STUDIES ON THE MECHANISM OF AROMATIC ALKY NATIONS PAR T A: THE PREPARATION AND P R O PE R TI ES OF 2,6-DI- TERTIARY-BUTYLPHENOL P A R T B: KINETIC STUDIES OF THE ALKYLATION OF PHENOLS WITH TERTIARY HALIDES P A R T C: THE MECHANISM OF THE INHIBITION OF PHENOL ALKYLATIONS BY OXYGENATED COMPOUNDS By F r a n k A. C a s s i s , J r . AN ABSTRACT Submitted to the School of G ra du ate Studies of Michigan State College of A g r ic u l t u re and Applied Science in p a r t i a l fulfillm en t of the r e q u i r e m e n t s for the degr ee of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY D e p a r t m e n t of C h e m i s t r y Year Approved 1953 F R A N K A. C A S S I S , J R . ABSTRACT A kinetic study of the u ncatalyzed alkylation of phenol was f i r s t r e p o r t e d in 1949 (1). The p r e s e n t in v est ig ati on i s c o n c e rn e d with f u r t h e r elucidation of the m e c h a n i s m of this following e x p e r i m e n t a l ap p ro ach es: r eaction , using the (a) a study of the effect of l a r g e ortho alkyl groups on the p r o p e r t i e s and p a r a r e a c t iv i t y of the phenol molecule; (b) a detailed kinetic a n a l y si s of the alkylation of phenol with triph en y lm e th y l chloride in dilute solution and in an i n e r t solvent; and (c) an investigation of the kin e tic s and m e c h a n ­ i s m of the r e p o r t e d inhibition of phenol alkylations by oxygenated compounds (1, 2). 2 , 6 - Di-t-butylphenol was p r e p a r e d by the alkylation of p - b r o m o phenol with an e x c e s s of isobutylene, followed by redu ctive d e b r o m i n a tion with Raney N ick el -A lu m in um alloy in alkaline solution. This phenol p o s e s s e d a s t e r i c a l l y h in d e re d phenolic hydroxyl group, the p r e s e n c e of which was d e m o n s t r a t e d by its complete insolubility in Cla is e n solution, and by the position of the i n f r a r e d hydroxyl a b s o r p ­ tion band a t 2 . 7 6 |j l . The r a t e s of p a r a b r o m i n atio n and diazonium coupling f o r this compound w e re found to be negligible when c o m ­ p a r e d to those f o r 2,6-xylenol. This is a t t r ib u t e d to the g r e a t e r s t e r i c inhibition of the c u s t o m a r y p a r a activating r es o n a n c e of a F R A N K A. CASSIS, J R . ABSTRACT hydroxyl group by the bulky t e r t i a r y butyl g ro ups . A tte mp ted n i t r a ­ tions of 2 , 6 -d i- t- b u ty lp h e n o l r e s u l t e d in e i t h e r cleavage of a t e r t i a r y butyl group to give 2 , - 4 - d i n i t r o - 6 - t-butylphenol, or, u nder m i l d e r conditions, oxidative coupling to 3, 3', 5,5 ' - t e t r a - t-buty ld iph en oq uino ne. Relative r a t e s of p a r a t e r t i a r y butylation at 50° w e re d e t e r ­ m i n ed f o r phenol, o - c r e s o l , m - c r e s o l , £ - c r e s o l , o_-t-butylphenol, 2,6-xylenol, and 2 , 6 -d i-t -b ut ylp hen ol . The r e a c t i o n was c a r r i e d out using the phenol to be alkylated in l a r g e e x c e s s , and was followed by a bs or bing the evolved hydrogen chloride in sodium b ic a r b o n a te tubes followed by Volhard an al ysi s f o r the chloride ion. The a l k y l a ­ tion r a t e d e c r e a s e d m a r k e d l y as the size a n d / o r n u m b e r of ortho su bst it ue nts was i n c r e a s e d . This in dicate s th at the f o r m a t i o n of the r e a c t i o n t r a n s i t i o n state und er the conditions employed is l e s s favore when the phenolic hydroxyl group is s t e r i c a l l y hindered. A p r e c i s e kinetic study of the alkylation of phenol and o_-cresol with trip h en y lm e th y l chloride was made in oy dichlorobenzene at 88° . The r e a c t i o n was r e ad ily followed by m e a s u r i n g the i n c r e a s e in p r e s s u r e of evolved hydrogen chloride at v a r i o u s t im e i n t e r v a l s in a c o n s t a n t -v o l u m e s yst em . F R A N K A. CASSIS, J R . ABSTRACT It was found that the r e a c t i o n was a u t o - c a t a l y z e d by the product, hydrogen chloride. When this m a t e r i a l was in t ro d u c ed initially, o v e r ­ all t h i r d o r d e r k in e tic s w e r e o bs er ve d, the r e a c t i o n being f i r s t o r d e r e ac h in phenol, t r i ty l ch lorid e, and the hydrogen ch lorid e. A m ath ­ e m a t i c a l a n a l y s i s of the a u t o - c a t a l y z e d r e a c t i o n s d e m o n s t r a t e d that the alkylation r a t e was s a t i s f a c t o r i l y e x p r e s s e d by the t w o - t e r m equation: = k^fphenol^halide] + k^[phenol][halide][hydrogen chloride] The v alu es of k expression. 0 and k I w e re d e t e r m i n e d g r a p h ic a l ly f r o m the above These c ons tan ts w e r e u s ed to obtain ca lc ula te d values of the r e a c t i o n p r e s s u r e at v a r i o u s t i m e s , which w e re in ex ce llen t a g r e e m e n t with the e x p e r i m e n t a l values o v e r the e n t i r e r eaction . The k^ value was o b s e r v e d to d e c r e a s e m a r k e d l y in going f r o m phenol to o_-cresolj how ever, the k^ value f o r the l a t t e r a p p r o a c h e s that obtained f o r the u n s u b st it ute d phenol. sition state r e q u i r e s m a x i m u m This in di ca te s tha t the t r a n ­ s t e r i c f r e e d o m of the hydroxyl group f o r the u ncat aly ze d p o r t i o n of the alkylation. A. c a r b o n i u m ion m e c h a n i s m involving p r e l i m i n a r y solvation of the halide by the phenolic hydroxyl group, o r by the hydrogen chloride 4 F R A N K A. C A S S I S ,.J R . ABSTRACT when p r e s e n t , was shown to be c o n s i s t e n t with all the o b s e r v e d f ac ts . The p o s s i b i l i ty of phenyl t r i ty l e t h e r as an i n t e r m e d i a t e , followed by acid cata ly ze d r e a r r a n g e m e n t to the alkylated phenol was shown to be untenable. A. p r e c i s e kinetic study was also made of the in hibitory effect of varying amounts of dioxane and t e t r a h y d r o p y r a n on the alkylation of phenol by t-butyl chloride at 50°. This inhibition is a p p a re n tly due to the f o r m a t io n of oxonium type complexes between the e t h e r added and the hydroxyl group of the phenol, which d e c r e a s e s the amount of phenol available f o r p a r t i c ip a t i o n in the alkylation p r o c e s s . A. c o m p a r i s o n of the o b s e r v e d r ea c t io n half t i m e s and those c a l cu la t e d f o r a 2:1 phenol-dioxane com plex w e re in e xc e l le n t a g r e e ­ ment. Accordingly, the mono-functional t e t r a h y d r o p y r a n was o b s e r v e d to give only half as m u c h inhibition p e r mole as that obtained f o r diox an e. Refe r ence s 1. H. H a r t and J. H. Simons, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 71, 345 (1949). 2. J. J. Bordeaux, M.S. Thesis, Michigan State College (1949). STUDIES ON THE MECHANISM OF AROMATIC ALKYLATIONS PAR T A: P AR T B: P A R T C: THE PREPARATION AND P RO PE R TI ES OF 2,6-D I-T ERTIA RY -B UTY LP HEN OL -a* KINETIC STUDIES OF THE ALKYLATION OF PHENOLS WITH TERTIARY HALIDES THE MECHANISM OF THE INHIBITION OF PHENOL ALKY LA TION S BY OXYGENATED COMPOUNDS By FRANK A. CASSIS, JR. A THESIS Submitted to the School of G r ad uate Studies of Michigan State College of A g r i c u l tu r e and Applied Science in p a r t i a l f ulf illm en t of the r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r the d eg ree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY D e p a r t m e n t of C h e m i s t r y 1953 ProQuest Number: 10008471 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10008471 Published by ProQuest LLC (2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 4 8 1 0 6 - 1346 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author would like to e x p r e s s his s i n c e r e a pp r e c i a ti o n to Doctor H a r old H a r t f o r his aid, guidance, and i n t e r e s t throughout the c o u r s e of this inv estig atio n and during the p r e p a r a t i o n of this m a n u ­ script. He also w i s h e s to e x p r e s s his g ratitu de to the R e s e a r c h C o r ­ p o r a t i o n of New York f o r a F r e d e r i c G a r d n e r C o t t re l l r e s e a r c h g r a n t which financed the m a j o r i t y of this work, and to his wife, Betty, f o r h e r p a t ie n t aid and e n c o u r a g e m e n t during the completion of this t h e s i s . ii 359314 TABLE OF CONTENTS P age INTRODUCTION HISTORICAL P A R T A: P AR T B: 1 ................................................................................................ THE PREPARATION AND P RO PE R TI ES OF 2,6-D I-T ER TIA R Y -B U TY LPH EN O L 22 Experimental 23 D i s c u s s i o n .............................................................................. 36 KINETIC STUDIES OF THE ALKYLATION OF PHENOLS WITH TERTIARY HALIDES . . 46 Experimental 47 R es ults and Calculations D i sc us si on . . M e c h a n i s m .................. P ART C: 63 86 92 THE MECHANISM OF THE INHIBITION OF PHENOL ALKY LA TIONS BY OXYGENATED COMPOUNDS .............................................................................. 100 Experimental 101 R es ult s and Calculations 10 4 D i sc u s si o n . . 116 S U M M A R Y .................. 121 BIBLIOGRAPHY 123 TABLES AND ILLUSTRATIONS PAR T A Figure P ag e 1. F i g u r e 2. Figure Figure Table 3. 4. 1. U l t r a v i o l e t A bsorption S p e c t r a of H ind er ed P h e n o l s ............................................................. U l t r a v i o l e t A bsorption S p e c t r u m of 3, 3',5,5 T e t ra - t- b u t y l - p - d i p h e n o q u i n o n e , 32 33 I n f r a r e d Absorption S p e c t ru m of 2, 6 - Di- t-butylphenol ................................................... 34 I n f r a r e d A bsorp tion S p e c t ru m of 2,6-D i-t-butylcyclohexanone 35 Effect of Alkylation Method on Yield of 2 , 6 - D i - t- b u t y l - 4 - h a l o p h e n o l ............................... 37 PART B Figure 1. F i g u r e 2. Table 1. Table 2. Figure 3. A p par atu s f o r the M e a s u r e m e n t of Relative Reaction Rates . ..................................... The R a t e - D e t e r m i n i n g A p p a r atu s 50 51 Relative R ates of Alkylation of Substituted P h e n o ls with t -B u ty l C h l o r i d e ................................................................. Kinetic Studies of the Alkylation of P h en o ls with Triphenyl methyl Chloride . . . . . . . in o^-Dichlorobenzene at 88° P r e s s u r e v e r s u s Time C u rv es f o r Some Alkylation E x p e r i m e n t s .............................. iv 64 66 67 P age F i g u r e 4. F i g u r e 5. F i g u r e 6. F i g u r e 7. Figure 8. F i g u r e 9- Figure 10. Application of Kinetic Data to a T h i r d - O r d e r Rate Equation ............... 70 Application of Kinetic Data to a S e c o n d - O r d e r Rate Law ..................... 73 C o m p a r i s o n of C a lcu lated Rate Curve f r o m A p pr ox im ated Constants and O b s e r v e d Rate Curve ............................ 74 A dherence of A uto -C a ta ly ze d Reaction to a T w o - T e r m Rate E q u a t i o n ..................... 79 C o m p a r i s o n of Calculated Curve f r o m P r e c i s e Rate Constants and E x p e r i ­ m e ntal Rate C u r v e ........................................... 81 A dherence of C atalyzed Alkylation to a T h i r d - O r d e r Rate L a w ...................... 83 V ariatio n of Rate Constants with Log of P henol C oncen trati on . . . . 85 PART C Figure Table 1. 1. F i g u r e 2. Table 2. P r e s s u r e v e r s u s Time Cu rves f o r Some Inhibition E x p e r i m e n t s 105 Kinetic Data f o r the Alkylation of P h e no l in the P r e s e n c e of Oxygenated Compounds ......................... 106 Adherence of Inhibition Data to a F i r s t - O r d e r Rate Law ....................................... 109 S u m m a r y of C alcu lated and O b s e r v e d H a l f - T i m e s f o r the Various Alkyla­ tion E x p e r i m e n t s .............................................. Ill 3. Y a r i a t i o n of Reaction H a l f - T i m e s with Mol Ratio of Dioxane to Phenol F i g u r e 4. V a r ia tio n of Reaction H a l f - T i m e s with Mol Ratio of T e t r a h y d r o p y r a n to Phenol ............................................................ Figure TO MY MOTHER vii INTRODUCTION The alkylation of the a r o m a t i c nucleus has long been an i m ­ p o r ta n t p r o c e s s to the organic c hem is t. Although s e v e r a l m e c h a n i s m of alkylation have been p o s tu la t e d over the p a s t h a lf -c e n tu r y , t h e r e have been only a r e l a t iv e l y few kinetic studies of the r ea ct io n . The u ncatalyzed alkylation of phenol with t e r t i a r y halides, d i s c o v e r e d in 1927 (1), conveniently p r o v id e s an ideal s y s t e m f o r a kinetic study of the m e c h a n i s m of the alkylation p r o c e s s . Such an investig atio n was underta ken by H a r t and Simons in 1949 (2). On the b a s i s of t h e i r e x p e r i m e n t a l evidence th ese i n v e s t ig a t o r s indicated the i m p r o ba bili ty of a high e n e r g y or simple ionic i n t e r m e d i a t e , and p r o p o s e d i n s te a d what was t e r m e d as fect." " th e a m p h o t er ic m e d iu m e f ­ This effect depends in e s s e n c e on the a m p h o te ric p r o p e r ­ ti es of phenol f o r a o n e - s t e p condensed phase r e a c t io n quite s i m i l a r in theory to the t e r m o l e c u l a r m e c h a n i s m s of L o w r y (3), which have been m o r e f i r m l y e s t a b l i s h e d r e c e n t l y by Swain (4, 5). The kinetic data obtained by H a r t and Simons did not, however e n t i r e l y disqualify the p o s si b i li ty of a c ar bo niu m ion m e c h a n i s m f o r the alkylation reac tio n . In view of the i n c r e a s i n g evidence favoring a c ar bo ni um ion i n t e r m e d i a t e in this and many oth er organic reac­ tions, it was obvious th at additional e x p e r i m e n t a l evidence was n e c ­ e s s a r y in o r d e r to e s t a b l i s h a m e c h a n i s m f o r the alkylation r e a c ­ tion that was c o n s i s t e n t with all the known f a c ts . This study is t h e r e f o r e c o n ce rn e d with a f u r t h e r elucidation of the m e c h a n i s m of this re a c t io n by thr ee e x p e r i m e n t a l a p p r o a c h e s . First, it a p p e a r e d d e s i r a b l e to synthesize phenols with l a r g e alkyl groups in the ortho positions, such as 2 , 6 - di- t-b utylp heno l, and to study the effect of such groups on the r a t e of alkylation in the p a r a position. If the m e c h a n i s m w ere of the S^.1 type, then in an equivalent o r identical solvent the r ate of alkylation should not be g r e a t l y affected by the p r e s e n c e of l a r g e alkyl groups ortho to the hydroxyl. On the o t h e r hand, should the r ea c t io n involve a c o n c e r t e d m e c h a n i s m , p a r t i c u l a r l y one r e q u ir in g coordination of the phenol with the halogen of the alkyl halide in the t r a n s i t i o n state (2), one would expect a d e c r e a s e in the r a t e of p a r a alkylation due to s t e r i c hin­ d r a n ce of the hydroxyl group by the bulky ortho sub stituents. Sev­ e r a l r e c e n t investigations have d e m o n s t r a t e d the la r g e s t e r i c effect of such s ub stitu en ts on the r e a c t iv i t y and s p e c t r u m of the phenolic hydroxyl group (6, 7, 8) . In all these c a s e s , however, th e r e was a sub st it ue nt p r e s e n t in the p a r a as well as the ortho position, t h e re b y making a study of a r o m a t i c substitution r e a c t i o n s i m p o s s i b l e . Second, an ex am ination of the kinetic data r e p o r t e d by K a r t and Simons indicated the need f or a kinetic an al ysi s of this in dilute solution, and in an i n e r t solvent. r eaction This would p e r m i t the d e t e rm i n a t io n of the p r e c i s e r a t e o r d e r with r e s p e c t to phenol, and avoid v a r i o u s explanations that a r e n e c e s s a r y when the phenol is p r e s e n t in e