INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image o f the page can be found in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photographed, a definite method o f “sectioning” the material has been followed. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand comer of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For illustrations that cannot be satisfactorily reproduced by xerographic means, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and inserted into your xerographic copy. These prints are available upon request from the Dissertations Customer Services Department. 5. Some pages in any document may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. University M icitiilm s International 300 N. Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 8308940 Ghoddousi,Shahriar i AN ASSESSMENT OF THE OPINIONS OF SELECTED MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC UNIT ADMINISTRATORS ON THE ISSUE OF THE FUTURE OF ACADEMIC UNIT ADMINISTRATION Michigan State University University Microfilms International Ph.D. 1982 300 N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this document have been identified here with a check mark V t. Glossy photographs or p ages______ 2. Colored illustrations, paper or print_____ 3. Photographs with dark background_____ 4. Illustrations are poor copy______ 5. Pages with black marks, not original copy______ 6. Print shows through as there is text on both sides of page______ 7. Indistinct, broken or small print on several p a g e s . 8. Print exceeds margin requirements_____ 9. Tightly bound copy with print lost in spine______ 10. Computer pri ntout pages with indistinct pri nt 11. Page(s)___________ lacking when material received, and not available from school or author. 12. Page(s)___________ iseem to be missing in numbering only a s text follows. 13. Two pages numbered I___________ . Text follows. 14. Curling and wrinkled pages 15. Other ^ University Microfilms International AN ASSESSMENT OF THE OPINIONS OF SELECTED MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC UNIT ADMINISTRATORS ON THE ISSUE OF THE FUTURE OF ACADEMIC UNIT ADMINISTRATION By S h ah ria r Ghoddousi A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan S ta te U niv ersity in p a r t i a l f u l f i l l m e n t of th e requirements f o r th e degree o f DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department o f A dm inistration and Curriculum 1982 ABSTRACT AN ASSESSMENT OF THE OPINIONS OF SELECTED MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC UNIT ADMINISTRATORS ON THE ISSUE OF THE FUTURE OF ACADEMIC UNIT ADMINISTRATION By S h ah riar Ghoddousi This study i s an opinion survey o f a sample o f deans o f c o lle g e s , chairpersons o f academic departm ents, and s e le c te d f a c u lty members regarding th e issu e s o f th e f u tu r e o f academic u n i t adminis­ t r a t i o n a t Michigan S ta te U n iv e rsity . I t i s a ls o an assessment o f d i f f e r e n t p o lic ie s suggested by u n it a d m in istra to rs f o r coping with f u tu re changes. S p e c i f i c a l l y , th e study was designed 1. to c o l l e c t d e t a i l e d and fa c tu a l information t h a t describ es the opinions o f s e le c te d deans, c h a irp e rs o n s, and f a c u lty members about the f u tu r e o f academic u n its and t h e i r perceptions o f th e f u tu re in the follow ing a re a s : (a) f a c u l t y - r e l a t e d i s s u e s , (b) s tu d e n t- r e la te d is s u e s , (c) program -related i s s u e s , (d) f in a n c e - r e la te d is s u e s , and (e) p h y s ic a l- r e s o u r c e s -r e la te d is s u e s . 2. to c o l l e c t inform ation regarding d i f f e r e n t a d m in istra tiv e p o lic ie s and courses o f a c tio n t h a t academic u n it a d m in istra to rs may suggest f o r coping with suggested f u tu re changes in the aforementioned areas. S hahriar Ghoddousi 3. to c o l l e c t information t h a t suggests a d m in istra tiv e to o ls and techniques needed by academic ad m in istra to rs f o r coping with fu tu re changes. 4. to feed back,.* summary o f findings o f th e study to academic u n its and c e n tra l ad m in istratio n of the u n iv e rs ity fo r co n sid eratio n in t h e i r re sp e c tiv e policy decisions concerning long-range planning a t Michigan S ta te U n iv ersity. The study was conducted in 15 colleges and 30 departments a t Michigan S ta te U n iv ersity. A two-phase survey technique was devised f o r the purpose o f the study. The f i r s t phase comprised an u n stru c­ tured qu estio n n aire as well as un stru ctu red in terv iew s. The purpose o f t h i s phase was to c o l l e c t information in an unstructu red way about fu tu re iss u e s and p o lic ie s to cope with issu es o f th e fu tu r e o f academic u n its . The second phase contained a s tru c tu r e d q u e stio n n a ire t h a t was based on content a n a ly s is o f the f ir s t- p h a s e q u e s tio n n a ire . The data were analyzed in terms o f c o r r e l a t i o n s , percentage, mean, mode, and freq uencies. The p rin c ip a l findings were reported in 23 statem en ts; based on th ese fin d in g s , th re e recommendations were suggested. Dedicated and presented to my w ife , Shamsdokht Shams Special ap p reciatio n to Dr. Richard L. Featherstone Dr. Farhang Mehr Dr. T. Harry McKinney Dr. Tom M. Freeman Dr. Mary Honora Kroger Dr. Fred C. Tinning Dr. Daniel P. Shoemaker ACKNOWLEDGMENTS To the members o f the corranittee, Drs. Richard F eatherstone, Harry McKinney, Walter Johnson, and Robert Monczka, f o r th e unique p a r t each has played in my educational as well as personal l i f e . Special acknowledgment is accorded to Dr. Richard L. F e a th e r-, s to n e , p ro fesso r o f ad m in istratio n and higher education and d ir e c to r o f the d i s s e r ta ti o n . His frie n d sh ip and scho larsh ip as well as r e l e n t le ss c a r e , sup po rt, and p o s itiv e concern were v i t a l in my educational and personal l i f e . Sincere ap p reciatio n i s expressed to Dr. Harry McKinney, my academic adv isor. To Dr. Dan Shoemaker, whose valuable su g g estio n s, c o n trib u ­ t i o n s , and encouragement enhanced my doctoral program and graduate experience. Acknowledgments are given to th e s t a f f o f the O ffice o f I n s t i ­ tu tio n a l Research f o r t h e i r unexcelled cooperation and supp ort. L a st, I acknowledge and extend my deep ap p reciatio n and g r a t i ­ tude to my wife and p a r tn e r, Dokhy, who encouraged me and shared my f a i t h and b e l i e f in higher education; and to my mother and f a t h e r , Homa Hesami and Mehdi Ghoddousi, f o r t h e i r lo v e, encouragement, and enduring support. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................... v ii LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................... ix Chapter I. II. III. INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY.................................................................. 1 .................................................. Background o f the Problem . P ro jec tio n s a t MichiganS ta te U niversity ........................... Planning f o r the Future o f Academic Unit A dm inistration ........................................................................... ................................................... Statement o f the Problem Purposes o f the Study .................................................................. Importance o f the Study............. ................................................... D efin itio n s of Terms .................................................................. L i m i t a t i o n s ....................................................................................... D e s i g n ............................................................................................... O v e r v i e w ........................................................................................... 1 4 6 14 16 17 18 20 20 21 REVIEW OF RELATED RESEARCHAND LITERATURE ................................ 23 In troduction ................................................................................... ................................................... Planning and Forecasting P l a n n i n g ....................................................................................... F o r e c a s t i n g ................................................................................... The Future and Futurism ................................................... S tra te g ie s fo r Change................................................................. Future Trends in Higher Education ...................................... C r i t i c a l Issues Facing Higher Education in Michigan . C r i t ic a l Issues Facing Michigan S ta te U niversity . . 23 23 23 34 37 39 43 45 47 METHODOLOGY............................................................................................ 48 Instrum entation and Data C ollection ....................................... D escription o f the P a rtic ip a n ts and S electio n o f the S a m p l e ........................................................................................... Analysis of Data ........................................................................... 48 v 52 53 Page IV. ANALYSIS OF THE D A T A ......................................................................... 55 In tro d u ctio n .................................................................................... Analysis o f the C o rrelatio n C o e f f ic ie n t .............................. C r i t e r i a Used in Analyzing the Survey Test ..................... C la s s if i c a t i o n o f Changes Into Likelihood Levels . . . C l a s s i f i c a t io n o f Changes Into Impact Levels ................. Functions in Which th e Change Will Occur ......................... The Most Likely Change Statements .......................................... Suggested P o lic ie s to Cope With Future Changes . . . . F aculty-R elated Changes ................. Student-R elated Changes ................. Program-Related Changes ........................................................... Finance-Related Changes ........................................................... Physical-R esources-R elated Changes .................................. Analysis o f Needed Tools, Techniques, and Support From Central A dm inistration ................................................... 55 55 59 61 64 71 74 97 97 98 101 102 103 V. SUMMARY, FINDINGS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 104 ................................... 110 Summary................................................................................................ F i n d i n g s ................................................................................... Recommendations ................................................................................ 110 114 118 APPENDICES............................................................................................................. 120 A. LIST OF CODED CHANGE STATEMENTS .................................................... 121 B. COMPUTER PROGRAM LISTING OF THE SOFTWAREDEVELOPED IN THIS STUDY FOR THE ANALYSIS OF THE DATA.............................. 128 C. GENERAL SUMMARY OF THE RESPONSES TO EACHCHANGE STATEMENT BY THE TYPES OF RESPONDENTS .................................. 133 D. COLLEGES AND INSTITUTIONS PARTICIPATING IN THE STUDY . . 227 ................................... 229 F. COVER LETTERS......................................................................................... 231 G. PHASE-ONE QUESTIONNAIRE .................................................................... 235 H. PHASE-TWO QUESTIONNAIRE .................................................................... 240 E. DEPARTMENTS PARTICIPATING IN THE STUDY BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................... vi 247 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Student Enrollments by Admission S ta tu s , Michigan S ta te U niversity (East Lansing Campus, Fall Terms) ..................... 5 2. D is trib u tio n o f Responses to the Phase-One Questionnaire . 49 3. D is trib u tio n o f Responses to th e Phase-Two Questionnaire . 51 4. Comparison o f Levels o f S ig nifican ce in the Analaysis o f C o rrelatio n Using Both Spearman and Kendall Methodologies ....................................................................................... 57 C l a s s if ic a tio n o f Faculty-R elated Changes Into Likelihood Level s .................................................................................................... 62 C la s s if ic a tio n o f Student-Related Changes In to Likelihood L e v e l s .................................................................................................... 63 C la s s if ic a tio n o f Program-Related Changes Into Likelihood L e v e l s .................................................................................................... 65 C l a s s if ic a tio n o f Finance-Related Changes Into Likelihood Level s .................................................................................................... 66 C l a s s if ic a tio n o f Physical-Resources-Related Changes In to Likelihood Levels ................................................................... 67 C la s s if ic a tio n o f Faculty-R elated Changes Into Impact L e v e l s .................................................................................................... 68 C la s s if ic a tio n o f Student-Related Changes Into Impact L e v e l s .................................................................................................... 69 C la s s if ic a tio n o f Program-Related Changes Into Impact L e v e l s .................................................................................................... 70 C l a s s if ic a tio n o f Finance-Related Changes Into Impact L e v e l s .................................................................................................... 72 C la s s if ic a tio n o f Physical-Resources-Related Changes Into Impact Levels ....................................................................................... 73 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. vi i Page 15. Respondents' Opinions o f the Level o f Likelihood and Impact o f the Five Groups o f Function-Related Change Statements ............................................................................... 73 16. ..Statements With Very High o r High Likelihood That Also Have Very High o r Hign Impact ..................... 75 17. Change Statements With Very High or High Likelihood, But Very Low or Low Impact ................................................................... 77 18. Change Statements With Very Low o r Low Likelihood o f O c c u r r e n c e ........................................................................................... 79 19. Change Statements With Very High o r High Impact But Not a High o r Very High Likelihood o f Occurrence ................. . 81 20. Change Statements That Respondents Suggested Will Occur in Long Term (6-10 Years) . . .................................................. 82 21. Change Statements That the M ajority o f Respondents (80 Percent and Higher) Thought Should Occur .............................. 84 22. Change Statements That the M ajority o f Respondents (80 Percent o r Higher) Thought Should Hot Occur ......................... 85 23. Changes That Will Be Most Promoted by Faculty Group . . . . 87 24. Changes That Will Be Most Promoted by Students ...................... 88 25. Changes That Will Be Most Promoted by th e Provost .................. 89 26. Changes That Will Be Most Promoted by S ta te and Federal . . 90 27. Changes That Will Be Most Promoted by Community ...................... 91 28. Changes That Will Be Most Hindered by Faculty Group . . . . 92 29. Changes That Will Be Most Hindered by Students 95 30. Changes That Will Be Most Hindered by th e P r o v o s t ................. 31. Changes That Will Be Most Hi ndered by S ta te and Federal ...................... 95 . . 96 32. Changes That Will Be Most Hindered by Community ...................... 96 vi i i LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Page Major Inputs to Decisions on Campus Program Offerings and P r i o r i t i e s ................................................................................... 8 2. Inputs in Goal S e ttin g ........................................................................ 12 3. I n te r r e la tio n s h ip s o f Planning Procedures .............................. 32 4. C h a r a c te r is tic s o f Curriculum A r t if a c t s in Schools o f Today and What They Might Be in th e Future ......................... 42 ix CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY Background o f th e Problem I t Is commonly believed t h a t long-range planning i s an essen­ t i a l fu nctio n o f academic u n it a d m in is tra to rs . Many academic u n it ad m in istrato rs understand the n e c e s sity to c h a r t th e f u tu re course o f t h e i r u n its and to determine how u n it goals w ill be achieved. Thus, asking about events t h a t may happen f iv e to ten years in th e fu tu re should be habitual to an academic a d m in istra to r and has become a n e c e s sity f o r planners and planning agencies. S tu rn er (1974) expanded on h is d e f i n iti o n o f planning by saying , "Planning funda­ mentally i s a campaign to move an o rganization toward i t s image o f the f u tu r e , on a tim etab le t h a t is both d e s ir a b le and f e a s ib le " (p. 2 ). Dalkey (1968) believed t h a t id e n tify in g change i s more impor­ t a n t today than ever befo re. He wrote: Science, technology, and advanced a d m in is tra tiv e methods are rap id ly extending th e scope o f public and p r iv a te control over economic and so cial development. To use th ese new powers w isely, i t is necessary to have a c l e a r p ic tu re o f th e f u tu r e — or more exactly o f the po ssible f u tu r e s , (p. 1) A fter the 1960s, a new a t t i t u d e toward th e fu tu re emerged through the work o f planning agencies and research groups. This new a t t i t u d e has extended some planning horizons in to a more d i s t a n t fugure. Helmer (1967) expanded on the change in a t t i t u d e toward planning fo r the fu tu re as follows: 1 2 The change is m anifesting i t s e l f in several ways: PHILO­ SOPHICALLY, in t h a t th e r e i s a new understanding o f what i t means to t a l k about th e f u tu r e ; PRAGMATICALLY, in t h a t th e re is a growing reco g n itio n t h a t i t is im portant to do something about th e f u tu r e ; and METHODOLOGICALLY, in t h a t th e re a re new and more e f f e c t i v e ways o f in f a c t doing something about the f u tu r e , (p. 1) Many a d m in istra to rs who are involved in th e planning and a d m in istra tio n o f academic u n its (deans, ch a irp e rs o n s, and sometimes fa c u lty members) have become well aware o f th e problem o f m aintaining q u a l i ty and v i t a l i t y while Implementing change w ithin th e academic o rg a n iz a tio n . The need f o r educational change has been brought about by in c re a sin g fin a n c ia l pressu res and new p o l i t i c a l and s o c ia l o u t­ looks, which have a l t e r e d somewhat r a d i c a ll y th e needs and demands o f th e many c o n s titu e n t groups. Consequently, a d m in istra to rs g en erally have been r e q u e s tin g ‘more Information t h a t i s p e r tin e n t to t h e i r own i n te rn a l problem solving and t h a t w ill a ls o help them meet req uests from co o rd in ating ag en cies, governing boards, l e g i s l a t o r s , and o th e r groups involved in the fin an cing and control o f higher education (Chaney, 1976). At a National Conference on Higher Education, Kerr (1971) expressed h is views o f change 1n higher education as follow s: Higher education in th e United S ta te s i s facing a period o f u n c e r ta in ty , confusion, c o n f l i c t , and p o te n tia l change, and i t has l i t t l e to guide i t in i t s p a s t experiences. For most o f i t s th r e e and o n e -th ird century h i s t o r y , i t has had a mani­ f e s t d e s tin y and through th e period from 1920-1970, was marked by rap id change and some stu d en t u n r e s t. . . . Two f a c to r s remained c o n sta n t: public b e l i e f in and support o f higher ed u catio n , and th e campus and s o c ie ty were both changing, but in compatible ways. This i s no longer so and higher education i s faced with a stagg erin g number o f u n c e r t a i n t ie s : (1) the d i r e c t io n o f change t h a t w ill be taking place in a s o c ie ty t h a t i s ever more d i v i s i v e , and in a world th a t i s undergoing 3 a c u l t u r a l r e v o lu tio n ; (2) th e impact o f the new educational technology; (3) i t s proper fun ctio ns in terms o f te a c h in g , re se a rc h , and s e r v ic e s ; (4) the governance o f th e i n s t i t u t i o n s ; and (5) fin a n cin g . (Cited in Huckfeldt, 1972, p. 2) In a d d itio n to the aforementioned concerns, academic u n it a d m in is tra to rs a lso are facing the problem o f d eclin in g enrollm ents in i n s t i t u t i o n s o f higher education in the United S ta te s (Carnegie Commission on Higher Education, 1973). New p ro je c tio n s by th e fed ­ e r a l government's National Center f o r Educational S t a t i s t i c s I n d i­ cated t h a t t o t a l co lleg e enrollm ent in 1988 w ill be about 5.5 percent below the p re se n t lev el (M ag arrell, 1980). Magarrell rep o rted : The p ro je c tio n s in d ic a te th a t p r iv a te co lleg es and u n iv er­ s i t i e s w ill be h i t harder than public i n s t i t u t i o n s . A pro­ j e c t e d in crease in th e enrollm ent o f p a rt-tim e stu d en ts is more than o f f s e t by th e p ro je cted lo ss o f f u l l - t i m e s tu d e n ts . For 1988, compared with 1979, th e p ro je c tio n s show: 1. P a rt-tim e enrollm ent up 3.7%; f u ll - t i m e enrollm ent down 9.3%. 2. P r iv a te i n s t i t u t i o n s ' enrollm ent down 7.4%; public i n s t i t u t i o n s ' enrollm ent down 3.1%. 3. Enrollment o f men down 3.7%; o f women down 4.3%. (p. 7) Based on an a n a ly s is o f the National Educational S t a t i s t i c s C e n te r's p r o je c tio n s , the t o t a l c o lle g e enrollm ent reached i t s peak in th e f a l l o f 1981 and w ill d eclin e 5.5 percen t from t h a t p o in t by 1988. By 1988, t o t a l enrollm ent would be 11,048,000, a lo ss o f n early h a l f a m illio n s tu d e n ts compared with t h i s y e a r 's estim ate o f 11,500,000 (M agarrell, 1980). Hecker and Ignatovich (1978) made p ro je c tio n s o f th e number o f high-school graduates in Michigan. These p ro je c tio n s were made on the assumption t h a t the average r a te s o f a t t r i t i o n (cohort su rv ival r a t i o s ) during th e 1971-78 period would continue in to the f u tu r e . 4 P rojected elev en th - and tw e lfth -g ra d e enrollm ents in 1990-91, based on an enrollm ent o f 327,193 in 1975-76, were as follow s: 1. High p ro je cted enrollm ent = 233,686 o r a decrease o f 28.6% from 1975. 2. Most l i k e l y p ro je cted enrollm ent = 224,692 o r a decrease o f 31.3% from 1975. 3. Low p ro je c te d enrollm ent = 2.5,010 o r a decrease o f 34.3% from 1975. The above p ro je c tio n ranges a re roughtly 14.5% o f th e most l i k e l y pro­ jectio n . P ro jec tio n s a t Michigan S ta te U niversity Michigan S ta te U n iv e rsity , founded in 1855, was th e f i r s t a g r i c u l tu r a l la n d -g ra n t c o lle g e in th e United S t a t e s . By th e 1960s, i t had e s ta b lis h e d i t s e l f as both a premier la n d -g ra n t i n s t i t u t i o n and a stro ng member o f th e A ssociation o f American U n i v e r s itie s . This i s a d i s t i n c t i o n and challenge c a r r i e d by a t o t a l o f only 18 public i n s t i t u t i o n s (MSU, 1980). As Michigan S ta te moves in to th e f u tu r e (1990), th e push toward growth and expansion based on new enrollm ents w ill d isap p ear. Consequently, s t a t e support o f higher education based on enrollm ents a t the same r e l a t i v e le v e ls as in the 1960s and 1970s i s expected to diminish (MSU, 1980, p. 2 ). Table 1 shows a f o r e c a s t o f p ro je cted enrollm ents a t Michigan S ta te U niversity from 1980 to 1995. As shown in t h i s f o r e c a s t , the t o t a l number o f undergraduates might d e c lin e from 35,335 to 27,766, or a d eclin e o f 21 p e rc e n t, in a 15-year period (O ffice o f I n s t i t u t i o n a l Table 1.—Student earellaents by adelation status, Michigan State University (East U M ta| caaput, fall terns). Enrol lean t UNOCRGRAOUAIE F lrs t-tla e Transfer Readnlttad Returns TOTAL 1900 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1969 1991 1992 1993 1994 199S T.029 7,029 5,829 6.412 6.228 6,028 6,028 6.028 6.028 6.028 5,429 8.227 6,206 5,026. 6.026 6,026 2.102 2.703 2,500 2.500 2.408 2.305 2.202 2,202 2,202 2,202 2.202 2.202 1,946 1.849 1,899 1.899 1,345 1,344 1,345 1.245 1.246 1,144 1.144 1.144 1,144 1,144 1.144 1.034 941 941 941 941 24.259 24,147 24.004 23.857 23.412 23,017 22.493 22.161 21.946 21.851 21.619 21.397 20.960 20.425 20,062 19,900 35.335 35,223 34,050 34.135 11.486 32.597 31.970 31.535 31.120 31.225 30.594 29,864 20,973 28.271 27,920 27,766 6RAD fROF Hew to prograa Readnltted Returning TOTAL 84 IS 1.017 1,115 84 IS 1.022 1.121 84 15 1,025 1.124 84 15 1.027 1,126 84 15 1.020 1.127 84 IS 1.029 1.128 84 16 1.030 1,129 84 15 0,031 1,130 84 15 1.03Z 1.131 84 IS 1.011 HASTER-DOCTOR New to prograa Reedattted Returning TOTAL 1,317 490 5,043 5.950 1,317 490 5.011 5,838 1.317 490 5,029 5,836 1.317 490 5,010 6.837 1.317 490 5.033 6.840 1,317 490 5.037 6.844 1,317 490 5.042 6.849 1.317 490 5.047 6.854 1,317 490 4.052 6.059 CAMPUS New Readnltted Returning TOTAL 1990 1.132 14 15 1.034 1 «133 84 15 1,015 1,134 64 IS 1.016 1.115 84 15 1,017 1.136 04 IS 1.038 1.137 84 IS 1,039 1.138 1.317 490 5.059 6.866 1,317 490 5.066 6.673 1.317 490 8.073 6,080 1.317 490 6.080 6.887 1,317 490 6,087 6,894 1.317 490 6,094 6,901 1,317 490 6,101 6,908 11.132 11,132 10.810 10,433 10.229 9,837 9.734 9.611 9.631 9.631 9,012 8,830 6.423 8.326 6,326 8.326 1,850 1,850 I.8S0 1.751 1,649 1.649 1.649 1.649 1.649 1,649 1,649 1.543 1,446 1.446 1.446 1,446 30,319 30.200 30.138 29,914 29.473 29.081 28.565 28.239 28,030 27.943 27.919 27.505 27,076 26,529 26,194 26.040 43,301 43,182 42.818 42,098 41,453 40,569 39.946 39.519 39,310 39,223 38,600 37,876 36,945 36.301 35,966 35.812 Source: O ffice o f In stitu tio n al Research, Michigan S tate U niversity, "Analysis o f Cosyoneats Used In fro ja ctln g Future Enrollaenta" (E ast Lansing; Michigan S tate U niversity, 19/1). 6 Research, 1979). The t o t a l number o f graduate p ro fe ssio n a ls may increase s l i g h t l y during the same p erio d , from 1,116 to 1,138 or about 2 p ercent. Table 1 also shows t h a t the p rojected number o f e n r o l l ­ ments f o r m a ste r's and doctoral stu den ts f o r the next 15 y ears w ill remain about the same. The t o t a l campus enrollm ent may d e c lin e 17 percent from 1980 to 1995. Using b i r t h s t a t i s t i c s f o r the years up to 1979, Hecker and Ignatovich (1978) p ro je cted t h a t tw elfth -g rad e Michigan pu blic school enrollments w ill show a declin e o f about 30 percent by 1995. Almost 66 percent o f the declin e was pro jected to occur during the period 1980 to 1985. The d eclin e in tw elfth -g rad e Michigan pub lic school enrollm ent is o f p a r t i c u l a r importance to Michigan S ta te U niversity because almost 90 percent o f Michigan S t a t e 's freshman enrollm ent flows d i r e c t ly from Michigan high schools (O ffice o f I n s t i t u t i o n a l Research, 1979). Planning f o r the Future in Academic Unit Adm inistration The p ro je cted declines in enrollment presented thus f a r , plus external pressures from s t a t e agencies and the fed eral government concerning a f fir m a tiv e a c tio n , handicapped s tu d e n ts , f in a n c ia l r e p o rt­ in g , and more and more s p e c i f i c and standardized inform ation about c o lleg es and u n i v e r s i t i e s , may present academic u n it ad m in istrato rs with the d i f f i c u l t but necessary ta sk o f developing coherent s t r a t e ­ gies and p r i o r i t i e s f o r academic u n it fu n c tio n s. I n f l a ti o n and re c e s ­ s io n , actin g to g e th e r , have driven co lleg e co sts upward and, sim ul­ taneou sly , the support d o lla rs o f p riv a te foundations such as the 7 National Science Foundation have been constrained (S h irly & Volkwein 1978). This s i t u a t i o n w ill r e s u l t in dramatic decreases in c o n tra c ts and grants f o r re se a rc h , in s tr u c tio n a l development, and medical edu­ catio n and in fellow ships f o r graduate stud ents (Breneman, 1975). In g e n e ra l, being aware o f th ese problems i s and/or should be a p a r t o f the academic u n it a d m in is tr a to r 's jo b . The a b i l i t y to make assumptions about the fu tu re as well as p re d ic tio n s o f f u tu re events t h a t may change o r a f f e c t an academic u n i t 's functions are o f c ru c ia l importance in making decision s in academic u n i ts . Almost a l l a u t h o r it i e s on academic a d m in istratio n agree t h a t planning fu n ctio n s should be an in te g ra l p a r t o f academic u n it a d m in istra tio n . Featherstone (1972) not only believed I n - l e g i t i ­ macy o f planning and management, but he in d ic a te d t h a t "planning and management functions o f the department should be improved." continued: He "With more e f f i c i e n t op eration and b e t t e r planning, a sub­ s t a n t i a l a tta c k on higher e d u c a tio n 's problems can be made, and some o f th e d i s t r u s t and f a l s e impressions now 1n evidence could be abated" (p. 12). Program management i s one o f th e e s s e n tia l functions o f aca­ demic u n it a d m in is tra to rs . S h irly and Volkwein (1978) suggested some major f a c to rs to be considered in e s ta b lis h in g th e program p r o f i l e o f the academic u n it. These f a c to rs are shown in Figure 1. In t h e i r paper, S h irly and Volkwein s ta te d t h a t , before o f fe r in g any program, academic u n its w ithin i n s t i t u t i o n s should have a statem ent o f t h a t i n s t i t u t i o n 's mission o r educational philosophy. They defined t h e i r view o f an educational philosophy as "the basic values held by the 8 i n s t i t u t i o n concerning the ro le o f education in s o c ie ty , th e ro le o f b asic and applied re se a rc h , the purposes o f a l i b e r a l ed u catio n , the meaning o f academic freedom, and s im il a r educational premises" (p. 475). External Needs, O p p o rtu n itie s , and C o n strain ts I n s t i t u t i o n a l Mission Educational Philosophy Role and Scope Goals and O bjectives Decisions on Program O fferings and P r i o r i t i e s . 1 "Matching 1 Process I n te rn a l S trengths and C a p a b ilitie s Figure 1 . —Major inputs to decisio ns on campus program o ffe rin g s and p r i o r i t i e s . (From Robert C. S h irly and J . Fred­ e ric k s Volkwein, "E stab lish in g Academic Program P r i o r i ­ t i e s , " Journal o f Higher Education 5 (1978): 49.) Determining th e r o le and scope o f i n s t i t u t i o n s in g e n e ra l, and o f academic u n its in p a r t i c u l a r , i s a ls o necessary before developing program p r i o r i t i e s . In form ulating a statem ent o f ro le s and p r i o r i t i e s , th e academic u n it should focus on id e n tify in g li m it a ti o n s and general boundaries o f i n t e l l e c t u a l a c t i v i t i e s . For example, should the a t t e n ­ tio n o f th e department be placed on graduate o r undergraduate s tu d ie s or on a balance o f te a c h in g , re se a rc h , and s e rv ic e s ? The o b je c tiv e s 9 o f th e department need to be viewed in r e l a t io n to p re d ic tio n s o f enrollm ent p a tte r n s and p ro je c tio n s o f financing f o r th e academic u n it. Thus i t i s almost mandatory t h a t academic goals and ob jec­ tiv e s be e s ta b lis h e d . The goals should be a by-product o f th e i d e n t i ­ f ie d needs o f th e i n s t i t u t i o n . External needs, o p p o r tu n itie s , and c o n s tr a in ts (Figure 1) a ls o have a major influen ce on program o f f e r i n g s . S h irly and Volkwein gave the follow ing examples o f such c o n s id e ra tio n s : The social/dem ographic c h a r a c t e r i s t i c o f the geographical a re a . Location in th e area o f unique i n s t i t u t i o n s o r o rg a n iz a tio n s. The types o f in d u stry lo cated in th e a re a . The e x iste n c e o f o th e r educational i n s t i t u t i o n s , t h e i r mis­ s io n s , and the o p p o rtu n itie s f o r c o lla b o r a tio n . Other d is tin g u is h in g c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o r resou rces o f th e geogaphical area t h a t may p resen t unique o p p o r tu n itie s . D istin gu ish ing c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f th e area t h a t c o n s tra in the i n s t i t u t i o n ' s a b i l i t y to develop c e r t a i n areas o f knowledge. (p. 475) The t h i r d f a c t o r shown in Figure 1 provides an in d ic a tio n o f what the academic u n it o r i n s t i t u t i o n can o r cannot do to r e a l i z e i t s g o a ls. Academic q u a lity i s a worthy ideal f o r departments and c o l ­ leges o f th e i n s t i t u t i o n , and i t can be reasonably argued t h a t every academic u n i t should not only meet minimum q u a l i t a t i v e stand ards but a ls o s t r i v e f o r academic ex cellen ce (Roose, 1979). The f in a l f a c t o r to be considered in reaching a d ecisio n on program o ffe rin g s and p r i o r i t i e s i s th e matching process (Figure 1 ). The decisio n should be reached a f t e r the m ission, ex tern al f a c t o r s , in te rn a l f a c t o r s , s tre n g th s and weaknesses, and c a p a b i l i t i e s are matched. 10 Although S h irly and Volkwein presented t h e i r model only f o r e s ta b lis h i n g academic-program p r i o r i t i e s , th e combination o f t h e i r model and F e a th e rs to n e 's model could be ap plied to d ecisio n making in a l l fu n ctio n a l areas o f academic u n i t s , i . e . , f a c u l t y , s tu d e n t, and fin a n ce. All th e ex tern al and in te rn a l f a c t o r s , as well as the m issions and goals o f the i n s t i t u t i o n , should be considered in any long-range planning s tu d i e s . The academic u n it a d m in is tra to r should study th e im portant iss u e s t h a t may face th e i n s t i t u t i o n 1n th e long term and, where a p p r o p ria te , make a d m in is tr a tiv e policy recommenda­ tio n s f o r the educational lead ers to co n sid e r. Such research should include s tu d ie s o f enrollm ent t r e n d s , social/dem ographic c h a r a c t e r i s ­ t i c s o f th e geographical a r e a , s tu d ie s o f th e q u a lity and deployment o f f a c u l t y , s tu d ie s dealing with th e adequacy and q u a l i ty o f s t a f f in the p resen t and in the f u t u r e , and, f i n a l l y , p o lic ie s to a t t r a c t new stu d e n ts during times o f d eclin in g enrollm ent. The knowledge o f a l l th e above t o p i c s , as well as knowing how to cope with th ese problems and demanding and searching f o r th e ap p ro p ria te a d m in is tra tiv e to o ls to solv e th e problems, can make o r destro y an i n s t i t u t i o n . Roach (1976) expressed his view on th e r o le o f th e academic department ch airp erson as follow s: "The academic department c h a ir p e r ­ son s h i f t s from being a s u b je c t-m a tte r s p e c i a l i s t to a developer o f departmental programs and a p a r tn e r in shaping the educational mission o f the school" (p. 13). The f o r e s ig h t o f academic u n it a d m in istra to rs and the a v a i l a ­ b i l i t y o f a d m in is tra tiv e to o ls to manage d i f f e r e n t fu nctio ns o f the academic u n it are the keys to th e successful achievement o f the u n i t 's 11 mission. The lack o f a d m in istra tiv e to o ls and knowledge is not the c o n tro llin g f a c t o r in higher education. Tools do not n e c e s sa rily need to be invented, but ad m in istra to rs need to recognize the need f o r the to o ls and t h e i r a p p lic a tio n s . The c o n tr o llin g f a c to r i s to move the academic u n it toward what i t wants to be o r , in S tu rn e r 's (1974) words, th e " i n s t i t u t i o n 's image o f th e f u tu r e ." In moving the i n s t i t u t i o n toward what i t should be, th e re w ill be a need f o r d i f ­ f e r e n t managerial t o o l s , such as d i f f e r e n t fo re c a s tin g techniques, f o r c e f i e l d a n a ly s is , and p r in c ip le s o f management by o b je c tiv e s . These to o ls and many o th ers have already been e s ta b lis h e d . The p o in t i s , in order to recognize the goals and o b jectiv es e s ta b lis h e d by c o n s titu e n ts o f academic u n i t s , what kinds o f academic to o ls would be o f help? The question o f how to r e l a t e th ese to o ls with functions o f the u n it to recognize the image o f th e f u tu re should be answered by academic u n it a d m in istra to rs . Sturner gave f iv e d i f f e r e n t types o f inputs to be weighed during the g o a l- s e ttin g process (Figure 2 ) . 