j a x m m n m m m m of m m m m m m w m w m m . cus sa Jeaaie Muriel Boyd a w i $ Submitted to the School for Advanced Graduate Studies of Michigan Stete University of Agriculture end Applied Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF BmoSGFHT Deportment of Chemistry 1958 ProQuest Number: 10008553 All rights reserved INFO RM ATIO N TO ALL USERS The quality o f this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete m anuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQ uest 10008553 Published by ProQuest LLC (2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQ uest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 4 8 1 0 6 - 1346 ACKNOWLEDCMBWT the author wishes to express her sincere gratitude to Dr. Barnes L. Fairley for the encouragement sod stimu­ lating guidance throughout the course of this work. 2he author also wishes to express her appreciation to other members of the Chemistry Department whose sug­ gestions were helpful in these investigations. Finally the author wishes to express her thanks to the Atomic Energy Commission for financial assistance in this work* KKttttXKXKKKWKKX ii the author was b o m in Billingsley, Alabama and received her secondary and high school education in the public schools of Alabama. She graduated from Sidney Lanier High School, Montgomery, Alabama in June, 19h7 • The author graduated from Huntingdon College, Montgomery, Alabama, in 1952 with the degree of Bachelor of Arts with majors in Chemistry and Mathematics. She entered Graduate School at Emory University in September, 1952 and held the positions of Teaching Assistant and Besearch Assistant in the Biochemistry Department of the School of Medicine for two years. After receiving the Master of Science Degree in March of 1955* the author was employed as a biochemist at the University of Michigan. In the winter of 1956 the author entered the Graduate School at Michigan State University. In the course of her graduate training the author served two quarters as a Graduate Teaching Assistant in Chemistry and two years as a Special Graduate Besearch Assistant under an Atomic Energy Commission Grant. Ill m m m m m m m orm m m m » M H W i tm of Michigan Stofco M m i t y of Agrleslliin and ApptXiod So Swbwni In fty%lii,i ^?^iiflM, y li g | * > iy t * * f ecidOj sod dSt^ydbt^lirilSiilL* Itiffffrll^fift yiftiffi js e ih y iie O L O f iic doiieffffit?*y soSds# oonpottmlf fetiett to Ini jrtrorviTeoTe to ptyri&lbln&js t* othsx* opgsnicsi by Kofdwfg) w n * found to be inectlee* Stadia of the tin*»eoiar** of growth of the gee* ffl vyyimi eww itf1 -eh^re# *byt ppopdloMBte end ea&nbbetyrete reffiKHT.e##-r Bete^iiretdopQ^o^Loi^te # M dJJ^ydrcerecil retired laager period* of adaptation before growth begun. pareseooe of ppopioiElo iffiid or gfltbedMgelA eef** in the growth neditim depreeeed eignlficmti^ the specific aet&rltiee of the pyristdiBee foreed by the &old to e ftediee also containing uxigU* JM?*** }^opicmftte~2~ew m e found to be incorporated relatfrely specifically into the pyrimidine# of the aoid* e the purine* of the mam mpu&umtB ooxKtoixxid much low# mmm%* of ©artou-li*. prtnsei of arglnixui, ufe&oh inhibit** growth of the ooldi on certain procoriowi *m*1* in ja*opionate, boaotariae, airinotatyrate and uracil, vai found to %md to on increase in the epecific activity of the pgrria&dlne baae* foitted by tin aold in a medium also containing WNMriMM*** OtuditOa ftftKtt* tb* ja*W8t©i Of aotlVitlOi affectin g u ra c il, anlBbbutymt* and botiH ^ljo^«pttoti^eiiso. On ttae $ynisddi5f** vi tkBLB Of CONTESTS P«g9 INTBOOTCTIDN X K X F E W M m m AMD HE3JLTS................................... Effsct. of Various Compounds on the Growth of Nauroapora g»gj» ffiP-.......................... .............. Materials......*...*.................................. Organism............ *...... *.... Growth Procedure .... Results..... *....... .............................. Stimulation by Uridine**................................ Arginine Inhibition ...... ....... Growth Curves....... ................ ............. The Utilization of Arainobutyric Acid in the Presence of Uracil-^-C14 for the Biosynthesis of Pyrimidines in Heurospora craasa 1298.... ............... ........... Sterials.1. ....... .... ............ ...... Growth Procedure .... ...... . isolation of the Ribonucleotides..... ................. Hydrolysis of Ribonucleotides ... ......... ...... One Dimensional Paper Chromatography.........*....... Isotope Measurement ....... ................. Results ...... ................... ............... The Utilisation of Propionate for pyrimidine Biosynthesis in Neurospora craasa ...... ............................ MaterialsT••"•T.*T .... .... ............ .......... . Growth Procedure. ....... ......... . Purification of the Purine and Pyrimidine Bases. ... Radioautography of Paper Chromatograms................. Results • ... . ........ ........ . .................... Utilization of Propionate in the Presence of Uracil-2-C14 for Biosynthesis of Pyrimidine in Meurospora omasa...... Materials.......... ............ ............... ..... Growth Procedure ... ........... . Results.... ..... .............. ..... ......... . The Utilization of Umcil-2-C14 in the Presence of Arginine for the Biosynthesis of Pyrimidines in Benrospom crassa... Materials......... ..... .777777... Growth Procedure...................................... Results........ .............. .......... ........... vii 10 10 10 10 11 11 15 16 IS id 18 20 20 22 23 2k 25 25 25 26 27 29 30 30 30 30 31 31 31 32 32 M E OP CONTENTS - Continued Page Isolation of Enzymatic Activity Related to Pyrimidine Metabolism...... *........ Materials. .... Methods............... Xnoubation .... Enzyme Preparations. ...... Remilte. DISCUSSKB BIBLIOGRAPHY APPENDIX... IS ..... SUMM^HX. .... 35 35 37 38 39 lib ..... ....... 57 59 ..... 62 viii LIST OF TABLES nMM Page I* Growth Response of Neurospora crass* 1298 to Various Compounds .T^77?:77.r.77.~':.77^7.*. ...... XI* Stimulatory Effect of tJridine on Various Supplements....... 12 16 XXX* Arginine Inhibition of Certain Growth Promoting Compounds.. 17 XV* Radioactivity of Ribonucleic Acid Bases from Naurospora crasaa 1298 after Growth in the Presence of Vai^ous Radio** active 5ompbunds...... *******........... *.... ix 33 LIST 0F FIGBTRES Page 31®® ^TrfBldlne biosynthesis................ $ 2* Pyopowd p$t$xivi^r of jyriicidlns d®grada%iosi*•«•«••*«•**#***« 7 1 * Proposed pftthi^ 3 * I’ yoploiiate m t a b o l i a m . b. Rftlative m%«* of gj*o#th.*.. . l b 1? 