x c e s s as the r e ac tio n solvent. Third, in p a r t i a l s u ppo rt of t h e i r c o n c e r t e d m e c h a n i s m H a r t and Simons d e m o n s t r a t e d the inhibitory effect of dioxane on the a l k y l ­ ation of phenol. Bo rd eau x (9) l a t e r showed that this inhibition was p rob ab ly due to the f o r m a t i o n of a 1:1 oxonium complex between phenol and dioxane of the type CH -C H / \ \ / O o - - - - H-°^ CH2 -CH2 If the p r e s e n c e of an unhindered hydroxyl group is r e q u i r e d in the tr a n s i t i o n state of the alkylation reac tio n, such a com plex would i n ­ deed account f o r the l a r g e inhibition observed. In view of the b i- f un ctio nallity of dioxane, how ever, it was of i n t e r e s t to in ve stigate the s t o ic h i o m e t ry and m e c h a n i s m of this i n ­ hibition in m o r e detail. A r e - e x a m i n a t i o n of the kinetic method u sed by B o r d ea ux c r e a t e d some doubt as to the a c c u r a c y of the s t o i c h i o m e t r i c d e t e rm i n at io n , and indicated that m o r e p r e c i s e kinetic data f o r the inhibition of phenol alkylations by dioxane w e re needed in o r d e r to f i r m l y e s t a b l i s h the n a tu r e of the p os tu la te d oxonium complex. In addition, it s e e m e d advisable to ver ify the g e n e r a l it y of the inhibition by extending this work to other oxygenated compounds. The th r e e ap pr oa ch e s e n u m e r a t e d above have all been s a t i s ­ f a c t o r i l y completed. F o r the sake of c l a r i t y in d e s cr ib in g the studies c a r r i e d out and the b e a r i n g that they have on the alkylation m e c h a n ­ ism , this th e s i s has been developed in t hr ee e x p e r i m e n t a l sections. However, it should be pointed out that e ac h p a r t is an outgrowth of the one p re ce di ng it, thus giving a s e r i e s of stepping stones leading u lt i m a t e l y to an i n t e r p r e t a t i o n of the m e c h a n i s m of the u ncatalyzed alkylation of phenol. HIS TORICAL A. P r e p a r a t i o n and P r o p e r t i e s of H indered Pheno ls The p r e p a r a t i o n of alkylated phenols is quite commonly a c c o m ­ p li sh e d through the well-known F r i e d e l and C r a f ts r e a c t i o n using such c a t a ly s t s as aluminum chloride, and o t h e r s . sulfuric acid, zinc chloride, In m o s t c a s e s , however, the p r e p o n d e r a n c e of p ro du ct is the p a r a s ubstituted phenol. This o rien tatio n is even m o r e strik­ ing when the alkylation is c a r r i e d out with t e r t i a r y halides or a l co ­ hols. of Indeed, H a r t has r ec e n t l y d e s c r ib e d , f o r example, a p r e p a r a t i o n t-butylphenol in 90-95% yields by this method (10), and s e v e r a l workers (1, 12) have r e p o r t e d p rev io u s to this that the d i r e c t a lk y l­ ation of phenol was not s a t i s f a c t o r y f o r the s y n th es is of o - t - b u t y l p hen ol. In 1934, how ever, Chichibabin (13) r e p o r t e d the sy nth es is of s e v e r a l ortho alkyl phenols in good yields f r o m alcohols, phenols, and a p ho sp h or ic acid ca ta ly st. Although the alkylation of phenol it se lf was not d e s c r i b e d by Chichibabin, p r e d o m i n a n t ortho s u b s t i t u ­ tion was r e p o r t e d f o r the benzylation and t e r t i a r y butylation of o_c re sol. This unique o r ie n ta ti o n effect a t tr ib u t e d to the use of p ho sp hor ic acid was r e - i n v e s t i g a t e d by H a r t and Haglund (14) in 1950 and the 6 - t - b u t y l - o - c r e s o l r e p o r t e d by Chichibabin was shown to be the 4- iso me r , Recently (15) the synthesis of o_-t-butylphenol was r e p o r t e d in 70 p e r c e n t yields using the s ch em e which is outlined below: OH OH (CH,) 3 3 Raney Ni-Al alloy^ Aqueous NaOH Isobutylene^ H2S° 4 ’ X OH -C-(CH ) 3 3 -V ' X + NaX. The r a n e y N ick el -A lu m in um alloy r eduction of the halogenated intermediate, c a r r i e d out in alkaline solution, p r ev e n t e d the r e a r r a n g e ­ m e n t of the o -t-buty lph en ol to the p a r a i s o m e r . 2, 6- D i-t-butylphenol has been r e p o r t e d by P a r d e e and Weinr i c h (16), and Stillson and Sawyer (17), the l a t t e r a ut ho rs being the only ones to indicate its method of s yn thesis. The p r o c e d u r e u sed was quite s i m i l a r to that d e s c r i b e d above f or the o-t-butylphenol, except that the reduction step was c a r r i e d out using p o t a s s i u m and liquid am m on ia. No indication of yield was given. It mig ht be well to mention h e r e the p r o p e r t i e s of h in d e r e d phenols. 2,4,6-tri-t-butylphenol in some p r e v io u s studies on Following t h e i r s y n th es is of 1945, Stillson, Sawyer, and Hunt (8) i n v e s ­ tig ate d the p r o p e r t i e s of this compound. This phenol was found to be insoluble in aqueous and alcoholic alkali and showed no c u s t o m a r y phenol co lo ra tio n with e i t h e r aqueous or alcoholic f e r r i c ch lorid e. T r e a t m e n t of the phenol, however, with a solution of phosphomolybdic acid and am m o n iu m hydroxide yielded a deep blue color. This te st , f i r s t developed by P l a tk o v s k a y a and Vatkina (18) in 1937, will det ec t as li ttl e as one p a r t h i n d e r e d phenol in 8,500 p a r t s of alcohol. All a t te m p ts to p r e p a r e a deriva tive utilizing the c u s t o m a r y re ac tio ns of the hydroxyl group failed, except f o r the f o r m a t i o n of a c r y s t a l li n e benzoate by refluxing a hexane solution of the sodium salt of the phenol (form ed in liquid a m m o n i a solution) with benzoyl chloride. Shortly following the introduction of the c l a s s of compounds known as the h in d e r e d phenols, Coggeshall (6) conducted a study of th e se m a t e r i a l s in o r d e r to d e t e r m i n e the effect of ortho s u b s t i ­ tuents on the i n t e r m o l e c u l a r hydrogen bonding of phenols. This p h e ­ nomenon is r ea d i ly r ec og ni ze d in the i n f r a r e d due to the f o r m a t io n of an abs or pti on band at 3 . 0 [jl c h a r a c t e r i s t i c of hydroxyl g roups in such c om plexes. In dilute solution in n o n - p o l a r solvents, w here t h e r e is little chance f o r hydrogen bonding to occur, only an ab so rp ti on band a t 2.75|x is obtained which is c h a r a c t e r i s t i c of the u n p e r tu r b e d h y ­ droxyl group. Consequently, a wave shift of 0 . 2 5 |jl is obtained f o r phenol in going f r o m dilute to c o n c e n t r a t e d solution. Cogge shall p o s tu l a t ed that l a r g e alkyl gro up s ortho to the hydroxyl would s t e r ic a lly m i n im i z e i n t e r m o l e c u l a r hydrogen bonding and thereu po n r e ­ duce this wave shift, with the magnitude of the reduction being a m e a s u r e of the hydroxyl hindrance by the ortho substituents p r e s e n t . Various alky lated phenols w ere studied and divided into the following c l a s s e s by v ir tue of the wave shift exhibited; 1. Unhindered phenols. Ex am ples : 2. p - c r e s o l , 2 , 6 - d i m e t h y l - 4 -t-butylphenol P a r t i a l l y hin de re d phenols. Ex am p le s: 3. Wave shift > 0 . 1 5p 2-methyl-4,6-di-t-butylphenol 2 - t-bu ty l - 4 -methylphenol H in der ed phenols. Example s : Wave shift > 0.0 4p but < 0 . 15 |jl Wave shift < 0. 0 4^ 2, 6 - d i - t - b u t y l - 4 - methylphenol 2 , 6 - d i - s e c - b u t y l - 4 -methylphenol The u l t r a v i o l e t a bs or pti on s p e c t r u m of o-t-butylphenol r e p o r t e d by H a r t (15) is v e r y s i m i l a r to that of phenol, with m a x i m a of a l m o s t identical extinction coefficients at 271 and 278m|a. This was c o m p a r e d to the s p e c t r u m of p - t- bu ty lp h en o l which is n e a r l y identical to that of the ortho i s o m e r , ex ce pt that the e n t i r e s p e c t r u m is shifted by 6 mp t ow a rd the r e d (peaks at 277 and 283 m p ) . The s p e c t r u m of p - c r e s o l as r e p o r t e d by Wolf and H erold (19) shows a s i m i l a r shift tow ard the lo n g e r wavelengths, w h e r e a s iq-cresol has its m a x i m a at a l m o s t identical wavelengths as phenol. alkyl substituent, This s p e c t r a l shift due to a p a r a r e g a r d l e s s of its size, has been used as a c r i ­ t e r i o n f or s t r u c t u r e a s s i g n m e n t studies of alkylated phenols (14), Before concluding, it should be pointed out that all the p r e ­ vious in ve st ig ati on s have d e m o n s t r a t e d the effect of ortho s ubstituents on the r e a c t i v i t y of the hydroxyl group and do not show what effect, if any, the se s ubstituents have on the usual ring activation by the p o l a r hydroxyl group. F o r this r eas on , a study of the s p e c t r a and p a r a r e a c t iv i t y of a compound such as 2 , 6 - di-t -b ut ylph en ol would be quite valuable and i n t e r es t in g . B. The M e ch an is m of A r o m a ti c Alkylation A r o m a t i c n u c l e a r substitution has been divided into f r e e r a d i c a l and ionic m e c h a n i s m s , with the l a t t e r subdivided into e l e c tr o p h il ic and nucleophilic r ea c t io n s . The ionic e l ec tr op h il ic substitutions have long been the c e n t e r of attention, f o r in this c l a s s have b een p la c ed such i m p o r t a n t r e a c t i o n s as nit ratio n, halogenation, acylation, sulfonation, and the r e ac tio n und er c o n s id e r a t io n h e r e , the F r i e d e l - C rafts a l k y l a ­ tion p r o c e s s . Although few kinetic studies have b een made of the m e c h a n i s m of a r o m a t i c alkylation, ionic i n t e r m e d i a t e s , such as those usually 10 a s s o c i a t e d with halogenation and n it ra tio n , have been f a v o r e d by many investigators. The g e n e r a l m e c h a n i s m f or the al uminum chloride ca ta ly ze d alkylation c o n s i s ts of the f o r m a t i o n of a c ar bo ni um ion, followed by e l e ct ro p h i l ic attack on the a r o m a t i c nucleus. R-X*. + *. A1C1„^ ^ R-X: A1C1 - O R® + [ :X-A1C1 ] R .. + © [-'X-A1C1 ] + HX + A1C1 C on sid era bl e evidence has been obtained to explain the f u n c ­ tion of the c a t a l y s t in this r e ac tio n , as is shown in the f i r s t equation above. Although a solution of aluminum halide in benzene o r of ethyl chlo ride in benzene shows negligible conductivity, it has been shown that a solution of all th r e e conducts an e l e c t r i c a l c u r r e n t with m i g r a t i o n of aluminum to the anode c o m p a r t m e n t (20). More r e c e n t evidence in fa vo r of p r e l i m i n a r y carbo niu m ion f o r m a t i o n was obtained th rou gh r ead y in terchang e of halogen in the p r e s e n c e of a lu min um b r o m i d e . Thus, when benzyl chlo ride, and aluminum b r o m i d e w e r e m ix ed in benzene solution, the offgas f r o m the r e ac tio n 11 contained 25.67 p e r c e n t HC1, and 74.33 p e r c e n t HBr. .. On the b a s i s 0 of f o r m a t i o n of the ion [ : C l - A l B r ], the values of 25 and 75 p e r c e n t would be exp ec ted (21). racem izes Also, the f ac t that oQ-phenylethy 1 chloride rapidly in the p r e s e n c e of aluminum chlo ride and oth e r Friedel-C rafts c a t a l y s t s is b e s t explained by the f o r m a t i o n of the p l a n a r c a r b o n i u m ion (22). T h e re has been a g r e a t deal of doubt concerning the s u b s e ­ quent steps of the alkylation r e ac tio n b eca use of the r e p o r t e d f o r m a ­ tion of b e n z e n e - a l u m i n u m chloride complexes (2 3). By employing g alliu m t r i c h l o r i d e as the alkylation catalys t, Ulich and Heyne (2 4) have obtained, however, the e qu ilib riu m constant for the f o r m a t i o n of the c a t a l y s t - h a l i d e complex, and have shown that the r ate of a l ­ kylation is d i r e c t l y p ro p o r t i o n a l to the c once ntr atio n of this complex and of the a r o m a t i c h ydr ocarb o n. It was concluded, t h e r e f o r e , that a f u r t h e r activating function of the c a t a l y s t was negligible. Since the function of the c a t a l y s t in this r ea c t io n c o n s i s t s in the g e n e r a t io n of c a rb o n i u m ions f r o m the alkyl halide, it would be exp ec te d that o th e r s t ar tin g m a t e r i a l s and rea ge nt s leading to c a r ­ bonium ions should be capable of effecting alkylation. Indeed, P r i c e (25) h as s u m m a r i z e d the use of olefins, alcohols, e t h e r s , and e s t e r s f o r s t a r t i n g m a t e r i a l s in the p r e s e n c e of such c a t a l y s t s as bo ron t r i f l u o r i d e , hydrogen fluoride, and sulfuric acid. 12 P e r h a p s a b r i e f mention should be made at this point of the school of thought concerning the ionic i n t e r m e d i a t e p r o p o s e d f or e l e c t r o p h i l ic a r o m a t i c substitution. Dewar (26) suggests that the e l e c t r o p h i l i c s p e cie s r e a c t s with the a r o m a t i c m olecule through the f o r m a t i o n of a -fT'-complex. S everal types of e x p e r i m e n t a l data have shown the suitability of th ese ■'fT'-electrons f o r such dative bond f o r ­ mation. Thus, Andrews and K e ef er (27) have attr ib ute d the solubility of a r o m a t i c h y d r oc ar bo ns in aqueous s i l v e r n i t r a t e to the f o r m a t io n of com plex es such as A.r-Ag^ and Ar-A g^^^, while a s i m i l a r e x p l a n a ­ tion f o r the solubility of HC1-A1C1^ m i x t u r e s in benzene was made by Brown and B r a d y (28). In a r e c e n t extensive study of such c o m ­ p le x es , however, Brown and c o - w o r k e r s (29) have p o s tu la te d the e x is te nc e of a r o m a t i c c ar bo ni um s alt s of the type Ar is C^H^), which can s e rv e as a highly p o l a r m e d iu m f o r the f o r m a t i o n and r ea c t io n of ionic i n t e r m e d i a t e s in the Friedel-C rafts r ea ct io n. These car bo ni um ion s a lt s (tr-complexes) w e re found f o r benzene, toluene, m -x yl en e, and m e s i ty le n e and a r e i l l u s t r a t e d by the following example: 13 ©H CH CH. H-C-H II + HCl + A1C1 A1C1 o 4 © V H H H H In this connection it is of i n t e r e s t to note that a s im ple l i n e a r r e l a ­ tionship was shown to e x i s t between the s tability of such g~-complexes and the r a te of a r o m a t i c substitution (30). No such r ela tio ns hip is known to e x i st between substitution r a t e s and the stability of the 1r - co m p lex es orig in ally p r o p o s e d by Dewar (26). At the sam e time, Brown and c o - w o r k e r s (29) extended t h e i r inv estig atio n of the A1C1-HC1 c a t a l y s t to include its r ela tio ns hip with alkyl ha lid es , which a r e g e n e r a l ly used as substituting agents in the Friedel-C rafts r eaction. D e te rm i n ati on of the m o l e c u l a r weight of aluminum b r o m i d e in methyl b r o m id e solution f r o m v ar io us vap or p r e s s u r e m e a s u r e m e n t s indicated that these components e x i st e d as a 1:1 complex. It was t h e r e f o r e concluded that the initial phase in the c u s t o m a r y a r o m a t i c alkylation r e ac tio n is the f o r m a t io n of a c a t a l y s t - a l k y l halide complex, followed by ionization as a p os si ble , but not e s s e n t i a l , second stage. (1) RX + > (RX: MX^) MX (2) (RX:MX3) -> R® MX ® 4 14 It n a t u r a l l y follows that the ionization step would be expected to i n ­ c r e a s e in i m p o r t a n c e when going f r o m a p r i m a r y to a t e r t i a r y alkyl halide. With the cationic m e c h a n i s m of a r o m a t ic substitution well e s t a b l i s h e d by the e a r l y "forties, Simons and c o - w o r k e r s (31, 32) p r e ­ sented so me challenging kinetic studies on the hydrogen fluoride c ata ly ze d alkylation of toluene with t-butyl chloride. These p a p e r s show th at although an ionic i n t e r m e d i a t e will explain the type of r e a c t i o n r a t e c u r v e s obtained, the r eactio n p r o c e e d s at too r apid a