1. These f iv e inputs are : The FANTASIZED views of what the i n s t i t u t i o n ought to be doing, based on i d e a l i s t i c s ta n d a rd s, individual wish l i s t s , o r p er­ sonal preferences and d e s ir e s . 2. The REALISTIC IMAGES o f the f u tu r e , t h e i r d e s ire s o f where they would lik e t h e i r i n s t i t u t i o n or individual department to be in one, o r f iv e , o r ten y e a rs. 3. The EXTRAPOLATION o f the PRESENT PATTERNS in to the FUTURE, assumed or documented, which would allow persons to understand what a 12 Fantasized Futures Images of P o te n tia lity Desires E x trap olation o f P resen t P a tte rn s and Trends R e a litie s (2 , 3, &4) R e a li s t ic Goals Uncertai n Future (4 & 5) Probable Forecasts o f th e S ta te of Soci ety/Uni vers i ty P red ic tio n s About the Future Figure 2 . - -I n p u ts in goal s e t t i n g . (From William F. S tu rn e r, Action Planning on the Campus [Washington, D.C.: American Asso­ c i a t i o n o f S ta te Colleges and U n iv e r s itie s , 1974].) s t r a i g h t - l i n e continuance o f th e p resen t p a tte rn s would look li k e in th e fu tu re . 4. The FORECAST OF THE FUTURE PATTERNS o r e v en ts, which would depend on an assessment of the " p ro b a b ility " o f c e r ta in in te rn a l and external so cial fo rces (such as economic trends in the world a t large 13 o r changes in th e s tu d e n ts ' c u r r i c u l a r i n t e r e s t s ) being i n f l u e n t i a l or c o n tr o llin g in the fu tu re . 5. PREDICTIONS about the c o n tr o llin g events and forces in an adm ittedly very "unknowable" f u tu r e , as based on highly i n t u i t i v e o r "educated" guesses about the fu tu re (p. 12). All f iv e inputs in goal s e t t i n g , which deal with person s, events, and f o rc e s , could be e x t e r n a l o r in te rn a l to the i n s t i t u t i o n (S tu rn e r, 1974). As shown in Figure 2 , Step 1 (Fantasized Futures) i s a highly in te rn a l phenomenon because i t involves people i n t e r n a ll y attach ed to i n s t i t u t i o n s o r departments who have to move the u n it toward a f u tu r e image o f the i n s t i t u t i o n . Step 5 (P red ictio n About the Future) i s highly extern al to the i n s t i t u t i o n . External events o r fo rces have to be p red icted by i n t u i t i o n o r "educated g uesses." Events external to the i n s t i t u t i o n are a l l s t a t e and federal reg u la­ t i o n s , a l l s o c ia l and environmental changes, technological changes, and so on. Academic u n its (c o lle g e s , scho o ls, departments) seem to be not <53 only a place f o r a d m in istratio n of c u rre n t a f f a f r s , but a ls o a decision making level f o r th e development o f f u tu r e educational programs and p o lic ie s in shaping the goals o f the academic u n i t . Robson (1976) quoted T o f f le r (1970), a f u t u r i s t , in d efinin g the a d m in is tr a to r's r o le : [ I t i s ] no longer s u f f i c i e n t f o r Johnny to understand th e p a s t. I t i s not even enough f o r him to understand the p r e s e n t, fo r the here-and-now environment w ill soon vanish. Johnny must learn to a n t i c i p a te the d ire c tio n s and r a t e o f change. He must, to put i t te c h n i c a l l y , learn to make re p e a te d , p r o b a b i l i s t i c , in c re a sin g ly long-range assumptions about th e fu tu r e . 14 Although T o f f l e r 's referen ce was to kindergarten through tw e lf th grade s tu d e n ts , h is statem ent in many ways can be applied to higher education a d m in is tra to rs , as w ell. Statement o f the Problem Long-range planning is one o f the most c ru c ia l fu nction s o f educational ad m in istratio n (Ohio Board o f Regents, 1973). Most edu­ catio nal ad m in istrato rs recognize t h a t th e re i s a need to determine the f u tu r e o f t h e i r i n s t i t u t i o n s . D iffe re n t aspects o f i n s t i t u t i o n s o f higher education and academic u n its w ithin th ese i n s t i t u t i o n s need to be f o re c a s t in a proper and system atic way so t h a t the b e s t course o f a c tio n may be predetermined. Three major areas must be considered when attem pting to iden­ t i f y the b e s t course o f actio n f o r the f u tu r e : (1) p re d ic tio n s about the f u tu r e , (2) a d m in istra tiv e ro le s in the management o f academic u n i t s ' functions in th e f u tu r e , and (3) th e c a p a b i l i t i e s (le a d e rs h ip , te c h n ic a l, p e rso n a lity ) necessary to solve the u n i t 's fu tu r e fu n ctio n . 1. P red ic tio n s about the f u tu r e . S electin g c r i t e r i a with which to id e n tif y the b e st course o f a c tio n and to make p red ictio n s about the fu tu re i s by no means an easy ta s k . Science, technology, and a d m in istra tiv e methods are rap id ly changing. P o l i t i c a l and so cial outlooks are changing a t a much f a s t e r r a t e than ever b efore. The needs and demands o f many c o n s titu e n t groups are also changing. Exploration o f the fu tu re should be done s y ste m a tic a lly . Some f u t u r i s t s have suggested t h a t explorers o f the fu tu re should use technology to c re a te new methodologies f o r an e f f e c t i v e p re d ic tio n 15 of the fu tu re (Neiswender, 1966). P rediction o f the fu tu re based merely on e x tra p o la tio n of the p ast i s no longer v a lid . Appropriate and e f f e c t i v e p re d ictio n s should not be based s o le ly on one f o r e c a s t ­ ing method but on d i f f e r e n t methods such as operational research techniques, co nstru ctio n o f mathematical models, sim ulation proce­ dures, and system atic use o f expert opinions (Helmer, 1967). 2. fu n ctio n s. A dm inistrative ro le s in the management o f academic u n i t s ' The a d m in istratio n o f academic u n i t functions (program, s tu d e n t, f a c u lty , f a c i l i t i e s , finance) i s not an easy ta s k . Although an estim ated 80 percent o f a l l a d m in istra tiv e decisions take place a t the departmental level (Roach, 1976), i t i s d i f f i c u l t to make v alid g e n e ra liz a tio n s about the a d m in istratio n o f the academic u n it because lead ersh ip ro le s o f the academic u n it ad m in istrato rs vary so g r e a t ly , not only among i n s t i t u t i o n s but w ithin a p a r t i c u l a r i n s t i t u t i o n . Some questions t h a t might be asked in devising p o lic ie s to cope with a n tic ip a te d events and t h e i r e f f e c t on th e functions o f aca­ demic u n its are: What should be the ro le o f academic u n it adm in istra­ to rs in approaching the p re d ic tio n t h a t as many as 2,100 stud ents (new enrollm ents) may be l o s t on th e main campus o f Michigan S ta te Univer­ s i t y (Table 1)? Are they going to lay o f f fa c u lty members? Are they going to go through marketing procedures to a t t r a c t more stud ents? Or w ill they choose to expand t h e i r educational programs in a way th a t more students w ill be a ttr a c te d ? 3. Supplying ap p ro p riate a d m in istrativ e to o ls and support to carry on the ad m in istrativ e t a s k s . In most academic u n i t s , u n it ad m in istrato rs are key in d iv id u als in determining th e success o f the 16 in stitu tio n . These a d m in istra to rs should be tra in e d to o f f e r some s o lu tio n s to th e many problems confronting the academic u n i t . what i s e f f e c t i v e tr a in in g ? Training to do what? Yet I f fu tu re p o lic ie s are approximately known, then th e c e n tra l ad m in istra tio n o f the u n iv er­ s i t y w ill be in a p o s itio n to o f f e r academic u n i t a d m in istra to rs an ap p ro p ria te tr a in i n g program. I t i s to d a y 's t r a in i n g t h a t w ill c r e a te tomorrow's a b i l i t y to solve the problems. The primary goal o f t r a i n ­ ing i s problem so lv in g as well as preventing the occurrence o f prob­ lems. In summary, th re e major problems were addressed in t h i s study: (1) i n s u f f i c i e n t inform ation gathered in a system atic way regarding the f u tu r e iss u e s t h a t may a f f e c t the a d m in istra tio n o f academic u n its a t Michigan S ta te U n iv e rsity ; (2) th e lack o f predetermined p o lic ie s o r courses o f a c tio n based on r e l a t i v e consensus o f academic u n it a d m in is tra to rs about th e f u tu r e issu es t h a t may a f f e c t d i f f e r e n t fu n ctio n s o f academic u n its ( s tu d e n ts , f a c u l t y , fin a n c e , programs, and f a c i l i t i e s ) ; and (3) th e lack o f to o ls and support t h a t might help academic u n it a d m in istra to rs accomplish t h e i r a d m in istra tiv e ta s k s . Purposes o f th e Study In essen ce, th e main purpose o f t h i s study was to provide inform ation r e l a t e d to each o f th e th r e e problems o f the research . S p e c ific purposes o f th e study were as follow s: (1) to c o l l e c t d e ta ile d inform ation d escrib in g the opinions o f s e le c te d academic u n it a d m in istra to rs and f a c u lty members about th e f u tu re o f academic 17 u n i t s , (2) to c o l l e c t information regarding d i f f e r e n t p o lic ie s and courses o f actio n t h a t academic u n it a d m in istrato rs might suggest fo r coping with fu tu re changes (fiv e to ten y e a r s ) , (3) to c o l l e c t suggestions about a d m in istra tiv e to o ls and techniques needed by aca­ demic u n it a d m in istrato rs t h a t could be provided by the cen tral ad m in istratio n o f Michigan S ta te U n iv ersity , and (4) to provide i n f o r ­ mation to departments, c o lle g e s , c e n te r s , and c e n tra l ad m inistration fo r co n sid eration in t h e i r re sp e c tiv e policy decisions concerning long-range planning a t Michigan S ta te U niv ersity. Importance o f th e Study The study is important because 1. I t addresses a recognized research need, as i d e n t i f i e d in th e l i t e r a t u r e asso c ia te d with goal s e t t i n g and planning in aca­ demic u n its . 2. I t w ill provide s p e c if i c information to academic u n it a d m in istrato rs and c e n tra l ad m in istrato rs o f Michigan S ta te U niversity concerning the f u tu re o f higher education academic u n its and the a d m in istratio n o f fu tu re issues on which the s e le c te d deans, c h a ir ­ persons, and fa c u lty were in agreement and those issu es on which d i s ­ agreement e x is te d . 3. This kind o f information w ill help academic u n it adminis­ t r a t o r s in improving t h e i r own p o s itio n with regard to the issu es of planning and the fu tu re o f academic u n it a d m in istra tio n , and to recognize more completely the views o f th e o th er s e le c te d academic u n it a d m in istrato rs w ithin Michigan S ta te U niversity. 18 4. The inform ation c o lle c te d in t h i s study w ill a s s i s t po licy makers and c e n tra l ad m in istra to rs in preparing f o r the fu tu re needs (d a ta , inform ation, t o o l s , support) o f academic u n it a d m in is tra to rs . D efin itio n s o f Terms The following terms a re defined in the context in which they were used in t h i s study. Academic u n i t —The b asic o rg anization al u n it w ithin which the educational a c t i v i t i e s o f an i n s t i t u t i o n take p la c e . Academic u n its in t h i s study were the co lleg es and departments o f Michigan S ta te U niversity . Department—A11 components o f la r g e r i n s t i t u t i o n a l o rgan iza­ tio n below th e lev el o f c o lle g e s , i . e . , department, sch o o l, d iv is io n , i n s t i t u t e , i n t e r e s t areas (F eatherston e, 1972). A dm inistration—11The overall management, c o o rd in a tio n , and f a c i l i t a t i o n o f the a c t i v i t y from I t s incep tion to i t s conclusion" (CES, 1978). Included in "management, c o o rd in a tio n , and f a c i l i t a t i o n " are r e s p o n s i b il i ty fo r planning, s t a f f i n g , budgeting, p u b lic iz in g , securing f a c i l i t i e s and s e r v i c e s , providing general s u p e rv is io n , and a l l o th e r such task s as are req u ired . " R e sp o n sib ility f o r planning, s t a f f i n g , budgeting" means t h a t the u n it e i t h e r does th ese things i t s e l f o r sees to i t t h a t they are done. Functions o f academic u n i ts —Teaching co urses, conducting re se a rc h , s e rv ic in g community, planning, le a d in g , communicating, co o rd in atin g , rep resen tin g ( u n it s , s tu d e n ts , f a c u l t y ) , n e g o tia tin g , and so on. In t h i s s tu d y , th e functions o f academic u n its were 19 c l a s s i f i e d in fiv e c a te g o rie s : s tu d e n t - r e la te d , f a c u l t y - r e l a t e d , r e s o u r c e s - r e la te d , f in a n c e - r e la te d , and program -related fu n c tio n s. a. Student: This function helps one recognize whom the academic u n it w ill serve and the degree o f e f f o r t (resou rces) required to ca rry o u t th e a c t i v i t y . Total enrollment and th e number o f se c ­ tio n s to o f f e r f o r each cou rse, as well as m i n o r itie s , commuting s tu d e n ts , e t c . , a re th e focus o f a tte n t i o n in t h i s function (Miyataki & Byers, 1976). b. Faculty: Faculty a v a i l a b i l i t y and fa c u lty assignment to the u n i t 's task s a re th e concern in t h i s function (Miyataki & Byers, 1976). Deployment o f f a c u lty and p o lic ie s on Issues o f te n u r e , work lo ad , and c o l l e c t i v e bargaining were a lso categorized under t h i s fu n ctio n . c. Physical resou rces: Primary a tte n tio n is devoted to in v e s tig a tio n and assignment o f f a c i l i t i e s , s u p p lie s , and s e rv ic e s to support the u n i t 's op eration (Miyataki & Byers, 1976). d. Finance: and uses o f a u n i t 's This function involves in v e s tig a tin g th e sources funds and id e n tify in g the a c t i v i t i e s t h a t w ill expand those funds and th e a c t i v i t i e s in which funds a re needed to accomplish the u n i t 's o peration (Miyataki & Byers, 1976). e. Program: This function determines what the academic u n it plans to o f f e r through i t s o p eratio n . Most o f the tim e, program is eq u iv alen t to curriculum . Program c o n tr o l, program d u p lic a tio n , and program make-up were the to p ics o f i n t e r e s t in t h i s fu n ctio n . Experts—Deans and chairpersons with a t l e a s t th re e years of experience in t h e i r c u rre n t p o sitio n were assumed to be ex perts fo r 20 the purpose o f In clusio n in t h i s study. Faculty members were assumed to be q u a lif ie d i f they had a c tu a lly p a r tic ip a te d in any kind o f plan­ ning process a t Michigan S ta te U n iv ersity . The rank o f the f a c u lty member was not considered In the s e le c tio n process because the actual knowledge o f planning and th e fu tu re was the concern in t h i s study. Lim itations The study was lim ite d to the e x te n t t h a t research p a r t i c i ­ pants (academic u n it a d m in istra to rs and fa c u lty members) might not have been t r u e ex perts in th e f i e l d of academic a d m in istra tio n . Also, the study was lim ite d to th e e x te n t t h a t some o f the q u estio n n aire respondents were not the actu al decision makers in t h e i r re sp e c tiv e c o lle g e s , departm ents, and c e n te r s . In a d d itio n , the r e s u l t s o f the study can be generalized only to Michigan S ta te U niversity because only academic u n it ad m in istra to rs and fa c u lty members from Michigan S ta te were included in the sample. Design A two-phase survey method was used to e l i c i t the opinions of academic u n it a d m in istra to rs on s e le c te d to p ic s o f concern 1n the p resen t in v e s tig a tio n . In th e i n i t i a l s te p , an unstructu red survey q u estio n n aire was mailed to the sample. The purpose o f t h i s ques­ tio n n a ire was to c l a r i f y respondents' opinions about the fu tu re of academic ad m in istratio n u n its and th e management o f f u tu re is s u e s . S p e c i f ic a l ly , the following two types o f information were sought: 21 1. The f u tu r e changes t h a t may take place in the functions ( s tu d e n t, f a c u l t y , re so u rc e s, f in a n c e , program) o f an academic u n i t a t Michigan S ta te U n iv e rsity . 2. The suggested p o li c ie s to cope with f u tu r e changes. Based on examination o f th e responses to t h i s q u e s tio n n a ir e , published inform ation a v a ila b le to th e r e s e a r c h e r , and inform ation gathered from th e O ffice o f I n s t i t u t i o n a l Research and ex p erts in the f i e l d o f s tu d y , the re s e a rc h e r prepared a t e n t a t i v e 11st o f q u e s tio n s . These questions were in co rpo rated in to a s tr u c tu r e d q u e s tio n n a ire (th e second phase o f th e s tu d y ) , which was used to c o l l e c t d ata about the t h i r d s ta t e d purpose o f th e study: to c o l l e c t inform ation t h a t suggests a d m in is tra tiv e to o ls and techniques needed by academic u n i t a d m in istra to rs t h a t could be provided by th e c e n tr a l a d m in istra tio n o f Michigan S ta te U n iv ersity . Overview Chapter I Included th e background and statem en t o f th e problem, th e importance and purposes o f th e s tu d y , d e f i n iti o n s o f term s, and the lim ita tio n s and design o f th e research . Chapter II co ntain s a review o f th e l i t e r a t u r e r e la t e d to th e study. The Delphi survey o f academic u n i t a d m in is tra to rs i s discussed in Chapter I I I . The e s s e n t i a l elements o f the research methodology a re s p e lle d out in t h i s ch ap ter in a way t h a t allows f o r maximum c l a r i t y and understanding o f th e a n a ly s is o f r e s u l t s . 22 Chapter IV includes an an aly sis o f the r e s u l t s o f the Delphi survey e l i c i t i n g th e opinions o f deans, c h airp erso n s, and fa c u lty members on issu es o f the fu tu re o f academic u n it a d m in istratio n a t Michigan S ta te U niversity. A summary o f the e n t i r e study, followed by recommendations f o r f u r th e r re se a rc h , i s found in Chapter V. CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED RESEARCH AND LITERATURE Introduction The research and l i t e r a t u r e r e la te d to several asp ects o f long-range planning and futurism are reviewed 1n t h i s c h ap ter. The chapter has two major p a r ts : 1. In the f i r s t p a r t o f t h i s ch a p te r, the in v e s tig a to r explores the e f f e c t and importance o f long-range planning in i n s t i t u ­ tio n s o f higher edu cation, with an emphasis on campus-wide p a r t ic i p a ­ to ry planning. Also, th e background and use o f some r e la te d management inform ation systems, f o re c a s tin g , and planning to o ls and techniques are reviewed. 2. In the second p a r t o f the ch a p te r, th e p r in c ip le o f the fu tu re and futurism 1s d iscussed, concentrating on th e problems t h a t w ill confront higher education in the next 10 to 15 y e a r s . Also, some observations about the fu tu re o f higher education a d m in istratio n and p ro jected changes in d i f f e r e n t aspects o f higher education 1n the next 10 to 15 y ears are reviewed. Planning and Forecasting Planning Central Michigan U n iv e rsity 's 1979-1980 Guide to Academic Planning (1979) begins with the statem ent t h a t 23 24 To plan i s to a n t i c i p a t e the f u tu re and to attem pt to shape t h a t f u tu re by i n t e l l i g e n t a c tio n . What i s a t b e s t d i f f i c u l t f o r an individual l i f e takes on new complexity when many liv e s merge in an o rg an izatio n such as a u n iv e r s ity . The understand­ ing o f i n s t i t u t i o n a l purpose and the a s p ir a tio n s o f members of the u n iv e r s ity community d i f f e r widely. P r o je c tio n s , however th o u g h tfu l, a re highly f a l l i b l e estim ates o f an uncertain f u tu r e . But to f a i l to a n ti c ip a t e and plan i s to face t h is u n certain f u tu re with no p re p a ra tio n , inadequate a t t e n t i o n to a l t e r n a t i v e s , and with l i t t l e conscious e f f o r t to determine th e course o f ev en ts, (p. v) E s s e n ti a l l y , planning r e f e r s to a process wehreby an i n s t i t u ­ tio n defines i t s philosophy and m ission, e s ta b lis h e s goals in keeping with t h a t philosophy, devises programs to a t t a i n t h a t g o a l, m arshalls i t s resources behind th e programs, and ev alu ates th e r e s u l t s (Salmon e t a l . , 1969). In the p a s t two decades, a u t h o r i t i e s have warned c o lleg es and u n i v e r s i t i e s o f the n e c e ssity to undertake long-range planning. O rig in a lly conceived as a tool f o r dealing with expanding enrollments (Harvey, 1971), long-range planning today i s c h ie f ly regarded as a means o f w isely a l lo c a tin g in c re a sin g ly lim ited reso urces. One c h a r a c t e r i s t i c o f th e 1960s 1n the United S ta te s was the rapid growth and development o f i n s t i t u t i o n s o f hig her education. Not only did th e co llege-age population r i s e to unprecedented numbers, but the proportion o f stu d en ts seeking higher education also rose s te a d il y . In a d d itio n , th e re was a g r e a te r awareness and a p p reciatio n o f the c o n trib u tio n o f higher education to nation al growth and s c i e n t i f i c development. This was followed by a concomitant r i s e in the level o f s t a t e and federal ap p ro p riatio n s f o r higher ed ucation , more p riv a te g i f t s , and increased stu d en t f e e s . In the l a t e 1960s, th e signs o f retrenchment were f i r s t observed; in creasin g numbers o f i n s t i t u t i o n s faced fin a n c ia l problems 25 (C h iet, 1971). In th e foreword to The New Depression in Higher Educa­ tio n (C hiet, 1971), Clark Kerr, chairman o f the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education, noted a c l e a r connection between th e e x tr a o r d i­ nary growth o f higher education in the e a r ly 1960s and th e f in a n c ia l strin g en cy t h a t began l a t e r in t h a t decade: Not only had enrollm ent a t both th e undergraduate and graduate le v e ls been mushrooming, but I n s t i t u t i o n s had Increased the q u a li t y and v a r ie ty o f t h e i r course o ffe rin g s and had responded to th e demand f o r g r e a te r e q u a lity o f o pp ortunity in higher edu­ catio n by Increasing t h e i r expenditures on stu d en t aid and by developing sp ecial programs to f a c i l i t a t e p a r t ic ip a ti o n in higher education o f students with le ss than adequate p re p a ra tio n . Other highly s i g n i f i c a n t f a c to rs 1n r is i n g co sts were th e increase o f graduate stu d en ts as a proportion o f th e t o t a l enrollm ent and the rap id growth o f exp end itures, (p. 1) Kerr concluded t h a t a l l o f the above f a c t o r s , plus a much g r e a te r r a t e o f i n f l a t i o n , co n trib u ted to a sharp Increase in th e c o s ts o f educa­ tio n per stu d e n t. I t is q uestio nable whether i n s t i t u t i o n s o f higher ed ucation, w ithout comprehensive planning p ro cesses, w ill be able to continue to meet t h e i r r e s p o n s i b il i t y to fund h ig h -q u a lity education (on a d e c lin ­ ing stu d en t t u i t i o n b a s e ), notw ithstanding the f a c t t h a t they must a ls o augment declines 1n th e a v a i l a b i l i t y o f stu d en t aid and fund sp ecial educational s e rv ic e s to stu d en ts from m inority groups and low-1ncome fa m ilie s . The planning process in education o rig in a te d in th e e arly 1960s, when th e re evolved increasing a t t e n ti o n to systems an aly sis and long-range planning, p a r t i c u l a r l y a t th e s t a t e level (Eble, 1978, p. 61). The development and implementation o f planning and management techniques in i n s t i t u t i o n s o f higher education has been underway fo r 26 almost two decades. From t h i s development has emerged an extensive body o f l i t e r a t u r e t h a t has o u tlin ed the a p p lic a tio n s o f planning processes in postsecondary education. In t h i s s tu d y , th e research er reviewed only th e l i t e r a t u r e t h a t was d i r e c t l y r e la te d to the p resent research. Most o f the l i t e r a t u r e deals with the management information systems and management techniques. The management and planning to o ls and techniques themselves have generated a number o f te c h n ic a l and conceptual problems. Chiet (1973) pointed out t h a t increased cen­ t r a l i z a t i o n o f th e decision-making process and c e n tr a liz e d a u th o rity over the c o lle c te d inform ation could have negative e f f e c t s on i n s t i ­ tu tio n s o f higher education, e s p e c ia lly those with complex o rgan iza­ tio n s. Poulton (1979) quoted C h i e f s guarded conclusion t h a t "management systems appear to have some s h o rt-te rm , though lim ite d , b e n e f i ts ; they promise g r e a te r f u tu re b e n e f i t s , but i t w ill take several y ears to t e s t t h a t promise" (p. 18). The r e s u l t s o f th e implementation o f management systems and U N N i N } M r o r o N r o r o r o - J— •— *-w— <0000000000000 -p»co ro — 'O io o o v ic n o ij^ w N — >-j-JOiooovicnui->urN3 -j o iD 0 3 vjoioi.c»oow — 1o o 0 o 0 o 0o 0o 0o 0o 0o 0 o0 o0 o0 c0 s0 oMo -r > o 0 0' O 0cn 00O 0 0 0 0O0O0O0 O 0O 0O 0 0O0OOO O O OOOQO aOoOaOc■O iouscovjcncncn.p*.r*.fc»coro nOt O n nO nOil>O^OO- O iX OO O ii ii nii n n ii ii ii ii ii ii ii n u II O II II OII O II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II Co . PO INS —j —j —J CO 5 E "n -n 3 0 o O CO PO — • o o o 3JWM *—I M *—I "O m z z Z Z Z 30 > H H HHHO — 5 2 2 2 1 r m m m m m gj — ■no co o __cscs GSG) G) n o o o < < z z 3m m mmms z oo h 30 30 30 3 7CCj m 0 1 > > 0 II U II 3 0 C O0 0 3 > Z Z CO< m o o — *— 1— ' to m v — I n m > w « « « Q 2 >HHn to —w 3 o UOM vj H H mo 5 3 w CO * COw . H*0 OI» VI V I CO o n to w —* * -----v-»H'• on cn h O » v 03 M w w siTO< O v l Z on ro — > w Z 30W -O » INS 30 O O —* C ro m « O 3000H » to — I CO O w w CO o * ts r - to 'v . w INS -~ -> u CO — ■ 30 c n v i v - « O O O O O 3» J» O O H H -O II o o o > > § 8 23H O s> 3z0 >2 >2t0s3 0o3 0n 3r> W 0 > > 3 0 30 •H U — I— 1*9000 O H — I II O ■ —»—- IN SO — . n o ii • *O » < o o o w m r™ < < J > r r 00 00 7 0 — * 30 cn i- i o — 00 00 • 00 00 00 TSw O I — * > > m » > II to J »to > THJ 30 OO CO00.0 COCOCO 30 H CSw — ■—rn m » m m m 13300 30 COO "O -o II TOCO 3»3» 53030 22 3» 50 30 GS 30 30 3D ■O'OO'OTJTJ —I —I —I—1—) —I 30 3 0 0 3 0 50 50 + + o o o o o o CJ1 + o + + o o o o o o o o o 30 50 O 70 JO TO DO DOO O O 30 70 O O TS TS H H II 7 0 70 -a -a H H 30 30 O O » w o o CO Co ~U TJ H H 30 30 *+*Tf n o n mm .OjO • « o 30 30 30 30 OOO O O 30 30 TJ TO -— to O Z 30 30 o -n O I— o > r~ cn ^ ii o — « 30 3»3»3> 7 0 70 70 TJU-O cn » o o tOw *o o H to 30 TO o COw S v l to o ro o CJ o '+’30 oo o o VJ ■vj * ro oo w CO * CO INS w cn * CO cn «vl 3Q« 70 ■ J» O 30 30 TS O O 30 H W 30 »— lw O TS H T oo w to Z TS 30H *n 3 0 r~ w 3»o ? 0 (0 0 » » n 0 0-0 30 "O CO CO —I TS TS 30 II o 30 to to II cs o *o ro to o 5T o o in o OS O• CO- sc o m o OS a: — OM OSCL I—OS CL «< ro o u i: o ■OH k: co os LU ■— cn CLd c n ao as > o C D O hCM O os a. o II Q +> a. • • « OSo_l oro os o o — —O’—I O C I— as cn H o cn • a. ■— "—* o s CM M co d d •s o o ii i n u r n d a s 10 I—I I—I > n rv o COo o s • >■ < '■ O • as O S M r• “ OS * o I— O — > c r OS r II"3 H C M h* * II II d>1—00 li ■—aCHo s d cn a s i«II£ i— • d O h m SS I I U J LU SC o d t— i - i + H- d id d CL> co a. za-Z iflOlA o OS II =» a s o o i n a s a s P :do co in xCM i— r— O I c o < K * ii d o ii ii cm a s d d d d > < Z < I W OS OS OS d Q O Q H £ < | os os ro o s> cC O CLw > ZII l— z o s || > a '—II w II v-*P O Z Od z — II -d oo oo ao U -Z 1L Z U .< J O o o O O Q O U -H I— Li. a s O . U O O S U . I L H H H M H Q U . U o o o o M Q H (/) c n hh a s J E Q O S m m O' LU o f g ■- »o •> a. asoss cn in — CM I— as § s d •*»— uj ui 111ccjn dz *— = CL d d d d r - ^ z z z i n •-* 2 z as z z z o c n — h i— in iu d !-* in CM os £ II Stfl CALL EXIT END • I •-D ro « K m cn cn -p » -p » -p > -P » -£ » -P » -P > -p i-£ > -P » c o c o c o c o c o co c o C 3 C o c o iM rM iM rM iM P o rM rM rM rM — —* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 —i o i D o o > J o ^ o i - H L j r o - j o i o ( X J > J O n j i - { > G j f \ j - j o i o o o v j o > w i - t i u i ' j - J O i o o o v i m o i . & ( j r ' j —' 0 ( 0 0 5 N j ( n o i - t > W [ \ ) ■ o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ii ii ii ii ii ii ii r iio ii ii—1ii ii ii ii 10 ii ii ii ii n ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii oii oii oii oii oii oii oii oii oii on O o s: po po po po 3 0 cn o O + + + + + + + + + + + + + + = = II : ^ > O C 3 0 5 0 o 70 •— . - — — * * > > ■ T I h ^ I h h h h J h O Z T J Z I / I 3 3 Z S3 •— O 2 2j> Hm 3 H m Hm H H 2 - I I 0 7 0 0 —1 g g ° po 1» O O ^ j O —— 3»3> o o : m m S m N O O <= II • 1^— - m < 7 3 D z m po S o O Oo im S_ O Z —< — • -< o m m po m -HO c r co z O m —■ —• = — ■ p o p o c n c o z PO > C O r~ > p o ci rn —I *o PO z -o » » — >» w n i H U H m —* O x sim =—■—■—< —* S C O = C/1 co m o co cn 0101 u i » — ■ O — 1 c n c n CJ1 CXI» 0 » D : : m = = sv .. s :* » s l— l POo to o o O O O o o o o = = = = - — PO — * s sv < •< •«< • s s wM «X «-CO = — = SIM = CO— = —■ : n s l s. i— coas— — * — * Cl — cn —i o * o Z 3= Z 00 X — M > I S S S PO ■—I -< O 70 H —' m m — O — -o 3 = 3 » O O 3> -< m + m o o c i m □ a o r po co < c i > — z — i ^ cd o 5 2 > c o r o —■ >—i co -n so o = z o o m m to — Cl CO —I s s o c o —l • C-. C_> ►** «• *o CO ►H M w it C_| s-O •— : « — ** I— II II C . C . «• II Ol s s s« II II m s s = •—■ = —■—* II II CO I M — — — X w —■z o *n . —I * c i - o m js » -H (-1 0 0 03> 0U — )1 GPOl — tj s p o p o o r * Z — ■OOHH s -< 3 0 po c z r~ + Si 3 0 - H 0 co z —I O —I Z L i— • -< “n W w m oa SCO —I z C l *• = 3> : > — O o I— •—CO — • « O —I — ----------n CO ___ o » po o o c= o II •— i 3 z » - « —i o - n "* = II m o o m o z z ja: — co po po m 3 o o £ c= o •o m m z 3 o r m w Z s> X UI 70 -H O P ) c o c o —i c m i—• mG l » = c0 o3 s-u -o z mCO I—I >-• z PO -o w * «• s —Is C 1s s = oO >O w w « « D C 3 X O c: — wmJI o x PO m rn co c II < -o "!H I6H II —O 50 O 70 70 :O O + S O O HHOHH r3>J»53>3s > z z >-• z z Irn rn po rn m ’P > * O P O o o m o n im > —* pwo —*wr •— «= ^H WS* s <• * n -Pfc PO * m s JO — w — r~ -n — s SPO s » » m "^ jO •— «• s "C — *"= rn m co •fil' 132 1520= 1530= 1540= 1550= 1560= 1570= 1580= 1590= 1600=240 1610= 1620=250 1621= 1622=255 1630= 1640=260 1650=400 1660= 1670= 1680= WRITE(11,150) (BLKLIN(J),J=1,7) WRITE(11,150) (BAR(I),1=1,7) 00 400 1=1,36 IF(I.EQ.8.0R.I.EQ.15.0R.I.EQ.22.0R.I.EQ.29.0R.I.EQ.32) +WRITE(11,150) (LINE(J),J=1,7) IF(I.EQ.7.0R.I.EQ.14.0R.I.EQ.21.0R.I.EQ.28.0R.I.EQ.36) +G0T0 250 WRITE(11,240) C0L1(I),C0L2(I),(DATMAT(I=1,J,CSTATE),J=1,10) F0RMAT(" " ,1 2 X ,2 A 1 0 ,4 (" i" ,2 ( lX ,I 3 ) ,lX ,)," !" ,2 (lX ,1 3 ),1'l" GOTO 400 WRITE(11,150) (BLKLIN(J),J=1,7) DO 255 K=1,5 DAT( K)=FLOAT{DATMAT(1+1,K,CSTATE))/10. WRITE(11,260) C0L1(I),C0L2(I),(DAT(J),J=1,5) F0RMAT(" M,12X,2A10,4("I",2X,F4.1,3X),"!",2X,F4.1,2X,"!") CONTINUE WRITE(11,150) (H0RZED(I),I=1,7) RETURN END APPENDIX C GENERAL SUMMARY OF THE RESPONSES TO EACH CHANGE STATEMENT BY THE TYPES OF RESPONDENTS 133 134 #1 Faculty work-load will Increase; less faculty time will be self assigned CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER I 1 VALUE VARIABLE OEANS N = 14 N = 27 REL FREQ (PCT) ABS AOJ REL FREQ (PCT) ABS AOJ ( I TOTAL FACULTY ( O . I . R . CHAIRPERS ! ( I ( ( N = 98 ! ( ! REL FREQ (REL FREQ ! REL FREQ! (PCT) ( (PCT) ( (PCT) ABS AOJ ABS AOJ ( ABS A0J1 ( L I KELTHO ! LOU (MODERATE OCCUR ! HIGH (GREAT (NO RCSP (MEAN RESP ! ---------------- IMPACT OF THE CHANGE ! NONE (LOU (MODERATE (HIGH (GREAT (NO RESP (MEAN RESP ( (FACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT PROHOTING(PROVOST THIS (ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP ( (MODE RESP f (FACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS (ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP (MODE RESP SHOULD’ I T ! " no OCCUR ? ! YES ! NO RESP —!--- !0 -2 YRS ESTTMATEDI3-5 YRS TIME OF (6 -1 0 YRS OCCUR (NO RESP ! (MODE RESP 21 29 29 7 23 31 31 0 I ! ! ! 0 15 38 46 0 0 ! ( ! ( ( ( 3. 8 0 14 36 43 0 7 ( 3. 3 50 ! 33 4 0 ! 2.0 15 54 31 0 ! ( ( ! 1. 0 37 48 11 4 2.0 ( ! ! ( ! ! ! ( 0 17 17 67 0 0 ( ! ! ! ! ! 0 0 51 47 0 2 0 0 52 48 0 0 I ! ! ! ( ( ! ( !• 0 0 67 33 0 0 3. 0 93 •93 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 *2 9 " ’ S I " ! ” 7 4 ’ ’ 7 4 " 64 69 ! 26 26 7 0 ( 0 0 14 50 29 7 0 4 42 42 12 0 3. 6 4 .0 __1 . 0 0 4 41 41 12 2 3 .3 0 3 .0 3B 0 11 52 7 4 37 44 7 0 93 100 ( 0 ( 0 0 0 ( 0 ( 0 0 0 ( 7 0 ! 28 2B( 30 391 3 .2 0 11 52 33 4 0 58 3S i 14 30 37 7 0 ( 38 50 12 0 94 00 0 96 0 ! ! 1 ( ( ( ! I 0 8 42 41 7 2 0 0 67 33 0 0 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 1 48 44 2 3 3 .5 3 .0 ! 100 100 2 0 00 0 0 1.0 1.0 4 0 17 17 67 0 0 0! 8( 43! 42! 7( 0! ! 3 .5 ( 3 11 2 0 2 1.0 80 20 33 67 33 67 67 31 2 18 53 22 8 19 57 23 0 33 67 33 67 23 52 18 6 2.0 0 0 00 2.0 9 94 78 20 2 21!( 0 49( 45( 2! 0! ! 2.0 1 ■1 96! 1! 1! 2! 00 (! i i ■! 69! 31! 0! -! 25! 55! 20! 0! ! I 135 #2 Financial rewards commensurate with professional training will decrease CHANGE STATEMENT ! DEANS NUMBER : sssssa: I REL FREQ VARIABLE ! VALUE ! ! ABS AOJ ! —a ; NONE LIK EOLIH p O - -! -LOU -! MODERATE ! OCCUR !HIGH IGREAT tNO RESP ! {MEAN RESP! ----------------- j ------------------ 1 0 0 (NONE I IMPACT (LOW ! OF THE {MOOERATE ! 43 55 I 29 36 CHANGE {HIGH (GREAT ( 7 9 0 (NO RESP 1 21 ( ! (MEAN RESPI 3 .5 0 ’ "’ lFACULTY””! GRP MOST (STUDENT ( PROMOTINGIPROVOST ! THIS ! ST ♦ FED ! CHANGE (COMMUNITY! (NO RESP ( ( ( 7 0 21 36 29 7 REL FREG (PCT) ABS ADJ 11 22 26 26 11 4 12 23 27 27 0 4 15 56 22 4 0 4 15 58 23 0 4 .0 ! ! ! ! 1 ! 4 0 4 78 11 4 »!■ 4 ! 0 ( 4 ! 81 ! 12 1 0 I SHOULD*IT !~No” ! OCCUR 7 ! YES ! ! NO RESP I n " - 77 21 7 23 0 10*2 YRS E S T IN A T E 0I3-5 YRS TIME OF (6 -1 0 YRS OCCUR !NO RESP 21 36 14 29 SO 50 20 0 33 33 15 19 ! ! ( ( ! ( (MODE RESP! 8 0 0 1.0 2 .0 1.0 0 0 12 78 a 2 4 .0 0 86 * 00 2 41 41 18 0 2 00 0 _ 4.0 58 0 33 a s s e s s (s s s s s s s s s ( s: 0 50 0 29 7 0 14 4 .0 ( ( ! ( 0 (FACULTY GRP MOST ! STUDENT ! HINDERING!PROVOST ( THIS (ST ♦ FED ! CHANGE (COMMUNITY! ! NO RESP ! ! ( (MODE RESP! f ! ! TOTAL ( 98 ( N ( ( ! ( (REL FREQ (REL FREG (REL FREQ! ( (PCT> ! (PCT) ( (PCT) ! ( ABS AOJ ( ABS AOJ ( ABS AOJ! ( ! ( ! C ssssasas(a: =* (! ! ( 0 ! ! 0 18 18 ! ! 1? 2 0 ! ( 27 28 ( 33 33 ! 29 2 9 ! ! 33 34 ( 17 17 ! 28 2 8 ! ( 18 18 ( 50 50 ( 15 16! ! 2 0 ( 0 ! 3 0! ! ! ! ! 4 .2 3 .5 ! ! 3 .2 ! i —! ■!• ■!• ! 0 2 2 I ! 1 1! I 5! 17 ! 5 6 ( I 24 24 ( 33 33 ! 24 2 6 ! 42 ! 33 33 ! I 43 4 5 ! ! 23! 17 ! 21 » 26 ! 5 0! ! 2 ! 1o7 0 ( ! ! ! ! ! ! 3 .8 ! 3 .8 ! 3 .5 2 12 0 3 .1 0 8 0 23 38 31 0 s(: I ! !• 78* 81 ! 0 ! 15 ( 15 4 ! 4 ! 0 4 ! ! 1.0 ! (• 89 96 ! 4 4 ! 7 0 ( (NODE RESP! ! CHAIRPERSI FACULTY ( O . I . R * ! « N = 27 ( N a I N a SI ! ! ! ( ! ! ! ( 0 6 0 6 1.0 0 0 12 80 8 0 ( ( ! ! ( ! ! ! !■ 92 ! ! ! ! ! ! ( ! !' 96* 98 I 2 2 37 37 20 6 1.0 40 ( 40 ! 21 ( 0 !! ! 0 0 0 83 17 0 0 0 0 83 17 0 ! ! ! ! ! ! 4 .0 1000 1000 (! 0 0 0 0 1.0 1000 1000 1! 0 0 ! 33 50 17 0 2.0 33 ( 50 ! 17 ! ° i ! —! 20!1 2 0 10 72 12 3 11! 13! 0! ! ! 4 .0 ! 80* 85! 0! 0 12! 11 3 3! 0 0! 6 0! ( 1.0 ! 91 5 4 ! 95! 5! 0! ...! 34 37 17 12 2.0 38! 42! 20! 0! ! ! 