INFORMATION TO USERS This dissertation was produced from a m icrofilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The follow ing explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated w ith a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You w ill find a good image o f the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being p h o to g rap h ed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper le ft hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections w ith a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The m ajority o f users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from dissertation. "photographs" if essential to the understanding o f the Silver prints of "photographs" may be ordered at additional charge by writing the Order Department, giving the catalog number, title, author and specific pages you wish reproduced. University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, M ichigan 48106 A Xerox Education Company 72-30,063 WEBSTER,Jr., Randolph Wyatt, 1933THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DEAN OF STUDENTS OFFICE AT MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY. Michigan State University, Ph.D., 1972 Education, administration University Microfilms, A XERQXCompany, Ann Arbor, Michigan (^Copyright by RANDOLPH WYATT WEBSTER, JR. 1972 THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DEAN OF STUDENTS OFFICE AT MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY By Randolph Wyatt Webster, Jr, A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Administration and Higher Education 1972 PLEASE NOTE: Som e p a g e s m a y h a v e i n d i s t i n c t print. F i l m e d as r ec eive d. University Microfilms, A Xerox Education Company ABSTRACT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DEAN OF STUDENTS OFFICE AT MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY By Randolph Wyatt Webster, Jr. Purpose and Statement of ttxe Problem The purpose of this dissertation was to provide an historical study of the development of the Dean of Stu­ dents Office at Michigan State University between 1857 and the 1970-1971 school year and to contrast and compare this development with national student personnel trends. The author's hypothesis was: that the development of the Dean of Students Office at Michigan State University closely approximates the development of dean of students offices across the nation. To accomplish this purpose the author first pre­ sented a general historical overview of the evolvement of the dean of students offices in the United States which provided a frame of reference for the examination of the development of the Michigan State University Dean of Stu­ dents Office. Secondly, the historical-chronological Randolph Wyatt Webster, Jr. development of the Dean of Students Office at Michigan State University was discussed in depth. Thirdly, the author analyzed the data and attempted to support or refute the hypothesis. Methodology Data were obtained from written sources and from personal interviews. This study included both original and secondary written sources, although original sources were used primarily when the historical development of the Dean of Students Office at Michigan State was described. The written sources were subjected to external criticism— determining the genuineness of the evidence, while internal criticism was applied to the personal interviews and to the written sources. Organization of the Chronological Development of the Dean of Students Office at Michigan State University The presentation of the development of the Dean of Students Office at Michigan State University was divided into five periods for discussion. 1st: 1857-1858 through 1895-1896, covered the years prior to the establishment of the Office of Dean of Women, the first recognized office which performed deanof-student-related functions. Randolph Wyatt Webster, Jr. 2nd: 1896-1897 through 1934-1935, included the development of the Office of the Dean of Women which encompassed the formative stages of the Dean of Students. 3rd: 1935-1936 through 1943-1944, described the evolvement of the Office of the Dean of Men and the ser­ vices that both the Offices of the Dean of Women and Dean of Men provided during the latter 193 0 ’s and the World War II years, the early 1940's. 4th: 1944-1945 through 1960-1961, detailed the establishment of the first officially titled Office of the Dean of Students, covering Stanley E. Crowe's and Tom King's administrations. 5th: 1961-1962 through 1970-1971, explored the- advancement of the Office of the Dean of Students under the guidance of John Fuzak, Dean of Students and later Vice President for Student Affairs; Eldon Nonnamaker, Assistant Director, later Associate Dean and then Dean of Students; and Milton B. Dickerson, Vice President for Student Affairs. Findings 1. That in most instances there was a definite pattern in the development of the dean of students offices across the nation, a progression of emphasis from one of control to one of services and educational functions, to one of student development. Randolph Wyatt Webster, J r . 2. That the chronological periods of development of the Dean of Students Office at Michigan State demonstrated the following: 1857-1858 Through 1895-1896 Precedents were established that were to be followed later by student personnel deans. Emphasis was on control with the President and the Faculty unilaterally determining policies, rules, and regulations and utilizing the stu­ dent government as a strategem for control. 1896-1897 Through 1934-1935 Regulative activities continued to be empha­ sized but women students were afforded the opportunity to modify and/or change various policies and rules. The providing of ser­ vices by student personnel administrators began to develop. 1935-1936 Through 1943-1944 Emphasis was on student activities and the service concept. 1944-1945 Through 1960-1961 Specialized student personnel services were established and expanded. Randolph Wyatt Webster, Jr. 1961-1962 Through 1970-1971 A greatly expanded student personnel pro­ gram— one which not only provided the tra­ ditional services but also furnished the thrust for the development of community government and a student development phil­ osophy, singularly advanced the profession­ alization of student personnel workers, assisted in conflict resolution in situations of critical magnitude never before encountered by the University, undertook as a Divisional responsibility evaluative and research pro­ jects, instituted significant innovative pro­ grams, and incalculably increased the number of contacts with students, individually and collectively. 3. That the analysis and interpretation of the data does support the hypothesis that the development of the Dean of Students Office at Michigan State University approximates the evolvement of dean of students offices across the nation, a progression of emphasis from one of control to one of services and educational functions to one of student development. Expectations and Recommendations It would appear that Michigan State University Dean of Students Office will continue to expand its Randolph Wyatt Webster, Jr. efforts in the student development processes, "facili­ tating as effective personal and interpersonal growth as can be devised in the frame of the Collegiate experience." A continued emphasis will be placed on learning the various principles of conflict resolution; re-identifying various channels through which the Dean of Students Office reaches students and redefining its modes of operation; helping students to develop leadership skills; providing more comprehensive services to off-campus stu­ dents; establishing and/or participating in ongoing programs in areas which students have indicated are crucial, e.g., racism, drugs; and conducting evaluations of the Office's operation, based whenever possible, upon attainment of specific objectives. It is recommended that the Michigan State Uni­ versity Dean of Students Office establish a Dean of Stu­ dents Archives and identify an individual to act as curator. are: Additional studies which could be developed one, a study which establishes the critical require­ ments, for Dean of Students staff members— student inter­ actions, through an analysis of critical incidents as reported by Dean of Students personnel and students; two, a study, conducted after Michigan State University has experienced at least a year of student involvement in academic governance, which would compare the perceptions of students, faculty, and administrators with respect Randolph Wyatt Webster, Jr. to the effectiveness of students' participation in various areas of academic governance, e.g., department, college, Academic Council, Academic Council Standing Com­ mittees . ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author expresses his sincere gratitude to his guidance committee m e m b e r s : Dr. Eldon R. Nonnamaker, Dr. Louis F. Hekhuis, Dr. Max R. Raines, and Dr. James B. McKee, for their constructive suggestions and for being so willingly available for consultation. A note of special thanks is extended to my chairman, Dr. Nonna­ maker, for his direction and for his kindness and thought­ fulness. Deepest appreciation is expressed to my father who has given me continuous encouragement throughout the ye a r s . Many thanks to my wife, Diana, for her faith in my educational quests, her steadfast love, and her assistance, and to my children, Randy, Marian, Trent, and Ruth, for their cooperation, understanding, and enthusiastic support. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter I. 1 INTRODUCTION Purpose and Statement of the Problem . Limitations of the Study ................ Definition of T e r m s ............. ... Organization of the Study................ II. III. METHODOLOGY ................................. THE EVOLVEMENT OF THE DEAN OF STUDENTS OFFICES IN THE UNITED STATES................ Introduction . . . . .. ................ Historical Development.................... Summary . ................ IV. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DEAN OF STUDENTS OFFICE AT MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY . 3 4 4 6 8 12 12 12 23 24 THE CONCEPT OF STUDENT CONTROL PERIOD, ............. 1857-1858 THROUGH 1895-1896 26 Administrative-Faculty Responsibility Student Self-Government ................ Student Government in Disfavor. Additional Areas of Faculty Control . Emergence of Service Concept . Summary . . . . . ................ 27 29 32 33 34 35 ESTABLISHMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE OFFICE OF THE DEAN OF WOMEN, ENCOMPASSING THE FORMATIVE STAGES OF THE DEAN OF STU­ DENTS OFFICE PERIOD 18 96-18 97 THROUGH 1934-1935 ................................. 37 Impact of Dean of Women's Office . Dean of Women as in Locus "Maternal". Expansion of Dean of Women's Role. Separate Government for Women Emerges 38 39 42 45 in Chapter Page Organized Effort to Promote Women's D e v e l o p m e n t .............................. The First Administrator to Assume the Role of aDean of S t u d e n t s .............. Functions Crystallized for the Dean of Women's Office .......................... Service Role Expanded............... S u m m a r y ................................. 48 50 52 55 56 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE OFFICE OF THE DEAN OF MEN AND THE EVOLVEMENT OF STUDENT ACTIVITIES AND THE SERVICE CONCEPT PERIOD 1935-1936 THROUGH 1943-1944 . . . 57 Office of the Dean of Men Established . Expansion of Student Activities in the 1930 's .................................... Informal Non-Professional Guidance A c t i v i t i e s .......................... Gradual Development of Students' SelfDetermination .......................... 64 Impact of World War I I ............ S u m m a r y , ............................. 65 EMPHASIS ON SPECIALIZED STUDENT PERSONNEL SERVICES PERIOD 1944-1945 THROUGH 19601 9 6 1 ................................... Establishment of the Dean of Students Office— Service Concept in Full Sway. Student Self-Determination Expanded . Contact with Students Through Student A c t i v i t i e s ......................... S u m m a r y ............................. ERA OF EMPHASIS ON STUDENT DEVELOPMENT PERIOD, 1961-1962 THROUGH 1970-1971. . 59 63 63 66 . 67 76 81 83 . Expanding Faculty-Administrative Inter­ actions ................................. Impact of Nation-Wide Student Activism . Controversy Over "Speakers Policy" . . The Challenge of Legalisms and Due P r o c e s s ............................. 91 The Academic Freedom Report, The Judicial System and Student Development. Relating to Student Activists During Confrontations in the Late 1960's. . . iv 58 85 86 88 90 92 96 Chapter Page Reorganization of the Dean of Students O f f i c e .................................... 97 Professionalization of Staff............. 99 Commitment to Research and Evaluation. . 102 Innovative Programs...........................103 Increased Support for Student Organi­ zations........................................ 106 Summary........................................ 107 V. ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF THE DATA . . 109 S u m m a r y ........................................ 122 VI. SUMMARY, EXPECTATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS . 123 S u m m a r y .......................... 123 Expectations .............................. 125 Recommendations and Implications for Further Study .............................. 138 Concluding Statement........................... 140 BIBLIOGRAPHY.............................................. 142 APPENDICES Appendix A. Student Government Constitutions................. 149 B. The Staffing and Structures of the Dean of Students Office at Michigan State University. 191 Dean of Students Office Organizational Structures and Job Descriptions ............. 234 D. Student Group Regulations .................... 325 E. Graduate Program in College Personnel Work As Established in 1964 ....................... 333 The Associate Dean of Students' Charge to Staff Concerning Reassessment of the Dean of Student's Office .......................... 339 A Chronology of Organizations, Departments and Positions Which Had Relevance to Stu­ dent Personnel Administrations ............. 342 C. F. G. v LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Page Services Rendered by the Office of High School Cooperation According to T y p e s ........................................ vi 73 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The philosophical emphasis and specific responsi­ bilities of dean of students offices across the nation are constantly changing. A general overview of the evolve- ment nationally and a detailed analysis of Michigan State University Dean of Students Office's development within that context can contribute to a better understanding of the origin, nature, aims, and objectives of dean of stu­ dents offices in general and the MSU Dean of Students office in particular. This research is conducted on the historical continuum, referred to by Cowley as "investi­ gating the present in light of the past with a view to preparing for the constantly arriving future . . . the history of each sector has shaped its present character­ istics, and both the past to glimpse No and the present can be assessed and to prepare for the future."'*' study has been located that traces the develop­ ment of a dean of students office at a large public land ^W. H. Cowley, "Student Personnel Services in Retrospect and Prospect," School and Society, LXXXV, No. 2103 (January, 1957), 20. 1 2 grant educational institution of higher learning from its inception to the present time. A study such as this could provide prospective and experienced student person­ nel workers, other administrators, faculty, and the interested public with new frames of references, new perspectives, and new focuses for evaluation. Knight points out that "a knowledge of history of schools and other educational agencies is an important part of the professional training of the teacher or a school admin­ istrator . . . only in the light of their origin and growth can the numerous educational problems of the present be viewed sympathetically . . . the school administrator, or the public. by the teacher, . . . " 2 His­ torical research can also provide happiness and pleasure. A. L. Rowse says that "the knowledge of history enriches and fills out our appreciation of the world around us under our eyes. It gives an interest and a meaning to things which perhaps we should not have noticed before. . . . " 3 Therefore, this dissertation will attempt to provide an in-depth comprehensive study of the Dean of Students Office at Michigan State University, a large public land grant educational institution. 2 (Boston: E. W. Knight, Education m the United States Ginn and C o . , 1^34), p. 38. 3 A. L. Rowse, The Use of History Macmillan Co., 1948), pTI 3"l. (New York: The 3 Purpose and Statement of the Problem The purpose of this dissertation is to provide an historical study of the development of the Dean of Stu­ dents Office at Michigan State University and to contrast and compare this development with national student personnel trends. It is the author's hypothesis that the development of the Dean of Students Office at Michigan State University closely approximates the development of dean of students offices across the nation. To accomplish this purpose the author has first presented a general historical overview of the evolvement of dean of students offices in the United States, pro­ viding a frame of reference for the examination of the development of the Michigan State University Dean of Students Office. Secondly, the historical-chronological development of the Dean of Students Office at Michigan State University from 1857 through the 1970-1971 school year is discussed in depth. Thirdly, based on analysis of the data, the author has attempted to support or refute the hypothesis. It was the responsibility of the author to select, organize, and cogently present events, facts, and trends concerning the development of Michigan State University Dean of Students Office, fostering an understanding of this Office in the 70's in light of its past. 4 Limitations of the Study This study is subjective. While every effort was made to apply rigid control standards to all phases of this study, the dissertation is influenced by the author's perceptions and beliefs. Man is a social creature in an institutionalized world who thinks as a member of a group. 4 What man sees and what he thinks are shaped by his background, his common experiences. This author is a Caucasian, thirty-eight-year-old male who received his B.A. with a major in history, his M.A. with a major in Administration, Educational Service from Michigan State University, and is presently working on his doctorate in Higher Education-Student Personnel while a full-time member of the Dean of Students Staff at Michigan State. These factors and many more, realized or not, affect how the study is organized, what is included, omitted, the conclusions drawn, and others. Definition of Terms Control.— A process justified by the in-locoparentis concept, varying from unilateral establishment and enforcement of rules and regulations by the faculty and/or administrators as agents of the governing boards 4 Reality Peter L. Berger, The Social Construction of (New York: Anchor Books, 1967), pp. 48-61. 5 to partial or incomplete involvement of students in their own self-discipline and development and in the operations of the University. Dean of the College.— A position created during President Butterfield's administration; a "Dean of Deans" who was responsible for all on-campus education; John Phelan, the only individual to hold this title, served from 1925-1926 through 1927-1928. Dean of Students.— Student personnel administrator. House Director.— Supervisor of dormitory life in the Women's Building. In loco parentis.— The concept that an institution of higher education serves in lieu of the parents for students attending the institution, teaching values, maintaining order, preserving traditional morals. M. A . C .— Michigan Agricultural College, founded in 1855 and established in 1857 was re-named Michigan State College in 1925 and in 1955, Michigan State University. Professionalization.— The development of pro­ fessional ability, attitudes, and status. Regulatory Committee on Social Functions.— The Faculty Committee on Entertainment, the Society and Entertainment Committee, the Social Committee of the 6 Faculty, and the Faculty-Student Social Committee were various titles applied to the organization which regu­ lated student social functions. Service.— Assistance to or for students provided by specialized student personnel programs, with or without student involvement in the designing and implementation of the programs. Societies.— Student organizations originally established to provide opportunities for discussions and presentations of essays and lectures which later became more social-function oriented. Student Development.— A total university community effort to solve campus problems and to develop and pro­ vide services, facilitating meaningful growth experiences, with the office of the dean of students in a key position to play a role of active intervention in every sector of the campus community. This approach stresses faith in individual's potentiality for development, understanding, and acceptance of others and also involves continued emphasis by the office of the dean of students on research, consultation services, innovative programs, and evaluation. Organization of the Study This study is organized into six chapters. Chapter I is an introduction to the study and includes 7 the purpose of the study and a statement of the problem, limitations of the study, definition of terms, and the organization of the study. Chapter II discusses the methodology, the method of securing and source of data, and the method of treating data— external and internal criticism and utilization of appendices. Chapter III presents a general historical overview of the evolvement of the dean of students offices in the United States, establishing the context in which the Michigan State Uni versity Dean of Students Office is examined. Chapter IV is an in-depth study of the development of the Michigan State University Dean of Students Office. Chapter V provides an analysis and interpretation of the data. Chapter VI, the concluding chapter, provides the summary including expectations for future developments within the Michigan State University Dean of Students Office, recommendations, and implications for further study. CHAPTER II METHODOLOGY Data were obtained from written sources and from personal interviews. Written materials were secured from the Michigan State University Dean of Students Office's files, publications, and College Personnel Library; Michigan State University Library, the reserve stacks, the Archives, and the business library located in Eppley Hall; the State of Michigan Library; the Michigan State University Office of the Registrar; and individuals' personal professional collections. written sources used are: Examples of specific The Report of the Secretary of the State Board of Agriculture, 1867-1957; Michigan State University "Faculty Minutes" 1857-1959 and "Admin­ istrative Minutes" 1916-1959; Michigan State University Office of the Dean of Students staff reports and pro­ posals; Michigan State University Catalogues, student handbooks, student yearbooks, student and faculty phone directories; Madison Kuhn's The First Hundred Years; Maud Gilchrist's The First Three Decades of Home Economics at Michigan State College; and W. J. Beal's History of 8 9 The Michigan Agricultural College and Biographical Sketches of Trustees and Professors. Those individuals interviewed were Dean of Students and Home Economics staff members, other administrative officers, and faculty members and students. While this study is based on both original and secondary written sources, original sources are used pri­ marily when the historical development of the Dean of Students Office at Michigan State University is described. Both written sources were subjected to external criticism— determining the genuineness of the evidence, and internal criticism— determining the meaning, trustworthiness, and value of the statements made. 5 After the written sources were tested for authenticity, internal criticism was applied, e.g., it was found that the names obtained from phone books were not always current; internal criticism was also applied to statements made during interviews. Examining the qualifications of the reporter or ascer­ taining the time span between events and comments about the events were examples of internal criticism applied; following is a descriptive explanation of these examples. Individuals were identified to be interviewed and those to be quoted from written source material were selected Carter V. Good, The Methodology of Educational Research (New York: D. Appleton-Century Company, 1935), pp. 257-64; Walter R. Borg, Educational Research An Intro­ duction (New Y o r k : David McKay Company, I n c ., 1963) , pp. 193-96. 