ £ so ersn-o role, C teruency ah m ter or-etas i on o: v.o.ire txe intern aces c. iese asst .asus-ieauersnir v.xen r.e ouic.es :xs _s _n or TO o « ** I "\ rs oi ■- o - _ a c s ;o be .us-ie aaersnir or:: e^ess, ethers :o-er.t v.oic os tr.e re i or m e As such is n e c e s s a r i l y limited. s o at us - a e a u e r s n p oe an integral pa:.i■t oi cess 'ob situation, .n acministr&tor. some exer . to in the for o r o f e s s i :r.a 1 tite a e v e i o o ■ xxeter.ce. fable 5 .s '.restive c e r r s.-io s.. .Or creasiv* m** 4- a. r t ohou-cht Action orovite ana action on the 40 R esponses 17 fully a c c e p t a b l e 3 acceptable w i t h r e s e r v a t i o n s not a cceptable Kes ponses 16 very important important not very 4 important respo n s e s agreement that 60 per cent to ti.la criterion are 65 pe r cent it is fully accept a b l e in agreemen t "very i m p o r t a n t 11. "this is far sore of r e s t r i c t i n g hritz that C. nor eson comments important than the typical practice intern activities fto a Id F. that on the part c r eative action notes his official clearance. o p p o r t u n i t y for creative On the whole, The this consensus Camp b e l l points etical k n o w l e d g e out of the intern p r e ­ R a l e i g h V*• Holms teat limit expression. criterion receives of opinion insofar as the intern makes that to routine and that the p o s i t i o n of the intern might rating. and it should be classed as ma n a g e r i al out ies . " supposes as stated, in seems p r o f itable a high to be that use of t h e o r ­ to solve a p r a c t i c a l administrative 41 problem, he ivcness. host a d m i n i s t r a t i v e conditions creative ia e x h i b i t i n g resourcel'ulneaa a s si g nm e nt s for some de g re e of r e f l e c t i v e action, exactly alike and creats a t i s f y the tho ught and since no two p r o b l e m s i tu a ti o ns are in all details. Table 6 C or r el a te d R e a d i n g and St udy in In bernshlp P ra c t i c e The i n t e r n s h i p s hould include a su b s t a n t i a l amount of g u id e d re a di n g and study d e s i g n e d to c o r ­ relate the f u n d e d knov.;ledge of the p r of e s s i o n to the pra c tical s it u ation at hand. Res oonses ful l y accept a bl e 14 acceptable w i t h r es e rv a ti o ns 6 not accep table Res ponses very important 10 important 9 not very important 1 S e v e n t y per cent this of the r es p onses f av o r e d criterion as be i ng f u l l y acceptable. trast w i t h the m a j o r i t y opinion, c om m en t ed that the student read ing before his In c o n ­ Paul J. Iviisner should ha v e done the internship. P r o b a b l y all of the 42 experts w ould a ree that the stuaent sh o u l d h a v e an adequate b a c k g r o u n d of reading and t h e o r e t i c a l k n o w ­ ledge before b e g i nning his C. Borgeson points out, internship, additional "will or should h e l p to fill ing and e xperience." b u t as Fritz gu i d e d r e a d i n g in the gaps in his John II. F i s c h e r notes f u n c t i o n here should be "to d e v e l o p the train­ that the i n t e r n fs a b i l i t y to use the literature for h e l p on p r a c t i c a l I>roblems." C e r t ainly an i n t e r n s h i p p r o g r a m w h i c h ignored this criterion might a3 f a i l i n g to capitalize material. host educators p r a c t i c i n g administrators tion for their jobs oe open to criticism upon v a l u a b l e resource agree that even those who have excellent prepara­ are obliged to continue their re ading and study of p r o f e ssional m a t e r i a l s w h i c h relate to their job situations. al to a ssume that It w o u l d seem l o g i c ­ (a) an intern can and should make p r o f i t a b l e use of pertinent m a t e r i a l s job a s s i g nment and relating (b) that college au t h o r i t i e s and s h o u l d fur n i s h h i m w i t h some g u i d a n c e to his can in this effort. Such appears to be the opinion of the 14 experts who find this criterion f u l l y acceptable. 43 Table 7 Via 1 tatIon at the "Scene of A c t i o n " by the C o 11 e ye - Actvi a er The internship should involve periodic tion at the "scene ol’ action" by the c o l l e g e - a d v i s e r (f i e l d - s p o n s o r ) for purposes a s s i sting the of the local visita­ intern, of conferring with and and e v a l u a t i n g his w o r k in terms job situation. Responses 14 fully acceptable accep t a ble with reservations 4 not a c c eptable 1 (no response) (1) Respo n s e s very important 13 important not very 6 important Opinions 1 about the a c c e p t a b i l i t y of this criterion are d e f i n i t e l y divided, ping and m e r g i n g of viewpoints. per cent of the responses w i t h some o v e r l a p ­ On the one hand, favor the b e i n g f u l l y acceptable. frits G. this point as follows: "I believe improves the a d m i n istrative criterion as Borgeson speaks on this d e f i n i t e l y experience, in m a k i n g the p r o f essor alert 70 and also aids to f i e l d problems and 44 si tuations." should also K e n n e t h R en a me include sunseats the local that co nferences supervising-adminisbrator• Some s i g n i f i c a n c e m a y be at t ac h e d to the f o l l o w ­ ing statements point. r e p r e s e n t i n g a somewhat a i ff e re n t 0. H. A u r a n d says, " Pr im a r i l y the local a d m i n ­ istrator s hould be r e sp o ns i bl e . r ep r es e nt a ti v e should be to the intern." view­ The college cautious about oirect E. E d m u n d Reutter, Jr., advice r e f e r r i n g to the in t er n sh i p p r o g r a m in Teachers College, University, "be are d o u b t i n g makes the real value hypothesis, questionable this sta tement: of this b e y o n d a m i n i m u m point. readily acceptable at first, so far as we are concerned. an a d m i n is t ra t iv e This is now O bs e rv i ng i n t e r n ’s cork is a i ff e re n t fr om o bserving a p r ac t ic e teacher. m eaningless Columbia ’g u i d e d t o u r s ’. ’V i s i t s ’ may become On the other hand, some visits w ould be n e c e s s a r y . " R e p r e s e n t i n g the m i n o r i t y opinion in this case is Paul J. Li s ne r who rejects this that sh ould be left w it h the "the full r e s p o n s i b i l i t y criterion and notes local s u p e r i n t e n d e n t . " Clyde It. C a mp b e l l raises •whether the advisers with a class should not be in the c om m unity of interns where at the same time the the q ue stion as to they study the community interns are given experience in 45 ,icho o 1 a dm in 1 a t r a 11 o n . T able JoInt The planning, (b) nis 8 PIanr in _ , Ac b i o n , and E v a l u a t i o n in tern ship shoulo. make pr o vi s io n Tor joint action, and evaluation, co llege-adviser, ac m i n i s t r a t or in and (c) by (a) the intern, the su o e r v i s i n g - the c o o p e r a t i n g achoo 1 - conimunity. Res oonses fully acceptable 17 a cceptable wi th re s er v at io n s 2 not acceptable (no response) (1) Respon ses very important 17 important 5 not very important E i g h t y - fi v e per cent of the responses find this criterion f u l l y acceptable, rate it as "very Important". and 85 per cent also Q u al i f y i n g comments made by two of the experts. 0. H. A u r a n d states "the college r e p r e s e n t a t i v e should a v oi d p r essing h i m s e l f into the p i c t u r e - - t h e his own feet". are that intern should stand on Paul J. h i s n e r says, "If the college 46 needs this for evaluation. I w o u l d not want the In­ tern w o r r i e d about a g r a d e " • By ana large, agreement (a) the that there appears to .be g e n e r a l since the in t er n s h i p p r o g r a m involves intern, (b) his c o l l e g e - a a v i s e r , and local s u p e r v i s i ng - ad m in i st r a t o r, provi si o n for joint planning, by the three parties. there s h o u l d be action, Otherwise may not be p ro p e r l y protected, (c) the and e v a l u a t i o n the in terests of each and the co n di t io n s m a x i m u m benefit fr om the intern s hi p e x p e r i e n c e for left unfulfilled# Table 9 I n t e r n ship S hould The Be Tear the bnd of F o r m a l T r a i n i n g i n te r n s h i p should be served at co mpletion of the of p r o f e s s i o n a l graduate or ne a r the s t u d e n t ’s f ormal p r o g r a m preparation. Res conses f u ll y accept a bl e a c c e p t a b l e with reservations 11 9 not accept ab l e Res ponses very important important not very important 4 12 4 47 The co nsensus of opinion c o n c e r n i n g the a c c e p t a b i l i t y of this criterion able, of the re s ponses out 45 per cent ri servatI m a to It. is 0 e n e r a l l y f a v o r ­ in dicate and 20 per cent at t ac h little For example, Fritz im p or t an c e C. Borge so n says that i n t e r n s h i p should come "normally at or ne a r c o m p l e t i o n yet might well some cir cumstances i n t e r n s h i p in a u m i n i s t r a t i o n • sharpen the choices her.neth Hehage Thurston notes in r e f e r e nc e C am p b e l l notes that that some th inking in terms "it of the and others to the cocto ra t e degree. that It may be d e s i r a b l e to h av e a says, "Internship might For others It might Y.alter come in ad va nce of h o l d i n g an a d m i n is t ra t iv e post for some level. are Raold F. b e g i n n i n g and an ad v an c ed level of internship. A. A n d e r s o n it of the m a s t e r ’s d egree as the end of formal training, ma de training", of opinion here may he a c c o u n t e d for in some me asure by the fact re flect sh o u l d 3 ome other tilings." Tiie diverge n ce re sponses experience "I could argue for h a v i n g Lee L. w o u l d de p e n d upon This of later p r o f e s s i o n a l states, occur e a r l i e r . " justify e a r l i e r on the L.A. come nea r the end of the d o c t o r a t e w o r k after h o l u i n g m i n o r ad m in i st r at i ve p os ts." ma ke O b v i o u s l y ci rcums tances it d e si r a b l e might be such as to for an incividual to ha ve Internship 48 ex periences ear ly in his grad uate Clyde is.. C a mp b el l points more fr o m his ences t r a i n i n g program. out that a atuaent m i gh t course work if he h a d i n t e r n s h i p e x p e r i ­ at the b e g i n n i n g or in the m i d d l e for the most get part, however, there of his is a g r e em e nt program, that int e rn s h i p should occur ne a r the end of the f or m al p re p ar a ti o n program, when the student b etter e q uipped to profit f r o m his make a more w o r t h w h i l e c on t r i b u t i o n c om m unity in which he serves his is apt to be training, and to to the school- internship* Table 10 Period of Time I nv o lv e d in In t e r n s h i p The i n t e r n s h i p should olock of time, at least Involve a c o n s i d e ra b le ( r e s p on s es ) /! /-1— 3..?i)ies-t.e£/.9./ A ~ ~ y e a r / 9/ / 2 y e a r s / Q / basis, qu a rt e r/ 2 / on a fu l l- t im e or the eq uivalent. Responses f u l l y ac c ep t a b l e 15 a ccepta b le w i th re s er v at i on s 4 not a cc e pt a bl e 1 49 R es p o n s e s 12 very important important 7 not very important (no response) (1) The ex perts d i sa g re e as to the m i n i m u m l ength of time de s ir a bl e lor the i n t e r n s h i p experience, find this in terms criterion g e n e r a l l y a c c e p t a b l e and i m po rtant of th e ir own opinion as to the p e r i o d of time w h i c h should be required. that but "it de pends of the intern". Truman k. somewhat upon Roald F. Pierce states the pr evious Ca m pbell p r efers e x pe r ie n ce one q u ar t er at the b e g i n n i n g level and one y ea r at the ad v a n c e d level. time Fritz C. Borgeson (or equivalent) recommends comments suggests as an absolute minimum, one y e a r as the optimum. as follows; one s e m e s t e r full and h a l t e r A. A n d e r s o n "I don't t h i n k the i n t e r n s h i p s hould be full-time. It is b et t er for on-campus work." A n o t h e r r e s p o n d e n t b e lieves that the bo ha v e p ar t -time I nt e rn s h i p should be full-time, intern should get a nd that the completely away f r o m the college atmosp h er e and influence. It is evident that the jury of ex perts is 3 harply d i v i d e d in re spect to this Issue, and that 50 internships are p r e s e n t l y c o n d u c t e d on time bases varying f r o m p a rt - ti m e for one q ua r t e r to full- t im e for a year. A more u ni f o r m s t a n d a r d in this respect w ould a pp e ar to be desir able. Table 11 f l e x i b i l i t y in Time A l l o t m e n t The i n t e rn s hi p s hould make p ro v i s i o n for f l e x i ­ bility in time al l o tm e nt to b e t t e r meet interests of the h i m s e l f and his individual intern--as the needs an d d e t e r m i n e d by aaviser(s). R esponses f u l l y accept a ol e a ccepta b le 14 with re s er v at i on s 5 not accept