5 . Soggosrted pathway of pyyiadd&ao bioayaihasia in tha a^nwBom eras** aataat, 1298.......... X $3 1 INTRODUCTION The discovery of nucleic acids was made in some investigations carried out cm the nuclear material of pus cells by Friedrich Miescher in 169? • Later nucleic acids were shown to be normal constituents of all cells and tissues studied. On hydrolysis nucleic acids were found to yield purine and pyrimidine bases, as well as a pentose sugar, and phosphoric acid. Two types of nucleic acid have been found. One of these contained the purine bases, adenine and guanine1 the pyrimidine bases, cytosine and thymine; and a sugar D(-)-d©oxyribose. The second type contained adenine and guanine; the pyrimidine bases, cytosine and uracil; and the sugar, D(-)-ribose. Both contained phosphoric acid. Although It is clear that nucleic acids play a fundamental part in cellular metabolism, the exact nature is difficult to determine. Deoxyribonucleic acids have been indicated by many indirect lines of evidence to be the basic genetic material of cells (1). Ribonucleic acid seems to be connected with the process of protein synthesis in the cell. Host organisms are able to synthesize nucleic acids from simple metabolites* The purine and pyrimidine bases are thought to be incorporated Into the nucleic acids in the form of their nucleotides. The pathway of purine biosynthesis has been worked out to a large extent both in mammals and microorganisms. Comparatively little evidence, 2 however, has been found for a pathway by which pyrimidines are synthesised• The biosynthesis of pyrimidines from simple precursors was demon­ strated in an experiment by Barnes and Schoanheimer (2) In which N15 labeled ammonium citrate administered to rats was incorporated into the pyrimidines of nucleic acids* The investigations of Heinrich and Wilson (3) showed that position two of the nucleic acid pyrimidines is derived from C0 a in the rat. This finding was confirmed by Lagerkvist (U). In searching for simple metabolic precursors of the pyrimidine nucleus, Mitchell and Houlahan (5) introduced important information in studies of the mutants of Neuroapora erases that require uridine for growth* In these mutants orotic acid was found to accumulate in the medium during growth* For several of these mutants uridine could be replaced by oxaloacetic acid (6), boring and Fierce (?) found orotic acid would replace pyrimidines as growth factors for certain pyrimidineless mutants of N* crassa* Orotic acid is also a growth factor for Lactobacillus bulgguicua ggj if C 14 labeled orotic acid is provided in the medium, the isotope appears in uridine-5 *-phosphate and cytidine-5 1phosphat© but not in adenine or guanine (8). Eeich&rd (?) had obtained results earlier in the rat. Orotic acid is used by animal tissues, since the administration of N 15 (9 ) or C 14 (10) labeled orotic acid to rats leads to appearance of the isotopes in the pyrimidines but not in the purines* Wright et al. (8 ) demonstrated in L. bulaaricus Op that DL-ureidosuccinic acid was as effective a precursor for the pyrimidines of the 3 nucleic acids as was orotic acid * Reichard (11) showed ansymatically with rat liver mitochondria that aspartic acid in the presence of carhasQrl phosphate, adenosine triphosphate and magnesium ion could be converted to ureidosuccinic acid by mitochondrial fractions and later he showed labeled aspartic acid to be incorporated into the pyrimidines (12). The synthesis of ureidosuccinic acid required several steps, the first being the production of caxfeasyl phosphate. The method of formation of this compound was worked out by Jones, Specter and Liproann (13)* In the second part of the reaction, the carbainyl phosphate trans­ ferred its carbamyl group to aspartic acid forming carbamyl^aspartic acid, often called ureidosuccinic acid. These reactions were demon­ strated to take place in the mitochondrial fraction* Experiments by Woods, Ravel and Shlve (lU) with L* arabinosus 17-5, which is an aspartic acid recpiiring mutant, showed that pyrimidines, as well as threonine and lysine, could spare the aspartic acid requirement, indicating the use of aspartic acid for pyrimidine formation in this organism. The precursor relationship of carbamyl aspartic acid to orotic acid was established in nutritional experiments in microorganisms and isotopic experiments in microorganisms and mammals (3, 11, 12). The conversions were shown by Lieberman and Komberg (1$) to require two enzymes, one which effects the ring closure of carbamyl aspartic acid to dihydroorotic acid and the other, a diphosphopyridine nucleotide requiring enzyme, which removed two hydrogens from dihydroorotic acid to produce orotic acid. k The mechanism for the formation of uridins-5*^phosphate from ©rotate hag been clarified by Xoraberg and co-irorkere (16, 17, 18). far the first atop of the conversion of orotic acid to uridine-S*pho*phate, Liebermann end Kornberg (16) showed that the formation of ^pfec«i^oriboeyl*-l*'|37rciph©s|hato from adenosine triphosphate ami riboae» S-j&osphate mas requiredprior to the ffetsaatiem of ©rotidine<-51-^phosphate iron ©rotate* The eaayae, orotidylic pyrophosiiKnylase, which catalyses this reaction, mas purified from yeast autolysates and mas found to he . specific for erotic acid. A second emym, oroti^ylic decarboxylase, catalysed the decarboxylation of ©rottd±ne-5 1^phosphate to fern uridine5 1-phosphate (1?). ta the absence of 1he orolidylie decarboxylase, ' oretidli^^^^ihesphate accumulated. be irreversible. The decarboxylation mas. found to The conversion of uridine-51-phosphate to phosphate mas shown by Eernbwg (1®) to take place at the triphosphate level aed to rs'i Htf | ^ C c .0 0 <- > 0OOS QrotidinaH?1-phosphate diphospho** GH jyridlne- 0 ,c. of f ,0 Wt' Hs f c ^S8®eS8£BS8SiSSSKS5SSSS^ 8Bp£L«MBtaxy Coqxnnds Waight at Compound (««*) DryW algit of MyoeliuB (ag^—U daya) 5 5 57.0 n.x UraciX QK»$ ffnwll ......... u opropfcmic acid XbamtiM ffcyaddiaaa IMSM Aapartic Aeid Group Aspartic acid Tfyfeirittffiii*P»^ f» aCid Orotic aeid aa&d Homoserino A,It 10 5 2 * x 2.7 2 5 0 0 5 8*55 5 T 5 0 0 0 6 0 6 a IB * 8 io.o 0 0 30 0 0 anludnobutyric Acid Group A# o-Aialnobutyric Aeid %#eto butyric Aeid <^!^drosy butyric aeid f5j^Aoaiue tr’olaucine ’ Cyclop£ro|»neajoadino'Hsarooixyjlxc ae&ci I* IToplonie Aeid Aexylie aeid p*I^uIi^|il?OplOlwXE WSIm Kethyl-iaalonio aeid Succinic aeld jyrutrie aeid Aeetle aeid n-f^Bplandne Glycerol Glycine a 10 5 5 a a a*a 10 5 S .1 5 5 6#3 0 2? 5 15 lb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 tit* fMVlttKllir sent!omd pathways of biosynthesis. Bio uracil grasp include* the compounds shown by ^various workers to comprise 1sbo pathway Suggested in Figure 2* fhese compounds were beto^reidop^ioole teli, and dibpdrouraoil, leading to the synthesis of uracil, m l dihydrothymina leading to the synthesis of thymine. Uracil bad boon Shown previously tO .|SNSSiies .gPCWth# Xa these studies dihylrcmraoil, botaHJUroldoproplcaio eoldj,'tbjyo&T*» and dlJayd^tbyiBiAS were ffoowrt to replace the yy«*^«rtriigMn **K|afre««at to a H thymidine, w m degree than uracil itself. She nucleoside, not able to satisfy the pyrlitttdine'retirement for growth*' supld |aftQ bean shf***** to 'bo a degi PM^ttsift joodict of uncil through biitltdti gold (36)# but It did not replace uracil for gvcwtb* the compound* of tho aspartic acid group were those shown in Figure X* Aspartic acid, acid, #ad dfhydrooroti© a d d did not show any fflitseity to satisfy the-iwrlraldine isotiiiiBdt Us growth response to orotie sold indicates its ass for pyrimidine bio* synthesis. (Eutamic aeid has b m m Shown to be readily converted to aspartic aeid by reactions* Since a mutant of H. erases nMdi laefte glntamie dehydrogenase has been reported by Fineham (39), the re$iAr«B*t of m al|ha asto© group was visualised. However, again no growth response resulted* fhreenine hat been shown previously by Ifcirley (SO) to be need in place of jyriiaidines. the wain pathway for the biosynthesis of threonine has bean shown to be eonrsrsion of aspartic acid to homoserine (bo) which in tarn gives rise to threonine (111)* Horaoaevine was shown to give a significant amount of growth* 1U Allothreonine, which differs from the naturally occurring L-threonine by sin inversion at the second asymmetric carbon atom, was not suitable for growth. In the process of looking for compounds which were related to aminobutyric acid and which also gave significant growth responses, propionic acid was shown to give very interesting results. For this reason the arainobutyric acid group was divided into two sections, one which contained compounds related to amlnobutyric acid and the other which contained compounds shown by Stumpf (U2) and Stadtnsan (1*3) to be related more directly to the metabolism of propionic acid itself. CHaCH2C00H Adenosine triphosphate coen8yKeA «£► CHaGHgCO^Coanayme A Propionic Acid Propionyl-coenayme A CHaOH^O-Coensyiae A J/ V* fOOH CH^CBGO-Coenzyme A CHgCHGO-Coenzyme A HH* beta~alonyl--coen2iym© A aciylyl-joenzyme A methylmlonyl-cpenzyme A pHgCHgGO-Coenayme A BDOC-CHaCH2CO-Coonayme A OH hydroxypropionyl- ° ° T \ GHgCH^OOOH \ OH V HOOC-CH^CH^gCOOH GH3COOH hydroxy* acetic propionic acid acid Figure 3* succinyl-'coenzyme A succinic acid p Krebs Cycle Propionate Metabolism. 