10 because of their primary relationship to student personnel work or who were in position to knowledgeably comment on the development of the Michigan State University Dean of Students Office. Of those interviewed, one Dean of Stu­ dents staff member has served from 1934 to the present; one executive secretary has, with the exception of a break between April 1, 1948, to September, 1950, been secretary to the Dean of Men, the Counselor for Men, the Dean of Students, and the Vice President for Student Affairs from 1937 to the present; one Home Economics faculty member has been on the staff since 1931; and two administrators served, among other capacities, as Assistants to President John Hannah and are presently directly responsible for the University's historical collections. Upon examination of the time span between events and recollections of the events it was found that individuals interviewed often could not accurately remember specific dates, events, and items if there were a considerable time lapse between the period discussed and the present. Therefore, written materials were primarily used for specific verification of facts with observations by individuals interviewed being incorporated in the dissertation as overall impressions. The appendices have been organized as an important part of this dissertation. Instead of including reference materials in the body of the paper, as experimental design 11 studies are prone to do, this study includes in the appendices supportive documents that were obtained through historical research. This includes documents not readily obtainable by the reader, but which provide the reader an opportunity to explore ideas in depth, statements, and trends, or to trace in detail the staffing and structure of the Dean of Students Office at Michigan State University. The appendices are: Appendix A — Student Government Constitutions; Appendix B — The Staffing and Structures of the Dean of Students Office at Michigan State University; Appendix C — Dean of Students Office Organizational Structures and Job Descriptions; Appendix D — Student Group Regulations; Appendix E— Graduate Program in College Personnel Work as Established in 1964; Appendix F — The Associate Dean of Students' Charge to Staff Concerning Reassessment of Dean of Students Office; Appendix G— A chronology of Organizations, Departments, and Positions Which Had Relevance to Student Personnel Administration. CHAPTER III THE EVOLVEMENT OF THE DEAN OF STUDENTS OFFICES IN THE UNITED STATES Introduction This chapter presents a general historical over­ view of the evolvement of the dean of students offices in the United States, establishing the context in which the development of Michigan State University Dean of Students Office will be examined. Historical Development The development of relevant functions for dean of students offices, undergirded by philosophical and theo­ retical constructs has been slow. Prior to the estab­ lishment of offices of dean of men and dean of women— offices which performed functions later incorporated within the deans of students offices— university presi­ dents, members of the faculty, and the boards of trustees, acting in loco parentis administered the discipline and provided various services to the students, such as, con­ sultation, tutoring, recreational activities, general 12 13 health, and sanitation care. These services were not organized ongoing programs but rather by-products of an educational environment in which both the educators and the students lived in close proximity. The events following the passage of the Morrill Act in 1862 precipitated the creation of offices of dean of men and dean of women. More than 600 colleges and uni­ versities were founded between 1862 and 1912 with the predominant objective: . . . to make higher education the right of every citizen regardless of place of residence, social standing, vocational aspiration, or sex. The work­ ing out of this prepotent aim is to be seen in the efforts that were made to start a college, however humble, in every sizeable settlement and in the three new types of colleges that emerged— women's colleges, co-educational colleges, and 'manual l a b o r ' colleges . . . enrollment in institutions of higher learning expanded from approximately 4 0,000 to over 400,000 students. Pioneer campuses metamorphosed into large, well-equipped, modern institutions with curriculums that had multiplied from two or three to an impressive array of liberal arts and professional courses of study.» Leonard declares that between 18 62 and 1912 the growth in number and variety of students and the educational insti­ tutions' increased complexity necessitated the organization of personnel services into separate administrative units ... as had not been the case earlier the trustees now . . . could no longer take an active part in campus life. Presidents could no longer personally super­ vise the study halls, assign students to rooms or g Eugenie Leonard, Origins of Personnel Services In American Higher Education (Minneapolis: University of: Minnesota Press, 1^56), pp. Ill, 113. 14 tramp the dormitory halls at midnight. They did not have time to buy food or teach students table manners. Disciplinary problems, except for the most serious cases, had to be delegated, along with control of the numerous activities, to designated personnel in charge of student a f f a i r s . 7 0 Johnson points out that since many of the "tasks" grew out of crisis situations and "things gone wrong" the role of student personnel administrators, e.g., those perform­ ing dean-of-students-related functions, was defined largely in terms of control, structured containment, and supervision. Wrenn specifically identifies the addition of the presence of women on the campus as hastening the estab­ lishment of student deans. It was obvious that college deans, always men, could not be expected to deal with the peculiar problems of "females," particularly as to living quarters, dress, and conduct, so deans of women began to appear. These first deans bore such Victorian titles as Lady Principal, Matron, or even Warden, but they performed the work of a dean of women with additional responsibility for courses or curricula to which women were admitted. At first only regu­ lators of conduct and protectors of women's morals, these deans began to counsel women, to pay attention to unique needs, to see the relationship of out-of­ class activities to classroom performance, and to plan for the social development of women students. College and university administrators eventually saw that similar services might be provided for men.9 ^Ibid., p. 114. g Walter F. Johnson, "Student Personnel Work in Higher Education: Philosophy and Framework," in College Student Personnel: Readings and Bibliographies, ed. by Fitzgerald (Boston! Houghton Mifflin Company, 197 0), p. 6. lege 9 C. (New York: Gilbert Wrenn, Student Personnel Work in Col­ The Ronald Press, 1951), p. T3! 15 The embryonic formations of dean of students offices began, then, during the latter years of the 1800's when the first dean of men was appointed at Harvard and the first deans of women by that title were appointed at Swarthmore, University of Chicago, and Oberlin.'*'0 Significant direction was given to the dean of students office in 1938 when leaders in the field of education, such as Hopkins, Paterson, Lloyd-Jones, C. G. Wrenn, Cowley, published, of View" "The Student Personnel Point (.revised later in 1949) . This is summarized by M u e l l e r ^ who states that the "Student Personnel Point of View" emphasizes: Cl) Individual differences are anticipated, and every student is recognized as unique, (2) each individual is to be treated as a functioning whole, (3) the personnel program is to be developed on the basis of individual drives, interests, and goals. E. G. Williamson 12 and Esther Lloyd-Jones 13 published books, 1937 and 1938 respectively, which spotlighted ~^ Ibid., p. 30; Kate Mueller, Student Personnel Work in Higher Education (Boston: Houghton Mifilin Com­ pany, 1961) , pp. 52-53. 11Ibi d ., p. 56. 12 E. G. Williamson, Student Personnel Work: An Outline of Clinical Procedures (New York: McGraw Hill Book Company, 1937) . 13 Esther Lloyd-Jones, A Student Personnel Program for Higher Education (New York! Harper and Brothers, may. ' -------- 16 student personnel work and helped influence the dean of students offices to develop specialized services— orien­ tation, counseling, placement, and others. Following World War II, with the advent of federal legislation for veterans and increased interest and mone­ tary aid for school guidance programs, the dean of stu­ dents offices' programs of student personnel services were greatly expanded. 14 Wrenn 15 points out that as the student personnel workers, e.g., deans of students, were able to help students in various kinds of counseling relationships, were able to encourage and supervise stu­ dent organizations and social situations, and were able to provide personalized facilities for the housekeeping aspects of campus life— living and eating arrangements, financial aid, etc., they served to meet student needs. He states that the progress in the development of student responsibility for life in the residence halls, the regu­ lations of student conduct on campus, and the management of student organizations was slow during the 1950's and 1960's; but he observes the establishment of counseling 14 Archie Ayers, Student Services Administration in Higher Education (Washington; Government Printing Office, 1966), p. 6; C . Gilbert Wrenn, "The Development of Stu­ dent Personnel Work in the United States and Some Guide­ lines for the Future," in The Individual and the System, ed. by W. John Minter (Boulder, Colorado: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, 1967), p. 104. 1 5 Ibid., p. 102. 17 centers staffed with professionally equipped personnel, the integration of services for men and women under deans of students, and the strengthening of financial aid, job placement, and health services did, however, occur during this period. 16 The dean of students offices were still expected, though, to maintain their "watch dog" role, but during this calm period of time, this role was not militantly challenged by students. Gradually the emphasis developed which projected the dean of students offices in the role of "educator." Stark 17 Johnson discusses this aspect, past and present, while 18 adds that some institutions tried to relate all personnel functions to this standard with the result that programs were placed out of focus, overemphasizing "educative value" as had been done earlier to "service value." While a gradual shift in emphasis from regarding students as objects to be controlled, to viewing students as individuals to be helped, serviced, and educated was demonstrated, it was not until the mid-sixties that the . Gilbert Wrenn, "Foreword," in College Stu­ dent Personnel, ed. by Fitzgerald (Boston: Houghton Miff­ lin Company, T970), p. v. 17 Matthew Stark, "The Student Personnel Administra­ tor As An Educator: The Teaching of Human Relations," NASPA, V, No. 2 (October, 1967), 147-49. 18 Johnson, p. 10. 18 dean of students offices, reacting to their own selfconsciousness, began discernible, distinctive changes in working with students. This self-consciousness arose as a result of the continued professionalization of its members and in response to student activism, a force which demanded, often dramatically, that the dean of students' office increase its knowledge of and responsive­ ness to the student culture, which compelled the office to evaluate its techniques used in relating to people, and which required of student personnel workers expanded pro­ fessional knowledge in areas such as law, drugs, racism, sexuality, territoriality, behavioral development. As the offices began examining their functions it became apparent even with the shift in emphasis that a myriad of control activities were still being regarded as essential tools for dealing with students. Priorities were established and the offices began to re-define their role to that of student development specialist— "facili­ tating as effective personal and interpersonal growth as can be devised in the frame of the collegiate experience." This approach is designed to enable every student to become a self-directing person— an individual so aware of himself, others, and his environment that he is able 19 Philip A. Tripp, "The Role of the Dean of Stu­ dents in the Academic Community: Servant or Leader?" Conflict and Change in the Academic Community (papers prepared for NASPA 52nd Annual Conference, Detroit, National Association of Student Personnel Administrators, April, 1970), p. 45. 19 19 to interact as an integrated, responsible personality. Johnson, 20 speaking of student personnel work in general (but specifically applicable to the dean of students office) reflects that student development is not a new concept. He states what is different is the emphasis and the approach— a total university community effort to solve campus problems and assist individuals in their behavioral development with the student personnel worker in a key position to play a role of active intervention in every sector of the campus community. As the emphasis in behavioral development evolved and as the in loco parentis dimension diminished the nature of the dean of students' control function changed to that of assisting all members of the university community to cooperatively develop guidelines for academic freedom and due process and help one another to act responsibly. Deans of students offices have come to realize the value of working through student concerns as suggested by Keniston: 21 handling student complaxnts honestly, openly, consistently, indicating the underlying intel­ lectual, moral, philosophical, or political positions from which they act, clearly delineating university 20 21 Johnson, p. 10. Kenneth Kenison, "Deans and Dissenters" (address at the National Association of Student Personnel Adminis­ trative Conference, 1967, Cincinnati, Ohio). 20 expectations for student conduct and providing responsive channels. Campus tensions in many cases have been reduced through the willingness of dean of students personnel and other members of the university community to involve students in the decision-making process. Indeed, The Report by the American Council on Education's Special Committee on Campus Tensions 22 underscores this action, stating campus tensions will be eased as all members of the academic community are involved in decision­ making and held responsible for their actions, and as communications are improved within the university. The current student development approach also includes a continued emphasis on research, consultation services, innovative programs, and evaluation, and deans of students are being enjoined to continue advances in these areas. Wise 23 states that considerable amount of time should be spent on researching student cultures and Greenleaf 24 asks should not student personnel administrators 22 . "Involving Entire College Community in Decisions Called Key to Easing Campus Tensions," The Chronicle of Higher Education, IV, No. 29 (April 27, 1970) , TJ 3—5. ^ W . Max Wise, "Culture, Politics and The Dean of Students," Conflict and Change in the Academic Community (papers prepared for the NASPA 52nd Annual Conference, Detroit, National Association of Student Personnel Admin­ istrators, April, 1970), p. 50. ^ E l i z a b e t h Greenleaf, "How Others See Us," The Journal of College Student Personnel, IX, No. 4 (July, I9TO , 231.------------------------ 21 be attuned to student concerns, such as, draft, racial problems, student power? Tripp adds, that the dean of students must be "a student of students and be responsible to translate his findings concerning them into programs and services that facilitate their education individually and collectively." 25 It is also pointed out that as dean of students offices develop understandings of and sensi­ tivities to students' concerns and needs, it can perform a valuable function of serving as interpreter and con­ sultant to the faculty, other administrators, and the interested public. 26 Katz 27 asserts that deans of stu­ dents should work with the academic community in developing curriculum. innovative. Rogers 28 exhorts deans of students to be According to Robinson 29 student personnel administrators must continue to conduct evaluations, 25 Tripp, p. 44. 26 Johnson, p. 11; Wise, pp. 50-51. 27 Joseph Katz, "The Role of the Student Dean in Educational Innovation" (paper read at the College Student Personnel Institute, Claremont, November, 1965, College Student Personnel Abstract, I, No. 3 [April, 1966], 164). 28 Allen Rodgers, "The New Student Dean An Innovator for Student Development," NASPA, VI, No. 3 (January, 1969), 135-37. 29 Donald W. Robinson, "Evaluation as a Function of Student Personnel Administration," in College Student Personnel, Readings and Bibliographies, ed. by Fitzgerald (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1970), p. 156. 22 listing six reasons: (1) means for clarifying program goals and objectives, (2) means of relating program objectives to the broad educational objectives of the university, (3) means for evaluating effectiveness of the total program and its several subdivisions, for keeping the program in proper perspective, for program modification, (4) means (5) basis C6) stimulus for basic research. Evaluation, as Johnson and Fitzgerald have discussed in Student Personnel Seminars, 30 are to occupy more than ever a position of prominence in the dean of students office. Chapman has advanced a plan, based on the student development concept, which could serve as a model for deans of students offices. 31 He quotes Hazen Foundation's report of the Committee on the Student in Higher Education which advocates developmental education and cites Abraham Maslow's hierarchy of human needs, stating that colleges have opportunities to meet higher order needs. His model is a Student Development Center that employs action pro­ grams of Human Relations, Volunteer Services, 30 Dr. Walter F. Johnson and Dr. Laurine E. Fitz­ gerald, Education 98 2, Fall, 1969. 31 James L. Chapman, "Toward a New Concept of Stu dent Affairs," College and University Business, March, 1969, pp. 69-72. 23 Motivational Seminar, Counseling and Research, and Admin istrative Services to focus on individual development through need satisfaction. Summary The evolvement of the dean of students offices can be traced through its emphasis— from control, to services and education, to student development which incorporates services, education, behavioral development and a continued emphasis on research, consultation ser­ vices, innovative programs, and evaluation. CHAPTER IV THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DEAN OF STUDENTS OFFICE AT MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY The presentation of the data of this chapter will be divided into five periods for discussion. 1st: 1857-1858 through 1895—1896 covers the years prior to the establishment of the Office of Dean of Women, the first recognized office which performed deanof-student-related functions. 2nd: 1896-1897 through 1934-1935 includes the development of the Office of the Dean of Women which encompasses the formative stages of the Dean of Students Office. 3rd: 1935-1936 through 1943-1944 describes the evolvement of the Office of the Dean of Men and the ser­ vices that both the Offices of the Dean of Women and Dean of Men provide during the latter 1930's and the World War II years, the early 1940's. 24 25 4th: 1944-1945 through 1960-1961 details the establishment of the first officially titled Office of the Dean of Students, covering Stanley E . Crowe1s and Tom H. King's administrations. 5th: 1961-1962 through 1970—1971 explores the advancement of the Office of the Dean of Students under the guidance of John A. Fuzak, Dean of Students and later Vice President for Student Affairs; Eldon R. Nonnamaker, Assistant Director, later Associate Dean and then Dean of Students; and Milton B. Dickerson, Vice President for Student Affairs. THE CONCEPT OF STUDENT CONTROL PERIOD, 1857-1858 THROUGH 1895-1896 26 27 Admini str ative-Faculty Responsibility During the period of 1857-1896 the President and faculty under authorization of the Board of Trustees, acting in loco parentis, administered discipline and pro­ vided services to the students, establishing philosophies and guidelines that were eventually incorporated in the student personnel d e a n s 1 modus operandi. The following rules and regulations established by the Board of Trustees on October 23, 1857, indicate the rigid standards which were applied by the Agricultural College of the state of Michigan: 1. Students shall not absent themselves from the college premise's without permission. 2. They are required promptly to attend all chapel exercises, recitations, lectures and field operations and to discharge every duty imposed upon them. 3. They shall faithfully observe all study hours and remain quietly in their rooms during the same, except on leave of absence. 4. They shall neither bring nor use upon the premises any spirituous or intoxi­ cating liquors. 5. The use of tobacco and other narcotics being disapproved of under all circumstances is forbidden in any of the college buildings. 6. No student will be permitted to use obscene or profane language. 7. Card playing and other games of chance are wholly prohibited. 8. No student will be per­ mitted to interrupt or interfere with the labor of fellow students and other persons employed on the premises, or to visit them at their labor. 9. The mutilation or defacement of any part of the college premises is regarded as a great misdemeanor both in principle and accessories. All damages shall be assessed upon the offenders. 10. On Sabbaths students shall attend the public religious services held at the college and during the hours not neces­ sarily otherwise occupied shall remain quietly in their rooms and engage in nothing inconsistent with the proper observance of the day. 11. Upright and gentlemanly deportment will on all occasions be 28 required. 12. As no person can be received into the Institution under the law creating it for less than one term, any student leaving during that term with­ out permission from the faculty is liable to expulsion and a forfeiture of further privileges in the Institution. 13. Violations and disregard of the rules of the College or countenancing the same on the part of others will subject the offender to reprimands, suspensions or expulsions, as the faculty may determine. 14. Students are expected fully to cooperate with the faculty to secure the object for which the Institution was established. 15. Firearms will not be permitted to be kept or used upon the College p r e m i s e s . 32 George Geddes1 statement illustrates the philoso­ phy of the time during which the rules were established: I speak from experience when I say that nothing can be better for the student than constant occupation under rules and orders. Three hours each day given to work, and four to six more devoted to study, will so fill up the time that but little will be left for outside amusements.33 The rules were expanded and modified down through the years but it was not until the 1960's that the emphasis was changed from control, as an in-loco-parentis responsi­ bility by the University and, in particular, the Dean of Students Office, to involvement of the total University community, faculty, students, and administrators in developing policies, rules, and regulations and engaging in the mediation and/or adjudication of disputes or violations. 32 "Minutes of the Board of Trustees," October 23, 1857. 33 George Geddes, "Agricultural College of Mxchigan and Its Influence," Report of the Secretary of the State Board of Agriculture of the State of Michigan, For the Year 1872, p. Z8T:-------- ------------------ 29 Student Self-Government The first organization for student government, Students' Government, was established m 1875. 34 Begin­ ning in the school year 1881-1882, a trial by jury was included in the governmental process. 35 The Students' Government was simplified and partially united to the Students' Organization in August, 1882, for the purpose of maintaining good order in the dormitories and the general comfort of students in pursuit of study. 36 Briefly, the students were organized into districts. The districts selected captains and lieutenants who were responsible for preventing all disturbances within their districts, for securing a gentlemanly deportment from all students everywhere about the grounds, and especially toward visitors, and for serving on a court for the trial of offenders. 37 Report of the Secretary . . . 187 5 , "Report of the Faculty," p. 23; Report of the Secretary . . . 1884, "Report of the President,1' p. 24. "^Report of the Secretary . . . 1 884, "Report of the President," pp. 24-25. 36 Appendix A. 37W. J. Beal, History of the Michigan Agricultural College and Biographical Sketches of Trustees and Professors (East Lansing; Michigan Agricultural College Press, 1915), p. 77; Appendix A. 30 The faculty constructed the student government. Prof. Geo. T. Fairchild . . . took a very active part in perfecting this organization. All the original documents are in his handwriting, and bear the impress of his cool, discriminating judgment. This fact is mentioned here to show that the plan was undertaken with great care and deliberation on the part of the Faculty and was given, at least during its inception, all the support and encouragement possible by the members of the Faculty.38 The faculty also retained the right to take cognizance in their discretion of any case of misdoing brought to their notice and called for all elections, trials, and marks accruing from trials to be reported regularly by the President of the College to the Faculty. 39 In essence, the students were to discipline themselves, through an organization designed by the faculty, accord­ ing to rules they did not make, and in accord with faculty expectations. President Abbot had noted the success of self-government 40 but his comments just prior to the adoption of the 18 82 constitution, indicate the atmosphere in which the new constitution was developed: . . . as to discipline the faculty is the legis­ lative body, and I desire to govern in accordance with their will . . . for several years it had grown 58 Report of the Secretary . . . 1 898, "Report of the President/' p. 35. 39 Report of the Secretary . . . 1884, "Report of the President," p. 2Tl 40 Report of the Secretary . . . 1877, p. 24; 1878, p. 46; 1880, pp. 16-17. 31 into a habit with me not to report to the faculty the minor infractions of law, but by seeing the students, talking with them, and gaining the aid of officers and prominent members of the societies to which they belong, to lead students to selfcontrol, and a freely chosen obedience to rule. While I have insisted that with the president and faculty rests the final decision of each case, I have taken the students into free counsels regarding college matters, explained reasons of college rules and discipline, and heard all their opinions and wishes. I have not compelled them to inform on each other, but have required them to give any and all information regarding themselves. 