r ate to allow f o r the e n e rg y r e q u i r e m e n t s of such an i n t e r m e d i a t e . On the b a s i s of e x p e r i m e n t a l o bs e rv a ti o n s, Simons (31) p r o p o s e d a t h i r d - o r d e r m e c h a n i s m which he t e r m e d the effect." " a m p h o t e r i c m e dium This m e c h a n i s m involved simultaneous bond-making and b on d - b re ak i n g in the t r a n s i t i o n state, to avoid the n e c e s s i t y of a high e n e r g y ionic i n t e r m e d i a t e . It should be pointed out h e r e that such e x p e r i m e n t a l o b s e r v a ti o n s as the f act that the hydrogen fluoride ca ta ly ze d alkylation of benzene with d - s e c -butyl alcohol yields sec- butyl benzene with 99.5 p e r c e n t r ac e m i z a ti o n , while in a c c o r d with the cationic m e c h a n i s m , would be difficult to explain on the b a s i s of the c o n c e r t e d m e c h a n i s m s ugges ted by Simons (36). ’ 15 The r a t e of the r e ac tio n studied by Simons and c o - w o r k e r s was highly dependent on the p r e s s u r e of the hydrogen fluoride c a t ­ alyst. Since the kinetic activity of this c a t a l y s t in the r e ac tio n m i x tu r e was not known, n o r its v a ri a n c e with t e m p e r a t u r e changes, it was not p r a c t i c a l to study the r ate o v er a t e m p e r a t u r e range in o r d e r to d e t e r m i n e the activation e n e r g i e s . In addition to this, these r e a c t i o n s involved a m a t e r i a l that was c o r r o s i v e to g la s s, and t h e r e ­ f o re r e q u i r e d a m e t a l r e a c t i o n s yst em . With the d i s c o v e r y by van Alphen in 1927 that phenols could be al kylated in the p a r a position with t e r t i a r y alkyl halides in the absence of any added c a t a l y s t s (1) followed by the work of Bennett and Reynolds (33) and Simons and H a r t (34), a re ac tio n was supplied which o ffer ed ideal conditions f o r kinetic study of the alkylation mechanism. The l a t t e r w o r k e r s found that the alkylation with t-butyl chloride was a homogeneous, quantitative rea ct io n that p r o c e e d s at a m easurable r ate at convenient t e m p e r a t u r e s . c a r r i e d out in an evac uated g la s s If the rea ct io n w ere s yst em , it could r e ad ily be f o l ­ lowed by m e a n s of the i n c r e a s e in p r e s s u r e due to the evolution of hydrogen chloride gas. H a r t and Simons r e p o r t e d a kinetic an al ysi s of the r eactio n in 1949 (2). The alkylations w ere c a r r i e d out on phenol, p - c r e s o l , 16 and anisole using t-buty l chloride as the halide. The i m p o r t a n t e x ­ p e r i m e n t a l o b s e r v a t i o n s f r o m this work can be e n u m e r a t e d as f o l ­ lows: 1. The r e a c t i o n exhibited a high o r d e r r a t e dependency upon phenol c on ce ntr atio n. 2. Initial hydrogen chloride p r e s s u r e had little o r no effect on the r e a c t i o n r a t e . 3. C a lculated e n e r g i e s of activation w e re quite low, a p p r o x ­ i m a te ly 14-17 k. c a l . / m o l e . 4. Anisole f ailed to r e a c t un der cor re sp on d in g r ea c t io n c o n ­ 5. The r e a c t i o n was a l m o s t completely inhibited by the a d ­ ditions . dition of p-dioxane in diluent amounts. The l a s t two r e s u l t s indicated the i m p o rta nc e of the hydroxyl group in the t r a n s i t i o n state of the reactio n. The actual role of the dioxane in the inhibition was not d e t e r m i n e d by H a r t and Simons. B o r d e a u x (9) l a t e r c a r r i e d out a kinetic study of the alkylation of phenol using varyin g amounts of dioxane as a diluent. On the b a s i s of a s e r i e s of calculations B or deau x showed that the inhibition was p r o b ab ly due to the f o r m a t i o n of a 1:1 oxonium complex between phenol and dioxane. T h e re is no doubt of the m e r i t of the suggestion 17 of such co m p lex es f o r explaining the m e c h a n i s m of the inhibition, as dioxane is b a s i c and the f o r m a tio n of oxonium s a lt s of this m a t e r i a l has b een d e m o n s t r a t e d p r e v i o u s l y by B a r t l e t t and Dauben (35). A close e xa m ination of the kinetic method u sed by Bordeaux, however, creates some doubt as to the a c c u r a c y of the s to i c h i o m e t r ic d e t e r ­ mination, and indicates the need f o r m o r e p r e c i s e kinetic data in o r d e r to e s t a b l i s h the role of oxygenated m a t e r i a l s in the alkylation reaction . On the b a s i s of the e x p e r i m e n t a l r e s u l t s e n u m e r a t e d above, H a r t and Simons (Z) c o n s i d e r e d th ree m e c h a n i s m s , all of which could s a t i s f a c t o r i l y account f o r the r a te data obtained. The p o s s i b i l it y of the f o r m a t io n of an unstable phenyl alkyl e th er , followed by r e a r r a n g e m e n t of this e t h e r in the p r e s e n c e of the g e n e r a t e d hydrogen chloride, was d i sc ar de d , since the r eaction showed no c a t a l y s i s o r a u t o - c a t a l y s i s by hydrogen ch lo ri de. A second p o s s i ­ bility involved the p r e l i m i n a r y f o r m a t io n of a f r e e o r solvated c a r ­ bonium ion, followed by e le c t ro p h i l ic attack at the p a r a position of the phenol. Such a m e c h a n i s m was not favored, since it was pointed out th at cal cu lat io n s s i m i l a r to those of P e a r l s o n and Simons (31) gave a m i n i m u m e n e r g y r e q u i r e m e n t s of Z8 k.cal. p e r mole f o r the f o r m a t i o n of a solvated t-bu tyl c a r bo n iu m ion, in phenol at 45°. The e x p e r i m e n t a l l y d e t e r m i n e d activation e n e r g i e s were 14-17 k.cal. p e r m ole. The t h i r d m e c h a n i s m which was p r o p o s e d by these i n v e s t i g a t o r s , and which, has been mentioned b ef or e, was t e r m e d the ^ a m p h o t e r i c m e d iu m e f f e c t . " This m e c h an is m , e s p ec ia lly suited to the e n u m e r a t e d o b s e r v a ti o n s , involves a o n e - s t e p condensed phase r e a c ­ tion which m a k e s use of the a m p h o t er ic p r o p e r t i e s of phenol. Thus, it c o n s is ts of p o l y m o l e c u l a r attack on the chlorine of the alkyl halide, and on the p a r a hydrogen of phenol, as is shown s c h e m a t ic a l ly below. O-H -H C l- B u The solid lin es indicate the bonds p r i o r to reaction, and the dotted lines indicate the bond shifts when r e a c t io n o c c u r s . The chief point h e r e is the concept of s im ultan eo us b r eakag e and f o r m a t i o n of bonds with no r e q u i r e m e n t f o r a high e n e r g y i n t e r m e d i a t e capable of i n d e ­ pendent e x i s t e n c e . This m e c h a n i s m finds support in that it is s i m ­ i l a r to the suggestion of a c i d - b a s e c a t a ly s i s by Lowry (3), and the t e r m o l e c u l a r m e c h a n i s m s p r o p o s e d r ec e n t l y by Swain (4, 5). Price (36) has c r i t i c i z e d the i nf er en ce of Simons and co- wor ke tha t f r e e ca rb o n c at ion s, such as those p o s tu la te d as i n t e r m e d i a t e s in 19 the F r i e d e l - C r a f t s r e action , cannot exist. He points to the i n d i s ­ putable evidence of Hughes and Ingold (37), of H a m m e t t (38), and of B a r t l e t t (39), f o r the t r a n s i e n t ex istence of the trip heny lm eth yl cation in many nucleophilic d i s p l a c e m e n t r e a c t i o n s . Swain (4), however, has shown quite conclusively that trip heny lm eth yl halid es , and even methyl h al id es (5), can undergo d i s p l a c e m e n t in benzene solution, r eq u i r i n g in the r a t e - d e t e r m i n i n g step both pull on the leaving group and at tack on carbon; i.e ., by a " c o n c e r t e d " p ush-p ull, or t e r m o l e c ular p ro c e s s. Even though benzene was the only solvent used, th e r e is no a p p a r e n t r e a s o n why such m e c h a n i s m s should be l e s s c o n c e r t e d in alcohol o r even w a t e r solution (40). Following a study of the f o r m at io n of triphen ylm eth yl e t h e r s with phenol and methyl alcohol, Swain pointed out that although kinetic o r d e r has been u s ed m o r e than any other evidence as a c r i t e r i o n f o r deciding which m e c h a n i s m is operating in a p a r t i c u l a r ca s e, it does not depend on m e c h a n i s m alone, but r a t h e r on the degree of p a r t i c i p a t i o n of the solvent (5). Thus, trip hen ylm ethy l chlo ride in w a t e r gives f i r s t o r d e r kin e tic s (both attack on carbon and solvation of chlorine by the solvent); benzyl chloride with m e r c u r i c n i t r a t e in w a t e r solution gives second o r d e r kin etics (attack on car bo n by solvent and solvation of chlorine by phenol, and no p a r ti c ip a t io n by 20 solvent). T h e r e f o r e , Swain p r e f e r s to say that all d i s p la c em e n t s i n ­ volving tri p h en y lm e t h y l, t-butyl, benzyl, and methyl halides in benzene solution o c c u r by one m e c h a n i s m , a t e r m o l e c u l a r one, r e g a r d l e s s of the kinetic o r d e r obs erv ed . It m i gh t be well to point out, befo re concluding this s urv ey , that all through the h i s t o r y of the th e ory of a r o m a t i c substitution, r e a c t i o n s involving the phenol molecule have o ffered some u nex plain­ able r e s u l t s on the b a s i s of conventional e l ec tr op h il ic substitution. F o r e xam p le, when iodine monochloride is u s ed as a chlorinating agent, iodine r a t h e r than chlorine is intro du ced into the benzene ring as a r e s u l t of the unequal c h ar g e d is tr ibu tio n between the d i s s i m i l a r halogen atoms: [ :A +S :ci:] -S Although some chlo rin atio n occa si on ally o c c u r s even with iodine monoch lo ride, M i l i t z e r has shown (41), and it is not c l e a r why, that iodine m ono bro mid e acts ex cl usi ve ly as a b ro m in atin g agent f o r phenol. S im i la r l y , although the k in e tic s of halogenation of benzene is c o n s i s ­ tent with the c a r b o n i u m ion m e c h a n i s m , P a i n t e r and Soper (42), and r e c e n t l y B e r l i n e r (4 3) have indicated f r o m iodination k in etics that the halogenation of phenols is a different, m o r e complex p r o c e s s . 21 In addition, although the r e a c tio n s of for mal deh yd e and a r o m a t i c s s upposedly p r o c e e d by at tack of a p r o to n a te d f o rm ald eh yd e cation, 0 CH^-OH (36), the well-known condensation of formaldeh yde and phenols p r e s u m a b l y involves a differen t m e c h a n i sm , deriving its driving fS rc e f r o m something o th e r than the e l ec tr op h il ic n a t u r e of the f o r m a l d e h y d e - p r o t o n com plex (36). P AR T A THE PREPARATION AND P RO PE R TIE S OF 2 ,6 -DI-TERTIARY -BUTYLPHENOL 22 Expe r i m e n t a l 4 - B r o m o -2, 6 -d i- t- b u ty lp h e n o l c Br-(' -( c h 3) 3 yOH c -(c h 3) 3 A m i x t u r e of p -b ro m op h en o l (86.5 g., 0.5 mole), 200 ml. of benzene, and 4 m l . of 98 p e r c e n t sulfuric acid was t r e a t e d at 65±5° f o r ten h o u r s with two m o l e s of isobutylene in an alkylation v e s s e l s i m i l a r to tha t u s e d by Stillson, Sawyer, and Hunt (8). After e x t r a c ­ tion with 20 p e r c e n t alkali to remov e the u n r e a c t e d p-bro moph en ol o r any m ono alkylated pro duct, the benzene solution was washed with w a t e r until n e u t r a l to l i tm u s , d r i e d o v er anhydrous and the solvent r e m o v e d at r edu ced p r e s s u r e . sodium sulfate, Any t-butylbenzene f o r m e d by alkylation of the solvent was also r em ove d at this point. The r e s id u e was f r a c t i o n a l l y d isti lle d in a n it ro g en a t m o s p h e r e through a V i g r eu x column. The d is ti lla te , b.p. 126-128 at 4 m m . , yielded white c r y s t a l s on cooling, which, r e c r y s t a l l i z e d f r o m aqueous ethanol, m e l t e d a t 83-83.5°. Anal. The yield was 51 g. (35.6%). Calcd. f o r C ^ H ^ O B r : B r, 27.95 and 27.75 p e r c e n t . B r , 28.03 p e r c e n t . Found: When |)-xylene was u s ed as the solvent, alkylation of the s o l ­ vent was m i n im i z ed , and the d i- al k y la te d p r o d u c t was obtained in a yield of 47 p e r c e n t . At 70° in the absen ce of a solvent, and with the isobutylene u n d e r ZOO p . s . i . in a steel bomb, 2 3 p e r c e n t of the d e s i r e d p r o d u c t was obtained. In e a c h ca se , n e u t r a l iz a t io n of the initial alkali e x t r a c t , and f r a c t i o n a l d isti lla tio n of the organic l a y e r yielded 20 to 25 p e r c e n t of 4 - b r o m o - 2 - t-butylphenol, b.p. 129-131° at 6 m m . 4 -Chloro - 2 , 6-di -t-butylphenol C-(CH ) C l- -OH C-(CH ) A m i x t u r e of p -c hlo ro p he n ol (64 g., 0.5 mole) and 100 g. of 85 p e r c e n t sulfuric acid was t r e a t e d at 70±5° f or th r e e h o ur s with 1.5 m o l e s of t- bu tyl alcohol in a th r e e - n e c k e d , o n e - l i t e r f la s k equipp with a s t i r r e r and t h e r m o m e t e r . F ifty g r a m s of 98 p e r c e n t sulfuric aci d was added r ap id ly at the end of each of the f i r s t two hours, in o r d e r to m a in ta in the acid c on ce ntr ation . A fter s t i r r i n g f o r an a d ­ ditional h ou r, the s yrupy r e d solution was p o u r e d onto c r a c k e d ice and the p r o d u c t e x t r a c t e d with benzene. The benzene solution was 25 then w a sh ed with b ic a r b o n a t e and e x t r a c t e d with C la is en solution. The b en ze ne l a y e r was d r i e d o v e r anhydrous p o t a s s i u m carbonate and the solvent r e m o v e d at r edu ced p r e s s u r e . The r e s id u e was f r a c t i o n a l l y d is t i ll e d through a Vigreux column. The d isti lla te , b.p. 111-115° at 5 m m . , yielded white c r y s t a l s on cooling, which, c r y s t a l l i z e d f r o m ligroin, m e l t e d at 75-76°. re - The yield was 29 g. (2 4%). Anal. Cl, Calcd. f o r C H OC1: 14 21 Cl, 14.76 p e r c e n t . ^ Found: 14.61 and 14.70 p e r c e n t . The C la is en solution e x t r a c t yielded about 5 p e r c e n t of 4- c h l o r o - 2 -t-bu ty lph en ol a f t e r n e u t ra liz a tio n . was followed with p - b ro m o ph en ol , When the above p r o c e d u r e 5 p e r c e n t of 4 - b r o m o - 2 -t-butylphenol was r e c o v e r e d f r o m the alkali e x t r a c t , but the benzene solution yielded no 4 - b r o m o - 2 , 6 - d i - t - b u t y l p h e n o l ; only p o l y m e r i c r e s i d u e s w ere obtained. 2, 6- D i- t-b u ty lp he no l C - Found: Calcd. f o r C 2o H 40 O : 2 C, 83.2 p er ce nt ; H, 9.85 p e r c e n t . C, 82.5 and 82.7 p e rc en t ; H, 9.69 and 9.65 p e r c e n t . This p r o d u c t was identified as 3, 3',5,5 1- te tr a - t- b u t y l d i p h e n o - quinone on the b a s i s of the above a na ly si s, coupled with a subsequent study in this l a b o r a t o r y by W. J . D e t ro i t on the p r o p e r t i e s and s p e c t r a of s e v e r a l sub st it ute d diphenoquinones (45). Acid R e a r r a n g e m e n t The w a r m solution of five drops of 98 p e r c e n t sulfuric acid in one m l . of 2 , 6 -d i- t-b u ty lp h en o l was f u r t h e r heated f o r s e v e r a l m in u te s , then p o u r e d into cold w a t e r . up in p e t r o l e u m e t h e r , The org an ic p r o d u ct was taken and the l a t t e r washed with 10 p e r c e n t aqueous 30 alkali to e x t r a c t any r e a r r a n g e d pro du ct. Acidification, followed by e x t r a c t i o n with l i g r o in and ev ap o ra tio n of the solvent yielded c r y s t a l s which, r e c r y s t a l l i z e d f r o m lig roin , m e l t e d at 55-55.5°; m ixed with an authentic sample of 2 , 4 -d i-t-b uty lph en ol, 55-56°. Relative R at es of B ro m i na ti on and Coupling T r e a t m e n t of 2 , 6 - di- t-bu tylph en ol with b ro m i ne in carbon t e t r a c h l o r i d e solution showed no lo ss in b ro m in e co lo r o ver a p e r i o d of t h i rt y m i n u te s . S i m i l a r t r e a t m e n t using 2,6-xylenol as the phenol gave d ec ol or atio n of the b r o m in e solution in l e s s than one minute. To a cold solution of. 1 g. of 2,6-xylenoi in 20 ml. of 5 p e r ­ cent sodium hydroxide, was added an e x c e s s of diazotized aniline. A f t e r a few m in utes the solution was f i l t e r e d f r e e of small amounts of r e s in o u s m a t e r i a l , acid. and the f i l t r a t e was n e u t r a l i z e d with acetic A fte r f i l t r a t i o n and r e c r y s t a l l i z a t i o n f r o m ligroin, yellow p l a t e s w e r e obtained, m . p . 