a bl e (no response) (1) Resjjonses ver y Important 7 Important 10 not very Im portant 1 (no response) (2) S ev e nt y per cent of the jury is in agreement that this criterion is f u l l y acceptable. at least, it seems to be sound. M. T hu r st o n points out, Theore tically, In practice as Lee "c ircumstances are b ou n d to 51 govern." The n e c e s s i t i e s as well as of the local s ch o ol - co m mu n it y , considered. This c on s ideration is contract. institution, must be is p a r t i c u l a r l y true w h er e a f i n a n c i a l involved, is under o b l i g a t i o n to adjust oi' the t r a i n i n g in w h i c h case the intern to f ulfil the time terms of his In any case u s ua ll y it s hould be p o ss i bl e the stay in the i n t e r n ’s a s si g n m e n t job s i tu a ti o n results experiences, so that his in en r i c h e d l ea r n i n g r a th e r than r e p e t i t i o n wh ich nave been "learned'1. the time must be of experiences 0. K. A u r a n d comments of a r e a s o n a b l e length. Arnold emphas i ze s the point that p ra c ti c al l y f u l l - t i m e w o r k - - t h a t priority ana not be enforced that Vvilliam E. i n t e r n s h i p should be it "should have simply a "spar e-time proposition". Table 12 F l e x i b i l i t y in Type of A s s i g n m e n t The i n t e r n s h i p should make pr o vi s io n for f l e x i ­ bility in type of assign m en t and interests to be t t e r meet of the inaiv i du a l by h i m s e l f and his intern--as d e t e r m i n e d adviser(s). fully a c ce p ta b le accept a bl e w i t h r e s e rv a ti o ns not acceptable the needs Responses 19 1 52 Responses 11 very Important 9 important not very im portant N i n e t y - r i v e per cent of the re sponses this criterion as b e i n g fully acceptable, ceives a 100 per cent favor and it r e ­ enaorseinent as b e i n g e it h er " i m p o r t a n t ” or "very important". made fu r t h e r comment, except None Clyu.e k. of the experts C a m p b e l l who r ai s ed a pe rtinent question as to w h e t h e r there m i gh t be some assign me n ts E v i d e n tl y this on w hi c h all interns criterion s hould work. should rate h i g h on any list of criter ia for the e v al ua t io n of pro grams of i n t e r n ­ ship. Table 15 Co nauct of In t er n s h i p Programs to Ivleet A c c r e d i t i n g Standards The in t e r n s h i p p r o g r a m s hould be c o n d u c t e d at a r e s p e c t a b l e gra duate r e c o g n i z e d standards q ualifi c at i on s load, level of p r o f i c i e n c y of a c c r e d i t i n g agencies of instructors, m a t e r i a l resources, evaluation, credits, supervision, (i.e. meet as to teaching p r o f e s s i o n a l ethics, etc.). 53 R es p o n s e s 15 f u l l y ac c ep t ab l e 3 a c c e p t a b l e wi th reserv at i on s not accept a bl e (no response) (2) Re s po n s e s 12 very important 4 important not very r- important (no response) This (2) criterion is less tie fin 1 te than some of ;he p r e c e d i n g criteria, and icceptable to the members ■a - v > "Cf course if that seans i na p pr o pr i at e of a jury, it is g e n e r al l y t heir comments it might be b e t t e r stated* Anders on says, but not although it should be conformity 'baiter A. 'respectable', to ou t m o d e d and standards. " Truman fierce says, "i .. uld not wane to sacri fice purpose or m e t h o & in order tc ac hieve 'respectable' pracuate 1 vel of p r o f i c i e n c y as it v.ould be uefined by some prac.net e sc h oo l s. " n i s c h e r points system(s) a out that, "The n a t u r e of the school selected ana the p r o f e s s i o n a l tne ac.jinistrs.tor with w h o m the intern such importance as to 'make or break' John K. stature serves cf are of th e orocram. fable 14 T nt e rn s hi o ohoulu Kot j e o p a r d i z e the Status of the R e gu l a r Staff fhe an Interr.ship pro rain s houlc not intern for a re gular the teacher hopar^ice •iinistrator in 01 cooper a ti n g s c ho o l- c om m un i ty subst itute (i.e. should not the cor.tinned employment and privil eg e s of the complete, regular staff)* ac c 14 on5 not acceptable ( r o response) r esponses very ir.ip.crtant 14 important not very Inroortant (no response) (2 ) The m a j o r i t y opinion favors acceptance of this of the jury criterion. (70 per cent) However, fro m ir.aivic.uals indicate that the statement v.'hat c o nt r ov e rs i al example, ana perhaps is some- poorly framed. Lee Li. Thur ston wond ers if acceptance criterion means comments For of the that the intern shou ld be a super- 55 r.unerary? Appropriately tion as to w h e t h e r the enough* he raises "coraglete, something d e f i n a b l e anc fixed? re g u l a r The the q u e s ­ s t a f f ” is Im p l i c a t i o n is that the Intern mi ght we ll be cor.siaered a part of uiar staff. John H. F i s c h e r comments the e s ta b l is h me n t and operation program must reflect those of the princi ples internship and practices intern would competent m e m b e r of tine profession. S. Ar-r.olc notes that r,the school vising s u p e r i nt e nd e nt that pers onnel ooserve in every r e spect which the any should that as s c r u p u l o u s l y as system and the s u p e r ­ must be se l ec t ed w i t h c a r e ” so problems o c c a s i o n e d by the presence will not arise wi t hi n the local J. merges on points tives must be Clyde F. i n t e r n ’s staff. Fritz that the u n i v e r s i t y r e p r e s e n t a ­ "on g u a r d ” to avoid such jeopardy. Campbell substitute out V.illiam suggests teachers that and perhaps interns might act as teach part time. Other C ri t e r i a In response members of the to a request for additi o na l jury su g ge s t e d the followi ng: barter A. Ar.aerson: reg u larly an Intern advi s e r s .” criteria, ”The s e mi n ar w it h intern should attend other interns and 56 Paul J. kisner: "3e certain that the intern rets a w e l l - r o u n d e d experience. a dm i n i s t r a t o r is important, fairly free of college iui aance out the intern s hould be control where p o s s i b l e . ” Claren ce E. hewell: "Unless p re p a r i n g for some t ec h ni c al an intern is spec ialty w ithin ge neral field of school a d m i n i s t r a t i o n even then) re lations the cf school a dm i ni s tr a ti o n. should be placed same time assure (or at the h u m a n Consider' upon p l an n i n g and evaluat i ng the i n t e r n ’s e x p e r i e n c e s . sho uld pr ovide for pu r po s e f u l the (and pe rh aps intern s hi p shoul d e mp h as i ze aspect a'ole emphasis of the Such p l a n n i n g experience, least not and at the interfere v;ith) the neces s ar y fl e x i b i l i t y . " 0. A s su m pt i on s In answer to the question, y ou agree "To what that the f o l l o w i n g assump t io n s underlie programs extent do should of in t ernship?" the tw e nt y experts r ep l ie d as follows; Assumption I I nt e rn s h i p should reduce the d u a l i s m be tween t heory and practice k no w le d ge vs. (in the sense of p r o f e s s i o n a l a b ility to administer). 57 R es p on s es 19 agree 1 agree w i t h re s er v at i on s disagree Ninety-rive w it h this per cent assumption. that in t er n s h i p notes that agree W i l l i a m E. A r n o l d points out "must be c a re f ul l y p l an n ed and i n t e r ­ p reted if this r e s u l t s . " "the pr a ct i c a l of the r es p onses is most Paul J. 1.isner comments important." that Lee N. T h ur s to n "the iaea of a d u a l i s m betv/een good t he o ry and good pr a ct i c e is obsole t e. " focuses upon the d e s i r a b i l i t y of a t te ntion this pu r po s e also many other wa y s. " throughout John H. F i sc h er "seeking the gr a duate p r o g r a m in Clyde 1.. Campbell supports this v iewpoint by ob s er v i n g that present day p r e p a r a t i o n programs for school ad m in i st r at o rs too academic are prone to be in nature. Assumption II I n t e r n s h i p s hould h a v e as its the p r o f e s s i o n a l pr e p a r a t i o n economical ed u c a t i o n a l s chool-com munity. central purpose of the i n t e r n — not service to the coopera t in g 58 Respo ns e s 18 agree 2 agree w i t h r e s e r va t io n s disagr ee ............ . The 90 per cent ag r ee m en t points to the d e s i r a b i l i t y a pp roved listings programs on this as s um p t i o n of r e t a i n i n g it in any of a s s u m p t io n s w h i c h should of internship. However, u n de r l i e the comments of the experts call a t te n ti o n to the fact that the "central" purpose is not n e c e s s a r i l y the only purpose or o u t ­ come, and that e c on o mi c al service may be a w or t hw h i l e b y - p r o d u c t W i t h r ef e rence to this Thurston each." says, of internship. assumption, Lee K. "I fancy you are e n titled to some John H. J i s c h e r states that the obligation of school systems mini strators to the local school to share of "It recognizes and p r a c t i c i n g a d ­ in p r o g r e ss i ve traini n g. " w il l ia m E. A r no l d f ul l y agrees wi t h the assumption, but w o ul d not m in i mi z e the fact m ay also benefit. 0. H. A u r a n d notes purpose m a y be a c hi e v e d Reutter, Jr. that incidentally". places great tion but recognizes that the local scho ol E. E dm u nd Importance upon this a s s u m p ­ that f i n a n c ia l co nsiderations m ay be a m o d i f y i n g f a c t o r in some instances. liisner believes "the second Paul J. that If the intern can get his 59 p r o f e s s i o n a l train i ng and still h e l p the local school, "o .k." Assumption III I n t e r n s h i p should promote r a p i d and d e s i r a b l e gr o w t h of the intern t o ward co mp etent a e m o c r a t i c l ea d er ship in his p r o f e s s i o n a l r e l a t i o n s h i p s w i t h school employees and students. Res oonses 19 agree agree w i t h re se rvations 1 dis agree Ninety-five with this per cent of the r e s p on s es assumption. w or r ie d aoout the experts felt 0. K. Au r an d is ’rapid' feature". that fu rther comments agree "not too m u c h Obviously, the upon this a s s u m p ­ tion and the companion one which fo llows wer e unnecessary. Assumption IV I nt e rn s hi p should promote r a p i d and d e s i r a b l e g r o w t h of the intern t o wa r d competent d e m o c r a t i c l e a d e r s h i p in his p r o f e ss i on a l r e l a t i o n s h i p s citizens and or g an i ze d co mmunity groups. w i th lay- 60 Responses 19 agree 1 agree w i t h r e se r va t io n s d is a g r e e The 95 per cent agreement is i de n tical ass u mp t i o n upon this assumption to the re sponse t ab u l a t e d for the p r e c e e d i n g (No. III). Assumption V Int e rn s h i p should promote rapid and d e s i r a b l e g r o w t h of the intern toward social and e mo t io n al maturity. Responses agree 15 agree w i th re servations 4 dis agree 1 This assumption seems to be the most contro­ v e r s i a l one to w h i c h the experts were a s k e d to respond. W h i l e 75 per cent agree in general, m i n o r i t y o pinion to the effect that there is a strong the student d e f i n i t e l y should not be consid e re d for an i n t e r n s h i p a ss i gn m en t unless he is alre ady quite mature b o t h s o c i a l l y and emotionally. John PI. P is c h e r says, "This assumption is less 61 v a li d h e re persons than others beca use of s a ti s f a c t o r y m a t u r i t y to the internship. ment as I see it only of maturity, While sh o ul d be a d m i t t e d it c o nt r ib u te s care must be e x e r c i s e d that the inter ns h ip is not used to do w ha t and qualities p rior to the interns h ip p e r i o d . ” a c q u i r e d most of this comments already." that "he should h a ve - R o a l d E. this viewrjoint by n o t i n g that h av e this says, other e xp e ri e nc e s should have clone fo r the indiv id u al Virgil Ivi. Rogers supports to begin with". "If he to d e v e l o p ­ Ca m pbell "he sh o ul d E. E d m u n d Reutter, Jr. i s n ’t s o ci a ll y and e m o t i o n a l l y ma t u r e he s h o u l d n ’t be ma j oring in e d u c a t i o n a l administra­ tion at all." Assumption Internship, intern, to be of m a x i m u m value requires his r e ad i ne s s and p ro f e s s i o n a l education to internship, al education, VI to the in the areas of general (i.e* h e mu st possess, p r io r some b r e a d t h of ge n er a l and p r o f e s s i o n ­ and some knoviledge of the theory and p ra c ti c e of ad ministration). Responses agree agree w i t h reservations disagree 20 62 Here is an a s s u m p t i o n w h i c h receives per cent en dorsement of the R e u t t e r seems to e g r e s s the 100 jury of experts. the feelings the jury in his brief comment, Assumption E. E d m u n d of m embers of ’’the m or e the b e t t e r J" VII Interns h ip should s u b s t a n t i a l l y Improve the quality of the total p r e p a r a t o r y p r o g r a m by p r o v i d i n g i n d i v i d u a l i z e d instruction and me t ho a to meet of the ana f l e x i b i l i t y in content the pe c ul i a r interests and needs individual trainee. Re sponses agree 17 agree with reservations 2 disagree Alt h ou g h 85 per cent of the responses w i t h this assumption, of the jury of experts comments suggest f r om individ u al members that as a statement is too b ro a d to ha ve m u c h meaining. says, "This program, ass umption is part It E. E d m u n d Re utter of the w h o l e graduate and only I n ci d en t al to the internship." Vvilllam E. A r n o l d agrees w i t h the assumption, this does not agree open the aoor to all kinds and result in a ’patch w o r k ’ i nt e rn s hi p ." "provided of exceptions 63 A s s u m p t i o n VIII Interns h ip should provide o pp o r t u n i t y for the intern to carry real a dm i n i s t r a t i v e r e s p o n s i b i l i t y ■which is very b e ne f ic i al to h i m in hi3 preparatory program. Res po n se s agree 18 agree with r es ervations 2 disagree Eigh ty poor cent agreement w it h this of the responses assumption, indicate and 20 _er cent i n ­ dica te agre ement with certain r e s e r v a t i o n s — such as the one voiced by R a l e i g h 7;. H o l m s t e d t who ''There may be some u i f f i c u l t y in this, h ow one defines comments, d e p e n d i n g upon ’r e a l 1 r e s p o n s i b i l i t y •” Other Assum p ti o ns In reply to a request for statement of other assumptions, members of the jury of experts ma ke the following, suggestions — some of which are in the fo rm of questions of ideas for consideration, 1. or advancement I n t e r n s h i p should provide wise use of g r aduate o pp o r t u n i t y for institution p er s onnel f r o m fields rel a t e d to e d uc a ti o na l administration. 