6 9 -2 0 ,9 2 5 ROWLAND, Howard Ray, 1929A STUDY OF TOE CAMPUS OMBUDSMAN IN AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITH EMPHASIS ON MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY. Michigan State U niversity, Ph.D., 1969 Education, adm inistration University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan © C o p y rig h t by HOWARD RAY ROWLAND 1969 A STU D Y O F THE C A M P U S OMBUDSMAN IN A M ERICA N H IG H ER ED UCA TIO N WITH E M P H A S IS ON MICHIGAN S T A T E UNIVERSITY By H ow ard Ray R o w la n d A T H ESIS S ubm itted to M ic h ig an State U n i v e r s i t y in p a r t i a l fu lfillm e n t of t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s fo r the d e g r e e of DOCTOR O F P H IL O S O P H Y D e p a r tm e n t o f A d m in is tr a tio n a n d H ig h e r E d u catio n 1969 ABSTRACT A STUDY O F TH E CA M PU S OMBUDSMAN IN A M ERICA N H IG H ER EDUCATION W IT H E M P H A S IS ON MICHIGAN STA T E U N IV ERSITY By H o w ard R a y Row land T h e p u r p o s e b of t h i s stu d y w e r e : to d efin e th e c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n , to r e v ie w th e c i r c u m s t a n c e s leading to h i s a p p e a r a n c e on th e a c a d e m i c s c e n e , to d e s c r i b e h i s a c tiv i tie s , and to a n a ly z e the e ffe c ts o f h i s a c t i v i t i e s . C a m p u s o m b u d sm e n a t s i x in s t i t u t i o n s of h ig h e r e d u c a t i o n w e r e in te rv ie w e d : U n iv e r s ity of C a l i f o r n i a a t B e rk e le y , C o lu m b ia U n iv e r s it y , U n iv e r s ity o f D e tr o it, M ic h ig a n State U n i v e r s i t y , San D ieg o S tate C o lle g e and San J o s e S ta te C o l­ le g e . S tu d e n ts w ho c o n s u lte d th e c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n at M ic h ig a n State U n i v e r s i t y d u r in g th e 1968 fa ll t e r m w e r e s u r v e y e d . T h r e e s im u lta n e o u s d e v e lo p m e n ts le d to th e a p p o in tm e n t of ca m p u s o m b u d s m e n a t f o u r te e n o r m o r e c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s in the U nited S t a t e s by th e end of 1968. One w a s th e i n c r e a s i n g d o m i ­ n an ce o f l a r g e - s c a l e f o r m a l o r g a n iz a tio n s in m o d e r n s o c i e t y . H o w a rd R ay R ow land a c c e n tu a tin g th e a s y m m e t r y in s iz e an d p o w e r b e tw e e n the in d iv id u a l and th e o r g a n iz a tio n . A n o th e r w a s r a p id e n r o l l m e n t g ro w th a t in s t itu ti o n s o f h i g h e r e d u c a tio n , e x p a n d in g m a n y o f th e m in to c o m ­ p lex, q u a s i - b u r e a u c r a t i c o r g a n iz a tio n s . B y th e m i d - 1 9 6 0 's , s t u ­ d e n ts h a d b e g u n t o r e a c t a g a in s t in d iv id u a l n e g l e c t an d a b u s e w ith in the i m p e r s o n a l o r g a n iz a tio n . The t h i r d d e v e lo p m e n t w a s th e s p r e a d of th e o m b u d s m a n c o n c e p t in civ il g o v e r n m e n t. O f S ca n d in a v ia n o rig in , th e c iv il o m b u d s m a n i s a n in d e p e n ­ dent, h i g h - l e v e l o f f ic e r w ho r e c e i v e s c o m p la in ts , m a k e s i n q u i r i e s and r e c o m m e n d s a p p r o p r i a t e a c tio n . H is r e m e d i a l w e a p o n s a r e p e r s u a s i o n , c r i t i c i s m and p u b lic ity . He cannot r e v e r s e a d m in is tr a ­ tiv e a c tio n . T h e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n , m o d e le d p r i m a r i l y on the D a n is h c iv il o m b u d s m a n , i s d efin ed a s an in d e p e n d e n t f a c u lty m e m b e r who r e c e i v e s c o m p la i n ts , m a in ly fro m s tu d e n ts , a t a c o lle g e o r u n i v e r ­ s ity . H e m a k e s in q u i r i e s and r e c o m m e n d s a p p r o p r i a t e a c tio n . r e m e d i a l w e a p o n s a r e p e r s u a s io n an d c r i t i c i s m . a d m i n i s t r a t i v e o r a c a d e m ic ac tio n . H is H e can no t r e v e r s e H is c h ie f r e s p o n s i b i l i t y i s to h elp r e s o l v e in d iv id u a l stu d e n t g r i e v a n c e s . H is s e c o n d a r y r e s p o n s i ­ b ility i s t o s e e k p r o c e d u r a l c h a n g e s to r e d u c e g r i e v a n c e s . H is o b je c tiv e i s to i m p r o v e r a t h e r than r e p l a c e th e e x i s t i n g s y s t e m . Both th e c iv il o m b u d s m a n and c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n a r e a u x i l i a r y to , n o t r e p l a c e m e n t s f o r, e x i s tin g f u n c t i o n a r i e s . .* H o w a rd R ay R ow land T h e m e th o d of s e le c tio n a n d th e p e r s o n s e l e c t e d w e re found to be c r u c i a l in th e e s t a b l i s h m e n t of th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n p o s itio n . H e m a y be s e l e c t e d by a n y p o w e r g ro u p o r c o m b in atio n o f p o w e r g r o u p s a t h i s i n s t itu ti o n . T h e m a n n e r of s e l e c t i o n u s u a lly i s c o n s i s t e n t w ith the in s t i t u t i o n 1 s p o w e r e m p h a s is . I n s titu tio n s w ith c a m p u s o m b u d s m e n r a n g e in s i z e fro m l a r g e u n i v e r s i t i e s to s m a l l c o l le g e s . A t M ic h ig a n S ta te U n iv e r s ity , a l l c l a s s r a n k s and s tu d e n t a g e g r o u p s w e r e r e p r e s e n t e d by s tu d e n ts who c o n s u lte d th a t in stitu tio n * s o m b u d s m a n . On a p r o p o rtio n a l b a s i s , u p p e r c l a s s m e n , m a l e s tu d e n ts and m a r r i e d s tu d e n ts w e re m o r e in c lin e d to c o n s u lt th e o m b u d s m a n w h ile u n d e r c l a s s m e n , f e m a le s tu d e n ts and s in g le s tu d e n ts w e r e l e s s in c lin e d . S tu d e n ts fro m c e r ­ ta in c o l le g e s - - p a r t i c u l a r l y A rtB and L e t t e r s and U n iv e r s it y C o lleg e - w e r e " o v e r r e p r e s e n t e d " in th e om budsm an* s o ffic e w h ile s tu d e n ts f r o m o t h e r c o l l e g e s - - p a r t i c u l a r l y E d u c a tio n and N a t u r a l S c ie n c e - w ere "u n d e r re p re se n te d . " F o u r d i f f e r e n c e s d is tin g u is h th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n f r o m th e c h ie f s tu d e n t a f f a i r s o f f ic e r . T h e o m b u d s m a n h a s no staff, c o n ­ s i d e r s s tu d e n t a c a d e m i c a s w e ll a s n o n - a c a d e m i c p r o b l e m s , is n o t in v o lv e d in s tu d e n t d i s c i p l i n a r y m a t t e r s , and h a s m o r e in v e s tig a to r y a u th o r ity . T w o - t h i r d s o f th e 218 s u r v e y e d s tu d e n ts w ho co n su lted th e M ic h ig a n S tate U n i v e r s i t y o m b u d s m a n in d ic a te d th a t h e h e lp e d r e l i e v e H o w a rd R ay R ow land stu d e n t f r u s t r a t i o n and h o s ti lity . N e a r l y h a l f of th e r e s p o n d e n ts c o n ­ s i d e r e d th e p r o b l e m s th ey took to th e o m b u d s m a n " c o m p le t e ly s o lv e d " w hile o n e - t h i r d r e p l i e d "no t so lv e d a t a l l . " None th o u g h t th e f u n c tio n s of the o m b u d s m a n sh o u ld be d is c o n tin u e d , alth o u g h o n e - t h i r d r e c o m ­ m e n d ed c h a n g e s . N e a r ly t h r e e - f o u r t h s of th e s u r v e y e d s tu d e n ts would h a v e c o n s u lte d th e o m b u d s m a n e v e n i f h is r e c o r d s w e r e o pen f o r p u b lic i n s p e c ti o n . T h i r t e e n of 207 r e s p o n d e n ts c l a im e d to h a v e e x p e r i e n c e d " u n p le a s a n t t r e a t m e n t " by an yo ne in v o lv e d in t h e i r c o m ­ p la in t a f t e r c o n s u ltin g th e o m b u d s m a n . N e a r ly a l l s u r v e y e d s tu d e n t s would r e t u r n to th e o m b u d s m a n w ith o t h e r p r o b l e m s a n d r e c o m m e n d h im to o t h e r s tu d e n ts . T r a i t s s e l e c t e d by s u r v e y e d s tu d e n ts a s m o s t i m p o r t a n t f o r a c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n to h a v e w e r e , in d e s c e n d in g o r d e r : kn o w led g e of campuB o p e r a t i o n s and r e g u la tio n s , u n d e r s ta n d in g , e f f e c t i v e n e s s , a u th o rity a n d a c c e s s i b i l i t y . A n o n - te a c h in g fa c u lty m e m b e r ( a d m in ­ i s t r a t o r ) w a s t h e i r f i r s t c h o ic e f o r a n o m b u d s m a n . The p re fe rre d m e th o d of fillin g th e p o s itio n w a s s e l e c t i o n by a d m i n i s t r a t i o n , f a c u lty and s t u d e n t s . A t e r m of o ffic e e x te n d in g beyond tw o y e a r s w a s h ig h ly fav o red . A c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n m o d e l p r o p o s e d b y t h e a u th o r in c lu d e d * th e s e f e a t u r e s : L o n g - t im e , h i g h l y - r e s p e c t e d , w e l l - p a i d fa c u lty m e m b e r r e lie v e d o f te a c h in g d u tie s ; s e le c te d by a c o m m itte e r e p r e s e n t i n g H o w ard R a y R ow land s tu d e n ts , fac u lty and a d m in is t r a tio n ; a p p o in te d f o r r e n e w a b le tw oy e a r t e r m by institution* s g o v e rn in g b o a r d ; p r i v a t e o ffice s e p a r a t e fro m m a in a d m in is t r a tio n b u ild in g e a s ily a c c e s s i b l e to s tu d e n ts ; r e c e p tiv e to in d iv id u a l s tu d e n t g r i e v a n c e s c o n c e r n in g th e in s titu tio n , both a c a d e m ic and n o n - a c a d e m ic ; u s e s r e a s o n e d p e r s u a s i o n to b r in g about e x p e d itio u s r e d r e s s o f g en u in e g r i e v a n c e s ; d e t e c t s p a t t e r n s of g r ie v a n c e s and w o rk s fo r c h a n g e s to end th e m ; h a s a c c e s s to n e a r l y a l l c a m p u s f ile s ; k e e p s w r i tte n c o n fid e n tia l r e c o r d s ; m a k e s p e r i o d i c r e p o r t s ; a p p e a ls to o r g a n iz a tio n a l s u p e r i o r s o r c h ie f a d m i n i s t r a t i v e o ffic e r w h en re b u ffe d ; h a s no p o w e r to ta k e d i s c i p l i n a r y a c tio n , r e v e r s e d e c is io n s o r c ir c u m v e n t r e g u la tio n s . The a u th o r concluded t h a t e v e n w h en p e r f o r m i n g e ffe c tiv e ly , th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n cannot w a r d off m a j o r s tu d e n t c o n f r o n ta tio n s o f a p o litic a l n a tu r e ch a lle n g in g th e o r g a n iz a tio n a l s t r u c t u r e of th e in s titu tio n . L ik e th e c iv il o m b u d sm a n , th e p o s itio n r e q u i r e s an o r g a n iz a tio n a l s t r u c t u r e w h ich i s r e l a t i v e l y s ta b le , s u p p o r te d and tr u s t e d b y m o s t of th e people w ith in it m o s t of the t i m e . It i s in te n d e d to m a k e a s y s te m of g o v e rn m e n t functio n a s d e s ig n e d r a t h e r than to r e s t r u c t u r e th e s y s te m . PREFACE In th e b e s t o f w o r l d s , t h e r e w o u ld b e no n e e d f o r a n O m b u d s m a n , fo r a l l p u b lic s e r v a n t s a n d a l l f a c u lty m e m b e r s and e m p lo y e e s of u n i v e r s i t i e s w ould b e d o in g t h e i r j o b s p e r f e c t l y . U n til th a t w o rld a r r i v e s , h o w e v e r , t r o u b l e - s h o o t e r s , w h e th e r c a lle d O m b u d s m e n o r n o t, w ill b e n e e d e d . J a m e s R u s t, O m b u d s m a n M ic h ig a n S tate U n iv e r s it y A CK N O W LED G M EN TS M a n y p e o p le h e lp e d th e a u t h o r co n d u c t th i s s tu d y . few a r e a c k n o w le d g e d h e r e . O nly a N o n e th e le s s , s i n c e r e a p p r e c i a t i o n i s ex ten d ed to a l l th o s e who, s o m e w h e r e alon g th e w ay , o p en e q a d o o r, a n s w e r e d a l e t t e r , o r o f fe re d a w o rd of e n c o u r a g e m e n t. A m o n g th o s e e n title d to s p e c i a l r e c o g n itio n a r e : D r . V an J o h n s o n , a kind an d d e d ic a te d a d v i s e r w ho a d ju s te d h is b u sy s c h e d u le t o fit m in e ; D r . E d w a r d B la c k m a n , D r . R i c h a r d F e a t h e r s to n e and D r. D on ald O l m s t e d , e a c h of w h o m o ffe re d e x c e ll e n t s u g g e s tio n s and p r o f e s s i o n a l g u id a n c e ; D r . J a m e s R u st a n d h i s s e c r e t a r y , M r s . H e le n G ro h , w h o se t r u s t a n d c o o p e r a tio n e x c e e d e d the a u t h o r 1 s e x p e c ta tio n s ; R e v . J . B e n to n W h ite , D r . G e o r g e L e itm a n n , D r . N e ls o n N o rm a n , D r. I r v in g D eK o ff and T h o m a s D a v is , w ho p a tie n tly a n s w e r e d u n e n d in g q u e s tio n s ; D r . S ta n le y A n d e r s o n , w ho g e n e r o u s l y p r o v id e d a n u n p u b ­ lis h e d m a n u s c r i p t f o r r e s o u r c e m a t e r i a l ; My w ife , J u n e , a n d d a u g h t e r s , R u n a y and R h o n d a , who r e a l i z e d how m u c h i t m e a n t to m e and m a d e the n e c e s s a r y s a c r i f i c e s IV TABLE OF CONTENTS Page L IS T O F T A B L E S ...................................................................................... ix C h a p te r I. II. INTRODUCTION O F THE P R O B L E M ........................ 1 S ta te m e n t of th e P r o b l e m ....................................... O b j e c t i v e s ........................................................................ D e fin itio n o f T e r m s ..................................................... P r o c e d u r e ........................................................................ L i m i t a t i o n s ................................................................... O v e r v i e w ........................................................................ 10 10 11 14 18 19 R EV IEW O F THE L I T E R A T U R E .................................. 21 The O r g a n iz a tio n an d th e I n d iv id u a l . . . . T he U n i v e r s i t y and th e S t u d e n t ............................. C iv il O m b u d s m a n . ................................................ S w e d e n ................................................................... F i n l a n d ................................................................... ........................ D e n m a rk N o r w a y ................................................................... New Z e a l a n d ......................................................... G r e a t B r i t a i n ..................................................... C an ad a a n d O t h e r N a t i o n s ............................. U nited S t a t e s ..................................................... S i m i l a r i t i e s an d D i f f e r e n c e s ....................... C a m p u s O m b u d s m a n ................................................ C o n c lu s io n ........................................................................ 22 28 47 49 53 53 55 57 59 61 62 67 70 78 v III. T H E CA M PU S OMBUDSMAN: A GENERAL, E V A L U A T I O N ................................................................................... 83 I n s titu t io n s w ith O m b u d s m e n ............................................ 86 F o r S tu d e n ts O n ly ........................................................... 86 94 F o r S tu d e n ts and O t h e r s ....................... F o r F a c u l t y O n l y ......................................................... 105 107 S u m m a r y ............................ I n s titu t io n s C o n s id e r in g O m b u d s m e n ....................... 108 D e s c r i p t i o n .................................................................. 109 S u m m a r y ....................................................................... 116 S e le c te d O m b u d s m e n : S i m i l a r i t i e s and D issim ila ritie s .................................................................. 116 C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s ......................................................... 117 A c t i v i t i e s ....................................................................... 118 A t t i t u d e s ....................................................................... 120 C o n c lu s io n .............................................................. 121 IV. T H E CAM PUS OMBUDSMAN: A STU D EN T E V A L U A T I O N ................................................................................. 124 I n s titu t io n a l S e t t i n g ..............................................................126 O p e r a ti o n a l P r o c e d u r e s ................................................ 12 9 S tud en t C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s .................................................... 135 E x p e r i e n c e s ............................................................................ 140 A t t i t u d e s ......................................................... 148 C a s e s and C o m m e n t s ......................................................... 155 S um m ary . ....................................................................... 161 V. SUM M ARY , CONCLUSIONS AND R E C O M M E N D A T IO N S .................................................................. 164 S u m m a r y ................................................................................. 164 T he F i r s t R e s e a r c h Q u e s t i o n ............................ 164 T he S econd an d T h i r d R e s e a r c h Q u e s t i o n s ....................................................................... 166 T he F o u r t h R e s e a r c h Q u e s t i o n ............................ 169 T he F if th R e s e a r c h Q u e s t i o n ................................. 171 T he Sixth R e s e a r c h Q u e s t i o n ................................. 172 The S e v e n th R e s e a r c h Q u e s t i o n ....................... 173 T he E ig h th R e s e a r c h Q u e s t i o n ............................ 174 The N in th R e s e a r c h Q u e s t i o n ............................ 175 T he T e n th R e s e a r c h Q u e s t i o n ....................... . 1 7 6 vi T h e E le v e n th R e s e a r c h Q u e s t i o n ................... T h e T w elfth R e s e a r c h Q u e s t i o n ................... T h e T h ir te e n th R e s e a r c h Q u e s tio n . . . . T h e F o u r te e n th R e s e a r c h Q u e s tio n . . . . T h e F if te e n th R e s e a r c h Q u e s t i o n ................... C o n c l u s i o n s ...................................................................... R e c o m m e n d a tio n s . . . ' .......................................... 180 181 181 182 182 186 180 S E L E C T E D B I B L I O G R A P H Y ........................................................ 192 P u b lis h e d S o u r c e s ........................................................ B o o k s ........................................................................... B u lle tin s a n d A n n o u n c e m e n t s ........................ ................... J o u r n a l an d M a g a z in e A r t i c l e s N e w s p a p e r an d N e w s le tte r A r t i c l e s . . . P a m p h l e t s .................................................................. P u b lic D o c u m e n t s ............................................... R e p o r t s ....................................................................... U n p u b lish e d S o u r c e s .................................................... D i s c u s s i o n N o te s ............................................... D o c u m e n ts ............................................................. I n t e r v i e w s .................................................................. L e t t e r s ....................................................................... M a n u s c r i p t s ............................................................. M e m o r a n d a ............................................................. N ew s R e l e a s e s ........................................................ P a p e r s ....................................................................... R e p o r t s ....................................................................... S p e e c h e s .................................................................. 192 192 197 198 206 210 211 212 212 212 213 213 213 215 215 215 216 217 218 A P P E N D I C E S ......................................................................................... 219 A ppendix A L e t t e r to C a m p u s O m b u d s m e n ........................ A ppendix B I n te r v ie w S chedule fo r C a m p u s O m b u d s m e n ............................................................. A ppendix C I n f o r m a tio n O btain ed f r o m C a m p u s O m b u d s m a n I n t e r v i e w s ...................................... A ppendix D F o r m U s e d by O m b u d s m a n a t M ic h ig a n S tate U n i v e r s i t y ............................ .... v ii 219 221 228 261 A ppendix E L e t t e r s In c lu d e d w ith Q u e s t io n n a ir e S ent to S tu d e n ts W ho C o n su lte d O m b u d s m a n a t M ic h ig a n S tate U n i v e r s i t y ............................................... A ppendix F Q u e s t i o n n a i r e Sent to S tu d e n ts Who C o n s u lte d O m b u d s m a n a t M ic h ig a n S ta te U n i v e r s i t y ................................. LIST O F T A B L E S T able 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Page C o lleg e D is tr ib u tio n of S tudents W ho C o n su lted C a m p u s O m b u d sm a n C o m p a r e d w ith A ll S tu den ts E n ro lle d a t M ic h ig an State U n iv e r s ity , F a l l T e r m , 1968 133 C la s s D is tr ib u tio n o f S tu den ts W ho C o nsulted C a m p u s O m b u d sm a n R e g a r d in g A c a d e m ic P r o b l e m s C o m p a re d w ith A ll S tu den ts E n r o lle d a t M ichigan S tate U n iv e r s it y , F a ll T e r m , 1968 .................................................................................... 136 C l a s s D is tr ib u tio n o f S tudents W ho C o nsu lted C a m p u s O m b u d sm a n R e g a r d in g N o n -A c a d e m ic P r o b l e m s C o m p a re d w ith A ll S tu d ents E n r o lle d a t M ichigan State U n iv e r s it y , F a ll T e r m , 1968 ................................................................................ 137 C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f 218 S tudents W ho C o n su lted O m b u d sm a n a t M ic h ig a n S tate U n iv e r s ity , F a ll T e r m , 1968 ................................................................ 139 S o u rc e s o f In fo rm a tio n about C a m p u s O m b u d s ­ m a n R e p o rte d by S tu d en ts W ho C o nsulted O m b u d sm a n a t M ic h ig a n S tate U n iv e r s ity , F a ll T e r m , 1968......................................................................... 141 P r e v io u s P r o b le m - S o lv in g A tte m p ts M ade by S tu d en ts Who C o n s u lte d O m b u d sm a n at M ic h ig an State U n iv e r s ity , F a l l T e r m , 1968 . . . 142 A c c e s s i b ilit y of C a m p u s O m b u d sm a n a s R e p o rte d by S tu d en ts Who C o n su lted H im a t M ich ig an S tate U n iv e r s ity , F a l l T e r m , 1968 .................................... 143 ix 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. C l. C2. C3. C4. E f f ic ie n c y of C a m p u s O m b u d s m a n a s R e p o r te d b y S tu d en ts W ho C o n s u lte d H im a t M ic h ig a n S tate U n iv e r s it y , F a l l T e r m , 1968 ................................ 144 E f f e c t i v e n e s s of C a m p u s O m b u d s m a n a s R e p o r te d b y S tu d e n ts W ho C o n s u lte d H im a t M ic h ig a n S ta te U n iv e r s it y , F a l l T e r m , 1968 ................................................................................. 146 I m p o r t a n c e o f C o n f id e n tia lity to S tu d e n ts Who C o n s u lte d O m b u d s m a n a t M ic h ig a n S tate U n iv e r s it y , F a l l T e r m , 1968 ............................................ 149 A ttit u d e s o f S tu d e n ts W ho C o n s u lte d O m b u d s m a n a t M ic h ig a n S ta te U n i v e r s i t y A n a ly z e d by N a tu r e o f P r o b l e m , F a l l T e r m , 1968 150 M o st Im p o rtan t T r a its a C am pus O m budsm an Should H a v e , a s C h o s e n by S tu d e n ts Who C o n s u lte d O m b u d s m a n a t M ic h ig a n S tate U n iv e r s it y , F a l l T e r m , 1968 152 A ttit u d e s R e g a r d in g S e le c tio n a n d T e n u r e of C a m p u s O m b u d s m a n H e ld b y S tu d e n ts Who C o n s u lte d O m b u d s m a n a t M ic h ig a n S tate U n iv e r s it y , F a l l T e r m , 196JB 154 C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of C a m p u s O m b u d s m e n a t Six I n s titu tio n s of H ig h e r E d u c a tio n (O c to b e r, 1968) 228 C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of Six I n s titu t io n s o f H ig h e r E d u c a tio n w ith C a m p u s O m b u d s m e n a s R e p o rte d by T h o s e O m b u d s m e n ( O c to b e r , 1 9 6 8 ) ................................................................................................ 231 O r i g in o f O ffic e o f C a m p u s O m b u d s m a n a t Six I n s titu tio n s of H ig h e r E d u c a tio n a s R e p o rte d by T h o s e O m b u d s m e n ( O c to b e r , 1 9 6 8 ) ........................ 234 R a tio n a le f o r O ffic e of C a m p u s O m b u d s m a n a t Six I n s titu t io n s of H ig h e r E d u c a tio n a s R e p o rte d by T h o s e O m b u d s m e n ( O c to b e r , 1 9 6 8 ) ................................................................................................ 239 x C5. C6. C7. C8. C9< D e s c r i p t i o n of O ffice of C a m p u s O m b u d s m a n a t Six I n s titu t io n s of H ig h e r E d u c a tio n a s R e p o r te d b y T h o s e O m b u d s m e n (O c to b e r, 1 9 6 8 ) ................................................................................................ 241 O b je c tiv e s of O ffice of C a m p u s O m b u d s m a n a t Six I n s titu t io n s o f H ig h e r E d u c a tio n a s R e p o r te d by T h o s e O m b u d s m e n (O c to b e r, 1 9 6 8 ) ........................................................................ 245 O p e r a ti o n a l P r o c e d u r e s o f O ffic e o f C a m p u s O m b u d s m a n a t Six I n s t i t u t i o n s o f H ig h e r E d u c a tio n a s R e p o r te d by T h o s e O m b u d s ­ m e n (O c to b e r, 1 9 6 8 ) .............................................................. 246 E f f e c t s o f O ffice of C a m p u s O m b u d s m a n a t Six I n s titu t io n s o f H ig h e r E d u c a tio n a s R e p o r te d by T h o s e O m b u d s m e n (O c to b e r , 1 9 6 8 ) ................................................................................................ 252 A ttitu d e s an d O p in io n s of C a m p u s O m b u d s m e n a t Six I n s titu t io n s o f H ig h e r E d u c a tio n ( O c to b e r , 1 9 6 8 ) ........................................................................ 254 xi CHA PTER I INTRODUCTION O F T H E P R O B L E M D u rin g th e p a s t c e n tu r y , A m e r i c a n in s titu tio n s of h ig h e r ed u c a tio n h av e b ee n c h a r a c t e r i z e d b y ra p id g ro w th and i n c r e a s in g co m p lex ity . In 1869, about 52, 000 s tu d e n ts w e r e e n r o lle d fo r d e g r e e s in the n a t i o n 's c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s . T h is fig u re r e p r e s e n t e d only 1. 1 p e r cent of the p o p u la tio n b etw e en 18 and 24 y e a r s old. * B ut a m a j o r change w a s afo o t. T he M o r r i l l A ct of 1862, p ro v id in g f e d e r a l s u p p o r t f o r l a n d - g r a n t c o lle g e s , h ad begun to m a k e s t a t e in s titu tio n s a c c e s s i b l e to m i d d l e - c l a s s m id w e s te r n youth f a r r e m o v e d fro m e lite e a s t e r n a c a d e m ie s . T he e g a l i t a r i a n s p i r i t of the f r o n t i e r , w ith i t s e m p h a s is on a d v a n c e d p r a c t i c a l le a r n in g a s th e av en u e to o p p o rtu n ity , w a s t r a n s f o r m i n g h ig h e r ed ucatio n. By 1900, th e n u m b e r of s tu d e n ts e n r o lle d f o r d e g r e e s had r i s e n five t i m e s to n e a r l y a q u a r t e r of a m illio n . T en y e a r s l a t e r * E d w a rd J . B lo u s te in , " T h e New S tudent and H is Role in A m e r ic a n C o lle g e s , " L i b e r a l E d u c a tio n , LIV (O c to b e r, 1968), 351. 1 2 th e to ta l r e a c h e d 355, 000, W hen W o rld W a r I en d ed , th e fig u re a p p r o a c h e d h a lf a m illio n . It doubled a g a in by 1929, m o r e than doubled o n ce m o r e by the end of W o rld W a r II, and a g a in s in c e then. * T he 1960 fig u re s u r p a s s e d 3, 600, 000, ac c o u n tin g fo r 1 4 .2 p e r ce n t of th e 18-24 y e a r o ld s . In 1965, th e to ta l w a s 5, 920, 000. 2 T oday th e r e a r e an e s t i m a t e d 6 ,7 0 0 , 000 s tu d e n ts e n r o lle d in s o m e 2 ,4 0 0 in s titu tio n s o f h ig h e r e d u c a tio n in the U nited S ta te s. T h u s, th e m o s t s p e c t a c u l a r i n c r e a s e of a l l w a s in the I 9 6 0 ' s, w hen c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s counted n e a r l y tw ic e a s m a n y s tu d e n ts a t the end of the d e c a d e a s a t i t s beginn in g . T h is ad d itio n of m o r e th a n t h r e e m illio n s tu d e n ts d u p lic a te s in one d e c a d e the to ta l e n r o l l ­ m e n t g ro w th in h ig h e r e d u c a tio n d u rin g the t h r e e c e n t u r i e s s in c e H a r v a r d w a s founded. 3 B uilding f r a n tic a lly to m e e t su c h u n p r e c e d e n te d d e m a n d s , u n i v e r s i t i e s h a v e ex panded to " m u l t i v e r s i t i e s , " t e a c h e r s c o lle g e s ^ M a rtin M e y e r s o n , " T h e E th o s of the A m e r ic a n C o lleg e Student: Beyond th e P r o t e s t s , " in T he C o n te m p o r a r y U n iv e rs ity : U. S. A . , ed. by R o b e rt S. M o r is o n (B oston: B eaco n P r e s s , 1967), p. 268. 2 Sidney G. T ick to n, "T h e M ag n itu d e of A m e r i c a n H ig h e r E d u c a tio n in 1 9 8 0 ," in C a m p u s 1980: T he Shape of th e F u tu r e in A m e r ic a n H ig h e r E d u c a tio n , ed. by A lv in C. E u r i c h (New York: D e la c o r te P r e s s , 1968), p. 14. Q C la r k K e r r , " T h e F r a n t i c R a c e to R e m a in C o n t e m p o r a r y ," in C o lle g e s a t the C r o s s r o a d s , ed. by W illia m P . L i n e b e r r y (New Y ork: H. W. W ilso n , 1966), p. 27. 3 to s t a t e c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s , and p r iv a te c o lle g e s to s e m i- p u b lic u n iv e rsitie s. Oin e e a w eek , on th e a v e r a g e , a new pu blic in s titu tio n of h ig h e r e d u c a tio n , u s u a lly a tw o - y e a r c o lle g e , opens i t s d o o r s . I N e v e r in h i s t o r y h a v e s o m a n y young p eo p le con tinu ed t h e i r e d u c atio n beyon d th e s e c o n d a r y sc h o o l a s in c o n te m p o r a r y A m e r ic a . C alled upon to e d u c a te p r e v io u s ly u n im a g in e d n u m b e r s of s tu d e n ts , h ig h e r e d u c a tio n i s no lo n g e r lim ite d to a s o c ia l, e c o n o m ic , o r i n t e l ­ le c tu a l e l ite , y a m p u s e s a c c o m m o d a te s tu d e n ts fro m a l l s e g m e n ts of s o c ie ty w ith a \ a s t ra n g e o f a ttitu d e s and c o m p e te n c ie s . 2 One o r m o r e m e m b e r s o f m o s t A m e r ic a n f a m il ie s h av e had s o m e c o lleg e o r u n i v e r s i t y ed u c atio n . One of e v e r y tw e n ty -e ig h t p e r s o n s in the n atio n i s taking co lleg e c o u r s e w o r k , inclu d in g e x te n sio n c o u r s e s . By c o n t r a s t , in 1869 it w a s one in e v e r y 740. 3 In s o m e p a r t s of th e nation tod ay, m o r e than h a lf th e high s c h o o l g r a d u a te s e n t e r co lleg e w itho u t d e la y . Two m a j o r f a c t o r s c o n trib u te to th e continuing s u r g e in e n r o llm e n ts : the "b a b y boom " follow ing W o rld W a r II and th e ^ In d ic a tio n s a r e th a t by 1970 th e n a tio n w ill h a v e 1, 000 t w o - y e a r co lle g es e n r o llin g m o r e th a n two m illio n s tu d e n ts . 2 M e y e r s o n , " T h e E th o s of th e A m e r ic a n C o lleg e S tudent, " p. 268. W. M ax W ise, T hey C om e f o r the B e s t of R e a s o n s (W ashington: A m e r ic a n C ou ncil on E d u c a tio n , 1958), pp. 5 -6 . 4 i n c r e a s i n g n e c e s s i t y of a c o lle g e e d u c a tio n to a t t a i n p o s it io n s of p o w e r a n d p r e s t i g e in A m e r i c a n s o c ie ty . D u rin g th e f o u r t e e n - y e a r p e r io d , 1 9 4 6 -5 9 , a t o ta l of fifty -f iv e m illio n c h i l d r e n w e r e b o rn in th is c o u n try , in c o n t r a s t to o n ly t h i r t y - s i x m il lio n d u r in g th e p r e ­ ceding f o u r t e e n - y e a r p e r i o d . T h e 1970 c e n s u s m a y r e v e a l a s m a n y a s eig h t m illio n m o r e c o l l e g e - a g e p e r s o n s in th e n a tio n th a n in 1960, c o m p r i s i n g p e r h a p s tw e lv e p e r c e n t of th e to ta l p o p u la tio n . * In to d a y 1 s s o p h is tic a te d , te c h n o lo g ic a l s o c ie ty , th e a m o u n t an d q u a lity of a p erso n * s e d u c a tio n h a v e a c r u c i a l im p a c t on h is o p p o r tu n iti e s f o r a l l l e v e l s o f o c c u p a tio n a l a c h ie v e m e n t. T h is , in tu r n , d e t e r m i n e s w h e th e r h e w ill be a b l e to m a i n t a i n o r a d v a n c e h i s s o c i a l - c l a s s p o s itio n . s itu a tio n : A s V e n e r h a s s u m m a r i z e d th e " C o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s h a v e b e c o m e th e g a te w a y th ro u g h w h ic h c a r e e r - o r i e n t e d y o u th m u s t p a s s to r e a c h th e h ig h le v e l jo b s w h ic h a s s u r e th e m of m e m b e r s h i p in a t l e a s t th e u p p e r 2 m id d le c l a s s . " T ic k to n h a s p r e d i c t e d tw e lv e m illio n A m e r i c a n c o lle g e a n d u n i v e r s i t y s tu d e n ts by 1980, an i n c r e a s e of 103 p e r c e n t o v e r 1965. * Jo h n F r e d T h a d e n , " T h e C hanging C o lle g e S tu den t P o p u ­ la tio n , " in T h e C o lle g e S tu d e n t, by W ilb u r B. B r o o k o v e r e t a l . (New Y o rk : T h e C e n t e r f o r A p p lie d R e s e a r c h i n E d u c a tio n , Inc. , 1967), p. 20. 2 A r t h u r M. V e n e r , " C o lle g e E d u c a tio n and V o c a tio n a l C a r e e r , " in B r o o k o v e r e t a l . , T he C o lle g e S tu d e n t, p. 103. 5 M ost of th is g ro w th w ill be in p u b lic , r a t h e r th a n p r iv a te , i n s t i t u ­ tio n s. 1 T h a d e n h a s w a r n e d t h a t "th e n u m b e r of p o te n tia l a p p lic a n ts for c o lle g e a d m is s io n f o r the n e x t fifte e n to tw e n ty y e a r s w ill be a s tr o n o m ic a l i n c o m p a r is o n w ith the p a s t . " 2 T h is i n c r e d i b l y ra p id exp ansio n, N a s o n h a s c o m m e n te d , " i s one of th e b r u te f a c t s of _ a c a d e m ic life a t th e p r e s e n t t i m e , and i t s im p a c t on h i g h e r e d u c a 3 tion i s in m a n y r e s p e c t s b r u t a l . " B u lging e n r o llm e n ts , p a r t i c u l a r l y s in c e th e m i d -1940* s, have m a d e th e s p r a w lin g u n i v e r s i t y w ith 10, 000 to 5 0 ,0 0 0 s tu d e n ts m o r e r e p r e s e n t a t i v e o f the a c a d e m ic s c e n e th a n th e c o lle g ia l i n s t i ­ tution. No r e v e r s a l of th is t r e n d is in d ic a te d in M a y h e w 's p r e d i c ­ tion th a t by th e end o f th e c e n tu r y the a v e r a g e A m e r ic a n c o lle g e w ill have 2 0 ,0 0 0 s tu d e n ts . 4 W ith in s t itu ti o n a l g r o w th c o m e s i n c r e a s i n g c o m p le x ity . In th is r e s p e c t , c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s m i r r o r th e p r o b l e m s of the * T ick to n , " T h e M ag nitu de o f A m e r i c a n H ig h e r E d u c a tio n in 1980, " p. 14. 2 g T h a d e n , " T h e C hanging C o lle g e S tu den t P o p u l a t i o n ," p. 35. J o h n W. N a so n , " A m e r i c a n H ig h e r E d u c a tio n in 1 9 8 0 -Some B a s ic I s s u e s , " in E u r i c h , e d . , C a m p u s 1980, p. 397. 4 L e w is B. M ayhew , e d . , H ig h e r E d u c a tio n in th e R e v o lu ­ tio n a ry D e c a d e s (B e rk e le y , C a l i f . : M c C u tc h a n P u b lis h in g C o r p . , 1967), p. 463. 6 l a r g e r s o c ie ty . F o r s i z e d e m a n d s d if f e r e n t and m o r e i m p e r s o n a l f o rm s o f o r g a n iz a tio n w h ich , a s M ayhew h a s p o in ted out, " o ften evoke a n e g a tiv e r e s p o n s e in s tu d e n ts and fa c u lty a l i k e , " * T he m a s s i v e e d u c a tio n a l in s titu tio n i s one m a n if e s ta tio n of the d o m in a n c e of l a r g e - s c a l e f o r m a l o r g a n iz a tio n s th ro u g h o u t th e n a tio n , a m o v e ­ m en t W i llia m s h a s id e n tifie d a s " th e m o s t obv io u s s in g le tr e n d in the s o c i a l s t r u c t u r e s of th e tw e n tie th c e n tu ry . 2 A g ro w in g c o n c e r n in A m e r ic a n h ig h e r e d u c a tio n i s the plight o f the in d iv id u a l s tu d e n t on th e l a r g e and i m p e r s o n a l c a m p u s. A lthough s tu d e n ts in g r o u p s a r e e x e r tin g c o n s id e r a b le in flu e n c e on a d m in is t r a tiv e a c tio n th ro u g h e ffe c tiv e o r g a n iz a tio n , s tu d e n ts a s in d iv id u a ls c o m p la in of n e g le c t, a b u s e and m a n ip u la tio n . P erson al a n x ie tie s and f r u s t r a t i o n s g e n e r a te d w ith in th e e d u c a tio n a l i n s t i t u ­ tion o fte n le ad t o w ith d r a w a l f r o m th e in s titu tio n o r d is r u p tiv e p r o ­ te s t a g a in s t it. A c o m m o n c o m p la in t r a i s e d by c o lle g e and u n iv e r s i ty s t u ­ d ents c o n c e r n s a c l u s t e r of i s s u e s o ften r e f e r r e d to a s la c k of 4' - . . . ■ ■ - 1Ibid. 2 Robin M. W illia m s , J r . , " A m e r ic a n S ociety in T ra n s itio n : T re n d s and E m e r g in g D e v e lo p m e n ts in S ocial an d C u l tu r a l S y s te m s , " in O u r C hanging R u r a l S o ciety : P e r s p e c t i v e s and T r e n d s , ed. by J a m e s H. Copp (A m es, Iowa: Iowa S tate U n iv e r s ity P r e s s , 1964), p. 24. 7 a c c e s s to th e a d m i n i s t r a t i o n . T h e s tu d e n t w ho h a s a c o m p la in t, a > p r o b le m o r a s u g g e s tio n , o r w ho i s c h a r g e d w ith s o m e o ffe n se , o fte n d o e s n o t know w h e r e to go to m a k e h i m s e l f h e a r d . T h e s c o p e and v a r i e t y o f s tu d e n t p r o b l e m s th a t a r i s e c a n n o t be a n tic ip a te d by th e in s titu tio n . F u r t h e r m o r e , the d iffu s io n of a d m i n i s t r a t i v e r e s p o n s i ­ b ility r e q u i r e d in a q u a s i - b u r e a u c r a t i c s y s t e m te n d s to s e g m e n t stu d e n t s e r v i c e s . T h u s , th e s tu d e n t w ith a g r ie v a n c e i s c o n s t r a i n e d by ig n o r a n c e a b o u t p r o c e d u r e s and a n i n h e r e n t e l u s i v e n e s s in th e p r o c e d u r e s th e m s e l v e s . H is f r u s t r a t i o n i s o ften a k in to th a t of the c itiz e n tr y i n g to " f ig h t c ity h a ll. T h e a n a lo g y b e tw e e n th e g r i e v a n c e o f a s tu d e n t a g a i n s t h i s u n i v e r s i t y an d th e g r i e v a n c e o f a c i tiz e n a g a i n s t h is g o v e r n m e n t p a r t i a l l y e x p la in s w hy d u r in g th e I 9 6 0 ' s h a r d - p r e s s e d e d u c a tio n a l in s t itu ti o n s , s e e k in g w a y s to c o m p e n s a te f o r th e b u r e a u c r a t i c im b a la n c e b e tw e e n s tu d e n t a n d o r g a n iz a tio n , b e c a m e i n t e r e s t e d in the' o m b u d s m a n . A lth o u g h new to h ig h e r .e d u c a t i o n , th e o m b u d s m a n i s w e l l e s ta b li s h e d in c iv il g o v e r n m e n t, h a v in g e m e r g e d a s a p a r l i a m e n t a r y p o litic a l in s t itu ti o n 160 y e a r s a g o in S w eden. R e c o g n iz in g th e n e e d fo r a p r o t e c t o r of th e p e o p le , w h ic h is one m e a n in g o f th e t e r m , th e 1 S a m u e l G o ro v itz , e d . , F r e e d o m an d O r d e r in th e U n i v e r ­ s ity (C le v e la n d : T h e P r e s s o f W e s t e r n R e s e r v e U n iv e r s it y , 1967), p. 20. 8 1809 Sw edish c o n s titu tio n p r o v id e d f o r a " J u s titie o m b u d s m a n " to se e th a t c i tiz e n s w e r e not d e p r iv e d of t h e i r r i g h t s and l i b e r t i e s . Since then , s i m i l a r p o s itio n s h a v e b ee n in s titu te d in th e o th e r t h r e e S can dinav ian c o u n t r ie s an d r e c e n t l y in New Z e a la n d and G r e a t B r i t ­ ain. O th e r l a r g e n a tio n s , in clu d in g C a n a d a and th e U n ited S ta te s , a r e c o n s id e r in g w ay s of fittin g th e o m b u d s m a n in to t h e i r g o v e r n ­ m e n ta l s t r u c t u r e s . * On a s m a l l e r s c a le , the s t a t e of H aw aii and two C an ad ian p r o v i n c e s - - A l b e r t a and New B r u n s w ic k - - h a v e p a s s e d o m b u d sm a n le g is la tio n . O m b u d sm a n b ill s h a v e b ee n in tr o d u c e d in n e a r l y a l l A m e r ic a n s t a t e and C a n a d ia n p r o v in c ia l l e g i s l a t u r e s . Such a p o s i ­ tio n is being tr i e d e x p e r i m e n ta lly in B uffalo and N a s s a u C ounty, New Y ork , and San D iego, C a lif o rn ia . A n u m b e r of o th e r A m e r ic a n 2 c itie s a r e c o n s id e r in g th e m e r i t s of the o m b u d s m a n co n c ep t. The f i r s t c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n w a s ap p o in ted in 1966 a t E a s t e r n M on tan a C o lle g e . By th e end of 1968, a t l e a s t f o u rte e n ^D onald C. Row at, " T h e S p re a d o f the O m b u d s m a n I d e a , " in O m b u d sm e n f o r A m e r ic a n G o v e r n m e n t ? , ed. by S tanley V. A n d e rso n (E nglew ood C liffs, N . J . : P r e n t i c e - H a l l , I n c . , 1968), pp. 7-3 6 . 2 H ing Yong C heng, " T h e E m e r g e n c e and S p re a d of th e O m b u d sm an I n s titu tio n , " T h e A n n a ls of th e A m e r ic a n A c a d e m y of P o litic a l and S o cial S c i e n c e , CCCLXXVII (M ay, 1968), 2 0 -3 0 . A lso, W illia m H. A ngus and M ilto n K ap la n , " T h e O m b u d s m a n and L ocal G o v e rn m e n t, " in A n d e r s o n , e d . , O m b u d s m e n f o r A m e r i c a n G o v e r n m e n t ? , pp. 1 0 1-3 5. 9 co lle g e s an d u n i v e r s i t i e s h a d fa c u lty m e m b e r s s e r v in g a s o m b u d s ­ m en, in c lu d in g su c h la r g e and in f lu e n tia l in s titu tio n s a s th e U n i v e r ­ sity of C a lif o r n ia a t B e r k e le y , C o lu m b ia U n iv e r s it y an d M ic h ig an State U n iv e r s ity . S e v e r a l in s titu tio n s h ad f a c u lty - s tu d e n t o m b u d s ­ m an c o m m itt e e s o r s tu d e n t o m b u d sm e n . O th e r s w e r e in v a r io u s s ta g e s of a p p o in tin g fa c u lty o m b u d sm e n . Some fifty c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s f r o m a l l a r e a s of the c o u n try w e r e r e p r e s e n t e d a t the f i r s t n a tio n a l m e e tin g on th e o m b u d sm a n in h ig h e r ed u c atio n O c to b e r 2 4 -2 5 , 1968, in D e tr o it, M ic h ig an . T h u s, a new p o s it io n - - th e c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n - - i s e m e r g ­ ing in A m e r ic a n h ig h e r ed u c a tio n . In d ic a tio n s a r e th a t d u rin g the next few y e a r s a s u b s t a n tia l n u m b e r of c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s w ill e s ta b lis h th e office of o m b u d sm a n , ev en though th e r o le in v o lv e d i s am b ig u o u s b e c a u s e th e p o sitio n h a s not b e e n fu lly d efin e d o r s y s t e ­ m a tic a lly s tu d ie d . P e r s o n s p r e s e n tly s e r v i n g a s c a m p u s o m b u d s ­ m en do not h av e id e n tic a l r o le p e r c e p tio n s . I n q u i r i e s th ey r e c e i v e r e v e a l m u c h i n t e r e s t in th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n b u t lit tle u n d e r ­ sta n d in g of h i s a c tiv i tie s . E ven the s c a n t am o u n t of l i t e r a t u r e on the s u b je c t g iv e s ev id e n c e of d iv e rg e n t think in g. a p r e s s i n g need fo r m o r e in fo rm a tio n . In s h p r t , t h e r e is T h is stu d y w a s con d ucted to p ro v id e s u c h in f o rm a tio n , a s i s in d ic a te d in th e s ta te m e n t o f the p ro b le m and r e l a t e d o b je c tiv e s . 10 S ta te m e n t of the P r o b le m T he p r o b le m on w h ich th is s tu d y i s b a s e d i s fo u r-fo ld : (1) to d e fin e th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n , (2) to r e v ie w th e c i r c u m s t a n c e s heading to h is a p p e a r a n c e on th e a c a d e m ic s c e n e , (3) to d e s c r i b e h is a c tiv i tie s , and (4) to a n a ly z e th e e f f e c ts of h is a c tiv i tie s . O b je c tiv e s B e c a u s e th e stu d y i s p r i m a r i l y e x p l o r a to r y in n a t u r e , r e s e a r c h q u e s tio n s r a t h e r th a n h y p o th e s e s w e r e u s e d a s a guide in co llec tin g and a n a ly z in g d a ta . A s o b je c tiv e s to b e p u r s u e d , the f o l­ lowing q u e s tio n s w e r e f o rm u la te d : 1. W hat a r e th e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of the c a m p u s o m b u d s ­ m an? 2. How i s th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n s e l e c t e d ? 3. To w hom i s the c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n r e s p o n s i b l e ? 4. W hat a r e th e s i m i l a r i t i e s and d i s s i m i l a r i t i e s am ong v a r io u s c a m p u s o m b u d s m e n ? 5. W hat c o n d itio n s an d e v e n ts have b ro u g h t c a m p u s o m ­ b u d s m e n in to e x i s te n c e on A m e r ic a n c o lle g e and u n iv e rsity ca m p u se s? 6. How p r e v a l e n t i s the o m b u d sm a n in A m e r i c a n h ig h e r e d u c a tio n ? 7. W hat k in d s of g r ie v a n c e s do s tu d e n ts b r in g t o the cam pus om budsm an? 8. W hat a r e th e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of s tu d e n ts w ho co nsult th e c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n ? 11 9. W hat a r e th e s i m i l a r i t i e s and d i s s i m i l a r i t i e s of th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n and th e c iv il o m b u d s m a n ? 10. W hat a r e th e s i m i l a r i t i e s and d i s s i m i l a r i t i e s of the c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n and o th e r c o lle g e and u n i v e r s i t y f u n c tio n a r i e s ? , , 11. How d o e s th e c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n a s s e s s h is e f f e c t iv e ­ ness? 12. How do s tu d e n ts w ho c o n s u lt the c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n a s s e s s h i s e f f e c t iv e n e s s ? 13. Do s tu d e n ts who c o n s u lt th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n e x p e ­ r i e n c e r e t a l i a t i o n f r o m th o s e inv o lv ed in t h e i r g r i e v ­ ances? 14. I s c o n fid e n tia lity im p o r ta n t to s tu d e n ts who c o n s u lt the cam pus om budsm an? 15. Can a m o d e l be d e v e lo p ed f o r c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n to follow , w ith m o d ific a tio n s to m e e t th e s p e c if ic n e e d s of t h e i r in s t itu ti o n s ? D efin itio n of T e r m s B e fo re m o v in g to p r o c e d u r e s follow ed to p u r s u e th e o b j e c ­ tiv e s lis te d ab o v e , i t i s n e c e s s a r y to d efin e s e v e r a l t e r m s to be u se d th ro u g h o u t th e r e m a i n d e r of the s tu d y . S ince one p a r t of the p ro b le m i s to d e v is e a c o m p r e h e n s iv e d e fin itio n of th e t e r m " c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n , " th e d e s c r i p t i o n g iv e n h e r e is a p r e l i m i n a r y d e fin itio n u se d a s a g u id e in conducting th e stu d y . a p p e a r s in C h a p te r V. A m o r e c o m p le te d efin itio n The follow ing d e f in itio n s h a v e b e e n adopted: C iv il O m b u d s m a n . - - A n in d e p e n d e n t, h ig h - le v e l o f f ic e r in c iv il g o v e r n m e n t who r e c e i v e s c o m p la in ts , who p u r s u e s i n q u i r i e s 12 into the m a t t e r s involved, an d who m a k e s r e c o m m e n d a tio n s f o r s u ita b le a c tio n . H e m a y a l s o in v e s tig a te on h i s own m o tio n . m a k e s p e r io d ic p u b lic r e p o r t s . He H is r e m e d i a l w e a p o n s a r e p e r ­ s u a s io n , c r i t i c i s m and p u b lic ity . He cannot a s a m a t t e r of law r e v e r s e a d m in is t r a tiv e a c tio n . * C a m p u s O m b u d s m a n . - - A n in d e p e n d e n t fa c u lty m e m b e r who r e c e i v e s c o m p la in ts , p r i m a r i l y f ro m s tu d e n ts , a t a co lleg e o r u n iv e r s ity , who p u r s u e s i n q u ir ie s in to the m a t t e r s involved, and who m a k e s r e c o m m e n d a tio n s fo r s u ita b le a c tio n . re p o rts. He m a k e s p e r io d ic H is r e m e d i a l w e a p o n s a r e p e r s u a s i o n , c r i t i c i s m and, a t h is d is c r e tio n , p u b lic ity . H e cannot a s a m a t t e r of p o lic y r e v e r s e a d m in is tr a tiv e o r a c a d e m ic a c tio n . Student O m b u d s m a n . - - A s tu d e n t a t a c o lle g e o r u n iv e r s i ty who p e r f o r m s e s s e n ti a ll y th e s a m e fu n ctio n s a s th o se p e r f o r m e d by a c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n . R o le . - - T he set o f p r e s c r i p t i o n s d efin in g w hat the b e h a v io r • of a p o sitio n m e m b e r should be. 2 *T he O m b u d s m a n , R e p o rt o f th e T h ir ty - s e c o n d A m e r ic a n A sse m b ly , O c to b e r 2 6-29, 1967 (New Y ork: C o lu m b ia U n iv e r s ity , u ndated), p. 6. 2 B r u c e J . Biddle an d E dw in J . T h o m a s , R ole T heo ry: C oncepts and R e s e a r c h (New York: Jo h n W iley and Sons, I n c . , 1966), p. 29. 13 R o le P e r c e p t i o n . - - The m a n n e r in w h ic h an in d iv id u a l v iew s a p o s itio n he f i l l s . T h is c o n c e p t i s a p tly d e s c r i b e d by K ah n and h is a s so c ia te s: E a c h p e r s o n . . - h a s a co n c ep tio n o f h i s office an d a s e t of a ttitu d e s and b e lie f s about w h a t he sh o u ld and sh o u ld not do w hile in th a t p o sitio n . He h a s s o m e a w a r e n e s s of w h a t b e h a v io r w ill fu lfill h i s r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s , le a d to the a c c o m p lis h m e n t o f th e o r g a n iz a tio n a l o b je c tiv e s , o r f u r t h e r h i s own i n t e r e s t s . He m a y ev en h a v e had a p a r t in d e t e r m in in g th e f o r m a l r e s p o n s i ­ b ili tie s o f h i s office. * Role C o n flic t. — E x p o s u r e o f an in d iv id u a l to in c o m p a tib le 2 b e h a v io r a l e x p e c ta tio n s in^a given p o s itio n . A c t i v i t i e s . - - S p e c ific a c tio n s o r p u r s u i t s : o v e r t b e h a v io r s th a t a r e a p p a r e n t and e v id e n t to th e s e n s e s . " E s t a b l i s h m e n t . 11- - The a g g r e g a te of in d iv id u a ls who hold the p r i m a r y p o s itio n s of p o w e r , a u th o r it y and d e c is io n - m a k in g in an o r g a n iz a tio n . " M u l t i v e r s i t y . 11- - T e r m c o in e d by C l a r k K e r r to d e s c r i b e a co m p lex in s titu tio n of h i g h e r e d u c a tio n and r e s e a r c h w h ic h i s no t R o b e r t L. K ahn, D onald M. Wolfe, R o b e r t P . Q uinn, J . D. Snoek, and R o b e rt A . R o s e n th a l, O rg a n iz a tio n a l S t r e s s : S tu d ie s in R o le C onflict a n d A m b ig u ity (New Y o rk : Jo h n W iley and Sons, I n c . , 1964), p. 18. 2 N e il G r o s s , W a r d S . M a s o n , and A le x a n d e r W. M c E a c h e rn , E x p lo r a tio n s in R ole A n a ly s is (New Y ork : J o h n W iley and Sons, Inc. , 1958), p. 246. 14 an a c a d e m ic c o m m u n ity but r a t h e r s e v e r a l c o m m u n itie s w ith v a r ie d , even c o n flic tin g , i n t e r e s t s . 1 T h e n ex t s te p i s to d e s c r i b e th e p r o c e d u r e u s e d to g a t h e r in fo rm a tio n n e e d e d to p u r s u e th e o b je c tiv e s o f th e stu d y . P ro ced u re U sin g m e th o d s r e c o m m e n d e d by A n g e ll and F r e e d m a n , a s y s te m o f c l a s s i f ic a ti o n and a n a l y s i s o f w r i t t e n m a t e r i a l s w a s em ployed to c o n v e rt w id e ly s c a t t e r e d in f o r m a tio n abo u t c iv il and ca m p u s o m b u d s m e n in to o r g a n iz e d d a ta . 2 M a t e r i a l s stu d ie d in th is m a n n e r in c lu d e d c o r r e s p o n d e n c e , c o p ie s of o f fic ia l d o c u m e n ts , w r itte n r e c o r d s and r e p o r t s , u n p u b lis h e d p a p e r s and s p e e c h e s , m in u te s of m e e ti n g s , o th e r m e m o r a n d a , b o o k s, b ib lio g r a p h ie s , and a r t i c l e s in p e r i o d i c a l s and n e w s p a p e r s . A lthough a n u m b e r of c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s w e r e included in th e c o lle c tio n of d a ta , the fo c u s w a s on s ix in s titu tio n s w hich h av e f u ll- tim e o r p a r t - t i m e c a m p u s o m b u d s m e n . S e le c te d for t h e i r l a r g e s i z e , fu n c tio n a l d i v e r s i t y and g e o g r a p h ic a l * C la r k K e r r , The U s e s of the U n i v e r s i t y (New Y ork: H a r p e r & Row, 1966), pp. 1 8 -1 9 . 2 R o b e r t C. A n g ell an d R o n ald F r e e d m a n , " T h e U s e of D o cu m e n ts, R e c o r d s , C e n s u s M a t e r i a l s , and I n d i c e s , " in R e s e a r c h M ethods in the B e h a v io r a l S c i e n c e s , ed . by L eo n F e s t i n g e r and D aniel K a tz (New Y o rk: H olt, R i n e h a r t and W in sto n , 1953), pp. 30023. 15 d is trib u tio n , the in s titu tio n s w h o se o m b u d s m e n w e r e in te rv ie w e d are; (1) U n iv e r s ity of C a lif o r n ia a t B e r k e le y , (2) M ic h ig an S tate U n iv e r s ity , two m a j o r p u b lic u n i v e r s i t i e s ; (3) C o lu m b ia U n iv e r s ity , (4) U n iv e r s ity of D e tr o it, tw o m a j o r p r i v a t e u n i v e r s i t i e s , th e f o r m e r w ith o ut r e lig io u s a ffilia tio n and th e l a t t e r a R o m an C a th o lic (Je su it) in s titu tio n ; and (5) San D iego S tate C o lle g e , (6) San J o s e State C o lle g e , two p u b lic in s titu tio n s in the s a m e (C a lifo rn ia S tate College) s y s t e m . T a p e - r e c o r d e d in te r v i e w s w ith t h e s e six c a m p u s o m b u d s ­ m en , t r a n s c r i b e d in to m o r e th a n 100 ty p e w r itte n p a g e s , p ro v id e d m uch of th e d a ta s u m m a r i z e d in C h a p te r III and A ppendix C. As Good h a s p oin ted out, th e f a c e - t o - f a c e in te r v ie w o f f e r s a d v a n ta g e s o v e r the m a ile d q u e s tio n n a ir e , * A s e m i - s t r u c t u r e d s c h e d u le of q u e s tio n s a s s u g g e s te d by M acco b y and M a c c o b y p ro v id e d r e s p o n s e s that could be c o m p a r e d and c o n t r a s te d . 2 B e c a u s e th e p o p u la tio n of c a m p u s o m b u d s m e n i s so s m a l l and no a c c u r a t e r o s t e r i s a v a ila b le , n o th in g could h a v e b ee n g ain ed 1C a r t e r V. Good, E s s e n t i a l s o f E d u c a tio n a l R e s e a r c h (New York: A p p le to n - C e n tu r y - C r o f ts , 1966), p. 229. 2 E le a n o r E.. M acco b y an d N ath an M acco by , " T h e In te rv ie w ; A T ool of S o cial S cie n c e , " in H andbook o f S o c ia l P s y c h o lo g y , ed. by G a r d n e r L in d ze y (R ead in g, M a s s . : A d d is o n - W e s le y P u b lis h in g Com pany, I n c . , 1954), I, 4 4 9 -8 7 . 16 by a tte m p tin g to u s e ra n d o m s a m p lin g . N o n -ra n d o m s e le c tio n w a s c o n s id e re d m o r e a d v a n ta g e o u s b e c a u s e it allo w ed c o n c e n tr a tio n on th o se in s titu tio n s w hich h av e ta k e n th e le a d in u tiliz in g c a m p u s o m ­ b u d sm e n . A lthough no s t a t i s t i c a l in f e r e n c e s c a n be m a d e fro m su ch in te rv ie w fin d in g s, c a r e f u l ly c o n s id e r e d g e n e r a liz a ti o n s a r e not inv alid. * T he m a in e m p h a s is in th e stud y, a s in d ic a te d by th e title , w as on M ich ig an S tate U n iv e r s ity , w h e r e s tu d e n ts who h a v e c o n ­ su lted th e c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n w e r e s u r v e y e d . T h is in s titu tio n w as chosen fo r s tu d e n t a s s e s s m e n t b e c a u s e i t s c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n h a s been in office lo n g e r th a n a n y o th e r o m b u d sm a n a t a m a j o r u n i v e r ­ sity . F u r t h e r m o r e , h e d e a l s with a w ide r a n g e of s tu d e n t g r i e v a n c e s and r e c o r d s th e n a m e s of a l l who v i s i t h im . A to ta l of 525 s tu d e n ts co nsu lted th e o m b u d sm a n d u r in g the 1967-68 a c a d e m ic y e a r , followed by 305 d u rin g the 1968 fa ll t e r m . A ny a tte m p t to ta k e a ran do m s a m p le f r o m a l l 830 s tu d e n ts would h a v e b e e n c o m p lic a te d by the fa c t th a t m a n y of th o s e s tu d e n ts had ch an ged r e s id e n c e o r w e r e no lo n g e r e n r o lle d by D e c e m b e r 31, 1968. Such an a p p r o a c h p ro b a b ly would h a v e r e s u l t e d in a low r e s p o n s e and a b ia s e d s a m p le . A lso, th e q u e s tio n n a i r e w h ich w as d ev elo ped r e q u i r e d th e s tu d e n t to *D avid R. K ra th w o h l, How to P r e p a r e a R e s e a r c h P r o p o s a l (S y ra c u se , N . Y . : By the A u th o r, S y ra c u s e U n iv e r s it y , 1966), p. 32. 17 r e c a l l h i s v is i t to the o m b u d s m a n in c o n s id e r a b le d e ta il. It i s lik e ly that q u e s tio n n a i r e s r e t u r n e d by s tu d e n ts w h o se v i s i t s had o c c u r r e d s e v e r a l m o n th s e a r l i e r would h a v e co n tain ed n u m e r o u s e r r o r s of re c o lle c tio n . To l e s s e n th e s e a n tic ip a te d p r o b le m s of n o n - r e s p o n s e and p oo r r e c a l l , th e s u r v e y w a s c o n c e n tr a te d on th e m o s t r e c e n t tim e p e rio d long enough to c o v e r a w ide ran g e of s tu d e n t g r i e v a n c e s - - t h e 1968 f a ll t e r m . A gain, ra n d o m s a m p lin g w a s d e e m e d in a p p r o p r ia te b e c a u se of th e s m a l l p op ulatio n in vo lv ed. C o n se q u e n tly , a d e c is io n w as m a d e to s a m p le w ith c e r t a in ty and th u s e l im in a te s a m p lin g e r r o r , r e c o g n iz in g , of c o u r s e , th a t e r r o r s a t tr i b u ta b l e to n o n ­ sa m p lin g f a c t o r s ( e . g . , n o n - r e s p o n s e ) w ould not b e e lim in a te d . Q u e s tio n n a ir e s w e r e s e n t to a l l 305 fa ll t e r m s tu d e n ts f o r whom a d d r e s s e s w e r e a v a ila b le , follow ed by a n o t h e r m a ilin g to n o n ­ r e s p o n d e n ts a f t e r two w e e k s . E f f o r t s to o b ta in a high le v e l of r e s p o n s e w e r e e n h a n ce d by the c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n 1 s w illin g n e s s to in c lu d e in b o th m a ilin g s a l e t t e r u rg in g c o o p e ra tio n and a s s u r i n g anonym ity. O f the 288 q u e s tio n n a i r e s s e n t, 218 w e r e r e t u r n e d f o r a 75. 6 p e r cent r e s p o n s e . * F in d in g s a r e r e p o r t e d in C h a p te r IV. The q u e s tio n n a ir e i s r e p r o d u c e d in A ppendix F . ^ Q u e s tio n n a ir e s could n o t be s e n t to s e v e n te e n of the o r i g ­ inal 305 s tu d e n ts b e c a u s e c u r r e n t a d d r e s s e s w e r e u n a v a ila b le . 18 Since the c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n i s o b lig a te d to k e e p h i s f ile s co nfiden tial, a t no ti m e did th e r e s e a r c h e r l e a r n th e n a m e s of s t u ­ dents in v olved in the s u r v e y e x c e p t f o r th o s e w ho v o lu n ta r ily i d e n t i ­ fied th e m s e l v e s f o r p o s s ib le fo llo w -u p in te r v i e w s . A lso, th e o m ­ b u d sm an w a s u n ab le t o link n a m e s w ith q u e s tio n n a i r e r e s p o n s e s b e c a u se r e t u r n s w ent to the r e s e a r c h e r and r e m a i n in h is p o s s e s s i o n . This p r o c e d u r e w a s e x p la in e d in the q u e s tio n n a ir e s o th a t r e s p o n ­ dents would n o t be h e s i t a n t to a s s e s s th e o m b u d s m a n ca n d id ly and co m p letely . D a ta o b ta in e d w e r e p r o c e s s e d by c o m p u te r . B e f o r e r e p o r tin g and a n a ly z in g th e in f o r m a tio n g a th e r e d in su c ce e d in g c h a p t e r s , i t i s i m p o r ta n t to s p e c ify s o m e of th e l i m i t a ­ tions im p o s e d by the p r o c e d u r e ad o p ted . L im ita tio n s A s w ith a ll r e s e a r c h e n d e a v o r s , th is stu d y h a s d e fin ite lim ita tio n s . No a t te m p t w as m a d e to o b ta in d e ta ile d in f o rm a tio n on all c a m p u s o m b u d s m e n o r to r e p o r t d e v e lo p m e n ts in the a r e a u n d e r in v e stig a tio n w h ich o c c u r r e d a f t e r D e c e m b e r 31, 1968. A lso , s t u ­ dent r e a c tio n to the c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n w a s not a s s e s s e d a n y w h e re ex cep t a t M ic h ig a n S ta te U n iv e r s ity . F in a lly , no s y s t e m a t i c a tte m p t was m a d e to d e t e r m i n e a t titu d e s h eld by fa c u lty and a d m i n i s t r a t o r s con cerning th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n a t any in s titu tio n . 