15 Aralnobatyrate, ichick haul already been shown to give a high growth response in It* erases 1298 (20), gives on deamination the keto &cldf slpha^kstobatjrric acid, in some organisms ikk)• Although the reaction has been shewn to he reversible, the keto acid did not support growth. Heither did the al$l*a-hydroxy?mtyric acid. fhreoniae which is readily converted by mat liver to Alpba-**tfdm<^tyric sold (k5 ), was indicated hgr Ib&rXey to he a precursor. fsoleueima has also been demonstrated to yield alptm-ketofcutyrio acid (U6)* bat evidently did not give rise to aminobutyrie acid since no growth resalted • Of the compounds give® in Figure propionic, acrylic, Igrdraaty- propionie and methylmalonic acids gave varying growth responses* Succinic, pyruvic, and acetic acids and alpha««alanine have been Shown to be related to the oxidative pathway of propionate metabolism through the Krebs cycle (U?) * these failed to replace the propionic acid retirement* Other three eaibon compounds failing to give growth were n-propyl amine and glycerol. Olycine which has such an important role in purine biosynthesis was found to be inactive here. ISble II shews the results of adding uridine to sewn of the previously reported supplements. Lysine showed a slight stimulation by uridine while uracil and dlMrouraoil give a great response. X&hydroorotie acid seems to inhibit growth in the presence of uridine. 16 s t m b u jobx snrae* car ukxbhb on tabxqus somotMsam ^pplm m ba ftfiMiimtiMiMflia of SupfOaawnt 1. 9*1 mg> Uridine SlNiShWiiliiBt aspartic acid jfld l IbuaaUllM^maASLX Jl d 3Joiytir©o3?otie j|lfr i) ■■bia s 1,1 ' I C■1fl4iis*s u^yiXJ rC/QUTC03JL 6.2 5 mg. 5.1 5 5 2 2 2 2 B. 0.5 mg. Uridine lvalue aspartic Wei#* of Bycelis 5.5 12.6 6.1 0 61.? 6.9 10.2 tiS.S 27.5 5 5.1 5 30.? 31.6 2?.0 Arginine has bean found to hero an Inhibitory effect on the utilisation of certain of the jyrlmidine precursors (Fairley, unpiblished). Bradl, alpiaMuainobutyric acid, propionic acid, and homo•ariaa have been found to be Inhibited by very email quantities of arginine. Xhe remits are Shram la table XXX. Ornithine Shewed the same effect at about 100 times the concentretionB used for arginine. Citrullina wui not ao clear-cut. 17 ARGININE INHIBITION OF CERTAIN GROWTH PROMOTING COMPOUNDS Supplements Concentration of Arginine (mg.) A. Uracil (3 mg*} I^arglnine 58 0.01 0.1 1.0 10.0 Uracil (5 mg.) Dr&rginine Uracil (10 mg.) L~arginine 10.0 10.0 z 5 k.l 17 30 0 *001 0.01 0.1 0.5 0.01 0.1 1.0 10.0 20 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 18 B. Homosarine (6 mg.) L*arginine 17 32 C. Propionic acid (6 mg.) L~arginine 3k 22 B. Amino butyric acid (5 mg.) L-arginine Weight of Mycelium (rag.— days) 0.01 0.1 1.0 0 0 0 18 Qrowth Curves Growth curves irere plotted for the time of incubation response of the mold to selected compounds. Uracil, dihydrouracil, beta-ureidopropionic acid, propionic acid, and alpha-aminobutyric acid were given in equiiaolar amounts to the mold. Bach set was run in triplicate. Five sets of flasks were run for each compound. The results of these experiments are shown in Figure i*. Of the various compounds tested, growth began first on uracil, followed in order by arainobutyric acid, propionic acid, dlhydrouracil, and finally beta-ureldopropionic acid. Once growth began the growth rates were e s s e n tia lly the same. Compared with other compounds aminobutymte and propionate gave lower maximum of growth. Utilisation of Acid in of mm Materials Uraeil~2-C14 was obtained from the Isotopes Specialties Company. The specific activity of the sample was given as 0.6 millicuries per millimole. This sample m s used in all the experiments involving administration of uracil to the mutant. The amlnobutyric acid was obtained from nutritional Biochemicals. The organism used was the N. crassa mutant, 12985 described before. \ GROWTH C\J O OF CD LO UJ H UJ o C L iT U J H < O cc Q < : 3 a ■t; 3 o O 00 5 (T a o o a. o 3 <1 5 a: 5F CL’ Of O 3 : ui? J___ o o o 00 o O w as axt^iefiiCifri **s»p xne and ei^eered ee Afffo bliie ehegi%l.gjg spots on e light gStnfsd# guaaing, which fluoresces adi^itlgr# appeared eh' a light Hal# #$#$ m th* f#p^e back** 1Kb® spots «#r# out out and dlls*# Into tMll to Q'SSS * hjrtoo- ■tiaeeie **!«» Aftor amSseiM^tmg to* toHrt«ta*NUn«u totoswtoad titm to* sbsoitono® «t 250 m. OM hawJrsd larabd* of atoh sample -me plated Had cwoitod. too todtotottosfctr*** ^oaaadto to aMoetotod with to* aitoariaaat atowbtog apota. ' One tanndrsd lambda alira crassa toe Ut Materials Sodium propd.onate-2-C14 m s obtained from the Volk Radiochemical Company. Two samples were used, toe first sample bad a specific 26 activity given at 1.2 millicuriee per millimole. The second sample bad a specific activity given as 2.52 millicaries per millimole. Two experiments mere carried out using the mutant, 1258, Qrcrwth procedure The amid mas again grown in 125 nl, flasks, to each of which was added 25 ml* ef basal mtrient medium. Sixteen flasks were used in each Qxperiigent. To each of the flaskswas added 0.88 mg. of radio* active propionate (0.65 mg* of propionic acid) and 6*2 mg. of unlabeled propionic acid which had been unified by redistillation. This gave a concentration of 6.85 mg. of propionic acid par 25 ml* of media, a concentration found to be satisfactory for optimum growth, m estab­ lishing the specific activity of the sample, it was found that the radioactivity of propionic acid must be determined before dilution with the medium and that two drops of 1 U sodium hydroxide prevented evapor­ ation of the propionic acid from the plates. Observation of these precautions gave the calculated specific activity, Autoclaving, inocu­ lation, incubation for sir days, and harvesting of the mycelial pads were carried cut in the same manner as described on page 11. The iso­ lation and hydrolysis of the ribonucleotides and the chromatography of the bases m SJowaw 50 were made in the same maimer as described on pages 21 and 22 , 27 Purification of the Purine and pyrimidine Bases the uracil eluted from the column was again removed from the parehlorate and chromatographed on paper as previously described. Since the radioactivity of the eluted fractions did not agree with the ultraviolet absorbtion data, impurity of the cytosine fraction m s indicated. The fact that a high radioactivity m s found in those fractions that gave no ultraviolet absorbance indicated that this highly labeled compound m s not a purine or pyrimidine. This m s shown to be true by chromatographing the highly radioactive fraction that m s 0luted from the columl JUBt before the fraction. The Rf (ratio of distance that the compound moved to that which the solvent moved) m s