64 2. juc.nr.ent. An intern should ha ve a c hi e v e d m ature M a t u r i t y as a fact or in his success cannot be overlooked. 3. The p r o p r a m that intern ship plan can bo used. is the best e xp e ri e nc e It Is superior to (a) o b se r vi n g a n u m b e r of succe ssful administrators, m a k i n g s o ci o l o g i c a l studies ana of schools (c j a b b r e v i a t e d fi e la experiences (b) and communities, in two or more communities• 4o Does si at us-euo? in te rn sitIg t en o. to re in force the S h o u l d creative wo rkers learn fro m i.witnt ing? 'will the intern be learning to do b e t t e r things s h o u l d n ’t be c.one at all or at best be that lear ning to uo things 5. successful that are of lesser import a nc e ? 'The interns h ip p r og r am should prove in education because it has proved s u c c e s s ­ ful in medicine. 6. b ec a us e The internship p rogram Is desirable It is p o pular with students, faculty members, and school superinte ndents, b, future Programs w ■ — I . . . . . . . The final section q u e s t i on n ai r e of the s u rv e y- a pp r ai s al su b mi t t ed to the twenty members jury of experts, concerns of the their conside r ed opinions 65 and j uiggrnts as to wliat s hould be the Internship p ro g r a m of the future. are r e p r e s e n ­ These comments tative of some of the more advanced, in the field of education them as a partial basis dations t hi nking The w r i t e r values for c o nc l us i on s and r e c o m m e n ­ stated in C hapter VI. John Ii. f 1 a c h e r : the time when trators, "we s hould look f o r w a r d to Internships will be an e s t a b l i s h e d part of the p r o f e s s io n al training of all sch ool a d m i n i s ­ and provided an acceptable basis. this today. mature In all grad uate institutions The use of a sch ool on s ystem for purpose 'will be a mark of excellence, and the c ooperating a d m i n i s t r a t o r will be a c c e p t e d as an associate of the r a d u a t e faculty. D e v i o u s l y he will n ee d to h av e h i g h quali fi c at i on s h i m s e l f . ” "The interns h ip should come at the c o n c l u d i n g part of graduate t r ai n in g level) (certainly at the po s t- m as t er s and should f ollow a va r i e t y of other field expe riences such as guided visits p ar t ic i pa t io n in field research, sibilities full-time in admini stration, Increasing respon­ and fi n a l l y full-scale, Internship wi t h p ri n ci p al or s u p e r i n t e n d e n t . " Clarence A. N e w e l l ; aeal about and observations, "We h av e He arned a great the ad m in i s t r a t i v e provisions for intern- 66 s h i p s , out have not learned enough yet in some cases h a ve not been c o n c e r n e d e n o u g h ) aoout int e rn s h i p experience itself. sinpie way to improve the emphasis noon some Internships 1 b e lieve r.t ur e we should nrobe b lv experiences Dest is to the rrov;th of an i n t e r n . ” s h ou l d place upon human r e l a t i o n s h i p s of the routines the i n t e r n s h i p experi e nc e learn b etter ho w to evaluate "future (and pe rhaps _reater and less emphasis of a d m i n i s t r a t i o n . In the include more brooeeninp; O such as p a r t i c i p a t i o n and school stuuy councils, but Internship should continue to be in f ie l d studies the hard core of an the r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s actually i n volved in the a n m i n i s t r a t i o n educat i on a l program in a specific of an on-.point; situation. I hope th e time 'will come when p r a c t i c a l l y every a d m i n i s t r a ­ tor will have h a d an I n t e r n s h i p . ” Julian E. in my judrment, fuuure. futt e r w o r t h : "The be a r e q u i r e m e n t However, substi tute for internship. or, that there are if necessary, for example, of s c h o ol - co m mu n it i es or for part-time in the n o t - t o o - d i s t a n t one should r ec o g n i z e otner influences that may p re c ed e oo servation in t er n s h i p will, directed, fo r short periods, over longer periods. Such experiences are not as pood as first-class Inter nships but may have to be used as substitutes in some instances for 67 ma ny years to come. Surveys ences are important means conception of the job. and. other f i e l d e x p e r i ­ of . iving men an e n la r g e d There will be m u c h e x p e r i m e n t ­ ing here with means we h a v e n ’t thought m uc h about. It would be well for the c o l l e g e - a d v i s e r to live in the community where judgment this I3 interns are working* but in mjr far in the futu re and not as important as other m a t t e r s . ” Truman L. fierce: "I th ink the intern s hi p of the future should be more cl o s e l y geared to the phases of the student's student guidance to the wisest general, campus p r o g r a m of preparation. and p er s on n el practices are es s ential use of i n t e r n s h i p experiences. the meaning; of the fetter In term i n te r n s h i p should be b ro a de n ed to include more experience in the life of the c o mm u n11 y . Lee L_. T h u r s t o n : future programs "The n ature and scope of will p r o b a b l y be quite varied. ship as a requirement Intern­ for all Is a long w ay off. tnis age we may perhaps see a b r o a d e n i n g program, In but administrators will continue to make their w a y by various paths. this As to the use of field surveys, is of value, of creative I feel that and that the intern s h o u l d be a point contact between the f a culty and staff of the local school and the f a culty of the g ra d ua t e school ." 68 Paul J. i.'ianer; requirement. basis, The "Internship should be a Intern should « 184 opinion, Is the gr o w i n g t e nd e nc y t o provide e xperiences in other types (a) service In the state department (b) service w i t h p ub l is h er s of positions suc h as of education, of p r o f e s s io n al materials, (c) w o r k w i t h s ch o ol ar c hitectural firms, survey and consul ta t or y act ivities, responsibility and (d) state (e) e xe c utive in p r o f e s s i o n a l organizations at the state and n a t i o n a l levels. New Y o r k U n i v e r s i t y has done pr om ote Intern s hi p internships a great deal to of the more u n u s u a l types. W a l t e r A. A nd e r s o n , Chairm a n, Departm e nt of A d m i n i s t r a t i o n and Sup ervision, New Y o r k U niversity, says : "There is great need t o prepare p ro m is i ng young p eo p le f or administrative posts in state and n a ti o na l ed u cation agencies and organizat ions. The chances are good that the young man or w o m a n w h o wo r ks closely w it h top-flight educational leaders In such agencies and organizations and w h o has competent gu idance and supervision f r o m a u n i v e r s i t y w i l l re ceive u nusual preparation. It is important that this type of intern ha ve a v a r i e t y of a d m i n i s t r a t i v e and supervisory experiences, Including those that take place In the central office, In connection w i t h re s e a r c h studies , and in field s e r v i c e s . 11 ^ A nd e rs o n, W a l t e r A., "internships in Sc h oo l A d m i n i s t r a t i o n , " The N a t i o n *s Schools , November, 1952, p. 53. 185 E. C. B o l m e i e r , Pr o fe s so r of Educat ion, Duke U n i v e r s i t y , 2 re ports an I nternship currently being served In the S p e c i a l Devices Center at Port W a s h i n g to n , Ne w Y o r k , b y is also a c a pt a in out that "this a d oc t or a l candidate who In the Army, Dr. Bolmeier points i n t e r n ’s experiences ment and u t i l i z a t i o n of in the d e v e l o p ­ learning aids should suggest desirable ad a pt a ti o ns to public education and admi nlstrat i o n •w Other po s si b i l i t i e s for future In t er n sh i p assignments include experiences wi th labor unions, city a dm i nistration, chambers at the in dustrial pe r so n ne l offices, of commerce, local, state, and various soci al agencies and n at i o n a l levels. is also re a s o n to b e l i e v e that u n iv e rs i ti e s w el l en d ea v or to h e l p and train teachers positions (by means There might local school systems select of inter nship programs) al ready e m pl o ye d promising in those s ch o ol systems for of administration. The g r o w i n g emphasis in pr ograms upon the value of direct experience h u m a n r el a ti o ns in the area of (as opposed to practice keeping, b u d g e t making, of int ernship in re co rd and r ou t i n e a d mi n istrative 2 Bolmeier, E. C., Ibid., p. 55. 186 detail) 23. Is i l lu s tr a te d by the d a t a p re s en t ed In Table A l t h o u g h opinion is somewhat d i vided as to w h i c h types of Internship experiences h av e p r o v e n to be most satisfa c to r y, success groups there Is more agree m en t of Internships of students devoted concer ni n g largely to w o r k i n g w i t h and w i t h groups of lay-citizens tha n Is the case w i t h respect to intern sh i ps d e vo t ed to f o l l o w i n g the ro ut ine of p r a c t i c i n g admini st r at o rs . In r es p on s e to the question, noticeably ’’Has greater demand on the part there b e e n a of h i r i n g a u t h o r it i es for graduates who ha ve h a d internship exp e ri e n c e than for those wh o have h a d no such e x p e r i e n c e ? ” r e pr e se n ta t iv e officials in four I n s t i t ut i on s answered y e s . Two re plies In d icated It was too soon to judge. A l l officials questioned w e r e unanim ous a n s w e r i n g no to the f o l l o w i n g question: b e l i e v e that a y o u n g person in ”D o you is apt to be more s u c c e s s f u l In e ducational a dm i n i s t r a t i o n if he goes str aight through his u nd ergraduate p ro g ra m , I n c l u d i n g Internship, to the d o c t o r ’s degree-- than and g ra duate if he Interru pts hi s f or m al t r a i n i n g at the b a c h e l o r ’s or m a s t e r ’s level to t e a c h for t w o or more years, then completes his doctorate pr ogram, internship?” In other words, the cons ensus omi tting of opinion 187 T A B L E 23 S A T I S F A C T O R Y A N D U N S A T I S F A C T O R Y TYPES OF I N T E R N S H I P E X P E R I E N C E S AS R E P O R T E D B Y SIX TRAINING- IN STITUTIONS W h a t types of inter nship experiences h a ve been found to be most s a t i s f a c t o r y , fairly satisfactory, or least satisfactory? Type of Experience Conducting c om m u n l t y surveys Working with b u d g e t or financial affairs Working with r ec ords and administrative forms S u p e r v i s i n g and Imp r o v i n g Instruction Working with groups of lay citizens Working with groups of studen ts Following r o u t i n e of the practicing a d m i n i s tr a to r s No e x p e r i ­ ence or bas i s for evaluation Most satis­ factory Fairly satis­ factory 3 1 2 3 2 1 2 3 3 2 1 4 1 1 Least satis­ factory 1 5 2 1 2 2 Other ( s p e c i f y ) : C o n d u c t i n g field research, w o r k wi th staff personnel, plant and business a d mi n