136 #3 Faculty members will decrease as faculty members retire DEANS N a 14 CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 3 VALUE 0 7 14 36 36 7 (NONE .............. (LOU IMPACT OF THE (MODERATE CHANGE (HIGH (GREAT (NO RESP 29 50 14 0 7 4. I ! I ( (MEAN RESP( ( faculty"" ( ! ( mmmmmmmmm | 0 0 ( ( ( ( 0 31 54 15 0 0 ( ! ! ! ! ! ( g’ 0 0 43 46 43 46 0 0 7 0 3 .0 aaaassaaa 4 19 19 22 33 4 4 19 19 23 35 0 15 26 33 22 4 { 0 15 27 35 23 0 3. 7 4 0 48 44 79 85 14 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 1 .0 J•••« ••••■ SHOULD I T ( NO ( OCCUR 7 ( YES ( ( NO RESP ! 43 50 7- 46 54 0 (0 - 2 YRS I ESTIMATED13-5 YRS ( TIME OF (6 -1 0 YRS ! OCCUR (NO RESP ! ( ! (MODE RESP! 29 43 21 7 31 46 23 0 ( ! ( ! ( ! ! 4 0 50 46 0 0 85 4 4 92 4 4 7 0 0 0 ( 8 ! 8 22 37 31 2 0 3. 9 0 10 27 39 20 4 22 ! 38 ! 32 ! |I! 1 0 10 29 41 20 .0 3. 7 ! ! ( ! ! !| 1 ! 4 ! ! 59 ! 31 33 ! 2 2 ! 4 0 ! ! ! 3 .0 4 2 57 2 ’ 8 2 **8 7 * 00 0 ! ! ! ( 6 ! ’51**85* 73 ! 27 ! 0 34 49 17 37 44 40 48 7 0 31 45 16 11 2.0 12 8 ! 2.0 1 0 0 17 50 17 17 0 3. 4 0 0 0!! - (1 0! 0 14 15! 3 .9 32 33 17 4 3 .5 0 0 4 1 33! 34! 18! 0! ! ! -! 4! 1! 89! 7( 00 6 15 0 0 17 50 17 17 0 20! 33( 36! 84 ! 15 4 0 4. 5 19 32 35 3 I! 11! ! 100 100 6 1.0 0 17 67 I 10 55! 6 71 25 4 17 67 0 0 17 53 37 00 1.0 00 17 REL FREC! 1 ABS AOJ ( ABS AOJ REL FREG CPCTI ABS ADJ (REL FREQ ! (PCT> ! ABS AOJ ! (NONE LIK E LIH O !LOW OF {MODERATE (HIGH OCCUR (GREAT !NO RESP ! (MEAN RESP! ( N a 27 I ! ! VARIABLE ! ! ! ! FACULTY ( 0 . I . R . ! ( N a 6 N a 51 ! CHAIRPERS 67 33 0 0 3 .0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 1.0 50 50 0 0 1.0 4! D 6 1.0 00!! 0! ! ! 50 * * 6 8 * * 7 li 28 2 9 ! 4 01 67 33 ’ 3 5 **3 7 ! 44 47! 14 15! 0 500 67 33 38! 1! 0( ! 3 .0 ! 7 2.0 0!! ! «•—• 137 #4 An Increase number of faculty will leave higher education for oosltlons In business and Industry. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 4 VARIABLE ! VALUE ! _ ! __________ _ _______ LXKELIHD ! LOU OF OCCUR ! MODERATE !HIGH ! GREAT ! NO RESP I 1 MEAN RESP I. . . . . . . . . IMPACT OF THE CHANGE (NONE ILOU (MODERATE IHIGH (GREAT (NO RESP ( (MEAN RESP •••« •••••f (FACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT PROMOTING(PROVOST THIS (ST • FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP ( (MODE RESP (FACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS ! ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP DEANS N = 14 N s 27 REL FREO (PCT) ABS AOJ REL FREG (PCT I ABS AOJ 0 (0 -2 YRS ESTIMATED(3>5 YRS TIME OF !6 - 1 0 YRS OCCUR (NO RESP ! (MODE RESP FACULTY 21 36 36 0 7 0 19 48 22 4 4 23 38 38 0 0 3 .1 7 36 21 29 0 7 2 19 50 23 4 20 29 31 12 0 6 3*0 8 38 23 31 0 0 4 11 37 37 4 7 ( ! ! ! ( ! 45 7 21 21 9 27 0 0 14 0 18 26 7 33 15 7 11 29 14 33 0 7 9 64 27 50 21 21 2.0 0 15o 2.0 2 2 24 0 ”fl1~” 83~ 15 52 15 19 39 10 24 29 8 37 17 8 3 .0 57"”67* 2 14 39 18 22 6 ! I N s 98 I ! REL FREO ! REL FREG! (PC.T) I (PCT) ! ABS ADJ ! ABS ADJI ! ! =========! 0 2 21 31 33 II 120 1?0 0 17 50 17 17 0 3 .4 3 .3 4 12 40 40 4 0 TOTAL 33 0 50 0 17 0 ! ! t ! ! ! ! ! 2 ~21 20! 19 37 29 8 5 39! 30! 9! 0! ! 3 .2 ! -! ! 5 ! 15 t 37 ! 23 ! 13 ! 6 ■ 3 . 3 ! 7 ! 3 . 5 ! ..3 2 . 8 ____ ( * • • • I* 4 3 ~ * 5 0 * ! " ’ 3 3 " * 3 5 " l ” " 4 5 " " 4 9 ” ! " “ a s * 8 3 ! " 44 0 0 I 0 0 ! 0 0 0 ! 0 ! 0 4 0 0 ( 0 ( 9 ! 0 0 ! 0 8 27 ! 27 0 0 ! 26 29 33 ! 26 30 ! 37 17 17 ( 19 14 17 ! 38 ( 12 13 ! 4 14 0 ! 0 ! 0 0 ! 7 0 ! 8 9I 1 1. 0 ! 1. 0 ! 5 . 0 ( 1. 0 1 36 ( ( ( ( ( ! O .I.R . REL FREQ (PCTI ABS ADJ ::::: :e s : (MODE RESP SHOULD I T ( NO OCCUR 7 ( YES ! NO RESP J I ! N a 51 N s 6 I ! ========= =========! I CHAIRPERS 18 64 18 0 » 2 IS 42 19 23 0 ! I ! ! ! ! 200 50 60 0 0 200 17 51 13 31 .3 3 0 1.0 33 0 50 0 17 0 17o ei 3 .0 «!* ( ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 76 16 83 17 SO 50 50 ! 50 ( 22 47 22 10 24 52 24 0 17 17 ! 83 ( 8 2.0 0 0 H 0 2.0 0 ■(! • 0( 0 !I ! 34 7 27 6 7 19 5! 1 6! 39! 25! 14! 0! 2 !! ---- ! 47! 0! 4! 27! 21! 0! ! ! ■! 42! 9! 3 3! 8! 9! 0! ! 1.0 ! .......j 73 791 19 2 1 ! 7 __0! "It"_20! 51 18 13 2.0 59! 21! 0! ! ! 138 #5 There will be less faculty mobility, less faculty turnover, and greater desire for job security. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER S c|: ! t VARIABLE ! i 5 VALUE DEANS N = 14 ! CHAIRPERS! FACULTY ! O . I . R . ! N = 27 I N s 51 ! TOTAL S58SSBSSS s s s s s s s s s ' s s s s a s s r s | x 1 ! REL FREQ REL FREO !REL FREQ fREL FREQ !REL FREQ! «PCT> CPCT) ! CPCT) I CPCT> I (PCT) I ABS ADJ ABS AOJ ! ABS ADJ ! ABS AOJ ! ABS AOJ! ! (NONE LIK E LIH D ! LOU OF !------MODERATE ! HIGH OCCUR JGREAT !NO RESP ! IMEAN RESP 0 0 14 15 7 a 29 31 43 46 .7 •' 0 4 .1 ! NONE !LOU •MODERATE 1HIGH fGREAT ! NO RESP ! 1MEAN RESP 0 7 36 43 7 7 IFACULTY GRP MOST ! STUDENT PROMOTING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ! COMMUNITY !N0 RESP 43 0 7 29 IMPACT OF THE CHANGE IMODE RESP ! FACULTY GRP MOST ! STUDENT HINOERING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMNUNITY 1NO RESP ! IMODE RESP ■!■ SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR ? ! YES ! NO RESP ■! « !0 - 2 YRS ESTIMATED!3-5 YRS TIME OF !6 - 1 0 YRS OCCUR INO RESP IMODE RESP 0 8 38 46 8 0 2.0 7 59 0 15 15 0 11 27 0 36 27 37 4 19 19 4 19 1.0 3 .0 36 43 14 7 22 46 0 8 31 15 0 21 86 Z 7 0 7 26 37 1.0 92 8 0 0 4 24 40 T f ! ! 32 ! 0 t ! ! 0! 8 28 40 24 ! ! 1 ! 0! 38 46 15 0 33 44 4 19 2.0 0 10 12 39 31 8 4 .0 0 14 29 39 12 6 0 11 13 43 34 ! ‘ ! ! ! •!• 0 ! 13 31 42 12 ! ! ! ! 0! 67 0 17 17 ! ! ! ! 0! 0 !! 45 5 23 23 5 ! •!« ! ! ! ! ! 0! I ! 80 !I •»« 41 I 55 ! 5 ! 0 !! ! 49 0 14 *0 IB 1.0 41 2 25 6 2 24 60 ! 0 ! 17 ! 24 ! ! '!■ 54 ! 3 ! 33 ! 8! 3 ! 0 ! 0 4 .5 0 H 50 17 0 :s!i 0 ! 0! 17 ! 17 ! 67 ! 0 !! ! 0 !I 17 17 50 17 0 83 0 0 0 1.0 17 0 33 33 0 17 ! ! ! I ! f ■! • 83 ! 17 ! 37 41 14 8 40 ! 45 ! 15 ! 0 ! 0 !! ! 36 3? 4 .0 0 11 29 40 14 6 3 .6 53 0 0 ! 17 ! 18 3 13 00 !! 0 !! 12 ! 1.0 «!■ 36 20 ! ! 2 24 40 ! 40 ! 13 ! 3 ! 21 0 0 0 1.0 ■!• 1000 1000 !! 0 0 ! 33 33 0 33 50 ! 50 ! 0 ! 1.0 0 a 83 ! 3 .0 »!• 78 16 2.0 11 00 !!! *o7 1.0 6 0 0 3 .7 3 .5 92 ! 11 ! sssf s 3 .8 1.0 0 29 21 7 22 37 30 7 4 .0 3 .5 21 0 4 0 !! ! 82 =! 0! 9! 15! 38! 37! 0! I ! —! 0! 12! 30! 42! 15! 0! ! ! -! 61! 0! 14! 21! 4! 0!I ! —! 45! 3! 31! 17! 4! 0! I r ■! 88! 11 12! 36 42 10 41! 48! . . 7. . . . .0!I 12 2.0 12! 0!» ! 139 <6 Faculty will become more attuned to the academic needs of older students, and willing to try new methodologies to meet needs of Individual students and groups 1n new settings. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 6 DEANS (CHAIRPERS ! ! N = 27 14 N *” ” } * ! REL FREQ VARIABLE I VALUE (PCT) i ABS AOJ i s s s s s s s s s js s s s s s s a s (NONE LIK E LIH D !L0U SO 54 OF (MODERATE 38 36 OCCUR {HIGH Q (GREAT 7 7 !N 0 RESP 0 ( (S S S S S S E S S ( (REL FREQ ! (PCT) ( ABS ADJ ( _______ 0j 0 80 j(MEAN — . . .RESP ... IMPACT OF THE CHANGE (NONE (LOU (MODERATE (HIGH (GREAT (NO RESP ( (MEAN RESP . . . . . . . . . i. . . . . . . . . (FACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT PROMOTING1PROVOST THIS (ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP ! (MODE RESP -! ...... (FACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT HINDERING(PROVOST THIS (ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP i iMOOE RESP SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR 7 ( YES ! NO RESP ESTIMATEO!3“ 5 YRS TIME OF (6 -1 0 YRS OCCUR (NO RESP ! (MODE RESP 21 29 29 14 0 19 26 30 11 15 8 0 0 0 15 19 0 30 26 29 29 31 31 36 7 38 0 0 0 2 24 31 27 6 10 22 30 35 13 0 3 .4 3 .2 11 5 .0 17 21 33 12 27 24 4 25 0 0 29 59 4 4 IS 0 19 7 86 7 8 1 92 ( 0 ! 7 81 11 8 ( 92 ! 0 1 14 57 15 ! 62 ! 23 I 19 44 26 21 50 29 1. 0 73 5 5 18 0 0 1. 0 ! ( ( ! 1 1 ! 0 ( 11 0 2.0 !! 2.0 ** 2 26 35 30 7 0 61 8 4 8 0 20 ( ! ! 1 ! 1 ( 1 ( ! ( ( ( 13 30 26 4 28 ! ( TOTAL 1 ( ( ! ! ( N s 98 I ! ( ! ( s rs s s s s s ! ( 6 REL FREQ (REL FREO! (PCT) ! (PC T) ! ABS ADJ ( ABS ADJ! ( _________ ! !' 8 0 2.0 3 .0 92 0 0 8 0 0 2 19 28 40 11 0 3. 1 ! ! « ! ! ( 1 ! 86 0 0 7 0 7 N = 3. 4 3 .3 25 33 33 N s 51 2 18 25 37 10 8 29 29 22 25 15 17 11 0 2*6 0 0 O .I.R . REL FREQ (PCT1 ABS ADJ o"""os 26 26 FACULTY 17 50 17 0 17 0 17 50 17 0 17 0 2. 5 0 50 33 17 0 0 0 50 33 17 0 0 2. 7 17 ! ! ! ( ! ( ! 17 0 50 0 50 0 0 17 17 ( ( ( ! ( ( ! 1 17 17 i 27 27 26 11 12 ! 8 Ot! 3 .2 1 23 30 28 7 11 3 .2 8 76 10 5 10 0 0 83 100 ! 0 0 ! 0 0 ( 0 0 ! 0 0 ( 17 0 ! ! ! 1 .0 65 5 3 9 0 17 18 75 8 19 81 0 0 0 ( 100 100 ! 0 0 ! 12 80 8 24 47 26 51 1. 0 228 230 2.0 17 33 33 17 2.0 20 40 40 0 ! -! 1! 26! 33! 31! 8! 0! ! ! —! 11 26! 12! 23 28 3 27 3 .0 3 .0 2! 29! 29! 28! 1 30! 3( 29! 0!! ! ! 79! 6! 4! 110!! 0!! ! —! 13! 87! 0! —! 20 22 ( 47 5 2 ! 23 9 26( 0(! 2.0 . «( 140 #7 There will be more "outside" activities for non*un1vers1ty employment. I .e .. consulting, patient care. etc. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER DEANS ! ! O .I.R . ICHAIRPERS! FACULTY ! TOTAL ! i ! 1 VARIABLE ! ! IREL FREO 1REL FREQ IREL FREO IREL FREQ IREL FREO! ! CPCT) I CPCT) » CPCT) I CPCT) ! CPCT) ! I ABS ADJ ! ABS ADJ ! ABS ADJ ! ABS AOJ ! ABS AOJ! VALUE _______ !________ _________{— s t____ ' ________ ' ___ s____!_______* -----j p "| n ™ “ i j o '! o ””5” ! 1 1! LIK E LIH D !LOW OF MODERATE OCCUR JHIGH !6R£AT !NO RESP ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 14 50 29 0 7 15 54 31 0 0 ! 30 ! 15 ! 26 ! 15 ! 11 ! ! 33 17 29 17 0 ! I ! ! ! 29 24 IB 6 24 ! 38 31 23 B 0 ! f ! 1 ! . . . . . . . . . MEAN j. . . . . RESP! . . . . j. . .3..2. . ---|.! . .3. .2. . . . . i.! . .3. .0. . . . . | ! IMPACT OF THE CHANGE (NONE (LOU (HOOERATE (HIGH (GREAT (NO RESP ! ( ! ! ( ( ! ! 0 01 4 4 29 31 ( 19 21 64 69 ! 44 50 0 0 ( 19 21 0 01 4 4 ! 7 0 ! 11 0 ( ! 1 ( ( ! ! 4 5 29 25 12 4 25 ! 1 39 34 16 5 0 ! ( ( I ( ! 33 33 17 0 17 40 40 20 0 0 ! I ! ! ! ! 2 .6 28 26 21 7 17 33! 31! 26! 9! 0! .! . .3. .1. . . . j! | 0 0 1 33 40 ( 50 60 ( 0 0 ( 0 0 ! 17 0 ! ( ! 3 27 3B 11 3 18 4! 32! 46! 14! 41 0! . . . . . . . . _!MEAN_RESP! . ^ . . . . . . . . . ^ . .2 .7. . . ! . 3. .0. . ^ !. . . 2. .7 . . . . . !. . . .2..6. . . . (. . .2. .6. . . . !^ GRP HOST (STUOENT ! PROMOTING(PROVOST ! THIS 1ST * FED ! CHANGE (COMMUNITY! ! NO RESP ! ! ! 0 0 ! 7 8 ! 14 15 ! 21 23 ! 7 0 ! ! 0 0 7 19 15 ! 0 ( 0 ! 9 ! 22 ! 0 ! 0 0 ! 2 3 ( 4 5 ! 6 8 ! 24 0 I ! . . . . . . . . . ^! .MODE . . . . RESP! . . . . ^ . . . 1. *0. . . . . ^ !. . . .1 .*0. . . . ^ 1. . . 1. .0 ..... ! GRP MOST (STUDENT ! HINDER INC.! PROVO ST ! THIS (ST ♦ FED ! CHANGE (COMMUNITY! ! NO RESP ! 0 21 29 14 14 ! ! 1 ! ! IMODE RESP! 4 .0 ! ! 0 25 33 17 0 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 11 41 19 11 19 ! 14 50 23 14 0 3 .0 ! ! ! ! ! 6 39 18 4 24 ! 3 .0 SHOULD” I T ! " no * - ” ” ” * »” 5 o" ’ 54“ l " ” s 3 ~ ~ 4 l’ ! OCCUR 7 I YES ! 43 46 I 48 59 ( ! NO RESP ! 7 0 I 19 0 ! ! 8 51 23 5 0 ! ! 0 0 ! 0 0 ! 0 0 1 0 0 ! 33 0 ! 1 .0 . ! 0 33 33 0 33 ! 0 2 6 11 19 0! 3! 8! 14! 0! . . ^ !. . . 1. .0. . . . ^! 0 50 50 0 0 ! ! ! ! ! 6 37 20 7 21 8! 47! 26! 9! 0! ! 3 .0 ! ! 3 .0 53 25 ! ~“ 5o” 6o“ ! 3 l" " 3 8 ! 71 ! 33 40 ! 49 621 0 ! 17 0 ! 20 0! 20 31 22 27 27 43 30 0 . . . . . . . . . |. . . . . . . . . j. . . . . . . . . |. . . . . . . . . |. . . . . . . . . j. . . . . . . . . |----- . . . | (0 -2 YRS ! ESTIMATED!3 -5 YRS ! TIME OF !6 - 1 0 YRS ! OCCUR (NO RESP ! ! ! (MODE RESP! 14 64 14 7 2 .0 15 69 15 0 I I ! ( ! ! 26 33 15 26 2 .0 35 45 20 0 ( ! I ! 1 ! 2 .0 ! ! ! ! ! ! 50 17 17 17 1 .0 60 20 20 0 ! ! ! ! ! ! 22 36 18 23 29! 47! 24! 0! ! 2 .0 ! 141 #8 There will be Increasing criticism of the principle of tenure CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 8 sssssssssf sssssssss f VARIABLE ! ! VALUE ! ______ ^ ______ LIK E LIH D ! LOU OF ! MODERATE OCCUR {HIGH (GREAT (NO RESP ! IHEAN RESP IMPACT OF THE CHANGE JNONE (LOU (MODERATE (HIGH (GREAT !NO RESP ! IMEAN RESP .........! ......... (FACULTY GRP MOST (STUOENT PROMOTINGIPROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY !NO RESP I (MODE RESP — -( (FACULTY ORP MOST (STUDENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP ! IMOOE RESP SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR 7 ! YES ! NO RESP ..... ESTIM ATEDI3-9 YRS TIME OF 16-10 YRS OCCUR !NO RESP ! (MODE RESP DEANS CHAIRPERS ! FACULTY N s 14 N * 27 X SSSSS9SS REL FREQ (PCT! ABS ADJ 00 7 43 43 7 0 14 21 50 7 7 ! ! ! ! ! ! 0 15 23 54 8 ! ! ! I ( 1 1 0 3. 5 0 0 21 43 29 ( 0 0 23 46 31 4 .0 00 00 7 0 11 22 33 30 4 00 00 0 1.0 0 15 22 44 11 7 0! | 0! 16 ! 24 1 48 ! 12 I ! 0 ! 3. 6 4 4 30 37 224 4 4 31 38 23 ! ! ! ! ! 0 II ! 89 0 92 ! •: 0 7 4 0 0 0! 4 1.0 SO 43 7 54 46 0 99 33 7 29 50 14 7 31 54 15 0 19 48 2.0 0! 1 12 ! 23 35 ! 31 I 3. 9 4 .0 93 100 ! REL FREQ (REL FREQ (PCT! ! (PCT! ABS ADJ ! ABS AOJ 0 0 8 46 46 0 4. 4 ! N s 51 ! _ 64 ! 36 ! 0 i •I* 21 ! 54 ( 22 250 !! 11 ! 2.0 ! 4 4 22 33 35 2 4 4 2? 34 36 0 3. 9 4 16 18 37 22 4 0 6 TOTAL I ! N s 98 ! ! rs x s s s s s ! 6 REL FREO (PCT! ABS AOJ s rs 0 0 17 17 0 0 33 33 50 50 0 0 17 33 90 0 17 33 90 0 4 .3 4 4 38 26 28 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 13 17 17 2 0 0 0 0 1.0 1.0 33 67 33 67 24 47 24 29 50 29 17 17 6 2.0 0 0 0 83 0 2.0 2 14 19 41 18 5 3 3 33 33 26 3 91 0 4 1 0 4 •! 2! IS! 20! 43! 19! 01 ( ( 3! 3! 34! 34! 26! 0!! i ! 99! 0! 4! 1! 0! 0! ! . . . . . . . (1 74 26 0 0 1.0 73 25 2 6 3 .0 1000 1000 0 0 REL FREO! ( PCT> ! ABS ADJ! i ssxs ! 2 2! ! 6 1 9! 18 35 36! 36 3T! ! 3 ! ! 4 .0 3 .6 4 .0 3 .0 92 N s 4 .2 4 16 18 39 22 0 3. 6 4 4 37 25 27 O .I.R . 0 0 83 0 63 33 4 66! 34! 0! *21”"*23T 90 21 7 2.0 54! 231 0! ! ! 142 #9 Faculty will be more socially concerned CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : j—. VARIABLE ! I ! ! DEANS » ! VALUE ! ! CHAIRPERS! FACULTY ! O . I . R . ! N s 14 ! __ 9 — sss I ! ! : s I s I ! I I I ! N = 98 ! I I 1s s s s s s s s ! ! I t TOTAL IREL FREQ IREL FREQ IREL FREQ IREL FREQ IREL FREQ! ? CPCTI I CPCT) I CPCT) I CPCT) I CPCT) I I ABS AOJ I ABS AOJ I ABS AOJ I ABS AOJ I II It II II I SS2 Is S S S i I 7 B ! 7 I 90 98 ! 30 INONE LIK E LIH D ILOU ------OF IMODERATE I OCCUR (HIGH IGREAT I I NO RESP I I I I 29 0 0 14 33 ! 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! 41 7 36 ! 0 19 I MEAN RESP! IMPACT OF THE CHANGE INONE ILOU IMODERATE IHIGH I GREAT I NO RESP 20 ! I IMEAN ■!« RESP! I IMOOE !■ RESP! IFACULTY I GRP MOST I STUDENT I PROMOTING!PROVOST I THIS 1ST ♦ FEO I CHANGE {COMMUNITY! I NO RESP ! I !FACULTY ! GRP MOST ! STUOENT ! HINDERING!PROVOST I THIS 1ST ♦ FEO I CHANGE {COMMUNITY! !NO RESP ! ! 29 ! 93 ! 11 ! 21 12 !! 12 ! 67 100 ! 0 0! 0 0! ! IMOOE RESP! SHOULO I T ! NO l‘ OCCUR T ! YES ! ! NO RESP ! *!• !0-2 YRS ESTIMATED!3«9 YRS TIME OF !6-l0 YRS OCCUR !NO RESP ! ! I ! ! ! IMOOE RESP! 67 100 ! 33 0 ! 61 ! ABS ACJi 143 #10 There will be « change In retirement patterns; more early retirement will occur. CHANGE STATEMENT DEANS N: 1* NUMBER ! 10 VARIABLE VALUE CHAIRPERS IREL FREO I (PCT) I ABS AOJ I I INONE ! LIK E LIH D ILOU ------OF IMODERATE I OCCUR I HIGH IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESP! ►!* INONE IMPACT ILOU OF THE IMODERATE CHANGE I HIGH IGREAT I NO RESP I (MEAN RESP! •!• ■I(FACULTY ! GRP MOST ! STUDENT ! PROMOTING! PROVOST ! THIS 1ST * FED 1 CHANGE (COMMUNITY! !NO RESP ! IMODE RESP! . . . . . . . . . ^. . . . . . . . . ^. GRP MOST ISTUOENT ! HINDERING!PROVOST ! THIS 1ST ♦ FED ! CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! !NO RESP ! ! ! IMODE RESP! 15 21 23 31 8 23 0 *? Z1? 3 .0 0 21 50 21 REL FREO I PCT) ABS ADJ 4 46 15 27 2 *9 0 23 54 23 3 .0 !IS S SS SSS SS) ! e”s’5‘ 1 0 35 38 12 13 20 21 18 19 0 41 37 4 4 42 38 4 0 IS 15 3 .3 2 2 14 IS 55 60 20 21 2 2 8 0 3 .1 21 23 19 19 41 64 69 44 33 0 4 46 35 43 4 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 71 77 7 14 0 7 8 15 0 1.0 63 4 IS 7 7 4 65 4 15 8 8 0 21 7* 7S 59 4 62 0 ! 0 - 2 YRS ! ESTIM ATEDI3-5 YRS ! TIME OF 16-10 YRS ! OCCUR !NO RESP ! ! ! IMODE RESP! 7 43 43 7 4 52 37 7 4 56 40 0 2 .0 8 46 46 0 2.0 2 53 2 10 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 45 I ! 47 ! 4 ! 2 ! ! ! ! 3 .0 1. 0_ 23 2 33 17 0 24 1.0 43 47 17 ! 33 ! 33 ! l l *! 0 ! ! 2 .5 ! .f. 17 0 17 ! H 0 0 0 ! 0 ! 0 ! ! I 3 0! 83 ! 3 .0 8! 39! 2 .9 2 16 49 24 26 3 .1 31 1 49 I —I 2! 1. 7 ! 52! 26! 2! 0! ! ! -! 33! 1! 52! 11 12 2!! 0! 3 .0 ! 69 ! ”*67’ " st" ! ” " ? 9 " " 6 9 ! 0 ! 2 2! 3 ! !' 0 13 ! ! 9 ! 17 17 ! ! 17 17 ! 5 I 5 ! 14 0 ! 0 0 ! ! I ! ,o ! ! ! .(.... ........i 37 4 0 ! 17 ■ "? ? "! 48 ! 56 6 0 ! 83 52 ! 8o 0 ! 7 0! 0 0 10 12 11 60 1.0 1 \ 0 10 -!* 20 ! 10 12 29 35 33 40 ! 45 16 7 37 22 ! 0 I 20 17 18! 12 13! 6 0 !I 17 I 0 I I I 0 8 10 4 0I 50 I 33 I 0 2.8 ■!■ 8 3 .0 3 .0 0 0 50 33 0 17 2 .9 0 SHOULD*??! “ no ” ” " " ” " !* OCCUR 7 ! YES ! ! NO RESP ! ■!• ! I TOTAL I I N s 98 I I ________ I sjs s s s s s s s s s Is s s s s s ! I I REL FREO IREL FREG I REL FREQ! (PCT) I (PCT) . ... . (PCT) I ABS ADJ I ABS AOJ I ABS AOJ! I I 6 N r 27 4 44 15 26 7 4 I FACULTY I O .I.R * I IN s N s 51 S3 0 33 17 2.0 40 I 8 38 42 0 !! 12 ! 3 .0 9! 43! 48! 0!! .*! 144 #11 There will be greater value placed on research and oubltcation of a national scope. NUMBER S 11 j--==-= ! VARIABLE ! ! VALUE _____ I________ ” INONE LIKELIH O ILOU OF IMODERATE OCCUR .HIGH IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESP IMPACT OF THE CHANGE INONE ILOU IMODERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESP I FACULTY GRP MOST ISTUOENT PROMOTING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE I COMMUNITY INO RESP IMODE RESP . . . . . . . . . ^. . . . . . . . . GRP MOST (STUDENT HINDERINGI PROVOST THIS 1ST * FED CHANGE I COMMUNITY INO RESP IMODE RESP CKAIRPERS Ij FACULTY DEANS N s 1A N = 27 REL FREQ (PCT) ABS ADJ ==== 7 14 14 50 7 7 8 15 15 54 8 0 3 .4 7 8 23 38 31 7 0 0 2 .9 14 0 64 14 0 7 3 .0 71 14 00 0 14 26 26 19 15 11 0 I I ■!■ 0 I 11 46 12 41 30 7 I I 33 I I I I 11 I 0 0 59 7 0 7 7 19 ! ! REL FREOI I CPCT) ! I ABS ADJI ! I I ========! 6 7! 3 .2 0 24 33 33 8 0 . !$ 34 8 3 .3 |I . . . .3..0. . . 73 9 0 9 9 0 I I I I I I I I 43 50 7 46 54 0 67 11 I 75 I I 1 0 -2 YRS ESTIMATEO!3 -5 YRS TIME OF 18-10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP I IMODE RESP 36 36 14 14 42 42 17 0 11 48 22 19 14 59 27 0 1.0 I SK SSSSSl 18 18 0 250 II 63 2 642 62 I 110 120 II 124 12 4 11 0 II 2 0 SHOULD” IT !"N O OCCUR ? I YES I NO RESP . . . . . . . . . j. . . . . . . . . 6 _ ____ 22 1.0 1.0 208 208 22 22 0 ! I I N s 98 I I TOTAL 1I 56 3 .0 83 17 0 0 N = REL FREO (PCT) ABS ADJ SSSSJ ssssssss : : : : : : : : : 4 1 0 0 29 I 29 I 33 33 21 I 17 I 18 18 0 I 3 .3 15 0 69 15 I O .I.R . REL FREQ IREL FREG I PCT I I IPCT) ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ 3 .2 21 36 29 0 I I N = 51 I I========= II It It *11 It CHANGE STATEMENT 2.0 0 S3 14 4 14 4 12 1.0 60 16 4 16 4 0 45 47 51 53 4 0 10 11 55 25 61 10 280 2.0 53 50 I 581 145 #12 There will be greater competition with Industry for highly qualified faculty* CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 12 N s :========!========= VALUE VARIABLE (NONE LIK E LIH D (LOU OF (MODERATE OCCUR (HIGH (GREAT (NO RESP » IMPACT OF THE CHANGE DEANS 0 29 14 29 7 0 ! FACULTY GRP HOST (STUDENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS (ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP ! IMODE RESP 1----------------SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR 7 ! YES I NO RESP ------- (0 -2 YRS ESTINATED I3-5 YRS TIME OF !6 - 1 0 YRS OCCUR (NO RESP ! (MODE RESP 0 36 ! N = 27 7 7 19 37 15 15 18 36 21 3 .1 (FACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT PROMOTING!PROVOST THIS !ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY INO RESP ! IMOOE RESP ( ! REL FREO (REL FREQ CPCT) ! ( ABS ADJ ( O .I.R . 50 33 0 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 60 40 17 l 53 " ? ! 46! 126 IB! 9! 0! 32 32 >0 3 .0 38 62 0 33 50 17 14 54 22 0 33 33 17 40 ! 60 ! 0 ! 17 20 2.0 1 3! Is 321 33 381 14 17! 14 0! ! . . 3. .6 . . . . II 30 35! 0! 0 4 5! 7! 6 44 52! 0! 16 ! 5, ,0 ! 40 40 0 I I ! 49! 51! 0! 1 24! 521 24! 42 43 15 18 40 18 23 ,0 01! ! 146 #13 Temporary faculty will make up a larger percentage of the total faculty. CHANGE STATEMENT I I ICHAIRPERS! t ! DCANS I VARIABLE ! ! FACULTY O .I.R . 1 TOTAL I I N = 27 I N =51 I ! IsssssssssISSSSSSSS3 NUMBER ! VALUE I IREL FREQ IREL FREQ IREL FREQ I (PCT) I CPCT) ! CPCT) ! ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ I INONE LIK E LIH D ILOU OF -----IMODERATE I I HIGH OCCUR IGREAT INO RESP 28 I REL FREQ IREL FREQ! CPCT) CPCT) I ABS ADJ I ABS AOJ! 50 50 I IMEAN RESPI INONE ILOU IMODERATE I HIGH IGREAT INO RESP IMPACT OF THE CHANGE I I I I I I I IMEAN RESP! !■ ■!----— TY GRP MOST ! STUDENT I PROMOTINGI PROVOST I THIS 1ST ♦ FED I CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! INO RESP I I . . . . . . — I IMOOE RESP! 1- 7 7 50 29 0 88 0 0 0 83 17 0 0 3 .0 86 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 I I IMODE RESP! 0 1 . . . j. . . . . . . . . |. I T ! NO I 43 50 7 I YES 1 43 50 0 . . jI . .NO . . RESP . . . . . |I . 14 I FACULTY I GRP MOST I STUDENT I HINDERINGI PROVOST I THIS 1ST ♦ FED I CHANGE ICOMMUNITY1 INO RESP I ....... SHOULO OCCUR ....... 1 0 -2 YRS I ESTINATEOI3 -5 YRS I TIME OF 1 6 -1 0 YRS I OCCUR INO RESP I I IMOOE RESP! 43 43 0 14 1 .0 SO 50 0 0 4 I 4 36 I 16 41 28 I 20 I l? 0 I I I 3 .5 31 3 .1 0 0 71 14 0 14 4 33 26 11 12 I 54 I 1 I I I I I I 4 0 67 19 0 11 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 4 0 75 21 0 0 ’ !■ I I I I 1 1 I 1 6 \t 17 46 26 0 3 .8 7 2 67 20 4 0 100 100 63 71 15 17 11 12 0 0 0 0 0 11 1. 0 74 80 19 20 7 0 75 86 6 7 4 5 2 2 0 0 14 0 1. 0 78 87 12 13 10 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1. 0 50 so 50 50 0 0 If 22 33 29 16 3 .0 11 2.0 I I I I 1 I i I 1 I I 21 I 71 I 80 II I I 6 2 59 18 4 12 3 .0 2.0 26 40 35 0 17 83 17 83 0 0 0 0 2.0 I I ! I I I I I 1 I I 74 7 5 1 0 12 1 70 20 9 23 46 17 27! S3! 20! 147 #14 Faculty will be Increasingly dissatisfied with their career. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 14 VALUE _ _ _ _ _ T_ _ _ tNoiic LIK E LIH D f LOU OF {MODERATE OCCUR (HIGH (GREAT !NO RESP I (MEAN RESP IMPACT OF THE CHANGE ! N s 14 N s 27 I N s 51 ! N = 6 ! ________ N s 98 ! ! INONE ILOU IMODERATE (HIGH IGREAT INO RESP (MEAN RESP ■I REL FREO (PCT > ABS ADJ ! IREL FREO ! (PCT) I ABS ADJ ! REL FREQ! (PC T) J ABS ADJ! ! T I 36 21 29 0 7 INODE RESP 38 23 31 IS 4 0 29 21 29 12 ! 15 38 19 15 0 0 31 23 31 26 Xl 4 u ! ! 62 I 0 ! 8 ! 8 ! 23 ! 0 ! 1.0 27 9 45 0 18 0 SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR ? ! YES ! NO RESP 93 100 0 0 7 0 7 8 57 67 21 25 14 0 2. 0 1 ! ! ! I ! 3 .0 27 f 42 I 19 ! ! 33 14 14 16 0 17 17 33 33 0 0 3 .2 0 17 17 33 33 t 37 7 7 22 15 42 ! 41 19 22 0 7 11 46 21 25 0 8 0 8 ! 8 ! 25 ! 17 ! 0 ! 11 i 1. 0 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 85 88 11 12 4 0 15 17 52 58 22 25 0 11 2. 0 71 21! 35! 13 9 0! 20 22! 1 5! 0 3 .8 33 24 3 .2 10 40 28 23 50 50 0 3. 6 27 37 6 8 22 29 18 24 2 3 0 25 1. 0 45 61 12 16 14 18 3 2 2 3 25 0 1.0 ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 ! ! 6 19 32 1 0 ( 20 16 1.0 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! I IB 20 39 18 20 {S S S S S S S S i 0! 12 ! 3. 7 3 .3 ! f ! t 0I 3 .1 2i7 36 0 14 21 !0 -2 YRS E STIH ATED I3-5 YRS TIME OF 16-10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP ! (MODE RESP 15 37 19 00 (FACULTY GRP MOST ! STUDENT HINOERING!PROVOST THIS ! ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP ! IMODE RESP . . . . . . . . . |. . . . . . . . . 11 2 .8 ! FACULTY GRP MOST ISTUOENT PROMOTING!PROVOST 1ST ♦ FED THIS CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP I REL FREO ! REL FREO (PCT) ! (PCT) ABS ADJ 1 ABS ADJ ! =ssssssss| - s . -- B TOTAL I ssssssssst S K 3 S 3 S S S I VARIABLE I ! ! CHAIRPERSI FACULTY I O . I . R . DEANS 80 95 4 5 0 16 8 11 51 70 14 19 27 0 2. 0 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! I ! ! ! ! ! 28 31 20 1.0 1 100 100 0 0 1 ! 0 0 ! 50 60 1 33 40 ! 0 0 ! 17 0 ! ! 1. 0 -I 1! 111 31! 34! 23! 0! 10 ! 3 .7 ! 50 50 4. 5 33 50 0 0 17 25 17 25 0 0 33 0 1. 0 33 50 0 0 17 25 17 25 0 0 33 0 ! ! .......I 35 5 15 17 43! 6! 191 22! 19 01 8 10! 1.0 ! ! ! ! ! ! 40 12 19 2 5 21 1.0 85 5 10 3! 6! 0! ! ! 94! 60!! i r ’ is i 51 16 20 2.0 64! 21! 0! ! ! 148 <15 The average age of faculty group will pass an acceptable level. DEANS NUMBER : 15 s s s s s s s s s ): : : : : : : : : ::::::::: I MEAN RESP 1— — — IMPACT OF THE CHANGE INONE ILOU IMOOERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I . . . . . . . . . {MEAN I RESP {FACULTY GRP MOST ! STUDENT PROHOTING!PROVOST THIS !S T ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY ! NO RESP ! IMODE RESP . !FACULTY- . GRP MOST {STUDENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS 1ST • FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP i IMODE RESP REL FREO CPCT) ABS ADJ 7 14 7 29 21 21 II l|» II II . INONE L IK E LIH D ILOU OF {MODERATE OCCUR (HIGH IGREAT !NO RESP N s 27 18 9 36 27 0 3. 5 3. 4 36 0 7 21 0 36 0 57 14 0 29 56 0 11 33 0 0 “ 19 31 19 19 12 0 11 19 11 11 7 41 4 26 15 11 4 41 6 44 25 19 6 0 37 4 7 7 4 41 62 6 12 12 6 0 1. 0 3. 0 REL FREO CPCT) ABS AOJ 7 26 7 0 44 12 IS 12 a 45 11 21 32 21 14 0 2 8 16 IB 6 51 4 16 32 36 0 27 0 10 6 0 57 64 0 23 14 0 0 1. 0 “ 27“ 13 47 13 0 0 3. 0 18 2 2 57 41 5 5 0 0 87 12 0 51 100 0 0 49 0 1 0 -2 YRS ESTIM ATED I3-5 YRS TIME OF 1 6 -10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP 7 36 29 29 10 50 40 0 19 22 19 41 31 37 31 0 0 IB 2. 0 2. 0 33 0 33 33 0 13 14 10 41 2 0 0 0 0 SO 100 0 0 0 0 50 0 17 0 0 17 0 67 27 55 3. 0 17 0 0 67 0 13 19 14 6 45 50 0 0 50 0 0 50 0 0 0 39 61 0 0 0 0 33 100 67 0 3 .0 ! ! —! 4! 24! 35! 26! 11! 0! ! 2 ! --- 1 ! 31 6 1 ! ! 1 21 ! e 16! ! 9 18! 2! ! 0! ! 50 I ! ! 1( .0 . . Ij ■!------ 50 100 ! 0 0 ! 50 0 ! 0 22! 24! 171 ~ 0! 3 .1 13 5 26 5 1 50 1 .0 3. 0 52 7 41 ! 17 0 17 17 50 I ______ ! *= 7 121 1* 24! ~~lb“” 3 6 * " * 1 7 ~ * 5 0 ! 6 14 0 0 91 9 IMODE RESP REL FREQ IREL FREO! I CPCT) ! CPCT) ABS AOJ I ABS ADJ! 1 .0 71 7 21 ...... 6 3 .0 SHOULO I T ! NO OCCUR 7 ! YES ! NO RESP ! I TOTAL 3 .6 3. 4 . . . . . 0 80 20 0 0 N s 3. 0 2. 7 1. 0 T REL FREO CPCT) ABS ADJ 2. 7 0 20 40 20 20 0 0 14 29 14 14 29 N s 51 I I I I I I N = 98 I I I IS S S S S S S S l I I O .I.R . ssszssxss H VALUE N = 14 II II II Oh II VARIABLE CHAIRPERS! FACULTY II II II O il 11 II H o il CHANCE STATEMENT 54 3 43 6 20 26 46 27! 10! 51! 10! 2! 0! ! 0 ! ...| 95! 5! 0! -----! 12! 39! 49! 0! ! 0 ! .... 149 #16 Opportunities to add younger faculty will decrease. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 16 » ! VARIABLE ! ! ! VALUE rla aaaaaaa a ! NONE LIK E LIH D ILOU OF IMOOERATE OCCUR I HIGH IGREAT INO RESP I I MEAN RESP IMPACT OF THE CHANGE INONE ILOU IMODERATE IH1GH (GREAT INO RESP (MEAN RESP (FACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT PROMOTING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY !NO RESP ! IMOOE RESP DEANS N a 14 t (MODE RESP I_________ FACULTY O .I.R . N a 51 N = aaaaaaaaa I REL FREG IREL FREO REL FREO (PCT ) I (PCT) (PCT) ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ ABS ADJ I _________ 0 14 7 36 29 14 0 .(_ -17 I 19 8 42 33 0 19 „ 26' 19 15 I I I I 3 .9 0 7 21 14 43 14 36 0 7 29 14 14 19 41 19 15 ! 50 I 0 ! I 4 2 30 4 22 26 0 19 0 8 33 1 7 0 SO 21 } 0 0 7 0 30 7 26 4 7 26 3 .0 86 100 0 0 14 0 ! 0 -2 YRS ESTIMATEDI3-S YRS TIME OF 16-10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP ! IMODE RESP 14 43 29 14 ! I ! ■! * 17 I 50 ! 33 ! 0 ! ! 74 11 15 0 4 27 35 25 8 30 38 28 0 36 5 27 32 I I REL FREO IREL FREQ! (PCT) I (PCT) I ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ! I I 50 50 50 50 0 17 0 50 33 0 0 50 60 16 0 *1 17 40 0 0 1.0 39 48 22 4 26 5 *8 18 0 IS 21 0 0 1.0 82 6 12 93 7 22 27 44 55 15 18 19 0 16 45 22 18 19 55 26 0 2.0 0 0 17 17 33 16! 18! 39! 25! 0! 21 2 01 1.0 40 10 35 5 14 16 35 22 10 2! 0! 7! 22 2 5 ! 35 3 9 ! 27 30! 10 0! ! 3 .9 ! •! 32 38! 3 4! 26! 2 6 30! ! 2 16 ! 1.0 I *! 33 4 1 ! 50 33 35 5 33 28 0 2 3 .7 0 17 0 4 .0 0 I sIaaaaaaaa | 29 4 27 24 0 I aaaaaaaa: sisra a a a a a l 4 .5 0 4 B7 13 0 2.0 6 15 20 40 21 20 21 3 .9 1.0 SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR ? ! YES I NO RESP 2.0 22 48 22 0 1.0 27 0 64 14 37 3 *6 3 .9 1.0 21 22 22 30 22 0 3 *4 8 I I TOTAL I I I I N a 98 I I I -- 0 4 .1 ■!■ ! FACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT HINDERING(PROVOST THIS 1ST • FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY INO RESP ICHAtRPERS 1 I N a 27 20 20 40 12 28 5 IT 20 0 17 2 20 15! 35! 6! 3! 0! I 3 .0 1.0 100 100 0 0 0 0 I 8 2 9 3 ! 33 50 0 17 2.0 40 60 I ! ! 6 7! 18 45 19 17 22! 54! 23! 0! 12 2.0 0! >! 150 #17 There w i l l be more a c c o u n ta b ility w ith regard to teaching m ission. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 17 ______________ f VARIABLE I ! I VALUE ! IMPACT OF THE CHANGE N s 51 ! IREL FREO ! CPCT) ! ABS AOJ I REL FREO CPCT) ABS ADJ REL FREO CPCT) ABS AOJ I I I 1 I ■!« ■!■ IMEAN RESP! IFACULTY I GRP MOST ISTUOENT I PROMOTINGIPROVOST I THIS 1ST ♦ FED I CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! !ND RESP ! I IMODE RESP! 0 7 SO 14 217 0 8 54 15 23 0 3 .5 57 7 62 23 08 57 21 7 7 62 23 8 7 0 7 0 ! 0 -2 YRS ESTIM ATEDI3-5 YRS TIME OF 1 6 -10 YRS OCCU INO RESP 36 43 14 7 38 46 15 0 ! IMODE RESP! l* lS 0 00 15 33 37 7 7 0 00 0 0 0 7 16 36 40 1000 44 2 .0 0 0 0 0 48 4? ’ § 41 48 4 7 2.0 2 &» 31 33 8 8 2 19 34 36 9 0 4 16 37 25 10 8 4 17 40 28 11 0 3. 0 1.0 1.0 0 15 23 37 25 0 3. 3 0 4 .0 3 .0 92 ! ! ! ! 52 24 0 7 !> iE il 48 22 0 14 22 35 24 6 3. 7 3 .4 3 .3 86 ? 32 28 0 3 .8 IFACULTY’ * ! * GRP MOST ISTUOENT I HINDERING!PROVOST ! THIS 1ST ♦ FED ! CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! INO RESP I ! ! IMODE RESP! *!* ■!« SHOULD I T ! NO ! OCCUR ? ! YES I I NO RESP ! ... sssssssss 8 32 7 30 30 26 7 44 52 4 0 ! i TOTAL I I N s 98 I N s 6 _________ I _______ I ! FACULTY N s 27 ! • CHAIRPERS ! N = 14 j ______^ ___ INONE I LIK E LIH D ILOU I OP IMODERATE I OCCUR I HIGH I IGREAT I INO RESP I I I IMEAN RESP! INONE ILOU IMODERATE {HIGH IGREAT INO RESP DEANS 80 6 2 2 0 89 7 35 43 40 49 2.0 0 11 0 0 1 11 1201 ! ! ! ! ! ! 0 0 67 17 17 0 2 0 0 67 17 17 0 13 41 28 9 7 100 100 0 0 17 86 3 2 1 0 8 1.0 17 33 60 7 880 8S0 33 67 0 0 2.0 I 21 14! 44! 30! 10! 0! I . .3..0. . . ! ! 3. 0 1.0 34 66 10 0 0 0 0 31 61 12 REL FREQ I REL FREO! CPCT) ! CPCT) I ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ! I ! =====*==? 0 0 ! ! 0 ! 0 10 11! 17 17 28 2 9 ! ! ! 33! 33 33 31 ! 50 50 26 2 7 ! 0 0! ! 6 0 ! I 4. 3 3 .8 ! ! 0 I 0 II 17 17 14 15! I 40 I 33 33 43! 291 0 0 27 ! ! 50 SO ! I 0 0 7 ! ! 3 .4 I 3. 8 ! 10 1.0 8 O .I.R . 93! 3! 21!! 0! 0!• ! ■! 35! 65! 0! *37” 4o| 33 67 46 0 0 89 ! 51! 9! 0!! 2.0...! 151 #18 There will be a greater number of faculty exchanges and jo in t appoint* ments between colleges and departments. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 18 ! VARIABLE I f I VALUE INONE LIK E LIH D ILOU OF {MODERATE OCCUR IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESP IMPACT OF THE CHANGE INONE ILOU IMOOERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP IMEAN RESP I FACULTY GRP ROST ISTUOENT PROMOTINGIPROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP IMODE RESP ......... ......... GRP MOST ISTUOENT HINDERINGI PROVOST THIS 1ST * FEO CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP I IMOOE RESP >!* SHOULO I T ! NO OCCUR 7 I YES I NO RESP •I* 1 0 -2 YRS ESTIM ATED I3-5 YRS TIME OF 1 6 -10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP IMODE RESP I I ICHAIRPERSt FACULTY DEANS N s 14 ! N s 27 I I* ! . I N s 51 I I O .I.R . I I N s 6 I I I TOTAL I I I I I N s 98 I I I I S 3 3 S S 3 S 3 I ======== ! I I I I REL FREO IREL FREO IREL FREO IREL FREQ IREL FREQ! I (PCT) ' I (PC T) I (PC T) I IPCT ) (PCT) ! ABS ADJ I ABS AOJ I ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ I ABS AOJ! I I I I I !========= t=: I 21 21 14 T 23 23 15 0 0 0 4 11 48 17 58 17 8 0 11 7 19 s .i 3 .2 33 I I 67 I ! I 14 0 ! I I 3 .0 !■ ’57*” 73' I 7 9 I 7 I 7 I ! 0 I ! I 29 0 57 00 0 00 21 1.0 •!■ 21 64 14 25 I 75 I 0 I 21 57 7 14 25 67 8 2.0 5 27 32 23 14 0 3 .2 3 .1 14 50 14 7 14 4 22 26 19 11 19 15 4 52 0 4 26 5 14 59 14 9 0 I I I I I I I I 2 24 ~ 27 25 B 14 ! ! I I I I 4 27 33 18 i 20 I 5 I 70 ! 0 5 0 3 .0 56 4 110 0 30 79 5 16 I 0! 0I 0I 1.0 26 56 19 22 44 7 26 2.0 2 != I 27 I 32 30 5 I 33 I 40 21 20 2.8 31 2 20 1.0 32 I 68 I 0 I ■I* 30 I 60 I 24 59 18 29 I 71 I 0 I 18 S3 22 67 100 II 228 100 I I 2.0 0 20 60 20 17 0 0 I 4! 27! 32! 14 HI 0! 3 .1 20 II 17 20 SO 0 0 17 3 23 28 229 0 4 20 41 14 4 16 60 2 .9 I I ■! 5! 241 491 17! 51 01 I . . . . . . . II 2 .4 39 I I 51 I 4 5 I I 2 I I I 3 .0 I39 61 I 2 3 I 20 30 I 4 6 I 0 I I 35 I 2 41 0 17 50 17 I========!1 3 .0 3 .2 2 16 Ei 31! 3! 62! 3! 3! 0! 17 0 I ! I ! _ 3 .0 __ ! 3 .0 -I I■ "iso*” ?' ! 47 691 3 4! o o ! o o I 14 2 1 ! 4 6! 17 25 ! 0 ! 0 I ! 32 33 ! ! ! 00 83 0 0 00 II 100 I 0! 0I 24 2 49 22 20 00 1.0 ! 33 40 ’ ! ' 50 60 ! 17 0 I 17 50 17 17 2.0 20 60 20 0 1.0 • I! 24 301 70! 17 0 ! •I 19 2 5 ! 51 65! 58 218 10 0!! I 2.0 ! #19 Faculty will demand salary adequate to keep up with Inflation. CHANGE STATEMENT DEANS CHAIRPERS FACULTY 0 .I.R . I I TOTAL 1 N = 27 N s 14 N s 51 N s 6 N = 98 I I s ls s s s s s s s s ========= ========= ========= ========= ========! I I ! REL FREO REL FREQ REL FREQ REL FREQ REL FREQ! VALUE 1PCT ) (PCT) (PCT) I VARIABLE I CPCTl (PCT) ABS ADJ ABS ADJ! I ABS AOJ ABS AOJ ABS AOJ I I .... -j INONE "*‘ o"s * r ■” o o ' o " V * “ o ~ s o” 7 8 LIKELIH D ILOU 7 8 0 0 6 6 6 71 OF 14 15 14 15 IMODERATE 7 8 0 0 11 12! IHIGH OCCUR 43 46 41 46 25 28 0 0 31 34! IGREAT 29 31 33 37 47 51 83 100 43 47! 7 0 INO RESP 11 0 17 0 9 0! 8 0 I I 4 .1 IMEAN RESP 4 .2 4 .2 1 4 .0 5 .0 NUMBER 1 19 It 11 II 11 II* •1 II II IMPACT OF THE CHANGE INONE ILOU IMODERATE IHIGH (GREAT INO RESP 0 21 14 43 14 7 IMEAN RESP S3 100 81 0 00 0 0 7 0 0 IFACULTT GRP MOST (STUDENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP I IMOOE RESP 21 64 7 7 82 4 23 69 22 56 4 15 26 65 4 0 0 a o 0 0 4 .0 19 70 43 29 7 55 36 9 59 26 4 0 1.0 0 17 0 17 50 17 0 20 0 20 60 0 0 16 29 23 22 9 * 83 100 84 3 3 4 .2 206 0 10 1.0 2 2 2 2 31 34 47 51 10 11 8 0 4 .0 11 11 0 17 40 19 23 0 3 .4 4 IS 85 0 1.0 *2 0 0 7 00 11 1.0 14 79 7 21 0 16 37 18 22 8 0 4 .0 • 0 17 29 29 25 0 3 .6 1.0 RESP SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR ? I YES I NO RESP f 1 0-2 YRS ESTIMATEO!3 -5 YRS TIME OF 16-10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP I IMOOE RESP 0 15 26 26 22 11 3 .5 (FACULTY GRP POST ISTUOENT PROMOTING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY INO RESP i IMODE I 0 23 15 46 15 0 67 29 4 13 87 59 24 67 27 0 6 12 1.0 0 17 1.0 67 17 17 80 20 0 0 0 0 83 100 17 0 33 50 40 60 17 0 0 2.0 0 931 3! 31 0 001! 10 01I 1.0 f1 21 2I t! §6 2 8 t 3 59! 108 9! 0! 4 .0 4 .0 12 80 8 00 00 0! 18! 31! 26! 25! 0! ! 3 .6 ! I I ........I 13 78 9 151 85! 01 55 27 5 13 64! 31! 6! 0! I 1.0 I ...... 153 #20 There will be a concentration of faculty efforts on professional educa> tlon vs. general education. CHANGE STATENENT OEANS N s 14 NUMBER : 20 it* ! ! REL FREO IPCT) VARIABLE I VALUE t ABS ADJ ! :!= s s s s s s s s ! NONE 0 0 LIK E LIH D ILOU 14 25 7 (MODERATE OF IHIGH OCCUR 96 62 fGREAT INO RESP 43 ! IMEAN RESP 9 .3 0 IMPACT OF THE CHANGE in o n I " ” ” "* ILOU IMOOERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP IMEAN RESP 0 14 14 29 7 36 29 14 7 14 0 36 IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUDENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP I INODE RESP 43 7 14 0 0 36 SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR 7 I YES I NO RESP 50 14 36 10 -2 YRS ESTIM A TE 0I3-5 YRS TIME OF 16-10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP I IMODE RESP 29 29 0 43 ------ 0 22 22 44 110 44 22 11 22 0 0 1. 0 !• 0 1.0 I FACULTY I O . I. R . I ! N s i N s 51 I IREL FREO I IPCT) I ABS AOJ I REL FREO IREL FREO (PCT) I IPCT) ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ I 0 26 12 0 0 3. 4 IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUDENT PROMOTING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHAN6E ICOMMUNITY INO RESP I IMODE RESP ! ICHAIRPERS I I N s 27 I :| s s s s r s s s s 11 11 33 19 I I I I I I I I I 67 11 22 0 0 0 0 n 41 4 19 2 II 12 27 25 16 14 41 14 0 14 33 31 19 3 .5 5 14 36 33 33 24 2* 12 14 1. 0 78 I 22 I 0I 52 30 19 64 36 0 51 31 18 50 I 50 I 19 56 4 24 71 5 33 37 44 49 24 0 1. 0 00 II 22 2.0 I 0 55 2 10 8 2 24 1. 2.0 72 3 13 10 3 0 8 33 I 50 1. 0 17 17 0 17 0 SO 1. 50 17 33 3 .4 14| 01I I —I 31 161 27 341 31 391 91 7 01 1 3 .4 I 21 26 0 II 20 13 33 0 33 0 ll I I 1 I I I I 0 I !■ 62 I 38 I 0 I 6 00 II 17 0 I 44. 11 15 0 4 26 I I I I I I I 25 I 33 0 IB I 11 0 II 22 3 .0 27 20 18 20 29 li 211 261 371 0 I if 25 I 50 I 17 10 120 18 I I 1 1 I I 1 I 60 15 20 0 5 0 50 I 25 I 0 I 0 17 3 .3 2. 0 33 3 .0 4 12 29 27 27 36 9 9 18 0 -0 25 - 0 II ”5 16 ll 33 0 IS 0 14 32 50 5 0 I REL FREQ1 IPC T) I I I ABS AOJ! I ! •IS S S S S S 2 S S ( 2 0 32 3.5 22 30 7 7 IS 19 N s 98 I :f szssssess! s s s s x s s s lI I I 3 .4 I I I I I TOTAL I I I I I 7 —I 331 261 171 91 11 141 22 01I I 1.0 1 —I I 48 81 1 6 I 11 I 5 l ?l 31 I 2 01 I 28 I I I I 0 1 ■I* 75 I ' v m \ 25 I 28 35! 0 I 0! 21 0 H 50 2.0 33 33 0 33 0 0 0I 67 I 33 I 0 II I 27 41 5 28 2.0 37! 56! 7! 01 I I 154 #21 Pressure for collective bargaining and unionization will Increase. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 21 VARIABLE VALUE DEANS IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESP IMPACT OF THE CHANGE INONE ILOU IMOOERATE IHIGH I6REAT INO RESP REL FREO CPCT) ABS AOJ REL FREO IPCT) ABS ADJ IMEAN RESP •I IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUOENT PROMOTING!PROVOST 1ST ♦ FEO T H IS . CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP IMOOE RESP IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUOENT HINDER IN G ! PROVOST THIS ! ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY ! NO RESP IMODE RESP SHOULO I T ! NO OCCUR ? ! YES ! NO RESP 1 0 -2 YRS ESTIM ATEDI3-5 YRS TIME OF 16-10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP ! IMODE RESP 0 0 B 23 21 46 43 21T 2o3 0 7 0 7 7 29 57 0 14 2.0 0 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 8 ! 0 ! ! ! ! ! 77 8 8 0 3 .0 86 0 92 8 0 33 67 0 7 8 22 23 30 31 37 38 4 0 4. 0 93 96 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 4 0 1. 0 11 12 0 0 78 81 7 0 4 3.0 ! ! ! I ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! 8 ! 0 I 0 ! 85 88 114 120 37 37 7 19 1.0 100 100 31 18 37 33 18 39 3 .9 S.B 0 15 15 1.0 7 0 71 7 7 7 REL FREO CPCT) ABS AOJ 4 4 26 27 56 68 114 120 3 .8 14 14 21 2! 43 46 7 0 4. 0 79 85 7 8 0 0 0 0 7 8 7 0 I O .I.R . I TOTAL I I I ! N a 27 N a 51 N a 6 I N a 98 1 ! I aaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaa ta a a a a a a a | I ! N a 14 ::::: LIKELIHD ILOU OF IMODERATE OCCUR IHIGH FACULTY CHAIRPERS 45 45 9 0 28 82 IB 19 20 21 47 50 6 0 REL FREQ IREL FREO! CPCT) I CPCT) I ABS ADJ ! ABS AOJ! ! ! aaaaaaaaa Ia a a a a a a a ! 0 0 07!! 27 28! 67 67 35 36! 28 29! 33 33 4 0! I 3 .9 ! 4 .3 00 17 50 33 0 00 17 50 33 0 ! 4. 1 4 .2 ! 78 85 100 100 ! 9 0 0 ! 8 0 0 0 0 ! 2 2 0 0 ! 4 4 0 0 ! 0 0 0 ! B ! 1. 0 ! 1. 0 I 14 15 ! 0 0 ! 2 2 ! 0 0 I 83 83 ! 63 70 I 9 ! 17 17 1 8 4 ! 4 0 0 ! 10 0 I 0 0 ! 3.0 75 81 18 19 8 0 3.0 67 67 ! 33 33 ! 33 43 10 14 39 50 110 17 67 17 2.0 0 0 2.0 0( 17 67 17 0 •I 1! 18 24 43 9! 19! 26! 451 0! ! 4 ) ! ...! 84 89! 5 5! 0 0! 2 2! 3! 3 6 0!! 1 ) ! —I 11 12! 1 1! 69 8 3 7 3 .0 9! 3! 0! ! ! ■! 79 84! 15 16! 6 0*!! 33 38! 45 52! 8 10! 14 0! ! 2.0 I 155 #22 There will be more women and minorities on the faculty. CHANGE STATEMENT DEANS NUMBER ! VARIABLE I ! ! VALUE JNONE LIK E LIH D ILOU OF ------IMODERATE I OCCUR IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP IMPACT OF THE CHANGE RESP! INONE ILOU IMODERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP 1 I I I I I IMEAN RESPI IFACULTY I GRP MOST ISTUOENT I PROMOTINGIPROVOST I THIS 1ST ♦ FED I CHANGE t CONMUNITYI INO RESP I I I . . . . . . . . . IMOOE | . . . . . RESPI ....|. IFACULTY I GRP MOST ISTUDENT I HINDERING!PROVOST I THIS 1ST ♦ FEO I CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! INO RESP I I ------ I. I INODE RESP! SHOULD I T ! NO I OCCUR 7 I YES I I NO RESP I ^- - - - - - - j - • E STIH ATED I3-5 YRS I TIME OF 16*10 YRS I OCCUR INO RESP I I I IMOOE RESPI 0 0 7 64 29 0 1 1 1 I I I 4 .2 4 11 30 26 30 0 39 29 7 7 I 30 30 1 41 41 1 19 I 19 44 I 0 0 1 I 2 .9 I 7 0 57 36 0 0 I I I I I I I 1 4 0 33 59 4 0 79 <• 85 1 0 0 I 0 I 0 8 1 7 7 8 » 7 0 I I 1 .0 1 74 4 7 4 0 11 14 I 86 1 0 I •1 57~’ 5 ? ' I 43 I 43 0 I 0 0 I 0 I 1.0 I 3 .0 14 86 6 20 49 12 8 6 I I I I I I I 1 10 2 24 55 4 6 83 4 8 4 0 0 I I I 1 1 I 1 I 65 4 6 0 0 25 26 74 0 26 I 74 I 0 I 22 71 26 70 0 4 27 73 0 0 4 .0 1 .0 G I I I I I 6 21 52 12 8 0 I i 2 .0 0 17 67 17 0 0 0 Ns 98 I I I I I I ssssssl I I I I I I I 17 67 17 0 0 0 sss: 29 2 3 .9 6 26 46 13 6 3 0 I 0 I 17 ! 83 I 0 I 0 I I 4 .0 I 7 1 31 55 3 3 87 5 8 0 0 0 83 0 0 17 0 0 0 33 67 0 83 0 0 17 0 0 1 .0 » 0 — *” ” * 33 50 SO 17 17 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 0 0 1 I 2 .0 1 I 2 21 7 7! 21 22! 39 401 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 0 0 17 83 0 0 1 " 37 " ' ii* I 41 46 1 12 13 I 10 0 I 17 17 33 33 17 0 2 .0 1 .0 1m 8 17' 33 33 10 2 » 58 4 0 4 .0 TOTAL REL FREO IREL FREO! IPCT) I IP C T) ! ABS ADJ I ABS AOJ! 3 .5 2 .9 4 0 33 59 4 0 2 .0 41 31 3 .9 I I 1 1 1 1 I I 7 0 57 36 0 0 N = 20 20 3 .7 3 .0 II : SI I oB""o ’ i 4 11 30 26 30 0 0 21 57 14 7 0 0 21 57 14 7 0 O .I.R . REL FREQ IPC T) ABS ADJ I 0 0 7 64 29 0 FACULTY ssssssssaf IREL FREO IREL FREO IPCT) I CPCT) I ABS AD«J I ABS AOJ I I I IMEAN ■I* ICHA1RPERS I ! N = 27 I :|sssssssss I 291 0! I I 6! 261 471 14! 6! 01 I 2 .8 I 7! 1! 32! 57! 31 0! I 4. 0 I 70 3 5 3 1 17 1 .0 85! 4! 6! 4! 11 0! I I 23! 77! 01 ... | 39! 50 531 7 8! 6 01 I 2. 0 ! 22 73 4 156 #23 Th«re w i l l be more s tr in g e n t review p r io r to a tta in in g tenure and prom otion. I I I I NUMBER ! 23 N x 14 N x 51 N s 6 N x 98 I I _x =— J x x s x x x s s s s IXKXXXXXXX x x s x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x ! I I f REL FREQ IREL FREO REL FREQ REL FREQ REL FREQ1 VARIABLE f VALUE (PCT) I (PCT) (PCT) (PCT) (PC T) I ! ABS AOJ I ABS ADJ ABS ADJ ABS AOJ ABS ADJI f I :!========= :s x x x x s !========= x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x ! (NONE I LIK E LIH D ILOU 0 0 I 2 2 1 7 7 91 OF 19 19 (MODERATE 9 IHIGH 43 43 471 OCCUR 45 47 48 50 SO 50 46 IGREAT 50 50 43 45 42! 41 30 31 50 50 INO RESP 0 0 4 0 4 0 ! 3 1 IMEAN RESP 4 .1 4 .4 4 .3 I 4 .5 4 .3 CHANGE STATEMENT DEANS 0 ICHAIRPERS I I N x 27 I 0 00 00 FACULTY 0 6 0 6 ! ! TOTAL 0 . I«R * 0 0 0 01 11 0 IMPACT OF THE CHANGE INONE ILOU IMODERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESP IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUOENT PRONOTINGIPROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP I IMODE RESP IFACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT HINDERINGIPROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP INODE RESP 0 0 50 36 14 0 0 0 50 36 14 0 93 I SHOULD” IT I T o ----------OCCUR 7 I YES I NO RESP 7 93 7 I 93 I (0 -2 YRS E STIN ATED I3-5 YRS TIME OF 1 6 -10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP I (MODE RESP 64 36 0 0 64 I 36 I 0 1.0 0 *!■I 0I 0 1I I 17 88 4 4 0 73 79 8 0 85 4 0 0 96 4 0 0 80 2 0 0 95 2 83 0 83 0 84 11 0 16 17 0 17 0 11 85 4 4 4 41 IB 2 60 2 60 0 !• £ ... 17 0 83 0 0 0 2 1.0 81 0 ff ft 17 83 0 17 83 0 44 52 0 4 46 54 0 0 49 35 6 54 39 7 67 33 67 33 2.0 10 1.0 0 0 0 0 1.0 2 01I I ■I 81 21 851 81 4 1 5 4! II 01 I I —I 2 0 0 3 94! 2! 01 0! 31 0! I 1. 0 ! 1.0 78 4 8 7 3 .0 3 .0 3 .0 01 4! 351 461 151 3 .7 3 .3 3 .8 0 4 0 0 —I 0 4 34 44 14 4 17 0 83 0 0 0 04 0 1.0 . . . . . . . . j. 0 17 0 13 0 3 .0 3 .0 93 0 0 0 7 6 0 12 12 3 .7 0 0 2 35 io n 4 100 100 I 00 0 I 0 2 33 44 19 11 3 .6 0 8 27 54 0 0 ’ la " ” ?! 77 81! . . 5. . . . .0!I 51 541 42! 6 01 40 3 1.0 31 I I 157 #24 More faculty members trill seek retraining as 1t becomes aooarant that their present specialty lacks career prospects. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 24 =========| ========= ! ! VARIABLE ! ! ! VALUE ========= I========= (NONE LIK E LIH D !LOU OF (MODERATE (HIGH OCCUR (GREAT (NO RESP ( (MEAN RESP :======: I=========(========: 0 57 21 0 57 I t 21 ( 147 14 0 0 36 36 0 ! 36 1 36 1 2\ 2\ \ IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUDENT PROMOTINGI PROVOST THIS (ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP 36 .lMODE.RESP . . . . . . . . . ^. . . . . . . . . 6RP MOST ISTUDENT HINDERING!PROVOST • THIS (ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP 0 1 ! 3. 0 ! 0 0 7 7 0 7 7 50 43 (MODE RESP 85 I 0 1 1 1.0 (0 -2 YRS ESTIHATED I3-5 YRS TIME OF ( 6 - 1 0 YRS OCCUR (NO RESP ! I 3 .0 79 21 ! I ! 0 IMOOE RESP ! SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR T I YES I NO RESP . . . . . . . . . f.. . . . . . . . 36 I I 43 1 0 0 210 21 II 43 79 0 0 2.0 4 37 30 15 0 15 2.6 2 .7 (NONE (LOU (MODERATE (HIGH (GREAT INO RESP I (MEAN RESP IMPACT OF THE CHANGE I I I ICHAIRPERS I FACULTY ! ! N s 2T N = 14 I l l : 51 I I =========II s s s s s s s s : ! REL FREQ IREL FREQ (REL FREQ (PCT) I (PCT) I (PCT) ABS ADJ I ABS AOJ I ABS AOJ I I DEANS 4 22 44 15 0 15 »!> I 2 i 20 41 i i 16 i 6 i 16 t i 30 .11. 7 15 35 13 9 0 1 I I I ( 2$ 1 .0 59 0 19 1 .0 15 15 41 30 15 2.0 0I I \ 18 2 23 49 19 7 0 ssszssss: ssssssss) 0 33 0 33 0 0 33 17 17 33 17 17 0 0 50 33 IT 0 0 0 50 33 17 0 50 0 0 75 3 14 6 3 0 0 0 1.0 25 0 0 0 1.0 33 67 33 67 10 43 12 17 33 50 17 33 50 3.0 45 0 0 3 .0 31 32 19 5 11 21 341 361 221 61 01 . . . . . . . . II 2 21 5! 12 21 241 481 201 61 01 I 1 ( 471 41 361 8 91 3 4( 13 0! 1 1.0 1 41 3 32 58 1 761 11 115 15! 7( 1 23 1! 0! I ! . . 1. .. 0. . . | 33 67 0 0 I 2 .......| *8 7o 17 0 0 33 ( 3 .0 50 0 0 0 N s 98 I 3 .0 50 1.0 26 I 27 74 ! 57 16 0 ! ■!■ 17 I 48 I 35 35 37 0 18 REL FREGI (PCT) ! ABS AOJ) SO 1 .0 53 2 10 4 2 29 REL FREQ (PCT) ABS AOJ 52 7 33 5 2 ! ========( 3 .7 |.. . . .. .. 73 I TOTAL N a 6 ========: 3 .2 3. 1 43 0 23 41 27 7 0 3 .1 43 ( 0 0 4 26 52 17 0 0 2 20 35 24 6 14 37 || 7 50 43 I 2. a 21 ! 79 1 2 4 43 I 3| I I ! I ! O .I«R « 0 0 26 62 29! 71! 11 39 37 13 13! 45! 42! 0! ! 12 . . . . . . 0. !I 2.0 ( ...... 158 #25 The q u a lity o f fa c u lty members t r i l l Increase r e la tiv e to present. CHANGE STATEMENT I NUMBER : 29 ! VALUE _ :::| ::::::::1 IREL FREO IREL FREO I (PCT) I (PC TI ‘ ABS AOJ I ABS AOJ REL FREO IREL FREO IREL FREO! (PCT) I (PCT) I (PCT) I ABS AOJ I ABS AOJ I ABS ADJ! I I I INONE ' LIK E LIH D ILOU OF --------IMODERATE I IHIGH OCCUR IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESPI ■!* IMPACT OF THE CHANGE INONE ILOU IMODERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I I ! I I I I I — IMEAN RESP! |FACULTr~"Y —— GRP MOST ISTUDENT ! PROMOTING!PROVOST ! THIS 1ST ♦ FEO I CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! INO RESP ! ! ! ________IMODE RESP! . . . . . . . . . ^. . . . . . . . . ^. GRP MOST ISTUOENT ! HINDERING!PROVOST ! THIS ! ST ♦ FED ! CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! INO RESP I ! ! IMOOE RESPI ■!« SHOULD I T ! NO ! OCCUR 7 ! YES ! 1 NO RESP 1 I 7 21 36 29 23 38 31 7 0 0 8 I 0 2 *9 7 7 36 43 0 8 I 8 ! 0I ! I 3 .2 29 0 50 7 0 14 ! 33 0 58 8 0 0 3. 0 50 7 0 7 21 14 ! 58 8 0 8 25 0 1. 0 ! IMODE RESP! ■!« I I I I I I ! I 2 .0 18 55 27 0 11 30 33 7 4 15 13 35 39 9 4 0 I I I I I I 2 .6 0 11 19 37 19 15 0 I 13 22 43 22 0 3 .7 22 15 30 11 0 22 16 24 43 8 2 8 2 .6 2 14 43 25 6 10 2 15 48 28 :==! === s s s I :!=s I 0 0 I 12 14! 90 75 I 27 30! I I 17 25 I 38 4 3 ! 0. 0 I 10 1 1 ! I 2 21 I 0 0 I 0! I 33 0 I 11 I I 2 .6 I I 2.2 —I 0I 0 2! 17 33 17 0 33 3 .2 29 19 38 14 0 0 3. 0 I I I I I I I I 41 52 I 4 5 I I ! 7 10 I I 26 33 I 0 I I • 0 0 1 I 22 I I 1. 0 I 0 0 I 86 100 I 14 0 I ! 0 -2 YRS ! 14 ESTIMATED!3 -5 YRS I 43 TIME OF 16-10 YRSI 21 OCCUR INO RESP I 21 ! I I I I I I I 38 I 46 I .( ..... ! I TOTAL I I N s 98 I I I tfs s s s s s s s s :=!===: VARIABLE • ! ICHAIRPERS I FACULTY I O . I . R . I ! N s 27 N s 91 ! OCANS 31 18 29 4 2 16 3 .0 37 21 35 5 2 0 1 .0 35 6 10 14 2 33 53 9 15 21 3 0 1. 0 I I I I I I I I 0 17 17 0 17 50 I I I I I I I ! 17 0 17 17 0 50 17 33 50 15 70 15 17 I 83 I 0 I 14 75 12 16 I 84 I 0 1 11 33 37 19 14 41 45 0 12 31 35 15 40 45 3 .0 22 3 .0 25 50 25 0 0 0 3 .0 12 0! ! .3 .3 — 1 27_ ” 3 3 ! 14 18! 32 39! 6 8! I I ! I ! 1 I I 38 5 8 16 4 29 33 I 67 I 0 I 12 72 15 0 11 33 34 33 0 33 33 0 0 1 .0 ll 50 ■I* 31 8 14! 40! 35! 9! I I I ! I I I I 0 33 33 0 33 0 2 .0 0 I I I I I I I I 33 I 67 ! 0 II I 2 19 3 .0 1 22 3 .0 31 0! I I 7! HI 23! 6! 0! I 01 •I 141 42! 43t 0! I I 159 #26 The percentage of student failure will Increase significantly. CHANGE STATEHENT ! ICHAIRPERS ! ! N s 27 DEANS ( FACULTY ! O . I . R . ! I ! N s 98 ! TOTAL I N s 14 N s 51 NUMBER : 26 ( N s 6 ! ! I s s s s s s s s s ! s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s (s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s ! s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s ! t VARIABLE VALUE INONE LIK E LIH D ! LOU OF 1HODERATE OCCUR (HIGH IGREAT !NO RESP IMPACT OF THE CHANGE REL FREQ IREL FREO REL FREO CPCT1 I (PCT) (PCT) ABS ADJ t ABS ADJ ABS ADJ ! (s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s ! 19 24 22 26 43 SS 56 71 49 SB 14 16 21 2 ? 4 5 0 0 22 0 7 21 1HEAN RESP 2 .4 INONE (LOW IHOOERATE IH1GH (GREAT !NO RESP 7 ! 2* 21 f MEAN RESP . . . . . . . . . ^. . . . . . . . . GRP HOST (STUDENT PROMOTING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ! COMMUNITY (NO RESP INODE RESP ! 1 64 0 0 7 7 21 7 64 0 0 7 21 S H O U L D *IT !*N O *"*"*’ OCCUR 7 ( YES ! NO RESP SO .........( ......... (0 * 2 YRS ESTIMATED!3 -5 YRS TIME OF (6 *1 0 YRS OCCUR (NO RESP (MODE RESP ! 2.0 29 21 0 SO 21 29 2.0 4 11 15 37 11 22 0 0 9 9 0 4 14 25 31 4 26 ( ! ( ! ! ! ! ! 11 44 4 4 11 26 64 ! 36 ! 0 1 59 15 26 70 ! 30 ! 37 37 26 0! ! I 2.0 55" ""IS"S23! 33 48 10 1 0 0 si 202 67 33 0 ‘*” 12 21 32 7 23 2.0 I I 33 17 50 6 0 10 4 4 27 0 1.0 15 60 5 5 15 0 ! ! ! ! ! ! I 80 ! 20 ! 0 I 0 50 50 0 12 47 10 6 2 24 2. 0 57 22 22 4 33 25 37 2.0 17 50 0 0 0 0 67 8 5 5 0 46 11 6 3 5 29 0 0 0 1.0 15 62 13 8 3 0 ! ! ! I ! ! 1 I 72 ! 27 1 0 ! 6 ( S3 ! 41 ! 0 I ! ! 10 48 6 4 5 27 ! I $ 64! 16! 9! 7! 1.0 0 0 ! 33 100 ! 00 ! 0 0 ! 0 0 ! 0 ! 67 60! 13! 1! 3! 0! ! 1 161 28! 41! 9! 0! 3 .3 ^ . . . .4 ..3. . . 2. 0 0 REL FRED! (PCTJ ! ABS ADJ! 2.6 5 17 32 40 5 '4 3 * * 5 9 * 16 22 1.0 9 82 0 0 9 0 50 I ! I 22 0 ! I 3 .2 I 0 17 17 0 0 0 1 .9 5 14 19 48 14 3 .5 07 ! 16 4 8 ** 6 5 " 7 10 11 15 1.0 (FACULTY ________ GRP MOST (STUDENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP ! (MODE RESP 0 0 1 .9 9 I 18 ! ' i if I 9 ! 0 ! 29 0 0 0 f IREL FREQ ! (PCT) ! ABS ADJ ! _______ 0! ! I *! 14! 65! 8! 6! 7! 0! ! 2 1 !! 50 100 ! 0 I 0 0 1 50 56 19 24 74! 261 0! 2. 0 0 33 17 50 2.0 0 67 33 0 —I 2 37 28 34 2.0 »! 3! 55! 42! 0! ! ! 160 #27 Admission standards w i l l d e c lin e . reducing the q u a lity o f e n te rin g stu d e n ts. CHANGE STATEMENT ! I ICHAIRPERS! t I ! Na 27 I ! I DEANS NUMBER : 27 N = 14 FACULTY O . l. R . N s 51 N s TOTAL 6 Isssssssss t ■:s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s : ! 1 ! ! REL FREO IREL FREQ I REL FREO REL FREO I ( PCT > I CPCT) VARIABLE t VALUE CPCT) CPCT) ABS ADU I ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ ABS ADJ ! ! Is s s s s s s s s ! INONE ! 7 8 ! I_ "S~ * LIK E LIH D ILOU 36 38 37 42 I 33 40 31 33 (MODERATE I 22 25 I 27 29 17 20 36 38 (HIGH 14 15 OCCUR 19 I 18 19 IGREAT 4 4 33 40 12 12 INO RESP 11 0 17 0 0 0 6 6 21 I IMPACT OF THE CHANGE (MEAN RESP! 2 .9 INONE ILOU (MODERATE I (HIGH IGREAT ! INO RESP I 0 ! I (MEAN RESP! ■!• (FACULTY ! GRP MOST (STUDENT PROMOTING(PROVOST THIS ! ST ♦ FED I CHANGE (COMMUNITY! - — HHUNr ‘ ' (NO RESP I ( ! (MOOE RESP! ■!■ »!■ ! FACULTY I GRP MOST (STUOENT ! HINDERING!PROVOST I THIS ! ST ♦ FED ! CHANGE (COMMUNITY! INO RESP ! ! ! IMOOE RESP! ■I * 2 .7 0 14 15 it 29 11 31 T 11 3 .6 3 .8 7 7 14 29 36 7 4 19 8 8 15 31 38 0 62 29 31 67 7 7 0 4 15 0 0 7 ■!• 2 ! ! ! ! ! ! 11 44 26 19 26 40 17 0 0 20 0 SO 17 17 0 60 20 0 3 .8 2 IS 49 12 13 8 0 0 17 0 0 17 14 45 20 0 3 .4 3 .6 21 0 REL FREO! (PC T) ! ABS ADJ! ! 5_ ” _6! 34 37! 27 2 9 ! 16 18! 10 * 111 8 0! I 2 .9 I ........! \\ 37 IB 9 3 .6 17 20 33 0 17 40 0 33 3 .0 0 40 20! 0! ! ! .......I 4 13 32 22 19 9 3 .0 3 .0 1! 13! 25! 40! 4! IS ! 35! 25! 21! 0! ! 77 4 IS 67 80 17 0 17 20 00 ‘ 6 7 "*7 5 ! 5! 13 15! 1! 1 4 5! 0! 10 ! 84 6 10 93 1 7 ! 83 100 0 0 17 ’ a s " " 94! 24 43 16 18 29 52 19 0 0 67 17 17 14 1 55 ! 32 I 0 I ! I 2. 0 14 43 21 21 18 55 27 0 8. 92 1 a ! 0 I 0 4 6 00 0 4 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2. 0 I 24 37 16 71 4 14 10 -2 YRS ESTIM ATEDI3-5 YRS TIME OF ! 6“ 10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP ! 0 !! 0 16 78 I 9 ! 9 ' 0 4 0 81 7 11 IMOOE RESP! 33 I 11 93 100 ! 0 ! 0 7 0 ! ! ! 25 ! 30 SHOULD I T ! NO ! OCCUR 7 ! YES ! ! NO RESP ! ! ! ! ! 2i i ! 4 ! .0 57 ! ! ! ! 21 I 15 If * 22 5 .0 0 07 4 4 33 37 4 4 30 33 19 0 2 .9 0 I • N s 98 I I ssssssss! 2. 0 1.0 1.0 0! I ! ! ! ! 2. 5 0 10 0 80 20 0 17 45 19 18 0 ! 6! 0! ! 211 55! 24! 0! ! 2.0 ! ... 161 #28 Michigan State University undergraduate enrollment will decrease. CHANGE STATEMENT ! ! VALUE I IREL FREQ IREL FREQ I ! (PCT! I ABS ADJ I ABS AOJ I 21 36 29 7 I (MEAN RESPI INONE ILOU (MODERATE ! HIGH IGREAT INO RESP I ! ! I ! I I mean r e s p ! »!■ ■!< {FACULTY GRP MOST {STUDENT PROMOTING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY! INO RESP ! I_________ 07 INONE LIK E LIH D ILOU OF INOOERATE OCCUR I MICH IGREAT INO RESP IMPACT OF THE CHANGE ICHAIRPERS N = 14 NUMBER : 28 t VARIABLE I ! I t ! N = 27 I !========= DEANS I I MODE RESP! 0! e 23 38 31 0 3 .9 36 43 7 7 5“ 15 35 " 27 23 0 4 37 26 26 38 46 0 4 40 28 28 4 26 0 19 41 11 11 5 .0 2 14 27 25 27 4 2 I 14 29 27 — 0 8 25 39 24 4 4 29 0 21 46 0 5 .0 0 16 6 10 55 14 0 8 0 64 0 84 8 21 27 ! 55 ! 18 ! 19 56 15 21 62 17 IB 20 ! I (MODE RESP! 43 14 21 2.0 0I ! ! 17 8 42 17 17 0 3 .0 11 2.0 22 6 41 10 2 27 7 51 ! 12 ! 20 ! 3 .0 0 8 47 24 12 2.0 0 17 33 0 17 17 50 0 0 17 0 0 40 20 40 0 20 20 60 0 '!■ ! 1 6 31 35 22 5 3 18 4 14 46 14 17 6 40 10 8 3 .0 0 0 17 67 17 17 67 2.0 1 13 27 27 29 4 18 91 ! 100 100 9 ! 0 0 53 ! 27 ! 0 ! ! ======== I 5 .0 3 .0 0 ! REL FREO! (P C T! ! ABS ADJ! ! 3 .8 4 .0 81 19 0 ! ! ! ! 33 17 5 .0 78 19 4 !0 - 2 YRS E STIM A TE 0I3-5 YRS TIME OF 16-10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP 0 0 33 17 11 67 ! 33 ! 0 ! ! ! ! 0 ! ! I N = 98 ! ! ========1 TOTAL 3 .7 5? 8 33 18 7 57 29 14 NO ! YES ! NO RESP I 3 .0 15 7 37 IS 15 11 17 67 3 .7 SHOULO I T ! OCCUR 7 ! ! 21 29 . ! ! ! 0 17 27 41 24 0 7 0 36 7 0 50 10 30 0 o' 4 .4 IFACULTY GRP MOST ! STUDENT DEir ! HINDERING I PROVOST ! 1ST ♦ FED ! THIS CHANGE I COMMUNITY! INO RESP ! ! ! !MOOE RESP! 10 ! o 17 67 n 3.8 3 .8 18 18 ========: 3 .7 3 .6 3 .5 I 14 I 14 I 7 I 14 29 I 21 0 IS 33 26 22 i FACULTY I O . I . R . I N s 51 I N s 6 11 s s s s s s s s : 1 REL FREQ IREL FREQ (PC T! I (PCT) ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ I ________ 17o 1! 14! 28! 28! 301 0! ! ! ■! It 61 32! 37! 24! 01 I •! 41 21! 5! 17! 541 0! ! ! 21! 7! 49! 12! 10! 0! ! ! .......I 80 13 86! 14! ..! ...£ 1 *n"" 2n 50 5 7 ! 19 12 2.0 22! 0! ! ! 162 #29 Michigan State University graduate and graduate professional enroll* ment will decrease. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 29 DEANS VALUE ! __ LIK E LIH D OF OCCUR IMPACT OF THE CHANGE ! n5Se= (LOU (MOOERATE (HIGH (GREAT (NO RESP . ( (MEAN RESP (NONE ’ (LOU (-MODERATE (HI6H (6REAT (NO RESP ( (MEAN RESP IFACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT PROMOTING1PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY INO RESP (MODE RESP . . . . . . . . . |. . . . . . . . . (FACULTY GRP HOST (STUDENT HINDERING(PROVOST THIS (ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP ! (MODE RESP SHOULo’ l T ! *NO OCCUR 7 I YES I NO RESP ......... ......... ESTIM ATED!3-5 YRS TIME OF 1 6 -1 0 YRS OCCUR INO RESP ! (MODE RESP ( ( ( ICHAIRPERS! FACULTY N s 14 ( ( !sssssssss ! I VARIABLE I ( N s 27 ! ( N = 51 N s :(sssssssss)ssssssss: REL FREO (REL FREO (PCT) ((PCT) ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ ! 0 36 0 45 21 0 21 7 14 27 9 IB 3 .0 0 7 4 37 19 30 7 4 0 4 55 36 26 21 0 51 0 3 .3 0 29 0 29 14 29 2. 0 217 210 14 36 38 ! 19 ( 31 ( 8( 0( 3 .8 0 40 0 40 20 0 ! ( ! ! I ! ! ! 33 I I1 * 33 I o I: 22 ( 0 !( 29 0 ! 21 ~ 30 ! 60 ! 2.0 REL FREQ ! REL FREO! (PCT) ! (PCT) ( ABS AOJ ( ABS ADJ! ! ! 4 30 0 22 33 11 5. 0 *» 22 7 0 15 10 ! 0! 11 2.0 8 10 fB ( If 2 ! 316 16 ! 0 ( 10 ( 4 33 0 25 37 ( ■( ( ( ( ! ( 0 ( ! ! 57 9 26 9 ! ! ! ! 0! 0! ! . .4 . . . 0. . Ii 15 56 19 25 27 25 4 sssssssss) 0 33 17 0 33 17 28 30 28 9 0 17 ! 21 0 12 22 2 17 46 I 53 20 28 6 0 ( ( ! 1 ! 0 ! 37 29 0 20 20 20 40 0 11 8 0 0 0 ( ! ! I ! 0 17 0 17 50 17 20 0 20 60 0 5. 0 *1 33 0 0 33 12 0 20 43 24 14 23 50 27 0 5 31 23 22 10 10 3 .0 ! ) I 50 I 0I 0! 50 I 0 I 0 I I I 3! 34! 26! 25! 11! 0! ! ! “-! 01 35 9 11 3 .5 1.0 ’ 6 5 ~ "7 3 * 24 27 2.0 ( ( I ! ) ! 3 .8 5.0 8 0! 0 s > 17 ! 17 41 1 17 1 33 0 ! 17 3 .3 10 IB 2 14 37 20 0 40 ( 20 ! 40 ( 0 ( ! 3 .4 I 3 .1 1.0 ! . 1 . 0 __! "71*100*1"- v r i v i 0 0 I 15 15 ! 29 ) 4 3 .0 0 9 43 29 0 (REL FREO I (PCT) ( ABS ADJ ( 4 6 sssssssss! ssssssss) :(sssssssss(ssssssss: ( ( ( TOTAL ! • ! ( N s 98 ! ( ! O .I.R . 13( 38! 39! 1 0“ ! 01 ! ......(( 6 22 1 18 34 18 5 38 7 7! 27! 1! 0! ! 511 10! 2?i 3! 0! I 1.0 ( 2 27 ’67~BoV *7o”_80! 17 17 20 I 0 I ........! ■ 0 !? 17 2.0 0 I BO I 20 I 0 II I 17 12 20! 01 ’I?"” 0! 48 19 15 2.0 57! 23! 0! ! ......! 163 #30 There Mill be a la rg e r percentage o f n o n -tra d ltlo n a l students. CHANGE STATEMENT DEANS ( FACULTY ( 0 * 1 .R . ! N s 14 NUMBER : 30 N s 21 ( N s 6 N s 51 ! s s s s s s s s s } s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s (s s s s s s s s : ! REL FREG REL FREQ REL FREQ (REL FREQ VARIABLE ! VALUE tP C T I (PCT > (PCT) I (PCT) ABS ADJ ABS ADJ ABS AOJ ( ABS ADJ __! ! s _ _ |s - _ _ sssssssss sssssssss ( ssssssss: 4 5 ( LIK E LIH D ILOU 7 8 4 5 7 50 50 OF (MODERATE 30 32 22 26 43 46 OCCUR (HIGH 27 33 29 31 17 17 48 52 (GREAT 14 IS 27 33 33 33 27 *0 (NO RESP 7 16 0 ( (MEAN RESP 3 .6 3 .5 3 .9 3 .3 CHAIRPERS 1 1 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 ( 1 ! TOTAL ( ( ! I N : 98 ! ! (s s s s s s s s ! 1 ( ! IMPACT OF THE CHANGE RESP ..... ... . Smean ......... 4 64 69 lo l § 7 0 23 31 n n (FACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT HINDERING(PROVOST THIS (ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP 71 0 0 0 14 14 (0 -2 YRS ESTIMATED!3 -5 YRS TIME OF (6 -1 0 YRS OCCUR (NO RESP ! (MODE RESP 4 4 22 15 4 41 15 31 54 15 0 2.0 24 18 29 0 0 0 17 11 16 52 32 0 27 39 16 18 2.0 67 33 0 33 48 19 ( 0 ! ( ! 17 67 17 0 2.0 0( 21 22 10 32! 0( ! 5 .0 ! ! ! 67 ( 33 ( ( >!■ 17 67 17 0 0 12! 28 14 0 0 I 5! 25! 26! 4 83 ! ( ! ! 17 ! ( 1.0 *20~~24" 63 76 18 0 17! 13! 12 3 .0 0 ! —( 50! 3 .2 0 33 0 01! 3( 16! 11 0 0 33 0 31 0 50 17 17 17 0 17 0 8 3 14 44 15 SO SO 12 1 . 0 ___ n 15 48 30 7 26 26 10 3 .7 0 0 17 0 29 5 11 22 22 2! 9! 29! 3 7! 23! 11 3 .0 83 22 4 W 0 63 9 9 9 1.0 93 100 7 0 50 17 17 17 51 9 21 0 5 .0 57 10 22 43 8 18 16 0 2 16 43 6 6 6 44 7 0 2 14 3 .3 4 26 17 4 48 0 5 .0 83 0 0 0 17 0 1.0 2.0 0 11 3 .0 29 50 14 7 12 46 33 4 3 .2 21 29 S H O U LD "IT !" no " ’ OCCUR ? ( YES ( NO RESP 11 si 2 .9 GRP MOST (STUDENT PROMOTING!PROVOST THIS (ST ♦ FEO CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP ( (MODE RESP . . . . . . . . ' 222E.SE2E 4 2 8 26 33 20 0 (NONE (LOU (MOOERATE (HIGH IGREAT (NO RESP t (REL FREQ! I (PCT) I ! ABS ADJ! ! ! (s s s s s s s s ! 50 5 3 9 8 24 ----- ! 66! 7! 4! 12! 11! 0! i 10 ! 20 * 2 4 ! 761 0! 66 13 23 " 2 7 ! 45 5 1 ! 19 2 2 ! 12 0! 0 ! ! >...* 164 #31 Students w i l l demand a g re a te r ro le 1n determ ining c u r r ic u la r content and form a t. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 31 s |s s s s s s s s s ! VARIABLE 1 I ! VALUE s s s s s s s s : (s s s s s s s s s INONE LIK E LIH D ILOU OF 1MODERATE OCCUR IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I OEANS I I ICHAIRPERS I REL FREO IREL FREO CPCT) I CPCT) I 0 0 00 0 0 S 88 4 0 0 0 I 1 1 I I I 0 0 I 84 100 I 0 0 I 0 0 I 0 0 I 16 0 I I 2 .0 I 0 0 I 83 100 I 0 0 I 0 0 I 0 0 I 17 0 I I I 2 .0 85 3! 95! 26 32! 83 100 0 GRP MOST ISTUDENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP I INODE RESP "55------ SHOULD” ? I OCCUR ? I YES 1 NO RESP I 1 0 *2 YRS E STIM A TE 0I3-5 YRS TIME OF 1 6 -1 0 YRS OCCUR INO RESP I (MOOE RESP I I 2.2 0 0 I IMOOE RESP . . . . . . . . . ^. . . . . . . . . I I I IREL FREQ IREL FREO! I CPCT) I I (PCT) I ABS AOJ 1 ABS ADJ! I I I sss s l (s s s s s 3 SII I 67 80 48 531 17 20 23 2 6 ! I 14 161 I I I 17 I 2 .7 2 .6 I I S I 24 27 I 50 60 39 45 I 17 20 16 18 I 17 20 4 I 14 I 17 I 3 .0 I 2 .6 2 .9 REL FREO CPCT) ABS ADJ ! ABS ADJ ABS ADJ sss 4 S 37 43 33 39 21 I 21 I 8 9 4 5 14 0 IN O N E *""’ " ILOU IMODERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP IMEAN RESP I IFACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT PROMOTINGIPROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP I I N s 98 I I I I : I ss s s s s s : s is s s s s s s s | IMEAN RESP IMPACT OF THE CHANGE I I TOTAL FACULTY I O . I . R . I N s 51 I N * 6 I N s 14 I N s 27 ! s s s s s s s s s !s s s s s s s s s 8 37 25 29 11 53 36 0 0 50 60 17 50 20 60 0! 165 #32 Student's demand for subsidies, fellowships, scholarships, etc. will rise. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 32 j VARIABLE I I **"*• VALUE !_ JNONE LIK E LIH D ILOU OF {MODERATE OCCUR IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I ......... IMPACT OF THE CHANGE ILOU IMODERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESP ! I FACULTY GRP MOST ! STUDENT PROMOTING!PROVOST 1ST ♦ FED THIS CHANGE ! COMMUNITY INO RESP I INODE RESP ! FACULTY GRP MOST ! STUDENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS !ST «■ FED CHANGE ! COMMUNITY INO RESP I IMODE RESP I I ICHAIRPERS! FACULTT I I N s 14 I N s 27 I N s 51 I I s s s s s s s s s |s s s s s s s s s |s s s s s s s s s I TOTAL I I I N s 6 I N s 98 I I I ssssssss : { ssssssss) REL FREO IREL FREQ IREL FREO CPCT) I CPCT) I CPCT) ABS ADJ 1 ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ REL FREO IREL FREO! CPCT) I CPCT) I ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ1 DEANS sssssss S 0 7 14 43 14 21 0 I | S S S S S S S S S I S SsSs;s s s s s s 0I 17 I 0 15 9 18 55 18 IS 17 I 43 I 22 I 37 19 15 0 0 II I 3 .7 3 *8 0 0 1 29 36 I 29 36 I 21 27 I 0 I 1 21 I I 2 .9 7 22 22 22 7 19 0 0 I 79 100 I 0 0 I 0 0 1 0 0 I 21 0 I I 2 .0 I 7 70 0 7 0 15 0 0 0 so 21 29 7 0 19 56 4 IS 0 0 0 70 30 0 4. 0 0 . I« R . I I I I I I I I 9 27 27 27 9 0 3 .0 9 83 0 9 0 0 2 .0 9 0 22 65 4 0 4. 0 ■!< I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 0 8 24 38 29 0 33 17 17 33 3 .9 2 33 33 24 7 0 3. 0 2 67 0 4 10 18 I I I 1 1 I I I 2 4 16 53 6 20 I I I I 1 I I 1 2 81 0 5 12 0 2. 0 2 5 20 66 7 0 4. 0 I I I I I 1 0 33 17 0 17 33 0 SO 25 0 25 0 3. 0 41! 25! 0! I 3 .8 ! 18 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 0 0 17 SO 0 33 0 0 25 75 0 0 4. 0 1 I I I I I ! I ... -j n 19 6 19 241 3 .0 0 4 5 IB 2 3 2 14 53 7 20 4 36 43 21 45 I 55 I 0 I 44 41 IS 52 I 48 1 0 I 33 45 22 5 7 0 I 50 17 33 75 I 25 I 0 I 38 42 20 1 0 -2 YRS ESTIMATED!3 -5 YRS TINE OF 16*10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP I IMODE RESP 14 36 21 29 20 SO 30 0 33 30 19 19 41 I 36 I 23 I 24 37 16 24 31 49 21 0 17 33 17 33 25 50 25 0 24 35 17 23 . . . . . . . . . |......... 2.0 0! 0 I I 2.0 2 .0 lit 81 0! I —— I 3 4! 69 SSI SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR 7 I YES I NO RESP : 0! 11 ! 22! IS 0 0 I 67 100 I 0 0 I 0 0 I 0 0 I 33 0 I I I 2 .0 I I 90 18 50 25 25 0 3 .7 2 27 27 20 6 18 I 1 I I I 1 I I I U ssssssss! 0 0 10 20 31 24 18 I I I sssss 0 I 0! 5! 61 0! I I —! 4! 3! 18! 67! 9! 01 I I --! 01 —I 32! 45! 23! 0! I . . 2. .. 0. . . .! 166 #33 F in a n cia l problems w i l l b rin g about movement toward a student body com­ posed o f the socioeconomic e l i t e . CHANGE STATEMENT DEANS NUMBER : 33 ! 1 VARIABLE ! ! VALUE ! N = 14 ! IREL FREO ! (PCT) ! ABS AOJ ! INONE I LIK E LIH D ILOU I ---------------- I' OF IMOOERATE IHIGH OCCUR IGREAT INO RESP I I IMEAN RESPI IMPACT OF THE CHANGE CHAIRPERS! FACULTY I N s 27 ! N s 51 » ILOU I IMOOERATE I IHIGH I IGREAT I INO RESP I I IMEAN RESP! (FACULTY ! GRP MOST (STUDENT I PROMOTING!PROVOST ! THIS 1ST ♦ FED ! CHANGE (COMMUNITY! INO RESP ! I ! (MODE RESP! . . . . . . . . . |. . . . . . . . . |. 0 64 21 14 0 0 0 64 21 14 a o 2 .5 0 14 52 0 0 14 15 43 36 7 46 38 0 SHOULD OCCUR 100 100 0 0 0 0 ! ' I IMODE RESP! 0 17 42 25 17 0 3 .0 0 43 36 21 2 .0 11 7 19 4 7 7 37 15 30 4 .0 4 .0 0 14 36 ! I I •!• • I!0 -2 YRS I ESTIM ATEDI3-5 YRS I TIME OF !6 - 1 0 YRS I OCCUR INO RESP I 12 I "“lo " " !? ' 29 29 29 0 0 14 14 64 9 I ! I I » I I I I I I 0I 3 .7 3 .9 (FACULTY ! GRP MOST (STUDENT ! HINDERING!PROVOST ! THIS 1ST ♦ FED ! CHANGE ! COMMUNITY! INO RESP ! t i IMODE RESP! I T ! NO 7 ! YES I NO RESP 11 29 30 14 11 26 26 26 0 11 36 0 21 14. =========! 2 .7 21 0 0 REL FREQ ! REL FREO (PCT) I (PCT) ABS ADJ ! ABS AOJ I 0 14 21 29 =========! 0 55 45 0 5 ! 11 ! 11 ! 53 I 21 ! 0 II ! 3 2 !* 4 26 15 19 l$ i 32 I 18 I 0 I I 1.0 I 78 100 0 0 22 11 30 37 22 3 .0 12 4 12 40 20 13 4 0 2 .3 4 20 24 20 18 16 5 23 28 23 21 0 3 .3 26 11 35 18 2 10 2 27 27 31 16 16 25 21 0 II I 11 2 .0 6 22 39 33 3 .0 6 I ! REL FREO ! REL FREQ! (PCT) I (PCT) I ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ! ! ! sssssssss) 15 I? t 33 40 39! 0 0 I 35 33 40 I 21 24! 0 I 15 1 7 ! 17 20 I 3! 3 17 0! 0 ‘! 10 I ! 2 .5 ! . . . 2. .6 . . . . . I! 2| I 15 1 8 ! 0 17 19 2 3 ! 17 30 3 5 ! 22! 33 0! 33 it 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 50 5 .0 13 34 I 60 I 2 14 I 38 I 48 ! 3 143 40 40 0 10 25 0 I 18 N = =========! 0 4 .2 4 .0 8 ! I ! TOTAL I ! I ! N = 98 I ! _________ I O .I.R . 98 2 0 9 32 59 0 0 3 .6 0 0 ■!■ 0I 0I 100 ! 0I ■!« 0I 0 0 ! 0 0 ! 67 100 I 0 0 ! 33 0 ! ! 4 .0 ! 67 100 ! 0 0 ! 33 0 ! 0 17 50 33 3 .0 •!« 0! 25 ! 75 ! 0 I! ! 2 9 3 31 27 29 ! ! -! 3! 13! 4! 43! 37! 0! ! ! 4 .0 12 18 10 22 14 22 16! 24! 13! 29! 18! 0! ! I 4 .0 ------------ 82 1 17 99! 10 !! .......( 6 27 39 29 9! 37! 54! 0! I ! 3 .0 167 #34 The student p r o f ile w i l l change—more a p p lica n ts w i l l seek second pro­ fe s s io n a l s k i l l s . .......... CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 34 VARIABLE VALUE j- -- LIK E LIH D ILOU OF (MODERATE OCCUR IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP ! IMEAN RESP IMPACT OF THE CHANGE INONE ILOU IMOOERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP (MEAN RESP IFACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT PROMOTING(PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP I IMODE RESP — 1----------------! F ACULTY GRP HOST (STUDENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY INO RESP ! IMOOE RESP DEANS CHAIRPERS N s 14 0 11 44 0 14 SO 52 0 11 48 15 7 19 58 0 14 3. I ! 0 83 0 8 8 0 I 1 ! ! ! ! 21 30 48 21 21 29 0 30 30 0 4 15 4 10 0 6 ! I ! ! ! ! 3. 2 8 59 0 2 8 24 2 .0 68 05 21 30 24 4 8 16 6 43 1.0 1.0 16 29 25 ( 2 .0 2.0 0 0 33 0 0 17 24 44 15 1.0 0 4 .0 2 I 20 I 37 I 32 ! 7 ! 0 I! ! 10 77 0 3 10 0 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! i 14 I 28 I 10 I 0 !I I 17 17 17 17 33 3. 5 3 5 59 0 2 12 21 2 .0 8! 0! ! —I 6! 75! 0! 31 16! 0! I . . .2...0. . } I 33 30 17 17 50 33 33 0 16 8 38 26 53 32! 68! 23 32 20 24 31! 42! 27! 0! ! 00 00 1.0 24 53 24 31 ! 69 I 0 I 17 50 33 25 75 0 !0 - 2 YRS ESTIMATED13-5 YRS TIME OF !6 - 1 0 YRS OCCUR !NO RESP 21 36 29 14 25 42 33 0 22 48 15 15 26 57 17 0 24 24 24 29 33 ! 33 I 33 ( 33 17 67 33 50 0 ! 1! IB ! 46! 27! 17 45 55 0 1.0 6 ! 37 44 19 2.0 14 37 21 0 0 ! 67 100 ! 0 0 ! 0 0 ! 0 0 ! 33 0 ! 17 83 0 0 I! 1 25 25 25 25 14 71 14 2.0 11 50 SHOULD IT1 NO OCCUR 7 ! YES ! NO RESP (MOOE RESP REL FREO! (PCT) ! ABS ADJ! 00 50 0 33 33 0 3 *6 5 64 0 0 32 0 ! ssssssss! 0 0! 12 151 29 35! 30 36! 14! 0! IB ! ! 3 .5 -I 2 14 59 18 9 0 t N s is s s : ss s s Is s s s s s s s : 12 20 0 3. 2 4 52 0 0 26 19 ! ssssssss! 20 35 3 *3 0 17 ! ! ! N s 98 ! s s s s s s s s s (s s s s s s s s : ! REL FREQ IREL FREO (PCT) I (PCT) ABS AOJ I ABS AOJ 0 14 15 21 25 0 71 0 7 7 14 0 13 227 26 3 *4 i i N s 51 REL FREO (PCT) ABS AOJ 0 17 33 42 ! ! TOTAL FACULTY ! 0 . I . R . N s 27 REL FREO (PCT) ABS ADJ 0 14 29 36 7 14 ! 0 1.0 0 48! 5! 81 26! 13! 0! I I 1.0 21 . . . . . . 0. I! 2.0 ! 168 #35 Students w i l l be more s o c ia lly concerned and In vo lve d . CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 33 DEANS n N s 27 s s s s s s s s s !s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s ) s s s s s s s s s J REL FREO ( REL FREQ CPCTJ ( CPCT) VALUE VARIABLE I ABS AOJ ( ABS ADJ __________ i __________ J 0 ""Ia""I5” ( 0* INONE LIKELIH O (LOU 36 45 ! 61 OF (MODERATE 14 18 ( 30 9 ' 7 7 9 OCCUR (HIGH (GREAT 7 9 0 0 (NO RESP 15 0 ( (MEAN RESP 2.4 2 .5 0 21 IMPACT OF THE CHANGE \ hI hz --------(LOU (MODERATE IHIGH (GREAT (NO RESP ( . . . . . . . . . (MEAN . . . . . .RESP ... GRP MOST (STUDENT PROMOTING(PROVOST THIS (ST * FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP . . . . . . . . . (MOOE . . . . . RESP . .. GRP MOST (STUDENT HINDER ING(PROVOST THIS (ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP . . . . . . . . . f(MOOE . . . . . .RESP ... 7 14 36 14 7 21 9 18 45 IB 9 0 3 .0 14 57 0 0 7 21 210 0 29 36 5 .0 ! ( ! ! ! ! ( 1 ! ( 22 I 33 ! 2.4 1 1 ! ( ! ! 2 29 29 4 2 33 2. 6 51 2 4 4 33 „ 10 10 16 8 18 , 39 * ! I 1 ! ( ! ( 1 ! ! ! !. ! I 9 76 3 6 6 0 2 .0 10 30 10 REL FREQ (REL FREOC ( CPCT) ! CPCT) ABS ADJ ( ABS AOJ! ! 3 44 44 6 3 0 16 16 26 13 29 0 ( 6 17 33 17 0 0 33 ! ! ( ( ( ! ! ( 8 40 20 25 50 25 0 0 0 ! I ! ! ( ! ( ! 426 34 6 2 29 2. 0 17 33 17 0 0 33 2. 0 0 50 0 00 0 100 0 00 SO 0 2.0 17 33 33 50 67 0 0 SO 100 ( 30 0 ! 5 70 25 0 12 21 0 33 0 • ((■ 67 (0 -2 YRS ESTIMATED!3 -5 YRS TINE OF ( 6 - 1 0 YRS OCCUR (NO RESP 7 36 29 29 10 30 40 0 I ( ( ( 0 I 15 0 4 52 19 26 2.0 24 22 43 2.0 5 .0 41 38 0 0 17 50 2.0 0 2 .4 2. 52! 27! 8! 3! 01! ! -I 6! 9! 3! 0! ! 7! 73! 1! 6! 13! 0! ( 10 19 10 8 21 36 0 50 30 0 19 67 ! I 5 .0 23 11! . . .2 .. 0. . . ( ! 33 33 33 2.0 6 2 3 52 1 4 9 29 22 78 ! 30 0 ( 25 50 25 0 0 0 20 18 82 2.0 27 0 2 .0 7 REL FREQ CPCT) ABS ADJ ssssssss: ) 14 10 ( 35 49 ( 20 27 1 6 8 ( 2 3 ! 27 0 1 TOTAL 1 N s 98 ! ( I s s s s s s s s : ■( s s s s s s s s ! N s sssssssss ! 0 64 0 9 0 .I.R . N s 31 7 00 (( 22 IS 44 ! 22 0 !! 26 14 64 (MOOE RESP 5 29 57 10 0 0 2. 7 0 0 I 520 09 !( 7 0 1 22 19 SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR 7 ! YES ! NO RESP 21 4 22 44 7 0 22 18 ! 73 ! 2.0 14 FACULTY CHAIRPERS s in [ ! ( 33 ! 0 ! ! 16! 22! 161 13! 33! 0! ! ! 5 .0 ) 24 48 28 8 34 __ 21 37 34( 661 01 ■( 13! 53! 34! 0! ! 2.0 ( 169 ! #36 For maximum f l e x a b l ll t y In jo b m arket, the students w i l l demand a broader general education as w e ll as s k i l l tr a in in g . I CHANGE STATEMENT DEANS ICHAIRPERS I NUMBER : 36 N s 14 I N s 27 I s s s s s s s s s ) s s s s s s s s s !s s s s s s s s s ! s s s s s s s s s FACULTY N s 51 sssssssss REL FREQ ! r EL FREO REL FREQ CPCT) I CPCT) CPCT) ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ ABS AOJ I —s I s .- s s s | - _ - s — s - - Is s s s s s s s s ! NONE “"IS™** I 29 41 46 LIK E LIH D ILOU 41 48 33 OF -----IMOOERATE 25 30 33 20 23 IHIGH OCCUR 19 IGREAT 14 17 *1 »I li INO RESP 14 14 0 11 VARIABLE VALUE 0 210 I 0 0 21 I ! I I I IHOOE RESP! . . . . . . . . . I— ! ! IMODE RESP! ■!■ ■!• I NO 1 I OCCUR ? I YES ! NO RESP I 1 0 -2 OCCUR YRS I YRS 1 YRS I INO RESP I I 1 IMODE RESP! 13-5 16-10 I ! I I I 11 7 74 4 0 4 11 14 57 0 0 0 29 41 15 20 BO 0 0 0 0 2 .0 21 64 14 0 43 2* 2 IB I 8 83 4 0 4 0 ! I ! I ! I I 29 I 75 I 0 I 1* 70 11 0 I I 7 63 15 67 33 - I 15 2. 0 0 26 43 29 20 22 65 2 2 7 0 2. 0 33 17 .0 I I 17 33 0 0 0 so 17 17 0 17 0 50 53 ! 14 14 0 4 29 i i i 12 12 8 Ii 21 1 18 0 1 61 22 9 I 74 ! S3 17 I ! 0 ! I 22 ! 77 1 0 I 6 9 ! ! 41 ! 0 I I 2. 0 I 27 33 0 50 2 19 36 22 4 16 25 50 25 0 3 .1 2 33 33 33 0 33 33 33 2. 0 SO 0 0 50 50 0 I I I I I 5 19 6! 16 6 10 5 29 231 91 141 1.0 50 0!! II 0! 2.0 I ’34**47! 2. 0 33 33 0 33 0 0 21 23! 431 27! 5! ’ l9 ’ *2 4 ! 53 6 6 ! 2 3! 33 67 0 g 0 0 1.0 1.0 79 22 11 3. 0 I I I I I I I I 37 6 0 7525 0 0 0 2 .2 0 3. 1 18 51 2 2 6 22 REL FREQ) CPCT) I ABS AOJI t ssssssss) 9 11! 46! 40 261 13! 4! 3 14 0! I 2 .5 I I js -jso 17 0 0 33 52 19 1.0 0 I I 2. 0 1 36 22 35 24 0 2. 0 0 11 11 22 0 4 8 58 25 4 3. 1 50 58 1 29 33 I 0 0 ! 0 0 ! 7 8 I 14 0 I ! 1 .0 1 --------! . . . . . . . . . IFACULTY GRP MOST tSTUDENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! INO RESP i 2 .4 2 .7 4 7 52 22 4 TOTAL I I N s 98 I I ssssssss) I IREL FREQ I CPCT) I ABS AOJ 0 IMEAN RESP) 2 .S »!• ■I* 7 (NONE ! 8 IMPACT ILOU ! 36 42 OF THE IMOOERATE I 7 8 I CHANGE IHIGH 25 IGREAT ! 14 17 INO RESP ! 14 0 ! I ! IMEAN RESPI 3 .0 1 IFACULTY GRP MOST ! STUDENT PROMOTINGIPROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! INO RESP 0 --------» I I O . I. R . I I N s 6 I Is s s s s s s s : 7t 0! I I ■"I 19 62 241 76! 0! 5 43 23 29 ’7! 601 33! 0! I IB 2.0 ! ...... 170 #37 Students will become Increasingly protective and assertive of their rights as customers and citizens, and Intolerant of redtape and bureaucracy. ......... CHANGE STATEMENT DEANS CHAIRPERS! FACULTY I N s 27 I N s 51 N s 14 NUMBER : 37 s s s s s s s s s Is s s s s s s s a s s s s s s s s s SSSSSSSSS! s s s s s s s s s ! I ! REL FREO REL FREO IREL FREQ CPCT) VARIABLE ! CPCT) VALUE I CPCT) ! ABS ADJ ABS ADJ | ABS ADJ ! ssssss :s s s s s s s s s s s s : :1 s s s s s s s s s 0 0 INONE 1 4 4 LIK E LIH D ILOU 36 13 17 I 38 14 15 OF 48 54 IMOOERATE 38 36 39 43" IHIGH 14 OCCUR 15 24 26 15 17 IGREAT 7 11 12 13 INO RESP 0 7 11 0 I IMEAN RESP 2 .9 3 .3 3 .2 0 0 8 IMPACT OF THE CHAN6E INONE ILOU IMOOERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESP . . . .. . . .. |... .. .. .. IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUDENT PROMOTINGIPROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP 0 36 21 29 7 7 3 .1 0 0 00 7 14 7 29 21 7 21 S H O U Lo'lT I T o ----------OCCUR 7 I YES I NO RESP 1 0 -2 YRS ESTINATED I3-5 YRS TIME OF 1 6 -10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP 0 19 44 15 4 19 0 0 00 0 0 18 9 0 43 36 21 55 45 0 33 44 22 29 43 7 21 36 55 9 ' 0 26 44 11 19 119 3. 0 2. 