1 have never acted as a spy, nor employed others to do so, nor by any way of questioning pretended to any knowledge of students' doings that I did not have. There would of course be failures in discipline under this method of proceeding, and the best suc­ cesses would often appear to be failures, when it was heard that some offenses had been committed and not made the subject of faculty discipline. I have no reason to doubt the substantial wisdom of this course of proceeding, nor have I had in the main cause to regret the freedom allowed to students in representing their own views, believing it to be better to run some risks of disorder for a large gain in self-government. The moral condition of students was never better than now. Profaneness, drinking, and other gross vices were never so infrequent, and the reports of the officers show a zeal in study and standing in classes never before so uniformly high. However, this plan does not meet with the approval of the faculty, and I cheer­ fully join with it, in its way; and in obedience to its will offenses are now reported to the faculty for faculty investigation and discipline, and students are required to tell all they know of the actions of other students. . . . 41 President Snyder points out that between 18761896, "it is quite evident that very often the organization drifted into the hands of those least fitted to control such matters. 41 When this occurred discipline became Report of the Secretary . . . 1882, "Report of the President," p. 45. 32 lax and often the Faculty was compelled to mete out punishment regardless of the wishes of the organization.” 42 Student Government in Disfavor By 1892 the student government was becoming in disfavor and the faculty established new dormitory rules and directed that inspection be made by cadet officers under rules prescribed by the Military Department, the Commandant of Cadets to have general supervision. 43 By the fall term of 1896, . . . the better element among the students were willing to give it up. The Faculty were equally willing to assume control. During the winter term the Faculty quietly exercised its authority and student government was a thing of the past at M.A.C. So quietly was the transition made that it is difficult to fix the exact time. No pro­ tests came from students. They seemed perfectly willing to relinquish all claims to authority and allow the Faculty to shoulder the responsibility and assume entire control.44 In retrospect this should not be a surprise, for the reins had always been held by the Faculty. The demise of stu­ dent government came during the same period that the Office of the Dean of Women was established. Student government was re-formed in 1908 and as the antecedent 42 Report of the Secretary . . . 1898, "Report of the President," p. 35. 43 44 "Faculty Minutes," July 6, 1892. Report of the Secretary . . . 1898, "Report of the President," p. 35. 33 administration structure of the Dean of Students Office unfolded and the office of the Dean of Students estab­ lished, student government proceeded through various stages— from being controlled by the Faculty and the Administration through gradual achievement of selfdetermination to being self-directed. Additional Areas of Faculty Control The Faculty's requirement that all student organizations must be approved, illustrated by the following quote from a Faculty Meeting, established a precedent that the future student personnel deans were to follow. Resolved that Messrs. Clute and the other peti­ tioners be permitted to organize themselves into a Society, after the time for the next regular election of Officers in the existing Society. Provided the Society which they shall form be purely educational in its nature, and hold its meetings on the same evening with the existing Society; and shall consist of members not belong­ ing to the existing Society, at the time and after its first meeting; and provided the Con­ stitution, laws, and bylaws, and all changes of them be submitted to, and approved by the Faculty; and the Faculty be kept informed of the members belonging to the Society, and have 45 at any time liberty of access to their meetings. The Faculty regulation of social activities also provided directions for student personnel deans. "Faculty Minutes," March 24, 1862. The 34 following specific regulations found in the Faculty Minutes, 46 while of the period just after the establish­ ment of the Dean of Women, serve to illustrate the various expectations, past, present, and future: any society inviting guests of the opposite sex must provide for such entertainment a chaperon acceptable to the President of the College or to the Faculty Committee on Entertainment and the name of the chaperon must accompany the request for permission to hold the enter­ tainment; not more than half the whole number of Friday nights of each term can be given up to society and mili­ tary parties; no young lady in the care of the College would be allowed to attend more than four dancing parties during the term; all entertainments must close at 11:00 P.M. Emergence of Service Concept Another activity which the Faculty informally handled, then more specifically organized in 1894 and which later fell under the auspices of student personnel deans, was counseling of the students. 1894, and the October 1, 1894, The September 24, "Faculty Minutes" con­ cerning this aspect are quoted verbatim. 46 "Faculty Minutes," December 12, 1898; December 11, 1899; February 13, 1900; June 7, 1900. 35 Dr. Edwards of the Committee on social relations with students reported as follows: To the Faculty of the Michigan Agricultural Col­ lege. Gentlemen: — Your committee appointed to con­ sider the question of closer social intercourse and companionship between members of the Faculty and students, after careful considering the matter report that in their opinion there is a serious lack of social contact and kindly sympathy between the students and faculty; that from both points of view such a state of affairs is deeply to be regretted, and that it is the duty of the Faculty to seek at once some remedy for the existing evil. Your committee would therefore recommend: (a) That all students now living in the College dormitories be equally parceled out according to geographical location among the members of the Faculty, with the exception of the President. (b) That Dr. Grange and Prof. Kedzie be requested to divide between them the non-resident students. (c) That each Professor concentrate himself upon.his quota of students in an earnest effort to make himself their confidential adviser, companion and friend, to create between himself on the one hand and in his quota of students on the other a bond of sympathy and friendly interest. (d) That while it would in our judgment seem invidious for the President to thus devote himself to any one quota of students he be requested to cooperate with the Professors by advice and in whatever other way he may see fit. (e) That a Committee be at once appointed to carry out the details of this plan. Respectfully submitted, Howard Edwards, Chairman Faculty Meeting (October 1, 1894) On motion the resolution reported by special committee— relating— to social relations with stu­ dents was taken up and adopted. Summary During this period which preceded the establish­ ment of an office specifically designed to deal with student personnel services, Dean of Women's Office, precedents were established that were to be followed 36 later by student personnel deans. It was apparent during this period that the emphasis was on control. The President and the Faculty unilaterally determined policies, rules, and regulations utilizing the student government as a stratagem for control. ESTABLISHMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE OFFICE OF THE DEAN OF WOMEN, ENCOMPASSING THE FORMATIVE STAGES OF THE DEAN OF STUDENTS OFFICE PERIOD 1896-1897 THROUGH 1934-1935 37 38 Impact of Dean of Women's Office Although women were in attendance at Michigan State since 1870, when ten women were admitted, it was not until 1896 when a women's course was approved that Miss Edith F. McDermott 47 assumed the responsibilities for the Women's Department but not the title, of Dean of Women. The course was described by President Snyder as "a course of study for young women, covering four years of work . . . affords an opportunity to acquire a thorough knowledge of English, mathematics, history, literature, French, German, botany, chemistry, entomology, natural philosophy; but the distinguishing feature, of course, is the emphasis it lays on home making." 48 Forty-two women were enrolled the first year, seventeen of whom lived in remodeled Abbot Hall, previously a men's dormitory. 49 Miss McDermott, besides teaching household science and cooking acted as matron of the dormitory, and served on the Society and Entertainment Committee, a Standing Committee of the Faculty which supervised Report of the Secretary . . . 1 8 9 8 , "Faculty and Other Officers," p. 51 “Report of the President," pp. 28-29. ^ 8Report of the Secretary . . . 1 8 9 7 , "Report of the President," pp. 26-27. 49 Report of the Secretary . . . 1 8 9 8 , "Report of the President," p. 29. - 39 student social activities. 1898 Mrs. Harriet Bacon 51 50 In the second year, 1897- was appointed as matron enabling Miss McDermott to spend more time on her academic work. Dean of Women as in Locus "Maternal" Miss McDermott resigned at the end of the 18971898 school year. The department was reorganized which included the removal of the matron position, and Miss Maud Ryland Keller was placed in charge as Dean of Women's Department; therefore becoming the first Dean of Women. 52 Miss Keller describes her duties saying, . . . the work of the Dean of Women has varied. . . . In addition to classes, her work has been to grant permissions, sign excuses, general responsibility for women in her department. Supervision of Abbot Hall and care of finances help to make up the duties of the D e a n . 5 3 She adds in her report of June 30, 1900, that . . . we have tested regulations which will be printed for use in the new dormitory. . . . We have had no housekeeper during the year, and this gave the care of the house to me. I have had, also, care of the sick. Fewer students have been sick this year than before, owing perhaps to better sanitary conditions of the 50Ibid., pp. 28-29, 32. *^Ibid., "Faculty and Other Officers," p. 6. 52 Report of the Secretary . . . 1 8 9 9 , "Report of the President," p. 22. 33Report of the Secretary . . . 1899, "Report of the Women's Department," p . 49. 40 house. The sickness has been cause of greater anxiety, however, because of its epidemic character, the diseases being tonsilitis, measles and scarlet f e v e r . 5 4 The regulations governing women were exacting. Kuhn contrasts attitudes concerning the discipline of women and men saying, "while men were expected to be quiet and orderly, women were subjected to more minute supervision." 55 Gilchrist says, Because of the fact that "Agricultural College" was not even a village and that East Lansing, when incorporated in 1908, consisted of houses few and far between, the State Board and the faculty believed that our girls should be safely guarded and their mode of life carefully super­ vised. . . . The rules were strict. Victorian ideas prevailed to some extent in the early 1900's. The 1906-1907 Catalogue under "Discipline— Supervision of Young Women:" states, In addition to giving a practical education, the College aims to make its women's dormitory a home. The women there are under the supervision of the head of the department. The restraints are only such as are made necessary by numbers. What rules exist are required by the health and best interests of the women. They aim to secure the proper number 64 Report of the Secretary . . . 1900, "Report of the Women's Department," p. 49. 55 Madison Kuhn, Michigan State the First Hundred Years (East Lansing: The Michigan State University Press, T9S5T, p. 208. c/r Maud Gilchrist, The First Three Decades of Home Economics at Michigan State College 1896-1926, A Bulletin of Michigan State College (East Lansing: Michigan State College Press, 1947), p. 66. 41 of hours of sleep for all women students, and quiet during hours to study; certain hours are set apart for receiving c a l l e r s . 57 The Dean of Women at Michigan State being entrusted with the overall responsibility for the care of the women stu­ dents followed the pattern described earlier in the his­ torical overview of the evolvement of dean of students offices in the United States. Miss Keller resigned at the end of the 1900-1901 school year and Miss Maud Gilchrist was appointed as Dean of Women's Department, a position she held for twelve years with the exception of a leave of absence in 1906 when Elizabeth S. Jones was Acting Dean. 58 During her administration she encouraged the development of a student government which did not become a reality due to a lack of student interest. 59 She also sought to liberalize the restrictive policies concerning women and in her concluding report as Dean, June 30, 1913, asserted, "I believe a more liberal policy toward the women students would result to advantage on both sides. 57 Catalogue; Officers and Students of the Michi­ gan State Agricultural College for the Year 1906-19U7 (East Lansing: Michigan State Agricultural College Press, 1907), p. 157. CO Report of the Secretary . . . i9 ° 7 > "Report of the W o m e n 1s Department," p. 66; Report of the Secretary . . . 1 913, "Report of the President," p. 33. 59 Gilchrist, p. 67. 42 The dean should feel free to let the young women decide most matters for themselves in the conduct of their daily college l i f e . " ^ Expansion of Dean of Women's Role On November 13, 1909, the Board of Trustees authorized and directed the President to organize the instructional force of the College into four divisions, one of which was the Division of Home Economics, whereupon Maud Gilchrist's title was changed from Dean of the Women's Department to Dean of Home Economics, and in the 1911-1912 school year to Dean of the Division of Home Economics.61 Miss Gilchrist concluded her tenure of service saying, The duties of the dean's office have become so varied and considerable that a regular stenographer should be employed to carry on the work. In addition to the correspondence, which is at times large, the dean issues all orders for supplies for class work, and furnishings and repairs for the building; she signs all bills belonging to the division and ok's the payrolls for all regular and student employees. The women students are classified three times a year under her super­ vision; their records and blanks are filed in her office; she keeps lists of social activities and ^ Report of the Secretary . . . 1 9 1 3 , "Report of the Dean of the Division of Home Economics," pp. 81-82. 61 "Board of Trustees Minutes," November 13, 1909; Report of the Secretary . . . 1 9 1 0 , "Faculty and Other Officers," p. 77 "Report of the Dean of Home Economics, pp. 83-84; Report of the Secretary . . . 1 912, "Report of the Dean of the Division of Home Economics," p p . 72, 74. 43 of those who attend; all excuses for absence from class and permits for absence from town are given by her? she acts as general adviser to the women students and for their organizations; her office is a bureau of information as far as may be, of the various matters pertaining to them. The four departments of work— music, physical culture, domestic art and domestic science— have grown in every way in these years, in numbers, courses, classes and character of the w o r k . 62 It should be noted that a House Director, Miss Katherine Cameron, was appointed September 1, 1909, which did provide the Dean some relief. Mrs. Harriet B. Crawford 64 63 She served until assumed responsibility in September, 1911; she was replaced by Mrs. Mary H. Page fic; in September, 1912. Miss Gilchrist was commended for her efforts by President Snyder who said that, . . . the splendid development of this department has been due in no small measure to the good judg­ ment, keen initiative and courageous efforts of the Dean. She brought to the position the very best of training in scholarship and experience? 62 Report of the Secretary . . . 1913, "Report of the Dean of the Division of Home Economics," pp. 78-79. 63 Report of the Secretary . . . 191 0 , "Faculty and Other Officers," p. 10. 64 Report of the Secretary . . . 1912, "Faculty and Other Officers, *' p. l l . 65 Report of the Secretary . . . 191 3 , "Faculty and Other o f f i c e r s , p . I I . 44 thorough preparation reinforced with the very highest qualities of character made her adminis­ tration one of signal s u c c e s s . 66 Mrs. Lillian L. Peppard served as Acting Dean of the Division of Home Economics fall and winter terms of the 1913-1914 school year with Miss Georgia L. White being appointed Dean on April 1, 1914. 67 Miss Edith W. Casho, a member of the Division since 1911, was recog­ nized for her efficiency in looking after the health of students and in various duties of the dormitory, by being appointed Assistant to the Dean in 1915. 68 During Miss White's term of office, the staff gradually increased, e.g., house mother, matrons. 69 Miss White, in 1916, writes that the increase in the number of women students . . . though not large has made necessary readjust­ ments along many lines; as the dormitory, dining­ room and laboratory accommodations were inadequate to meet it. It has also seemed essential to make some changes in the plans for the life of the young 66 Report of the Secretary . . . 1913, "Report of the President," p. 33. 67 Report of the Secretary . . . 1 9 1 4 , "Report of the Dean of the Division of Home Economics," p. 110; Report of the Secretary . . . 1915, "Faculty and Other Officers, p. Ek ^Gilchrist, p. 28. ^ F r o m this point on the study will only refer to individuals when some significant point, example, illustration, is to be made; the staffing and structural development from 1896 through 1970-1971 may be found in Appendix B. 45 women and in regulations governing their social activities, for more than half of the students in the division, aside from those whose homes are in Lansing and East Lansing, were housed outside of the Woman's Building and the problems to be met have been increasingly those of a scattered body of stu­ dents rather than those of a group living under one r o o f .70 Separate Government for Women Emerges One significant development was the establishment of a Women's Student Council, 1916-1917. The 1917 Wolverine states that it was founded because of the growing need for an official organization to represent women and help main­ tain a spirit of cooperation and good will among the women of the College. 71 Miss White reports, . . . that the Council will concern itself with many and varied interests in the division, and will work with the Men's Student Council to maintain the traditions and standards of the College and to promote progress. We feel that the organization of this Council will be of great help in developing the life of the d i v i s i o n . 72 "The Student Council" composed of only men was re-established in 1908, again primarily as a control agent, and it appears that until at least after the development of a new Constitution in 1914 it was struggling to develop 70 Report of the Secretary . . . 1916, "Report of the Dean of Division of Home Economics," p. 146. 7^1917 Wolverine, p. 271. 72 Report of the Secretary . . . 1 9 1 7 , "Report of the Dean of Division of riome Economics,*' p. 125. 46 a positive self-concept. 73 World War I depleted the ranks of the Council and affected its efficiency. The Women's Student Council— Miss Gilchrist's dream long come true— from its inception working with the Dean of Women, pro­ vided needed opportunities for women to assume leader­ ship roles and to participate in their own self-government. The 1919 Wolverine reported: "The principal activities of the Council during the past year have been confined to a revision of the Women's Regulations, making them more liberal and democratic." 74 For example, "couples could stroll unchaperoned across Farm Lane Bridge or Grand River Avenue; coeds could go canoeing, although only in the company of members of the flourishing men's Canoe Club; junior and senior women might attend Lansing theaters without a chaperone, provided there were two or more couples in the party." 75 The Women's Student Council was renamed Women's Student Government in 19201921; Women's League, 1921-1922 through 1922-1923; Women's Self-Government Association, 1923-1924; and 73 Appendix A; 1912 Wolverine, pages not numbered. 741919 Wolverine, p. 275. 75Kuhn, p. 320. 47 reorganized in 1929-1930 as the Associated Women Students' Organization. 76 A.W.S.'s description in the 1930 Wolverine is as follows: The Associated Women Student's Organization is composed of all the women students on the campus represented by a council of eleven, elected by the members. The purpose of this association is to regulate all matters pertaining to the student social life, to further the spirit of unity among the women, and to increase their sense of respon­ sibility in making and keeping a high social standard. A.W.S. puts forth an extra effort each year to make Freshman Week a success. They hold mass meetings, carry out judicial work and give teas, etc., aiding the Freshmen in getting acquainted. This year in their attempt to make easier for each new girl her adjustment to her new surround­ ings, they organized the movement of "Freshman Councillor" and carried it out. This year A.W.S. has a new system of signing out slips and of special permission. As an experiment they tried one o'clock permission on Saturday nights for formal parties. Through a joint committee of A.W.S. and the Student Council the point system was revised. With the assistance of other groups on the campus, they sponsored the Co-ed Prom and Lantern Night. They were able to send two representatives, Dorothy Prideaux and Anthenia Andros, to the A.W.S. convention at Vermillion, South Dakota. They are looking forward with especial pleasure to the coming year and they are enthu­ siastically planning to make it one well worth while. They are planning an interesting orien­ tation week, and to work for better convocations and to give Freshman teas.77 ^ 1921 Wolverine, p. 342; 1922 Wolverine, p. 367; 1924 Wolverine, p. 3l2; 1930 Wolverine, p. 314. 771932 Wolverine, p. 154. 48 Organized Effort to Promote Women's Development The Pan Hellenic Association, which was reorga­ nized in 1922 to actively promote inter-fraternity (sorority) cooperation 78 and the Spartan Women's League which was organized in 1931 to create a stronger bond of friendship among the College women, to enter teams in competitive athletic sports and to develop campus leadership, 79 gave women students additional opportuni­ ties to acquire leadership skills and to influence the campus. It would appear that the Office of the Dean of Women worked closely with the various women's organi­ zations, advising and providing supportive assistance for such activities, as freshmen women orientation. While control regulations were certainly still most prominent, the Office helped women students institute changes. The Dean of Women as a member of the Adminis­ trative Group and a member of the Faculty and of par­ ticular, the Social Committee, was in position to effectually represent the women students' views. 80 The Division of Home Economics was reorganized during the 1916-1917 school year with Miss White being designated as Dean of Home Economics and Dean of Women 78Ibi d ., p. 235. 79I bid., p. 209. OA "Faculty Minutes," May 3, 1915; Minutes," May 1, 1916. "Faculty 49 for the 1917-1918 school year. 81 Miss White comments, . . . owing to the growth and to the increased specialization in the division, as well as to facilitate the financial management, separate departments of Domestic Science and Domestic Art have been created with separate budgets, the remaining work of the division being carried on under the denomination— Dean's Office and Dormi­ tories. This is in line with the development of the work of the division, and with the hope which we have had that eventually the dormitory life and department life may be made as distinct as possible.82 In the 1918-1919 school year Miss Mary E. Edmonds served as Dean of Home Economics with Miss Annie Howard as Advisor of Women who, in her capacity, relieved the Dean of many details. 83 In the 1919-1920 school year Miss Eudora H. Savage became Dean of Women within the Division of Home Economics, a title which she held for three years. During these years Mary Edmonds, 1919-September 26, 1920; May Person, September 27-December 1, 1920; Mary Sweeney, December 1, 1920-June 30, 1922, respectively, were in charge of the Division. 84 Miss Savage resigned m 1922 81 Report of the Secretary . . . 1 9 1 7 , "Report of the Dean of the Division of Home Economics," p. 125; Report of the Secretary . . . 1918, "Faculty and Other Officers,*' p. 5^ QO Report of the Secretary . . . 1 917, "Report of the Dean of the Division of Home Economics," p. 125. 83 Report of the Secretary . . . 1919, "Faculty and Other Officers," p. 7. 84 Report of the Secretary . . . 1920, "Faculty and Other Officers," p. 7; Report of the Secretary . . . 1921, "Report of the Department of Home Economics," 50 and the dean of women responsibilities fell upon the shoulders of the Acting Dean of Home Economics for the 1922-1923 period, Miss Louise Hathway Campbell. 85 Jean Krueger was appointed in 1923 as Dean of Home Economics and Women 86 and served in this dual capacity until Dr. Clara Powell was appointed Advisor of Women, start­ ing the 1926-1927 school year. Miss Krueger comments in her end of year report, June, 1927, "with the appointment of Dr. Clara Powell to the position of Advisor of Women to serve on the staff of the Dean of the College, the work of the Dean of Women has been removed from this 87 Division." The First Administrator to Assume the Role of a bean of Students John Phelan, Dean of the College, as part of his responsibility devoted much of his time to the tasks of a dean of students during the period 1925-1926 through pp. 74-75; Report of the Secretary . . . 192 2 , "Faculty and Other Officers," p. 7 ; Gilchrist, p. 30. QC Report of the Secretary . . . 