istration, aux i l i a r y services, board of education meetings 188 is that a competent e d u c at i on a l ad ministrator needs to u nd e rs t an d t e a c h i n g and to ha v e ha d teac hing experience. A c c o r d i n g to this report, internship is no substitute for t e a c h i n g experie n ce In the p r e p a r a ­ tion of p ri n ci p al s and superintendents. In r eply to the qu e st i on , "Has there been any evidence of ’e x p l o i t i n g 1 the intern (I.e., conti n ui n g a l ea rning experience, for the be n ef i t s ch o o l - c o m m u n i t y after that of the local experience has been learned)?" officials In fo u r of the re p orting institutions ans wered no, w h i l e officials instit u ti o ns a n swered y e s . However, in two two of the rio answers w e re q u a l i f i e d w i t h a st atement to the effect that r ep r es e n t a t i v e s of the t r a i n i n g institutions are ob liged to be constantly of the intern. that the exercises B. on guard against exploi ta t io n The conclusion Is that danger exists Intern may be exploited, close supervision of the unless the university Internship program. The Intern Fi ve out of the six r ep o r t i n g colleges u n i v e r s it i es state that the prospe ct i ve r e q u i r e d to file w i t h the he a d his and intern Is of the department or d e s i g na t ed re p re s en t at i ve a w r i t t e n appli c at i on f or assign ment to Inter nship. This applica t io n is 189 f i l e d several weeks or months b e f o r e the sta rting date of the p r o p o s e d internship period* Th e p ra ctice of ca r ry i ng academic d ur i ng the internship pe r i o d var ies Most of the course w o r k considerably. institutions p ermit the intern to take one or two academic courses d u r i n g his Internship, b ut e xceptions are so n um erous as to re n de r invalid any conclusion that there is a definite pattern f ol l o w e d in the several instit utions. S ou t he r n Illinois U n i v e r s i t y re quires to live in the commu nities their Internships. interns In w h i c h they are s er v in g The other five r e p o r t i n g i n s t i t u ­ tions h av e no su c h re q uirement, a l t h o u g h efforts are made in some Instances for Interns to identify t he m se l ve s rather closely w i t h local situations. Pour institutions report that their interns r e c e i v e approximately h a l f salary f o r t heir services. S al aries are p a i d by the communitles. c o o p e ra t in g school- In no case does the Intern r ec e iv e m o n e t a r y r em u ne r at i on f r o m the t r a i n i n g Institution. Two institutions report that their interns r e ceive no salary f r o m any source at p r esent, but express a hope that this condition may be m od i f i e d In the near future. 190 In r e s p o n s e to the question, "What co n ta c t does the intern ha ve w i t h his college adviser (field sponsor) duri ng i n t e r n s h i p ? 11 all s i x re po r ti n g institutions stated that c o n f e r e n c e s be tween the college adviser w er e h el d (b) intern and his (a) prior to assignment, at time of assignment, (c) during internship as needed, and (d) at r eg u l a r w eekly or b i- w eekly Intervals. A s i milar re s po n se was received answer the in to a qu e st i on co n ce r n i n g conferences b e t w e e n intern and the local admi nistrator w h o di rectly supervises hi3 w o r k in the cooperating schoolcommunity. A l l s ix r e p o r t i n g institutions also stated that each intern has i nv o lving b o t h h is ad minis trator. co nferences, one or more conferences college adviser and the local In addition to these sche duled o cc a si o n a l Intern seminar sessions and i nf ormal g e t- t o g e t h e r s f o r Interns and college f a c u l t y members i nstitutions. are s po n so r ed by all of the r e p o r t i n g Regular intern seminars are r e po r te d In f ou r instit u t io n s. R es p o n s e s to the question, "Does the Intern have an o p p o r t un i ty to a ssume a substantial st atusleadership role and in staff meetings, l a y - c i t i z e n s 1 g ro ups?" were statements. The co n cl u si o n staff committees, qualified by lim iting is t h at such opportunity 191 Is quite limi ted In ma ny instances, depending upon the situation. The d a t a p r e s e n t e d in Table 24 show that many factors are involved in ch oosing an i n t e r n s h i p assignment. weight The fact or h av i ng the greatest of in fluence is the f a c u l t y member. intern fo r his judgment of a single college One of the fa ctors having the i nf l u en c e is the i n t e r n ’s own request. as s c h o l a s t i c record, character, least F ac t or s such and social maturity r a n k high. T ABLE 24 F A C T O R S I N F L U E N C I N G CHOICE OF INTERN FOR H I S I NT E RN S HI P Weig ht of Influence (ch eck) Greatest Some None S c h o l a s t i c r e c o r d and a ca d em i c rank J ud g m e n t of a college faculty member J ud g me n t of a co m mi t te e of c ol lege facu lty Character Physical Health S o c i a l m a tu r i t y S p e a k i n g ability P e r s o n a l appea r an c e S uc c e s s in p re vious job or field ex p er i en c e I n t e r n ’s r e q u e s t for a p a r t i c u l a r assignment C h o i c e by chance (first come, f ir s t served) 3 3 6 2 4 3 4 2 2 2 2 4 2 ' r 2 ‘T" 2 3 4 1 1 2 3 1 6 192 D a t a c o n c e r n i n g re c o r d s w h i c h the inte rn is r e q u i r e d to ke e p d u r i n g his in T a b l e require 25. the Five of t h e s i x r e p o r t i n g in s titutions intern to keep a daily a n e c d o t a l r e c o r d of some kind; report internship are r ep o r t e d four r e qu i re a c o m p r e h e n s i v e pr o je c t and an e v a l u a t i o n p aper; w h i l e the s i x i n s t i t u t i o n s r eq u i r e c o m p i l a t i o n of fo r m s only th ree of the in t er n to keep a and p r o c e d u r e s u s e d by the local school. T A B L E 25 W H A T R E C O R D S IS THE I N T E R N R E Q U I R E D TO KEEP DURING HIS INTERNSHIP Check Yes No D ai l y a n e c d o t a l r e c o r d of a ct i vi t ie s , p ro b l e m s and r e l a t e d theory C o m p r e h e n s i v e r e p o r t of p r o j e c t s and a ct i vi t i e s (at end of internship) C o m p i l a t i o n of f or m s and p r o c e d u r e s use d by the local s chool E v a l u a t i o n of his i n t e r n s h i p ex p e r i e n c e s (at end of Internship) H e l p p r e p a r e joint e v a l u a t i o n r eport (intern; c o llege adviser; local a d m i n i s t r a t o r C. 5 1 4 2 3 3 4 2 4 2 The College Adviser A l l s i x i n s t i t u ti o ns (Ball S t at e T ea c he r s C ol l eg e , N e w Y o r k U n i v e r s i t y , Ohio State U n iv e rs i ty , S o u t h e r n Il linois Un i v e r s i t y , T e a c h e r s C o l l e g e Columbia University, and U n i v e r s i t y of Maryland) 193 r ep o r t that the college ad viser (I.e., the university faculty member wh o s u p e r v i s e s interns In the field) te ac hes other college classes in addition to his duti es w i t h the intern sh i p program. In none of the s i x programs surveyed does a college adviser devote f u l l time to the Internship program. Some p ro v ision Is made in five of the six Institutions for r e d u c i n g the college a d v i s e r ^ t ea c hi n g (class) load in p r o p o r t i o n to the number of interns for w h o s e gu i da n ce he Is responsible. Three institutions make p r o v i s i o n for r e d u c i n g the teaching load approxi m at e ly each Intern supervised. one hour p e r w e e k for One I nstitution reports a tw o-hour per w e e k pe r Intern r e du c t i o n of teaching load, and one institution r ep o rt s a three-hour per w e e k re duction on the same basis. No f i x e d plan is r ep orted in the r e m a i n i n g institution. conclusion is that the t e ac h i n g adviser is reduced, load of the on the average, and one-half hours per w e e k for The college ap p roximately one each I ntern under his guidance• In reply to a q u e s t i o n concer ni n g h o w many interns one person should attempt to supervise time work, including p la c em e nt , visita ti o n, and evaluation) officials (full­ guidance, In the s i x r ep o rt i ng 194 I ns t i tu t io n s s tated n u m b e r s r a n g i n g f r o m eight to twenty, w i t h the average computed to be fifteen. Tea chers Co l lege, Columbia, prefers to spread the r e s p o n s i b i l i t y for superv i si o n of interns s ev e r a l college staff members, t hr e e to five among e a c h of w h o m su pervises Interns, r ather than to h a ve one pe r s o n s up e rvise f i f t e e n Interns as a f u ll -time assignment. This I n st i tu t io n appears to be the only one of the s ix In w h i c h the word "internship" is r e c o g n i z e d In the title of t he person w h o directs p ro gram. E. E d m u n d Re u tt er , Jr., currently serves in a p o s i t i o n e nt itled C oo r di n at o r Program. the Internship of Internship T hi s p os i ti o n also carries w i t h It a p r o f e s s o r i a l r an k w h i c h may vary f r o m as sistant to f ul l p r of e ss o rs h i p, occupies d e p e n d i n g upon the individual w h o the position at a given time. I ns titutions, the p erson w h o d i rects In the other or coordinates internships carries no special title w i t h respect to the In ternship program. R e s p o n s e s to the question, "Does the college adviser v isit the intern at the scene of the intern*s work?" were unanimously y e s . In f o u r institutions, the v i s i t a t i o n p r o g r a m consists of approximately two v is i ts per term, ea c h visit b e i n g one-half day In length. One in s ti t ut i on reports b i -w eekly v i s i t a ti o n 195 d ur i ng the first h a l f fre q u e n t v i s i t a t i o n thereafter, i nd i vi d u a l situation. reports of the semester, with that The de pending upon the So u th e rn Illinois Univer s it y the co l le g e adviser is an off-campus con s ul t a n t w h o vi s it s the f ul l day at intern on the job for a least once per month. co llege a d v i s e r ’s responsibilities s e v e r a l in s ti t ut i on s are tabulated In Table all insta nces his r e s p o n si b il i ti e s Include t a i n i n g r e l a t i o n s b e tw e e n of the s u p e r v i s e s the 26. In (a) m a i n ­ (b) h e lp i ng the to adjust p r o p e r l y to the local situation, w o r k i n g closely w i t h the in the the college and the c o o p e r a t i n g school - co m mu n it y , In t h r e e leas and intern (c) local school administr ator. six institutions the college ad viser internship w o r k of the In only one I n s t i t ut i on does student, and the college ad vi ser w o r k d i r e c t l y w i t h the c o o p e r a t i n g - s c h o o l staff. 196 T A B L E 26 R E S P O N S I B I L I T I E S OF THE IN T ERN'S C OL L EG E A D V I S E R la the co llege adviser (field sponsor) re s po n si b le for: Response Yes No S u p e r v i s i n g di r ec t l y the of the s t u d e n t ? In ternship w o r k 3 M a i n t a i n i n g r e la t i o n s be tween c oo p er a ti n g school? 3 college and 6 H el p i n g the intern to adjust to the local s i t u a t i o n ? 