94.5-95.5°. The melting point r e p o r t e d ,o f o r 4 - p h e n y l a z o - 2 , 6-xylenol is 95-96 . A t te mp ted coupling with 2 , 6 -di-t-b ut ylp hen ol in alcoholic sodium hydroxide un der the s a m e conditions r e s u l t e d in quantitative r e c o v e r y of the s t a r t i n g m a t e r i a l . 31 A bso rp tio n S p e c t r a The u l t r a v i o l e t a b s or pti on s p e c t r a shown in F i g u r e s 1 and 2 w e re d e t e r m i n e d with a B eckm a n s p e c t r o p h o t o m e t e r (Model DU), using 1-cm. q u a r t z ce lls . The cyclohexane solvent (for the phenols) was f r e e d of benzene by p a s s a g e through a ctivated s i l i c a gel, followed by f r ac t io n a ti o n . quinone. Absolute alcohol was u sed as solvent f o r the The 2 , 6 - d i - t - b u t y l - 4 - m e t h y l p h e n o l was obtained f r o m the K o pp er s Company, P i t t s b u r g h , Penn sy lvania, and was p u r if ie d by d is ti lla tio n (146° at 20 mm*) and r e c r y s t a l l i z a t i o n f r o m ligroin, m.p. 69-70°. The i n f r a r e d abs or pti on s p e c t r a (F ig u re s 3 and 4) w ere o b ­ tained through the g e n e r o s i t y of Dr. G. B. B. M. Sutherland and Dr. W. R. Vaughan, U n i v er s it y of Michigan, Ann A r b o r. 2200 32 FIGURE I 2 , 6 -D i-t-b u ty lp h en o l 2000 2 ,6 -D i-t-b u ty l-p -creso l ( 2 . 3 6 x 1 0 ~ 4 4* .T 1800 1600 1400 200 1000 800 600 400 200 220 230 240 250 260 270 Wave L e n g th (m*/) 280 290 300 Log g 33 360 400 Wave L e n g t h 440 480 520 (m^y) FIGURE 2 * The U l t r a v i o l e t A b s o r p t io n S p ectru m 3 , 3 ' , 5 , 5 1~ t e t r a - t - b u t y l - j ^ - d i p h e n o q u i n o n e . of % Transmission 34 too 100 90 90 80 80 80 70 70 70 60 60 60 50 50 50 40 40 30 20 100 100 100 100 90 90 90 90 80 80 80 80 70 70 70 60 60 60 50 50 60 60 40 40 40 40 40 30 30 30 20 20 20 100 70 30 20 Wave Length (p) 2 3 4 5 6 9 7 8 FIGURE?. Infrared Absorption Spectrum of 2,6-Di-t-butylphenol 10 20 35 V* Transmission 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 90 90 80 80 80 90 90 90/ 90 80 80 80 . 3( 70 70 70 70 TO TO 60 60 60 60 60 60 50 50 50 50 50 50 40 40 40 40 40 40 30 30 30 30 30 30 20 20 20 20 20 20 Wave Length (//) 2 3 4 6 8 FIGURE fcInfrared Absorption Spectrum of 2,6-Di-t-butylcyclohexanone 10 40 20 3.6 D is c us si on The following sch eme represents the s e r i e s of r ea ct io ns by m e an s of which 2 , 6 -d i- t-b ut ylp h en o l was s yn thes iz ed in this work: OH OH Isobutylene H SO 2 4 X X Raney Ni-A.l alloy Aqueous NaOH and Ethyl Alcohol (CH ) -C 3 OH c -( c h 3) 3 + NaX This p r o c e d u r e is e s s e n t i a l l y the sam e as that outlined by H a r t (15) f o r the p r e p a r a t i o n of o-t-butylphenol. C o n s id er ab le difficulty in the alkylation step was encountered in attempting to introduce the second t-butyl group. This difficulty undoubtedly a r i s e s b e c a u s e of the high s t e r i c r e q u i r e m e n t s of the two t- bu ty l g r o u p s . A study of the alkylation step was th e r e f o re made, and the r e s u l t s a re s u m m a r i z e d in Table 1. E x p e r i m e n t 2 (Table I) p r od uc ed the h ighest yield of the d e ­ s i r e d p r o d u c t. C o ns id era bl e quantities of t-butylbenzene were o b ­ t a in ed in E x p e r i m e n t 1 due to p r e f e r e n t i a l alkylation of the solvent a f t e r in tr odu ction of the f i r s t t-butyl group. The fo rm at io n of such 37 TABLE 1 E F F E C T OF ALKY LA TION METHOD ON YIELD OF 2,6-DI- T -B U T Y L - 4-HALOPHENOL Reagents Expt. P hen ol Alkyl ating Agent Solvent Catalyst Temp. (° C.) MonoDiAlkyl- AlkylTime ated ated (hrs.) P r o d - P r o d ­ uct uct <%) (%) p - b ro mophenol i so b u­ tylene ben­ zene 98% H SO 2 4 65± 5 10 29 35.6 -b ro mo phenol isobu­ tylene E- x y ­ lene 98% 65=t 5 10 18 47 £-bromophenol isobu­ tylene J’c none 70 25 23 E" chlorophenol t-buty l alcohol 85% H SO u Tt 75 5 24 p-bromophenol t- butyl alcohol 85% 75 H2S° 4 98%H SO 2 4 H2S° 4 * U n d e r 200 p . s . i . in steel bomb. none 38 a b y - p r o d u c t was m i n i m i z e d by using p -xy len e as the solvent. A t­ te m p t s to i n c r e a s e the yield of d i- a l k y la t e d p r o d u c t in E x p e r i m e n t 3, by c a r r y i n g out the r ea c t io n under p r e s s u r e in a steel bomb and in the abs ence of a solvent, f ailed b eca use of i n c r e a s e d for mat io n of p o l y m e r i c r e s i d u e s . The o th e r alkylation method ( Exp er im en ts 4 and 5), although producing a f a i r amount of d e s i r e d p rod uct with -chlorophenol yielded only p o l y m e r i c m a t e r i a l s when the b r o m o i s o m e r was used. The r eduction of the halogen in t e rm e d i a t e was c a r r i e d out using Raney N i ck el -A l um i nu m alloy and aqueous alkali according to the p r o c e d u r e of Papa, Schwenk, and c o - w o r k e r s (47), and the phenol was s olu bilized by the addition of ethyl alcohol to the r eaction m i x ­ t u re . This reduction method afforded a s u p e r i o r yield (93%) to the p r o c e d u r e of Stillson and Sawyer (17), who used p o t a s s i u m and liquid a m mon ia. Although the p r o d u c t r e p o r t e d by these w o r k e r s was a solid, m.p. liquids. 38-39°, both m ethods of reduction afforded us c o l o r l e s s At that ti m e , we w e re in fo rm ed by Dr. R. H. Rosenwald of the U n i v e r s a l Oil P r o d u c t s Company, that his group had succeeded in p r e p a r i n g what was thought to be c r y s t a l li n e 2,6 — di— t— butylphenol, m.p. 38-38.5°, by the reduction of 2,6 - di- t-b u t y l -p-bro mop heno l with hyd rog en in the p r e s e n c e of p allad iu m on charcoal. When our phenol failed to c r y s t a l l i z e a f t e r the addition of a sample of Dr. Rosenw ald's product, both m a t e r i a l s w e re subjected to u l t ra vio le t an aly sis . While o u r m a t e r i a l gave the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c phenol s p e c t ru m (see F i g u r e 1), the solid p r o d u c t f u r n i s h e d us by Dr. Rosenwald gave no absorption in this region. This p r o d u c t was subsequently shown to be 2 , 6 - d i - t - butylcyclohexanone (44). It is known that phenols can be converted to the c o r r e s p o n d i n g cyclohexanones by p a r t i a l hydrogenation. How­ e ver , the m i l d conditions (room t e m p e r a t u r e and 50 atm.) used by Rosenwald, which effected such a con vers io n a r e quite s u r p r i s i n g and c e r t a i n l y b e a r f u r t h e r investigation. F o r example, Whitaker (48) has r e p o r t e d the p r e p a r a t i o n of s e v e r a l alkyl cyclohexanones by hydrogenation with Adams platinum ca ta ly st. 2, 6 - D i - t - b u t y l - 4 - m e t h y l - phenol r e q u i r e d a t e m p e r a t u r e of 200° at 150 atm. p r e s s u r e f or c onv er sion to the co r r es p o n d in g cyclohexanone. It might also be pointed out that f u r t h e r hydrogenation to the cyclohexanol was i m ­ p o s s ib le with such a m ol ec ule due to the s t e r i c p ro te c tio n of the carbonyl by the t -a l k y l groups. In view of these o b s e r v a ti o n s , the i n f r a r e d absorption s p e c t r u m of our p r o d u c t was obtained, and a slight con ce ntration of the a l i ­ phatic carbonyl group was detected by virtue of the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c a b s o r p ti o n band at 5.8p (for example, see F i g u r e 4 for the i n f r a r e d 40 s p e c t r u m of the p u r e carbonyl compound). Chem ical se pa ra tio n of such an i m p u r i ty being a l m o s t im p o ss ib le due to the l a r g e s t e r i c h ind ranc e of the t- buty l g rou ps, the phenol was car ef ully fra ct io n ate d and, a f t e r f r e e z i n g in d ry ice and im m e d i a te vacuum f il tr ati on , a f ­ fo rded a solid which gave white p r i s m s f r o m ethanol, m.p. 37-38°. The i n f r a r e d s p e c t r u m of this pro du ct (Figure 3, e x p e ri m e n t a l s e c ­ tion) showed no a b s o r p ti o n band at 5.8|jl. A study was also made of the r e ac tio ns and p r o p e r t i e s of 2 , 6 - d i- t- b u ty lp h e n o l and s e v e r a l points of this study a r e worthy of discussion here. When the phenol was n i t r a t e d with con ce n tra te d n i t r ic acid in g la cial acetic acid (1:1) at room t e m p e r a t u r e , a yellow solid, i de n ­ tified as 4 , 6 - d i n i t r o - 2 -t-butylphenol was isolated. This pro duct is identical with th at obtained by Ipatieff, P i n e s and F r i e d m a n (46) f r o m the n i t r a t i o n of 2 , 4 - d i - t - b u t y l p h e n o l . In the l a t t e r case, the 4 - t- bu ty l group was c leaved f r o m the ring, w h e r e a s in the p r e s e n t in sta n ce one of the 2 - t-b utyl groups was cleaved. This r e s u l t is also in a c c o r d with the r e p o r t by Stevens (49) of the dealkylation of ortho alkyl phenols during distillation in acidic media, and the r e a r r a n g e m e n t of o-t-bu ty lp heno l to the p a r a i s o m e r in the p r e s e n c e of s ulfuric acid, r e p o r t e d by H a r t (15). O u r p ro d u c t also underwent 41 r e a r r a n g e m e n t , to 2 ,4 - d i- t -b u t y l p h e n o l , under the conditions d e s c r ib e d by the l a t t e r i n v e s t i g a t o r . An a t t e m p t at n i t r a t io n without cleavage, using a 1:6 n itr ic to acetic acid m i x t u r e at 0° yielded small quantities of dark r ed n ee dl es , m . p . 245-247 , which contained no nitrogen. The analysis of this compound a g r e e d with that calculated f o r 3 , 3',5,5 ' - t e t r a - t butyl-p-diphenoquinone. S i m i l a r oxidation p rod ucts have been is ola ted in a n u m b e r of n i t r a t io n s of substituted phenols as well as f r o m other phenol oxidations. As f u r t h e r proof of s t r u c t u r e , the absorption s p e c t r u m of th is compound is shown in F i g u r e 2. The m a j o r peak in the s p e c t r u m , at 418 mp, is s i m i l a r to that r e p o r t e d by Valyashko and S h c he rb ak (50) f or diphenoquinone, but shifted slightly tow ard a lon ger wave length. D e tr o it and H a r t (51) have r ecently r e p o rt e d the p r e p a r a t i o n and s p e c t r a of diphenoquinone and s e v er a l alkylated de riv ativ e s . S e v e r a l p r e l i m i n a r y e x p e r i m e n t s w ere c a r r i e d out to c om par e the r e l a t iv e p a r a r e a c t i v i t y of this highly h in d e r e d phenol with 2,6dimethylphenol, which by the s ta n d a r d s set up by Coggeshall (6) b a s ed on the i n f r a r e d s p e c t r u m , would be c l a s s e d as an unhindered phenol. The l a r g e d ifferenc e in the ' s t e r i c effect of the methyl and t e r t i a r y butyl groups is also exe m p lif ie d by the solubility beh av io r of the 42 two compounds. W h e r e a s 2 , 6 -dimethylphenol is soluble in 20 p e r c e n t sodium h ydroxide, the d i - t - b u t y l d eriv ativ e is completely insoluble even in alcoholic p o t a s s i u m hydroxide ( C l a i se n 's solution). In the f i r s t e x p e r i m e n t it was found that the dimethylphenol rapidly d e c o l ­ o r iz e d a solution of b r o m i n e in car bo n t e t r a c h l o r i d e while the d i - t butylphenol showed no b ro m i n atio n a f t e r a much lo ng er p e r i o d of reactio n. More conclusive evidence of d e c r e a s e d rea ct iv it y at the p a r a p ositio n in the m o r e h ind red phenol was obtained by the diazonium coupling reac tio n . The 4 - ph en yla z o-2, 6 -dimethylphenol was obtained f r o m the dimethylphenol and diazotized aniline quite easily, while s e v e r a l a t te m p t s with the 2 , 6- d i- t-bu tylp heno l gave p r a c t i c a l l y quantitative r e c o v e r y of the s ta rt in g m a t e r i a l . An explanation of the above r e s u l t s using known e l e c t r i c a l effects of alkyl g ro up s a p p e a r s untenable. The introduction of ortho alkyl g roups can affect ring activity by virtue of t h e i r inductive and hyperconjugative effects. B e r l i n e r (52) c a r r i e d out a study of the r ela tiv e e l e c t r o n i c effects of the methyl and t e r t i a r y butyl groups by m e a s u r i n g the r a t e s of b r o m i n a t io n of toluene and t-butylbenzene in 85 p e r c e n t ace tic acid. The r e s u l t s of this work show that toluene is b r o m i n a t e d five t im e s f a s t e r than the t-butyl deriv ativ e. This d if fer en ce w as a t t r ib u t e d to the l a rg e d e g re e of hyperconjugation that 43 is p o s s i b le in the methyl group, which supposedly o v e rc o m e s the g r e a t e r inductive effect of the t-bu ty l group. In a r e c e n t book on hyper conjugation, however, B a k e r (5 3) has d is c l o s e d the r e c e n t kinetic studies of Conn, Hughes, and Jon es f o r the n i t ra t io n of a s e r i e s of alkyl b e n z e n e s. Although these studies v er if y the o v e r - a l l r e s u l t s obtained by B e r l i n e r f o r c o m p a ra tiv e activity of toluene and t-butyl benzene, these w o r k e r s a r e carefu l to point out that the p ro po rtion of i s o m e r i d e s f o r m e d in the r e ac tio n shed a different light on the explanation of the r a t e i n c r e a s e in going f r o m t-butylbenzene to toluene. Thus, the following r ela tiv e r a t e s of r ea c t io n w ere obtained: Ring Substituent Me Et i-P r t- Bu H Relative Rate 100 97 87 73 6.8 However, the p r o p o r t i o n of i s o m e r i d e s d e t e r m i n e d gave p a r t i a l rate f a c t o r s of the following magnitude: Ring Substituent Me t-Bu % Ortho 54.6 12.3 Consequently, even though the o v e r - a l l % Meta % Para 3.2 8.7 42.2 79.0 rate of n i t ra t io n of toluene was f a s t e r than t-bu ty lb en zene , the a p pa re nt activation of the positions m e t a and p a r a to the alkyl groups is much g r e a t e r in the l a t t e r c o m ­ pound, and m u s t be a t t r ib u t e d to the g r e a t e r inductive effect of the t- bu ty l group, since t h e r e a r e no c(^-hydrogens available in this group 44 f o r h yper conjugation. B a k e r , t h e r e f o r e , points out that the d e t e r ­ mining f a c t o r in the o v e r - a l l r a t e s is the ortho substitution, which is m uch s lo w e r in t-bu tylb en zene b e ca u se of the l a r g e r s t e ri c effect of the t- buty l group. On the b a s i s of these studies one would expect a g r e a t e r p a r a activation in 2 , 6 - d i- t-b u ty lp he no l than in the dimethyl derivative b eca use of the l a r g e r inductive effect of the t-butyl group. The fact that this is not the c a s e , ind icate s that an a ltern ativ e m e c h a n i s m m u s t be sought. S te ri c hindrance of the hydroxyl group in the phenol m o le cu le , by the l a r g e t-butyl groups, could p re ve nt co p l an ­ a r i t y between this group and the benzene ring, th e re b y reducing the e l e c t r o n d ensity at the p a r a po sition by virtue of a s t e r i c inhibition of the usual hydroxyl r e s o n an c e. This would account fo r the lack of b r o m i n a t io n and diazo coupling which was o b s er ve d f or the h i n ­ d e re d 2, 6 - d i- t-b u ty lp he no l. Both the u l t r a v i o l e t and i n f r a r e d a bs or ptio n s p e c t r a of the 2 , 6 - d i -t -b ut ylp h en ol w e re d e te rm i n ed . The f o r m e r is given in F ig ur e 1 with that of 2 , 6 - d i - t - b u t y l - 4 - m e t h y l p h e n o l f o r c om par is on . The m a j o r p eak s at 271 and 278 mp a r e identical with those of phenol and o t h e r ortho al kylated phenols, and indicate the absence of any alkyl group in the p a r a position. 