1923, "Faculty and Other Officers," p. 51 ‘'Report of the Dean of Home Economics," pp. 72-81. **6Report of the Secretary . . . 1 924, "Report of the President," p. 3T\ "Report of the Department of Home Economics," p. 77. 87 Report of the Secretary . . . 1 927, "Report of the Division of Home Economics," pp. 82-83. 51 QO 1927-1928. Kuhn points out: "Dr. Clara E. Powell served under him as adviser to women and J. W. Steward, as attendance officer, relieved the deans and others of the responsibility for certifying excuses, an important task, for one negative credit was assigned for each six to twelve unexcused absences;" (when an individual accrued six absences one credit was added to the graduation requirement); Phelan also provided extensive direction to counseling and guidance. 89 Phelan's report, included in the Report of the Secretary of the State Board of Agriculture, 1926, aptly illustrates his responsibilities. To the President: Sir:— I beg to report the progress during the year in the organization of the work of the Dean of the College. Freshman Week was established and carried out in such a way that both students and faculty con­ sidered it very much worth while. A system of advisers of Freshmen has been organized. The freshmen report to their advisers at least once a month. The adviser has a record on the student's work and is often able to be of great service to him. The Student Council and the Women's Self Government Association deserve mention for their loyal cooperation in student affairs. Q Q Report of the Secretary . . . 1926, "Report of the Dean of the College," p. 155; Report of the Secretary . . . 1927, "Report of the Dean of the College," pp. 158-5$; Report of the Secretary . . . 1928, "Report of the Dean of the College,11 p. 54; Kuhn, p. 301. ®^Kuhn, p. 301. 52 A large number of upperclassmen have come to the office with their personal problems. There have been relatively few cases of serious disci­ pline . For future consideration may I suggest five impor ta n t i terns: (1) The appointment of a Dean of Women who would act as adviser to the girls. (2) The organization of an Orientation Course for Freshmen. (3) The development of a system of personnel that will be of advantage to the college staff in providing them with vital infor­ mation concerning the students. (4) The development of an organization that will assist graduates in finding positions. This organization should cooperate with all divisions and departments of the college. (5) The attendance of students is kept in the several divisions of the college. I would suggest that there be created the position of Attendance Officer and that records of attendance be centralized.90 In 1928, The Board eliminated the Dean of the Col­ lege, the advisor to women, and other positions; President Shaw and a secretary assumed most of the functions, though J. W. Steward was continued as attendance officer until June 17, 1936 and, a new Dean of Women, Miss Elisabeth W. Conrad was appointed. 91 Functions Crystallized for the Dean of Women's Office Miss Conrad, to enable the "College to have more right to dictate as to the caliber of women engaged by 90 Report of the Secretary . . . 1926, "Report of the Dean of the College," p. 155. 91 Kuhn, p. 334; Report of the Secretary . . . 1 9 3 6 , "Report of the Supervisor of Attendance," p. 54. 53 sororities as housemothers," requested and received approval from the Board of Trustees on March 24, 1930, for the College to pay $10 a month for ten months to each of the ten sorority housemothers, starting fall 1931. 92 The housemothers were thus members of the Dean of Women staff and their selection by the sororities were subject to the approval of the Office. 93 Miss Conrad's reports to the President as evi­ denced by the Annual Reports of the Secretary of the State Board of Agriculture 1932—1944 presented for the first time comprehensive and detailed descriptions of the activities of the Office of the Dean of Women. The following selective quotes from her report to the Presi­ dent in 1932 exactingly describe the Dean of Women's Office organization and its activities. To the President: Sir:— The office of the Dean of Women was moved from the Library Building to the Women's Building in September, 1931. The resulting changes in the handling of work in the office of the Dean of Women may be outlined as follows: The larger waiting room gave more space for cooperating student organizations; A.W.S. officers were granted one desk and file enabling them thus to have regular office hours and make their student contacts more effectively; the Panhellenic was also given file space for records and encouraged to deal more systematically with "Board of Trustee Minutes," March 24, 1930; Report of the Secretary . . . 1932, "Report of the Dean of Women," p. 52. Q O Report of the Secretary . . . 1932, "Report of the Dean of Women," p. 52. 54 sorority organization problems. A less formal atmosphere in the office seemed to encourage easy student approach. The number of students who came in for advice and assistance was very greatly increased. This was probably aided by the fact that students learned that their wants would be taken care of without an indefinite period of waiting. The two assistants to the Dean of Women were given individual desks and their work more clearly differentiated. To the housing assistant came all interviews with girls seeking work and all problems of the girls working for room and board, doing light housekeeping, or living off-campus. The housing assistant was also given charge of inspecting all off-campus houses, visiting several times each term each house in which students lived and adjust­ ing personal difficulties which arose between land­ ladies and students. She also served as advisor to the A.W.S. vice-president in House Presidents' meet­ ings and in the checking of weekly house reports. All assignments of rooms in the two dormitories, taking deposits and authorizing refunds were under her jurisdiction. She developed a very simple and accurate system of card files which show individual accounts at a glance. Her employment supervision included the dormitory telephone switchboard in Mayo Hall and the elevator service in the Women's Building. A continually fluctuating number of girls usually about 85 worked off-campus during the year. The secretary's duties, in addition to the usual secretarial work of caring for correspondence and keeping correspondence files, included the keeping of the social calendar. She interviewed the student social chairmen of all organizations, and registered all social dances or evening parties. A total of 231 dances were registered during the year. Inasmuch as all dances must be chaperoned by at least two couples of accepted standing in the community, it has been likewise the duty of the secretary to issue official recognition "invitations" to these chaperons. Characteristic student procrastination necessitated the devotion of much secretarial time on Thursday and Friday of practically each week to the matter of dances for whom chaperons were not recorded. With the informal atmosphere of the new office an open door policy has been stressed. Interviews cannot be tabulated but may be classified as largely with parents, students below par in academic work who came either voluntarily or in response to a request at the beginning of a new term, interviews with students whose health problems had been reported by the Campus Health Service or by their house matrons; freshmen and transfers, particularly those whose social adjustments were noted as unsatisfactory. A few cases of discipline entered into the year's work, and also many detail questions of dormitory management and policy varying from student insistence on personal radios to parental resentment of A.W.S. discipline meted out to daughters. Conferences with student leaders and meetings with student organizations cut deep into the after 7:00 p.m. hours, but seem always a necessary part of the constructive work, as are also the acceptances of official invitations to formal student social functions. The introduction of the faculty advisory system for freshmen and new students changed the character of the interviews with failing students. The question for the Dean of Women to ask was no longer "Why did you fail?" but "What are you doing or what can we help you do to make it possible for you to get better study results?"94 Service Role Expanded During the depression years the Dean of Women's Office spent considerable time helping young women contend with the economic conditions. Miss Conrad, in discussing the office endeavors in this area, commented that "A special note should be made here of the especially good work done by Miss Petersen, not only in securing an unusually large number of homes where girls were able to work for room and board, but also in the constant and sympathetic supervision given the women so placed." 95 It might also be noted at this point, that Miss Mabel F. 94 95 Ibid., pp. 50-51. Report of the Secretary . . . 1935, "Report of the Dean of Women,1' p^ 35. 56 Petersen's long record of service to the Dean's Office extends from 1934-1935 to date. To provide women with inexpensive housing the first cooperative, Concord House, was established in 1936 under the auspices of the Dean of Women with Supervision by a resident housemother.96 Summary Regulative activities continued to be emphasized during this period but women students were afforded the opportunity to modify and/or change various policies and rules. The providing of services by student personnel administrators was beginning to develop during this period. The next period in the development of this study, 1935-1936 to 1943-1944, will include further discussion of the Dean of Women's Office as well as the delineation of the newly established Office of the Dean of Men. 96Kuhn, p. 357. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE OFFICE OF THE DEAN OF MEN AND THE EVOLVEMENT OF STUDENT ACTIVITIES AND THE SERVICE CONCEPT PERIOD 1935-1936 THROUGH 1943-1944 57 58 Office of the Dean of Men Established In May of 1935 the first Dean of Men was appointed. President Shaw reports that In May 1935, in response to an apparent need and growing demand, the position of Dean of Men was created and Dr. F. T. Mitchell, Associate Pro­ fessor of Education, was appointed (though without complete severance of his relations with his former department). Dr. Mitchell has administered the Freshman Week program most successfully, has accom­ plished much in improving housing conditions for men, and has acted in an advisory capacity to all of the leading groups of men students on campus. The new position has been more than justified.97 The first year's staff consisted of Mr. Glen Stewart, Assistant to the Dean of Men in charge of National Youth Administration (an agency created by Executive Order in 1935 to furnish part-time work for students in high schools and colleges); Mr. C. A. Rosenbrook, Assistant to the Dean of Men in charge of housing men students; and Miss Blanche Barnhart as Secretary. 98 Kuhn 99 also points out that the Freshman Week and testing programs became the responsibility of the Dean of Men in the 1935-1936 school year with Paul L. Dressel, a half-time assistant, administering entrance and diagnostic examinations and exploring vocational aptitudes to advise 97 Report of the Secretary . . . 1936, "Report of the President," p. 28. 98 Report of the Secretary . . . 1936, "Brief of Annual Report o£ Dean ot M e n , ” p. 56 ^ K u h n , p. 375. 59 students on their careers. (Author's note: Paul Dressel was not a half-time assistant; he did provide the stated services but not in a formal capacity.)^®® Dean Mitchell's personal message to the students in Fall 1935 conveys his perception of the Office: Coming to an institution of higher learning for the first time, you will meet perplexities of many kinds. The Office of the Dean of Men is open all day and the chief function of this office is to assist students in adjusting themselves to college life. You are welcome to come in at any time.101 Dean Mitchell's commitment to personal interaction with students is evidenced by his statement, To make students feel at home, I personally visited all men in Wells Hall and many in off-campus houses. The Blue Key men visited all freshmen which I did not visit and we found a considerable number of men a bit unhappy because of living conditions. These cases were adjusted with no delay.1°2 Expansion of Student Activities j-n the 1936's' The Dean of Women and the Dean of Men personnel spent considerable time throughout the 1 9 3 0 's supervising, assisting, and advising student activities. While student organizations and social functions had down through the years been gradually increasing, it was during the 1 930's 100Conversation with Dr. Paul L. Dressel on March 22, 1972. ^ ^ 1935-1936 Student Handbook, p. 7. 102 Report of the Secretary . . . 1938, "Annual Report of the Dean of Men," p. 96. 60 that they expanded significantly. Even the depression did not seem to dampen enthusiasm. in 1933, Miss Conrad observes "Social events succeeded each other throughout the year much as in former times, although after a few experiences with deficits, student social committees learned to plan less expensive dances." 103 By the end of the school year in 1939 Miss Conrad reports a total of 420 registered social affairs. 104 Dean Mitchell reports m 1939, "There are a large number of campus organizations for men students— probably too many. Approximately 75 per cent of the men students participated in some extra-class activity or belonged to some organization or both." 105 (The Dean of Men had an extra-curricular or non-academic record for every man during the year.)^*^ The Dean of Women's Office worked closely with A.W.S.; Spartan Women's League; Mortar Board, a senior women's honorary; and Pan Hellenic Council. organizations were most active. All the An example is the 103 Report of the Secretary . . . 193 3 , "Report of the Dean of W o m e n ,'* p . 39. 104 Report of the Secretary . . . 1939, "Report of the Dean of Women," p. 7l. ^^^Report of the Secretary . . . 1939, "Report of the Dean of Men," p. 6"9. ^ ^ Report of the Secretary . . . 1938, "Annual Report of the Dean of Men," p. 96. 61 description in the 1935 Wolverine of one of the A . W . S . ' endeavors: The biggest project undertaken by A.W.S. during the year consisted of an orientation program for fresh­ men women. Formerly, this work was treated in the weekly physical education lectures, but the limited time which could be devoted to orientation made it advisable for a new system to aid freshmen women in becoming acquainted with their new surroundings. The freshmen were divided alphabetically into groups of about twenty each. At the head of every group was a junior, carefully chosen for her quali­ ties of leadership. In informal meetings were discussed problems and topics of general interest such as citizenship, social etiquette, mannerisms, adjustment and similar subjects. The whole plan proved very successful considering the short time it has been in effect, both freshmen and upper­ classmen apparently profiting immensely by the opportunities afforded for the development of closer contacts among Spartan w o m e n . 107 In 1936 A.W.S. also kept a detailed filing system of the extra-curricular activities of each girl on campus, sponsored a co-ed carnival at which Freshman girls were introduced to activities on campus, co-sponsored with Mortar Board a lecture for Senior women on the topic of marriage and the home, undertook a variety of other 108 activities. Dean Mitchell personally served as Faculty Advisor for Interfraternity Council, Co-ordinating Council of Fraternities; Blue Key, a junior and senior national honorary; Student Council; and Independent Men's League, ~*~^71935 Wolverine, p. 92. 108 1936 Wolverine, p. 83; Report of the Secretary 1936, "Report of the Dean of Women," p. 55. 62 which was established under Dean Mitchell's guidance to provide a channel of authority and activity for men who 109 were not members of fraternxtxes. The Interfraternxty Council gave recognition in the 1936 Wolverine to Dean Conrad and Dean Mitchell for their assistance in compiling a list of patrons who would be available for campus parties. Dean Mitchell also sought and received approval from the Administrative Group, Faculty, and the Board of Trustees in the 1937-1938 school year for the College to contribute $100 per year for the house­ mother of Farmhouse fraternity, Mrs. Nell B a r t l e t t . ^ 1 The first fraternity, though, to employ a housemother, according to the Faculty and Students Directories, was Phi Delta Theta in 1935-1936 who retained the services of Mrs. Helen Stephenson; Mrs. Jonathan Palmer served the next year and then the Fraternity discontinued retaining 112 a housemother for a number of ye a r s . The Dean of Mens 1 09 Report of the Secretary . . . 1938, "Annual Report of the Dean of Men," p. 96; K u h n , p . 392. ~^^1936 Yearbook, p. 85. 11‘*'"Faculty Minutes," October 1, 1937; Report of the Secretary . . . 1 938, "Annual Report of the Dean of Men," p. 98. 112 1935-1936 Faculty and Students Directory, p. 19 1936-1937 Faculty and Students Directory, p. 19. 63 Office also inaugurated in the fall of 1937 the Part Time Employment Service. 113 Informal Non-Professional Guidance Activities The Dean of Women's Office, as reflected earlier, and the Dean of Men's Office were deeply involved in guidance activities. Dean Mitchell indicates during the 1938-1939 school year, . . . 872 men students came to the office to confer on personal problems. These problems ranged from one end of the category to the other. Each case was heard sympathetically and some plan of action determined and followed. Many men return many times for assistance. Personally, this activity is the most challenging of all things to do. My relations with this group have been pleasant and enjoyable, but at times disappointing. There has been splendid cooperation on every hand and I feel much good has been accomplished.114 Gradual Development of Students' Self-Determination While in loco parentis regulations were still the rule and not the exception, e.g., social regulations or the "speakers regulation," passed by the Faculty on September 28, 1936, which required that all outside speakers be approved by the Administrative Authorities before the program may be arranged, it appears that 11i Report of the Secretary . . . 1941, "Brief Annual Report of the Dean of Men," p. 75. 114 Report of the Secretary . . . 1939, "Report of the Dean of Men," p. 70. 64 students were gradually becoming involved in some aspects of controlling their campus life. A.W.S. had acquired and continued to acquire privileges for women students and two students were included on the Social Committee of the Faculty for the first time in 1937— 1938 school year. 115 The Student Government became a truly repre­ sentative body in 1940 including women as official voting members for the first time,'*'^^ thus providing the students a stronger base from which to operate. Impact of World War II The early 1940's with the United States involved in World War II, were trying years. Kuhn writes, "vio­ lation of the tradition against smoking became more brazen and drinking at College parties increased. How­ ever few the offenders, these excesses were symptomatic of widespread uncertainty about traditional values in war which threatened the survival of both the individual and his civilization." 117 Miss Conrad reports, "Indi­ vidual initiative lagged, and new projects did not materialize in the traditional campus activity group." 115 118 1937-1938 Student Handbook, p. 52. "Faculty Minutes," July 7, 1939; Appendix A. "^^Kuhn, p. 405. 118 Report of the Secretary . . . 1942, "Report of the Dean of Women," p. 83. 65 The elimination of the retail automobile business, a prime source of income for Michigan residents hurt the students financially; consequently, many students contacted the Office of Dean of Women and the Office of Dean of Men for job placement. 119 The first cooperative living unit for men, Hedrick House, was established in 1940 120 and in 1941 eleven co-op houses combined to form the InterCooperative Council. 121 These two cooperative ventures and others were most helpful during the difficult economic conditions. The Office of the Dean of Women and the Office of the Dean of Men provided support and direction to these new living group organizations. Summary The 1935-1936 through 1943-1944 period indicates a stress on service by the Offices of the Dean of Women and Dean of Men, but it is not until the 1944-1945 through 1960-1961 period that specialized services are identified and consolidated under a dean of students. 119 Ibid., p. 84; Report of the Secretary . 1943, "Brief Annual Report of the Dean of Men," p. 104. 120 Kuhn, p. 357. 121194 2 Wolverine, pp. 426-27. EMPHASIS ON SPECIALIZED STUDENT PERSONNEL SERVICES PERIOD 1944-1945 THROUGH 1960-1961 66 67 Establishment of the Dean of Students Office— Service Concept in Full Sway' On March 7, 1944, the Administrative Group dis­ cussed the need for the unification of student personnel services 122 and recommended to and received approval from the Faculty that the State Board of Agriculture be asked to sanction a regrouping and reorganization of these 123 services under a Dean of Students, an action which was subsequently taken. An officially titled Office of the Dean of Stu­ dents was established on July 1, 194 4, with Stanley E. Crowe as Dean. This Office provided the direct and indirect supervision of the following activities: Orien­ tation of new students; Office of the Registrar; Counsel­ ing and Testing Service; Placement Service; Servicemen's Institute; Counselor for Men; Counselor for Women; Dormi­ tory Management; Summer School; General College; Academic Coordinator for the Army, and Lecture-Concert Series. 1 oo 1 ?! 124 124 "Administrative Group Minutes," March 7, 1944. "Faculty Minutes," April 7, 1944. Report of the Secretary . . . 1945, "Report of the Dean of Students,'* p. 41; "Minutes of Administrative Group," August 29, 1944. 68 A condensed description of each area secured from combining verbatim information from the "Report of the Dean of Students" 125 and from Michigan State College/ 126 Story of the Y e a r , follows: REGISTRAR'S OFFICE A total of 6,640 civilian, Army, and short course students received instruction at Michigan State College in 1944-45. The number of Army trainees enrolled declined considerably during the year as the various military programs were curtrailed or discontinued. A large increase was noted in the number of women students enrolling. All 83 Michigan counties were represented, as well as most of the other states, the District of Columbia, two United States territories, and 13 foreign countries. The College conferred 600 degrees, including 38 masters, nine doctorates, two professional degrees, and two honorary degrees. The Michigan State staff was composed of 749 men and women engaged in administrative, instruc­ tional, extension, and research work. Robert S. Linton is the college registrar. COUNSELING AND TESTING During the year the work of the Board of Examiners and Basic College Counseling was con­ cerned with two major tasks: The in-service training program for Basic College counselors, and the comprehensive examinations for Basic College courses. Testing and counseling was done on numerous rehabilitation cases as well as on many high school and elementary school pupils referred by parents or teachers. Some adult non-college persons also were tested and counseled. The Freshman Week testing program is conducted by this department which is under the direction of Dr. Paul Dressel. 125 Report of the Secretary . . . of the Dean of Students,** p. 4l. 126 1945, "Report Michigan State College, Story of the Y e a r , A Michigan State College Bulletin (East Lansing: Michigan State College Press, XL, No. 9 [January, 1946], 33-35). 69 PLACEMENT With the inclusion of Home Economics and Agri­ cultural teachers in September, 1944, formation of the Central Placement Office, directed by Tom King, was completed. During the year 35 industrial and business firms sent representatives to the campus for the purpose of interviewing students interested in obtaining employment. Referrals for full-time jobs totaled 288, and of this group 190 were successfully placed in jobs. In teacher placements, 68 graduates of the current year were placed. Thirty-three inexperienced teachers, graduates of former years, also were placed, and 55 experi­ enced teachers were assisted in finding other positions. Part-time work was found for 286 M.S.C. students during the year. SERVICEMEN'S INSTITUTE The Servicemen's Institute was established on July 1, 1944, to give personal guidance to war veterans from the moment they begin their studies until they complete them and are placed in jobs. Dr. Fred T. Mitchell was chosen to act as director. At Michigan State the matriculating veteran has a special faculty counselor to advise him on various matters and to discuss with him his pre­ vious training with the view to fitting the exserviceman into the proper college courses. Upon entering, the veteran is given an achievement test to determine his current educational level, and is provided refresher or review courses if the tests indicate they would be beneficial. Double-period, non-credit review courses are taken by many of the veterans, and classes are kept small so that tutorial-type instruction may be given. By and large, war veterans enrolled at Michigan State have received better grades than the average student. This is attributed to their social— not necessarily chronological— maturity, their desire for an education, and their willing­ ness to make the best use of their time. More than 300 veterans, including several women, enrolled at M.S.C. during the 1944-45 fiscal year, and that number was expected to double by fall term, 1945. ARMY SPECIALIZED TRAINING PROGRAMS The Army Specialized Training Program was carried on during the year with a greatly reduced number of trainees. The enrollment ranged from 200 to 600. On July 1, 1945, the ASTP unit moved from Abbot Hall to Wells Hall. The number will drop to approximately 300. 