19 B e c a u s e o f th e r e s t r i c t e d s a m p l e s u s e d f o r th e study, i n t e r p r e t a ti o n o f th e find ing s m u s t be k e p t in p r o p e r p e r s p e c tiv e . It is to be e x p e c te d th a t s i m i l a r s tu d ie s inv olving o t h e r in s titu tio n s of h ig h e r e d u c a tio n m ig h t y ie ld c o n t r a d ic to r y r e s u l t s . T herefore, it is n ot c la im e d th a t th e d a ta o b ta in ed p r e s e n t a c o n c lu s iv e o r c o m p re h e n s iv e a n a ly s is of u n i v e r s a l in s titu tio n a l p r a c t i c e and s t u ­ dent r e s p o n s e r e g a r d in g th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n . N e v e r th e le s s , in f o rm a tio n p r e s e n t e d in th e follow ing ch a p ­ t e r s m a y be u s e f u l in th e a d a p ta tio n of th e o m b u d s m a n co n cep t to o th e r c o lle g e and u n iv e r s i ty c a m p u s e s s in c e s tu d e n t p r o b le m s and o r g a n iz a tio n a l s t r u c t u r e s b e a r a d e g r e e o f s i m i l a r i t y f r o m i n s t i t u ­ tion to in s titu tio n . T o s o m e e x te n t, t h e r e f o r e , th e fin d in g s of th is study m a y h a v e b ro a d a p p lic a tio n , m o d ifie d to m e e t lo c a l c i r c u m ­ s ta n c e s and in d iv id u a l p r e f e r e n c e s . O v erv iew T he c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n h a s b e e n id e n tifie d a s a new p o s i ­ tion w hich A m e r ic a n c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s h a v e a d a p te d fro m civil g o v e r n m e n t to h e lp th e in d iv id u a l s tu d e n t cope w ith the c o m p lex in stitu tio n . A n eed f o r f u r t h e r in f o r m a tio n i s e s ta b li s h e d a s the b a s is f o r th is e x p l o r a to r y stu d y . T o p r e p a r e a fo u nd ation fo r the ensuing c h a p t e r s , th e p r o b le m to be e x a m in e d h a s b e e n id e n tified , 20 t e r m s defined, o b je c tiv e s s ta te d , p r o c e d u r e d e s c r i b e d and l i m i t a ­ tio n s re c o g n iz e d . T h e se c o n d c h a p te r i s a r e v ie w of p r o f e s s i o n a l and r e s e a r c h l i t e r a t u r e r e g a r d i n g the d e v e lo p m e n t of the o m b u d s m a n co n cep t b oth in c iv il g o v e r n m e n t and in h ig h e r e d u c a tio n . R e f e r e n c e s to s e le c te d l i t e r a t u r e c o n c e r n in g r e la tio n s h i p s b etw e en th e o r g a n iz a tio n and the in d iv id u al and b e tw e e n the u n i v e r s i t y and th e s tu d e n t a l s o a r e in r eluded, T h e c h a p te r c lo s e s w ith a s u m m a r y of the o m b u d sm a n c o n ­ cept in th e o r y and p r a c t ic e . I n f o r m a tio n o b ta in e d fro m i n te r v i e w s and c o r r e s p o n d e n c e w ith c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n i s p r e s e n t e d in th e th ir d c h a p te r and Appendix C. D a ta c o lle c te d in a s u r v e y of s tu d e n ts who h av e c o n ­ su lte d a c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n a r e a n a ly z e d in th e fo u rth c h a p te r . The stu d y i s co n clu d ed in th e fifth and final c h a p te r , w h e r e r e s e a r c h q u e s tio n s a r e r e c o n s i d e r e d , find in g s s u m m a r i z e d and r e c o m m e n d a ­ tio n s m a d e. B e fo r e tu r n in g to s p e c if ic i n q u i r i e s r e g a r d i n g th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm an , an ad e q u a te u n d e r s ta n d in g of th e h i s t o r i c a l and s o c i o ­ lo g ic a l d e v e lo p m e n t of the o m b u d s m a n co n c ep t i s n e c e s s a r y . T h e r e f o r e , p e r tin e n t l i t e r a t u r e i s r e v ie w e d in th e n e x t c h a p te r . C H A P T E R II REVIEW O F TH E L IT E R A T U R E In th e p r e v io u s c h a p te r the c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n w a s identified a s an e m e r g in g p o sitio n in A m e r i c a n h i g h e r e d u c a tio n som ew hat an a lo g o u s to th e o m b u d sm a n in c iv il g o v e r n m e n t. B oth d ev e lo p m e n ts w e r e s e e n a s a t te m p ts to a m e l i o r a t e p e r s o n a l p r o b l e m s in the i m p e r s o n a l o r g a n iz a tio n . It w a s p o in te d out, h o w e v e r, th a t th ere i s a s y e t n o g e n e r a l u n d e r s ta n d in g o r a g r e e m e n t r e g a r d in g th e role of the c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n ev en though a n u m b e r o f in s t itu ti o n s have e s ta b li s h e d the p o s itio n and o t h e r s a r e m o v in g in th a t d ir e c tio n . The need f o r m o r e in f o rm a tio n w a s c ite d a s th e m a in p u r p o s e o f the study. In o r d e r to a s s i m i l a t e e x is tin g in f o r m a tio n , r e l a t e d l i t e r a ­ tu re i s re v ie w e d in t h i s c h a p te r . S u rv e y ed i n th e f i r s t s e c tio n a r e se le c te d r e f e r e n c e s to th e o r g a n iz a tio n and th e in d iv id u a l. In th e second s e c tio n r e c e n t l i t e r a t u r e c o n c e r n in g th e u n i v e r s i t y and th e student i s c o n s id e r e d . W r itte n m a t e r i a l s d e a lin g w ith th e o m b u d s ­ man in civ il g o v e rn m e n t and th e o m b u d s m a n in h ig h e r e d u c a tio n a r e 21 22 exam ined in th e th ir d and fo u rth s e c tio n s . T he f in a l s e c tio n i s a s u m m a r y of the o m b u d s m a n c o n c ep t in th e o r y and p r a c t i c e a s re p o rte d in the l i t e r a t u r e . T he O r g a n iz a tio n and th e In d iv id u al M o d e rn c iv iliz a tio n d e p e n d s on b u r e a u c r a t i c a l l y - s t r u c t u r e d o rg a n iz a tio n s a s the m o s t r a t i o n a l and e ffic ie n t f o r m of s o c ia l grouping known. By c o o rd in a tin g d i v e r s e in d iv id u a l a c t i v i t i e s , so ciety a t ta i n s p r e d e t e r m i n e d o b je c tiv e s . It a l s o co n tin u a lly e v a lu ­ a te s o r g a n iz a tio n a l fu n ctio n s and m a k e s a d j u s tm e n ts . A lthough o rg a n iz a tio n s a r e a n c ie n t in o r ig in , m o d e r n i n d u s t r i a l n a tio n s h a v e m o re and l a r g e r o r g a n iz a tio n s than a n y p r e v io u s s o c i a l s y s t e m s . * D u rin g th e p a s t f o rty y e a r s b e h a v io r a l s c i e n t i s t s h a v e p r o ­ duced a c o n s id e r a b le a m o u n t of l i t e r a t u r e on o r g a n iz a tio n s . A m ong the re c o g n iz e d a u t h o r i t i e s in th e field i s E tz io n i, who h a s e p ito m iz e d the a ll- p e r v a d in g in flu e n c e of o r g a n iz a tio n a l a c tiv i ty in th is s ta te m e n t: We a r e born in o rg a n iza tio n s, educated by o rg a n iz a tio n s, and moBt of ub spend m uch of our liv e s w orking for o rg a n iza tio n s. We sp en d m u c h of o u r l e i s u r e tim e paying, p la y in g , and p r a y ­ ing in o r g a n iz a tio n s . M o st of u s w ill d ie in an o r g a n iz a tio n , and w hen the tim e c o m e s f o r b u r ia l, th e l a r g e s t o r g a n iz a tio n of a l l - - t h e s t a t e - - m u s t g r a n t o ffic ia l p e r m i s s i o n . 2 N .J .: \A m ita i E tz io n i, M o d e rn O r g a n iz a tio n s (E nglew ood C liffs, P r e n t i c e - H a l l , Inc. , 1964), p. 1. 2Ibid. S om e c o n te m p o r a r y o b s e r v e r s , su c h a s C r o z i e r and D ow ns, * re g a rd the b u r e a u c r a t i c o r g a n iz a tio n a s g e n e r a lly b e n e fic ia l to the individual, but th ey a r e in th e m in o r ity . e m p h a siz e d i t s d e t r i m e n t s . M uch of th e l i t e r a t u r e h a s M e rto n , f o r e x a m p le , h a s cited the s t r e s s on d e p e r s o n a liz e d r e la t i o n s h i p s a s a fu n d a m e n ta l c a u s e of in d iv id u a l f ru s tra tio n : Since f u n c tio n a r ie s m in im iz e p e r s o n a l r e la tio n s and r e s o r t to c a te g o r iz a tio n , th e p e c u l i a r i t i e s of in d iv id u a l c a s e s a r e often ig n o re d . . . . S te re o ty p e d b e h a v io r i s n o t a d a p te d to the e x ig e n c ie s o f in d iv id u a l p r o b l e m s . 2 A nother s o u r c e o f c o n flic t b etw e en th e o r g a n iz a tio n and th e in d iv id u a l i s the te n d e n c y of b u r e a u c r a t s to adopt a d o m in e e r in g a ttitu d e a s s o c ia te d w ith v e s te d a u th o rity . T he u n d e r ly in g d ile m m a , a s M erton h a s d e s c r i b e d it, i s th a t b u r e a u c r a c y " i s a s e c o n d a r y g ro u p s tr u c t u r e d e s ig n e d to c a r r y on c e r t a i n a c t i v i t i e s w hich cannot be s a tis f a c to r ily p e r f o r m e d on the b a s is of p r i m a r y g r o u p c r i t e r i a . " 3 A r g y r i s h a s d is c o v e r e d a la ck of c o n g ru e n c y b etw e en th e needs o f " h e a lth y " in d iv id u a ls and the d e m a n d s of the f o r m a l o r g a n i ­ zation. A lthough h is fo cus i s on e m p lo y e e s r a t h e r th a n c lie n ts , both 1M ic h e l C r o z i e r , T h e B u r e a u c r a t i c P h e n o m e n o n (C hicago: U n iv e rsity of C h icag o P r e s s , 1964) and A nthony D ow ns, In sid e B u r e a u c r a c y (B oston: L ittle , Brow n and C om pany, 1967). 2 R o b e r t K. M e rto n , S o cial T h e o r y and S o cial S tr u c tu r e (New Y ork: F r e e P r e s s , 1957), p. 202. 24 a r e a f f e c te d by th e d y s f u n c tio n s he h a s id e n tif ie d . * C o le m a n a l s o h a s pointed out th a t th e lin k a g e b e tw e e n th e l a r g e o r g a n iz a tio n an d th e in div id u al in e v ita b ly c r e a t e s d if f ic u ltie s . H e r e c e n t l y w r o te : T he p r i n c i p a l p r o b l e m s th a t a r i s e w ith t h i s f o r m of r e l a t i o n a r e due to th e a s y m m e t r y in s i z e b e tw e e n th e in d iv id u a l a n d th e o r g a n iz a tio n , and th e a s y m m e t r y in p o w e r th a t s t e m s f r o m th e s i z e d i s p a r i t y . O r d i n a r i l y th e o r g a n iz a tio n c a n m o b il iz e f a r m o r e r e s o u r c e s t o f u r t h e r i t s i n t e r e s t s th an c a n th e in d iv id u a l to f u r t h e r h i s . It h a s e n o r m o u s e c o n o m ie s o f s c a l e , s i n c e it 2 i s in v o lv e d in s i m i l a r r e l a t i o n s w ith m a n y in d iv id u a ls . L ik e C o le m a n , K ahn and h i s a s s o c i a t e s h a v e n o te d a s u b ­ s ta n tia l r e l a t i o n s h i p b e tw e e n s t r e s s an d o r g a n iz a tio n a l s i z e . T h e ir s tu d ie s le d to t h i s r e v e la tio n : The c u r v e o f s t r e s s b e g in s to r i s e a s w e t u r n f r o m tin y o r g a n i ­ z a tio n s to th o s e o f 50 to 100 p e r s o n s , an d the r i s i n g c u r v e c o n tin u e s u n til w e e n c o u n te r th e o r g a n iz a tio n a l g i a n t s . O nly fo r o r g a n iz a tio n s of m o r e th a n 5000 p e r s o n s d o e s th e c u r v e of s t r e s s l e v e l o f f - - p e r h a p s b e c a u s e a n o r g a n iz a tio n s o l a r g e r e p r e s e n t s s o m e k in d of p s y c h o lo g ic a l in f in ity and f u r t h e r i n c r e a s e s a r e u n fe lt. ^ D im o c k , too, h a s c o n c lu d e d th a t s i z e i s th e m o s t p r o l i f i c s o u rc e of d iffic u lty a m o n g a l l th e v a r i a b l e s in flu e n c in g i n s t itu ti o n a l m a n a g e m e n t. H is a n a l y s i s of th e p r o b le m i s w id e ly a c c e p te d : * C h r is A r g y r i s , P e r s o n a l i t y and O r g a n iz a tio n (New Y ork: H a r p e r & Row, 1957). 2 J a m e s C o le m a n , u n p u b lis h e d p a p e r w r i t t e n f o r th e C o m ­ m is s io n on T e s t s , C o lle g e E n t r a n c e E x a m in a tio n B o a rd , 1968. 3 K ahn e t a l . , O r g a n iz a tio n a l S t r e s s : flict and A m b ig u ity , p. 394. S tu d ie s in R o le C o n ­ 25 Size i n c r e a s e s the in flu e n c e of e v e r y f a c t o r in a d m in i s t r a t i o n that c o n tr ib u te s to b u r e a u c r a t i c e x c e s s e s . . . . S ta n d a rd p r a c t i c e s a r e in v ite d and th e n r e ta in e d a f t e r t h e i r u s e f u ln e s s i s o v e r b e c a u s e few p eo p le a r e in a p o s itio n to s e e th e w hole p ic tu r e . . . . But p r e c i s e r u l e s a r e d iffic u lt to av o id w h en s iz e c o n tr ib u te s to im p e r s o n a l i t y and m e n h e s i t a t e to p la c e t r u s t in people w hom th e y do n o t know w e l l . 1 Dimock i s in a g r e e m e n t w ith A r g y r i s th a t " p a th o lo g ic a l b e h a v io r " in a b u r e a u c r a c y can be t r a c e d to the im b a la n c e b e tw e e n th e r o le of the in d iv id u al and th a t o f the g r o u p in a d m in is t r a tio n . P e o p le r e a c t to th is im b a la n c e by b e c o m in g s e l f - c e n t e r e d , av o id in g r e s p o n s i b ilit y and e x e rtin g t h e i r p o w e r in p e tty w a y s . T he co m m o n f a c t o r in a l l th re e ty p e s of b e h a v io r " i s th e lo s s of p e r s o n a l id e n tif ic a tio n and s e lf-fu lfillm e n t. " M a la d ie s " to w h ich b u r e a u c r a t s in g o v e r n m e n ta l o r g a n i ­ zations a r e s u s c e p ti b le h av e b ee n d ia g n o se d by R o bson as: E x c e s s iv e s e n s e of s e l f - i m p o r t a n c e , in d if f e r e n c e to the fe e lin g s o r c o n v e n ie n c e o f o th e r s , o b s e s s i v e a d h e r e n c e to e s ta b lis h e d p r a c t i c e r e g a r d l e s s of r e s u lt in g h a r d s h ip , p e r s i s ­ te n t a d d ic tio n to f o r m a lity , and a s t i g m a t i c in a b ility to p e r c e iv e the to ta lity of g o v e r n m e n t b e c a u s e of p r e o c c u p a tio n w ith one of its p a rts , 3 ^ M a r s h a ll E . D im o c k , A d m in is tr a tiv e V ita lity (New Y ork: H a rp e r & Row, 1959), p. 92. ^ I b i d , , p. 104. 3 W illia m A. R ob so n, T he G o v e r n o r s and th e G o v e rn e d (Baton Rouge: L o u is ia n a S tate U n iv e r s ity P r e s s , 1964), p. 17. 26 D u r in g a r e c e n t S en ate s u b c o m m it te e h e a r i n g , a w itn e s s contended th a t " th e v e r y s t r u c t u r e of o u r m o d e r n s o c ie ty , i t s c o u n t­ l e s s a g e n c ie s a n d b u r e a u s , h a s b e c o m e a m a j o r i n g r e d i e n t in th e p ro d u c tio n of u n h a p p in e s s and u n r e s t . " H e co n tin u ed : S o cia l s c i e n t i s t s h a v e know n f o r y e a r s th a t i n c r e a s i n g o r g a n i ­ z a tio n a l c o m p le x ity e n c o u r a g e s th e g r o w th of b u r e a u c r a c y . In m o s t i n s t a n c e s , t h e r e i s a d i r e c t r e la t i o n s h i p b e tw e e n a b u r e a u c r a t i c s t r u c t u r e and f e e lin g s of is o l a t i o n and s o c i a l im p o te n c e . M o r e o v e r , a s w e co n tin u e to a d v a n c e te c h n o lo g i­ c a lly w ith o u r a m a z in g c o m p u t e r s an d t h e i r c o ld ly o b je c tiv e o p e r a t i o n s , m o s t in d iv id u a ls h a v e no c h o ic e e x c e p t to b e c o m e p a s s iv e r e c i p i e n t s o f a d e c is io n m a k in g p r o c e s s w hich is b eyo nd c o m p r e h e n s io n . . . . 1 T h e s e o b s e r v a tio n s p a r a l l e l th o s e o f B e n n is , who h a s a r g u e d that b u r e a u c r a c y " i s h o p e l e s s l y out of jo in t w ith c o n t e m p o r a r y re a litie s. . . . " H is c r i t i c i s m s of b u r e a u c r a c y in c lu d e it s e m p h a s i s on c o n fo rm ity , in a d e q u a te j u r i d i c a l p r o c e s s , r e s t r i c t e d c o m m u n i­ cation, and s lu g g i s h n e s s to a d j u s t to new c o n d itio n s . T he e f f e c t i v e ­ n e s s o f b u r e a u c r a c y , h e h a s w r i t t e n , " s h o u ld be e v a lu a te d on h u m a n a s w e ll a s e c o n o m ic c r i t e r i a . " 2 S ta te m e n t by D ick W i llia m s , R e s e a r c h A s s i s t a n t , C i tiz e n s C o n feren c e on S tate L e g i s l a t u r e s , in U . S . , C o n g r e s s , S e n a te , C o m ­ m itte e on the J u d i c i a r y , R e g io n a l O m b u d s m a n P r o p o s a l , H e a r i n g s , b efo re th e S u b c o m m itte e on A d m i n i s t r a t i v e P r a c t i c e and P r o c e d u r e of the C o m m itte e on th e J u d i c i a r y , 90th C o n g ., 2nd s e s s . , 1968, p. 160. 2 W a r r e n G. B e n n is , C h ang in g O r g a n i z a t i o n s (New Y o rk : M c G ra w -H ill Book C o m p an y , 1966), pp, 4, 6, 9. 27 In h i s a p p r a i s a l o f c o n t e m p o r a r y o r g a n iz a tio n s , G a r d n e r has d e p lo re d th e " a lm o s t in e v ita b le m o v e m e n t of a n o r g a n iz a tio n tow ard e l a b o r a t e n e s s , r i g i d i t y and m a s s i v e n e s s an d away f r o m sim p lic ity , fle x ib ility a n d m a n a g e a b le s iz e . . . . "* He h a s e x p r e s s e d p a r tic u la r c o n c e r n w ith the b u r e a u c r a t i c c o m m u n ic a tio n s y s t e m and its e ffe c t on d e c is io n - m a k in g : A s o r g a n iz a tio n s . . . b e c o m e l a r g e r and m o r e c o m p le x , the m e n a t th e top . . . depend l e s s and l e s s on f irs th a n d e x p e ­ r ie n c e , m o r e and m o r e on h e a v ily " p r o c e s s e d " d ata. B e fo r e re a c h in g th e m , the r a w d a t a - - w h a t a c tu a lly g o e s on " o u t th e r e " - - h a v e b e e n s a m p le d , s c r e e n e d , c o n d e n sed , co m p ile d , coded, e x p r e s s e d in s t a t i s t i c a l fo rm , sp u n i n t o g e n e r a liz a ti o n s and c r y s t a l l i z e d into r e c o m m e n d a tio n s . What i s f ilte r e d out is e m o tio n , fe e lin g , s e n tim e n t and m o o d . T h u s, the p ic tu r e of r e a l i t y a t th e top le v e ls of o r g a n iz a tio n s i s s o m e t i m e s s e r io u s ly d i s t o r t e d . "W e s u f f e r th e c o n s e q u e n c e s w hen w e r u n h ea d on in to s itu a tio n s th at c a n n o t be u n d e r s to o d e x c e p t in t e r m s of th o s e e le m e n ts th a t h a v e been f ilte r e d out, " he h a s w a r n e d . 3 In c o n c lu d ­ ing h is a s s e s s m e n t , G a r d n e r w ro te : It is r id ic u lo u s th a t th e in s titu tio n s m a n d e s ig n s fo r h is own benefit sh o u ld w ork to h is d is a d v a n ta g e . We c a n n e v e r e l i m i ­ n a te the c o n flic t b e tw e e n m a n a n d h is in s titu tio n s . . . but w e *John W. G a r d n e r , S e lf-R en e w a l: T he In dividu al and th e Innovative S o c ie ty (New Y o rk : H a r p e r &. Row, 1964), p. 80. 2I b i d . , p. 78. 3Ibid. , p. 79. 28 can i n s i s t th at one o f the a i m s of an y o r g a n iz a tio n be th e d e v e lo p m e n t of th e in d iv id u a ls who m a k e it up. * T h e U n iv e r s it y and th e Student A m ong the l a r g e - s c a l e o r g a n iz a tio n s w h ich a r e b e in g studied to d e t e r m in e t h e i r e ffe c t on the in d iv id u a l a r e A m e r ic a n c o lleg e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s , p a r t i c u l a r l y d u r in g t h e i r p a s t d e c a d e of s p e c ta c u la r g ro w th an d in c r e a s i n g tu r m o il . It i s c u r io u s , h o w e v e r, that only in r e c e n t y e a r s h a s th e A m e r ic a n in s titu tio n of h ig h e r e d u ­ cation a s an o r g a n iz a tio n s u b je c te d i t s e l f to the s a m e kind o f in te n sive r e s e a r c h th a t h a s b een a p p lie d to o t h e r o r g a n iz a tio n s . 2 M cC onnell d e c la r e d in 1963 th a t " s o little r e s e a r c h h a s b e e n done on how c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s a r e o r g a n iz e d and a d m in is t e r e d 3 that . . . the field h a s not b e e n to uch ed. " Since th en a t r i c k l e of l i t e r a t u r e b a s e d on e m p i r i c a l s tu d i e s h a s begun to a p p e a r , alth ou g h the r e s u lt in g id e n tific a tio n of s p e c if ic p r o b le m s h a s b een s o m e w h a t 1I b i d . , p. 65. 2 J o h n C. C o r s o n , G o v e rn a n c e of C o lle g e s and U n i v e r s i t i e s (New Y ork: M c G r a w - H ill Book C om pany, In c. , 1960), p. 187. o T . R. M c C o n n ell, "N ee d ed R e s e a r c h in C o lle g e an d U n iv e rsity O rg a n iz a tio n and A d m in is tr a tio n , " in T he Study o f A c a ­ d em ic A d m in is tr a tio n (B o u ld e r, Colo. : W e s te r n I n t e r s t a t e C o m ­ m is s io n f o r H ig h e r E d u c a tio n , 1963), p. 113. 29 o v ersh a d o w e d by s t i l l u n a n s w e r e d q u e s tio n s r e g a r d in g o r g a n iz a tio n a l s t r u c t u r e and g o a ls . * A ny a tte m p t to s tu d y the r e la tio n s h i p b e tw e e n the i n s t i t u ­ tion of h i g h e r e d u c a tio n and th e in d iv id u a l s tu d e n t i s c o m p lic a te d by the fact th a t a u t h o r i t i e s d i s a g r e e on th e n a tu r e of th e o r g a n iz a tio n . F o r e x a m p le , M ille tt 2 and, to s o m e e x te n t, C o r s o n 3 clin g to the o rg an ic m o d e l of a u n ified a c a d e m ic c o m m u n ity w h ile , a t th e o th e r e x tre m e , K e r r h a s d e s c r i b e d the m e c h a n i s t i c " m u l t i v e r s i t y " a s th e p r a g m a tic r e a l i t y . U nlike an o r g a n is m , w h o se p a r t s a r e i n e x t r i ­ cably bound t o g e th e r , K e r r ' s " in c o n s is t e n t in s titu tio n " h a s m a n y p a r ts w h ic h c a n be a d d e d an d s u b t r a c t e d w ith lit tle e f f e c t on the whole. It i s , h e s a id , " h e ld to g e t h e r by a d m i n i s t r a t i v e r u l e s and 4 pow ered by m o n e y , " * ^ M c C o n n ell h a s d e c l a r e d th a t a c o n c e p tu a l f r a m e w o r k does not e x i s t f o r f o r m u la tin g a c o h e re n t s e t of h y p o th e s e s fo r in v e s tig a tin g o r g a n iz a tio n an d a d m in is t r a tio n in h ig h e r e d u c a tio n . Ib id . 2 J o h n D. M ille tt, T he A c a d e m ic C o m m u n ity (New Y ork: M c G ra w -H ill Book C o m p an y , I n c . , 1962). 3 4 C o r s o n , G o v e r n a n c e of C o lle g e s and U n i v e r s i t i e s . K e r r , T he U s e s of th e U n i v e r s i t y , p. 20. 30 B a r z u n and B o ulding h a v e lik e n e d th e u n i v e r s i t y to a c o r p o ra tio n , 1 2 C l a r k to a f e d e r a tio n , and M o r a n to a h o ld in g c o m p a n y . 3 H e n d e rs o n , by c o n t r a s t , h a s d efin e d it a s a d is t in c t iv e p r o f e s s i o n a l 4 o r g a n iz a tio n . M o r t i m e r K a d is h is a m o n g th o s e w ho c o n s i d e r the u n iv e r s i ty to be a p o lit ic a l in s t itu ti o n m a d e up o f s p e c i a l i n t e r e s t 5 groups. P a r s o n s h a s d r a w n an a n a lo g y b e tw e e n s p e c i a l i n t e r e s t g ro u p s in th e a c a d e m i c i n s t itu ti o n and th e s e p a r a t i o n of p o w e r s in g o v e r n m e n ta l a f f a i r s : F a c u l t i e s h a v e a r o le s o m e w h e r e b e tw e e n th e fu n c tio n s of the j u d ic ia l an d l e g i s l a t i v e b r a n c h e s of g o v e r n m e n t, p a r t i c i p a t i n g in bo th . . , . S tu d e n ts an d a lu m n i p la y a r o l e in s o m e r e s p e c t s p a r a l l e l to th o s e of c o n s titu e n c ie s in r e l a t i o n to p o l i t i c a l o f f ic e ­ h o l d e r s . B ut th e " ju d i c ia l" r o le o f th e fa c u lty s u b s t a n t i a l l y m o d if ie s th e " p u r e d e m o c r a c y " o f th e c o n s titu e n c y ty p e of r e la t i o n s h i p . 6 J a c q u e s B a rz u n , T he A m e r i c a n U n i v e r s i t y (New Y o rk : H a r p e r & Row, 1968), p. 3; K e n n e th E . B ou ld in g, T he O r g a n i z a ­ tio n a l R e v o lu tio n (New Y o rk : H a r p e r & B r o t h e r s , 1953), p. 51. 2 B u r to n R. C l a r k , " F a c u lty O r g a n iz a tio n and A u th o r ity , " in T he Study of A c a d e m ic A d m i n i s t r a t i o n , p. 51. 3 W illia m E . M o r a n , " T h e S tudy o f U n i v e r s i t y O r g a n i z a ­ tio n s, " JournaJ^_o£J|ijgherJE du£ati£n, XXXIX ( M a r c h , 1968), 1 5 0 -5 1 . 4 A lgo D. H e n d e rs o n , " T h e D e s i r e d In flu e n c e , " J o u r n a l o f . H ig h er E d u c a tio n , XXXVIII (J u n e , 1967), 304. 5 M o r t i m e r R. K a d is h , q u o te d in G o r o v itz , ed . , F r e e d o m and O r d e r in th e U n iv e r s it y , p. 168. g T a lc o tt P a r s o n s , " T h e A c a d e m ic S y ste m : A S o c i o l o g i s t 's V ie w ,11 T he P u b lic I n t e r e s t , XIII ( F a ll, 1968), 185. 31 Kourke and B ro o k s h av e id e n tifie d u n iv e r s i t y a d m i n i s t r a t i o n a s a cabinet s y s t e m o f g o v e r n m e n t. * S tro u p h a s d e c la r e d th a t c o lle g e s a r e b u r e a u c r a t i c s o c ia l o rg a n iz a tio n s , b le n d in g a u th o r ity w ith s p e c ia liz a tio n . 2 H is p o sitio n is su p p o rte d by th e fin ding s of A y e r s and R u s s e l, who, a f t e r s tu d y ­ ing the o r g a n iz a tio n a l s t r u c t u r e of 608 A m e r ic a n in s titu tio n s of h ig h e r e d u c a tio n , concluded th a t the m o s t p r e v a le n t s y s t e m i s one that follow s th e b u r e a u c r a t i c p a t t e r n o f h i e r a r c h y of a u th o r ity and division o f r e s p o n s i b ilit y . 3 P re sth u s 4 a l s o h a s noted the d o m in a n c e of b u r e a u c r a tic p a t t e r n s in m o s t l a r g e in s titu tio n s of h ig h e r e d u c a 5 tion and P i n n e r h a s e x p r e s s e d c o n c e r n w ith th e te n d e n c y of u n i v e r ­ s itie s to im i ta t e b u s in e s s and g o v e r n m e n t p r a c t i c e s . C e r ta in ly F r a n c i s E . R o u rk e an d G len n E . B ro o k s , T he M a n a g e r ia l Revolution in H ig h e r E d u c a tio n { B a ltim o re : J o h n s H o pkins P r e s s , 1966), p. 111. 2 York: H e r b e r t S tro u p , B u r e a u c r a c y in H ig h e r E d u c a tio n (New F r e e P r e s s , 1966), p. 98. 3 U . S . , D e p a rtm e n t of H e a lth , E d u c a tio n and W e lf a r e , Office of E d u c a tio n , I n te r n a l S tr u c tu r e : O rg a n iz a tio n and A d m in ­ is tr a tio n of I n s titu tio n s of H ig h e r E d u c a tio n , by A r c h ie R. A y e r s and Joh n H. R u s s e l, B u lle tin No. 9 (W ashington, D .C . : G o v e r n ­ m ent P r in tin g O ffice, 1962). 4 R o b e rt P r e s t h u s , T he O r g a n iz a tio n a l S o ciety (New York: Vintage B o o ks, 1962), p. 241. 5 F ra n k P in n e r , "T h e C r i s i s of th e S tate U n i v e r s i t i e s : . A n aly sis and R e m e d ie s , " in N e v itt S an ford , e d . , The A m e r ic a n College (New Y ork: Jo h n W iley and Sons, In c . , 1966), p. 959. 32 ** Blau1 s f o u r b a s i c c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of b u r e a u c r a t i c o r g a n i z a t i o n - s p e c ia liz a tio n , a h i e r a r c h y o f a u th o r ity , a s y s t e m of r u l e s , and i m p e r s o n a l i t y - - a l l a r e found in th e l a r g e u n iv e r s i ty . 1 R o u rk e and B rooks h a v e jo in e d Stoke in r e g a r d i n g th is d e v e lo p m e n t a s an in e v ita b le r e s u l t of i n c r e a s e d e n r o l l m e n t s and fu n c tio n s. 2 h as s ta te d th a t b u r e a u c r a c y h o ld s th e u n i v e r s i t y to g e th e r . H u tc h in s 3 W illia m s h a s p o in te d out, h o w e v e r, th a t th e e x is te n c e of a b u r e a u c r a c y w ith in a u n i v e r s i t y d o e s n ot n e c e s s a r i l y m e a n th a t th e o rg a n iz a tio n i s to ta lly b u r e a u c r a t i c . It a l s o h a s c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of a p r o f e s s io n a l o r g a n iz a tio n not a s s o c i a t e d w ith b u r e a u c r a c i e s , s u c h a s w i d e l y - d i s p e r s e d d e c is io n - m a k in g and lim ite d h i e r a r c h i c a l a u th o rity . He h a s d e s c r i b e d the u n i v e r s i t y o r g a n iz a tio n in the United S ta te s a s em b o d y in g a co n tin u o u s s tr u g g le b etw e en th e c e n t r a l i z e d - b u r e a u c r a t i c s y s t e m and th e d if f u s e d - c o lle g ia l s y s t e m . * P e t e r M. B lau, B u r e a u c r a c y in M o d e rn S o cie ty (New York: R andom H o u se, 1967), p. 19. A ls o s e e B e a r d s le y R u m l, M emo to a C o lleg e T r u s t e e (New Y ork: M c G r a w - H ill Book C o m ­ pany, Inc. . 1959), pp. 5 5 -5 6 . 2 R o u rk e and B ro o k s , T he M a n a g e r ia l R e v o lu tio n in H ig h e r E d u ca tio n , p. 5; H a r o ld W. Stoke, T he A m e r i c a n C o lle g e P r e s i d e n t (New York; H a r p e r & Row, 1959). p. 152. 3 R o b e r t M. H u tc h in s, " T h e I s s u e s , " in T h e U n iv e r s ity in A m e r ic a (Santa B a r b a r a , C a l i f . : C e n t e r f o r the Study of D e m o ­ c r a tic I n s titu tio n s , 1967), p. 6. 33 Thus, th e u n iv e r s i ty m a y be c o n s id e r e d a s q u a s i - b u r e a u c r a t i c r a t h e r th a n " p u r e ly " b u r e a u c r a t i c . * N e v e r th e le s s , th e b u r e a u c r a t i c s p e c ia liz a tio n r e q u ir e d in a larg e o r g a n iz a tio n c r e a t e s s p e c ia l p r o b le m s in a u n iv e r s ity . A c c o rd ing to F o lg e r , s ta f f s p e c i a l i s t s tend to u s u r p w h at fa c u lty m e m b e r s and s tu d e n ts r e g a r d a s t h e i r p o lic y -m a k in g p r i v i l e g e s . A s th e i n s t i ­ tution ex p a n d s, th e s e s p e c i a l i s t s b e c o m e m o r e e s s e n t i a l and e x e r t m o re a u th o rity . 2 Folger* s fin d in g s a r e s u p p o r te d by Boland* s stu d y of 130 c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s , w hich c o n f ir m e d h is h y p o th e sis that a s s i z e i n c r e a s e s o r g a n iz a tio n a l s p e c i a l i z a t i o n a ls o i n c r e a s e s . 3 T h is s a m p lin g of the l i t e r a t u r e s e e m s to in d ic a te a s h o r ta g e of r e s e a r c h and a s u r p lu s of opinion r e g a r d in g th e o r g a n iz a tio n a l 4 s t r u c t u r e of A m e r ic a n c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s . T he a m b ig u ity re s u ltin g fro m th e s e co n flic tin g c o n c e p ts is r e f le c te d in r e la te d *Robin M. W illia m s , J r . , A m e r ic a n S o cie ty (New Y ork: A lfred A. Knopf, 1967), pp. 3 16 -1 8 . 2 Jo h n K. F o lg e r , " U rb a n S p ra w l in th e A c a d e m ic C o m ­ m u n ity ," in M ayhew , e d . , H ig h e r E d u c a tio n in th e R e v o lu tio n a ry D e c a d e s, p. 184. 3 W a lte r R eed B oland, " A m e r i c a n I n s titu tio n s of H ig h e r E ducation: A Study of S ize and O rg a n iz a tio n " (u n p u b lish ed P h .D . d is s e r ta tio n , U n iv e r s it y of M ic h ig an , 1966). 4 A s r e c e n tly a s 1966 S an fo rd e m p h a s iz e d th e need f o r sc ie n tific s tu d y o f th e s t r u c t u r e and fu n ctio n in g of c o lle g e s a s i n s t i ­ tutions. The A m e r i c a n C o lle g e , pp. 2 4 -2 5 . 34 l i t e r a t u r e p e r ta in in g to th e a s s o c i a t i o n b e tw e e n the in d iv id u a l s tu d e n t and the a c a d e m i c in s titu tio n . T h a t p o r tio n o f th e l i t e r a t u r e w i l l now be c o n s id e r e d . S in ce th e end of W o rld W a r II, a ll e l e m e n t s o f the u n i v e r s i t y - - t r u s t e e s , fa c u lty , a d m i n i s t r a t i o n and s t u d e n t s —h a v e b e e n s e a r c h ­ ing f o r a d e fin itio n of t h e i r r i g h t s a n d r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s w ith in th e o r g a n iz a tio n . F a c u l ty m e m b e r s h a v e a t te m p te d to bu ild new c o n ­ c e p ts of t h e i r p la c e in p o lic y - m a k in g d e c i s i o n s . T r u s t e e s an d a d m i n i s t r a t o r s h a v e found it i n c r e a s i n g l y d iffic u lt to b a la n c e c o m ­ p etin g o b je c tiv e s in m a n a g in g th e c o m p le x in s titu tio n . S tu d e n ts h a v e a rg u e d f o r a m o r e in f lu e n tia l r o l e in the e d u c a tio n a l p r o c e s s , d e m a n d ­ ing m o r e a tte n tio n on th e one h an d an d m o r e f r e e d o m on th e o t h e r . * It i s th e s e s tu d e n t d e m a n d s and t h e i r m a n if e s ta tio n s th a t h a v e a t tr a c te d th e g r e a t e s t a m o u n t of a tte n tio n in th e r e c e n t l i t e r a t u r e of h ig h e r e d u c a tio n . S c o r e s of b oo ks and a r t i c l e s on the " c o n d itio n " of th e A m e r ic a n c o lle g e s tu d e n t h a v e a p p e a r e d s i n c e th e 1964 F r e e S peech M ovem ent a t th e U n i v e r s i t y of C a lif o r n i a a t B e r k e l e y - - t h e f i r s t p r o ­ longed s tu d e n t r e b e l lio n on a m a j o r u n i v e r s i t y c a m p u s . That d i s ­ ruption to u c h e d off a w ide v a r i e t y o f s tu d e n t p r o t e s t s on c o lle g e 1O tis A. S in g le ta r y and R o b e r t B. Y eg g e, " I n t r o d u c t i o n , " D en v e r L aw J o u r n a l , X L V (S p e c ia l, 1968), 497. 35 c a m p u s e s a c r o s s the n a tio n , a p a t t e r n w h ic h c o n tin u e s to expand and in te n s ify . It a l s o led to the f o rc e d w ith d r a w a l o f C la r k K e r r a s p r e s id e n t of th a t in s titu tio n s h o r t l y a f t e r h e had w a r n e d in a l e c t u r e at H a r v a r d U n iv e r s it y o f " a n in c ip ie n t r e v o lt of u n d e r g r a d u a t e s t u ­ d e n t s ." In h is r e m a r k s , l a t e r p r in te d and w id ely d is s e m in a te d , K e r r m a d e o t h e r p r o p h e tic o b s e rv a tio n s : The s tu d e n ts find t h e m s e l v e s u n d e r a b lan k et of i m p e r s o n a l r u l e s fo r a d m i s s i o n s , fo r s c h o l a r s h i p s , f o r e x a m in a tio n s , f o r d e g r e e s . It i s i n t e r e s t i n g to w a tc h how a fa c u lty in te n t on few r u l e s f o r i t s e l f c a n fash io n s u c h a p le th o r a of th e m f o r th e s t u ­ d e n ts . T he s tu d e n ts a ls o w a n t to be t r e a t e d a s d is tin c t i n d i ­ v id u a ls . If th e fa c u lty lo o k s on i t s e l f a s a guild, th e u n d e r g r a d u a t e s tu d e n ts a r e co m in g to look upon th e m s e l v e s m o r e a s a " c l a s s " ; s o m e m a y even fe e l lik e a " lu m p e n p r o l e t a r i a t . " Lack of facu lty c o n c e r n fo r te a c h in g , e n d le s s r u l e s and r e q u i r e m e n t s , and im p e r s o n a l i t y a r e the in c itin g c a u s e s . 1 T he B e r k e le y c a m p u s d e m o n s tr a ti o n s u n d e r s c o r e d K e r r ' s concern th a t th e l a r g e s t a t e u n i v e r s i t i e s w e r e m o s t v u ln e r a b le to ch a rg e s of n e g le c t of s tu d e n ts . " T h e m u l t i v e r s i t y i s a co n fusin g place f o r th e s t u d e n t ," h e d e c la r e d . "H e h a s p r o b le m s of e s t a b - lishing h i s id e n tity and s e n s e of s e c u r i t y w ith in it. ..2 M a r io Savio, th e l e a d e r of th e B e r k e le y r e v o lt, found th e " d e p e r s o n a liz e d , u n r e s p o n s iv e b u r e a u c r a c y " of th e u n i v e r s i t y s y m p ­ to m atic of w h a t m a y e m e r g e a s th e n a t i o n 's g r e a t e s t p r o b le m . * K e r r , T he U s e s of th e U n i v e r s i t y , pp. 1 0 3 -4 . 2I b i d . , p. 42. 36 " H e re we find it i m p o s s i b l e u s u a lly to m e e t w ith anyone but s e c r e ta r ie s ," he w ro te. "B ey on d th a t, w e find f u n c tio n a r ie s who cannot m a k e p o lic y b u t c a n only h id e beh in d r u l e s . "* T h is th e m e h as r e a p p e a r e d in s u b s e q u e n t w r i tin g s on th e c o n t e m p o r a r y u n i v e r ­ sity stu d e n t and r e c e iv e d re n e w e d e m p h a s is in a 1968 r e p o r t by th e C o m m itte e on the S tudent in H ig h e r E d u catio n : . . . A m e r ic a n s tu d e n ts . . . . a r e e n m e s h e d fro m k i n d e r g a r t e n to th e g r a v e in th e c o m p le x , s p e c ia liz e d , b u r e a u c r a t i c , and i m p e r s o n a l in s t itu ti o n s o f A m e r ic a n life . W h e th e r we lik e it o r not, w e a l l — s tu d e n ts and t e a c h e r s a l i k e - - l i v e in th e m o s t ad v a n c e d te c h n o lo g ic a l n a tio n in th e w o rld ; and in s u c h a s o c ie ty , a s in i t s e d u c a tio n a l in s t itu ti o n s , in d iv id u a ls ten d to feel lo s t and to look f o r new w a y s to a s s e r t t h e i r in d iv id u a lity and ju s tify th e ir liv e s. ^ The f a ilu r e of fa c u lty and a d m i n i s t r a t o r s to r e c o g n iz e t h e s e p s y c h o ­ lo g ic al n e e d s w a s r e g a r d e d by th e c o m m itte e a s a m a j o r s o u r c e of student f r u s t r a t i o n : T h e p r o c e d u r e s and s ty l e of th e u n iv e r s i t y o r c o lle g e a r e c a lc u la te d to p r e v e n t s tu d e n ts fro m c r e a tin g p r o b le m s f o r the in s titu tio n by e x p r e s s i n g t h e i r own in d iv id u a lity w ith in it. A s a r e s u l t , fa c u lty and a d m i n i s t r a t o r s do a i l th e y can in t h e i r d e a lin g s w ith s tu d e n ts to s t a n d a r d i z e p r o c e d u r e s and d e p e r s o n ­ a l iz e c o n ta c ts . . . . M a r io Savio, "A n E n d to H is to r y , " B e rk e le y : T he New Student R e v o lt, by H a l D r a p e r (New Y o rk: G ro v e P r e s s , I n c . , 1965), p. 179. 2 T h e S tudent in H ig h e r E d u c a tio n (New H aven, C o n n . : T he H azen F o u n d a tio n , 1968), p. 18. A lso s e e P a u l W o o d rin g , The H ig her L e a r n in g in A m e r i c a : A R e a s s e s s m e n t (New Y ork: M c G ra w H ill Book C o m p an y , I n c . , 1968), pp. 10, 234. 37 T h o se a g e n ts of the in s titu tio n w ith w hom the s tu d e n ts a r e in m o s t fre q u e n t c o n t a c t - - s e c r e t a r i e s , c l e r k s , t e l l e r s in th e b u r s a r ' s o ffice, and c a m p u s p o l i c e - - a r e f r e q u e n tly p eo p le who, p e r h a p s w ith v e r y good r e a s o n , do not p a r t i c u l a r l y lik e young p eop le and a r e q u ite s u c c e s s f u l a t g e n e r a tin g a r e c i p r o c a l d i s ­ lik e of t h e m s e l v e s . 1 The r e p o r t w ent on to s u g g e s t th a t m u c h s tu d e n t u n r e s t m ig h t be tra c e d to " a u t h o r i t a r i a n p o lic e , ru d e c l e r k s , h o s t i l e and u n f rie n d ly s e c r e t a r i e s , and t e s t y t e l l e r s . " 2 Rudolph h a s a s s e r t e d th a t co lleg e s tu d e n ts c o n s titu te th e m o st n e g le c te d , l e a s t u n d e r s to o d e le m e n t on the A m e r ic a n a c a d e m ic scene. He r e c e n t l y w ro te : . . . s tu d e n ts knew how to u s e a co lleg e a s a n i n s t r u m e n t of t h e i r m a tu r a tio n . T he u n i v e r s i t y h a s b e c o m e a l e s s w ie ld y in s t r u m e n t f o r th a t p u r p o s e , often a m o s t d is a p p o in tin g i n s t r u ­ m e n t. S tu den ts h a v e s t r a n g e l y alw ay s h a d to i n s i s t th a t th e y a r e h u m a n b e in g s . . . . T oday n e g le c t ta k e s on new f o r m s : n e g le c t h a s b e c o m e a function of s iz e and of a s h ift in p r o f e s ­ s o r i a l c o m m itm e n t r a t h e r th an of a d m i n i s t r a t i v e a b s e n t m in d e d n e s s o r b lin d n e s s . . . . . . . t o d a y 's s tu d e n t would a c tu a lly p r e f e r a happy blend of f re e d o m and guided c o n c e r n . . . . W h e th e r th e c o n te m p o ­ r a r y u n iv e r s i ty can c r e a t e th a t c o m b in atio n . . . i s p e r h a p s i t s g r e a t e s t c h a lle n g e . ^ 1Ibid. , pp. 39 -40 . 2I b i d . , p. 64. 3 F r e d e r i c k R udolph, " N e g le c t of S tu d e n ts a s a H i s t o r i c a l T r a d itio n ," T he C o lleg e and th e S tu d en t, ed. by L a w r e n c e E. Dennis and J o s e p h F . K au ffm an (W ashington, D . C . : A m e r i c a n Council on E d u c a tio n , 1966), pp. 5 7 -5 8 . 38 A t e r m c o m m o n ly u s e d by d i s s a t i s f i e d s tu d e n ts to d e s c r i b e the u n iv e r s i ty is " f a c t o r y , " d en o tin g a cold and im p e r s o n a l s e ttin g in w hich s tu d e n ts , lik e a s s e m b l y lin e p r o d u c ts , lo se t h e i r in d iv id u a l­ ity. * A p a r a l l e l a l s o h a s b ee n d ra w n b etw e en th e u n i v e r s i t y and the p riso n , w ith th e s in g le i m p o r ta n t e x c e p tio n th a t th e stu d e n t i s r e l a ­ tively f r e e to le a v e . In both in s titu tio n s the m a j o r o c c u p a n ts a r e governed by r e g u la tio n s th e y h ad no s h a r e in m a k in g an d g e n e r a lly 2 have no in v o lv e m e n t in e n fo rc in g . B a rz u n h a s s u g g e s te d th a t the student m a y f a i r l y be r e g a r d e d aB a v ic tim of the c o lle g e he a tte n d s: A v ic tim , a c c o r d in g to one s im p le d e fin itio n , i s one who h as s o m e th in g in f lic te d upon h im w ithout cho ice and th a t h e m u s t e n d u re . It w ould b e too s im p le a r e j o i n d e r to s tu d e n t g r ie v a n c e s to s a y th a t th e y do not h a v e to e n d u r e t h e i r w o es; th e y can s ta y aw ay. T hey do u n d e rg o c o m p u ls io n w ith o u t ch o ice and it c o m e s fro m s o c ie ty , w hich m a k e s a b a c h e l o r ' s d e g r e e in d is p e n s a b le for b u s i n e s s and th e p r o f e s s io n s , th e se being at th e s a m e tim e the re c o g n iz e d m e a n s of m a k in g o n e ' s w a y . C o lle g e s tu d e n ts a r e cau g h t in th e m a n d a r in s y s t e m . T h e r e f o r e th e y do h a v e to e n d u re bad te a c h in g , a p e t r if ie d c u r r ic u lu m , and o th e r m a r k s of n e g le c t w h e r e th e s e ob tain. T o that e x te n t th e y a r e v ic tim s e n title d to r e d r e s s . A lthough he would c o n s id e r th e s e v ie w s a s e x t r e m e , Howe h a s m a in ta in e d th a t th e " u s u a l a ttitu d e to w ard s tu d e n ts i n th e A m e r ic a n D avid G o ttlie b , " C o lle g e C l im a te s and S tudent S u b c u ltu r e s ," in B ro o k o v e r e t a l . , T h e C o lleg e S tu d e n t, p. 82. A lso E d u c a tio n a t B erk eley : R e p o r t of the S e le c t C o m m itte e on E d u c a tio n (B erk eley : U n iv e rsity of C a lif o r n ia P r e s s , 1968), pp. 1 5 -1 6 . o T h e S tudent in H ig h e r E d u c a tio n , p. 39. 3 B a rz u n , T he A m e r ic a n U n iv e r s ity , pp. 7 3 -7 4 . 39 u n iv e rs ity i s th a t th e y c o n s titu te a m i x t u r e of n e c e s s a r y c o n s u m e r and i r k s o m e d ep e n d en t. T h ey pay t h e i r m o n e y (o r r e c e i v e t h e i r fellow ships) and m u s t th e n s u b m it to w h a te v e r d is c ip li n e s and ro u tin e s th e u n iv e r s i t y p r o p o s e s . . . . "* He h a s a d v o c a te d a r e ­ c o n s id e ra tio n of th e r e la tio n s h i p b e tw e e n the u n i v e r s i t y and th e student, " th e t e r m s of w h ich w e r e o r ig in a lly s e t u n d e r r a d ic a lly d iffe re n t c o n d i tio n s ." 2 T h u s, th e r e c u r r i n g th e m e in th e l i t e r a t u r e i s that, fro m the s tu d e n t1 s p o in t of view , th e u n i v e r s i t y is a h ig h ly f o r m a liz e d , im p e rs o n a l and r u le - m a n a g e d e n t e r p r i s e , an " o r g a n iz e d , b u r e a u ­ c ra tiz e d s y s t e m th a t iB c o n tr o lle d f r o m w ith o u t, th a t i s p r i m a r i l y re sp o n siv e to e x t e r n a l p r e s s u r e s , . . . and th a t is m ig h tily c o m m itted to th e going s y s t e m . " 3 A s w ith o th e r b u r e a u c r a c i e s , in the u n iv e rs ity th e s tu d e n t is r e g a r d e d a s a c u s t o m e r who d o e s n ot hold as im p o r ta n t, i n t r i n s i c o r p e r m a n e n t a r e la tio n s h i p to the h i e r 4 a rc h y and i t s c o n tin u an c e a s d o e s the e m p lo y e e . s T he s tu d e n t is ^ Irv in g Howe, "B ey o n d B e r k e l e y ," in R evo lu tion a t B e rk e le y , ed. by M ic h a e l V. M i l l e r and S u san G ilm o r e (New Y ork: Dial P r e s s , 1965), p. xix , 2I b id . , p. x v iii. 3 S tro u p , B u r e a u c r a c y in H ig h e r E d u c a tio n , p. 152; P a u l P o tte r , "S tu dent D is c o n te n t and C a m p u s R e fo r m , " in M ayhew , ed. , H igher E d u c a tio n in the R e v o lu tio n a r y D e c a d e s , p. 257. 4 S tro u p , B u r e a u c r a c y in H ig h e r E d u c a tio n , pp. 8 5 -8 6 . 40 su sp ic io u s of a d m i n i s t r a t o r s and e n tre n c h e d facu lty m e m b e r s who, when in doubt, w ill " u s e vague law s o r r e g u la tio n s t o e r r on the side of th e e s ta b lis h e d o r g a n iz a tio n a g a in s t th e i n t e r e s t s of in d iv id ­ u als . . . p r e s s i n g f o r c h a n g e ." * W hen the stu d e n t i s t r e a t e d u n ­ fa irly , he i s no t f a m i l i a r enough w ith how th e in s titu tio n w o rk s to know w hat to do o r w h e r e to tu rn . 2 E v en w h en the in s titu tio n a tte m p ts to p e r s o n a l i z e r e la tio n s w ith s tu d e n ts , the o u tc o m e i s u su a lly a n o th e r b u r e a u o r f o r m a liz e d p r o c e d u r e . 3 S in ce the i n s t i ­ tution h a s b e c o m e too big, to o co m p lex , too m u c h in v o lv e d w ith the task of run ning i t s e l f to give m u c h a tte n tio n to the s tu d e n t, h is own education a p p e a r s to be th e le a s t im p o r ta n t o f a ll i t s fu n ctio n s. For him , e d u c a tio n b e c o m e s a " s y s t e m " to be " b e a te n " a t e v e r y o p p o r4 tunity. The v e r y m e c h a n i s m s d e s ig n e d by th e in s titu tio n to e x p e d ite , * T e r r y F . L u n sfo rd , "Who A r e M e m b e r s o f th e U n iv e r s ity C o m m u n ity ? " D e n v e r Law J o u r n a l , XLV (S p ecial, 1968), 553. 2 N ic h o la s von H offm an, T he M u ltiv e r s ity (New Y ork: Holt, R in e h a rt and W in sto n , 1966), p. 180. 3 G. L e s t e r A n d e rs o n , " T h e O rg a n iz a tio n a l C h a r a c t e r of A m e ric a n C o lle g e s and U n i v e r s i t i e s , " in T h e Study of A c a d e m ic A d m in is tr a tio n , p. 18. 4 " I s P r o t e s t th e O nly S o lu tio n ? " in The A m e r ic a n Student and H is C o lle g e , ed. by E s t h e r L lo y d - J o n e s and H e r m a n A. E s t r i n (Boston: H oughton M ifflin C om pany, 1967), p. 339. 41 eq ualize and p r o t e c t h is i n t e r e s t s t u r n out to b e i r r i t a t i n g and d ehu m an izing . * The s t u d e n t 's r e s e n t m e n t a g a in s t in s titu tio n a l " p r o c e s s in g " has been a p tly d e s c r ib e d by M e y e rso n : A t B e rk e le y , one of the s tu d e n t d r a m a t i z a t i o n s of c o m ­ p la in ts w a s th e IBM c a r d on w h ic h w a s p r in te d , "D o not fold, sp in d le o r m u tila te , " and w h ich w a s w o r n a s a b a d g e . S tu d e n ts, r e s e n tin g lin e s and f o r m s , r e s e n t i n g im p e r s o n a l i t y and the f r ic tio n s of a la r g e stu d e n t body, r e s e n t i n g r u l e s and r e s t r i c ­ tio n s , r e s e n t e d the feelin g th a t th e y w e r e a s m a n ip u la te d and u n d istin g u ish a b le a s an IBM c a r d . O b je c tin g to w h a t they r e ­ g a rd e d a s th e m a c h in e c h a r a c t e r of u n i v e r s i t i e s , th e s tu d e n ts . . . w is h e d to s m a s h the m a c h i n e . 2 K au ffm an h a s s u g g e s te d th a t s tu d e n ts who r e g a r d th e m ­ se lv e s a s f a c e l e s s , an onym ous h u m a n b e in g s " a r e not th e b e s t h o p e for o u r s o c i e t y . " 3 W ilso n h as ad d ed : "W e m u s t not only s y m p a ­ th ize w ith the s t u d e n t 's d e s i r e to m a k e a h u m a n o r p e r s o n a l c o n ­ n ection w ith h is co lleg e, w e m u s t a l s o v ig o r o u s ly a s s i s t him in m aking su c h a c o n n e c ti o n ." 4 T he i n s t i t u t i o n 's f a ilu r e to m ak e th a t *Kate M u e lle r , quoted by L lo y d - J o n e s , "W hat A re C o lle g e Students M ade o f ? " ib id . , p. 42. 2 M e y e r s o n , " T h e E th o s of th e A m e r ic a n C o lle g e Student: Beyond the P r o t e s t s , " pp. 2 78 -7 9 . 3 K au ffm an, " T h e Student in H ig h e r E d u c a tio n , " in D e n n is and K auffm an, e d s . , T h e C ollege and th e S tu d e n t, pp. 144-45. 4 L ogan W ilson, " I s the Student B e co m in g th e ' F o rg o tte n M a n ' ? " in D e n n is and K au ffm an , e d s . , T he C ollege a n d the S tu ­ dent, p. 60. A ls o s e e von H offm an, T he M u l t i v e r s i t y , p. xix. 42 connection h a s b ee n cite d b y a fa c t-fin d in g c o m m is s io n a s one of the p r im e r e a s o n s f o r the s t u d e n t d i s t u r b a n c e s in th e s p r i n g of 1968 a t C olum bia U n iv e r s ity . * S a n fo rd K a d is h h a s o b s e r v e d " m o r e s e m i fo rm a liz e d w a y s of s t u d e n t s ' e x p r e s s in g ju d g m e n t and p r e f e r e n c e s and g r i p e s " o n the B e r k e le y ca m p u s s in c e the 1964 d e m o n s tr a ti o n s . 2 Stroup has s u g g e s te d f o u r a v e n u e s to w a r d th e kind of in s titu tio n a l r e s p o n s e d e s i r e d by s t u d e n t s - - d e c e n t r a l i z a t i o n , in f o r m a lity , p e r s o n a l d e c is io n - m a k in g a n d c o m m u n ic a tio n . 3 K o ile h a s p oin ted out that c o n s id e r a b le r e s e a r c h ev id en ce f r o m b u s in e s s , m e d ic in e and education s u p p o r t s "the r a t h e r s im p le notion th a t p eo p le tend to a c t and to b e c o m e m o r e m a t u r e , to a s s u m e g r e a t e r r e s p o n s i b ilit y , and g e n e ra lly to function b e t t e r when th e y a r e tr e a t e d w ith r e s p e c t , w ith 4 dignity, and a s m a tu re p e r s o n s of w o r th . . . . " Som e o b s e r v e r s w h o have a r g u e d fo r ch an g in g s tu d e n tin stitu tio n a l r e la tio n s h i p s contend th a t the c o n te m p o r a r y s tu d e n t is sig n ific an tly d iffe re n t f r o m h is p r e d e c e s s o r s . In an in f o r m a l s u r v e y , *C r i s i s at C o lu m b ia (New Y o rk : V in tag e B ooks, 1968), pp. 34-35. 2 S a n f o rd H, K a d is h , quoted in G o ro v itz , F r e e d o m and O r d e r in the U n i v e r s i t y , p. 152. 3 4 S tro u p , B u r e a u c r a c y in H ig h e r E d u c a tio n , pp. 1 76 -7 7 . E a r l Koile, " T h e Student N obody K now s, " in L lo y d - J o n e s and E s tr in , e d s . , The A m e r i c a n Student and H is C o lle g e , p. 25. 43 deans of s tu d e n t a f f a ir s c h a r a c t e r i z e d t o d a y 's s tu d e n ts a s b r i g h t e r and m o r e s o p h is tic a te d , c o s m o p o lita n , in f o r m a l and e x p e r ie n c e d than th o se of p r e v io u s g e n e r a t i o n s . T h ey a l s o w e r e d e s c r i b e d a s m o re i d e a l i s t i c , in tr o s p e c ti v e , c r i t i c a l and i n s i s t e n t on in v o lv e m e n t in d e c is io n s a ffe c tin g t h e i r liv e s . * In a tte m p tin g to e n h a n c e t h e i r s ta tu s w ithin th e u n iv e r s i ty , stud ents a r e tu rn in g m o r e to l e g a l i s t i c d e fin itio n s o f th e i r r i g h t s , p e rh a p s in d i r e c t p r o p o r tio n to t h e i r p e r c e p tio n th a t th e y h a v e been ignored o r r e j e c t e d by th e in s titu tio n . K auffm an h a s s u g g e s te d that stu d e n ts " w ill d e m a n d a r e la tio n s h i p , even if it m u s t be le g a lly p r e s c rib e d ," 2 A r e c e n t s tu d y by M c C le lla n s e e m e d to s u p p o r t h i s h y p o th e sis th a t n o n - le g a l n o r m s , w hich h ave long g o v e rn e d s p e c if ic re la tio n s h ip s b etw e en p u b lic u n i v e r s i t i e s and s tu d e n ts , h av e been and a r e b eing r e p la c e d by le g a l n o r m s . 3 T he J o in t S ta te m e n t on R e p o rte d by th e e d i t o r s of the J o u r n a l of th e A s s o c ia tio n of Deans and A d m i n i s t r a t o r s o f S tu d ent A f f a i r s , B u lle tin No. 2 (A pril, 1967), p. 11. F o r s i m i l a r a s s e s s m e n t s of c o n t e m p o r a r y c o lle g e s t u ­ dents, s e e J o s e p h K atz an d N ev itt S anfo rd , " T h e New Student P o w e r and N eeded E d u c a tio n a l R e f o r m s , " P h i D e lta K a p p a n , XLVII (A p ril, 1966), 398; a l s o , K enneth K e n is to n , "T h e F a c e s in th e L e c t u r e R o o m ," in M o riso n , e d . . The C o n t e m p o r a r y U n iv e rs ity : U. S. A . , pp. 315-49. 2 3 K au ffm an , " T h e Student in H ig h e r E d u c a tio n ," p. 145. S tep h en D o u g la s M c C le lla n , "An A n a ly s is of How th e Role of Law H as A ffected S p e c ific R e la tio n s h ip s B etw een P u b lic U n i v e r ­ s itie s and T h e i r S tudents: L e g a l G u id e lin e s f o r A d m in is tr a tiv e D ec isio n -M a k in g " (u n p u b lish e d P h . D. d i s s e r t a t i o n , M ic h ig a n State U n iv e rsity , 1967). R ights and F r e e d o m s o f S tu d e n ts adopted in 1967 by th e U. S. N atio n al Studeqt A s s o c ia ti o n and s u b s e q u e n tly e n d o r s e d by m a j o r fa c u lty and a d m in s t r a t i v e a s s o c i a t i o n s i s a m a n if e s ta tio n of th is tr e n d . 1 B e a n e y h a s m a in ta in e d th a t it w ould be a " d i s a s t r o u s m i s ta k e " f s tu d e n t c l a im s w e r e to b e c a s u a lly d i s m i s s e d s im p ly b e c a u s e the laikr p r e s e n t l y p r o v id e s no c o m p u lsio n to a c t d if fe re n tly . 2 Y egge h a s added th a t r e g a r d l e s s of d if f e r e n c e s of opinion o v e r w h e th e r the law sh ould b e in v o lv ed in a c a d e m ic m a t t e r s , the f a c t o f u ltim a te le g a l R e d re s s e x i s t s . T h is fa c t in flu e n c e s s tu d e n t- in s ti tu tio n a l r e ­ la tio n s. 3 A f te r a n a ly z in g r e c e n t c o u r t d e c is io n s a ffe c tin g s tu d e n ts , C h a m b e rs h a s co n c lu d ed th a t th e c o n v e n tio n a l le g a l d o c tr in e th a t the re la tio n s h ip b e tw e e n th e s tu d e n t and h i s c o lle g e i s a l m o s t w holly c o n t r a c t u a l - - a t r a n s a c t i o n in v o lv in g p u r c h a s e and s a l e of e d u c a tio n a l s e r v i c e s b e tw e e n two p a r t i e s - - i s no lo n g e r v ia b le . H e h a s d e te c te d a d ec id ed s h ift in fa v o r of th e stu d e n t: The m o r e m o d e r n view i s th a t the b eg in n in g of th e r e la tio n s h ip is no lo n g e r s im p ly th e in c e p tio n of a c o n t r a c t, beeaw-se it h a s *A d m in is tra to r * s H andbook: U n d e r s ta n d in g th e J o in t S ta te m e n t on R ig h ts and F r e e d o m s of S tu d en ts (C hicago; C o lleg e and U n iv e rs ity B u s i n e s s , u n d a te d ) . 2 W illia m M. B e a n e y , "S tu d e n ts, H ig h e r E d u c a tio n , an d the Law, * D e n v e r Law J o u r n a l , X LV (S pecial, 1968), 513. 3 R o b e r t B. Y egge, " E m e r g in g L e g a l R ig h ts f o r S tu d e n ts ," i b i d . , p. 78. 45 b e c o m e l e s s a v o lu n ta r y a g r e e m e n t th a n " a n a c t o f s u b m i s s i o n " (in th e w o r d s of one judge) b e c a u s e th e p r o je c te d s e r v i c e is s o in d is p e n s a b le to the stu d e n t th a t he i s l a r g e l y a t t h e m e r c y o f th e o th e r p a r t y . T h is m e a n s th a t th e t r a d i t i o n a l r u l e s of th e law of c o n t r a c t s p la y a d e c r e a s i n g r o l e , an d a r e in g r e a t p a r t su p p la n te d b y new n o tio n s w h ic h ta k e in to a c c o u n t th e m u tu a l o b lig a tio n s o f th e in d iv id u a l a n d of s o c i e t y - - a n d o f c itiz e n an d sta te . . . . 1 T h is c o n c e p t i s not a r e t u r n to th e o u tm o d e d d o c t r i n e of in loco p a r e n t i s - - u n d e r w h ic h th e c o lle g e a c t s in p la c e of th e p a r e n t - -b u t m o r e c l o s e l y r e s e m b l e s a f id u c ia r y r e s p o n s i b i l i t y on th e p a r t of the in s t itu ti o n . A s d e s c r i b e d by W illia m s o n , thiB r e l a t i o n s h i p co m p els th e in s t itu ti o n to a c t f o r th e b e n e fit of the s tu d e n t on m a t t e r s r e le v a n t to th e r e la t i o n s h i p b e tw e e n th e m . 2 W illia m s o n h a s is s u e d a w a r n in g , h o w e v e r , th a t i n c r e a s e d e m p h a s i s on le g a l r i g h t s cannot c i r c u m v e n t th e f a c t th a t a " d u a l c i tiz e n s h ip " a p p l i e s to th e stud ent in h i g h e r e d u c atio n : We s e e m to te a c h o u r s tu d e n ts th a t t h e r e i s b u t o ne kind of c i tiz e n s h ip and th a t i s th e f o r m of c i tiz e n s h ip e x i s tin g in o u r p o litic a l d e m o c r a c y . To b e s u r e , s tu d e n ts a r e c i tiz e n s and a s s u c h , a r e e n title d to a l l th e r i g h t s of th e C o n s titu tio n , both f e d e r a l an d s t a t e , a n d o t h e r r i g h t s a s d e fin e d by s t a t u t e s an d by c o u r t d e c is io n s . T h ey do n o t lo s e t h e s e c i tiz e n s h ip r i g h t s w hen th e y e n r o l l in a u n i v e r s i t y . B ut . . . w e fa c e s o m e v e r y p u z z lin g m o d if ic a tio n s . . . . M ..M . C h a m b e r s , T h e C o lle g e s and th e C o u r t s . 1 9 6 21966 (D a n v ille , 111.: I n t e r s t a t e P r i n t e r s & P u b l i s h e r s , I n c . , 1967), in tro d u c tio n . 2 E . G. W illia m s o n , "D o S tu d e n ts H ave A c a d e m ic F r e e ­ d o m ? " in L lo y d - J o n e s an d E s t r i n , e d s . , T h e A m e r i c a n S tu den t and His C o lle g e , p. 315. 46 . . . an a c a d e m ic in s titu tio n i s not a f o r m o f p o litic a l dem ocracy. . . . . . . th e s tu d e n t i s a d m itte d t o a s t a t e - c h a r t e r e d e d u c a ­ tio n a l c o r p o r a tio n , th e a c a d e m ic in s titu tio n . It i s n o t a d e m o c r a c y , i t i s a c o r p o r a tio n , o f a p e c u l i a r c h a r a c t e r , w ith th e d efin e d m i s s i o n of i n s t r u c t i n g youth. . . . M e m b e r s h ip in th is kind of a c o r p o r a t e e n t e r p r i s e d o e s not n e g a te th e s tu d e n t 1 s c iv ic and s t a t e r i g h t s . But w e fa c e s o m e in te r e s t i n g q u e s tio n s th a t h a v e no t e n t i r e l y b e e n c l a r i f i e d a s to w h at m o d ific a tio n one type of r ig h t im p o s e s upon a n o t h e r a s he e x e r c i s e s both ty p e s of r ig h ts . . . . * W illiam son* s d e fin itio n of th e a c a d e m ic in s titu tio n a s an ed u c atio n al c o r p o r a t i o n - - d i s p u t e d by m a n y a s to o n a r r o w and l e g a l i s t i c - - b r i n g s to full c i r c l e th is re v ie w of th e l i t e r a t u r e c o n ­ cerning th e r e la tio n s h ip of th e u n i v e r s i t y to th e stu d e n t. T he only r e a s o n a b le c o n c lu sio n th a t can be d r a w n i s th a t th e s t u d e n t 's r ig h ts and th e institution* s r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s a r e u n s e ttle d and a r e in th e p r o c e s s of ch an g e. M uch of the a tte n d a n t co n fu sio n s e e m s to s te m from d i s a g r e e m e n t o v e r th e o r g a n iz a tio n a l s t r u c t u r e and g o a ls of the u n iv e r s ity . A lthough p e r tin e n t l i t e r a t u r e h a s p r o l i f e r a t e d in re c e n t y e a r s , m u c h of it i s s u b je c tiv e and p r e s c r i p t i v e . O b je c tiv e findings b a s e d on e m p i r i c a l r e s e a r c h a r e la c k in g . T h is i s th e s c e n e upon w h ich the c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n c o n ­ cept h a s m a d e i t s a p p e a r a n c e in A m e r i c a n h ig h e r e d u c a tio n . The origin o f th e co n c e p t, h o w e v e r, a l s o m u s t be t r a c e d th ro u g h a n o th e r * I b id ., pp. 3 0 9 -1 0 . 47 s tr e a m of l i t e r a t u r e - - t h a t w h ich d e a ls w ith th e o m b u d s m a n in civ il g o v ern m e n t. T he re v ie w w ill now be tu r n e d in th a t d ir e c tio n . C iv il O m b u d sm a n A d e c a d e ago l i t e r a t u r e c o n c e rn in g the o m b u d sm a n in civ il g ov ernm en t w a s p r a c t i c a l l y n o n - e x is t e n t in th e U nited S ta te s . it i s e x te n siv e and i n c r e a s i n g r a p id ly . Today T he f i r s t E n g lis h - la n g u a g e book in the field w as U t l e y 's O c c a s io n f o r O m b u d s m a n , p u b lish ed in London. * Two b a s i c r e f e r e n c e s p u b lis h e d in th is c o u n try a r e The O m b u d sm an : C i tiz e n 1 s D e f e n d e r , e d ite d b y R ow at, O m budsm en and O th e r s : G ellhorn. 3 2 and C i tiz e n s ' P r o t e c t o r s in N ine C o u n tr ie s by G e llh o rn a l s o h a s w r i tte n When A m e r i c a n s C om plain : G o v ern m en tal G r ie v a n c e P r o c e d u r e s , w hich m a k e s a c a s e fo r o m b u d s m e n - c r itic s of public a d m i n i s t r a t i o n in the U nited S ta te s . 4 A w ork by S a w e r e n title d O m b u d sm e n h a s b een p u b lis h e d in *T. E , U tle y , O c c a s io n fo r O m b u d sm a n (London: son, 1961). 2 C. J o h n ­ D o nald C. R ow at, e d . , T he O m b u d sm a n : C i t i z e n 's D efender (London: G e o r g e A lle n & Unwin, L t d . , 1965). 3 W a lte r G e llh o rn , O m b u d sm e n and O th e r s : C i t i z e n s ' P r o te c to r s in Nine C o u n trie s (C a m b rid g e , M a s s . : H a r v a r d U n i­ v e rs ity P r e s s , 1966). 4 G e llh o rn , W hen A m e r ic a n s C o m p lain : G o v e r n m e n ta l G rievance P r o c e d u r e s (C a m b rid g e , M a s s . : H a r v a r d U n iv e r s ity P r e s s , 1966), 48 M elbo urn e. * T he m o s t r e c e n t v o lu m e i s O m b u d s m e n f o r A m e r ic a n G o v e rn m e n t? e d ite d by A n d e rso n fo r the A m e r ic a n A s s e m b ly . 2 E a r l i e r he had w r i t t e n a m o n o g ra p h c a lle d C an ad ia n O m b u d sm a n P ro p o sa ls. 3 O th e r r e la te d w o r k s in c lu d e The C itiz e n and th e A d 4 m in is tr a tio n : T he R e d r e s s of G r ie v a n c e s ed ite d by W hyatt, The G o v e rn o rs and the G o v ern ed by R o b son , and The C o n tro l of P o lic e 5 D isc re tio n : T he D a n is h E x p e r ie n c e by A a ro n . S u p p lem e n tin g th e s e b ooks a r e two U .S . g o v e r n m e n t d o c u ­ m ents r e p o r tin g C o n g r e s s io n a l o m b u d s m a n h e a r i n g s , an u n p u b lish ed g study by S an d b erg , and n u m e r o u s a r t i c l e s in p r o f e s s i o n a l jo u r n a ls , popular m a g a z in e s and n e w s p a p e r s . Of p a r t i c u l a r i n t e r e s t a r e i s s u e s 1G e o ffre y S a w e r, O m b u d sm e n (M elb o u rn e: M e lb o u rn e U n i­ v e r s ity P r e s s , 1964). 2 S tan ley V. A n d e rs o n , ed. , O m b u d sm e n f o r A m e r ic a n G o v e rn m e n t? (Englew ood C liffs, N . J . : P r e n t i c e - H a l l , I n c . , 1968). 3 A n d e r s o n , C an ad ian O m b u d sm a n P r o p o s a l s ( B e r k e l e y , __ C a lif.: In s titu te of G o v e r n m e n ta l S tu d ies, 1966). 4 S ir J o h n W hyatt, e d . , The C itiz e n and th e A d m in is tra tio n : The R e d r e s s of G r i e v a n c e s (London: J u s t i c e - - B r i t i s h S ection of the In te rn a tio n a l C o m m is s io n of J u r i s t s , 1961). 5 T h o m a s J . A a ro n , T he C o n tro l of P o lic e D is c r e tio n : The Danish E x p e r ie n c e (S p rin g field , 111.: C h a r l e s C. T h o m a s , P u b ­ lis h e r , 1966). Q C a r l H. S an d b erg , "O m b u d sm a n : The R e d r e s s o f C i tiz e n s ' G rie v a n c e s" (u n pu blished h o n o r s p a p e r , O hio U n iv e r s ity , 1968). 49 of jo u r n a ls d ev o ted w h o lly o r p a r t i a l l y to a r t i c l e s on th e o m b u d sm a n . E v ery th in g li s t e d above w a s p ro d u c e d d u rin g th e I 9 6 0 ' s . In re v ie w in g th e l i t e r a t u r e , th e d ev e lo p m e n t of the c iv il o m b u d sm an co n c ep t w ill be t r a c e d , f i r s t in o th e r c o u n t r ie s and th en in the U nited S ta te s . S i m i l a r i t i e s and d if f e r e n c e s in o m b u d s m a n a c tiv itie s w ill be noted. Sweden A c c o rd in g to S a n d b erg , the w o r l d 's o ld e s t a g e n c y d ev o ted e x c lu siv e ly to helping c i tiz e n s who h a v e been a b u s e d o r n e g le c te d by public o f fic ia ls is th e Sw edish o ffic e of o m b u d sm a n , o r J u s t i t i e o m b u d sm an (a b b r e v ia te d " J . O . ").* E s ta b lis h e d u n d e r Sweden* s c o n ­ stitu tion of 1809, the o ffic e h a s r o o t s r e a c h in g b ac k to an c ien t S candinavia. A n d e rso n h a s r e p o r t e d th a t the f i r s t o m b u d sm a n , known a s " u m b o d s m a d r , " w a s a m e d i a t o r b e tw e e n feuding f a m i l i e s in the p r i m i t i v e I c e la n d ic le g a l s y s t e m . 2 a g e n t 's n a m e c o n s is ts o f th r e e s y ll a b le s : T he m o d e r n fo rm o f th is " o m , " m e a n in g ab o u t; "bud, " m e a n in g m e s s a g e ; and " m a n , " m e a n in g m a n o r p e r s o n . Thus, the l i t e r a l t r a n s l a t i o n i s " a m a n w ith a m e s s a g e about ^I b id . , p. 17. 2 A n d e rs o n , "A n O m b u d sm a n f o r the U .S . ? " C e n te r D ia r y : 14, p u b lish ed by the C e n t e r fo r the Study of D e m o c r a t i c In s titu tio n s , Santa B a r b a r a , C alif. ( S e p te m b e r - O c to b e r , 1966), p . 19. 50 s o m e th in g . 