6 W o r k i n g c l osely w i t h the adminlstrat or? 6 local W o r k i n g d i rectly w i t h the cooperatingschool s ta f f? 1 5 CHAPTER VI CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING I N T E R N S H I P P R A C T I C E S IN T H E P R O F E S S I O N A L PREPARATION OF E D U C A T I O N A L A D M I N I S T R A T O R S A r e v i e w of the f i n d i n g s p o s s i b l e the f o r m u l a t i o n recommendations of this study makes of c er t ai n concerning conclus i on s Internship programs and in e d u c a t i o n a l a dm i ni s t r a t i o n . A. G e n e r a l C o nc l us i on s There is little a gr eement among e d u c at o rs as to w h a t c o n s t it u te s an H i n t e r n s h i p w in e d u c a t l o n a l administration. Abbreviated field experiences i n v o l v in g o b s e r v a t i o n and limited p a r t i c i p a t i o n are c a l l e d internships o th e r areas in some lo c al i ti e s, w h i l e inservice t r a i n i n g pr o gr a ms administrators for p r a c t i c i n g are si m il a r l y de s i g n a t e d . Between t hese two ex tremes sire i n t e r n s h i p p r o g r a m s in l ength f r o m twelve w ee k s ranging on a p a r t - t i m e b as i s to one year on a f u l l - t i m e basis experiences in and i nv o lv i ng ranging f r o m highly specialized research in some p a r t i c u l a r p h a s e of e d u c a t i o n to the b road r ou t i n e s of the p u bl i c s chool s u p e r i n t e n d e n c y and principalship• 198 R e p r e s e n t a t i v e , ongoing internship programs v a r y sign If lcantly In their o r g a n i z a t i o n . s c o p e . and s u p e r v i so r y p r o c e d u r e s . at different institutions; graduate Internships are levels are or ganized offered in the several training on va r yi n g t im e bases; h av e no common de n om i na t or as to types or extent a dm i ni s t r a t i v e experie nces provided for the and are of intern; characterized by few common standards of su pervisory procedures. The number of internships and the n umber of in stltutions offe rlng programs of in ternship are increasing. F o l l o w i n g the pattern of an expanded p r o g r a m of off-campus student teaching at the u n d e r ­ graduate level, graduate schools are opportunities for suitable placement in e ducational administration. institutions have inaugurated d ur i ng the past two y e a r s . p la n n i n g stage, seeking; addit ional of interns Several tra ining internship programs h e w programs, n ow in the are scheduled to be initiated in the n e ar future. Internship programs university are e s t e e m e d . College and officials curre nt l y engaged in directing internship p ra c tices endorse such pro grams most e nt h us i as t ic a ll y . Interns and local school 199 adm i ni s t r a t o r s are r e p o r t e d to be unanimous in their f a v o r a bl e r e a c t i o n s to the I nt e rn s hi p p r ograms w i t h w h i c h they h av e been associated. be a g r o w i n g w e i g h t of opinion in favor of internships, as ex pressed by l ea ding educators o rg a nizations There appears to and p r o f e ss i on a l in the f ie l d of education. of p r o f e s s i o n a l Th e volume literature d ealing with internships is a ls o increasing. There is g e n e r a l agreement of two objec tives of programs concer n in g the value of i n t e r n s h i p . These objectives ares (a) to d e v e l o p b etter admini strators than could be d e v e l o p e d in an on-campus p r o g r a m of largely t h e o r e ti c al training, (b) to guide the intern in better u n d e r s t a n d i n g and e va l ua t in g t h e o r y T he s e are the in terms of practice. only two objectives rated as " i m p o r t a n t " or Mv e r y i m p o r t a n t ” b y all twenty of the le ading educa t or s s e l e c t e d to serve as a jury of experts• There is ge neral agreement concerning the a cc e p t a b i l i t y of fo u r cr it e r i a for evaluating intern s hi p p r o g r a m s . T h e s e c ri t e r i a are: 200 (a) the I n t e r n s h i p should consist largely of si g ni f ic a nt a d m i n i st r at i ve w o r k n ec e ss a ry to the w e l l - b e i n g of an on - g o i n g e d uc a ti o na l p rogram--not s o- c a l l e d Mm a d e 11 work; (b) the internship should p ro vide substantial opportu n it y for c re ative th ou ght and action on the pa rt of the Intern; (c) the internship should make p ro v ision for joint planning, his action, college adviser, and e v al u at i on by the Intern, and the supervising admini s tr a to r In the co o pe r at i ng school-community; and (d) the In t e rn s hi p should make p ro v is i on for fle x i b i l i t y needs in type of assig nment to better meet the and interests of the Individual i nt e r n — as d e t e r m in e d by h i m s e l f and his adviser(s). These four c r i t e r i a were rated as "fully a cc e pt a bl e " by s e v e n t e e n or more members of the Jury of twenty experts. There is general accept a nc e of five assumptions w h i c h should un d er l ie internship. (a) or be Inherent in programs of These assump ti o ns ares interns h ip s hould reduce the d u a l i s m b e t w e e n theory and p r a c t i c e — in the sense of p r o f e s s i o n a l k n ow l ed g e versus ability to administer; 201 (b) Interns h i p should have as Its c e ntral p ur p os e the p r o f e s s i o n a l prepa r at i on of the Intern; (c) intern sh i p should p r o m o t e d e si rable gr owth of the intern toward competent democratic lea dership in his p r o f e s s i o n a l re latio nships w i t h sc hool empl oyees, students, l a y - c i t i z e n s , and o r ga nized c om m u n i t y groups; (d) internship, to be of m a x i m u m value to the intern, r e q u i r e s his readiness in the areas of g e n e r a l and p r o f e s s i o n a l education; (e) Intern s hi p should provide o p p o r t u n i t y for the intern to carry real admin i st r at i ve responsibility. E i g h t e e n or more members experts of the jury of twenty indicated agreement w i th each of these five ass umpt i o n s • I n t e r n s h i p pro grams b e t w e e n co l leges improve r e la t i o n s h i p s and the cooper at i ng sc h oo l - c o m m u n l t i e s in their r e s p e c t i v e a r e a s . School systems and p r a c ­ t ic i ng adminis t ra t or s b e co m e acquai nted w i t h new ideas e ma n a t i n g f r o m colleges, and the colleges in t ur n b e c o m e more acutely aware of problems and p ra c ti c es in the field. Interns often serve in a liason c a pa c it y between colleges and local school systems, w i t h a mutually be n ef i c i a l result. Interns 202 p r o v i d e p oints of creative contact b et w e e n the fa culty and s t a f f of t h e local s c h o o l and the faculty of the g r a d u a t e school. I n t e r n s h i p is an int egral part preparatory program. of the total The t en dency in some in stances to d i v o r c e the i n t e r n s h i p f r o m direct r e l a t i o n s h i p w i t h other p o r t i o n s of the p r e p a r a t o r y p r o g r a m minimizes its e f fe c t i v e n e s s as an instrument fo r the promotion of c ap a bi l i t y for future p r o f e s s i o n a l growth. the Confidence in the s u p e r v i s o r y abi lity of local a d m i n i s t r a t o r does not p re c lu d e the desirability of c o n t i n u i n g g ui dance f r o m the t r a i n i n g of the in stitution. The p o t e n t i a l i t i e s i n t e r n s h i p can be re a l i z e d three-way ad viser, and s u p e r v is i on only by means c o o p e r a t i o n be tween the intern, his and the co llege local administrator. I n t e r n s h i p pr o gr a ms r a i s i n g the of afford o pp o rt u ni t ie s fo r leveI of the p r o f e s s i o n . relationship between The close internship experie n ce s in the f ie l d and the i n s t r u c t i o n a l and r e s e a r c h programs on - c a m p u s f a c i l i t a t e s the s er v ices. As the y ou n g e d u c a t o r s Improvement of e d u c a t i o n a l local a d m i n i s t r a t o r helps p r e p a r e for a d m i n i st ra t iv e positio n s, he 205 tend s to d e v e l o p a b r o a d e r p e r s p e c t i v e and a g r ea t er sense of r e s p o n s i b i l i t y to the p r o f e s s i o n . I n t e r n s h i p empha si z es e f f e c t i v e usage As and of p r o f e s s i o n a l k n o w l e d g e and theory in t er m s of p r a c t i c a l function the m e a n i n g is served, situations. In so far as this the i n t e r n s h i p is desir able. it goes be y o n d this f u n c t i o n and a t tempts to develop imitative p r o f i c i e n c y techniques becomes in the m e c h a n i c s and of s chool m a na ge m e n t less desirable. routine, The qu a l i t y e x p e r i e n c e must be s a f e g u a r d e d b y ti ve p l a n n i n g , analyzation, Intern ship provides in t er n s h i p of internship continuing coopera­ and e valuation. a. c o n t i n u i n g , c om p re h en s lve e x p e r i e n c e in a d m i n i s t r a t i v e r e s p o n s i b i l i t y to one significant school-community s i t u a t i o n . f e a t u r e w h i c h is un i qu e It Th i s is a in i n t e r n s h i p - t y p e training. Is s u p e r i o r t o a series f ie l d e x p e r i e n c e s be c au s e of brief, it p r o v i d e s disconnected the intern w i t h an o p p o r t u n i t y to d e v e l o p a Mf e e l ,f for the In its entire ty. job In no other type t r a i n i n g is the p r o s p e c t i v e a d m i n i s t r a t o r e n a b l e d t o r e a l i z e this objective• 204 I n t e r n s h i p makes an Impact up on the on-campus program. By f o c u s i n g a t te n t i o n u po n p r a c t i c a l pr o b l e m s and si t ua t i o n s In the field, I n t e r n s h i p s t im u la t es c re a t i v e t h i n k i n g and gives p oint and p u r p o s e to a c a d e m i c study. ships Traditional on-campus line and tend to be modified. group processes staff r e l a t i o n ­ More d e m o c r a t i c are s ub s t i t u t e d for c o n v e n t i o n a l c l a s s r o o m p r o c e d u r e as p r of e ss o rs , Interns, a d m i n i s t r a t o r s w o r k to g et he r o n -c a mp u s In a c ommon p r o f e s s i o n a l cause. administrators program. in by Interns rec eive attention The s ol u t i o n the a s si s t a n c e class and s i g n i f i c a n t and p r a c t i c i n g in the on-campus of such p r o b l e m s of experts local and off-campus M a t e r i a l s fo r and se minar study become more v i t a l as p r o b l e m s b r ou g ht and often demands in the r e l a t e d d i s c i p l i n e s of sociol o gy , p s yc h ol o gy , p u b l i c a d m i n i s t r a t i o n , and g o v e r n m en t , r e s u l t i n g In more e f f e c t i v e use of the t ot a l r e s o u r c e s of the t r a i n i n g Institution. I n t e r n s h i p pr o gr a m s p r o v i d e professors to continue and d e v e l o p m e n t . In t he f i e l d As o p p o r t u n i t i e s f or their own p r o f e s s i o n a l g r ow t h college p r o f e s s o r s vi s it interns and confer w i t h local a d m i n i st r at o rs , they be c om e mo re alert to c o n t e m p o r a r y f i e l d p r ob l em s a nd a d m i n i s t r a t i v e practices. 20 5 The h as aize of the c o o p e r a t i n g school or c o m m u n i t y no ap p ar e n t effect upon the e xcellence Internship e x perience. of the E f f e c t i v e internships, as r e p o r t e d by officials c o n n e c t e d w i t h all p ro g r a m s surveyed, w e r e in c ommunities r a n g i n g f r o m small T he served v i l l a g e s t o large cities. d i s ta n ce of the c o op e ra t in g f r o m the t r a i n i n g I n s t i t u t i o n has supervisory provisions supervision in size school-community an effect upon in i n t e r n s h i p s , P r op e r and i n t e g r a t i o n of internship pr o gr a ms w e r e r e p o r t e d to be less effective, or at least mo re difficult, w h e r e i n t e r n sh i ps w e r e served at di s ta n c e s g re a t e r than f o r t y miles f r o m the campus. T h r e e f ac t o r s upon exert the gr e atest i n fl uence the se l ec t io n of s c h o o l - c o m m u n i t l e s i n t e r n s h i p s are s e r v e d . T h e s e factors in w h i c h are: (a) p e r s o n a l and p r o f e s s i o n a l q ua l i t i e s the of local a d m i n i st r at o r, (b) b r e a d t h of o p p o r t un it y for s e v e r a l kinds of i nt e rn s hi p e x p e r i en c es , (c) di s ta n ce college campus. of the s c h o o l - c o m m u n i t y f r o m the 206 R e p o r t s f r o m institutions surveyed Indicate that 75 per cent of all Internships the t h r e e - v e a r p eriod served during 1949-1952 w e r e served in superintendencies and p r l n c l p a l s h i p a . s p e c i a l i z e d types of internships, su ch as w o r k in e xe c utive of state and n a tional organizations, offices p r o f e s s i o n a l ma g a z i n e editorship, of e d uc a ti o n, state department e d u c a t i o n a l research, a d m i n i st r at i on , More and college are re c eiving an increasing amount of att ention. O pinion is divided c oncerning w h i c h types of in t e rn s hi ps h a v e proven to be most s a t i s f a c t o r y . In gen eral, w o r k w i t h students, staff, lay-citizens, sind o rg a n i z e d c om m un i ty groups appears to be f av o re d over w o r k w i t h budgets, records, and administrative forms. Four f a ctors exert the gr e atest influence upon the choice of & graduate student f o r assignment to internship. In order of their importance, by officials conn ected w i t h all programs surveyed, t hese factors (a) as reported ares Judgment of a college fac ulty member, (b) s o c i a l maturity, 207 (c) character, (d) s cholastic r ecord and There educative. is d a nger that Unless internships may he m i s - the q u a l i t y of direct is p r o p e r l y safegua r de d b y means be tween the college danger that as to de fy academic rank. and experience of cooperative the local school, effort there is internship expe riences may be so disc onnected integration; so repetitive of automatic skills as to become narrov/ing; or so divorc e d f r o m acceptable theory as to result in un d es i ra b le W it h ou t learnings. close s up e rv i si o n and guid ance f r o m the college, the intern may be unable to di sc r im i na t e between desirable observed and undesi r ab l e a dm inistrative practices in the field situation. Bl ind fo l lo w in g of local exa mple contr ibutes to the s t at u s- q uo and may