0 11 1 6 0 3 .1 0 29 5 43 5 19 0 2 2 32 55 14 0 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I 2 2 80 91 2 2 12 2 2 0 I I I I I I 20 2 45 14 6 14 0 0 » 2 0I 0I 0 17 33 IS i 33 2S i IT 0 sl 0 8 23 2 52 16 7 0 3. 0 42 *8 18 45 18 20 22 56 22 0 33 0 0 17 0 50 8 0 67 0 0 33 0 0 I I I I I I I I 1 1. 0 •••■ a 17 50 33 0 I 0 50 17 33 2. 0 0 75 25 0 I 1 — II 22! 19 40 21 451 24! 71 12 0! I 3 .1 I 6 1! 95! 1! 1! 1! 0! I 2 .0 I ■I 25! 20 4! 3 37 461 15! 12 8 10! 19 0! I 3. 0 I — I 35 4 3 ! 46 57! 19 0! 82 1 1 1 14 lo o 33 2 12 0 2 .0 35 49 16 2. 0 I REL FREO I REL FREO! CPCT) I CPCT! ! ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ I I ! sssssssss! ' I ~ ! 0 I. 16 16! 33 SO I 41 451 19 2 2 ! 25 I 11 25 I ! I 10 0! 33 I I 3 .7 3 .2 I I 4 .0 .2 . 0 3. 0 ai«M 43 57 0 2. 0 19 49 23 6 8 81 100 0 0 0 19 22 4 . 33 4 19 22 2 18 45 22 2 .0 2 .0 0 2 23 3 .1 93 100 IMODE RESP I IFACULTY GRP HOST ISTUDENT ________ HINOERINGIPROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP I IMODE RESP IMODE RESP 0 38 23 31 128 • I O.I.R. I TOTAL }t I I N s 98 I N s 6 ! I sssssssss! ssssssssl • I I 1 I I I 20 45 14 20 26! 56! 1 8! 0! I 2. 0 I 171 #38 Students w i l l be In c re a s in g ly dedicated to th e attainm ent o f p r a c tic a l, employable s k i l l s ra th e r than Ideas. CHANGE STATEMENT I CHAIRPERS! FACULTY DEANS N = 1A NUMBER : 38 N s 27 I N s 51 I s s s s s s s s s !s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s sssssssssIS S S SS S SS I ! I ! REL FREO REL FREO IREL FREO CPCT) VARIABLE I VALUE CPCT) I CPCT) ! ABS ADJ ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ !________ I s s s s s s s s s Is s s s s s s s s 4 INONE 4 I 0 0 LIK E LIH D ILOU T 8 15 IS I 6 6 OF ! MODERATE 29 33 23 I 25 27 OCCUR 37 38 I IHIGH 21 25 45 48 IGREAT 19 19 I 29 33 18 19 14 0 4 INO RESP I 6 0 I IMEAN RESP 3 *8 3 .5 3 .8 0 0 22 0 ! IMPACT OF THE CHANGE —— INONE ILOU IMOOERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP IMEAN RESP IFACULTY GRP MOST 'STUDENT PROMOTING IPROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP I IMODE RESP IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUDENT HINDERING!PROVOST 1ST- ♦ FED THIS CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP INODE RESP SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR 7 I YES I NO RESP . . . . ------ 1 . . . . . . . . . 1 0 -2 YRS E STIM A TE 0I3-5 YRS TIME OF 1 6 -1 0 YRS OCCUR INO RESP I IMOOE RESP ? 17s 14 36 29 14 42 33 0 4 .0 0 0 0 79 0 2.0 71 7 0 0 0 91 9 I !I I I I I I 75 I 4 I 3 .4 0 870 20 02 10 11 8 0 2.0 80 73 64 21 14 75 I 25 I 0 I 70 22 7 76 1 24 I 0 I 71 20 10 *1 57 7 14 25 67 8 0 26 52 7 15 30 61 9 0 I 1 I I 25 43 14 18 2.0 20 22 0 4 .4 3 .8 0 0V 83 100 I 0 0 I 0 0 I 79 114 12 I 104 114 4 4 4 I 4 11 40 II 82 20 I 1.0 I 1.0 I I I I 0 0 0 00 7100 26 29 11 0 2.0 67 4 21 1.0 0 0 0 33 63 7 14 ! TOTAL ! I ! N s 6 I N * 98 ! I ! sssssssss) ssssssssl ! REL FREO 1REL FREO! CPCT) I CPCT) I ABS ADJ I ABS AOJ! ! I sssssssss! ssssssss! I 1! 0 0 9! 0 0 . 23 251 50 60 I 40 43! 33 40 I ! 17 ' 7 4 4 I 0 0 11 44 12 II 438 46B 22 24 I 33 35 16 I 157 0 II 106 100 3 .4 92 I O .I.R . 2.0 2.0 If 0 0 . 40 I 40 I 200 II I ! 3 .8 17 2.0 83 100 I 0. 0 0 0 17 1.0 78 22 0 *2 17 17 80 1 20 I 0 I 3* 52 17 0 33 33 0 33 50 50 0 0 1.0 I I I I 38 31 14 8 °! i -i 1! 91 41! 33! 16! 0! 3 .5 0 76 I I •I 0! 841 0! 1! 151 13 10 01I 2.0 •II 71 4 83 2 11 1.0 69 20 10 80! 5! 91 3! 2! 0! I I —I 0! —I *6 47 10 17 2 .0 31! 57! 0! I I 172 #39 The q u a lity o f students Mho w i l l complete a degree program w i l l be o f a considerably h ig h er le v e l. I DEANS CHAIRPERS ! FACULTY 0. I.R. TOTAL N s 14 Ns a N = 27 ! N s 51 N s 98 | ! S S S S S S S S S ! S S S S S S S S S Isssssssss {sssssssss sssssssss j ! ! ! REL FREG REL FREQ IREL FREQ REL FREQ REL FREQ! VARIABLE ! VALUE (PCT) CPCT1 I IPCT) (PCT) (PCT) { 1! ABS AOJ ABS AOJ 1 ABS ADJ ABS AOJ ABS ADJ! » ssssssss ssssssssss {sssssssss sssssssss ssssssssl 4 { 16 IB ! NONE ! 7 8 17 25 11 13! LIKELIHD tLOU 57 67 37 ! 33 36 50 75 39 46! OF ---IM OOERATE ! 14 17 37 0 0 26 30! I 25 29 OCCUR 4 7 0 0 IHIGH I 12 13 00 IGREAT I 7 8 0 { 2 2 28!! INO RESP ! 14 0 19 15 0! I 12 33 ! I I I IMEAN RESPI 2.3 1.7 2 I 2.A 2.4 ! I ~! -!■ 7 8 0 0 I 2 122 11 00 00 11 2 2! INONE 7 IMPACT ILOU ! 10 10 OF THE IMOOERATE I 14 u i t I 43 *1 ! 50 100 1 38 _ 22 27 I 20 23 I 0 0 I 22 CHANGE IHIGH I 43 if 7 9 { 10 12 1 0 0 I 9 111 IGREAT I 14 17 19 0 { 16 0 I 50 0 I 18 0! INO RESP I 14 0 ! I I I 3.2 I 3. 3 I 3.0 I 3 . . . . . . . . . IM |.E .A .N . . .RESPI{ . 3.6 •I* ■! •FACULTY I 50 64 44 55 { 41 54 1 33 67 I 43 GRP MOST ISTUDENT I 21 27 19 23 I 24 31 1 0 0 I 20 PROMOTINGIPROVOST I 7 11 14 I 2 3 I 0 0 I 5 7! THIS 1ST ♦ FED I 0 7 9 « 6 6 8! 0 0 I 4 i ; 50 ll 3? 1 2 3! CHAN6E {COMMUNITY! 0 0 I 23 01 INO RESP ! 21 19 0 ! 24 0 I ! I I I ! 0 I 1.0 I 1 1.0 I IN O D E RESP! 1.0 1 . . . . . . . . . . ^. . . . . . . . . . —! 7 10 I 14 21 1 0 0 0 0 1 9 13! GRP HOST ISTUDENT ! 64 90 1 37 50 I 27 41 I 33 67 36 521 3 4! HINDERINGI PROVOST .! 0 01 0 0I 6 9 I 0 0 13 19! THIS 1ST ♦ FED ! 0 0 I IS 20 1 16 24 I 17 33 7 10! CHANGE {COMMUNITY! 7 10 1 15 20 1 4 6 1 0 0 INO RESP ( 29 0 ! 26 0 1 0 1 50 0 32 0! |1 33 ! I I I IMODE RESP! 2. 0 ! 2. 0 I 2. 0 I 2. 0 2.0 I -I17 33 18 24! SHOULD"!TI " no”’ "” ” I’ 7 9 26 32 I OCCUR T I YES I 71 91 33 67 56 68 I £1 ?7 58 761 SO 0 23 0! 19 0 I 24 0 . . . . . . . . . I. .NO . . RESP . . . . . Ij . 21 0 >!• 9 131 14 20 14 I 6 9 11 17 33 ESTIMATED!3-5 YRS ! 36 50 17 33 36! 26 33 I 24 34 36 51! 17 33 TIME OF !6-10 YRS ! 21 30 41 52 I 39 57 30 01 OCCUR !NO RESP ! 29 0 50 0 22 0 I 31 0 ! ! ! ! 3.0 ! 3 .0 3 .0 1.0 IMOOE RESP! 2 .0 ! mmmmmU CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 39 173 #40 The student population will have a greater representation of women and minorities. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : AO VARIABLE ! ! I VALUE INONE LIK E LIH D ILOU OF IMOOERATE OCCUR IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I I f I FACULTY IREL FREO ! (PCT) ! ABS ADJ ! REL FREO (PCT) ABS ADJ ! I ! I I I I I I I I I I IMEAN RESPI * " I faculty" " I GRP MOST ISTUOENT I PROMOTING I PROVOST I THIS 1ST ♦ FED I CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! INO RESP ! Smode r e s p ! IFACULTY I GRP MOST ISTUDENT I HINDERING I PROVOST ! THIS 1ST ♦ FED I CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! INO RESP ! ! ! IMODE RESPI ■I■!■ SHOULD I T ! NO ! OCCUR 7 I YES I I NO RESP I . . . . . . . . . i.........! . 10-2 _ .I YRS ESTIM ATEDI3-5 YRS I TIME OF 16-10 YRS ! OCCUR INO RESP I I I N = 51 N = 27 ss ss ss ss s sssssssss .................. ILOU IMOOERATE (HIGH IGREAT INO RESP CHAIRPERS ! N a 1# !_ _ IMEAN RESPI IMPACT OF THE CHANGE DEANS I IMODE RESP! 0 0 1A 6A 21 0 21 0 0 22 0 1A 6A 37 22 A.O 22 59 A3 0 0 7 3 .5 0 21 29 29 21 0 0 21 29 29 21 0 ! I ! ! 1 ! I 20 20 0 20 AO 0 5. 0 I 1 I ! I I I 7 30 A 37 11 11 0 2 18 AT 16 6 2A 6A 12 0 11 36 50 7 7 38 5A 8 0 A1 33 19 7 1 1 ! ! ! 7 1. 0 28 37 15 0 8 33 A A2 12 0 ! I I ! I I 17 22 17 11 33 0 ! ! ! I ! I ! ! 6 18 A A3 1A 16 2 7 21 5 51 16 0 ! ! ! ! 1 1 ! 47 15 9 6 2A 0 1. 0 ! I ! I ! ! I n AA 36 20 0 27 A1 18 1A 32 AS 20 0 2. 0 I 0 50 25 33 0 2 0 18! 55! 20! 5! 01 10 3 .1 0 0 I 0 0 I 0 0 ! 67 100 ! 0 0 I 33 0 ! 5 20 7 A1 1 I ! ! I I 23 11 6 6 20 33 I 1 n ! I ! ! SO 17 0 33 ! ! I ! 3A 39 15 12 I 2 75 25 0 0 I I —I 6! 2A I 8! A7! 151 0!I A .0 I ---- 1 13 ! so 0 0 0 50 0 1. 0 1. 0 21 16 A9 18 A 0 A. 0 I . . . . . . . II 1 ! 0! 8 0 0 ! 67 100 ! 33 0 ! 0 1 18! 301 37! 16! 3 .3 33 17 33 0 0 0 33 33 01 18 28 3A 1A 2 .7 22 65 1A 1 20 20 0 25 0 0 12 I 88 I 0 ! ! ! I ! 0I 20 AO 17 0 20 S3 18 7 A. 0 31 10 6 A 16 33 I 3. A 3 .1 5. 0 7 ! 93 I 0 ! 17 33 17 17 17 3 .5 A. 0 11 15 11 7 22 33 7 93 0 2. 0 10 2 .9 3. 0 1A 1A 0 1A 29 29 25 33 1A 12 110 120 4? *| 0 IB 20 AO 2A 6 s s ssssss: (s s s s s s s s l I I REL FREQ IREL FREO! (PCT) I (PCT) I ABS ADJ I ABS ACJI I I s s s s s s s s : 1s s s s s s s s l _ _ s _ s _ ._ . 3 .2 0 AS N s REL FREO (PCT) ABS AOJ 0 2A I I I TOTAL ! I I I N s 98 I 0 . I* R . ii 35! 171 9! 9! 301 0! ! .0 I "SI 0! -----! 38! AAt 17! 0I! .0 I 174 #41 Student In te re s t t r i l l cover d is c ip lin e s and majors not p re s e n tly o ffe re d . CHANGE STATEMENT DEANS ICHAIRPERS FACULTY I I 1 I N s 98 I ! O .X .R . TOTAL N s 51 I N s 27 N s 6 I s s s s s s s s s !s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s ( s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s S S S S S S S S ! ! I ! REL FREG IREL FREG REL FREQ REL FREO REL FREO! VARIABLE ! VALUE cpcti I CPCT) CPCT) CPCT) (PC T) I ! ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ ABS ADJ ABS ADJ ' ' ~ J! ABS ADJt __! I s s s s s s s s s (s s s s s s s s s sssssssss ssssssss! ■ s " b "”! o " I 4 5 17 25 ! LIK E LIH D ILOU SO 36 " l* 18 23 17 25 19 24! OF IMOOERATE 57 57 29 38 17 25 26 32 3^ 39! IHIGH OCCUR 19 23 20 2 1 IGREAT l? 4 5 17 25 4 5! INO RESP 24 0 19 0 33 0 19 0! I I IMEAN RESP 2 .9 2 *9 2 *9 2 *7 2 *9 ! N s 14 NUMBER : 41 | IMPACT OF THE CHANGE 0 INONE ILOU (MODERATE (HIGH IGREAT INO RESP I (MEAN RESP 21 II 7 7 0 0 19 37 19 4 23 38 31 S 0 22 3 .2 IFACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT PROMOTINGIPROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP 7 64 I 2.0 IMODE RESP »!• IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUDENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP 79 0 0 7 0 14 8 8 0 15 0 I ! I I 69 I I I I •!« 92 I ! ! I 22 8 I ! 15 ! 85 ! 0 ! ! 0 -2 YRS ESTIM ATEDI3-5 YRS TIME OF 1 6 -10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP 14 43 29 14 17 ! 50 ! 33 ! ! 2.0 0! 26 15 4 5 n *i it xi 0 3 .0 H0 5 14 0 12 51 16 70 8 11 27 3| 33 19 5 0 25 4 27 10 2 31 0 17 17 17 17 33 0 0 25 25 25 25 0 0 0 0 0 17 33 50 0 0 0 33 67 17 17 0 50 57 0 4 37 33 26 5 50 45 0 10 14 11 29 ll 0 3 .0 0! 9 53 1 2 10 33 33 17 50 0 17 17 67 2.0 33 0 0 50 50 0 121 701 1! 3! 14! 01 ! — !! 2.0 00 I . . . . . . . (! 34 3 22 11 *3s””67* 44 2.0 7! 2 28 1.0 18 55 27 22 t2t2l! 22 24 3 .0 *33””4S" 3! 2 16 37 17 5 0 2.0 37 6 40 14 3 0 —— — I 3 .1 3 .5 2.0 2 .0 0! 0I 14 79 7 IMODE RESP! 22 30 SHOULD*IT(” n 0 OCCUR ? ! YES I NO RESP ! 7 56 0 4 11 4 25 3 .1 . . 1. .. 0. . . . | . . . . . . . . JK S E .iE 8? 0 24 48 24 0 8 10 221 22 53 24 8 ll 29 3 .0 46! 4! 31! 15! 3! 0! I ! 301 701 0! •I 11! 40! 49! 0! ! ! 175 #42 The number o f students who take more than fo u r years to complete an undergraduate degree program w i l l Increase. »* CHANGE STATEHENT NUMBER : 42 DEANS CHAIRPERS N s 14 N s 27 s s s s s s s s s !s s s s s s s s : VARIABLE ! ! VALUE !________ IMPACT OF THE CHANGE INONE ILOU IMOOERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP (MEAN RESP IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUDENT PROMOTING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP I IMOOE RESP IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUDENT HINDERINGIPROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP I IMODE RESP ■ •■ •••••■ SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR 7 I YES I NO RESP •!« 1 0 -2 YRS ESTIMATED! 3 -5 YRS TIME OF 1 6 -10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP ! IMODE RESP O .I.R . N s 51 N s sssssssss sssssssss REL FREO CPCT) ABS ADJ { --= - LIK E LIH D ! LOU OF (MODERATE OCCUR (HIGH IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESP FACULTY 43 29 29 0 43 29 29 0 3 .9 ** 2* 0 2 .9 36 14 42 17 7 14 8 0 0 33 21 0 2.0 4 13 56 19 0 11 4 17 62 17 0 0 29 50 21 0 0 0 S3 18 4 18 8 75 4 8 4 10 64 21 19 25 11 0 2.0 l i7 i10i IS 0 5 0 0 S 5 0 0 0 17 33 33 17 0 0 20 40 40 0 0 0 SO 0 0 0 60 0 33 40 17 0 0 0 0 10!l0 H 0 0 17 17 25 33 17 33 50 25 0 00. 00 4 .0 43 57 ’“ 41 18 So* 50 0 50 33 17 60 40 0 33 41 11 15 39 48 13 0 14 47 20 17 59 24 50 17 75 25 33 0 2.0 0 20 2.0 0 0 1 .0 361 26! 22 12 0! 2 14 48 19 3 13 I I ! 2! 16! f S2 !I 4! 0! I 3 .1 I —— ! 4 5! 74 86! 1 1! 4 51 4! 3 ! 13 I 2.0 ■II 23 10 15 0 33! 141 21! IS 21! 10! 7 29 1.0 37 48 15 32 “ 0 35 15 24 21 6 0 1.0 1 121 It 10 22 261 3 .8 2.0 2 .0 24 10 16 14 4 33 I I I N s 98 I I sssssssss ssssssssl I REL FREO REL FREQ! CPCT) CPCT) I ABS ADJ ABS AOJ! I sssssssss ssssssssl 3 .2 4 4 4 18 6 4 .2 3 .2 7 67 4 7 4 11 26 2 3 .7 3 .0 1.0 *4 3 ~ *5 o " 43 SO 14 0 29 50 11 12 11 0 2 .9 0 0 1000 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 0 29 122 3 .S 7 7 29 29 36 .3 6 0 REL FREO REL FREO CPCT ) CPCT) ABS AOJ ABS AOJ ssss s s s s s s s s : 0 0 IS 17 14 22 23 IB 41 46 27 §3 29 30 16 TOTAL 41 43 16 0! t I ! 491 51! 0! ’ 23” "2 8 ! 44 52! 16 2 0 ! 16 0! I 2.0 I 176 #43 The r f r r ic u lu n w i l l co n s ta n tly change to address a v a ila b le jo b markets f o r graduates CHANCE STATEHENT NUMBER : A3 I CHAIRPERS I FACULTY DEANS N s 27 N s 14 I N s 51 I I I i to tal t ! I N s 6 I N s 98 ! I I s s s s s s s s s Is s s s s s s s ! 0 « I.R » s s s s s s s s s !s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s I!si s s s s s s s s I REL FREQ REL FREQ IREL FREQ REL FREQ IREL FREQ! CPCT) CPCT) I CPCT) IP C TI ! CPCT) I VARIABLE VALUE ABS ADJ ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ ABS ADJ ! ABS AOJ! I I ! ! ssssssss! Is s s s s s s s : sssss ■ * l7 ~ " l7 " 1 - 2 A A I 2! INONE A LIK E LIH D ILOU ' * 22 231 22 22 36 36 25 27 OF IMOOERATE 37 AO 36 36 31 32! ' 33 33 37 39 29 29 OCCUR IHIGH 31 32! 26 28 IGREAT 10 1 1 ! A A 50 30 12' A A INO RESP ! ! 3 .7 3 .3 IMEAN RESP ! 3 .4 3 .0 3 *0 ! 0 4 4 INONE 1! 1 IMPACT ILOU 91 8 7 11 12 47! 37 40 45 50 60 64 il 48 50 OF THE IMOOERATE 34 39 42 33 40 21 30 31 CHANGE IHIGH 35! IGREAT 7 7 8! 0 10 10 4 4 5 17 6 0 0 4 0 INO RESP I I ! 4 ! 3 .4 3. 2 - IMEAN RESP ! 3. 2 ! 3. 5 — 1 — ------! IFACULTY 17 20 I 23 2 5 ! 21 21 I 22 24 1 25 28 43 47 64 64 ! 39 64 ! GRP MOST ISTUDENT 50 60 I 51 55! 4 I PROMOTINGIPROVOST 0 2! 0 ! 4 2 2 0 4 I 4 4 0 0 0 0 I 4 THIS 1ST ♦ FED 3! 14 14 I 4 4 I 18 17 1 4! 19 I 13 CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP 0 I 8 17 I 7 ! 0 0 I 7 0 I ! 2 .0 2 . 0 2.0 2.0 I 2< I IMODE RESP — 1 IFACULTY 57 53 33 40 I 55 6 4 ! 62 ! 63 71 ! 63 I GRP MOST ISTUDENT 0 0 I 2 0 0 ! 1 0 I 0 2 I 1! HINDERINGI PROVOST 17 I 22 26 1 17 20 I 0 0 ! 15 16 19! 1A! 1ST ♦ FED A THIS 5 I 12 36 38 ! 11 12 I 33 40 ! 4 0 ! 2! 0 0 I 0 2 0 ! 0 5 I CHANGE ICOMMUNITY 7 0 I 16 17 INO RESP 0 ! 11 0 I 0 ! 13 ! I I 1. 0 1.0 I . I 1. 0 ! 1. 0 IMODE RESP -— ! 14 19 21 I 24 26 SHOULD I T ! NO 15 ! 50 60 ! 22 25! 79 69 74 73! 85 I 70 79 I 33 40 ! 68 OCCUR 7 I YES 0 I| _ 8 ! NO RESP 7 0 ! 0 17 0 I 9 11 ____ >| ■■■ei< ----- !! • • • • I• ‘50”~60" I 32 3 5 ! 2 l " " 2 l " ! " " S I ” 36 I ’ s i " *3 6 !0 - 2 YRS 41 64 37 43 451 64 ! 37 40 I ESTIM ATEDI3-5 YRS 33 40 14 24 14 ! I 18 20 17 TIME OF 1 6 -10 YRS 22 0 19! OCCUR INO RESP 7 0 I 14 17 10 0 0 I 0 ! I 1 .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 I ! MOOE RESP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 2 0 12 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 01 0 0 20 0 0 0 01 10 0 01 0 177 #44 The p ro fe ssio n a l and te c h n ic a l areas w11l be exoanded to meet Dressing needs o f our s o c ie ty . CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : AA I CHAIRPERS I FACULTY DEANS N s 14 sssssssss sssssssss I I REL FREO REL FREO VARIABLE ! VALUE (PCT ) CPCT) ABS ADJ ABS AOJ ! ! _________ S S S S S S S S S Isssssssss INONE LIK E LIH D ILOU OF ------IMOOERATE OCCUR IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESP IMPACT OF THE CHANGE INONE ILOU IMOOERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP IMEAN RESP IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUDENT PROMOTINGIPROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP IMODE RESP 0 1A A3 29 1 0 15 AG 31 8 3 .3 0 7 A3 29 1A 0 8 A6 31 15 A A 32 AS l* l2o 11 IREL FREO ! (PCT) I ABS ADJ (s s s s s s s s : I 8 0 1.0 37 I 11 80 II I I A3 AO A9 58 12 20 A 16 1A 23 5 0 2A 67 29 I 71 I 1 0 -2 YRS ESTIMATED!3 -5 YRS TIME OF 16-10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP I (MODE RESP 7 6A 1A 1A 8 30 AA 11 15 35 I 52 I 13 I 52 0 11 11 7 19 1.0 11 2 .0 0 I •!• 0 1I I 0 17 B 0 I 10 111 0 29! I 25 I 25 I 50 I 0 II I 0 -II 25 25 25 25 I I I I 0I 3 .5 8 9 is i? 12 0 0 17 17 33 33 33 3 .A I I I I I I I I 26 63 2.0 39 37 6 8 11 6A 0 1A 1A 9 0 I 25 75 0 75 17 0 10 s s s s s s s s s !s s s s s s s s l I REL FREQ I REL FREG! (PCT) I (PCT) I ABS AOJ I ABS ADJI I I sssssssssI ssssssssl A .2 0 20 22 22 20 21 6A 1A 1.0 0 I I I I ! I I SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR 7 I YES 1 NO RESP 8 33 0 0 0 21 33 0 21 22 25 11 0 2.0 19 30 0 19 SO 0 7 29 0 1A 0 15 23 A9 13 3 .6 IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUDENT HINDERINGIPROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP r IMODE RESP 58 0 0 1A 22 A5 12 8 I 0 I 3 .A 31 31 15 15 TOTAL N s 98 I Is s s s s s s s s 3 .6 3 .5 29 29 1A 1A 7 7 A A 30 AA A 0 AA 33 7 O .I.R . j N s 51 N s 27 0 5 .0 0 33 17 0 17 33 0 I 50 I 25 I A5! 13! 0! I 3 .5 ! SI 12 9 1 7 A0 3A ll 8! AA! 37! 9! 8 10 0! I 3 .A I »! 19 221 2A 2 8 ! 7 8! 191 20 231 01 0I 0 I 12 25 I 2 .0 2.0 A9 i •I 601 33 0 0 17 0 50 67 I IS 17 50 33 25 I 75 I ’ 2 3 **2 7 1 6A 731 12 0! 16 19 25 18 31 0 33 17 0 50 67 I 33 I *1 9 * *2 A ! AA 5AI 18 221 18 0! I 2.0 I 0 0 1.0 10 A1 SO 2.0 0 00 !I 10 18 A 00 18 33 I I I I I 1.0 1 .0 0I 00 I! 01 12! 22! 5! 0! I 178 #45 More “non-trad1t1ona1Mcourses will be offered, (e.g ., short courses, new time frames, e tc .). CHANGE STATEMENT DEANS NUMBER VARIABLE I I VALUE ! I FACULTY I O . I . R . I IN s N s 51 I sss I I REL FREO IREL FREO (PCT) I (PCT) ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ I sss (s s s s s s s s ICHAIRPERS I ! N=2 7 I : Is s s s s s s s s I 6 IREL FREO IREL FREO I IPCT) I PCT) ABS AOJ ! ABS ADJ I I !IS S S S S S S S S INONE LIK E LIH D ILOU OF {MODERATE I OCCUR IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESP! IMPACT OF THE CHANGE INONE ILOU (MODERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I ! I ! ! ! I I . . . . . . . . . |(MEAN . . . . . RESP! . . . . j. (FACULTY I GRP MCST ISTUDENT I PROMOTINGIPROVOST I THIS 1ST ♦ FED I CHANGE (COMMUNITY! INO RESP ! I I I MODE RESP! ! F AC U LTY **I" GRP MOST ISTUDENT ! HINDERING!PROVOST ! THIS ! ST ♦ FED ! CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! INO RESP I ! ! (MOOE RESP! ■!• ! SHOULD I T ! NO ! OCCUR ? ! YES ! NO RESP ! (0 - 2 YRS ESTIM ATEDI3-5 YRS TIME OF 1 6 -1 0 YRS OCCUR (NO RESP ! !■ 1 ! ! ! ! (MOOE RESP! 3 .2 0 29 S7 7 7 0 0 14 00 0 ‘I 3 .4 ! ! ! ! ! ! 33 0 0 9 S2 23 I 14 M i 8 32 12 4 44 0 7 ! I I 1 1 ! 16 35 14 4 16 16 19 42 16 S 19 0 I I • I* f 1 1 ! I I 3$ SO 17 0I 17 0 IS 0 0 0 IS 62 I 23 ! 0 ! ! 2 .0 ! 28 72 0 22 25 — 59 67 7 11 2.0 84 I 12 ! 1 33 50 17 12 46 0I! 0 17 17 0 33 33 0 25 25 0 50 0 33 SO 17 40 60 0 1! 13! 51! 20 22! 11 12! 00 00 2.8 0 26 67 7 1! 7! 34! 41! 17! . . . . . . . II 0 710 11 12 IS 17 1.0 8 3 .7 63 11 1.0 61 32 38 IS 33 5 .0 83 I I IREL FREQ! I (PCT) I I ABS AOJ! I I •! s s s s s s s s ) 3 .7 3 .5 7 30 11 4 I I :|s s s s s s s s | 5? ' 45 8 20 14 44 32 0 14 14 36 7 29 0 17 27 48 IB 0 3 .8 41 30 7 14 57 21 7 24 41 16 14 0 29 57 7 7 3 .0 79 1 0 4 4 31 46 IS 0 3 *6 2 .9 14 14 36 7 29 0 4 4 30 44 15 4 I I I TOTAL I I I I N s 98 I 3 .3 ! ! ! ! ! ! 179 #46 Study and work w i l l be combined; a change from present p a tte rn o f education fo llo w e d by work. change I I ICHAIRPERS! I I DEANS statem ent I I I I I -I* ' 3 7 " " 40 I 56 60 I 7 0 I - I26 30 I 57 I 13 I 0 0 0 7 1.0 29 71 0 2 10 11 12 12 8 43 36 14 S H O U LD *!TI" 5 5 ----------OCCUR ? I YES I NO RESP IMOOE RESP CHAIRPERSI FACULTY I N s 27 I N s SI I s s s s s s s s s ts s s s s s s s : I REL FREO IREL FREQ CPCT) I CPCT) ABS ADJ I ABS AOJ I s s s s s s s s s )s s s s s s s s : I 0 2 26 28 I 24 I 37 42 27 31 33 36 I I 13 7 0 I 0 I 3 .4 3 .3 I >!• 4 4 I 0 0 7 I 14 16 39 45 33 36 t 41 44 I 25 30 8 7 8 I 14 7 0 I I 3 .4 I 3 .3 11 I 15 0 I I 2.0 I 80 0 4 93 0 5 14 0 2 0 2 0 1.0 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 11 12 20 20 20 1 101 10 0 0 0 44 35 0 10 2.0 86 2 2.0 10 1.0 1.0 112 ! R 0 IB 21 37 29 16 I I TOTAL I N s 6 I N s 98 I I I sssssssss! ssssssss! I I REL FREQ I REL FREQ! CPCT) I CPCT) I ABS AOJ I ABS ADJI I I sssssssss) I 1 II I 13 1 5 ! 0 90 60 I 35 381 ! 29 3 1 ! .0 13 151 33 40 ! I 9 0! 17 I I 3 .4 I ! 3 .8 — I■1 ! 0 ! 17 ! I 38 4 2 ! 33 40 ! 17 ! 31 3 4 ! 9 0! I H I ! 3 .4 3 .4 I I —-I•I 1! 1 0 0 I 59 6 5 ! 67 80 I 0 I 7 8! 14 16! 17 20 I ! I 9 0 9 0! 17 0 I I I •I 95! 83 100 I 0 0 I 1 1! -2 ! 0 I 1! I 1 0 0! 0 0 I 17 0! I I I I I -I* ■ • • • • • • j 'I ! ” I 29 3 1 ! 67 80 I 62 691 0 I 9 0! 17 ■I ■I* I 22 26! 17 67 80 I 43 4 9 ! I 21 25! 0 17 I 13 0! I I 2.0 I 2 .0 I O .I.R . 20 20 0 0 181 #48 The c e n tra l a d m in is tra tio n o f the u n iv e rs ity w i l l Increase I t s q u a n tita ­ t iv e judgement o f programs. E ffic ie n c y and products w i l l be viewed c r i t i c a l l y . CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : ! I VARIABLE ! I ! LIK E LIH D OF OCCUR IMPACT OF THE CHANGE 48 VALUE _ ■jSoSe' " ' " ILOU IMOOERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESP INONE ILOU IMOOERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO AESP DEANS N = 14 REL FREO CPCT 1 ABS AOJ 0 0 7 71 IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUDENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP I IMODE RESP SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR 7 I YES I NO RESP ——------ 1 ------- ! 0 -2 YRS E STIM A TE 0I3-5 YRS TIME OF 16-10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP I I MOOE RESP :::: 0 0 7 71 210 210 0 IS 15 41 22 7 0 0 6 16 16 44 24 0 4 .1 0 0 36 50 14 0 IMEAN RESP IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUOENT PROMOTINGIPROVOST THIS 1ST * FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP I IMODE RESP I I I N s 51 N s 27 N s 6 t N s 98 I I sssssssss SSSSSSSSS II s s s s s s s s l I REL FREQ REL FREQ REL FREQ I REL FREQ! CPCT) CPCT) CPCT) I CPCT) I ABS ADJ ABS ADJ ABS ADJ I ABS AOJI I I sssssssss sssssssss| ssssssssI FACULTY CHAIRPERS O 0 36 50 14 0 71 29 0 0 1 .0 7 26 44 15 7 0 2i 0 4 67 15 4 11 n 0 50 36 14 0 85 0 4 0 0 0 e 8 28 48 16 0 24 47 16 6 ! 0 4 75 17 4 0 3 .0 1000 1000 00 00 00 00 1.0 50 36 14 0 3 .7 3 .0 n ll n 4 .0 3 .8 71 29 0 0 0 6 16 49 ! ! ! ! ! ! s 25 50 17 0 2 4 81 11 2 0 3 .0 96 0 11 1.0 0 17 33 33 17 I 0 II 17 17 33 33 I 0I 17 33 33 17 1 3 73 13 2 7 3 .0 1. 0 40 60 0 45 49 47 51 50 50 50 50 44 48 48 52 33 36 45 49 14 IS a 0 2. 0 67 80 17 20 0 0 17 0 1. 0 0 2.0 00 0 0 I ! I I ! I I I ! I I I ! I ! I I 91! 01 27 46 15 5 0 0 I 0 0 I 100 100 I 0 0 1 0 0 I 0 0 I 1000 1000 0 0 0 00 00 0 0! 9! 15! 261 0! I I 4 .0 -I 3 3 .0 0 0 8 14 49 24 4 I 37 56 7 7 I 1 I I 0 I! 88 96 22 22 00 00 8 0 1. 0 8 I I I 0 II 3 .5 3. 8 2 4 75 10 2 8 0 17 17 33 33 0 3 .8 0 I I TOTAL O . I. R . 90 1 2 0 0 7 1.0 40 54 6 41 43 9 7 81 281 48! 16! 0! ! ! —! 1! 3! 14! 2! 0! I ! —I 97! 1! 2! 0! 001! ! ! ! 42! 58! 0! 44! 46! 10! 0! I 2 .0 I 182 #49 To make programs more f le x ib le and adaptable, more e le c tiv e courses th a t w i l l be counted toward graduation w i l l be o ffe re d . I I I 1 DEANS ICHAIRPERS! FACULTY I I I NUMBER : AS I Ns 1A I N = 27 I N = 81 ______________________ I _______ ___ !_ _ ____ !_ I I * ~I * " I ” * '* -= !-= -= = = _ I IREL FREO IREL FREQ IREL FREO VARIABLE I VALUE I CPCT! I CPCT1 I I IPCTJ I ! ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ! I none LIK E LIH D ILOU I OF IMOOERATE I OCCUR IHIGH I IGREAT I INO RESP I I I IMEAN RESPI IMPACT OF THE CHANGE - 67 I INONE ! ILOU I IMOOERATE I IHIGH I IGREAT I INO RESP I I I IMEAN RESP! if Xcult” ’i GRP MOST ISTUDENT I PROMOTING!PROVOST I THIS 1ST ♦ FED I CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! INO RESP I I 1 IMOOE^RESPI fFA C U LTY **! GRP MOST ISTUDENT I HINDERINGIPROVOST I THIS 1ST ♦ FED I CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! INO RESP I I I IMODE RESP! 57 7 0 0 0 36 89 11 0 0 0 0_ I I I I I I .I 56 4 19 0 0 22 71 5 24 0 0 0 I I I I I I I 45 0 18 4 2 31 66 0 26 6 3 0 I 1 I I I I I 17 0 17 17 0 50 33 0 33 33 0 0 I I I I I I I 48 2 15 3 1 31 . . . . . . . . . f . . . . . . . . . | . . 1. .0. . . . . . I | . . .1. .0. . . . .I i . . . 1. ..0. . . . I j . . . 1. .0. . . . . I| . . . . 1. .0. . . jI SHOULD I T ! NO I OCCUR 7 I YES I I NO RESP I AS A3 14 50 I 50 I 0I 10-2 YRS ESTIM ATEDI3-5 YRS TIME OF 16 -1 0 YRS OCCUR INO RESP 21 50 14 14 25 58 17 0 A8 33 19 59 I A1 I 0I A1 31 27 57 I 43 I 0I IS 44 15 26 20 I 60 I 20 I 0I 8 37 24 31 11 54 34 0 33 17 50 67 I 33 I 0I A3 33 24 57! 43! 0! 17 17 0 67 50 I 50 I 0I 0I 12 40 18 30 17! 571 26! 0! !———— I— ---------!----. . . . . . I. . . . . . . . . | ----- —--- 1. . . . . . . . | ! I 1 I I I IMODE RESP! 2 .0 I I I I I I 2 .0 I I 2 .0 I I I I I I 1 .0 I I 2 .0 I I 183 #50 More programs will be tailored for the Individual students. CHANGE STATEMENT s .| VARIA9LE f ! LIK E LIH D OF OCCUR IMPACT OF THE CHANGE s__. VALUE REL FREQ CPCT) ABS ADJ I INONE ILOU IMOOERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESP 0 7 43 IMODE RESP IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUOENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP I IMODE RESP SHOULO I T ! NO OCCUR ? ! YES ! NO RESP ... REL FREO IREL FREQ IREL FREO CPCT) I CPCT) I CPCT) ABS AOJ I ABS ADJ I ABS AOJ ! 21 29 217 ! ...^ ..p ..... ESTIMATEO!3 -5 YRS TIME OF 1 6 -10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP ! IMODE RESP f D .l.R « (NONE !LOW ------IMOOERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP ! (MEAN RESP IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUDENT PROMOTINGIPROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP ernes I ICHAIRPERS! FACULTY I I N= ? N s 14 51 I s s s s s s s s s !s s s s s s s s s !s s s s s s s s : 2 NUMBER t 50 —s I DEANS 7 14 25 33 25 8 I I I I 0I 3 .0 217 21 I 0 48 30 4 0 19 0 59 I 36 I 5 0 0 2 .5 0 I! 9 55 27 9 I I ! 0! I ! * 3 .4 15 41 0! 18 ! SO I 32 ! 0 ! 0 » 19 ! ! 3 .1 0 0 I 4 865 •!■ ! ! 71 70 91 I 4 5 I‘ 0 0 I 4 5 I 0 I 19 I I I* 64 90 1 44 55 0 0 0 1 27 0 I 14 7 I 4 5 I 0 0 19 29 0 I I I 129 36 I 48 59 64 I 50 33 41 19_ 0 I • I" 7 9 I ’ 1 5 " 26 SO 64 I 30 42 27 I 32 0 I 30 I 2.0 I 2.0 9 00 00 21 0 2.0 0 0 100 1.0 2.0 22 11 1.0 0 22 35 14 22 0 0 0 27 44 17 3 .1 4 67 4 5 89 5 2.0 0 0 8 10 1.0 !■ ! ! ! 0! ! ! 0 33 50 17 67 33 0 00 6? 33 0 00 2 .3 I I I s s I 25 0 I I !■ I *43” *5 6 * I I 25 33 I I 0 24 I I I I ! 0 33 50 17 0 0 6 2.8 10 12 20 0 0 0 67 80 17 17 20 0 ^ 2.0__ 17"*25 0 17 33 0 0 25 50 33 56 44 33 67 33 67 "V 9 46 46 0 17 67 17 17 67 17 31 31 31 2.0 0 0 2.0 6 0 2.6 ■! 0 01 20 2 5 ! 38 17 6 IB 0 46! 21! 7! 0! 3 .1 I I 222 2.0 3! 0! ! I —! 4! 6834 88! 5! 0 0! 45 0 20 10 1 23 1.0 4 .0 45 35 0 ! 20 21 21 21 0 18 2 .7 2! 7 :s: 8 10 38 29 20 24 31 24 N s I I TOTAL I I I I N = 98 I t I Is s s s s s s s ! t I IREL FREQ! I CPCT) I I ABS ADJ! ! ! 5 ! 35 4 1 ! 28 33! 15 18! 1 1! 16 ! ! ! 59! 0! 27! 13! 1! 01 I I 43 5 2 ! 39 4 7 ! 18 0! ■ •••••■ | 10 1 4 ! 36 49! 27 3 7! ! 28 ! 0 2.0 ! 184 #51 There w i l l be pressure f o r e re d u ctio n In number o f high cost teaching models, I . e . , la b s. CHANGE STATEMENT ! NUMBER : 51 I 1 ! CHAIRPERS { f a c u l ty { j N s 27 N s 51 DEANS N s la =========I=========!========= VARIABLE VALUE ! I REL FREO CPCT ) ! ! ABS ADJ ! SS3SS33! t !N0NE LIKELIH O •LOU OF {MODERATE OCCUR {HIGH {GREAT ! NO RESP I {MEAN RESP! {NONE (LOU (MOOERATE ! {HIGH (GREAT (NO RESP ! {MEAN RESP1 ■!■ ■!■ _ {FACULTY ! GRP MOST (STUDENT ! PROMOTING!PROVOST ! 1ST * FED ! THIS CHANGE (COMMUNITY! (NO RESP I ! ! (MODE RESP! IMPACT OF THE CHANGE 0 7 25 50 7 7 08 51 54 8 0 1 {REL FREQ I tP C TI 1 ABS ADJ I 0 » '4 15 19 33 19 11 4 17 21 37 ' 3 .5 0 15 23 62 REL FREO (PCT) ABS ADJ 6 12 24 27 16 16 4 29 SO 17 0 3 .8 10 24 29 14 20 *7 0 IS 3 .0 57 64 29 7 69 ! 31 ! 0 ( !0 -2 YRS ! ESTIMATED!3 -5 YRS ! TINE OF (6 -1 0 YRS ! OCCUR !NO RESP ! ! ! (MODE RESP! 36 36 38 38 23 0 62 31 8 0 0 0 1.0 21 7 1 .0 33 44 4 37 50 11 67 11 4 4 0 15 78 13 11 2.0 0 17 2 45 27 2 24 67 10 0 0 5 17 17 50 0 17 12 29 37 17 0 ! ! N = 98 ! ! ========! REL FREQI CPCT) ! ABS ADJ! ! 0 36 SO 14 0 SO 33 0 17 60 40 00 12 ! ! 20 28 Y 10 ! 0 ! 39 33 0 0 17 26! 38! 16! Oi I 3 .4 ! •! 2! Ill 23 2 8 ! 39 4 6 ! 11 13! 15 0! 44 32 4 IT 83 100 85 90 2.0 33 14 13 5! 15! 3 .6 3 .0 71 27 24 29 0 20 20 60 4 13 22 0 3 59 36 3 0 1 .0 8 22 00 3 .4 22 83 0 40 20 40 3 .0 0 IS 17 30 41 11 19 33 17 33 2 1.0 74 0 7 14 28 33 19 0 3 .0 4 .0 IFACULTY ! GRP MOST ! STUDENT ! HINDERING(PROVOST ! !ST ♦ FED ( THIS CHANGE (COMMUNITY! (NO RESP ! ( ! (MODE RESP! ■!■ ■(• SHOULD I T ! NO ! OCCUR 7 ! YES ! ! NO RESP 1 S9 0 0 7 REL FREO CPCT) ABS ADJ 3 .5 0 62 23 TOTAL 6 SSSSSSSS3 ========= 3 .5 0 4 26 44 15 11 3 .5 57 21 O .I.R . N = !========= ========= ========= 33333333! 3 .6 14 21 57 I 00 0 0 0 ! 1! 2! S3! 381 51 01 1 3 .0 I .......{ 66 80! 12 15! 2! 2 2! 0! 0! 0 17 ! 1.0 . . 1. 0J 67 80 17 20 17 0 "7 0 ""8 4 ! 13 1 6 ! _16_ _ 0 ! 0 ’IjT'sO! 67 17 17 2 .0 0 80 20 0 35 19 22 2.0 45( 25! 0! ! 185 #52 There will be an Increasing emphasis on quality research programs, partlculary research applied to social needs. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 92 DEANS I (CHAIRPERS N s 14 I N s 27 I __________ ts s r s c s s s : ! VARIABLE I 1 ;! VALUE ‘ INONE LIK E LIH D •LOU OF IMOOERATE OCCUR ■HIGH (GREAT (NO RESP ! (MEAN RESP > 1 - ........ IMPACT OF THE CHANGE (NONE (LOW IMOOERATE (HIGH (GREAT (NO RESP ( (MEAN RESP (FACULTY GRP HOST (STUDENT PROMOTING(PROVOST (ST ♦ FED THIS CHANGE (COMMUNITY !NO RESP (MOOE RESP . . . . . . . . . ^. . . . . . . . . GRP MOST {STUDENT HINDERING(PROVOST THIS ! ST ♦ FED CHANGE ! COMMUNITY ! NO RESP (MODE RESP I (_ 90 21 14 0 8 94 29 19 3 .4 0 21 29 36 7 - -- I I ( ! I ( ! «!■ 01 31 23 38 8 15 29 36 31 38 12 10 3 .3 0 0 33 17 8 17 25 0 1. 0 2. 8 99 22 12 12 0 0 29 36 37 9 45 20 16 24 19 0 ( 18 15 7 4 7 30 ~5 j ” 21 11 5 11 0 1. 0 !” 1 ! ! ! ( 1 0 40 60 0 0 0 ( ( 1 ( ! ! ( ( 0 33 0 17 17 40 ( 0 ! 0 ! 17 0 ! __ 1 . 0 4* 0 ! 1 ! ! ( |! ( 0 ( 2 .6 3 .3 27 19 0 33 50 0 0 17 44 24 13 22 07 0 •! ( 4. 0 2 28 26 30 13 0 ( .160 180 0 33 11 15 . TOTAL ! I ! ! 18 1* 0 ..... 33" " w ” ! 4 6 1 16 1 10 14 22 ! 3 ( 2 37 0 ( 1. 0 ( REL FREQ (REL FREQ( (PCTI I ABS AOJ -- 26 19 30 11 15 I N s 6 N s 51 ! N = 98 f ! I s s s s s s s s x s s rs s c s s : |S S S S S 3 S S ( REL FREQ (REL FREQ (PC TI ( CPCTI ABS AOJ I ABS AOJ 0 7 ! ( O .I.R . FACULTY ( ( 17 17 33 0 17 222 2 12 11 0 ( . . . . . . . II 3 .3 0 17 35 26 0! 20! 40! 29! 10 12! 12 0i! 3 .4 ! 26 30! 17 24 16 16 21! 29! 20! 33, 47! 131 13! 18! 91 0 0! 01! 1.0 •{• • • • • ■ • • * 1 J *2 0 ! 20 20 40 0 0 4. 0 9 12 6 31 0! 1.0 !( SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR 7 ( YES 1 NO RESP 21 71 7 23 ! 77 ( 0 ! 22 63 15 26 ( 74 ! 0 ( 29 59 12 33 ( 67 ( 0 ! 67 17 17 80 ! 20 ( 0 ! 29- ”s3! 59 12 6 70!( « 0 -2 YRS ESTIMATED13-5 YRS TIME OF (6 -1 0 YRS OCCUR (NO RESP 29 36 29 7 31 38 31 0 19 37 22 22 24 48 29 0 14 29 33 24 18 38 44 0 0 50 17 33 0 75 25 0 16 34 29 . . . . . . . . . I. . . . . . . . . (MOOE RESP 2. 0 ! ! ! !| ( 2. 0 ! ! ( ! ( 3. 0 ! ! 1 ! I 2. 0 ■! 21! 43! 36( 21 -0! 2 .0 186 #53 Research w i l l be tie d more c lo s e ly to In s tru c tio n . CHANGE STATEMENT NU"BER : 53 DEANS N s 14 VALUE (MEAN RESP IMPACT OF THE CHANGE (NONE (LOU (MODERATE (HIGH (GREAT (NO RESP ( . . . . . . . _!!!E*N R£5P 0 14 36 21 0 29 0 20 30 30 0 0 3 .1 29 7 29 44 . . . . . . . . . ! (MODE . . . . . .RESP ... 11 0 00 0 0 36 1*0 (FACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT HINDERING(PROVOST THIS (ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP 36 7 7 14 0 36 GRP MOST (STUDENT PROMOTING(PROVOST THIS (ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP ( (MODE RESP 1 I ! ! ! ! t ( 1. 0 ( ! ( ( ! ! ! ( 4 14 33 25 6 18 53 ( 37 6 20 11 16 42 32 0 0 3. 0 37 7 19 7 44 56 11 11 22 0 0 7 11 30 22 0 30 4 31 29 16 4 16 11 ( 26 ( 0 lS ! 0 (( 1.0 ■!(« 30 ( ( ( ! ( ! ! ! 30 19 0 15 0 37 47 29 0 24 0 0 1. 0 II ( ( ( ! ( ( ! ! f M ! NONE LIK E LIH D (LOU OF (MODERATE (HIGH OCCUR (GREAT (NO RESP (REL FREO ! CPCT* ( ABS ADJ ( •1 II II II •1 U ====!========= IEL FREO (REL FREO CPCT* CPCT* ! ABS ADJ ! ABS ADJ ( (SSSSSSSC 1:========= 0 0 ( 7 10 37 SO 29 40 ! 36 50 ( 22 30 0 0 ! 7 10 7 10 ! 0 0 29 0 ! 26 0 I 2 .4 ! 2 .8 5 37 35 19 5 0 2 .8 5 17 40 31 7 0 3. 2 45 6 10 6 0 33 =========!( ========(( 51 0 0( 33 50 ( 33 42! 33 29 3 6 ! 0 =0° ? 10 131 4! 0 0 0 213 0( 33 ( 2 .7 ! 2.5 —! 4 0 0 ! ( S( ( ( ! ! ! 33 33 0 0 33 30 SO 0 0 0 2.5 17 33 46 7 24 1. 0 33 ! 67 ( 0 00 0 00 0 50 2.0 ( ! ! 1 ! ! ! 17 0 0 33 0 50 (• I ! ( 1 ( 1 33 0 0 67 0 0 4. 0 14 33 22 3 23 19( 43! 3 ( 35 ! ! ! ! ! ( ( ! 38 9 -( 59! 14 ( 33! 67! 0! 6 10! 110 17! 00!! 36 » 1.0 !( 26 41 33 39 ! 61 ( 0 ! 27 55 18 33 1 67 ( 0 ( 33 H 33 50 ( 50 ! 0 ( 24 30 26 (0 -2 YRS ! ESTIMATED!3 -5 YRS ( TIME OF (6 -1 0 YRS ! OCCUR (NO RESP ( ( 1 (MODE RESP! 7 36 21 36 11 56 33 0 11 41 11 37 18 65 18 0 ( ( ( ! ( ! 14 27 33 25 18 37 45 0 0 33 17 50 0 67 33 0 11 33 24 32 2. 0 3. 0 ! 2. 0 471 8 211 ( 6( 10 6(( 0( 1.0 (( 11 ! 89 ( 0 ! 2. 0 01( 19 7 4 27 7 57 36 ! ! ( ( 4! I ( ( I ( I SHOULD I T ! NO ! OCCUR 7 1 YES ( ! NO RESP ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 REL FREO (REL FREOI CPCT* ( CPCT* ( ABS ADJ I ABS ADU( ( 68 9 15 9 0 0 TOTAL N = 10 12 208 100 1.0 ! ( ! ( ! ! ! ! ( I N r 98 ( ( =! ========! . ( 0 * 1 .R • :! = = = = = = = = = ! I s s s s s s s s : ! ! H II II VARIABLE ( ! (CHAIRPERS! FACULTY ! ( ! N = 27 ( N = 51 ! ( ( ( ! ! ! ! 16! 48! 36! 0! ! 2. 0 ! 187 #54 There t r i l l be more choice o f general education courses. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 54 ! ! VARIABLE ! I ! VALUE !========= !NONE LIK E LIH D ILOU OF (MODERATE (HIGH OCCUR (GREAT (NO RESP ( (MEAN RESP ■(• IMPACT OF THE CHANGE (NONE (LOU (MODERATE (HIGH (GREAT (NO RESP ! (MEAN RESP ! (CHAIRPERS FACULTY I N s 14 ! N s 27 N s 51 ( S(SSS*SS3S3 SSSSSSSSi ! REL FREQ (REL FREQ REL FREQ (PCT) ( ,(P C T ) (PCT) ABS ADJ | ABS ADJ ABS ADJ DEANS 0 14 29 7 21 29 0 *!========= 22 19 100 60 20 100 ( 0 0 ( 1? 22 37 ! ( 30 ( 0 I 15 30 15 11 0 3 .5 0 7 43 29 ! FACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT HINDERING! PROVOST THIS (ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP ! (MODE RESP 21 7 0 43 2lr 1.0 67 t 15 52 19 ( ( ( 0 ! 0 ( IS ( ! 37 ( 12 ! 120 (! 0! 37 ! ! 17 61 22 0 2.0 41 19 7 4 4 26 ! _ 1.0 ■I** 55 25 10 5 5 0 60 40 ( 0 I 41 15 48 0 (0 - 2 YRS ESTIMATED!3 -5 YRS TIME OF (6 -1 0 YRS OCCUR I NO RESP 21 33 I 56 ( 41 26 11 52 33 14 ! (MODE RESP 36 7 36 27 16 25 6 16 33 19 30 7 110 !( 22 0 2.0 (! 1.0 N = 29 't 20 1770 2.8 24 37 16 29 46 20 20 0 2 2 6 ========!( REL FREQ (PCT) ABS AOJ ========= 0 17 17 17 17 33 0 24 ! ! ( N = 98 ! 0 25 25 25 25 0 3 .5 2 2 35 4 25 46 5 33 4 24 0 8 105 22! 0!! - ! ! 50 27 so 33 0 225(( 20 0! 2 .5 17 33 0 0 0 50 2 .9 33 67 17 0 0 33 0 50 0 33 0 0 67 33! ! ( 34 301 49! 17! 1! 3! 0! ! ! •! 47! 18 a 3 29 0! 8 11! 26! 11 ! 4! 1.0 !! 0 22 50 100 50 0 16 33 20 31 23 49 29 0 33 17 0 50 1.0 23 38 13 1 2 22 2.0 42 2.0 IT 2 ‘ 8! 28! 14! 33 33 0 23 18 23 11 3l 4 .0 ’45”*57’ ! REL FREQ! (PCT) ( AES ACJ! __! .= -_ _ = _ _ | 3 .1 0 2.0 1.0 43 29 29 ■!« 10 12 2.0 ! ? ( ’ no OCCUR T ( YES I NO RESP . . . . . . . . . I. sssssssss 2 .9 3 .1 220 0 0 7 11 36 0 1.0 ll 0 3 .3 3 .3 43 4 25 21 33 17 20 40 10 30 (FACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT PROMOTING(PROVOST THIS (ST ♦ FED CHANGE ! COMMUNITY (NO RESP ( (MODE RESP sh o u ld ” 4 ! • TOTAL O .I.R . 67 33 ’ 4 2 " ” 54! 36 46! 22 0( ’24~"35! 31 14 31 44! 21! 0( ! ( ...... 2.0 188 #55 There will be an Increase 1n research and teaching 1n the behavioral sciences. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 55 = --! I ! OEANS N * CHAIRPERS 14 N s 27 s — xsssssss; VALUE REL FREQ CPCTI ABS ADJ INONE LIK E LIH D 'LOW OF IMOOERATE OCCUR ! HIGH (GREAT INO RESP 0 0 36 56 217 33 11 0 0 0 36 VARIABLE ! 1 I - - - - - - - - } (MEAN - - - - - - - - -RESP -. . . IMPACT OF THE CHANGE (NONE (LOU (MODERATE (HIGH (GREAT INO RESP I (MEAN RESP (FACULTY"" GRP MOST (STUDENT PROMOTING(PROVOST THIS (ST • FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP (MODE RESP GRP MOST (STUDENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS (ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP (MODE RESP 2.5 0 36 14 7 7 36 REL FREO (PCT> ABS ADJ 1. 0 I ” ” 22' 0 0 14 22 29 44 7 11 36 0 0 19 33 19 4 26 REL FREO (PCT) ABS AOJ 4 25 27 10 2 31 6 37 40 14 3 0 2. 7 ..... 44" T o " 4 5 15 20 7 10 4 5 26 0 la 0 ..... ” ” 20 11 4 7 15 27 11 20 44 0 6 4 10 2 37 9 6 3 0 1. 0 ” 4 14 8 10 47 *« ’ 7 26 15 19 0 1.0 30 44 26 40 60 0 31 35 33 47 S3 0 (0 -2 YRS ESTIHATED I3-5 YRS TIME OF !6 - 1 0 YRS OCCUR INO RESP 7 36 11 56 33 11 41 17 61 10 31 20 39 16 52 32 0 ! MODE RESP 21 2.0 0 IS 22 33 2.0 0 2.0 0 17 33 0 0 0 33 67 0 REL FREQI (PCT) ( ABS AOJ! ( ssssssss! 4 6! 23 3 3 ! 29 4 1 ! 16! 4! 3 30 ! 2 11 01 50 2 23 29 11 3 32 0 0 0 0 SO 100 0 0 0 0 50 0 17 0 0 0 50 2 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 17 50 17 33 50 0 33 17 50 2.0 ” 42 6 6 8 3 35 u 3! 34! 4( 0! ! .8 ! ■•••I 641 9! 9! 12 ! 5! 0! 1 .0 (! 0 0 67 33 0 " " IS 5 10 14 10 45 281 9! 19! 26! 19! 33 67 0 29 39 33 42! 58! 0( 9 35 IS 38 15! 56! 30! 4 .0 33 67 0 36 REL FREQ (PCT) ABS ADJ 1 .0 ......... 