45 The i n f r a r e d a b s o r p t i o n s p e c t r u m is shown in F i g u r e 3. The hydroxyl a b s o r p t i o n band o c c u r r i n g at 2.76 p. is indicative of a highly h in d e re d hydroxyl gro up , since Coggeshall (6) has shown that an u n ­ h in d e re d hydroxyl, in c o n c e n t r a t e d solution, will exhibit c h a r a c t e r i s t i c abs orption at 3.0 p wavelength due to p ro b ab le a s s o c ia t io n o r i n t e r m o l e c u l a r h ydrog en bonding. In 2 , 6 - di- t-bu ty lp hen ol, all i n t e r m o l e c - ula r h ydrogen bonding is a p p ar en tly prev en ted . PART B KINETIC STUDIES OF THE ALKY LA TION OF PHENOLS WITH TERTIARY HALIDES 46 47 Expe r i m e n t a l I. Materials The phenol was J. T. B a k e r Chemical Company m a t e r i a l , and was p u r i f i e d by d is ti lla tio n at a t m o s p h e r i c p r e s s u r e with a small amount of benzene to r em ove the w a ter. The f ra c t io n boiling 175 to 183° at a t m o s p h e r i c p r e s s u r e was f u r t h e r f ra c t io n a te d in a Vigreux column, the m a t e r i a l boiling f r o m 180 to 182° being retained. The phenol was then d e g a s s e d and f u r t h e r p u rif ie d f o r kinetic s am p les in an a p p a r a t u s s i m i l a r to the one d e s c r i b e d by H a r t and Simons (2). The de ga ss in g was a c c o m p l is h ed by a l te r n a te f reezing , evacuation, and thawing. The a p p a r a t u s design then enabled distillation at 20 mm. in a n i t ro g e n a t m o s p h e r e , such that a 50 ml. f o r e - c u t could be d i s c a r d e d b ef or e collection of the phenol u sed in the kinetic m e a ­ surements. The phenol was s t o r e d in a d e s i c c a t o r under a nitrogen a t m o s p h e r e until r e a d y f o r use. The t-b uty l chlo ride was E a s t m a n Kodak white label m a t e r i a l . This was d r i e d o v e r p o t a s s i u m carbon ate (anhydrous), and f r a c t i o n ­ ated in a n i t ro g e n s t r e a m , retaining the sample which boiled c o n ­ stantly at 52° at a t m o s p h e r i c p r e s s u r e and had a r e f r a c t i v e index of n 20 D 1.3851. The halide was then p laced in a small distilling system, 48 d e g a s s e d accord ing to s t a n d a r d techniques, and dis ti lle d and collected in a n i t ro g e n a t m o s p h e r e . The tri ph en yl methyl chloride ( h e r e a f t e r r e f e r r e d to as trityl chloride) was M ath ies on C hem ical Company p r a c t i c a l g rad e. This m a t e r i a l was t r e a t e d twice in benzene solution with decolorizing c h a r c o a l , followed by r e c r y s t a l l i z a t i o n f r o m benzene -pentane s o l u ­ tion. The faintly yellow tinted c r y s t a l s w ere f i l t e r e d rapidly, dried, and s t o r e d in a vacuum d e s i c c a t o r o ver m i n e r a l oil. The d ried c r y s t a l s w e r e as c o a r s e as g r an u la te d s ug ar and had a melting point of 110-111°. All o per at io ns in this p u rif ication w e r e designed to exclude a t m o s p h e r i c m o i s t u r e . The p - d i c h l o r o b e n z e n e was f r a c t i o n a t e d through a Vigreux column with a s m a l l amount of benzene to r em ov e t r a c e s of w a te r. The f r a c t i o n boiling 180-181° at a t m o s p h e r i c p r e s s u r e was re ta in ed and s t o r e d in a n it ro g e n a t m o s p h e r e . The o th e r phenols used in the r ela tiv e r ate studies were all car ef ul ly f r a c t i o n a t e d and s t o r e d under n itrog en until used. In a d d i ­ tion to f ra ct io n a ti o n , the 2,6-xylenol (Edcan L a b o r a t o r i e s ) was r e c r y s t a l l i z e d f r o m p e t r o l e u m e t h e r , m.p. 49°. The p u rif icatio n of the 2 , 6 - d i - t -b u t y l p h en o l was d e s c r i b e d in P a r t I of this th e si s. 49 II. A p p a r a tu s A.. Relative R at es of Alkylation The a p p a r a t u s u s e d is shown in F i g u r e I. It c on s is te d of a 125 m l . r e a c t i o n f la s k , A, with a n it ro g en bub ble r extending to the bottom of the f las k. The f l a s k was s ea le d to a co nd en ser at B, which was f itted at the top with a 14/35 m ale ground g l a ss joint, C. The c o n d e n s e r was a t ta ch e d to a tube, D, with a t h r e e - w a y stopcock, E, whose outlets w e r e fit ted with 14/35 male ground g l a s s joints, F, to which sodium b ic a r b o n a te tubes w ere connected. The sodium b i ­ c ar bo nat e tubes w e r e connected to a d ry ice t r a p by me ans of a r u b b e r joint, G. The r ea c t io n f l a s k was shaken manually at i n t e r ­ vals, and a continuous s t r e a m of dry n it ro g en gas was bubbled through the r e a c t i o n m i x tu re during the c o u r s e of the reaction. The r e a c t i o n f l a s k was s u b m e r g e d in a co nstant t e m p e r a t u r e bath m a i n ­ tained at 50.0±0.1° during the e x p e r i m e n t s . B. Quantitative Kinetic M e a s u r e m e n t s A s c h e m a t i c d i a g r a m of the r ate ap p ar at us is shown in F ig u r e 2 with p ho tog raph s of v ar io u s p a r t s of the s y s t e m appearing on follow­ ing p ag es . 50 Ng D \ ^ -G FI GURE 1* Apparatus Rates of R ea ctio n . for th e Measurement of R elative 51 e e> 0=dy=: (mm.) Pf (mm.) k (1 mole-1 m i n - 1) kl ...(1 m o l e - 2 m i n - 1) 1 0. 315(P) 0.631 88.2 5 42.2 0.20 37 0.001744 2* 0 . 6lO(P) 0.610(F) 0.629 0.629 71.5 73.8 525.5 529.0 0.4296 0.4389 Appr.k = 0.2786° 0.005381 0.0054305 Appr.k = 0.005812 3 0.9132(F) 0.6105 87.4 657.0 0.78623 0.0081475 4 1.184(F) 0.5935 126.2 670.5 1.0869 Appr.k = 0.6814° 0.013125 Appr.k = 0.012950 5 1.184(C) 0.5921 101.5 757.5 0.3327 0.010353 6 1.368(C) 0.3571 162.0 435.0 0.3552 0.010114 7 ** 1.368(C) 0.3571 279-1 553.4 0.01112(B) 107.8 506.2 8 10.55(F) 0.009779 0.01241 5 ^ 9 10.61(F) 0.009881(B) 104.5 499.7 min.) 0.01357 5 i / l 2 min.) * Check runs m ad e at this concentration. ' ^ H y d r o g e n chloride added initially. P = phenol. C = o - e r e sol. B r e p r e s e n t s the n u m b e r of m o le s of t-butyl chloride added to the phenol (in p la ce of t r i t y l chloride). 67 700 600 Pressure, M illim eters 500 400 300 200 100 0 100 200 300 Time, FI GURE 3 . Pressure and 7 , T a b le 2. vs. 400 500 600 700 M inutes Time C u r v e s for Experim ents 4, 5, 68 was b r o ug h t about in all the o th e r e x p e r i m e n t s following the f o r m a ­ tion of a sufficient c on c e n t r a ti o n of hydrogen chloride in the reactio n. OH C-C l + OH + HC1 Working with this hy pothesis the following equation was applied in an at te m p t to d e s c r i b e the r e a c t i o n rate: d p /d t = [phenol] [halide] [HCl] (1) Using Ma M as the initial phenol concentration, and 1’b M as the initial halide co n ce ntr ati on , the above t e r m s would be r e p r e s e n t e d f r o m the e x p e r i m e n t a l data a t any time during the r ea c t io n as: [phenol] = a - [(p - p )/(p - p )]a o i o [halide] = b - [(p - PQ)/(Pf * PQ)]b [HCl] = P - PD where p r e p r e s e n t s the ins ta ntaneous p r e s s u r e , p pressure solvent, phenol, (a total of the v a po r p r e s s u r e s of the halide), and p the initial reaction and the final e q u i li b r iu m p r e s s u r e . Substituting the above in equation (1) we get d p /d t =■ k [a - (p - p )/(p - P ) a ][t> - (p - P ) / (Pf - P ) b Kp ~ P ] 1 O t O o x o which can b e s im p lif ie d by expanding and collecting t e r m s to: d p / d t = k^ab[(p^ - p )/( pf - pQ)]2 [p . p ] (2) or [dp/ (p - p) {p - p )] = [k a b/(p - p )2]dt 1 o l i o Inte gr atio n of the l a t t e r gives [l/(P£ P q) 1 [ U / ( p f - pi] + [ l / ( Pf - Po)]ln [(p - p o) /( pf - p 07j = [k ab /(p - p ) ]t + C[p - p ] JI o t o (3) Evaluation of the c ons tan t of in tegr ati on is im p oss ible h er e, however, b e ca u se on setting t = 0 and p = p , the equation b eco m es o [l/(p I )T| - p ) ] j [ l / ( P f - P )] + [ l / ( p f - P )]ln[(p - p )/(p - p = C, OL _ _ f O f O O O f Q i which is in d e t e r m i n a t e due to the n a t u r e of the log t e r m . By multiplying equation (3) through by (p can be f - p ), however, it o r e v i s e d to the f o r m of an e q u a tio n r e p r e s e n t i n g a s t r a i g h t line [T l/(p f - P)] + [2.30 3 / (pf - PQ)]log[(p - PQ)/(Pf - P)TJ = [ k 1a b / ( p f - PQ)]t + c tPf - PQ]2 T h e r e fo r e , using Y to r e p r e s e n t the le ft side of the equation, a plot of Y v e r s u s t should yield a s t r a i g h t line when the ex per im en ta l data a r e applied to the equation. shown in F i g u r e 4. A plot of this type f o r E x p e r i m e n t 4 is It is r e a d i l y s een that the equation holds e x c e p ­ tionally well f o r the l a t t e r p a r t of the reaction, but gives no s t r a i g h t line r el a t io n s h i p during the f i r s t 150 m in utes of reaction. 70 10 * to X -2 “4 -5 -6 00 300 200 Time F I GU R E 4 . Experim ent A pp lication 4. of , Data 400 500 M inutes to Third Order R ate E q u a t io n , 71 Since the l a t t e r p a r t of the re a c tio n was r e p r e s e n te d so well by equation (1), it b e c a m e a p p a r e n t th a t the in itia l ra te might be d e s c r ib e d b y the sam e equation m inus the HCl te r m , which of co u rse would be of in s ig n ific a n t m agnitude n e a r the beginning of the reactio n . Thus, d p /d t = k [phenol][halide] o (4) T r a n s c r ib in g th is to the e x p e r im e n ta l un its, expanding, and collecting t e r m s as w as done in the p re v io u s c a s e , we get d p /d t = k ab[(p o f - p ) /( p , - p )]2 f o o r, [dp/(pf - p )2] = [kQa b /(p f - PQ) 2]dt Upon in te g r a tio n one then obtains [ l / ( p f - P)1 = [kQa b /(p f - P q)2 ]1 + C ^ Thus, when t = 0, p = p , the in te g ra tio n constant, C, b eco m es equal o to [ l / ( p f - p )]• o Substituting th is value f o r C in equation (5), we ob- tain the e x p r e s s io n [X/(pf - P)] = [kQa b /(p f - PQ) 2]t + U /( P f " PQ)] which once ag ain is the f o r m equation f o r a s tr a ig h t line. (6) C o n se­ quently, a p lo t of [ l / ( p £ - p)] v e r s u s [t] should give a s tr a ig h t- lin e r e la tio n s h ip when applied to the e x p e r im e n ta l data, if the in itial ra te is s a t i s f a c t o r i l y r e p r e s e n t e d by equation (4). Such a p lo t is shown 72 fo r E x p e r im e n t 4 in F ig u r e 5. Once again the m a rk e d deviation fro m a s tr a i g h t line is seen; it is r e a d ily ap p aren t, how ever, that the d e ­ viation does not begin till a f te r the f i r s t 125 m inutes of reactio n . F r o m the fo reg o in g r e s u l t s , th e re f o re , it is re a so n a b le to a ssu m e th a t a co m b in atio n of equations (1) and (4) m ight well d e s c rib e the e n tir e r e a c tio n r a t e . Thus, d p /d t - k Q[phenol][halide] + k [phenol][halide][HCl] (7) The e v alu atio n of the r a te co nstan ts in the above equation was a t ­ te m p te d b y c o n s id e rin g the two p a r t s of equation (7) s e p arately , and using the two g r a p h ic a l m ethods which have ju s t been d escrib e d . Each r a t e co n s ta n t was d e riv e d f r o m the slope of the s tra ig h t-lin e p o rtio n of the d e riv a tiv e c u rv e s , exem plified by F ig u r e s 4 and 5. This was done f o r s e v e r a l ru n s, and the valu es obtained ap p ea r in Table 2, d esig n ated as the a p p ro x im a te d values of and k^. In o r d e r to te s t the a c c u r a c y of the co n stan ts ev alu ated in this m an n er, a calcu lated curve f o r E x p e r im e n t 2 was p r e p a r e d fr o m equation (9) resu ltin g f r o m the in te g r a tio n of equation (7), which follows. The solid curve in F ig u r e 6 r e p r e s e n t s th is calcu lated cu rv e, while the dotted line shows a s i m i l a r p lo t of the e x p e rim e n ta l data f o r co m p ariso n . Since the e x p e r im e n ta l points show co n sid era b le deviation fro m the c a lc u la te d c u rv e , it i s obvious th at the d e te r m in e d v alu es of the 73 45 40 35 30 25 20 o I— I K a o 50 100 50 200 250 300 350 T im e, M i n u t e s FIGURE 5 . A p p l i c a t i o n o f D a t a t o S e c o n d Order R a t e Law, E xp erim ent 4. 74 -o Pressure, M illim eters 300 100 1000 2000 3000 Time , M i n u t e s FIGURE 6 . C o m p a r i s o n o f C a l c u l a t e d Curve from A p p r o x i ­ m a ted R a t e C o n s t a n t s and O b s e r v e d Curve f r o m E x p e r i m e n t 2. 75 ra te c o n s ta n ts a r e in e r r o r . Consequently, the application of th ese co n stan ts, o btained by tr e a tin g the beginning and end of the re a c tio n s e p a r a te ly as p ro v id e d by equations (1) and (4), gives a th e o re tic a l ra te cu rv e of the sam e shape as th at o b serv ed , but does not r e ­ produce the o b s e r v e d curve as a c c u r a te ly as one m ight like. tic u la r , the v alu es of k o In p a r ­ s e e m to be quite a b it off, as seen fro m Table 2. E quation (7) was th e r e f o r e ev alu ated in the following m anner: T r a n s c r ib in g to the e x p e r im e n ta l te rm s as d e s c rib e d p rev io u sly , we get + ki E ■C(p ■ po)/(pf ■ po)]3 E ■[

/(pf ■ po>3 E ■p3 Expanding and co llectin g t e r m s , dp /dt = k ab[(p - p)/(pf - 2 P Q) ] + k t ab[(pf - p ) / ( p f - 2 P q >] [p - P Q] d p /d t = ab[(p X - p ) / ( p I, - P O )] [kO + k X (p - p vJ )] dp /dt = [ a b / (p f - P0) 2 ][Pf - P]2 tk 0 + k ! (P ‘ Po)] Equation (8) can now be tr a n s f o r m e d to an in teg rab le fo rm , 2 2, [dp/ (pf - p) {kQ - k 1Po + kjp)] = [ab /(p £ - Pq) ]dt Upon in te g r a tio n of the above we then g et (8) It w a | quite obvious at this point that the in te g ra te d fo rm was too co m plex f o r a re a s o n a b le evaluation of the reactio n c o n ­ s ta n ts . A ttention was th e r e f o r e tu rn e d to the u n in teg rated fo rm (equation 8). If this equation is r e a r r a n g e d as follows, [(dp/dt) / (p - p )Z] = [{k ab) / (p - p ± i l o )2][p - p ] + [(abk ) / (p o o f o - p)2](10) we once again have the m a th e m a tic a l e x p r e s s io n fo r a s tr a ig h t line. 2 Thus, if [(dp/dt) (p - p) ] w e re p lo tted a g ain st [p - p ], the r e s u lt f o should be a s tr a i g h t line f o r all the ex p e rim e n ta l data if equation (10) s a ti s f a c to r il y r e p r e s e n t s the re a c tio n . In such a case, the te rm 2 [(k. ab) / (p - p ) ] would r e p r e s e n t the slope of this line, and 1 f o 2 [(abk )/(p - p ) ] would be equal to the value of the in te rc e p t, o f o f r o m which then k o and k 1 could be evaluated. The d e te r m in a tio n of (dp/dt) f o r the MY U t e r m of equation (10) was c a r r i e d out a c c o rd in g to the method d e s c rib e d by H a r t and Sim ons (2). A. p lo t of the e x p e rim e n ta l data was f i r s t made on la rg e g ra p h p a p e r , and a spline was u se d to draw a sm ooth curve through th e se p o in ts. N o r m a ls to the r a te c u r v e s w e re then drawn with a 77 plane f i r s t - s u r f ace m i r r o r held in a sm all fra m e at rig h t angles to the plane of the c u rv e . The n o r m a l was e s ta b lis h e d when the curve and its im age a p p e a re d to give no p e rc e p tib le b r e a k . The slope of the r a te cu rv e, [dp/dt], was then d e te rm in e d as the n e g a ­ tive r e c i p r o c a l of the slope of the n o rm a l. About fifteen to twenty slopes w e re d e te r m in e d f o r each curve, at r e g u la r tim e in te rv a ls throughout the r e a c tio n . The v alu e of p* was d e te rm in e d by ex tra p o latio n of the r e a c ­ tion cu rv e to z e ro tim e. Since the re a c tio n curve was quite flat n e a r the beginning of the re a c tio n , with c o n s id e ra b le a c c u r a c y . this d e te rm in a tio n could be made The value of p was found ex p erim en ta lly \ f in all the ru n s , with the exception of the v e r y slow phenol