be m i s - e d u c a t i v e There in effect. is danger that interns may be e x p l o i t e d . Care must be taken to see that the jected to constant re p et i t i o n intern is not of routine tasks he has p r e v i o u s l y de monstrated his competence, for the benefit p er m itted of the local school. in w h ic h merely He must be and en c ou r ag e d to have a v a ri e ty of types of ad m i nistrative experiences, needs sub­ in accordance w i t h his and the scope of educati o na l ad m inistration 208 as a profession. I nt e rn s hi p is only one of several methods by w h i c h the p reparation p r o g r a m may he made more effective. Other laboratory and field experiences may be equally valua b le in h e l p i n g the p rospective t ra t or to underst a nd ships of theory and appreciate and practice, p r o f e s s i o n a l knowledge adminis­ the pr o p e r r e l a t i o n ­ and to further his and c ompetence. The experienced a dm i ni s tr a to r may derive more b enefit f ro m cl a ssroom and se minar study alone, or f r o m field trips or survey w o r k co mbined wi t h his on-campus p r o g r a m of study--whereas the i n e xp e ri e nc e d trainee may profit most f r o m a continu ing exper ience in adminis tr a ti v e r e s p o n s i b i l i t y of an internship nature w h i c h enables h i m to develop a nf e e l ?l for the job in its entirety. W h a t e v e r method is used V to promote the effect i ve n es s for the that individual student, there practice. of the pr e p a r a t o r y p r o g r a m it should be recognized is no essential d i c h o t o m y between Theory as taught practical as pr actice is b a r r e n and pointless. theory and in the c l as s r o o m may be as itself. P r actice w i thout The d u a l i s m be tween theory the two is a ciualism only in the sense that both are component parts of the whole. for purposes tory process. They cannot be of dissection In re ality separated and analysis they are one. except of the p r e p a r a ­ As internship 209 helps theory to b r i n g about a b e t t e r balance and practice in the p re p ar a to r y program, serves a l egitimate purpose. other types B• in the fu n c t i o n of of laboratory The same may be it said for and field experiences. Recomme n da t ions Th® intern ship should be standardized the period of time considered to be the most desirable internship service. devoted to i t . in terms One school year is length of time for I nternship-type experiences lesser duration should be designated by of other titles, such as field p r ac t ic e s or w o r k experience programs. The internship should be served at the p o s t ­ master 1s l e v e 1 , p re f er a b l y formal t r a i n i n g . during the seve nth year of Viith due regard for the ex cellent master's degree p r o g r a m of internship conducted by Southern Illinois University, students by and master's degree, large have sufficient it appears do u bt f ul that acquired, prior to the a d mi n istrative knowle dge and pr o f e s s i o n a l maturity to re alize m a x i m u m b e ne f it from a r e s p o n s ib l e The internship assignment. internship s h o u I d , at the doctorate be an estab 11shed part leve1 , of the pr of s s s i on a 1 training of all school adminis t ra t or 3 who have not previously of 210 d e m o n s t r a t e d th e ir competence in respon s ib l e administrative positions. opt i on a l l y available also, Internship should be to exper ienced admini st r at o rs in terms of their needs and d esires for a d d i t i o n a l t ra i n i n g leading to more r e s p o n s i b l e or d if f er e nt kinds of administrative positions. F u l l - s c a l e , f u l l - time internship should be p r e c e d e d by other field e x p e r i e n c e s , Gu i de d visits, o bs ervations, f i e l d trips, p a r t i c i p a t i o n in field surveys and research, school study councils, and other l ab o r at o r y - t y p e experiences should be p r o v i d e d prior to in te rnship. The isolation of on-campus classroom i ns t r u c t i o n f r o m pr a ctice in the field bod es the f u tu re of the profession, e x p e r i en c es b o t h ill for A variety of laboratory on-campus and off-campus en riches the t o t a l p r e p a r a t i o n p r o g r a m and makes for c o m p r e h e n s i v e and accurate concept a more of re s po n si b il i ti e s and o p p o r t un i ti e s in educational administration. The internship should p r ov i de op p o r t u n i t y for .ludicious us e of g ra duate in3t ltution p e r s o n n e l . i n c l u d i n g persons f r o m fields related t o e d u c a t l o n a l administration. Any tendency to re l eg a te r e s p o n s i b i l i t y to the total local s chool a d m i n i s tr a to r s h o u l d be v i g o r o u s l y resisted. While the local 211 a d m i n i s t r a t o r in his r e s p o n s i b i l i t y for in the own r ig h t assumes direct superv is i ng the w o r k of the intern local situati on, the training institution should not r e l i n q u i s h its r es p o n s i b i l i t y for continuing gu idance of the intern d u ri n g this phase p r o f e s s i o n a l preparation* sessions of his R eg u la r on-campus seminar i nv o lving other interns and members g ra d ua t e s chool f a cu l t y should be provided. c on f er e nc e s of the Informal and discus sion groups, t o gether w i t h c or r el a te d r ea d i n g and study should be encouraged. The gr a d u a t e Institution s hould assume major r e s ­ p o n s i b i l i t y for r e la t i n g Internship experiences the f i e l d to the total p re p a r a t o r y program. p r e s u p p o s e s effective usage of guidance In This services, as w e l l as ma t er i al facilities and p e r s o n ne l resources on-campus• Administrators in c o op e ra t in g school-com m un i ti e s shou ld be invited t o p articipate in i nternship wo r kshops and c o n f e r e n c e s . should basis Members initiate wo r kshops of the co llege faculty and conferences on the of mutual respect and for the unified purpose of I m pr o v i n g the quality of e d u c a t i on a l administration. As a d m i n is t ra t or s and college professors come to a sat i s f a c t o r y u n d e r s t a n d i n g of the op p ortunities and 2X2 responsibilities of internships, will be fostered. Both the college and the local school w i l l bene f i t . may w e l l future lead to and i n t e r n s h i p should admini s t r a tive of preparation for improved e d u c a tional Include several kinds of experiences. The discovery and e v a l u a ­ of an i n t e r n ’s major strengths only come about trative work. an improved programs intern exper i e n c e and w e a k n e s s e s can through varied experiences in a d m i n i s ­ Inasmuch as the future development in his is dependent tional and conferences in the field. The tion Such workshops school a d m i n istrators practice cooperative effort upon of total competence as an administrator this assessment, he should have some in e a c h of such Important areas a d m inistration in e d u c a ­ as (a) p e r s o n n e l administration, (b) admin i s t r a t i o n of student activities, (c) a d m i n i s t r a t i v e relationships w i t h members of the f a c u l t y and board of education, (d) w o r k w i t h c i t i z e n s 1 groups, (e) and commu n i t y surveys. He might w e l l be assigned major r e s p o nsibility in connection w i t h project s areas In one or more of these of human relati o n s h i p s . In addition, an 213 i n e x p e r i e n c e d intern should have at least b r i e f e x p e r i e n c e in other areas such as (a) b u d g e t (b) records and finance, and administrative forms, (c) a u x i l i a r y services, (d) school plant management, and (e) daily administrative routine. Th e Intern should keep adequate records his internship e x p e r i e n c e . of S u c h records should include s (a) an anecdotal account w e e k l y a ctivities, (b) problems, of his daily and related theory; a report of special projects undertaken, i n c l u d i n g p e r t i n e n t data relative to facts procedures or involved, and actions obtained, taken or r e c o m m e n d a ­ tions made; (c) forms, a compilation of materials, a d m i n i s t r a t i v e equipment, organization, methods and procedures used in the co o p e r a t i n g school-community; (d) a fi n a l comprehensive evaluation p a p e r c o n c e r n i n g the quality and value of his total I n t e r n s h i p experience. The f o l l o w i n g c r i t e r i a should be used for e v a l u a t i n g the internship: 214 (a) The Internship consists largely of si g n i f i c ant admin i s t r a t i v e w o r k necessary to the w e l l - b e i n g of an on-going ed u c a t i o n a l program, not so-called f,m a d e H work, (b) The internship provides substantial o p portunity for creative thought and action on the part of the intern, (c) The internship makes provi s i o n for c o n t i n u i n g joint pl anning, by action, and evaluation the intern, his college adviser, and the local a d m i n i s t r a t o r in the c o o p e r a t i n g school-community, (d) The in t e r n s h i p makes provision for f l e x i b i l i t y in types of assignments to meet i n d i v i d u al needs and interests, as determined by the intern and his p r o f e s s i o n a l associates, (e) The intern s h i p involves the i n t e r n ’s contin u ­ ing administrative r e s p o n s i b i l i t y to a particular s c h o o l - c o m m u n i t y si tua t i o n for a considerable period of time, p r e f e r a b l y one school year, (f) The m a s t e r ’s degree internship is served at the p o s t ­ level, p r e f e r a b l y during the seventh year of fo r m a l training, (g) The internship provides I ntern to work, opportunity f o r the as an a d m i n i s t r a t i v e assistant, in 215 d emocratic group processes Involving lay-citizens and school p e r s o n n e l In the cooperating school- community • (h) The intern s h i p provides the variety of a d m i nistrative and special, intern w i t h a experiences, b o t h routine including most of those a dministrative position(s) common to the in w h i c h he serves his internship. (i) The internship is integrated with p r e p a r a t ory p r o g r a m by means c orrelated study, of seminars, the total conferences, and other guidance and supervision of the intern by members of the college faculty. b i b l i o g r a p h y A. BOOKS Brownell, S. M . , "Some Needed Adj u s t m e n t s In Courses of S c h o o l Admin i s t r a t i o n In the Light of War D e m a n d s , " National Society of College Teachers of E d u c a t i o n * 29th Y e a r b o o k * Ann Arb o r , Michigans Ann A r b o r Press, 1944* pp* 71-76. Campbell, Clyde M . , Pract i c a l A p plications of D e m o c r a t i c Administration. New York: Harper and brothers, 1§52. p. 299. Dewey, John, Experience and E d u c a t i o n . The Macmillan Co., 1 9 & 8 • pT 13. N e w Yorks Dewey, John, "The Rela t i o n of Theory to Practice In E d u c a t i o n , " Third Y e a r b o o k of the N a t i o n a l Society for the Scientific Study In E d u c a t i o n . Bloomington, Illinoiss Public Sc h o o l P u b l i s h i n g Co., 1904. p. 150. Faunce, Roland C., and Nelson L. Bossing, D e v e l o p i n g the Core Curriculum. N e w Yorks P r e n t i c e - H a l l , I n c J~, T95TT pTT§7. F e a t h e r s tone, W i l l i a m B., A F u n c t i o n a l C u r r i c u l u m for Y o u t h . New Y o r k s A m e r i c a n B o o k Co.~ 1950. pZ . C.: United States Office of Education, 1941. p. 74. Marshall, J. E., editor, D e v e l o p i n g Leaders for E d u c a t i o n . A report o f t h e W o r k Confer e n c e of P r o f e s s o r s of E d u c a t i o n a l Admin i s t r a t i o n at Endlcott, N e w York, 1947. p. 47. N a t i o n a l E d u c a t i o n Association, The Amer i c a n S c h o o l S u p e r l n t e n d e n c y . 3 0 t h Yearbook, A m e r i c a n A s s o c i a ­ tion of S c h o o l Administrators. W a s h i n g t o n D. C . : N a t i o n a l E d u c a t i o n Association, 1952. p. 397. Newell, Clarence A., H a n d b o o k for the D e v e l o p m e n t of I n t e rnship Programs in E d u c a t i o n a l A d m i n i s t r a t i o n . N e w York! C o o p e r a t i v e P r o g r a m In E d u c a t i o n a l A d m i n i s t r a t i o n , Middle Atlantic Region, Teachers College, C o l u m b i a University, May, 1952. p. 4. Newlon, Jesse H., E d u c a t l o n a l A d m i n i s t r a t i o n a S o c i al P o l i c y . N e w York! Charles S c r i b n e r ^ Sons, 1934. p. 261. Otto, H e n r y J., E l e m e n t a r y School Organization and A d m i n i s t r a t i o n . N e w York! 1). Appleto n - C e n t u r y C o . , I n c ., 1944. p . 300. 