21 43 36 ! N s 98 ! I SSSSSSSSi 3 .0 SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR 7 I YES I NO RESP . . . . . . . . . | . — -- -- — TOTAL 6 2 *7 2. 9 0 25 45 25 5 0 1.0 4 .0 N s 51 sssssssss . s . . — . . . A 5 26 35 20 27 29 41 30 40 14 19 11 15 4 4 5 27 26 0 2 . 8 ._ _ . . . 3 . 1 ’4 3 " * 6 ~ 7 11 0 0 7 11 7 11 36 0 O .I.R . N s s fs s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s 2. 8 0 56 22 11 11 0 FACULTY 0 67 33 0 0( ! 1.0 I .......| 2.0 0!! ( 189 #56 The disagreements over the value of a liberal versus a teachnlcal/professlonal education will Increase 1n Intensity. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 96 VARIABLE ! ! VALUE (NONE LIK E LIH D ! LOU OF IMOOERATE OCCUR IHIGH f GREAT INO RESP I (MEAN RESP I I I ! N s J4 ! N = 27 ! N s 51 I f :========I ========= I========= I f OEANS REL FREQ IREL FREQ IREL FREQ (PCT) I (PCT) I (PCT) ABS AOJ I ABS AOJ ! ABS ADJ I 4 30 26 19 11 11 0 I 30 ! 36 50 ! 14 ! 0 ! 0 ! 29 ! 2 .9 ! 4 (FACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT PROMOTING!PROVOST THIS 1ST * FED CHANGE I COMMUNITY INO RESP 64 0 0 0 7 29 ■ •••■ ■ ■ ■ ■ (MOOE RESP (FACULTY GRP MOST ! STUDENT HINOERING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE I COMMUNITY (NO RESP t ! MOOE RESP s h o u lo ” i t i ” no OCCUR ? ! YES ! NO RESP !0 - 2 YRS E STIM A TE 0I3-5 YRS TIME OF 16-10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP i (MODE RESP 0 64 0 27 9 0 2. 8 0 21 mmm| I I ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 0 so 0 21 7 21 INONE ! LOU (MODERATE IHIGH (GREAT INO RESP ! I MEAN RESP IMPACT OF THE CHANGE ICHAIRPERS! FACULTY 0 20 3.0 3. 7 50 14 29 2.0 ! I ! ! ! 52 13 9 9 17 ! ! ! ! ! 2S 35 31 12 12 29 40 36 13 0 3 .5 2 18 37 20 8 16 TOTAL N = 6 xsssssss: REL FREQ CPCT) ABS AOJ 0 17 17 33 33 0 0 17 17 33 33 0 3 .8 2 21 44 23 9 0 17 17 50 17 0 0 33 17 40 0 ! 41 57 ! 14 10 ! 8 11 ! 8 11 ! 6 a • 27 0 ! 1. 0 ! 1. 0 mmmm1! —Masas*•#eii 67 82 ! 51 60 15 18 ! 33 40 19 0 I 0 16 33 17 17 40 20 20 17 17 20 0 10 I 22 20 ! 48 0 ( 11 19 70 ! 2.0 67 24 0 5 5 0 27 ! 59 I 14 ! 0 !! ! 22 39 16 24 2.0 28 51 21 0 1.0 0 0 1.0 BMMMMMMM 67 80 17 20 17 0 0 33 33 33 2.0 23! 30! 30! 14! 12 0!! 3 19 36 19 4! 23! 43! 23! 7! 6 0! • « • • • • • • (f 14 17 0 !! 20 0 0 ! 1.0 52 19 0 4 4 22 20 27 27 12 3 .1 10 12 59 i 2 *2! 16 40 20 47 REL FREQ1 (PCT) I ABS ADJ! . . . . . . . I! 17 17 50 17 2 .7 3 .1 N s 98 ! ! ! 3 .3 33 17 10 ! ! ! ! ! i ! 1. 0 ! •mmm asmm«■ !57 80 ! 14 20 ! 29 0 ! ! ! 1 ! ! 1 i ! 0 !I ( 1• 15 90 i - ” ! " 0 ii 7 0 7 0 15 15 0 40 20 20 20 0 0 4 26 35 26 9 22 30 227 1.0 29 14 14 14 0 29 4 33 29 21 12 0 O.I«R• 0 SO 50 0 48 9 4 5 14 19 59! 42 13 7 7 5 26 56! 18! 11! 51 6! 18! 0! 1.0 !! 10 ! 10 ! 7! 0!! 1.0 ! 57 24 18 —. » 18 43 15 23 701 30! 0! — «! 24! 56! 20! 0! 2.0 ! ! 190 #57 There w i l l be more emphasis on graduate work. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 57 sssssssss ! REL FREQ IPCT1 ABS AOJ VALUE JNONE LIK E LIH D ! LOU OF IMOOERATE OCCUR IHIGH ! GREAT INO RESP ! (MEAN RESP INONE (LOW IMOOERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I ----- - -RESP ----. . . . . . . . . IIMEAN (FACULTY GRP MOST I STUDENT PROMOTINGI PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY INO RESP I (MOOE RESP . . . . . . . . . ^. . . . . . . . . GRP MOST ISTUOENT HINDERINGIPROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY INO RESP IMOOE RESP SHOULD I T I NO OCCUR 7 I YES I NO RESP --!• 10 -2 YRS ESTIM ATEDI3-5 YRS TIME OF 1 6 -10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP ! (MOOE RESP 0 21 14 21 7 36 0 110 3. 4 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 44 33 0 11 11 0 1 I 1 1 1 I 44 I 56 1 0 0 36 62 21 370 43 2.0 I 0 0 20 20 0 0 10 12 0! 0! 3 .2 0 11 33 37 7 11 0 1 1 37 1 42 1 8 1 0 •1 I 3. 4 I 44 22 4 0 19 11 1 I I I I 1 •I ! 1. 0 1 1. 0 , | ..... * 1s• " T 1 "o’ " ” * ! 7 11 1 19 26 1 14 22 1 4 5 1 33 1 41 58 I 21 4 21 33 1 5 I 0 1 30 0 I 36 t 4. 0 4. 0 I 1 29 36 36 TOTAL 6 N s 90 I I s s s s s s s s s ) sSSSSSSSSI ss 10 120 3 .3 0 22 22 44 11 0 N s 11 12 3 .2 29 21 0 7 7 36 I N s 51 REL FREQ I REL FREQ REL FREQ I REL FREO! CPCT1 I (PCTJ ! CPCTI t ABS ADJ | ABS ADJ ABS ADJ ! ABS ADJ! I ! sssss: sssssssssf 4 4 *"'"5 ! 5 ~~fc! 5" 33 40 ! 16 19 __ ! 16 17 30 32 25 30 ! 24 2 9 ! 33 36 25 30 33 40 ! 33! 28 15 16 ! ! 17 16 ! 16 ! 33 22 .33 0 14 14 29 7 36 O .I.R . I I s s s s s s s s s (s s s s s s s s s I N s 27 !- = = -VARIABLE I ! __________ f IMPACT OF THE CHANGE CHAIRPERS I FACULTY DEANS N = 14 50 25 4 0 21 0 0 12 47 16 6 20 3 .0 0 15 59 20 7 0 3. 2 35 20 10 4 8 24 1 46 26 13 S 10 0 1. 0 18 16 10 16 14 27 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 24 22 14 22 19 0 1. 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 .2 0 33 17 33 0 17 0 40 20 40 0 0 3. 0 17 33 17 0 17 17 20 40 20 0 20 0 2. 0 1 1 1 1 I •I1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 | 1 I 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 I 67 100 ! 0 0 I 33 0 I■ X 4. 0 i 0 13 37 24 6 19 ! -! 0! 1 6! 4 6! 30! 80!! ! 3 S ! ... | 36 27! 21 7 9! 3 4! 11 1 4! ! 21 ! » ! 1 ..• ! 14! 10 14 ! 8 ! 27 38! 16! 11 ! 30 0 20 12 0 4 ! ) ! —I 26 59 13 30 1 70 1 41 35 24 54 1 46 1 67 17 17 80 I 20 i 37 41 22 531 26 56 4 15 30 65 4 12 43 16 29 17 61 22 0 0 33 0! 67 I 13 45 13 29 191 631 191 2.0 0 2.0 17 50 2.0 33 I 0I 01 ■I 0! I 2.0 . *I 191 #58 Competing courses (course d u p lic a tio n ) w i l l be e lim in a te d . CHANGE STATEMENT NUH9ER ! 58 OEANS ! ! N a 14 I ICHAIRPCRS FACULTY I N a 27 N a 51 I =========!=========!========::|3ZSSSS3SS aasaaaaa: ? ! VARIABLE ! VALUE ! ! - I !REL FREQ I CPCT) ! ABS ADJ !_ - 14~ j;- INONE ! I LIK E LIH D ILOU -----OF IMOOERATE II IHIGH OCCUR IGREAT I I INO RESP I I I MEAN RESPI IMPACT OF THE CHANGE 29 29 14 xs I IREL FREQ I CPCT) 1 ABS AOJ I 29 29 22 26 33 23 27 35 14 0 6 25 14 29 4 0 16 12 20 44 24 0 0 4 20 §59 6 16 14 2 .B . INONE I 0 0 I ILOW I 14 14 I IMOOERATE I 36 36 I IHIGH I 43 43 I IGREAT ! 7 7 I INO RESP I 0 0 I I I I IMEAN RESP! 3 .4 I ------------ f_ ------------ . . . . . . . . . | . IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUOENT PROMOTING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ F E D CHANGE ICOMMUNITY I INO RESP I IMODE ■!■ I RESP! ! 7 I 7 I 86 I 0 0 I 0 B6 I 114 124 2.9 11 19 41 22 0 7 8 B 114 68 124 7 7 63 0 TY 81 88 93 GRP MOST I STUDENT I 7 8 7 • » ! HINDERINGIPROVOST I 0 4 0 0 THIS 1ST ♦ FED I 0 0 0 0 CHANGE ' I COMMUNITYI 0 7 0 INO RESP I 0 ! I I MODE RESP! • • • • • • • • • J« • • • • ■ • • • f a . . . . . . . . J . 7 7 I 41 44 SHOULD I T ! NO I OCCUR 7 I YES I 93 93 I 52 56 I 7 0 I NO RESP I ■!< »!■ 30 33 10 -2 YRS I 36 36 ! 50 ! E S TIM A TE 0I3-5 YRS 50 48 54 14 ! 14 TIME OF 16-10 YRS OCCUR ! INO RESP 0 ! ! INODE RESP! 2.0 ! 2.0 1.0 0 0 11 12 11 0 2 75 0 2 18 REL FREQ! CPCT) I ABS AOJ! I 0 7 30 16 35 00 2 18 3 .3 0 0 33 17 33 17 0 5 0 83 0 00 0 6 0 83 0 0 0 0 n 25 31 24 32 39 29 50 33 0 17 0 1.0 10 112 01 ! I —— —I 81 5 1 0 1 92! 6! 1! 0! 1! 0! I 26 64 28! 72! 30 39 17 14 35! 45! 20! 0! ! 12 1.0 I ■e»a»««*cb | 1.0 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 ■ 6! 221 36! 31! 6! 0! I 3 .1 I ■I 7! 4 5! 83! 73 3 3! 2! 3 .0 83 100 00 20 26! 25! 261 9! 0! I 2 .9 I 17 3 .0 93 5 26 22 23 8 9 5 19 33 2B 5 0 17 2 90 0 2 ========! 11 12! 33 17 33 17 3 .3 61 16 2.0 17 33 50 0 0 5 23 35 30 7 0 ! . 0_ ’24’ “ m " 20 0 17 33 50 3 .0 76 4 N a 98 I I REL FREQ CPCT) ABS AOJ 10 120 4 6 83=8=83=! 3 .1 3 .0 1.0 N a TOTAL s aaaaaasa 3 .1 2 .8 7 3 .0 0 REL FREQ CPCT) ABS AOJ 0. 1.R. 11 60 40 10 . . . 0! ! 2.0 ! 192 #59 Computer science Instruction will become a part of all educational programs. * CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 59 —s j — *s DEANS N s 14 sssssssss ! REL FREO VARIABLE ! VALUE 1 ABS ADJ ABS ADJ ABS ADJ ! ABS ADJ! 1 __________ 1_________ I 1s s s s s s s s s I 11 14 0 0 *! 10 121 1 33 43 0 0 ! 17 201 8 9 24 26 ! 15 19 17 20 1 18 22! 1 11 14 29 33 50 60 1 23 2 8 ! 1 7 10 20 22 17 20 1 15 18! 1 22 0 10 0 17 0 I 15 0! 1 ( I ! 2 .6 3 *5 4 .0 I 3 .2 I 5 15 55 20 5 0 2 8 39 22 18 12 50 11 11 H 0 37 16 6 6 20 16 53 35 12 0 0 0 39 25 4 0 2 22 3. 0 11 41 11 37 0 17 17 50 0 17 44 19 7 7 23 0 33 33 17 0 0 17 50 32 5 10 2 0 0 50 0 17 0 33 1 .0 1 .0 2 .0 1 ! I 1 ! I I I 2 20 36 22 12 17 40 40 20 0 0 0 I I I I I I I I 34 16 6 5 17 21 0 75 0 25 0 0 ! I I I ! ! ! ! 37 23 4 7 1 28 1. 0 55 29 35 45 55 65 0 16 0 mmmm awaBMMamasM 10 12 18 65 39 49 18 31 39 0 20 0 2. 0 0 20 20 60 0 0 3. 4 3 .5 1. 0 1* 0 2 9 44 24* 20 0 2. 0 17 67 17 17 33 33 17 20 80 0 ■ ••• 20 40 40 0 2. 0 2! 1 2! 43! 27! 151 0! 1 ! 3. 4 43! 211 8! 61 22! 0! 1 1. 0 1 51! 321 6! 10! 1! 0! ! 1. 0 ! I 39! 32 49 ! 61! I 19 0! I mmmmm— I 1 12 16! ! 38 5 0 ! 34! 1 26 I 24 0! I ! 2. 0 ! 1 193 #60 There will be en Increase In quantitative emphasis 1n many curricula. ! VALUE ____ !_ ’(" REL FREO (REL FREO (PCT ) ( (PCT> ABS ADJ ! ABS ADJ ! * S S S S S S S S i (S S S S S S S S ! £I S S S S S S S S S !NONE LIK E LIH D (LOU OF (MODERATE OCCUR THIGH (GREAT (NO RESP (MEAN RESP IMPACT OF THE CHANGE (NONE (LOU IMOOERATE (HIGH (GREAT INO RESP ! (MEAN RESP GRP MOST (STUDENT PROMOTING(PROVOST THIS ! ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY INO RESP o"”*o' ( 14 20 1 I 60 ( I 0 ( I 7 10 43 7 29 3 .6 0 14 21 36 0 10 ( 0 20 30 SO 29 3 .3 36 14 56 22 36 0 0 0 14 0 0 22 (MOOE RESP (FACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT HINDERING(PROVOST THIS (ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY INO RESP (MODE RESP (0 -2 YRS E STIM A TE 0!3-5 YRS TINE OF (6 -1 0 YRS OCCUR (NO RESP ! . (MODE RESP 32 32 0 12 33 11 30 16 0 31 IS 21 16 3*2 3 .3 0 0 10 37 16 6 31 11 0 0 330 7 11 0 00 36 1.0 32 4 1 0 0 0 I 1§ I I I 0 33 40 ( “ 57 » ™ 17 33 ! £o 36 5S i 14 36 14 36 22 56 22 0 0 44 19 37 0 71 29 0 1 ( ! ! ! 12 29 22 37 0 2.0 ( ! 23 ! ! ! ! ! 0 ( 2. 0 0! ( ! ! 0! 38 57! 87 12 *! 11 ! 4 6! 9 34 1 23 36 1 0 38 50 1.0 38 ! 62 ( 0 ! 19 47 34 0 29! 1 3! 9 13! 35 49! 21 30! 3 7! 30 0( ! 3 .3 ( 2 2.0 42 ( 0 0! 201 38! . . . . . . . . . !—----— ! 0 41 2*0 2. 0 0 2 30 41 30 ( ! ( ! I ( ! I 60 ! 40 ! ( ( 17 ! 3 .4 ! SO 33 104 1.0 30 3 .3 61 6 24 33 0 0 14 27 20 9 20o 39 4 33 ! n ! 0 ( 2. 0 I ! 1 I ! I ! SO 8 12 ( 17“ 74 5 0 0 30 0 14 54 23 9 0 3 .3 , !. . . .1.0 ..... 0 40 40 3 .8 ■•■■•Ml 11 11 11 21 0 0 33 33 17 17 8 110 !■ ! 1 33 11 I 1 22 32 7 ! 1 30 ! ! 3 .3 !• --» -— ■ ! 44 63 4 I 5 ! 7 7 ! ! 7 30 I I 0 0( 17 49 23 I i { 1 1 .........{ ......... 22 22 1 i 1 1 1 SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR 7 I YES ! NO RESP ’36”"36' 0 0 ! t I TOTAL J ! ! ! N s 98 ! I ! (s s s s s s s s ! ! ! 1REL FREC! ! iP C T I 1 ! ABS ADJ! ! ! ! ssssssss J 2.0 1 I 1 J ssssssssi j ( ! O .I.R . ! ( N s 6 N s 51 1 S S S S S S S S i:( ssssssssi 1 REL FREO (REL FREO (PCT) ! (PCT) ABS ADJ 1 ABS ADJ ! FACULTY (CHAIRPERS ! ( N s 27 N s 14 NUMBER : 60 VARIABLE ! « ! ! DEANS ! ! ! 1 ! ! 1 1hAQVM 1 1 CHANGE STATEMENT 17 33 17 33 2. 0 20 1 1 *0° ! 25 50 25 0 32 1 4! 0( ! 1 ! 38! 57! 2( 3! 0! 0! I ! -( 0( ! ""*9 *" 15! 1 35 5 5 ! 19 31 ( I 37 ( 0! ! ! ! ! •# 2.0 194 #61 There t r i l l be a more h o lis t ic approach to problem s o lv in g and an Increase 1n team research. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 61 VARIABLE ! ! VALUE !___ _ .s |NONE LIK E LIH D fLOU OF (MODERATE OCCUR (HIGH (GREAT (NO RESP ( . . . . . . . . . |(MEAN . . . - - - -RESP -- — IMPACT OF THE CHANGE (NONE (LOU (MODERATE (HIGH (GREAT (NO RESP ( -.( (MEAN RESP (FACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT PROMOTING!PROVOST (ST * FED T H IS . CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP (MOOE RESP ! N s 14 CHAIRPERS! FACULTY I N = 27 ( N s 51 REL FREO (PCT) ABS ADJ REL FREO (REL FREO (PCT) 1 (PCT) ABS ADJ ! ABS ADJ DEANS !_e______ I______ T ” o [ o o 15 20 ( 16 20 ssssssssi 0 180 la 43 0 21 21 55 26 30 4 26 0 27 0 3 .4 0 21 21 21 14 21 27 27 18 44 19 1 I ! 1 ( ! 1 (FACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT HINDER ING(PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP ( (MODE RESP 36 7 7 7 7 36 SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR 7 t YES ( NO RESP 29 50 21 36 1 64 1 0 ! (0 -2 YRS ESTIMATE013-5 YRS TIME OF (6 -1 0 YRS OCCUR (NO RESP 29 29 14 29 40 40 20 0 (MODE RESP 56 11 11 11 11 0 1. 0 1. 0 60 t ( ! ! I ! ! ( t ! ! ! t 33 4 11 15 11 26 45 5 15 20 15 0 1. 0 41 11 4 7 0 37 1 ( *1 ! ! ! ! ! (■ I ! N = 6 27 35 35 15 0 ( ! ! ! ( ! REL FREO (REL FREOl (PCT) ( (P C T) ( ABS ADJ ! ABS ADJt ( I SSSSSSSS! !(SSSSSSSSt 0 0 0 0 S3 0( 0 0 00 17 100 0 83 3 .5 55 8 24 11 3 0 1. 0 6 3 .3 0 i 1 ■!< # 39 4 12 11 4 30 17 100 1 0 0 ! 0 0 ! 0 0 1 0 0 I 83 0 !I 1 1 .0 1 39 8 5 8 3 37 1 4 70 26 5 ! 95 ! 0 1 20 61 20 24 76 0 0 0 ! 17 100 ! 83 0 ! 15 59 26 22 30 22 26 30 40 30 0 16 35 16 33 24 S3 24 0 0 0 ! 17 100 I 0 0 ! 83 0 f! I 2 .0 ! 18 32 16 34 1. 0 2. 0 ( ! ! !a I ( 1. 0 2. 0 01 11 •! 1! lit 421 311 15( 01 1 3. 5 ( ...| 551 61 171 161 61 0 0 ! 0 0 1 0 0 ! 17 100 ! 0 0 ( 83 0 v! I 4 .0 ! 41 8 6 10 4 31 60 11 9 14 6 0 191 421 311 81 27 ( ! ( 1 ! !f I ( 65 18 6 12 0 0 0( 14 31 22 1 00 00 8 31 17 100 00 00 1 22 3 .0 41 6 18 8 2 25 ! ! TOTAL ( ( N s 98 I _________ 3 .0 3 .2 0 ( 102 122 0 ( 3 .5 1. 0 40 35 25 I 27 11 IS ( 12 0 I 22 26 0 80 0 0 20 0 0 31 27 4 0 t 22 3 .3 0 27 3 .3 57 0 0 14 0 29 35 ! 40 ( 5 ( ! O . I. R . 1 2 01 t 0 ( ----- ! 611 13 1 S( 131 51 0( ! 0 1 — I 211 79! 01 ... ( 28! 48! 25! 0!! 0 ! 195 #62 There will be an Increasing pressure to popularize courses to attract students. NUMBER : 62 !-= VARIABLE I VALUE INONE LIK E LIH D ILOU OF IMOOERATE OCCUR IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESP IMPACT OF THE CHANGE sssssssss REL FREO CPCT J ABS AOJ REL FREO CPCT! ABS AOJ REL FREO IREL FREO Ir E L FREQ! I CPCT) ! CPCT) I CPCT) ABS AOJ I ABS AOJ ! ABS ADJ! s — sssssssss sssssssss 4 4 12 14 37 40 24 28 26 2B 33 40 15 16 16 19 7 0 16 0 N = 27 INONE ILOU IMOOERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP IMEAN RESP IFACULTY GRP MOST 1 STUDENT PROMOTINGIPROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE {COMMUNITY INO RESP . . . . . . . . . IMODE . . . . . .RESP ... GRP HOST ISTUDENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE rCOMMUNITV INO RESP IMOOE RESP s_. 21 14 36 14 14 0 17 36 14 14 *3 42 17 0 56 15 19 7 58 25 B 0 B 0 37 15 26 4 7 36 7 43 0 0 14 60 16 20 0 27 18 18 42 8 SO D 0 0 3.0 1 ! I I I I I 48 11 15 4 7 15 0 0 6? 17 17 21 0 0 41 20 57 13 17 4 9 0 1. 0 I 1 I I I 1 I 51 0 18 2 2 27 51 24 70 0 24 3 3 0 1. 0 33 0 50 0 17 0 63 18 20 78 I 22 I 0 ! 83 17 0 1 0-2 YRS ESTIM ATEDI3-5 YRS TIME OF 1 6 -10 YRS OCCUR. INO RESP 7 57 67 41 33 IS 46 37 17 27 27 20 25 37 37 26 0 67 17 17 IMODE RESP 2 .0 1 .0 1.0 0 2.0 I 42 49! 13 16! 7! 6! 6 5 15 Ot I I I 1.0 33 0 50 0 17 0 3 .0 76 1 24 ! 0 ! 0!! 18 22! 1.0 70 22 7 0 0 17 17 ! I I ! ! 1 I I 31! 36! 17! -! 1! 9! 36 4 1 ! 24 2 8 ! 17 201 13 01 ! 3 .5 I 0 0 67 17 17 1? 17 92 1 8 I 0 I 11 12 1! 14! 3*5 W 79 7 14 Zl 32 15 0 17 SHOULO” I T I " no" ’ ” " " ’ OCCUR ? I YES ! NO RESP 21 14 50 33 17 3 .5 108 12 10 2 20 1.0 i 1 12 28 3 .7 3 .6 42 17 29 4 8 0D 0 50 33 17 2 2 10 12 25 11 0 1.0 1.0 I_______ I 0 I 3 .7 3 .5 3 .6 0 7 14 0 3 .4 0 14 217 1 11 12 23 17 42 17 0 3 .5 SO FACULTY ! O . l. R . CHAIRPERS =- ! ! i!s s s s s s s s s I ! ! I TOTAL I t ! ! N s 6 N s 51 ! N s 98 I I I 1 s s s s s s s s s Is s s s s s s s : :| s s s s s s s s | OCANS N s 14 CHANGE STATEMENT ! ! ! ! ! I I 1 83 I 17 I 0 I 0 80 20 0 47 4 22 2 4 20 5! 28! 31 51 1 9 0! I I 68 " b o ! 17 14 2 o{ •I 27 3 3 ! 36 4 4 ! 18 2 3 ! 19 0! 2 .0 ! I 196 #63 Budget c o n s tra in ts w i l l reduce support s e rv ic e s . CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 63 DEANS I I I N = 27 I N = 51 ICHAIRPERS! FACULTY N s 14 I I I 0«I•R# I I s s s s s s s s s Is s s s s s s s s Is s s s s s s s s VARIABLE 1 ! ! VALUE IMPACT OF THE CHANGE :s s js s s s s s s s j I I REL FREO IREL FREQ IREL FREO IREL FREO IREL FREQ! CPCTI I (PCT I I CPCT ) I (PCT) I CPCT) I ABS AOJ I ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ! INONE LIK E LIH D ILOU OF -----IMOOERATE IHIGH OCCUR IGREAT INO RESP 1 IMEAN I TOTAL I I N = 98 ! 23 I 50 I RESP INONE ILOU IMOOERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESP ........ 0 0 29 29 31 7 0 0 14 71 7 7 IFACULTY GRP MOST ! STUDENT HINOERING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP 14 14 64 ....'USSLSEfS sh o u ld” ? i ” no" ~ ” OCCUR ? I YES I NO RESP —---------! ! 0 -2 YRS ESTIM ATEDI3-5 YRS TIME OF 16-10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP IMODE RESP ! I I 1 t I I ! 0 4 19 33 41 4 I I ! I I ! I I 7 0 22 63 0 7 15 I 15 ! 69 I 32 4 .1 IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUDENT PROMOTING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP ! IMODE RESP 1 0 0 31 31 38 0 4. 0 0 0 7 3 .0 0 0 15 77 8 0 4. 0 80 !I 81 15 4 57 62 ! 23 ! 15 I 67 26 0 7 7 1 .0 0 4 18 29 35 14 8 0 24 68 0 0 I I I I ! I ! I 0 0 33 49 4 14 58 I 57 0 5 20 34 41 0 I ! 1 ! I I ! I 0 0 33 33 33 0 0 0 39 57 5 0 I I I I ! I I ! 0 0 50 50 0 0 4 .1 4 .0 66 11 12 ! 10 11 19 21 ! 20 23 4 0! 4 ! 0I 4 4 ! 0 0 0 !! 11 0 ! 140 I ! 1.0 I 1.0 !• I- 92 I 21 14 ! I I I I ! I I 4 .1 86* 7 7 0 4 19 35 42 0 •!• 0 !!. I 1.0 85 I IS I I 0 14 00 72 I 28 I I 61 16 6 18 74 19 7 0 . .0. I . 0 0 II I 06 100 1 .0 0 0 33 33 33 0 I 1 I ! 1 1 I I 0 3 20 31 37 9 0 0 SO 50 0 0 I I I I I I I I 2 0 29 56 3 10 4 .0 3 .0 17 33 33 0 0 17 47 0I 27 1 1 2.0 1 .0 4. 20 ! 40 I 40 I 0 I I I I I 67* 67 I 33 33 I 0 0 I 50 33 0 17 4, 12 62! 31 0! I I 33! 14! 3 0! 1! 1! 12 0!! 1.0 I ■sr 9 ! 92! 81 0! 61 —! 71! 0 ! *5 0 I! 13 60!! I 60 I 40 I I 1.0 24! ! 197 #64 Students w i l l have to c a rry a la rg e r share o f the co s t o f education. (Increased t u it io n ) . CHANCE STATEMENT 1ICHA1RPERS DEANS NUMBER : 64 FACULTY N s 14 ! N = 27 I s s s s s s s s s (s s s s s s s s s N = 51 I I 0. I. R. TOTAL I I IN : 6 N : 98 I I I i ! S S S S S S S S S 3333333=1 I I REL FREQ IREL FREQ REL.FREO IREL FREO I IPCT) CPCT) I CPCT) CPCT) ABS ADJ I ABS AOJ ABS AOJ I ABS ADJ !_ _ I :::: (s s s s s s s s s •NONE I !~' o" 0 LIK E LIH D ILOU 4 4 I I 0 OF IMOOERATE 21 23 I 19 19 13 I 33 33 OCCUR IHIGH 50 54 I 33 38 I 52 SO 50 IGREAT 39 44 I 26 21 23 I 17 17 ? INO RESP 7 0 I I I I I IMEAN RESP I 4 .1 I 3 .8 4 .0 ••■ ••••■ •(■ ■ ■ ••■ ■ •a mmmm mmmmm 4 .2 0 j ~ T “T INONE 0 I 0 0 0 0 IMPACT ILOU 4 4 0 4 0 17 17 OF THE IMOOERATE 43 46 30 32 33 33 36 38 30 32 CHANGE IHIGH 37 42 33 33 IGREAT 27 31 17 17 (NO RESP l o S 3§ VARIABLE FREO! PCT) I ABS ADJ! VALUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 10 12 0 . . . . —! 0 0! 0 0 2 16 42 32 8 4 .1 ■•■■■Ml | 0 4 27 35 26 9 20 22 12 I IMEAN RESP 3 .6 IFACULTY GRP HOST (STUDENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS 1ST • FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY INO RESP I IMODE RESP 0 64 29 0 0 7 SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR 7 I YES ! NO RESP 86 7 7 92 ! 78 8 ! 19 0 1 4 81 19 0 73 16 82 ! 18 I 1 0 -2 YRS ESTIM ATEDI3-5 YRS TIME OF 1 6 -10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP I IMOOE RESP 64 14 69 ! 15 I 15 ! 67 26 72 28 7 0 57 14 14 16 67 16 16 0 - 0 0 15 81 0 4 0 0 15 85 0 0 4 .0 1 11 12 67 72 7 80 0 7 80 7 0 69 31 0 0 0 2.0 1.0 ! 0 1.0 0 0 16 63 8 14 0 0 0 IB 73 9 0 4. 0 59 8 0 14 14 2.0 2.0 0 !! I I I 1 1 I 12 1.0 0 3 .9 3 .5 0 0 21 64 7 7 4 .0 I I I I I ! ! ! 0 IFACULTY GRP MOST I STUDENT PROMOTING(PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY INO RESP ! (NODE RESP .........! ......... 0 0 23 69 8 0 0 4 .0 3 .9 ! ! I 1 ! I ! ! 7 689 ! 0 I 16 ! 0 ! I I ! 0! 0 0 ! 0 0 ! 0 0 I 67 100 1 0 0 ! 33 0 ! 4 .0 17 33 17 ! 20 40 20 0 200 0 0 15 68 3 11 4 7 60 11 2! 18! 46! 34! 0!! ! 0! 4! 29! 38! 28! 0! I I - I 0! 0! 6! 0! I I —I 8! 68! 13! 0 0 0! 11 I '0l l!I 2.0 I 83 17 83 17 ’77~83! 15 17! 50 33 17 0 50 33 17 0 *6 0 ~ "6 8 ! 18 2 1 ! 17 17 2.0 0 0 1.0 10 8 0! 10 11! 11 0 !I 1 .0 ! 198 #65 S tate and Federal support w i l l be In c re a s in g ly d i f f i c u l t to g e t. f I CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 65 __________ ( ___ VARIABLE ! ! VALUE __________ J INONE LIK E LIH D ILOU OF 1MODERATE OCCUR IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN ■I* IMPACT OF THE CHANGE ! ! N s 27 REL FREQ CPCT) ! ABS ADO I :s s s s s s s : l' I 25 t I 29 33 I 36 42 I 14 0 REL FREQ CPCT) ABS AOJ t 0 210 I I I I ------ I I IMEAN .. .. .. .. .^ I I I RESPI GRP MOST ISTUDENT ! PROMOTING!PROVOST ! THIS 1ST ♦ FED ! CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! INO RESP ! ......... IMODE RESP1_ GRP MOST ISTUDENT ! HINOERING!PROVOST ! THIS 1ST ♦ FED I CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! INO RESP ! I CHAIRPERS ! N s 14 j ssssssss: RESPI INONE ILOU _____ IMOOERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP DEANS I IMODE RESP! 4 .2 0 0 21 36 29 14 0 0 25 42 33 0 !0 -2 YRS ESTIMATED!3 -5 YRS TIME OF 16-10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP I I I I IMODE RESP! 11 1 I I I I I I 0 0 8 92 0 0 4 .0 1 I I I I I I 17 17 50 8 TOTAL 6 REL FREQI CPCT), I ABS ADJ! I sssssssss sssssssss ssssssss! 0 1 0 4 22 30 43 0 I 4 0 0 91 4 0 4 .0 ! I I I I I I 00 50 17 33 13 43 35 10 I 1 I I I I REL FREQ CPCT) ABS AOJ ? 12 39 31 I 4 .1 4 0 0 78 4 15 N s REL FREQ CPCT) ABS ADJ 4 25 42 29 4 .0 0 4 19 26 37 IS N s 51 0 4 .0 0 4 16 37 35 8 1 0 4 17 40 38 0 4 .1 1 I ! I I I I 0 0 2 82 6 10 0 0 2 91 7 0 4 .0 I I I I I I 1 00 3 .8 0 17 50 0 33 0 10 I 0 17 50 0 33 0 3 .5 0 0 17 67 0 17 1 4 IB 36 31 50 17 33 0 0 20 80 0 0 4 .0 4 *0 I I 1 I 1 I 0 4 I9 12 35 10 ( 4 I I I I I 1 1 0 3 80 4 12 I 4 1! 5! 201 40! 34! 0!! I — I 0! 5! 22 ! 35! 391 0! I ! —! 1 0!! 3! 91! 5! 0!! I ■I 30 7 22 4 15 22 38 10 29 5 19 0 I I 1 I I I 31 10 35 2 8 14 36 11 41 2 9 0 1 I I 1 I I 33 0 17 0 0 50 67 0 33 0 0 0 1 I 1 I I I 29 9 32 3 9 18 860 1000 0 35! 11! 391 4! 11! 0 !| * I 1. 0 0 I. . . I . 0 1 3. 0 I ...2 : ••• I 951 e l" ” 9 2 ” ! * 9 s " i ‘ “ a s " " a s " ! ” ” 86 7 4 2 17 17 1 5! 2 I § 1 0 1 10 11 0 I 0 0 i 10 01 50 21 14 14 67 19 0 15 78 22 0 0 I 1 I I 55 18 10 18 67 21 12 0 I I I I 33 33 17 17 40 40 20 0 1 I I I 56 19 a 16 14 14 45 7 7 14 3 .0 s h o u ld ” I t i “ h’o J" OCCUR 7 I YES I 14 I NO RESP I . . . . . . . . . I. . . . . . . . . j . 37 26 I 4 .1 0 0 7 79 0 14 0 4 22 O .I.R . N s 98 I sssssssss sssssssss ss s sssssi ssssssss: 00 FACULTY 1.0 58 25 17 0 1* 0 I 1. 0 I 1. 0 I 67! 23! 10! 0 !f • 1. 0 I 199 #66 There w i l l be Increased re lia n c e on o u tsid e fu n d in g , I . e . , grants and c o n tra c ts . II IIII IIII in n z CHANGE STATEMENT 1 OEANS CHAIRPERS FACULTY O.I.R. II TOTAL II I I I N s 14 NUMBER : 66 N = 27 N s 6 I N s 98 I I s s s s s s s |I sssssssss!sssssssss I sssssssss sssssssss ssssssss sssssssss Is I I I ! IREL FREO REL FREO REL FREO REL FREQ IREL FREOI VARIABLE ! VALUE I CPCT) CPCT) CPCT) CPCT) 1 CPCT) I ! I ABS ADJ ABS AOJ ABS AOJ ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ! !_______ I s s s s s s s !I sssssssss ssssssss ssssssss: Is (NONE 0 0 00 00 II LIKELIHO ILOU 16 IS 2 2 6! 7 8 OF IMOOERATE 1 ? 22! 30 31 18 21 17 33 90 56 66 66 39 67 OCCUR IHIGH 17 33 61 67! IGREAT 21 23 19 19 26 28 17 33 20 26! 7 0 I NO RESP 16 0 6 0 50 0 13 0! I I 6.0 6.0 3.8 3.7 3.9 I . . . . . . . . . IM ^. E .A .N . . .RESP ... ■! 0 0! IMPACT ILOU 00 ' 0 0 3 6! SO 96 26 28 OF THE IMOOERATE 30 32 33 67 30 35! CHANGE IHIGH 29 31 37 0 0 36 39! IGREAT * n !§ SI 26 2B 17 33 19 23! 147 0 16 0! 7 0 16 0 50 0 INO RESP I ! IMEAN RESP 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.9 8 ! — ! IFACULTY 16 15 17 33 80 100 116 126 10 12! GRP MOST tSTUOENT 0 0 0 0 PROMOTING!PROVOST 17 33 69 61 23 661!! 26 28 17 33 ll THIS !ST ♦ FED 22 27 66 52 96 l l 39! CHANGE ICOMMUNITY 16 15 0 2 0 3 6! 7 INO RESP 7 0 SO 16 0! 20 ! 3.0 1.0 IMODE RESP 6.0 6.0 0 I — ! 50 I ^FACULTY 43 17 33 ! 63 74 ! 65 61 62! GRP MOST ISTUDENT 0 13 0 0 I 0 0 ! 10 71 0 ! 5 4 0 0 I 4 4 I 17 33 ! 4 HINOERING!PROVOST 5 5! 42 I 17 33 ! 171 THIS 1ST ♦ FED 36 9 I 13 7 10 13 CHANGE ICOMMUNITY 0 0 ! 7 11 6 8 9! 8 I 13 I 7 14 INO RESP 0 I 15 0 I 25 0 50 0 !| 0! 22 ! 1 IMODE RESP I 1. 0 1. 0 ! 1. 0 1. 0 1 1 *77! ISHOULD IT! NO 78 81 69 79 33 67 ! 17 33 ! ! OCCUR ? ! YES 19 19 ! I NO RESP 4 0 i! z \ 50 0 1 80! ! !0-2 YRS SO 58 56 60 17 33 ! 67 *571 IESTIMATEOI3-S YRS 14 17 33 36 ll ll 33 67 ! 26 4 4 0 D I 9 ll! ! TIME OF 16-10 YRS 21 25 10 12 14 0 7 0 SO 0 I 18 0! IOCCUR INO RESP 22 0 1.0 1.0 2.0 I 0 I! I !MOOE RESP 1.0 1 VITHO icen l •l ***» •1 «0M 1 200 There w i l l be le ss p riv a te money f o r research. CHANGE st ate m e n t DEANS CHAIRPERS! FACULTY N s 14 NUMBER : 67 s s s s s s s s s Is s s s s s s s s I ssssssss ! ! i ! N s 51 N s 27 sssssssss ssssssss: IREL FREQ REL FREQ CPCT) ! CPCT) I ABS ADJ ABS ADJ ! s s s s s s s |: S S S S S S S S 0 0 !NONE ! 0 0 33 39 LIK E LIH D ILOU ! 36 45 OF ------21 27 (MODERATE ! 15 17 IHIGH OCCUR 7 9 30 35 IGREAT I 14 18 7 9 INO RESP ! 21 0 15 0 ! ! (MEAN RESP! 3 .1 3 .0 I --------- 1. INONE ! IMPACT ILOU I 7 9 I 14 18 26 30 OF THE IMOOERATE _____ 44 52 CHANGE (HIGH I 50 64 ! GREAT ! 7 7 9 INO RESP I 15 0 VALUE II II H II U II II II II VARIABLE ! 0 I _ I IMEAN RESP! ■!* >!« IFACULTY ! GRP MOST (STUDENT I PROMOTINGIPROVOST ! 1ST * FED ! THIS CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! INO RESP I .IHOOE.RESP1 ^. . . . . . . . . ^. GRP MOST ISTUDENT ! HINDERINGIPROVOST I THIS 1ST ♦ FED I CHANGE (COMMUNITY! INO RESP ! I ! (MOOE RESP! >!• ■!• 21 3 .7 14 50 29 3 .6 100 0 20 70 0 22 a 0 50 7 14 36 11 22 0 11 11 33 17 17 0 1.0 0 17 1.0 !0 - 2 YRS ESTIMATED!3 -5 YRS TIME OF 16-10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP 7 36 21 36 2 .0 0 11 s ts s rs s s z 0 0 17 17 50 50 0 0 33 33 0 0 5 16 26 42 12 0 3 .4 0 4 27 35 14 20 3 .5 0 00 4 12 59 25 0 35 2 16 4 10 33 1.0 70 7 90 10 78 100 22 11 56 33 0 26 30 11 33 39 44 17 0 33 25 18 24 2 .0 0 22 1.0 0 50 17 33 0 17 17 50 17 20 20 60 0 0 3 4! ll 24 ui 0 4 05 !! 0! ! ! 1 2! 36 S3! 14 6 - 21! 9! 15! 77 3 96! 4! 28 38! 1 0!i 1.0 !! 17 ?? 44 33 23 0 33 33 17 17 40 40 20 0 1.0 0! 6! 321 47! IS ! H 0! ! 10 33 0 0 0 5 27 39 5 .0 83 100 00 0 . 0 17 ! ! . . . 3. ..7. . . |! 1.0 0 0 0 0 50 17 33 5 .0 53 3 24 6 15 0 11 13! 15 0! 3 .3 3 .8 0 0 5 REL FREO? CPCT) ! ABS ADJI 1 ssssssssi 2 2! 22 271 21 25! 28 3 3 ! ........ I 0 5 34 44 17 5 .0 33 0 33 . . . . . . . . . |. . . . . . . . . | I n 0 5 33 0 21 0 21 IMODE RESP! 0 4 N s 6 sssssssss REL FREQ CPCT) ABS ADJ 4 14 22 35 10 16 i ! ! N s 98 1 ! ssssssssi TOTAL REL FREQ CPCT) ABS ADJ 3 .7 10 21 79 100 ! 7 5 .0 5 .0 SHOULO I T ! NO 1 OCCUR 7 ! YES ! ! NO RESP ! 1 ! I I 0 O.I.R. II II II II II II It II II #67 0 20 01 >! 29 39! 16 231 28 0! 2 .0 201 #68 There w i l l be In cre a sin g pressure f o r departments to o b ta in funding from o u ts id e sources o th e r than general funds. I ICHAIRPERS 1 N = 14 NUMBER : 68 I N s 27 I s s s s s s s s s !s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s Is s s s s s s s s CHANGE STATEMENT VARIABLE VALUE INONE LIK E LIH O ILOU OF IMOOERATE IHIGH OCCUR IGREAT INO REBP I IMEAN RESP IMPACT OF THE CHANGE —--- I NONE*” " " ” ILOU IMOOERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESP IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUDENT PROMOTINGIPROVOST THIS 1ST «■ FEO CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP INODE RESP I IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUDENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP IMODE RESP sh o u ld" I t i " no” ~ ” " " " OCCUR 7 I YES I NO RESP 10 -2 YRS E S T IM A TE 0I3-5 YRS TIME OF 1 6 -1 0 YRS OCCUR INO RE£p IMODE RESP DEANS FACULTY O .I.R . N s 51 N s 0 64 *? 0I 0 I 0 69 31 0 4 .3 0 57 14 3 .8 7 0 64 21 0 7 8 62 I 15 I 1 I 19 52 “ 19* 11 39 35 12 4 0 63 26 0 7 64 I 70 7 4 0 4 15 21 0 I 9 I I I 21 58 21 0 46 0 36 36 14 14 42 42 17 0 4 0 68 28 0 0 3 .0 IS 1 .0 I I I I I I 27 2 3? 3? 57 43 2 0 61 22 0 16 0 0 0 01 50 33 0 10 0 3 .7 2 0 72 26 0 0 I I I I 1 I I 17 0 67 0 0 17 202 20 1.0 0 17 27 ’76""S" 12 12 13 47 22 60 27 0 10 12 22 0 3 .9 20 0 80 0 0 0 3 .0 67 0 17 1 .0 21 42 22 50 33 17 17 83 5 26 0 01 11 12 —! 0 3 .0 67 4 0 0 24 12 I 83 9 i *? 48 37 0 0 4 .0 I — 1.0— . h J . . . I— *5o"”54* 43 7 44 40 4 .2 4 .0 I I I I I I 1 I 8 0 69 23 0 0 0I 0I 27 1 .0 0 40 10 11 0 IS REL FREO IREL FREQ! CPCTI I CPCTI I ABS ADJ I ABS ADJI IIs s s s s s s s lI os * " o ' I 3 31 33 33 ! 44 SO 50 46! 17 17 33 36! 0! 9 I 4 .1 I 3 .8 4 0 0 0 21 7 0 4 16 44 36 4 .1 3 .0 50 0 4 IS 41 33 6 I I I TOTAL I N s 98 I I I s s s s s s s s s Is s s s s s s s l REL FREO IREL FREO REL FREO IPCTJ I CPCTI CPCTI ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ ABS ADJ I s s s s s s s s : Is s s s s s s s s 0 I I I 0 I I I I 1 I I I 80 I 0 I 20 I I I I 0 1.0 I 50 50 4 0 62 21 0 12 3 _ 4 3 6 3 18 l.o 5! 241 471 25! 0! I I I 5! 0! 71! 241 0! 0! I I I _ 5! 41 7! 41 0! i I ""7 1 ” *7 9 1 211 50 I 19 I 9 01 •I 46 5 6 ! 50 50 30 361 50 50 7 9! 17 0! I I 1 .0 1 .0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 202 #69 There t r i l l be Increased dependence on fa c u lty generated funds, g i f t s , g ra n ts , c o n tra c ts , c o n s u lta tio n s , and p a tie n t care. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 69 I I ICHAIRPERS! I I DEANS N = 14 | N s 27 I FACULTV N s SI N s s s s s s s s s :!s s s s s s s s s S S S S S S S S S |S S S S S S S S S I s s s s s s s s s VARIABLE ! ! I I REL FREO IREL FREO IREL FREQ CPCT) I CPCT) I CPCT) ABS ADJ I ABS AOJ I ABS ADJ ! ! VALUE SSSSSSSS! ____ (NONE LIK E LIH D ILOU OF IMOOERATE OCCUR IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESP ■t — — — INONE IMPACT ILOU OF THE IMOOERATE CHANGE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP IMEAN RESP IFACULTY GRP HOST ISTUDENT PROMOTING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP I . . . . . . . . ._!HOOE . . . . . .RESP ... GRP MOST ISTUOENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS 1ST * FEO CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP I !MODE_RESP SHOULo”iTI_NO OCCUR ? ! YES I NO RESP 10-2 YRS ESTIMATEDI3-5 YRS TIME OF 16*10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP I IMODE RESP I I s s s s s s s s s !s s s s s s s s s !sssssssss 07 14 57 147 3 .S 0 7 43 ** 3 .7 0 0 50 43 0 7 0a Ii 15 t 62 I 15 I 30 92 00 II 31 I 54 I 0 I 159 ‘I ! I i I 0 I 31 I 46 I 15 I 3 .8 0 4 26 41 I 0 0 54 46 0 0 ■!• I I 1 I I I i 04 II 28 I 44 I 24 I 7 I I 3 .9 I !' 11 12 I 0 1 0 44 46 I 41 42 I 0 0 I 4 0 I 0 II 22 3 .0 57 0 0 7 7 29 00 0 3 .0 80 0 0 10 10 0 1 I I I I I I 1 74 7 0 4 4 11 1. 0 42 33 25 0 1 I I I I I 41 52 0 7 2. 0 7 17 0 n 26 50 0 18 3 .9 0 0 6 18 35 24 18 7 21 43 29 0 3 .9 2 0 55 25 0 18 83 8 0 4 4 0 §10 !I 0 I 44 56 0 0 I I 1 I I I 96 ! I ! ! I I I REL FREQ I REL FREQ! CPCT) ! CPCT) I ABS AOJ I ABS AOJ! ! ! ssssssss! "" IT * " !* "! 17 I 33 33 I 0 33 32 n I 0I 33 33 »2 17 0 17 0 50 17 0 17 20 0 60 20 0 0 I I • I I I I -!■ I I I I I I 67 0 17 0 0 17 80 0 20 0 0 0 1. 0 • • • • * • • • 016. .0. . • ! I I I I I I 1 ! l\ 22! 491 221 19 0 I 44 33 33 I 19 0 0 II 11 3.0 85 8 0 5 3 0 N s I 3 .2 2 I 0 1 65 6 0 4 2 24 t TOTAL sssssssss! ssssssss! 3 .1 3 .0 I I I I I I I 1. 0 1 1. 0 m• • • • 9 »«eeaa* . . . . j 57 67 I 81 85 I 29 33 1 15 15 1 14 0 I 4 0 I 36 29 21 14 0 6 14 I I I I O . I. R . 0! 3 .8 I •I 01 8! 26! 42! 24! 0! I 3 .8 I — — I 5 6! 0 51 58! 32 0 38i 12 0! I 3 .0 I ■I 66 5 6! 1 1! 4 51 4! 3 20 I 1 22 37 01 01 71 12 18 86 14 0 50 SO 0 SO I 50 I 0 I 70 17 12 31 37 10 22 40 47 12 0 33 50 17 0 33 50 17 0 35 41 9 15 11! 2 > I 2. 0 2. 0 I I 1 1 1 I 0! —I 0! I 203 #70 More rlgorus budgeting concepts (Zero base budgeting) will be necessary 1n a ll areas. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER J TO j * f VARIABLE I VALUE ! ! sssssssss!sssssssss INONE LIKELIHD ILOU OP IMOOERATE OCCUR IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP IMEAN RESP INONE IMPACT ILOU OF THE IMOOERATE CHANGE (HIGH IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESP IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUDENT PROMOTING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FEO CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP I ____ , ! 2 2 S S .! ESP *1faculty” GRP MOST ISTUOENT HINDERINGIPROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP ! IMOOE RESP SHOULO IT I NO OCCUR 7 I YES I NO RESP 10-2 YRS ESTIMATEDI3-S YRS TIME OF 16-10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP IMODE RESP I OEANS ICHAIRPERS I N : 11 I N s 27 I ssssssss: : Isssssssss I REL PREO IREL FREO iPCT) I (PCT) ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ 0 : ! ssssssS ss 0I 0 0 14 17 29 33 14 17 29 33 14 3.7 I 4 4 I 19 17 I 99 67~ I 11 12 I 11 0 3.9 210 2508 0 0 4 33 ll 43 50 SO S . 14 17 I 14 ii l l 3.6 3.7 0 00 1! 00 00 0 36 42 ! 26 29 50 58 I 63 71 0 0! 0 0 14 0 I 11 0 ! 4.0 64 75 0 0 21 25 ! I I ! 0 00 !I 0 14 0 I 1.0 II 42 ! iS 58 I 14 0 ! •!* 29 36 I 43 55 ! 7 9 ! 21 0 !! 2.0 ! 4.0 74 87 0 0 11 13 00 0 15 1.0 74 85 15 17 11 0 33 37 56 62 0 0 11 0 2.0 I FACULTY 0. 1. R. TOTAL I I N s 51 Ns 6 N s 98 I sssssssss sssssssss ssssssss!I REL FREQ REL FREQ REL FREO! (PCT) (PCT) (PCT) I ABS ADJ ABS AOJ ABS AOJ! sssssssss sssssssss ssssssss! 4 9 2 2! 0 0 6 7 17 17 T 8! 19 22! 22 26 0 0 29 35 37 42! 50 50 24 28 B 25! 33 33 16 0 0!I 0 0 3.8 4.0 3.8 I •! 0 0 0 0 2 2 17 17 6 ?i 20 25 31 40 §§ 40! H H 25 32 33 33 21 26! 17 0! 22 0 0 0 4.0 3.7 3.8 ! .......I 00 00 \ 0 01 10!! 47 59 67 80 41 49! 29 37 17 20 41 49! 0 0 2 2 1 J 20 0 17 0 16 3.0 3.0 3.0 I •I 73 95 83 100 72 90! 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! 4 5 0 80 10 ! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! 24 0 17 19 0! I 1.0 1.0 ! 1.0 47 60 50 SO ’53”"63! 31 40 50 50 37! 22 0 0 0 . 31 16 .....0 . I! 35 44! 39 S3 17 22 29 50 M 36 45! 14 18 0 0 2! 10olI 25 0 33 0 1.0 2.0 . . 2.0 . . . . . .I 204 #71 Salary Increases will not keep pace with Inflation. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 71 ' S— VALUE ! _ _ ______ ! NONE LIK E LIH D (LOW OF IMOOERATE (HIGH OCCUR IGREAT INO RESP t 1HEAN RESP IMPACT OF THE CHANGE --------- ILOU IMOOERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESP IFACULTY GRP HOST ISTUOENT ________ PROMOTINGIPROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP I IMOOE RESP . . . . . . . . . ^. . . . . . . . . GRP MOST ISTUOENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP I IMODE RESP SHOULD I T ! OCCUR 7 I I . . . . . . . . . ^. I ICHAIRPERS! FACULTY O .I.R . TOTAL N s 14 s— S ! VARIABLE ! I DEANS NO YES NO RESP ........ E S TIM A TE 0I3-5 YRS TIME OF 1 6 -1 0 YRS OCCUR INO RESP I IMODE RESP I N s 27 I N s 51 N s 98 I N a 6 I I a s s s s s s s s f s s s s s a a a s la c a s s s s s s s s a s s s s a c _ss J REL FREO IREL FREO IREL FREQ CPCT) I (PC T) I CPCT) ABS AOJ I ABS AOJ I ABS AOJ =========!= = = = r= = = r 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 4 4 IS IS 21 29 I 71 77 I TS SI I 4 0 0 0 0 0 4. 0 7 0 7 79 0 7 0 0 23 54 23 I 1 1 I I ”7 14 1 .0 4 4 .7 0 0 2 § 20 9S 37 0 0 4 36 60 0 99 4 41 0 4 .2 00 54 I 0I 31 15 0 0 I I I I I I g; 75 17 8 0 ■I* I I I I 85 0 11 96 0 0 24 86 0 84 2 0 4 .0 70 0 4 7 0 19 81 88 94 98 l\ ls 4 8 70 13 0 15 83 17 0 0 78 6 4 89 7 4 1 .0 I 1 .0 0 0 00 89 100 17 0 0 0 11 12 5 3 .0 4 .7 8 8 01 11 18 1? *0 4 .0 91 2 0 6 6 0 0 8 0 1.0 12 0 0 00 00 00 6$0 1000 33 0 4 .0 1.0 REL FREQ! (P C T ) I ABS ADJI I sssssssss ssssssssi 4 .4 0I 93 100 1 64 2? 69 0 0 0 29 71 0 8 I 1.0 ? 0 0 4 33 pii ss 4. 6 8 I 85 I I I I 4 .0 I 50 0 29 14 0 7 0 0 4 .8 4 .8 0 0 21 50 0 0 REL FREQ (PCT) ABS ADJ SO 0 17 0 0 33 83 100 3 1 9 78 1 8 11 101 1! 841 0! I I 84! 7! 81 01 0! I I •I 96! 4! 67 100 0 0 0 0 33 0 9 3 14 1 .0 •I 31 6 7 0 1 90 4 0 i oi 73 0 0 17 0! 42 45! 6 0!I 4.9 I 12 1.0 1.0 1! 231 76! 1! IS ' 1 6 ! 36 3 8 ! 4 .0 75 0 25 0 01 01 11 6 _0! 73"”861 1 .0 111 4! 01 I I 205 #72 Supplies and Services costs will Increase dramatically as a result of the inflation and the acceptance of training grants. DEANS N s 14 0 0 00 00 4 00 5 9 30 36 44 99 19 0 4.5 41 58 26 37 30 0 4.0 30 44 0 0 19 28 7 11 7 11 33 0 1.0 70 90 7 10 22 0 52 74 19 26 0 0 30 0 1 .0 I FACULTY 0, 1,R• TOTAL I N s 51 I N S 6 N s 98 I sssssssss I!sssssssss ssssssssj1 I REL FREQ IREL FREO REL FREOI CPCT> I CPCT) CPCT) I ABS ADJ I ABS AOJ ABS ADJI I I I sssssssss ssssssss! 17 3! 4! 20 20 II 17 33 33 18 22 I 17 17 13 17! 24 30 I 17 17 29 361 35 45 I 17 17 33 41! 22 0 II 20 01I 4. 1 I 2.9 1 4.1 I 0 I 0 1 0 "oi 50 I 3 24 30 I 0 I 17 22! 33 I 29 36! 17 t 30 0 1 21 0! 22 0 II I 4.0 I 3.2 4.1 I .....) 50 60 60 6 9! 0 0 0! 18 24 I 0 0 10 14! 27 I 40 20 30 41! 29 41 I *3 0 26 361 27 0 I 17 0 29 01 I I 1.0 5.0 ..ilS * 43 63 I 17 20 ’ss”” ?! 1 1! 3 I 2 17 I 12 17 25! 10 14 I 5?0 600 10 151 2 3 I 17 20 6 9! 31 0 I 17 0 32 0! I I 1.0 I 3.0 . i:£ . ’ II II II II II REL FREO CPCT) VARIABLE t VALUE ! ABS AOJ !_______ ssssssss: 00 0 INONE LIKELIHD ILOU 0 OF 14 22 IMOOERATE OCCUR IHIGH 29 44 IGREAT 21 53 INO RESP 56 0 4,1 IMEAN RESP 0 INONE IMPACT ILOU 0 OF THE IMOOERATE 33 21 CHANGE IHIGH 29 44 IGREAT 14 22 INO RESP 36 0 I IM E A N RESP 3.8 .........