determined by locating the radioactivity on the paper. This m s carried out using the Forro Chromatographic Scanner (Ferro Scientific Company, Evanston, Illinois) coupled with a Nuelear-Chicago Model 1620 A ratemeter and a Model AW Esterline-Angus graphic ammeter. The of the activity peak m s 0.36. When the cytosine fraction m s chromatographed on paper four spots were located using the ultraviolet lamp. Their Rf values were* (1) 0.55, (2) 0.65, (3) 0.79, a»d (it) 0.88. spot, while the others were light absorbing. Spot (2) was a flourescent Significant radioactivity was found to be associated with spot (1) which from the spectrum obtained using the Beckmann spectrophotometer, Model DK-2 m s shown to be guanine, and with spot (3) which m s shown also by spectral studies to be cytosine. Scanning of the paper chromatograph showed a high peak of 28 radioactlvlty where the cytosine migrated, a lower peak where the gamine migrated and a much lower peak at a of 0.37 where there was no ultraviolet absorbing spot* The R^ of this latter spot corresponded to that found above in chromatography of the radioactive, non-ultraviolet light absorbing fraction and probably indicates slight contamination of the cytosine fraction with this material* Elution of the spots from the paper chromatograph and counting were carried out as previously described. This non-ultraviolet light absorbing material was originally eluted from Dowex-50 by 0.055 N hydrochloric acidi whereas cytosine required 2 N hydrochloric acid* However, there was not a complete separation of the two compounds and thus considerable purification was required for the cytosine fraction as was described above. Since this contaminating compound does not absorb light in the ultraviolet region it cannot very well be a pyrimidine or purine. Although the compound did not give a positive test with nlnhydrin {0.2 per cent ninhydrin in 1-butanol saturated with water), the concentration may not have been great enough to detect an amino acid. However, calculations based on the amount of radioactivity and the weight of an average amino acid, assuming no dilution of isotope, indicated there should have been sufficient material present to detect had this been of amino acid nature. Neither was a positive test for a ureido acid obtained after spraying with and para-diraethylaminobenzaadehyde, but again there may have been an insufficient concentration. n Adenine was reehromatographed to giro on idea of the parity of the VUtin* fraction* two ultraviolet absorbing spots were found on the paper* the n£ values were (X) 0 *57, and (a) O.??. The adenine wee fouad ty the Beckmann 0K-2 to he located la spot (2). Elution front the peper sad counting of the elntate wee carried out In the sente manner as the uracil end cytosine* Ikdioatiiography of Paper Chromatograms Strips tc be radloeutogrepbad were taped to 3 by ID inch sheets of Kedah BXue Brand X-ray film. A Spot of radioactive solution was placed In the upper right hand comer In order to nark the relation of the chromatogram to the developed film* The films, with attached papers, were placed between plywood boards which were clamped tightly together to Insure close contact of chromatograms and films# After a period of % weeks the chromatograms were removed and the films were developed for four minutes with Kodak D-X9 Developer, then placed in a stop bath of 1 per cent (w/v) acetic acid for 10 seconds, and left In a fixer solu­ tion of sodium thiosulfate for at least 10 minutes. The films ware then washed in cold tap water for apprrarimtely X hour, and then hung by clips to dry. Badioautographs run on the chromatographs of the cytosine fraction Showed the radioactivity of spot (3), which corresponds to cytosine itself, to be clearly associated with this spot and not contaminated with ether substances# 30 Results After purification by chromtography on paper, the specific activity of the cytosine was 31 to 33 per cent of the concentration of radioactivity originally given in the medium. per cent. The uracil was 33 to 3it The guanine erne 8 to 11* per cent and the adenine uas 9 to 12 per cent* A summary of the data is recorded in Table XT. t yresenee of tlraotl-2-C** ie jaHeuroapora diEWsaa Materials Tiro samples of uracil-2-C*5* were used# The first sample with a specific activity given of 0.6 milliouries per millimole was obtained from the Isotopes Specialties Company and was used in experiments with the mutant 12p8. One experiment was carried out. The second sample with a specific activity given of 1*2 adllicuries per millimole was obtained from Volk Badioehemicals Company and was used with the wild type of $. erases. One experiment was carried out. Orewth TToeedare' Two sets of ten 125 mi* Erlcmmeyer flasks wears used in the experi­ ment. Twenty-five milliliters of basal medium was added to each flask. In both sets* O.lt mg. of the labeled uracil and 9*6 mg. of unlabeled uracil were added to each of the flasks. The second set of ten flasks p #92 mg. of propionic acid in addition to the 10 mg. of uracil. 31 As in the experiment utilising uracil-2-G14 and ejainobutyrete, the first set of flasks served as a ©octroi and gars the incorporation of uracil into the jyrijtd4inea. the second sot shewed the influence of propionic acid m the amount of incorporation of uracil-2-C*4 into syrimidines of the imitant, 1298. The autoclarlng, inoculation, incubation, and harvest­ ing sere carried out as described on page H * the isolation and hydroly­ sis of the ribonucleotides and the ohromtography of the bases vers carried out in the manner already described, coluaaa m m listed end counted. the fractions £rm the Hie radioactivity was in direct proportion to the ultraviolet absorbance. Results the cytosine from the mold which was fed uracil-2-C1* and propionate was found to contain a concentration of radioactivity *dyi.«h ass 53 per cent of the initial concentration of the radioactivity furnished the mold as uracil-2-C14. there m s essentially no labeling of the purines, admins and guanine. Again the cytosine from the mold fed only uracil2-C*4 m ad basal constituents showed a dilution of specific activity of 83 per cent of the original specific activity. fhe fftilimtim of Umcil-2-CX 4 in the Presence of Arginine for :T,n$SSjSlpi^^ Kmroapors Crassa Materials Uraeil-2-Ci4 m s obtained from the isotopes Specialties Company, the specific activity of the sample m s given as 0.6 raillicruries per 3a nU lim olA . lh$ L-arginine mui obtained £rc® P fta .tle h l Ghsnlcal Cowpanjr. The argaalea nm& m i t t e l . piomie-2-C14 91 .0003 •ooit l.Ui x 10® cytosine uracil guanine adenine k .1*8 .56 14 104 104 104 104 .31 .33 .11 .13 X 1G4 X IQ4 X 104 X 104 .33 •3U .08 .09 i*.1*3 X it.72 X 2.05 X 1.80 X 1.2it x 10® cytosine uracil guanine adenine It .10 it .19 0.96 1.03 Continued 3U TiBLE XV «. Continued Supplement Compound Isolated From Hold Specific Activity of Supplement Specific Activity of Compound Isolated Ratio Experiment 5 2.50 x 10* cytosine uracil guanine adenine Utfacil-24*CX* ♦ propionate 2.21 x 10* .08 0.2 x 10* 0.23 x 10* .09 1 .1*5 x 10* .58 0 .51* x 10* 0.63 x 10* .21 .21 I.I4I x 10* .7U 2.50 * X04 cytosine uracil guanine adenine Experiment 6 OmoiX-S^14 mm 1.90 x H )4 cytosine uracil guanine adenine tJw.cil-2-C14 + Arginine •88 mm 0 0 1.90 x 104 cytosine uracil / i.n x 0 0 io * 1.01 35 m d gaaatna. Again th© eyiosln© ttm the wold #£■ the pariaee* £*d «aOy «&4 basAL eaasUtamfcs shoved « dilatloa ©f epeoifie activity of 7U g«p e«ai ©f the original