alkylation s. In th e se ru n s it was found th a t the data n e a r the end of the re a c tio n gave a l i n e a r p lo t of [dp/dt] v e r s u s p. e x tra p o la tio n of th is line to [dp/dt] = 0. T h e re fo re , p was found b y This l i n e a r it y was ju stified by the s u b stitu tio n of some actu al data, obtained n e a r the end of the re a c tio n s , in equation (10). When this was done at s e v e ra l p r e s s u r e s , it was found th a t the r e a c tio n r a te , [dp/dt], divided by the in s ta n ta n e ­ ous p r e s s u r e gave v a lu e s th a t changed p ro p o rtio n a lly with the change in p r e s s u r e . squares (57). The b e s t p lo t was d e te rm in e d b y the method of l e a s t The a c c u r a c y of the v alu es of pf by this method was 78 checked in s e v e r a l r e a c tio n s by c o m p a ris o n with the e x p e rim e n ta lly d e te r m in e d p^, v a lu e s. The d ifferen c e was of the o r d e r of one p e r ­ cent. The v alu es of " a 11 and " b 11 r e p r e s e n tin g the in itia l co n cen ­ tr a tio n of the phenol and halide, w e re d e te rm in e d by using both e x p e r im e n ta lly m e a s u r e d d e n s itie s , and available data f r o m the l i t ­ e r a t u r e f o r the d e n s itie s of the phenols u s e d in each ex p erim en t. The d e n s ity of the h a lid e - s o lv e n t com bination was d e te rm in e d at the r e a c tio n t e m p e r a t u r e in the u su al m a n n e r and the volume of solution was c a lc u la te d . The volum e of the phenol at the re a c tio n te m p e r a ­ tu r e was c a lc u la te d f r o m the l i t e r a t u r e d en s itie s , its solution in the halide - solv en t m ix tu r e being a s s u m e d to be p e r f e c t. Since the solutions w e re dilute, this assu m p tio n p ro b ab ly did not introduce an a p p re c ia b le e r r o r . Once the total r e a c tio n volume was c a l c u ­ la te d the m o l a r i t i e s of the phenol and halide could be d e te rm in e d in the u su al way. Having d e te r m in e d the n e c e s s a r y values f o r testin g the a p 2 p lic a b ility of equation (10), p lo ts of [(dp/dt)/(p^_ - p) ] v e r s u s [p - p^] w ere m ade and a r e i l l u s t r a t e d in F ig u r e 7. ta in ed o v e r the e n t ir e alky latio n re a c tio n . S traig h t lin es w ere ob­ The b e s t s tr a ig h t line w as d e te r m in e d in e a c h c a s e b y the method of l e a s t s q u a r e s , which 79 80 dp/dt 70 20 0 100 200 - FI GURE 7 . Adherence of 300 p Q, M i l l i m e t e r s A uto-C atalyzed R eaction tc Equation 10. 80 a u to m a tic a lly y ields the v alu es f o r the slope and in te rc e p t. ues of k^ and k , co lu m n s 6 and 1 , The v a l ­ Table 2 , could then be calculated. The a c c u r a c y of the c o n sta n ts d e te rm in e d in this way is illu s tr a t e d in F ig u r e 8, which shows the c lo se n e ss of the fit of the calculated curve ( p r e p a r e d f r o m equation 9) and the e x p e rim e n ta l points. r e s u l t s f o r E x p e r im e n ts The 1 through 6 w e re th e re f o re d e te rm in e d by this p r o c e d u r e , and a r e tab u lated in Table 2. The m a th e m a tic a l ap p ro a ch to E x p e rim e n t 7 was v a r ie d slightly since anhydrous hydrogen chloride was added before the r e a c ta n ts w e re m ixed in the re a c tio n v e s s e l. Since the ra te curve f o r this r e a c tio n shows no induction p e rio d (see F ig u re 3), the f i r s t t e r m of equation (7) can be d is c a r d e d and the re a c tio n d e s c rib e d by d p /d t = k^ |a~ - [(p - p Q) /(p f - p^3) £ | [ b - [

M i l l i m e t e r s o f .C atalyzed A lk y la tio n to Third 84 p lo t would be z e r o . T h e r e fo r e , the kinetic o r d e r with r e s p e c t to phenol m u s t be d e te r m in e d f r o m such a plot as the slope plus one, o r [n + 1]. G rap h s of log k^ and log k^ v e r s u s log of the phenol c o n c e n tra tio n a r e shown in F ig u r e d is c u s s e d in the sectio n to follow. 10, and th e i r significance will be 85 - 6. 0 -0.60 Ko, m = 1.23 -5.0- -4 .0 -0 .4 0 .40 -3 .0 - -0.30 - - - 6.0 -5.0 -4.0 -3.0 - 2.0 0.20 1. 0 - 1.0 Log P h e n o l C o n c e n t r a t i o n x 1 0 FIGURE 1 0 . V ariation Phenol C o n ce n tr a tio n . o f R a t e C o n s t a n t s With Log o f + 1.0 86 D iscu ssio n The alkylation of phenol and v a rio u s alkylated phenols was c a r r i e d out using both t-b u ty l c h lo rid e and tr ity l chloride as the alkylating ag en ts. In ea c h case the o v e r - a ll re a c tio n s can be d e ­ s c r ib e d by the following equations: H° - ( \ H° y /> >7 + t-R C l + t RC1 R \ -OH HCl Q /> - ° H HCl R The r e s u l t s a r e p e r im e n ts ^ t-R -/ s u m m a r iz e d in Table 1 in the p re v io u s section. Ex­ 1 through 7 w e re c a r r i e d out with the phenol to be alkylated p r e s e n t in la r g e e x c e s s ; consequently, the r e a c tio n m edium could h a r d ly be c o n s id e r e d as eq uivalent f ro m one e x p e rim e n t to another. The la r g e r a te d e c r e a s e o b s e rv e d in going fro m un su b stitu ted phenol to the highly h in d e re d 2 ,6 -d i-t-b u ty lp h e n o l m a y th e re f o re be the r e ­ sult of s e v e r a l f a c t o r s . Substitution in the ortho positions should d e c r e a s e the e ffic ie n c y of phenols f o r solvating carb o n iu m ions a n d /o r in co o rd in a tin g the halogen of the t-b u ty l ch lo rid e. That the effect is p r e d o m in a n tly s t e r i c is in d icate d by the g r e a t e r r e a c tiv ity of 2 ,6 -d im eth y lp h e u o l as c o m p a re d with the d i- t- b u ty l d eriv ativ e. The 87 opposite r e s u l t would have been p r e d ic te d on the b a s is of the r e l a ­ tive a c tiv a tio n of the p a r a p o sitio n due to the inductive effect of the alkyl g ro u p s. M eta and p a r a e r e sol (E x p erim en ts 6 and 7) both alkylate ortho to the hydroxyl and consequently r e p r e s e n t co m p arab le r e a c ­ tions. The so lv en t p r o p e r t i e s of th ese two m o lecu les a r e v e r y s i m ­ i l a r (58); th u s, the la rg e en h an cem en t of alkylation ra te fo r m - c r e s o l o v e r the p a r a i s o m e r is a s c r ib e d h e re to the in c r e a s e d e le c tro n density at the 6-p o sitio n cau sed by the inductive a n d / o r hyperconjugative e ffect of the m ethyl group. It b e c a m e obvious at this point in o u r study, that in o r d e r to avoid a m u ltip lic ity of explanations cau sed b y high phenol co n ce n ­ tr a tio n s in the r e a c tio n m edium , the k in e tic s m u st be studied in dilute solution and in an i n e r t solvent. The alkylation d e c r e a s e s in rate quite r a p id ly when solvents such as p -x y lene, et c e te r a , a r e used. In r e la tiv e r a te E x p e r im e n ts 8 to 10, an a tte m p t was made to use n itro b e n zen e, but h e r e again the ra te was exceedingly slow, even at 75° C. These e x p e r im e n ts do, how ever, r e p r e s e n t d eterm in atio n s in m o r e dilute solution, and once again the m a rk e d d e c r e a s e in rate f o r the 2, 6 -d i-t-b u ty lp h e n o l is o b s e rv e d . 88 In o r d e r to o v erco m e the ra te d e c r e a s e when an i n e r t solvent is em ployed, we tu rn e d o ur attention to h ig h e r-b o ilin g halides, so that the r e a c tio n ra te could be in c r e a s e d by elevating the te m p e r a tu r e . T rity l ch lo rid e m ade p o s s ib le a d ete rm in a tio n of m o r e p r e c i s e a lk y l­ ation k in e tic s m dilute solution (see Table 2 of the p rev io u s section), and in addition e lim in a te d the p o s s ib ility of dehydrohalogenation of the t e r t i a r y c h lo rid e. Ortho dichlorobenzene was se le c te d fo r the r e a c tio n solvent, as it o ffered an i n e r t m ed iu m of a m o d e ra te ly p o la r n a tu re (E — 7.8). The alky latio ns of phenol w ere c a r r i e d out at s e v e ra l phenol c o n c e n tra tio n s in o r d e r to d e te rm in e the o r d e r of the reactio n with r e s p e c t to phenol. At the lo w e r c o n ce n tratio n s, when the instantaneous p r e s s u r e was p lo tted a g a in s t the re a c tio n tim e, w ere obtained. n S M shaped cu rv es The a p p a re n t induction p e r io d was not r e a d ily n o ti c e ­ able a t the h ig h e r co n c e n tra tio n s of phenol, but was even m o re evident in the alk y latio n of o - c r e s o l . Since the m e a s u r e m e n ts w ere made in an a l l- g la s s reactio n s y s te m and a t an e le v a te d t e m p e r a tu r e , the p o s s ib ility of a p p a ra tu s le akage w as f i r s t in v e stig a te d as an explanation fo r the type of c u r v e s obtained. R eaction 6 was th e re f o re c a r r i e d out at a reduced halide c o n c e n tra tio n so th a t the final s y s te m p r e s s u r e would be well 89 below a tm o s p h e r ic p r e s s u r e , u n le ss leakage o c c u rre d . Tlie reactio n curve le v e le d off and held a t 435 m m . p r e s s u r e . The only o th e r lo g ical explanation f o r the induction p e rio d was th a t the r e a c tio n was a u to -c a ta ly z e d b y the hydrogen chloride f o r m e d fu rin g the alkylation. Reaction 7 was th e re fo re c a r r i e d out using the sa m e c o n c e n tra tio n s and conditions of Reaction 6, except th at an h y d ro u s h y drogen ch lorid e was added to the c r e s o l ampoule befo re it was b ro k e n in the re a c tio n sy stem . the e x p e r im e n ta l cu rv e (F igure As can be seen fro m 3), the induction p e rio d was c o m ­ p le te ly e lim in a te d u n d er th ese conditions, indicating that it was, indeed, the hyd ro g en ch lo rid e which was resp o n s ib le f o r the auto c a ta ly sis. The e x p e r im e n ta l data obtained in E x p e rim e n t 7 a re r e p r e ­ sen ted s a t i s f a c t o r i l y by the t h i r d - o r d e r equation, d p /d t = k ^ [ c r e s o l] [ tr ity l chloride][HCl] Once the ro le of the h y drogen ch lo rid e was u n d ersto o d in the tion, it w as r e a d ily seen th a t the o th e r experim ental curves reac­ should be fitte d by a t w o - te r m equation, a r r a n g e d so th at one t e r m would in c r e a s e and a n o th e r t e r m p ro c e e d e d . Thus, the d e c r e a s e in im p o rtan ce as the re a c tio n n S M shaped c u rv e s , f o r all the o th e r alkylation e x p e r im e n ts , we ire defined by the e x p re s s io n , 90 d p /d t = [phenol][halide] + k [phenol][halide][HCl] w here k^ is a s e c o n d - o r d e r ra te co n stan t and k^ the th i r d - o r d e r r a te c o n s ta n t d is c u s s e d above. E x am in atio n of th e se ra te co n stan ts, Table 2, r e v e a ls , however, th a t they v a r y c o n s is te n tly with change in phenol co n cen tratio n (i.e., f r o m one run to an o th er, although they a r e co n stan t f o r any given run). A lo g -lo g p lo t of phenol co n cen tratio n v e r s u s the ra te c o n ­ stan ts k^ and k^ gives a slope in both c a s e s of slightly g r e a t e r than 1.00 (F ig u re 10), which would le ad to a re a c tio n o r d e r of a p p ro x i­ mately 2 w ith r e s p e c t to phenol. This would a p p e a r to be in c o n s is ­ te n t with the r a te - d e te r m i n in g equations. One m u s t co n sid er, how­ e v e r, th a t the c o n c e n tra tio n of phenol (0.315 M to 1.184 M) is still too g r e a t f o r r e a l ly ideal kinetic m e a s u r e m e n ts . It th e re fo re a p ­ p e a r s re a s o n a b le to a s s u m e th at the change in phenol co n cen tratio n is g r e a t enough to cause a change in solvent c h a r a c te r , which in tu r n would account f o r the v a r ia tio n in the re a c tio n ra te co nstants. It is i n t e r e s tin g to note the la r g e d e c r e a s e in k^ when o - e r e s o l is u s e d in the e x p e r im e n ts in p lace of phenol. If E x p erim en ts 4 and 5 a r e c o m p a re d , w h ere the a r o m a tic co n cen tratio n s a r e equivalent, we see th a t the in itia l re a c tio n ra te f o r the q - c r e s o l alkylation is ju s t about 1/3 th at of phenol. The k^ value fo r the c r e s o l, however, 91 i s n e a r l y a s g r e a t as th a t f o r the phenol alkylation, which would lead one to b eliev e th a t the h ydrogen ch lo rid e, following its fo rm a tio n in the re a c tio n , a s s u m e s a role in the alkylation m e ch an ism which w as p e r f o r m e d in itia lly b y the o - c r e s o l , and som ew hat l e s s efficien tly than b y the u n s u b stitu te d phenol. 92 M ech an ism B efore fo rm u la tin g a m e c h a n is m fo r the re a c tio n under co n ­ s id e r a tio n , it will be well at this point to c o r r e l a te the facts p r e ­ sented in p a s t in v e stig atio n s with those re su ltin g fro m o ur kinetic stu d ie s co n ce rn in g the effect of hydrogen chloride on the alkylation r e a c tio n . In 1927 van Alphen (1) showed that phenyl tr ity l and o - c r e s y l t r i ty l e t h e r s could be t r a n s f o r m e d b y hydrogen chloride to p a r a alk y late d p h en o ls. B ased on this evidence, th is w o rk e r concluded th at the alk y lation of phenol with t e r t i a r y halid es p ro ceed e d by way of an e t h e r in te r m e d ia te , which, being unstable in the p r e s e n c e of hydrogen c h lo rid e , un d erw en t r e a r r a n g e m e n t to the alkylated phenol. The k in e tic stu d ies of H a rt and Simons (2), however, in d i­ c a te d th at when alkylation was c a r r i e d out in an e x c e ss of phenol as the solvent, it was n e i th e r a u to -c a ta ly z e d by the p roduct, hydrogen ch lo rid e, n o r c a ta ly z e d by added hydrogen ch lo rid e. We have found th a t when the re a c tio n is c a r r i e d out in dilute solution, the r e a c tio n ra te is slow enough to o b serv e a u to -c a ta ly s is by the h yd ro g en c h lo rid e f o r m e d during the re actio n . This a p p a re n t induction p e r io d is e lim in a te d when hydrogen chloride is added in itia lly to the re a c tio n m ix tu r e , and the re a c tio n is found to be 93 f i r s t - o r d e r with r e s p e c t to hydrogen ch lo rid e. It th e re fo re a p p e a rs th a t when the alk y latio n is c a r r i e d out in ex ce ss phenol, as was done hy H a r t and S im o n s , the re a c tio n is too rap id to give evidence of the a u to -c ataly sis. F u r t h e r m o r e , the s t i r r i n g technique u se d in the p r e s e n t w ork was s u p e r i o r to th at em ployed by H a rt and Simons, and p e r m i t t e d p r e c i s e r a te m e a s u r e m e n ts within one o r two m inutes a f te r the beginning of the re a c tio n . This is im p o rta n t in detecting auto - c a t a ly s is . In connection with th is d is c o v e ry one should also c o n sid er the k in etic stu d ies of Swain (4, 5) on the re a c tio n of tr ity l chloride with phenol in benzene solution. The re a c tio n p ro d u c t in this case was found to be phenyl tr ity l e th e r , but the r a te - d e te r m in in g method em ployed in th is w ork r e q u ir e d th at the hydrogen chloride produced in the r e a c tio n be consum ed b y py rid in e p r e s e n t in the reactio n m edium . Although this study a p p e a rs to add su pp o rt to van A lphen's p o stu la tio n th a t the e t h e r is f i r s t fo rm e d in the alkylation of phenol, followed by h y d ro g en ch lo rid e r e a r r a n g e m e n t, it is e n tire ly possible th at the n a tu re of the r e a c tio n is com pletely changed by the p re s e n c e of p y rid in e in the r e a c tio n m edium . On the b a s i s of th e se co n sid e ra tio n s and the facts p r e s e n te d in the d is c u s s io n sectio n , th e r e ap p ear to be two g en eral, and 94 e s s e n ti a lly d iffe re n t m e c h a n is m s that m ight well explain the facts o b s e rv e d , and thus d e s c r ib e the alkylation of phenol by t e r t i a r y h a lid e s in dilute solution. The f i r s t of th e se would involve the p r e li m in a r y fo rm atio n of the phenyl t r i t y l e t h e r as an unstable in te rm e d ia te , followed by the r e a r r a n g e m e n t of this e th e r in the p re s e n c e of the g en erated h ydrogen ch lo rid e to f o r m the tr ity l phenol. On the b a s is of some r e c e n t e x p e r im e n ts with the tr ity l e t h e r of o - c r e s o l (59), this m e c h ­ a n is m does not a p p e a r tenable f o r the alkylation reaction. Thus, when a 0.5 m o l a r solution of tr ity l q - c r e s y l e th e r in benzene was t r e a t e d w ith d ry hydrogen chloride fo r ten m inutes at 60 , a 90 p e r cent y ie ld of o - c r e s o l was is o la te d fro m a 10 p e r cent alk ali e x ­ t r a c t of the r e a c tio n m ix tu re . F r o m the alk ali-in so lu b le m a te r ia l a 70 p e r cen t r e c o v e r y of tr i ty l carb in o l, which is the expected h y ­ d r o ly s is p r o d u c t of tr ity l ch lo rid e, w as m ade. The re a c tio n between the e t h e r and hy d ro g en ch lo rid e, th e r e f o r e , is a v e r y ra p id cleavage, and not a r e a r r a n g e m e n t . Since the s ta rtin g m a te r ia l s used in the alkylation a r e the p r i m a r y p ro d u c ts of the e th e r cleavage, it follows th a t the a lk y la te d phenol is f o r m e d d ir e c tly and not b y way of the e th e r . 