111 A n o th e r m e a n in g of the t e r m p r e f e r r e d by R o s e n th a l and o t h e r s i s , s im p ly , " o n e who r e p r e s e n t s so m e o n e . " 2 O th e r a p p e lla tio n s, a s ev id e n c e d in book and a r t i c l e t i t l e s , in clu d e ag e n t, r e p r e s e n ta ti v e , g r ie v a n c e m a n , p u b lic p r o t e c t o r and c i t i z e n 1 s d efe n d e r. T he l i t e r a t u r e i s g e n e r a lly c o n s is te n t in u s in g the A n g li­ cized fo rm of s p e llin g o m b u d s m a n . In v e r b a l u s a g e , th e f i r s t sy llab le i s u s u a lly a c c e n te d and th e l a s t two s y ll a b le s a r e p ro n o u n ced to rh y m e w ith " w o o d s m a n ." M uch h a s b ee n w r i tte n abo u t S w e d e n 's o m b u d sm a n s in c e the m o d e rn c o n c e p t of th e o ffic e o r ig in a te d in th a t c o u n try . A c c o u n ts by A lfre d B e x e liu s , th e c u r r e n t t i t l e h o ld e r, and s tu d i e s by s u c h a u th o r itie s a s G e llh o rn and R o s e n th a l h a v e b een w id e ly d is s e m in a te d . F ro m th e s e s ta n d a r d r e f e r e n c e s , a few b a s i c fa c ts an d p r in c ip le s will be no ted . U nlike h is p r e d e c e s s o r , th e c h a n c e llo r of j u s t i c e (an office e s ta b lis h e d by K ing C h a r l e s XII in 1713), th e Sw edish o m b u d sm a n ^ F a r n s w o r th F o w le , " T w o O m b u d sm e n R e p o r t on R o l e s - Civic C o n tro l D e s c r i b e d by Swede an d New Z e a l a n d e r , " New Y o rk T im e s , F e b r u a r y 20, 1966, quoted in U. S . , C o n g r e s s , S enate, C o m m ittee on th e J u d i c i a r y , O m b u d sm a n H e a r i n g s , b e f o r e th e Sub­ c o m m itte e on A d m in is tr a tiv e P r a c t i c e and P r o c e d u r e of the C o m ­ m itte e on th e J u d i c i a r y , 89th Cong. , 2nd s e s s . , 1966, p. 380. 2 A lb e r t H. R o s e n th a l, " T h e O m b u d s m a n -- S w e d is h 'G r ie v a n c e M a n , ' " P u b lic A d m in is tr a tio n R eview , XXIV (D e c e m ­ b e r, 1964), 227. 51 r e p r e s e n t s P a r l i a m e n t r a t h e r th an th e k ing in s u p e r v is in g g o v e r n ­ m ent o f fic ia ls . T h is ch a n g e w a s m a d e in the 1809 c o n s titu tio n b ec au se th e c h a n c e llo r h a d not b e e n r e g a r d e d a s in d e p e n d e n t enough from the g o v e rn m e n t to p ro v id e s u ffic ie n t p r o te c tio n of c i tiz e n s ' r ig h ts. B e x e liu s h a s m a in ta in e d th a t the p o sitio n w a s c r e a t e d a g a in st the w is h e s of th e e x is tin g g o v e r n m e n t. * T he o m b u d s m a n m u s t be a p e r s o n of known le g a l a b i lity and o u tsta n d in g in te g r i ty c h o sen by P a r l i a m e n t to s e r v e a f o u r y ear te rm . H is s a l a r y i s e q u a l to th a t of a S u p re m e C o u rt ju d g e . 2 The p r e s e n t o m b u d s m a n i s a f o r m e r ju d g e. T he o m b u d s m a n co n d u c ts r e g u l a r in s p e c tio n s of g o v e r n ­ m ent in s titu tio n s , m a k e s in v e s tig a tio n s on h is own v o litio n , and h e a r s c o m p la in ts fro m an y c itiz e n . He d e c id e s w h a t c a s e s he w ill p u rsu e and w h at a c tio n sho u ld be ta k e n . Often th e a c tio n is a r e m in d e r o r a r e p r i m a n d r a t h e r th a n le g a l p r o s e c u tio n . 3 T he o m ­ budsm an r e j e c t s c o m p la in ts w h ich , in h is ju d g m e n t, a r e u n w a r ­ ran ted . A c c o rd in g to G e llh o rn , h e finds no fau lt in about 90 p e r 4 cent of th e c a s e s about w h ich a c o m p la in t h a s b ee n m a d e . He h a s 1A lf re d B e x e liu s , " T h e O m b u d sm a n f o r C iv il A f f a ir s , " in Rowat, ed. , T he O m b u d sm a n : C i t i z e n 1 s D e f e n d e r , p. 24. 2 G e llh o rn , O m b u d s m e n an d O t h e r s , pp. 2 0 2 -3 . 3 I b id . , p. 206. 4Ibid. , p. 250. 52 a c c e s s to a l l g o v e r n m e n t d o c u m e n ts and can r e q u e s t a d d itio n a l in fo rm a tio n fro m a l l o f fic ia ls . A lthough he g iv e s no o r d e r s , he m ay in itia te p u b lic p r o s e c u tio n , e v e n a g a in s t ju d g e s . He can n o t change but can p u b lic ly c r i t i c i z e a d m in i s t r a t i v e and j u d ic ia l d e c i ­ sio n s. He s u b m its an an n u a l r e p o r t to P a r l i a m e n t . B e x e liu s h a s indicated th a t n e i t h e r P a r l i a m e n t n o r th e a d m in is t r a tio n e x e r t s p o litic a l p r e s s u r e on h i m . 1 D u rin g th e n in e te e n th c e n tu r y h is e f f o r ts w e r e d ir e c te d chiefly at c o u r ts , p o lic e and p r i s o n s . G ra d u a lly , h o w e v e r, civ il s e rv ic e a d m in i s t r a t i o n h a s b e c o m e h is m a in c o n c e r n . The n u m b e r of c o m p la in ts p e r y e a r - - a b o u t 100 fifty y e a r s a g o - - w a s 550 in 1956 and 1 ,5 5 0 in 1966. 2 H is e f f e c ts h av e not b e e n s p e c t a c u l a r ; y e t he has had c o n s id e r a b le in flu en c e on th e w ay in w hich p u b lic o ffic ia ls p e r f o r m t h e i r d u tie s . B e x e liu s h a s m a d e t h i s c a p s u le e v a lu a tio n o f the office: The m e r e e x is te n c e of an O m b u d sm a n , in d e p e n d e n t of the b u r e a u c r a c y , to w hich anybody m a y c a r r y h is c o m p la in ts , w ill a c t to s h a r p e n th e a tte n tio n of th e a u t h o r i t i e s in d e a lin g w ith 1 B e x e liu s , " T h e O m b u d s m a n 1 s O ffice and O th e r M e a n s f o r P ro te c tin g C i tiz e n s ' R ig h ts in Sweden, " I n te r n a tio n a l S o cial S cie n ce J o u r n a l. XVIII (No. 2), 249. 2 I b id . , " T h e O rig in , N a tu r e , and F u n c tio n s of th e C iv il and M ilita ry O m b u d sm a n in S w e d e n ," T h e A n n a ls of th e A m e r ic a n A cadem y o f P o l i t i c a l and S o c ia l S c ie n c e . CCCLXXVII (M ay, 1968), 15. 53 c a s e s and to c o u n te r a c t te n d e n c ie s to w a r d a b u s e of p o w e r and a r b i t r a r y d e c is io n s . 1 F in la n d E x p a n sio n of th e o m b u d sm a n c o n c e p t b e g a n in 1919, w hen F i n l a n d 's new c o n s titu tio n b o r r o w e d f r o m Sweden th e id e a o f a p u b lic w a tc h m a n a g a in s t o f fic ia l m i s t a k e s . S ince Finland* s s y s te m of g o v e r n m e n t had long r e s e m b l e d S w e d e n 's , A n d e r s o n h a s in d ic a te d th a t th e only s u r p r i s i n g a s p e c t of the a d o p tio n i s th a t it took so long. A lthough the F in n is h o m b u d s m a n c lo s e ly p a r a l l e l s h is S w edish c o u n t e r p a r t in p o w e r s and d u tie s , he h a s not s p r u n g q u ic k ly to th e d e fe n s e o f b a s i c c iv il r i g h t s . A c c o rd in g to G e llh o rn , h is p o te n tia l in d e a lin g w ith p r o b le m s of L ittle M an and Big G o v e r n m e n t h a s not b e e n fu lly e x p lo re d . 3 D e n m a rk S tro n g ly in flu e n c e d by th e S w edish m o d e l, the o ffic e of o m ­ b u d sm a n w a s in c o r p o r a te d in to D e n m a r k 's c o n s titu tio n o f 1953. S tephan H u rw itz , the f i r s t D a n is h o m b u d sm a n , b eg a n h is d u tie s two 1I b id ., p. 16. 2 A n d e r s o n , " T h e S can d in a v ia n O m b u d sm a n , " A m e r ic a n S can d in a v ia n R e v ie w , LII ( D e c e m b e r , 1964), 4 0 3 -4 . 3 G e llh o rn , O m b u d s m e n and O th e r s , p. 89. 2 54 y e a rs la te r. It i s G e llh o r n 1 s opinion th a t th e f o r m e r p r o f e s s o r o f c r i m i n a l law a t th e U n iv e r s ity of C o pen hag en p r o b a b ly h a s done m o r e than an y o th e r p e r s o n to p o p u la r iz e th e o m b u d s m a n . H is e x c e lle n t r e la tio n s w ith th e pu blic p r e s s and h i s e x te n s iv e l e c t u r e t o u r s h av e b e e n i n s t r u m e n t a l in s p r e a d in g th e S ca n d in a v ia n id e a to o th e r p a r t s of th e w o rld . 1 D e s p ite t h e i r m a n y s i m i l a r i t i e s , th e D a n is h o m b u d sm a n h a s l e s s le g a l a u th o r ity th an th e o m b u d sm e n of Sweden and F in la n d . The j u d i c i a r y i s e x c lu d ed fro m th e p u rv iew of h is o ffic e, lim itin g h is ju r i s d i c t i o n s o le ly to a d m in is t r a tio n . a s a p ro se c u to r. 2 F u r t h e r m o r e , h e can no t a c t T h e s e lim ita tio n s h a v e b e e n r e ta in e d by o th e r g o v e r n m e n ts w h ich h av e s u b s e q u e n tly ad o p ted the o m b u d s m a n c o n ­ cep t. T h u s, i t i s the m o d ifie d D a n is h m o d e l r a t h e r than the S w edish p ro to ty p e w hich h a s b ee n e x p o r te d f r o m S can d in av ia . D u rin g th e five y e a r s ending in 1964, the D a n is h o m b u d s ­ m a n in v e s tig a te d only 856 c a s e s , c o n s titu tin g l e s s th a n 15 p e r ce n t of th e m a t t e r s r e g i s t e r e d a t h is o ffice. G e llh o rn h a s a t tr i b u te d the i n c r e a s i n g p r o p o r tio n o f d i s m i s s a l s p a r t i a l l y to th e o m b u d s m a n 's 1I b i d . , 2 pp. 5 - 6 . I b id . , pp. 12-13. T he o m b u d sm a n m a y o r d e r th e p u b lic p r o s e c u t o r to in v e s tig a te f u r t h e r o r to c o m m e n c e a c r i m i n a l p r o ­ ceed in g a g a in s t a n e r r i n g o ffic ia l, but he n e v e r h a s . 55 " s h a r p e n e d a w a r e n e s s of w hat h e can f e a s ib ly do. "* P ro fesso r H u rw itz h a s m a d e an e f f o rt to p e r s o n a l i z e h is o ffic e, p ro v id in g an a n s w e r w ith a n e x p la n a tio n f o r e v e r y c o m p la in t r e c e iv e d , n o m a t t e r how f a r - f e t c h e d . L ackin g the a u th o r ity of a p r o s e c u t o r , h e h a s r e l i e d l a r g e ly on p e r s u a s io n b ack ed by r e a s o n in g to a c c o m p lis h h is g o a ls . A c c o rd in g to A a ro n , h is r ig h t of p ub lic c r i t i c i s m , w h ich he c a u tio u s ly e x e r c i s e s , h a s p ro v e d to be a f o r m id a b le w eapon. 2 C on­ se q u e n tly , the v e r y e x is te n c e of h is office d is c o u r a g e s b u r e a u c r a t i c b e h a v io r th a t f r u s t r a t e s the p u b lic . 3 I n itia l o b je c tio n to th e office by c iv il s e r v a n t s h a s d is s ip a te d . A C openh ag en j u r i s t , 1. M. P e d e r s e n , h a s co n c lu d ed that th e D a n ish o m b u d s m a n 's office h a s p r o v e d to be a n e x t r e m e l y u s e ­ ful in s titu tio n , s u p p le m e n tin g th e c o n tro l w ithout h a m p e r in g the 4 e ffic ie n c y o r in d e p e n d e n c e of the a d m in is tr a tio n . N o rw a y A s in o th e r S can d in av ia n c o u n tr ie s , N o r w a y 's a p p o in t­ m e n t of an o m b u d sm a n w a s not p r e c e d e d by r e v e l a tio n s of g r o s s 1 Ibid. 2 3 , pp. 2 2 -2 3 . A a r o n , T he C o n tro l of P o lic e D i s c r e t i o n , p. 40. J a m e s E g an , " O m b u d s m a n ," H oliday, N o v e m b e r, 1966, p. 32. 4 I. M. P e d e r s e n , " D e n m a r k 's O m b u d s m a n ," in Row at, e d . , T he O m b u d sm a n : C i t i z e n 's D e fe n d e r, p. 94. 56 in e ffic ie n c y o r m a lf e a s a n c e in p u b lic o ffic e. A c c o rd in g to S to rin g , the g o v e r n m e n t 1 s a d m i n i s t r a t i v e a g e n c ie s w e r e e ffe c tiv e ly c a r r y i n g out t h e i r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s " b u t th e r e w e r e s o m e e v id e n c e s of the n o r m a l d i s e a s e s of b u r e a u c r a t i z a t i o n su c h a s u nd ue d e la y s , a g r e a t d e a l o f p a p e r w o rk , r e d ta p e , e tc . T hus, th e office of o m b u d s ­ m a n w a s added in 1962 to b r id g e the d ev e lo p in g g u lf b e tw e e n a d m in ­ i s t r a t o r s and c i tiz e n s . Os h a s po in ted out th a t th e c o m m is s io n w hich r e c o m m e n d e d the p o s itio n e m p h a s iz e d th e im p o r ta n c e of f i l l ­ ing it w ith the r ig h t p e r s o n - - a w e ll- p a id , h ig h ly -q u a lifie d la w y e r p o s s e s s i n g su c h in s ig h t and a u th o r ity th a t h is o p in io n s would be heeded. 2 The f i r s t o m b u d sm a n w a s A n d r e a s S ch ei, a m e m b e r of th e S u p re m e C o u r t a t the tim e of h is e le c tio n . A n d e r s o n h a s noted th a t N o rw a y 1 s o m b u d sm a n d i f f e r s fro m o th e r S can d in a v ia n o m b u d s m e n in th a t h is office h a s no j u r i s d i c t i o n 3 o v e r l o c a l g o v e r n m e n t o f fic ia ls . A ls o , he d o e s n ot r o u tin e ly in s p e c t a g e n c ie s and in s titu tio n s and he ca n n o t d ir e c t th a t a c iv il s e r v a n t be * J a m e s A. S to rin g , "T h e N o rw e g ia n O m b u d sm a n f o r C iv il A ff a irs : The F i r s t T h r e e Y e a r s , 1 9 6 3 - 6 6 ," W e s t e r n P o liti c a l Q u a r t e r l y , XXI (J u n e , 1968), 305, 2 A u d v a r O s, " T h e O m b u d s m a n fo r C iv il A f f a ir s , " in Row at, e d . , T h e O m b u d sm a n : Citizen* s D e f e n d e r , p. 95. 3 A n d e r s o n , "T h e O m b u d sm a n : P u b lic D e fe n d e r A g a in s t M a la d m in is tr a tio n , " P u b lic A f f a i r s R e p o r t , VI (A p ril, 1965), 3. 57 p r o s e c u te d o r s u b je c te d t o a d i s c i p l i n a r y p ro c e e d in g . d if f e r e n c e i s a p p a r e n t to G e llh o rn : One o th e r N o rw e g ia n n e w s p a p e r s have p aid lit tle a tte n tio n to th e o ffice. * W is k a r i h a s r e p o r t e d th a t in 1965 S chei r e c e iv e d 952 c o m p la in ts , r e s u lt in g in 344 in v e s tig a tio n s and 123 c o r r e c t i v e a c tio n s . 2 New Z e a la n d T he f i r s t n a tio n a l l e g i s l a t u r e o u tsid e S can d in av ia to p a s s a c iv il o m b u d sm a n a c t w a s th a t of New Z e a la n d . N o rth e y and O r r h av e s u g g e s te d th a t the d e c is io n w a s m a d e b e c a u s e th e g o v e r n m e n t had b e c o m e con v in ced th a t e x is tin g m e a n s a v a ila b le to the c itiz e n 3 f o r g ain in g r e d r e s s f o r a d m i n i s t r a t i v e i n j u r i e s w e r e in a d e q u a te . G e llh o rn , on th e o th e r h an d , h a s m a in ta in e d that th e o m b u d sm a n w a s c r e a t e d " n o t to c le a n up a m e s s , b ut r a t h e r , s im p ly to p ro v id e 4 in s u r a n c e a g a in s t fu tu re m e s s e s . " ^ G ellh o rn , O m b u d sm e n and O t h e r s , pp. 176, 188-89. 2 W e r n e r W is k a r i, " N o r w a y 1 s E x p e r ie n c e : How an O m ­ b u d s m a n O p e r a t e s , " N ew _Y ork_T im es, N o v e m b e r 20, 1966, IV, p. 3. 3 J . F . N o rth e y , "New Z e a l a n d 's P a r l i a m e n t a r y C o m m i s ­ s i o n e r , " in R ow at, e d , , T he O m b u d sm a n : Citizen* s D e f e n d e r , p. 127; G. S. O r r , R e p o r t on A d m in is tr a tiv e J u s t i c e in New Z e a ­ land (W ellington: R. E . Owen, 1964), p. 7. 4 G e llh o rn , O m b u d sm e n and O th e r s , p. 103. 58 New Z e a la n d 1 s o ffic e o f o m b u d sm a n , e s ta b li s h e d in 1962, c l o s e ly r e s e m b l e s D enm ark* s w ith m i n o r d i f f e r e n c e s , su c h a s th e om budsm an* s ap p o in tm e n t by th e g o v e r n o r - g e n e r a l upon r e c o m ­ m e n d a tio n o f the le g i s l a t u r e and th e r e q u ir e m e n t o f a m o d e s t filin g fee fro m c o m p la in a n ts . A ls o , th e law s p e c if ie s no p a r t i c u l a r q u a l i ­ fic a tio n s fo r the o m b u d sm a n . 1 T he f i r s t ap p o in tee w a s S ir Guy P o w le s , a d istin g u is h e d la w y e r an d a d m i n i s t r a t o r w ho w a s p r e v io u s ly h is country* s a m b a s s a d o r to In d ia. 2 W hile ac kn ow led ging th e c o n s id e r a b le in flu en ce o f S can d in av ia n e x p e r ie n c e , Pow e s h a s i n s i s t e d th a t New Z e a la n d fa sh io n e d a n o m b u d sm an to m e e t i t s own needs. F o r in s ta n c e , h i s i n s t r u c t i o n s fro m the le g i s l a t u r e w e r e n ot s im p ly to s e e that th e law i s c a r r i e d out but to s e e th a t ig h t i s d o n e. He b e g in s ea ch a n n u a l r e p o r t w ith th is r e m i n d e r : 4 to ld m e to s e e th a t we do r i g h t . " " Y o u 'v e N o rth ey , "N ew Z ealand* s P a r l i a m e n t a r y C o m m is s i o n e r , " p. 133; D avid P . O 'N e i l l , " T h e New Z e a la n d O m b u d s m a n , 1 A m e r i c a , CXII ( J a n u a r y 30, 1965), 166; G e llh o rn , O m b u d sm e n an d O h e r s , p. 104. 2 O 'N e i l l , " T h e New Z e a la n d O m b u d s m a n ," p. 168 3 S ir Guy P o w le s , " A s p e c ts o f th e S e a rc h f o r A d m in is tr a tiv e J u s t i c e w ith P a r t i c u l a r R e f e r e n c e to the New Z e a la n d O m b u d s m a n ," C a n a d ia n P u b lic A d m in is tr a tio n . IX (Ju n e, 1966), 14 3 -4 4 . D ia ry : H allo ck H offm an, "A n O m b u d sm a n fo r th e U . S . ? 14, p. 25. C e n te r 59 P o w le s r e c e n tly in d ic a te d how h e in te n d s to p u r s u e th a t policy: , . . th e O m b u d sm a n m u s t c a r v e and t r e a d h i s own path, b ein g c a r e f u l to m a in ta in h is in d e p e n d e n c e of both th e e x e c u tiv e and the j u d i c i a r y , so a s to be a b le to bu ild a t r a d i t i o n of s t r o n g an d i m p a r t i a l c r i t i c i s m of a d m i n i s t r a t i o n on th e one hand and of h e lp fu ln e s s to c itiz e n s on th e o t h e r . 1 G r e a t B r ita in W hen S i r E d m un d C o m pton b eg a n s e r v in g a s p a r l i a m e n t a r y c o m m i s s i o n e r in 1967, G r e a t B r ita in b e c a m e the f i r s t l a r g e n atio n to a tte m p t the a d a p ta tio n of the o m b u d s m a n co n c ep t to i t s g o v e r n m e n ta l stru c tu re . U n lik e h is S can d in av ia n c o u n t e r p a r t s , and to a g r e a t e r d e g r e e th a n in New Z e a la n d , th e B r i t i s h o m b u d s m a n i s a n ap p o in tee of th e h ea d of s t a t e . of P a r l i a m e n t . Y et he i s e x p e c te d to be an in d e p e n d e n t o f f ic e r C om pton, E n g l a n d 's f o r m e r c o m p t r o l l e r and a u d i t o r - g e n e r a l , h a s r e s t r i c t e d in v e s tig a to r y p o w e r s and no a u th o r ity to c o n ­ d u ct p r o s e c u t i o n s . P a rlia m e n t. He r e c e i v e s c o m p la in ts only th ro u g h m e m b e r s of H is fin al r e p o r t on e a c h c a s e is m a d e to th e M. P . who r e f e r r e d it to h im and it is th a t o ffic ia l who d e c id e s how th e fin ding s s h a ll be c o m m u n ic a te d to th e c o m p la in a n t and th e p r e s s . 2 ^ P o w le s , " A s p e c ts of the S e a r c h fo r A d m in is tr a tiv e J u s ­ t ic e , " p. 157. 2 G e o ffre y M a r s h a ll, " T h e B r i t i s h P a r l i a m e n t a r y C o m m is ­ s i o n e r fo r A d m in is tr a tio n , " T h e A n n a ls o f th e A m e r i c a n A c a d e m y of P o l i t i c a l a n d S o c ia l S cie n c e , CCCLXXVJI (M ay, 1968), 94. 60 L im ite d a s it i s , th e B r i t i s h v e r s i o n of o m b u d sm a n m a c h in e r y r e p r e s e n t s a s ig n ific a n t d e p a r t u r e fro m le g a l t r a d i t i o n in th a t c o u n try , a c c o r d in g to M a r s h a l l . The P a r l i a m e n t a r y C o m ­ m i s s i o n e r A ct g o e s beyond th e c o n t r o l of m a l a d m i n i s t r a t i o n in a n a r r o w s e n s e by p r o v id in g f o r a r e v ie w o f a lle g e d ly u n ju s t o r u n ­ r e a s o n a b le d e c is io n s by o f f ic ia ls . M o r e o v e r , it r e l a t e s to in ju s tic e c a u s e d by m a l a d m i n i s t r a t i o n in c e n t r a l g o v e r n m e n t d e p a r t m e n ts , a n a r e a not a d e q u a te ly c o v e re d by p r e v io u s le g is la tio n . * S till, a s R ow at h a s e m p h a s iz e d , it i s a f a r c r y fro m th e New Z e a la n d l e g i s ­ la tio n w hich a llo w s th e o m b u d s m a n to r e v ie w a d e c is io n i f he th in k s it i s s im p ly " w ro n g . " F u r t h e r m o r e , the B r i t i s h c o m m i s s i o n e r 's j u r i s d i c t i o n d o e s not in c lu d e fo u r o f th a t n a t i o n 's m o s t c o m p la in e d ab o u t a g e n c i e s - - t h e p o lic e , lo c a l g o v e r n m e n t, c o u r ts and n a tio n a liz e d i n d u s t r i e s . 2 In s e le c tin g h is s ta f f m e m b e r s , C om pton h a s in s i s t e d on o b je c tiv ity in t h e i r e f f o r ts to im p r o v e c iv il a d m in is t r a tio n : I d o n 't w an t c r u s a d e r s . T h is i s a n e x e r c i s e in f a i r n e s s . I w an t o b je c tiv ity . I a m k ee n th is sh o u ld w o rk out f a i r to a l l p a r t i e s . P e o p le a r e a p t to think th a t th e only thing th a t m a t ­ t e r s i s f a i r n e s s to the p e r s o n co m p la in in g . 1 s h a ll h a v e th e r e p u ta tio n o f 400, 000 p eo p le in m y h a n d s - - i f t h a t ' s how m a n y c iv il s e r v a n t s t h e r e a r e . E v e n i f w e a r e l I b i d . , p. 87. 2 R ow at, " R e c e n t D e v e lo p m e n ts in O m b u d s m a n s h ip , " C a n ad ia n P u b lic A d m in is tr a tio n , X (M a rc h , 1967), 4 1 -4 2 . 61 u n e a rth in g f a u lts in th e s y s t e m , i t a lw a y s b o ils down in the end to an a c tio n th a t so m e o n e h a s done. . . . an o p e r a tio n w hose e x e r c i s e i s to d e t e c t and i f p o s s ib le r e m e d y flaw s in ju s t ic e m u s t i t s e l f b e ju s t . * In h is f i r s t n in e m o n th s o f office, the B r i t i s h o m b u d sm an r e c e iv e d 1 ,0 6 9 c o m p la in ts ; only 2 p e r ce n t o f th o se d is p o s e d of w e r e found to be v a lid . 2 C a n ad a and O th e r N a tio n s A ll e x c e p t one of C a n a d a 's te n p r o v in c ia l l e g i s l a t u r e s hav e been c o n s id e r in g o m b u d sm a n s c h e m e s s in c e 1965, Two p r o v i n c e s - - A lb e r ta and New B r u n s w ic k - - h a v e p a s s e d o m b u d s m a n le g is la tio n , both in 1967. F o r t h e i r o m b u d sm e n , A lb e r ta c h o s e th e r e t i r i n g h ead of th e R o yal C a n a d ia n M ounted P o lic e and New B ru n sw ic k s e le c te d a f o r m e r u n i v e r s i t y p r e s id e n t. O m b u d sm a n p r o p o s a ls a l s o h ave b een d is c u s s e d in th e f e d e r a l P a r l i a m e n t and by city g o v e r n m e n ts . 3 In 1965, G uyana and M a u r itiu s in c lu d ed in t h e i r new c o n ­ s titu tio n s o m b u d sm a n m a c h in e r y m o d e le d on the New Z e a la n d ^ " P r o f ile : S ir E d m un d C o m pton , T he New O m b u d sm a n , " Sunday T im e s (London), A p r il 2, 1967, p. 1 1 . 2 S a n d b e rg , "O m b u d sm an : G r ie v a n c e s , " p. 45. 3 T he R e d r e s s of C i tiz e n s ' A n d e r s o n , C an ad ia n O m b u d sm a n P r o p o s a l s ; Cheng, " T h e E m e r g e n c e an d S p re a d of th e O m b u d s m a n In s titu tio n , " p. 25; Row at, "R e c e n t D e v e lo p m e n ts in O m b u d s m a n s h ip , " pp. 3 8 -4 0 ; R ow at, " T h e S p re ad of th e O m b u d sm a n I d e a , " in A n d e r s o n , e d . , O m b u d sm e n f o r A m e r ic a n G o v e r n m e n t ? , p. 23. 62 s y s t e m . * A c c o rd in g t o Row at, o th e r n a tio n s w hich h av e given a t t e n ­ tio n to the c o n c e p t in r e c e n t y e a r s in c lu d e A u s t r a l i a , I s r a e l , I r e ­ la n d , the N e th e rla n d s , S w itz e rla n d , A u s tr ia , W e s t G e r m a n y and I n d ia . 2 U nited S ta te s O m b u d sm a n l i t e r a t u r e p r o l i f e r a t e d in th e U nited S ta te s d u r in g the I960* s e v e n though C o n g r e s s did n o t e n a c t o m b u d sm an le g is la tio n . Since 1963, b ills h av e b ee n in tr o d u c e d r e p e a te d ly in C o n g r e s s and in n e a r l y a l l s t a t e l e g i s l a t u r e s but only one s t a t e - H a w a i i- - h a s c r e a te d th e p o sitio n . N e a r l y two y e a r s a f t e r i t s 1967 3 a c tio n the l e g i s l a t u r e of H aw aii s t i l l h ad not fille d th e p o st. C o n g r e s s m a n H e n ry S. R e u s s of W is c o n s in f i r s t p r o p o s e d an o m b u d s m a n - lik e a d m in is t r a tiv e c o u n s e l to C o n g r e s s and, m o r e r e c e n tly , S e n a to r E d w a rd V. Long of M is s o u r i h a s o ffe re d h is own 4 b ills fo r th e c r e a tio n of an a d m i n i s t r a t i v e o m b u d sm a n . L o n g 's s c h e m e s to t e s t th e f e d e r a l o m b u d s m a n id e a in th e D i s t r i c t of *Rowat, " T h e S p re ad of the O m b u d s m a n Id ea, " pp. 2 2 -2 3 . 2 I b id , 3 , pp. 7, 2 2 -2 3 , 2 6 -3 0 . A n d e rs o n , e d . , O m b u d sm e n fo r A m e r i c a n G o v e r n m e n t ? , p. 137. 4 Ibid. 63 C o lu m b ia <1966) and the s t a t e of M is s o u r i (1968) h ave not g ain ed C o n g r e s s io n a l s u p p o r t. R e u s s an n o u n ced in 1967 th a t he had a p ­ p o in ted a n o m b u d sm a n to h a n d le c o m p la in ts f r o m h is d i s t r i c t in an a tte m p t to p ro v e th a t th e s y s t e m can w o rk n a tio n a lly . * T he p u b ­ lis h e d p r o c e e d in g s of two C o n g r e s s io n a l o m b u d sm a n h e a r i n g s a r e v a lu a b le r e f e r e n c e w o rk s . 2 No A m e r i c a n m u n ic ip a lity h a s an o m b u d s m a n w hich f its the D a n ish m o d e l, alth o u g h v a r i o u s p la n s h av e b e e n p ro p o s e d and a few 3 a tte m p te d . T h r e e d e s c r i b e d by A ngus and K a p la n w ill be m e n tio n e d h e re .^ W idely p u b lic iz e d in 1966 w a s th e a p p o in tm e n t of an ac tin g " p u b lic p r o t e c t o r " fo r th e 1 .4 m illio n r e s i d e n t s of m e tr o p o lita n *New Y o rk T i m e s , F e b r u a r y 5, 1967, p. 67. 2 Long* s r e g io n a l o m b u d s m a n p r o p o s a l would h a v e p ro v id e d , a s a p ilo t p r o j e c t , an a tto r n e y a p p o in ted by th e P r e s i d e n t to d e a l w ith c o m p la in ts f r o m M is s o u r i r e s i d e n t s r e g a r d i n g f e d e r a l m a t t e r s . U . S . , C o n g r e s s , S enate, R e g io n a l O m b u d s m a n P r o p o s a l , H e a r i n g s , pp. 1-4 . 3 Since 1966, a p o lit ic a l d e b a te h a s b e e n r a g in g o v e r the f e a s ib ility of an o m b u d sm a n s y s t e m f o r the n a t i o n 's l a r g e s t m u n ic i­ p a lity , New Y o rk C ity. P r o p o s a l s and c o u n t e r - p r o p o s a l s h av e been r e p o r t e d in th e New Y ork T i m e s , w hich h a s ta k e n an e d i t o r i a l p o s i ­ tion fa v o rin g th e con cept. 4 A ngus and K ap la n , " T h e O m b u d s m a n and L o c a l G o v e r n ­ m e n t, " pp. 1 0 1 -35 . 64 N a s s a u C ounty in th e s t a t e of New Y o rk . 1 A f o r m e r judge w a s c h o s e n by the county e x e c u tiv e to f ill th e v a c a n t o ffic e of c o m m i s ­ s i o n e r o f a c c o u n ts by p e r f o r m i n g a s an o m b u d sm a n . He w as i n s t r u c t e d to r e c e i v e and in v e s tig a te c o m p la in ts f r o m th e p u b lic c o n c e r n in g an y d e p a r t m e n t o r a g e n c y of the county, o r of th e tow ns, c i tie s , in c o r p o r a te d v illa g e s o r s p e c i a l d i s t r i c t s w ith in it. T he p o sitio n w a s r e g a r d e d a s the f i r s t of i t s kind in th e U nited S ta te s . T h e a p p o in te e w a s g iv en the p o w e r of su b p o e n a but no d i r e c t e n ­ f o r c e m e n t a u th o rity . su re ." E m p h a s is w a s p la c e d on h is " p o w e r of e x p o ­ D u rin g h is f i r s t e ig h te e n m o n th s in office h e c o n s id e r e d m o r e th a n 500 c o m p la in ts . He co n tin u ed to s e r v e a s de fa c to o m b u d sm a n e v e n a f t e r N a s s a u C ounty v o t e r s o v e rw h e lm in g ly r e j e c t e d a 1967 p r o p o s a l th a t would h a v e e s ta b li s h e d th e p o st on a p e r m a n e n t b a s is . 2 In 1966, the C ity of Buffalo, New Y o rk, a g r e e d to c o o p e ra te w ith th e Law School o f th e S tate U n iv e r s it y of New Y o rk a t B uffalo in a lo c a l g o v e r n m e n t o m b u d sm a n p r o je c t. I ts o b je c tiv e w a s to e x p e r i m e n t w ith the a p p lic a tio n of th e o m b u d sm a n co n cep t to a la rg e u r b a n s e ttin g in N o rth A m e r ic a . A f t e r one p r o f e s s o r p r o c e s s e d a few g r i e v a n c e s , th e p r o j e c t w a s ex pan ded to a s e m i n a r involving ^Roy R. S ilv e r , " N ic k e r s o n N a m e s a P u b lic P r o t e c t o r , " New Y o rk T i m e s , J u n e 1 , 1966, p. 1. 2 A g is S a lp u k a s, " •O m b u d s m a n * on L . I . F in d s D e f e a t H as G iven H im M o re P o w e r , " New Y o rk T i m e s , D e c e m b e r 3, 1967, p. 59. 65 s e n i o r la w s tu d e n ts . E r i e C o u n ty . The a r e a of c o m p la in ts w a s e n l a r g e d to in c lu d e A g r a n t by th e O ffic e of E c o n o m ic O p p o rtu n ity p e r ­ m itte d a o n e - y e a r , f u l l - s c a l e o p e r a tio n in 1 9 6 7 -6 8 . * In a r e o r g a n i z a t i o n of th e city m a n a g e r* s o ffic e in 1967, th e San D iego, C a lif o r n i a , c ity c o u n c il a g r e e d to th e c r e a t i o n of an a s s i s t a n t with the t i t l e of " c i t i z e n s a s s i s t a n c e o f f i c e r . 11 The a s s i s ­ ta n t r e c e i v e s and i n v e s t i g a t e s c o m p la in ts an d m a k e s r e c o m m e n d a tio n s to both the m a n a g e r an d th e council. 2 T h e se a n d o t h e r o m b u d s m a n - lik e e x p e r i m e n t s in th e U n ite d S ta te s h a v e r e c e iv e d s o m u c h p u b lic ity th a t o t h e r c i t i e s a r e ap p ly in g th e t e r m to in a p p lic a b le p o s it io n s . R e ce n t a r t i c l e s in th e A m e r i c a n C ity , f o r e x a m p le , i n a c c u r a t e l y id e n tifie d m u n i c i p a l c o m p la in t and p u b lic r e la tio n s o f f i c e r s a s o m b u d s m e n , 3 G e ll h o r n h a s p o in te d out th a t e v e n New Y o rk City* s c o m m i s s i o n e r of in v e s t i g a t i o n i s not an o m b u d s m a n , d e s p i t e so m e s i m i l a r i t i e s in p o w e r s and d u tie s . "The m a in d if f e r e n c e b e tw e e n th e C o m m i s s i o n e r a n d an o m b u d s m a n - - a d i f f e r e n c e so b a s i c a s to en d t h e i r p a r a l l e l i s m - - i s th a t th e *Angus a n d K ap la n , " T h e O m b u d s m a n an d L o c a l G o v e r n ­ m e n t, " pp. 1 21 -3 1 . A ngus c o o r d in a te d th e B u ffa lo o m b u d s m a n p ro je c t. 2 lb id ., 3 p. 120. " S a v a n n a h 's 'O m b u d s m a n , A m e r i c a n C i ty , J u n e , 1968, p. 70. A lso E. H . P o tth o ff, "A n 'O m b u d s m a n , ' U .S . S t y l e ," A m e r i c a n C ity , J u l y , 1968, pp. 152, 154-55. 66 C o m m i s s i o n e r i s the m a y o r ' s m a n and an o m b u d s m a n i s h is own m a n , " he h a s w r itte n . 1 In 1967, th e A m e r ic a n A s s e m b ly ad ded im p e tu s to the O m b u d sm a n m o v e m e n t b y u r g in g e n a c tm e n t of la w s " to c r e a t e the s p e c ia l o ffic e r e q u i r e d to h a n d le c i t i z e n s ' c o m p l a i n t s - - t h e O m b u d s m a n ." 2 I ts 1968 p u b lic a tio n s u p p o r tin g th e in s titu tio n in c lu d e d an o b s e r v a tio n by Gwyn th a t o m b u d s m a n a d v o c a te s c o m e f r o m m o s t p a r t s of th e A m e r ic a n p o l i t i c a l s p e c t r u m , " r a n g in g f r o m M r . W il­ l i a m F. B u ck ley and th e A m e r i c a n B a r A s s o c ia tio n J o u r n a l to the U n ited A u to m o b ile W o r k e r s and M r . R oy W ilk in s of th e N A A C P ." He a ls o found no e v id e n c e of o r g a n iz e d o p p o sitio n . 3 So w id e s p r e a d h a s the le g is la tiv e d is c u s s i o n b e c o m e th a t th e N a tio n a l C o n f e r e n c e of C o m m i s s i o n e r s on U n ifo rm S tate L aw s i s c o n s id e r in g a m o d e l 4 law . In r e c e n t y e a r s , a r t i c l e s on the o m b u d s m a n h a v e a p p e a r e d in p r o f e s s i o n a l j o u r n a l s in the f ie ld s of law , p o lit ic a l s c i e n c e , s o c ia l * G e llh o rn , W hen A m e r i c a n s C o m p la in , p. 166. A n d e r s o n a l s o h a s w a r n e d a g a in s t th e d a n g e r s of d ilu tin g th e w o rd th ro u g h p o p u la riz a tio n and m is a p p r o p r i a t i o n . See O m b u d s m e n f o r A m e r ic a n G o v e r n m e n t ? , p. 2. 2 T h e O m b u d s m a n , A m e r ic a n A s s e m b ly , p. 8 . 3 W illia m B. Gwyn, " T r a n s f e r r i n g th e O m b u d s m a n , " in A n d e rs o n , e d . , O m b u d sm e n f o r A m e r i c a n G o v e r n m e n t ? , p. 67. 4 G e llh o rn , " T h e O m b u d s m a n 's R e le v a n c e t o A m e r i c a n M u n ic ip al A f f a i r s , " A m e r ic a n B a r A s s o c ia ti o n J o u r n a l , LIV ( F e b ­ r u a r y , 1968), 134. 67 s c ie n c e and p u b lic a d m in is t r a tio n and in su c h p o p u la r g e n e r a l c i r c u la ti o n m a g a z i n e s a s L if e , R e a d e r 1 s D i g e s t , T i m e , N ew sw ee k , H o lid a y , and T he New Y o r k e r . S i m i l a r i t i e s and D if f e r e n c e s T h ro u g h r e f e r e n c e s to s e le c te d l i t e r a t u r e , th e d e v e lo p m e n t of the c o n c e p t of th e o m b u d s m a n in c iv il g o v e r n m e n t h a s b ee n t r a c e d fro m i t s a n c ie n t I c e la n d ic o r ig in to i t s v a r io u s c o n t e m p o r a r y f o r m s . T he l i t e r a t u r e r e v e a l s th a t th e p o w e r and p e r f o r m a n c e o f c iv il o m ­ b u d s m e n v a r y f r o m c o u n try to c o u n try , but a l l h a v e c o m m o n c h a r ­ a c te ristic s. F o r th e m o s t p a r t , o m b u d s m e n a r e e m in e n t j u r i s t s who in v e s tig a te c i t i z e n s ' c o m p la in ts a g a in s t g o v e r n m e n t o f fic ia ls a t little o r no c h a r g e . A lthough t h e s e a d m i n i s t r a t i v e c r i t i c s a r e u s u a lly a g e n ts of th e l e g i s l a t u r e , th e y a r e only g e n e r a l l y a n s w e r a b le to it. T h e y h a v e no r e s t r i c t i v e t i e s w ith the e x e c u ii 'o. m a n m a y in q u ir e in to th e w o rk of h is l e g is la tiv e body. No o m b u d s ­ T h e ir a c c e s s to o f f ic ia ls and o f fic ia l p a p e r s is v i r t u a l l y u n lim ite d , p e r m it tin g them to r e v ie w a d m i n i s t r a t i v e a c tio n s th o ro u g h ly . One r e s u l t i s th a t o m ­ b u d s m e n defend o f fic ia ls a s w e ll a s c i tiz e n s ; in d e e d , m o s t c o m p la in ts a r e d i s m i s s e d a s unfo un ded . T h e i r d u a l g o a l i s to h e lp in d iv id u a ls r e d r e s s t h e i r g r i e v a n c e s in v o lv in g p u b lic a d m in is t r a tio n and to 68 s tr e n g th e n p u b lic a d m in is t r a tio n th r o u g h in v e s tig a tio n , su g g e s tio n , s u p p o r t, c r i t i c i s m and, in s o m e c a s e s , p r o s e c u tio n . * G e llh o rn h a s noted th a t, w ith few e x c e p tio n s , o m b u d sm e n a r e c h o se n o r re a p p o in te d b y e a c h new l e g i s l a t u r e . r e g u l a r r e p o r t s to th e body w hich a p p o in ted th e m . T hey m a k e T h e i r s a l a r y is g e n e r a lly s e t a t a h ig h le v e l and th e y a r e p e r m it te d to ch o o se t h e i r own a s s i s t a n t s . Some can q u e s tio n th e a c tio n s of c a b in e t m e m b e r s ; s o m e can re v ie w a c t s of lo c a l g o v e rn m e n t o f fic ia ls ; s o m e can c r i t i ­ c iz e th e c o u r ts and th e p o lic e . pow ers. O t h e r s m a y no t h a v e su c h b ro a d T h e r e i s a te n d e n c y f o r o m b u d s m e n to l im it th e m s e l v e s to m a t t e r s not e l s e w h e r e re v ie w a b le . w r i tte n and sig n e d . C o m p la in ts u s u a lly m u s t be H o w e v e r, in m o s t c o u n t r ie s the o m b u d sm a n h a s a u th o r ity to a c t w itho ut f i r s t r e c e iv in g a c o m p la in t. P erio d ic in s p e c tio n s of g o v e rn m e n t in s t itu ti o n s a r e no t s t r e s s e d in a n y c o u n try e x c e p t Sweden. fo rm al h e a rin g s. O m b u d sm e n con du ct in f o r m a l in q u i r i e s r a t h e r th an T h ey often se e k n e g o tia te d s e t t l e m e n t s . A ll a r e d ilig e n t in e x p la in in g t h e i r ju d g m e n ts and r e l y h e a v ily on p u b lic opinion f o r s u p p o r t. H o w e v e r, t h e i r r e la tio n s h i p s w ith the p u b lic * "T h e P e o p l e 1 s W a tch d o g , 11 T im e , D e c e m b e r 2, 1966, p. 58. Cheng h a s m a in ta in e d th a t a s ig n if ic a n t d e v e lo p m e n t in th e in s titu tio n of the o m b u d s m a n i s th e s h if t o f i t s m a in p u r p o s e aw ay fro m a tte n tio n to th e c o m p la in ts of in d iv id u a l c i tiz e n s and to w a rd the p ro m o tio n of b e t t e r p u b lic a d m i n i s t r a t i o n a ffe c tin g a l l c itiz e n s . O th e r a u t h o r i t i e s h a v e not ac k n o w led g e d th i s tr e n d . See " T h e E m e r g e n c e and S p re a d o f th e O m b u d sm a n I n s t i t u t i o n ," p. 23. 69 p r e s s v a r y c o n s id e r a b ly . 1 C o m p a r e d to th e c o u r t s , the o m b ud sm an * s m e th o d of h an d lin g a p p e a ls a g a i n s t a d m i n i s t r a t i v e d e c i s i o n s i s d i r e c t , i n f o r m a l , s p e e d y and in e x p e n s iv e . 2 A ll c iv il o m b u d s m e n h a v e h a d p r e v io u s e x p e r i e n c e in p u b lic s e r v i c e and a l l s e e m to r e g a r d t h e i r o m b u d s m a n a s s i g n m e n t a s th e c u lm in a tio n of a c a r e e r r a t h e r th an a s a c a r e e r - b u i l d i n g o p p o rtu n ity . No o m b u d s m a n h a s e v e r b e e n r e m o v e d f r o m o ffic e b e f o r e h i s t e r m e x p ire d . W h e r e a s S w ed ish o m b u d s m e n w e r e o n ce p r i m a r i l y c o n ­ c e r n e d w ith th e c o u r t s and la w e n f o r c e m e n t, m o d e r n day o m b u d s m e n a r e p r i m a r i l y c o n c e r n e d w ith c iv il s e r v i c e a d m i n i s t r a t i o n . A lth o u g h t h e r e h a s b e e n i n i t i a l r e s i s t a n c e in s o m e c o u n t r i e s , c iv il s e r v a n t s g e n e r a l l y do not r e s e n t the o m b u d s m a n . T he o m b u d s m a n i s not a s o c i a l a r c h i t e c t ; he can n o t a n d d o e s no t a t te m p t to m a k e sw e e p in g c h a n g e s in g o v e r n m e n ta l s t r u c t u r e . a r e t r i v i a l r a t h e r th a n e a r t h - s h a k i n g . M o s t of th e o m b ud sm an * s c a s e s H o w e v e r, A n d e r s o n h a s r e m in d e d c r i t i c s th a t " e v e n p e tty g r i e v a n c e s a r e i m p o r t a n t to the p e r s o n s h o ld in g th e m . " 3 O ne of th e s t r o n g e s t e a r l y a r g u m e n t s a g a i n s t the o m b u d s ­ m a n w a s th a t the g o v e r n m e n ta l and le g a l s y s t e m s in Sw eden and l G e llh o r n , O m b u d s m e n an d O t h e r s , pp. 4 2 2 -3 8 . 2 3 R ow at, " T h e S p re a d of th e O m b u d s m a n I d e a , " p. 9. A n d e r s o n , " T h e S c a n d in a v ia n O m b u d s m a n , " p. 409. 70 F in la n d w e r e s o d is t in c t th a t th e plan w ould n ot fit co n d itio n s in o th e r c o u n t r ie s . T h at a r g u m e n t w a s ex p lo d ed w hen D e n m a rk and N o rw ay s u c c e s s f u l l y t r a n s f e r r e d the in s titu tio n . A nderson has p o in ted out th a t New Z e a la n d and G re a t B r i t a i n h av e g r a f te d th e plan onto t h e i r c o m m o n -la w , p a r l i a m e n t a r y s y s t e m of g o v e r n m e n t. T h u s, g o v e r n m e n ts h av e both adopted an d a d a p ted th e co n cep t to fit t h e i r p a rtic u la r needs. Such d e m o n s tr a tio n s o f fle x ib ility h elp a c c o u n t fo r th e s u r g e of i n t e r e s t in the o m b u d s m a n th ro u g h o u t the w o r l d . 1 In ad d itio n to th e g e n e r a l body of l i t e r a t u r e on th e o m b u d s ­ m a n in c iv il g o v e r n m e n t, a r e la tiv e l y s m a l l q u a n tity of w r i tte n m a t e r i a l s h a s b e e n p ro d u c e d on a p p lic a tio n s of the o m b u d sm a n c o n ­ cept to o th e r s o c i a l o r g a n iz a tio n s . The r e v ie w w ill now be tu r n e d to l i t e r a t u r e c o n c e r n in g th e a d a p ta tio n o f the o m b u d sm a n p la n to A m e r ic a n in s titu tio n s of h ig h e r e d u c a tio n . C am p u s O m b u d sm a n No r e f e r e n c e s to the c a m p u s o r u n iv e r s i t y o m b u d sm a n w e r e d is c o v e r e d in th e l i t e r a t u r e of A m e r ic a n h ig h e r e d u c a tio n i Row at, " T h e S p re ad o f th e O m b u d s m a n I d e a ," pp. 2 2 -2 3 . Row at h a s w a r n e d , h o w e v e r, th a t the g r e a t e s t d a n g e r s to th e s u c ­ c e s s o f th e s c h e m e a r e th a t it m ig h t be d i s c r e d i t e d by b ein g adopted in an u n n e c e s s a r i l y tr u n c a te d f o r m , o r in a m a n n e r th a t m a y s u b ­ je c t i t to too m u c h p a r t i s a n p r e s s u r e . See " O m b u d sm e n f o r N o rth A m e r ic a , " P u b lic A d m in is tr a tio n R eview , X X IV (D e c e m b e r, 1964), 233. 71 p r i o r to 1966. In J a n u a r y of t h a t y e a r , F r a n z S c h n e id e r, a r e t i r e d facu lty m e m b e r a t th e U n iv e r s it y of C a lif o r n ia a t B e r k e le y , i s s u e d a b oo k let w hich c a r r i e d th is s t a t e m e n t on th e f i r s t p ag e: . . . to a s s u r e thoughtful c o n s id e r a tio n to e v e r y one in th is M U L T IV E R S IT Y , t h e r e sh o u ld be c r e a t e d the O ffice of OM BUDS­ MAN o f the S can d in av ia n p e r s u a s io n . T he e x is te n c e of s u c h an o ffice would b e c l e a r and co nv in cin g e v id e n c e th a t the b u s y m e n on to p a r e d e e p ly c o n c e r n e d th a t o r d e r and j u s t i c e p r e v a i l in t h e i r d o m ain . * P r o f e s s o r S c h n e i d e r 's b r i e f o m b u d s m a n s u g g e s tio n w a s co m b in ed w ith a r g u m e n ts fa v o rin g s tu d e n t e v a lu a tio n o f p r o f e s s o r s a t la r g e u n i v e r s i t i e s and a d e a n of i n s t r u c t i o n f o r im p ro v in g fa c u lty p e r f o r m a n c e a t s m a l l c o l le g e s - - in n o v a tio n s h e had b e e n a d v o c a tin g f o r a n u m b e r of y e a r s . The d e a n of i n s t r u c t i o n p o s itio n S c h n e id e r d e s c r i b e d in e a r l i e r w r itin g s in c lu d e d a few f e a t u r e s now a s s o c i a t e d w ith c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n . T h is slig h t r e s e m b l a n c e , h o w e v e r, a p p e a r s to be c o in c id e n ta l. B e fo re 1966 ended, t h e c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n id e a r e c e iv e d a b oo st f r o m A n d e r s o n , who d e s c r i b e d s u c h a p o s itio n in a r e p o r t is s u e d by th e B e r k e le y I n s titu te of G o v e r n m e n ta l S tu d ie s. The p o litic a l s c ie n c e p r o f e s s o r s u g g e s te d th a t a te n u re d fa c u lty m e m b e r w ith a r e p u ta tio n f o r r e c e p t i v e n e s s to s tu d e n t c o m p la in ts w ould be 1 F r a n z S c h n e id e r, Y e s ! and No 1 N eeded: A D ean of I n s tr u c tio n and a S tu d e n t- F a c u lty R e a c tio n S heet (B e r k e le y , C a l i f . : By the A u th o r, J a n u a r y , 1966), p. 1. 72 m o s t e ffe c tiv e . A s v ie w e d by A n d e rso n , th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n could in v e s tig a te both p o o r teaching an d u n f a i r a d m in is t r a tio n , r e p o r tin g h i s fin d in g s to th e p e rs o n s c o n c e r n e d an d , a t h is d i s c r e ­ tio n , to t h e i r s u p e r i o r s . T h e im p o r ta n c e of in d e p e n d e n c e f r o m all c a m p u s p o w e r g r o u p s w a s e m p h a s iz e d . 1 Two p r o f e s s i o n a l jo u r n a ls p u b lis h e d c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n a r t i c l e s in 1967. In one, S c h lo s s b e r g p r o p o s e d a " l e g a l p h ilo s o p h e r " a s s ig n e d to th e p resid e n t* s s ta ff to in v e s t i g a t e s t u d e n t s ' c o m p la in ts a n d m ake r e c o m m e n d a tio n s f o r r e d r e s s . 2 In the o t h e r , M u n d in g e r e s ta b lis h e d a t h e o r e t i c a l b a s i s for th e p o s itio n and m a d e a n u m b e r 3 of p r a c t ic a l s u g g e s tio n s f o r im p le m e n ta tio n . He e n v isio n e d th e o m b u d sm a n a s a p e r s o n o f a c a d e m ic a b ility and in te g r i ty , r e c e p tiv e t o c o m p la in ts f r o m any p e r s o n in the u n i v e r s i t y and e m p o w e re d to in v e s tig a te c a s e s of a lle g e d inequity o r m a l a d m i n i s t r a t i o n . S tu d en ts, facu lty and a d m i n i s t r a t o r s a l l would be inv o lv ed in h i s s e le c tio n . The office he d e s c r i b e d follow s th e S can d in av ia n m o d e l w ith m o d if ic a tio n s . 1A n d e r s o n , " O m b u d sm a n P r o p o s a l s : S tim u lu s to In q u iry , " P u b lic A f f a i r s R e p o r t , VII (D e c e m b e r, 1966), 3. 2 N a n c y K. S c h lo s s b e r g , "A n O m b u d s m a n f o r S tu d e n ts ," N A S P A - - J o u r n a l of the A s s o c ia tio n o f D e a n s and A d m i n i s t r a t o r s of Student A f f a i r s , V (Ju ly , 1967), 3 2-3 3. 3 D o n ald C. M u n d in g e r, " T h e U n iv e r s it y O m b u d s m a n ," J o u r n a l of H i g h e r E d u c a tio n , XXXVIII ( D e c e m b e r , 1967), 4 9 3 -9 9 . 73 A ls o in 1967, G o ro v itz in tr o d u c e d a book e n title d F r e e d o m and O r d e r in the U n iv e r s ity by r e c o m m e n d in g the a p p o in tm e n t of c a m p u s o m b u d sm en : . . . The u n i v e r s i t y could ap p o in t a n " o m b u d s m a n " c h a rg e d w ith the s o le r e s p o n s i b ilit y o f c h a m p io n in g th e c a u s e o f s tu d e n t c o m p la in ts and s u g g e s tio n s . He m ig h t be h ir e d by a c o m m itte e of th e fa c u lty s e n a te , and sh ould h a v e no s u p e r i o r in the a d m in ­ i s t r a t i o n , n o r any v o ic e in th e f o rm a tio n of r u l e s and p o lic ie s . But he sh o u ld be th o ro u g h ly in f o r m e d ab o u t th e u n iv e rsity * s p o lic ie s , p r e c e d e n t s , v a g u e n e s s e s , c h a n n e ls o f c o m m u n ic a tio n , p r o c e d u r e s f o r ch an ge, and lo c i of a u th o r ity and r e s p o n s i b i l i t y - in s h o r t, he should know the w o rk in g s of th e u n i v e r s i t y a s few o t h e r s do, an d a s s tu d e n ts a l m o s t n e v e r can , and he should m a k e a v a ila b le that kn ow led g e fo r the ch a m p io n in g of stu d e n t in te re s ts . An a c a d e m ic o m b u d sm a n could be of g r e a t h elp to s tu d e n ts , e s p e c i a l l y to th e s tu d e n t who la c k s th e c o n fid e n ce and a g g r e s s i v e ­ n e s s to ta k e up the c u d g e ls on h is own. T he o m b u d sm a n would not be a b u f f e r b e tw e e n stu d e n t an d a d m i n i s t r a t i o n , n o r a lia is o n , b ut a n o n - ju d g m e n ta l p ilo t w ho w ould g u id e e a c h student* s e f f o r ts th ro u g h the m o s t e ffe c tiv e c h a n n e ls . T h is s y s te m could a l s o be a h e lp to th e a d m in is t r a tio n , cu ttin g down on i l l - d i r e c t e d a s s a u l t s not to s p a r e th e d e a n s , but to fo c u s c o m p la in t and s u g ­ g e s tio n m o s t a p p r o p r i a t e l y . 1 B a rz u n a l s o e n d o r s e d th e c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n id e a in h is book, T h e A m e r ic a n U n i v e r s i t y , p u b lish e d in 1968: T h e c a m p u s . . . n e e d s a new o u tle t fo r g r ie v a n c e s , th e O m b u d sm a n of the Sw edish w e l f a r e s t a t e . T r a n s p la n te d to th e c a m p u s u n d e r any o t h e r n a m e , h e would p e r f o r m fu n c tio n s th a t no la r g e in s titu tio n ca n affo rd a n y lo n g e r to o v e rlo o k . . . . A student* s tim e i s p r e c i o u s and h is p a tie n c e th in . W o r s e , i f he h a s s u f f e r e d in ju s tic e fro m a r u le o r a c l e r k , h e sh o u ld h av e r e d r e s s . E x p e r ie n c e w ill d e t e r m i n e how th e b e n e v o le n t Om ^ G o ro v itz , ed. , F r e e d o m and O r d e r in th e U n i v e r s i t y , p. 20. 74 sh o u ld g o to w o rk , w ith w h a t s ta f f and u n d e r w h a t co n d itio n s. The one d a n g e r is th a t h is office sh ou ld b e c o m e a se c o n d a d m in ­ i s t r a t i o n d u p lic a tin g a n d i n t e r f e r i n g w ith th e s e p a r a t e o ffic e s. H is b e s t r o le w ould be e d u c a ti o n a l- - t e a c h in g by e x a m p le w hat w e n e g l e c t th ro u g h o u t m o d e r n life : why a l a r g e in s titu tio n h a s to a c t a s it d o e s , and how to get fro m an in s titu tio n w h at one i s e n title d to. 1 T h e a u t h o r s o f a t h i r d book, a l s o p u b lish e d in 1968, w e r e not e n t h u s ia s tic about b e n e f its to be g a in e d fro m a c a m p u s o m b u d s ­ m an. E n title d T he C u ltu r e of th e U n iv e rs ity : G o v e rn a n c e and E d u ­ c a tio n , th e v o lu m e e m b o d ie s the m a j o r i t y r e p o r t of th e 1967 Study C o m m is s io n on U n i v e r s i t y G o v e rn a n c e a t the U n iv e r s ity of C a l i f o r ­ n ia a t B e rk e le y . C o m m e n tin g on th e A c a d e m ic S e n a t e 's in te n tio n to ap p o in t a n o m b u d sm a n to h an d le s tu d e n ts ' c o m p la in ts r e g a r d in g a c a d e m ic m a t t e r s , the r e p o r t m a d e th is ev a lu atio n : T h e r e i s no d o u b t th a t th e S en ate n e e d s an in f o rm a tio n o ffice to guide s tu d e n ts w ith a c a d e m ic g r i e v a n c e s to th e c o m ­ m it te e having j u r i s d i c t i o n o v e r th e p a r t i c u l a r s u b je c t m a t t e r . It i s , h o w e v e r, h a r d l y n e c e s s a r y to c r e a t e an o m b u d s m a n to s e r v e th is r e l a t i v e l y s im p l e s e c r e t a r i a l fu n ctio n . Beyond th is , th e C o m m is s io n i s s k e p tic a l ab o u t th e v a lu e of t h i s a p p ro a c h . In i t s o r ig in a l S w edish c o n c ep tio n , th e o m b u d s m a n i s a w a tc h ­ dog ap p o in te d by and r e s p o n s i b le only to th e l e g is la tiv e body to s u p e r v i s e a d m i n i s t r a t i v e fu n c tio n s and r e c o m m e n d i m p r o v e ­ m e n ts . T he c u r r e n t c o n c e p t of th is in s titu tio n i s f o r a m u ch w a te r e d - d o w n v e r s i o n in w hich both th e e s s e n t i a l in d e p e n d e n c e of th e o ffic ia l fro m th e ag e n c y h e w a tc h e s and m o s t of h is p o w e r and p r e s t i g e a r e l o s t o r c o m p r o m is e d . A s a r e s u l t , th e i n s t i ­ tu tio n b e c o m e s little m o r e than a f o r m a lity , h a r m l e s s a t b e s t and a t w o r s t a d i v e r s i o n fro m th e u n d e r ly in g n e c e s s i t y fo r r e f o r m of g o v e r n m e n ta l o r a d m i n i s t r a t i v e s t r u c t u r e s . If th e * B a rz u n , T he A m e r i c a n U n iv e r s it y , p. 267. 75 B e r k e le y S en ate c o m m itte e s y s t e m is p r o p e r l y o r g a n iz e d , c o o rd in a te d , and fun ctio ning , only an in f o r m a ti o n office is r e q u i r e d ; i f it i s n o t, a n o ffic ia l w ith m u c h m o r e p o w e r o r p r e s t i g e th an th a t p r e s e n t l y c o n f e r r e d on the S en ate o m b u d s ­ m a n w ill be r e q u i r e d to a c c o m p lis h an y th in g of s ig n ific a n c e . * A t l e a s t e ig h t a r t i c l e s on th e c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n a p p e a r e d in p r o f e s s io n a l j o u r n a l s and p o p u la r m a g a z i n e s d u r in g 1968. and S p a rz o 3 F lac k 2 r e g a r d e d th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n a s an in n o v a tio n o ffe rin g r e m e d i e s fo r s tu d e n t u n r e s t . B la u s te in s p e c u la te d th a t m o s t m e n c h o s e n f o r c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n p o s ts w ould be law 4 te a c h e rs . S a n d le r, K ir k and H a llb e r g d i s c u s s e d p r o b le m s in vo lv ed C a le b F o o te, H e n r y M a y e r , and A s s o c i a t e s , T he C u ltu re of th e U n iv e r s ity ; G o v e rn a n c e and E d u c a tio n (San F r a n c i s c o : J o s s e y B a s s , I n c . , 1968), pp. 1 0 7 -8 . T he c o m m i s s i o n 's m a j o r i t y r e p o r t h a s b e e n c r i t i c i z e d a s r e f le c tin g " m a n y i l l u s i o n s . " See N ath an G la z e r , " ' S tudent P o w e r ' in B e r k e le y , " T he P u b lic I n t e r e s t , XIII (F a ll, 1968), 15-17. A n d e r s o n h a s s u g g e s te d th a t th e c o m m is s io n w a s p r i m a r i l y c o n c e r n e d w ith th e fact th a t c o m p la in ts a r i s i n g fro m th e re g u la tio n of s tu d e n t p o litic a l a c tiv ity w e r e e x p lic itly exclu d ed fro m the o m b u d s m a n 's ju r i s d i c t i o n . S tan le y V. A n d e rs o n , " O m ­ b u d sm a n P a p e r s : A m e r i c a n E x p e r ie n c e and P r o p o s a l s , " (book m a n u s c r i p t . I n s titu te of G o v e r n m e n ta l S tu d ie s, U n iv e r s ity o f C a li­ fo rn ia , B e rk e le y , u n d a te d ), p . V l l . 2 M ic h a e l J . F la c k , "In n o v atio n and the U n iv e r s ity in C r i s i s : T h r e e P r o p o s a l s , " E d u c a tio n a l R e c o r d , X LIX (S u m m e r, 1968), 348. 3 F r a n k J . S p a rz o , " F a c i n g th e I s s u e s of S tudent U n r e s t , " School &. S o c ie ty , XCVI (O c to b e r 26, 1968), 359. 4 A lb e r t P . B la u s te in , " C r e a tin g th e U n iv e r s it y O m b u d s ­ m a n , " Jo u rn al_ o fJL eg a l_ E d u o atio n , XXI ( D e c e m b e r , 1968), 191. 76 in m e th o d of s e le c tio n and o ffe re d s e v e r a l a l t e r n a t i v e s . 1 B u c c ie r i su g g e s te d th a t in it ia l c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n o p e r a tio n s w e r e e s t a b l i s h ing a p r e c e d e n t f o r o th e r in s titu tio n s of h ig h e r ed u c a tio n . 2 E dd y re v ie w e d and e v a lu a te d c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n d e v e lo p m e n ts and s u g 3 g e s te d th e f o r m a tio n of a n a tio n a l o m b u d sm a n a s s o c ia tio n . T he e d i t o r s of N a tio n , d e s p ite s o m e m is g iv in g s , g e n e r a lly s u p p o r te d the 4 c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n m o v e m e n t in an e d i t o r i a l . The a c t i v i t i e s of M ich ig an S tate U n i v e r s i t y 's o m b u d sm a n w e r e d e s c r i b e d by P o lla c k in P a r a d e m a g a z in e . 5 A n u m b e r of n e w s p a p e r a r t i c l e s on th e s u b ­ j e c t a l s o w e r e p u b lish e d . A c o lle c tio n of u n p u b lish e d s p e e c h e s and d is c u s s io n n o te s h a s b een a s s e m b l e d fro m ta p e r e c o r d in g s of s e s s i o n s co n du cted *Ake S a n d le r, H e n r y P . K ir k , and E dm ond C. H a llb e rg , "A n O m b u d sm a n f o r th e U n i v e r s i t y , " J o u r n a l of C o lleg e Student P e r s o n n e l , IX (M a rc h , 1968), 114-15. 2 C la u d ia H. B u c c ie r i, " O m b u d sm a n : New T r o u b l e s h o o te r on C a m p u s ," C o lleg e and U n iv e r s ity B u s i n e s s , XLIV (M a rc h , 1968), 5 2 -5 5 . 2 ( Jo h n P a u l E ddy, "C a m p u s O m b u d sm a n in A m e r ic a n H ig h e r E d u c a tio n , " K appa D e lta P i R e c o r d , D e c e m b e r , 1968, pp. 33-35. 4 "T h e C a m p u s O m b u d sm a n , " N a tio n , CCVII ( D e c e m b e r 9, 1968), 6 1 1 -12 . 5J a c k H. P o lla c k , " O - M - B - U - D - S - M - A - N ! The New C ollege H e r o , " P a r a d e , M a r c h 17, 1968, pp. 16 -18 . 77 d u rin g th e f i r s t m e e tin g on the o m b u d s m a n in h ig h e r e d u c a tio n O c to b e r 2 4 -2 5 , 1968, in D e tr o it, M ic h ig a n .* A n d e r s o n h a s a n a ly z e d p u b lish e d and u n p u b lis h e d m a t e r i a l s on th e c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n fo r a c h a p te r in a f o rth c o m in g book. H is m a n u s c r i p t c o n c lu d e s w ith th is s u m m a r y : T he o p e r a tio n o f a c a m p u s O m b u d sm a n office p r e s u p p o s e s a r e a s o n a b ly e f f ic ie n t a d m i n i s t r a t i o n , w ith i t s own c h a n n e ls of c o m m u n ic a tio n to s tu d e n ts and fa c u lty . . . . An O m b u d s m a n i s not a s u b s t itu te f o r th e ju d ic ia l p r o c e s s (w h e re t h i s i s a p p r o ­ p r i a t e ) , a lth o u g h h e can in v e s tig a te c o m p la in ts of u n f a ir p r o ­ c e d u r e . N o r is he a c o u r t of a p p e a ls to re v ie w th e s u b s ta n c e o f th e d e c is io n s of d i s c i p l i n a r y t r i b u n a l s . C a m p u s O m b u d sm e n a r e not m a j o r p a r t i c i p a n t s in the p o litic a l p r o c e s s of U n iv e r s it y g o v e r n a n c e , although an O m ­ b u d s m a n m a y f a c ilita te th e c o n s id e r a tio n o f m a j o r i s s u e s by w ee d in g ou t m in o r i r r i t a n t s . F in a lly , a c a m p u s O m b u d s m a n i s not a s u p e r - a d m i n i s t r a t o r , s e c o n d - g u e s s i n g o f f i c e r s - o f - t h e lin e . In d e c id in g w h e th e r o r not to c r i t i c i z e , th e O m b u d s m a n d o e s not a s k " I s t h i s how I w ould h av e done i t ? " I n s te a d , h e a s k s "W a s th is d e c is io n r e a s o n a b l e ? " A d m in is tr a tio n in A m e r ic a n u n i v e r s i t i e s n e e d s r e s p o n s i b le , e x t e r n a l, i m p a r t i a l c r i t i c s , lik e the O m b u d sm a n a t M ic h ig an S tate . K eep in g th e lim ita tio n s e x p r e s s e d in th e p r e c e d in g p a r a g r a p h s in m in d , t h e r e i s l i t t l e to lo s e , and m u c h to g ain f o r th e in d iv id u a l s tu d e n t in r e c tify in g o r r e s o lv in g g r ie v a n c e s , f o r th e a d m i n i s t r a t i o n in d oing a good jo b and g e ttin g c r e d i t fo r it, and f o r th e p u b lic in av o id in g u n s e e m ly c o n t r o v e r s y in th e g r o v e s of a c a d e m e . The m e th o d of p e r s u a s i o n i s e m in e n tly a p p r o p r i a t e in p l a c e s of le a r n in g . ^ An u n p u b lis h e d p a p e r by W h ite, th e f i r s t o m b u d s m a n a t San J o s e S tate C o lle g e , e x a m in e s th e c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n both in th e o ry M e e tin g w a s c o - s p o n s o r e d by H ig h e r E d u c a tio n E x e c u ­ tiv e A s s o c i a t e s and th e U n iv e r s it y of D e tr o it. R e c o r d in g s w e r e m a d e and t r a n s c r i b e d by th e a u th o r. 2 A n d e r s o n , " O m b u d s m a n P a p e r s , " p. V7. 78 and p r a c t i c e and m a k e s a n e v a lu a tio n b a se d l a r g e l y on the a u t h o r 's ex p e rien ce . H is t h e s i s i s th a t c a m p u s m i n i s t e r s should be co n ­ s i d e r e d f o r c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n a p p o in tm e n ts . * T h is r e v ie w of th e l i t e r a t u r e in d ic a t e s th a t a c o n s id e r a b le am o u n t of in f o r m a tio n c o n c e r n in g th e c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n h a s b een w r i tte n and p u b lis h e d in a s h o r t p e r io d of tim e . The a m o u n t is in s ig n if ic a n t c o m p a r e d w ith l i t e r a t u r e on the c iv il o m b u d sm a n , but th e l a t t e r c o n c ep t h a s b een in e x i s te n c e f a r lo n g e r . T o c o m p le te t h i s p o r tio n of th e stud y, g e n e r a liz a ti o n s d e r iv e d f ro m c iv il and c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n l i t e r a t u r e w ill now be su m m a riz e d . C o n c lu sio n T e c h n ic a lly , th e o m b u d s m a n co n c ep t can n o t be d e s c r i b e d a s a new s o c i a l in v e n tio n b e c a u s e it h a s been in e x i s te n c e fo r h u n ­ d r e d s of y e a r s an d w a s f o r m a liz e d a s a s y s t e m in 1809. H o w ev er, i t s t r a n s f o r m a t i o n in r e c e n t t i m e s in to an in s titu tio n w h o s e p r i m a r y fu nctio n i s to s u p e r v i s e b u r e a u c r a t i c g o v e r n m e n ta l a d m i n i s t r a t i o n , and i t s u s e e x c lu s iv e ly f o r t h i s p u r p o s e in D e n m a rk , N o rw a y , New *J. B en to n W hite, " T h e O m b u d sm a n in H ig h e r E d u c a tio n " (u n pu blish ed t h e s i s , G ra d u a te D iv isio n , P a c i f ic L u th e r a n T h e o lo g i­ c a l S e m in a ry , 1968). 79 Z e a la n d , G r e a t B rita in an d e l s e w h e r e , h a s g iv e n th e co n cept a new d im e n s io n and c h a r a c t e r . * If f re e d o m i s to h a v e any m e a n in g , it i s i m p e r a tiv e th a t an in d iv id u a l who fe e ls w ro n g e d by th e v e r y a g e n c ie s e s ta b li s h e d to h elp h im sh o u ld be a b le to a p p e a l q u ick ly , e a s ily , a n d w ith ou t c o s t to a p o lit ic a lly in d epen den t an d i m p a r t i a l office. T h e office of o m b u d s ­ m a n i s in te n d e d to s e r v e th a t p u r p o s e w ithout d is p la c in g e x is tin g r e m e d i a l a g e n c ie s , such a s the c o u r t s . 2 It a l s o a p p e a r s th a t once h is office i s in o p e ra tio n and h is a c t i v i t i e s g e n e r a l l y known, an o m b u d s m a n te n d s to p r e v e n t m a n y p o te n tia l g r i e v a n c e s fro m m a t e r i a li z in g . 3 T h e p sy c h o lo g ic a l v a lu e of the office r e s t s in th e in d i­ vidual* s know ledge th a t h e i s not h e l p l e s s b e f o r e th e la r g e i m p e r s o n a l 4 a d m i n i s t r a t i v e m a c h in e r y of g o v e r n m e n t. A n d e r s o n h as a t tr i b u te d th e w o rld w id e u p s u r g e of i n t e r e s t in th e o m b u d s m a n idea to th is c a p a c ity to m it ig a t e a g a in s t th e e v ils of b u r e a u c r a c y : *R ow at, e d . , T h e O m b u d sm a n : 2 C i t i z e n 's D e f e n d e r , p. 292. J o h n M. C a p o zz o la, "A n A m e r ic a n O m b u d sm a n : P r o b l e m s and P r o s p e c t s , " W e s te rn P o l i t i c a l Q u a r t e r l y , XXI (Ju ne, 1968), 290. 3 A n d e rso n , " T h e O m b u d sm a n : P u b lic D e f e n d e r A g a in s t M a l a d m i n i s t r a t i o n ," p. 4. 4 R o se n th a l, " T h e O m b u d s m a n - - S w e d is h 'G r i e v a n c e Man, ' " p. 230. 80 An e n o r m o u s b u r e a u c r a c y s e e m s to be a n in e s c a p a b le c o n ­ c o m ita n t o f m o d e r n in d u s t r ia liz e d m a s s s o c ie ty . In r e m e d y ­ in g the m a r g i n a l d e f e c ts o f p ublic a d m i n i s t r a t i o n , th e . . . O m b u d sm a n h a s p ro v e d to be e ffe c tiv e , n o n - d is r u p tiv e , in e x ­ p e n s iv e , and c u m u la tiv e to p r e - e x i s t i n g s a f e g u a r d s . * D a v is h a s a p p r a i s e d th e fu n d a m e n ta l id e a b eh in d the o m b u d sm a n in s titu tio n a s " th o ro u g h ly so u n d ": T h e id e a r e s t s h e a v ily upon the c a r d i n a l p r in c ip le o f check w h ich h a s p lay ed s u c h a n im p o r ta n t r o le in the h i s t o r i c a l d e v e lo p m e n t of p r o te c tio n s a g a in s t u n f a i r g o v e r n m e n ta l a c tio n . T h e check i s a l l th e m o r e effectiv e b e c a u s e it i s m a d e by an o f fic e r w ith a d if f e r e n t fo cu s fro m th a t o f the a d m i n i s t r a t o r w h o se a c tio n i s c r i t i c i z e d , and by one w ho h a s a m u c h b r o a d e r p e rsp e c tiv e . ^ A c c o rd in g to A n d e r s o n , the g e n iu s of the o m b u d s m a n c o n ­ cept i s th a t the h o ld e r of th e office h a s fu ll a u th o r ity to in v e s tig a te and p a s s ju d g m e n t, b u t no p o w e r to e n f o r c e . He h a s w r itte n : "T he e f f e c tiv e n e s s of the O m b u d sm a n lie s in th e r e s p e c t in w h ich he is held, and in th e g e n e r a l a c c e p ta n c e of th e r e a s o n a b l e n e s s of h is v ie w s ." 3 In s h o r t, the only sa n c tio n w hich the o m b u d sm a n can i m - p o se i s c e n s u r e . 