|......... IFACULTY 0 00 GRP MOST ISTUDENT 00 0 PROMOTING!PROVOST THIS 1ST 4 FED 43 67 CHAN6E ICOMMUNITY 21 33 INO RESP 36 0 I 4.0 IMOOE RESP IFACULTY 110 GRP MOST ISTUOENT HINOERINGIPROVOST 21 33 THIS 1ST ♦ FED 21 33 CHANGE ICOMMUNITY 14 22 INO RESP 36 0 INOOE RESP 3.0 57 100 SHOULD IT! NO OCCUR f I YE ~S 0 0 I NO RESP 43 0 ■10-2 IT .R . .S Y 43 67 ESTIMATED!3-5 YRS 14 22 7 11 TIME OF 16-10 YRS 36 0 OCCUR INO RESP I 1.0 IMODE RESP CHA1RPERS N s 27 sssssssss REL FREO CPCTI ABS 'ADJ sss ssss 4 4 0 0 4 4 41 48 37 43 15 0 4. 2 II II »M CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 72 sssssssss)sssssssss 100 100 7S 100 ° ! 0 0 24 0 I 0 0 >!* 55 76 I 67 80 126 168 II 170 200 27 0 I 17 0 I 1 .0 I 1 .0 *7 :S” ” 9 ? ! 2 31 .24 .01 ’53_*74I 13 5 29 1 .0 19! 71 0! I I 206 #73 There w i l l be severe co m p e titio n between the sciences end th e Humanities f o r S tate support o f In s tru c tio n . CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER t 73 I I ICHAIRPERS I FACULTY I I N s 27 I N s 51 DEANS N s 14 :|s ssssssss ! ! REL FREO CPCTI VARIABLE ! VALUE ABS AOJ ! ! ss s s s s s s : : ! s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s INONE 43 60 LIK E LIH D ILOU OF 7 IMOOERATE 7 OCCUR IHIGH 14 IGREAT 29 0 INO RESP I 2.9 I MEAN RESP 0 IMPACT OF THE CHANGE INONE ILOU IMOOERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESP IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUOENT PROMOTINGIPROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP IMOOE RESP IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUDENT HINOERINGIPROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FEO CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP IMODE RESP . . . . . . . . . | — ------ — SHOULO I T ! NO OCCUR ? I YES I NO RESP ......... ......... ESTIM ATEDI3-5 YRS TIME OF 1 6 -10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP IMODE RESP 0 0 10 10 20 7 10 14 20 29 40 21 29 s o 3.9 21 33 00 0 43 14 43 2 .0 N s TOTAL I I N s 98 I 6 I ! t I s s s s s s s s s Is s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s S S S S S S S S I I IREL FREO IREL FREQ REL FREO REL FREO! I CPCTI I CPCTI CPCTI CPCTI I I ABS AOJ I ABS ADJ ABS AOJ ABS AOJI I I I Is s s s s s s s s Is s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s S S S S S S S S I I 4 5 I 17 20 2 31 0 00 29 44 14 22 36 0 4. 0 7 12 7 12 29 50 14 25 0 0 43 0 3. 0 64 100 0 0 36 0 O .I.R . I I I I I I I I ! I I I 0I 75 I 25 I 0 0 0 17 20 17 20 17 20 17 20 17 3.0 7 I 4 5 30 36 I 27 3B 26 32 I 27 3B 13 18 I 14 19 19 0 ! 27 0 3.5 3.7 0 15 19 22 22 22 0 0 4 19 24 29 29 29 41 27 38 0 » I I 2 .0 0 20 40 17 20 17 20 17 0 3.4 33 SO *! 3.7 3.6 41 52 I 35 50 0 0 0 0 I 4 5 I B 22 29 I 24 33 11 14 I 4 I 29 0 22 1. 0 1 1. 0 37 48 1 35 S3 7 10 I 2 3 15 19 I 22 32 15 19 I 6 9 4. 5 1 2 3 22 0 I1 33 0 1. 0 1 1. 0 59 80 I 69 95 15 20 I 4 5 26 0 ! 27 0 •!« 37 50 I 29 43 22 __ 30 I 31 46 15 “ 20 I 8 11 26 0 I 31 0 1 .0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 33 50 0 33 1 I I I I I I ! 1 00 67 00 33 3 83 100 1 ? s 17 33 17 33 17 33 50 0 1 .0 15! 11 321 23 311 14 19! 24 0! I 3.5 I 24 0 e 24 26 16 26 -I 0! 111 33! 34! 221 0! I 3 .7 I ! 35 4 9 ! 0! 7! 24 341 7 10! 29 0 ! 1.0 I I 30 43 3 4 6! 23 34! 9 2 32 13! 3! 0! I 1.0 !I 666 92! 8! 28 01 ■I 27 39! 30 44! 11 17! 33 01 2 .0 I I 207 #74 The Board of Trustees will continue to consider political Issues 1n management of Investments. I I ! CHAN6E STATEMENT ! OEANS ICHAIRPERS! ! I I NUMBER : 7* I N s 14 I N s 27 I I I I s s s s s s s s s is s s s s s s s s 1s s s s s s s s s FACULTY N s 51 Is s s s s s s s s |s s s s s s s s s I I TOTAL I N s I I N s 98 I ! I sssssssssj ssssssssi O . I. R . ! rEL FREQ IREL FREO ! rEL FREO REL FREQ I REL FREO! I IPCTJ I IPCTJ I IPCTJ IPCTJ I IPCTJ I I ABS AOJ I ABS ADJ I ABS AOJ ABS ADJ I ABS AOJI I I I I I s s s s s s s s s ! s s s s s s s s s !s s s s s s s s s Is s s s s s s s s Is s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s ! S S S S S S S S I 0 0 0 0 0 INONE 0! 0 16 21 L IK E L IH 0 ILOU 7 10 7 9 00 00 I 110 191 OF 27 36 26 33 50 60 I 28 36! !MODERATE I 21 27 37 98 OCCUR IHIGH 29 21 27 27 39! 20 I6REAT 7 10 10 29 36 20 II 12 161 H 22 0 29 «1 21 0 INO RESP 17 0 I 22 0! I ! I 3.5 I 3.9 ' jHEAN RESPI 3*9 3.6 3.6 .......I 7 10 ! 0 0 ! 0 0 0 0 INONE 1 1! IMPACT ILOU 33 90 ! 16 22! 30 1 IS 19 I 19 18 21 OF THE IMOgERATE 7 10 ! 91 92 I 39 53 3S 90 I 33 19 20 ! 19 29 I CHANGE I Hit.. 19! 0 0 ! 19 96! IGREAT 17 20 ! 9 12! 21 30 I 9 S ! ! | ii 17 0 ! 29 0! 22 0 ! 29 0 29 INO RESP ! _3.0_ I .3 .2 I ! 3.1 .IMEAN RESP! . . 3.3 3.2 . . . . . . |> ”|F*CULTr”"l" 19 22 ! 7 10 I” la 18” 29 ’Is ” !?! GRP MOST ISTUDENT ! 0 0 ! 37 50 ! 25 35 T 0 7 0i I 23 33! PR0H0TIN6!PROVOST I 25 ! 7 10! 11 ! 0 0 I 10 14 THIS 1ST ♦ FED ! 19 22 ! IS 20 I ! 9 13! 17o 99 ! 15 20 ! CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! 50 75 j 18 26! 0 ! 26 0 I t o l l INO RESP ! §i 33 0 I 29 0! ! ! ! I ! ! I 2.0 ! 5.0 I 2.0 ! 2.0 IMODE RESP! 5.0 ■!■ »!« •I IFACULTY ! 0 0 30 92 I 33 67 ! 17 27! G R P M O S T ISTU D EN T 0 0 0 ! 0 ! 0 0 ! 1 2 ! ------jKf---------HIN DERIN G!PROVOST I 29 ,90 I 19 26 I 8 13 0 0 ! 13 21! THIS 1ST ♦ FEO ! 19 20 ! 11 16 I 18 29 17 33 ! 15 24! ■“E ICOMMUNITY! 29 90 ! CHANG 16 ! 20 32 0 17 27! INO RESP ! 29 0 ! l l 0 I 39 0 50 36 0! 1 I 1.0 __1.0 ! IMODE RESP! 3.0 1.0 ! 5.0 •I* ■!■ !« SHOULD IT! NO I 79 100 | 56 75 I 57 76 67 80 I ’So” 80! 19 25 ! 17 20 ! 15 20! OCCUR 7 I YES ! 0 ! NO RESP ! 21 0 ! 26 0 ! y 2o 17 0 ! . 24 . . . . . 0! .| “I* •I* ■!« !0-2 YRS ! 93 67 r 99 60 ! 95 66 67 100 ! 96 66! ESTIMATE0I3-5 YRS ! 26 35 ! 19 20 0 0 ! 16 29! TIME OF 16-10 YRS I l47 t ! ! 9 5 I 10 19 0 0 I 7 10! OCCUR INO RESP ! 36 0 ! 26 0 ! 31 0 33 0 I 31 0! I ! I ! ! I 1 .0 1 .0 IMODE RESPI 1 .0 I 1 .0 1.0 ! VARIABLE VALUE 208 #75 There w i l l be f is c a l pressure to reduce fa c u lty s iz e . CHANGE STATEMENT DEANS NUMBER ! 75 N : VARIABLE ! t = L IK E LIH D OF OCCUR REL FREQ CPCT) ABS AOJ VALUE ! r= -r- ! (NONE ILOU _ (MODERATE (HIGH (GREAT (NO RESP f ! 1 ! ( ( qs s ‘ os 7 14 29 43 I IMEAN RESPI IMPACT OF THE CHANGE INONE*’ ! (LOU 1 (MODERATE I (H I6H I IGREAT I INO RESP I I I (MEAN RESPI 0 7 7 50 29 7 SHOULD~It ! ” no” OCCUR ? ! YES I ! NO RESP ! . . . . . . . . . |.........( . ! !0 - 2 YRS ESTIMATED!3 -5 YRS TIME OF !6 - 1 0 YRS OCCUR (NO RESP ! ! I ! ! INODE RESP! 0 8 54 31 0 0 38 62 0 0 29 7 0 7 0 31 B 0 0 1.0 t 8 S 7 9i 43 29 14 14 50 33 17 0 1.0 0 4 22 37 33 4 0 4 23 38 35 0 0 4 22 26 41 7 4 0 15 74 4 4 0 REL FREQ CPCT) ABS ADJ 0 8 43 33 10 0 7 9 48 37 0 ft I 22 18 49 10 24 20 54 0 02 27 59 2 10 02 30 65 20 91 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 14 84 16 39 29 14 48 36 17 7 4 8 0 52 41 56 44 7 0 0 1.0 0 12 1.0 12 18 1.0 0 0 0 33 SO 0 17 4 .0 4 .0 80 26 0 33 ll 4. 2 84 4 I . 0. . *89**92" 0 0 33 67 0 0 78 4 110 120 -o 0! 0 0 33 67 0 I I I I 4 .7 4 .3 4 0 TOTAL I I N = 98 ! ! I sssssssss(ssssssss ( 1 I REL FREQ ( IREL FREQ! CPCT) I CPCT) I ABS AOJ ( ABS ADJI I ! I ========! 0 0! S SS S S SS S S )I 0 6 0 4 24 28 44 0 . X.Ra N = 4 .2 4 .0 "5 7 **6 2 * 0 REL FREQ I PCT) ABS AOJ 4 .1 4 .0 OMOPE RESPI . . . . . . . . . ^. . . . . . . . . ^ ! FACULTY N = 51 4 .0 4 .1 0 GRP MOST ISTUOENT I HINDERING(PROVOST ! THIS (ST • FEO I CHANGE (COMMUNITY! (NO RESP 1 ! I (MODE RESP! 6 15 51 46 4 .1 (FACULTY I 0 GRP MOST ISTUOENT ( 0 PROMOTING!PROVOST I 36 " THIS 1ST ♦ FED I 57 CHANGE I COMMUNITY1 !NQ RESP I 7 ! N s 27 sssssssss ssssssss: ! ! CHAIRPERS 14 27 0 0 0 0 . 33 I 17 I SO I 0 I I 1 0 0 40 60 0 0 1 I I I I 1 5 12 39 37 7 5! 13! 42! 40! 0! I 4 .2 I 0 3 01 24 44 _ 7. !. 2 481 31 20 22 ! 4. 2 01 1 1 1 1 26 62 2 8 11 1! 28! 68! 21 0! I 4 .0 .,! 7 6 **8 4 ! 8S o I 2 2! ! 200 !! 11 12 1! 1 0 I 0 0! 0 ! 10 0 !I 1.0 t 1.0 ••••■ ••| 78 841 32 i 14 16! 67 I 8 0! 50 60 ! '44**51! 17 20 ! 32 371 17 20 1 10 12! 17 0 ! 14 0! ! 1.0 !I 1.0 ! 67 0 17 0 0 17 209 #76 The t o t a l budget o f the u n iv e rs ity w i l l be much less fle x ib le . CHANCE STATENENT *--** VARIABLE ! VALUE I I _____ ^-.3.3.3=- LIK E LIH D 1LOU OF 1MODERATE OCCUR ! HIGH (GREAT (NO RESP ( (MEAN RESP IMPACT OF THE CHANGE 1N0NE (LOU (MODERATE (HIGH (GREAT (NO RESP ( (MEAN RESP (FACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT PROMOTING(PROVOST THIS (ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP ( (MODE RESP *!« (FACULTY GRP MOST (STUOENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS (ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP ( TOTAL ( ( N s 14 N = 51 ! N = 6 N s 98 I I ! ( s s s s r s s s s ========= f SS3S3S33S!(3S33S33SS =3333333( I REL FREQ REL FREQ ! REL FREQ (REL FREQ REL FREq ! tP C T l » IPCT> IP C T) I (PCT) CPCT> I ABS ADJ ABS ADU ( ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ ABS ADJ! ( I (MODE RESP 0 7 14 36 36 0 B IS 38 38 0 0 14 36 43 7 38 46 0 0 0 0 15 33 41 11 IS 0 7 38 6S 0 4 .0 42 43 7 0 14 50 0 80 0 n 0 15 44 7 30 0 0 19 (0 -2 YRS E STIM A TE 0I3-5 YRS TIME OF !6 - 1 0 YRS OCCUR (NO RESP 50 21 14 14 58 25 17 0 11 48 33 4 15 1 .0 I 00 (( 17 ( 37 ( 46 ! 0 !( ! 90 17 60 0 0 0 0 17 28 33 36 0 17 50 17 4 .0 00 55 ( 9 ! 36 ! ( 0 0 20 20 60 0 4 .4 00 ■((« 33 50 ( 0 0 27 35 ( 0 4221 ‘i0 i! 33*1 5000 ( ( 1.0 4 .0 ! ! ( ! 55 2 16 4 72 3 21 5 17 25 50 75 24 0 33 0 0 1.0 78 100 57 ! 39 ! 4 ( 45 14 14 27 8( 0 0 ( 22 ( ( 1 .0 0 0 00 62 19 19 0 ( ( ( •!* 67 17 17 80 20 0 17 17 33 33 25 25 50 0 3 .0 6! 8 10 ! 37 34 15 0 1 18 29 35 17 43! 401 0( ( ! >! 0! 1! 221 35( 42! 0! ! 4 .2 ! ! 20 24 54 1 18 4 .0 47 3 26 3 0 21 1.0 3 .0 92 * !" 0( 0 00 I5 4 .1 00 0 0 n 22 25 27 24 0 40 0 3 .8 0 2 0 33 0 0 4 .1 0 0 1.0 3 .0 1 .0 t 4 .0 36 0 02 0 2 ( 10 12 ( 39 90 ! 27 35 0 ( 22 4 4 4 44 44 4 .3 0 92 8 0 (MOOE RESP 0 4 .3 86 7 7 .........! . 4 4 4 41 41 7 4 .2 0 0 15 3333: !========= 33333333! =========! 4 .0 SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR ? ! YES ( NO RESP ! ( CHA1RPERSJ FACULTY I O . I . R . N s 27 NUMBER : 76 s| ( DEANS 80 4 16 20!( 30! 66 ! 1! 0(( ! ■! 60! 4! 32! 4! 0! 0! ( ( ■1 95! 51 Q( .......I 45 20 ' * SB( ( 12 26 16! 22 0! 1.0 !! ....... 210 #77 There w i l l be le ss support f o r graduate teaching a s s ls ta n ts h lp s . CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER J 77 f r N s 14 ( N tNONE LIKELIH O f LOU OF fMODERATE OCCUR (HIGH (GREAT (NO RESP ! (MEAN RESP (NONE*"” " (LOU (MODERATE (HIGH (GREAT (NO RESP ( (MEAN RESP (FACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT PROMOTING!PROVOST THIS (ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP (MODE RESP (FACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT HINDERING(PROVOST THIS (ST ♦ FED CHAN6E (COMMUNITY (NO RESP i (MODE RESP shoulo' I t ("55-------OCCUR 7 ! YES ! NO RESP . .. .. .. .. |......... (0 -2 YRS ESTIM ATED!3-5 YRS TIME OF (6 -1 0 YRS OCCUR (NO RESP ! (MODE RESP FACULTY 27 O .I.R . N * TOTAL 6 N s 51 » s (r s s s s s s s s s c s s s r r s : N s 98 ( ! ( s s rs s s s s s i sssssa ss( REL FREO (REL FREO REL FREO CPCT) I CPCT) CPCT > ABS ADJ ( ABS ADJ ABS ADJ :( s s s s s s s s s T B ( 0 0 1* 17 ( 7 8 15 25 I 19 21 18 29 33 ( 48 54 35 44 14 17 ( 15 17 16 14 0 ( 0 REL FREG !r E L FREQ! CPCTl ( CPCTI ( ABS ADJ ( ABS AOJI == ( VARIABLE t VALUE t ( _______ IMPACT OF THE CHANGE ! ICHAIRPERS DEANS 0 0 21 ( ( 3 .3 0 7 14 36 29 14 §* 21 B 17 42 33 0 33 37 19 11 0 0 27 73 0 0 0 0 30 59 0 11 210 67 15 7 0 0 0 36 29 7 29 1.0 •I50 ( 40 ( 10 ( 0 (( ! 56 26 4 20 31 25 20 0 5 24 39 32 0 4 .0 0 0 I! 00 31 39 4 24 41 51 4 .0 75 17 00 (( 0 (( 11 1.0 • . . — ..(«( 1.0 86 100 ( 78 87 0 00 !( 11 14 11 120 0 36 20 0 37 42 21 4 .0 67 ( 0 ( 33 ! 22 20 3 .7 3 .8 4 .0 43 0 0 3 .8 0r y ~ 4 .0 0 0 11 12 68 32 0 00 19 1.0 !__ __ __! ! ( ( ! ( ! ! 3. 3 ! '! T17 17 (( 67 67 ( ( 0 17 ! ( H I 3 .2 ! T 0 0 17 0 50 17 0 17 3 .0 53 16 67 20 22 V 82 102 0 0 1.0 *76""97" 50 17 17 0 0 17 200 (( 60 ( --Jj 1 14! 23! 42! 19! 0! ! 3 i ( ... ( 0 -0( 4 5! 26 3 0 ! 32 3 7 ! 23 2 8 ! *2 19 36 16 IS IS 1 1! 1! 38! 57! 3! 0! ! 4 .0 ! 200 !( 0 ( 31 46 2 19 ( *(■ 60 ( 55 ( 20 200 00 01 3 .9 ( 13 ! 10 I 1 ( 0 ( 20 ! 69! 17! 13! 1( 0! 0! I . . 1.0 . . . —!(. . . . 1.0 . . . . !( 22 0 0 41 22 10 27 57 30 14 0 0 50 33 17 1.0 0 33 33 0 33 0 0 33 33 0 33 0 2.0 67 ( 33 ( 0( 0! 60 ! 40 ( 0! ! ! 78 6 16 93! 71 0! 42~” s 5 ! 26 3 4 ! 8 110 !! 24 ! . .1.0 . . . . .! 211 #78 M.S.U. resources w i l l be a llo c a te d to those programs which a tt r a c t the most students. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 78 ! ! VARIABLE ! I CHAIRPERS ! FACULTY DEANS N s 27 N s 14 ! N s 91 ! 3SSSSSSSS VALUE !___ ! NONE LIK E LIH D ! LOW OF IMODERATE 1HIGH OCCUR !6REAT (NO RESP ! ih e a n ^ r e sp " in o n e " " ” " ” IMPACT !LOU OF THE I MODERATE CHANGE (HIGH ! GREAT INO RESP tMEAN RESP ! FACULTY GRP MOST ! STUDENT PR0M0T1N6!PROVOST THIS ! ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP . . . . . . . . . JIMODE . . . . . .RESP ... ! FACULTY GRP MOST ISTUDENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS ! ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP IMODE RESP REL FREQ CPCT) ABS ADJ 36 43 14 7 38 46 IB D 3 .7 0 0 !♦ 14 7 62 19 0 3 .9 7 8 69 23 7 0 0 0 0 3 .0 79 0 7 0 0 14 !E3SSS5K5S os” o* I 11 12 84 a4 92 22 20 21 37 40 94 23 25 6 0 7 22 41 0! 8I 24 ! 2? 0! 44 ! 24 ! ! ! 0 0 ! 114 76 ! 8! 7 70 ll 0 1.0 I 0 !! 7 3 .0 92 27 0 3 .8 3 .8 64 21 0 {SSSSXSCXS 3 .9 0 0 23 N = REL FREQ 1REL FREQ CPCT) ! (PCT) ABS ADJ I ABS AOJ ! 11 12 ! 81 4 7 0 0 7 20 27 39 25 6 2 1.0 42 27 0 6 28 06 1.0 sssssssss REL FREQ CPCT I ABS ADJ x s s sss: 0 0 0 0 0 0 SO 60 33 40 17 0 00 2 15 67 17 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 67 100 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 60 40 0 1 0 -2 YRS E STIM ATED !3-5 YRS TIME OF 1 6 -10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP 50 29 7 14 58 33 8 0 3? 26 0 15 70 ! 30 ! 43 27 14 16 51 33 16 0 17 33 17 33 25 50 25 0 2 .0 65 14 71! 16! B 01 I! ! ! ’ 7 9 " 87! 4! 4 7 ! 1 1! 0 9 Si ! 8 1.0 ! 1.0 50 33 17 1 .0 ! ! 2 •! 2! 9 10! 3 .0 67 100 62 38 ! ! aoi 2 3 .9 55 33 1.0 0!! af 60 1 40 ! 0 ! 1 .0 1 25! 0 56 37 7 IMODE RESP 6 17 IT 20 62 38 0 00 !!! 23 26 42 57 36 7 .........|......... 2! 7 8! 18 20! 43 46! 40 40 SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR 7 ! YES ! NO RESP 12 •!• ! 2 33 33 3 .0 6 82 00 ! REL FREQ! cpct) r ABS AOJ! 1! 2! 27! 45! 33 83 ! ! N = 98 ! _________ f 3 .9 3 .8 3 .0 78 0 0 20 29 6 884 !I 80 ' TOTAL 6 4 .4 3 .9 14 63 16 0 O .X .R . 55 35 61! 47 2B 9 16 56! 33! 11! 10 3 90!! .......I 1.0 0! ! ! 212 #79 Support and funding of construction programs form Alumni and friends of higher education will Increase. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER ! 79 ! OEANS CHAIRPERS FACULTY IMPACT OF THE CHANGE (NONE (LOU (MODERATE (HIGH (GREAT (NO RESP ( (MEAN RESP (FACULTY GRP MOST (STUOENT PROMOTING!PROVOST THIS (ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP (MODE RESP (FACULTY ________ GRP MOST (STUOENT HINDERING!PROVOST THIS (ST ♦ FED CHANGE (COMMUNITY (NO RESP ! (MODE RESP H II II It 1 1 a I a ( I--------- -- 10 1 20 21 21 100 3 .1 36 14 7 29 ( 20 3 .1 12 12 25 12 37 0 5 .0 36 50 2. 7 2 14 27 18 6 33 10 0 3 .1 14 7 21 43 2. 2 10 10 50 33 7 30 19 11 4 11 11 30 33 5 .0 (REL FREO (REL FREol ( (PCT) ( ( CPCT) ( ABS ADJ ( ABS AOJ( ( ( ( (XSSSSS33) ) ) 17 ( ( ! 50 60 33 AM ! ( 17 22 31 ( ! ! 4 ) ( 17 27 ( ! ! ( ! ( 2 .5 . -( 3 4) 17 33 12 17( 35 49( 33 67 16 2 3 ( 5 7( 50 29 0( 20 20 00 00 0 2.0 0 0 00 lo 41 9 36 0 2 0 27 14 22 35 3 0 42 21 33 0 3. 0 17 6 17 17 44 0 57 5 .0 0 e 2 10 22 6 11 ! ! ( ( ! ! ! ( 0 18 5 23 50 0 17 0 0 0 33 50 33 0 0 0 67 0 5. 0 0 0 17 17 0 0 50 50 67 0 0 ( ( ( ( ( ! ! ( 0 3 .0 5 .0 0 0 14 50 36 22 78 0 26 56 19 32 68 0 24 43 33 35 ! 65 ( 0 ( ) 50 100 ( 50 0 ! !0 -2 YRS* ESTIMATED!3 -5 YRS TIME OF (6 -1 0 YRS OCCUR (NO RESP 7 36 21 36 11 56 33 0 19 30 22 30 26 42 32 0 16 25 20 39 26 42 32 0 33 17 50 2 .0 2 .0 2 .0 0 2 .0 6 8 60 3 .1 I •! 9! 0 2 .7 3 .2 3 .0 0 14 0 14 71 0 3 21 41 26 9 0 ( ! ( SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR ? ! YES _ I.N O RESP_ (MOOE RESP ! ( TOTAL ( ( ! N = IA N s 27 N = 51 N = 6 t N = 98 ! ( ( SSSS3SSSS S3SSSSS3S 33S3S33S3 ! s r s s x s s s s ( s s s s s s s s f ! REL FREO REL FREO REL FREO CPCT) VALUE VARIABLE ( ( pctT (PCT) ! ABS AOJ ABS ADJ ABS ADJ !_ _ sssssssss SSSSSS3SS (S3SSSSSSS J NONE * 7 9 ( 11 13 6 LIK E LIH D ILOU * ( 52 * i 23 38 OF 30 ( (MODERATE 19 22 25 38 OCCUR (HIGH 4 4 4 30 ( 6 (GREAT 7 ( 0 9 0 6 (NO RESP 29 ! 15 0 0 33 (MEAN RESP ( I ! O .I.R . 0 67 33 0 6 1 26 10 24 33 2) 38! 15 ( 36) 0( 3i ) ( . . . )) 6) 12 10!( 10 20! 24 50 49! 0! ! 5 .0 ( *! 21 31) 48 691 31 0( >! 14 2 3 ! 29 4 5 ! 32! 37 0( ) 2 .0 ( w* 20 213 #80 New revenue sources t r i l l be sought, I . e . , from sales o f p a te n ts , o u b llc a tio n s , products, and se rvice s. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER I I ICHAIRPERS! I I I N s 27 ! t ! DEANS N s 14 80 FACULTT O .I.R . TOTAL N s 51 N s 6 x x x x x x x x Ix x x x x x x x x ! x x x x x x s x x XXXXXXXX! I ! I REL FREO (REL FREO t REL FREO REL FREQ I (PCTI I CPCT* VARIABLE ! (PCT* (PCT* VALUE ! ABS ADJ ABS ADJ ( ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ ( SXXXXXX' x x x x x x s x x XXXXXXXX1 I 2 3 14 18 0 { none 14 LIKEL1HO (LOU 30 I 18 12 16 OF 17 25 14 IS 20 I 22 32 (MOOERATE ! OCCUR IHIGH 27 41 33 90 29 30 40 t (GREAT 9 17 25 I 4 7 7 0 I 33 0 (NO RESP 33 0 26 I ( (MEAN RESP! 3 .0 4 .0 I 3 .3 3 .3 22 (NONE ! (LOU ! (MODERATE ! (HIGH (GREAT (NO RESP (MEAN RESP! (FACULTY I GRP MOST (STUDENT ! PROMOTING(PROVOST ! THIS (ST ♦ FED ( CHANGE (COMMUNITY! (NO RESP ( (MOOE NESPj (FACULTY ! GRP MOST (STUOENT ( HINDERING(PROVOST ! (ST «■ FED ( THIS CHANGE (COMMUNITY! (NO RESP ! ! ! IMOOE RESP! ! 7 36 21 14 210 9 49 27 IB 0 19 33 26 0 26 00 22 0 33 44 0 0 48 3 .0 4 .0 21 * 21 43 —I* 0 !I 20 49 I 39 I 00 II I I 65 ! U4 1| | 26 37 0 37 7 4 4 7 41 37 4 1.0 1.0 0 0 6 3 .1 2 .9 14 0 21 29 0 36 0 0 10 0 21 IMPACT OF THE CHANGE 0 0 !! I 24 27 10 4 33 35 41 19 6 0 2 .9 0 25 75 33 0 00 00 73 ‘I l80 17 33 17 17 0 50 33 33 0 0 1.0 3 .0 12 66 !(! 120 II ! 45 62 17 33 8 45 4 14 0 17 50 33 0 62 ! i 020 00 1.0 0 0 0 0 1.0 SHOULD I T ! NO ! OCCUR ? ( YES I NO RESP ^ 43 29 29 60 I 40 ! 0 I 26 48 26 35Y 65 ! 0 I 31 33 35 48 52 0 50 17 33 !0 -2 YRS ESTIMATEDI3-5 YRS TIME OF !6 * 1 0 YRS OCCUR (NO RESP 7 36 14 43 12 62 25 0 22 41 11 26 30 ! 55 ! 15 ( 01 18 14 25 43 31 24 45 0 50 100 ( 1 ! ! ! ! (MODE RESP! 2 .0 ■I* ! I I ( 2 .0 >!- 3 .0 0 0 50 2 .0 2 75 25 0 0 0 0 ( ■! 14 3( 32! 42! 20! 3? 0! R 2 .9 2 .7 4? 35 0 17 50 ! N = 98 ! ! xxxxxxxx! J REL FR£G( (PCT* I ABS ADJI ( xxxxxxxx! 3 4! 14 2 0 ! 18 2 6 ! 29 41 ( 6 9! 30 0! ! 3 .3 ! ! ! >! 8 12! 1 2! 42 14 1 34 63! 22! 20!! ! 3.0 ! *3 a” 67! 4! 5! 10 44 5! 181 0! ! —1.0 !! 33 36 32 48! 52! 0! ’l6””27! 27 18 39 43! 30! 0! ! 2 .0 ! 214 181 Funding p o lic ie s by colleges end deoartments w i l l be In c re a s in g ly conserv a tiv e . CHANGE STATEMENT DEANS N s 14 NUMBER : 81 ssssf s s :s = rs s s |: ! » ! (REL FREO VARIABLE ! VALUE f «PCT» I ABS ADJ I !_ _ ! :|s s s = : 0 0 (NONE “ ! 7 LIK E LIH D ILOU I ---------------- ! OF {MODERATE 36 38 OCCUR fHIGH 23 {GREAT 29 31 0 {NO RESP 7 8 21 { (MEAN RESP( IMPACT OF THE CHANGE INONE ILOU (MODERATE _____ -------1HI6H (GREAT INO RESP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1MEAN RESP! 3 .8 0 21 43 29 0 7 0 23 46 31 0 0 3 .1 (FACULTY ! GRP MOST (STUDENT I PROMOTING(PROVOST I THIS (ST ♦ FED ! CHANGE (COMMUNITY! (NO RESP ! ! ! (MOOE RESPI 14 17 0 0 36 42 36 42 0 0 14 0 (FACULTY I GRP MOST (STUDENT ! HINDERINGI PROVOST ! THIS 1ST ♦ FED ! CHANGE (COMMUNITY! INO RESP I ! I (MODE RESP! 43 21 7 7 0 3 .0 55 27 21 1.0 CHAIRPERS( FACULTY ( O . I . R . 1 ! N s 27 I N s 51 ! N = 6 s_ase| 0 20 10 12 01 01 n 0 01 IS 0 S9 20 2 22 1.0 1.0 IS 73 ! 33 27 I 50 (1 7 1 0 -2 YRS ! 43 ESTINATED13-5 YRS ! 21 TIME OF (6 -1 0 YRS I 21 OCCUR (NO RESP! . 14 37 37 7 19 45 ! 45 ! 9 ! 59 75 (MOOE RESP! 1 .0 0 •I« ! 20 0 0 ■!« 40 ( 60 I 0 ! 0 12 IS 0 !! 228 100 1.0 ! 1.0 20 686 2 22 20 2 0 59 22 ! ' lJ 0 87 ! 13 I I 1 01 201 01 111 it 22 1.0 SO 25 25 0 0 01 74 11 ■!« { N s 98 ! REL FREQ (REL FREO IREL FREQ (REL FREG( IP C TI { (PCT1 { { (PCT) { ABS AOJ ! ABS ADJ ( ABS AOJ ( ABS ADJ1 { ( :!:s r r ::s s : s (s r*s s s rs | 0 0 ( 0 4 {. A 0 ( 41 2 0 3 30 ( 26 0 17 41 41 50 33 40 1 38 451 15 29 36 50 60 ( 27 311 15 17 IB 0 15 0 ! 1 ( 4 .2 3 .7 ( 4 .0 I 4 .6 —1 »!■ 0 0 0 0 0 11 13 1 7 0 0 1 9 — 39 1 38 34 4. 0 . .! 33 40 I _ 35_ .I. _ 29 0 0 1 24 29! 11 13 I 22 26 50 60 I 17 2 0 ! 15 0 1 IS 0 17 0 1 15 0! 1 1 4 .2 3 .7 1 3 .5 I 3 .6 - I 4 5 ! I 4 5! 0 0 I 0 I 0! 0 52 64 I 61 54 6 6 ! 74 50 75 I 23 ! 18 21 251 4! 9 ! 2\ I 3 2 19 ! 18 0! 33 0 ! 18 ! I ! 3 .0 I ( 3 .0 ! 3 .0 3 .0 •! 74 95 1 75 95 50 75 " I" 881 4 8! 17 25 ! 0 0 0 1! 1 3! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0! 0 0 0 0! 0 33 1 SHOULD” ! ( “ no ” ” ” ! ” i ” ” 2" OCCUR ? ! YES ! 36 38 I NO RESP ! 7 0 •!■ ( TOTAL 0■(• 1 ’ at” 0 ! 23 209 67 100 I 33 0! 2.0 " s i” ” 73! 22 271 16 0! 59! 291 12! 0! ! . . 1.0 . . . . . .! 215 #82 There t d l l be more In flu e n ce and c o n tro l by o u tsid e agencies because o f th e fin a n c ia l sunport th a t p riv a te business and In d u s try w i l l g ive to M.S.U. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 82 ! ! VARIABLE I I VALUE I I DEANS It ! CHAIRPERS! FACULTV N * 27 11 REL FREO I REL FREO (PCT) IPC T) I ABS ADJ I ABS AOJ I ( IMPACT OF THE CHANGE 0 10 10 0 I 3 .0 INONE ILOU IMOOERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESP! 0 30 0 22 36 ! I I 0 0 3 .1 0 30 0 11 22 11 22 21 10 7 29 14 29 33 40 20 0 3. 5 ! I !■ I 0 19 43 29 14 I 1 I t I 10 20 12 22 0 14 29 20 0I 3.4 I 63 15 81 I 19 I 73 4 24 !0 -2 YRS ! ESTIMATED!3 -5 YRS ! TIME OF 16-10 YRS I OCCUR INO RESP ! ! ! INODE RESPI 7 36 29 29 10 50 40 19 44 IF !' 26 0 II 16 25 25 41 22 34 37 . 0 . . . . . . . . . j. . . . . . . . . y. 2 .0 70 0 20 5 5 0 I I 1 I I 1 I I 5. 0 52 0 15 4 4 26 1. 0 22 11 2.0 I 0I 15 I I 0 2 8 25 39 25 i 77 3 18 0 3 0 1. 0 2.0 0 0 0 17 50 33 0 3 11 34 53 0 5. 0 59 2 14 0 •2 24 28 18 7 17 17 0 21 3 .0 0 40 0 20 0 15 26 * n 40 0 24 J I ! I ! 1 ! I 95 I 5 I 0 I 20) 341 281 181 01 ! 25 0 50 0 25 0 I ! ! ! I ! 50 1 19 13 26 I 1. 83 as 17 17 0 0 1.0 ! 0! 1 I ! ! I I 3. 0 33 17 17 33 0!! 0 0 0 25 75 0 5. 0 17 0 33 0 17 33 35! 23! 9! ! 3 .4 1 .....I 0 1! 1 4 51 20 49 26 I 5. 3 .6 90 10 0 ! 1 I I I I 1 33 17 3. 4 64 7 29 3. 0 ! I ! ! ! I 0 0 0 19 61 0 0 33 0 17 39 26 16 0 SHOULD I T ! NO ! OCCUR 7 ! YES I I NORESP I I 40 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 63 22 0 0 18 29 0 43 0 0 29 5. 0 REL FREO! (PCT) ! ABS AOJ! ! 2 .9 (FACULTY I GRP MOST (STUDENT I HINDERINGIPROVOST ! THIS 1ST ♦ FED I CHANGE ICOMMUNITY) INO RESP ! ! ! IMODE RESP! I ! I I I ! 17 17 3 .1 0 0 0 14 57 29 . . . . . . . . . j. . . . . . . . . |. I IREL FREO 1 (PCT) I ABS ADJ I 16 I FACULTV I GRP MOST I STUDENT I PR0M0TIN6IPROVOST ! THIS 1ST ♦ FED I CHANGE tCOMMUNITY! INO RESP I I ! IMODE RESP! 0 0 0 20 80 0 N s 98 6 I ! ! ! I =========1 !======2=: ========! 0 0 I s s " 2 " * " i " I 17 17 2 3! 24 30 29 I 33 33 22 23 3 0 ! 27 35 17 17 26 33 I SSSSSSSSS'SSSSSSSSStSSSSSSSSS INONE 1 LIK E LIH O ILOU 30 I OF SO 50 IMOOERATE I OCCUR IHIGH 7 I OREAT 7 29 INO RESP IMEAN RESP! ! ! N s TOTAL I : : : : : : : : : I| ========= !========: ! !REL FREO t (PCT) t ABS ADJ 0 21 I N s 51 ! ! 0. X. R. 50 25 25 0 01 01 69 1! 261 1! 4! 01 I ■I 891 8 111 011 . 22 ... 16 32 19 33 241 471 291 01 I . . 2.0 . . . . . .I 216 #83 There win be greater emphasis on electronic/computer teaching material. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 83 DEANS I II : { 14 B_ls IREL FREO VARIABLE ! CPCT) VALUE ! ABS ADJ __________ ! __________ !_ INONE LIK E LIH D ILOU OF IMOOERATE OCCUR IHIGH I6REAT INO RESP !~ I 1 I I t 0 14 36 29 7 14 IMEAN RESPI 0 17 42 33 8 0 3 CHAXRPERS N s 27 FACULTY 0. 1. R. TOTAL N s 51 N = N = 98 ! I ssssssss: REL FREO CPCT) ABS AOJ REL FREO CPCT) ABS ADJ REL FREO) CPCT) ! ABS AOJ! I 33333 3=33 33=33 =333 33=33 SSBS 33333 ===! 0 0 0 0! 0 0 0 15 16 10 11 0 131 11 33 36 27 30 33 50 34! 31 33 36 17 25 33 37 36! 32 20 22 17 25 15 17! 11 12 7 0 10 0 01 33 0 11 ! 3. 4 ! 3. 7 3. 7 3. 6 1 0 17 *£ 33 8 0 0 19 33 30 7 11 45 18 27 0 9 0 33 7 30 11 7 11 0 14 36 29 7 14 IFACULTY I GRP MOST I STUDENT I PROMOTINGIPROVOST I THIS 1ST * FED I CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! INO RESP I I I IMODE RESP! 36 14 21 IFACULTY I GRP HOST (STUDENT I HINDERINGI PROVOST I THIS 1ST ♦ FED I CHANGE (COMMUNITY I (NO RESP ( ( ( (MOOE RESPI 50 7 7 7 0 29 SHOULO I T I NO i OCCUR 7 I YES 1 I NO RESP I 57 29 14 67 33 0 37 52 11 42 58 0 43 43 14 50 50 0 17 50 33 1 0 -2 YRS I ESTIMATED(3-5 YRS ( TIME OF (6 -1 0 YRS I OCCUR (NO RESP I ( I (MODE RESPI 21 29 29 21 27 36 36 0 22 44 19 15 26 52 22 0 31 33 16 20 39 41 20 0 3. 3 1 21 0 10 45 20 16 10 37 8 33 12 8 0 37 0 35 6 8 14 70 10 10 10 0 0 41 30 11 7 0 11 46 33 12 a 0 0 41 22 8 4 2 24 0! 15! 45! 26! 14! 0! ! ( 3. 4 0 25 50 0 25 0 0 13 40 22 12 12 0 33 33 33 0 0 34 5 31 7 7 16 33 33 33 0 0 0 41 21 9 5 1 22 29 75 0 42 44 14 0 0 50 100 0 0 50 0 26 37 17 20 3. 2 0 17 17 17 0 SO 54 28 10 5 3 0 17 17 17 0 0 50 2. 0 1. 0 2. 0 0 17 33 0 17 33 43 0 41 7 9 0 1. 0 1. 0 2. 0 0 11 50 22 17 0 3. 4 1. 0 1. 0 2. 0 0 21 37 33 8 0 3.2 1. 0 ======== I REL FREO CPCT) ABS ADJ INONE I ILOU I IMOOERATE I IHIGH 1 I GREAT 1 INO RESP I I I IMEAN RESPI IMPACT OF THE CHANGE 6 1. 0 2. 0 40! 6! 37! 9! 9! 0! ( 0 ( 1. 531 28! 12! . 7! 1! 01 I 1. 0 I 491 511 0! 321 46! 22! 01 I 0 I 2. 217 #84 There will be greater demand for computer usage and fa c ilitie s . CHANGE STATEHENT NUMBER : 64 ! ! VARIABLE ! I VALUE _!__ INONE LIK E L IH D ILOU OF IMOOERATE OCCUR IHIGH I GREAT INO RESP IMEAN RESP . . . . . . . . . I. IMPACT OF THE CHANGE INONE ILOU IMOOERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP ! IMEAN RESP ■I- IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUOENT PROMOTING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP IMODE RESP IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUOENT HINDERINGIPROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP IMODE RESP SHOULD~ITI“ n O OCCUR ? I YES I NO RESP ESTIMATED!3 -5 YRS TIME OF !6 - 1 0 YRS OCCUR INO RESP i IMODE RESP DEANS CHAIRPERS N s 14 N s 27 FACULTY N a 51 ! I I TOTAL I I I I N s 98 I O .I.R . N s 6 I I I I sssssssss sssssssss sssssssss sssssssss ! ssssssss! REL FREO CPCT) ABS AOJ sss: 0 0 0 0 7 54 50 36 38 7 0 REL FREO IPC T) ABS AOJ REL FREO IREL FREO! I IP C T) I IPCT) ABS AOJ I ABS AOJI I sss: I s s s s s s s s !I 0 I ! 0 1 II 33 40 16 18! 34 37! 50 60 39 4 3 ! 17 0 ! 4 .3 3 .9 29 43 14 7 31 46 ""*0 4 30 37 26 0 0 56 37 0 7 3 .7 0 8 00 "’ “ " l o " 14 20 14 20 36 50 15 7 30 15 7 26 0 7 00 7 92 0 1.0 0 29 0* 27 0 0 4 .0 77 0 0 60 40 0 0 52 0 00 25 43 18 14 71 6 67 4 8 4 00 30 50 20 0 77 5 20 10 40 20 10 0 22 6 31 33 31 9 0 ’27*’ 32" ’ 2 9 **4 o " 29 40 14 29 0 "39**49" 20 1.0 59 14 33 68 0 41 208 100 1.0 10 0 4 .2 60 20 20 0 36 40 12 11 0 33 17 0 33 II 40! 45! 14! 0! 3 .7 . . . . . . . !! 50 25 66 5 84 0 0 3 13 0 0 50 25 3 .0 4 .0 38 62 0 36 57 7 33 17 0 1.0 20 8 11 20 29 0 0! 50 17 17 17 l l0 14 0 0 3. 6 4 14 11 1.0 0 4 .2 3 .9 7 4 3 .0 45 14 0 0 11 36 4 .4 3 .4 63 86 REL FREQ tPCT> ABS AOJ I I 76! 6! 9! 5! 4! 0! I 1.0 ! 19! 8 12! 22 3 2 ! 13 21 5 30 3 .0 30! 7! 01 I _! 60 I “ * 3 0 * * 3 3 1 59 67! 40 I • • • • • • ■0I !I - » — « - !! 38 47! 33 50 I 37 4 6 ! 33 50 8! 19 33 0 0! I SO 33 17 0 1.0 11 0 0 6 .1.0 . . . . .I ! 218 #85 There t r i l l be r is in g pressure f o r s p e c ia liz e d lib r a r ie s and separate research b u ild in g s . • CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER S 85 S S S S S S S S S !sssssssss ! ! VARIABLE | VALUE !NQN£ LIKELIH D ILOU OF IMOOERATE OCCUR IHIGH I GREAT INO RESP t IMEAN RESP IMPACT OF THE CHANGE INONE ILOU I MODERATE !HIGH IGREAT INO RESP ! IMEAN RESP IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUOENT PROMOTING!PROVOST THIS 1ST ♦ FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP MOOE RESP ------------j! ---------IFACULTY GRP MOST ISTUDENT HINDERINGIPROVOST THIS. 1ST • FED CHANGE ICOMMUNITY INO RESP ! IMOOE RESP CHAIRPERS N s 27 sssssssss 0 14 29 36 7 14 0 17 33 42 8 0 0 22 15 19 7 37 3 .4 0 14 50 7 14 14 0 7 22 22 7 41 ! 06 100 ! 0 0 ! 0 0 ! 0 0 ! 0 0 ! 14 0 ! 1 .0 7 0 43 29 0 21 ( 9 0 55 36 0 0 3 .0 O .I.R . N s 51 N s 120 ! ! I I I I I 0 0 0 0 0 20 29 14 6 31 If 37 12 0 ! 82 6 0 12 0 0 1 .0 4 4 22 30 0 41 33 I ! ! ! ! I ! 6 6 37 50 0 0 4 .0 I ! I I ! ! 1 97 0 0 3 0 0 0 33 ! ! I ! ! ! ! 6 0 56 34 3 0 3 .0 I I ! I ! ! ! 19 44 37 29 71 0 35 31 33 53 47 0 !0 - 2 YRS ESTIMATEDI3-5 YRS TIME OF 16-10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP I IMODE RESP 21 36 21 27 45 27 15 30 15 41 25 50 25 0 12 22 31 35 IB 33 48 0 3 .0 17 17 33 ! 1 .0 4 0 35 22 2 37 0 29 43 20 9 0 3 .1 67 0 0 2 0 31 61 01I I 3 .0 -! 220!! 29 3 .0 0 58 42 0 2.0 REL FREQ! (PCT) ! ABS AOJ! ! sssssssss ssssssss! 17 23 2 3! 23 331 17 25 27! 33 50 31! \l 2 .9 3 .4 52 4 0 7 0 37 sssss ssss 3 29 41 50 36 14 21 0 2.0 N s 98 I I ssssssss! REL FREQ CPCT) ABS ADJ SHOULD I T ! NO OCCUR ? I YES I NO RESP .........! ......... TOTAL 6 REL FREQ CPCT) ABS ADJ 2 20 27 202 273 27 0 ■ 3 .2 0 17 58 8 17 0 3 .2 FACULTY ssssssss: REL FREQ (PCT) ABS AOJ REL FREQ CPCT) ABS ADJ II H II II II II II •1 II II u II II ! ! s s s s s s s s s OEANS N s 14 0 23 25 30 16 7 32 0 0 I 3 67 100 ! 0 0 ! 0 0 I 0 0 I 0 0 1 33 0 j 65 1 0 3 0 31 3 .2 1 .0 0 0 17 50 0 33 0 0 25 75 0 0 4 .0 0 0 50 17 33 2.0 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! 4 1 32 27 1 36 ! 3 1001! I ! I —I 1! 0! 4! 0! or i ) ! — ! 61 2! 49! 41! 2! 0! I ) I 00 35 34 32 511 49! 0 13 28 24 35 20! 421 37! 67 100 33 I 431 24! 75 25 0 0! 0! I 2.0 •! 219 #86 There w i l l be more p u b lic . non-un1vers1ty use o f f a c i l i t i e s . DEANS CHANCE STATEMENT CHAIRPERS ! ! N s 51 ! SSSSSSSSS i! ! FACULTY ! O . I . R . ! ! TOTAL ! ! ! N s 14 N s 27 NUMBER : 66 N s 6 ! N s 98 ! ! ! s s s s s s s s s ]s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s ssssssss: ! ssssssss! ! ! ! rEL FREO REL FREO REL FREO ! REL FREO ! REL FREQ! (PCT) (PCT) ! VARIABLE VALUE ! (PCT) (PCT) ! (PCT) ! ! ABS ADU ABS AOJ ABS ADJ ! ABS ADJ I ABS AOJ! 1 ! ! ! s s s s s s s s s !s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s 0 NONE ! "“’ 5 3~ I" 17 20 I 5“a_3! ! LIK E LIH D LOU 36 50 33 47 25 34 1 26 3 7 ! ! 29 ! or 14 26 37 MODERATE ! 33 40 ! 22 3 1 ! 7 HIGH ! 11 16 OCCUR 33 40 ! 29 I 17 24! GREAT ! 0 14 4 0 5 ! 4 - 6! 29 0 NO RESP r 0 30 25 17 ! 27 0! ! ! 3 .0 MEAN RESP! 3 .0 3 .0 2 .7 I 3 .0 ! !■ >! 0 4 6 NONE ! I ! IMPACT 19 29 LOU ! 29 40 35 47 ! 17 20 ! 29 40! OF THE 29 40 25 34 ! 67 80 ! 30 4 1 ! MODERATE ! 30 47 7 CHANGE HIGH ! 16 I 10 14! ! GREAT ! 7 3 ! 0 ! 3! 37 0 29 0 NO RESP ! 25 ! 17 ! 29 ! I 2 .9 MEAN RESP! 2 .7 I ! 2 .7 0 20 10 20 0 FACULTY ! STUOENT ! PROVOST ! ST ♦ FED I COMMUNITY! NO RESP ! MOOE RESP! FACULTV ! GRP MOST STUOENT ! HINOERING PROVOST I ST ♦ FED ! THIS COMMUNITY! CHANGE NO RESP ! ! MODE RESP! SHOULD IT OCCUR 7 NO |• I N§*RESP ! 0 -2 YRS YRS ESTIMA7ED 3 - 5 TIME OF 6 -1 0 YRS NO RESP OCCUR »!■ ! ! ! ! I MODE RESP! 0 0 7 14 50 29 0 22 22 0 10 10 GRP MOST PROMOTING THIS CHANGE 0 0 0 10 20 70 0 5. 0 0 0 0 2.8 0 60 4 4 7 52 33 6 11 78 0 5. 0 26 15 19 4 4 33 29 36 36 44 56 0 37 30 33 56 44 0 0 29 36 36 0 44 56 0 7 33 22 37 £§ 3. 0 3. 0 39 22 28 6 6 0 1. 0 2. 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 11 2 0 2.8 - - !■ !■ 0 0 ! 0 0 ! 0 0 1 0 ! 0 0! 4 6 ! 00 00 ! 49 10 14 ! ! 57 81 ! 67 100 I 55 29 0 !! 33 0 ! 31 ! -!* 31 SO ! 4 6! 25 41 ! 0! 0 3 ! 0! 1.0 j!. 5 .0 37 0 SO 12 0 0 21 0 29 7 0 43 l2 0 39 1? 6 43 20 31 2 .0 54 ! 46 ! 0I ■!■ 9 ! 63 ! 29 ! 0 !! ! 5 .0 17 17 0 0 33 33 4 .0 ! I !* 25 ! 25 ! ! 50 ! I 0 ! ! 0 0 ! 33 50 17 i 40 ! 60 ! 0 I 17 17 33 33 25 25 SO 0 3 .0 .[ ! ! ! ! 0 1 6 H 5 .0 28 7 22 4 44 11 35 6 37 1.0 37 34 30 52 461 0 _—| 6 37 23 34 2 .0 9! 53! 35! 0!! ! 220 #87 Only vlttaly needed, modest, and high p riority new construction will take place following the completion of the Connunl cation Arts and the Performing Arts buildings. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 87 VARIABLE ! ! I VALUE INONE LIK E LIH D ILOU OF {MODERATE OCCUR IHIGH 1 GREAT INO RESP I IMPACT OF THE CHANGE I ! DEANS ! ! N a 14 ! I I 0 14 14 36 14 29 36 7 14 3 .4 7 IMOOE RESP! IFACULTY ( GRP HOST ISTUOENT ! HINDERING!PROVOST ! THIS !ST ♦ FED ! CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! INO RESP ! I ! IMODE RESP! 1---------SHOULD I T ! NO ! ! OCCUR 7 I YES ! 10*2 1 ! ESTIMATED!3 *5 ! OCCUR INO RESP ! ! ! IMODE RESP!! 0 0 11 12 11 12 17 17 42 33 37 7 0 14 64 0 14 0 0 I I IREL FREQI I CPCT) ! I ABS AOJ! I , 33 19 15 100 120!! 11 33 31 15 4 .0 0 0 13 27 26 IS 17 22 I 22 0 3 .7 7 0 11 4 0 0 11 19 33 50 30 33' 50 31 33 15 22! 16 2 3 ! 1 II 30 0! I 1.0 I 49 33 I 60! 40! 37 24 50! I 6 43 209 II 200 29 I 0 00 2! 8 4121 0 0 1.0 1.0 67 ! 33 ! 0 ! 52 37 11 58 42 0 49 27 24 64 I 36 1 0 I 17 67 17 20 ! 80 ! 0 I 29 14 ?9 29 40 20 40 0 41 37 7 15 48 43 9 0 37 22 10 31 54 31 14 0 33 17 17 33 50 25 25 0 ! 1. 0 ! ! 14 52 24 5 14 5 57 29 14 ! ! ! ! ■! 0! 15! 68 8!! 0! 9! 29 41 19 4 11 4 22 0 1.0 3 .0 ! •I 01 4 .0 4 .0 0 56 33 13! 39! 36! 0! ! 16! 32! 33! 19! 0! ! 3 .5 ! 29 1 32 I 8 0 11 1. 0 ! Is s s s s s s s ! 36 40 0 11 if 39 17 33 42 4 .0 36 21 0 36 REL FREQ IREL FREQ CPCT) I CPCT) ABS ADJ I ABS AOJ I Is s s s s s s s : 4 .0 3 *8 IFACULTY ! GRP MOST ISTUOENT ! PROMOTINGI PROVOST ! 1ST * FED ! THIS CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! INO RESP ! I 0 21 25 14 0 0 N s 51 REL FREO CPCT) ABS AOJ I I I TOTAL I I I I I N S 6 I N s 96 I IIs s s s s s s s s (I s s s s s s s s tI FACULTV i O . I . R . sssssssss sssssssss r ! I I I I I . . . . . . . . . (IMEAN . . . . . RESP! . . . . j. I N s 27 I IREL FREQ t CPCT) I ABS AOJ IMEAN RESPI !« INONE ILOU {MODERATE I IHIGH I IGREAT I INO RESP I I CHAIRPERS 1. 0 I I ! ! ! ! 1. 0 ! ! ! ! ! 1 . IB . . . . . . 0( ! 12 lh 0! 1.0 ! 221 #88 Campus wide rem odeling, re fu rn is h in g , and Improvement o f o ld b u ild in g s w i l l have p r i o r i t y over new ones. CHANGE STATEMENT ! ! OEANS f NUMBER : BB 1 K : H ! s r s s s s s s s t s s s s s s s s s ls s s s s s s s : ! IREL FREO VALUE ! (PCT) VARIABLE I ! ! ABS AOJ ! I ! (NONE LIK E LIH D !LOtf _ ! OF IMOOERATE ! OCCUR IHIGH I GREAT INO RESP 1 IMEAN RESPI IMPACT OF THE CHANGE INONE ILOU IMOOERATE I IHIGH I6REAT INO RESP I IMEAN RESPI 0 0 0 0 43 46 3r 3S 4 .2 0 14 36 14 29 7 IS 38 IS 31 0 3 .6 IMODE RESP! • t■!« SHOULD I T ! NO I OCCUR 7 I YES I I NO RESP I 1 0-2 YRS I ESTIMATED!3 -5 YRS I TIME OF 16-10 YRS I OCCUR INO RESP I I I INODE RESP! 20 20 21 1.0 0 18 18 9 0 0 4 .1 0I 0 12 I 20 11 26 2B I 0 33 36 I 24 I I I 3 .7 I 22 0 4 4 33 52 4 4 36 56 0 0 4 .0 "43*”ss" 0 14 14 7 I O .I.R . N s 27 J N = 51 N s 6 s s s s s s s s s Is s s s s s s s s I REL FREO IREL FREO REL FREO (PCT) (PCT) I (PCT) ABS AOJ I ABS AOJ ABS ADJ s s s s s s s s s Is s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s : 0 I 0 0 0 7 B 0 C 15 IS 16 __ 33 33 37 38 37 46 37 SB 27 34 67 67 4 0 4 .0 0 0 0 IFACULTY I 0 0 GRP MOST ISTUOENT I PROMOTINGIPROVOST I SO 54 1ST « FED I THIS 43 46 0 0 CHANGE ICOMHUNITYI INO RESP I 7 0 I I .3 .0 . . . . . . . . . ^. . . . . . . . . ^ . GRP MOST ISTUOENT I HINDERING!PROVOST I THIS 1ST ♦ FED I CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! INO RESP I I CHAIRPERS I FACULTY 1 I I I I I I I 11 I 2!0 ! i 0 15 0 30 0 i 35 *6 10 20 12 20 0 3 .2 0 17 83 0 0 0 2 38 54 24 4 .0 39 4 4 12 2 39 0 65 6 6 19 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 35 65 17 83 17 83 SO 52 30 58 I 33 I 31 33 43 46 33 17 17 33 50 25 25 0 1.0 8I 11 0 II 1.0 I 8 110 27 2.0 I 0 1.0 44 4 4 12 66! 61 6! 18! 2 31 0! 1.0 II 27 51 0 |. . . . . . . . I 1.0 0 4! 1! 401 54! 1! 0! I 4 .0 I 34 45 1 16 34 44 I 56 I 0 I H 0! 19! 411 22! 18! 0! I 3 .4 I 40 60 0 0 ’67“Ioo" 021 0 16 36 19 IS 13 0 I I I I I I I 4 .0 I 0 33 SO 0 17 41 52 7 22 0 17 83 0 0 0 43 46 SO S4 7 0 43 29 14 14 IREL FREQ! I (PCT) I I ABS ADJ! I I : Is s s s s s s s | I ! 2 19! 16 36 4 1 ! 31 38! 0! I 4 .1 I 2 .8 0 29 41 0 0 0 0 4 .3 0 24 44 1.0 1.0 0 0 0 0 I I TOTAL I I I I N S 98 I I I :|s s s s s s s s ] 0 ■I | I 11 14 Ml 621 39 31 9 49! 39! 01 21 12 0!!I 1.0 I 222 There t r i l l be Increased co m petition f o r p h ysica l resources both w ith in colleges and the to t a l u n iv e rs ity . 0 0 36 29 21 14 i (FACULTY ( !GRP MOST (STUDENT ! ! PROMOTING!PROVOST ! ! THIS (ST ♦ FEO ! ! CHANGE (COMMUNITY! ! (NO RESP ( ( ! 1 ! (MODE RESP! 50 0 14 21 0 14 (FACULTY ! ! f GRP MOST (STUOENT ! ( (HINDERING (PROVOST ! THIS (ST ♦ FED ! !i CHANGE (COMMUNITY! (NO RESP ! I 1 ! !fl_________ (MOOE RESP! (SHOULD IT 1 NO I ( OCCUR ? ! YES ! ! NO RESP 1 ! | 1 ! (0 -2 YRS 1 !E S TIM A TE D !3-5 YRS ! i TIME O f (6 -1 0 .Y R S ! (NO RESP t (OCCUR ! ! ! ! (MODE RESP! 14 0 43 7 7 29 0 0 42 33 25 0 3. 8 0 4 30 26 33 7 1* 0 64 21 14 75 25 0 67 2| 7 43 14 14 29 60 20 20 0 37 41 11 11 3. 0 1. 0 II H II II if 37 0 26 19 1 17 78 0 14 B 0 0 0 0 ! 0 0 ( 50 100 ! 0 0 ! 0 0 ! 50 0 ! 1 3 .0 t 39 2 22 7 2 28 63 16 22 80 20 0 33 17 50 62 19 18 43 24 10 24 56 31 13 0 17 33 0 50 67 ( 33 ! 0 ( ■ sss ( 33 ( 67 ! 0 ( 0 ! ( 0 ! ! ( 1 ! 1 ! t ! 57 0 10 6 0 27 72 I 28 ! 0 ( MAMM1 42 1 46 ! 12 ! 0 t ! 0 ! 33 10 38 14 5 0 3. 0 2. 50 100 ( 0 0 ( 0 0 ( 0 0 1 0 0 ! 