70 COUNSELOR FOR MEN Activities of all men students attending Michigan State College were under the direction of Dr. Fred T. Mitchell, Counselor for Men. During the year 1944-45 all civilian men students were housed in approved rooms for men in East Lansing, residence halls for men having been occupied by women students and by military units stationed on the campus. Because of the large decrease in the enrollment of men owing to the war, relatively few of the stu­ dent organizations for men were active. All 16 social fraternities on the campus had active groups, nine groups occupying homes and seven not living as a unit. Groups without houses used the Student Union as a meeting place. Many of the activities planned by fraternities for post-war adjustment were put into operation during the year. COUNSELOR FOR WOMEN Fall term 1944 opened with a total of 2,733 women students enrolled. Their various activities during the year were under the supervision of the Counselor for Women, Mrs. Isabelle Gonon. Besides filling to capacity the three dormi­ tories for women, 10 co-operative houses, two annexes, and 14 sororities, women occupied for the first time the two dormitories for men, Mason Hall and Wells Hall, which were adapted for their use. The recreation rooms of Williams Hall and Campbell Hall, women's dormitories, were used to house 80 students until withdrawals permitted transfer of these students into regular residence rooms. Students living in co-operative houses came to a fuller recognition of their worth. With the purpose of achieving a stronger feeling of unity and inter-co-operation, and with the desire to help new students acquire and maintain a co-operative spirit and a sense of self respect and pride in their work, the girls organized the Women's Co-operative League, a council composed of a representative from each house. DORMITORY MANAGEMENT A manager of men's residence halls and a manager for women's residence halls supervise the food opera­ tions, furnishing and maintenance of the halls. GENERAL COLLEGE DIVISION The General College Division was closed on July 1, 1945, in accordance with a motion passed by the faculty after the organization of the Basic College. All students enrolled in the General College Division were either transferred into another school of the College or terminated their program on that date. 71 LECTURE-CONCERT SERIES The 194 4-45 Lecture-Concert Series was a success from the standpoint of programs offered and attendance. Michigan State students and faculty members, as well as townspeople, were privileged to hear such outstanding attractions as the Minne­ apolis Symphony, Lily Pons, Sigmund Romberg, and several noted lecturers. SUMMER SCHOOL The 1945 Summer School was organized into a regular quarter and concurrent six-week and threeweek sessions. The total enrollment was 1633 at the end of the first three weeks and the final enrollment figure will be increased by late regis­ trations for the second and third term language courses. A large group of rural teachers will enroll in August for a two-week Rural Education Workshop. Throughout the Dean of Students Administrations of Stanley E. Crowe, 1944-194 5 through 1949-1950; Tom H. King, 1950-1951 through 1960-1961; and John A. Fuzak, 1961-1962 through 1963-1964, basically many of the same services were provided. 127 The table of organizations and staff responsibilities did, however, vary and there were specific additions and deletions, for example, dormitory management which had historically been part of the student personnel services no longer came under the supervision of the Dean of Students after the 194 51946 school year; the Registrar's Office was deleted as of 1956-1957; the Office of School Cooperation and Health Services were added in April 1, 1949 and in 127 Detailed descriptions of the organization and structure of student personnel services during Tom King's and John Fuzak's Dean of Students administrations are found in Appendix C. 72 1951-1952 respectively; and the Placement Service which had been transferred to the President's Office in 1948-1949 was re-assigned to the Office of the Dean of Students in 1950-1951.128 Service was the credo of the Office of School Cooperation. Coordinator Guy H. Hill's 1949-1950 Report which encompassed the Office's first complete school year of operation states that the purposes of the Office are "to make available to the state all of the facilities and personnel of the College which will administer to the needs of public schools; to better acquaint high school students, their teachers and parents with Michigan State College and its services; and to constantly refine the processes and techniques for accomplishing these purposes." 129 The services rendered by the Office during 1949-1950 school year according to types are shown in Table 1. 130 The Office of School Cooperation continued to provide these various services throughout its tenure. The Director of Placement, Tom King, stresses that the primary function of the Placement Bureau was 128 Appendices B, G. 129 Report of the Secretary . . . 195 0 , "Report of the Coordinator of High School Cooperation," pp. 138-39. 130x, Ibid. TABLE 1.— Services rendered by the office of high school cooperation according to types. Number of Times Given Number of Staff Involved Teacher Workshops, Conferences and Institutes 47 89 4.738 480 High School Assemblies, "College" Days 69 232 9,280 19B High School Senior College Visitation Day (Innovation) 1 137 5.500 240 M.S.C.— High School Principal-Freshman Conference— "13th" Annual 1 97 350 161 Junior College Services 4 4 860 4— J r . Colleges Services to Institutions of Higher Learning 3 25 120 68 22 35,800 3— Colleges 68 Community Workshops 7 12 322 7 Parent-Teacher Institutes 6 12 1.500 100 36 55 8,000 36 242 685 66,470 1,297 Types of Services Number of High Schools Involved "Career" and High School Commencement Speakers Groups Affiliated with the Schools Totals Number of Recipients 74 to service all students who have attended Michigan State College through four major divisions: The Industrial Division, The Teacher Division, The Part-time and Summer Employment Division, and the Alumni Division. 131 He adds that the secondary function is to make available to employers the most effective service possible. 132 John F. Schlueter discusses the prime consideration, service, more specifically, saying service is provided in the five following areas: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. To the students— to counsel and guide them vocationally during their college years and to assist them in the development of graduate employment opportunities; To the faculty— to free them from nonacademic responsibilities; To the administration— to act as its repre­ sentative in student vocational matters and to carry out the important last step in the institution's broad responsibility— the marketing of its graduates; To the alumni— to provide an employment service to assist them in developing opportunities either for themselves or within their respective business concerns; To employers— to develop a satisfactory program of mutual understanding for the primary purpose of bringing together in an efficient manner the needs for both the graduate and those seeking to hire college g r a d u a t e s .133 The magnitude of the Placement Bureau's service increased greatly since its first involvement with the Dean of 131 Report of the Secretary . . . 1950, "Report of the Director of Placement," p. 133. 132Ibid., p. 134. 7 Report of the Secretary . . . 1951, "Report of the Director of Placement," p. 1^7. 75 Students Office in the 1944-1945 school year. In 1950- 1951 approximately 406 representatives of business, industry, and government conducted a total of 6,000 individual interviews and in addition, approximately 360 school superintendents and 100 college officials conducted a total of 2,600 individual interviews with approximately 800 new teaching candidates. 134 The Part- Time Employment division in the 1951-1952 school year was able to identify more job opportunities for students because not only departments on campus requested students for part-time jobs but more and more business and industrial concerns and home owners in the local area began to use the services of students to round out their employment needs 135 and by the 1952-1953 school year over 10,000 jobs were secured by students through the efforts of this D i v i s i o n . J a c w e i r Breslin adds^3^ that perhaps the most rapidly expanding department of the Placement Bureau is Alumni Placement. "At present our total active file on alumni numbers 1,650, and we are 134Ibid. 135 Report of the Secretary . . . 1952, "Report of the Director of Placement," p. 232. 33^Report of the Secretary . . . 1953, "Report of the Director of Placement,*1 p. 256. 76 constantly publicizing the fact that Michigan State College has many job openings which may mean a decided advancement for the alumnus." The expansion of the various services provided by the Placement Bureau has continued throughout the years. The inclusion of the Health Service within the Office of the Dean of Students was a recognition of the importance of consolidating the many student support services under one office for direction and coordination. Student Self-Determination Expanded One of the most significant developments, begin­ ning in the latter 1940's, continuing throughout the 1950's and expanding during the 1960's, was student self-determination. After the war, rules and regu­ lations were still most numerous with new ones being added, such as the requirement instituted starting the fall of 1950 that all fraternities must have housemothers 138 (Men's Co-ops were granted an exception due to extenuating circumstances, instead a full-time advisor-hostess, Mrs. Laurline Lee, was provided by 139 the Office of the Counselor for M e n ) . 13^Report of the Secretary . . . 1949, "Report of the Counselor for Men," p. 112. 13Q Report of the Secretary . . . 1950, "Report of the Counselor for Men," p. 124. 77 It was during this time that the Student Council became more assertive, seeking to become involved in the decision-making process. The following three quotes from Administrative Group meetings are interesting not only because they demonstrate student interest in par­ ticipating in University governance, but because they pointedly project administrative attitudes towards student involvement at the major governing level. The President has explained to the Student Council's President, Mr. Loring, that it is not possible to have regular attendance of a Student Council representative at the Administrative Group meetings. If the Student Council has sub­ mitted a question that needs some advice or action by the Administrative Group, a repre­ sentative may be called before the Group to present his case.140 . . . were other school faculties being approached on the matter of granting student participation in faculty meetings? The President stated that he thought it was better if students had something to present, to invite them in from time to time, as we did with Mr. McCartney, rather than have them in regular attendance. The Administrative Group agreed with the President.141 A communication from the Student Congress express­ ing regret over the loss of Dr. . . . and asking the College to retain his services. The President asked Dean King to inform the Student Congress that they have gone out of bounds in making such a request.142 140 "Administrative Group Minutes," February 11, 1947. 141 "Administrative Group Minutes," October 14, 1947. 149 "Administrative Group Minutes," April 29, 1952. 78 Student involvement was making some inroads at least at the Committee level. The "Faculty Minutes" of June 12, 1947, show the faculty discussed a recommendation from the Student Council for the Faculty-Student Social Committee to be changed to include ten members, four present student members, plus a member of the Activities Board and an equal number of faculty members with the chairman a faculty member. The 1948-49 Helmet, the student handbook, confirms that this recommendation . 143 was approved. The development of a viable, three-branch student government, was started by the 1949-1950 Student Council under the leadership of Louis Hekhuis, who appointed and gave direction to the "Little Hoover Commission." 144 This "think tank" organization established the framework for the All-College Student Government which included a "strong" executive, a legislative body, and an All-College Judiciary. 145 The Constitution was approved on May 3, 1951, by the student body, 3,304 to 384, and by the faculty on the same day. 146 Gaylord Sheets, chairman of 1431948-49 Helmet, p. 31. ^441950 Wolverine, p. 81; Conversation with Michigan State Student Activity Staff, March 21, 197 2. 145 146 Appendix A. Michigan State N e w s , Friday, May 4, 1951, p. 1; "Faculty Minutes," May 3, 1951. 79 the final drafting commission, after thanking the faculty and student body for passing the constitution commented, "From now on we can go forward to learn to discipline ourselves." 147 The student body voted to tax themselves up to an amount of $.25 per term and the Board of Trustees voted on May 15, 1952, to collect this fee as a part of the registration procedure. 14 8 This financial base enabled the All-College Student Government to initiate projects and to promote issues on their own volition. While A.W.S. had a judicial process, it was not until the new student government constitution was approved that the total student body had recourse to a judicial hearing. The Judiciary could take action regarding any legislation passed by the Student Congress or the execu­ tive branch of the government; rule on the constitutionality of actions taken by campus organizations and on cases involving the infraction of student government rules; hear disciplinary cases referred to the Judiciary if the student requests and if the request was approved by the Dean of Students. 147 1 4R 149 149 Michigan State N e w s , Friday, May 4, 1951, p. 1. "Board of Trustees Minutes," May 15, 1952. Appendix A. 80 Dean King comments: The change in student government to the Student Congress gave to the Student Judiciary some par­ ticipation in the investigations and recommendations relative to student conduct. In a raid on Wells Hall in the Fall, and an attempted so-called "panty raid" in the Spring, the Student Judiciary made excellent recommendations, which were followed almost entirely by this O f f i c e . 150 In the 1955-1956 school year the entire Uni­ versity judiciary pattern was defined with all of the courts, e.g., precinct judiciaries, dormitory judiciaries, and inter-dormitory judiciaries having their purpose, jurisdiction, composition, procedures, actions they may take, appeal routes, and where they are housed, clearly stated.'1'5^ The student body also voted to have the All- University Student Judiciary Court handle all disciplinary situations, except where remedial or medical services are indicated. 152 Therefore, Dean King states that for the first time the Dean of Students Office turned over most of the student disciplinary ca s e s , not settled in the residence halls, to the Student Judiciary— 206 cases. 153 ^ "^Report of the Secretary . . . 1952, "Report of the Dean of Students," p. 209. 151 Report of the Secretary . . . 1956, the Dean of Students," p. 230. "Report of 152Ibid. 153 Report of the Secretary . . . 1957, "Report of the Dean of Students," pp. 239-40. 81 Student self-discipline was being further extended, but there were still "certain types of violations" not given to the judiciaries. 154 The All-College Judiciary (retitled All-University Judiciary in 1955) was cer­ tainly a step toward effective student self-regulation, but it should be remembered that the Dean's Office did not always choose to allow cases to go before the Judiciary. 155 Contact with Students Through Student Activities The Dean of Students Office spent considerable time advising, guiding, and assisting through supportive services the many student government areas, all student organizations, and individual students. Mabel Petersen in her 1953 "Report of the Women's Division" comments Each of the Staff devotes many hours a week, after office hours, in meetings with students. The staff served as advisors for the following organizations and committees: Student Government, Women's InterResidence Hall Council, Pan-hellenic Council, Inter­ cooperative Council, Spartan Women's League, the two boards of Associated Women Students, Cooperative Advisers Association, Student-Faculty Social Com­ mittee, All-College Judiciary and Resident Advisors Groups.156 154 Report of the Secretary . . . 1956, "Report of the Dean of Students," p . 223. 155 Report of the Secretary . . . 1957, "Report of the Dean of Students," p. 240. 1 Sfi Report of the Secretary . . . 1953, "Report of the W o m e n 's Division," p . 299. 82 John W. Truitt reports that . . . a great deal of time has been spent in assisting many of our one hundred and seventy student organizations with problems of all types. . . . There was an apparent need to provide and interpret information concerning social, organi­ zational, and financial problems common to all M.S.C. student organizations. It seemed advisable that both faculty advisers and student leaders be brought together in a Leadership Clinic to fulfill the need expressed above. The Student Congress and our office worked cooperatively to organize this clinic which accomplished, at least in part, the desire that a similar meeting be held each fall as an annual event.157 Leadership training was provided in a regular three-hour course, Education 312, beginning Spring 1953 which proved to be especially valuable to Resident Assistants and prospective Resident Assistants 158 and in a leadership program established by Dr. and Mrs. John Kidd in the 1955— 1956 school year. 159 More leadership opportunities were developed in the latter 50's, e.g., Resident Halls Pre­ school Workshop, Educational and Administrative Service Course #309, Student Leadership Course AES #315; the Men's Division Educational Director and the residence halls advisory staff organized and directed a separate leader­ ship training program for chairmen of the activities, 157 Report of the Secretary . . . 1 9 5 3 , "Report of the M e n 's Division," p. 294. 158 Ibid., p. 296; "Report of the Dean of Stu­ dents," p. 235. 159 Report of the Secretary . . . 1 954, "Report of the Dean of Students," p . 233. 83 athletics, judicial, scholastic, and social aspects of the residence halls program. 160 The concerns for indi­ vidual students is reflected in the Report of the Women's Division which states that "much time was spent in helping students with a multiplicity of problems, for it is believed that one of the major functions of the Women's Division is helping students and their parents in an informal mann e r .161 Summary As a student at Michigan State University during this period of time and active in class and student government, particularly in the judicial area, this author's impression of the Dean's Office was one which provided many supportive services which attempted to pro­ mote students' educational experiences and which staffed friendly, understanding individuals willing to give of themselves. At the same time students were still expected to operate in only certain areas of university activities and while they were able to adjudicate violations they were still expected to accept, unhesitantly, the still Report of the Secretary . . . 195 6 , "Report of the M e n 's Division," p. 228; Report of the Secretary . . . 1957, "Report of the Men's Division," p. 242. ^ ^ Report of the Secretary . . . 1956, of the Women's Division," p. 237. "Report 84 myriad of rules and regulations. 162 Meaningful student involvement in university governance was not to occur until the 1960's. 162 The Helot, Michigan State College Publication, XLIX, No. 3 (September, 1954), 54-66; Sparta Guide, Michigan State University, Fall, 1961. ERA OF EMPHASIS ON STUDENT DEVELOPMENT PERIOD, 1961-1962 THROUGH 1970-1971 85 86 Significant involvement of the total university community, student, faculty, administrators in policy making began during the administration of John Fuzak. Expanding Faculty-Administrative Interactions Closer faculty-administrative relationships developed when John Fuzak became Dean of Students in the 1961-1962 school year. This is pointed out in "An Intro- duction to the University Student Affairs Committee," X 63 from which much of the phrasing has been combined with the author's. At that time, the administrative officers of the Dean of Students Office, primarily Dr. Fuzak and Dr. Eldon Nonnamaker, felt that the Office's relationship with the faculty of the University should be improved, specifically that the University Student Affairs Committee should be involved in the making of policy, since the areas of responsibility encompassed by the Dean of Stu­ dents Office resulted in policies which affected the entire University. Prior to 1961-1962, when Dean King served as Dean of Students, the committee, then known as the Faculty Committee on Student Affairs, was one of several standing committees of the Academic Council. Its role was solely advisory, and it served primarily X 63 "An Introduction to the University Student Affairs Committee," Prepared by the Student Activities Division, Dean of Students Office, ed. by Sue Hughes (East Lansing: Michigan State University, October 1, 1969), pp. 1-2. 87 as a sounding board. The Dean would ask the committee's opinion, but the committee itself had no real authority. The faculty by-laws of that period stated clearly that final authority for policy-making rested with the admin­ istrative officer. The committee itself could best be described as inactive. It was composed of about six representatives, and met on an average of once a term. Dr. Fuzak and Dr. Nonnamaker enlarged the Committee to include representatives from every college of the Uni­ versity, and they began meeting weekly with the Committee, both to inform them of the responsibilities of the Dean of Students Office, and to ask the opinions and advice of the Committee members on policy decisions. The Committee evolved to the point that, as a standing committee of the Academic Council it acted as the agent of the Council in the area of student affairs, subject to the Council's direction, and as a fundamental channel for the evalu­ ation and modification of regulations governing student conduct. Parenthetically, it should be added that the University Student Affairs Committee has subsequently been enlarged to give students a majority vote and its role in the evaluation and modification of rules governing student conduct has been redefined. 164 164 Bylaws for Academic Governance Michigan State University 1971, pp. 45-46; Academic Freedom for Students at Michigan State University, revised June 18, 1971, pp. 24-25. 88 Impact of Nation-Wide Student Activism Student activism across the nation as it concen­ trated on campus, national, and international issues did much to direct attention to the in-loco-parentis concepts held by many universities. Students stressed the respecta bility and value of their ideas and contributions and demanded that students be included in the governance of universities, establishing participatory democracies. Highlighted also were the students' expectations that students were to be guaranteed rights and were to be afforded due process. The Student Non-violent Coordi­ nating Committee's initial program of civil rights pro­ tests, assisting "black brothers and sisters" and stimu­ lating black consciousness, helped spark the white student i /re movement in the North. In 1961 the National Student Association began protesting the House Un-American Activi­ ties Committee's actions— its requests for universities to provide names of student activists to the Committee and its hearings. Society The Students For A Democratic (SDS) in 1962 urged disenfranchised and powerless The Politics of Protest, A Task Force Report Submitted to the National Commission on the Causes and Pre vention of Violence (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1969), pp. 88, 92. 166 Conversation with Max Raines, Professor of Administration and Higher Education, and Louis Hekhuis, Associate Dean of Students on April 26, 1972, and April 28 1972, respectively. 89 people to organize themselves and obtain their just rewards from the already powerful; 167 in 1966 The Free Speech Movement in Berkeley, California, which began over suddenly imposed restrictions on students who used the campus "to support or advocate off-campus political or social action" became . . . not simply a protest against particular vio­ lations of students' rights, but rather an expression of an underlying conflict between students as a class and the "multiversity" and its administration— a struggle between two fundamentally opposed inter­ ests in and orientations toward higher education.168 In 1966 SDS established a thrust which was first called "student syndicalism." It was "an effort to increase the 'class-consciousness' of students and break down what SDS saw as the bureaucratic quality of university life, the paternalistic treatment of students and the authoritarian pattern of education. . . . The existence of power­ ful student movements, such as those just discussed, has increased the power and influence of students on American campuses. This conclusion is supported by the following statement in The Politics of Protest: That students are beginning to be heard and considered in University policies is largely a result of the political activity and organization of students in recent y e a r s . 170 167 The Politics of Protest, p. 90. 168Ibid., p. 93. 170 Ibid., p. 119. 169Ibid., p. 97. 90 At Michigan State University the involvement of students in the decision-making process and the establish­ ment of student rights and responsibilities and procedures for due process, actions which fostered a developmental approach for working with people, were accomplished in part because of student pressure and legal decisions and in part because of the receptiveness of many members of the University community. Controversy Over "Speakers Policy" Faculty and student involvement in the decision­ making process was stimulated by the controversy over the "speaker's policy." All speakers had to be approved by the Administrative authorities. 