95 In the lig h t of th e s e fa c ts it is of i n t e r e s t to note the actual d ata r e p o r t e d b y Swain (4) f o r the k in e tic s of fo rm atio n of the phenyl tr ity l e t h e r . With a phenol m o la r ity of 0.056 in benzene solution at 25°, Swain d e te r m in e d a t h i r d - o r d e r ra te co n stan t of 0.004 ± 0.002 2 -1 S. 'm ole . -1 -mm. . By c o m p a ris o n , at o u r low est reactio n concentration (phenol m o l a r i t y = 0.315) in o -d ich lo ro b en zen e a t 88°, the reactio n ra te as e x e m p lifie d by the t h i r d - o r d e r ra te constant is only 0.001744 2 1 - 1 JL -mole -min. - . The fo rm a tio n of the e th e r under the conditions u sed by Swain, th e r e f o r e , a p p e a rs to be a much f a s t e r conversion than the alk y latio n re a c tio n , which once again indicates that the r e ­ action u n d e r stu d y is c o m p le te ly changed in n atu re by the p re s e n c e of p y rid in e in the r e a c tio n m ix tu re . A second and p r e f e r r e d m e c h a n ism , which is c o n s is te n t with all the d a ta o b tained in this study, involves the p r i m a r y ionization of the t e r t i a r y halide to f o rm a f r e e or solvated carbonium ion, which then a tta c k s the p a r a p o sitio n of the phenol to fo rm £ - t r i t y l phenol. Such a m e c h a n is m is d e s c r ib e d b y the following sequence, w here R is the trip h e n y l m ethyl group: t_R<^ ^ / / ~ OH S l °- - -> t - R - / ^"°H+ ^ with the e le c tr o p h ilic a tta c k at the p a r a position constituting the r a te d e te rm in in g step. It is re a s o n a b le that this be the slow step b ecause the t e r t i a r y carb o n iu m ion is the m o s t e a s ily fo rm e d of carbonium ions, and is in tu r n the m o s t u n re a c tiv e following its fo rm atio n, due to the s tab ilizin g e ffect of re so n a n c e . As to the con trib u tion by hydrogen chloride in the alkylation, it is quite lik e ly that it would fa c ilita te the ra p id fo rm atio n of the carb o n iu m ion f o r its attack on the phenol m olecule. G rayson and Brow n (60) have r e c e n tly shown th at the alkylation of benzene with a p r i m a r y halide p r o c e e d s by a t h i r d - o r d e r m e ch an ism involving the alkyl halide, AlCl^, and the a r o m a tic component. The r a te - d e term in in g step in th is r e a c tio n is d e s c rib e d as a nucleophilic a t­ tack by benzene on a h alid e-A lC l^ complex. fast R -C l [R -C l : A1C13] A1C13 + ^ ^ <■----[R-Cl : A1C13] SlQ^> R- ^ ^ + Hcl + A1C1 3 97 The couple [R -C l : A lC g ] is l e a s t ionic when R is p r im a r y , and m o s t ionic when R is t e r t i a r y . F o r the th ir d .- o rd e r m e c h a n is m we can th e re f o re w rite the m e c h a n is tic equations, + 2HC1 f r o m which the following ra te law can be derived: V = [(k 1)(k2)(H C l)(0 3-C -C l)(phenol)]/[(k_ + k 2){phenol)] When k 1 is la r g e as c o m p a re d to k , which m u s t be the case h ere “1 c* (the e q u ilib riu m c o n ce n tratio n of the carbo n iu m ion has to be v e ry sm all), then the e x p r e s s io n re d u c e s to the t h i r d - o r d e r ra te law, V = [(k1)(k2)(H C l)(0 3-C -C l)(p h e n o l)]/[k _ 1] = [(k 3)(H C l)(0 3-C -C l)(phenol)] When the h ydrogen ch lo rid e is not p r e s e n t in itially in the reactio n m ix tu re , the s o lv o ly sis of the t e r t i a r y halide is undoubtedly u n d e r ­ taken by the phenol p r e s e n t, which is known to have a high affinity f o r halogen. This e ffe c t is r e a liz e d in the k^ v alu es (Table 2) f o r 98 c o m p a ra tiv e ru n s of phenol and o - c r e s o l . The l a t t e r is le s s effective a t solvating c a rb o n iu m ions, and th e r e f o r e gives a slow er rate of re actio n . H ow ever, as soon as the hydrogen chloride is fo rm ed , the k^ v alu es f o r o^-cresol alkylation a pp ro ach that of phenol as the o - c r e s o l is r e p la c e d by hydrogen chloride i*t the solvolysis step. B e fo re concluding, some m ention should be made as to the re la tio n s h ip of this p r o p o s e d m e c h a n is m to the " a m p h o te ric medium e f f e c t " of H a r t and Sim ons (2), and the te r m o le c u l a r m e ch an ism s of Swain (4). Indeed, Swain has pointed out (5) th a t th e re is no sig ­ n ifican t d iffe re n c e b etw een a t e r m o le c u l a r re a c tio n and one involving p r e li m in a r y , r e v e r s i b l e fo rm a tio n of a p o la r com plex o r solvated ion of two r e a c t a n t s , followed by a slow re a c tio n with the third. Since such an i n t e r p r e ta t io n is s ta tis tic a lly le s s p robable in dilute solution, it a p p e a rs m o r e u seful at p r e s e n t to su b sc rib e to the g en eral con­ cept of the d is p la c e m e n t re a c tio n accep ted by m o st in v e stig a to rs . In the case of the w o rk of H a r t and Simons (2), how ever, such a t e r m o ­ l e c u l a r m e c h a n is m is highly p ro b ab le since the re a c tio n was c a r r i e d out in phenol as a solvent. We have shown the im p o rtance of the phenol m o lecu le f o r solvation of the halide when no o th e r c a ta ly s t is p r e s e n t , and in view of the a cc ep ted am p h o teric p r o p e r ti e s of phenol, th e r e is no doubt th a t a c o n c e rte d m e ch an ism , of the type 99 p ro p o s e d by H a r t and Sim ons (2), p ro v id es an a ttr a c tiv e a lte rn a tiv e when the r e a c tio n conditions fa v o r a m e ch an ism of r e la tiv e ly low e n erg y r e q u ir e m e n ts . PART C THE MECHANISM OF THE INHIBITION OF PHENOL ALKYLATIONS BY OXYGENATED COMPOUNDS 100 101 Expe rim e n ta l L Mate r i a l s The phenol and t-b u ty l chloride u sed in this investigation were p u rifie d by the sam e m ethod as th at d e s c r ib e d in P a r t B. The dioxane, an E a s tm a n Kodak pro d u ct, was p u rified by the m ethod d e s c r ib e d by F i e s e r (6 l). One l i t e r of dioxane was refluxed with 14 m l. of c o n c e n tra te d h y d ro ch lo ric acid fo r twelve hours. The m ix tu re was then cooled and s a tu r a te d with p o ta ss iu m hydroxide p e lle ts . The l a y e r s w ere s e p a ra te d , and the dioxane was tr e a te d with f r e s h p o ta s s iu m hydroxide, decanted, and refluxed with sodium f o r tw e n ty -fo u r h o u r s . F r e s h sodium was added at definite in te rv a ls until the m e ta llic s u rfa c e re m a in e d b rig h t. The dioxane was then d is tille d f r o m the sodium , s to r e d o v e r sodium and in a nitrogen a t ­ m o s p h e re u n til r e a d y f o r use. The te tr a h y d r o p y r a n was p r e p a r e d fr o m duPont dihydropyran by c a ta ly tic h y d ro g en atio n . To 8 g. of Raney nickel c a ta ly s t in a r u b b e r - s t o p p e r e d hydro g en atio n bottle was added 50.5 g. (0 . 6 mole) of dihydrop.yran. The bottle was shaken u n der f o r ty pounds hydrogen p r e s s u r e f o r t h i r ty m in u te s , the c a ta ly s t allowed to s e ttle , and the 102 p ro d u c t d eca n ted off f o r d is tilla tio n . The f r a c tio n a te d te tra h y d ro p y ra n , b.p. 85-86 , w as s to r e d u n d er n itro g e n until read y fo r use. II. P r e p a r a t i o n of Sam ples Since the a p p a ra tu s u s e d was the sam e as that d e s c rib e d in P a r t B, the s a m p le s w e re p r e p a r e d in much the same m a n n er. A fter the phenol was added to the am poule, sto p p ered and weighed, the oxygenated compound was added, the m ix tu re fro z e n in d ry ice and the am poule s e a le d u n d e r vacuum. The weight of the oxygenated compound was then o btained f r o m the total weight by difference. The t e r t i a r y halide sa m p le s w ere p r e p a r e d in the same m a n n er, using s ta n d a r d techniques f o r deg assin g and sealing off the sam p les. C are was tak en to keep oxygen and t r a c e s of m o istu re fro m the s a m p le s . III. Me a s u r e m e n t P r o c e dure The r a te of r e a c tio n was followed in the same m a n n e r as d e s c r ib e d in P a r t B f o r the quantitative k in e tics m e a s u re m e n ts . Follow ing e a c h run the halide addition tube was rin s e d with 95 p e r cen t ethanol, and the rin s in g s analyzed f o r chloride by the V olhard p r o c e d u r e , allowing fifteen m in u tes f o r re a c tio n of s ilv e r 103 n it r a te w ith the o rg a n ic halid e. The weight of alkyl halide in the am poule was then c o r r e c t e d f o r the am ount which rem a in ed behind. This c o r r e c t i o n was u s u a lly l e s s than one p e rc e n t. 104 R e s u lts and C alculations L D ata As w as p o in ted out p re v io u s ly , the ex p erim en ta l technique and ra te — d e te rm in in g m eth o d u sed h e r e is e s s e n tia lly the sam e as that d e s c r ib e d m D a r t B of this th e s is . Anywhere fro m 100 to as many as 2 0 0 t i m e - v e r s u s - p r e s s u r e read in g s w ere obtained f o r each run, and s p a c e p r e v e n ts th e i r tabulation. d ata a r e shown in F ig u r e However, s e v e r a l plots of these 1, and th ese c u rv e s will point out the c o n s is te n c y of the m e a s u r e m e n ts in any one ex p erim ent. Only one out of e v e r y ten p oints is shown on th ese cu rv es fo r the sake of c l a r i t y in the p lo ts. II. T r e a tm e n t of Data A s u m m a r y of the e s s e n ti a l data and r e s u lts is shown in Table 1. The e x p e r im e n ta lly d e te r m in e d f i r s t - o r d e r ra te constants (k) and the re a c tio n half tim e s (t . ) a r e given in columns 8 and 9, re sp ec- 1/ Z tively, and w e re d e te r m in e d by the following p ro c e d u r e . The u n c a ta ly z e d alkylation of phenol in the p re s e n c e of ex ce ss phenol w as deterjrained to be f i r s t - o r d e r with r e s p e c t to the t e r t i a r y h alid e. equation. Thus, the r e a c tio n is r e p r e s e n t e d m a th e m a tic a lly by the 500 105 Pressure, M illim eters 400 200 0 Time, FI GURE 1 , 3 , and 5, Pressure T a b le 1. 300 200 100 vs. M inutes Time C u r v es for Experim ents 1, 106 TABLE 1 KINETIC DATA FOR THE ALKYLATION O F P H E N O L IN THE P R E S E N C E OF OXYGENATED COMPOUNDS E x p t. t - B u Cl M ole s Phenol Mole s O x y g en ate Mole s ( 1) (2 ) (3) (4) - 0.01112 0.2156 0.009881 0.2165 0.009150 0.2120 0.006082 0.01071 0.2166 0 .0 1 347 D 0.01050 0.2123 0.02405 D 0.01167 0.2 223 0.0 3722 D 0 .0 1 1 2 9 0.2164 0.01221 0.01129 0.2091 0.02422 P 0.01 140 0.2142 0.0 3472 P 0 .0 1 1575 0.21 33 0.0 3248 X 10 * T h ese v a lu e s w e r e c a l c u la t e d on the b a s i s o x y g en ate a c t s only as a d ilu en t. M ean ing of s y m b o ls used: D — 1 , 4 - d io x an e. P = te tra h y d ro p y r a n . X = p_-“xylene . D P th a t the a d d e d 107 TABLE M o la rity * P henol 1 (Continued) Pf Po k (5) (6) (7) (8) 10.55 506.2 107.8 0.01241 55.2 10. 61 499.7 104.5 0.01357 53.1 10.28 401.2 98.1 0.007158 96.7 9-9,0 419.4 100.8 0.00 3884 178.6 9.46 413.2 95.0 0.001515 457.8 9.08 501.4 100.2 0.0004637 9.86 434.3 1 06 , 1 0.005828 1 19. 0 9.38 432.0 103.6 0.002580 268.8 9.06 390,0 132.0 0.001561 423.7 9.00 375.1 97.8 0.00 4742 146.1 t l /2 (9) 1497.3 108 d c / d t = kc w h ere c is the h alid e co n ce n tratio n . In te g ra tin g , In c = k t + co n stan t th e r e f o r e , log c = (k/2.30 3)t + constant Since the halide c o n c e n tra tio n in o u r m e a s u r e m e n ts is r e p r e s e n te d by the t e r m (pf - p), the equation is r e v is e d to read: (p£ “ p) = (k/2.30 3)t + co n stan t w here p r e p r e s e n t s the in stan tan eo u s total p r e s s u r e , p^ the final e q u ilib riu m p r e s s u r e , t the tim e, and k the f i r s t - o r d e r velocity constant. Thus, when log(p^ - p) is plotted a g a in st tim e, a s tra ig h t line should be obtained, the slope of which is equal to (k/2.30 3). This p lo t f o r some of the e x p e rim e n ts is shown in F ig u re 2. It is re a d ily seen how w ell the s tr a ig h t- lin e relatio n sh ip held throughout the e x p e r im e n ts . The r a te c o n sta n ts (k) w ere then obtained fro m th ese graphs as the p r o d u c t of the slope and 2.30 3. The values of in m o st c a s e s w e re d e te r m in e d e x p e rim e n ta lly by allowing the re a c tio n to go to com pletion. the In the c a s e of the v e r y slow re a c tio n s , however, value w as d e te r m in e d by e x tra p o la tio n of the s tr a ig h t line 109 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 oQ o 1.60 Time, FI GURE 2 . R a t e Law. Adherence 300 200 00 of M inutes Observed Data to F irst Order 110 o b tained by plo ttin g (dp/dt) v e r s u s p to (d p/d t = 0). shown in colum n 7, Table The p o value 1, r e p r e s e n ts the v ap o r p r e s s u r e of the t e r t i a r y h alid e, p lu s th a t of phenol and the oxygenated m a te r ia l used, and w as found by e x tra p o la tio n of the p r e s s u r e - tim e cu rv es to zero tim e. With th e se data av ailab le, it was then p o ssib le to calculate the v alu es of §^ven *n column 9, Table 1. It was then n e c e s s a r y to calcu late the half tim e s , t 1/2 , which one would ex p ec t under v ary in g assu m p tio n s concerning the actual role of the oxygenated m a t e r i a l in the alkylation reaction. This was done in the following m an n er: B o rd eau x and H a r t (9) d e riv e d the equation ,n [ ( tl / 2) / ( t l / 2 ° )] = [M /M]I in w hich t L/c, 0 r e p r e s e n ts ' the re a c tio n half tim e when no oxygenated m a t e r i a l is p r e s e n t , tim e fo r the reactio n un d er o b s e r ­ vation, M° the m o la r ity of phenol in the re a c tio n with no oxygenated m a te r ia l , M the phenol m o la r ity in the re a c tio n being studied, and n is the o r d e r of the re a c tio n with r e s p e c t to phenol. F rom Table 1, the r e f e r e n c e values a r e 54.0, and M° - 10.57 a t 50°. seen to be ~ The c alcu lated t ^ 2 values a r e shown in Table 2, and have the following significance: Ill TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF CALCULATED AND OBSERVED HALF-TIM ES FOR THE VARIOUS ALKYLATION EXPERIMENTS* ^ Expt. V2 obs. (min.) Mole Ratio \ / ' Z\ (mm.) h LZ\ (mm.) (mm.) (oxygenated compound/ phenol) I 55.2 2 53.1 3 96.7 65.5 78.7 95.4 0.02868 4 178.6 84.7 118.2 174.3 0.06205 5 457.8 10 3.1 217.6 497.7 0.11320 6 1497.3 134.0 461.3 1654.7 0.16751 7 119.0 85.9 118.4 165.7 0.05635 8 268.8 111.3 247.6 557.4 0.11598 9 42 3.7 137.2 400.2 1433.4 0.16198 10 146.1 144.5 0.15252 >!< The sym bols ^ y / Z ^ 3 ^1 / 2^* an(^ *d/2C a re < ^e^^ne<^ orL P 112, 112 The v alu es of (c0 ! 