4 'A n d e r s o n , " T h e S can d in av ia n O m b u d s m a n ," p. 409. 2 K en n e th C. D a v is , " O m b u d s m e n in A m e r ic a ; O f f ic e r s to C r iti c iz e A d m in is tr a tiv e A ctio n , " U n iv e r s it y of P e n n s y lv a n ia Law R e v ie w , CIX (Jun e, 1961), 1075. 3 A n d e rs o n , " T h e S can d in av ia n O m b u d sm a n , " p. 408. 4 H e n ry S. R e u s s and A n d e rs o n , " T h e O m b u d sm a n : T rib u n e of th e P e o p le , " T he A n n a ls o f th e A m e r i c a n A c a d e m y of P o l i t i c a l and S o c ia l S cie n c e , CCCLX III ( J a n u a ry , 1966), p. 46. 81 F r o m t h e s e g e n e r a l s t a t e m e n t s and th e p r e c e d in g re v ie w of l i t e r a t u r e p e r ta in in g both to th e c iv il an d c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n , a t l e a s t f o u rte e n g e n e r a l i z a t i o n s can be m a d e . T h ey a r e l i s te d below a s a co n clu d in g s u m m a tio n of e x is tin g in f o rm a tio n on th e o m b u d s ­ m a n in th e o r y and p r a c t i c e : 1 1. W h e r e v e r th e o m b u d s m a n h a s b e e n a s u c c e s s , he h a s b e e n w o rk in g in a r e l a t i v e l y s ta b le s y s t e m of g o v e r n ­ m e n t w hich i s s u p p o r te d and t r u s t e d b y m o s t of the p e o p le m o s t of th e tim e . 2. A h ig h p r o p o r ti o n of the c o m p la in ts b ro u g h t to the o m b u d s m a n a r e out o f h i s j u r i s d i c t i o n o r a r e d e e m e d by h im to be unfounded. 3. If h i s g r i e v a n c e i s g en u in e, a c o m p la in a n t often can be h e lp e d by the o m b u d s m a n . 4. T he o m b u d s m a n d o e s not d e a l w ith m a n y of th e th in g s th a t i r r i t a t e and f r u s t r a t e s o m e c i tiz e n s , s u c h a s p o lic y d e c is io n s . 5. T he o m b u d s m a n i s not a g e n e r a l s u p e r v i s o r of pub lic s e r v a n t s o r p u b lic s e r v i c e s . 6 . W h e r e v e r an o m b u d s m a n h a s b e e n a c tiv e , c i t i z e n s ' c o n fid e n c e in p u b lic e m p lo y e e s h a s b een e n h a n ce d . 7. T he o m b u d s m a n can im p r o v e p u b lic a d m i n i s t r a t i o n by in f o r m in g o f f ic ia ls of u n s a t i s f a c t o r y p e r f o r m a n c e by s u b o r d in a t e s w h ic h m ig h t o th e r w is e n e v e r b e c a lle d to t h e i r a tte n tio n . . T h e o m b u d s m a n b r in g s about p r o c e d u r a l re v ie w w ith in the a d m i n i s t r a t i v e a g e n c y . 8 ^ o r a e of th e s e p o in ts a r e p a r a p h r a s e d f r o m G e llh o rn , " T h e O m b u d s m a n 's R e le v a n c e to A m e r i c a n M u n ic ip a l A f f a i r s , " pp. 13440. 82 9. T he o m b u d sm a n a t t e m p t s to s t r i k e a b a la n c e b e tw e e n s ta n d a r d iz e d p r o c e d u r e s sh o w in g no f a v o r i t i s m and u n y ie ld in g b u r e a u c r a t i c r ig id ity . 10. T h e o m b u d sm a n d o e s not fu n ctio n a s a t r i a l c o u rt. 11. T he o m b u d sm a n d o e s not s u p e r c e d e o th e r o f fic ia ls ; h e s e e s to it th a t o t h e r s do t h e i r jo b s c o m p le te ly and ju s tly . 12. T he o m b u d sm a n b r i n g s g r ie v a n c e m a c h i n e r y w ith in r e a c h of p e r s o n s not lik e ly to s e e k o th e r m e a n s of redress. 13. T he o m b u d sm a n s y s t e m d o e s not e x c lu d e c itiz e n s fro m o th e r m e a n s of r e d r e s s . 14. M uch o f th e o m b u d s m a n 's p o w e r and e f f e c t iv e n e s s s t e m fro m h is p e r s o n a l p r e s t i g e and p e r s u a s i v e n e s s . C H A P T E R III THE CAM PUS OMBUDSMAN: A G E N E R A L EVALUATION T he l i t e r a t u r e r e v ie w e d in th e p r e v io u s c h a p te r r e v e a le d th a t the o m b u d sm a n in A m e r ic a n h ig h e r e d u c a tio n i s an inn ov ation a s s o c ia te d w ith s tu d e n t- in s ti tu tio n a l p r o b le m s and th e lo n g - e s t a b li s h e d c iv il o m b u d s m a n co n cep t. T he s tu d y w ill now be d i r e c t e d to w a rd a g e n e r a l e v a lu a tio n of th e ca m p u s o m b u d sm a n . V a r io u s a p p r o a c h e s to th e office ad op ted by fo u rte e n in s titu tio n s w ill be e x a m in e d in the f i r s t s e c tio n . D e v e lo p m e n ts a t in s titu tio n s in v a r io u s s ta g e s of e s ta b lis h in g th e p o sitio n a r e c o n s id e r e d in th e se c o n d s e c tio n . S elf- e v a lu a tio n s by s e le c te d c a m p u s o m b u d s m e n a r e r e p o r t e d in th e th ir d s e c tio n , co m b in ed w ith ta b le s in A ppendix C. C o n c lu s io n s d ra w n fro m th e s e findings m a k e up th e fin al p o r tio n of th is s e c tio n . S e v e r a l f a c t o r s h av e im p e d e d a t te m p ts to o b tain g e n e r a l in f o rm a tio n r e g a r d in g th e o m b u d sm a n in A m e r ic a n h ig h e r e d u c a tio n . One is th e auto n o m y of both p u b lic and p r iv a te in s t itu ti o n s , en a b lin g th em to adopt in n o v a tio n s w ithout r e p o r tin g su c h a c tio n s to c e n tr a liz e d 83 84 a g e n c ie s . * A n o th e r i s th e l a r g e n u m b e r and wide d i s p e r s i o n of c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s . A th ir d f a c t o r i s th e a b s e n c e of an y f o r m a l a s s o c ia tio n of c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n . S till a n o th e r i s th e t e n d ­ en cy o f s o m e a d m i n i s t r a t o r s and fa c u lty m e m b e r s no t to a n s w e r m a ile d i n q u ir ie s . F in a lly , th e inn ov atio n i s s p r e a d in g s o r a p id ly in d if f e r e n t f o r m s th a t the only c o n s ta n t in the o v e r a l l p a t t e r n is ch ang e. T h is m o n t h 's to ta l n u m b e r of c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n , fo r e x a m p le , is a l m o s t c e r t a i n to be d if f e r e n t f r o m l a s t m o n t h 's and next m o n t h ' s . D e s p ite th e s e o b s ta c le s , a c o n c e r te d e f f o r t w a s m a d e to s u r v e y and e v a lu a te th e c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n s itu a tio n a s of D e c e m ­ b e r 31, 1968. A lthough th e fin d in g s r e p o r t e d in th is c h a p te r a r e not a l l in c lu s iv e , th ey a r e a c c u r a t e to th e e x te n t th a t th e y a s s i m i l a t e in f o r m a tio n o b ta in e d fro m a n u m b e r of r e l i a b l e s o u r c e s . 2 A m ong th e a g e n c ie s w h ich could p ro v id e no in f o rm a tio n about c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n w e r e : B u re a u of H ig h e r E d u c a tio n , U. S. O ffice of E d u c a tio n ; A m e r i c a n A s s o c ia tio n of J u n i o r C o lle g e s ; C le a r in g H o use fo r J u n i o r C o lle g e In fo rm a tio n ; and A m e r ic a n A s s o ­ cia tio n fo r H ig h e r E d u c a tio n . In fo r m a tio n o b tain ed fro m th e U nited S ta te s N atio n a l Student A s s o c ia ti o n w as h e lp fu l but f r a g m e n ta r y . 2 No c la im i s m a d e th a t th is s u r v e y c o v e r s a l l A m e r ic a n c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s w ith c a m p u s o m b u d s m e n p r i o r to 1969. R a th e r , th e o b je c tiv e i s to d e s c r i b e and e v a lu a te th e r o le a t a w ide ra n g e o f in s titu tio n s , p a r t i c u l a r l y th o s e w h ic h a p p e a r to h a v e b e e n im i ta t e d by o t h e r s . A s u r v e y of s ix ty s e l e c t e d w e s t e r n u n i v e r s i t i e s in th e s u m m e r of 1968 in d ic a te d th a t s e v e n of the f i f t y - t h r e e i n s t i t u ­ tio n s w hich r e s p o n d e d had o m b u d s m e n . T h ey w e r e : C a lif o r n ia S tate C o lle g e a t L o s A n g e le s , San F e r n a n d o V a lle y S tate C o lle g e (s in c e 85 B e fo re p r o c e e d in g w ith s u r v e y fin d in g s, it i s a p p r o p r ia te t o point out a g a in th a t th is stu d y i s r e s t r i c t e d to a d e fin itio n of c a m ­ p u s o m b u d s m a n w h ich e x c lu d e s s tu d e n ts s e r v in g in th a t ca p ac ity . C o n se q u e n tly , a n u m b e r of in s titu tio n s w ith s tu d e n t o m b u d sm e n a r e not in c lu d e d in s u b s e q u e n t s e c tio n s . N o n e th e le s s , i t should be ac k n o w led g e d th a t th e f i r s t a tte m p t to a d a p t th e o m b u d sm a n co n c ep t to an in s titu tio n of h ig h e r e d u c a tio n in N o rth A m e r ic a a p p e a r s to h a v e ta k e n p la c e in 1965 th ro u g h s tu d e n t in itia tiv e a t Sim on F r a s e r U n iv e r s it y in V a n c o u v e r. * M o st s tu d e n t o m b u d s m e n have b ee n ap p o in te d by s tu d e n t g o v e r n m e n ts . H o w e v e r, a t s o m e in s titu tio n s , su c h a s th e U n iv e r s it y of C h ic a g o and th e U n iv e r s ity of T e x a s (C o l­ le g e of A r t s and S c ie n c e s ), the a p p o in tm e n ts h av e b e e n m a d e by to p 2 le v e l a d m i n i s t r a t o r s . O th e r in s titu tio n s w ith s tu d e n t o m b u d sm e n in c lu d e th e U n iv e r s it y of K en tu ck y , F l o r i d a State U n iv e r s ity , U n i­ v e r s i t y of M in n e s o ta and Jo h n s o n S tate C o lle g e in V e r m o n t. Student d is c o n tin u e d ), Sonom a S ta te C o lle g e , U n iv e r s ity of C a lif o rn ia a t I rv in e , S c r ip p s C o lle g e , U n iv e r s it y of D e n v e r and S tan fo rd U n i v e r ­ s ity . See U CLA D a ily B r u i n , F e b r u a r y 25, 1969, p . 3. A lthough s o m e of t h e s e a r e o m itte d in th is stu d y , o t h e r w e s t e r n in s titu tio n s not c o v e r e d in th e 1968 s u r v e y a r e in c lu d e d . *A n d e r s o n , " O m b u d s m a n P r o p o s a l s : S tim u lu s to In q u iry , " p. 3. 2 J a m e s W. B r a n n , " T h e C a m p u s O m b u d sm a n : C o lleg e S tu d e n ts ' D e fe n d e r, " C h r o n ic le of H ig h e r E d u c a tio n , III (N o v em ­ b e r 11, 1968), 4. A lso s e e New Y o rk T i m e s , O c to b e r 9, 1968, p. 47. 86 o m b u d sm en a l s o h av e b e e n appointed b y s tu d e n t g o v e r n m e n ts a t so m e in s titu tio n s w ith c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n . U s u a lly , c o o rd in a tio n of e f f o r ts is a tte m p te d . In s titu tio n s with O m b u d s m e n A m e r ic a n c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s w ith c a m p u s o m b u d s ­ m e n v a r y in s i z e fro m " m u l t i v e r s i t i e s , " su c h a s th e U n iv e r s it y of C a lifo rn ia a t B e r k e le y and M ichigan S ta te U n iv e r s ity , to s m a l l c o m ­ m u n ity c o lle g e s , such a s M acom b C o u n ty C o m m u n ity C o lle g e in M ichigan . F o r th e p u r p o s e of this a n a l y s i s , h o w e v e r, f o u r te e n in s titu tio n s know n to h av e h a d f u ll- tim e o r p a r t - t i m e o m b u d s m e n p r i o r to 1969 w ill be c a te g o r iz e d not by s iz e but by sco p e of office. The t h r e e m a in d iv is io n s in to which t h e y a r e o r g a n iz e d a lp h a b e tic a lly are: f o r s tu d e n ts only, f o r stu den ts a n d o t h e r s , and fo r f a c u lty only. A lthough the t h i r d d e s ig n a tio n does n o t fit th e p r e l i m i n a r y d e fin itio n of c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n p r e s e n te d in C h a p t e r I, th e sin g le in s titu tio n to w hich it a p p l i e s is in c lu d e d for th e p u r p o s e of c o m p a r is o n . F o r Students O nly At s e v e n c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n r e c e i v e s c o m p la in ts fro m stu d e n ts o n ly . s o u rc e s a re d ire c te d e lsew h ere. G r i e v a n c e s fro m o t h e r S a lie n t f e a t u r e s of the o m b u d s m a n p o sitio n on e a c h o f th e s e c a m p u s e s w ill be d e s c r i b e d . 87 U n iv e r s it y o f ^ C a lif o r n ia a t B e r k e le y B e fo re G e o rg e L e itm a n n w a s ap p o in ted o m b u d sm a n by th e A c a d e m ic Senate in 1968, B e r k e le y a l r e a d y had a " s t u d e n t a d v o c a te " a p p o in te d by th e A s s o c ia te d S tu d en ts and a co m p la in t o f fic e r a p p o in ted by th e a d m i n i s t r a t i o n . The l a t t e r p o s itio n w a s filled b y the a s s o c i a t e d ean o f s tu d e n ts , w ho w as d e s ig n a te d to a c t " a s an ' O m b u d sm a n , ' h e a r i n g s tu d e n t c o m p la in ts and tr y in g to r e c t i f y th e m . 2 11 L e i t m a n n 's h a l f - t i m e p o sitio n , in d e p e n d e n t o f both th e A s s o c ia te d S tu d en ts and th e a d m i n i s t r a t i o n , i s a o n e - m e m b e r c o m ­ m i t t e e of th e A c a d e m ic S en ate. T he only c o m p la in ts h e c o n s id e r s a r e th o s e r e g a r d in g d e c is io n s w h ich a ffe c t a s t u d e n t 's a c a d e m ic sta tu s. He w ill not h e a r c o m p la in ts a r i s i n g fro m th e re g u la tio n of s tu d e n t p o litic a l a c tiv ity . In c o m p la in ts a r i s i n g fro m d is c i p l i n a r y p r o c e e d in g s , h e w ill not r e v ie w th e s u b s t a n c e of the c a s e , but m a y g r e v ie w th e p r o c e d u r e s . * M ore d e ta ile d in f o r m a tio n about c a m p u s o m b u d s m e n a t B e r k e le y and five o th e r in s t itu ti o n s a p p e a r s in the t h i r d Bection of th is c h a p t e r and in A ppendix C. T he o t h e r s a r e C o lu m b ia U n i v e r ­ s ity , U n iv e r s it y o f D e tr o it, M ic h ig a n S tate U n iv e r s it y , San D ieg o S tate C o lle g e and San J o s e S ta te C o lleg e. 2 3 A n d e rs o n , " O m b u d sm a n P a p e r s , " pp. V 3 -4 . G e o rg e L e itm a n n , p r i v a t e in te r v ie w held d u r in g m e e tin g on th e o m b u d sm a n in h ig h e r e d u c a tio n , D e tr o it, M ic h . , O c to b e r 24, 1968. 88 E a s t e r n M o n tan a C o lle g e G e o r g e G lo eg e , p r o f e s s o r of c h e m i s t r y , b e c a m e th e f i r s t c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n in th e U nited S ta te s w ith h i s a p p o in tm e n t to th a t p o s t a t E a s t e r n M o ntan a C o lleg e on O c to b e r 7, 1966. T he s e le c tio n w a s m a d e by P r e s i d e n t S tan le y Heywood, w ho p r o m i s e d th e fa c u lty th a t " th e a d m i n i s t r a t i o n w ill in no w ay d ic ta t e th e m a n n e r in w hich h e c a r r i e s out h is r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s . " * Heyw ood a l s o e s ta b li s h e d th e s e " m i n im u m g ro u n d r u l e s " : 1. S tu d e n ts w ho h a v e e x h a u s te d a l l c h a n n e ls fo r r e d r e s s of g r i e v a n c e s m a y a p p e a l to the O m b u d sm a n . . . . 2. . . . th e O m b u d s m a n m a y d e c id e to in v e s tig a te o r not i n ­ v e s tig a t e th e c a s e . 3. T h e O m b u d sm a n h a s th e in d e p e n d e n t r ig h t to in v e s tig a te w h en t h e r e isn* t a c o m p la in t. 4. I n fo r m a tio n p ro v id e d to th e O m b u d s m a n . . . m a y be c o n ­ s i d e r e d p r iv ile g e d . . . . 5. T h e fin al r e p o r t to th e P r e s i d e n t of a n y in v e s tig a tio n w ill b e m a d e a v a ila b le c o n s is te n t w ith r e a s o n a b l e s a f e g u a r d s fo r p e rso n a l in fo rm a tio n . 2 T o t h e s e g u id e lin e s , H eywood added: I a m s u r e th a t s tu d e n ts w ill u n d e r s ta n d th a t th is is not a v e h ic le f o r p r o t e s t of a d e c is io n th a t i s n ot f a v o r a b le to th e m Heyw ood f i r s t an n o u n ced h i s in te n tio n to a p p o in t a c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n in h is in a u g u r a l a d d r e s s on M ay 15, 1966, pp. 10-11. 2 "A n n o u n c e m e n t I - O m b u d s m a n ," Info f ro m th e O ffice of th e P r e s i d e n t , E a s t e r n M o n tan a C o lle g e , O c to b e r 7, 1966, p. 2. 89 n o r i s it in te n d e d to b y p a s s an y p r o c e d u r e now in o p e r a tio n . . . . It i s m y in te n tio n to a c c e p t th e r e c o m m e n d a tio n s of th e O m b u d s ­ m a n and to m a k e a l l p o s s ib le c h a n g e s in th e lig h t of h is r e c o m ­ m e n d a tio n s . . . . i t i s m y hope th a t th e O m b u d sm a n w ill n e v e r n ee d to b e u s e d , b e c a u s e th a t could d e n o te th a t s tu d e n ts a r e a l r e a d y r e c e iv in g r e a s o n a b le c o n s id e r a tio n in a l l f a c e ts of o u r c a m p u s life . 1 G lo eg e , w h o se te a c h in g load w a s not re d u c e d to allo w tim e f o r h i s o m b u d sm a n a c t i v i t i e s , r e p o r t e d two y e a r s a f t e r h is a p p o in t­ m e n t th a t h e had h a d " v e r y lit tle b u s in e s s . " H is f i r s t c a s e inv olved th e d e a n of s tu d e n ts and h is se c o n d c o m p la in t c a m e f r o m a g r a d u a te s tu d e n t a t odds w ith h is c o m m itte e . M o st of h is c o n ta c ts h a v e b e e n in f o r m a l r e f e r r a l s m a d e by te le p h o n e . A fo rm he d e v e lo p e d f o r c o m p la in ts e n title d " P r e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t to the O m b u d sm a n " r e q u i r e s a d e ta ile d d e s c r i p t i o n of th e g r ie v a n c e and a c h ro n o lo g ic a l a c c o u n t of p r e v io u s a p p e a ls . F ew s tu d e n ts h a v e e le c te d to u s e it. 2 M ic h ig an S ta te U n iv e r s ity J a m e s R u s t, th e 'o m b u d s m a n a t M ic h ig an S tate U n iv e r s ity , h a s s e r v e d lo n g e r a s c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n a t a m a j o r u n i v e r s i t y th a n an y o th e r in d iv id u a l. H is a p p o in tm e n t by th e u n i v e r s i t y p r e s id e n t in 1967 w a s f o r a t w o - y e a r t e r m , a f t e r w h ich e i t h e r m a y t e r m i n a t e *I b id . , p. 3. 2 G e o r g e G lo eg e , p r iv a te in te r v ie w h eld d u r in g m e e tin g on th e o m b u d s m a n in h ig h e r e d u c a tio n , D e tr o it, M ich. , O c to b e r 25, 1968. 90 the a r r a n g e m e n t . tio n . S tu d en ts and fa c u lty w e r e in v o lv ed in h is n o m in a ­ The o ffice w a s r e c o m m e n d e d by a F a c u lty C o m m itte e on Student A f f a i r s in a r e p o r t a p p ro v e d e a r l y in 1967 by th e A c a d e m ic C o un cil, A c a d e m ic S enate and B o a rd of T r u s t e e s . 1 T he r e c o m ­ m e n d a tio n in c lu d e d th e s e p ro v is io n s : T he P r e s i d e n t s h a ll ap po int f r o m th e s e n i o r fa c u lty a high p r e s t i g e o ffic ia l w ith th e title of O m b u d sm a n . T he s e n s i t i v e and c o n fid e n tia l n a tu r e of the O m b u d s m a n 's w o rk d i c t a t e s th a t h e conduct h is o p e r a tio n s w ith d ig n ity and in te g r i ty . He s h a ll r e s p e c t th e p r iv a c y of a l l p e r s o n s who s o l i c i t h is a s s i s t a n c e and p r o t e c t th e m a g a in s t r e tr ib u ti o n . H is fu n ctio n s s h a ll in c lu d e th e follow ing c h a r g e s : He s h a ll e s ta b li s h s im p le , o r d e r l y p r o c e d u r e s f o r r e c e iv in g r e q u e s t s , c o m p la in ts and g r ie v a n c e s of s tu d e n ts . He s h a ll a s s i s t s tu d e n ts in a c c o m p lis h in g th e e x p e d itio u s s e t ­ tle m e n t of t h e i r p r o b le m s . He m a y a d v is e a stu d e n t th a t th e s t u d e n t 's r e q u e s t, c o m p la in t o r g r ie v a n c e la c k s m e r i t , o r th a t th e s tu d e n t should s e e k h is r e m e d y b e f o r e a n o th e r duly c o n s t i ­ tu te d body o r o f fic e r of th e U n iv e r s ity ; o r th e O m b u d sm a n (if he d e e m s it a p p r o p r ia te ) m a y a s s i s t th e s tu d e n t in o b tain in g a n in f o r m a l s e ttle m e n t of th e s t u d e n t 's p r o b le m . In th e p e r f o r m a n c e of h i s d u tie s th e O m b u d sm a n s h a l l h a v e b ro a d i n v e s tig a to r y p o w e r s and d i r e c t and r e a d y a c c e s s to a l l U n iv e r s ity o ffic ia ls f r o m the P r e s i d e n t down. W hen th e O m b u d sm a n d e e m s it n e c e s s a r y h e s h a ll r e p o r t d i r e c t l y to the P r e s i d e n t v a lid c o m p la in ts f o r w hich no r e m e d y h a s been One in c id e n t w hich p r e c i p ita t e d th e c o m m i t t e e 's s tu d y of a c a d e m ic f re e d o m on th e c a m p u s w a s th e s o - c a l l e d "S ch iff C a s e . M A f o r m e r s tu d e n t, P a u l Schiff, c h a r g e d th a t in 1965 th e u n iv e r s i t y r e f u s e d to r e a d m i t h im b e c a u s e of h i s p o lit ic a l a c tiv ity . A f e d e r a l c o u r t r u le d th a t S chiff h ad b e e n d e n ie d due p r o c e s s . J a m e s R u s t, p r i v a t e in te r v ie w h eld a t M ic h ig an S ta te U n iv e r s ity , D e c e m b e r 12, 1968. 91 found. He s h a ll a l s o r e p o r t any r e c o m m e n d a tio n s h e w is h e s to m a k e r e g a r d i n g s u c h c o m p la in ts . He s h a ll m a k e p e r io d ic r e p o r t s to th e P r e s i d e n t r e g a r d in g th e o p e r a tio n of th e O m b u d s m a n 1 s o ffic e. * A lth ou gh h is s e r v i c e s a r e e x c lu s iv e ly f o r s tu d e n ts , R u s t h a s in d ic a te d th a t o c c a s io n a lly s tu d e n t c o m p la in ts a r e conveyed to h im by t h e i r p a r e n t s . P r i o r to h is a p p o in tm e n t, R u s t h ad b e e n a lo n g - tim e E n g lis h p r o f e s s o r and a s s i s t a n t d e a n of the C o lleg e of A r t s and L e t t e r s . A s e p a r a t e office f a c ility w a s e s ta b li s h e d f o r h is o m b u d sm a n a c t i v i t i e s and h e w a s r e lie v e d o f te a c h in g a s s i g n m e n t s , e x c e p t th a t he e l e c te d to co ntinu e te a c h in g one c o u r s e a y e a r . S tan le y A n d e r s o n , an a u t h o r it y on th e o m b u d s m a n i n s t i t u ­ tion, h a s p r a i s e d the M ic h ig a n S tate a r r a n g e m e n t f o r i t s in d e p e n ­ dence. He h a s c a lle d a tte n tio n to c a r e f u l c o n s e n s u s in th e n o m in a ­ tio n p r o c e s s , p r e s t i g e of the office h o ld e r , sw e e p in g in v e s tig a to r y p o w er a s c r i b e d to the p o sitio n and s o le r e l i a n c e on r e a s o n e d p e r ­ s u a s io n . He added: "In d e p e n d e n c e i s r e in f o r c e d by s u c c e s s f u l o p e r a tio n . T he a d d itio n a l fu nction of in f o r m a tio n , c o u n s e llin g and r e f e r r a l s e e m s to fit in w e ll w ith th e O m b u d s m a n j o b . " 2 1 A c a d e m ic F r e e d o m fo r S tu d en ts a t M ic h ig a n S tate U n i v e r ­ s i t y , A R e p o rt o f th e F a c u lty C o m m itte e on S tudent A f f a i r s to the A c a d e m ic C o un cil, F e b r u a r y 7, 1967, pp. 3 1-3 2. 2 A n d e r s o n , " O m b u d sm a n P a p e r s , " pp. V 6 -7 . 92 New Y ork U n iv e r s it y (C o lleg e of E d u ca tio n ) By fa c u lty e le c tio n , H e r b e r t London b e c a m e o m b u d sm a n fo r th e C o lleg e of E d u c a tio n a t New Y o rk U n iv e r s it y d u r in g th e 1968-69 a c a d e m ic y e a r . L ondon w a s a u th o r iz e d to e x a m in e any c o m p la in t b ro u g h t to h im by a s tu d e n t o r g ro u p of s tu d e n ts of h is c o lle g e . He a l s o w a s e m p o w e re d " to c a ll f o r a re v ie w of an y d e c is io n of any o ffic ia l o r c o m m itt e e , o r of th e fa c u lty , th a t i s r e l a t e d to th e c o m ­ p la in t, and to a p p e a l to h ig h e r a u th o r ity w h en the p o s s ib ility e x i s ts , but he s h a l l not be a u th o r iz e d to a l t e r s a id d e c is io n by h is own a c tio n a l o n e . 1,1 San D iego S tate C o lleg e T h e a p p o in tm e n t o f N e lso n N o rm a n a s San D iego S tate C o lle g e 1 s f i r s t o m b u d sm a n w a s m a d e in 1968 by th e p r e s id e n t of the in s titu tio n in r e s p o n s e to a r e c o m m e n d a tio n by th e s tu d e n t body p r e s i d e n t a n d o th e r stu d e n t l e a d e r s . E x c e p t fo r an an n u a l off- c a m p u s te a c h in g s ti n t w h ich h e w an ted to c o n tin u e, th e a s s ig n m e n t is a f u ll- tim e r e s p o n s i b i l i t y fo r N o rm a n , who i s a p r o f e s s o r of * " P r o f e s s o r H e r b e r t I. L ondon E le c te d New O m b u d s m a n ," N e w s l e t t e r , G ra d u a te S tu d en ts O r g a n iz a tio n , School of E d u c a tio n , New Y o rk U n iv e r s it y , J a n u a r y , 1969, p. 1. In 1967, th e New Y ork U n iv e r s ity S enate h a d p ro p o s e d th e e le c tio n of o m b u d sm e n in e a c h of the institu tio n * s fifte e n s c h o o ls . See " O m b u d sm a n I s U rg e d by N .Y .U . A d v is o r y B o a rd , " New Y ork T i m e s , N o v e m b e r 19, 1967, p. 116. 93 h is t o r y . O b je c tiv e s of the office a r e m o d e le d on th o s e e s ta b li s h e d at M ic h ig a n S tate. In h is f i r s t few w e e k s of o p e r a tio n , N o r m a n r e c e iv e d m o r e c o m p la in ts ab o u t g r a d e s than an y o t h e r p r o b le m . He in v e s tig a te s n e a r l y a l l g r ie v a n c e s b ro u g h t to h im and s e e k s quick so lu tio n s. H is s t y l e of o p e ra tio n i s to spend m u c h of h is t i m e m a k in g f a c e - t o - f a c e c o n ta c ts outside h i s o ffic e , which i s lo c a te d in th e s t u ­ dent u n io n . He s u b m i ts r e p o r t s b o th to the c o lle g e p r e s i d e n t and the stu d e n t body p r e s i d e n t . * U n iv e r s ity of South C a ro lin a T h e f i r s t o m b u d sm an a t th e U n iv e r s ity o f South C a r o lin a w as ap p o in te d by th e i n s t i t u t i o n 's p r e s i d e n t in 1968 a f t e r c o n s u l t a ­ tion w ith s tu d e n t l e a d e r s . C h o sen to f ill the p o s itio n w a s H u b e r t Noland, a n e n g in e e r in g p r o f e s s o r . T h e idea h a d b e e n p r o p o s e d e a r l i e r by a s u c c e s s f u l ca n d id ate f o r s tu d e n t body p r e s i d e n t . Noland* s p o w e r s an d d u tie s a r e n e a r l y id e n tic a l to th o s e p r e s c r i b e d for the M ic h ig a n S ta te o m b u d sm an . T h e stu d e n t g o v e r n m e n t h a s nam ed a " s tu d e n t o m b u d sm a n c o m m itt e e " to w o rk w ith th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n . ^ ^ N elso n N o rm a n , p r iv a te in te r v ie w h e ld d u r in g m e e ti n g on th e o m b u d sm a n in h i g h e r ed u catio n , D e t r o i t , M i c h . , O c to b e r 2 4 , 1968. 2 C a r l Stepp, "N oland A p p o in te d F i r s t O m b u d s m a n ," G a m e ­ co ck , c a m p u s n e w s p a p e r a t U n iv e r s it y of South C a r o lin a . O c to b e r 29, 1968, p. 1. 94 W e s t V a lle y C o lleg e In 1968, th e B o a rd of T r u s t e e s o f W est V a lle y C o lle g e , a t w o - y e a r j u n i o r c o lle g e in C a m p b e ll, C a lif o rn ia , e s ta b li s h e d a n o ffic e of o m b u d s m a n "to d e fin e the r i g h t s of s tu d e n ts and a c t a s th e l i a i s o n b e tw e e n s tu d e n ts and th e a d m in i s t r a t i o n a n d / o r facu lty . " T h e b o a rd a c te d on a r e c o m m e n d a tio n by the c o l l e g e 's c h ie f a d m in ­ istra to r. * F o r S tu d en ts an d O th e r s T h e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n c o n s i d e r s c o m p la in ts f ro m o th e r p e r s o n s in a d d itio n to s tu d e n ts a t s ix in s titu tio n s of h ig h e r ed u c a tio n . H o w e v e r, th e s c o p e of h is a c t i v i t i e s v a r i e s f r o m c a m p u s to c a m p u s . T h e s e v a r i a t i o n s a r e noted in th e follow ing d e s c r i p t i o n s . U n iv e r s it y of C a lif o rn ia a t Irv in e T h e o m b u d sm a n r o l e i s one co m p o n en t of a f o u r - p a r t p o s i ­ tio n a t I r v in e w h ich b e a r s th e title of " A s s i s t a n t S tudent A f f a i r s V ic e - C h a n c e llo r f o r C o - C u r r i c u l a r L e a r n in g . " A c c o rd in g to J a c k L ittle , th e f i r s t p e r s o n to f ill th e p o s itio n , th e o t h e r c o m p o n e n ts a r e c o u n s e l o r - a t - l a r g e , r e s e a r c h a n d d e v e lo p m e n t in s tu d e n t lif e , ^Jtem in C JC A N ew s ( C a lifo r n ia J u n i o r C o lle g e A s s o c ia tio n ), J a n u a r y , 1969. 95 and c o - c u r r i c u l a r le a r n in g . * He w a s a p p o in ted to th e p o s t in 1967 by th e v ic e c h a n c e llo r f o r s tu d e n t a f f a i r s . H is a c a d e m ic p r e p a r a t i o n and p r o f e s s i o n a l e x p e r ie n c e a r e in c lin ic a l p sy c h o lo g y . L itt le h a s e s t i m a t e d th a t he s p e n d s 40 p e r c e n t of h is tim e p e r f o r m i n g a s a c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n . in th a t c a p a c ity a s : H e h a s d e s c r i b e d h is a c tiv i tie s " M a in ta in in g con tinu ou s in f o r m a l r e la tio n s h i p s w ith c a m p u s p e r s o n n e l, p a r t i c u l a r l y s tu d e n ts , so th a t t h e i r a r e a s of d i s s a t i s f a c t i o n . . . can g ain re c o g n itio n , and so th a t th e y can be h e lp e d to a n e ffe c tiv e c o u r s e of r e m e d i a l p e r s o n a l co u n s e lin g a n d / o r s o c i a l a c tio n . " To h i s job d e s c r i p t i o n h e h a s added t h i s note: "The fu n ctio n s o f th is office a r e to be p e r f o r m e d w ith full c o n fid e n tia lity of c o m m u n ic a tio n an d on a c o n s u lta tiv e o r XII (N o v e m b e r 1, 1968), 54548. 2 L e t t e r f r o m T o ll, p r e s i d e n t o f th e S tate U n iv e r s ity of New York a t Stony B ro o k , M a rc h 10, 1969. 3 B a r b a r a P a m e s s , " O m b u d sm e n P e r f o r m No M i r a c l e s , " M ichigan S ta te N e w s , c a m p u s n e w s p a p e r a t M ic h ig a n S tate U n iv e r ­ sity, J a n u a r y 6 , 1969, p. 17. 106 1968 by H a r o ld K itn e r , a p o litic a l s c ie n c e p r o f e s s o r . K it n e r ' s a p p o in tm e n t by th e u n i v e r s i t y p r e s i d e n t follow ed a r e c o m m e n d a tio n by th e F a c u lty S enate th a t s u c h a n office be in s titu te d . T he r e c o m ­ m e n d a tio n w a s b a s e d on a s tu d y of th e o m b u d sm a n c o n c e p t and i t s p o te n tia l a p p lic a tio n to th e u n i v e r s i t y w h ich th e p r e s i d e n t had c o m m is s io n e d K itn e r to conduct i n 1967. In e x p la in in g th e p o s itio n to fa c u lty m e m b e r s , th e p r e s i ­ d en t e x p r e s s e d th e h op e th a t th e o ffic e w ould be both c o r r e c t i v e and p r e v e n tiv e , and th a t " it m ig h t be s o s u c c e s s f u l a s to w o rk i t s e l f out of e x is te n c e . . . . " The o ffice w a s d e s c r i b e d a s " a c e n t e r fo r c o n ­ tin u o u s s e n s itiv i ty to w a r d s th e w hole r a n g e of p r o c e d u r e w hich a f f e c ts th e p r o f e s s i o n a l r o le of th e in d iv id u a l fa c u lty m e m b e r , and a ls o . . . a p la c e w h e r e he m a y t u r n i f th e fa c u lty m e m b e r b e lie v e s th at h e is b ein g t r e a t e d u n ju s t ly . 1,1 The o m b u d sm a n a l s o s e r v e s a s an e x p e d ite r o f id e a s th a t m ig h t no t be h e a r d b e c a u s e of the la c k of a p p r o p r ia te c h a n n e ls . T h r e e s a f e g u a r d s a r e m a in ta in e d to r e d u c e th e o m b u d s ­ m a n ' s w o rk load: h e c o n s i d e r s no g r ie v a n c e u n til a l l a v e n u e s of due p r o c e s s h a v e b e e n e x h a u s te d , he m a y r e j e c t a g r ie v a n c e h e * "D ean f o r F a c u lty C o u n s e l ( O m b u d s m a n ) ," s p e c i a l b u lle ­ tin is s u e d by O ffice o f th e P r e s i d e n t , K ent S tate U n iv e r s ity , J a n ­ u a ry 8 , 1969, p. 5. 107 fe e ls i s u n ju s tifie d , and he a t te m p ts s e ttle m e n t of d if f e r e n c e s th ro u g h c o m m u n ic a tio n and c o n c ilia tio n b e f o r e m a k in g r e c o m m e n ­ d a tio n s to th e p r e s i d e n t . 1 S u m m a ry T h is p o rtio n of th e g e n e r a l e v a lu a tio n of th e o m b u d sm a n in A m e r ic a n h ig h e r e d u c a tio n h a s r e v e a le d th a t a t a l l in s titu tio n s but one th e office w as e s ta b li s h e d e x c lu s iv e ly o r p r i m a r i l y to a s s i s t s tu d e n ts w ith p r o b le m s a r i s i n g f r o m t h e i r in s titu tio n a l r e l a t i o n s h i p s . Student p r e s s u r e i s ev id en t in th e e s ta b li s h m e n t of so m e of the p o s i ­ tio n s. A lthough th e a c t i v i t i e s of the v a r i o u s c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n a r e d i v e r s e , t h e i r r o l e s a r e b r o a d ly p a tte r n e d on S c an d in av ia n civil o m b u d sm an m o d e ls , p a r t i c u l a r l y D e n m a r k 's . E le v e n o f th e f o u r ­ te e n p o s itio n s d e s c r i b e d w e r e fille d by a d m in i s t r a t i v e a p p o in tm e n ts , c o m p a r a b le to e x e c u tiv e a p p o in tm e n ts in c iv il g o v e r n m e n t, r a t h e r than by fa c u lty s e n a te o r s tu d e n t g o v e r n m e n t a p p o in tm e n ts , c o m ­ p a r a b le to le g is la tiv e a p p o in tm e n ts . H o w e v e r, in m o s t c a s e s t h e r e is ev id en ce o f fa c u lty and s tu d e n t in v o lv e m e n t in th e n o m in a tio n o r se le c tio n p r o c e s s . Few c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n h a v e had p r o f e s s io n a l tr a in in g o r e x p e r ie n c e in s tu d e n t p e r s o n n e l w o rk . Only one of th e in s titu tio n s d isc o n tin u e d th e o ffic e a f t e r e x p e r im e n tin g w ith it. 108 The c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n c o n c e p t h a s b e e n a d a p te d to the g o v e r n m e n ta l s t r u c t u r e s of a w ide r a n g e of in s t i t u t i o n s - - p u b l i c and p r iv a te , la r g e an d s m a l l , u r b a n and n o n - u r b a n , old an d new , l i b e r a l and c o n s e r v a tiv e . Ind eed , by th e end of 1968, c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n could be found a t both e n d s of the h ig h e r e d u c a tio n s p e c t r u m - - t h e co m m u n ity c o lle g e and th e " m u l tiv e r s it y . " T h u s, fle x ib ility a p p e a r s to be one of the m o s t r e m a r k a b l e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n co n c e p t. In a few i n ­ s ta n c e s , h o w e v e r, th e r o le a p p e a r s to h a v e b e e n a l t e r e d so m uch to s a tis f y in s titu ti o n a l o r in d iv id u a l p r e f e r e n c e s th a t few of the f e a ­ t u r e s tr a d it io n a l ly a s s o c i a t e d w ith th e o m b u d sm a n r e m a i n in ta c t beyond the n a m e . I n s titu tio n s C o n s id e r in g O m b u d sm e n At l e a s t s ix te e n A m e r ic a n c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s w e r e co n s id e rin g th e p o s s i b ilit y of add in g a c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n p r i o r to 1969. At s o m e in s titu tio n s , im p le m e n ta tio n s e e m e d im m in e n t; a t o th e r s , the id e a h a d not a d v a n ce d beyond th e a w a r e n e s s and i n t e r e s t s ta g e s . * W id e s p r e a d p u b lic ity r e g a r d i n g c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n ^ R o g e rs h a s d iv id e d the d iffu sio n of in n o v a tio n p r o c e s s in to five s ta g e s : a w a r e n e s s , i n t e r e s t , e v a lu a tio n , t r i a l a n d adoption ( o r re je c tio n ). See E v e r e t t M . R o g e r s , "T h e C o m m u n ic a tio n of In n o ­ v atio n s in a C o m p le x In stitu tio n , " E d u c a tio n a l R e c o r d , X LIX (W in­ t e r , 1968), 72. 109 a p p o in tm e n ts a t s u c h in s titu tio n s a s B e r k e le y and M ic h ig a n S tate h a s been in flu e n tia l. A s M e y e r s o n h a s o b s e rv e d : B o a rd s o f t r u s t e e s , a d m i n i s t r a t o r s , and f a c u l tie s a t m a n y in s titu tio n s n o te and o fte n e m u la te the d e v e lo p m e n ts a t th e p a c e - s e t t i n g c o lle g e s an d u n i v e r s i t i e s . A lthough t h e r e m a y be no f o r m a l s y s t e m to A m e r ic a n h i g h e r ed u c a tio n , t h e r e i s a te n d ­ en c y to w a rd th e m e a n . . . , r e s u lt in g in m o r e in s titu ti o n a l sim ila ritie s. . . . 1 E v a n s a l s o h a s e m p h a s iz e d th e i m p o r ta n c e of the n a t u r e of i n f o r m a tion s o u r c e s in th e d iffu sio n of in n o v a tio n s in h ig h e r ed u c a tio n . 2 D e v e lo p m e n ts a t in s t itu ti o n s c o n s id e r in g o m b u d sm e n w ill now be s u rv e y e d . D e s c r i p tio n U n iv e r s ity of C a lif o rn ia a t L os A n g e le s * In J u n e o f 1968, th e c h a n c e llo r of the U n iv e r s it y of C a l i ­ fo rn ia a t L os A n g e le s e s ta b li s h e d a U n iv e r s it y P o l i c i e s C o m m is s io n m ad e up of s tu d e n ts , fa c u lty and a d m i n i s t r a t o r s . He s ta te d th a t i t s f i r s t o r d e r of b u s i n e s s sh o u ld be to c o n s id e r th e q u a lific a tio n s and r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s of a c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n , a p o s itio n w hich he a p 3 p ro v ed in p r in c ip le . ^ M e y e rs o n , "T h e E th o s of th e A m e r ic a n C o lle g e Student, " pp. 2 7 0-7 1. 2 R ic h a r d I. E v a n s , R e s i s t a n c e to In n o v atio n in H ig h e r E d u ­ cation (San F r a n c i s c o : J o s s e y - B a s s , I n c . , 1968), p. 31. 3 T he c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n id e a a l r e a d y h ad b e e n e n d o r s e d by two u n iv e r s i ty - w id e c o m m itt e e s . See A n d e r s o n , " O m b u d s m a n 110 C ity C o lleg e of th e S tate U n iv e r s ity of New Y o rk A body of s tu d e n ts , fa c u lty and a d m i n i s t r a t o r s known a s the C o m m itte e of S e v e n te e n p ro p o s e d th e a p p o in tm e n t of a n o m b u d sm a n am ong o th e r in s t itu ti o n a l r e f o r m s in a r e p o r t i s s u e d i n O c to b e r of 1968 a t C ity C o lleg e of th e S tate U n iv e r s it y of New Y o rk . C u lm in a tin g two y e a r s of stu d y , th e r e c o m m e n d a tio n s in clud ed an o m b u d s m a n " to in s u r e e q u ita b le t r e a t m e n t f o r s tu d e n ts o r facu lty m e m b e r s in s p e c ific c a s e s and to h e lp a d m i n i s t r a t o r s im p r o v e t h e i r p r o c e d u r e s . " 1 F r e s n o S tate C o lleg e T he o m b u d s m a n c o m m itte e a t F r e s n o S tate C o lleg e c i r c u ­ la te d to c o lle g e and u n i v e r s i t y p la c e m e n t o ffic es la te in 1968 a n an n o u n c em e n t s e e k in g a p p lic a tio n s fo r that in stitutio n* s new ly c r e a te d o m b u d s m a n p o sitio n . T he m a j o r r e s p o n s i b i l i t y of th e office h o ld e r w a s d e s c r i b e d a s follow s: " T o p ro v id e s tu d e n ts , facu lty , and a d m i n i s t r a t o r s an a v e n u e w h e r e b y th e y m a y b e t t e r u t i l i z e e x is tin g p r o c e d u r e s and e x p r e s s t h e i r c o n c e r n s abo u t a n y a s p e c t of th e college c o m m u n ity ." A p p lic a n ts w e r e a s s u r e d th a t th e o m b u d s m a n w ould be " r e s p o n s ib le e q u a lly to s tu d e n ts , fa c u lty , and a d m i n i s t r a t i o n . " P a p e r s , " p. V I 1. T he U n iv e r s ity P o l i c i e s C o m m is s io n su b se q u e n tly p ro p o se d th e a p p o in tm e n t of a n o m b u d s m a n by th e c h a n c e llo r on its r e c o m m e n d a tio n s . S ee UCLA D a ily B r u in , F e b r u a r y 25, 1969, p. 2. ^ J o h n K i f n e r , " R e f o r m s P la n n e d a t C ity C o l le g e ," New Y ork T im e s , O c to b e r 9, 1968, p. 47. Ill F a m i l i a r i t y w ith th e F r e s n o c a m p u s an d " a c o n c e r n f o r j u s t i c e " w e re l i s t e d am o n g n e c e s s a r y q u a lif ic a tio n s . * G eo rg e W a sh in g to n U n iv e r s it y In D e c e m b e r of 1968, the v ic e p r e s i d e n t f o r s tu d e n t a f f a i r s at G e o r g e W a sh in g to n U n iv e r s it y p r e s e n t e d a p r o p o s a l to th e p r e s i ­ dent f o r adding a n o m b u d s m a n a t th a t in s titu tio n . It w a s r e c o m ­ m ended th a t th e p o s itio n be fille d on a f u l l - t i m e b a s i s by a fa c u lty m e m b e r who w a s p o p u la r w ith s tu d e n ts . He w a s to be s e le c te d by c o m m itte e but w ould r e p o r t to the p r e s i d e n t . H is d u tie s w e r e to be id e n tic a l to t h o s e of th e M ic h ig a n S tate o m b u d sm a n . 2 U n iv e r s ity of H aw aii E s ta b lis h m e n t of a n office o f o m b u d s m a n i s in c lu d e d in a p r o p o s a l fo r a u n iv e r s i t y an d stu d e n t code a t th e U n iv e r s it y of H aw aii, a c c o r d in g to A c tin g P r e s i d e n t R o b e rt H ia tt. B oth the F a c u lty 3 Senate and the A s s o c ia te d S tu d en ts a r e c o n s id e r in g th e plan . A n n o u n ce m en t o f P o s itio n : O m b u d s m a n , F r e s n o S ta te C o lleg e, F r e s n o , C a lif. , D e c e m b e r 26, 1968. 1 2 O m b u d sm a n r e p o r t fro m D av id G. Speck to W illia m P . Smith, G e o rg e W a sh in g to n U n iv e r s ity , D e c e m b e r 19, 1968. A c c o r d ­ ing to a l e t t e r f r o m Speck d a te d J a n u a r y 24, 1969, S m ith s u b m itte d the r e p o r t to th e u n i v e r s i t y p r e s i d e n t . 3 L e t t e r fro m A c tin g P r e s i d e n t R o b e r t W. H ia tt, U n iv e r s ity of H aw aii, F e b r u a r y 25, 1969, 112 U n iv e r s ity of M i s s o u r i a t C o lu m b ia In A p r i l o f 1968, a n ad h o c c o m m itte e m a d e a n u m b e r of r e c o m m e n d a tio n s f o r i n c r e a s e d g r a d u a te fa c u lty p a r tic ip a t io n in a c a d e m ic g o v e r n m e n t a t th e U n iv e r s ity of M i s s o u r i a t C o lu m b ia . One c a lle d f o r an office o f o m b u d s m a n to d e a l w ith p r o b le m s w h ich g r a d u a te fa c u lty and s tu d e n ts a r e u n a b le to so lv e th ro u g h r e g u l a r c h a n n e ls. T h e p r o p o s a l added th a t: " T h e O m b u d s m a n s h a ll be a m e m b e r of th e G ra d u a te F a c u lty a t l a r g e , e le c te d by th e S enate fro m a s l a t e p r e s e n t e d by th e E x e c u tiv e C o m m i t t e e . 1,1 T he c o m ­ m i t t e e 1 s r e p o r t w a s a c c e p te d by th e G ra d u a te F a c u lty and i m p l e ­ m e n ta tio n h a s begun. A c o m m itte e d e s ig n a te d to e s t a b l i s h the office w ill s u b m it a l i s t of n o m in e e s to th e e x e c u tiv e c o m m itte e of the 2 G ra d u a te S en ate, w hich w ill m a k e th e fin al s e le c tio n . U n iv e r s ity of N ev ada T he U n iv e r s it y of N evada C h a p te r o f th e A m e r i c a n A s s o ­ ciatio n of U n i v e r s i t y P r o f e s s o r s h a s d is c u s s e d th e p o s s ib ility of ^ " G ra d u a te F a c u lty P a r t i c i p a t i o n in A c a d e m ic G o v e r n m e n t ," R e p o rt of th e Ad Hoc C o m m itte e on G r a d u a te F a c u lty O rg a n iz a tio n and P a r t i c i p a t i o n in G o v e rn m e n t a n d of th e C o m m itte e on P la n n in g and P o lic y of th e G ra d u a te C o un cil, U n iv e r s it y o f M is s o u r i a t C olum bia, A p r i l 18, 1968, p. 19. 2 L e t t e r fro m J o h n M. F r a n z , c h a ir m a n , G ra d u a te F a c u lty Senate C o m m itte e on P r o b l e m s an d P r o c e d u r e , U n i v e r s i t y o f M i s ­ s o u ri a t C o lu m b ia , J a n u a r y 24, 1969. . 113 e s ta b lis h in g an office of o m b u d sm a n a t th a t in s titu tio n . A w o rk s h o p on th e s u b je c t w a s s c h e d u le d e a r l y in 1969. * San F r a n c i s c o S tate C o lleg e A n o m b u d sm a n s e le c tio n c o m m itte e h a s s u b m itte d a l i s t of n o m in e e s to the a c tin g p r e s i d e n t of San F r a n c i s c o State C o lle g e . ac tio n w a s ta k e n p r i o r to 1969. No 2 S ou th ern I llin o is U n iv e r s ity at C a rb o n d a le A p lan fo r an e x p e r i m e n ta l "S tu den t In fo r m a tio n and C o m ­ p la in t O ffice (O m b u d sm an )" h a s been s u b m itte d to th e a d m in is t r a tio n of S ou th ern I llin o is U n iv e r s ity a t C a rb o n d a le . T he p r o p o s a l c a lls fo r an o ffice to r e s o l v e s tu d e n t c o m p la in ts " a r i s i n g out of th e fu n c ­ tioning of the u n iv e r s i ty b u r e a u c r a c y . " H o w e v e r, it e x p r e s s l y r u l e s out n o n - s p e c if ic g r ie v a n c e s , d is p u te s abo u t g r a d e s , d i s c i p l i n a r y m a t t e r s , and a p p e a ls to r e v e r s e d e c is io n s . It r e c o m m e n d s the a p p o in tm e n t of a f o u r - m a n o m b u d s m a n p a n e l of te n u r e d te a c h in g 1T he A A U P c h a p te r s u b s e q u e n tly r e c o m m e n d e d to the u n i ­ v e r s ity p r e s i d e n t th a t a c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n be ap p o in ted . P r o f e s ­ s o r E m e r i t u s C h a rlto n L a ir d w a s n a m e d to th e p o s t by the B o a rd of R egents in M a r c h of 1969. See " O m b u d sm a n B e g in s New J o b , " U n iv e rs ity of N ev ada S a g e b r u s h , M a r c h 11, 1969, p. 3. 2 L e t t e r f r o m N ancy M c D e rm id , m e m b e r of o m b u d sm a n s e le c tio n c o m m itte e a t San F r a n c i s c o S tate C o lle g e , F e b r u a r y 18, 1969. 114 facu lty m e m b e r s , a s s i s t e d by a f u ll- tim e s tu d e n t p e r s o n n e l w orker. * Stanford U n iv e r s ity In th e s p r in g of 1968, the S tan fo rd U n i v e r s i t y C h a p te r of the A m e r ic a n A s s o c ia tio n o f U n iv e r s it y P r o f e s s o r s s e t u p a f o u r m an o m b u d sm a n b o a r d "to a c t on i t s own and to i n s p i r e th e a d m in ­ i s t r a t i o n to r e p la c e th e A A U P O m b u d sm a n w ith a r e g u l a r U n iv e r s ity O m b u d sm a n . " 2 A p p a r e n tly th e a d m i n i s t r a t i o n w a s n o t in s p i r e d . S e v e ra l m o n th s l a t e r one o f th e p re sid e n t* s a id e s s ta te d th a t " n o th ­ ing d e fin ite h a s b e e n done, an d I know of noth in g beyond th e d i s c u s 3 sion s ta g e . " O th e r I n s titu tio n s P r i o r to 1969, c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n p r o p o s a l s a l s o w e r e u n d e r c o n s id e r a tio n a t the U n i v e r s i t y of M a s s a c h u s e t t s , N o rth T ex a s S tate U n iv e r s ity , O ak lan d U n iv e r s it y ( a ffilia te d w ith M ich ig an *"A P r o p o s a l fo r a Student In fo r m a tio n and C o m p la in t O ffice (O m budsm an) fo r S o u th ern I llin o is U n iv e r s it y , " u n s ig n e d , u n d ated . P ro v id e d by G e o rg e M c C lu re , D e p a r tm e n t of P h ilo s o p h y , S o u th ern Illin o is U n iv e r s ity a t C a rb o n d a le . 2 A n d e r s o n , " O m b u d s m a n P a p e r s , " p. V l l . 3 L e t t e r f r o m F r e d e r i c O. G lo v e r, e x e c u tiv e a s s i s t a n t to the p r e s id e n t, S tan fo rd U n iv e r s ity , F e b r u a r y 19, 1969. 115 State U n iv e r s ity ), P r in c e to n U n iv e r s ity , W ayne S tate U n iv e r s ity and W e s te r n M ic h ig an U n iv e r s ity , m u ch of th e i m p e t u s . Student g ro u p s w e r e p ro v id in g 1 It i s c u r io u s th a t th e o m b u d s m a n co ncept h a s not g ain ed a c c e p ta n c e a t V a lp a r a is o U n iv e r s ity , w h e r e th e m a n who h a s developed a w id e ly -a d o p te d r a tio n a le f o r th e p o s itio n -- D o n a ld M u n d i n g e r - - s e r v e s a s v ic e p r e s i d e n t f o r a c a d e m ic a f f a i r s . He h a s in d ic a te d th a t V a lp a r a is o could u s e a n o m b u d s m a n but he h a s been u n ab le to p e r s u a d e h is c o lle a g u e s of th e u tility o f su ch an office. ^ A t R u t g e r s U n iv e r s ity , E a r l e C liffo rd , d e a n of stu d e n t a f f a ir s , h a s e f f e c tiv e ly b lock ed e f f o r ts to e s ta b l i s h an office of o m b u d sm a n d e s p ite i t s a d v o c a c y by A lb e r t B la u s te in , a law p r o ­ fessor. In a 1968 s p e e c h , C liffo rd c a lle d th e c o n c ep t a " g im m ic k " ^ In fo rm a tio n o b tain ed th ro u g h c o r r e s p o n d e n c e w ith p e r ­ so n s at in s titu tio n s lis te d . O th e r in s t itu ti o n s c o n s id e r e d but r e je c te d o m b u d s m a n p r o p o s a l s p r i o r to 1969. W e s te r n in s titu tio n s w hich took s u c h a c tio n gave one o r m o r e of th e s e r e a s o n s : la c k o f d e m o n s tr a te d need ; n e g a tiv e s tu d e n t and a d m i n i s t r a t i v e r e a c tio n ; ex istin g good r a p p o r t am o n g s tu d e n ts , fa c u lty and a d m in is t r a tio n ; and d ean s a l r e a d y p e r f o r m i n g th e fu n c tio n s . See U C L A D a ily B ru in , F e b r u a r y 25, 1969, p. 3. 2 L e t t e r f r o m D onald C. M u n d in g e r, v ic e p r e s i d e n t f o r a c a d e m ic a f f a i r s , V a l p a r a i s o U n iv e r s it y , F e b r u a r y 20, 1969. 116 w hich no in s titu tio n n e e d s if p r o p e r l y o r g a n iz e d . re sp o n d e d to Clifford* s o b je c tio n s by l e t t e r . B la u s te in h a s 1 S u m m a ry At l e a s t s ix te e n c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s w e r e m o v in g to w a rd th e a p p o in tm e n t of c a m p u s o m b u d s m e n p r i o r to 1969. A l­ though t h e i r o b je c tiv e s w e r e s i m i l a r , m e th o d s of im p le m e n ta tio n v a r ie d c o n s id e r a b ly . In v o lv e m e n t of s tu d e n ts a s w e ll a s fa c u lty and a d m in is t r a tio n in o m b u d s m a n p lan n in g w a s a l m o s t u n i v e r s a l . The in flu ence of c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n d e v e lo p m e n ts a t o t h e r in s titu tio n s w a s eviden t. S e le c te d O m b u d sm e n : S i m i l a r i t i e s an d D i s s i m i l a r i t i e s T o o b ta in m o r e d e ta ile d in f o r m a tio n on th e c a m p u s o m b u d s ­ m an , p e r s o n s s e r v in g in th a t c a p a c ity a t s ix in s titu tio n s of h ig h e r ed ucation w e r e c h o s e n f o r p e r s o n a l in te r v i e w s in th e fa ll of 1968. S ele c tio n s w e r e m a d e on th e b a s is of in s titu ti o n a l s i z e and d i v e r s i t y . The in te rv ie w s c h e d u le i s r e p r o d u c e d in A ppendix B. T he o m b u d s m e n in te rv ie w e d and t h e i r in s t itu ti o n s a r e : G eo rge L e itm a n n , U n iv e r s it y of C a lif o r n ia a t B e r k e le y : Irv in g C l i f f o r d ' s s p e e c h , "S econd T h o u g h ts on th e O m b u d s m a n in H ig h er E d u c a t i o n , " w a s p r e s e n t e d in D e tr o it, M i c h . , on O c to ­ b e r 25, 1968. B laustein* s l e t t e r to C liffo rd i s d a te d N o v e m b e r 19, 1968. 117 DeKoff, C o lu m b ia U n iv e r s it y ; T h o m a s D a v is , U n i v e r s i t y of D e tr o it; J a m e s R u s t, M ic h ig a n S ta te U n iv e r s it y ; N e ls o n N o r m a n , San D iego State C o lle g e ; an d J . B e n to n W h ite, San J o s e S ta te C o lleg e . T o f a c i l i t a t e c o m p a r i s o n s m u c h of th e s e l f - e v a l u a t i o n d a ta e lic ite d f r o m t h e s e i n t e r v i e w s a r e s u m m a r i z e d i n t a b l e s in A p p e n ­ dix C. O t h e r p e r t i n e n t f a c t s w e r e p r e s e n t e d e a r l i e r in th is c h a p te r . A d d itio n a l p e r s p e c t i v e h a s b een g a in e d th ro u g h c o r r e s p o n d e n c e with th e six o m b u d s m e n a n d a c c e s s to t h e i r r e p o r t s , w r i t i n g s and speeches. In a s s i m i l a t i n g and a n a ly z in g th is in f o r m a tio n , a few g e n e r a liz e d o b s e r v a t i o n s h a v e b e e n m a d e r e g a r d i n g s i m i l a r i t i e s and d i s s i m i l a r i t i e s in th e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s , a c t i v i t i e s a n d a ttitu d e s of the in te r v ie w e d o m b u d s m e n . T h o se fin d in g s w ill now b e p r e s e n t e d . C h a ra c te ristic s S im ila ritie s A ll s i x o m b u d s m e n h a v e s p e n t a c o n s i d e r a b l e len g th of tim e a t t h e i r i n s t i t u t i o n s , ra n g in g f r o m s e v e n to tw e n ty -o n e y e a r s . A ll but one h a v e h ad c o l le g e te a c h i n g e x p e r i e n c e . a c a r e e r ; one i s n e a r i n g r e t i r e m e n t . N one i s b eg inn ing N one h a s h a d le g a l t r a i n i n g o r p r o f e s s i o n a l p r e p a r a t i o n in s tu d e n t p e r s o n n e l w o r k . H o w e v e r, a l l but one h a v e h a d e x p e r i e n c e in c o u n s e lin g s t u d e n t s . F o u r o f th e six have d o c t o r a l d e g r e e s , a n d th e s a m e h o ld s t r u e f o r te n u r e ^ 118 D issim ila ritie s T he s ix o m b u d s m e n r e p r e s e n t six d i v e r s e c a r e e r f ie ld s . T h e i r a c a d e m ic ra n k r a n g e s f r o m a s s i s t a n t p r o f e s s o r to fu ll p r o ­ fessor. n ot. T h r e e h av e been d e a n s o r a s s i s t a n t d e a n s and t h r e e have One is a n o rd a in e d m i n i s t e r . A c tiv itie s S im il a r itie s A ll s ix o m b u d s m e n w e r e ap p o in te d no e a r l i e r th a n S e p te m ­ b e r of 1967 an d none w e r e a s k e d to s e r v e t e r m s ex ten d in g beyond tw o y e a r s . A ll r e c e iv e c o m p la in ts f ro m s tu d e n ts and a l l b u t one r e c e iv e m o s t of t h e i r c o m p la in ts fro m u n d e r g r a d u a t e s tu d e n ts , * A ll but one c o n s i d e r n o n - a c a d e m i c a s w e ll a s a c a d e m ic c o m p la in ts . A ll a r e f is c a lly a c c o u n ta b le to , and s u b m it p e r io d ic r e p o r t s w ith re c o m m e n d a tio n s to, the o f f ic e r o r body w hich ap p o in ted th e m . A ll u s e f a c e - t o - f a c e c o n ta c t m o r e th a n an y o th e r f o r m of c o m m u n ic a tio n in conducting t h e i r a c t i v i t i e s . A ll h a v e a c c e s s to o fficial f ile s on th e cam p u s, e x c e p t f o r c l a s s i f i e d g o v e rn m e n t r e s e a r c h an d h e a lth and p s y c h o lo g ic a l r e c o r d s . F o u r of th e s ix c o n s i d e r t h e i r own r e c o r d s to be c o n fid e n tia l. A ll r e p o r t e d c h a n g e s in in s titu tio n a l ^ L e itm a n n r e p o r t e d an e v e n d iv is io n b e tw e e n g r a d u a t e s t u ­ d e n ts and u n d e r g r a d u a t e s . 119 p o lic ie s and p r o c e d u r e s a s a r e s u l t of t h e i r in v e s tig a tio n s and r e c o m m e n d a tio n s . A ll b u t one h a v e t h e i r o f fic e s in b u ild in g s s e p a r a t e fro m th e m a in a d m i n i s t r a t i o n b u ild in g . F o u r o f th e six a r e c o n s id e r e d f u ll- tim e o m b u d s m e n an d h a v e a s e c r e t a r y . For a ll s ix , th e r a t e of c o m p la in ts r e c e iv e d h a s i n c r e a s e d d u r in g t h e i r tim e in o ffic e. v idu al c a s e s . A ll but one h a v e r e s e r v a t i o n s ab o u t p u b lic iz in g i n d i­ A ll h ave ex c h an g e d id e a s an d in f o r m a tio n w ith o th e r c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n . D issim ila ritie s F o u r of th e s ix o m b u d s m e n w e r e a p p o in te d by th e p r e s i d e n t of t h e i r in s titu tio n , one by th e s tu d e n t g o v e r n m e n t and one by the fa c u lty g o v e r n m e n t. T h e r e i s s o m e e v id e n c e o f s tu d e n t a n d / o r fac u lty s u p p o r t in th r e e o f th e f o u r p r e s i d e n t i a l a p p o in tm e n ts . T h r e e o m b u d s m e n e x p e r ie n c e d a n i n c r e a s e in s a l a r y a n d / o r ra n k o r s ta tu s w hen th e y w e r e a p p o in ted ; t h r e e did n o t. a r e te a c h in g p a r t - t i m e and t h r e e a r e not. T h ree om budsm en The a v e ra g e n u m b er of c o m p la in ts h a n d le d p e r w ee k v a r i e s f r o m f e w e r th a n six a t B e r k e le y to tw e n ty - s e v e n a t M ic h ig an S tate . T h e r e i s n o a g r e e m e n t on how the o m b u d s m a n should p r o c e e d if a s o lu tio n c a n n o t be found fo r a valid c o m p la in t. T h r e e h a v e found s tu d e n t p e r s o n n e l w o r k e r s on th e ir c a m p u s e s to be c o o p e ra tiv e ; tw o h a v e n ot; one i s u n c e r t a in . 120 T h e r e i s m u c h v a r i a t i o n in th e e x te n t to w hich t h e i r r e p o r t s a r e c irc u la te d . A ttitu d e s S im il a r itie s A ll s ix o m b u d sm e n s e e th e m s e l v e s a s a u x i lia r y to , not r e p la c e m e n ts fo r, e x is tin g c a m p u s f u n c tio n a r ie s . A ll bu t one b e ­ lie v e th a t t h e i r a c tiv i tie s h a v e h e lp e d a l le v i a te s tu d e n t f r u s t r a t i o n and h o s tility . A ll view th e c h ie f a d m i n i s t r a t o r of the in s titu tio n a s the student* s h ig h e s t a p p e a l to a u th o r ity . A ll c o n s id e r good r e l a ­ tio n s h ip s w ith s tu d e n ts a s a p r i m e q u a lific a tio n f o r th e p o sitio n . A ll but oqe r e c o m m e n d a t w o - y e a r m a x im u m t e r m of o ffic e fo r th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n . F o u r b e lie v e t h e i r office w ill be in e x is te n c e ten y e a r s h e n c e ; tw o a r e u n c e r ta in . D issim ila ritie s T h r e e of th e in te rv ie w e d o m b u d sm e n c o n s id e r t h e i r b u d g e ts and f a c i l i t i e s a d e q u a te ; t h r e e do n o t. co n flict; t h r e e h a v e not. T h r e e h a v e e x p e r ie n c e d r o le T h r e e think of t h e m s e l v e s a s a p a r t o f th e " E s ta b lis h m e n t" ; t h r e e do not. T h re e fav o r a p ro fe ssio n a l o rg a n i­ zatio n of c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n ; t h r e e do n o t. T h e r e i s a l s o no a g r e e ­ m e n t on how the o ffic e of o m b u d s m a n d if f e r s f r o m o th e r o ffic es on 121 the c a m p u s . R u s t s t r e s s e s th e o m b u d s m a n 's g r e a t e r sc o p e and pow er of in v e s tig a tio n ; L e itm a n n e m p h a s i z e s h is in d e p e n d e n c e ; W hite p o in ts to h is p e r s o n a liz e d c o n c e r n ; D a v is b e lie v e s th e o m ­ b u d sm a n sho uld no t b e d i f f e r e n t - - t h a t i s , a l l fa c u lty and a d m i n i s ­ t r a t o r s sh o u ld s t r i v e to p e r f o r m a s o m b u d sm e n . C o n c lu sio n A ll six ca m p u s o m b u d sm e n g e n e r a l l y a g r e e th a t they h av e a tw o -fo ld r e s p o n s ib ility ; ( 1 ) to h e lp in d iv id u a ls so lv e t h e i r i n s t i ­ tu tio n al p r o b le m s , and (2 ) to s e e k in s titu tio n a l c h a n g e s th a t w ill re d u c e in d iv id u a l p r o b le m s . tive and p r e v e n tiv e a c tiv i tie s . T h e s e m a y be c h a r a c t e r i z e d a s p a l l i a ­ O p e r a tio n a l s t y l e s d if f e r a c c o r d in g to w hich p o rtio n o f th is r e s p o n s i b ilit y t a k e s p r i o r i t y in th e m in d of the o m b u d sm a n . T h r e e of th o s e i n t e r v i e w e d - - L e itm a n n , N o rm a n and R u s t - - s e e m to le a n to w a rd th e p a llia tiv e a p p r o a c h . T h ey a r e in clin ed to r e a c t to c o m p la in ts a s th e y a r i s e and to m a k e r e c o m ­ m e n d a tio n s fo r r e p a i r i n g r a t h e r th an r e s t r u c t u r i n g in s titu tio n a l p r o ­ c e d u re s . * T he o th e r t h r e e - - D a v i s , D eK off and W h i t e - - r e g a r d *R ust h a s m a in ta in e d th a t s o - c a l l e d m in o r g r i e v a n c e s can b re a k th e m o r a l e o f in d iv id u a l s tu d e n ts and s p r e a d th is b re a k d o w n thro ug ho ut a s tu d e n t body. He b e l ie v e s th a t m o r e a tte n tio n can be devoted to th e " l a r g e r th in g s " i f so m e b o d y c a n be found to c o r r e c t the " li ttle t h i n g s " - - a n d th a t i s th e r o l e of th e o m b u d sm a n . D i s c u s ­ sion n o te s , m e e tin g on o m b u d sm a n in h ig h e r e d u c a tio n , D e tr o it, Mich. , O c to b e r 25, 1968. T he follow ing d a y a t th e s a m e m e e tin g 122 th e m s e l v e s a s " c h a n g e a g e n ts " and t h e i r a c tio n s a s c a ta ly tic in b rin g in g ab o u t s t r u c t u r a l a l t e r a t i o n s . 1 T hey a r e m o r e lik e ly to seek out g r i e v a n c e s r a t h e r th a n w a it f o r in d iv id u a l p r o b le m s to com e to th e m . It sh ould be no ted th a t th e s e a r e d is tin c tio n s in d e g r e e , not in kind. N o n e th e le s s , th e l a t t e r " a c t i v i s t " e m p h a s is is f a r t h e r r e m o v e d fro m th e c iv il o m b u d s m a n m o d e l th a n the fo rm er. D e s p ite th e s e d if f e r e n c e s in r o le p e r c e p tio n , it is a l s o a p p a re n t th a t a l l s ix o m b u d sm e n a r e g e n e r a lly c a u tio u s in t h e i r p r o c e d u r e s , w o rk in g a s q u ie tly a s p o s s ib le to a r r i v e a t f a ir an d r e a s o n a b le a d ju s tm e n ts to d iffic u lt h u m a n r e la t i o n s p r o b le m s . U n su re of t h e i r a u th o r ity and w ith l i t t l e p r e c e d e n t to g uide th e m , they a r e t e s t i n g v a r io u s p e r s u a s i v e a p p r o a c h e s and e v a lu a tin g L e itm a n n sa id : " I 1 m going to confine m y s e l f to w hat I think I c a n do, n a m e ly h e lp the in d iv id u a l s tu d e n t w ith h i s in d iv id u a l p r o b le m . " N o rm a n r e c e n t l y m a d e th is a s s e r t i o n : " A t l e a s t two O m b u d s m e n we know r e f u s e to ta k e an y d i r e c t p a r t in c o n fro n ta tio n p r o c e e d in g s . We s h a r e t h e i r b e lie f th a t o u r r o le i s p r i m a r i l y to h e lp s tu d e n ts solve t h e i r in d iv id u a l p r o b le m s b e f o r e th e y expand to g ro u p s i z e or e s c a l a t e to e x t r a - p r o c e d u r a l a c tio n . " N elso n F . N o rm a n , T h e O m bu d sm an : A New B ird on C a m p u s , San D iego S ta te C o lleg e , undated, p. 1 1 . *DeKoff h a s s u g g e s te d th a t a c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n m a y p r e c ip ita te c o n fro n ta tio n . He added: "I in te n d to a c t a s a c a ta l y s t, not a s so m e b o d y who p o u r s o il on tr o u b le d w a t e r s . I ' m a tte m p tin g to c r e a t e s itu a tio n s th a t a r e lying d o r m a n t and n ee d s o m e u p h e a v ­ al. . . . " D is c u s s io n n o te s , m e e tin g on o m b u d s m a n in h ig h e r education, D e tr o it, M ic h ., O c to b e r 25, 1968. 123 r e s u l t s . * T h ey r e c o g n iz e th a t th e s u c c e s s of t h e i r a c tiv i tie s r e s t s h e a v ily on t h e i r own p r e s t i g e , p e r s o n a l i t y and p e r s u a s i v e p o w e r. Although th e y c a n r e s o r t to t h e i r u ltim a te w e a p o n - - a p p e a l to th e p r e s i d e n t - - t h e y w is e ly p r e f e r to hold i t in r e s e r v e u n til e v e ry th in g e ls e h a s fa ile d . T h ey r e a l i z e th a t too m u c h " ru n n in g to the p r e s i ­ dent" w ill w e a k e n r a t h e r th a n s tr e n g t h e n t h e i r s e m i- in d e p e n d e n t p o s itio n s . A n o th e r f a c to r w h ich cannot be ig n o re d i s th a t a t l e a s t four of the s ix a r e s t i l l b u ild in g t h e i r c a r e e r s and t h e r e f o r e h o pe to avoid c o s tly m i s t a k e s in a r o le w hich a f f o r d s th e m a g r e a t d e a l of v is ib ility . A ll s ix would u n d o u b te d ly a g r e e th a t A n d e r s o n 's w a r n in g about the. c iv il o m b u d s m a n a p p lie s e q u a lly to th e m : "A m o n g the o m b u d s m a n 's w o r s t e n e m i e s a r e s o m e o f h is b e s t f r ie n d s : th o s e who e x p e c t to o m u c h of h im . " 2 D eK off h a s a d v is e d new c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n not to b e c o m e sty liz e d too so o n. "We a l l d o n ' t r e a l l y know w hat i t m e a n s y e t, " he d e c la r e d . D is c u s s io n n o te s , m e e tin g on o m b u d s m a n in h i g h e r ed ucatio n, D e tr o it, M i c h ., O c to b e r 25, 1968. 