171 In the spring of 1962 a group of students did in fact bring a speaker without approval; in the fall of 1962 the Student Govern­ ment President, to test the reaction of the University, cooperated in bringing a speaker to the University with­ out receiving approval and as a result he was removed from office. 172 A furor developed and Dr. Nonnamaker felt that the wisest course of action was to get repre­ sentatives from the University community to sit down and 171 172 "Faculty Minutes," September 28, 1936. Conversation on March 9, 1972, with Eldon Nonnamaker who served as Director of the Men's Division of Student Affairs in 1962-1963. 91 talk about the problem; he therefore, asked representatives from all the major student governing groups, from the faculty, and from the administration to come together to discuss the issue at hand and to make recommendations. 173 The inclusion of leaders from the major student governing groups provided a basis for the eventual re-structuring of the student government in 1965, 174 the inclusion of faculty representatives accorded recognition to the faculty, and the inclusion of all three segments of the University com­ munity laid the groundwork for total University community participation in the University governance. The Challenge of Legalisms and Due Process The Paul Schiff case in 1965 underscored the need for the University to clearly identify University expectations and to insure that due process be afforded in all situations. The following information regarding the Schiff case was obtained from Robert Fedore's dissertation. 175 Mr. Schiff was an activist student who participated in challenging University regulations, in particular, the University's regulation on the distri­ bution of written materials— publishing and circulating ^ ^ Ibid. 175 ^ ^ Ibid.; Appendix A. Robert Fedore, "An Evaluation of the Report on the 'Academic Freedom for Students at Michigan State Uni­ versity,'" (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University, 1969), pp. 6, 34-37. 92 a pamphlet, "Logos." Mr. Schiff did not enroll for spring term of 1965 and when he tried to do so for summer term, Dr. John Fuzak, Vice President for Student Affairs, refused to approve Schiff's application for re-admission on the grounds of his conduct. He appealed this decision to the Federal District Court of the Western District of Michigan on the grounds that he had been denied his constitutional rights. The Court directed the University to present Mr. Schiff a statement of charges, provide him with a hearing, and to insure that the interests of all parties were protected. After due deliberation Mr. Schiff was denied re-admission— though he was granted re-admission for the winter term of 1966— but it was apparent that the University needed to study the rights and responsibilities of students. A study was instituted and from the recommendations arose the Academic Freedom for Students at Michigan State University, usually referred to as the Academic Freedom Report, which was adopted on May 16, 1967, by the Board of Trustees to be implemented 120 days after that date. The Academic Freedom Report, The Judicial System and Student Development This Report stresses community responsibility in developing and abiding by guidelines for academic freedom and due process and in adjudicating or mediating con­ flicts. The spirit of the judicial process established 93 under the Academic Freedom Report is based on good faith— a mutual trust between the University and the student. The established judicial system involves student judiciaries at the living-unit level, governing an All-University Student Judiciary and a Student-Faculty Judiciary. To provide direction, coordination, and continuity to, and evaluation of the judicial system, the Dean of Students Office established in the Fall of 1969 the Judicial Programs Office, designating Ms. Ruth Renaud as Director. In contrast to the 1950's the student personnel staff encouraged student judiciaries to adjudicate and/or mediate the whole gauntlet of violations from roommates not communicating, to drinking, to questionable behavior in public, to a member of the opposite sex remaining in a room beyond stated requirements; the Student-Faculty has original jurisdiction to hear cases involving academic dishonesty, requests for re-admission from suspension for non-academic reasons, and appeals concerning the sub­ stance of a regulation or an administrative decision. The staff's perception is that the system is an integral part of the total educational process. Operation under the Academic Freedom Report has led to a de-emphasis on disciplinary control and sub­ stituted instead a developmental approach for working with people— that of accepting people, helping them to 94 work through their problems and assisting them in becoming self-actualizing, developing themselves to their full potential. This statement is supported by Ray Byers, a previous residence hall graduate advisor, who asserted in his presentation in Instruction in Higher Education, 828E, Summer, 1970, that the Academic Freedom Report has created an atmosphere at Michigan State University "where people are reacting to one another in a developmental manner." The student development emphasis is reflected in an exacting and comprehensive study conducted, by an Ad Hoc Committee created by the Dean of Students, Dr. Eldon Nonnamaker, on the resident assistant position. 176 This study was completed on April 12, 1971, and among other items stressed that the resident assistant was to act as a facilitator/mediator and also was to provide positive type support actions to encourage compliance to regulations. His role was not to be that of "establishment punitive control agent." The establishment of channels, under the Academic Freedom Report, to challenge administrative decisions and the substance of regulations and to initiate changes has fostered orderly change. Examples are the students' utilization of the judicial channels to challenge the 176 "Report of the Committee to Study the Resident Assistant Position," April 12, 1971, p. 15, Appendix G, pp. 1-3. 95 Women's Hours and Open House policies. In these instances the Student-Faculty Judiciary issued cease and desist injunctions against hall government actions, which were in conflict with All-University policies, so that the status quo would be preserved until policies dealing with these matters, already in the legislative channels, were finalized. Ultimately, new policies were effected and were accepted by the students. The last major vestiges of in loco parentis rule were removed with the passage of the new Student Group Regulations: Closing Hours In University Residences, April 27, 1970, 177 Social Regulations, April 27, 1970, 178 University Residence Hall Alcohol Policy, April 29, 1970, 179 and the adoption of the Bylaws for Academic Governance, May 21, 1971, which seated thirty-two stu­ dents on the Academic Council of 110 total membership and which entitled students to participate in the decision­ making process within departments, colleges, and Standing Committees of the Academic Council. 177 Appendix D . 178Ibid. 180 180 179Ibid. Bylaws for Academic Governance Michigan State University, 1^71. 96 Relating to Student Activists During Confrontations in the Late 1960's The Dean of Student's commitment to community government and the student personnel point of view of creating within each student motivation to seek exper­ iences and knowledge, both of an academic and non-academic nature, which will assist her in becoming a self-reliant, self-evaluative, self-analyzing, and self-directing indi­ vidual provided the basis from which the Office related to the student activists of the latter 1960's. The Office had provided an early impetus for community governance in its handling of the "outside speaker" crises, was intimately involved in the development and implementation of the Academic Freedom Report, shared in the debating of the various recommendations on student participation in academic governance, supported removal of in loco parentis restrictions, and consistently related to students in a one-to-one or smal1-group sharing relationship. The Dean of Students Office had therefore established credibility with many students and when stu­ dents, as they did in 1969-1970, created conflict situ­ ations, e.g., student strike (boycott of classes from May 5 until about May 15) the Office was in a position to interact with students and facilitate the undertaking of constructive activities, such as, a mass democratic meeting in the Auditorium. The staff operated as responsive channels of communication from students to 97 the highest administrative echelon, faculty, and interested citizens and from these publics to the students. By being constantly on the scene of action, the staff was often in position to stress, reason, and dialogue rather than over­ reaction. The following quote from "Annual Report of the Vice President for Student Affairs 1969-1970" by Milton B. Dickerson provides an insightful reflection on student activism: For a large portion of the basic causes one must look at the society as a whole. The social problems faced by today's Americans generate much of the tension appearing on the campuses. Solutions can be found only by the diligent efforts of individual students, faculty and administrative staff. The Dean of Students staff must assist in identifying these problems and in developing educational programs which will help students to better understand and cope with them. If conflict on the campus is to be resolved, or at least kept within reasonable limits, in the final analysis it can probably be done only through better educational programs. Certain ele­ ments of control will probably have to be employed but it is important to create means of resolving conflict before rigid control becomes n e c e s s a r y . 181 Reorganization of the Dean of Students Office As various events were happening across the campus, the Dean of Students Office, itself, was under­ going changes. During the 1960's, for a variety of reasons, changes in student personnel administrative structures were accomplished with a trend toward 181 "Annual Report Vice President for Student Affairs 1969-1970," p. 1. 98 establishing offices of Vice President for Student Affairs. For example, in some universities the office of Vice President for Student Affairs was created to place student personnel services on the same adminis­ trative level as other units within the university. Increased university's enrollment and the subsequent increase in the number of administrative offices and services were other factors which influenced re­ structuring the dean of student offices. Student activities, housing, governance, and discipline alone were often enough to fully occupy the time and energies of the dean of students staff. The removal of some of the areas of responsibilities from the jurisdiction of the dean of students and assigning them to a Vice Presi­ dent for Student Affairs helped to create a manageable span of control. Michigan State University Dean of Students Office reorganization is a case in point. To enhance the admin­ istrative position of student personnel services and to create a more manageable span of control, among other reasons, the Dean of Students Office was placed under the jurisdiction of a Vice President for Student Affairs in 1964-1965. The Office of the Dean of Students retained the responsibility for student activities, housing, governance, financial aid, and discipline and the Dean of Students Staff's responsibilities for the Health 99 Center, Counseling Center, and Draft Deferments were assumed by the Office of the Vice President for Student Affairs, which also assumed the responsibilities for Intramural Athletics. The Dean of Students Placement Service was reassigned to the Office of the Vice President for Special Projects. John Fuzak, who had been the Dean of Students, was appointed as Vice President with Eldon Nonnamaker and Laurine Fitzgerald being selected as Associate Dean and Assistant Dean respectively. Dr. Milton B. Dickerson became the Vice President for Student Affairs for the 1967-1968 school year and served through the 1970-1971 school year. Professionalization of Staff The professionalization of the Staff was stimu­ lated by the decision of the University to open co­ educational residence halls in 1961-1962. This made the employment of qualified student personnel workers, both men and women requisite— previous to this time housemothers for the womens' residence halls had little if any professional training. 182 Professionalization was advanced by the initiation, late in the spring of 1964, of a graduate program in College Personnel Work, jointly administered by the Dean of Students Office and 182 Frances H. DeLisle, "Annual Report of the Women's Division of Student Affairs," July 16, 1962, p. 22. 100 the College of Education. 183 Under the guidance of Dr. Laurine E. Fitzgerald, Dr. Walter F. Johnson, and Dr. Eldon R. Nonnamaker this program, combining practical experience with formal academic training, developed to be rated as one of the finest in the United States. Dr. Fitzgerald has served as the primary coordinator from the Dean of Students Office. The Dean of Students' Inservice Training Program, e.g., central staff seminars, residence hall advisory staff workshops, also provides opportunities for the staff to grow professionally. The Office of the Dean of Students College Personnel Library of Resource Materials and the pro­ fessional publications by the Office are means by which students and administrators in student personnel can become more professional. Students and administrators can readily secure professional information from the library and through the publications share and communi­ cate ideas and publish articles and studies. The Library has psychological and sociological journals and publi­ cations of student personnel and higher education, including reference text books and "classics" in guidance and personnel work. In the 1965-1966 school year the Student Personnel Administration Newsletter 183 Appendix E. (SPAN) was published, under the 101 guidance of Assistant Dean Laurine Fitzgerald, to promote staff cohesiveness through the sharing of ideas. With the publication of the Staff Courier between Fall 1968June 1970 under the direction of the Assistant to the Dean, Robert Fedore, SPAN was re-designed as a personal information and notes quarterly sent to graduates and staff of Student Personnel and Higher Education. The new Staff Courier increased its coverage emphasizing national student personnel endeavors plus including some local professional happenings and ideas. This publication was shared with other student personnel administrators across the nation. In February, 1971, the Staff Courier was placed under an editor who was a member of the Division of Graduate Education and Research and who obtained materials from a staff member from each of the Divisions within the Office of the Dean of Students. The stress has been on "in house" communication includ­ ing the periodic features of various Divisional functions. The MSU Orient has been published since the fall of 1965, identifying ongoing student personnel activities at Michigan State University and furnishing space for staff members to publish articles and studies. The circulation is to all former staff members and students in student personnel and to the national executive boards of National Association of Student Personnel Administrators, 102 National Association of Women Deans and Counselors, and American College Personnel Association. Commitment to Research and Evaluation The Dean of Students Office has continued to be committed to conducting research, but to date has not re-allocated funds for extensive research projects, or been able to secure sufficient computer time. 184 Dr. Fxtz- gerald, Associate Dean of Students for the Division of Graduate Education and Research, writes, The concern and involvement of personnel within the Office of the Dean of Students for descriptive, basic action and experimental research has been implemented through the efforts of the staff members of the Division, and coordinated by a half-time Graduate Assistant during the current academic year. A major research project of a descriptive nature was initiated in the fall, an attempt to assess the preferences and speculative assessments made by parents and students of Michigan State University who have had direct contact with residence halls; in addition, a follow-up survey of the MSU Omnibus II was initiated, and a minimum of five or six in-depth individual projects were coordinated, stimulated and encouraged by personnel of the Division. The purposes of this sub-division of the total respon­ sibilities of the Office of the Dean of Students are to coordinate the on-going research which involve students and the divisional aspects of the Office of the Vice President for Student Affairs, to provide resource for researchers within the functional and budgetary area and in the entire University regarding relevant projects, to stimulate the investigation of problems in areas of interest within the broad field of College Student Personnel 184 Dr. Laurine Fitzgerald, "Annual Report of the Associate Dean for Graduate Education and Research, 197071," pp. Al, A5, A6. 103 Administration, to provide resource and assistance to graduate students and staff members who wish to pursue research projects, to provide personnel who can assist in the development of survey instruments in response to the needs evidenced by staff members of the Dean of Students O f f i c e s . 185 The Dean of Students Office personnel as they individually daily perform in various roles and at sundry activities constantly seek feedback from students, faculty, and other administrators on the effects of their actions and programs with which they are associ­ ated. These personal assessments represent an ongoing evaluative process. An in-depth study of the Dean of Students' organizational structure was conducted during the summer of 1969 (Dr. Nonnamaker's charge to the staff is included in Appendix F ) , with a reorganization being proposed in the fall of 1969 and adopted officially in April, 1970; this provided a more functional organizational structure. 186 Innovative Programs Several innovations have been accomplished during the latter part of the 1 960's. During Winter Term 1970 funding was obtained and a comprehensive drug education program, which served as a national model, was developed as a service provided by the Student Governance Division. ^~*Ibid. , p. A5. 186 "Annual Report Vice President for Student Affairs 1969-70," p. 1; Appendix C. 104 After two successful years, the program became independent of the Division, receiving state and federal funds and moving its entire operation off campus. The Associate Dean for University Governance, Dr. Louis Hekhuis, pro­ vided considerable personal input into the development of an off-campus crises intervention center. It is staffed by volunteers trained as para-professionals. As this center services both the University community and the public, and as the Student Governance Staff concentrated on assisting both on-campus and off-campus students, individually or collectively, through organi­ zations, e.g., Off-Campus Council, Pan Hellenic Associ­ ation, Inter-Fraternity Council, Inter-Cooperative Council, it was felt that the inclusion of the Director of the Center on the Student Governance staff, between the summer of 1970 and June of 1971 would provide supportive assistance to a center which serviced students and would assist the Student Governance staff in increasing its awareness of student concerns. These objectives were realized and the crises intervention center is now oper­ ating independently of the University. The Black Student Aide Program was developed as the result of extensive in-depth discussions between black student representa­ tives, Residence Hall Area Directors, Student Governance staff, and the Dean of Students over a three-month period in the winter of 1968. This exchange of ideas helped the 105 Dean of Students staff to better perceive the needs and concerns of minority students; as a result, a plan was initiated to retain black students on residence hall staffs, over and beyond those who were selected as resident assistants, to help both white and black stu­ dents to understand one another, and to facilitate black students' adjustment to the total University environment. The program, now supervised by the Black Student Aide Coordinator of the Dean of Students staff, has proved to be a significant endeavor. While historically student volunteer services have existed for many years, it was Michigan State stu­ dent personnel services that first established an officially designated office to provide support for volunteer programs, both in an advisory capacity and in the operation of necessary educational and practical services. 187 Upon the recommendation of Milton B. Dickerson, Vice President for Student Affairs, and Provost Howard Neville, the Board of Trustees, on November 22, 1967, approved the creation of this Office, with James Tanck as its Director and on January 2, 1968, the Office of Volunteer Programs, 187 Conversation on March 24, 1972, with John Cauley, current Director of the Office of Volunteer Programs; The Volunteer Action Effort at Michigan State University, "A Report on the Initial Year of the M.S.U. Office of Volunteer Programs," 1968, pp. 20-23. 106 located in the Student Activities Division area of the Dean of Students, commenced operation. 188 The duties are implemented by two major divisions within the Office of Volunteer Programs, the MSU Volunteer Bureau which serves as a central information and recruit­ ing agency for all student and community volunteer pro­ grams which use college students and others from the campus, and the Volunteer Transportation Pool which transports volunteers to the point within the community where they are needed. 189 The Office of Volunteer Pro­ grams provides peripheral liaison and support activities to thousands of volunteers and coordinates approximately sixty-five community volunteer programs, with roughly 1,000 volunteers in the field at any one time working on long-term, ongoing community projects. Increased Support for Student Organizations The Dean of Students Office's service to registered student organizations, 191 greatly expanded in the 188 The Volunteer Action Effort at Michigan State University, p. 23 189Ibid., p. 40. 190 Conversation on March 24, 197 2, with John Cauley. 191 Student organizations have not had to be approved since the winter of 1966; students just register the name of the organization, the purpose of the 107 1960's. In the 1969-1970 school year over 303 organizations were registered; 192 requests for information and supportive assistance was prodigeous. As of the fall of 1968 advisors were no longer required, consequently many organizations utilized in the place of an advisor, the Dean of Students staff. The demands by student organi­ zations have certainly grown since 1896 when Dean of Women's functions began. At that time there were only approximately twenty non-fraternal organizations on campus, all having advisors for guidance and support. 193 Summary The period of the 1 9 6 0 's through the early 1970's witnessed a greatly expanded student personnel program— one which not only provided the traditional services, but also furnished the thrust for the development of community government and a student development philosophy, singu­ larly advanced the professionalization of student person­ nel workers, assisted in conflict resolution in situations organization, the officers, their addresses and phone numbers and the name of the advisor if there is one— Con­ versation with Ms. Lana Dart, Assistant Director of Student Governance on March 9, 1972. 192 . "Directory of Registered Student Organization, Michigan State University, 1969-1970." 193 Beal, pp. 205-14; Michigan State Agricultural College Catalogue, 1896, pp. 10(5-07. 