specific activity, Hal^rielsi Sodium gvejfaiwtfN^M^ was obtained from the Volk Radl©che»&c*XB Company* tym specific activity was gfcrattte 1-2 milliettries ]ser m lm . Dihydrooracil and eoantfyaft. A (product of ftebei Laboratories) %uMMiUik i l k A m - Iff diwfrmanflms Jr Jl A th ttklfcfliiiMtoria iMIuhtMi WWFW w P T ^ M S I W I J £ 3 P G * ! w ! tW O P M R v t i i . T O y i w p Ivw lEIS^m iW f l l w B W B l lwA * ® 8 H P 9 e @ 1 8 i l * CMLi^. wMMMMdMI JCBfl JSIjjnG^ %YfA the baainja salt ©f ASc.Mi MfcJ f ^tokab iMmtiMa dkUM am MkjLvLa mrn-rnb^mfai^mdm iS^OpSJw v)%|^ 8ffiKw5 PKBjroW ^ftWU&lfipv was obtained fpom BuiritA©Bal IMJI ml tiitti arinin'i© AM I Mb.' H ill. MnBnMAJMttdS A.Mwse xvocx* xa revccisxaec w nee oxauxixcie fojssi ifyiyjy^g ifiny eiyt doee not give the teat with nitrepecsside cmleee reduced again:* Methods Both alpha and hat* amino aoida ware detected after paper chroma­ tography fay reaction With nlnhyarir!. Brneil M l determined both In eolation team lta absorbance using the Beetaisim spectrophotometer, Modal W,and after chwaatograiiiir on paper fay looating tbs spots with an ultrwriolet lamp. Attempts at chromatographing propionate ware wa» successful baaaasa such small amounts ware not detectable by present methods. Dihydrouracil and beta-ureidoproplonic sold were detected on chromatograms (with or without previous nimhydrin treatment) by spraying SB ilitfa 0*5 X a©dia» faydrtarfde, | ^ M i | after drying for thirty minutes, fay spraying with a station containing 100 ml. of ethanol, 10 ml. of concentrated hydrochloric acid, oid 1 gnu of para*»dlmetfay:i^^ defayde. thlo loot spray destroyed guy color produced fay ninhydrin and produced a yellow color with ureMo acids (formed by the sodium bytaadLde ipXtySxig or m m d^i^ied m tyr tuo ** ffe® fiap»fe *tea& of chromatograms with a k K faydroacyiamim isolation {pX 6-5*7 *0) followed fay aprwyiaag with ferric t t . d E . *■‘•Muifc. r'l tMl■>' Wfca&!tlkiMiMiMM k,JW ‘JiE? T Uu%iM JifcJMMhd* X^JlkfWln^kd: A ^fcW** cixiori»e %& MmxMmtiFQ orw$mz i wewMMNi of per cent f e m e cntorxQ©, jus Jkhfafc^t iiK■*&.*&.jtfh Jr ttf tfl‘■Vllit^^rtfli i^ Vl*t I*i'.tiHKlf XiL. acag/• Mfcait if litf 1 ifTl *4 HIMl»h<14^2 per cent iLmaJ .Ikfafc^fa hii^r*» l i ilih iSftl Jt j^. jite-.rih'&.ddt' acm, and. 3ffa w i!0^»rociy.oric lie secons tkhJMibfe Tsrocedare iarolTiKi faydroiywle of the tfaieaitar with strong of sodium hydroxide im 100 i&* of 95 per cent (3 esu methanol), followed fay spraying with Sodium nltropameside reagent (1.5 gn. of sodium nitroprusflide aired la $ ml* of 2 X sulfuric acid, nod adding 95 »&• methanol and 10 el* of 26 pen* cent ammonia. M i solution was filtered to remove aalte). Us* enaymatie reaction was allowed to proceed while kept at constant teaperatare is • w t « r tw«b. All wcpMflnmito iwre cuwisd out «t 35° C. fop wajying pwioda of tiiM . 39 A number of d i H M t procedures were us©d for preparing sdations of the ncrooULal constituents to bo spoMiineci for ©osyisatic activity, the prteipl© mim in ail of the procedures was comj&et© destruction of tb» J^Slial nails to free tbs inner constituents. In cats of the first attempts, jayoelta grown for four days were harvested by filtering on &Buchner funnel, and the pads wars stored in tbs deep frees© for two days* After slight thawing the pads ware ground with carborundum powder in 0.1 M phosphate buffer. During grinding tbs mixture was kept sold by dipping in an ethanol-dry is© bath, tbs was frosen and upon rethawing and. allowing insoluble particles to settie, tb© supernatant was used la tests for ©nasnsaiie activity uoon arainobutyric acid* (Ms milliliter of th® solution was used with various oonoesstrations of aaaiEiolmtyric sold in phosphate buffer (j® ?.?). fhe total vote© was § si* and. the reaction time was for 30 and 60 minute periods. .After addition of 1 *&« of £ per ©wot trichloroacetic acid and filtering, 50 lambda spots were placed on Chateau #3 paper, the developing aolveat was l«fcute&olfglacial acetic aoldidlstilled water in a ratio of 80*30*80 by vote®. After derelopiag for IT hours, drying, and spraying with ninhydrin, no change in tee oonoaatration of andnobu^ric acid was cbserved. When this expertent was repeated the m m results were ob­ tained. Wtm freshly harvested mycelia, ground with carborundum and incubated with aminebutyrlc acid showed no activity over periods of 30 laimtes, 80 minutes, 120 minutes, and k hours incubation time. * kO Another treatment of the mycelial pads in order to study enzyme activity involved preparation of an acetone dried ponder* The freshly harvested mycelia were homogenized in the growth medium followed by extraction of the suspension with 6 volumes of acetone at -20° C. The acetone was filtered off and the powder was placed in a dessicator. One hundred milligrams of the powder were allowed to stand in 1 ml. of water for 6 hours* Three substrates were used* propionic acid (3.7 mg.), aminobutyrlc a d d (5*15 mg.), aspartic acid (U.US mg.) and aminobutyrate plus 1 mg. of jyridaxd-hydrochloride. Incubation was carried out for 50 minutes followed by filtration through a sintered glass filter. Aliipiots were placed on Whatman #1 paper aiad the development of the paper was carried out for 16 hours with a solvent consisting of equal volumes of 0.1 N sodium acetate and ethanol. Again no change was observed except for a small decrease in concentration of the aminobutyrate with the {yddoxal«-hydrochloride. This experiment was tried again using acetone dried powder of the residue left after centrifuging the homo* genized nycelial pads, but again no activity was observed. All of these preparations showed succinic dehydrogenase activity as determined by the common methylene-blue procedure. A third preparation was very similar to the first one described in that the freshly harvested mycelia were frozen in the deep freeze for I*.# hours after which they were ground in phosphate buffer (0.1 N pH 7*9) using a tea Broeek hand grinder. The homogenate was centrifuged in a Servall refrigerated centrifuge for 10 minutes at 11,000 revolutions ia per minute at h° C. 1 mg* of uracil. One milliliter of the supernatant urns used with The controls were 1 mg. of uracil to which 1 ml. of enzyme was added at the end of the experiment. One mi31.iliter of the ens^me served as a blank. At the end of 12 hours each of the solutions was diluted to 100 ml. and the concentration of uracil determined on the Beckmann spectrophotometer, Model 00. Ho change in uracil eoncentration was observed. A fourth method of preparation, which was more successful than the previous ones, involved lyophilization of the harvested myeelia. This removes the water under vacuum and at low temperatures* leaving a brittle dried myoelia which can be ground to a powder. One hundred milligrams of this freshly prepared powder, when incubated in phosphate buffer in the presence of uracil showed a slight activity as was detected by a decrease of the uracil concentration determined by the absorbance. This experiment was repeated with similar results for uracil, and at the same time aminobutyrate decreased in concentration as was shown by chromatography on paper. Ho activity was observed with respect to action on dihydrcuraeil. Ho activity could be found 1» the powder that had been standing at room temperature in a dessicator for several days. The fifth and most successful preparation consisted of freezing the freshly harvested mycelial pads on blocks of dry ice and homogenizing in trie (tris-hydroxymethylaminomethane) buffer (pH 7*9). A modification of this procedure involved homogenizing the frozen mycelia in a Waring blender with the dry ice and diluting afterwards with tris buffer. One milliliter of the homogenate m s used with 0.05 mg. uracil, 0.07 mg. 1*2 tf ribot* t o 0.01 «ig* ttootto t o total volnmo m» 3 Mil* 3DaoabatlGM uaa carried oat fo r 12 hour*, ffee eszymatic a c tiv ity *** fealiod by tailing t o solutions ,i» a watar bath for %$ minutes. Ali<$iot« (i$© Itoda) tot- t o t o t o g x m i M ©n ^tptr t o t o uxtol »pot# lo e a to by u#a of «a a lto v lo ltt lamp* U racil 4& t o ionmmo# o f t o ’ a y G tlitl preparation o ta to a groat to x to t to. e v e n tra tio n . Wltb ftoat t o AW t o a g to l eonctototon decreased ta t not to t o tan* d&gro* a s v ith a m o il alca®* $ to t o t o o f prsptJEwblott uas trie d using m rlotts substrates. A to g to ta t o t dAbydrouracil (0 .1 » g .), amia©~ ta % to acid (0*1 Mg*)# tatA to astto (0.05 mg*)* beta-^roidopropim ic to d (0*1 mg*)* propionic to ld (0*1 m g.), u r to l (0 .1 'Mg-*)f prop&onAs m M f t o ritaat^**|ta8$m t© ( I mg*), tata*nmdd©p^pi©nie acid plus (2 »g*5, t o p3E^io^l*»pant«th«l3ae (1 mg.) plus rS ta to **jiiifeospbsta (2 Mg*-}* $$$&' fixtures Ad a final tMXaws of j? ml* hhwps ineubstod fo r ilHrtKi bourns. offcor * M tte s c tlrib jr * * * dootrpyod by hosting. On. hundred lajfcds *3_l<*aoia * * r * spotted on p *j» r. The paper was deraioped fo r 2tt iK un tn * satttmted phaaoHvuter solvent. A fter -drying flw arnl#tt the phenol s t ill prevented detection o f any e ltrs rio le t absorbing spots. Sp«gri«j5sith niiihyteia ahsiwd * in a ria o - butyric asltd but no eherago la b et*-*la ain » . Spraying a ith aCUcali, followed by spraying s ith p a*w *d lM tl$te*d »fi^ so change is ecraeenfcratiea ot dlhydrawacJi or bote-woidopropioaie a d d . Ib is lsfctsr sywKUal p w i***i±o n « u found to giro interesting results in * study « f its action on propionate ted bete-alanyi-paHtethelne. 1*3 H e incubation mixture eoaaisbcd pot should have been a n**r ultrsvlalat abasibiBg spot appeared xhiah mgr be £eeK&hs&3&0 fraa of the satar# SasuXts She preparation found be be m e t sueoeeaful was that uslas a Waring blaaiar hoaogenate of the fremt M i d aad dry ios dilated Dith tris buffer. Being thia preparaiioB diaappoamnae of aaiadfeatyxate sad uracil n a n obeereed. Also » the jawwaoe of beta-alaayX-jaatatheinB, rlboae-S-ndMepbate, jwopdanie acid, adanoaine triptoajtoate, aad eoauqnm A, fe*»atiaa of a smr thio-eatar sa# * W M i . U5 DISCUSSION From the results presented In the previous section, various de­ grees of growth of the mold were observed in the presence of certain compounds in the basal medium. Other compounds when added to the basal media failed to promote growth of the mold* Some of these latter find­ ings were expected since the idea that the mutant utilises a pathway different from the normal organism has already been introduced, Thus, finding that ureidosucclnic acid and aspartic acid would not support growth of the mold was not surprising, although these compounds have been described by Korriberg (IB) as playing an important role in pyrimi­ dine biosynthesis In other organisms. Another compound, orotic acid, shown to be an Intermediate in this same sequence of reactions studied by Komberg, has Already bean shown by boring (7) to be used by the imitant for growth. The small amount of growth, in comparison to that found for alpha-aminobtttyric acid and some of the other compounds shcnm in the results in Table I, probably indicates that orotic acid does not give rise to orotidine-S1-phosphate and then to uridine-#* phosphate as was suggested by Korafeerg for ih© normal pathway. A rela­ tively slow decarboxylation to form uracil followed by conversion of uracil to uridine-#1-phosphate, seems to be another possibility. failure ©f the mutant to grow either on alpha-ketobutyric acid or on alpha-hydroxybutyrie acid indicates that these compounds are not intermediates in the use of the amino acids by the mutant. 1*6 Both horaoaerin© and threonine hare bean ehoim to give rise to alphaketobutyrlc acid (1*1). Klmcay et &1. (14*) have traced the catabolism ef Cx*-lab©l©d axdnobutyric acid in rat liver homogeaates and found that the amino acid is converted to the koto acid followed by oxidative decasbcocylation to the next loser monoe&rboxylic acid, propionic acid. Fairley (20) has demonstrat$d that aminobutyric acid, homoterlne, and threonine were utilized by the mutant to about the earn* extant for growth. Homoserine and threonine are interconvertible and this inter** conversion has been suggested to take place through the hydration of a vinylgiycin® intermediate (hi). Hydrogenation of this intermediate has been suggested to occur giving alpha-aminobutyric acid (5Q) • Allothreonine did not replace threonine as an additive to the basal media supporting growth. Threonine raeemase, tharefore, would not seem to be present in the stttant, although it has been found in Escherichia coll (£1). Since isoleucine can be derived from the alpba-ketobutyrie acid formed from either threonine or homoserine (52), it was expected to act in a maimer similar to these two compounds. However, the failure of isoleu­ cine to support growth seems to further indicate that the Iceto acid is not the common intermediate between threonine, homoserln© and aminobutyric acid. Failure of cyclopropane aminocarboxylic acid to support growth suggests that the mold cannot open th© cyclopropane ring to form either homoserine, threonine or aminobutyric acid. Since threonine is known to give rise to butyric acid and propionic acid (55), both of these compounds were tested as possible intermediates hi im the utilization of the aliphatic amino acids. In higher animals threonine can he cleaved to yield glycine and acetate (5U). The results show that of the four compounds, propionic acid was the only' one used by the mold for growth, these results were comparable to those obtained when aminobutyric acid was added to the medium. This finding Is strongly indicative of the use of propionic acid for pyrimidine formation in the mutant by & pathway closely related to that by which the amino acids are utilised. The metabolism of propionate has received considerable attention. St&dtman (1*3) has shewn that dried cells of Clostridium propjonlcum metabolize propionic acid in the presence of ammonium salts to form beta^alanine. These reactions tales place through Coenzyme A derivatives. Traplonyl-Coensyme A is formed from propionic acid, adenosine triphos­ phate and Coenssy&e A . Propionyl-Ooenzyme A or acrylyl-Coonzyme A in the presence of ammonium ions is converted to beta-alanyl-Cosnzyme A. An early step in the utilisation of propionate by pig heart involves the addition of carbon dioxide to the three carbon compound (55)* This can occur only after the propionic acid is converted to propionyl-Coenzyme A. The product of the reaction is methylmalonyl-Coenzyme A and the reaction requires adenosine triphosphate. This product is then converted to succinic acid by an isomerization reaction. Other pathways of propionate metabolism exist. In cow udder propionic acid-l-C14 Is converted to acetic aeid-l-C14* & reaction which can not take place by way of the above mentioned mechanism (56). Ia peanut mitochondria, propionate appears to be acidised to beta* hydroooosropionic acid, pmfamp byway of the Coms&Mrii derivatives propionic acid* acrylic acid, and beta4$rdrc«ypr^ of acid (M)* Ift Trie* of the atAebence of these jntbirays, Bam of the inter* modim m of these reaction* m m tested as growth js*Gmoters for the mutant. 