2 p. 155. A n d e rs o n , O m b u d sm e n fo r A m e ric a n G o v e rn m e n t? , r C H A P T E R IV THE CAMPUS OMBUDSMAN: A STUDENT EVALUATION C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s , a c t i v i t i e s and a t titu d e s of the c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n w e r e d e s c r i b e d in th e fin al p o rtio n o f th e p r e v io u s c h a p te r . In fo r m a tio n w a s o b ta in e d fro m p e r s o n s who have a s s u m e d th a t ro le a t s ix in s titu tio n s of h ig h e r e d u c a tio n . A n o th e r d im e n s io n w ill now be add ed to th e stu d y th ro u g h an a n a l y s i s o f a s u r v e y of stu d e n ts w ho h av e c o n s u lte d a c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n . M ic h ig a n S tate U n iv e r s it y and i t s o m b u d sm a n , J a m e s R u st, w e re s e le c te d fo r t h i s p h a s e of th e in v e s tig a tio n f o r s e v e r a l r e a s o n s . F i r s t , w ith a n e n r o llm e n t a p p ro a c h in g 40, 000, M ich ig an S tate i s one of the l a r g e s t u n i v e r s i t i e s in th e n a t i o n - - a " m u l tiv e r s it y " o f fifteen s e p a r a te s c h o o ls and c o lle g e s w ith d i v e r s e , e v e n conflicting, i n t e r e s t s . * P r o b l e m s a s s o c ia te d w ith th e im b a la n c e b etw een the o rg a n iz a tio n and the in d iv id u a l a r e p r e v a le n t on t h i s sp ra w lin g ^D uncan N o r t o n - T a y l o r , "M e g a v e rsity * s S tru gg le w ith I t s e l f , " F o r tu n e , M ay, 1967, pp. 161-65. 124 125 ca m p u s, w h ic h h a s b e e n th e sc e n e of a n t i - “E s ta b lis h m e n t" d e m o n s tr a tio n s by d is s id e n t s tu d e n ts . Secondly, M ic h ig a n S tate w as one o f th e f i r s t in s t i t u t i o n s of h i g h e r e d u c a tio n to e s t a b l i s h an office of o m b u d sm a n . T h e p o sitio n w a s s u p p o rte d b y a l l p r i m a r y pow er g r o u p s on the c a m p u s , in clu ding top a d m i n i s t r a t o r s , t r u s t e e s , and s tu d e n t and facu lty l e a d e r s . A n o th e r r e a s o n f o r the s e le c tio n is that M ic h ig an S t a t e 's o m b u d s m a n h a s b e e n in o ffic e lo n g e r th a n any o th e r o m b u d sm a n a t a m a j o r u n iv e r s i ty . He h a n d le s a w id e v a r ie ty of stu d e n t c o m p la in ts and k e e p s c u m u la tiv e r e c o r d s . F in a lly , as was in d ic a te d in th e p r e v io u s c h a p te r , o th e r c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s a r e m o d e lin g o r m a y m o d e l t h e i r c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n o p e r a tio n on the M ic h ig an S tate plan. 1 A to ta l of 525 p e r s o n s c o n s u lte d the M ic h ig a n S ta te o m b u d s ­ m an d u r in g th e 1967-68 a c a d e m ic y e a r , h is f i r s t y e a r in o ffic e, followed by 305 d u rin g th e 1968 fall t e r m . F o r r e a s o n s g iv e n in the firs t c h a p te r , the l a t t e r g r o u p w as c h o s e n fo r a m a ile d q u e s tio n n a i r e su rv e y co nducted d u rin g th e 1969 w in te r t e r m . T h e n u m b e r of q u e s ­ tio n n a ir e s s e n t w as r e d u c e d to 288 b e c a u s e six o f th e 305/fh d iv id u a ls w ere not c u r r e n t l y e n r o lle d s tu d e n ts w h en they c o n s u lte d t h e o m b u d s ­ man and a d d r e s s e s could no t be o b ta in e d fo r e le v e n o th e r s . 1 A m ong Two th e m a r e San Diego S ta te C o lleg e and G e o r g e W a s h ­ ington U n iv e r s ity . R u st h a s a n s w e re d r e q u e s ts f o r in f o r m a tio n about his office fro m s c o r e s of in s titu tio n s . 126 w ee k s a f te r th e f i r s t m a ilin g , a se c o n d copy of the q u e s tio n n a i r e w as s e n t to th o s e who h a d not r e s p o n d e d . O f the 288 s tu d e n ts involved, 218 r e t u r n e d q u e s t i o n n a i r e s fo r a 75. 6 p e r ce n t r e s p o n s e . L e t t e r s in c lu d e d in both m a ilin g s and the q u e s tio n n a i r e a r e r e p r o ­ duced in A ppendix E and A ppendix F . B e f o r e s u r v e y fin d in g s a r e p r e s e n t e d , s o m e a tte n tio n is given to th e in s t itu ti o n a l s e ttin g an d o p e r a tio n a l p r o c e d u r e s of the M ichigan S ta te o m b u d sm a n . In th e th ir d s e c tio n , c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of s tu d e n ts w h o c o n su lted the o m b u d s m a n d u r in g th e 1968 f a ll t e r m a r e d e s c r ib e d . E x p e r ie n c e s of th o s e s tu d e n ts in c o n s u ltin g th e o m b u d sm an a r e r e v ie w e d in th e fo u rth s e c tio n . A ttitu d e s r e l a t e d to th ose e x p e r i e n c e s a r e a n a ly z e d in the fifth s e c tio n . and c o m m e n ts a r e cited in th e s ix th s e c tio n . A few c a s e s The fin a l s e c tio n i s a s u m m a r y of s u r v e y fin d in g s. I n s titu tio n a l S etting F o u n d ed in 1855 a s th e nation* s p io n e e r l a n d - g r a n t c o lle g e , M ichigan S ta te U n iv e r s ity h a s b e e n a p a r t of the n a tio n a l m o v e m e n t to m a k e h ig h e r e d u c a tio n a v a ila b le to a ll a b l e s tu d e n ts . * D u rin g 1M uch of the in f o r m a tio n in th is s e c tio n c a m e f r o m two p u b licatio n s: M ic h ig a n State: P r o f i l e of a U n i v e r s i t y , b r o c h u r e p r e p a r e d by U n iv e r s it y E ditor* s O ffice, M ic h ig an S tate U n iv e r s it y , undated; and M ic h ig a n S tate U n iv e r s ity : C a ta lo g of C o u r s e s an d A cad em ic P r o g r a m s , M ic h ig an S tate U n iv e r s it y P u b lic a tio n , LXIII (D e ce m b er, 1968). 127 m o s t of i t s h i s t o r y , the institution* s e d u c a tio n a l and r e s e a r c h p r o ­ g r a m s w e r e c o n c e n tr a te d on a g r i c u l t u r e . A lthough th is e m p h a s is h a s now s p r e a d to o th e r f ie ld s , the u n iv e r s i ty s t i l l h a s no law sc h o o l o r t e r m i n a l - d e g r e e m e d ic a l sch o o l. 1 In r e c e n t y e a r s , thro ug h w id e s p r e a d in te r n a tio n a l p r o g r a m s , M ic h ig an S tate h a s h elped found u n i v e r s i t i e s and h a s p ro m o te d e d u c a tio n a l and a g r i ­ c u ltu ra l i m p r o v e m e n ts in a n u m b e r of f o re ig n c o u n tr ie s . T h e m a in c a m p u s a t E a s t L a n sin g h a s b e e n so g r e a t l y e n ­ la rg e d to a c c o m m o d a te in c r e a s i n g e n r o l l m e n t s th a t b us s e r v i c e , once a c o n v e n ie n c e , i s now a n e c e s s ity . O ld - s ty le c l a s s r o o m b u ild ­ ings r e m i n i s c e n t of the " a g sc h o o l" e r a a r e s t i l l sta n d in g , alth o u g h la r g e m o d e r n l a b o r a t o r i e s and c l a s s r o o m - o f f ic e c o m p le x e s a r e p r e ­ d om inant. Som e 2 0 ,0 0 0 s t u d e n t s - - m o r e th a n h a lf the to ta l e n r o l l ­ m e n t - - r e s i d e in u n iv e r s ity - o w n e d living u n its . T hey c o m p r i s e one of the l a r g e s t c a m p u s r e s i d e n t p o p u latio n s in th e w o rld . M o st of the r e s id e n c e h a l l s f o r u n m a r r i e d s tu d e n ts a r e huge h i g h - r i s e s t r u c t u r e s . A p a r tm e n ts fo r m a r r i e d s tu d e n ts a r e c l u s t e r e d in t h r e e " v i l l a g e s . " S tu d e n ts a r e e n r o lle d fro m e v e r y county in M ic h ig an , e v e r y s ta te in th e n a tio n and m o r e than s e v e n ty - fiv e fo re ig n c o u n tr ie s . As th e r e s u l t of a co n tin u o u s r e c r u i t i n g ca m p a ig n , one of th e l a r g e s t 1T he C o lleg e of H u m an M ed icine p r e s e n t l y p r o v id e s a p r o ­ g r a m of s tu d y w h ich p r e p a r e s s tu d e n ts fo r e n t r a n c e a t the ju n io r lev el to m e d ic a l s c h o o ls o ffe rin g the D o c to r of M e d icin e d e g r e e . 128 g ro u p s of N a tio n a l M e r it S c h o la rs in the n a tio n i s found a t M ic h ig a n State. A r e c e n t s tu d y r e v e a le d th a t the i n s t i t u t i o n 's f r e s h m e n in 1967 w e r e m o r e in te llig e n t and m o r e a m b itio u s e d u c a tio n a lly th an the f r e s h m e n in 1958. * In a d d itio n to s o m e 1, 600 te a c h in g facu lty m e m b e r s , the u n iv e r s i ty h a s m o r e th a n 400 r e s e a r c h p r o f e s s o r s , n e a r l y 300 e x te n sio n w o r k e r s and a b o u t 375 a d m i n i s t r a t o r s . It i s am o n g the top tw en ty in s titu tio n s in th e U n ited S ta te s in the n u m b e r of d o c to r a l d e g r e e s a w a rd e d a n n u a lly . M ic h ig an S tate i s a m e m b e r o f the B ig Ten s c h o la s t ic and a th le tic c o n fe re n c e . In n o v atio n s in r e c e n t y e a r s in c lu d e n u m e r o u s in s titu tio n a l r e s e a r c h , e v a lu a tio n and d e v e lo p m e n t p r o g r a m s , liv in g - l e a r n in g c e n te r s , an H o n o rs C o lleg e, t h r e e r e s i d e n t i a l l i b e r a l a r t s c o lle g e s , a s e p a r a t e s m a l l u n iv e r s i ty (O akland), and c u r r ic u lu m r e v is i o n s . A lthough th e t r u s t e e s and a d m in is t r a tio n h av e tr a d it io n a l ly e x e r c is e d m u c h of th e d e c is io n - m a k in g p o w e r in th e in s titu tio n , m o re a u th o r ity i s being a s s u m e d by fa c u lty and s tu d e n ts th ro u g h th e A ca d em ic C o u n c il and A s s o c ia te d S tu d e n ts. A n u m b e r of c h a n n e ls a r e open to s tu d e n ts fo r so lv in g p r o b le m s r e l a t e d to the in s titu tio n . R e b e c c a N ie te r t, " F r e s h m e n Found B r i g h t e r T h an P r e d e ­ c e s s o r s , " M ichi^an_State_2iew s, J a n u a r y 16, 1969, p. 14. T h is c o m p a ra tiv e stu d y w a s co n du cted b y I r v in J . L eh m an n and W a lk e r H. H ill th ro u g h th e O ffice o f E v a lu a tio n S e r v ic e s . 129 E ac h c o lle g e m a in ta in s an a c a d e m ic s tu d e n t a f f a i r s o ffic e. u n its and r e s id e n c e h a l l s h a v e a d v i s e r s . A c a d e m ic The u n i v e r s i t y m a in ta in s o ffic es fo r a d m i s s i o n s , s c h o l a r s h i p s , f in a n c ia l a id s , co u n se lin g , p la c e m e n t and r e l a t e d a c t i v i t i e s . T h ro u g h th e A s s o c ia te d S tu d en ts, le g al c o u n s e l i s m a d e a v a ila b le to s tu d e n ts . In a d d itio n , t h e r e a r e stu d e n t s e r v i c e o r g a n iz a tio n s , a H e a lth C e n te r and a V e te r a n s G uidance C e n te r , T h e A c a d e m ic F r e e d o m R e p o r t w hich e s ta b lis h e d the office of o m b u d s m a n a ls o c r e a t e d a s tu d e n t- f a c u lty j u d i c i a r y to c o n s id e r c a s e s and a p p e a ls in vo lv ing d i s c i p l i n a r y a c tio n a g a in s t stu d e n ts . * T h e c a m p u s n e w s p a p e r p r o v id e s a s e r v i c e c a lle d " S p a r ta c u s s " w hich a n s w e r s s tu d e n t q u e s tio n s and in v e s tig a te s s t u ­ dent c o m p la in ts . O p e r a tio n a l P r o c e d u r e s A lthough th e A c a d e m ic F r e e d o m R e p o rt g iv e s th e M ich ig an State o m b u d sm a n " b r o a d in v e s tig a to r y p o w e rs and d i r e c t and r e a d y a c c e s s to a l l U n iv e r s ity o f f i c i a l s , 11 i t d o e s not e x p lic itly d efin e h is r e s p o n s i b ilit ie s o r p r e s c r i b e h is p r o c e d u r e s . A c c o rd in g to Jo h n R einoehl, c h a ir m a n o f the F a c u lty C o m m itte e on Student A f f a ir s , the r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s w e r e p u r p o s e ly le ft v ague b e c a u s e th e a u th o r s felt " th a t the in d iv id u a l h i m s e l f w ould h a v e to m a k e th e jo b; to 1 A c a d e m ic s it y , pp. 16-19. F r e e d o m f o r S tu d en ts a t M ic h ig a n S tate U n i v e r ­ 130 d e s c r i b e it w ould c i r c u m s c r i b e it. " The o m b u d sm a n , he added, w as n ot d e s ig n e d to be a g lo r if ie d c o u n s e lo r but m o r e of a " s u p e r a c a d e m ic -a s s is ta n t dean. 1,1 D u rin g Rust* s f i r s t y e a r a s o m b u d sm a n , h e fre q u e n tly r e f e r r e d to h i m s e l f not in th o s e t e r m s b ut r a t h e r a s " a kind of tr a f f ic cop, te llin g s tu d e n ts w hich p eop le to s e e and w h a t p r o c e d u r e s to follow . " 2 H e l a t e r e x p r e s s e d r e g r e t o v e r hav in g u s e d th a t " u n - fo rtu n a te m e ta p h o r " 3 and s u m m a r i z e d h is p r o c e d u r e s in h an d lin g each c o m p la in t a s one o r m o r e of th e follow ing a c tiv i tie s : (1) ad v is­ ing, (2) e x p la in in g , (3) r e f e r r i n g , (4) re v ie w in g , and (5) taking d ir e c t a c tio n . In a l l c a s e s , he t r i e s to be a c a r e f u l and i n t e r e s t e d lis te n e r , f F ro m th e b eg in ning , R u s t h a s a tte m p te d to m o d e l h is office on that o f th e c iv il o m b u d sm a n in D e n m a rk , m a k in g n e c e s s a r y 1B e v e r ly T w itc h e ll, " A c a d e m ic F r e e d o m R e p o r t Swings Into E ffe c t, " M ic h ig a n S tate NewB, S e p te m b e r , 1967, p. 10. 2 " F i r s t U n iv e r s it y O m b u d sm a n , " P hi D e lta K a p p a n , XL.IX (N ov em ber, 1967), 142. 3 R u st, p r iv a te in te rv ie w h e ld a t M ich ig an S tate U n iv e r s ity , D e c e m b e r 12, 1968. 4 U n titled , u n d a te d m im e o g r a p h e d s ta te m e n t p r e p a r e d by Rust, M ic h ig an S tate U n iv e r s ity ( r e v is e d in J a n u a r y , 1969), pp. 7 -8 . In a p r i v a t e c o n v e r s a tio n , RuBt add ed th e p r o c e d u r e of " ta k in g d i r e c t a c tio n . 11 131 a d ju s tm e n ts to fit th e u n i v e r s i t y s itu a tio n . He h a s k ep t h is p r o c e ­ d u r e s s im p le and d i r e c t , a s k in g th e s tu d e n t to p r o v id e only a few ite m s of b a s i c in f o r m a tio n in w r itin g about h i m s e l f and h is c o m p la in t p r i o r to a p r iv a te c o n s u lta tio n . Appendix D. A copy of th e f o r m u se d a p p e a r s in D u rin g o r i m m e d ia te l y a f t e r the in te rv ie w , R u s t r e c o r d s h i s i m p r e s s i o n s and l a t e r in d ic a t e s in w r itin g how th e p r o b ­ lem w a s h a n d le d . p ro b le m . A s e p a r a t e file i s m a in ta in e d f o r each s tu d e n t- C a s e s a r e c l a s s i f ie d by type o f c o m p la in t fo r fu tu re r e f e r e n c e , p a r t i c u l a r l y f o r r e p o r t s to the u n i v e r s i t y p r e s id e n t. The two b r o a d c a t e g o r i e s a r e " a c a d e m ic " and " n o n - a c a d e m ic " with s e v e r a l s u b - d iv is io n s u n d e r e a c h . R e c o r d s and r e p o r t s a r e k ep t confidential... .If th e r e s o lu t io n of a p r o b le m is p ro lo n g e d , th e o m b u d sm a n a t te m p ts to k e e p th e s tu d e n t p o ste d on d e v e lo p m e n ts. In r e f e r r a l c a s e s , h e a s k s th e s tu d e n t to r e p o r t r e s u l t s . Not a l l of the o m b u d s m a n 's b u s in e s s c o m e s fro m p e r s o n a l v i s i t s . He a l s o h an d le s c o m p la in ts co n v ey ed by te le p h o n e and l e t t e r . He d o e s not conduct in v e s tig a tio n s on h is own in itia tiv e . In a tte m p tin g to r e d r e s s s tu d e n t g r i e v a n c e s , R ust r e l i e s h ea v ily on r e a s o n and p e r s u a s i o n a p p lie d th ro u g h te lep h o n e c o n v e r ­ sa tio n s and p e r s o n a l c a l l s . le tte rs. O c c a s io n a lly , h e s e n d s m e m o s and W hen h e can no t g e t c o o p e ra tio n fro m one in d iv id u al, h e m ay tu r n to th a t person* s o r g a n iz a tio n a l s u p e r i o r . U ltim a te ly , h e 132 m a y ta k e a c a s e to th e p r e s i d e n t , alth o u g h he h a s r a r e l y c h o sen t h i s " la s t r e s o r t " m e a s u r e . In h i s f i r s t r e p o r t to the p r e s i d e n t , R u s t o b s e r v e d th at s ta tin g h is v ie w s on a m a t t e r to the p e r s o n c o n c e rn e d " i s th e c h ie f s o u r c e of the O m b u d s m a n 's p o w e r . " On th e u n iv e r s i ty s c e n e , R u s t h a s i n t e r p r e t e d th is p o w e r to m e a n " th a t th e b e s t w ay f o r an O m b u d s ­ m a n to o p e r a t e i s q u ie tly , p e r s u a s i v e l y , behind th e s c e n e s . 1,1 He r e g a r d s h is p r o c e d u r e s to be c o m p a r a b le to th o s e of both a m e d i a t o r and an a d v o c a te : "I s e e k e x p la n a tio n s of th e s t u d e n t 's p r e d ic a m e n t and a tte m p t to p e r s u a d e p eo p le to h elp s o lv e o r c l a r if y i t , " he h a s w ritte n . ^ M o r e in f o rm a tio n r e g a r d i n g p r o c e d u r e s of the M ic h ig an State o m b u d sm a n a p p e a r s in C h a p te r III an d A ppendix C. " T h e R e p o rt of the U n iv e r s it y O m b u d sm a n to th e P r e s i d e n t for the School Y e a r, 1967-68, " u n d ated , u n sig n e d , M ic h ig an S tate U n iv e rs ity , p. 2. 2 I b i d ., p. 3. R e co g n iz in g th e u n u s u a l p r o c e d u r e s r e q u ir e d in s e rv in g e f f e c tiv e ly a s a c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n . P r e s i d e n t Jo h n Hannah m a d e th is s ta te m e n t w hen he ap p o in te d R u s t to th e po sitio n : "T he O m b u d sm a n w ill be c h a r g e d w ith r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s u n c o m m o n in A m e ric a n u n i v e r s i t i e s , o r in d e e d in u n i v e r s i t i e s a n y w h e re . " See "MSU A p po in ts D ean A s F i r s t O m b u d s m a n ," A m e r ic a n School and U n iv e r s ity , O c to b e r, 1967, p. 58, H an n ah a ls o h a s ack n o w led g ed that the o m b u d sm a n a s s ig n m e n t " w ill c a l l fo r th e e x e r c i s e of g r e a t p atien ce, u n d e r s ta n d in g , and p e r s u a s i o n . " The P r e s i d e n t ' s R e p o rt of P r o g r e s s , 1 9 6 6 -6 7 , M ic h ig an State U n iv e r s it y P u b lic a tio n , LXII (N ovem ber, 1967), 6 . TABLE I COLLEGE DISTRIBUTION OF STUDENTS WHO CONSULTED CAMPUS OMBUDSMAN COMPARED WITH ALL STUDENTS ENROLLED AT MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY. FALL TERM. I968a 0) School or college (2) Number of students who consulted ombudsman (3) Percentage of total students who consulted ombudsman (4) Number of students enrolled (5) Percentage of total university enrollment (6) Difference between percentages (column 3 minus 5) (7) Number of students "expected" to consult ombudsman based on college size*1 (8) Difference between actual and "expected" number of students to consult ombudsman (column 2 minus 7) .1 19 0 + 9.0 33 427 .1 3 0 9.8 - 2.8 29 • 8 1,940 4.9 4 .8 15 4 6.7 6,264 15.7 - 9.0 47 -27 10 3.3 2,380 6.0 - 2.7 18 - 8 Home Economics 6 2.0 1,478 3.7 - 1.7 11 - 5 James Madison 0 0 422 1.1 * 1.1 3 - 3 Human Medicine 1 .3 92 .2 .1 0 4 - Agriculture 19 6.4 2,603 6.5 Arts and Letters 60 20.1 4,422 11.1 3 1.0 423 1.1 - Business 21 7.0 3,900 Communication Arts 17 5.7 Education 20 Engineering Lyman Briggs 4 2 1 r TABLE 1—Continued (I) School or college (2) Number of students who consulted ombudsman (3) Percentage of total students who consulted ombudsman (4) Number of students enrolled (5) Percentage of total university enrollment (6) Difference between percentages (column 3 minus 5) (7) Number of students "expected" to consult ombudsman based on college size** (8) Difference between actual and "expected" number of students to consult ombudsman (column 2 minus 7) .8 7 + 2 3.0 881 2.2 Natural Science 21 7 .0 4,822 12.1 - 5.1 36 -15 Social Science 50 16.7 5,441 13.6 + 3.1 41 + 9 0 0 866 2.2 - 2.2 7 - 7 62 20.7 4,015 10.1 +10.6 30 +32 39,949 100.3C Veterinary Medicine University College (includes no preference and unclassified) Total a 299 9 9 .9C + — 299 — In credit programs on East Lansing campus. ^"Expected" number was computed by multiplying percentage in column 5 tim es 299, the total number of students who consulted the ombudsman. Obtained figure was rounded to nearest whole number. c Does not total 100 because of rounding. 134 9 Justin Morrill 135 t Student C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s D u rin g th e 1968 f a ll t e r m , a t th e b egin n ing of R u s t ' s se co n d y e a r a s M ic h ig an S t a t e 's o m b u d s m a n , 305 p e r s o n s c o n s u lte d h im about a d i v e r s i t y o f p r o b le m s . O f th is n u m b e r , 299 w e r e c u r r e n t l y e n r o lle d s tu d e n ts , fo u r w e r e f o r m e r s tu d e n ts , and tw o w e r e r e l a t i v e s of s tu d e n ts . The co lleg e d is t r ib u t io n of the 299 s tu d e n ts by n u m b e r and p e r c e n ta g e i s p r e s e n te d in T a b le 1. T he p e r c e n t a g e s a r e th e n c o m p a r e d w ith c o lle g e p e r c e n t a g e s fo r th e t o t a l u n i v e r s i t y e n r o l l ­ m e n t. The fin al c o lu m n s show th a t s tu d e n ts f r o m A r t s and L e t t e r s and U n iv e r s it y C o lleg e w e r e c o n s id e r a b ly " o v e r r e p r e s e n t e d " in the o m b u d s m a n 1 s office w hile s tu d e n ts f r o m E d u c a tio n an d N a tu r a l « S cience w e r e c o n s id e r a b ly " u n d e r r e p r e s e n t e d . " A pplying the P e a r s o n " G o o d n e s s - o f - F it" T e s t f o r c o m p a r in g s a m p le and p o p u la ­ tion d is t r ib u t io n s to th e s e f ig u r e s y ie ld s a Chi S q u are o f 99. 3, s i g ­ n ifica n t a t th e . 0 1 le v e l. T h u s, th e h y p o th e s is that th e c o lleg e d is tr ib u tio n of s tu d e n ts who c o n s u lte d th e o m b u d sm a n w a s the s a m e a s th e c o lle g e d is tr ib u tio n of a l l u n i v e r s i t y s tu d e n ts i s r e j e c t e d . 1 D if f e r e n c e s a l s o a r e a p p a r e n t w hen s tu d e n ts w ho c o n s u lte d the c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n a r e s e p a r a t e d by c l a s s ra n k . A m ong th e 144 1T h e P e a r s o n " G o o d n e s s - o f - F i t " T e s t i s d e s c r i b e d in W illia m L, H a y s, S ta ti s tic s f o r P s y c h o lo g i s ts (New Y o rk : H o lt, R in e h a rt and W in sto n , 1963), pp. 5 8 0 -8 4 . TABLE 2 CLASS DISTRIBUTION OF STUDENTS WHO CONSULTED CAMPUS OMBUDSMAN REGARDING ACADEMIC PROBLEMS COMPARED WITH ALL STUDENTS ENROLLED AT MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY. FALL TERM. 1968a (1) Class rank (2) Number of students who consulted ombudsman (3) Percentage of total students who consulted ombudsman (4) ‘ Number of students enrolled (5) Percentage of total university enrollment (6) Difference between percentages (column 3 minus 5) (7) Number of students "expected" to consult ombudsman based on class size (8) Difference between actual and "expected" number of students to consult ombudsman (column 2 minus 7) Freshman 13 9.0 9,670 24.2 -15.2 35 -22 Sophomore 31 21.5 7,618 19.1 + 2.4 27 + 4 Junior 42 29.2 7,758 19.4 + 9.8 28 +14 Senior 49 34.0 6,954 17.4 +16.6 25 +24 Graduate 7 4.9 7,668 19.2 -14.3 28 -21 Special 2 1.4 281 .7 1 + 1 144 100.0 39,949 100.0 Total + .7 — 144 • £ In credit programs on East Lansing campus. Since the ombudsman handles problems separately, in this tabulation a student was counted once for each problem he presented. Thus, one student with two problems is treated the same as two students with one problem each. °"Expected" number was computed by multiplying percentage in column 5 times 144, the total number of stu­ dents who consulted the ombudsman regarding academic problems. Obtained figure was rounded to nearest whole number. TABLE 3 CLASS DISTRIBUTION OF STUDENTS WHO CONSULTED CAMPUS OMBUDSMAN REGARDING NON-ACADEMIC PROBLEMS COMPARED WITH ALL STUDENTS ENROLLED AT MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, FALL TERM, 1958 (1) Class rank (2) Number of students who consulted ^ ombudsman (3) Percentage of total students who consulted ombudsman (4) Number of students enrolled (5) Percentage of total university enrollment (6) Difference between percentages (column 3 minus 5) (7) Number of students "expected" to consult ombudsman based on class size (8) Difference between actual and "expected" number of students to consult ombudsman (column 2 minus 7) F reshman 18 10.0 9,670 24.2 -14.2 44 -26 Sophomore 34 18.9 7,618 19.1 - .2 34 0 Junior 31 17.2 7,758 19.4 - 2.2 35 - 4 Senior 49 27.2 6,954 17.4 + 9.8 31 +18 Graduate 45 25.0 7,668 19.2 + 5.8 35 +10 3 1.7 281 .7 + 1.0 1 + 2 180 100.0 39,949 100.0 180 --- Special Total — In credit programs on East Lansing campus. ^Since the ombudsman handles problems separately, in this tabulation a student was counted once for each problem he presented. Thus, one student with two problems is treated the same as two students with one problem each. °"Expected" number was computed by multiplying percentage in column 5 times 180, the total number of stu­ dents who consulted the ombudsman regarding non-academic problems. Obtained figure was rounded to nearest whole number. 138 a c a d e m ic p r o b l e m s b ro u g h t to th e o m b u d s m a n , j u n i o r s and s e n i o r s w e r e " o v e r r e p r e s e n t e d " an d f r e s h m e n and g r a d u a te s t u d e n ts " u n d e r r e p r e s e n t e d " in p r o p o r tio n to c l a s s s i z e . p r e s e n t e d in T a b le 2 T hese c o m p a riso n s a r e . A r e v e r s a l i s n o ted f o r g r a d u a t e s tu d e n ts w h e n c l a s s r a n k d is t r ib u t io n i s a p p lie d to n o n - a c a d e m i c p r o b le m s . I n s te a d of b e in g " u n d e r r e p r e s e n t e d , " th e y w e r e " o v e r r e p r e s e n t e d . " A g ain , f r e s h ­ m e n w e r e " u n d e r r e p r e s e n t e d " and s e n i o r s w e r e " o v e r r e p r e s e n t e d . " See T a b le 3. T he g e n e r a l o b s e r v a tio n w h ic h can be m a d e f r o m th e d a ta in th e s e t h r e e t a b l e s i s th a t d u r in g th e 1968 fa ll t e r m s tu d e n ts in A r t s and- L e t t e r s and U n iv e r s it y C o lle g e w e r e r e l a t i v e l y m o r e in c lin e d to c o n s u lt the o m b u d s m a n w h ile s t u d e n t s in E d u c a tio n and N a t u r a l S cien ce w e r e r e l a t i v e l y l e s s in c lin e d . * F r e s h m e n w e r e r e l a t i v e l y l e s s in c lin e d to c o n s u lt th e o m b u d s m a n w h ile s e n i o r s w e r e r e l a t i v e l y m o r e in c lin e d . G r a d u a te s tu d e n t s w e r e m o r e in c lin e d to c o n s u lt th e o m b u d sm a n a b o u t n o n - a c a d e m i c p r o b l e m s than a c a d e m i c p r o b l e m s . G e n e r a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s , of t h e 218 s tu d e n ts w ho r e s p o n d e d to the o m b u d s m a n s u r v e y q u e s t i o n n a i r e a r e s u m m a r i z e d in T a b le 4. It w ill be n o te d th a t a l l c l a s s r a n k s , a l l s tu d e n t a g e g r o u p s an d a l l ^Of th e 218 r e s p o n d e n ts , 4 9 .5 p e r cent w e r e e n r o lle d in th r e e c o l l e g e s - - A r t s and L e t t e r s , S o c ia l S cie n ce and U n i v e r s i t y C o lleg e. TABLE 4 CHARACTERISTICS OF 218 STUDENTS WHO CONSULTED OMBUDSMAN AT MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, FALL TERM, 1968a F re sh m an Sophomore Ju n io r N % 25 11.5 38 49 Housing Sex C lass rank 17.4 Male F em ale N % 151 69.3 67 30.7 M arital statu s Senior 61 28.0 N Graduate O thers (special) 38 On campus resid en ce hall m a r r ie d housing % 17-18 20 9.2 19 35 16.1 20 39 17.9 21 36 16.5 22 22 10.1 23-24 21 9 .6 25-26 10 4 .6 % 27-28 13 6.0 167 76.6 29 and over 13 6 .0 49 22.5 9 4.1 2 .9 Not in ­ dicated 85 28 23 82 % 39.0 1 2.8 1 0 .6 37.6 % 17.4 Residency Single 7 N N Off campus supervised unsupervised 22.5 Age 156 71.6 N. 3.2 M a rrie d Divorced 60 2 27.5 .9 Michigan O ther sta te s F oreign countries a Based on 218 re tu rn s from 288 questionnaires sent. A to tal of 305 p erso n s consulted the ombudsman between Septem ber 1 and D ecem ber 31, 1968. 140 typ es of stu d e n t h o u sin g w e r e r e p r e s e n t e d . (All g r a d e point a v e r a g e s also w e r e r e p r e s e n t e d . ) H o w e v e r, th e p e r c e n ta g e of m a l e r e s p o n ­ dents (69. 3) w a s h ig h e r th a n the a 11- u n i v e r s i t y p e r c e n ta g e (58. 7) and the f e m a le p e r c e n ta g e (30. 7) w a s lo w e r (41. 3 ) . 1 A lso , a h ig h e r p e r c e n ta g e of m a r r i e d s tu d e n ts (27. 5) w a s r e p r e s e n t e d th a n in the to ta l u n i v e r s i t y p op ulatio n (1 7 .5 ). E x p e rie n c e s The m o s t f re q u e n tly cited s o u r c e of in f o r m a tio n about th e o m b u d sm an f o r s tu d e n ts w ho c o n s u lte d h im d u r in g the 1968 fa ll t e r m w as the M ic h ig an S tate N e w s , th e c a m p u s n e w s p a p e r . T he se c o n d m o st f r e q u e n tly c ite d s o u r c e of in f o rm a tio n w a s a n o th e r s tu d e n t ( o r stu d e n ts). Few s tu d e n ts l e a r n e d ab o u t th e o m b u d s m a n th ro u g h in s t r u c t o r s o r a d m i n i s t r a t o r s . in T ab le 5. O nly 6 S o u rc e s of in f o r m a tio n a r e r e p o r t e d p e r c e n t of s u r v e y r e s p o n d e n ts felt th a t th e s e r v i c e s of th e o m b u d s m a n a r e w id ely known am o n g s tu d e n ts . N egative a n s w e r s c a m e f r o m 4 4 .5 p e r ce n t an d th e r e m a in in g 4 9 .5 p e r c e n t w e r e u n c e r t a in . *Of th e 305 p e r s o n s who c o n s u lte d R u s t d u r in g th e 1968 f a ll te r m , 6 8 . 9 p e r c e n t w e r e m e n and 31. 1 p e r c e n t w e r e w o m en . N ote how c lo s e ly th is r a t i o c o r r e s p o n d s w ith th e s e x d is tr ib u tio n of s u r v e y re sp o n d e n ts. O n ly 2 8 .9 p e r cent o f th e s u r v e y r e s p o n d e n ts w e r e u n d e r c la s s m e n , w h e r e a s 43. 3 p e r ce n t of a l l s tu d e n ts e n r o lle d w e r e u n d e r c la s s m e n . 141 TA B L E 5 SOURCES O F INFORM ATION ABOUT CAM PUS OMBUDSMAN R E P O R T E D BY STUDENTS WHO CONSULTED OMBUDSMAN A T MICHIGAN STA TE UNIVERSITY, F A L L T E R M , 1968 S o u rc e of in f o rm a tio n State N ew s (c a m p u s n e w s p a p e r) N u m b e r of s tu d e n ts who cite d s o u r c e : U nder­ G r a d u a te s g rad u ates T o ta l O th e r s (Special) N %a 109 29 3 141 6 4 .7 Student(s) 86 14 2 102 46. A c a d e m ic F r e e d o m R e p o rt 32 3 1 36 16. 5 R e sid e n c e h a l l adviser(s)* 23 0 1 24 1 1 .0 A c a d e m ic a d v i s e r ( s ) 13 3 1 17 7. I n s tr u c to r ( s ) 5 2 0 7 3. 2 A d m in is tr a to r ( s ) 5 2 0 7 3 .2 P r o f e s s io n a l c o u n s e lo r(s ) 3 0 1 4 1 .8 19 5 1 25 1 1.5 O th e r s o u r c e s T o ta l ct 8 8 363b P e r c e n t a g e citin g th is s o u r c e am o n g a l l r e s p o n d e n ts (218). b T o ta l e x c e e d s n u m b e r of r e s p o n d e n ts (218) b e c a u s e s o m e cited m o r e th a n one s o u r c e of in f o rm a tio n . 142 N e a r ly h a l f th e s u r v e y e d s tu d e n ts had ta k en t h e i r p r o b le m s to two o r m o r e p e r s o n s in a u th o r ity b e f o r e tu r n in g to the o m b u d sm a n . F e w e r th a n one in fo u r had gone d i r e c t l y to th e o m b u d sm a n . U nder­ c l a s s m e n w e r e l e s s in c lin e d to go d i r e c t l y to th e o m b u d s m a n th an u p p e r c l a s s m e n and g r a d u a te s tu d e n ts . p r e s e n te d in T a b le 6 C la s s ra n k c o m p a r is o n s a r e . TA BLE 6 PREVIOUS PR O B L E M -SO L V IN G A T T E M P T S MADE BY STUDENTS WHO CONSULTED OMBUDSMAN A T MICHIGAN STA TE UNIVERSITY, F A L L T E R M , 1968 To how m a n y p eo ple in a u th o r ity did you ta k e y o u r p ro b le m b e f o r e c o n s u ltin g the o m b u d s m a n ? C la s s ran k None N One % M o re than th re e T h ree Two N % N % N % N % F resh m an 5 2 0 .0 4 1 6 .0 11 44. 0 4 16. 0 1 4 .0 Sophom ore 7 1 8 .4 9 2 3 .7 9 2 3 .7 8 21 . 1 5 13.2 J u n io r 12 2 4 .5 13 2 6 .5 19 38. 8 2 4. 1 3 6 Senior 17 28. 3 16 2 6 .7 14 23. 3 10 1 6 .7 3 5 .0 G ra d u a te 10 2 6 .3 13 34.2 8 21 1 4 1 0.5 3 7 .9 O th e r (sp e c ia l) 1 1 6 .7 3 5 0 .0 1 1 6 .7 0 0 1 1 6.7 58 26. 9 62 28. 7 28 13. 0 16 7 .4 T o ta ia 52 24. 1 . a. Tw o of th e 218 re s p o n d e n ts did n o t a n s w e r th is q u e stio n . F in a l p e r c e n ta g e s to ta l 100. 1 b e c a u s e of ro u n d in g . .1 143 A co m m o n s tu d e n t c o m p la in t on m o s t l a r g e u n iv e r s i ty c a m p u s e s p e r t a i n s to th e in a c c e s s i b i l i t y of i n s t r u c t o r s and a d v i s e r s in t h e i r o ffic e s . S tu d en ts who c o n s u lte d th e M ichigan S tate o m b u d s ­ m an w e r e a s k e d how long th ey w a ite d to s e e h im a f t e r a r r i v i n g a t h is o ffice. M o st of th e r e s p o n d e n ts in d ic a te d th a t th e y saw h im im m e d ia te ly o r w a ite d l e s s th a n te n m in u te s , w ith o r w ith o u t an a p p o in tm e n t. T he fin ding s a r e p r e s e n t e d in T a b le 7. TABLE 7 ACCESSIBILITY O F CAMPUS OMBUDSMAN AS R E P O R T E D BY STUDENTS WHO CONSULTED HIM A T MICHIGAN STA TE UNIVERSITY, F A L L T E R M , 1968 If you had m a d e a n a p p o in tm e n t, If you h a d not m a d e a n a p p o in tm e n t, upon a r r i v i n g a t h is office how long did you w a it to s e e th e o m b u d s m a n ? N N % No d e la y a t a l l 39 4 0 .2 8 U n d e r 10 m in u te s 40 41. 2 .12 1 1 .3 10 to 30 m in u t e s 17 17. 5 0 0 30 to 60 m in u te s 1 1. 0 106 100. 0 97 99. 9 % .9 73 68 21 19. T o ta la R e m a in in g 15 of 218 r e s p o n d e n ts c o n s u lte d o m b u d sm a n by l e t t e r o r te le p h o n e , not in p e r s o n . Second p e r c e n ta g e d o e s not to ta l 1 0 0 b e c a u s e o f ro un ding . 144 W hen campUB o m b u d sm e n w e r e a s k e d how long it took to p r o c e s s a p ro b le m , a n s w e r s v a r ie d w id ely . S u rv e y ed s tu d e n ts at M ichigan S tate w e r e a s k e d to r e c a l l how long it took the o m b u d sm a n to p r o c e s s t h e i r p r o b le m s . (See T a b le TABLE 8 ,) A lthough m o s t r e s p o n s e s 8 E F F IC IE N C Y O F CAMPUS OMBUDSMAN AS R E P O R T E D BY STU D EN TS WHO CONSULTED HIM A T MICHIGAN STA TE U NIVERSITY, F A L L T E R M , 1968 How long did it take th e o m b u d sm a n to h a n d le y o u r p r o b le m ? C la s s ra n k 10 m in u te b o r le ss N % 39. 1 8 34. 9 24. 3 J u n io r 11 Senior • N F resh m an 9 Sophom ore M o r e than 1 hour m in u te s to 1 h o u r 10 N % 8 6 26. 16 4 3 .2 12 3 2 .4 2 3 .4 21 44. 7 15 31. 9 23 41. 1 17 3 0 .4 16 28. 6 G ra d u ate 6 1 9 .4 8 25. 8 17 54. 8 O th er (sp ecial) 2 2 8 .6 3 42. 9 2 28. 6 60 2 9 .9 73 36. 3 68 33. 8 T o ta la q u estio n . % 1 S ev en teen o f th e 218 re s p o n d e n ts did not a n s w e r th is S om e p e r c e n ta g e s do n o t to ta l 100 b e c a u s e of ro u n d in g . 145 w e r e in th e " te n m in u te s to one h o u r " r a n g e , n e a r l y 30 p e r ce n t r e p lie d th a t it took te n m in u te s o r l e s s . O nly 26. 1 p e r c e n t of the f r e s h m e n a n s w e r e d " m o r e th a n one h o u r " c o m p a r e d w ith 54. c e n t of th e g r a d u a te s tu d e n ts . 8 per Rust* s e x p la n a tio n fo r th is d if f e r e n c e i s th a t th e new s tu d e n t i s m o r e lik e ly to b r in g a p ro b le m to the o m ­ b u d sm a n w hich can b e h an dled q u ic k ly b e c a u s e the s tu d e n t i s not fully a w a r e of e x is tin g c h a n n e ls and p r o c e d u r e s a v a ila b le to him . 1 T o a s s e s s th e om budsm an* s e f f e c tiv e n e s s a s p e r c e iv e d by stu d e n ts w ho had c o n s u lte d h im , one s u r v e y q u e s tio n a s k e d , "T o w hat e x te n t is th e p r o b le m you took to the o m b u d s m a n now s o lv e d ? " (See T a b le 9 .) N e a r ly h a l f th e r e s p o n d e n ts in d ic a te d that t h e i r p r o b le m s - w e r e " c o m p le te ly s o lv e d " ; o n e - th ir d view ed t h e i r p r o b le m s a s "n o t so lv e d a t a ll. " 2 E x c e p t f o r two s tu d e n ts who r e p o r te d a w o rs e n in g of t h e i r g r i e v a n c e s , th e o t h e r s saw t h e i r p r o b le m s a s p a r tia lly so lv e d . T he ju n i o r c l a s s w a s the only c l a s s in w h ich m o r e stu d e n ts r e p o r t e d t h e i r p r o b le m s "not so lv e d a t a l l " than " c o m ­ p le tely so lv e d . " 1 R u s t, p r iv a te in te r v ie w h e ld a t M ic h ig an State U n iv e r s ity , D e c e m b e r 12, 1968, 2 R u st e s t i m a t e d in O c to b e r of 1968 th a t t w o - t h i r d s to t h r e e fo u rth s o f the c o m p la in ts h e r e c e iv e d d u r in g th e 1967-68 s c h o o l y e a r w e r e s e ttle d to th e student* s s a tis f a c tio n . See E d w a rd B r ill , " O m ­ budsman* s P o w e r H e lp s S t u d e n t s , " M ic h ig an S tate N e w s, O c to b e r 30, 1968, p. 1 . 146 TABLE 9 E F F E C T IV E N E S S O F CAMPUS OMBUDSMAN AS R E P O R T E D BY STUDENTS WHO CONSULTED HIM A T MICHIGAN STA TE U NIVERSITY, F A L L T E R M , 1968 T o w hat e x te n t i s th e p r o b le m you took to the o m b u d s m a n now s o lv e d ? C l a s s ran k F resh m an S ophom ore J u n io r S enior G ra d u a te O th e r (sp e c ia l) T o ta la C o m p le te ly so lv e d N % 12 20 5 2 .2 54. 1 3 6 .7 48. 3 55. 6 57. 1 48. 6 18 29 20 4 103 P a rtia lly so lv e d N 3 3 12 9 7 3 37 Not so lv e d at all % N % 1 3 .0 8. 1 2 4 .4 14. 9 1 9 .5 42. 9 17. 4 8 12 P r o b le m i s w o rse N 9 34. 8 3 2 .4 38. 8 3 6 .7 2 5 .0 0 0 70 3 3 .0 19 22 % 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 .4 0 0 0 0 .9 How m u c h did the o m b u d sm a n h e lp you w ith y o u r p ro b le m ? C la s s ra n k F resh m an Sophom ore J u n io r Senior G ra d u a te O th e r (s p e c ia l) T o ta l *3 M o r e than I e x p e c te d A s m u ch a s I ex p e cte d L e s s than I e x p e c te d N % N N % 9 16 15 3 7 .5 4 3 .2 30. 6 3 6 .0 4 7 .2 57. 1 38. 8 6 25. 29. 42. 34. 25, 4 0 31. 0 8 22 17 4 83 9 10 13 18 10 3 63 % 3 7 .5 27. 0 2 6 .5 2 9 .5 27. 8 42. 9 29. 4 11 21 21 9 0 68 0 7 8 Six of the 218 r e s p o n d e n ts did n o t a n s w e r th is q u e s tio n . Some p e r c e n ta g e s do not to ta l 100 b e c a u s e of ro un ding . F o u r of th e 218 re s p o n d e n ts did not a n s w e r th is q u e s tio n . Some p e r c e n ta g e s do n o t to ta l 100 b e c a u s e of ro u n d in g . 147 A r e l a t e d q u e s tio n - - " H o w m u ch d id the o m b u d s m a n h e lp you w ith y o u r p r o b l e m ? " - - w a s a n s w e r e d on the b a s i s of e x p e c t a ­ tio n s . (See T a b le 9 .) T he h ig h e s t p e r c e n ta g e of s tu d e n ts a n s w e r e d " m o r e than I e x p e c te d " although n e a r l y o n e - th ir d r e p lie d " l e s s th an I e x p e c te d ." A s w ith th e p r e v io u s q u e s tio n , fa v o r a b le r e s p o n s e s e x c e e d e d u n fa v o ra b le r e s p o n s e s i n a l l c l a s s e s e x c e p t the ju n io r cla ss. * The A c a d e m ic F r e e d o m R e p o rt d i r e c t s th e o m b u d sm a n to p r o te c t th o se w ho s o li c it h is a s s i s t a n c e " a g a in s t r e tr ib u ti o n . " 2 The im p U catio n i s th a t p e r s o n s a g a in s t w hom com plaintB a r e m a d e m a y a tte m p t to p u n ish the s tu d e n t for h i s a c tio n . To d e t e r m in e w h e th e r th is c o n c e r n i s w a r r a n t e d , s u r v e y e d s tu d e n ts w e r e a s k e d i f th e y e x p e ­ rie n c e d u n p le a s a n t t r e a t m e n t by an y o n e inv olved in t h e i r c o m p la in t a f t e r c o n s u ltin g the o m b u d sm a n . Of 207 s tu d e n ts w ho a n s w e r e d th e q u e s tio n , t h i r t e e n c la im e d so m e kind of u n fa v o ra b le r e a c tio n although m o st of th e e x p la n a tio n s w e r e v a g u e . A few ty p ic a l r e s p o n s e s a r e cited: The p r o f w a s r e a l m a d and a s k e d who i t w as th a t c a lle d D r. R ust. No a n s w e r w a s fo rth c o m in g a n d he d ro p p e d th e m a t t e r . *A h i g h e r p e r c e n ta g e o f w om en (46. 3) th an m e n (35. 4) felt that th e o m b u d s m a n 1 s a s s i s t a n c e e x c e e d e d t h e i r e x p e c ta tio n s . 2 A c a d e m ic F r e e d o m R e p o r t f o r S tu d en ts a t M ic h ig an S tate U n iv e r s ity , p . 31. 148 My a d v i s o r did n ot s e e m to b e th e s a m e . O nce f rie n d ly and h e lp fu l, sh e w ould only do w h at sh e h ad to. P r o f e s s o r m a d e n a s ty r e m a r k s in c l a s s s e v e r a l tim e s , once a im e d o b v io u sly a t m e . I h a v e no r e a l e v id e n c e th a t th e O m budsm an* s in v o lv e m e n t h a d e ffe c t on m y t r e a t m e n t , b u t p eo p le c o n c e r n e d b e c a m e v e r y d e f e n s iv e and l e s s open w h en I next h a d c o n ta c t w ith th e m ab o u t two m o n th s l a t e r . A ttitu d e s In p r o p o s in g the office of o m b u d sm a n , th e A c a d e m ic F r e e ­ dom R e p o rt s t r e s s e d the " s e n s iti v e and c o n fid e n tia l n a tu re of th e O m budsm an* s w o rk . " The r e c o m m e n d a tio n p ro v id e d th a t h e " s h a l l r e s p e c t th e p r iv a c y of a ll p e r s o n s who s o l i c i t h i s a s s i s t a n c e . 1,1 To d e t e r m in e w h e th e r s u r v e y e d s tu d e n ts r e g a r d e d c o n fid e n tia lity a s e s s e n t i a l , th e y w e r e a s k e d th is q u e s tio n ; "W ould you h a v e c o n s u lte d the o m b u d s m a n i f h i s r e c o r d s w e r e open f o r in s p e c tio n by a n y o n e ? " (See T a b le 1 0 .) N e a r ly t h r e e - f o u r t h s o f th e r e s p o n d e n ts a n s w e r e d "Y es. " T w e n ty - s e v e n s tu d e n ts g a v e a n e g a tiv e r e s p o n s e and t h i r t y w ere u n c e rta in . A lthough c o m p a r a tiv e ly few s tu d e n ts w e r e c o n ­ c e rn e d abo u t c o n fid e n tia lity , it could be a r g u e d th a t ev en a s m a l l p e r c e n ta g e i s enough to ju s tify co ntinu in g th e po licy. 149 T A B L E 10 IM PO R T A N C E O F C O N FID E N T IA LIT Y TO STUDENTS WHO CONSULTED OMBUDSMAN A T MICHIGAN STA TE UNIVERSITY, F A L L T E R M , 1968 C l a s s ra n k Would you h a v e c o n s u lte d th e o m b u d s m a n if h is r e c o r d s w e r e open f o r in s p e c tio n by a n y o n e ? U n c e r ta in Y es No F resh m an 22 1 2 S ophom ore 21 6 10 J u n io r 37 5 7 7 5 .5 S en io r 45 8 7 75. 0 G ra d u a te 29 6 3 76, 3 5 1 1 7 1 .4 159 27 30 O th e r ( s p e c ia l) T o ta la % Y es 88.0 56. 73. 8 6 Tw o of the 218 r e s p o n d e n ts did not a n s w e r th is q u e s tio n . A ttitu d e s c o n c e rn in g the o m b u d sm a n a r e p r e s e n t e d in T able 11 a c c o r d in g to th e n a t u r e of th e student* s p r o b le m . p o la riz e d r e s p o n s e s a r e in c lu d e d . O nly In s o m e p ro b le m a r e a s th e o m ­ b u d sm an a p p e a r s to h ave b e e n m o r e s u c c e s s f u l th an in o t h e r s . H ow ever, s u rv e y e d s tu d e n ts g e n e r a l l y fe lt th a t th e o m b u d s m a n had done e v e ry th in g he could to h elp th e m . W ith few e x c e p tio n s , th ey TABLE 11 ATTITUDES OF STUDENTS WHO CONSULTED OMBUDSMAN AT MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY ANALYZED BY NATURE OF PROBLEM, FALL TERM, 1968® • Nature of problem Number of students with problem Student's reaction to way ombudsman handled problem Generally satisfied Generally dissatisfied Did ombudsman do everything within his authority to help student with problem? N % N % Yes Would student: Return to ombudsman with other problems? No Yes No Recommend ombudsman to other students? Yes No Registration and admission 25 15 60 8 32 14 6 16 1 21 1 Academic requirements 24 17 71 5 21 15 4 18 0 21 1 Traffic regulations 11 7 64 4 36 6 3 7 3 8 2 Financial need 18 14 78 3 17 14 1 16 0 16 0 Quality of instruction 11 4 36 4 36 3 4 6 1 8 1 Housing 23 16 70 7 30 16 1 20 1 20 0 U se.of facilities and services 12 7 58 3 25 6 1 9 0 11 0 Tuition and fees 23 15 65 5 22 13 3 14 3 18 1 TABLE 11— Continued ..... Nature of problem Number of students with problem Student's reaction to way ombudsman handled problem Generally dissatisfied Generally satisfied Did ombudsman do everything within his authority to help student with problem ? Would student: Return to ombudsman with other problems ? Recommend ombudsman to other students ? N % N % Yes No Yes No Yes No 15 12 80 3 20 10 0 11 1 14 0 Academic advice 21 17 81 3 14 14 3 15 1 20 0 Health center 2 0 0 2 100 0 0 1 0 1 1 Employment 11 7 64 1 9 9 2 10 1 10 0 Library 4 2 50 2 50 1 1 3 0 4 0 Grades 28 21 75 5 18 21 2 19 2 23 1 Other problems 53 36 68 12 23 34 5 44 2 49 0 281b 190 67 • 176 36 209 16 244 8 Total N e u tr a l and uncertain responses do not appear in table. Percentages rounded to nearest whole number. ^Greater than number of students surveyed because som e students had multiple problems. 151 Academic status 152 w ould r e t u r n to th e o m b u d s m a n w ith o t h e r p r o b l e m s and w ould r e c o m m e n d h im to o th e r s tu d e n ts . F r o m a l i s t o f f o u r t e e n t r a i t s , s t u d e n ts w ho had c o n s u lte d th e o m b u d s m a n s e l e c t e d "k n o w le d g e o f c a m p u s o p e r a t io n s and T A B L E 12 M OST IM P O R T A N T T R A IT S A C A M PU S OMBUDSMAN SHOULD H A V E , AS CHOSEN BY STU D E N TS WHO CO N SULTED OMBUDSMAN A T MICHIGAN S T A T E U N IV ERSITY , F A L L T E R M , 1968® M o st f re q u e n t t h ir d c h o ic e s M o s t fre q u e n t s e c o n d c h o ic e s M ost freq u en t f i r s t c h o ic e s T im e s chosen T ra it 44 K n o w led g e of cam pus o p e ra tio n s and r e g u l a ­ tio n s 31 K no w led ge of cam pus o p e r a t io n s and re g u la ­ tio n s 40 E f f e c tiv e n e s s 36 U n d e r s ta n d in g 29 E ffe c tiv e n e ss 28 U n d e r s ta n d in g 32 A u th o r ity 24 A c c e ssib ility 25 A u th o rity 22 E f f e c tiv e n e s s 15 U n d e r s ta n d in g 21 E m p a th y 18 A c c e ssib ility 15 H o n e sty 15 T im e s chosen T ra it K now ledge of cam pus o p e r a tio n s and r e g u l a ­ tio n s T ra it T o ta l 167 114 T im e s chosen 114 In e a c h c o lu m n , o n ly th o s e t r a i t s c h o s e n by 15 o r m o r e o f the 218 r e s p o n d e n ts a r e l i s t e d . 153 r e g u la tio n s " a s th e m o s t i m p o r ta n t t r a i t he sh o u ld h ave. m o s t f re q u e n t o f f i r s t , s e c o n d and t h i r d c h o ic e s. T he n e x t two m o s t fre q u e n t c h o ic e s w e r e u n d e r s ta n d in g a n d e f f e c tiv e n e s s . ra te d t r a i t s w e r e a u th o r ity and a c c e s s ib il ity . 1 It w a s the O th e r h ig h ly A ll t r a i t s c h o s e n by fifteen o r m o r e r e s p o n d e n ts a r e p r e s e n t e d in T a b le 12. A ttitu d e s r e g a r d in g s e le c tio n and te n u r e of the c a m p u s o m b u d sm an by s tu d e n ts who h av e c o n s u lte d him a r e s u m m a r iz e d in T able 13. A n o n - te a c h in g fa c u lty m e m b e r ( a d m in i s tr a to r ) w a s the f ir s t ch o ice, r e c e iv in g tw ic e a s m u c h su p p o rt a s a te a c h in g facu lty m em ber. S e le c tio n by a d m i n i s t r a t i o n , faculty an d s tu d e n ts w as the fa v o rite m e th o d f o r filling th e p o s itio n . w as the le a s t p o p u la r. 2 U naided fa c u lty s e le c tio n In te rv ie w e d c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n g e n e r a lly Of the 218 r e s p o n d e n ts , 52. 7 p e r ce n t in c lu d e d know ledge am ong t h e i r f i r s t th r e e c h o ic e s . O t h e r p e r c e n ta g e s w e r e : u n d e r ­ stan d in g , 3 7 .6 ; e f f e c tiv e n e s s , 3 6 .2 ; a u th o rity , 21. 1; and a c c e s s i ­ bility, 1 8 .3 . 2 The p r e f e r r e d s e le c tio n m e th o d m a y b e i n t e r p r e t e d a s an e n d o r s e m e n t of th e s y s te m w hich w a s followed a t M ic h ig an S tate. The p r o v o s t s o lic ite d n o m in a tio n s f r o m d ea n s, fa c u lty m e m b e r s and stu d e n t l e a d e r s . He and a stu d e n t g o v e rn m e n t s e le c tio n c o m m itte e p la ced the s ix t y - f iv e n a m e s s u b m itte d in th r e e c a te g o r ie s : " r e c o m ­ m en d ed , " " a c c e p t a b l e ," a n d "not a c c e p t a b l e . " A f i r s t r e c o m m e n d a ­ tion and a l t e r n a t e s w e r e s u b m itte d to th e u n iv e r s i ty p r e s id e n t, who then m a d e h is r e c o m m e n d a tio n to th e B o ard of T r u s t e e s . T h is is the p r o c e s s d e s c r i b e d in an u n title d , undated m im e o g r a p h e d s t a t e ­ m en t p r e p a r e d by R u st, M ic h ig a n S ta te U n iv e r s ity ( r e v is e d in J a n u ­ a ry , 1969), p. 3. TABLE 13 ATTITUDES REGARDING SELECTION AND TENURE OF CAMPUS OMBUDSMAN HELD BY STUDENTS WHO CONSULTED OMBUDSMAN AT MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, FALL TERM, 1968 The campus ombudsman should be a: H is te rm of office should be: He should be selected by: i Teaching faculty m em b er N % 42 20.0 faculty m e m b er (adm inistr ato r) P ro fe ssio n a l student p erson n el w o rk er 84 40 40.0 19.0 Student 0 0 Lawyer 11 5.2 1 .5 None of these 32 15.2 Total 210 Campus m in is te r N N % 8 3.7 L ess than 2 y e a rs 19 8 .9 2 1 .5 Students and faculty 44 2 0 .6 Students and ad m in istratio n 13 6.1 Faculty and adm inistration 21 9.8 104 48.6 4 1.9 A dm inistration Students Non-teaching ■ Faculty A dm inistration, faculty and students Some other group Total 214 % 9 4 .8 22 1 1 .6 M ore than 2 y e a r s 158 83.6 y e a rs Total 189 155 a g r e e d th a t a t w o - y e a r t e r m of office w a s s u ffic ie n t. a f iv e - to - o n e m a r g in , f a v o r e d a lo n g e r t e n u r e . S tu den ts, by 1 R e s p o n s e s to t h r e e o t h e r q u e s tio n s w ill b e r e p o r t e d b e f o r e tu rn in g to s p e c if ic c a s e s and c o m m e n ts . W hen a s k e d w h e r e the o m b u d s m a n 1 s office should be lo c a te d , 4 1 . 4 p e r c e n t of 203 r e s p o n ­ d e n ts c h o s e th e S tudent S e r v ic e s B uilding. The A d m in is tr a tio n Building w a s the n ex t m o s t p o p u la r c h o ic e . cent) w a s th e Student U nion. L e a s t p o p u la r (7. 9 p e r T w o - th i r d s of th e r e s p o n d e n ts thou gh t the o m b u d s m a n h e lp e d a l le v i a te s tu d e n t f r u s t r a t i o n and h o s tility . the r e m a i n d e r , 14 p e r cen t did n o t think s o and 19. u n c e r ta in . 6 Of p e r cen t w e r e None of the s u r v e y e d s tu d e n ts tho ug ht the fu n ctio n s of the o m b u d s m a n sh ou ld be d is c o n tin u e d . O f 208 r e s p o n s e s , 144 favo red no change and 64 r e c o m m e n d e d c h a n g e s . C a s e s and C o m m e n ts T h e f r u s t r a t i o n s e x p e r ie n c e d by in d iv id u a l s tu d e n ts in c o p ­ ing w ith the la r g e u n i v e r s i t y a r e not a d e q u a te ly e x p r e s s e d by coun ting M o st s tu d e n ts who r e c o m m e n d e d a t e r m of office lo n g e r than two y e a r s c o n s id e r e d e f f e c tiv e n e s s g a in e d th ro u g h e x p e r i e n c e a s e s s e n ti a l. A few ty p ic a l c o m m e n ts c o n v e y th is a ttitu d e : " E x p e r ie n c e te a c h e s h im the r o p e s and how to h an d le odd s i t u a t i o n s . 11 " T h e m o r e e x p e rie n c e th is p e r s o n h a s , th e g r e a t e r b e n e fit to th e p e r s o n c o n ­ su ltin g h im . " "I f e e l th a t th e m o r e p r o b l e m s ta k e n c a r e of, the m o r e efficie n t the O m b u d s m a n ." " It ta k e s t i m e to u n d e r s ta n d th e lo o p ­ h o le s. " " T h e lo n g e r h e s e r v e s , th e b e t t e r he know s the w o rk in g s of the U n iv e r s ity . " "I b e lie v e th e lo n g e r h e 1 s in th e job, th e m o r e a w a re h e w ould be o f how to cut th ro u g h r e d ta p e . " " E x p e r ie n c e i s d efin itely a r e q u i r e m e n t fo r e ffic ie n t o p e r a tio n o f th is o ffice. " 156 and c la s s if y in g t h e i r p r o b le m s . T a b le s sh ow ing n u m b e r s and p e r c e n ta g e s of c o m p la in ts and t h e i r d is p o s itio n p r e s e n t only th e s u r f a c e f e a t u r e s of s tu d e n t i r r i t a t i o n s and a n x ie tie s r e v e a le d to th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n . In th is s e c tio n , a few s p e c if ic c a s e s a r e d e s c r ib e d in the s tu d e n ts ' own w o r d s . Student a t titu d e s to w a rd th e o m b u d s m a n - -b o th p o s itiv e an d n e g a t i v e - - a l s o a r e d ra w n fro m t h e i r q u e s tio n n a ir e r e s p o n s e s . T he s e le c te d c a s e s and c o m m e n ts p ro v id e f u r t h e r e v id e n c e of th e d i v e r s i t y of s tu d e n t g r ie v a n c e s and opinion a t a " m u l tiv e r s it y . " A ll quo ted s t a t e m e n t s w e r e m a d e by s tu d e n ts who c o n su lte d the M ic h ig a n S tate o m b u d sm a n d u r in g the 1968 fa ll t e r m and who su b s e q u e n tly r e s p o n d e d to th e s u r v e y q u e s tio n n a ir e . N a m e s a r e not r e v e a le d . F i r s t , s o m e s tu d e n t d e s c r i p t i o n s of t h e i r p ro b le m s : My p r o b le m w a s r e a l l y s illy . I had r e c e iv e d an F f o r a c o u r s e I d i d n 't ta k e . A f t e r s e e in g 5 people who w o u ld n 't b e lie v e m e , I w ent to the o m b u d sm a n who so lv e d th e p ro b le m in 5 m in u te s . The r e a s o n I le f t MSU w a s th a t 1 h a te d r e d ta p e and b e l lig e r e n t a d m in is t r a tiv e p e r s o n n e l. T h is m a k e s an i m p e r s o n a l u n i v e r ­ s ity even m o r e s o . P e r h a p s th e o m b u d s m a n can do m o r e to r e lie v e th is feelin g . I w a s h a r d l y h e r e a m o n th o r s o w hen I d is c o v e r e d 1 could not affo rd the r id ic u lo u s food p r i c e s in Owen H all. I a p p ro a c h e d th e m a n a g e r of th e h a l l and e x p la in e d m y fin a n c ia l d i s t r e s s : not only w a s he a d a m a n t ab o u t h old in g m e to th e c o n tr a c t, but h e e x p r e s s e d a t o t a l lack of c o n c e r n fo r m y p r e d ic a m e n t. . . . I w a s q u ite d i s t r e s s e d , e s p e c i a l l y s in c e I w ould p ro b a b ly h ave to w ith d ra w fro m sc h o o l i f not allo w ed to b r e a k the c o n tr a c t. It w a s th en th a t I d e c id e d to ta k e m y c a s e to D r. R u s t. . . . 157 . . . O nce th e a p p lic a tio n w a s s e n t on to th e c o n t r a c t c o m m itte e , 1 r e c e iv e d w o rd in l e s s th an a w e e k th a t I had b ee n r e l e a s e d . A lthough th e e n t i r e p r o c e s s o c c u p ie d a sp a n o f s o m e t w o - t h r e e w e e k s , I b la m e th e d e l a y n ot on D r. R u s t, who w a s m a g n ific e n t th ro u g h o u t, bu t on the s lo w - g r in d in g w h e e ls of b u r e a u c r a c y . If I h ad had no r e c o u r s e beyond th e a d m in ­ i s t r a t i o n s tu m b lin g b lo c k , 1 w ould not be in sc h o o l now. F u r t h e r m o r e , 1 a m g r a tif ie d to know th a t in an e n o r m o u s u n iv e r s i t y lik e th is t h e r e i s a l e a s t one p e r s o n who c a r e s . My p r o b le m w a s th a t an a d d itio n a l fee w a s a tta c h e d to m y s u m m e r tu itio n A F T E R I had c o m p le te d th e c o u r s e . I w a s in f o rm e d th a t th e S chedule Book w a s in e r r o r a s to the n u m b e r of c r e d i t s th e c o u r s e c a r r i e d . The O m b u d s m a n in f o r m e d m e th a t t h e r e w a s n o th in g h e could do b ut th a t I sho u ld ap p ly f o r fee re d u c tio n b e c a u s e th e i n c r e a s e d c r e d i t s now m a d e m e e lig ib le fo r th a t b e n e fit, I did so and a f t e r s o m e d e la y t h e r e w as r e t u r n e d to m e N O T the a m o u n t of fee re d u c tio n f o r w hich I w a s .e lig ib le , bu t th e e n t i r e a m o u n t w hich I had p aid f o r the added two c r e d i t s . T h o s e e x t r a c r e d i t s w e r e d ro p p e d f ro m m y reco rd . . . . , . . tr y in g to g e t th e u n i v e r s i t y to ch ang e m y le g a l r e s i ­ d e n c e in o r d e r to r e c e iv e g r a d e s and r e g i s t r a t i o n m a t e r i a l . . . . I r a n a l l o v e r c a m p u s tr y in g to find out who is r e s p o n ­ s ib le . I h ad a q u e s tio n o f w hen a fin al e x a m sh ou ld be g iv e n s in c e th e tim e s c h e d u le l i s t e d 2 d if f e r e n t c l a s s t i m e s a s h aving the fin al a t the s a m e tim e and both i n s t r u c t o r s s a id t h a t ' s w h en th e y w e r e going to h o ld th e e x a m . S ince one cannot be in two p la c e s a t th e s a m e tim e I c a lle d D r. R u s t to s e e if a c o r r e c t i o n to the tim e s c h e d u le h ad b een p u b lis h e d . H e did not know but told m e who to c a ll in th e R e g i s t r a r ' s o ffice. I c a lle d the R e g i s t r a r ' s office and th e y s a id a m is ta k e h a d b een m a d e and in f o rm e d m e of the c o r r e c t i o n . . . . I p u r c h a s e d an H . P . R. fee r e c e ip t c a r d fro m th e c a s h i e r ' s window in th e A d m in is tr a tio n b uilding and lo s t i t the s a m e a f te rn o o n . Since I h ad m a d e two c o p ie s w hen buying it and le ft one t h e r e I w en t back th e n ex t day to s e e i f I could g et a d u p lic a te , an d w a s to ld a t th e c a s h i e r ' s w indow th a t th e y did 158 n ot k ee p the e x t r a copy but s e n t it to a n o th e r office . . . but th a t I w ould p r o b a b ly j u s t h a v e to buy a new one. A f te r going to the in d ic a te d office, b ack to the c a s h i e r ' s w indow , b ack to the o ffice, o v e r to the I . M . bu ilding , and b a c k to the office in the A d m in is tr a tio n building, I s t i l l h ad not found w h e r e the se c o n d copy of m y fee r e c e i p t c a r d w a s . Standing o u tsid e the A d m in is tr a tio n b u ild in g r a t h e r f r u s t r a t e d and a n g ry , I n o tic ed I w a s j u s t a c r o s s th e s t r e e t f r o m M o r r i l l h a l l and d e c id e d to s e e D r. R u st. He c a lle d up so m e o n e on th e phone (he a s k e d fo r the p e r s o n by nam e) and im m e d ia te ly found th e e x t r a copy and to ld m e to go b ac k to a c e r t a i n g i r l in th e A d m in is tr a tio n b u ild ­ in g . W hen I got o v e r th e r e , a d u p lic a te fee r e c e i p t c a r d w a s w a itin g , and the g i r l in f o rm e d m e th a t a s f a r a s sh e knew , it w a s th e f i r s t one e v e r i s s u e d a t M. S. U. In a ll, I w a s r a t h e r i m p r e s s e d by the e x p e d ie n c y w ith w h ich the o m b u d s m a n w a s a b le to u n ta n g le th e s n a r l s a s tu d e n t ca n b e c o m e e n m e s h e d in w hen d e a lin g w ith th e b u r e a u c r a c y of th e U n iv e r s ity . O th e r s tu d e n ts e x p r e s s e d t h e i r e n t h u s ia s m f o r the p e r s o n a l touch and e f f e c tiv e n e s s of th e o m b u d sm a n in m o r e glow ing t e r m s . H e re a r e - a few e x a m p le s : F r o m m y c o n ta c t w ith th e O m b u d sm a n I b e lie v e it i s one of th e m o s t im p o r ta n t and u se fu l o ffic e s in the U n iv e r s ity , and I h av e b e e n in m a n y of th e m in th e 10 y e a r s I h a v e sp e n t h e r e at MSU. . . . the OMBUDSMAN i s one of th e b e s t th in g s f o r any co lle g e c a m p u s . M any t i m e s , the s tu d e n t j u s t d o e s n 't g e t a f a i r b r e a k , and w ith th e o ffice of th e O m b u d sm a n , the s tu d e n t g e ts a se c o n d c h a n c e . . . . . . . T h is i s . . . th e f in e s t p o s s ib le a s s i s t a n c e a v a ila b le in any typ e of la r g e o r g a n iz a tio n . D r . R u st i s th e f i r s t a d m i n i s t r a t o r in t h i s u n iv e r s i ty who t r e a t e d m e lik e a p e r s o n w ith fe e lin g s in s t e a d of j u s t a stu d e n t n u m b e r . He lis te n e d to m y g r i p e s p a t i e n t l y - - a t no tim e w a s I rushed. . . . In an e r a of p r o t e s t and d i s s a t i s f a c t i o n it w a s r e f r e s h i n g to t r y a c o n s tr u c tiv e a d m i n i s t r a t i v e c h a n n el and find-it d o e s 159 w o rk . "O m b u d d in g " . . . could be a r e a l p o s itiv e p r o c e s s fo r re lie v in g s tu d e n t h o s t i l i t i e s . . . . B u r e a u c r a c y and c o m p u te r s ca n n o t li s t e n to e x p la n a ­ tio n s . A c e n t r a l office s u c h a s D r. Rust* s i s e ffe c tiv e a s giving a fe e lin g of so m e o n e p e r s o n a lly i n t e r e s t e d in the s tu d e n t, a " l a s t h o p e , " and a ls o I think it can o ffe r s ig n ific a n t s u g g e s tio n s about s o m e of th e p r o b le m s e n c o u n te re d . . . . M ayb e so m e of th e r id ic u lo u s p r o b le m s can b e e lim in a te d . I s e e th e O m b u d sm a n . . . a s w o rk in g f o r u n d e rs ta n d in g and u n ity am o n g . . . s tu d e n ts , facu lty , and a d m i n i s t r a t o r s . . . . It w a s nice to know th a t out of 40, 000 s tu d e n ts th e r e is t i m e fo r o n e. A p p o in tm e n t of a n o m b u d sm a n w a s th e b e s t th in g that* s h ap p e n ed to MSU in y e a r s . L ong liv e th e o m b u d sm a n . N ot a ll c o m m e n ts w e r e p o sitiv e , h o w e v e r. A few stu d e n ts w e r e l e s s fa v o r a b ly i m p r e s s e d w ith th e o m b u d s m a n 's s e r v i c e s , and su g g e s te d c h a n g e s. H e r e a r e s o m e of t h e i r r e a c tio n s : T h e office a s I s e e it now i s ju s t a fig u re h e a d . D r. R u st e i t h e r cannot o r w ill not do an yth in g to h e lp s tu d e n ts . I think th e o m b u d sm a n should t r e a t th e stu d e n t w ith u n d e r ­ sta n d in g and c o n c e r n . I w a s co n fro n ted w ith a cold in te rv ie w and did not f e e l c o m fo r ta b le . . . . G e t so m e o n e who i s a b it m o r e r e c e p tiv e to chan ge, T he w ay th e office s e e m s to w o rk now i s not to r e a l l y cut th ro u g h the b u r e a u c r a c y but to point th e s tu d e n t b ac k in to it. It s e e m s to be m o r e an i n s t r u m e n t to p ac ify th e s tu d e n ts than to r e a l l y h e lp th e m . W hat w e don* t n ee d is a n o th e r r e d tape ta n g led b u r e a u c r a t i c o ffice. I h ad h op ed th a t th e O m b u d sm a n would b e s o m e o n e who could ta k e a c tio n and not j u s t s a y h e w ould do s o m e th in g and not 160 do any th in g . B ut I got the ty p ic a l r u n a ro u n d fro m h im . i t w a s a p r o b le m th a t r e q u i r e d im m e d ia te a c tio n . And H e m o n o p o liz e d th e c o n v e r s a tio n an d o ffe re d no r e a l i n f o r ­ m a tio n ab o u t how 1 could a l le v i a te th e p r o b le m s fa c in g m e . I w a s v e r y d is a p p o in te d in h i s d e fe n s iv e p o s tu r e r e l a t i v e to U n i­ v e r s i t y p o lic ie s . W hen I ta lk e d to th e O m b u d sm a n I f e lt th a t h e w a s rude an d s a r c a s t i c . My p r o b le m h a s s in c e b e e n c o m p le te ly so lv e d but th ro q g h no h e lp of M r . R u st. S e v e r a l s tu d e n ts w e r e b o th e re d by th e o m b u d s m a n 's lack of a u th o r ity to s e t a s id e r u l e s and r e g u la tio n s o r o v e r r u l e p r e v io u s d e c is io n s in o r d e r t o so lv e t h e i r p a r t i c u l a r p r o b le m s . A few of t h e i r c o m m e n ts r e v e a l p e r c e p tio n s of the r o l e qu ite d if f e r e n t fro m that h eld by th e o m b u d s m a n h im s e lf : -The o m b u d s m a n 's office i s a g r e a t id e a but m u s t . . . be given a u th o r ity p e r v a d in g the e n t i r e s t r u c t u r e of th e u n iv e r s i ty . T h is u n i v e r s i t y h a s to o m a n y " c u t an d d r ie d " r u l e s and r e g u la tio n s . A s t u d e n t 's p ro b le m sh o u ld g et in d iv id u a l a t t e n ­ tio n and r e s u l t s , w ith e x c e p tio n s m a d e w hen n e c e s s a r y . A s it i s now, w h en t h e r e i s a u n iv e r s i ty ru lin g and a s t u d e n t 's s i t u a ­ tio n w a r r a n t s h im an e x c e p tio n to the r u le , th e s tu d e n t is l o s t and th e O m b u d sm a n cann ot help . G ive th e O m b u d sm a n s o m e " o v e r r i d e " p o w er. W ith b r o a d e r d i s c r e t i o n a r y p o w e r s , R u st m ig h t e ffe c tiv e ly m e d ia te b e tw e e n a d m i n i s t r a t i o n and s tu d e n t a c t i v i s t s - - m u c h a s D ean s o f S tu d en ts often s e e k to do. I found th e o m b u d sm a n h elp fu l in e x p lain in g w hy I co uldn ' t g e t w hat I w a n te d , but no t how I could p o s s ib ly g e t it. I feel p a r t of h is jo b sho uld be to h e lp th e s tu d e n ts ; not j u s t to e x p la in th e a d m i n i s t r a t i o n 's p o sitio n . A few c o m m e n ts w e r e m a d e r e g a r d i n g th e n ee d f o r m o r e p u b lic ity ab o u t th e office of o m b u d sm a n . T h e s e a r e ty p ic a l: 161 . . . If m o r e s tu d e n ts knew w h a t th e o m b u d sm a n i s and how he can h e lp a s tu d e n t, I* m s u r e m a n y w ould s e e k h is ad v ic e . T he m a in p r o b le m i s not m a n y s tu d e n ts know about t h i s m a n . P e r h a p s M r . R u st could g et s o m e a d d itio n a l p u b lic ity th is y e a r . . . . m a n y s tu d e n ts a r e u n a w a re th a t h i s s e r v i c e s a r e a v a ila b le . I h o p e th a t m o r e p e o p le l e a r n o f th is s e r v i c e - - i t n e e d s m o r e p u b lic ity . . . . R u s t h a s in d ic a te d th a t e a c h t i m e a f e a tu r e s t o r y about h is office a p p e a r s in th e c a m p u s n e w s p a p e r , h e n o tic e s an i n c r e a s e in c o m p la in a n ts d u rin g th e next few d a y s . * S u m m a ry S tu d en ts who c o n s u lte d th e o m b u d s m a n a t M ic h ig an State U n iv e rs ity d u r in g th e 1968 f a ll t e r m w e r e g e n e r a lly c h a r a c t e r i s t i c of a l l s tu d e n ts e n r o lle d . A ll c l a s s r a n k s , s tu d e n t ag e g r o u p s , g r a d e point a v e r a g e s and s tu d e n t h o u s in g ty p e s w e r e r e p r e s e n t e d . H ow ­ e v e r, c e r t a i n c o lle g e s w e r e " o v e r r e p r e s e n t e d " and " u n d e r r e p r e ­ se n te d " in th e p r o p o rtio n s of s tu d e n ts s e r v e d by th e o m b u d sm a n . A lso on a p r o p o r t i o n a l b a s i s , u n d e r c l a s s m e n w e r e g e n e r a lly " u n d e r r e p r e s e n t e d " and u p p e r c l a s s m e n " o v e r r e p r e s e n t e d . " M a le s t u ­ d en ts and m a r r i e d s tu d e n ts w e r e " o v e r r e p r e s e n t e d " w h ile fe m a le stu d e n ts and s in g le s tu d e n ts w e r e " u n d e r r e p r e s e n t e d . " *R ust, p r iv a te in te r v ie w held a t M ic h ig an State U n iv e r s ity , D e c e m b e r 1 2 , 1968. 