2X9 Flttenger, tion. T55T. Benjamin P., Local Public School A d m l n l s t r a New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., p. 103. T h e Q u e s t i o n n a i r e . R e s e a r c h Bulletin of the N a t i o n a l E d u c a t i o n Association. VIII, No. 1, January, 1930 p. 18. Reeder, W. G., The Fundamentals of Public School A d m i n i s t r a t i o n . New York: The Macmillan Company, T 9 4 1 . p. 11. Riso, S i s t e r Mary Karen, The Prof e s s i o n a l E d u c a t i o n of S c h o o l A d m i n i s t r a t o r s . typ e w r i t t e n doctoral d i s s ertation. New YorW: F o r d h a m University, 1950. p. 110-112. Sears, Jesse B., The Nature of the Admini s t r a t i v e P r o c e s s • New York: M c G r a w - H l l 1 Book Company, I n c . , 1950. p. 42. Smith, B. Othanial, W i l l i a m 0. Stanley, and J. Ha r l a n S h o res, F u n d a mentals of C u r r i c u l u m D e v e l o p m e n t . N e w York: W o r l d B o o k C o m p a n y , 1950. p. 651. S t r a t e m e y e r , Florence, Off-Campus Student T e a c h i n g . A s s o c i a t i o n for Student Teaching, 30th Y e a r b o o k . L o c k Haven, Pennsylvania: c/o State Teachers College, 1952. p. 3. Tyler, R. W., ”T r a i n i n g Administrative Officers for D e m o c r a t i c L e a d e r s h i p , ” E i g h t h An n u a l Conference for A d m i n i s t r a t i v e Officers of Public and Pri v a t e S c h o o l s . B e r k l e y , C a l i f o r n i a : U n i v e r s i t y of C a l i f o r n i a Press, 1939. pp. 63-72. W a t s o n , Goodwin, Do n a l d P. Cottrell, and E s t h e r M. Ll oyd-Jones, R e d i r e c t i n g Teacher E d u c a t i o n . New York: Bu r e a u of Publications, Teachers Co l lege, C o l u m b i a University, 1938. p. 63. W h e a t o n , Gordon A., A Status Study of Internship Pr o g r a m s in Scho’ol Adminlstrat i o n . T y p e w r i t t e n d o c t o r a l project. New York: Teachers College, C o l u m b i a University, 1950. 220 B. PERIODICAL ARTICLES Alberty, Harold, "Administrative Leadership In the H i g h S c h o o l , " E d u c a t i o n a l Leadership, V:433. April, 1948. e Ander s o n , W a l t e r A., "Internships in School A d m i n i s ­ tration," The N a t i o n 1s S c h o o l s . November, 1952, Bolmeier, E. C., "internships in School A d m i n i s t r a ­ tion," The N a t i o n 13 S c h o o l s , L:55, November, 1952. Campbell, R o l a n d P., "Educational Leadership In Group P l a n ning," E d u c a t i o n a l A d m i n i s t r a t i o n and S u p e r ­ vision, X X X I I : 193-202, April, 1946. Cocking, W a l t e r D., "Education of an A d m i n istrator," The N a t i o n 1s S c h o o l s , XXVIII:31-32, July, 1941. Conant, James B., "News In R e v i e w , " The N a t i o n 1a S c h o o l s , L:102, August, 1952. Cooke, D. H . , "The S u c c e s s f u l A d m i n i s t r a t o r Is a L e a d e r , " American School Bo a r d J o u r n a l , CXI:29, October, T § 4 £>• E i k e n b e r ry, D. H., "The P r o f e s s i o n a l Training of S e c o n d a r y Sc h o o l P r i n cipals," School Review, X X X V II:508, September, 1931. Fixley, E. H., "Governing Factors In the Construction of T r a i n i n g Programs for Superintendents of S c h o o l s , " E d u c a t i o n a l A d m i n i s t r a t i o n and S u p e r ­ v i s i o n , XXIV:632-633, April, 1938. Hill, Ci M., "Trends in the T e a c h i n g of School A d m i n i s t r a t i o n , " School and S o c i e t y , XXVIII:33-35, July 8, 1933. Hunt, H. C., "Why Not Internships for School A d m i n i s t r a t o r s , " School M a n a g e m e n t . X V I I I : 12, Fe b r uary, 1949. Kilpat r i ck, W i l l i a m H.« "A R e c o n s t r u c t e d Theory of the E d u c a t i v e Process," Teachers College Record, X X X I I : 556-558, March, 1 9 3 1 7 “ 221 McGrath, G. D., MThe w e e d for Improving the Social Climate for our T e a c h e r T r a i n e e s , ” Education. LXXI:180, November, 1950. Melby, Ernest L . , ”L e a d e r s h i p is Release of C r e a t i v i t y , ” Sc h o o l E x e c u t i v e , LXVIII:33, November, 194137 Neal, Charles D., ”lnternship In Teacher T r a i n i n g , ” E d u c a t i o n , L X X I i 183-189, November, 1950. Reavis, W. D., ”B r i d g i n g the Gap Between Th e o r y and Pr a ctice In the T e a c h i n g of H i g h School A d m i n i s ­ t r a t o r s , ” School Review, XXXIj547, September. 1923. SIfert, E a r l R., ”The H i g h School P r i n c i p a l , ” C l e a rlng H o u s e , X V I I S387-391, March, 1943. Strayer, G. D., ”E d u c a t i o n of the Superintendent of S c h o o l s , ” Teachers College R e c o r d , XLVI:169, D ecember, 1944• Strayer, G. D., ”Job Analysis and the P r o b l e m A t t a c k in the Trai n i n g of Superintendents of S c h o o l s , ” S c hool and S o c l e t y , XXVIII:289, March, 1926. Ullrich, P. H., ’’Colleges Make Big Strides In School A d m i n i s t r a t o r T r a i n i n g , ” The Nation's Schools, XI:43, April, 1933. V e n d e r Werf, L., ’’New Concept of Teacher P r e p a r a t i o n , ” P e abody Journal of E d u c a t i o n , July, 1950, 71. Vincent, W. S., ”E x p e r i e n c e S c h o o l for A d m i n i s t r a t o r s , ” S c h o o l E x e c u t i v e , LXVIII:37-40, March, 1949. A P P E N D I X E S SURVEY-APPRAI5AL QUESTIONNAIRE Concerning Programs of internship in Educational Administration (name and position of person answering questionnaire) (mailing address) I ; l.f ; I :2eJ I I It.| f 5.1 I 6f1 f 7*| I 6.7 t ^ (date) OBJECTIVES How do you evaluate the following objectives of an internship program? (check) | very | fnot very f | important limportant limportant I To make a gradual transition from preparation I 1 | I I to full-time administration. 1 I_________ f To put the ideal of "learning by doing" into f § I '§ practice at the graduate school level* I I I i To guide the interne in better understanding ! I | f and evaluating theory in terms of practice*____ I_________ I j To instil in the intern an acceptable interpre| | I | tation of a code of professional ethics. ______ I I j_______ 1 To help the intern develop desirable profesl i l t sional habits, interests and ideals. ! f ^ ________ To test whether more training is needed before I I I the intern begins full-time administration. l i l t To provide practical work experience with lay- I I citizens in an ongoing educational program. j I I i To develop better administrators than could be | | 1 developed in an on-campus program of largely f f [ I theoretical trainings_________________________ 1_________ E_________ j__________ ? Other objectives and/or comments: (please specify) 2 224 II. CRITERIA How acceptable do you find the following criteria for evaluating internship programs? 1* The internship should consist largely of significant administrative work necessary to the well-being of an on-going educational program— not socalled "made" work* fcheck | fcheckl Ifulljr acceptable | I fvery important ^acceptable with reservations! " | limportant i i ihot acceptable I ~~i Inot very important Comment: 2# The internship should involve the intern>s assumption of real and con­ tinuous administrative responsibility for the work he does and, insofar as legally and/or morally possible, for the results of his work* icheck i ifully acceptable l __l lacceptable with reservations • i inot acceptable 1 1 ___ fveiy important limportant Inot very important jcheck 1 § E z 5 I Comment: 3* The internship should provide numerous opportunities for the intern to serve as a status-leader in democratic group processes involving teachers, students, parents, and other lay-citizens. f c h e c k ^ ________________________ Icheck"f 5? 1 Ivery important |fully acceptable I S I limportant lacceptable with reservations | I I "1 fhot very important fnot acceptable 1 Comment: 1|« The internship should provide substantial opportunity for creative thought and action on the part of the intern* ghiilly acceptable I lacceptable with reservations# tiot acceptable I Comment! 1 Ivery important 1 limportant r |not very important jcheck I 1 I 1 \ 5 ^ 225 The internship should include a substantial amount of guided reading and study designed to correlate the funded knowledge of the profession to the practical situation at hand* check ifully acceptable 1 ^acceptable with reservations f ;not acceptable 1 i f ? ? ivery important limportant Inot very important icheck I 5 £ 5 - Comments The internship should involve periodic visitation at the ’’scene of action11' by the college-adviser (field-sponsor) for purposes of conferring with snd assisting the intern, and evaluating his work in terms of the local job situation* iclieck I Irully acceptable 1 § lacceptable with reservations i | aiot acceptable f = Ivery important limportant Inot very important icheck § 5 | | § £ = Comments The internship should make provision for joint planning, action, and evaluation, by (a) the intern, (b) his college-adviser, and (c) the superv i sing-administrator in the cooperating school-community* gcheckl gfully acceptable ' I | ^acceptable with reservationsT' I not acceptable I I ________„ _______ ivery important limportant fnot v e r y important check'i £ i = 1 I Comments The internship should be served at or near the completion of the graduate student»s formal program of professional preparation* icheck I i jfully acceptable I lacceptable with reservations \ inot acceptable ? 1 Comments fvery important limportant |not very important check 1 i 1 i | f s 226 The internship should involve a considerable block of time, at least (check) /I quarter/ / /I semester/ 1 / A year/ / /2 years/ / on a full-time basis, or the equivalent, icheck I flully acceptable i I lacceptable with reservations I f m o t acceptable ^ ^ __________________________ |very important limportant mot very important fchecK I = ! I s s = Comment: The internship should make provision for flexibility in time allotment to better meet the needs and interests of the individual intern— as determined by himself and his adviser(s). |check'| foully acceptable I j Iac ceptable with~*res ervations I I inot acceptable I I icheck I §veiy important limportant Inot very important I I | I Comment: The internship should make provision for flexibility in type of assignment to better meet the needs and interests of the individual intern— as determined by himself and his adviser(s). Icheck Ifuiiy acceptable I lacceptable with reservations 1 fnot. acceptable 1 § I 1 1 :_______________________ icheck | I £ fvery important limportant inot very important _ Comment: The internship program should be conducted at a respectable graduate level of proficiency (i.e. meet recognized standards of accrediting agencies as to qualifications of instructors, supervision, teaching load, material resources, professional ethics, evaluation, credits, etc.). ich'eok Iz ifuljiy acceptable f lacceptable with “reservations f fnot acceptable* I Comment: s I 1 Ivery important limport.-mt inot very important icheck = l 13. ' 227 The internship program should not substitute an intern for a regular teacher or administrator in the cooperating school-community (i.e. should not Jeopard­ ize the continued employment and privileges of the complete, regular staff). gcheck' Ifullly acceptable "" * \ la'cceptable wlih reservations I jioi acceptable | j g f I jveiy importani kmporiant jhou very important jcheckTI j I r~ | Comment: lU. Other criteria (specify): 15. Further comment: note: Permission is requested to give credit to you for ideas and suggestions given in your comments. Do you give permission to use y our name in connection with such quotations?. Please check: /yes / / /no / j 6 ASSUMPTIONS 228 To what extent do you agree that the following assumptions should underlie programs of internship? 1* Internship should reduce the dualism between theory and practice (in the sense of professional.knowledge vs. ability to administer)# icheck I fagree | | Comment: iagree with |reservations f 1 I Idisagree 2. Internship should have as its central purpose the professional prepara­ tion of the intern— not economical educational service to the cooperating school-community# I check f s 5 |agree__ . t fagree with freservations i ; Comnent: 1 Idisagree 3* Internship should promote rapid and desirable growth of the intern toward competent democratic leadership in his professional relationships with school employees and students* f check i ■ ■ - j ■i Comment: fagree Iagree with freservations fdisagree U. Internship should promote rapid and desirable growth of the intern toward competent democratic leadership in his professional relationships with lay-citizens and organized community groups. Icheck I Comment: Iagree________ I iagree with I" Ireservations I Idisagree 5* Internship should promote rapid and desirable growth of the intern toward social and emotional maturity* § checK I Comment: fagree iagree with T freservations | 7 6* Internship, to be of maximum value to the intern, requires his readiness in the areas of general and professional education (i*e* he must possess prior to internship, some breadth of general and professional education, and some knowledge of the theory and practice of administration)* I check j I 7* 229 5 3 Iagree f iagree with § freservations I | | ! Idisagree f I Comment; Internship should substantially improve the quality of the total prepar­ atory program by providing individualized instruction and flexibility in content and method to meet the peculiar interests and needs of the individual trainee* I check 1 Iagree iagree with ireservations Comment: I | f Idisagree_____ [ 8* Internship should provide opportunity for the intern to carry real administrative responsibility which is very beneficial to him in his preparatory program* I check ? Iagree I iagree with "| ireservations I Idisagree 9* Comment: j f ! I______ | Other assumptions (specify): ) 230 8 IV. FUTURE FR0GRAM5 What should be the internship program of the future (i.e. nature and scope of experiences; tendency to become a requirement; part that field surveys should have in the program; advisability of college-adviser living in the cooperating community while working with a group of interns; etc.)