108 of critical magnitude never before encountered by the University, undertook as a Divisional responsibility evaluative and research projects, instituted significant innovative programs, and incalculably increased the number of contacts with students, individually and collectively. CHAPTER V ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF THE DATA Testing the Hypothesis that the Development of the Dean of Students Office at Michigan State University Approximates the Evolvement of dean of students offices across the nation. In reviewing and analyzing Chapter III, "The Evolvement of the Dean of Students Offices in the United States," the author has concluded that in most instances there was a definite pattern in the development of the dean of students offices across the nation, a progression of emphasis from one of control to one of services and educational functions to one of student development. This chapter will test the hypothesis that the develop­ ment of the Dean of Students Office at Michigan State University described in Chapter IV approximates the national pattern. In Michigan Agricultural College's period of development from 1857-1858 through 1895-1896, which covers the years prior to the establishment of the Office of Dean of Women, precedents were established which were 109 110 later followed by student personnel deans. The principal precedent during this period was one of control. The President and Faculty established the rules and regu­ lations and designed the student government as an organi­ zation to enforce the rules and regulations in accordance with faculty expectations. This was demonstrated in the establishment of the Students' Government in 1875, in its revision in 1882 and also in the situation in the 1890's when the Faculty, as the student government lost students' support, established new rules and directed that dormitory inspection be made by cadet officers under the supervision of the Military Department. The Faculty also approved all student organizations and student social event requests. Student life was strictly regulated! The emphasis, then, in this period, which had a direct influence on the philosophy developed by the Dean of Women in the next period, was placed on the President and the Faculty in lieu of student parents to maintain order and preserve traditional morals. The first dean-of-student-office related functions received official recognition at Michigan Agricultural College with the establishment of a women's course in 1896 under the direction of Edith F. McDermott who assumed the responsibility for the Women's Department. In the formative years of the Dean of Women's Department the staff responsibilities were numerous and varied, e.g., Ill care of the sick, supervision, and maintenance of the dormitory building. concern. Control, though, was the major As was stated earlier by Kuhn and Gilchrist, regulations governing women were exacting and Victorian ideas prevailed to some extent in the early 1900's. At Michigan Agricultural College the Office of the Dean of Women's overall responsibility for the care of women stu­ dents followed the in-loco-parentis control precedent established in the period 1875-1876 through 1895-1896, providing the same emphasis that other dean of students offices across the nation employed as they began to evolve. At Michigan Agricultural College the control over women students did gradually move on the continuum away from administrative autocratic establishment and enforcement of rules to some student involvement in the regulation of their own lives. Miss Gilchrist sought to liberalize the restrictive policies and with the establishment of the Women's Student Council in the 1916-1917 school year which evolved to Associated Women Students', women stu­ dents were afforded the opportunity to modify and/or change various policies and rules. Male students, on the other hand, operating in a void without any student personnel dean, were not provided with any meaningful opportunities to regulate their own conduct, e.g., the 1908 student council constitution and statements made 112 in the yearbook implied that the student council was trying to change its control agent image. While the providing of services was not the major concern of the office responsible for women stu­ dents during 1896-1897 through 1934-1935, this service function did begin to evolve. For example, the Dean of Women's Office spent considerable time helping to place young women in homes where they could work for their board and room and helping to establish the first cooper­ ative house in 1936 in an effort to provide women with inexpensive housing. The service function was expanded by the Michigan State College Office of the Dean of Women and the newly established Office of the Dean of Men, May, 1935, during the 1935-1936 through 1943-1944 period, with the stress on control being somewhat de-emphasized; students became more involved in controlling some aspects of their campus life, especially through A.W.S. and the 1940 Student Government which enabled women for the first time to be official voting members. The Office of the Dean of Men administered entrance and diagnostic examinations, organized and coordinated Freshmen Week orientation, and assisted in vocational counseling. The Office of the Dean of Women specifically facilitated the orientation of women students as it assisted the A.W.S. in its orientation program for freshmen women. The Offices 113 of the Dean of Men and the Dean of Women were also involved in placement activities— the Office of the Dean of Men, namely, in its cooperative activity with the National Youth Administration, to furnish part-time work for students, and the Office of the Dean of Women, particularly, in its efforts to place students in homes where they could work for their board and room. Counsel­ ing of an informal non-professionalized nature and informal leadership training was provided as students came to the Offices for assistance or as the staff advised the various student organizations. Supervision of living accommo­ dations and life within the various living units, e.g., residence halls, co-ops, private homes, was also provided by the Offices. While it was not until the 1944-1945 through 19601961 period that specialized services were identified and consolidated under a dean of students at Michigan State College, the gradual increase, during the 1935-1936 through 1943-1944 period, of the emphasis on service and a gradual decline in the emphasis on control follows the pattern of development of the dean of students offices across the nation. With the establishment at Michigan State College of the Office of the Dean of Students on July 1, 1944, the providing of specialized personnel services became a reality. The various services during the 1944-1945 114 through 1960-1961 period correspond in most cases to those identified by Hopkins 194 in a 1948 address, though possibly not always as thorough or complete as he advo­ cated. For example, he advocated an effective orientation program spread throughout the year, but with the exception of some A.W.S. directed activities Michigan State College did not provide an effective ongoing orientation program. Hopkin's eleven specialized student personnel services are as follows: 1. A program of pre-College counseling, selection, and applicant-centered admissions. 2. An organized program for diagnosis and counseling of students. This includes both intensive clini­ cal counseling and the normal day-to-day edu­ cational and personal counseling provided by the faculty and other less professionally trained counselors. 3. An effective orientation program, spread through­ out the entire first year. 4. Remedial assistance in various areas for those students who need it. 194 E. H. Hopkins, "The Essentials of a Student Personnel Program," Educational and Psychological Measure­ ment, VIII, No. 3 (Autumn, 1948), 431-32. 115 5. Definite provision for the supervision, coordi­ nation, and integration of the "Co-curriculor" program on campus. 6. A student health service, providing professional services in areas of both physical and mental health. 7. An adequate program of supervision of living arrangements, including the food service program. This program must be provided in such a manner as to contribute to the maximum extent possible to the social-educational objectives of the insti­ tution, as they relate to the individual student. 8. A well-organized program for administering financial aids, student employments, post-graduate placements, and job follow u p s . 9. Special facilities for developing and evaluating the religious life and interests of students on the campus. 10. There must be devised and maintained an adequate system of permanent cumulative personnel records which include pertinent information relative to all aspects of student life and student accom­ plishment. 116 11. At present, and for the next few years, a special service providing for the Coordination of Veterans' Affairs is an essential part of the total program. The personnel services at Michigan State College were implemented by divisions within the Dean of Stu­ dents Office such as the following: the Office of School Cooperation; Placement Bureau; Foreign Student Advisory Service; Servicemen's Institute; Counseling Center; Health Service; Housing Assignments; Registration, Admissions and Records; Alumni Relations; Counselor for Men and Counselor for Women, later in this period retitled Men's Division and Women's Division of Student Affairs. A description of the Counseling Center's accomplishments by the Director, Donald Grummon, aptly points out the numerous and most significant activities with which a specialized student service may become involved. Nearly 5,000 students were seen for individual counseling, an increase of 12 per cent over the previous year. The total number of counseling con­ tacts with these students increased still more— by 18 per cent. Approximately 5,000 students, a gain of 46 per cent, were also seen in other pro­ grams such as the Summer Clinics, special testing programs, and admissions testing and counseling— though many of these were the same students seen in our individual counseling program. In all pro­ grams combined, the number of students served increased by 28 per cent over the previous year. These increases in the quantity of our work are quite remarkable, especially since sizable increases have also been recorded each year for several years now. 117 We also saw over 700 non-students for counseling and/or testing and held over 2,000 conferences with faculty, parents, high school personnel, and visitors. In addition to this heavy load of counseling and testing we made time to serve on doctoral commit­ tees, to teach 17 sections of courses for the Department of Psychology and the College of Edu­ cation, to hold 627 conferences with students in which we served as instructors rather than coun­ selors, to begin to develop a sound program of supervision and training for graduate students working half-time at the Counseling Center, to plan and administer the orientation program for new students, to assist with the selection of scholarship applicants, to administer the tutor­ ing program for the Athletic Department, to serve on All-University committees and as advisers to several student organizations, to help the State Civil Service Commission select applicants for the State Police, to do some diagnostic testing for the psychiatric service in the University Health Service, to prepare 10 articles for publication, to get 28 research projects planned or under way, to partici­ pate in the activities of professional societies, to improve our in-service training program, to plan for a new building, and to make innumerable speeches before professional student, and community groups. It has been a busy and productive y e a r ! 195 The Dean of Students Office did provide, through the Men's and Women's Division, supervision, coordination, and integration of the "co-curricular" program. Con­ siderable time was spent advising, guiding, and assisting students, individually and collectively, e.g., leadership training was not only provided in informal unstructured situations, but also in specific educational courses and workshops. These two Divisions also provided direction and support to students through the various residence hall programs. 195 The Report of the Secretary . . . 195 7 , "The Report of the Director of the Counseling Center," p. 258. 118 During this period of emphasis on specialized student personnel services one significant development was the advancement of student self-determination with a corresponding de-emphasis on control. The student govern­ ment with its re-organization in 1951, including the establishment of an All-College Judiciary, came to be recognized as a responsible effective influential force. It appears, though, that the Michigan State University Dean of Students Office responded somewhat more slowly than other dean of students offices across the nation in its relaxing of control measures. For example, the Annual Report of the Women's Division for the year 19551956, states that Washington State University distributed in the fall of 1955 the results of a periodic survey of rules, regulations and social practices involving a nation­ wide sample in which Michigan State University par­ ticipated. According to this survey, closing hours for women on this campus were a little more con­ servative than the typical university, which usually included different closing hours for freshmen. These data, together with the revision of hours for the new Michigan State University Library, influenced us to investigate the possibility of a change of hours for women students for the fall of 1956. It was recommended to A.W.S. that closing hours be extended to 10:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, except for freshmen for whom closing hours on these evenings would remain the same as at present. A satisfactory academic average at the end of the first term will qualify for extended h o u r s .196 ~^6Report of the Secretary . . . i956, "The Annual Report of the Women's Division," p. 2 T 6 . 119 It has been demonstrated that in comparison with the national trend of dean of students offices evolvement, Michigan State University Dean of Students Office's development did follow the national pattern of emphasis from control to service and educational functions. The control influence, however, remained stronger at Michigan State University than at many other colleges. With the dawn of the 1960's Michigan State Uni­ versity Dean of Students Office intertwined and under­ girded its service concept with the student development philosophy— a total University community effort to solve campus problems and to develop and to provide services, facilitating meaningful growth experiences, with the Office of the Dean of Students in a key position to play a role of active intervention in every sector of the campus community. Faith in the individual's potentiality for development, understanding and acceptance of o t hers, and the involvement of the Office in research, consultation services, innovative projects, and evaluation are also essential principles and activities for a student develop­ ment program. While the Dean of Students Office had been slow in exorcising the in-loco-parentis control concept, it now provided the leadership in the promoting and refin­ ing of the humanistic student development approach. The Dean of Students Office fostered community government through encouraging the faculty, students, 120 and administrators to sit down together and work out various problems, e.g., "the speaker policy," through its assisting in the development, implementation, and ongoing evaluation of the Academic Freedom Report, and through coordinating and implementing student participation in academic governance. Operating under the Academic Freedom Report led to a de-emphasis on disciplinary control and substituted instead a developmental approach for working with people. This approach entails accepting people, helping them to work through concerns, and assisting them in becoming self-actualizing, developing themselves to their fullest potential. The last major vestiges of the in-loco-parentis rule were removed with the passage of the Student Group Regulations: Closing Hours In Uni­ versity Residences, April 27, 1970, Social Regulations, April 27, 1970, University Residence Hall Alcohol Policy, April 29, 1970, and by the adoption of the Bylaws for Academic Governance, May 21, 1971. These policies, in effect, allow students, in cooperation with other members of the University community, to establish standards for student conduct and for students to be significantly involved in the governance of the University. The new social regulations clearly place Michigan State University in the position of being one of the few universities to utilize the student development approach to the extent that all major in-loco-parentis regulations 121 were removed. This observation is supported by Christensen in his doctoral dissertation, 1970, when he says "even though there is a trend to move toward fewer rules govern­ ing non-academic activities, there is still considerable control over the student's life except in a few rare universities." 197 The Dean of Students Office as a part of its ongoing student development program conducted research, such as the attempt to evaluate the preferences and specu­ lative assessment made by parents and students of Michigan State University, about living accommodations in the residence halls. The Staff also sought constant feedback about the various programs from the students, faculty, administrators, and the community at large and conducted, in the summer of 1969, an in-depth examination of the Dean of Students Office's objectives, organizational structure, and modus operandi. The innovative endeavors, such as the Drug Education Project, Black Aide Program, Volunteer Programs, support for the Crises Intervention Center, and the service provided to countless registered student organizations all relate to the student development concept. With Michigan State University Dean of Students Office's espousal of the student development concept, the 197 Val Rigby Christensen, "A Survey and Evaluation of Existing Student Conduct Codes and Regulations in Selected Four-Year Institutions of Higher Learning" (unpub­ lished Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University, 1970) , p. 256. 122 Office's pattern of development had progressed from an emphasis on control, to service and educational functions, to student development. Summary The analysis and interpretation of the data does support the hypothesis that the development of the Dean of Students Office at Michigan State University approxi­ mates the evolvement of dean of students offices across the nation, a progression of emphasis from one of control to one of services and educational functions to one of student development. CHAPTER VI SUMMARY, EXPECTATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS Summary The purpose of this dissertation was to provide an historical study of the development of the Dean of Students Office at Michigan State University and to con­ trast and compare this development with national student personnel trends. The author's hypothesis was: that the development of the Dean of Students Office at Michigan State University closely approximates the development of dean of students offices across the nation. To accomplish this purpose the author first pre­ sented a general historical overview of the evolvement of the dean of students offices in the United States which provided a frame of reference for the examination of the development of the Michigan State University Dean of Stu­ dents Office. Secondly, the historical-chronological development of the Dean of Students Office at Michigan State University was discussed in depth. Thirdly, the author analyzed the data and attempted to support or refute the hypothesis. 123 124 Data were secured from written sources and from personal interviews and were subjected to external and internal criticism. In the analysis and interpretation of the data the author found that in most instances there was a definite pattern in the development of the dean of students offices across the nation, a progression of emphasis from one of control to one of services, and educational functions to one of student development. The author discovered that the development of the Michigan State University Dean of Students Office did, in fact, approximate this pattern enabling him to accept his hypothesis. As the history of the Dean of Students Office at Michigan State University unfolded, personages out of the past were revealed which demonstrated a humanness approach in Michigan State's earliest days, e.g., T. C. Abbot, whose approach appeared to be premature for acceptance and Miss Maud Gilchrist whose push for the acceptance of women students as responsible, mature young ladies encouraged the involvement of women students in many significant activities. This history, upon close inspection, also revealed the dichotomy between theory and practice as applied to self-discipline and selfgovernment. the students' While student personnel workers alluded to self-discipline and self-government as supported by the various student personnel offices, 125 stressing the value of self-determination and the student personnel point of view, in actual practice this goal was very slow in being realized— the 1960's. Expectations It would appear that the Michigan State University Dean of Students Office will continue to expand its efforts in the student development processes. The humanness approach has fostered understandings of and sensitivity to others and has assisted individuals to reach their goal of developing themselves to their fullest capacity. This direction would be in keeping with Tripp's prediction about education and student personnel work in the year 2000: There will be more concern for self-awareness and development of warm fulfilling interpersonal relations as significant objectives in the edu­ cational experience . . . much of the future will fall to a new generation of student develop­ ment experts. They will be responsible not only for integrating the intellectual experiences of the individual but also for assisting students in their study and treatment of moral and ethical problems. They will consult in the development of life styles and on the affective and aspirational aspects of student government.198 Grant also advocates the student development approach as the ongoing emphasis, saying to student personnel workers, 198 Philip A. Tripp, "Student Personnel Workers: Student Development Experts of the Future," Journal of NAWDC, XXXI, No. 3 (Spring, 1968), 143. 126 . . . we can look forward to performing a unique function central to the educational process of facilitating behavioral development rather than providing a peripheral or complementary service. We will seek to free the student from environ­ mental domination rather than be control agents of student conduct.199 Specifically, a student development specialist and a student could jointly develop a behavioral profile for the student, describing where he is now in his developmental process, identifying his aspirations, and the ways in which he might reach his goals. His develop­ ment could be projected against various personality theories such as Jung's personality concepts,200 Erickson's "Eight Ages of Man," 201 and Holland's "Personality . ,,202 types." Jung's theories on personality have been incor­ porated in the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and related to man's total self-developmental experiences, e.g., 199 Harold Grant, "Higher Education m Student Personnel Work in the Year 2000," Journal of NAWDC, XXXI, No. 3 (Spring, 1968), 141. (London: 200J. H. VanderHoop, Character and the Unconscious Routlege and Paul L t d ., 1950) , pp. 130-98. 201 York: Erik H. Erickson, Childhood and Society (New W. W. Norton and Company, Inc., 1963), pp. 247-74. 202 John L. Holland, The Psychology of Vocational Choice (Waltham, Mass.: Blaisdell Publishing C ompany, 1966), pp. 1-96. 127 personal, educational, and vocational. 203 Further assistance could be provided by helping the individual to develop an educational and vocational program to modify his personality, e.g., through assertive train­ ing,204 desensitization-relaxation,205 and by creating environments which would enable the student to satisfy the three basic needs of identity, stimulation, and security and to become self-directive. A supportive environment would be one which would insure that the student would have his own territory, 206 a place to call his own, and would be one which would foster the student's development of his own life style through social modeling. Examples of individuals which could serve as models would be: faculty and staff members; the student's peer group, which could include specially designed small interaction groups, security groups com­ posed of members whose modes of operation are similar 203 Indicator 1963) . Isabel Briggs Myers, The Myers—Brings Type (Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 204 (New York: Joseph Wolpe, Behavioral Therapy Techniques Pergamon Press^ 1968), pp. 38-53. 205Ibid., pp. 54-101. 206 The importance of territory is discussed by Robert Ardrey, The Territorial Imperative (New York: Dell Publishing Company, 1966); Desmond Morris, The Naked Ape (New York: The Dell Publishing Company, 1969); Edward T. Hall, The Hidden Dimension (New York: Doubleday and Co., 1966). 128 and stimulation groups composed of members whose modes of operation vary; and individuals within the larger community. For example, if the student would like to be a banker, he could associate with a banker and learn both personal and technical skills from him. Since behavioral development is an ongoing process the student development specialists would work in various areas with students throughout the student's University experience. A continued emphasis will be placed on learning the various principles of conflict resolution, for as Gross 207 states, conflict is an inevitable concomitant of cooperative action in organizations. He points out that conflict can energize creative and growth-producing potentialities. 208 The Report of the American Bar Associ­ ation Commission on Campus Government and Student Dissent concludes that "tension itself is not necessarily evil, and may be the hallmark of a sensitive progressive academic community." 209 An example of Michigan State Uni­ versity Dean of Students Office's continued interest in conflict resolution was the participation of residence 207 Managing 62-73. Bertram M. Gross, Organizations and Their (New York: The Free Press, 1968), pp. 47, 59, 208Ibid. 209 The Report of the American Bar Association Commission on Campus Government and Student Dissent (Chi­ cago: American Bar Association, 1969), p. 36. 129 hall advisors who were new to their positions and those advisors who had also been designated as "judicial specialists" and were concurrently receiving training and orientation from the Judicial Programs Office in an in-service training program on conflict resolution during November, 1971. detail by Ms. Westfall This program is described in 210 who concludes that the model presented, one of ongoing involvement, by its emphasis on human understanding and self-awareness, is preventative in nature. She adds, "it attempts to encourage communi­ cation which conveys a message rather than turning people off. It is pointed toward building and maintaining a sense of community which is functional and which allows for individual differences within a living unit." 211 The understanding and the use of conflict reso­ lution principles by the Dean of Students personnel help them to effectively relate to the various segments of the University and society at large. Michigan State Uni­ versity, a large complex educational institution, serves multi interests— students, faculty, administrators, non­ professional employees, and society at large. 210 It is in Sandra K. Westfall, "Learning Various Principles About Conflict Resolution: A Model for On-Going Involve­ ment," The MSU Orient, VII, No. 1 (Winter, 1972), 11-16. 211x, ., ,c Ibid., p. 15. 130 Clark Kerr's terms a "multiversity." 