162 The s u rv e y e d s tu d e n ts m o s t f re q u e n tly c ite d the ca m p u s n e w s p a p e r a s t h e i r s o u r c e of in f o rm a tio n about th e o m b u d sm an . N e a r ly h a lf of th e m had ta k e n t h e i r p r o b le m s to tw o o r m o r e p e r s o n s in a u th o r ity b e f o r e c o n su ltin g the o m b u d sm a n . M o st of th e m w e r e able to s e e th e o m b u d sm a n im m e d ia te ly o r w ithin a few m in u te s a f t e r a r r i v i n g a t h is o ffic e, w ith o r w ith o u t an a p p o in tm e n t. o m b u d sm a n h a n d le d m o s t p r o b le m s in one h o u r o r l e s s . The G ra d u a te s tu d e n t p r o b le m s g e n e r a lly r e q u ir e d lo n g e r han d lin g th a n f r e s h m a n p r o b le m s . N e a r l y h a lf th e s tu d e n ts in d ic a te d th a t t h e i r p r o b le m s w e r e " c o m p le te ly s o lv e d " ; o n e - th ir d view ed t h e i r p r o b le m s a s "n o t so lv ed a t a ll. " The h ig h e s t p e r c e n ta g e o f s tu d e n ts r e p o r t e d th a t th e o m b u d sm a n h e lp e d th e m w ith t h e i r p r o b le m s m o r e than th ey e x p e c te d , although n e a r l y o n e - th ir d r e p lie d " l e s s th a n e x p e c te d ." Only t h i r t e e n of 207 r e s p o n d e n ts c la im e d to h a v e e x p e rie n c e d " u n p le a s a n t t r e a t ­ m e n t" by an y o n e involved in t h e i r c o m p la in t a f t e r c o n su ltin g the o m b u d sm an . N e a r l y t h r e e - f o u r t h s of th e s u r v e y e d s tu d e n ts would h a v e co n su lted th e o m b u d sm a n w ith t h e i r p r o b le m s ev e n if h is r e c o r d s w e r e open f o r pu blic in s p e c tio n . W ide d if f e r e n c e s a p p e a r e d on the s a t i s f a c t i o n - d i s s a t i s f a c t i o n continuum r e g a r d in g the w ay the o m b u d s ­ m an h an d led v a r io u s k in d s of p r o b le m s . H o w ev er, the s tu d e n ts g e n e r a lly w e r e s a tis f ie d th a t th e o m b u d sm a n had done e v e ry th in g h e 163 could to h e lp th e m . O nly a few would n ot r e t u r n t o th e o m b u d sm a n w ith o th e r p r o b le m s o r r e c o m m e n d h im to o th e r s tu d e n ts . T ra its s e le c te d b y th e s tu d e n ts a s m o s t i m p o r ta n t fo r a c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n to h av e w e r e , in d e s c e n d in g o r d e r , know ledge of c a m p u s o p e r a tio n s and re g u la tio n s , u n d e r s ta n d in g , e f f e c tiv e n e s s , a u th o r ity and a c c e s ­ s ib ility . A n o n - te a c h in g fa c u lty m e m b e r ( a d m i n i s t r a t o r ) w a s t h e i r f i r s t ch o ice fo r a n o m b u d sm a n . T he p r e f e r r e d m e th o d of filling th e p o sitio n w a s s e le c tio n by a d m in is t r a tio n , fa c u lty and s tu d e n ts . T he s u r v e y r e s p o n d e n ts o v e rw h e lm in g ly fa v o re d a t e r m of office e x te n d ­ ing beyond two y e a r s . T he Student S e r v ic e s B u ilding w a s th e m o s t p o p u la r choice fo r th e lo c a tio n of th e om budsm an* s o ffice. T w o- th ir d s of-the r e s p o n d e n ts thought th e o m b u d sm a n h e lp e d a l le v i a te stu d e n t f r u s t r a t i o n and h o s tility . None th o u g h t th e fu n ctio n s of th e o m b u d sm an should be d is c o n tin u e d , alth o u g h n e a r l y o n e - t h i r d r e c o m ­ m ended ch an g es. T h ese and p r e v io u s findings w ill be re v ie w e d in th e fin al c h a p te r a s r e s e a r c h q u e s tio n s a r e r e c o n s i d e r e d , c o n c lu s io n s d ra w n , and r e c o m m e n d a tio n s m a d e . CHAPTER V SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOM MENDATIONS In C h a p te r I fifte e n r e s e a r c h q u e s tio n s w e r e p r e s e n t e d a s g u id e s to the c o lle c tio n and a n a ly s is of in f o rm a tio n on the o m b u d s ­ m a n in A m e r ic a n h ig h e r e d u c a tio n , A n s w e r s to th o s e q u e s tio n s o b ta in ed f ro m th e stu d y a r e s u m m a r iz e d in th is f in a l c h a p te r . In ad d itio n , c o n c lu s io n s a r e d ra w n and r e c o m m e n d a tio n s m a d e . S u m m a ry T he F i r s t R e s e a r c h Q u e stio n W hat a r e th e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of the c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n ? D ra w in g a p r o f ile of the c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n i s d ifficu lt b e c a u s e of in d iv id u a l d if f e r e n c e s . A ny g e n e r a liz e d o b s e rv a tio n m u s t be q u a lifie d b e c a u s e of e x c e p tio n s . Y et t h e r e a r e c e r t a i n c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s s h a r e d by a l l o r m o s t of th e six c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n in te rv ie w e d f o r .t h i s stu d y . The following s u m m a r y s t a t e m e n t s d e s c r ib in g th e " c o m p o s ite " c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n a r e b a s e d on th o se 164 FT 165 fin ding s. T aken to g e th e r , th e y p ro v id e a m o r e c o m p re h e n s iv e d e s c r ip tio n of th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n th a n th e p r e l i m i n a r y d efin itio n w hich a p p e a r s in C h a p te r I. T h e p r i m a r y r e s p o n s i b ilit y of th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n is to r e c e iv e and h elp r e s o l v e in d iv id u a l s tu d e n t g r ie v a n c e s a t an i n s t i t u ­ tion o f h i g h e r e d u c a tio n . A s e c o n d a r y r e s p o n s i b ilit y i s to r e c o m m e n d w ays of im p r o v in g a d m in is t r a tiv e and a c a d e m ic p r o c e d u r e s in o r d e r to r e d u c e th e n u m b e r and d e g r e e of s tu d e n t p r o b le m s . He d e t e r m i n e s w hich c o m p la in ts m e r i t h i s c o n s id e r a tio n . T he c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n h a s s p e n t a c o n s id e r a b le le n g th of tim e a t h is in s titu tio n , w h e r e h e h a s b ee n a te a c h in g fac u lty m e m b e r and h a s a d v is e d s tu d e n ts . He i s id e n tifie d w ith a n a c a d e m ic d i s c i ­ p lin e , in w h ich h e h o ld s an ad v a n ce d a c a d e m ic d e g r e e . He p ro b a b ly h a s not h ad p r o f e s s io n a l p r e p a r a t i o n o r e x p e r i e n c e in th e law o r in stu d e n t p e r s o n n e l w o rk . He r e g a r d s h is o m b u d sm a n r o le a s a t e m p o r a r y a s s ig n m e n t, n ot a c a r e e r fie ld . He r e p o r t s to th e o f fic e r o r g ro u p w hich ap p o in ted h im . In conducting h i s a c t i v i t i e s , th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n u s e s f a c e - t o - f a c e c o n ta c t m o r e than a n y o th e r f o rm of c o m m u n ic a tio n . He h a s a c c e s s to o ffic ia l f ile s on th e c a m p u s , e x c e p t f o r c la s s if ie d reco rd s. He c o n s id e r s h i s own r e c o r d s a s co n fid e n tia l. He m a y p u b lic iz e h i s a c tiv i tie s in v a r io u s w ay s, b ut not in d iv id u a l c a s e s 166 w ith ou t p e r m i s s i o n fro m th e s tu d e n ts inv o lv ed. He b r i n g s about ch a n g es in in s titu ti o n a l p o lic ie s and p r o c e d u r e s a s a r e s u l t of h i s in v e s tig a tio n s and r e c o m m e n d a tio n s . g ation on h i s own in itia tiv e . H e r a r e l y co n d u c ts an i n v e s t i ­ He cannot on h is own in itia tiv e r e v e r s e a d e c is io n o r d i s r e g a r d a n e x is tin g r e g u la tio n . d is c ip lin a r y p o w e r. p e r s u a s i v e a b ility . He d o e s not h ave H is p o w e r r e s t s in h is p e r s o n a l p r e s ti g e an d He s t a t e s h is v ie w s on a c a s e to th e p e r s o n s c o n c e rn e d an d p o s s i b ly to t h e i r o r g a n iz a tio n a l s u p e r i o r s . His h ig h e st a p p e a l to a u th o r it y i s to th e p r e s id e n t of th e in s titu tio n . He is a u x i lia r y to, not a r e p la c e m e n t fo r, e x is tin g c a m p u s fu n c tio n a rie s . The Second an d T h ird R e s e a r c h Q u e s tio n s How i s the c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n s e l e c t e d ? To w hom is the c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n r e s p o n s i b l e ? T h e s e q u e s tio n s a r e c o n s id e r e d jo in tly b e c a u s e they a r e so c lo s e ly r e l a t e d . T he c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n m a y be s e l e c t e d by stu d e n ts, facu lty o r a d m i n i s t r a t i o n - - o r any co m b in a tio n o f th o s e p r i m a r y p o w er g r o u p s - - a t h i s in s titu tio n . If h e i s s e le c te d e x c lu siv e ly by one p o w e r g ro u p , h e m a y be p e r c e iv e d a s h a v in g lo y a ltie s and v e s te d i n t e r e s t s in th a t g r o u p . R e g a r d l e s s of w hich g ro u p o r g ro u p s a r e involved in h i s s e le c tio n , it is s ig n ific a n t th a t th e o m b u d sm an i s a 167 facu lty m e m b e r who r e t u r n s to the fa c u lty r a n k s a f t e r h i s t e r m o f office en d s. H o w e v e r th e id e a o r ig in a t e s on a p a r t i c u l a r c a m p u s , tw o f a c t o r s a p p e a r to be c r u c i a l in th e e s ta b li s h m e n t of th e p o s itio n . T hey a r e : (1) th e m e th o d of s e le c tio n , and (2) th e p e r s o n s e le c te d . The m e th o d o f s e le c tio n i s im p o r ta n t b e c a u s e th e c a m p u s o m b u d s ­ m a n n o r m a ll y i s r e s p o n s i b le to th e a p p o in tin g in d iv id u a l o r body. The p e r s o n s e le c te d i s a ls o a n i m p o r ta n t c o n s id e r a ti o n b e c a u s e th e efficacy of th e p o s itio n d e v e lo p s fro m th e p r e s t i g e and s ty le of the in d iv id u al who f ills it. r At M ic h ig a n S tate U n iv e r s ity , w h e r e th e c a m p u s o m b u d s ­ m an h a s b e e n r e l a t i v e l y e ffe c tiv e , h i s s e le c tio n w a s b r o a d ly b a s e d , involving s tu d e n t, fa c u lty and a d m i n i s t r a t i v e l e a d e r s . T he p e r s o n chosen w a s a s e n io r p r o f e s s o r e x p e rie n c e d in te a c h in g , a c a d e m ic ad v isin g and a d m in is t r a tio n . By c o n t r a s t, a t M a co m b C ounty C o m ­ m u n ity C o lleg e the p r e s id e n t, a c tin g a lo n e , s e le c te d th e o m b u d sm a n , who w as h i m s e l f a t o p - l e v e l a d m i n i s t r a t o r . T he a r r a n g e m e n t a t th e U n iv e r s it y of C a lif o r n ia a t B e rk e le y , w h e re the o m b u d sm a n i s a o n e - m e m b e r c o m m itte e of th e A c a d e m ic Senate, p r o v id e s fo r in d e p e n d e n c e and a u to n o m y fro m th e a d m i n i s ­ tr a tio n . H o w e v e r, t h e r e w as no s tu d e n t r e p r e s e n t a t i o n in th e s e l e c m tion p r o c e s s . W hite p ro v e d to be a n a b le o m b u d s m a n a t San J o s e 168 State C o lleg e b e c a u s e of h is p e r s o n a l q u a l itie s but w a s h a m p e r e d by a p r e s i d e n t i a l a p p o in tm e n t la c k in g f o r m a l s tu d e n t o r fa c u lty a p p ro v a l. By a c c e p tin g a s tu d e n t g o v e rn m e n t a p p o in tm e n t a s o m b u d sm a n a t the U n iv e r s ity of D e tr o it, D av is b e c a m e the s tu d e n ts ' a d v o c a te but a ls o the s tu d e n ts ' s e r v a n t. T he m a n n e r in w hich an in s titu tio n of h ig h e r e d u c a tio n appoints a c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n u s u a lly i s c o n s is te n t w ith i t s p o w e r e m p h a s is . A t B e rk e le y , w ith a tr a d it io n of s tr o n g fa c u lty c o n tr o l in a c a d e m ic m a t t e r s , the o m b u d s m a n w a s c h o sen by and r e p o r t s to the A c a d e m ic S en ate. Since h i s j u r i s d i c t i o n i s r e s t r i c t e d to a c a ­ d em ic p r o b l e m s , n e i th e r s tu d e n ts n o r a d m i n i s t r a t o r s had a vo ice in h is s e le c tio n . A t M ich ig an S tate, w h e r e a tr a d it io n of a d m i n i s ­ tr a tiv e c o n tr o l i s sh iftin g , s tu d e n ts and fa c u lty w e r e in volved in the s e le c tio n alth ou g h th e c h ie f a d m i n i s t r a t o r m a d e th e final d e c is io n . At E a s t e r n M o n tan a C o lle g e , w h e r e n e i t h e r s tu d e n t n o r fa c u lty pow er h a s s e r i o u s l y c h a lle n g e d a d m i n i s t r a t i v e a u th o r ity , th e p r e s i ­ dent a r b i t r a r i l y m a d e the a p p o in tm e n t. In c iv il g o v e rn m e n t, the o m b u d s m a n i s n o r m a ll y ap p o in ted by the le g is la tiv e b ra n c h to w atc h o v e r th e e x e c u tiv e o r a d m i n i s t r a ­ tive b r a n c h . H e d o e s not in v e s tig a te le g is la tiv e a c tiv ity . A d ire c t p a r a lle l ca n n o t be d raw n in h ig h e r e d u c a tio n b e c a u s e n e i t h e r the 169 facu lty n o r s tu d e n t g o v e rn in g b o d ie s a r e e q u iv a le n t to a n a tio n a l o r s ta te l e g i s l a t u r e an d th e a d m in is t r a tio n i s not fu lly c o m p a r a b le to th e e x e c u tiv e b r a n c h in r e p r e s e n t a t i v e g o v e r n m e n t. T hese d is tin c tio n s c o m p lic a te th e p r o b le m of s e le c tin g a c a m p u s o m ­ b u d sm a n w h o i s a p a r t of, y e t a p a r t f ro m , p o w e r g r o u p s in v o lv e d in h is in v e s tig a tio n s . P ro v id in g h is s a l a r y f ro m an o u tsid e s o u r c e , su ch a s a p r iv a te fou nd atio n, m ig h t en a b le h im to a p p e a r m o r e in d e p en d en t, but would not so lv e th e b a s ic d ile m m a o f s e le c tio n and a c c o u n ta b ility . T he F o u r th R e s e a r c h Q u e stio n W hat a r e th e s i m i l a r i t i e s and d i s s i m i l a r i t i e s am o n g v a r i o u s c a m p u s o m b u d s m e n ? A ll six in te rv ie w e d c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n a g r e e d th a t t h e i r b a s ic r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s a r e to h elp in d iv id u a ls so lv e in s titu tio n a l p r o b le m s an d to se e k in s titu tio n a l c h a n g e s th a t w ill r e d u c e i n d i ­ vidual p r o b le m s . O p e r a tio n a l s t y l e s d if fe r a c c o r d in g to w hich r e s p o n s i b ilit y is u p p e r m o s t in th e m in d of th e o m b u d sm a n . T he ca m p u s o m b u d s m a n w ho s e e s h i m s e l f a s a " c a t a l y s t , " " c h a n g e ag en t" o r " a c t i v i s t " d e v i a te s fro m th e civ il g o v e r n m e n t c o n c e p t of o m b u d sm a n , w hich i s e s s e n ti a ll y in te n d ed to m a k e a s y s t e m of 170 r e p r e s e n t a t i v e g o v e r n m e n t fu n ctio n a s it w a s d e s ig n e d to function r a t h e r than to r e s t r u c t u r e o r r e p l a c e th a t s y s t e m . * S im il a r itie s in c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s , a c t i v i t i e s and a ttitu d e s of the s ix in te rv ie w e d c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n w e r e d e s c r i b e d in C h a p te r III and in the a n s w e r to th e f i r s t r e s e a r c h q u e s tio n . D issim ila ritie s m a y b e s u m m a r iz e d a s follow s: C a m p u s o m b u d s m e n r e p r e s e n t a d i v e r s i t y of c a r e e r fie ld s and a c a d e m ic r a n k s . Some e x p e r ie n c e d a s a l a r y i n c r e a s e a n d / o r h ig h e r s ta tu s a s a r e s u l t of t h e i r a p p o in tm e n t; o th e r s did not. a r e teach in g p a r t - t i m e ; o t h e r s a r e not. p la in ts ; o th e r s r e c e i v e only a few. Som e Som e p r o c e s s m a n y c o m ­ Som e c o n s i d e r g r ie v a n c e s fro m any p e r s o n a s s o c i a t e d w ith h i s in s titu tio n ; o t h e r s c o n s id e r only s t u ­ d ent c o m p la in ts. S om e p u b lic iz e t h e i r a c t i v i t i e s and c i r c u l a t e t h e i r r e p o r t s m o r e e x te n s iv e ly th a n o th e r s . conflict; o t h e r s h a v e not. o th e r s do not. Som e h a v e e x p e r ie n c e d r o le S om e id e n tify w ith th e " E s t a b l i s h m e n t ''; Som e k e e p c u m u la tiv e w r i tte n r e c o r d s ; o t h e r s k e e p few r e c o r d s . *Two a u t h o r i t i e s on th e c iv il o m b u d s m a n , G e llh o rn and A n derso n, a g r e e on th is p oint. G e llh o rn h a s w ritte n : " . . . an om bud sm an i s not a c o u n te r v a ilin g p o w e r in s o c ie ty . H is c r i t i ­ c is m s alone cannot r e m a k e o r undo m a lfu n c tio n in g g o v e r n m e n ta l m a c h i n e r y ." See O m b u d s m e n and O t h e r s , p. 192. A n d e r s o n h a s sta ted : " . . . the O m b u d s m a n i s only good f o r m a r g i n a l d e f ic ie n ­ c i e s - - c o r r e c t i n g e r r o r , im p r o v in g p r o c e d u r e s , p r o m p tn e s s , and p o lite n e ss. If t h e r e i s a b a s i c in e q u ity in th e s o c ie ty , o r s o m e th in g b a s ic a lly c o r r u p t, th e O m b u d sm a n c a n ' t do a thing. " See "A n O m budsm an f o r the U .S . ? " C e n te r D ia ry : 14 , p. 23. 171 T h e F ifth R e s e a r c h Q u e s tio n W hat co n d itio n s and e v e n ts h a v e b ro u g h t c a m p u s o m b u d s m e n in to e x is te n c e on A m e r ic a n c o lle g e and u n iv e r s i t y c a m p u s e s ? T h is q u e s tio n w a s a n s w e r e d in the re v ie w of r e la te d l i t e r a ­ t u r e in C h a p te r II and th e d e s c r i p t i o n of c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n o p e r a ­ tio n s and p r o p o s a ls in C h a p te r III. To s u m m a r i z e , e f f o r ts to a d a p t the c iv il o m b u d s m a n id e a to A m e r i c a n h ig h e r e d u c a tio n in th e l a t t e r h a lf of the I 9 6 0 ' s r e f le c te d a g e n e r a l c o n c e r n fo r in d iv id u a l r ig h ts in th e la r g e o r g a n iz a tio n and a s p e c if ic c o n c e r n f o r s tu d e n t r ig h ts in the a c a d e m ic o r g a n iz a tio n . A t m o s t in s titu tio n s , th e p o s itio n w a s added d u r in g o r a f t e r r a p id e n r o llm e n t g ro w th and s e r i o u s s tu d e n t p ro te sts: S tudent and fa c u lty in itia tiv e o r in v o lv e m e n t w e r e e v id en t in n e a r l y a l l i n s t a n c e s , ev e n w h e r e a p p o in tm e n ts w e r e m a d e by a d ­ m in istra to rs. On a n u m b e r of c a m p u s e s , th e o m b u d sm a n p r o p o s a l f i r s t a p p e a r e d along w ith o th e r in s t itu ti o n a l r e f o r m s re c o m m e n d e d by a s p e c ia l c o m m itte e o r c o m m is s io n of facu lty , o r fa c u lty and s tu d e n ts , o r fa c u lty , s tu d e n ts and a d m i n i s t r a t o r s . T h is w a s the c a s e a t M ic h ig an S tate U n iv e r s ity , New Y o rk U n iv e r s ity , C ity C o l­ le g e of th e State U n iv e r s ity of New Y o rk and th e U n iv e r s it y of M i s ­ s o u r i at C o lu m b ia . The p la n w a s s u c c e s s f u l ly p r o m o te d by s tu d e n t l e a d e r s a t San D ieg o S tate C o lleg e an d the U n iv e r s it y of D e tr o it. D ir e c t p r e s i d e n t i a l a c tio n e s ta b li s h e d th e p o sitio n a t su c h p la c e s a s 172 E a s t e r n M ontana C o lle g e , S tate U n iv e r s it y of New Y o rk a t Stony B rook and San J o s e S tate C o lleg e . C a m p u s o m b u d s m a n d e v e lo p m e n ts in 1968 w e r e g r e a t ly in flu en c ed b y and p a t te r n e d a f t e r th o s e p o s itio n s w hich had b ee n e s ta b lis h e d a y e a r e a r l i e r . P r o p o s a l s f r e q u e n tly r e f e r r e d to the D an ish c iv il o m b u d sm a n m o d e l e m p h a s iz in g " r e a s o n e d p e r s u a s i o n . " W idely p u b lic iz e d and im i ta t e d w e r e the p o s itio n s a t M ic h ig an S tate, San J o s e State and Stony B ro o k . At so m e in s titu tio n s , s tu d e n t p r o t e s t b e c a m e so tu r b u le n t th a t " m ild " a p p r o a c h e s f o r a lle v ia tin g s tu d e n t g r i e v a n c e s - - s u c h a s a c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n - - w e r e in a d e q u a te to s a t i s f y p r e s s i n g d e m a n d s . T hu s, a - c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n p r o p o s a l a t s t r i k e - p la g u e d San F r a n c i s c o State C o lleg e in 1968 fa ile d to m a t e r i a l i z e . A lso , th e c a m p u s o m ­ b u d sm a n co n c ep t a s d efin e d in t h i s stu d y w a s b y p a s s e d a t in s titu tio n s w h e re s tu d e n ts w e r e c h o s e n to fill the p o sitio n . T he Sixth R e s e a r c h Q u e s tio n How p r e v a le n t i s th e o m b u d sm a n in A m e r ic a n h ig h e r e d u c a tio n ? A s in d ic a te d in C h a p te r III, e f f o r ts to d e t e r m in e th e n u m b e r of c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n in th e U n ited S ta te s a s of D e c e m b e r 31, 1968, w e re im p e d e d by th e a b s e n c e of a c e n t r a l r e g i s t r y , th e m u ltip lic ity of in s titu tio n s , u n a n s w e re d i n q u i r i e s and the innovation* s r a p id 173 spread. F o u r te e n c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s w e r e known to have had f u ll- tim e o r p a r t - t i m e o m b u d sm e n p r i o r to 1 9 6 9 --a n d p o s s ib ly five o th e r w e s t e r n c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s . c o n s id e r in g th e in n o v a tio n . A t l e a s t s ix te e n m o r e w e r e T he r e m a r k a b l e fle x ib ility of th e c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n co n cep t i s e v id e n c e d in the w id e r a n g e of in s titu tio n s w hich h a v e ado pted it. T h ey in c lu d e c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s th a t a r e la r g e and s m a ll, p u b lic and p r iv a te , old and new, e a s t e r n and w e s t e r n , g r a d u a te and tw o - y e a r , u r b a n and n o n - u rb a n , c o n s e r v a tiv e and l i b e r a l , and c o m p a r a tiv e ly w e ll-k n o w n and unknown. T he Seventh R e s e a r c h Q u e s tio n W hat k in d s of g r i e v a n c e s do s tu d e n ts b rin g to th e c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n ? S tudent g r i e v a n c e s can be c la s s if ie d b r o a d ly a s " a c a d e m ic " and " n o n - a c a d e m i c , " w ith s e v e r a l s u b - c a t e g o r i e s u n d e r each . A c a d e m ic p r o b le m s in c lu d e r e g i s t r a t i o n and a d m is s io n , a c a d e m ic r e q u i r e m e n t s , q u a lity of i n s t r u c tio n , tu itio n and fe e s , a c a d e m ic s ta tu s , a c a d e m ic a d v ic e and g rad eB . N o n - a c a d e m ic p r o b le m s in clu de t r a f f i c r e g u la tio n s , fin a n c ia l need, h o u sin g , u s e of f a c i liti e s and s e r v i c e s , h e a lth c e n t e r , e m p lo y m e n t and l i b r a r y . C a m p u s o m b u d s m e n h a v e e n c o u n te r e d tw o m a j o r d iffic u ltie s in c la s s if y in g s tu d e n t g r i e v a n c e s . One c o n c e r n s th e n u m b e r of s p e c ia l p r o b le m s th a t do not r e a d i ly fit in to an y p r e s c r i b e d c a te g o r y . 174 E x a m p le s a r e in a b ility to g e t a m a ilin g a d d r e s s ch an g ed , a b u s iv e lan gu age by a u n i v e r s i t y e m p lo y e e , r a c i a l d i s c r i m i n a t i o n in s e l e c t ­ ing m e m b e r s f o r a c a m p u s o r g a n iz a tio n , and r e f u s a l by a u n iv e r s i ty b o o k s to re to m a k e a refu n d . T he o th e r c o n c e r n s th e n u m b e r of c o m ­ p la in ts th a t fit in to two o r m o r e c a t e g o r i e s . F o r e x a m p le , i f a s t u ­ dent c l a im s h e h a s b e e n u n ju s tly f ir e d f ro m a c a m p u s jo b h e n e e d s to pay fo r h is ro o m and b o a r d , should the p r o b le m be c la s s i f ie d a s fin a n c ia l n e e d , h o u sin g o r e m p l o y m e n t - - o r a l l t h r e e ? 1 A ll s ix in te rv ie w e d o m b u d sm e n w e r e s u r p r i s e d by the d iv e r s i ty and c o m p le x ity of s tu d e n t g r i e v a n c e s b ro u g h t to th e m . Some p r o b le m s w e r e beyond the c o m p e te n c e of the o m b u d sm a n , r e q u ir in g p r o f e s s i o n a l le g a l, p s y c h i a t r i c o r m e d ic a l a tte n tio n . The E ig h th R e s e a r c h Q u e s tio n What a r e the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of s tu d e n ts who c o n s u lt th e c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n ? A ll c l a s s r a n k s , s tu d e n t ag e g r o u p s , and g r a d e p oin t and stu d e n t h o u s in g c a t e g o r i e s a t M ic h ig an S tate U n iv e r s ity w e r e r e p r e ­ s e n te d by s tu d e n ts w ho c o n su lted th a t in stitu tion * s o m b u d sm a n d u rin g the 1968 fa ll t e r m . H o w e v e r, on a p r o p o r ti o n a l b a s i s , u p p e r c l a s s m e n , * R u st d e s c r i b e d th e c o m p la in t c l a s s i f ic a ti o n p r o b le m in h is f i r s t r e p o r t to th e p r e s i d e n t a t M ic h ig a n S tate U n iv e r s ity , "T h e R e p o rt of th e U n iv e r s it y O m b u d sm a n to th e P r e s i d e n t f o r th e School Y e a r, 1 96 7 -1968, " pp. 7 -8 . 175 m a le s tu d e n ts and m a r r i e d s tu d e n ts w e r e m o r e in c lin e d to c o n s u lt the o m b u d s m a n w h ile u n d e r c l a s s m e n , fe m a le s tu d e n ts and sin g le s tu d e n ts w e r e l e s s in c lin e d . A lso on a p r o p o r ti o n a l b a s is , s tu d e n ts fro m c e r t a i n c o l l e g e s - - p a r t i c u l a r l y A r t s and L e t t e r s and U n iv e r s it y C o l l e g e - - w e r e " o v e r r e p r e s e n t e d " in th e o m b u d s m a n 's o ffic e w hile s tu d e n ts fro m o th e r c o l l e g e s - - p a r t i c u l a r l y E d u c a tio n and N a tu r a l S cie n ce--w e re "u n d er re p re se n te d . " The N inth R e s e a r c h Q u e s tio n What a r e th e s i m i l a r i t i e s and d i s s i m i l a r i t i e s of the c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n and th e c iv il o m b u d s m a n ? Both the c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n and th e c i v il o m b u d sm a n a r e p r o f e s s io n a l p e r s o n s , e x p e r ie n c e d in s c h o l a r s h i p and p u b lic s e r v i c e . Both a r e ap p o in te d r a t h e r th a n e le c te d to office. Both a tte m p t to r e d r e s s p e r s o n a l g r ie v a n c e s and to im p r o v e a d m i n i s t r a t i o n . Both re ly h e a v ily on p r e s t i g e and p e r s u a s i o n to a t t a i n t h e i r en d s. Both m ake r e c o m m e n d a tio n s bu t n e i th e r c a n r e v e r s e d e c is io n s . has d isc ip lin ary n o r en fo rcem en t po w ers. sible to c o m p la in a n ts . Both a r e r e a d ily a c c e s ­ Both r e p o r t to the body w h ich ap p o in ted th e m , yet m a in ta in in d e p e n d e n c e fro m th a t body. they w ill p u r s u e . N e ith e r Both d ec id e w h ich c a s e s Both w o rk in a r e l a t i v e l y s ta b l e s y s te m of g o v e r n ­ m ent s u p p o r te d and t r u s t e d by m o s t o f the p e o p le m o s t of th e tim e . 176 Both can b r in g about p r o c e d u r a l re v ie w w ith in an a d m i n i s t r a t i v e ag ency . N e ith e r fu n c tio n s in a f o r m a l, ju d ic ia l m a n n e r . By c o n t r a s t, th e s c o p e of th e c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n 1 s s e r ­ v ic e s i s f a r m o r e r e s t r i c t e d th a n th a t of the c iv il o m b u d sm a n . The c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n u s u a lly s e r v e s only s tu d e n t c o m p la in a n ts a t one in s titu tio n of h ig h e r e d u c a tio n w h ile th e c iv il o m b u d sm a n s e r v e s a l l c itiz e n s o f a nation o r s ta te . T he c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n i s l e s s lik e ly to con du ct in v e s tig a tio n s on h is own in itia tiv e th a n is the c i v il o m ­ b u d sm a n . The c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n n o r m a ll y w o r k s alone o r with m in im a l a s s i s t a n c e ; th e c iv il o m b u d s m a n h a s a s ta ff. The cam pus o m b u d sm a n p ro b a b ly d o e s not h a v e f o r m a l le g a l tr a in in g ; th e c iv il o m b u d sm a n u s u a lly i s a j u r i s t o r a la w y e r . T he c a m p u s o m b u d s ­ m a n is m o r e lik e ly to s e r v e a s h o r t e r t e r m of o ffic e than th e civ il o m b u d sm a n . M o st c o m p la in ts a r e co nveyed to th e c a m p u s o m b u d s ­ m an in p e r s o n and to th e c iv il o m b u d sm a n by m a i l . The p o s itio n o f civil o m b u d sm a n i s m o r e p r e s ti g io u s th a n the p o s itio n of c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n . T h e T enth R e s e a r c h Q u e s tio n What a r e th e s i m i l a r i t i e s and d i s s i m i l a r i t i e s o f th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n and o t h e r co lleg e an d u n iv e r s i ty f u n c tio n a r i e s ? A s s ig n e d r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s and o p e r a t io n a l p r o c e d u r e s d i s ­ tin g u ish th e c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n fro m o t h e r f u n c tio n a r ie s in h ig h e r 177 e d u c a tio n . The a d m i n i s t r a t i v e o f f ic e r he m o s t c l o s e ly r e s e m b l e s is th e d e a n o r v ic e p r e s i d e n t fo r s tu d e n t a f f a i r s . Both a r e a p p o in ted o f f ic e r s who a t te m p t to h e lp s tu d e n ts so lv e t h e i r p r o b le m s . th e r e a r e so m e b a s i c d if f e r e n c e s . Y et F o r one, th e c h ie f s tu d e n t a f f a i r s o f fic e r c o o r d in a te s a s t a f f of a s s i s t a n t d e a n s , c o u n s e lo r s , h o u sin g d i r e c t o r s and o t h e r p r o f e s s i o n a l s tu d e n t p e r s o n n e l w o r k e r s . o m b u d sm a n , by c o n t r a s t , h a s no s t a f f to s u p e r v i s e . T he Except for a s e c r e t a r y , he u s u a lly w o r k s alo n e. A no th er d if f e r e n c e is th a t w h ile th e c h ie f s tu d e n t a f f a i r s o f fic e r i s c o n c e rn e d w ith s tu d e n t g ro w th and d e v e lo p m e n t, the m a in t h r u s t o f h is r e s p o n s i b i l i t y i s in th e n o n - a c a d e m i c o r c o - c u r r i c u l a r area. Student p r o b l e m s in v o lv in g s p e c if ic c o u r s e s and p r o f e s s o r s as w e ll a s o th e r a c a d e m i c c o n c e r n s a r e g e n e r a l l y not c o n s id e r e d to be w ith in the p u rv ie w of th e s tu d e n t a f f a i r s o ffic e . By c o n s id e r in g both a c a d e m ic an d n o n - a c a d e m ic p r o b le m s , th e o m b u d s m a n c o v e r s a b r o a d e r range o f s tu d e n t c o n c e r n s th an th e c h ie f stu d e n t a f f a i r s o ffic e r. Still a n o t h e r d if f e r e n c e i s th a t th e c h ie f stu d e n t a f f a i r s o ffic e r i s in v o l v e d - - d i r e c t l y o r i n d i r e c t l y - - i n s tu d e n t d i s c i p l i n a r y m a tte rs. On m o s t c a m p u s e s , e n f o r c e m e n t of r u l e s and r e g u la tio n s is h is u ltim a te r e s p o n s i b i l i t y . T h e o m b u d sm a n , on th e o th e r h an d , h a s no d is c ip li n a r y o r e n f o r c e m e n t p o w e rs . 178 F in a lly , the c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n h a s m o r e in v e s tig a to r y a u th o rity th an the c h ie f stu d e n t a f f a i r s o f f ic e r in c e r t a i n s e n s i t i v e a r e a s , s u c h a s a s tu d e n t c o m p la in t a g a in s t a te a c h in g fa c u lty m e m ­ ber, A lso , the o m b u d s m a n m a y in v e s tig a te c o m p la in ts d i r e c t e d a g a in s t the stu d e n t a f f a i r s office. The c h ie f s tu d e n t a f f a i r s o f f ic e r d o es n ot h a v e r e c i p r o c a l in v e s tig a to r y a u th o r ity r e g a r d i n g the o m ­ budsman* s o ffice. M o r e than a n y o th e r fu n c tio n a ry , th e p r o f e s s io n a l s tu d e n t p e r s o n n e l w o r k e r is lik e ly to r e g a r d the c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n a s an e n c r o a c h m e n t, a n u is a n c e o r e v e n a th r e a t. Clifford* s o b je c tio n to an o m b u d sm a n and h i s c o n ten tio n th a t the om budsm an* s r o le sh o u ld be a s s u m e d by the c h ie f stu d e n t a f f a i r s o ffic e r* i g n o r e s two i m p o r ­ tant c o n s id e r a tio n s . One i s th e -c o n flic t th a t e x i s t s b e tw e e n fa c u lty and stu d e n t p e r s o n n e l s ta f f a t m o s t c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s . C h ie f student a f f a i r s o f f ic e r s often a r e h eld in r e l a t i v e l y low e s t e e m by te ach in g facu lty . d em ic c o lle a g u e . 2 T h e o m b u d s m a n , on the o th e r h an d , i s a n a c a ­ T he o th e r c o n s id e r a tio n i s th e fact th a t s tu d e n t d is c ip lin e i s u s u a lly one of the r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s of th e c h ie f s tu d e n t * C liffo rd , "S eco nd T h o u g h ts on th e O m b u d sm a n in H ig h e r E d u c a tio n ," pp. 4 -5 . 2 See K au ffm an , "T h e S tud ent in H ig h e r E d u c a tio n ," p. 153, and T. R o g e r Nudd, " T h e D ean I s a M a r g in a l M a n ," J o u r n a l of E d u ­ cation al S o cio lo g y , XXXV ( D e c e m b e r , 1961), 145-51. 179 a f f a i r s o f f ic e r . C o n seq u en tly , h e i s often r e g a r d e d w ith s u s p ic io n o r r e s e n t m e n t by s tu d e n ts . * The o m b u d s m a n i s f r e e of th a t s tig m a . A n o th e r p o s itio n w h ich r e s e m b l e s th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n in so m e r e s p e c t s i s th a t of c o lle g e c h a p la in o r c a m p u s m i n i s t e r . S tro u p h a s po in ted out th a t th e c o lle g e c h a p la in te n d s to b e a " m i d ­ dle m a n " r e a d i ly a c c e s s i b l e to th o s e w ith c o m p la in ts . If h e is h ig hly s k ille d , he m a y s u c c e e d both in m a in ta in in g the co n fid en ce of th o s e who c o m p la in and th o s e to w hom th e c o m p la in ts a r e a d d r e s s e d . 2 F o r th e s e an d o th e r r e a s o n s , W hite h a s p r o p o s e d th a t c a m p u s m i n i s t e r s be c o n s id e r e d f o r c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n p o s ts . g T he m a in d i s ­ tin c tio n h e r e i s th a t th e c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n u s u a lly c o m e s fro m and r e t u r n s tp th e fa c u lty r a n k s w h e r e a s the c a m p u s m i n i s t e r i s not c o n ­ s id e r e d a c o lle a g u e . A lso , the m i n i s t e r ' s id e n tif ic a tio n w ith a p a r t i c u l a r r e lig io u s faith o r d e n o m in a tio n m ig h t l im it h is e f f e c tiv e ­ n e s s on a c a m p u s w h e r e r e lig io u s a f f ilia tio n s a r e d i v e r s e . 1 K au ffm an , " T h e S tudent in H ig h e r E d u c a t i o n , " p. 156, and Nudd, " T h e D ean Is a M a r g in a l M an, " p. 146. A ls o s e e P e t e r H. A r m a c o s t, " F a c u lty - S tu d e n t P e r s o n n e l R e la tio n s h ip s : A H ouse D iv id e d ," N A S P A - - J o u r n a l of th e A s s o c ia tio n of D ea n s and A d m in ­ i s t r a t o r s o f Student A f f a i r s , II ( J a n u a ry , 1965), 8 . 2 3 110. S tro u p , B u r e a u c r a c y in H ig h e r E d u c a tio n , pp. 182-83. W h ite, " T h e O m b u d sm a n in H ig h e r E d u c a tio n , " pp. 96- 180 The E le v e n th R e s e a r c h Q u e s tio n How d o e s th e c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n a s s e s s h is e f f e c t iv e n e s s ? A ll b u t one o f th e s ix in te rv ie w e d c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n b e lie v e t h e i r a c t i v i t i e s h a v e h e lp e d a l le v i a te s tu d e n t f r u s t r a t i o n and h o s tility . A ll c o n s id e r good r e la tio n s h i p s w ith s tu d e n ts a s a p r im e q u a lific a tio n f o r the p o s itio n . A ll but one fe e l th a t the o m b u d sm an m a y g ro w l e s s e ffe c tiv e a f t e r tw o y e a r s in o ffice. F o u r of the six b eliev e t h e i r o ffic e w ill be in e x is te n c e te n y e a r s h e n c e ; tw o a r e u n c e r ta in . Both R u s t a t M ic h ig an State and N o rm a n a t San Diego State h a v e e s t i m a t e d th a t fro m tw o - th ir d s to t h r e e - f o u r t h s of the c o m p la in ts b ro u g h t to th em d u r in g t h e i r f i r s t y e a r in office w e re se ttle d to th e s tu d e n t s 1 s a tis f a c tio n . * W hite a ls o h a s m a d e a f a v o r2 able a s s e s s m e n t of h i s e f f e c tiv e n e s s a t San J o s e S tate. H o w ev er, none of th e s ix h a s a tte m p te d to m e a s u r e h i s e f f e c tiv e n e s s by s y s t e ­ m a tic a lly s a m p lin g s tu d e n ts w ho h ave c o n s u lte d h im . * B r ill , "O m budsm an* s P o w e r H e lp s S tu d e n ts ," M ic h ig an State N e w s , O c to b e r 30, 1968, p. 1 . N o rm a n , T he O m bu dsm an: A New B ird on C a m p u s , p. 6 . 2 73. W hite, " T h e O m b u d sm a n in H ig h e r E d u c a tio n ," pp. 72- 181 T he T w elfth R e s e a r c h Q u e s tio n How do s tu d e n ts w ho c o n s u lt the c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n a s s e s s h is e f f e c t iv e n e s s ? S u rv e y ed s tu d e n ts who c o n s u lte d th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n d u rin g th e 1968 f a ll t e r m a t M ic h ig a n State U n iv e r s it y g e n e r a lly r e g a r d e d th e o m b u d sm a n a s e ffe c tiv e in h e lp in g th e m o v e r c o m e in s titu tio n a l o b s ta c le s . T w o - th ir d s of them fe lt th at he w as i n s t r u ­ m e n ta l in r e lie v in g s tu d e n t f r u s t r a t i o n and h o s tility . N e a r ly h a l f of th e m a l r e a d y h ad ta k e n t h e i r p r o b le m s to .tw o o r m o r e p e r s o n s in a u th o rity b e f o r e c o n su ltin g the o m b u d sm a n . M o st s tu d e n ts who c o n su lte d th e o m b u d s m a n w e r e s a t i s f i e d th a t he had d one e v e ry th in g w ith in h ie a u th o r ity to h e lp th e m . T h e r e f o r e , they w ould r e t u r n to h im w ith o th e r p r o b le m s and r e c o m m e n d h im to o th e r s tu d e n ts . T h e ir a s s e s s m e n t i s s u m m a r i z e d a t the end o f C h a p te r IV. The T h ir te e n th R e s e a r c h Q u e stio n Do s tu d e n ts who c o n s u lt th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n e x p e rie n c e r e ta lia tio n f r o m th o se inv o lv ed in t h e i r g r i e v a n c e s ? O nly th i r t e e n of 207 s tu d e n ts who c o n s u lte d th e o m b u d sm a n d u rin g th e 1968 fa ll t e r m a t M ic h ig a n State U n iv e r s it y l a t e r e x p e r i ­ enced " u n p le a s a n t t r e a t m e n t " by an y o n e in v o lv e d in t h e i r c o m p la in t. No c a s e s of s e v e r e r e tr ib u ti o n w e r e r e p o r t e d . m ation a p p e a r s in C h a p te r IV. M o r e d e ta ile d i n f o r ­ 182 The F o u r te e n th R e s e a r c h Q u e s tio n Is c o n fid e n tia lity i m p o r ta n t to s tu d e n ts who c o n s u lt th e c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n ? N e a r l y t h r e e - f o u r t h s of 216 s tu d e n ts who c o n s u lte d the o m b u d sm a n d u rin g th e 1968 fa ll t e r m a t M ic h ig an S tate U n iv e r s ity would not h a v e b ee n d e t e r r e d if h is r e c o r d s w e r e o pen f o r in s p e c tio n by anyone. O f the r e m a in in g o n e - f o u rth , t w e n t y - s e v e n s tu d e n ts would h a v e b een d e t e r r e d a n d th i r t y w e r e u n c e r t a in . T h e in d ic a tio n is th at m o s t s tu d e n ts a r e u n c o n c e r n e d about c o n fid e n tia lity . How­ e v e r, th o s e s tu d e n ts who a r e c o n c e r n e d w ill n o t b r in g t h e i r p r o b ­ le m s to th e o m b u d sm a n w ith o u t the a s s u r a n c e of p r iv a c y . M o re d e ta ile d in f o r m a tio n a p p e a r s in C h a p te r IV. The F ifte e n th R e s e a r c h Q u e s tio n Can a m o d e l be d e v e lo p ed f o r c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n to follow, w ith m o d if ic a tio n s to m e e t the s p e c if ic n eed s of t h e i r in s titu tio n ? T h e six in te r v ie w e d c a m p u s o m b u d s m e n do not a g r e e th a t a m o d e l can be d e v e lo p e d th a t i s a p p lic a b le to a l l in s t itu ti o n s of h ig h e r e d u c a tio n . N o rm a n , fo r e x a m p le , h a s s ta te d th a t b e c a u s e th e r e i s no m o d e l o m b u d sm a n , " e a c h p r a c t i t i o n e r m u s t fit th e p a r ­ ti c u l a r n e e d s of s tu d e n ts a t h is u n iv e r s i ty . R u s t, on th e o th e r ^ N o rm a n , The O m b u d sm a n : A New B ird on C a m p u s , p. 1. hand, b e lie v e s that h is o p e r a t io n a l p r o c e d u r e s a r e a p p lic a b le to any u n i v e r s i t y c a m p u s. H e h a s c i r c u la te d n u m e r o u s c o p ie s of a b r o c h u r e d e s c r ib in g th o s e p r o c e d u r e s and h a s s e e n th e m followed e ls e w h e r e . S c h lo s s b e r g h a s e m p h a s iz e d th e n e e d fo r a c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n m o d e l b e f o r e the c o n c e p t b e c o m e s too " b a s ta r d iz e d . "* W hen the f i r s t c a m p u s o m b u d s m e n lo ok ed fo r a m o d e l, they tu r n e d to the D a n ish c iv il o m b u d sm a n , m a k in g n e c e s s a r y a d ju s tm e n ts to fit t h e i r co lleg e o r u n iv e r s i ty . G e n e ra lly , ca m p u s o m b u d sm e n w ho have follow ed th a t m o d e l h a v e been m o r e effectiv e th an th o se w ho have a c c e p te d th e o ffice w itho u t c a r e f u lly c o n s id e r in g it s o r ig in and r o le in c i v i l g o v e rn m e n t. T h e m o d e l s u g g e s te d h e r e i s th at o f th e D a n ish c iv il o m ­ b u d sm a n a d ju s te d to the o r g a n iz a tio n a l " c l i m a t e " of th e m o d e rn A m e r ic a n in s titu tio n o f h ig h e r e d u c a tio n . It c lo s e ly r e s e m b l e s the office of o m b u d sm a n a t M ich ig an S tate U n iv e r s ity b e c a u s e no o th e r la r g e u n iv e r s i t y h a s y e t eq u a led th a t in s titu tio n in e ffe c tiv e ly t r a n s ­ f e r r i n g th e c iv il g o v e rn m e n t c o n c e p t to the a c a d e m ic s c e n e . The f e a t u r e s l i s t e d a r e c o n s id e r e d e s s e n t i a l to th e p r o p e r functioning o f a c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n o p e ra tio n : * S c h lo s s b e rg , " T h e O m b u d sm a n in C u r r e n t S ta tu s and T h e o ry , " u n p u b lish e d s p e e c h d e l iv e r e d a t m e e tin g on o m b u d sm a n in h ig h e r e d u c a tio n in D e tr o it, M i c h ., O c to b e r 24, 1968, p. 5. 184 1. T he in s titu tio n w ith a c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n should h a v e a n o r g a n iz a tio n a l s t r u c t u r e w h ich is r e l a t i v e l y s ta b le , s u p p o r te d and t r u s t e d by m o s t of the p e o p le w ith in it m o s t of the t i m e . . T he office of o m b u d sm a n sh o u ld be e q u iv a le n t in s a l a r y and p r e s t i g e to th a t of h ig h - le v e l a c a d e m ic and a d m i n ­ i s t r a t i v e p o s itio n s . 3. T he c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n sh o u ld be a lo n g - tim e fa c u lty m e m b e r a t th e in stitu tio n , e x p e r ie n c e d in te a c h in g and a d v is in g , and h ig h ly r e s p e c t e d by s tu d e n ts , c o lle a g u e s and a d m i n i s t r a t o r s . R e g a r d l e s s of h i s a c a d e m ic d i s ­ c ip lin e , he sh o u ld h a v e s o m e r u d im e n t a r y know ledge of th e law and sh o u ld b e c o m e th o ro u g h ly a c q u a in te d w ith th e c iv il o m b u d sm a n c o n c e p t. 4. H e sh o uld be c a r e f u l ly s e l e c t e d by a c o m m itte e r e p r e ­ s e n tin g s tu d e n ts , facu lty an d a d m in is tr a tio n . T he a c t u a l a p p o in tm e n t should b e m a d e o r c o n firm e d by the g o v e rn in g b o a r d of the in s titu tio n upon th e r e c o m m e n d a ­ tio n of it s c h ie f a d m in i s t r a t i v e o ffic e r. 5. H e sh o uld be ap p o in ted f o r a tw o - y e a r t e r m of o ffice, re n e w a b le by m u tu a l a g r e e m e n t of the o m b u d sm a n and th e s e le c tio n c o m m itte e . . H e sho uld m a k e p e r io d ic r e p o r t s of a g e n e r a l n a t u r e th a t a r e w id ely p u b lic iz ed to a l l m e m b e r s of th e i n s t i ­ tu tio n . He a l s o m a y m a k e c o n fid e n tia l r e p o r t s w ith r e c o m m e n d a tio n s to the c h ie f a d m in is t r a tiv e o f f ic e r , w ho should d e t e r m i n e the e x te n t of t h e i r c ir c u la tio n . 2 6 7. W h ile s e r v in g a s o m b u d sm a n , he sho uld not be r e q u i r e d to te a c h c o u r s e s o r p e r f o r m o th e r f a c u lty d u tie s . . H e sho uld h a v e a p r iv a te o ffic e s e p a r a t e fro m th e m a in a d m i n i s t r a t i o n bu ilding and e a s i l y a c c e s s i b l e to s t u ­ d e n t s . He sh o u ld h av e a s e c r e t a r y b ut n o t a s ta ff . 9. H e sh o u ld be r e c e p tiv e to in d iv id u a l s tu d e n t g r ie v a n c e s c o n c e rn in g th e in s titu tio n , b o th of an a c a d e m ic and n o n - a c a d e m ic n a t u r e . He sh o u ld d e c id e w hich c o m ­ p la in ts a r e w ith in h is j u r i s d i c t i o n and c o m p e te n c e and w h ic h of th o s e m e r i t h is in v e s tig a tio n . 8 185 10. He sh o u ld u s e r e a s o n e d p e r s u a s i o n to b r in g abo u t r e d r e s s of g en u in e s tu d e n t g r i e v a n c e s a s e x p e d itio u s ly and e q u ita b ly a s p o s s ib le . 11. W h e re a p a t te r n o f stu d e n t g r ie v a n c e s d e v e lo p s , he should w o rk f o r a change in r e g u la tio n s , p r o c e d u r e s o r p e r s o n n e l to p r e v e n t su c h p r o b le m s fro m r e c u r r i n g . 12. He sh o u ld not co n d u c t in v e s tig a tio n s on h i s own i n i t i a ­ tiv e b u t r a t h e r in r e s p o n s e to s tu d e n t c o m p la in ts . 13. He sh o u ld have a c c e s s to a l l c a m p u s o ffic e s and f ile s , e x c e p t m e d ic a l, p s y c h o lo g ic a l and g o v e r n m e n tc l a s s i f ie d r e c o r d s . 14. He sh o u ld k ee p w r i t t e n r e c o r d s on e a c h c a s e he c o n ­ s i d e r s and th o s e r e c o r d s sh ou ld be c o n fid e n tia l. 15. When reb u ffe d in th e c o u r s e o f a n in v e s tig a tio n , he sh o uld h av e th e a u th o r ity to a p p e a l to th e c h ie f a d m i n ­ i s t r a t i v e o f f ic e r f o r in te rv e n tio n . 16. He sh o u ld not h a v e a u th o rity to ta k e d i s c i p l i n a r y a c tio n , r e v e r s e d e c is io n s o r c ir c u m v e n t r e g u la tio n s . H is p o w e r should l i e in h is p r e s t i g e , p e r s u a s i v e n e s s and p e r s i s t e n c e in s ta tin g h is v ie w s to p e r s o n s in v o lv e d in a g r ie v a n c e and, i f n e c e s s a r y , to t h e i r o r g a n iz a tio n a l su p e rio rs. 17. The c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n sh o uld s u p p le m e n t, not s u p e r ­ ced e, o th e r m e a n s of r e d r e s s f o r s tu d e n t g r i e v a n c e s . 18. D e c is io n s on w h e th e r to co n tin u e th e office sho uld be b a s e d on s y s t e m a t i c s a m p lin g of s tu d e n ts who h a v e c o n s u lte d the o m b u d s m a n . Few n o n - te a c h in g r o l e s in h ig h e r e d u c a tio n a r e a s d e m a n d in g - - y e t allow a s m u c h la titu d e f o r in d iv id u a l s ty le and p e r s o n a l i t y - a s that of o m b u d sm a n . He s e e m s to p e r f o r m b e s t w h e r e h e h a s a s p e c ific m a n d a te , v ag u e g u id e lin e s and b r o a d s u p p o r t. A lthough th e 186 c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n ca n in flu e n c e im p r o v e m e n ts in in s titu tio n a l p o lic ie s and p r o c e d u r e s , m u c h o f h is d a y - to - d a y a c tiv ity i s in d iv id ­ u a l c a s e w o rk w h o se r e s u l t s a r e l o n g - t e r m and c u m u la tiv e , and t h e r e f o r e d iffic u lt t o a s s e s s . C o n c lu s io n s A lthough th e o m b u d s m a n co n c ep t i s w e l l - e s t a b l i s h e d in * c iv il g o v e r n m e n t, i t i s s t i l l a n in n o v a tio n and an e x p e r i m e n t in A m e r ic a n h ig h e r e d u c a tio n . R e g a r d e d a s a fad a n d a t h r e a t by s o m e fa c u lty and a d m i n i s t r a t o r s , th e c o n c e p t i s r e c e iv in g m u c h o f i t s in it ia l s u p p o r t f ro m s tu d e n ts . S anfo rd h a s d e p lo r e d th e te n d e n c y of the c o lle c tiv e fa c u lty to r e s i s t in n o v a tio n , * w h ich R o u rk e and B r o o k s m a in ta in d o e s not r e f l e c t s o m u c h a la c k of v is io n o r a d e f e n s e of v e s te d i n t e r e s t s a s a b e lie f t h a t h ig h e r e d u c a tio n " c o u ld e a s i l y be d am a g e d by a d m i n i s t r a t i v e in n o v a tio n s w hich m ig h t be p e r f e c t ly a c c e p ta b le in o t h e r ty p e s of o r g a n iz a tio n s . " 2 L utz h a s e n c o u ra g e d th e u n iv e r s i ty to r e c o g n i z e th a t th e only w ay to avoid d is r u p tiv e chanjge i s to p ro v id e c h a n n e ls f o r s tu d e n t g r i e v a n c e s so th a t the n a t u r e and s o u r c e s of th e g r i e v a n c e s c a n be d i s c o v e r e d and th e " s y s t e m " m a d e 1 S a n fo rd , 2 e d . , The A m e r i c a n C o lle g e , pp. 19-21. R o u rk e and B r o o k s , T he M a n a g e r ia l R e v o lu tio n in H ig h e r E du catio n , p. 1 . 187 m o r e r e s p o n s i v e an d a c c e s s i b l e . 1 L ooking a h e a d to 1980, S anford h a s p r e d ic te d th a t c o lle g e s o r u n i v e r s i t i e s w h o se a u t h o r i t i e s c a n lis te n to s tu d e n ts and a d a p t in r e a s o n a b le w a y s to r e a s o n a b le d e m a n d s w ill avoid s e r i o u s tr o u b le . " T h e n e x t 12 y e a r s w ill be a p e r io d of m u c h e x p e r im e n ta tio n and in n o v a tio n on c o lle g e c a m p u s e s , " h e added. 2 A s w ith an y inn o v atio n , th e p o sitio n of c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n is m o r e lik e ly to be a c c e p te d if i t i s p e r c e iv e d a s a s u p p le m e n t t r a t h e r than a t h r e a t to e x is tin g p r a c t i c e . A s M ile s h a s pointed out, in n o v a tio n s w hich c a n be added to a p r o g r a m w ithout s e r i o u s l y d i s / 3 tu rb in g o t h e r p a r t s of it a r e lik e ly to be ad o p ted . K e r r a ls o h a s noted th a t in the u n i v e r s i t y change " c o m e s m o r e thro u g h spaw ning the new th a n r e f o r m i n g th e o l d . " 4 E v a n s h a s in d ic a te d th a t the d e g r e e of a c c e p ta n c e of an in n o v a tio n by p r o f e s s o r s m a y p a r t l y depend on w h e th e r th e y view the in n o v a tio n a s b eing in s titu te d o r im p o s e d by th e u n iv e r s i ty a d m i n i s t r a t i o n o r w h e th e r th e y fe e l th a t 1R o b e rt L u tz , " C o m m e n t , " D e n v e r Law J o u r n a l, XLV (Special, 1968), 5 7 6 -7 7 . 2 S an ford , " T h e C o l l e g e S tudent of 1 9 8 0 ," in C a m p u s 1980, p. 197. 3 M . B. M ile s , ed. , In n o vatio n in E d u c a tio n (New Y ork: T e a c h e r s C o lle g e , C o lu m b ia U n iv e r s ity , 1964), p. 638. 4 K e r r , T he U s e s of th e U n i v e r s i t y , p. 102. it o r ig in a te d a s a r e s u l t o f t h e i r own p lanning. * T he s a m e o b s e r v a ­ tio n p ro b a b ly h o ld s t r u e fo r s tu d e n ts . A n o th e r f a c t o r i s th a t s o m e in s titu tio n s , m o r e than o t h e r s , p r o v id e a m o r e r e c e p tiv e s o c ia l c lim a te f o r th e in tr o d u c tio n and a c c e p ta n c e of in n o v a tio n s. 2 R o g e r s h a s li s t e d five c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s w hich, w hen view ed fro m th e sta n d p o in t of in d iv id u a l o r g ro u p p e r c e p tio n s , p a s t r e s e a r c h h a s found to a ffe c t th e r a t e of a d o p tio n of a n in n o v a tio n . They are: (1) r e la tiv e a d v a n ta g e , (2) c o m p a tib ility , (3) c o m p le x ity , (4) d i v i s i ­ b ility , and (5) c o m m u n ic a b ility . T he in d iv id u a l d e t e r m i n e s r e la tiv e ad van tage l a r g e l y on the b a s i s of w h e th e r h e th in k s th e p r o p o s e d i n ­ novation w ill im p r o v e the e x is tin g s itu a tio n . C o m p a tib ility c o n c e r n s th e d e g r e e to w hich p o te n tia l a d o p t e r s f e e l it i s c o n s is te n t w ith t h e i r v a lu e s and e x p e r i e n c e s . The m o s t f re q u e n t d iv is ib ility th a t p o te n tia l a d o p te r s e m p lo y i s th a t o f lim ite d ad o p tio n , "w h ich by not r e q u ir in g w h o le h e a rte d a c c e p ta n c e of an in n o v a tio n le a v e s th e w ay open to 3 r e t u r n to an o ld e r id e a a t any tim e . " If c a r e f u l ly in tr o d u c e d and im p le m e n te d , th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n c o n c e p t h a s f e a t u r e s w hich fav o r a r a p id r a t e of adoption. *E v a n s , R e s is t a n c e to Inn o v atio n in H ig h e r E d u c a tio n , p. 153. 189 The te s tin g p e r io d f o r th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n c o n c e p t h a s not ended; it h a s j u s t begun. I t s p la c e o r p e r m a n e n c e in th e o r g a n i ­ z a tio n a l s t r u c t u r e of th e u n i v e r s i t y i s not fu lly e s ta b lis h e d . D u rin g th e n ex t few y e a r s , m a n y m o r e c o lle g e s an d u n i v e r s i t i e s a r e lik e ly to " t r y o u t" th e p o sitio n . A s w ith m o s t id e a s b o r ro w e d f r o m g o v ­ e r n m e n t by h i g h e r e d u c a tio n , the c o n c e p t m a y u n d e r g o a d d itio n a l ch a n g es to m a k e it m o r e w o rk a b le and a c c e p ta b le w ith in th e a c a ­ d e m ic in s titu tio n . T he s p r e a d of th e o m b u d s m a n id e a in h ig h e r e d u c a tio n w ill be c lo s e ly tie d to i t s r a t e o f ado p tio n in c iv il g o v e r n ­ m e n t. To the e x te n t th a t th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n i s p e r c e iv e d a s a t e m p o r a r y e x p e d i e n t - - a " g i m m i c k " - - i n h ig h e r e d u c a tio n , h i s c o n ­ tin u a tio n i s in doubt. To th e e x te n t th a t h e i s r e g a r d e d a s a p e r m a ­ nent a d d itio n p e r f o r m i n g n e c e s s a r y fu n c tio n s , h i s s ta b ili ty i s a s ­ sured. T h u s, e a c h in s titu tio n would be w e ll a d v is e d to stu d y th e o m b u d sm a n c o n c e p t and i t s im p l ic a tio n s c a r e f u l ly b e f o r e d e c id in g w h e th e r to ad o p t it. It i s a m i s t a k e f o r an in s titu tio n to e x p e c t to o m u c h of its ca m p u s o m b u d s m a n . E v en w hen p e r f o r m i n g e ffe c tiv e ly , he i s not cap ab le of w a rd in g off m a j o r s tu d e n t c o n f r o n ta tio n s of a p o litic a l n a tu re c h a lle n g in g the o r g a n iz a tio n a l s t r u c t u r e of th e in s titu tio n . A cam p u s o m b u d s m a n , f o r e x a m p le , w ould not h a v e p r e v e n te d s tu d e n t 190 u p r i s i n g s on th e s c a le o f th o s e a t B e r k e le y , C o lu m b ia an d San F r a n c i s c o S tate . He r e l i e v e s s tu d e n t p r e s s u r e s and f r u s t r a t i o n s , h e i m p r o v e s a d m i n i s t r a t i o n , but he d o e s not put down m a s s stu d e n t r e b e llio n s . R e c o m m e n d a tio n s M o st r e s e a r c h e n d e a v o r s end w ith a p le a fo r f u r t h e r i n v e s t i ­ g atio n . T h is s tu d y i s no e x c e p tio n . A lthough a g r e a t d e a l of i n f o r ­ m a tio n h a s b e e n p r e s e n te d on th e s e p a g e s , the e m p h a s is on M ic h ig an S tate U n iv e r s ity le a v e s u n a n s w e re d m a n y q u e s tio n s ab o u t stu d e n t and facu lty r e a c tio n to th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n a t o t h e r in s titu tio n s . C o m p a ra tiv e s tu d i e s would p ro v id e a m o r e c o m p r e h e n s iv e view . A lso , p e r s o n a l in te r v i e w s w ith c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n o t h e r th an th e s ix s e le c te d f o r th is in v e s tig a tio n w ould e n l a r g e th e " c o m p o s ite " p ic tu r e of th i s new fu n c tio n a ry in A m e r ic a n h ig h e r e d u c a tio n . In ad ditio n, a s y s t e m a t i c stu d y n e e d s to be m a d e of stu d e n t o m b u d s ­ m e n and o th e r a l t e r n a t e m e th o d s f o r r e d r e s s i n g s tu d e n t g r ie v a n c e s . F in a lly , an in te r n a tio n a l s u r v e y m ig h t r e v e a l th a t c o lle g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s in n a tio n s o th e r th a n th e U nited S ta te s a ls o a r e e x p e r i ­ m e n tin g w ith th e o m b u d sm a n co n c e p t. B e c a u s e o f.n a tio n a l i n t e r e s t in th e c iv il o m b u d s m a n in A u s t r a l i a , C a n ad a , G r e a t B r ita in and W e s te rn E u ro p e , u n i v e r s i t i e s in th o s e p a r t s of th e w o rld a r e p e r h a p s the in s titu tio n s m o s t lik e ly to be in v o lv e d in s u c h e x p e r im e n ta tio n . 191 T h e s e s u g g e s tio n s f o r f u r t h e r r e s e a r c h a r e tie d to the u n d erly in g r e a s o n f o r conducting th is s t u d y - - t h e p r e s s i n g n e e d f o r m o r e in f o rm a tio n . H opefully , th e s te p ta k e n h e r e w ill le a d to m o r e s te p s to w a rd a b e t t e r u n d e rs ta n d in g of th e s ig n ific a n c e of th e o m b u d s ­ m a n in A m e r ic a n h ig h e r ed u c atio n . S E L E C T E D BIBLIOGRAPHY 1 S E L E C T E D BIBLIO GRA PH Y P u b lis h e d S o u rc e s B ooks A a ro n , T h o m a s J . T he C o n tro l o f P o lic e D is c r e tio n : The D an ish E x p e r i e n c e . S p rin g fie ld , 111.: C h a r l e s C. Thoijaas, P u b l i s h e r , 1966. A n d e rs o n , S tan ley V. C a n a d ia n O m b u d sm a n P r o p o s a l s . B e rk e le y , C a l i f . : I n s titu te of G o v e r n m e n ta l S tu d ies, 1966. Englew ood , ed. O m b u d sm e n f o r A m e r i c a n G o v e r n m e n t? C liffs, N . J . : P r e n t i c e - H a l l , I n c . , 1968. A r g y r i s , C h r i s . P e r s o n a l i t y and O r g a n iz a tio n . & Row, 1957. New Y ork: H a r p e r H arper & B a rz u n , J a c q u e s . T he A m e r i c a n U n iv e r s ity . Row, 1968. New Y o rk B e n n is, W a r r e n G. C hanging O r g a n i z a t i o n s . H ill Book C o m p an y , 1966. New Y ork: M c G ra w - B iddle, B ru c e J . , and T h o m a s , E dw in J . R o le T h e o ry : C o n c e p ts and R e s e a r c h . New Y o rk : Jo h n W iley and Sons , I n c . , 1966. B lau, P e t e r M. B u r e a u c r a c y in M o d e rn S o c ie ty . H o u se, 1967. New Y ork: R and o m B oulding, K en n e th E . T he O r g a n iz a tio n a l R e v o lu tio n . H a r p e r & B r o t h e r s , 1953. K ew Y ork : B ro o k o v e r, W ilb u r B . , e t a l . T h e C o lleg e S tu d e n t. New Y ork: C e n te r fo r A pplied R e s e a r c h in E d u c a tio n , Inc. 1967. T he 193 C h a m b e r s , M. M. T he C o lle g e s and th e C o u r ts , 1 96 2 -1 9 6 6 . D a n ­ v ille , 111.: I n t e r s t a t e P r i n t e r s &. P u b l i s h e r s , I n c . , 1967. Copp, J a m e s H . , ed. O u r C hanging R u r a l Society: P e r s p e c t i v e s and T r e n d s . A m e s , Iowa: Iow a S tate U n iv e r s ity P r e s s , 1964. C o r s o n , J o h n C. G o v e rn a n c e of C o lle g e s and U n i v e r s i t i e s . Y o rk : M c G r a w - H ill Book C o m p an y , I n c . , 1960. C r o z i e r , M ic h e l. The B u r e a u c r a t i c P h e n o m e n o n . v e r s i t y o f C h icag o P r e s s , 1964. New C hicago: U n i­ D en n is, L a w r e n c e E . , and K au ffm an, J o s e p h F . , e d s. T he C o lleg e and th e S tu d e n t. W ash in g to n, D . C . : A m e r ic a n C ou ncil on E d u c a tio n , 1966. D eV ane, W illia m C. H ig h e r E d u c a tio n in T w e n tie th - C e n tu r y A m e r i c a . C a m b r id g e , M a s s . : H a r v a r d U n iv e r s ity P r e s s , 1965. D im ock, M a r s h a l l E . A d m in is tr a tiv e V ita lity . & Row, 1959. Downs, Anthony. In sid e B u r e a u c r a c y . C o m pan y, 1967. B oston: New Y ork: H a r p e r L ittle , B row n and D r a p e r , H a l. B e rk e le y : The New Student R e v o lt. G ro v e P r e s s , I n c . , 1965. E tz io n i, A m ita i. M o d e rn O r g a n i z a t i o n s . P r e n t i c e - H a l l , In c. , 1964. E u ric h , A lv in C. , ed. C a m p u s 1980: A m e r ic a n H ig h e r E d u c a tio n . 