0g the compounds tried acrylic acid, beta*lydroaypiropi©nic acid and met^lmadcwsic acid aapported growth, suggesting that boas or ^ all of these Gfmpmi&et may be iatemediatee in the nee of propionate for pyrimidine formation* fhe finding that propionate end related compounds supported growth of the syriaddineleas atmin, led to the suggestion that these expounds m m used for pyrimidine foimtion by omrerslon to beia-el&nine, beta* ureidopropionie acid, and dthydrouraoil* When the compounds were tested ^ iU iMkfcdt UUii?l: llb^UlkjA fw h *ih At dSa*tokfa'Mfcd& Jb.rfk a l r 4 m |-ft VXtfu<(ltMJMltiM**aK4^fc as growth supplements^ osta^aianins was xcmm to me *S*tftUflk inactive* However^ the remaining two compounds dtd permit growth to occur* beta* alanine itself Is not utilised for growth, the pathway by which propionic acid is used might require formation of the activated form, bei*«w&anylCoanzyme A. fhs failure of the m M to use beta-elanine indicates the absence of the wrnym needed for the direct activation* fhe results obtained from experiments In Which the growth of the mold was deteradned as a function of time for these various growth* supporting ccropownds, indicate, however, that neither propionate nor aminobutyrate can be used by a pathway which involves free beta-ureidopropionate or dihydrouracil as intermediates, these conclusions were readied on the basis of the results shown in figure k, showing 149 amino-butyrate and propionate to give & lower maximum of growth as well as beginning growth at a tin© far before dihydrouracil or ureidopropionate. If propionate and aidnobutyrate were utilised by conversion to ureidopropionic add, dihydrouracil and then to uracil, the lag in initiation of growth, which probably indicates adaptation to the substrate, should hare been of the sane order or greater than with dlhydrouraeil and ureidopropionio acid* Since the maximum reached in the curves when the latter substances were used as growth substituents, is similar to that reached by uracil, these substances probably are utilised after conversion to uracil by the reversal of the degradative pathway shown in Figure 2. Once growth begin, the growth rates as measured by the slopes of the curves were essentially the sane, indicating no great destruction of any of the compounds occurred during the adaptive period* Compared with the other compounds, aminobutyrate and propionate were found to give a lower maximum of growth, this is presumably related to the use daring growth of substantial amounts of these compounds for metabolic reactions other than pyrimidine formation. Since the absence of uridine derivatives for coensyme reactions has been suspected as the major deficiency in the mold as it begins growth, selected compounds were chosen to see whether the addition of a small amount of uridine would cause any significant growth effect. The results in Table II showed that only dihydrouracil gave a more than additive response in the presence of uridine* A similar effect has been shown (21) for aminobutyric acid and threonine. These results are con­ sistent with the use of an initial supply of a trace of uridine to So jMrittft * e m p i i»»wii«upy In th# utilisation of t&ee® cmpmatei tonWW|| tfeli 8©a« not rt&ft out t&© po»«tbiIity tfeai uridine siatply allawit a worn rapid adaptation by m m k m m pcmmm* m * reaulta In Table 17* Bhawing tba uiilimttc® bgr 1&e sold of fe®t& B&dieaeiiim uraull and «ttiudbu%mte supplied together in tbs basal awdtem# jawida laxlton* support fear ths utiligsatiosi of aaincAmtyrate in ipdadd&*is biosynthesis* Sfc the Gonirol sa^&idwaats with mmam ljnfo*rtd*9 AltiK!&» tbs 8S to W par o m t of tbs initial oous«nti*mtim at jmdioaeiirtty aippLisd In tbs nmoll# WHO * vmtsr M <*h *gttSBt* afeMiftMkjfeat ^4 ----.'at If the ^ntlnidln«a for»ad had a# their sol® pp9o$t*n*s? i,Jftmi^t, €5* M ® lUibh^MfaErtb 9fcfeA Atj^ii w R fl^ m U m Jm fllw w ' 0 9 933 4 .9 0 9 X 9 0 vO i n Idflmttiaal sactent as tbs praeureQi*# fjfyft dilution of the isotope which nan aolnally fw iwt at the that a^ntkssls of ths pyirt&idi&&$ occurred the s©tup©es of the ymeteS't'ty»_> fRIffh on fffitftftftdfiftfotsci tantnat@j $$ WOll && fPQBi the 8UP|>3JLOd# Whsn wijMtoatyrie m i d m s *Ma& «3m g with tbs uracil-2-C1*, utilisation of d m docresood to on ermn groator octant, and produced EPrliddinea which n » labeled to sattoi^r bgr ojmtbasis at xamlX itsolf or wbstbsr it m s atilissd bp•Bother mitts. Bsmmr* tits duts pressntsd jsmiousljr in tbs grcarth 51 curves (page 19) suggests tbs two substances were used by different routes* If propionate and aminobutyrate are used by the wold for pyrimidine biosynthesis by tbs same pathway, then the concentration of radioactivity found in the pyrimidines Isolated from the mold would be expected to be of the same order as that found for aminobutyrate* Indeed, the results shewn in liable IV do shew considerable dilution, 31 to 33 per cant of the initial concentration of radioactivity, to have taken place in formation of the pyrimidines by the mold when propionate-2-C14 was added to the medium* However, aminobutyrate-3-C14 was found to be utilised to the extent of li* pen* cent of the initial concentration of radio* activity* Thus, although the dilution Is to a much greater degree than uracil itself, it is to a lesser degree than aminobutyrate* The rela­ tively low concentration of activity found in purines, ID per cent of the original radioactivity, indicates that there is a specific incorp­ oration of propionic acid into the pyrimidines. Further evidence for utilization of propionate for pyrimidine bio­ synthesis by the mold is found in the results expressed in Table IV. Although in the above experiment the dilution of the initial radioactivity m s great enough to section the specificity of propionate utilisation for pyrimidine biosynthesis, this experiment shorn that propionate is used to a considerable extent* Again in the control experiment using uracil-2-C14 alone, a slight dilution of the isotopic carbon was noted as the compound m s used for nucleic acid pyrimidine formation. When 52 ppoptonlo m U mm m m u tth the mwmlMMfl* to ths b siftl swdius^ th * flutt* mood both of tfa© coapcmnd* torpyriiaiaia# syathesi*. fho urm cil- u&§ fcworpormted to th * octant o f 53 |w r cent of the in itia l concentration o f u tiliis tio a fo3p jairineSa iftfco th * isnri«M*ae* end w w tie slla r a * It mpptmraolmr,%hemtore,th at propionic acid mi»t bo- added bo the H o t of krnam jtf&jMMttie precursors. W ith th is demonstration of the moo of tW acids* ostd&&* butyrle tod propiento eeide, fo r jgrrfaddiae biogadaeeie toe problem o f to r J*to fcy toiash theyere u tilis e d jeraeanto lt w if . S m w m m of to r Of tho &VX$g$$P ©f growth, it. #»QW bfttk compounds are mtilisoi by the lioosoBtof by tho sxpopisiBiits to ftOflOfitO that pathway >■ With the 5jifo:naaiian this thesis* a ^**ffeaT. potiomy oo21 8 W bo suggested* .^totototot ki^i ©: MS idMflWkik f ir APl^Mb . ^toS tofc The pftipesea pathway v lth tha £nrm1A.m of th« bate- tlMc&X-Qemusr** i-rib o tld e . 5Eh« iuact step wwOd b« the foroitlc® of the To^'*ax*iAoT^$£my%MtomtfmA-^rSbotide. Treatth is ooaqpennd, dl^‘ phoephato. A etaalljr* toe tofo«cto3tl«4 o f toe «UM>ee«tooa|tokto could HO— C H 2 CH* PROPIONIC H Y DR OXY PRO PIO Nld1 ACID ACID a d e n o s in e CDEn Z Y M E t r ip h o s p h a t e a CO- C oenz ^ CO-COENZYME A \ CH, / 2 CH, \ P R O P IO N Y L -C O E N Z Y M E _ CH ----- // CH„ A 1 ACRYLY L - COENZYH HN— C / \ 0=C \ N— » CH (— // CH 1 R t B OTIDE URIDINE-5 - P FIGURE 5-SUGGESTED P A T H W A Y OF PYRIM CR ASSA Ml c o 2h H ,N — C H \ C H a . 