111*111 3, Table 2) w ere calcu lated a s ­ suming th a t the oxygenated m a t e r i a l s e r v e s only to d e c r e a s e the phenol c o n c e n tra tio n by dilution of the reactio n m ix tu re. F o r exam ­ ple, d ata f r o m E x p e rim e n t 5 a r e considered: 6 [ (11 / 2, a ) / 5 4 .iP] = [10.57/9-46] ; t ^ y^ a - 103.1 m inutes The o r d e r n was taken as 6 b eca u se H a rt and Simons (2) pointed out th a t the a p p a r e n t re a c tio n o r d e r with r e s p e c t to phenol was sixth. The v alu es of t . b (column 4, Table 2) w ere calcu lated with 1/2 the a s s u m p tio n that eac h mole of added oxygenated compound com ­ bined with one m ole of phenol, and thus d e c r e a s e d the available phenol f o r alkylation. Using the sam e E x p e rim e n t as above, t . b 1/ ^ is found to be: [(t^ /^ b )/5 4 .0 ] = [10.57/8.36]^; The v alu es of t 1/2 ~ m inutes c (column 5, Table 2) w ere obtained in the sam e m a n n e r f r o m the assu m p tio n that each mole of oxygenated m a t e r i a l co m b in ed with two m o les of phenol, to d e c re a s e the phenol c o n c e n tra tio n f o r alkylation even f u r th e r . E x p erim en t 5 is used again as an ex am p le. 6 [ ( t i / 2 c ) / 54.°] = [10.57/7.29] ; t 1 /2 c = 497.7 m inutes In the c a s e of the e x p e r im e n ts involving fetra h y d ro p y ra n as the oxygenated m a te r ia l , the l a t t e r assu m p tio n is omitted, of co u rse, 113 since only one oxygen atom is p r e s e n t fo r com plex fo rm atio n with the phenol m o lecu le . F ig u res 3 and 4 show plots of th ese calculated half tim es a g a in st the oxygenate-phenol c o n ce n tratio n ratio, as co m p ared to the sam e c u r v e s fo r the e x p e rim e n ta l half tim es {column 2, Table 2). 114 800 600 / t I OBS. 400 i— ! -P 200 0.00 0.025 0.050 0.075 0.100 0.125 0.150 Mol R a t i o FIGURE 3„ to Phenol. H alf-Tim e Values vs. Mol R a t i o of Gioxane 0.175 115 800 700 600 500 400 OBS CM 300 f-I -P 200 00 0 .05 0.15 0.10 Mo l R a t i o FI GURE 4 . H alf-Tim e V alues T e tr a h jd r a p y r a jn t o P h e n o l . vs. Mol R a t i o of 116 D iscus sion The m e c h a n is m p o stu la te d by H a r t and Simons (2) fo r the u n cataly ze d alkylation of phenol with t e r t i a r y halides was b a s e d upon s e v e r a l e x p e r im e n ta l o b s e rv a tio n s . -Arnong these was the com plete inhibition of the re a c tio n by the addition of ap p ro x im ately 21 mol p e r c e n t of 1,4-dioxane. In view of the fa c t that o ther diluents of eq u iv alen t d ie le c t r i c c o n s ta n t had no such m a rk e d effect on the r e ­ action r a te , it was suggested that the dioxane inhibition was due to a h y drogen bonding effect which red u ced the available hydroxyl groups fo r p a r tic ip a tio n in a c o n c e rte d reaction. In an e ffo rt to f ir m ly e s ta b lis h the role of the dioxane in the r e actio n , B o rd ea u x (9) conducted a kin etic investigation of the r e a c ­ tion using v ary in g am ounts of dioxane. Once again the re s u lts in d i­ c ated th a t the inhibition was too g r e a t to be due to a dilution effect, and it was su g g e s te d th a t the dioxane fo rm e d a 1:1 oxonium-type com plex with the hydroxyl group of the phenol. This suggestion is su p p o rted by the w o rk of B a r t l e t t and Dauben (35), which showed that dioxane was b a s ic enough to fo r m oxonium compounds with acidic s u b s ta n c e s such as phenol. In view of the r a t h e r cru d e ex p e rim e n ta l technique used by B ordeaux, how ever, i t was f e l t th a t m o re p r e c i s e quantitative 117 m e a s u r e m e n ts of the s to ic h io m e try of the inhibition would be of value. With the aid of a ra te m e a su rin g a p p a ra tu s such as that d e s c r ib e d in P a r t II, it was p o ssib le in this investigation to make 3- m o r e a c c u r a te study of the effect of oxygenated compounds on the alkylation r a t e . It was pointed out by H a rt and Simons (2) that the uncatalyzed re a c tio n p ro c e e d e d by v irtu e of the p r e s e n c e of a la rg e e x c e ss of phenol. As was seen f r o m th e ir kinetic data, any significant d e c re a se in phenol co n c e n tra tio n r e s u lte d in a la rg e d e c r e a s e in reactio n rate . T h e r e fo r e , the addition of any in e r t m a te r ia l would be expected to cause a r a te d e c r e a s e . The r e s u lt s tabulated in Table 1 verify this, but the d e c r e a s e o b s e rv e d is f a r g r e a t e r than would be expected fo r only dilution of the re a c tio n m ix tu re (column 3, Table 2). F or ex­ am ple, c o n s id e r E x p e rim e n t 4, in which dioxane was used as the in h ib ito r. The e x p e r im e n ta lly d e te rm in e d half tim e was 178.6 m in u tes; the c a lc u la te d half tim e fo r dioxane dilution is 84.7 m inutes, while the half tim e b a s e d on the assu m p tio n th at one mole of phenol is co m p lex ed p e r m ole of dioxane is 118.2 m inutes. When the half tim e was c a lc u la te d f o r the a ssu m p tio n that each mole of dioxane co m p lex ed two m o les of phenol, it was found to be 174.3 m inutes. The l a t t e r value c o r r e s p o n d s quite well to the e x p erim en ta lly 118 determ ined, value in E x p e r im e n t 4, and it can be seen that the other dioxane E x p e r im e n t 3 through 6 coincide m the same m an n er. c o r r e l a t i o n i s i l l u s t r a t e d in F ig u r e This 3, w here it is seen that the ex ­ p e r im e n ta l half tim e cu rv e follows quite clo sely the calcu lated curve fo r a 2:1 oxonium com plex between phenol and dioxane. If an inhibition of this type is g e n e ra l and if the r e s u lts ob\ tained above a r e f a ir l y a c c u ra te , then it follows that an oxygenated m a t e r i a l s i m i l a r to dioxane, but having only one available oxygen for oxonium fo rm a tio n , should inhibit the reactio n by the fo rm atio n of a 1:1 oxonium com plex. T e tra h y d ro p y ra n was chosen^for this work b e ca u se the ring size is the same as in dioxane except that one dioxane oxygen is re p la c e d by a m ethylene group. to 9, Table E x p erim en ts 7 1, and F ig u re 4 show th at this reasoning is substantiated. The r e s u l t s of this study add additional evidence to the p o s tu ­ lation by H a r t and Simons (2) and in P a r t s A. and B of this th e sis that the u n c a ta ly z e d alkylation of phenol p ro c e e d s by a m echanism involving the a v a ila b ility of the phenolic hydroxyl group, and that the effective c o n c e n tra tio n of phenol is d e c r e a s e d by the form ation of co m p lex es such as: and V /° 'H E x p e r im e n t 10 was c a r r i e d out using p^-xylene in place of the oxygenated m a t e r i a l . C om paring this ex p e rim e n t with E x p erim en ts 6 and 9, w h ere c o m p arab le am ounts of oxygenated m a te r ia l w ere added, it is seen th a t the o b s e rv e d half time is much low er in the xylene e x p e rim e n t, w here the ra te d e c r e a s e is cau sed only by dilution. A no th er p o s s ib le explanation of the inhibition studied h e re , which h as not been m entioned, is that the addition of an oxygenated m a terial such as dioxane m ight cause in c r e a s e d solubility of the evolved hydrogen ch lo rid e in the phenol-dioxane m ix tu re s . Since the r a te w as followed by the in c r e a s e in hydrogen chloride p r e s s u r e , this could give the effect of a p p a re n t inhibition. This p o ssib ility was e lim in a te d by H a r t and Simons (2), who c a r r i e d out two e x p e r i­ m e n ts with a c o n s ta n t m ol ra tio of dioxane to phenol. In the f i r s t e x p e r im e n t the r e a c tio n was conducted in the usual m ann er and no alky latio n o c c u r r e d . In the second ex p erim en t, the re a c ta n ts w ere f i r s t s a tu r a t e d with h y drogen ch lo rid e and then the reactio n c a r r i e d 120 out as b e f o r e . Once again the r e s u l t was the same; th ere was c o m ­ p lete inhibition of the re a c tio n . Since hydrogen chloride was not evolved even when the re a c tio n m edium was alre ad y s a tu ra te d with the g as, it was concluded th a t the inhibition was not an a rtifa c t. SUMMARY ^ -D i-t-b u ty lp h e n o l, a compound exhibiting maximum s te r ic h in d ra n c e of the hydroxyl group, was syn th esized by the method of ~ H a r t (15) in 44 p e r c e n t y ie ld s. This compound was c h a r a c te r iz e d by its a lk a li in so lu b ility, sen sitiv ity to the phosphomolybdic te s t for h in d e re d p h en o ls, and its c h a r a c t e r i s t i c u ltrav io le t and in f r a r e d ab s o rp tio n s p e c tr a . The action of su lfu ric acid cau sed this phenol to r e a r r a n g e to 2 ,4 -d i-t-b u ty lp h e n o l, while n itra tio n at 25° to 35° in glacial acetic a c id (1:1) gave cleavage of a t-b u ty l group to yield 4 ,6 - d i n i t r o - 2 - t butylphenol. U nder m ild e r n itra tin g conditions the phenol was oxidized to 3, S '^ B '- te tr a - t- b u ty ld ip h e n o q u in o n e . 2 , 6 -D i-t-b u ty lp h e n o l gave negligible r a te s of p a r a brom ination, diazonium coupling, and alkylation when co m p ared to 2 , 6 -xylenol. This is a ttr ib u te d to s te r i c inhibition of the usual hydroxyl resonance with the a r o m a tic rin g , by the bulky t-butyl groups. R elative r a t e s of p a r a t-b u ty latio n of s e v e ra l phenols w ere d e te r m in e d a t 50°, using the phenol to be alkylated as the reaction solvent. The alk y latio n r a te was found to d e c re a s e with an in c re a s e 121 122 in size a n d / o r n u m b e r of ortho alkyl groups. The o b serv e d rate d e c r e a s e , u n d e r the r e a c tio n conditions employed, could, r e s u lt fro m several facto rs, all of which, how ever, could be a ttrib u te d to s te ric h in d ra n c e of the hydroxyl group by the bulky ortho substituents. P r e c i s e kin e tic studies of the alkylation of phenol and o - c r e s o l w ere m ade in o -d ich lo ro b en zen e a t 8 8 °, using triphenyl methyl ch lo rid e. The r e a c tio n was found to be auto cataly zed by hydrogen chloride f o r m e d during the alkylation, and t h i r d - o r d e r kin etics w ere obtained when the hydrogen ch lo rid e gas was p r e s e n t initially in the reaction. A k in e tic study of the inhibition of this re a c tio n by dioxane and te tr a h y d r o p y r a n was c a r r i e d out at 50° in ex ce ss phenol. E vi­ dence w as p r e s e n te d to show that phenol f o r m s 2:1 and 1:1 com plexes, re s p e c tiv e ly , with th e se m a t e r i a l s , thus d ec re a sin g the phenol a v a il­ able f o r alkylation. A c a rb o n iu m m e c h a n is m involving p r e li m in a r y solvation of the halide by the phenol o r hydrogen ch lo rid e, followed by a r a te d e te rm in in g e le c tr o p h ic attack by the carbonium ion on the phenol, is p r o p o s e d to account f o r the facts o b serv ed h ere and in s e v eral p re v io u s in v e s tig a tio n s . BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. J . van Alphen, Rec. T rav . Chim ., 46, 2 87 (1927). 2. H. H a r t and J. H. Sim ons, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 3. T. M. L ow ry and I. J. F a u lk n e r, J. Chem. Soc., 127, 2883 (1925). 4. C. G. Swain, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 70, 1119 (1948). 5. C. G. Swain and R. W. Eddy, ibid., 70, 2989 (1948). 6. N. D. C oggeshall, ib id ., 6 9 , 1620 (1947). 7. N. D. C oggeshall and E. M. Lang, ib id ., 70, 3283 (1948). 8. G. H. Still son, D. W. Sawyer, and C. K. Hunt, ib id ., 67, 30 3 (1945). 9. J . J. B ordeaux, M.S. T hesis, Michigan State College (1949) - 345 (1949). 10. H. H a rt, J. Chem. Educ., 27, 398 (1950). 11. R. P . P e r k i n s , A. J . D ie tz le r, and J. T. Lundquist, U. S. P a t e n t 1,972,599 (1934). 12. A. E. Chichibabin, Bull. soc. chim ., 13. A. E. Chichibabin, Compt. rend., 14. H. H a r t and E. A. Haglund, J . Org. Chem., 1_5, 396 (1950). 15. H. H a rt, J . Am. Chem. Soc., 71, 1966 (1949). 16. W. A. P a r d e e and W. W einrich, Ind. Eng. Chem., 17. G. H. S tillso n and D. W. Saw yer, U. S. P a te n t 2,459,597 (1949). 123 [5] 2, 497-520 (19 35). 1_98, 12 39 (1934). 3^6, 595 (1944). 124 18. V. M. P la tk o v s k a y a and S. G. Vatkina, J. Applied Chem. (U .S.S.R .), lCb 202 (1937); C.A., 31_, 4232 (1937). 19- K. L». Wolf and W. H erold, 20. E. We rtypo roch, B e r ., 21. V. V. K o rsh a k and G. S. Kolesnikov, J. Gen. 14, 1092 (1944); C.A. 40, 40 33 (1946). 22. K. B odendorf and H. Bohme, Ann., 516, 1 (1935). 23. D. V. N ightingale, Chem. R ev s., 25_, 24. H. Ulich and G. Heyne, Z. E le c tro c h e m ., 25. C. C. P r i c e , Chem. Revs., 29, 37 (1939). 26. M. J. S. D ewar, " E le c tr o n ic Theory of Organic C h e m is tr y ," O xford U n iv e rs ity P r e s s , C larendon (1949). 27. L. J. A ndrew s and R. M. K ee fer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 72, (1950). Z. physik Chem., [B] 1_3, 201 (1931). 64B, 1378 (1931). Chem. (U.S.S.R.), 358 (1939). 41, 509(1935). 3113 28. H. 29. H. C. Brow n, L. P . Eddy, W. J. W allace, M. G rayson, and K. L. N elson, A b s tr a c ts of P a p e r s p r e s e n te d a t Symposium on C ataly sis in H y d ro carb o n C h e m is try , Atlantic City, New J e r s e y , Septem­ b e r , 1952, p. 65. 30. F. E. Condon, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 74, 2528 (1952). 31. W. H. P e a r l s o n and J . H. Simons, ibid., 6 7 , 352 (1945). 32. J. W. S p r a u e r and J. H. Simons, ibid., 64, 648 (1948). 33. G. M. B ennett and F . M. Reynolds, J. Chem. Soc., 131 (1935). 34. J. H. Sim ons and H. H a rt, J . Am. Chem. Soc., 6jS, 1309 (1949). 35. C. Brow n and J . B rady, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 71, 3573(1949). P . D. B a r t l e t t and H. J. Dauben, ib id ., 6 2 , 1339 (1940). 125 36. C. C. P r i c e , " R e a c tio n s a t the C a rb o n -C arb o n Double B o n d ," I n te r s c i e n c e P u b l i s h e r s Inc., New York (1946). 37. E. D. Hughes, J. Chem. Soc., 968 (1946). 38. L . P . H am m ett, " P h y s i c a l O rganic C h e m is tr y ," M cGraw-Hill Book Company Inc., New York (1940). 39. P . D. B a r t le tt , A b s tr a c ts of P a p e r s , Tenth National Organic C h e m is tr y Symposium , Boston, M ass. (1947). 40. C. G. Swain, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 72, 4578 (1950). 41. W. M ilitz e r , ib id ., 68, 256 (1938). 42. B. S. P a i n t e r and F . G. Soper, J. Chem. Soc., 342 43. E. B e r l i n e r , J . Am. Chem. Soc., 7 3, 4307 (1951). 44. R. H. Rosenwald, U n iv ersal Oil P ro d u c ts Company, priv ate c om m unic a tio n . 45. W. J. 46. V. N. Ipatieff, H. P in e s , 60, 2495 (1938). 47. E. Schwenk, D. P ap a, and B. Whitman, J. Org. Chem., 7, 5 87 (1942). 48. A. C. W hitaker, J. Am. 49. D. R. Stevens and J . B. 50. N. A. Valyashko and M. M. Shcherbak, J. Gen. Chem. (U.S.S.R.), 8, 1641 (1938). 51. W. J . D e tro it and H. H art, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 74, 52. E. B e r l i n e r , ib i d ., 71, 1195 (1949). 53. J. W. B a k e r, (1947). D e tr o it and H. H art, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 7^4, 5215 (1952). B. S. F rie d m a n , J. Am. Chem. Soc., Chem. Soc., 6 9 , 2414 (1947). McKinley, U. S. P a te n t 2,290,60 2 (1943). 5215 (1952). " H y p e rc o n ju g a tio n ," Clarendon P r e s s , Oxford (1952). 126 54. H. A. Iddles, K. S. F r e n c h , and E. F . M ellor, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 61, 3192 (1939). 55. H. A. Id d les, W. H. M ille r, and W. H. P o w e rs , ibid., 62, 71 (1940). _ ~ “ 56. H. A. Iddles and H. L. M inckler, ib id ., 62, 2757 (1940). 57. A. G. W orthing and J. Geffner, " T r e a t m e n t of E x p erim ental D a t a ,11 John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N. Y. (1943), p. 88. 58. " I n te r n a tio n a l C r itic a l T a b l e s , " M cG raw-H ill Book Company, Inc., New York, N. Y., 6, 92 (1929). 59. H. H art, unpublished r e s u lt s . 60. L. F . F i e s e r , " E x p e r im e n ts in Organic C h e m is tr y ," D. C. Heath and Co., New York, New York, 1941, p. 368.