? 231 Status-Survey Questionnaire Concerning Selected Programs of Internship in Educational Administration (name and position of person answering questionnaire) (name of training institution) (date) The Program ko# enrolled Spring term 19$2 1* i Total No. School Admin* Majors (approx'») , « , taking 1 ' ' tralr ‘ j rfo. students internship training' ; Comment: 2 . 3* No* total number"of students who have participated in the internship program tpedate; Years in which internship experiences are normally provided: Check f Fifth year (Master^s)' j Sixth Year S Seventh freer (boctoraT ! Post-Doctoral h+ Time basis upon which internship is organized: frar-i3Se” " ! Half-time ! 6ne-fourth time I Other (describe ............................. . . .. j 1 1 j j J 1 No* j No* of different school-communitiea (locations) used 1 No# 6. 1 No* of different locations used by any one intern j j j 232 • 2 7. T^rpes of cooperating school-communities used: TJKecT ’Rural' Village or iown (less than pop. J Small city (£.666-29^999 p ° p ‘ > Large m 000 or more pop.7 m 8* Distance of cooperating school-communities from the training institution: I Name of town (or schooTT 9* INo* of miles Is there a written agreement or contract between the training institution and the cooperating school-community? Check j yes j | jno 10* Does the training institution pay the cooperating school or administrator for supervising the intern*s work? Check I yes I j = no 11. ’What factors influenced choice of cooperating school-communities used for internship experiences? _____________________ Weight of Influence (check) Greatest Some i None | • ♦ Proximity to the training institution { | Personal and professional qualities of the local 1 i administrator " .. Request of the local school for interns Special opportunity for one specific type of \ internship experience. J - .* 1n Breadth of opportunity for several kinds of j internship experiences i I General quality of staff and leadership in the 1 : 1 ; local school ..... ) * Arrangements made by intern seeking training i Other (explain) i -------------------------------- j 233 - 3 12* What is the amount of credit toward the degree required or allowed for internship experiences? ; Mo* of term hrs* (specify if semester hrs*) j Has ter* s program jboctoral prog* Minimum required 1 i I'-iaximum allowed (total; Maximum aL lowed Cone term) | j Maximum 5& of total credits required for S j degree which may be earned in internship (Comment) 13* In what types of administrative positions have students interned during the past three years? \ No. of interns l i : : --- f ’.......... i Elementary school principalship I Senior or junior high school principalship 1 Local superintendency ; Assistant suberihtendencv County superlnten&ehcy "" Supervising princIpalship State Department! of Education Other (explain) llu What types of internship experiences have been found to be most satisfactory.) fairly satisfactory^ or least satisfactory? I Type of Experience i Conducting community surveys IWorking with budget or financial I affairs IWorking with records and adminisj trative forms j Supervising and improving instruci tion i Working with groups of lay citizens i Working with1 groups of students !Following routine of the practicing Iadministrators jOther (specify) !No experfairly j least lienee or satis- j satisibasis for factory! factory ievaluation ( most [ satis| factory I I I [ I | I * t 1 : : f 1 j 1 j 234 - lf>. h - Has there been a noticeably greater demand on the part of hiring authorities for graduates who have had internship experience than for those who have had no such experience? Check [yes j 11 "f jno j j Comment: 16, Do groups of interns have get-togethers sponsored by the college for talking _______________________ over common problems Check 4 j Regular seminar sessions ! Is tiie college staff represented i I ..- -i...... . I : .-i i : [(Comment) 17* What kinds of professional and social activities are engaged in jointly by interns and college faculty: ______ ______________ Check I ¥es | No j Frequency j T College departmental staff meetings j j j Paculty-intern social activities ' ! f" 7 ! j j (Comment) 18, Do you believe that a young person is apt to be more successful in education­ al administration if he goes straight thru his undergraduate and graduate program, including internship, to the doctor's degree— than if he interrupts his formal training at the bachelor's or master's level to teach for two or more years, then completes his doctorate program, omitting internship? Check: jyea | j jno j j Comment:______________ ________________ 19* Has there been any evidence of "exploiting” the intern (i.e. continuing a learning experience for the benefit of the local school-community after that experience has been learned)? Check: 1)fes f I Ino j I Comment: The Intern 20. Does the prospective intern file a written application for assignment to internship? Check: I'tea I ] jNo ! 1 If yes, when? 235 - $ - 21* Does the intern cariy a program of academic course work during his internship? Checks jYes j j j Mo j j If yes, describes 23# Is the intern required to live in the community in which he is having his internship experience? Check: [Yes I i Ifa> I 1 2U * Does the intern receive a salary (or other monetazy remuneration) for his services? I— CKScE-----_________ j Yes | Mo j From the cooperating school-coimunity I j j"^rbm the' draining institution ~ r" ' r j ] I (Indicate approximate amouni) " " j 2^* 1 j ? I f What contact does the intern have with his college-adviser (field sponsor) during internship? ^ _________ j Check ' ~] | Conference prior to assignment j ~*1 1 Conference at time of assignment ' " I 1 I Conferences during Iniernsnip as needed 1 | Conferences at regular weekly"'intervals I Other (describe briefly) 26, What contact does the intern have with the local supervising-administrator during his internship?_______________________________________ ___________ ^ I Check | [Conference prior"to assignment ! I |Conference at time of assignment 1Conferences during internship as needed jOther (describe briefly) 27, Does the intern have one or more conferences during his internship which involve both his college-adviser and his supervising-administrator? Check: jYes j j I'Nol I I 28, Does the intern have an opportunity to assume a substantial statusleadership role in: Check TSF 1 mg L Staff meetings? i StaiT commaittees? jlay-ciiizen »s groups T Other (specify) 29 • Is the intern held directly responsible to the local supervising-admlnistra tor for his action in the field situation? Check: IYes ! i j No 1 jScholastic record and academic rank I Judgment of a college faculty member ! Judgment of a committee of college faculty 1 Character 1 Physical health | Social maturity l Speaking ability 1 Personal appearance j Success in previous job or field experience j Intern's request for a particular assignment jChoice by chance (first come, first served) Weight of influence 1 (check) I Greatest Some Nonej » 1 j ; 1 i 1 j 1 t t i i i : : : : t | ! . f i j 1 | Other (explain) What records is the intern required to keep during his internship? [check |Yes !Wo Daily anecdoted record of activities,problems & related theoiy ] j Comprehensive report of projects & activities (at end of j I internship) 1 j Compilation of forms & procedures used by the local school j Evaluation of his internship experiences (at end of Internship i help prepare joint evaluation report (intern; college-adviser; j j local administrator) i I Other (describe) { t i \ 1 1 1 j i »i: 1 } i ? The college-adviser 32, Does the college-adviser (field-sponsor) teach regular college classes in addition to his work with the internship program? Check j ^es j jj Noj Other assigned duties or responsibilities? ______________ -'" ' 1 | ^ Jf§! 33« What provision is made for reducing the college-adviser's teaching (class) load in proportion to the number of interns for whose guidance he is responsible? _____ I**"" Check [ Approximately 1 hour per week for each Iniern [ 1 Approximately 2hours per week for each intern I jApproximately 3hours per week for each intern” j I I I j I Other (explain) | ~ 3U« Does the college-adviser visit the intern at the scene of the intern*s work? Check: s Yes \ t ifooi I If yes, describe average number and length of visits:________________ __________________________________________ 35* Is the college-adviser (field sponsor) responsible for: !Check ___________ _______[Yes' 1 N o | Supervising dlrecily Die internship work of ihe student^ ] I j Maintaining relations between college and cooperating school? j j IHelping the intern to adjust to the local situation? 1 I jWorking closely with the local administrator? j j |Working directly with the cooperaiing-school staff 7 T*""" r jOther (specify) 36, What is the title of the college-adviser who supervises the internship program? (specify) ________________ __________________________________ 37 • How many interns should one person attempt to supervise (full-time work, including placement, visitation, guidance and evaluation)? Number of interns i ; Further Comment: Interview Check-list 238 Cname"and position of interviewee) (name of training institutionJ (date; 1* What provision is made for flexibility in the length of time of the intern­ ship experience (i.e. consideration for prior experience, demonstrated ability in college work, etc.)? 2. What provision is made for flexibility in type of assignment to fit the needs of the individual intern (i.e. use of guidance information, student's own preference, faculty judgment, etc.)? 3. What impact, if ary, is the internship having upon the rest of the prepara­ tory program (i.e. regular academic courses, the instructors themselves, etc.)? 239 - 2 - lw What reactions have you had from students as to the value of their intern­ ship experiences? 5>« What are the main strengths of the present program, as you see them? 6. What are the main weaknesses or problems of the present program, as you see them? 7• What do you consider to be the future of educational administration internship programs in general (i.e. modifications as to nature and scope, tendency to become a requirement, etc.)? 240 - 3 - 8* What are your plans or desires as to the future of this particular program? (a) number of interns? (b) length of internship period? (c) more than one internship session per student? (d) supervisory modifications? (e) cooperative planning and evaluation? (f) changes in types of internship experiences? 9* What special qualifications or abilities should the faculty-adviser (field-sponsor) possess to a marked degree? 10* How and to what extent is it possible for the intern to assume adminis­ trative responsibility, when legal and moral responsibilities lie with the practicing administrator? 11* Granting that it takes the practicing administrator at least a year to know his own school-community sufficiently well to become really effective in educational leadership, how can the intern expect to have a satisfactory administrative experience in less time? 241 - h - 12• Are there some kinds of learning found most easily in internships which might well be brought into the more formalised campus program, in the interests of econony and efficiency? If so, what are they - and to what extent might they be brought in? (i.e. leadership activities of a democratic nature in working with adults in group processes, etc.) 13. How is the internship program benefiting or hurting the training institution in its relationships with the cooperating school-communities ? Hi. General comment (including points of interest in the status-survey questionnaire)•