2* A search for further grcsifth^^pportin compounds for If* jgasssiai added the following compounds* propionic, acrylic, beta-hydrcay- praj&onic, beta-uraidoptropiGnie, ffiSthylnalonic acids and dibyxhreuraeil. Various intermediates of the Koraberg scheme were not need for growth. Studies of the time-cours© of growth of the mold on various supple* meats shewed that propionate and mdnobatyrate gave similar responses. Beta^oreidoproplon&te and dihydrouraeil required longer periods of adaptation before growth began* 3* Broplnate*2-C14 m e found to be incorporated, relatively specifically into the pyrimidines of the mold* The purines of the same expert* manta contained much loser amounts of carbon-lU* 58 It. She { M M B N of nnlalwHed propionic acid la the growth wMam depreeeed significantly tits specific aetlTitt.es of the pyrimidines fexnad by the sold la a madia® also containing ttr*cH-2*Cw . $. Arginine m foam to inhibit strongly tits growth of tits mold with propionate or heaoaerine a» mpg&emHits. A weak inMbttico of tits use of uracil for grcarth m noted, tits jmssnss of arginine in heml wedfww containing araoll-a-C1* led to aa lacrosse in the specific aetiwities of tits pyrlMidines fonaed. 6. Preliminary experlzRenbs shewed that ewsymas wars present In the mold, l u u J & aSIXQOIm a r a l B O D t t t y i U t i O r t & f S & i XA X U Z ?. Ob tha basis of tbs results a slur pathway far the synthesis of pyriiflidt&e compounds is suggested, a pathway which leads fro® p^pl<»iyl*^3oenay«e & throu# the Coomym I derivatives of bate* alanine and beta^ureidopropionic acid to dihydrouridylic acid and finally to uridine-*#*-phosphate. 59 BIBLIOQHA.FHI 1. Hotchkiss, R. D.j Brachet, J., The Suclelo Adds, Vol. XI, Chargaff, E. mod Davidson, J. H., eds., Chapters 27 and 28, Academia Press, Hew lark, 1955, p p . 435, 476. 2. Bamea, V. W., Jr., and Schoenheiaer, S., J. Biol. Chem., 151. 123 <391*3). 3. Heinrich, X. R. and Wilson, D. W., J. Biol. Cham., 186, 447 (1950). 4* Lagerkvist, U., Acta. Chan. Scand., U, 1151 (1950). 5. Mitchell, R, K., Houlahan, M. B., and %re, J. S., J. Biol. Chen., 178, 525 (1948). 6. Mitchell, H. K., and Houlahan, M. B., Federation Proc., 6, 506 (1947). 7. Loring, H. S., and Pierce, J. S., J. Mol. Cham., 153. 61 (1944). 8. Wright, L. D., MUler, C. S., Skeggs, H. S., Huff, J. W., Weed, 1. L., and Wilson, 0. W., jr. An. Cham. Soc., T^, 1898 (1951). 9. Bergstrom, 3., Arvidson, St., Harameraton, E., Ellasson, H. A., Reichard, p., and von Ubiah, H., 3. Biol. Gham., 177, 11$5 (1949)} U»id, 179, 189 (1949). 30. Hurlbnrt, R. B.» and Potter, P. 8., 3. Biol. Cham., 195, 257 (1952). 11. Beichard, P., Acta Chora. Soand., 8, 795, 1102 (1954). 12. Ralchard, P., and Hanshoff, S., Acta Cham. Scand., 10, 548 (1956). 13. Jones, M. B., Spector, L., and Lipmann, P., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2X» 819 (1955), ll». Woods, L., Havel, J. M., and Shive, W., J. Biol. Cham., 209. 559 (1954). 15. Liebenaan, I., and Korhbarg, A., 3. Biol. Chem., 207, 911 (1954). 16. Kornberg, A., Lieberman, I., and Slmras, B. S., J. Am. Cham. Soc., 26, 2027, 2844 (1954). 60 17. Koxnberg, A., liebaiwan, I., and Sirama, E. S., J. Biol. Chat., 215, 389, 1(03, 1(17 (1955). IB. tiebermn, I., J. Biol. Cham., 222. 7 ® (1956). 19. Welch, A. D., Enzymesi Units of Biological Structure and Function. Gaebler, o. H., ed., Academic Press inc., Hew Tork, 1956, p. 5k7. 20. Fhirlegr, d. I., J. Biol. Chaw., jQg, 3U7 (1951(). 21. Hermann, R. 1., and Shirley, J. L., J. Biol. Cham., 227, 1109 (1957). 22. Fide, £., Henderson, R. B., and Fink, R. M., J. Biol. Chen., 197 W(1 (1952)1 m , 31)9 (1953). Fink, H. M., McOoughey, C., dine, H. E. and Fink, K., J. Biol. Cham., 218, 1 (3956). 23. Fritaeon, P., Acta Cham. Scand., 30, 167k (1956). 21t. Candlakis, E. S., J. Bid. Chem., 221, 315 (1956). 25* Qrlsolia, S. and Wallach, D. P., Biochim. at Biopii. Acta, 18, 1(1(9 (1955). 26. Butman, R. J., Cantarenr, A. and Paschkis, E. S., J. Biol. Chon. 210, 321 (195k). 27. Candlakis,E. S., J. Bid. Ohaa., Mg, 329 (1957). 28. lagerkrist, U., and Reichard, P., Acta. Chem. Scand.,8,361 (195k). 29. Kalckar, H. M., J. Biol. ©am., 167. k7? (19k7). 30. Oatem, P., and 250, 155 (1937). Terszakowec, J., Hoppe-Sayler*a 2. physiol.Chem., 31. Capotto, R., 1. Bid. Chem., 3 ^ 801 (1951). 32. Korhberg, A., and Pricer, W. E., J. Bid. Chem., 193, U81(1951). 33. Oreertoerg, 0. S., Federation Proe., 12, 1 (1953). 3k. Bravarman, 0., and Chargaff, E., Biochim. et Biopbys. Ada, 16, 52k (1955). 35. McHutt, W. S., Biochem. J., £0, 38k (1953). 61 36. langfeld, F., and Stieglits!, J., As. Cham. 3., 3 5 0 4 (1693). 37. Beadle* S. V „ «ad ‘Satan, E. 1., fra. tat. Arad. Sci., 27, i>99 (1941). 38. tayeiathl, 0., tat Komberg, A., J. Biol. Chen., JgJ, 717 (1952). 39. Pinehara, J. B. S., 3 . Son. nUaedsiol., JJJ, 236 (1954). 40. Black, S., and mgrfc, 41- 3. Biol. Ohara., 213. 27, 39, 51 (1955). J,. Horcwitss, ». H., tat Fling, M., 3, Bid. ©wra., 42' (Honmalll, J., wad Statpf, F. S., J. An. Chut. See., jg, 2652 (1957)* 43' Stndtnnn, E. R., 3. Am. Ohsra. See., ]£, $16$ (1955). 44. Kln&exy, S. S., Ttakeda, X., end Oranlierg, B. X., Bloehem. «t B&o$&ps. Aete. Iff 561 (1955). 45' Idea, 0. Q., tat areeuberg, B. M., J. Biel. Chen., Jgjg, 367 (1953). 46. Abelaon, P. 8., wad Vegel, H. J., J. tael. Chan., 2£f, 355 (1955). 47. Stack, A. 1., end maker, X., j r . Biel. Ohm., Sg2, 203 (1958). 48. Wletand, I., end Koppa, R., .fuatas Liebig Aanalen der Chorale, 588. 15 (1954). ^ 49. t a n , 8. 0., 3. Am. Chen. See., 60, 1325 (1938). 50. Bnria, B. B., Adrascea in Enayaology, Tel. 16, Read, F. F. ed., Bofceraclenee Publishers, fins., 1955, p. 24?. 51* Anee, H., J. An. ©u». See., |j§, 3858 (1954). 52. BWbeTger, S., end Adelbarg, S. A., 3. Biel. Ohera., 192. 883 (1951). 53. Carden, B. P., and Barker, 8. A., Arch. Bioehen., 32, 1 ® (1947). 54. tin* S., and Oreedoerg, B. H., J. Ben. Ptiyaiol., J8, 181 (1954). 55. Unpin, X., ortta, P. J., and Oohoa, S., Batar«,126, 823 (1955). 56. tanea, A. S., Peetere, 0., and Lanryaaena, X., Biochem. J., 61*, 726 (1956). 57. Msknaaeh, 1. 0., Barter, X. A., Canavaea, J., and Orieolta, S., Federation Free., JJ, 278 (1958). 62 X* Basal M dh Calcium chloride l ga. Ammonium tartrate go gn. Ammoniumnitrate XO gm. Potassium d%drogeaa phosphate 10 gm. l&gneeium sulfate heptahydrate g gm. Sodium chloride 1 gm. Sucrose 101 gnu Blotla 26 Trace element solution 10 ml. Distilled water to 10 1. 2, Trace element solution! Sodium tetraborate Ammonium molybdate Fmric chloride sulfate h&it&hydiftte Cupric chloride IrfirtiTrri initfi’lfra ii*ih» iW 4W-lfk^l 1 1wol mltm ' m n &mcnia onionme Distilled water 3* Guitar® slantst 8*6 gm* 6.i* gen. ' 50.0 &*. 200.0 gm. 27.0 gm. 1. £f a*> gm* to 500*0 mi. Th© mold is iiaintained on culture slants eoasisting of Vtaaai vftariium containing 2 per cent agar a*** 1.0 rag, of uracil per ml* ttm agar and uracil are dissolved in basal medium by heating and 10 ml* fractions of the resulting culture median are transferred to fytm tost tubes. Hie tubes are stoppered with cotton plugs and are sterilized by autocXaving. The tabes are placed m a slant while Still hot to provide maximum surface area and the contents allowed to gel. The mold is transferred from tube to tube at two^week intervals using standard sterile technique.