212 The Dean of Students Office has been in a position to help the various interest groups understand one another's con­ cerns and needs and to assist in the resolution of con­ flicts that have arisen, for example, students' requests for a variety of living arrangements in dormitories, such as, the assignment of males and females in alternate rooms on the same floor, or students' activities related to the larger societal happenings, such as, the United States invasion of Cambodia. The Dean of Students Office will in the future continue to play a key role in the operation of the University by acting as interpreter and mediator and by assisting in the continuous development, implementation, and evaluation of processes and structures for orderly change. The Michigan State Dean of Students Office will be re-identifying various channels through which it reaches students and redefining its modes of operation. Traditionally, the Dean of Students Office has established close bonds with the student government. ated Students of Michigan State University But, the Associ­ (ASMSU), the present student government, has fallen into the state Mueller describes of student governments in general, 212 Clark Kerr, The Uses of the University (Cam­ bridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1964), pp. 18-45. 131 The structures are top-heavy with the cumbersome machinery of yearly elections and procedures unsuited to the loose organization of the campus: they are overridden with petty politics and stymied with parliamentary minutiae; the indif­ ference and apathy of their constituents is 10 times worse than in the general society and they have no programs for reducing it; they have nothing comparable to a civil service preparation for office, nor an apprenticeship, such as the faculty committee system o f f e r s . 213 With students now formally participating in academic governance, with few social regulations to which ASMSU can direct its energy to change, and with internal dissentions within ASMSU, the role of ASMSU and the effect this role has or any role change by ASMSU would have on the Dean of Students must be examined. A concomitant concern will be for the enhancement of student leadership skills. The Dean of Students' staff does provide an atmosphere for the development of leader­ ship skills as they advise and assist and relate in informal situations to students, providing leadership training by example. Leadership training often occurs in organizational development as the individuals come to recognize the various stages of and the demands upon the members imposed by the group development process. The Dean of Students' emphasis, though, will be directed specifically to developing meaningful leadership training 213 Kate H. Mueller, "The Future of the Campus Personnel Worker," Journal of N A W D C , XXXI, No. 3 (Spring, 1968), 133. 132 courses, stressing, for example, basic skills of how to meet people and/or how to express oneself, game activi­ ties, and conflict resolution techniques. In addition, leadership training could be supported through independent study projects. An educational-credit leadership training experience could be implemented through a seminar team consisting of a member of the Dean of Students Office and a Faculty member from the specific area in which the student wishes to do his study could provide the student direction, assistance, and evaluation. This experience could not only be beneficial to the student, it would provide opportunities for an exchange of ideas between the members of the team, fostering closer administrative-facuity relationships. Leadership training could also be advanced through the creation of job oppor­ tunities for students to serve as para-professionals. Continued emphasis on leadership training is sustained by Nonnamaker, who, in an address to Michigan State Uni­ versity Dean of Students personnel and students, declares, I can only say that in a democratic society uni­ versities carry a great part of the burden for developing leadership. In the highly technical and complex world in which we live, it would seem to me that there are few, if any, other societal institutions to which we can look to for so much. A great trust has been placed in all of us, students and staff alike, to assume this burden. 133 It would be morally wrong for us to shirk such duty, or not to make the most of the opportuni­ ties that such a great institution as this offers.214 More and more students are living off campus (over half of the students presently do so) and Michigan State University Dean of Students Office will expand its ser­ vices provided for these students. Much attention has been devoted to the development of a creative residence hall system and now the same effort will be expended to provide more comprehensive services to off-campus stu­ dents , such a s , fostering interactions and understandings within and between groups, e.g., communes, co-ops, fra­ ternal organizations, facilitating individual behavioral development, and providing expertise in finances, housing concerns, drugs, racism, to name a few areas. This will necessitate an increase in staffing and an expansion of the work already being accomplished in the field. The Dean of Students Office will continue to pro­ vide and/or participate in ongoing programs, like the "Racism Resource Program" proposed by Ms. Sue Hughes, Assistant Director of Student Governance, which entails: 1. Developing a bibliography (and, if feasible, library) of materials reflecting all possible aspects of race relations. A. Pamphlets, position papers, manifestos, etc. B. Political position books C. Research, theory and personal experience books 214 Eldon R. Nonnamaker, Director, Men's Division of Student Affairs, Address at the Leadership Workshop, Michigan State University, 1962. 134 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. D. Fictional works E. Films, slides, A-V displays F. Tapes G. Simulation games, models, etc. Developing contacts with local authorities on various aspects of race relations, and local exponents of particular positions, who can speak from their own point of view. Acting as a focal point for dissemination of information and opinion on the subject of race relations and racism, most particularly in the following areas: A. The white experience— cultural attitudes and behavior B. The minority experience— black, chicano and native american C. The economic factors of racism D. The social, psychological and sexual factors of racism E. The personal experience of racism— how it operates on the individual, as distinct from the society Planning and implementing programs for infor­ mational, training and mutually educational purposes for the following audiences: A. Central (non-academic) administrative staff who, by virtue of their positions must respond in official capacities to instances of racial tension B. Advisory staff in the residence halls, and other living units where applicable C. Students or student groups requesting pro­ grams or assistance D. New freshmen (after arrival, fall term) Planning and implementing programs for crisis situations, designed to promote discussion of the racial tension involved Developing working relationships with depart­ ments of the University dealing with aspects of race relations and racism, attempt to develop such relationships with the off-campus community Serving as a complaint bureau to collect infor­ mation about possible and existing areas of racial tension, direct such information to concerned parties, and/or provide assistance where appro­ priate. 215 215 Sue Hughes, "Racism Resource Program— Proposal for Implementation Within the Student Activity Division of the Dean of Students Office," Michigan State University, October 1, 1970, pp. 2-3. 135 Whether or not the Dean of Students Office may be effectively and efficiently evaluated by "systems" analysis, namely, "Program Budget Evaluation System" (PBES), a version of the "Programming Planning Budgeting System" (PPBS), must be determined. Governor Milliken, on February 16, 1971, issued an Executive Directive which informed department heads and the chief executives of state institutions of higher education that a Program Planning Budget System was to be implemented across the state. 216 Within the Dean of Students Office much dis­ cussion and the dissemination of written material has followed, describing just what PBES entailed and discuss­ ing the applicability of "systems" analysis to education and specifically to the Dean of Students' activities. 217 216 William D. Peterson and Donald S. Svoren, "Proposal for a Staff Self Study" (East Lansing: Office of the Dean of Students, Michigan State University, May 14, 1971), pp. 1-2. 217 Ibid., pp. 1-7 and Appendices; Alan C. Coe, "The PBES Concept" (East Lansing: Division of Education and Research of the Office of the Dean of Students, Michigan State University, October 28, 1971), pp. 1-8; David Coleman, "The State's View of PBES," Inservice Training Program, Michigan State University, November 3, 1971; Coe, "PBES Problems" (East Lansing: Division of Education and Research of the Dean of Students, Michi­ gan State University, November 15, 1971), pp. 1-4; Elliot G. Ballard, "MSU's Response to PBES," Inservice Training Program, Michigan State University, November 17, 1971). 136 Due 218 presents a review of the overall PPBS operations, Isachsen 219 has developed a Planning Pro­ gramming Budgeting Model, specifically designated for the College of Education at Michigan State University, while Coe presents PBES basics and an example pertaining to the Dean of Students Office. 1. The State of Michigan has general goals (Major Program Goals) 2. These general goals are reduced to a number of slightly more specific goals (Program Category Goals) 3. These goals are further reduced to objectives which are specific and give direction to organi­ zational effort. (Program Sub-Category/ objectives) 4. In order for an objective to be accomplished an activity (element) must take place. Alternate activities should be developed and evaluated for its effectiveness. The most appropriate activity is selected for implementation. 5. The consequence of the activity is output. 6. Impact or evaluation attempts to determine how well the organization is accomplishing its goals and objectives. 7. It should be noted that the very basis of PBES rests on value judgments. Decisions on what is "good" for the c i t i z e n s o f the state and their institutions reflect values. MAJOR PROGRAM Intellectual Development and Education MAJOR PROGRAM GOAL To provide a system of learning experiences. . . . 218 John F. Due, "Introduction to the General Features of Planning, Programming, Budgeting Systems," Excerpts from Government, Finance: Economics of the Public Sector (4th e d .; Homewood, 1 1 1 .: R. D. Trevin, 1^68), pp. 1-13. 219 Olaf Isachsen, "Proposal for a Model and Proce­ dure for the Allocation of Financial Resources in a College of Education Within a Complex University System" (unpub­ lished Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University, 1970). 137 PROGRAM CATEGORY PROGRAM SUBCATEGORY OBJECTIVE (one of many) PROGRAM ELEMENT OUTPUT IMPACT Assume that the dilema of instruction/ research and public service is solved. Student Services To provide programs which supplement and/or complement the students classroom experience. Concerts and music festivals, lectures, etc. Number of events held by tape, number of persons participat­ ing, etc. Number and percent of partici­ pants indicating positive evaluation of the event, increase in participation in cultural program, etc.220 Whether or not PBES will be incorporated into the Dean of Students Office's operations, the impetus it has created for assessing outputs can stimulate evaluations to be based, whenever possible, upon attainment of specific objectives. Michigan State University Dean of Students staff are catalysts, resource people, facilitators, advocators, educators, evaluators, mediators, and students. They are perceived by the students as specialists who can handle their specific concerns; though, as the staff assist in a variety of situations they are, in effect, generalist, 221 sensitive administrators. 220 221 To be effective the Dean of Coe, "PBES Concept," pp. 2, 6. Discussion at the Annual Midwest Activities Directors Conference, Chicago, Illinois, January 11-12, 1972. 138 Students personnel must continue to be flexible and responsive. Their capabilities and the direction of their emphasis will affect not only the student and the University, but also society at large, for all are integrally intertwined. "The real test of the value of the Office of Student Affairs lies not so much in its structure, but in the people who fill the various . . positions m the structure." 222 Recommendations and Implications For Further Study It is recommended that the Michigan State Uni­ versity Dean of Students Office establish a Dean of Stu­ dents Archives and identify an individual to act as curator. A copy of all reports, studies, proposals, papers, newspaper stories, articles, books written by the Dean of Students staff or about the Office would be filed, indexed, and stored in a secure area. The curator would be responsible for clipping stories from the local newspapers and staff members would be responsible for sending a copy of their work to the Archives. While this study has described events, programs, philosophies, trends, and identified individuals, there is a need for a study which would provide a better 222 Eldon Nonnamaker, "Foreward," Description of Professional Positions— Office of Student Affairs: Dean of Students O f f i c e , East Lansing, Michigan State University, July, 1963. 139 understanding and definition of the patterns of person­ ality traits and behaviors that contribute to satisfactory or unsatisfactory Dean of Students staff member— student interaction. A study which established the critical requirements, for Dean of Students staff members— student interactions, through an analysis of critical incidents as reported by Dean of Students personnel and students would be most significant. The Critical Incident Technique is described in detail by Flanagan; and Jensen 225 223 Walker and Alcorn, 224 provide illustrative examples of this Technique. Briefly, the design of the study could be developed to solicit from Dean of Students personnel and students who participated in staff-student interactions satisfactory or unsatisfactory incidents, defined as critical incidents which facilitate or hinder a student's academic progress or personal development. After all the critical incidents were obtained the staff and student 223 John C. Flanagan, "The Critical-Requirements Approach to Educational Objectives," School and Society, LXXI, No. 1849 (May 27, 1950), 321-24; John C. Flanagan, "The Critical Incident Technique," Psychological Bulletin, LI, No. 4 (July, 1954), 327-58. 224 Bill R. Walker and John D. Alcorn, "Critical Requirements of Foreign Student Adviser," The Journal of College Student Personnel, IX, No. 3 (May, 1968), 190-92. 225 Alfred C. Jensen, "Determining Critical Require­ ment for Teachers," Journal of Experimental Education, XX, No. 1 (September, 1951), 79-85. 140 incidents, treated separately, would be sorted into two basic groups which would be catalogued as satisfactory and unsatisfactory and an analysis would be made to identify salient features (elements) of the incidents. These elements would be synthesized and designated as Critical Requirements— aptitudes, abilities, attitudes, or other requirements for staff-facuity interaction which are critical in the sense that they are frequently factors causing either successful or unsuccessful inter­ action, i.e., either facilitating or hindering a student's academic progress or personal development. A comparison could then be made between the Critical Requirements derived from incidents described by students and Critical Requirements derived from incidents described by the staff. This study referred to the recent involvement of students in academic governance. A study conducted after Michigan State University has experienced at least a year of student involvement in academic governance could com­ pare the perceptions of students, faculty, and adminis­ trators with respect to the effectiveness of students' participation in various areas, e.g., department, college, Academic Council, Academic Council Standing Committees. Concluding Statement This study is congruent with the emphasis of selfconsciousness and rationality in our present American 141 Society, referred to by McKee and Useem 226 as the Post Modern Society, which stresses the examination of, and the speculating and reflecting on, all aspects of American society. Hopefully, this study will provide a stimulus for others to continue to explore the history of the development of the Michigan State University Dean of Students Office. 226 James McKee and John Useem, Michigan State University Sociology Course #471, "Modern American Society," Spring, 1970. BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Academic Freedom for Students at Michigan State University. Revised. June 18, 1^71. "Administrative Minutes, Michigan State University." 1916-1959. "An Introduction to the University Student Affairs Com­ mittee." Prepared by the Student Activities Division, Dean of Students Office. Edited by Sue Hughes. East Lansing: Michigan State University, October 1, 1969. "Annual Report, Assistant Dean of Students, Michigan State University." 1963-1964. "Annual Report, Dean of Men, Michigan State University." 1936-1944. "Annual Report, Dean of Students Office, Michigan State University." 1945-1957, 1964-1965, 1965-1966, 1966-1967. "Annual Report, Dean of Women, Michigan State University." 1932-1944. "Annual Report, Men's Division of Student Affairs, Michigan State University." 1962-1963. "Annual Report, Student Activities Division, Office of Student Affairs, Michigan State University." 1963-1964. "Annual Report, Supervisor of Attendance Report, Michigan State University." 1933-1936. "Annual Report, Vice President for Student Affairs, Michigan State University." 1969-1970. Ardrey, Robert. The Territorial Imperative. Dell Publishing Company, 1966. 142 New York: 143 "A Study of the Social Policies and Procedures." The Social Affairs Committee. Office of the Dean of Students, Michigan State University, Report No. One, April, 1967. Ayers, Archie. Student Services Administration in Higher Education"! Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1966. Beal, W. J. History of the Michigan Agriculture College and Biographical Sketches of Trustees and Professors"! East Lansing: Michigan Agricultural College Press, 1915. Berger, Peter L. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor Books, 1967. "Board of Trustee Minutes, Michigan State University." 1857-1959. Borg, Walter R. Educational Research an Introduction. New York: David McKay Company, Inc., 1963. Bylaws for Academic Governance Michigan State University --------------------Tg7TCatalogue: Officers and Students of the Michigan State Agricultural College for the Year, 18^5-1896 Through 1970-1971. East Lansing: Michigan State University. Chapman, James L. "Toward a New Concept of Student Affairs." College and University Business, March, 1969. Christensen, Val Rigby. "A Survey and Evaluation of Existing Student Conduct Codes and Regulations in Selected Four-Year Institutions of Higher Learning." Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University, 1970. Coe, Alan C. "The PBES Concept." East Lansing: Division of Education and Research of the Office of the Dean of Students, Michigan State University, October 28, 1971. ________ . "PBES Problems." East Lansing: Division of Education and Research of the Dean of Students, Michigan State University, November 15, 1971. Cowley, W. H. "Student Personnel Services in Retrospect and Prospect." School and Society, LXXXV, No. 2103 (January, 1957). 144 "Directory of Registered Student Organizations." Michigan State University, .1969-1970, Due, John F. "Introduction to the General Features of Planning, Programming, Budgeting Systems." Government, Finance; Economics of the Public Sector. 4th ed. Homewood, 111 . : R. D. Trevin, n’ sir Erickson, Erik H. Childhood and Society. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, Inc., 1963. Faculty and Student Directory. Michigan State University, ------- 1932-1970:---------"Faculty Minutes, Michigan State University." 1857-1959. Fedore, Robert F. "An Evaluation of the Report on the 'Academic Freedom for Students at Michigan State University."' Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University, 1969. Flanagan, John C. "The Critical Incident Technique." Psychological Bulletin, LI, No. 4 (July, 1954). "The Critical-Requirements Approach to Edu­ cational Objectives." School and Society, LXXI, No. 1849 (May 27, 1950). Gilchrist, Maud. The First Three Decades of Home Econo­ mics at Michigan State 1896-1926. A Bulletin of Michigan State College. East Lansing: Michigan State College Press, 1947. Good, Carter V. The Methodology of Educational Research. New York: D. Appleton-Century Company, 1935. Grant, Harold. "Higher Education in Student Personnel Work in the Year 2000." Journal of NAWDC, XXXI, No. 3 (Spring, 1968). Greenleaf, Elizabeth. "How Others See Us." The Journal of College Student Personnel, IX, No.- 3 (July, T W T — --- ---------- Gross, Bertram M. Organizations and Their Managing. York: The Free Press, 1968. Hall, Edward T. The Hidden Dimension. Doubleday and Company, 1^66. New York: New 145 Handbook for Student Leaders. ------------ Michigan State University, Holland, John L. The Psychology of Vocational Choice. Waltham, Mass.: Blaesdell Publishing Company, 1966. Hopkins, E. H. "The Essentials of a Student Personnel Program." Educational and Psychological Measure­ m e n t , VIII, No. 3 (Autumn, 1948). Hughes, Sue. "Proposal for Implementation Within the Student Activity Division of the Dean of Students Office." Michigan State University, October 1, 1970. "Involving Entire College Community in Decisions Called Key to Easing Campus Tensions." The Chronicle of Higher Education, IV, No. 29 (April 27, T5T0). Isachsen, Olaf. "Proposal for a Model and Procedure for the Allocation of Financial Resources in a Col­ lege of Education Within a Complex University System." Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University, 1970. Jensen, Alfred C. "Determining Critical Requirements for Teachers." Journal of Experimental Education, XX, No. 1 (September, 1551). Johnson, Walter F. "Student Personnel Work in Higher Edu­ cation: Philosophy and Framework." College Stu­ dent Personnel: Readings and Bibliographies. Edited by Fitzgerald. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1970. Katz, Joseph. "The Role of the Student Dean in Educational Innovation." Paper read at the College Student Personnel Institute, Claremont, November, 1965, College Student Personnel Abstract, I , N o . 3 (April, 1966). Kenison, Kenneth. "Deans and Dissenters." Address at the National Association of Student Personnel Admin­ istrative Conference, 1967, Cincinnati, Ohio. Kerr, Clark. The Uses of the University. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1964. Knight, E. W. Education in the United States. Ginn and C o ., 1934. Boston: 146 Kuhn, Madison. Michigan State the First Hundred Years. East Lansing: The Michigan State University Press, 1955. Leonard, Eugenie. Origins of Personnel Services in American Higher Education. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1956. Lloyd-Jones, Esther. A Student Personnel Program for Higher Education. New York: Harper and Brothers, T9W.-------- Michigan State College, Story of the Y e a r . A Michigan State College Bulletin. East Lansing: Michigan State College Press, XL, No. 9 (January, 1946) . Michigan State N e w s . Friday, May 4, 1951. "Michigan State University Handbook for Social Chairmen of Campus Organizations, Major Governing Groups and Group Advisors, 1960-1961." "Michigan State University Supplement to Prospectus for Graduate Program in College Personnel Work, Col­ lege of Education Dean of Students Office, March, 1965." Morris, Desmond. The Naked A p e . New York: Publishing Company, 1967. The Dell Mueller, Kate H. Student Personnel Work in Higher Edu­ cation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1961. "The Future of the Campus Personnel Worker." Journal of N A W D C , XXXI, No. 3 (Spring, 1968). Myers, Isabel Briggs. The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Service Princeton, N.J.! Educational Testing T 1963. Nonnamaker, Eldon R. Director, Men's Division of Student Affairs. Address at the Leadership Workshop, Michigan State University, 1962. _________. "Foreward." Description of Professional Positions— Of fice~ of Student Affairs : Dean of Students Office! East Lansing: Michigan State University, July, 1963. Peterson, William D., and Svoren, Donald S. "Proposal for a Staff Self Study." East Lansing: Office of the Dean of Students, Michigan State University, May 14, 1971. 147 "Report of the Committee to Study the Resident Assistant Position, Michigan State University." April 12, 1971. Report of the Secretary of the State Board of Agriculture of the State of Michigan. For the Years 1867-1957. Robinson, Donald W. "Evaluation as a Function of Student Personnel Administration." College Student Personnel, Readings and Bibliographies. EcTited by Fitzgerald. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1970. Rodgers, Allen. "The New Student Dean an Innovator for Student Development." NASPA, VI, No. 3 (January, 1969) . Rowse, A. L. The Use of History. Millan Co., 1948. Sparta Guide. New York: The Mac- Michigan State University, 1961, 1964. Stark, Matthew. "The Student Personnel Administrator as an Educator: The Teaching of Human Relations." N A S P A , V, No. 2 (1967). Student Handbook. Michigan State University, 1932-1933, 1934-1935, 1936-1937, 1937-1938, 1948-1949, 1949-1950, 1951-1952, 1966-1967 through 1970-1971. The Helmet. Michigan State University, 1948—1949, 19511352. The Helot. Michigan State College Publication, 1953, XLI X , No. 3 (September, 1954). The Politics of Protest. A Task Force Report Submitted to the National Commission on the Causes and Pre­ vention of Violence. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1969. The Report of the American Bar Association Commission on Campus Government and Student Dissent. Chicago: American Bar Association, 19