1968. New Y ork : E nglew ood C liffs, N . J . : T he Shape of th e F u tu r e in New Y ork: D e la c o r te P r e s s , E v a n s, R ic h a r d I. R e s is t a n c e to In n o vation in H ig h e r E d u c a tio n . San F r a n c is c o : J o s s e y - B a s s , I n c . , 1968. F e s t i n g e r , L eon, and K a tz , D an ie l, e d s . R e s e a r c h M eth o ds in th e B e h a v io r a l S c i e n c e s . New Y o rk : H olt, R in e h a r t and W in sto n , 1953. 194 F r e e d m a n , M e rv in A. The C o lleg e E x p e r i e n c e . J o s s e y - B a s s , I n c . , 1967. San F r a n c is c o : G a r d n e r , Jo h n W. S e lf-R e n e w a l: T he In d iv id u a l an d th e In n o v ativ e S o c ie ty . New Y ork: H a r p e r & Row, 1964. G e llh o rn , W a lte r . O m b u d sm e n and O th e r s : C i t i z e n s 1 P r o t e c t o r s in N ine C o u n t r i e s . C a m b r id g e , M a s s . : H a r v a r d U n iv e r ­ s it y P r e s s , 1966. _________ . W hen A m e r ic a n s C o m p la in : G o v e r n m e n ta l G rie v a n c e P r o c e d u r e s . C a m b r id g e , M a s s . : H a r v a r d U n iv e r s ity P r e s s , 1966. Good, C a r t e r V. E s s e n t i a l s o f E d u c a tio n a l R e s e a r c h . A p p le t o n - C e n tu r y - C r o f ts , 1966. New Y ork: G o ro v itz , S am u e l, ed. F r e e d o m and O r d e r in th e U n i v e r s i t y . C lev elan d : T h e P r e s s of W e s t e r n R e s e r v e U n iv e r s ity , 1967. G r o s s , N eil; M ason , W a rd S. ; and M c E a c h e rn , A le x a n d e r W. . E x p lo r a tio n s in Role A n a l y s i s . New Y o rk : Jo h n W iley an d Sons, I n c . , 1958. H ays, W illia m L. S ta ti s tic s f o r P s y c h o l o g i s t s . R in e h a r t and W inston, 1963. New Y ork: H olt, Kahn, R o b e r t L#. ; W olfe, D onald M. ; Q uinn , R o b e rt P . ; Snoek, J . D. and R o s e n th a l, R o b e rt A. O r g a n iz a tio n a l S t r e s s : S tu d ies in R o le C o n flic t and A m b ig u ity . New Y ork: Jo h n W iley and Sons, I n c . , 1964. K atz, J o s e p h , e t a l . No T im e f o r Youth: G ro w th and C o n s tr a in t in C o lle g e S tu d en ts. San F r a n c i s c o : J o s s e y - B a s s , I n c . , 1968. K e r r , C l a r k . The UBes of the U n i v e r s i t y . Row, 1966. New York: H a r p e r & L indzey, G a r d n e r , ed . H andbook of S o c ia l P s y c h o lo g y . Vol. I. R ead in g , M a s s . : A d d is o n - W e s le y P u b lish in g C o m pany , I n c . , 1954. 195 L in e b e r r y , W illia m P . , ed. C o lle g e s a t th e C r o s s r o a d s . Y o rk : H. W. W ilso n , 1966. New L lo y d - J o n e s , E s t h e r , and E s t r i n , H e r m a n A . , e d s . T he A m e r ic a n S tudent an d H is C o lle g e . B oston: H oughton M ifflin C o m ­ pany, 1967. M a rc h , J a m e s G . , ed. H andbook of O r g a n i z a t i o n s . M cN ally and C o m p any , 1965. C hicago: Rand M a rtin , R o s c o e C . , ed. P u b lic A d m in is tr a tio n and D e m o c r a c y . S y ra c u s e , N . Y . : S y r a c u s e U n iv e r s it y P r e s s , 1965. M ayhew , L e w is B . , ed. H ig h e r E d u c a tio n in th e R e v o lu tio n a ry D e c a d e s . B e r k e le y , C a l i f . : M c C u tc h an P u b lis h in g C o rp . , 1967. M e rto n , R o b e r t K. S o cial T h e o r y and S o c ia l S t r u c t u r e . F r e e P r e s s , 1957. New Y ork: M ic h ig an S tate U n iv e rs ity : C a talo g of C o u r s e s and A c a d e m ic P r o ­ g r a m s . E a s t L a n sin g : M ic h ig a n S tate U n iv e r s it y P u b l i c a ­ t i o n , LXIII, D e c e m b e r , 1968. M ile s, M. B . , ed. In n o v atio n in E d u c a tio n . New Y ork: C o lle g e , C o lu m b ia U n iv e r s ity , 1964. T each ers M ille r , M ic h a e l V. , and G ilm o r e , S usan, e d s . R e v o lu tio n at B e r k e l e y . New Y o rk : D ia l P r e s s , 1965. M illett, Jo h n D. T he A c a d e m ic C o m m u n ity . H ill Book C o m pan y, I n c . , 1962. New Y ork: M c G ra w - M o ris o n , R o b e r t S . , ed. T he C o n t e m p o r a r y U n iv e r s ity : U .S .A . B o sto n: B eaco n P r e s s , 1967. P e rk iris , J a m e s A. T he U n iv e r s it y in T r a n s i t i o n . P r i n c e t o n U n iv e r s it y P r e s s , 1965. P r in c e to n , N . J . P e r v in , L a w r e n c e A. ; R e ik , L o u is E . ; and D a lr y m p le , W illa rd , e d s . The C o lle g e D ro p o u t and th e U tiliz a tio n of T a l e n t . P r in c e to n , N . J . : P r in c e to n U n iv e r s it y P r e s s , 1966. 196 P r e s t h u s , R o b e r t. T h e O r g a n iz a tio n a l S o c ie ty . B o o ks, 1962. New Y o rk: V intage R e s e a r c h in H ig h e r E d u c a tio n : G uide to I n s titu tio n a l D e c i s i o n s . New Y ork: C o lleg e E n tr a n c e E x a m in a tio n B o a rd , 1965. R obson, W illia m A. The G o v e r n o r s and th e G o v e r n e d . B aton Rouge: L o u is ia n a S tate U n iv e r s ity P r e s s , 1964. R o u rk e , F r a n c i s E . , and B ro o k s , G lenn E. T he M a n a g e r ia l R e v o lu tio n in H ig h e r E d u c a tio n . B a ltim o r e : J o h n s H o pkins P r e s s , 1966. Row at, D onald C . , ed . The O m b u d sm a n : Citizen* s D e fe n d e r. London: G e o r g e A lle n & Unwin, L t d . , 1965. Rudolph, F r e d e r i c k . The A m e r ic a n C o lle g e and U n iv e rs ity : A H i s t o r y . New Y ork: V in tag e B o ok s, 1962. R um l, B e a r d s le y . M em o to a C o lle g e T r u s t e e . H ill Book C o m p an y , Inc. , 1959. S anford, N ev itt, ed . The A m e r ic a n C o lle g e . arid Sons, I n c . , 1966. S aw er, G eo ffre y . O m b u d s m e n . M e lb o u rn e : P r e s s , 1964. New Y ork: M c G ra w - New Y ork : Jo h n W iley M e lb o u rn e U n iv e r s ity Sm ith, G. K e r r y , ed . S t r e s s and C a m p u s R e s p o n s e . W ash ing to n, D. C . : A m e r ic a n A s s o c ia ti o n f o r H ig h e r E d u c a tio n , 1968. Stoke, H a r o ld W. T h e A m e r ic a n C o lle g e P r e s i d e n t . H a r p e r & Row , 1959. New Y ork: S troup, H e r b e r t . B u r e a u c r a c y in H ig h e r E d u c a tio n . F r e e P r e s s , 1966. New Y ork: The Student in H ig h e r E d u c a tio n . F o u n d atio n , 1968. New H aven, C o n n .: T he H azen The Study of A c a d e m ic A d m in is tr a tio n ( 8 a r t i c l e s ) . B o u ld e r, C o l o . : W e s te r n I n t e r s t a t e C o m m is s io n f o r H ig h e r E d u c a tio n , 1963. 197 U tley, T. E . O c c a s io n fo r O m b u d s m a n . Jo h n so n , 1961. London; Von H offm an, N ic h o la s . T he M u l t i v e r s i t y . h a r t and W in sto n , 1966. C h risto p h er New Y o rk : H olt, R in e ­ W hyatt, S ir John, e d . The C itiz e n and th e A d m in is tra tio n ; T h e R e d r e s s o f G r i e v a n c e s . London: J u s t i c e - - B r i t i s h S ectio n of th e I n te r n a ti o n a l C o m m is s io n of J u r i s t s , 1961. W illia m s, Robin M. , J r . Knopf, 1967. A m e r i c a n S o c ie ty . New Y ork : A lf r e d A. W illia m so n , E. G. Student P e r s o n n e l S e r v ic e s in C o lle g e s and U n i v e r s i t i e s . New Y o rk : M c G ra w -H ill Book C om pany, I n c . , 1961. W ise, W. Max, T h e y C om e f o r the B e s t of R e a s o n s . A m e r ic a n C o un cil on E d u c a tio n , 1958. W ashington: W oodring, P a u l. T h e H ig h e r L e a rn in g in A m e r ic a : A R e a s s e s s ­ m e n t . New York: M c G r a w - H ill Book C o m pany , Inc. , 1968. B u lle tin s a n d A n n o u n ce m en ts A n d e rso n , S tanley V. " O m b u d sm a n P r o p o s a l s : S tim u lu s to In q u iry . " P u b lic A f f a i r s R e p o r t . B u lletin of the I n s titu te of G o v e r n ­ m e n ta l S tu d ie s . U n iv e r s ity of C a lif o rn ia a t B e r k e le y , VII, D e c e m b e r , 1966. _________ . "T he O m b u d sm a n : P u b lic D e f e n d e r A g a in s t M a la d m i n is ­ tr a tio n , 11 P u b lic A f f a i r s R e p o rt. B u lletin of the I n s titu t e of G o v e r n m e n ta l S tu d ie s. U n iv e r s ity of C a lif o rn ia a t B e rk e le y , VI, A p r il, 1965. A nnouncem ent of P o s itio n : O m b u d s m a n . F r e s n o , C a l i f . : F r e s n o State C o lle g e , D e c e m b e r 26, 1968. "A nnouncem ent I - O m b u d s m a n . 11 Info f ro m the O ffice of th e P r e s i ­ dent. E a s t e r n M o ntana C o lleg e, O c to b e r 7, 1966, pp. 2 -3 . 198 " D ea n f o r F a c u lty C o u n s e l (O m b u d sm an ). " S p ecial B u lle tin . O ffice of th e P r e s i d e n t , K e n t S tate U n iv e r s it y , J a n u a r y 1969. 8, H a v e l, J a m e s T. " T h e O m b u d sm a n . " Y o u r G o v e r n m e n t. B u lle tin of th e G o v e r n m e n ta l R e s e a r c h C e n te r . U n iv e r s ity of K a n s a s , L a w r e n c e , XXIII, J a n u a r y 15, 1968, 1-3. P a z e n , D ick. "O m b u d sm a n . " I n f o r m a tio n a l B u lle tin 6 7 - 6 . M a d i­ so n , W i s . : L e g is la tiv e R e f e r e n c e B u re a u , S tate of W is c o n ­ s in , A p r il, 1967. J o u r n a l and M a g a z in e A r t i c l e s A b ra h a m , H e n r y J . "A P e o p l e 1 s W atch do g A g a in s t th e A buse of P o w e r . " P u b lic A d m in is tr a tio n R eview , X X (S u m m e r, I960), 152-57. A n d e rm a n , S teven D. "T h e Sw edish J u s titie o m b u d s m a n . " A m e r i can J o u r n a l of C o m p a r a tiv e Law, XI (S p rin g , 1962), 2 2 5 38. < A n d e rso n , S tan le y V. " C o n n e c tic u t O m b u d s m a n ? " m e n t , LXX ( M a r c h - A p r il , 1965), 1 -8 . C a s e and C o m ­ _________ . "T h e S can d in av ia n O m b u d sm a n . " A m e r ic a n S can d in av ian R e v ie w , LII ( D e c e m b e r, 1964), 4 0 3 -9 . _________ ; B uchanan, Scott; H offm an, H allo ck ; and H u tc h in s, R o b e r t M. "A n O m b u d sm a n f o r th e U. S. ? " C e n te r D ia r y ; 14, C e n te r f o r the Study of D e m o c r a t i c I n s titu tio n s , S an ta B a r b a r a , C a l i f . , ( S e p te m b e r - O c to b e r , 1966), pp. 1 9 -2 5 . A n d re n , N ils . " T h e Sw edish O ffice of 'O m b u d s m a n . ' " M u n ic ip a l R ev iew , XXXIII (1962), 82 0 -2 1 . 199 A r m a c o s t, P e t e r H. " F a c u lty - S tu d e n t P e r s o n n e l R e la tio n s h ip s : A H o u se D iv id e d , " N A S P A - - J o u r n a l o f the A s s o c ia ti o n of D e a n s and A d m i n i s t r a t o r s o f Student A f f a i r s , II ( J a n u a ry , 1965), 3 -9 . A s c h e r , C h a r l e s S, " T h e G r ie v a n c e M an o r O m b u d s m a n ia . " P u b lic A d m in is tr a tio n R e v ie w , XXVII (Jun e, 1967), 174-78. B e x e liu s , A lfre d . " T h e O m b u d s m a n 1 s O ffice and O th e r M e a n s f o r P r o t e c t i n g C i t i z e n s 1 R ig h ts in S w e d e n ." I n te r n a tio n a l S o c ia l S c ie n c e J o u r n a l , XVIII (No. 2), 2 4 7 -5 1 . "T h e S w edish I n s titu tio n of the J u s t i t i e o m b u d s m a n . " I n t e r n a t i o n a l R eview of A d m in is tr a tiv e S c ie n c e s , XXVII (1961), 2 4 3 -5 6 . _________ , and P o w le s , S ir Guy. " T h e O m b u d sm a n : C h am p io n of th e C itiz e n , " R e c o r d of th e A s s o c ia tio n o f th e B a r of the C ity of New Y o rk , XXI (Jun e, 1966), 385-411. B la u ste in , A lb e r t P . " C r e a tin g the U n iv e r s it y O m b u d sm a n . " J o u r n a l of L e g a l E d u c a tio n , XXI ( D e c e m b e r , 1968), 191. B lo u ste in , E d w a rd J . " T h e New S tudent and H is R o le in A m e r ic a n C o l l e g e s . " L ib e r a l E d u c a tio n , LIV (O c to b e r, 1968), 34564. Bolang, C a r l O laf. "B ut th e O m b u d sm a n T hought O th e r w is e . " A m e r ic a n - S w e d is h M on th ly , LVII (July, 1963), 2 2 -2 4 . B rann , J a m e s W. " T h e C a m p u s O m b u d sm a n : C o lleg e S tu d e n ts 1 D e f e n d e r . " C h r o n ic le of H ig h e r E d u c a tio n , III (N o v e m b e r 11, 1968), 1, 4. " B rita in : Tough C h e e s e . " N e w sw e e k , LXXI ( J a n u a r y 8 , 1968), 32. B u c c ie ri, C la u d ia H . "O m b u d sm a n : New T r o u b l e s h o o te r on C a m p u s. " C o lleg e a n d U n iv e r s it y B u s i n e s s , XLIV (M a rc h , 1968), 5255. " B u re a u c ra ts 1 B u g b e a r." N e w sw e e k , LXVI (O c to b e r 25, 1965), 54. "T he C a m p u s O m b u d sm a n . " N a tio n , CCVII ( D e c e m b e r 9, 1968), 611 -12 . 200 C a p o z z o la , Jo h n M. "A n A m e r ic a n O m b u d sm a n : P r o b l e m s and P r o s p e c t s . " W e s t e r n P o l i t i c a l Q u a r t e r l y , XXI (June, 1968), 2 8 9 -3 0 1 . C a r t e r , L. J . "S tudent U n r e s t: A d m i n i s t r a t o r s Seek W ays to s R e s t o r e P e a c e . " S c ie n c e , CLX (Ju n e 14, 1968), 1205-8. C h r is t e n s e n , B ent. " T h e D a n is h O m b u d sm a n . " U n iv e r s ity of P e n n ­ sy lv a n ia Law R e v ie w , CIX (Ju n e, 1961), 1100-26. "A C iv iliz e d T h in g ." T he New Y o r k e r , XL, ( F e b r u a r y 13, 1965), 136+. C o o p e r, F r a n k E . " T h e N eed fo r a n O m b u d s m a n in S tate G o v e r n ­ m e n t. " P r o s p e c t u s , I (A p ril, 1968), 2 7 -4 4 . D av is, K en neth C. " O m b u d sm e n in A m e r ic a : O f f ic e r s to C r iti c iz e A d m in is tr a tiv e A ction . " U n iv e r s ity of P e n n s y lv a n ia Law R e v ie w , CIX (Ju ne, 1961), 1057-76. De S m ith, S. A. "A n g lo -S ax o n O m b u d s m a n ? " P o l i t i c a l Q u a r t e r l y (London), XXXIII ( J a n u a r y - M a r c h , 1962), 9 -1 9 . Eddy, Jo h n P a u l. " C a m p u s O m b u d sm a n in A m e r ic a n H ig h e r E d u c a ­ tio n . " K appa D e lta P i R e c o r d , D e c e m b e r , 1968, pp. 33 -35 . E gan, J a m e s . " O m b u d s m a n ." H o lid a y , X L (N o v e m b er, 1966), 28+. E l l e r , J . N. "S w ed es H ave It, An O m b u d sm a n . " A m e r i c a , CXIV (M a rc h 19, 1966), 377. F a r le y , M a r t a P i s e t s k a , and F a r l e y , A n d re w N. "An A m e r ic a n O m b u d sm a n : Due P r o c e s s in th e A d m in is tr a tiv e S t a t e . " A d m in is tr a tiv e Law R e v iew , XVI (S u m m e r, 1964), 2 1 2-2 1. " F i r s t U n iv e r s it y O m b u d s m a n . " P hi D e lta K ap p an, XLIX (N o v e m ­ b e r , 1967), 142. F la c k , M ic h a e l J . "In n o v atio n and the U n iv e r s it y in C r i s i s : T h r e e P r o p o s a l s . " E d u c a tio n a l R e c o r d , X LIX (S u m m e r, 1968), 3 4 7-4 9. F ra m p to n , G e o ffre y . " T h e O m b u d sm a n . " New S ta te s m a n , LXVI (O c to b e r 25, 1963), 5 60 -6 1 . 201 F r ie d m a n n , K a r l A. " C o m m o n s, C o m p la in ts and th e O m b u d sm a n . " P a r l i a m e n t a r y A f f a i r s (London), XXI (W in te r, 1907-68), 3 8 -4 7 . G e llh o rn , W a lte r . " T h e O m budsm an* s R e le v a n c e to A m e r ic a n M u n ic ip a l A f f a i r s . " A m e r i c a n B a r A s s o c ia tio n J o u r n a l , LIV ( F e b r u a r y , 1968), 134 -4 0 . " T h e Sw edish J u s t itie o m b u d s m a n . " Y ale Law J o u r n a l, LXXV (N o v e m b er, 1965), 2 - 5 8 . G la z e r , N ath an . 11* S tudent P o w e r ' in B e r k e l e y . " I n t e r e s t , XIII ( F a ll, 1968), 3 -2 1 . "G rie v a n c e M an v. B u r e a u c r a c y . " The P u b lic T im e , LXXX (A ugust 24, 1962), 20. G r o s s m a n , H o w ard J . "Do School D i s t r i c t s Need an O m b u d s m a n ." A m e r ic a n School B o a rd J o u r n a l , CLV ( D e c e m b e r , 1967), 6 -7 . H a m ilto n , R an d y H. " C a n You F ig h t C ity H a ll and W in ? " M a n a g e m e n t, X LIX ( O c to b e r, 1967), 2 6 8 -7 5 . " O m b u d s m a n o r W h a t? " (M a rc h , 1968), 132-37+. P u b lic N atio n al C iv ic R e v ie w , LVII "O m b u d sm a n : W hat H e Can and C annot Do. " A m e r ic a n C i ty , LXXXIII (May, 1968), 40, 44. "H andling th e People* s G r i e v a n c e s . " C h r i s t i a n C e n tu r y , LXXXII (O c to b e r 27, 1965), 1310-11. H e n d e rs o n , A lgo D. " T h e D e s i r e d In flu e n ce , " J o u r n a l of H ig h e r E d u c a tio n , XXXVIII (June, 1967), 30 4 -1 1 . Hogan, C h a r l e s . " P r o p o s e r s of R e fo r m . " S a tu rd a y R e v ie w , L ( J a n u a r y 7, 1967), 3 7 -3 8 , H u rw itz , S tephan. "D enm ark* s O m b u d sm a n : T he P a r l i a m e n t a r y C o m m i s s i o n e r f o r C iv il and M il ita r y G o v e rn m e n t A d m in ­ i s t r a t i o n . " W is c o n s in L aw R eview , M a r c h , 1961, pp. 169 99. 202 J a g e r s k i o l d , Stig. " T h e Sw edish O m b u d s m a n ." U n iv e r s it y of P e n n s y lv a n ia Law R e v ie w , CIX (Jun e, 1961), 1077-99. K a s s , B enny L. "W e Can, In d eed , F ig h t C ity H all: The O ffice and C o n cep t of O m b u d sm a n . " A m e r ic a n B a r A s s o c ia tio n J o u r n a l , LIII (M a rc h , 1967), 2 3 1 -3 6 . K au ffm an , J o s e p h F . "S tu d en t P e r s o n n e l A d m in is tr a tio n : Some Q u e s tio n s and R e c o m m e n d a tio n s . " E d u c a tio n a l R e c o r d , X LV (S u m m e r , 1964), 2 9 1 -9 8 . K atz, J o s e p h , and S an fo rd , N e v itt. " T h e New Student P o w e r and N eed ed E d u c a tio n a l R e f o r m s . " P h i D e lta K appan, XLVII (A p ril, 1966), 3 97 -40 1 . K ent, G e o r g e . " T h e y F ig h t C ity H a ll- - A n d W in. " R eader* s D i g e s t , LXXXIII (Ju ly , 1963), 29-3 0+ . K ru s z y n s k i, E u g e n e . "An O m b u d s m a n fo r P u b lic E d u c a tio n . " P h i D e lta K a p p a n , L (N o v e m b e r, 1968), 155-58. L efolii, K en. "W hat th e R ig h t O m b u d sm a n W ould Do f o r C a n a d a ." M aclean* s (T o ro n to ), LXXVII (A p ril 18, 1964), 6 . L evine, D a n ie l U. " O rg a n iz in g f o r R e f o r m in B ig -C ity S ch oo ls. " P h i D e lta K ap p a n , XLVIII (M a rc h , 1967), 3 1 1 -1 5 . " L itt le Man* s C h am p io n . " N e w sw e e k , LXVIII ( D e c e m b e r 12, 1966), 28, 33. Long, E d w a rd V. " P u b lic D e f e n d e r. " New Y o rk T im e s Book R e v ie w , LXXI (N o v e m b e r 27, 1966), 54+. McKeown, R o b e r t. "W hy C an ad a N e e d s an O m b u d s m a n ." M a g a z in e , XIV, 2 - 3 , 24. W eekend "MSU A p p o in ts D ean A s F i r s t O m b u d sm a n . " A m e r ic a n School and U n i v e r s i t y , X L (O c to b e r, 1967), 58. M o o re , W ilb e r t E. " F o r e c a s t i n g the F u tu r e : T he U nited S ta te s in 1 9 8 0 ." E d u c a tio n a l R e c o r d , XLV ( F a ll, 1964), 3 4 1-5 4. M o ra n , W illia m E . " T h e Study of U n iv e r s it y O r g a n i z a t i o n s ." J o u r n a l of H ig h e r E d u c a tio n , XXXIX (M a rc h , 1968), 14451. 203 M u e lle r , K a te . “ T h r e e D ile m m a s of th e Student P e r s o n n e l P r o f e s ­ sio n and T h e i r R e s o lu tio n s . " J o u r n a l of th e N atio n al A s s o c ia tio n of W om en D ea n s and C o u n s e lo r s , XXIX (W in te r, 1966), 8 6 -9 0 . M u nd ell, D. W. "O m b u d sm a n fo r C a n a d a ? " VII (Ju n e , 1964), 179-209. C an ad ia n B a r J o u r n a l , M u n d in g e r, D onald C. " T h e U n iv e r s it y O m b u d sm a n . " J o u r n a l of H ig h e r E d u c a tio n , XXXVIII ( D e c e m b e r , 1967), 4 9 3-9 9. N a d e r, R alph. "A n A n s w e r to A d m in is tr a tiv e A b u s e . " H a r v a r d Law R e c o r d , D e c e m b e r 20, 1962, pp. 13, 15. * N elso n , B r y c e . "S tud ent P o w e r: D e m a n d s f o r C hange a t Stony B r o o k 's ' T a l k - I n . ' " S cie n c e , CLXII (N o v e m b e r 1 , 1968), 5 4 5-4 8. N o r t o n - T a y l o r , D uncan. " M e g a v e r s i t y 1 s S tru g g le w ith I ts e lf. " F o r t u n e , LXXV (May, 1967), 161-65. Nudd, T. R o g e r. " T h e D ean Is a M a r g in a l M a n ." J o u r n a l of E d u ­ c a tio n a l S o cio lo g y , XXXV ( D e c e m b e r , 1961), 145-51. " T h e O m b u d sm a n : A S y m p o siu m . " A d m in is tr a tiv e Law R e v iew , XIX (N o v e m b e r, 1966), 6 -10 6. " O m b u d sm a n , A n y o n e ? " 129. N atio n a l R e v ie w , XIII (A ugust 28, 1962), "O m b u d sm a n a t B e rk e le y , " P hi D e lta K a p p a n , L ( J a n u a ry , 1969), 307. "O m b u d sm a n a t W o r k . " E c o n o m is t (London), CCIII (Ju n e 23, 1962), 1222. " O m b u d s m a n - -O n The M o v e ." 1967), 267. P u b lic M a n a g e m e n t, X LIX (O c to b e r, " O m b u d s m a n - - T h e P e o p l e 's C h a m p io n ." A m e r ic a n B a r A s s o c i a ­ tio n J o u r n a l , LIII ( J a n u a ry , 1967), 4 8 -4 9 . " O m b u d sm en in A m e r i c a . " U n iv e r s ity of P e n n s y lv a n ia Law R e v ie w , CIX (Ju n e, 1961), 1057. 204 O 'N e ill, D avid P . "T h e New Z e a la n d O m b u d sm a n . " A m e r i c a , CXII ( J a n u a r y 30, 1965), 166-68. P a r s o n s , T a lc o tt. " T h e A c a d e m ic S y stem : A S o c i o l o g i s t 's V iew . T he P u b lic I n t e r e s t , XIII ( F a ll, 1968), 173-97. 11 P e e l, R oy V . , ed . " T h e O m b u d sm a n o r Citizen* s D e fe n d e r: A M o d e rn In s titu tio n " (14 a r t i c l e s ) . T he A n n a ls of th e A m e r i ­ can A c a d e m y of P o l i t i c a l a n d Social S c ie n c e , CCCLXXVII (M ay, 1968), i- 1 3 8 . "T he P e o p l e 's W atchdog. " T im e , LXXXVIII ( D e c e m b e r 2, 1966), 58+. P o llac k , J a c k H. " O - M - B - U - D - S - M - A - N I T he New C o lleg e H e r o . " P a r a d e , M a rc h 17, 1968, pp. 16-18. Potthoff, E . H . "An 1 O m b u d sm a n , • U .S . S ty le ." A m e r i c a n C ity , LXXXIII (Ju ly , 1968), 152, 154-55. P ow les, S ir G uy. "A C i t i z e n 's R ig h ts A g a in s t the M o d e rn State, and I t s R e s p o n s ib ilitie s to H im . " New Z e a la n d J o u r n a l o f P u b lic A d m in is tr a tio n , XXVI (M a rc h , 1964), 1-3 3 , _________ . " A s p e c ts of th e S e a r c h f o r A d m in is tr a tiv e J u s t i c e with P a r t i c u l a r R e f e r e n c e to th e New Z e a la n d O m b u d sm a n , " C a n ad ia n P u b lic A d m i n i s t r a t i o n , IX (June, 1966), 133-57. Quade, Q u e n tin L . , and B e n n e tt, T h o m a s J . "S h ield f o r th e C i t i z e n . " M o d e rn A ge, VIII ( F a ll, 1964), 3 7 7 -8 8 . R eu ss, H e n r y S. "An A m e r ic a n O m b u d s m a n ? " P u b lic M a n a g e m e n t, X LIX (O c to b er, 1967), 2 6 5 -6 7 . _________ . "A n ' O m b u d s m a n ' f o r A m e r i c a . 11 New Y o rk T im e s M a g a z in e , S e p te m b e r 13, 1964, pp. 30+. _________. "A T r o u b le - S h o o te r f o r C o n g r e s s . " P r o g r e s s i v e , XXX ( F e b r u a r y , 1966), 2 3 -2 5 . "W e N eed an A m e r ic a n O m b u d s m a n ." LXXXII (M a rc h 3, 1965), 2 6 9 -7 1 . C h r i s t i a n C e n tu r y , 205 _________ , and A n d e r s o n , S tanley V. " T h e O m b u d sm a n : T rib u n e of th e P e o p le . " T he A n n a ls of th e A m e r ic a n A c a d e m y of P o l i t i c a l and S o c ia l S cie n c e , CCCLXIII ( J a n u a ry , 1966), 4 4 51. R o g e r s , E v e r e t t M. " T h e C o m m u n ic a tio n of In n o v atio n s in a C o m ­ p lex I n s titu tio n . " E d u c a tio n a l R e c o r d , X LIX (W in te r, 1968), 67-77. R o s e n th a l, A lb e r t H. " T h e O m b u d s m a n -- S w e d is h 'G r i e v a n c e M an. P u b lic A d m in is tr a tio n R e v ie w , XXIV ( D e c e m b e r , 1964), 2 2 6 -3 0 . 1" Row at, D onald C. "A n O m b u d sm a n S c h e m e fo r C a n a d a . " C a n ad ia n J o u r n a l of E c o n o m ic s and P o l i t i c a l S c ie n c e , XXVIII (Nov e m b e r , 1962), 5 4 3-5 6. " O m b u d s m e n fo r N o rth A m e r i c a . " P u b lic A d m i n i s t r a tio n R e v ie w . XXIV ( D e c e m b e r , 1964), 2 3 0 -3 3 . _________ . " R e c e n t D e v e lo p m e n ts in O m b u d sm a n sh ip . " C a n ad ia n P u b lic A d m i n i s t r a t i o n , X (M a rc h , 1967), 3 5 -4 6 . _________ . "W e N eed a New D e fe n se A g a in s t S o -C a lle d J u s t i c e . " M a c l e a n 's (T o ro n to ), LXXIV ( J a n u a r y 7, 1961), 10, 8 2 -8 3 . S a n d e rs , M. K. " S w e d e n 1 s R e m e d y fo r P o lic e B r u ta lity . " H a r p e r ' s . CCXXIX (N o v e m b er, 1964), 132+. S a n d le r, A k e. " T h e O m b u d sm a n : W hat I s H e ? I s He N e e d e d ? Who W ill B e n e f it? " V ita l I s s u e s , XVII, F e b r u a r y , 1968, _________ ; K irk , H e n r y P . ; and H a llb e r g , E d m o n d C. "A n O m b u d s ­ m a n f o r th e U n iv e r s ity . " J o u r n a l of C o lle g e S tud ent P e r ­ s o n n e l, IX (M a rc h , 1968), 11 2-1 5. " S a v a n n a h 's 'O m b u d s m a n . '" 70. A m e r ic a n C ity , LXXXII (Ju n e , 1968), S c h lo s s b e r g , N ancy K. "An O m b u d sm a n f o r S tu d en ts. " N A SPA- J o u r n a l of th e A s s o c ia tio n of D e a n s and A d m i n i s t r a t o r s o f S tudent A f f a ir s . V (Ju ly , 1967), 31 -33 . 206 S h ep p ard , C la u d e - A rm a n d . "A n O m b u d sm a n f o r C an ada. " M c G ill L aw J o u r n a l , X (No. 4, 1964), 29 1 -3 4 0 . S ilv e r, I s id o r e . " T h e C o r p o r a te O m b u d sm a n . " H a r v a r d B u s in e s s R e v ie w , X LV (M a y -Ju n e , 1967), 7 7 -8 7 , S in g le ta ry , O tis A. , and Y eg g e , R o b e r t B . , e d s . " L e g a l A s p e c t s of S tu d e n t- I n s titu tio n a l R e la tio n s h ip s " (7 a r t i c l e s , 12 c o m m e n ts ). D e n v e r L aw J o u r n a l , XLV (S p ecial, 1968), 4 97 -6 7 8 . Sm ith, A u stin . "W h at T h is C o u n try N e e d s I s A n O m b u d sm a n . " A s s o c ia ti o n M a n a g e m e n t, XV (1963), 4 0 -4 2 . S p arzo , F r a n k J . " F a c in g th e I s s u e s of Student U n r e s t. " S chool & S o c ie ty , XCVI (O c to b e r 26, 1968), 3 59 -6 1 . "A State S tatu te to C r e a te th e O ffice of O m b u d sm a n . " H a r v a r d J o u r n a l on L e g is la t io n , II (Ju n e, 1965), 2 13 -3 8 . S to rin g, Jam eB A. "T h e N o rw e g ian O m b u d s m a n f o r C iv il A f f a ir s : T h e F i r s t T h r e e Y e a r s , 1 9 6 3 - 6 6 ." W e s te r n P o l i t i c a l Q u a r t e r l y , XXI (J u n e , 1968), 30 2-2 4. T h o r s o n ,- K im . "W hat A bout a n O m b u d s m a n ? " S a sk a tc h e w a n B a r R e v ie w , XXVIH ( D e c e m b e r , 1963), 1 6 9 -79 . W ainw rig ht, Loudon. " F o r th e O m b u d sm a n , a H e a r t y Skoal. " L if e , LXI (D e c e m b e r 16, 1966), 26. W eb er, P a u l J . "A F r ie n d in C ity H a ll. " A m e r i c a , CXIX (O c to ­ b e r 19, 1968), 3 5 2 -5 4 , W e r n e r , R ay O. " E d u c a tio n a l T y ra n n y and the O m b u d sm a n . " School & S o c ie ty , XCV (O c to b e r 28, 1967), 3 91 -9 2 . W hite, J . B enton. " H u m a n iz in g th e U n i v e r s i t i e s . " H u m a n ity , V ( F e b r u a r y , 1969), 6 -7 . "Why T h o se S tu d en ts A r e P r o t e s t i n g . " 2 4 -2 5 . T i m e , XCI (May 3, 1968), N e w s p a p e r an d N e w s le tte r A r t i c l e s "A dvice and C o n s e n t ." E d i t o r i a l , New Y o rk T i m e s , D e c e m b e r 5, 1966, p. 44. 207 " A u d ito r G e n e r a l N a m e d a s B r i t i s h O m b u d s m a n . 11 New Y ork T i m e s , A u g u st 5, 1966, p. 9. B e n n e tt, C h a r l e s G. " U .S . O f f e r s To Aid O m b u d sm a n P l a n . " New Y o rk T i m e s , J u n e 7, 1967, p . 40, B r i l l , E d w a rd . "O m budsm an* s P o w e r H e lp s S tu d en ts. " M ic h ig a n S tate N e w s , O c to b e r 30, 1968, p. 1. B ylin, J a m e s E . " T h e O m b u d sm a n . " W a ll S tr e e t J o u r n a l , N o v e m ­ b e r 22, 1966, p. 18. " C i t i z e n 's P r o t e c t o r . " E d i to r ia l, New Y o rk T i m e s , J a n u a r y 21, 1967, p. 30. C legg, H elen . " C o m p la in ts . " L a n s in g ( M i c h .) S tate J o u r n a l , M a rc h 13, 1969, p. 3, C r a ib , R alph. " O m b u d sm a n A lla y s C a m p u s R a c ia l S trife . " San F r a n c i s c o C h r o n ic le , N o v e m b e r 20, 1967, p. 13. F o w le, F a r n s w o r t h . "T w o O m b u d s m e n R e p o r t on R o l e s - - C i v i c C o n tro l D e s c r i b e d by Swede and New Z e a la n d e r . " New Y o rk T i m e s , F e b r u a r y 20, 1966, Q u oted in: U .S . C o n ­ g r e s s . S en ate. C o m m itte e on th e J u d i c i a r y . O m b u d s m a n . H e a r in g b e f o r e the S u b c o m m itte e on A d m in is tr a tiv e P r a c ­ tic e and P r o c e d u r e of th e C o m m itte e on th e J u d i c i a r y , S en ate, on S. 190. 89th Cong. , 2nd s e s s . , 1966, p. 380. F ox, Sylvan. " C o lu m b ia N a m e s a n O ffic ia l T o B e O m b u d sm a n f o r th e S tu d e n ts. " New Y o rk T i m e s , M a y 29, 1968, p. 24. G e ttn e r , V ic t o r S. " C u r b on A b u s e s of P u b lic P o w e r . " L e t t e r to e d i t o r . New Y o rk T i m e s , O c to b e r 17, 1965, IV, p. 17. G ra n t, W illia m . " C o lle g e O m b u d s m a n - - V a lu a b le New O ffic ia l. " D e tr o it F r e e P r e s s , D e c e m b e r 8 , 1968, p. CIO. t "H aw aii A p p ro v e s B ill C r e a tin g O m b u d s m a n . " New Y o rk T i m e s , M ay 1, 1967, p. 54. H ofm ann, P a u l. "S w ed ish O m b u d s m a n F in d s M o st C a s e s B a s e l e s s . " New Y o rk T im e s , J u n e 20, 1967, p. 41. 208 _________ . "W ide U s e of O m b u d s m e n in U. S. Is U rg e d by A m e r ic a n A s s e m b l y . " New Y o rk T i m e s , O c to b e r 30, 1967, p. 25. Ite m in C JC A News c o n c e rn in g o m b u d s m a n a t W e st V a lle y ( C a l i f . ) C o lle g e ( C a lifo rn ia J u n i o r C o lleg e A s s o c ia tio n n e w s l e tte r ) , J a n u a r y , 1969. K ifn e r, Jo h n . " R e f o r m s P la n n e d a t C ity C o lle g e . " New Y o rk ¥ i m e s , O c to b e r 9, 1968, p. 47. King, Seth S. " O m b u d s m a n B ill F ile d by O ' C o n n o r. " New Y o rk T i m e s , M ay 1 2 , 1967, p. 36. K n o w les, C lay to n. "O m b u d sm a n P l a n S ub m itted b y B a r. " New Y o rk T i m e s , M ay 9, 1967, p. 30. N a d e r, R a lp h . "A n O m b u d sm a n f o r the U .S . ? " M o n it o r , A p r i l 1, 1962, p. 20. C h r i s t i a n S cie n ce "A New H igh B u dg et Is V oted in H aw aii. " New Y o rk T i m e s , A p r i l 1, 1968, p. 7. N ie t e r t, R e b e c c a . " F r e s h m e n F ound B r i g h t e r T h an P r e d e c e s s o r s . " M ic h ig a n S tate N e w s , J a n u a r y 16, 1969, p. 14. "O m b u d sm a n B e g in s New J o b . " U n iv e r s ity of N ev a d a S a g e b r u s h , M a r c h 11, 1969, p. 3. " O m b u d sm a n fo r th e U. S. " E d i t o r i a l , W a sh in g to n P o s t , A u g u st 20, 1962, p. A16. "O m b u d sm a n Is M aking a B ig H it in New Z e a la n d . " New Y ork T i m e s , A u g u st 25, 1968, p. 6 . "O m b u d sm a n I s U rg e d by N. Y .U . A d v is o r y B o a rd , " New Y ork T i m e s , N o v e m b e r 19, 1967, p. 116. "O m b u d sm a n P la n U rg e d in N e w a rk . " New Y ork T i m e s , A p r il 28, 1968, p. 44. "O m b u d sm a n U rg e d T o P r o t e c t P o o r . " New Y o rk T i m e s , O c to b e r 27, 1967, p. 56. 209 P a r n e s s , B a r b a r a . "O m budflm en P e r f o r m No M i r a c l e s . " M ich ig an S tate N e w s , J a n u a r y 6 , 1969, p. 17. " P r o f e s s o r H e r b e r t I. L ondon E le c te d New O m b u d s m a n ." N e w s ­ l e t t e r , G ra d u a te S tu d e n ts O r g a n iz a tio n , School o f E d u c a tio n , New Y o rk U n iv e r s ity , J a n u a r y , 1969, p. 1. " P ro file : S ir E d m u n d C o m p to n , T h e New O m b u d sm a n . " T im e s (London), A p r i l 2, 1967, p. 11. Sunday " P u b lic P r o t e c t o r . " E d ito r ia l, New Y o rk T i m e s , O c to b e r 14, 1965, p. 46. "A R e a l O m b u d sm a n . " E d i t o r i a l , New Y o rk T i m e s , J u n e 22, 1967, p. 38. "R ep. R e u s s B e g in s O m b u d sm a n T e s t . " a r y 5, 1967, p. 67. " R ig h ts C a m p a ig n Begun in San J o s e . " 1967, p. 33. New Y o rk T i m e s , F e b r u ­ New Y o rk T i m e s , O c to b e r 3, R o s e n th a l, B e n ja m in S. " O m b u d s m a n a s C itiz e n - G o v e r n m e n t L ink. " L e t t e r to e d ito r , New Y o rk T i m e s , F e b r u a r y 2, 1967, p. 34. S alpu kas, A g is. " 'O m b u d s m a n ' on L. I. F in d s D efea t H a s G iven H im M o r e P o w e r . " New Y o rk T i m e s , D e c e m b e r 3, 1967, p. 59. S ikes, J a m e s R. " L . I. O m b u d sm a n Is a B u s y A d v is e r . " New Y ork T i m e s , N o v e m b e r 20, 1966, p. 53. S ilv e r, Roy R. " N ic k e r s o n N a m e s a P u b lic P r o t e c t o r . " T i m e s , J u n e 1, 1966, p. 1. New Y o rk "S om ebody to L i s t e n . " E d i t o r i a l , New Y o rk T i m e s , M ay 13, 1967, p. 32. Stepp, C a r l . "N oland A ppointed F i r s t O m b u d sm a n . " G a m e c o c k , c a m p u s n e w s p a p e r a t U n iv e r s it y of South C a ro lin a , O c to b e r 29, 1968, p. 1. "Stony B ro o k A pp o in ts 3 F a c u lty O m b u d s m e n ." New Y o rk T i m e s , A p r i l 16, 1967, p. 82. 210 T w itc h e ll, B e v e r ly . " A c a d e m ic F r e e d o m R e p o rt Swings Into E f f e c t . " M ic h ig an S tate N e w s, p. 10. "U . of C h icag o O m b u d s m a n ." New Y o rk T im e s , O c to b e r 9, 1968, p. 47. " U n iv e r s i ty O m b u d s m a n K ept B u sy a t Stony B ro o k . " New Y o rk T i m e s , D e c e m b e r 10, 1967, p. 146. "U P C O pen M e etin g W ill D is c u s s O m b u d s m a n ." U CLA D a ily B r u i n , F e b r u a r y 25, 1969, pp. 2 - 3 . W a g g o n er, W a lte r H. "N e w a rk M a y o r B a r s P o lic e R eview B o a rd . " New Y o rk T i m e s , M a rc h 1, 1968, p. 1. W is k a r i, W e r n e r . " N o r w a y 's E x p e r ie n c e : How a n O m b u d sm a n O p e r a t e s . " New Y o rk T i m e s , N o v e m b e r 20, 1966, IV, p. 3. P a m p h le ts A d m i n i s t r a t o r 's Handbook: U n d e r s ta n d in g th e J o in t S ta te m e n t on R ig h ts and F r e e d o m s of S tu d e n ts . C hicago: C o lle g e and U n iv e r s ity B u s i n e s s , u n d ated . F a c u lty and Staff H an d b o o k . E a s t e r n M on tan a C o lle g e , S e p te m b e r 1967. " O m b u d s m a n , " pp. 62 -6 3 . K ra th w o h l, D avid R. How to P r e p a r e a R e s e a r c h P r o p o s a l . S y r a ­ c u s e , N . Y . : By th e A u th o r, S y r a c u s e U n iv e r s ity , 1966. M ichigan State: P r o f i l e of a U n i v e r s i t y . E a s t L an sin g : U n iv e r s ity E d i t o r ' s O ffice, M ic h ig a n S tate U n iv e r s ity , u n d a te d . N o rm a n , N elso n F . T he O m b u d sm a n : A New B ir d on C a m p u s . San D ieg o State C o lle g e , u n d a te d . S c h n e id e r, F r a n z . Y e s l and N ol N eeded: A D ea n of I n s tr u c tio n and a S tu d e n t- F a c u lty R e a c tio n S h e e t. B e r k e le y , C a l i f . : By th e A u th o r, J a n u a r y , 1966. 1, 211 The Student a n d H is P u b lic I m a g e - - T h e D ean S p eak s O u t. A P u b li­ c a tio n of N A SPA —J o u r n a l of th e A s s o c ia tio n of D e a n s and A d m i n i s t r a t o r s of Student A f f a i r s . B u lle tin No. 2, A p ril, 1967. The U n iv e r s ity in A m e r i c a . An O c c a s io n a l P a p e r on th e R o le of E d u c a tio n in th e F r e e S o ciety . Santa B a r b a r a , C a l i f . : C e n te r fo r th e Study of D e m o c r a t i c I n s titu tio n s , 1967. P u b lic D o c u m e n ts United N a tio n s , G e n e r a l A s s e m b ly . R e m e d ie s AgainBt th e A buse of A d m in is tr a tiv e A u th o r ity - - S e le c te d S tu d ie s . (S T /T A O / H R /1 9 ) 1964. U .S . C o n g r e s s . S en ate. C o m m itte e on the J u d i c i a r y . A d m i n i s t r a ­ tiv e O m b u d s m a n . H e a r in g b e f o r e the S u b c o m m itte e on A d m in is tr a tiv e P r a c t i c e and P r o c e d u r e o f th e C o m m itte e on th e J u d i c i a r y , S en ate, on S. 1195. 90th C o n g ., 2nd s e s s . , 1968. U. S. C o n g r e s s . S en ate. C o m m itte e on the J u d i c i a r y . O m b u d s ­ m a n . H e a r in g b e fo re the S u b c o m m itte e on A d m in is tr a tiv e P r a c t i c e an d P r o c e d u r e o f th e C o m m itte e on th e J u d i c i a r y , S e n a te , on S. R e s . 190. 89th C o n g . , 2nd s e s s . , 1966. U .S . C o n g r e s s . S en ate. C o m m itte e on th e J u d i c i a r y . R e g io n al O m b u d sm a n P r o p o s a l . H e a r i n g s b e f o r e th e S u b c o m m itte e on A d m in is tr a tiv e P r a c t i c e and P r o c e d u r e of th e C o m m it­ te e on the J u d ic ia r y , S en ate, on S. 3123. 90th Cong, , 2nd s e s s . , 1968. U .S. D e p a r tm e n t of H e a lth , E d u c a tio n and W e lf a r e , O ffice of E d u ­ c a tio n . I n t e r n a l S tr u c tu r e : O r g a n iz a tio n and A d m i n i s t r a ­ tio n o f In s titu tio n s of H ig h e r E d u c a tio n , by A r c h ie R. A y e r s and J o h n H. R u s s e l. B u lle tin No. 9. W ash in gton , D. C. : G o v e rn m e n t P r i n t i n g O ffice, 1962. 212 R e p o r ts A c a d e m ic F r e e d o m f o r StudentB a t M ic h ig a n S tate U n iv e r s ity . A R e p o r t of the F a c u lty C o m m itte e on Student A f f a i r s to the A c a d e m ic C o u n c il, F e b r u a r y 7, 1967. C r i s i s a t C o lu m b ia . R e p o r t of th e F a c t - F in d in g C o m m is s io n A p po inted to I n v e s tig a te the D is tu r b a n c e s a t C o lu m b ia U n iv e r s it y in A p r i l and M ay 1968. New Y o rk : V in tag e B o o k s, 1968. E d u ca tio n a t B e rk e le y : R e p o rt of th e S e le c t C o m m itte e on E d u c a ­ t i o n . B e rk e le y : U n iv e r s it y o f C a lif o r n ia P r e s s , 1968. F o o te , C a leb ; M a y e r , H e n r y ; and A s s o c i a t e s . T he C u l tu r e of the U n iv e r s ity : G o v e rn a n c e and E d u c a tio n . The M a jo r i ty R e p o r t of th e Study C o m m is s io n on U n iv e r s it y G o v e rn a n c e , U n iv e r s it y of C a lif o r n ia a t B e r k e le y ; a l s o T he D is s e n tin g R e p o r t. San F r a n c i s c o : J o s s e y - B a s s , Inc. , 1968. G o a ls fo r A m e r ic a n s : P r o g r a m s f o r A ctio n in the S i x t i e s . T he R e p o r t of th e P r e s i d e n t ’ s C o m m is s io n on N a tio n a l G o a ls . (See e s p e c i a lly W r is to n , H e n ry M. , "T h e I n d iv id u a l," pp. 3 5 - 5 8 .) P u b lis h e d f o r the A m e r i c a n A s s e m b ly by P r e n t i c e - H a l l , In c. , 1960. T he O m b u d s m a n . R e p o r t of th e T h i r t y - s e c o n d A m e r i c a n A s s e m b ly , O c to b e r 2 6 -2 9 , 1967. New York: C o lu m b ia U n iv e r s ity , u n d a te d . O r r , G. S. R e p o rt on A d m in is tr a tiv e J u s t i c e in New Z e a l a n d . W elling to n : R. E . Owen, 1964. The P r e s i d e n t ’ s R e p o r t of P r o g r e s s , 1 9 6 6 -6 7 . M ic h ig a n S tate U n i­ v e r s i t y P u b lic a tio n , L.XII, N o v e m b e r, 1967, U n p u b lish e d S o u rc e s D is c u s s io n N o tes M eeting on o m b u d s m a n in h ig h e r e d u c a tio n . S p o n so re d by H ig h e r E d u c a tio n E x e c u tiv e A s s o c i a t e s a n d U n iv e r s it y of D e tr o it. O c to b e r 2 4 -2 5 , 1968. 213 D o c u m e n ts L ittle , J a c k F . O m b u d sm a n , U n iv e r s it y of C a lif o r n ia a t I r v in e . " J o b D e s c r ip tio n C a rd . " U n iv e r s it y of C a lif o r n ia P e r s o n ­ n e l O ffice. D ate d F e b r u a r y 15, 1968. I n te r v ie w s D a v is , T h o m a s F . O m b u d sm a n , U n iv e r s it y of D e tr o it. P r i v a t e in te r v ie w h e ld a t U n iv e r s it y of D e tr o it, D e c e m b e r 11, 1968. DeKoff, I rv in g . D i r e c t o r f o r S tudent I n t e r e s t s , C o lu m b ia U n iv e r s ity . P r i v a t e in te r v ie w h eld d u r in g m e e ti n g on o m b u d s m a n in h ig h e r e d u c a tio n , D e tr o it, M i c h . , O c to b e r 24, 1968. G loege, G e o rg e . O m b u d sm a n , E a s t e r n M o n ta n a C o lle g e . P r i v a t e in te r v ie w h e ld d u rin g m e e tin g on o m b u d s m a n in h ig h e r e d u c a tio n , D e tr o it, M ich. , O c to b e r 25, 1968. L e itm a n n , G e o rg e . O m b u d sm a n , U n iv e r s it y of C a lif o r n ia a t B e r k e le y . P r i v a t e in te r v i e w h eld d u r in g m e e tin g on o m ­ b u d s m a n in h i g h e r e d u c a tio n , D e t r o i t , M i c h . , O c to b e r 24, 1968. N o rm a n , N e lso n F . O m b u d sm a n , San D iego State C o lle g e . P r i v a t e in te r v ie w h e ld d u rin g m e e tin g on o m b u d s m a n in h ig h e r e d u c a tio n , D e tr o it, M i c h . , O c to b e r 24, 1968. R u st, J a m e s D. O m b u d sm a n , M ic h ig an S ta te U n iv e r s ity . P r i v a t e in te r v ie w h e ld a t M ic h ig a n S tate U n iv e r s it y , D e c e m b e r 12, 1968. W hite, J . B enton. A s s o c ia te O m b u d sm a n , San J o s e S tate C o lleg e. P r i v a t e in te r v ie w h eld d u r in g m e e tin g on o m b u d s m a n in h ig h e r e d u c a tio n , D e tr o it, M i c h . , O c to b e r 24, 1968. L e tte rs R e ce iv ed B y A u th o r A n d e rso n , S tanley V. A s s o c i a t e P r o f e s s o r of P o l i t i c a l S cien ce, U n iv e r s it y of C a lif o r n ia a t Santa B a r b a r a . M a rc h 5, 1969. 214 B la u s te in , A lb e r t P . P r o f e s s o r of L aw , R u t g e r s U n iv e r s ity . M a r c h 5, 1969, Eddy, J o h n P a u l. D e a n o f S tudents, J o h n s o n ( V t . ) State C o llege. F e b r u a r y 21, 1969. F r a n z , J o h n M. C h a ir m a n , G ra d u a te F a c u lty S enate C o m m itte e on P r o b l e m s and P r o c e d u r e , U n i v e r s i t y of M is s o u r i a t C o lu m b ia . J a n u a r y 24, 1969, G loege, G e o r g e . O m b u d sm a n , E a s t e r n M on tan a C o lleg e. b e r 4, 1968. N o v em ­ G lo ver, F r e d e r i c O. E x e c u tiv e A s s i s t a n t to the P r e s i d e n t , S tan­ f o r d U n iv e r s ity . F e b r u a r y 19, 1969. G oldfarb , T h e o d o re . F o r m e r O m b u d sm a n , S tate U n iv e r s ity of New Y o rk a t Stony B ro o k . O c to b e r 21, 1968. H iatt, R o b e r t W. A c tin g P r e s i d e n t , U n iv e r s it y of H aw aii. a r y 25, 1969. F ebru­ K itn e r, H a r o ld . O m b u d sm a n , D ean f o r F a c u lty C o u n sel, K ent S tate U n iv e r s it y . M a rc h 14, 1969. L eitm an n , G e o rg e . O m b u d sm a n , U n i v e r s i t y of C a lif o rn ia a t B e r k e ­ le y . F e b r u a r y 5, 1969. L ittle , J a c k F . O m b u d sm a n , U n iv e r s it y of C a lif o rn ia a t I rv in e . F e b r u a r y 24, 1969. M c D e rm id , N ancy. M e m b e r , O m b u d sm a n S e le c tio n C o m m itte e , San F r a n c i s c o S tate C o lle g e . F e b r u a r y 18, 1969. M u n d in g er, Donald C. V ice P r e s i d e n t f o r A c a d e m ic A f f a ir s , V a l­ p a r a i s o U n iv e r s ity . F e b r u a r y 20, 1969. S ch n eid er, F r a n z , P r o f e s s o r E m e r i t u s , U n iv e r s ity of C a lif o r n ia a t B e r k e le y . F e b r u a r y 6 , 1969. Speck, D av id G. A s s i s t a n t D ean o f M en , G e o r g e W ash in g to n U n i­ v e r s i t y . J a n u a r y 24, 1969. Toll, J o h n S. P r e s i d e n t , S tate U n iv e r s ity of New York a t Stony B ro o k . M a r c h 10, 1969. 215 W hite, J . B e n to n . A s s o c ia te O m b u d sm a n , San J o s e S tate C olleg e. F e b r u a r y 19, 1969. O th e r s B la u s te in , A l b e r t P . , to C liffo rd , E a r l e W . , D ean of Student A f f a i r s , R u t g e r s U n iv e r s ity . N o v e m b e r 19, 1968. W hite, J . B e n to n , to C la r k , R o b e r t D, , P r e s i d e n t , San J o s e State C o lle g e . J u ly 19, 1968. M a n u s c r ip ts A n d e rs o n , S ta n le y V. " O m b u d s m a n P a p e r s : A m e r i c a n E x p e r ie n c e an d P r o p o s a l s . " C h a p te r V. Book m a n u s c r i p t . I n s titu te o f G o v e r n m e n ta l S tu d ies, U n iv e r s it y of C a lif o r n ia , B e r k e le y , u n d ated . M e m o ra n d a M e m o ra n d u m to Student A f f a i r s Staff. P r e p a r e d by J a c k F . L ittle , O m b u d s m a n . U n iv e r s it y of C a lif o r n ia a t I r v in e , A u g u st 3, 1967. Toll, Jo h n S. "A n n o u n c e m e n t o f S e le c tio n of O m b u d sm e n and O th e r K ey A p p o i n t m e n t s ." S tate U n iv e r s it y of New Y o rk a t Stony B ro o k , M a r c h 29, 1967. _________ . " P r o c e d u r e s f o r th e O m b u d sm e n . " S tate U n iv e r s ity of New Y o rk a t Stony B ro o k , A p r i l 18, 1967. _________ . " 1 9 6 6 -6 7 R e p o r t of th e O m b u d s m e n ." S ta te U n iv e r s ity of New Y o rk a t Stony B ro o k , N o v e m b e r 10, 1967. N ew s R e l e a s e s K u rlin s k i, W ay n e. "In W hat M ay Be U. S. C o lleg e ' F i r s t , ' Stony B ro o k N a m e s 'O m b u d s m e n ' To I n v e s tig a te S p e c ia l 216 P r o b l e m s On F a s t- G r o w in g U n iv e r s it y C a m p u s . " N ew s r e l e a s e , S tate U n iv e r s it y of New Y o rk a t Stony B ro o k , A p r i l 13 (1967). i New s r e l e a s e on a p p o in tm e n t of o m b u d s m a n . O ffice o f P u b lic I n ­ f o r m a tio n , M a c o m b C ounty C o m m u n ity C o lle g e , W a r r e n , M i c h . , A p r i l 11, 1968. P apers B oland, W a lte r H eed . " A m e r ic a n I n s titu tio n s of H ig h e r E du catio n : A Study of S ize and O rg a n iz a tio n . " P h . D . d i s s e r t a t i o n , U n iv e r s it y of M ic h ig an , 1966. B r a d le y , W a lte r E . "An O m b u d sm a n f o r M a co m b . " M a c o m b C ounty C o m m u n ity C o lle g e , W a r r e n , M i c h . , F e b r u a r y 20, 1968. C o lem a n , J a m e s . P a p e r w r i t t e n f o r th e C o m m is s io n on T e s t s , C o lleg e E n t r a n c e E x a m in a tio n B o a rd , 1968. M c C le lla n , Stephen D o u g la s. "An A n a ly s is of How th e Role of Law H a s A ffec ted S p ecific R e la tio n s h ip s B e tw ee n P u b lic U n i­ v e r s i t i e s and T h e i r S tu den ts: L e g a l G u id e lin e s fo r A d m in ­ i s t r a t i v e D e c is io n -M a k in g . " P h . D. d i s s e r t a t i o n , M ic h ig an S tate U n iv e r s ity , 1967. M u n d in g e r, D onald C. " T h e U n iv e r s it y O m b u d sm a n . " U n sign ed , u n d ated p a p e r p r e p a r e d a t V a lp a r a is o U n iv e r s ity . "A P r o p o s a l f o r a Student In fo r m a tio n and C o m p la in t O ffice (O m ­ b u d sm a n ) f o r S o u th ern Illin o is U n iv e r s it y , " U n sig n ed , u n d a te d p a p e r p ro v id e d by G e o rg e M c C lu r e , D e p a r tm e n t of P h ilo s o p h y , S o u th e rn I llin o is U n iv e r s it y a t C a rb o n d a le . R ust, J a m e s D. U n titled , u n d ated s t a t e m e n t on r o le o f c a m p u s o m b u d s m a n . M ic h ig an S tate U n iv e r s it y , r e v i s e d J a n u a r y , 1969. S andberg, C a r l H. " O m b u d sm an : T he R e d r e s s of C i tiz e n s ' G r i e v ­ a n c e s . " H o n o rs p a p e r , O hio U n iv e r s it y , 1968. 217 W e e k s, K ent M. "A C o m p a r a tiv e A n a ly s is of th e C iv il O m b u d sm a n O ffic e s in D e n m a rk , F in la n d , New Z e a la n d , N o rw a y and Sweden. " I n s titu te of G o v e r n m e n ta l S tu d ies, U n iv e r s it y of C a lif o r n ia a t B e r k e le y , 1967, W hite, J . B enton. "T he O m b u d s m a n in H ig h e r E d u c a tio n . " T h e s is , G ra d u a te D iv isio n , P a c i f ic L u th e r a n T h e o lo g ic a l S e m in a ry , 1968. R ep o rts "T h e F u n c tio n of th e O m b u d sm a n (R e v ise d O c to b e r 3, 1 9 6 7 )." J o s e S tate C o lle g e . San G o ld b erg , H o m e r ; G o ld fa rb , T h e o d o re ; and W e in b e rg , R o b e rt. "A R e p o rt to P r e s i d e n t T o ll and th e U n iv e r s ity C o m m u n ity f ro m th e O m b u d sm e n . " S tate U n iv e r s ity o f New Y ork at Stony B ro o k , u n d ated . " G ra d u a te F a c u lty P a r t i c i p a t i o n in A c a d e m ic G o v e rn m e n t. " R e p o rt of th e Ad H oc C o m m itte e on G r a d u a te F a c u lty O rg a n iz a tio n and P a r t i c i p a t i o n in G o v e rn m e n t and of th e C o m m itte e on P la n n in g and P o lic y of th e G r a d u a te C o u n cil. U n iv e r s it y of M is s o u r i a t C o lu m b ia , A p r i l 18, 1968. " I n s titu tio n a l P o lic y C h a n g e s a t San J o s e S tate C o lleg e C o m in g O ut of R e c o m m e n d a tio n s o r I n v e s tig a tio n s . " (R e p o rt p r e p a r e d b y J . B en to n W hite, O m b u d sm a n , 1 9 6 7 -6 8 .) San J o s e S tate C o lle g e , u n d a te d . " P o s itio n R e s u m e of O m b u d sm a n a t San J o s e S tate C o lleg e . " O ffice of th e E x e c u tiv e V ice P r e s i d e n t , San J o s e S tate C o lleg e , M ay 3, 1968. " T h e R e p o rt o f th e U n iv e r s ity O m b u d sm a n to th e P r e s i d e n t f o r the School Y e a r , 1 9 6 7 - 1 9 6 8 ." ( P r e p a r e d by J a m e s D. R u s t, O m b u d s m a n .) M ic h ig an S tate U n iv e r s ity , u n d ated . Speck, D avid G. O m b u d sm a n r e p o r t a d d r e s s e d t o W illia m P . S m ith, V ice P r e s i d e n t f o r Student A f f a i r s . G e o rg e W ash in g to n U n iv e r s ity , D e c e m b e r 19, 1968, 218 S p ee c h e s (All d e l iv e r e d a t m e e tin g on o m b u d s m a n in h ig h e r e d u c a tio n s p o n ­ s o r e d by H ig h e r E d u c a tio n E x e c u tiv e A s s o c i a t e s and U n iv e r s it y of D e tr o it, O c to b e r 2 4 -2 5 , 1968, in D e tr o it, M ic h .) C liffo rd , E a r l e W. D ean of S tudent A f f a i r s , R u t g e r s U n iv e r s ity . "S eco n d T h o u g h ts on th e O m b u d s m a n in H ig h e r E d u c a t i o n . " D av is, T h o m a s F . O m b u d sm a n , U n iv e r s it y o f D e tr o it. T r o u b l e s h o o t e r - - T h e O m b u d s m a n ." R u s t, J a r k e s D. O m b u d s m a n , M ic h ig a n S tate U n iv e r s ity . O m b u d s m a n in P r a c t i c e . " "C am pus "The S c h lo s s b e r g , N an cy K. A s s o c ia te P r o f e s s o r , W ayne S tate U n i v e r ­ s ity . " T h e O m b u d s m a n in C u r r e n t S ta tu s an d T h e o r y . " W hite, J . B enton . A s s o c ia te O m b u d sm a n , San J o s e S tate C o lle g e . " T h e O m b u d s m a n i n P r a c t i c e . 11 A P P E N D IC E S A P P E N D IX A L E T T E R TO CAMPUS OMBUDSMEN 219 MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY b ast u m w o . m ic h io a n C O LU O I o r EDUCATION • DIFAKTM IHT OF A D L U N im A T lO N AND U IO H M EDUCATION EM O U O N HALL October 14, 1966 Dr. ________ Ombudsman In stitu tio n C ity , S t a t e Dear Dr. Among th e c u r r e n t in n o v a tio n s o f I n t e r e s t i n American h ig h e r e d u c a tio n i s t h e attem pt t o a d a p t th e ombudsman co n ce p t t o th e c o l l e g e and u n i v e r s i t y campus. To d a te , a t l e a s t sev en p e rs o n s a t f i v e I n s t i t u t i o n s have been named academic ombudsmen and a number o f o t h e r ap p o in tm e n ts a re b e in g c o n s id e re d . Because o f t h e w id e s c a le i m p l i c a t i o n s o f th e ombudsman movement i n American h ig h er e d u c a t i o n , I am c o n d u c tin g a d e s c r i p t i v e and a n a l y t i c a l s tu d y of t h i s phenomenon f o r my d o c t o r a l d i s s e r t a t i o n a t M ichigan S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y . I have receiv ed encouragement and a s s i s t a n c e from the M ic h ig a n S ta te ombudsman, Dr. James R u st. To o ur knowledge, no o t h e r d i s s e r t a t i o n s tu d y in t h i s a re a i s i n p ro g re s s. Since th e p o p u la tio n I am s tu d y in g i s so sm all, I t w i l l be n e c e s s a r y for me to o b ta in a c o n s i d e r a b l e amount o f d a ta from each e x i s t i n g academic ombudsman. My best o p p o r tu n i ty f o r g a t h e r i n g t h i s in fo rm a tio n i s a t the " C o n s u lta tio n on the Ombudsman i n American H igher E d u c a tio n " O ctober 2 4 -2 5 , 1968, i n D e tro it sponsored by th e U n iv e r s ity o f D e t r o i t i n c o o p e r a tio n w ith H igh er Education Executive A s s o c i a t e s . I have r e c e iv e d p e rm issio n from c o n s u l t a t i o n o f f i c i a l s to tape r e c o r d th e p ro c e e d in g s . I n a d d i t i o n , I p l a n t o conduct and tape r e c o r d a p r iv a te s e m i - s t r u c t u r e d i n t e r v i e w w ith each campus ombudsman p r e s e n t , I a n t i c i p a t e t h a t each I n te r v ie w w i l l ta k e about one h o u r . In o r d e r not to i n ­ t e r f e r e w i t h th e c o n s u l t a t i o n program, I p la n to c o n d u c t th e in te r v ie w s d u r in g these p e r i o d s : B efore 1:30 p.m. T h ursday, O cto ber 24 A f t e r 9 :3 0 p.m. T hursday, O cto ber 24 B efore 9 a.m. F r id a y , O ctober 25 A f t e r 3 p.m. F r id a y , O ctob er 25 220 The purpose o f t h i s l e t t e r i s t o make you aware o f t h i s s tu d y , t o s o l i c i t y o u r c o o p e r a tio n and t o r e q u e s t y o u r p a r t i c i p a t i o n I n th e I n te r v ie w s 1 w i l l be c o n d u c tin g I n D e t r o i t . I w i l l c o n t a c t you t o make s p e c i f i c a rra n g em en ts a t th e m e e tin g . In th e e v en t t h a t you do n o t a t t e n d , I w i l l a tte m p t to I n ­ te rv ie w you a t a l a t e r d a t e . I f t h a t c a n n o t be a r r a n g e d , I w i l l send you a q u e stio n n a ire . Ombudsmen and o th e r s who a s s i s t I n th e p r e p a r a t i o n o f th e stud y w i l l be p r o ­ v id e d w ith a summary o f f i n d i n g s . My g o a l I s t o com plete th e p r o j e c t by Ju ne o f 1969. I would a p p r e c i a t e a re s p o n s e from you p r i o r t o th e D e t r o i t m e e tin g . S in c e r e ly , Ray Rowland NDEA G rad uate Fellow C ollege o f E d u c a tio n Room 401-1 E ric k s o n H a l l Michigan S t'a te U n iv e r s ity E a s t L a n s in g , M ichigan 48823 P. S. - M a t e r i a l s you may have which would be u s e f u l I n t h i s stu d y In c lu d e th e follo w ing : 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. P e r s o n a l d a ta s h e e t o r b i o g r a p h i c a l s k e tc h Job d e sc rip tio n Copy o f document e s t a b l i s h i n g y o u r o f f i c e I n f o r m a tio n on how s e l e c t i o n o f ombudsman was made C o p ie s of p u b lis h e d a r t i c l e s r e g a r d i n g yo u r o f f i c e C op ies o f s p e e c h e s o r s t a t e m e n ts you have made r e g a r d in g your o f f i c e R e p o r ts Is s u e d by your o f f i c e P lease b r i n g th e se and o t h e r p e r t i n e n t m a t e r i a l s to th e D e t r o i t m eeting o r send to me. M a t e r i a l s w i l l be r e tu r n e d a t y o u r r e q u e s t . A P P E N D IX B INTERV IEW SCH EDU LE F O R CAM PUS OMBUDSMEN A PP E N D IX B IN TER V IEW SCH EDU LE FO R CAM PUS OMBUDSMEN A. B. P e r s o n a l D ata 1. N am e of re s p o n d e n t 2. A ge of re s p o n d e n t 3. P r e s e n t title 4. P re v io u s title 5. A c a d e m ic ran k 6. T e n u re ? 7. C o lleg e d e g r e e s h eld 8. C a r e e r fie ld o r m a jo r a c a d e m ic d is c ip lin e 9. P re v io u s p r o f e s s io n a l e x p e rie n c e 10. N u m b e r o f y e a r s a t p r e s e n t lo c a tio n 11. F a c u lty and a d m in is tr a tiv e p o s itio n s h e ld d u rin g th a t p e rio d 12. P re v io u s e x p e rie n c e in c o u n s e lin g ? 13. M e m b e rs h ip in p r o f e s s io n a l and h o n o r a r y o rg a n iz a tio n s , in c lu d in g o ffic e s h eld A. S c h o la rly a c tiv itie s ( r e s e a r c h an d p u b lic a tio n s ) 15. H o n o rs and a w a rd s 16. O th e r v o lu n te e re d in fo rm a tio n I n s titu tio n a l D ata 1. N am e o f in s titu tio n 2. Age of in s titu tio n 221 A d m in is tra tio n ? 222 C. 3. L o c a tio n 4. S ize 5. G e n e ra l d e s c r ip tio n (c o e d ? p u b lic o r p r iv a te ? u r b a n ? ) 6. O rg a n iz a tio n a l s tr u c t u r e 7. T ype of g o v e rn m e n t 8. S tudent c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s 9. F a c u lty c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s 10. M a jo r ch a n g es in in s titu tio n in r e c e n t y e a r s 11. O th e r v o lu n te e re d in fo rm a tio n O rig in o f O ffice of O m b u d sm a n 1. D e s c rib e s e q u e n c e of e v e n ts w hich b ro u g h t office o f o m b u d s­ m a n in to e x is te n c e : a . b . c . 2. O rig in a l s u g g e s tio n o r p ro p o s a l S u b seq u en t a c tio n (in clu d in g d e la y s ) F in a l d e c is io n (a u th o riz a tio n ) On w hat d a te w a s office o f o m b u d sm an o ffic ia lly e s ta b lis h e d on y o u r c a m p u s ? 3. On w h at d a te w e r e you c h o se n to s e r v e a s o m b u d sm a n ? 4. On w h at d a te d id you b eg in y o u r d u tie s ? 5. Is th e a s s ig n m e n t a f u ll- tim e r e s p o n s ib ility o r do you sp en d so m e tim e te a c h in g o r en g ag ed in o th e r a d m in is tr a tiv e a c tiv i tie s ? E x p la in . 6 . D id you a c tiv e ly se e k th e o ffic e ? 7. A re you th e f i r s t o m b u d sm an on y o u r c a m p u s ? o m b u d sm a n ? I f n o t, e x p la in . T h e only 8. D id y o u r s e le c tio n in v o lv e any ch an g e in y o u r a c a d e m ic ra n k o r s a l a r y ? E x p la in . 9. H as th e le n g th of y o u r t e r m of o ffic e b e e n d e te r m in e d ? s o , how long i s th e te r m of o ffic e ? 10. H as a p r o c e s s b e e n d e te r m in e d b y w h ich th e o m b u d sm an can be re m o v e d fro m o ffic e b e fo re h is te r m e x p i r e s ? If s o , w h at o ffic ia l o r a g e n c y h a s th is a u th o rity ? If 223 11. D id any o rg a n iz e d g ro u p a c tiv e ly s u p p o rt th e e s ta b lis h m e n t o f th e o ffic e ? If s o , id e n tify and d e s c r ib e . 12. D id any o rg a n iz e d g ro u p a c tiv e ly o p p o se th e e s ta b lis h m e n t o f th e o ffic e ? If s o , id e n tify and d e s c r ib e . 13. D e s c rib e p r o c e s s by w hich you w e r e c h o se n o m b u d sm an : a . b. c. D. E. N o m in atio n p r o c e d u r e E le c tio n o r a p p o in tm e n t p r o c e d u r e O ffic ia l o r a g e n c y m a k in g fin a l s e le c tio n R a tio n a le fo r O ffice o f O m b u d sm an 1. W hat w e r e the m a in a rg u m e n ts a d v a n c e d by p ro p o n e n ts to ju s tify th e e s ta b lis h m e n t of o ffic e of o m b u d sm a n ? 2. C an you r e c a l l an y in c id e n ts on y o u r c a m p u s p r i o r to th e e s ta b lis h m e n t of th e office w h ich s u p p o rte d th o s e a r g u m e n ts ? 3. W hat o ffic e s , s e r v i c e s and p r o c e d u r e s a lr e a d y e x is te d on y o u r c a m p u s fo r h an d lin g in d iv id u a l p ro b le m s a t th e tim e th e o ffice o f o m b u d sm an w a s e s ta b lis h e d ? 4. H ave any of th o se s e r v ic e s ch an g ed o r b e e n d isc o n tin u e d s in c e the a p p e a r a n c e of the o m b u d sm a n ? D e s c rip tio n o f O ffice of O m b u d sm an 1. D e s c rib e the lo c a tio n of y o u r o ffic e on th e c a m p u s. 2. D e s c rib e th e p h y s ic a l a r r a n g e m e n t o f th e o ffic e . 3. D e s c rib e th e o ffice e q u ip m e n t and f a c ilitie s (su c h ite m s a s te le p h o n e , ta p e r e c o r d e r , copying m a c h in e , in te rc o m s y s ­ te m , e t c . ) 4. Do you w o rk alo n e o r do you h a v e a s s is ta n c e in th e o ffic e ? 5. If you h a v e a s s is ta n c e , id e n tify th e o th e r s ta f f m e m b e r s by t it le and d e s c r ib e th e i r d u tie s . 6. W h e re d o e s y o u r o ffic e fit in to th e a d m in is tr a tiv e f r a m e ­ w o rk of y o u r in s titu tio n ? 7. T o w hom do you s u b m it w r itte n r e p o r t s ? I 224 8. W hat i s co n tain e d in th e r e p o r t s ? 9. How often a r e w r itte n r e p o r ts s u b m itte d and how d e ta ile d a r e th e y ? 10. 11. F. G. How w id ely c ir c u la te d a r e y o u r w r itte n r e p o r t s ? T o w hom i s y o u r o ffic e f is c a lly a c c o u n ta b le ? 12. D o es an y o ffic ia l o r a g e n c y h av e a u th o rity to in v e s tig a te th e o p e ra tio n s o f y o u r o ffic e ? 13. H a s su c h an in v e s tig a tio n e v e r o c c u r r e d ? O b je c tiv e s of O ffice of O m b u d sm an 1. L is t and b r ie f ly d e s c r ib e the m a jo r o b je c tiv e s of y o u r o ffic e , in o r d e r of p r io r i ty if p o s s ib le . 2. How do th e s e o b je c tiv e s m a k e y o u r o ffice d if fe re n t fro m an y o th e r o ffice on y o u r c a m p u s ? O p e ra tio n a l P r o c e d u r e s # 1. On y o u r c a m p u s , w ho m a y s e e k a s s is ta n c e fro m th e o m ­ b u d sm a n ? a b c d e f . . . . . . U n d e rg ra d u a te s tu d e n ts G ra d u a te s tu d e n ts F a c u lty A d m in is tr a to r s C iv il s e r v ic e (n o n -a c a d e m ic ) e m p lo y e e s P e r s o n s fro m o ff c a m p u s 2. F ro m w h ich g ro u p in d ic a te d in 1 do you r e c e iv e th e l a r g e s t n u m b e r of c lie n ts ? T he s m a lle s t n u m b e r of c lie n ts ? 3. A re y o u r r e c o r d s and f ile s c o n fid e n tia l o r a r e th e y op en fo r in s p e c tio n by any in te r e s te d p e r s o n ? 4. Do you h av e a c c e s s to o ffic ia l r e c o r d s th ro u g h o u t th e c a m ­ p u s ? In d ic a te w h at k in d s of in fo rm a tio n a r e n o t a v a ila b le to you. 5. In w hat w ay s do you p u b lic iz e y o u r a c tiv itie s ? a. b. S p e e c h e s to c a m p u s o rg a n iz a tio n s N e w sp a p e r a r t i c l e s 225 c. d. e. f . R ad io a n d / o r te le v is io n in te rv ie w s N o tic e s o r p o s te r s L e tt e r s to s tu d e n ts o r c a m p u s o rg a n iz a tio n s O th e r w ay s (sp e c ify ) 6. How m a n y c lie n ts c o n ta c t you in a ty p ic a l w eek ( o r w h a t­ e v e r tim e p e rio d s e e m s m o s t a p p r o p r ia te ) ? 7. L is t th e b ro a d c a te g o r ie s of c o m p la in ts r e c e iv e d b y y o u r o ffic e , su c h a s g r a d e s , fe e s , h o u sin g , li b r a r y , p a rk in g , e tc . 8. C an you ran k th e s e c a te g o r ie s of c o m p la in ts fro m m o s t fre q u e n t to le a s t fre q u e n t? 9. W hat i s th e a v e ra g e le n g th of tim e it ta k e s to so lv e a p ro b ­ le m p r e s e n te d to y o u r o ffic e ? 10. W hat k ind of c o m p la in ts do you re fu s e to c o n s id e r (out of y o u r ju r is d ic tio n ) ? 11. D e s c r ib e a " ty p ic a l" c a s e and i t s d is p o s itio n . 12. W hat te c h n iq u e s do you g e n e r a lly u se to so lv e a p r o b le m ? a .b c d e . . . . . C o u n selin g o r a d v is in g c lie n t A p p ea l to a u th o rity P e r s u a s io n Im p lie d t h r e a t of in v e s tig a tio n O th e r te c h n iq u e s 13. In g e n e r a l, how w ould you d e s c r ib e th e r e a c tio n s of facu lty and a d m in is t r a to r s a g a in s t w hom c o m p la in ts h av e b een lodged ? 14. How do you p r o c e e d if n o re m e d y can b e found f o r a v alid c o m p la in t? 15. C an d e c is io n s m a d e by th e o m b u d sm an b e o v e r r u le d ? so , by w hom ? 16. Is th e r e an y a u th o r ity on c a m p u s to w h ich a p e r s o n w ith a c o m p la in t m a y a p p e a l b e y o n d th e o m b u d sm an ? 17. In y o u r d a y - to - d a y o p e r a tio n s , w hich o f th e s e m e a n s of c o m m u n ic a tio n do you u s e th e m o st and th e le a s t ? a . b. c. T ele p h o n e F a c e - to - f a c e c o n ta c t W ritte n m e s s a g e s If 226 H. I, E f f e c ts of O m b u d sm an 1. C an you r e c a l l an y in c id e n ts of o rg a n iz e d s tu d e n t s u p p o rt f o r the o ffic e of o m b u d sm a n ? D e s c r ib e . 2. C an you r e c a l l any in c id e n ts of o rg a n iz e d s tu d e n t o p p o si­ tio n to th e office of o m b u d sm a n ? D e s c rib e . 3. C an you r e c a l l any in s ta n c e s in w h ic h in s titu tio n a l p o lic ie s o r p r o c e d u r e s h a v e b e e n changed a s a d ir e c t r e s u l t of in q u ir ie s a n d / o r re c o m m e n d a tio n s by the o m b u d sm a n ? D e s c rib e . 4. Do you b e lie v e th e o ffic e of o m b u d sm a n w ill co n tin u e to fu n ctio n a s it is d u rin g th e next te n y e a r s ? If n o t, do you e x p e c t i t to be ex p an d ed , re d u c e d o r a b o lis h e d ? A ttitu d e s and O p in io n s 1. How w o u ld you d e s c r ib e th e g e n e r a l a ttitu d e of p r o f e s s io n a l stu d e n t p e r s o n n e l w o r k e r s on y o u r ca m p u s r e g a r d in g th e o m b u d sm a n ? 2. W hat e d u c a tio n and e x p e rie n c e w ould b e s t p r e p a r e a p e r s o n to s e rv e e ffe c tiv e ly a s a ca m p u s o m b u d sm a n ? L is t s e v e r a l, th e n ra n k th em in o r d e r of im p o r ta n c e . 3. W hat t e r m s b e st d e s c r ib e the r o le o f the c a m p u s o m b u d s­ m an? 4. If you c o u ld s ta r t o v e r ag a in a s a c a m p u s o m b u d sm an , w hat w o u ld you do d iffe re n tly ? 5. You p ro b a b ly had s o m e n o tio n s o f w h at you w o u ld be d o in g a s a c a m p u s o m b u d sm an w hen y ou a s s u m e d th a t o ffice. H ave y o u r a c tu a l o p e r a tio n s d if fe re d fro m y o u r e x p e c ta tio n s ? If so , in w h a t w a y s ? 6. B e c a u se o f the r e la tiv e is o la tio n o f the c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n fro m h is c o lle a g u e s and h is d is c ip lin e , th e p o s s ib ility o f ro le c o n flic t e x is ts . H ave you e x p e rie n c e d th is fe e lin g ? If so , how do you c o u n te r it ? 7. Do you c o n s id e r y o u r s e lf a p a r t o f o r a p a r t f ro m w hat i s c o m m o n ly r e f e r r e d to a s th e a c a d e m ic " E s ta b lis h m e n t" (th o se w h o hold and w ield p o w er o v e r o th e r s ) ? 227 8. D o you b e lie v e th e o ffic e of o m b u d sm a n h a s h e lp e d a lle v ia te stu d e n t h o s tility and f r u s t r a tio n r e g a r d in g a d m in is tr a tiv e b u r e a u c r a c y and th e a c a d e m ic " E s ta b lis h m e n t" ? 9. C an you r e c a l l th e g r e a t e s t d is a p p o in tm e n ts you h a v e e x p e ­ r ie n c e d in s e r v in g a s a c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n ? D e s c r ib e th e m . 10. C an you r e c a l l th e g r e a t e s t s a tis f a c tio n s you h a v e e x p e r i ­ e n c e d in s e r v in g a s a c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n ? D e s c r ib e th e m . 11. How long sh o u ld th e te r m of o ffice be f o r a c a m p u s o m b u d s­ m a n ? W hy? 12. A r e y o u r b u d g et, s t a f f and f a c ilitie s a d e q u a te f o r h an d lin g th e w o rk lo a d of y o u r o ffic e ? 13. Should th e fin d in g s an d re c o m m e n d a tio n s o f th e c a m p u s o m b u d sm a n b e p u b lic iz e d ? W hy o r w hy n o t? 14. In y o u r o p in io n , w h a t a r e th e b ro a d s o c io lo g ic a l im p lic a ­ tio n s of th e o m b u d sm a n " m o v e m e n t" in A m e r ic a n h ig h e r e d u c a tio n ? 15. H ave you e s ta b lis h e d c o n ta c t w ith o m b u d sm en on o th e r 'c a m p u s e s ? Do you f e e l you can im p ro v e y o u r p e r f o rm a n c e by e x c h an g in g in fo rm a tio n and id e a s w ith y o u r c o u n te r p a r ts e ls e w h e r e ? 16. Do you b e lie v e c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n w ill g a in p r o f e s s io n a l s ta tu s and b e c o m e a p e rm a n e n t a d d itio n to A m e r ic a n c o l­ le g e s and u n i v e r s i t i e s ? A re you fa v o ra b le o r u n fa v o ra b le to w a rd e f f o r ts to f o rm a n a tio n a l o rg a n iz a tio n o f c a m p u s o m b u d sm e n ? A P P E N D IX C INFO RM A TIO N O BTAINED FROM CAM PUS OMBUDSMAN IN TERV IEW S TABLE C l CHARACTERISTICS OF CAMPUS OMBUDSMEN AT SIX INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION (OCTOBER, 1968) Item Name Age U n iv ersity of C alifornia at B erkeley G eorge Leitm ann 43 Columbia U niversity Irving DeKoff 45 Thom as D avis M ichigan State U niversity Ja m e s Rust San Diego State College San Jo se State College N elson N orm an Benton W hitea 37 58 51 37 Ombudsman Ombudsman Ombudsman Ombudsman A ssista n t P ro fe ss o r; Dean P ro fe s s o r P ro fe s s o r Campus M in iste r A ssista n t P ro fe s s o r P ro fe s s o r, A ssista n t Dean P ro fe s s o r A sso ciate P ro fe s s o r (Equivalent) P re s e n t title Ombudsman P rev io u s title P ro fe s s o r A ssista n t Dean A cadem ic rank P ro fe s s o r None Y es No Y es Y es Y es No P h .D . E d.D . M .A .T . P h .D . P h .D . B .D . T enure ? H ighest d eg ree 228 D ire c to r fo r Student In te re s ts U n iv ersity of D etro it TABLE C l —Continued Item U n iv ersity of C alifornia at B erkeley C a re e r field o r m a jo r discipline E ngineering P rev io u s p ro fessio n al experience G overnm ent; u n iv e rsity teaching 11 P o sitio n s held during th at period A ssistan t p ro fe s so r to p ro fe sso r P rev io u s experience in counseling? adm inistration? Yes No M ichigan State U niversity San Diego State College San Jo se State College P h y sical Education M athem atics E nglish H isto ry Theology U n iv ersity teaching, a d m in istra ­ tion Teaching at a ll lev els 18 In stru c to r, a s s is ta n t dean Yes Y es 8 In stru c to r, dean Yes Yes College and u n iv e rsity teaching 21 A cting d epartm ent chairm an, a s s is ta n t dean Yes Yes Radio; high school, college teaching 8 A ll academ ic ranks No No M in istry , counseling 7 Cam pus m in is te r Y es Y es 229 Y ears at p re se n t location U niversity of D etro it Colum bia U niversity TABLE C l —Continued Item Scholarly ac tiv itie s H onors and aw ards U n iv ersity of C alifornia a t B erkeley Jo u rn a l a rtic le s and books G en eral Colum bia U niversity U n iv ersity of D etroit M ichigan State U n iv ersity Jo u rn a l a r tic le s Textbook m an u scrip t J ournal a rtic le s Fencing coach citation " T e a c h e r of Y ear" aw ard Phi B eta Kappa San Diego State College San Jo se State College Jo u rn a l a rtic le s Jo u rn al a rtic le s M inor None 230 aln a ll ta b le s, San Jo s e State College inform ation p erta in s to Benton W hite in h is capacity a s om budsm an in 1967-68. He w as asso c ia te om budsm an in 1968-69 w hile Ralph Poblano se rv e d as om budsm an. TABLE C2 CHARACTERISTICS OF SIX INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION WITH CAMPUS OMBUDSMEN AS REPORTED BY THOSE OMBUDSMEN (OCTOBER, 1968) U n iv ersity of C alifornia a t B erkeley Columbia U n iv ersity U n iv ersity of D etro it Michigan State U niversity San Diego State College San Jo se State College 100 215 88 114 72 111 N um ber of students 28,000 17,500 8,000 39,949 D escription Coed, public, se m i-u rb a n Coed, urban. C atholic Coed, public, se m i-u rb a n Coed, public, Coed, public, u rb an urban O rganization 16 se p a ra te One of 9 cam puses of colleges, 2 sta te u n iv e r­ of which a re to ta lly auton­ sity , each om ous. with a ch an cello r. P re sid e n t, d eans, d ep artm en t chairm en. 15 colleges, a ll under c e n tra l con­ tr o l. B oard of Shifting from college tr u s te e s for to u n iv e rsity . State College System . Item Institution1s age (in y e a rs) 23,000 24,000 231 Coed, p r i­ vate, Ivy League -f I TABLE C 2--C ontinued Item G overnm ent Ii Colum bia U niversity U n iv ersity of D etro it D ivision is s m a lle s t ad ­ m in istra tiv e unit; A ca­ dem ic Senate; B oard of R egents b e ­ tw een u n i­ v e rs ity and le g isla tu re . U n iv ersity M ore student o riented than Council is b efo re. ad v iso ry body; provost is chief ad ­ m in istra tiv e o fficer; no faculty senate. V ery in te lli­ gent, a g g re s ­ siv e; only top 3% of high school g ra d u ­ a te s adm itted; n e a rly h alf of stu d en ts a re in graduate w ork; v ery s m a ll ra c ia l m in o rity . Highly selected ; la rg e contin­ gent of foreign s tu ­ d en ts; g ra d u ­ a te s outnum ­ b e r u n d e r­ g rad u ates. Above national n o rm s; 85% a r e Catholic; m o st a re g rad u ates of C atholic high schools in D etro it a re a . M ichigan State U n iv ersity San Diego State College San Jo se State College R egents, p resid e n t, provost, A cadem ic Council, A ssociated Students. C alifornia State College System (18 units). P re sid e n t, academ ic and executive vice p resid e n t. P re se n c e of in creasin g ly la rg e num ­ b e rs of f ir s tra te students h as tr a n s ­ form ed cam ­ pus. V ery able; u n iv e rsity tak es v ery sm a ll upper percentage of high school g rad u ates; s ta te colleges take la r g e r segm ent, down to top 30%. Whole sp e c ­ tru m , but v e ry sm a ll r a c ia l m in o rity ; a c tiv ist s tu ­ dent g o v ern ­ m ent. 232 Students U n iv ersity of C alifornia at B erkeley TABLE C2—Continued Item F aculty U niversity of C alifornia at B erkeley F a irly ag g ressiv e; r a th e r lib e ra l. U niversity of D etro it M ichigan State U n iv ersity San Diego State College San Jo se State College Not p a ro ­ chial; try in g to get 12unit teaching load reduced to 9. M iddle-ofroad to lib ­ e ra l; ty p ical sta te college lim itatio n s. One of the m o re b r il­ lian t in nation; e x ­ tre m e ly w ellqualified. M ajo rity have P h .D .' s; p re fe r to w ork on sm a ll cam ­ pus. Wide range from many in stitu tio n s; m uch r e ­ se a rc h and ex p erim en ­ tation. Significant in c re a s e in black s tu ­ dents; new p resid e n t; m a jo r changes in p ro g re s s . Building new do rm s to a ttra c t d is ­ tant students; m o re black students; m o re involve­ m ent in com m unity. Growth Rapid grow th; a d ­ m in istratio n encourages innovation; m o re student pow er and re s tle s s n e s s . 4 Growth; new p resid e n t; A cadem ic Council with students a s voting m em ­ b e rs . 233 M ajor changes M ost in recen t y e a rs o ccu rred since 1964 F re e Speech M ovement; c u rric u la revam ped; q u a rte r s y s ­ tem . Columbia U niversity TABLE C3 ORIGIN OF OFFICE OF CAMPUS OMBUDSMAN AT SIX INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION AS REPORTED BY THOSE OMBUDSMEN (OCTOBER, 1968) Item U n iv ersity of C alifornia a t B erkeley Columbia U niversity U niversity of D etroit M ichigan State U niversity O riginally suggested by P ro f. F ran z Schneider, long-tim e faculty m em ­ b e r (date not estab lish ed ). DeKoff, in 1965, re c o m ­ m ended ex­ pansion of "D ire c to r of Student I n te r ­ e s ts " office which had been in o p e r­ ation about 10 y e a rs . Campaign F aculty C om m ittee p ro m ise of candidate fo r on Student p resid e n t of A ffairs held Student Gov­ h e a rin g s on student rig h ts ern m en t in sp rin g of and re s p o n si­ 1968. b ilitie s in 1966-67 at re q u e st of u n iv e rsity p re sid e n t. Subsequent action C onsidered by A ssociated Students and F acu lty Student R e la­ tio n s Com ­ m ittee of A cadem ic Senate a fte r 1964 F re e Speech M ove­ m ent. D eK off's recom m enda­ tion su p ­ ported by C om m ittee on Student Life in 1967. Student G overnm ent p resid e n t proposed faculty nam es fo r om buds­ m an to Stu­ dent Senate, w hich in te r ­ viewed D avis in August of 1968. A fter study and h earin g s, com m ittee issu ed A ca­ dem ic F r e e ­ dom R eport of 1967, which re c o m ­ m ended office of om buds­ m an. San Jo se State College Campaign In fa ll of p ro m ise of 1967 black candidate for students d e m o n stra t­ A ssociated Student Body ed in p ro te st p resid e n t in of conditions sp rin g of on cam pus and in com ­ 1968. m unity; p resid e n t of college se t up h e a rin g s. Candidate won election; no opposition to om buds­ m an idea from adm in­ is tra tio n o r faculty. College p r e s i­ dent proposed om budsm an to p ro te c t rig h ts of ethnic m i­ n o ritie s on cam pus; sup­ p o rted by A cadem ic Council E xecutive C om m ittee. 234 O riginal suggestion o r pro p o sal San Diego State College TABLE C3—Continued Item U n iv ersity of C alifornia at B erkeley Columbia U n iv ersity U niversity of D etro it M ichigan State U niversity San Diego State College San J o s e State College M eeting of A cadem ic Senate in May of 1968. F inal decision m ade in Ja n u a ry of 1968. Instigation from Student Senate to academ ic vice p resid e n t and p resid e n t fo r authorization. No faculty involvem ent in selectio n . A ccepted by A cadem ic Council, A cadem ic Senate, T ru s te e s by sp rin g of 1967; student le a d e rs given chance to veto nam es on p ro v o st1s lis t of 60 nom inees; u n iv e rsity p resid e n t m ade final selectio n . Both college p resid e n t and student gov­ ernm ent < le a d e rs involved in selectio n ; financial problem delayed final action u n til m id-S eptem ­ b e r of 1968. A s soon a s black com m unity accepted p roposal, college p r e s i­ dent asked W hite to fill position. D ate office w as established \ M ay 16, 1968 Jan u ary , 1968 A pril, 1968 M arch 16, 1967 Septem ber, 1968 S eptem ber 22, 1967 235 F inal authorizatio n TABLE C3—Continued Item U n iv ersity of C alifornia at B erk eley Columbia U niversity Announced on A pril, 1968 May 28, 1968, by u n iv e rsity president*3 Ju n e, 1968, by A cadem ic Senate C om m ittee on C om m ittees Date f irs t om budsm an began duties Septem ber 30, Ju ly 1, 1968 1968 F u ll-tim e o r p a rt-tim e assignm en t ? H alf-tim e (also teach es) M ichigan State U n iv ersity San Diego State College San Jo se State College August, 1967 S eptem ber 15, S eptem ber 27, 1968 1967 Septem ber 5, 1968 Septem ber 1, 1967 Septem ber 15, O ctober 1, 1968 1967 P a rt-tim e (holds o th er a d m in is tra ­ tiv e offices) F u ll-tim e (teaches one co u rse p e r y ea r) F u ll-tim e (teaches offcam pus course annually) F u ll-tim e Rank rem ain s unchanged but s a la ry is in ­ crea sed . No, but is now on 12m onth in stead of 9-m onth assignm ent. E quivalent to asso c ia te p ro fe sso r; no p rev io u s a c a ­ dem ic rank. 236 Date f irs t ombudsm an w as chosen Any change in rank o r s a la ry ? U n iv ersity of D etro it No F u ll-tim e Status change and sig n ifi­ cant s a la ry in c re a se . No TABLE C3—Continued Item U n iv ersity of C alifornia at B erkeley Columbia U niversity U niversity o f'D etro it Y e a r-to -y e a r A cadem ic year A cadem ic c year t Can om buds­ m an be rem oved from office before te rm e x p ire s? If so, method No p ro c e ss of rem o v al is estab lish ed ; only u n iv e r­ unknown. sity p r e s i­ dent could do it. "Student G overnm ent can rem ove m e any tim e; u n iv e rsity a d m in istra ­ tion c a n 't do it." San Diego State College San Jo se State College U ndeterm ined Inform al arran g em en t w ith p r e s i­ dent of u n i­ v e rsity ; a fte r 2 y e a rs e ith e r can m ake change. U ndeterm ined ( F ir s t om ­ budsm an a c ­ cepted on o n e-y ea r b asis) By u n iv ersity p resid e n t. No p ro c e s s estab lish ed ; would have to be done by p re sid e n t of college. U ncertain 237 Length of te rm of office M ichigan State U niversity TABLE C3—Continued U niversity of C alifornia at B erk eley Item Group(s) which supported estab lish m en t of officed U n iv ersity o f D etro it C om m ittee on U n iv ersity Student Life. Student Gov­ ern m en t. M ichigan State U n iv ersity F aculty C om m ittee on Student A ffairs. San Diego State College San Jo se State College Student G overnm ent, student new spaper, AAUP. None aAIl six om budsm en indicated that-they did not activ ely seek the office. bA fter h is appointm ent, DeKoff receiv ed u n iv e rsity p re sid e n t’ s approval to se rv e in "an om budsm an-like c a p a c ity ." On O ctober 1, 1968, h is title w as changed from "D ire c to r of Student In te re s ts " to "D ire c to r fo r Student In te re s ts . " L eitm ann h as been asked to se rv e a second o n e-y ea r te rm , ^ o om budsm en indicated aw aren ess of any organized opposition to the estab lish m en t of the office; 238 StudentF aculty R elations B oard of A ssociated Students; a lso group w hich p ro ­ posed office. Columbia U niversity TABLE C4 RATIONALE FOR OFFICE OF CAMPUS OMBUDSMAN AT SIX INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION AS REPORTED BY THOSE OMBUDSMEN (OCTOBER, 1968) U n iv ersity of C alifornia at B erk eley U niversity of D etro it A rgum ents used to ju stify establish m en t of office Many student To a c t as a ca taly st fo r com plaints reg ard in g resolving student academ ic sta tu s and g riev an ces. p ro g ram . Any la rg e organization needs an om budsm an. Cam pus incidents which supported th o se a rg u ­ m ents F re e Speech M ovement of 1964; im p e r­ so n al n atu re of operation; student needed so m e­ one to talk to o th er than s e c r e ta ry o r dean. Item See R eport of Many sm a ll Cox C om m is­ ir rita tio n s . sion (issued a fte r student rebellion in sp rin g of 1968). M ichigan State U niversity T estim ony of stu d en ts in h e a rin g s conducted by F aculty C om m ittee on Student A ffairs. San Diego San Jo se State College State College Rapid growth causing p r o ­ ced u ral pro b lem s; student did n 't know w here o r how to get help. No specific Schiff case; g en e ra l s tu ­ incidents. dent u n re s t and a p p e a r­ ance of New Left; s it-in s . I « C om m unica­ tions b re a k ­ down in organization regard in g executive d ecisio n s; college p r e s ­ ident needed to be b e tte r inform ed. B lack student w as refu sed adm ission to a so ro rity ; p resid e n t of college w as unaw are of incident. 239 Columbia U n iv ersity TABLE C 4--C ontinued Campus agencies and p ro ced u res for handling in d i­ vidual student pro b lem s in existence before office of om budsm an w as e s ta b ­ lished D epartm ent ch airm en , a s s is ta n t deans, deans, vice ch an cello r and chan cel­ lo r; ju d ic ia ry com m ittee; dean of s tu ­ dents office. Have any of th e se s e rv ic e s been changed o r d isco n tin ­ ued? No Columbia U niversity A sso ciate dean of s tu ­ den ts fo r Columbia College; nothing on a u n iv e rsity wide b a s is. M ore co o rd i­ nation but no significant changes e x ­ pected; d is c i­ p lin a ry func­ tion to be rem oved from d ean 1s office. U n iv ersity o f D etro it M ichigan State U n iv ersity San Diego State College San Jo se State College N on-academ ic p ro b lem s to dean of s tu ­ dent a ffa irs ; academ ic p ro b lem s to college deans. Many offices to handle a wide v a rie ty of p ro b lem s, such a s s tu ­ dent a ffa irs, academ ic a d v ise rs, a s s is ta n t deans, coun­ selin g cen ter; but weak sy stem in som e col­ leg es. P re sid e n t of college and F aculty Senate responsive to student needs; plus u su al s e r ­ v ices. Student A ctiv ities Office and a ll i ts se rv ic e agencies; academ ic com m ittees; m any g rie v ­ ance p ro c e ­ d u re s. No No. "I r e f e r m any s tu ­ dents to th e m ." No. "One problem is that m any students don11 know w h a t's available to th e m ." "T hey o p e r­ ate m o re effectively when they know so m e ­ one d ire c ts stu d en ts to them and checks b a c k .' 240 Item U n iv ersity of C alifornia a t B erk eley TABLE C5 DESCRIPTION OF O FFICE OF CAMPUS OMBUDSMAN AT SIX INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION AS REPORTED BY THOSE OMBUDSMEN (OCTOBER, 1968) Item U n iv ersity of C alifornia a t B erkeley Columbia U niversity U niversity of D etro it Location of the office on cam pus T em p o rarily in a sm a ll wooden building at n o rth end of cam p u s; eventually to be with o th e r A cadem ic Senate offices n e a r c e n te r of cam pus. Low L ib ra ry Student (administra~- Union. tion building) in the cen ter of M orningside cam pus (D eK off's choice). A rrangem en t of the office Two ro o m s, one fo r ombudsm an and one for s e c re ta ry . N ice, larg e p riv ate of­ fice, outer office and reception a re a ; co n fer­ ence room and work room to be added. "N ine-bynine foot cubicle with round table and four c h a ir s .11 M ichigan State U niversity San Diego State College San Jo se State College B asem ent of B asem ent of M o rrill H all, new Student Union. one of the o ld e r build­ ings on cam ­ pus; between Student Union and Student S ervices building. Old b a r ­ ra c k s build­ ing in h e a rt of cam pus, betw een a d ­ m in istra tio n building and office of college p r e s ­ ident. "W indow less, O u ter office and in n e r g rim room office; "only w ith bright orange rug I suitable place at tim e p ro v id e d ." of appoint­ m ent. " R eception a re a and two offices fo r om budsm an and asso c ia te om budsm an; "not v e ry a ttr a c tiv e ." TABLE C5—Continued Item U n iv ersity of C alifornia at B erkeley Columbia U n iv ersity U n iv ersity of- D etro it M ichigan State U n iv ersity San Diego State College San Jo se State College None A ccess to copying m achine. R eco rd er, a c c e s s to copying m achine. A cc ess to re c o rd e r, copying m achine. D ictaphone, copying m achine. A ccess to re c o rd e r, copying m achine. A ssistan c e in office o p e ra ­ tion S ecretary ; p ro v isio n fo r g rad u ate law student a s s is ta n t, "but h a s n 't becom e n e c e s s a r y ." F u ll-tim e "top-flight" executive s e c re ta ry ; 5 student r e s e a rc h a s s is ta n ts . None, but "m u st get student s e c ­ r e ta r ia l h e lp ." F u ll-tim e s e c re ta ry "who so m e­ tim e s ad vises students in m y a b s e n c e ." None in office; " s e c ­ r e ta r y of . student body p resid e n t tak es m y c a l l s ." A sso ciate om budsm an (o n e -q u a rte r tim e) and s e c r e ta ry (fu ll-tim e ). "It doesn11; I am not a c ­ countable to p resid e n t of c o lle g e ." Ombudsm an is m e m b e r of college p r e s ­ id en t' s staff. t C om m ittee of "R ight now W here does it' s in one of A ca­ the office fit in in stitu tio n 1s dem ic Senate. lim b o ." a d m in istra tiv e s tru c tu re ? Ombudsman "H andm aid" of U n iv ersity re p o rts to Student Gov­ u n iv e rsity p re sid e n t. ern m en t. 242 Office equipm ent TABLE C 5--C ontinued Item U n iv ersity of C alifornia at B erk eley A cadem ic To whom a re w ritte n re p o rts Senate. subm itted? How often a re re p o rts m ade? Outstanding individual c a se s (but no nam es); a n a ly s is ; leg islativ e p ro p o sals. Annually U niversity of D etro it M ichigan State U niversity San Diego State College San Jo se State College U n iv ersity p resid e n t. Student Gov­ ern m en t p re sid e n t and Senate; a c a ­ d em ic deans; faculty. U n iv ersity p resid e n t (provost gets copy). P re sid e n t of college and student body p resid en t. College p resid e n t. "A ction pro p o sals" (reco m m en ­ dations) plus su m m ary of pro b lem s ombudsm an h as d ealt with. Sum m ary of p ro b lem s and p ro ced u res used to solve them , plus reco m m en ­ dations. Sum m ary of om budsm an's a c tiv itie s, student p ro b ­ lem s, so lu ­ tio n s, r e c ­ om m enda­ tions. G en eral im ­ p re ssio n s; m a jo r ca ses; recom m en­ dations. Sum m ary of a c tiv itie s of office, with reco m m en ­ dations. As needed. A s n e c e s­ s a ry . Annually Monthly, "but I hope they won' t be too exacting." As often a s n e c e ssa ry , plus end-ofy e a r re p o rt. 243 What is included in the re p o rts ? Columbia U niversity TABLE C5—Continued U niversity of C alifornia a t B erk eley Item •How w idely circu lated a re re p o rts ? D oes any agency o r official have authority to investigate^ the office? M ichigan State U niversity San Diego State College San Jo se State College Faculty, s tu ­ U n iv ersity p resid en t d ents, a c a ­ dem ic deans, and provost. u n iv e rsity p resid e n t. A ll ad m in is­ tr a to r s and o th e rs in te r ­ ested in the office. Not m ade public but copies go to offices and p erso n s r e ­ fe rre d to in re p o rts . U niversity of D etro it Not c irc u ­ lated but open to any m em b er of A cadem ic Senate; m ay be p rin ted in m inutes. U n iv ersity p r e s id e n t's decision. A cadem ic S enate. U niversity p resid e n t. U n iv ersity Student G overnm ent. U niversity p resid e n t. U n iv ersity p re sid e n t. P re sid e n t of U n iv ersity Student G overnm ent. T ru s te e s, u n iv e rsity p resid e n t, A cadem ic Council. No \ Not c le a rly estab lish ed . Unknown In addition to stan d ard ite m s, telephone(s) and ty p ew riter(s). ^At none of the in stitu tio n s had such an investigation actually o ccu rred . P re sid e n t of college. T ru s te e s, chancellor, p resid e n t of college. 244 To whom is the office fiscally accountable ? Columbia U n iv ersity TABLE C6 OBJECTIVES OF O FFICE OF CAMPUS OMBUDSMAN AT SIX INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION AS REPORTED BY THOSE OMBUDSMEN {OCTOBER, 1968) M ichigan State U n iv ersity Colum bia U n iv ersity U n iv ersity of D etro it What a r e the m a jo r o b jec­ tiv e s of the office? To h e a r student g riev an ces reg ard in g academ ic sta tu s d ecisio n s; a fte r in v e sti­ gation, r e c ­ om m enda­ tio n s m ay be m ade w here ap p ro p riate . To m ake contact with e n tire u n i­ v e rsity ; to inform ad ­ m in is tra to rs , faculty and students reg ard in g redefinition of office fo r handling g riev an ces. To m ake c e r ­ ta in a ll s tu ­ dents have opportunity to be h eard , covering wide range of co m p lain ts— academ ic, p erso n al, financial, etc. To help s tu ­ dents find solutions fo r th e ir p ro b lem s, w hether academ ic o r nonacadem ic. How do th ese objectives m ake the office d iffe r­ ent from other offices on cam pus ? Autonomy and n e u tra l­ ity; office is not linked to a d m in is tra ­ tion, A sso ­ ciated Stu­ d en ts, o r, in a se n se, to faculty. U nansw ered "S houldn't be d ifferen t. E v ery dean, a s s is ta n t dean, adm in­ is tr a to r and faculty m em ­ b e r should be an om buds­ m an in h is own r ig h t." U nansw ered M ore scope and pow er of investigation; im m ediate and forceful a c c e ss to se n io r faculty •. and h ig h er echelon a d ­ m in is tra to rs . Item San Diego State College San Jo se State College To be a v a il­ O riginally, to p ro te c t able to any student with hum an rig h ts any problem ; of ethnic m in o ritie s to help him solve it o r on cam pus: now, to p ro ­ te ll him how te c t individ­ he can get a s sista n c e . u a l rig h ts of a ll students on cam pus. The om buds­ m an p e rso n ­ a liz e s in d i­ vidual con­ c e rn . "If ev e ry office operated p erfectly , he w o u ld n 't be n e e d e d ." 245 U niversity of C alifornia a t B erk eley TABLE C7 OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES OF O FFICE OF CAMPUS OMBUDSMAN AT SIX INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION AS REPORTED BY THOSE OMBUDSMEN (OCTOBER, 1968) Item U niversity of C alifornia a t B erk eley U nd erg rad ­ uate and graduate students. U n d erg rad ­ u ate and g raduate students, a d m in is tra ­ to r s , faculty, p e rso n s from off cam pus, civ il se rv ic e em ployees. U n d erg rad ­ uate s tu ­ d ents. U n d erg rad ­ uate s tu ­ d ents. U n d erg rad ­ uate s tu ­ dents . E thnic m in o ritie s am ong u n d e r­ g raduate s tu ­ dents. O ff-cam pus p erso n s. P a re n ts of students. G raduate students. O ff-cam pus p e rso n s. U n d erg rad ­ u ate and graduate students, a d ­ m in is tra to rs (including p resid en t), faculty. L a rg e st num ber of clien ts ? U n d erg rad ­ E venly divided b e ­ u ate s tu ­ tw een u n d e r­ d ents. g rad u ate and g rad u ate s tu ­ d en ts. N on-students. 246 U n d erg rad ­ uate and graduate students, and a few p a r ­ en ts. U n d erg rad ­ u ate and graduate students, a d m in is tra ­ to rs , faculty. U n d erg rad ­ uate and g rad u ate stu d en ts, for academ ic p ro b lem s only. S m allest num ber? San Jo se State College U n iv ersity of D etro it Who m ay seek a ssista n c e from the om budsm an? M ichigan State U n iv ersity San Diego State College Columbia U n iv ersity TABLE C7—Continued Item U n iv ersity of C alifornia a t B erkeley Columbia U n iv ersity U n iv ersity of-D etroit M ichigan State U n iv ersity San Diego State College San Jo se State College Confidential Confidential Confidential R ecords open o r confiden­ tia l? Confidential Some open but som e confidential. Open "b ecau se I n e v e r re c o rd anything con­ fidential. " D oes om buds­ m an have a c c e s s to official re c o rd s on cam pus? Yes Y es, except classified governm ent re s e a rc h co n tra cts. Y es, "but it m ight be m o re diffi­ cult if I w e re n 11 also a d e a n ." Y es, except A ll except Y es, includ­ psychological ing faculty. fo r student health o r re c o rd s. p sy c h ia tric re c o rd s ; un­ c e rta in about faculty p e r ­ so n al re c o rd s . N ew spapers, faculty bul­ letin . N ew spapers, sp eech es, rad io . N ew spapers, sp eech es, n o tices on bulletin b o ard s. Speeches, new spapers, radio. * Speeches, new spapers, rad io in te r ­ view s. Speeches, new spapers, radio-T V . 247 How does om budsm an publicize a c tiv itie s ? TABLE C7—Continued Item N um ber of client contacts in typical week U n iv ersity of C alifornia a t B erkeley 6 to 8 Columbia U n iv ersity Too soon to d eterm in e. U niversity of D etro it 25 M ichigan State U n iv ersity San Diego State College San Jo se State College 27 12 to 15 About 15 G rad es, use of fa c ilitie s, ad m issio n policy, reg u ­ latio n s. i Housing, food se rv ic e s , lib r a r y s e r ­ v ice, book­ s to re . G rad es, fees, h o u s­ ing, lib ra ry , parking, u n fair g ra d ­ ing, rude tre a tm e n t, poor te a c h ­ ing. Wide range of academ ic and nonacadem ic p ro b lem s. G rades, fees, h o u s­ ing, p e r ­ sonal. G rades, fees, h ous­ ing, lib ra ry , parking. M ost frequent com plaints Lack of inform ation. Too soon to d eterm in e. A cadem ic re q u ire ­ m en ts. P ro b lem s of in stru c tio n . G rades Housing I I 248 Broad c a te ­ g o rie s of com plaints receiv ed TABLE C7—Continued Item U niversity of C alifornia at B erkeley Columbia U niversity U niversity of D etroit Michigan State U niversity San Diego State College San Jo se State College Simple p ro b ­ lem s take 1 o r 2 days; se rio u s p ro b ­ lem s h a v e n 't been resolved yet. Some p ro b ­ lem s take about 2 m inutes, but o th e rs w ill take 2 y e a rs. F o r som e com plaints no solution is p o ssib le; in g en eral, 2 to 4 days. Some can be ■settled in a few seconds; "one I have spent se v e ra l h o u rs on fo r alm o st a m o n th ." Some can be settled in 3 m inutes; o th e rs take w eeks, even m onths. Some can be handled by a phone call, "but I 'v e w orked a s long a s 3 w eeks on one co m p lain t." What kinds of com plaints a re not consid­ e re d ? Nonacadem ic o r solely p o liti­ cal. U ncertain None Any student problem that involves offcam pus peo­ ple o r law s. Em otional problem s that should go to a counselor. , P re lim in a ry 'in q u iry m ade fo r a ll com ­ plaints. Typical case and its disposition Student u p set Too soon to by change in d eterm in e. academ ic r e ­ quirem ent; investigation rev ealed that it d id n 't affect h e r. P re -s e n io r w asn11 p e r ­ m itted to buy s e n io r ring; investigation put an end to a r b itr a r y regulation. F o r 2 y e a rs student w as unable to get u n iv ersity to change h e r home ad ­ d r e s s ; om ­ budsman c o rre c te d it by phone call. Student with fath er in se rv ic e claim s r e s i ­ dent low -fee sta tu s; le g is ­ la to r is help­ ing om buds­ m an solve problem . F aculty m em ­ b e r charged w ith im p ro p er tre a tm e n t of N egro student m ade public apology a fte r ombudsm an intervened. 249 Length of tim e required to solve a problem TABLE C7—Continued Item U niversity of C alifo rn ia a t B erk eley Columbia U niversity U n iv ersity of t)e tro it M ichigan State U n iv ersity Counseling, inform ation gath erin g , p ersu asio n , reco m m en ­ dations. Get and check fa c ts because som e com ­ p lain ts a re unjustified; appeal to au th o rity if n e c e ss a ry . Counseling, advising, app eal to authority, p ersu asio n , publicity. R eactions of faculty and a d m in istra to rs ag ain st whom students m ake com plaints M ost se rio u s case brought ad v e rse reac tio n from faculty m em ­ b e r involved. R eaction in one ca se in ­ volving a d ­ m in is tra to r w as s a tis fa c ­ to ry . E xcellent co­ G en erally excellent operation in g e n e ra l: "so cooperation. fa r only one faculty m em ­ b e r and one a d m in istra to r have given m e tro u b le ." L isten, advise, explain, re f e r , take d ire c t action, review . San Jo se State College Advice to Get d e ta ils, student; p e r ­ r e f e r student to p ro p e r suasion to faculty and office; o r in ­ a d m in istra ­ v e stig a te , find solution to rs . o r m ake reco m m en ­ dation. "No p attern h e re a t a l l , " "D efensive a t f ir s t but now that they know I w ill defend them if they a r e rig h t, accep ­ tance has in c re a s e d ." 250 P ro b le m ­ solving techniques used San Diego State College TABLE C 7--C ontinued Item P ro c ed u re if no rem edy can be found for valid com ­ plaint U niversity of C alifornia at B erkeley Publicity Columbia U n iv ersity U n iv ersity of D e tro it M ichigan State U n iv ersity San Diego State College San Jo se State College Follow -up on reco m m en ­ dations; "if one ad m in is­ tr a to r balks, 1 take it to the next le v e l." "I se rv e a s contact m an betw een faculty d ec isio n ­ m aking groups and s tu d e n ts ." "I adm it I 'm "If no rem edy stum ped. If can be found I get s e v e ra l w ithin the s tru c tu re , I like it, I go to p resid e n t go beyond the o r p ro v o st s tr u c t u r e .11 fo r advice o r with su g g e s­ tio n s. " Recom m end a change in ru le s o r p ro ­ cedure so problem won' t happen again. P r e s id e n t's office. To whom m ay a com plainant appeal beyond the om buds­ m an? C hancellor (highest au th o rity on cam pus). P re sid e n t (final au th o rity on cam pus). P re sid e n t of Student Gov­ ern m en t o r u n iv e rsity p re sid e n t. StudentFaculty Ju d ic ia ry o r u n iv e rsity p resid e n t. Which m eans of com m uni­ cation is used m o st by the om budsm an? With com ­ plainant, fa c e -to -fa c e contact; fo r gathering inform ation, telephone. Telephone and fa c e -to face contact. F a c e -to -fa c e contact. With s tu ­ F a c e -to -fa c e dents, face - contact. to -fa c e con­ ta c t; w ith faculty, te le ­ phone. Which is used the le a s t? U nansw ered W ritten m e ssa g e s. Telephone W ritten m e ssa g e s. Vice p resid e n t o r p resid e n t. W ritten m e ssag e s. Telephone and fa c e -to face contact. W ritten m e ssa g e s. TABLE C8 E FFE C T S OF O FFICE OF CAMPUS OMBUDSMAN AT SIX INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION AS REPORTED BY THOSE OMBUDSMEN (OCTOBER, 1968) Item U n iv ersity of C alifornia at B erk eley Columbia U niversity U n iv ersity of D etro it Student Faculty R elations B oard of A ssociated Students gave office "v ery stro n g su p ­ p o rt. 11 U nansw ered Student Gov­ ern m en t. Any evidence of organized opposition to office of om budsm an? No "Student gov­ ern m en t opposition at f ir s t because m y appoint­ m ent w as by u n iv e rsity p resid e n t without s tu ­ dent involve­ m ent. " No Some a g ita ­ tion in favor of office on p a rt of stu ­ dents "but I d o n 't r e c a ll student gov­ ernm ent going on re c o rd in fav o r of it." No San Diego State College San Jo se State College 1968 cam ­ paign p ro m ise of Student Gov­ ernm ent p resid en t. "Students wanted it continued, a t le a st black com m unity did. Students have estab lish ed m th e ir own om - n> budsm an in student gov­ ern m en t. 11. 252 Any evidence of organized support for office of om budsm an? M ichigan State U n iv ersity No "M exicanA m erican com m unity does not tru s t any college officials, to an e x te n t." TABLE C8—Continued Item U n iv ersity of C alifornia a t B erk eley W ill office of om budsm an function " a s i s 11 for next ten y e a rs ? U niversity of D etro it "One com ­ m ittee decided to g et rid of old ru le s; lib ra ry s e t up g rie v ­ ance com ­ m ittee of students and fa c u lty ." "C e rta in req u ire m e n ts fo r g rad u a­ tion w ere ch an g ed ." Should be a fu ll-tim e position; qualified people h ard to find b ecause it is such a d iffi­ cult job. W ill continue W ill receiv e a m uch b e tte r to function. definition; om budsm an w ill be con­ cerned w ith m o re than Students; m o re sta ff m ay be needed. M ichigan State U n iv ersity San Diego State College San Jo s e State College "O peration of s e v e ra l cam ­ pus offices is tightened up a s re s u lt of m y in q u irie s and re c o m ­ m endations. " "M ore s tu ­ dent p a r tic i­ pation on college com ­ m itte e s ." "A num ber of p o licies w ere changed, in such a re a s a s p la c e ­ m ent, h o u s­ ing, te r m i­ nating e n ro llm e n t." "No idea; I don11 fo re se e any r e a l le s ­ sening of student te n ­ sion, not in im m ediate f u tu r e ." "Don11 know; it m ay have perm anent u tility ." It h a s a place and w ill con­ tinue func­ tioning; its ro le w ill be b e tte r u n d e r­ stood; it w ill be expanded to include b ro a d e r sp e ctru m of p ro b lem s. 253 Any in stan ces "Not yet. I w here p olicies hope it w ill o r p ro ced u res h ap p en ." w ere changed a s d ire c t re s u lt of om ­ budsm an' s in q u irie s and/ o r re c o m ­ m endations ? Columbia U niversity TABLE C9 ATTITUDES AND OPINIONS OF CAMPUS OMBUDSMEN AT SIX INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION (OCTOBER, 1968) Item U n iv ersity of C alifornia a t B erkeley On the whole, A ttitude of v e ry co o p er­ student p e r ­ sonnel w o rk e rs ativ e. reg ard in g om ­ budsm an What a r e b est qualifications fo r cam pus om budsm an? Y e a rs of ex perience on a p a rtic u la r cam pus; sy m ­ pathetic to ­ w ard students; open m inded; not su b ject to outside p r e s ­ s u re s ; te n u re ; no w o rrie s about p rom o­ tion. Colum bia U niversity U n iv ersity of D etro it M ichigan State U niversity "V ery much in accord w ith what I am doing b ecause we a r e acting a s a unit; good feed b ack ." Unknown; "I A verage o r le s s than av­ have had no era g e ; "o u r feedback dean of s tu ­ from th e m ." dent a ffa irs d o esn '1 'buy' th is position a s m uch a s he sh o u ld .11 Teaching and a d m in istra ­ tive e x p e ri­ ence, plus student con­ ta c t; e x p e ri­ ence on a p a rtic u la r cam pus depends on its siz e . "S ort of born to the p o si­ tion; ra p p o rt w ith students; love fo r u n i­ v e rsity ; teaching e x ­ p erien ce; an o u tsid er would have d iffic u lty ." Much e x p e ri­ ence as classro o m te a c h e r; som e a d m in istra ­ tiv e e x p e ri­ ence useful; also student advising o r counseling; leg al e x p e ri­ ence o r a c ­ c e ss to law ­ y e r. San Diego State College San Jo se State College "V ery healthy; m any of them are my p e r­ sonal frien d s. T h e r e 's no reaso n for com petition." "T hey a r e su spicious of om budsm an, som ew hat m isinform ed and resen tfu l; they feel an in tru sio n on th e m ." E ducation (discipline) m akes little difference; ex perience in w orking with students. E xperience in academ ic com m unity; good rap p o rt w ith students; som e adm in­ is tra tiv e "know-how"; cam pus m in ­ is t e r fits th is d e s c rip ­ tion. TABLE C9—Continued Item U niversity of C alifornia at B erkeley M ichigan State U n iv ersity San Diego State College San J ose State College Colum bia U niversity U niversity of D etro it S e ttle r of g riev an ces, im p a rtia l judge, M r. H onesty. Foot in the d oor, wedge in the w all. One who encourages students to work through estab lish ed channels. U nansw ered "I would keep good re c o rd s from the b e ­ ginning, no m a tte r how busy I w a s ." L earn m o re about ro le; re la te b e tte r to M exicanA m erican com m unity. "Much m o re v arie d ; I expected m o re a c a ­ dem ic com ­ p lain ts. 11 "Y es. I did not have tim e to study what to do; ju st s ta rte d do­ ing i t . " "O thers expect him to be som e kind of god and reso lv e a ll difficulty. He is n 11 and c a n 't . " C ourt of la s t re s o rt. If you could begin again as an om buds­ m an, what would you do d ifferen tly ? U nansw ered "I would have "I would s ta rte d a s an dem and f o r­ om budsm an." m a l accep ­ tan ce of position by u n iv e rsity p re s id e n t." Have ac tiv itie s differed from ex pectation s? No "Not re a lly , "I changed except they ex isting operations to a r e m u ltip ly ­ m eet m y ex ­ ing. " pectatio n s. " Red tape cut­ A dvocate of te r , m iddle hum an rig h ts m an, friend of all, public defender, m ira c le m an. 255 What te rm s b est d escrib e om budsm an ro le ? TABLE C9—Continued Item U niversity of C alifornia at B erkeley Columbia U niversity U n iv ersity of D etro it M ichigan State U n iv ersity San Diego State College San Jo se State College "No, b ecause th is is a h alftim e appoint­ m ent. " "I h a v e n 't felt iso lated y et; om buds­ m an who gets stuck in h is office c a n 't be effective." O ccasionally "I have felt som e is o la ­ tion from m y academ ic d ep artm en t, but I tr y to keep in touch through m e e t­ ings and by teaching a t le a s t one co u rse a y e a r in m y a r e a . " "I feel v ery lonesom e being se p a ­ rated from m y co l­ leag u es. I am not k eep ­ ing up in m y subject f ie ld ." No, because ro le of om ­ budsm an is so s im ila r to ro le of cam ­ pus m in iste r. A re you a p a rt of o r a p a rt from the cam pus E sta b ­ lish m en t? "The in ten t is to be a p a rt from the E s ta b lish ­ m e n t." A p a rt of it. "I c a n 't d i­ v o rce m y self from those in pow er; yet m y ro le is p e c u lia r ." A p art fro m it. " I’ m m o re student orien ted . F o rm a l su p ­ p o rt fro m u n iv e rsity p resid en t won' t change that, e ith e r." "A p a rt of it, but in a c u r­ io u s position. I w as given p o st by E s ­ tab lish m en t to c ritic iz e it. I 'm a faculty m e m ­ b e r, not an a d m in is tra ­ to r ." A p art from it, "although th is is d e ­ batable. Om budsm an c a n 't be a defender of sta tu s q u o ." A p a rt of it. "O m budsm an m u st have som e kind of com m itm ent to the in s ti­ tution. " 256 Have you experienced ro le conflict? f TABLE C 9--C ontinued Item U niversity of C alifornia a t B erkeley Columbia U niversity U niversity of D e tro it M ichigan State U n iv ersity San Diego State College San Jo se State College "Not yet. It w ill n ev er rem ove a ll the f r u s tr a ­ tion but it c e rta in ly w ill h e lp ." "I' m s u r­ p rise d a t the am ount of quiet on cam pus now and the am ount of hope th at changes w ill o c c u r ." "A bsolutely. I have m o re understanding and m o re p a tie n c e ." "If so, v ery slightly. It s till goes o n ." "Y es, but we h a v e n 't come to any of the m ain te s ts y e t ." "Y es, but it i s not going to prevent a ll confronta­ tio n s. " D isappoint­ m ents experienced in serv in g as om budsm an U nansw ered U nansw ered "When so m e­ one d o e s n 't ap p reciate o r m is in te rp re ts what I am d o in g ." Inability to do anything about valid g riev an ces concerning stu d en tfaculty r e la ­ tionships, esp ecially g ra d e s. "Running into a stone w all. Students a re in h aste. I hate to be a long-range o p e r a to r." Inability to re la te to M exicanA m erican com m unity. 257 Does the office of om budsm an help allev iate h o stility and fru stra tio n of stu d en ts? TABLE C 9--C ontinued i Item U n iv ersity of C alifornia at B erk eley Colum bia U niversity U niversity of D etro it M ichigan State U niversity Helping s tu ­ dents in alm o st d esp erate situ atio n s. Moving a A cceptance and p ra is e of case sheet from "in black com ­ p ro c e ss" file m unity. to "co m ­ pleted" file. "Two y e a rs fo r m e, although 3 o r 4 m ight be m o re s e n s i­ ble. No lo n g er than th a t." One y e a r, renew able fo r another v ear. "A fter a y e a r o r so you a re p sy ­ chologically drained and p erh ap s a b u re a u c ra t y o u rse lf." Tenured faculty m em ­ b e r on 2 y e a r appoint­ m ent. "E ach om budsm an h a s h is blind spots and m ight lo se p e rs p e c tiv e ." No Y es. "P lu sh fa c ilitie s a r e not im p o r­ tan t. " U nansw ered Getting any Students filterin g into s m a ll p ro b ­ lem solved. office with com plaints o r ju st to talk. How long should om ­ budsman* s te rm of office be? Two y e a rs . Two y e a rs , p erh ap s longer. A re your budget, fa c ili­ tie s and sta ff adequate? Yes No. M ust be la rg e r to in c re a s e work load. Two y e a rs . "It* s good to have new b lo o d .11 No V "Y es, so f a r ." » San Jo se State College 258 S atisfactions experienced in serv in g as om budsm an San Diego State College I TABLE C9—Continued Item U n iv ersity of C alifornia at B erkeley Columbia U niversity Depends on c a se . If publicity pin­ points com ­ plaint, no. If identity can be con­ cealed and case is of g en e ra l in te re s t, y es. U ncertain. Some m eans i s needed to le t students know that office is viable. Sociological im plication s of cam pus om budsm an developm ent A m elio rates im p e rso n al n atu re of the la rg e ca m ­ pus, but shouldn11 u n ­ duly p re s s u re young faculty m e m b e rs to conform . Only way of m aking b u re a u c ra c y m o re hum an­ is tic . Yes A "gim m ick," but a v ery good one. A ll suni v e rs ifie s w ill have one in^ten y e a rs because s tu ­ dents w ill dem and it. M ichigan State U niversity San Diego State College San Jo se State College Caution m ust "H aven11 be ex ercised . m ade up m y m in d ." "I wouldn* t publicize an individual c a s e ." When they involve policy he can* t get changed. At tim e s, he can help u n iv e r­ sity by m ak ­ ing a public iss u e (poli­ cies r a th e r than people). Is it sp re a d ­ ing because it is a "gim ­ m ick" to keep students q u iet? "If I believed that I* d give up th e jo b ." P erso n alizin g la rg e in s ti­ tutions; g iv ­ ing individual a c c e ssib ility to o rg an iz a­ tion. A new in ­ stru m en t in p ro jectiv e psychology. E ach se e s in it w hat he w ants to. Adding new fro stin g to an old job is an erro r. 259 Should findings and re c o m ­ m endations of om budsm an be w idely publi­ cized ? U niversity vof D etroit TABLE C9—Continued Columbia U niversity U niversity of D etro it Have you m ade contact with other cam pus om budsm en ? Yes "A bsolutely." Yes W ill cam pus ombudsm an attain p ro fe s ­ sio n al sta tu s and becom e perm anent addition to academ ic sc en e? "S ep arate p ro fessio n , 1 doubt; p e r ­ m anent ad d i­ tion, y e s ." "Y es. People with common concerns band to g e th e r ." Item M ichigan State U n iv ersity "L im ited , but it h as im proved m y p e rfo r­ m ance. " "T h ere Y es, but a should n ev e r national o r ­ be a p ro fe s ­ ganization would be dif­ sio n al om ­ budsm an. ficult to m ain tain b e­ I 'm not keen cause no one about a p ro ­ fessio n al o r ­ w ill sta y in ganization. " office long. San Diego State College San Jo se State College "I am try in g to develop unity among C alifornia om buds­ m en. " Y es, by c o r­ respondence. "P ro b ab ly not. Individ­ u al w ill have standing in a p ro fessio n before he g ets the job." "A qualified y e s . N ational organization could help people sh a re id e a s ." 260 U n iv ersity of C alifornia a t B erkeley A P P E N D IX D FORM USED BY OMBUDSMAN A T MICHIGAN STA TE UNIVERSITY 261 No. ___________ O F F IC E O F TH E OMBUDSMAN D a t e ___________ N a m e _________________________________ S tudent N u m b e r _____ C o lle g e _______________________________ M a j o r ___________ • —C la s s F S L o ca l A d d re s s J S G Spec. P r o g r a m ( C ir c le One) ___________________________ T elep h o n e ____________________ 1 w ish to c o n su lt th e O m b u d sm an about A P P E N D IX E L E T T E R S IN CLUD ED W ITH Q U ESTIO N N A IRE SEN T TO STU D EN TS WHO CONSULTED ' OMBUDSMAN A T MICHIGAN STA T E UNIVERSITY 262 M IC H IG A N STATE U N I V E R S I T Y b a st i a n k n g . m ic h io a n h i d OFFICE OF TUB OMBUDSMAN F e b ru ary 3» 1969 The opening o f t h e O f f i c e of-Ombudsman In 1967 a t Michigan S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y marked a n o t h e r I n n o v a t i o n In American h i g h e r e d u c a t i o n . S i n c e t h e n , t h e r e has been much I n t e r e s t on t h e campus and a c r o s s t h e n a t i o n r e g a r d i n g I t s f u n c t i o n s . Although I have r e c e i v e d c o n s i d e r a b l e Informal " f e e d b a c k " from s t u d e n t s who have c a l l e d on me, as y e t no o r g a n i z e d e f f o r t has been made t o o b t a i n an e v a l u a t i o n o f t h e o f f i c e from s t u d e n t s who have used I t s s e r v i c e s . Now the tim e has come f o r such an a s s e s s m e n t . With my c o o p e r a ­ t i o n , Mr. Howard Ray Rowland, a d o c t o r a l s t u d e n t In t h e C o l le g e of E d u c a t i o n , • Is c o n d u c t i n g by means o f t h e e n c l o s e d q u e s t i o n n a i r e a s u rve y o f s t u d e n t s who c o n s u l t e d th e Ombudsman d u r i n g t h e l a s t f o u r months o f 1968. You a r e I n clu de d In t h a t g r o u p . I s i n c e r e l y hope t h a t you w i l l f i l l o u t t h i s q u e s t i o n n a i r e and send I t p r o m p tly t o Mr. Rowland In t h e e n v e l o p e p r o v i d e d . R e s u l t s o f t h i s s u r v e y w t l l a f f e c t t h e f u t u r e o p e r a t i o n o f t h i s o f f i c e and p e rh a p s t h e o p e r a t t o n of s i m i l a r o f f i c e s which a r e b e in g e s t a b l i s h e d on o t h e r campuses. To i n s u r e f u l l and f r e e r e s p o n s e from s t u d e n t s s u r v e y e d , Mr. Rowland has d e v i s e d a syste m whereby n e i t h e r he nor I w i l l be a b l e t o I d e n t i f y by name t h e I n d i v i d u a l r e s p o n d e n t s . The o n ly e x c e p t i o n s wi l l be s t u d e n t s who v o l u n t a r i l y r e v e a l t h e i r names t o Mr. Rowland s o t h a t he might c o n t a c t them f o r I n t e r v i e w s . So p l e a s e d o n ' t h e s i t a t e t o " t e l l I t l i k e I t I s " In t h i s q u e s t i o n n a i r e . Your p a r t i c i p a t i o n wi l l be g r e a t l y a p p r e c i a t e d by a l l co n ce rn e d . Sincerely (/ James D. Rus Ombudsman 263 M I C H I G A N STATE U N I V E R S I T Y om ci or b a st l a n h n o • m ic h iq a m 4m ij t u i om b u d sm an F e b ru ary 17» 1969 R e c e n tl y you were s e n t a survey q u e s t i o n n a i r e s e e k i n g Informa­ t i o n a bo u t your e x p e r i e n c e wi t h t he Of f i c e of Ombudsman. H r. Howard Ray Rowland, the d o c t o r a l s t u d e n t who I s c o n d u c t in g t h e s u r v e y , Informs me t h a t some o f t h e q u e s t i o n n a i r e s s t i l l have n o t been r e t u r n e d . Enclosed Is a n o t h e r copy of the q u e s t i o n n a i r e . P l e a s e f i l l I t o u t and send I t to Mr. Rowland In th e env elo pe p r o v i d e d a t you r e a r l i e s t c o n v e n i e n c e . Responses n o t r e c e i v e d w i t h i n t h e n e x t two weeks can no t be Included In t h e s u r v e y r e s u l t s . May I 'r e m i n d you a g a i n t h a t t h i s Is t h e ' f i r s t s y s t e m a t i c e f f o r t t o a s s e s s t h e Of f i c e o f Ombudsman by su r v e y i n g s t u d e n t s who have used I t s services. Your p a r t i c i p a t i o n w i l l make th e s t u d y more c o m plete . Please involved In that event, t h a t he w i l l be a s s u r e d t h a t your name w i l l not be r e v e a l e d t o anyone t h i s e v a l u a t i o n , u n l e s s you v o l u n t e e r f o r an I n t e r v i e w . In only Mr. Rowland wi l l l e a r n your i d e n t i t y and he has pledged keep I t c o n f i d e n t i a l . If you have a l r e a d y r e t u r n e d the f i r s t q u e s t i o n n a i r e , you may d i s ­ reg ard t h i s a p p e a l . Thank you f o r you r c o o p e r a t i o n . S incerely I L ends James D. Rust Ombudsman A PPE N D IX F Q U ESTIO N N AIRE SEN T TO STU D EN TS WHO CONSULTED OMBUDSMAN A T MICHIGAN STA T E UNIVERSITY Form No. OMBUDSMAN SURVEY at Michigan State University (W in te r T e rm 1969) This confidential survey is being conducted by Howard Ray Rowland, NDEA Graduate Fellow, Room 401-1, Erickson Hall, College of Education, Michigan State University (Phone 353-3708). OMBUDSMAN SURVEY AT MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY (Winter Term 1089) P lease read this fir st; The Office of Ombudsman was established in 1967 at Michigan State University in response to a recommendation of the Academic Freedom Report that a senior faculty member be appointed to "asBlst students in accomplishing the expeditious settlement of their problem s.11 To a s se s s the effectiveness of that office, this questionnaire is being mailed to all students who consulted the ombudsman during the period September 1 through December 31, 1968. Your cooperation is earnestly solicited. Please answer all questions and mall the completed questionnaire to the researcher within two weeks. For your conven­ ience, a return envelope is enclosed. Important! The researcher conducting this survey does not know your name. Although infor­ mation you provide will be made available to interested persons, including the ombudsman, you will remain anonymous to all concerned. This precaution is taken to enable you to answer a ll questions candidly and completely. UnleBS you choose to do so in Section F, do not reveal your name on this form. Thank you! A. Information About You IN THIS SECTION, ANSWER ALL ITEMS AS THEY APPLIED WHEN YOU CONSULTED THE OMBUDSMAN SOMETIME BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 1.AND DECEMBER 31, 1068. 1. When you consulted the ombudsman, your class rank was: (1) Freshman (2) ___ Sophomore (3) Junior (4) Senior (5) ___ Special Student (6) _ _ _ Graduate Student (7) Other (indicate) ___________________ 2 . When you consulted the ombudsman, you r age (in y ea rs) w a s : ___________ 3. Your s e x is ; (1) (2) _ _ _ Male F em ale 4. When you consulted the ombudsman, your m a rita l Btatus w as: (1) S ingle (2) M arried (3) _ _ D ivorced (4) ____ Widow o r W idower 5. When you consulted the ombudsman, you w ere a leg a l resid en t of: ( 1) ___ M ichigan (2)_____ Another sta te (3) ____ A nother country 6. When you consulted the ombudsman, your student resid en ce was: On cam pus Off cam pus __ in a resid en ce h a ll . (2) ----- in m arried housing (3) ___ in su p erv ised housing (hom e of p arent(s) or (1)' rela tiv e(s), co -o p h ou se, fratern ity, sorority, su p erv ised apartm ent) (4) in unsupervised housing 7. When you consulted the om budsm an, you r sc h o o l o r c o lle g e within the U n iv e r sity w as; (1) ___ University College (2) __ College of Agriculture and Natural Resources (3) ___ College of ArtB and Letters 6 (4) ___ College of Business (5) ___ College of Communication Arts ° ^ ---- College of Education m _ College or Engineering (B) ___ College of Home Economics (0)____ (10)____ .... (11) ___ (12)____ (13) ___ .... (14)____ ___ (1<)____ College of Human Medicine James Madison College , ... _ ,, Justin Morrill College , _ . _ Lyman Driggs College _ .. ,., . , . College of Natural Science _ . College of Social Sciences College of Veterinary Medicine olhcr |>[lsclfy) 8. When you consulted the ombudsman, were you also enrolled in Honors College? (1) ___ Yes (2) ___ No 0. When you consulted the ombudsman, your cumulative grade point average was: (1) ___ 4.0 If uncertain about your cumulative grade point 3 0 to 3 0 average, remember this letter grade scale: (3) 2.0 to 2.0 (4) ___ 1.0 to 1.0 in ___ |.Below | i1.0 n (5) A* ■ a4.n0 B ■ 3.0 to 3.9 C _ - ,2.0_ .to ,2.0_ D ■ 1. 0 to 1. 0 Below D ■ Below 1.0 1 (6) ___ None (first-term student) 10. When you consulted the ombudsman, how many institutions of higher education other than Michigan State had you attended? (1) None (2) One (3) Two (4) ___ More than two 11. If you had attended some other institution(s), Indicate kind(s): (1) __ Two-year college (3) ___ Other (explain) (2) Four-year college or university ______________________________ 12. When you were in high school, what was the approximate total enrollment of the school you attended for the greatest length of time? (1) Under 500 (2)____ 500 to 1000 (3) 1000 to 2500 (4) Over 2500 Your Prior Knowledge About the Ombudsman From which source(s) did you learn about the (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) ___ Student(s) ___ Residence Hall Advlser(s) ___ Instructor(s) ___ Academic Adviser(s) ___ Adminlstrator(s) (6) ___ Academic Freedom Report State News (7) (8) _ Professional Counselors) (0) Other (indicate) 2. If you checked more than one source, from which did you get the most information about the ombudsman? (Check only one) (6) _ Academic Freedom Report (1) ___ Student(s) __ State News (2) ___ Residence Hall Adviser(s) (7) _ Professional Counselor(s) (8) (3) ___ Instructor(s) Other (indicate) (4) ___ Academic Adviser(s) (9) (5) ___ Admlnistrator(s) C. Nature of Your Problem Indicate the general nature of the problem you took to the ombudsman: (Check one or more) Academic Status (9) (1) ___ Registration and Admission (10) Academic Advice (2) ___ Academic Requirements Health Center (3) ___ Traffic Regulations (11) Employment (12) (4) ___ Financial Need (13) (5) ___ Quality of Instruction ■ Library (14) Grades (6) ___ Housing (15) ----- Other (indicate) (7) ___ Use of Facilities and Services (8) Tuition and Fees 2. The identity of a student who consults the ombudsman is not revealed except possibly to those directly involved in his complaint. Would you have consulted the ombudsman if his records were open for inspection by anyone? (1) Yes (2) No (3) Uncertain D, Disposition of Your Problem 1. To how many people in authority did you take your problem before consulting the ombudsman? (1) ___ None (3) _ _ Two (5) Morethanthree (indicate) (2) ___ One (4) ___ Three ____________________________ 2. If you made an appointment with the ombudsman, how long beyond the appointed hour did you wait to see him ? (1) ___ No delay at all (3) 10to30 minutes (5) Over60minutes (2) ___ Under 10 minutes (4) ____ 30 to 60 minutes 3. If you did not make an appointment with the ombudsman, how long did you wait to see him after arriving at his office? (1) ___ No delay at all (3) 10to30 minutes (5) Over60minutes (2) ___ Under 10 minutes (4) ____ 30 to 60 minutes 4. How long did it take tho ombudsman to handle your problem? (1) ___ 10 minutes or less (4) ___ 1 day to 1 week (2) ___ 10 m i n u t c B to 1 hour (5) ___ 1 week to 1 month (3) ___ 1 hour to 1 day (6) ___ more than 1 month 5, As far as you personally arc concerned, to what extent is the problem you took to the ombudsman now solved? (1) ___ Completely solved (2) More than half solved (3) ___ Half solved (4) ___ Less than half solved (5) ___ Not solved at all (6) ___ The problem is worse than it was before G. How much did the ombudsman help you with your problem? (1) ___ Much more than 1 expected (2) ___ Slightly more than 1 expected (3) ___ About as much as 1 expected {4) ___ Slightly less than I expected <5) ___ Much less than I expected 7. How would you describe your degree of satisfaction with the way the ombudsman handled your problem? <1} ___ Totally satisfied (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) <7) ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ Mostly satisfied Slightly satisfied Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied Slightly dissatisfied Mostly dissatisfied Totally dissatisfied • 8. In your opinion, did the ombudsman do all he could within the authority of his office ■to help you with your problem ? (1) ___ Yes {2) No (3) ___ Uncertain 0. If the ombudsman could not help you attain the outcome you desired, did he adequately explain why? (1) Yes (2) No 10. After consulting the ombudsman, did you experience unpleasant treatment by any person(s) involved in his investigation of your complaint? (1) Yes (2) No 11, If y o u r a n s w e r to Q u e stio n 10 w a s Y e s , p le a s e d e s c r ib e what happened; 12. IN THE EVENT YOU ARE NOT PRESENTLY ENROLLED, ANSWER THIS QUESTION AS IF YOU WERE STILL A STUDENT AT MICHIGAN STATE: If you had another problem you could not handle through normal University "channels," would you return to the ombudsman? (1) ___ Yes, for any kind of problem (2) ___ Yes, but only for certain problems (3) ___ Uncertain about returning (4) ___ No, would not return 13. Would you recommend the ombudsman to other students? (1) ___ Yes, for any kind of problem (2) ___ Yes, but only for certain problems (3) ___ Uncertain about recommending (4) ___ No, would not recommend Your Attitudes Regarding the Ombudsman 1. The ombudsman should be: (Check one) (4) ___ a student (1) ___ a teaching faculty member (5) ___ a lawyer (2) ___ a non-teaching faculty member (administrator) (6) ____ a campusm inister (3) ___ a professional student personnel (7) ___ none of these (explain) worker 2. How long should one person serve us ombudsman? (1) L ess than 2 years (2) 2 years (3) More than 2 years 3. ReaBon(s) for your answer to Question 2 ; _________________________________________ 4. Which group or combination of groups should select the ombudsman? (6) ___ Faculty and Administration (1) ___ Administration (7) ___ Administration, Faculty and (2) ___ Students Students (3) _____ Faculty (8) ___ Other (indicate) (4) ___ Students and Faculty (5) ___ Students and Administration 5. Read the following list of traits. Then mark a 1 in front of the most important trait an ombudsman should have. Mark a 2 in front of the second most important trait and a 3 in front of the third most important. DO NOT MARK MORE THAN THREE. (1) ___ Patience (2) Empathy (3) ___ Understanding (?) ___ Efficiency (12) ___ Experience (8) ___ Campus "contacts" (13) ___ Sensitivity (9) ___ Authority (14) ___ Effectiveness (4) ___ A ccessibility (10) ___ Persuasiveness (5) ___ Impartiality (11) ___ Honesty (15) ___ Other (identify) (6) ___ Knowledge of campus operations and regulations Are the services of the ombudsman widely known among students? (1) ___ Yes (2) ___ No (3) ___ Uncertain 7. What was your general impression regarding the location of the ombudsman's office on the campus? (1) ___ Very positive (2) ___ Positive (3) ___ Neither positive nor negative (4) ___ Negative (5) ___ Very negative 8. In your opinion, where on the campus should the ombudsman' 8 office be located? (1) ___ Where it is (2) ___ Student Union (3) ___ Student Services Building (4)____ Administration Building (5)____ Other (specify) 8. Drawing from your personal experience, do you believe the ombudsman helps alleviate student frustration and hostility? (1) ___ Yes (2) ___ No (3) Uncertain 10, The functions of the ombudsman should be: (1) ___ continued without modification (2) ___ discontinued (3) ___ modified in some way 11. If you believe the ombudsman's functions should be modified, indicate how: p . Your A v a ila b ility for In terview The researcher may want to interview some respondents. If you have no objection to being contacted for an interview, please list your: Nam e___________________________________________________________________________ Address ________________________________________ Phone________________________ MAKE ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS YOU WISH ON THIS PAGE OR ON A SEPARATE SHEET. PLEASE PLACE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE IN RETURN ENVELOPE AND MAIL IMMEDIATELY. DO NOT PUT YOUR RETURN ADDRESS ON ENVELOPE. THANK YOU I