50 0 ( ( 1 1. 0 22 0 33 24 2 20 60 0 24 16 0 0 1. 0 26 7 30 11 4 22 27 0 41 29 2 0 ! ( ! ! ( t ( ( 56 0 22 IS 0 7 20 0 60 10 10 0 0 4 27 28 27 15 0 6 22 31 25 16 4. 0 58 0 17 25 0 0 ! ( ! 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ( ( ! ! ! ( o 4 32 28 36 0 ! ! TOTAL ! 1 t N s 6 I N s 98 ! t ! s s s s !s s s s s s s s ( ! ! REL FREQ (REL FREG! CPCT) (PCT) ! ! ABS AOJ ! ABS AOJ! ___I ! sssss ssss 1 0 ( 0 0 "~o! 0 l 1! 0 ( 12 141 33 50 ( 17 25 ! 33 38! 17 25 ! 41 4 7 ! 33 0 I 13 0! t ! 4. 3 ! 3. 7 ! O . I . R. H II II II II II It II II II II II II It (NONE ( (LOU 1 IMOOERATE ! (H IG H . ! (GREAT 1 (NO RESP t ! 1 (MEAN RESP! II » ! IMPACT ! OF THE 1 CHANGE ! ! ! t ! CHAIRPERSt FACULTY t N s 27 ( N s 51 ( S3S83 ! REL FREQ (REL FREQ (PCT) ! ABS ADJ 1 ABS AOJ ( 85833 0 0 0 0 ! 0 ! 0 2 2 IS 15 ( 8 9 37 38 ! 35 42 39 47 44 46 ( 4 0 t 16 0 ( 4* 3 4 .3 1 II N II II fl II II II H II M II II ! ! ! CHANGE STATEMENT I DEANS i ( N s 14 i NUMBER : 89 ( i ! Is s s s s s s s s ( s s s s s s s s s ! s s s s s ! ( ( ! ! (REL FREO (PCT) (VARIABLE I VALUE ( « ( ! ABS AOJ J ! ! 1s s s s s s s s s ( s s s s s s s s s ! ssss I (NONE ( 0 0 (L IK E L IH D (LOW ! 0 0 ! OF 14 (MODERATE ! 17 ! OCCUR (HIGH ( 21 25 t (GREAT ! 50 58 ! (NO RESP ! 1A 0 t 1 I ! (MEAN RESP! 4. 4 II II M II #89 0 7 26 37 30 0 3 .9 0 0 67 0 33 0 3. 7 3 .0 1 .0 1 .0 0 0 33 0 17 50 2. 0! 5! 311 33! 31! 0( ! 9 ! 3. 44! 0! 31! 231 1! 0! ! 1. 0 ! 54! 3! 31! 10! 3( 0! ( 1. 0 ! 76! 24! 0! — 1 40 51! 28 36! 10 13! 0! 22 ! 1. 0 ! 190 There will be a greater sharing of physical resources. CHANGE STATEMENT NUMBER : 90 ! VARIABLE t ! I !i deans i N s 14 • ! - :sssssss|: VALUE (NONE LIK E LIH D ILOU OF IMOOERATE OCCUR IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I ! INONE ILOU IMOOERATE I IHIGH IGREAT I INO RESP I I — I IMEAN RESP! j. ssssssss sssssssss 4 4 7 25 37 42 19 21 GRP MOST ISTUOENT I PROMOTING!PROVOST I THIS 1ST ♦ FED I CHANGE {COMMUNITY! INO RESP ! ! ! IMODE RESP! 22 11 3 .5 10 0 0 70 50 0 0 14 20 0 29 0 0 64 7 0 29 0 15 33 22 15 15 ! 0 0 90 10 0 0 3. 0 8 0 I I ! I 1 I I 3. 4 11 0 56 19 0 15 13 0 65 22 0 0 REL FREQ CPCT) ABS AOJ REL FREO! CPCT) I ABS ADJI ssssssss: ssssssss! 17 33 17 33 3. 0 2 16 35 20 16 I 0 0 H 18 0 14 I I I I I I 3 .4 so 1 4 0 63 16 2 16 5 0 74 19 2 0 3. 0 1 I I I 1 1 I 3. 3 0 0 33 17 0 50 0 0 67 33 0 0 3 .0 17 SO 33 25 75 0 I 29 I 14 1 14 1 43 50 25 25 0 33 48 4 15 39 57 4 0 39 33 48 40 33 17 67 33 1 0 -2 YRS ESTIMATE013-5 YRS TIME OF 16-10 YRS OCCUR ! NO RESP ! I •MOOE RESP! 1 .0 2 .0 1.0 10 120 18 1 .0 1 I ! I I 1 3 .3 5 0 59 15 1 19 69 3 4 1 1 21 30 70 0 1.0 18 SO 100 I 0 0 I 0 0 I 0 0 I 0 0 I 50 0 I 25 61 14 1 1 I 1 I I 11 37 17 14 3 35 65 0 93 2 2 0 2 0 76 2 2 0 2 18 2 I 30 56 15 1.0 16 I 20 80 0 1.0 I I I I I I 20 0 0 67 33 0 0 14 57 29 I 78 4 13 4 0 0 36 3 .8 IMODE RESP! !• SHOULD I T ! NO I OCCUR ? ! YES I ! NO RESP I I 67 4 11 4 0 IS 26 19 25 SO 25 0 *2 7 0 0 0 36 I I 1 I I I I 00 ! FACULTY GRP MOST (STUDENT ! TUDEAHINDERING!PROVOST I THIS 1ST ♦ FED ! CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! INO RESP I 89 11 0 0 0 0 I 4 .0 2 14 1 N s 9B I ssssssss! 3 .9 0 17 39 26 17 0 TOTAL 6 sssssssss 00 2 ~ S=2~ 4 5 16 18 43 50 22 25 14 0 3 .7 7 3 .2 N = REL FREO CPCT) ABS AOJ REL FREO CPCT) ABS AOJ 0 200 14 40 29 7 10 30 21 29 0 I ! ! I ! I I 0 . I*R « sssssssss t ! REL FREO ! CPCT) I ABS AOJ IMEAN RESPI IMPACT OF THE CHANGE I CHAIRPERS! FACULTY N s 51 N = 27 0 SO 1 .0 21 71 23! 43! 24! 0! ! I 2!! 14! 45! 21! 17! 0!! ! —! 60!! 1! 0! ! I —I 4! 51 1! 1! i 01 1.0 I .......I 0 0 24 5? 30! 01 *3 6 ” ” 46! 34 43! 8 11! 22 01I 1 .0 I 224 #91 Physical f a c i l i t i e s w i l l become obsolete due to la ck o f adequate main­ tenance. • CHANGE STATEHENT NUMBER : 91 VARIABLE ! f ! ! VALUE IMPACT OF THE CHANGE ! ( I( ! ( ( ( ( ( ( ! 1 (MEAN RESPI . . . . . . . . . f. . . . . . . . . j. (FACULTV I GRP MOST (STUDENT ( PROMOTING!PROVOST ! THIS (ST ♦ FED ! CHANGE (COMMUNITY! (NO RESP ! ( ! (MODE RESPI . . . . . . . . . j. . . . . . . . . | . (FACULTY 1 GRP MOST (STUDENT ! HINDERING!PROVOST ( THIS (ST * FED ! CHANGE (COMMUNITY! (NO RESP ( ( FACULTY ! O . I . R . ! N a 51 ! N = 6 ! (CHAIRPERS N ! (MODE RESP! 0 7 21 29 21 21 0 a 27 36 27 0 ( ! 1 ! ! ! 3 .8 0 7 19 29 29 21 7 11 7 98 11 15 7 9 37 33 15 36 36 0 9 *0 9 0 15 56 9 22 19 0 50 0 0 36 22 9 33 9 7 30 22 0 78 0 0 0 3 .0 SHOULD I T ! NO *7l"IoO OCCUR ? ! YES 0 0 29 0 ! NO RESP ( !■ ■(< ! 0-2 YRS 1 I?" 22 ESTIMATED(3-5 YRS ! 36 56 19 TIME OF (6 -1 0 YRS ! 22 0 36 OCCUR (NO RESP ! ! ! 2.0 (MOOE RESPI 1 ! ! ! ! ( ! ! ! ! f ! 9 .0 1 0 8 58 1 32 1! 0! 12! 8?i 9 1 ! ! ! ( ! 39 2 22 2 0 35 1 ! ! ! ! ; 32 2 30 2 2 33 —! 61 3 33 3 '0 0 1.0 3 .0 19 19 23 0 91 19 15 26 55 25 20 0 1.0 ! ! ! ! ( ! I ! " ~ I i ’ " l9 l 10 12! 15 32 13 18 18 29 9 32 5 97 5 11 0 22 '( " ’ ! 22 I 30 ! 10‘ 12 ! 22 0 ! ! 3 .8 2 .9 I !« ’ 0" 0 2 3 ( 0 0 0 0 ( 0 0 18 25 ( 83 83 16 22 ! 17 35 50 ! *17 0 0 29 0 I ! 9 .2 9 .2 ! !■ 0 0 ( 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 B 12 ( 55 87 1 83 100 0 ( 0 0 0 0 ( 17 0 37 1 9 .0 ( 9 .0 10 12 9 9 93 39 0 5 0 19 71 5 0 ( !S=! IB 9 13 9 57 13 0 9 .0 0 0 ! 0 0 ( 0 0 ( 69 100 ! 0 0 ! 36 0 ! ! 9 .0 ! ! ! N = 98 ! ! REL FREO (REL FREG ( REL FREC! (PCT) (PCT) ! I (PCT) ! ABS ADJ ! ABS AOJ ( ABS AOJ! ! !_ _ 3 .5 T 0 9 IB TOTAL : 1s ! (REL FREG (REL FREG CPCT) ! (PCT) ( ABS ADJ ( ABS AOJ RESP( (NONE (LOU (MODERATE (HIGH IGREAT (NO RESP ! 1 ! DEANS ( I none LIK E LIH D (LOU OF (MODERATE OCCUR (HIGH (GREAT (NO RESP ( (MEAN ■!■ ! ( 2 29 29 22 39 2.0 3 0 39 35 0 1 ( ( ! ! 1 50 0 33 0 0 17 60 0 90 0 0 0 ( ( 33 17 2.0 22 9 .1 1.0 ( 100 100 ! ( 0 0! II 19! 39! 16! 0! ! 3 .3 ! ! 3! 9! 12 16 ( 2B 36! 33 92! 1.0 69 0! ! ! -! 0! ! I 97! 3! 99! 3! 3! 0! ■ ! —! 6 921 20 ! 22 39! I •( 29 90 I 90 ! 29 19 39 0 ! 2.0 8! 01 ( 37! 29! 0(1 i 225 #92 Research e x p e rtis e w i l l be traded f o r new equipments. ! CHANGE STATEMENT DEANS NUMBER : 92 N : 4 ! VARIABLE ! ! VALUE INONE I ILOU ! IMOOERATE ! IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I IMEAN •I- 14 N = 27 IREL FREO ! (PCT) ! ABS AOJ ! NONE ! LIK E LIK O ILOU ! OF -----{MODERATE !f OCCUR {HIGH (GREAT t ! NO RESP I I I {MEAN RESPI IMPACT OF THE CHANGE ICHAIRPERS RESP! ■!■ 0 29 0 14 0 57 0 67 0 33 0 0 2 *7 0 14 14 14 0 57 0 0 3 .0 ! RESP! ■!" 4 7 7 19 7 56 11 4 4 15 4 63 a 17 17 42 17 0 7 21 7 64 20 60 20 0 19 11 59 0 a a 10 12 63 30 10 10 40 10 0 0 21 21 26 32 0 10 20 2 65 0 no 28 56 0 67 50 50 0 0 I I I I I I 33 100 ! 0 0 0 0 67 0 ! 0I 0! 8 8 16 69 25 25 50 0 60 0! ! ! 3 .5 11 1 6 15 2 ! 31! 3! 17! 43! 6! 0! ! ! •! 22 6 1 ! 0 0 ! 0 01 6 17! 50 I 50 I 7 19! 0 I 1 3! 0 0 11 2? 23! 33! 8 211 4 .0 SO ! 50 ! 0 ! 3 .0 83 17 0 9 13 64 17 17 67 1.0 3 .0 17 17 0 29 6 65 2.0 ========! o '! 4 10! 0 20 4 8 ! 9 21! 50 ! 0 ! 7 17! 2 5! 50 ! 0 I 57 0! ! 4 .0 2.6 ! ■! 0 0 I 1 3! 0 0 I 8 21! a 0 17 0 17 67 0 0 17 17 0 67 8S 11 0 2 6 64 36 0 45 27 0 { REL FREQ ! REL FREQ! (PCT) ! (PCT) ! ABS ADJ ! ABS ADJ! ! ! 1.0 29 0 4 0 65 6 =========! ! 3 .5 4 .0 18 18 0 0 10 -2 YRS ESTIM ATEDI3-5 YRS TIME OF 16-10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP 5 3 .7 1.0 4 .0 2 .0 0 2 2 .5 7 7 0 59 26 15 59 ! 57 0 64 0 83 17 0 IMODE RESP! 0 26 36 7 57 ! 45 23 14 4 .0 SHOULD I T ! NO ! OCCUR ? ! YES ! I NO RESP ! ! ! ! ! 20 10 6 3 .5 (FACULTY I 29 80 GRP MOST ISTUOENT I 0 0 PROMOTING!PROVOST I 0 0 1ST ♦ FED I 7 20 THIS 0 0 CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! 0 INO RESP I 64 I I 1.0 (MODE RESP! ■!■ (FACULTY t 0 0 GRP MOST (STUDENT ! 0 0 HINOERINGIPROVOST I 7 20 THIS 1ST . FED ! 29 80 CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! 0 0 INO RESP ! 64 0 I IMODE ■!■ 8 50 25 17 2 .5 0 33 33 33 REL FREQ (PCT) ABS ADJ ! ! TOTAL ! I N = 98 I ! ! O .I.R . N = N s 51 REL FREQ (PCT) ABS ADJ 4 22 11' 7 0 56 FACULTY ‘ ! ! ! 63 0! ! 1.0 ! ’29'"76! 9 241 8 14 12 65 24! 41! 35! . . . . . .0!I . . . . . . . . I . . 62 33 100 ! 67 2.0 0 ! ! ! 2.0 0! ! I 226 #93 Clerical tasks will be facilitated by usage of modern equipments. CHANGE STATEMENT DEANS ICHAIRPERSI FACULTY I I I I I N = 98 I I_______ I ! I I I TOTAL 0*2 NUMBER ! i IREL FREQ IREL FREQ IREL FREQ I (PCT) I (PCT) I (PCT) VARIABLE ! VALUE • I ABS ADJ I ABS ADJ I ABS AOJ ! :=! INONE LIK E LIH D ILOU OF : IMOOERATE I OCCUR IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP I (MEAN RESP! REL FREQ IREL FREQ! I (PCT) I (PCT) ABS AOJ I ABS AOJ! I J I 3 .6 I I I I I I I I IMEAN RESPI ■I I FACULTY I GRP MOST I STUDENT I PROMOTINGIPROVOST I .TH IS 1ST ♦ FED I CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! INO RESP 1 I I IMODE RESP! IMPACT OF THE CHANGE INONE ILOU IMOOERATE IHIGH IGREAT INO RESP IFACULTY ! GRP MOST (STUDENT ! HINOERINGI PROVOST ! THIS 1ST ♦ FED ! CHANGE ICOMMUNITY! INO RESP ! I I IMODE RESPI SHOULD I T | ” no ” OCCUR ? ! YES I ! NO RESP ! 10-2 YRS ESTIM A TE 0I3-5 YRS TIME OF 1 6 -10 YRS OCCUR INO RESP I ! I ! I ! IMODE RESP! o" 0! 12 23 30 15 19 0 11 32 23 14 19 15! 29! 37! 19! 0! ! ! ■! 0! 14! 39! 29! 18! 0! 3 .5 29 38! 35 46! 3 4! 0! 1 8 24 3 .0 IB 4 16 16 4 43 1.0 1.0 14 64 21 *36" 21 14 29 1.0 31 7 28 2B 7 0 18 82 20 0 20 2 .0 41 44 15 0 0 17 50 1.0 19 3 n n\ 1.0 0 0 50 100 SO 0 0 33 0 I ! -! 32! 5! 6 40 1.0 iT h IB 0 3” 35 12 17 0 0 17 17 SO 1! 11! 18 10! 01 I ! ! fi 7?! 0! I 40 26 13 21 1.0 51! 32! 17! 0! APPENDIX D COLLEGES AND INSTITUTIONS PARTICIPATING IN THE STUDY 227 228 1. College o f A g ric u ltu re & N atural Resources 2. College o f A rts & L e tte rs 3. C ollege o f Business & Graduate School o f Business A dm inistration 4. College o f Communication A rts & Science 5. C ollege o f Education 6. College o f Engineering 7. C ollege o f Human Ecology 8. C ollege o f Human Medicine 9. J u s tin M orrill College 10. Lyman Briggs C ollege 11. C ollege o f N atural Science 12. College o f O steopathic Medicine 13. C ollege o f Social Sciences 14. U n iv ersity C ollege 15. College o f V eterin ary Medicine 16. Life-Long Education 17. O ffice o f I n s titu tio n a l Research APPENDIX E DEPARTMENTS PARTICIPATING IN THE STUDY 229 230 1. A dm inistration & Higher Education 2. American Thought & Language 3. Audiology & Speech Science 4. Communication 5. Community Health Science 6. Counseling, Personnel S erv ic e s, & Psychology 7. Criminal J u s tic e 8. Crop & Soil Science 9. Family & Child Science 10. Food Science & Human N u tritio n 11. F o restry 12. Geography 13. H ealth, Physical Education, & R ecreation 14. H istory 15. Human Environment & Design 16. Management 17. Marketing & T ran sp o rtatio n 18. Medical Technology 19. M etallurgy, Mechanics, & M aterial Science 20. Music 21. Natural Science 22. Nursing 23. Physiology 24. Pathology 25. Racial & Ethnic S tudies 26. Radiology 27. Telecommunication APPENDIX F COVER LETTERS 231 232 MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Thank you fo r agreeing to work on our Futures p r o je c t. We a n t i c i ­ p ate th a t we w ill re q u ire about 30 minutes o f your tim e once a month over a period o f 2 months. S hahriar Ghoddousi (who w ill be using much o f th e m ateria l f o r h is d is s e r ta tio n ) w ill c o n ta c t you e ith e r In person o r by m a ll. In o rd e r to re fre sh your memory, we have th e follow ing purposes: 1. To c o l l e c t d e ta ile d and fa c tu a l inform ation th a t describ es th e opinions o f s e le c te d academic u n it a d m in istra to rs and s e le c te d fa c u lty members about th e fu tu re o f academic u n its a t Michigan S ta te U n iv ersity . 2. To c o lle c t inform ation regarding d if f e r e n t s tr a t e g i e s , p o lic ie s , and courses o f a c tio n th a t academic u n it a d m in istra to rs may use in coping with fu tu re changes (te n y e a r s ) , given th a t th e changes do occur. 3. To c o lle c t inform ation t h a t suggests a d m in istra tiv e to o ls and techniques needed by academic a d m in istra to rs which could be provided by c e n tra l a d m in istra tio n o f Michigan S ta te U n iv ersity . Thanks ag ain . S in c e re ly , Richard L. F eatherstone P ro fesso r RLF:cmk 233 MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY December 18, 1979 Dear Dr. Thank you f o r your p a r tic ip a tio n In th e f i r s t phase o f our fu tu re p r o je c t. Ue a n tic ip a te t h a t we w ill re q u ire about 60 m inutes o f your tim e 1n th i s f in a l phase. S h ah ria r Ghoddousi (who w ill be using th is m ate ria l f o r h is d is s e r ta tio n ) w ill c o n ta c t you e it h e r in person o r by m a il. This Is th e l a s t phase o f th e study on fu tu re changes In th e general a t t r i b u t e s o f Higher Education which may a f f e c t th e Academic U nit o r U n iv ersity A d m in istratio n . In o rd e r to re fre s h your memory, we have th e follow ing purposes: 1. To c o l l e c t d e ta ile d and fa c tu a l Inform ation t h a t d escrib es th e o p inions o f s e le c te d academic u n it a d m in istra to rs and s e le c te d f a c u lty members about th e fu tu re o f academic u n its a t Michigan S ta te U n iv e rsity . 2. To c o l l e c t inform ation regarding d if f e r e n t s t r a t e g i e s , p o li­ c i e s , and courses o f a c tio n t h a t academic u n it a d m in istra to rs may use 1n coping w ith fu tu re changes (te n y e a r s ) , given th a t th e changes do o ccur. 3. To c o l l e c t Inform ation t h a t suggests a d m in istra tiv e to o ls and techniques needed by academic a d m in istra to rs which could be provided by c e n tra l a d m in istra tio n o f Michigan S ta te Uni­ v e r s ity . I want to thank you again f o r your help in th is time-consuming p r o je c t. S in c e re ly , Richard L. F eath ersto n e P ro fesso r 234 MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY I am a d o cto ral stu d e n t working on a th e s is study designed to assess th e opinions o f Michigan S ta te U n iv ersity academic u n it a d m in istra to rs on th e fu tu re issu e s o f academic a d m in istra tio n . E ffectiv en ess and e ffic ie n c y in a d m in istra tio n a re everyone's g o a l, y e t l i t t l e i s known about th e changes lik e ly to occur in th e next te n y ears and th e e f f e c t th e se changes w ill have on a d m in istra tio n o f academic u n its . This study i s an attem pt to. narrow th i s knowledge gap by id e n tify in g th e changes lik e ly to o ccu r. The study is designed to provide informa­ tio n based on th e e x te n t o f agreement among c o lle g e deans, departm ental ch a irp e rso n s, and s e le c te d fa c u lty members who have been involved 1n actu al long-range planning a t MSU. The stu d y , employing a Delphi method, 1s designed as a fo u r-sta g e mail survey. The enclosed q u e stio n n a ire groups areas o f academic a d m in istra tio n under f iv e major headings: F acu lty , S tu d en t, Program, Finance, and Physical Resources. Each p a r tic ip a n t i s asked in Question I to 11st th e most im portant changes t h a t they fo resee in each o f th e fiv e areas l i s t e d above. In Question I I , th e p a r tic ip a tin g a d m in istra to r is asked to d e ta il th e most im portant a d m in istra tiv e p o lic ie s necessary to deal w ith th ese fu tu re changes. The next th re e stag e s o f th is stu d y , based on th e r e s u lt o f th e f i r s t q u e s tio n n a ire , c o n s is t o f s h o rt m u ltip le -c h o ic e q u e stio n s; th ese w ill be mailed to you in th e next several months. The success o f t h i s study depends upon your p a r tic ip a tio n . Thank you very much f o r your tim e and co o p eratio n . S in cerely y o u rs, S h ah riar Ghoddousi APPENDIX G PHASE-ONE QUESTIONNAIRE 235 The Assessment o f Opinions of Michigan S ta te U n iv ersity Academic U nit A dm inistrators on th e Issu es o f th e FUTURE o f Academic Unit A dm inistration RETURN By: May 10, 1979 To: S h a h ria r Ghoddousi 424 Erickson (C ollege o f Education) Michigan S ta te U niversity S elf-ad d ressed envelope enclosed P lease complete fo r 2nd and 3rd sta g e follow -up Name: U nit: Address: ________________________________________________ ___________ 237 PURPOSE The purposes o f th is study a r e as follow s: 1. To c o lle c t d e ta ile d and fa c tu a l inform ation th a t describ es th e opinions o f s e le c te d academic u n it a d m in istra to rs and s e le c te d fa c u lty members about th e fu tu re o f academic u n its a t Michigan S ta te U n iv ersity . 2. To c o lle c t Inform ation regarding d if f e r e n t s tr a t e g i e s , p o lic ie s , and courses o f a c tio n th a t academic u n it adm inis­ t r a to r s may use in coping w ith fu tu re changes (te n y e a r s ) , given t h a t th e changes do occur. 3. To c o lle c t inform ation th a t suggests a d m in istra tiv e to o ls and techniques needed by academic a d m in istra to rs which could be provided by c e n tra l a d m in istra tio n o f Michigan S ta te U n iv e rsity . The inform ation regarding the f i r s t two purposes w ill be gathered in a sy stem atic way by using th e Delphi method. The Inform ation regarding th e th ir d s ta te d purpose w ill be c o lle c te d through a sim ple survey method, which w ill be adm inistered a t a l a t e r tim e. 238 QUESTION I A fte r each o f th e f iv e headings given below, please l i s t th e th re e most im portant CHANGES t h a t you feel WILL tak e place during th e next ten y ears and w ill a f f e c t your academic u n it (in clu d in g the d ire c tio n and magnitude th e change w ill ta k e , i . e . , in c re a sin g , d ecreasin g , la r g e , s m a l l , . . . ) . I f you fe e l t h a t no im portant changes w ill occur in th e se s p e c ifie d areas during th e next ten y e a r s , please In d ic a te t h is and re tu rn th e q u e stio n n a ire . I-(FACULTY) ________________________________________________________ II-(STUDENT) III-(PROGRAM) IV-(FINANCE) V-(PHYSICAL RESOURCES) 239 QUESTION II A fter each o f th e fiv e headings given below, please l i s t th e most im portant a d m in istra tiv e p o lic ie s , s tr a t e g i e s , and courses o f a ctio n th a t your academic u n it might use in coping w ith th e fu tu re changes you in d ic a te d 1n Question I . I-(FACULTY)____________________________________________________________ II-(STUDENT) III-(PROGRAM) IV-(FINANCE), V-(PHYSICAL RESOURCES) APPENDIX H PHASE-TWO QUESTIONNAIRE 240 241 The purpose of th is questionnaire Is to assess the opinions o f M.S.U. academic u n it a d m in istra to rs re ­ garding th e p o te n tia l changes in th e general a t t r i ­ butes o f Higher Education which may a f f e c t th e u n it o r u n iv e rs ity a d m in is tra tio n . P lease RETURN By: January 10 To: S h a h ria r Ghoddousi C ollege o f Education 424 E rickson Hall Michigan S ta te U n iv e rsity S e lf-a d d re sse d envelope enclosed. INSTRUCTION PLEASE REM THESE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY before beginning. I f you have any questions pitas* coil Shahriar Ghoddousi, J5S-1744. The change statements or* lis te d on tho lo f t hand stde of the questionnaire under tha major headings: Faculty. Students. Prograa, Finance, snd Physical Resources. There are SEVEN questions related to each chenge it*tenant*. 1. The f i r s t coluan is fo r a NO OPINION response. I f you have no Idea or opinion about the change statement, please eark (X) In th is colwn and go to the n est change statenent. __ „ . I . The neat se t o f columns are related to the LIKELIHOODOF OCCURANCE o f the change. Please choose one of the five th at b a s t t i t s your opinion 3. The neat s e t o f col inn a are related to the IMPACT OF TOE CHSNQE. Please choose one o f the five th a t beat f i t s your opinion and nark i t with a (X). . 4. The neat a e t o f columns ere related to d ifferen t groups or agencies that uould HOST promote THE CHANCE (th at w ill be n o tt Interested In working to Mke the change occurj. Please Indicate with a (X) the group o r agency th at you believe w ill nost promote the change. 5. The neat se t o f columns are related to the group* or agencies that would HOST HlhPIR THE CHANGE (th a t w ill be mast Interested In working to prevant tha occuranca of the change). P lan e choose the group or agency th a t bast f i t s your opinion and mark I t with a (X). 6. The neat column Is related to APPR0PR1ATNE5S OF THE CHANGE. I f yw think th is change SHOULD happen nark (X) In th is coluan. if you think this change SHOULlTMrhappen, please leave th is column BLANK. Tour rtspons* should indicate whether you favor tha change, not whether you think I t 7. T ha'las^three^oU m ns are .related to tha TIME THAT CHANGE HAT OCCUR. If you think the change w ill occur In tha neat two years, please nark (X) in the f i r s t column; I f you think the change will occur between two and five years from now, please nark (X) In the second column; end I f you think the change w ill occur between five and ten years from now, please mark a (X) 1n the la s t colvm . ' There are three pages of change statements In th is questionnaire. Thank you for your cooperation. j« c ii l> M U u M t im !v.ta» «l ia t *s!ic.5*.»£* 1 l j 'w n » a m j } | » i n < : »sa ■-!-:n :ai l J : • ( N i c r w i W . 'u U i !ta:e«»•-•« »*»•;««»(•» 1 ! =1 CHANGE STATEMENT j1 i1 i: SS ! Mi-i— 1! ! FACULTY L F a c u lty u o rk -lo .td w i l l I n c r e a s e ;l e s s ( a c u i t y e l m w i l l be s e l f 2- f i i w a ; i 4 l rew ards coK xensurate w ith p r o U s i i o i w l t r a i n i n g w i l l q :::p :r:L p ::-::q :x : .Uj i i i i l L il ij 3* r ..c a l:y p*nfcar« w i l l d e c re a s e a s ( a c u i t y nem bers cdC iM *— 4 - An n u a b e r o f f a c u l ty w i l l le a v e h ig h e r e d u c a tio n f o r . ? o s i t : e n s In buv iu ey s and i n d u s t r y . - - — — — —- — — i ! 5 - T .icrc w i l l h< l e u f a c u lty n o b i li t y * l e s s ( a c u i ty tu rn o v e r* and J .L '*.rc.ic jliiJ JLL ti l l : •1 ; ' II i jj iL L U iJ J J j 1 ! ;j -------- — ! ! .;U Ji.U !ii--LL.L. iiliiii •3 - r c - p i r u v f a c u l ty w i l l make up a l a r gs ue r p e. rrc c ae n ta c ag;e. o f cthhe. lt o ct aa l I | I i ! ! ! sacul ***. — • I - - r.ic u lv - w i l l be i n c r e a s i n g ly d i s s a t i s f i e d w ith t h e i r c t r e e r . — — — — IS- TIw ag e f a c u lt y w i l l p a s s an a c c e p ta b le l e v e l . — — — — — * |e - *’ ,» p a .':n » Itie s to add younger ( a c u i ty w i l l d e c r e a s e .— — — — — »7- l u c r e i i l i ae a a r o a c c o u n t a b i li ty w ith r e g a r d to te a c h in g m is s io n .— IS - V.-.efw w i l l be a g r e a t e r number o f f a c u l t y exchanges and J o i n t ap;io*.-.:acacs betw een c o lle g e s and d e p a r tm e n ts .— 19- ?.«cu Zvf w i l l demand s a l a r y a d e q u a te to k eep up w ith i n f l a t i o n . — — * (C - V .icrt w ill l»a a c o n c e n tr a tio n o f f a c u l t y e f f o r t s on p r o f e s s io n a l cJw C .:vun v s . g e n e r a l e d u c a tio n . — — —— —— — — —— — — — 21- V r c s i.r c * f o r c o l l e c t i v e b a r g a in in g 4 u n io n i z a ti o n w i l l I n c r e a s e .— * - L J - L C j . ' I Ll.i|!iS.iUj | I j I- H I M III LJ !. JjJiJjlL.li.LLLi mu ? ! Ill i i1 j III i T i Ml . ,| HI Ii H i! I | !I : l I I I f 1 l i l i I!I i i f f iE E E B ib : I t i ! Ill; ' l ! ' ! ! i! [ r I | I I *i*t ‘T»i t I ; t t I r i Si! i i I tt M ill *, i ] •h ! ! I ! !'l! ! i I r\> 4* r\> Sal la SkcjAiiiiai iw I IVhtss ilO i ,r.VMch wO bkrSnosS tssaase wd rtfctsi'staacfes .v.-.Ctr w wsat j tries oc’a * . . u . . .lasatfl me tc* . CHANGE STATEMENT L - iiU 111! 2 2 - T h e n w i l l b« s o r e vorzcn and a l n e r l c t.e s on Che f a c u l t y . - — — —— — 1 3- There w i ll be c u r e s t r i n g e n t rev iew p r i o r co a t t a i n i n g t t a u r c and Oro-.c rik tn .----- — ---------------------- — 1 4 - K-'te f a c u lt y n e a b e rs v i ' l se ek r e t r a i n i n g a s i t becomes a p p a r e n t t h a t t h e i r p r e s e n t s p e c i a l t y la c k s c a r e e r p r o s p e c ts * — — — — — 35- Tue v a l l e y o f f a e u lc y num bers w i l l I n c r e a s e r e l a t i v e to th e p re se n t.* S T UDENT 1- The p e rc e n ta g e o f s tu d e n t f a i l u r e w i l l in c r e a s e s i g n i f i c a n t l y * — — 2- A i i a i t o n s ta n d a rd s w i l t d e c lin e * re d u c in g th e q u a l i t y o f e n t e r in g stu d * ;:.ts .— 1- ;l.S .y . u n d e rg ra d u a te e n c o l l r e n t w i l l d e c r e a s e . - - - - - - - —— —— — ---------— JI.S.'w'. g ra d u a te and g ra d u a te p r o f e s s i o n a l e n ro llm e n t w i l l d e c r e a s e .— 5- T hera v i i l he a l a r g e r p e rc e n ta g e o f n o n - tr a d i t Iona I s t u d e n t s .— * — ' 6 - S tu d sr.ts w i l l demand a g r e a t e r r o l e i n d e te rm in in g c u r r i c u l a r c o n te n t Ufo 7* S tu d en t dca.ind f o r s u b s i d i e s , fe llo w s h ip s * s c h o la rs h ip s * e t c . w i l l j 89* iP* 1112. |3 |4 15* |6 - F ii.a r z la l p r o b ic s s w i l l b rin g about movement coward a s tu d e n t body ! c o n p .'ic j o f th e so c io c c o n u r.lc e l i t e . ™ * — — — — — — — — *— Tne stu d e n t p r o f i l e w i l l change—c o r e a p p l ic a n ts w i l l s e e k second p ro fs* * £ o n a l s k i l l s . ----— —- — ----.----------------- ------------ ----------- ------- ^ S tu d e n ts w i l l b e n o ru s o c i a l l y co n cern ed and in v o lv e d .- ----f o r :jx le m a f l e x i b i l i t y In Job m a rk e t, th e s tu d e n ts w i l l demand a | b r a i i g e n e r a l e d u c a tio n as w e ll a* s k i l l t r a i n i n g . —*— --------------------- —j S c u d t u s w i l l b ecoau in c r e a s in g ly p r o t e c t i v e end a s s e r t i v e o f t h e i r j ( lf i li ii a s c u s c o a e r s and e l t i t c n s * and i n t o l e r a n t o f re d ta p e and j b*.?re ic r a c y .— — —- — — — -!• Stud«at:« w i l l be I n c r e a s in g ly d e d ic a te d to th e a t t a l n n c n t o f p r a c t i c a l , | e*V l:;*able s k i l l s r a t h e r th a n i d e a s . — — —— — — — —— -IThe * « .illty o f s t u d e n ts who w i ll co m p lete a d e g re e program w i l l be o f j a ccr > id cr.ib ly h ig h e r l e ve l . — --JTho !:«idcnt p o p u la tio n w i l l have a g r e a t e r r e p r e s e n ta t i o n o f woneu I jn-J * ..io r I t t c s . - * - — — — — — — —— — — — - — — i5tu::*-.t i n t e r e s t w i l l c o v e r d i s c i p l i n e s and m a jo rs n o t p r e s e n t l y ro co .u b mum J liL i— .L llliL li] m iiii! rini L *•• i i j! m u Ite v l I CHANGE STATEMENT OI A 17- Th* c e l i t o f s tu d e n t* who ta k u c o r e th a n f o u r y e a r s t o c o e p ie c e s o u n d e rg ra d u a te d e g re e p to g r a a w i l l I n c r e a s e .----------------------------------- ------ P ro o rarn 1- The c u r r l c u l u a w i l l c o m c a n tly e h i n ^ co a d J r c s t i v a d a b l t Job 2- Tho p r o U i s l o n a l and t e c h n i c a l a r e a s w i l l be expanded co n eec p r e s s in g n e e d s o f o u r s o c i e t y . — ............ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I - Jtare " n o n - c n d l s i o A a l " c o u rs e s w i l l be o f f e r e d , ( e .g . s h o r t c o a r s e * , new e ls e fra m e s , e t c . ) — — - — - ---- -------------- --------------------------------- ------------Study and work w i l l be com bined; a change c'rcri p r e s e n t p a t t e r n o f e d u c a tio n fo llo w e d by w o rk .— — * •— . . . . . . . . — . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5- Jtare s t r i n g e n t and e x a c tin g e v a lu a tio n and a c c o u n t a b i l i t y o f co u rse * and p r a g m a s w i l l be denam fed by chose who pay f o r t h e n .— — — 5 - The c e n t r a l a d a l n l s c r a t i o n o f th e u n i v e r s i t y w i l l in c r e a s e i t s q u a n t i t a t i v e judgem ent o f program s, e f f i c i e n c y and p ro d u c t w i l l be vi11 : ro -p » .vMes iVVMt H Ute|A;iua« IS* ••.VK'i* II (,1c iBtcWwed |:c s r ;4 wn :Sfloi/ese«ic!«i jiiRCti t»a . t'Vsn tetnran.‘jsr-iig il ! , I ! t !“J,t ! i I i l i j t l : «5 « ii IJ4. ? i IS-?}t SJ .! : l v, i! Si ?«w|! Io CHANGE STATEMENT 2 0 - T here w ill he i n c r e a s in g p r e s s u r e co p o p u ia r iic c o u rs e s co a t t r a c t s t u d « * : : s .~ —------ --------— —— ---------------------------- -— FINANCE 1c o n s t r a i n t s u i l l re d u c e su p p o rt s e r v i c e s . - --------------------------2 - S tu d e n ts *<111 have t o c a r r y a l a r g e r s h i r e o f d ie co sc o f e d u c a tio n * ( in c r - is e l tu ic in n )— ......................................................................... - 3 - S t a t e ir il T e J e n l su p p o rt w i l l be in c r e a s in g ly d i f f i c u l t co f ic c .— -■ 4 - T here u i l l be in c re a s e d r e l i a n c e on o u ts id e funding* i . e . , g r a n ts — -----— --------------- — . — ---- -----and c o n t r a c t s . — — ------5* TLvre w ill he l e s s p r i v a t e coney f o r re s e a rc h * — — —--------C- T here w«K he i n c r e a s in g p r e s s u r e f u r d R p a rtn e n ts Co o b t a in fu n d in g I Crum a u ts id * s o u rc e s o t h e r chan g e n e r a l f u n d s .-------------------------------------7 - T .turc w il l be in c re a s e d d ependence on f a c u l t y g e n e ra te d f u n d s , g i f t s , g r j n t i , c o n t r a c t s , c o n s u l ta ti o n , and p a t i e n t c a r e . - — ——- — — 8 - ;?or*s rig a ro u s b u d g e tin g c o n c e p ts (z e ro b ase b u d g e tin g ) w i l l be necer i.iry in a l l a r e a s . - — - — - - —-----------------------— - - i ------------------------, 9 - S a la r y in c r e a s e s w i l l n o t k eep pace w ith i n f l a t i o n . — -------------------S u p p l e s cr.d s e r v ic e s c o s t s v l l l I n c re a s e d r a n a c lc a ) ly a s a c c s u l t o f I n f l a t i o n and th e a c c e p ta n c e o f t r a i n i n g grant**.----------------------M - T here w i ll ae s e v e re c o c p c c ic io n betw een th e s c ie n c e s and t h e hu-a.-.itl*ss fo r S t a t e su p p o rt o f I n s t r u c t i o n . - — 12- The ;jar« l o f T r u s te e s v l l l c o n tin u e co c o n s id e r p o l i t i c a l I s s u e s In nana**none o f in v e n tn e n ts . — — ------— —- —-------—-------—— 1 3 - T h e n v i l l be f i s c a l p r e s s u r e to red u ce f a c u lt y s i z e . - — — The c a t.il budget o f th e u n i v e r s i t y w i l l be kucIi l e s s f l e x i b l e . - - —- 13- T nere u i l l be l e s s su p p o rt f o r g r a d u a te coaching a s s i s t a n c s h l p s . - - - - 16- X .S .T . r e s o u r c e s w i l l be r e a l l o c a t e d co tho: ! > 1 I ! i i i i I i ! i i ! ! i \ .L L L i- U J - L •.LLliLU . i i :! ; i ,ui JI~ l-j.---4.-j-.i- LUl! I I I i : ; I f I | j : ; i ! i l l ! ..L»i T II i UTi - tlT T tT i i i Ul ItlT lT j : • : : i.L n r - n T T T - :- .LJ-l.LJ.-i-i. i i i t il ro -P* I I : ;J 4t Itl ■_ !I : i i XIn!IIIT! 5 ! Ti| ' ii| I I I I I ! _______________ CHANGE ST A T EMENT j -C - T here u t i l be d o r e I n f lu e n c e mu! c o n t r o l by o u t s i d e a g e n c ie s b e c a u s e o f th e f i n a n c i a l s u p p o r t t h a t p r i v a t e b u s in e s s and i n d u s t r y v l l l g iv e | • P H Y S IC A L R E S O U R C E .......... 1 - T here w i l l bo g r e a t e r em phasis on e l c c t r o n l c / c o n p u t c r te a c h in g 2- T here w i l l be g r e a t e r demand f o r com puter u sa g e and f a c i l i t i e s . - ----------- ! 3- T n ::e w i l l be r i s i n g p r e s s u r e f o r s p e c i a l i z e d l i b r a r i e s an d s e p a r a t e j t- T'rer s w i l l be r a r e p u b l i c , m m - u n lv e r s lty u se o f f a c i l i t i e s . — 5 - ( s l y v i t a l l y n e e d e d , r a d a s t , and h ig h p r i o r i t y no*- c o n s t r u c t i o n w i l l » p la c e f o llo w in g c c n p lc t io n o f th e Cor.m unlcacion A rcs & Che ?w:or*.in; Arts bulldir.ji. ---.------------------ — ----- ---- ------------ S - C i- v js v id e r r a d e l i n j * , r e f u r n i s h i n g , and Im provement o f o ld b u ild in g s v l l l have p r i o r i t y o v e r new o n e s .— ----— 7 - " ? ;« w i l l be in c r e a s e d c o m p e titio n f o r p h y s i c a l r e s o u r c e s b o th v i t h i n c o lle g e s and th e t o t a l u n i v e r s i t y . — — -------------------------------- S— T .-Jrs w i l l be a g r e a t e r s h a r in g o f p h y s ic a l .r e s o u r c e s .— ------------— 9- P h y s ic a l f a c i l i t i e s w i l l k c u s i : o b s o le te due t o la c k o f a d e q u a te - : im ic r.a n C e .---------------- — ------------------ — — .------------------ ............. 10- K c -:» rc h e x p e r t i s e w i l l be trade*! f o r new e q u ip m e n t.- — — - —™ 11* O . r i c i ! ta s k s w i l l be f a c l M c.itcd by th e u sa g e o f n a d e rn e q u ip m e n t.— V hat k in d o f TOOLS, TEClKtQWES . and SyPPgRT, c e n t r a l a d m i n i s tr a t i o n o f S t a t e U n iv e r s ity stay p r o v id e y rv to f a c i l i t a t e y o u r a d n ln ls t r a tl v * . Job In o r d e r t o c o p e w ith ch an g es. ? l e : s s PRIORITIZE y o u r s u g g e s tio n s . I f n o te ro o n In needed p le a s e u s e b ick o f t h i s s h e e t. BIBLIOGRAPHY y\ 247 BIBLIOGRAPHY Abelson, P h ilip H. "Lim its to Growth." Science 175 (March 1972). A bies, Hlgino A. "F aculty Reactions to I n s titu tio n a l Change: An E xploratory Study o f th e Development Program o f th e U niversity o f th e P h ilip p in e s College o f A g ric u ltu re ." Ph.D. d is s e r ta tio n , Michigan S ta te U n iv e rsity , 1969. Adams, Carl R. e t a l . "Decision-Making and Inform ation Systems in C o lleg e s." Journal o f Higher Education 47 (Januarv-Februarv -------------------1976). Adelson, Marvin, and A ronl, Samuel. " D iffe re n tia l Images o f the F u tu re." In The Delphi Method: Techniques and Approaches. E dited by Linston e t a l . London: Addlson-Wesley, 1975. A llen , Dwight. "What th e Future o f Education Might Be." In The F uture o f Education: 1975-2000. E dited by Theodore W. H ippie. C a lifo rn ia : Goodyear P ublishing C o., 1974. Amara, R. C ., and S ala n clk , G. R. "F o recastin g : From C onjectural A rt Toward S cien ce." The F u tu ris t 6 (June 1972). Angel, Dan. C r itic a l Issu es Facing Michigan Higher Education: 1978. Anthony, Robert N. Planning and Control Systems: A Framework f o r A n a ly sis. Boston! Harvard U n iv ersity P re ss , 1965. B ald ersto n , F rederick E. Jo ssey -B ass, 1974. Managing Today's U n iv e rsity . San F rancisco: B e rtlan d , Jouvenel de. The A rt o f C onjecture. T ran slated by Lary N ik ita . New York: Basic B ooks,T 567. B ickner, R. "A fter th e F u tu re, What?" th e F u tu re. Edited by W. H irsch. P ublishing C o., 1967. Breneman, David. Education?" In Inventing Education fo r San F rancisco: Chandler "Economic Trends: What Do They Imply fo r Higher AAHE B u lle tin 32 (September 1979). . Graduate School Adjustments to the New Depression in Higher Education! Washington, D.C.: Government P rin tin g O ffic e , 1975. 248 249 Broudy, Harry S. "Education: 1975-2000." In The Future o f Education: 1975-2000. Edited by Theodore W. H ippie. C a lifo rn ia : Goodyear Publishing C o., 1974. Cammack, Elwin F. "Long-Range Planning. In I n s titu tio n a l Research in th e U n iv ersity : A Handbook. Edited by Paul L. Dressel and a sso ­ c i a t e s . S a n F rancisco: 3ossey-B ass, 1971. Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. A Cl a s s 1f 1ca t i on o f I n s ti tu tio n s o f Higher Education. B erkeley, C a l i f .: Carnegie Commission, Casasco, Juan A. Planning Techniques f o r U n iv ersity Management. Washington, D.C.: American council on E ducation, 19/0. Central Michigan U n iv ersity . "1979-1980 Guide to Academic P lanning." Vol. 3, no. 1. Mt. P lea sa n t: C entral Michigan U n iv e rsity , O ffice o f th e P ro v o st, September 1979. CES O ffice o f O perations Research and A n aly tical S tu d ie s. "Annual Report 1977-1978." East Lansing: Continuing Education S e rv ic e s, Michigan S ta te U n iv e rsity , December 1978. Chaney, John. "Inform ation Systems: The O bjectives o f th e Involved Executive Manager." In Proceedings o f th e Eighth Annual Confer­ ence o f th e American I n s t i t u t e f o r Decision S cience. E dited by Carl R. Adams. San F rancisco: November l9!76. C h ie t, Earl F. The New Depression in Higher Education: Excerpts From a Study o f F in an cial C onditions a t 2l C olleges and U n iv e r s itie s . Carnegie Foundation fo r th e Advancement o f Teaching, 1971. . "The Management Systems C hallenge: How to Be Academic Though S y stem atic." In Education and th e S ta te . Edited by John F. Hughes. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Educa­ t i o n , 1975. C lark e, A rthur C. P r o file s o f th e F uture. Harper and Row, 1971. Rev. ed. New York: Cohen, Michael D ., and March, James G. Leadership arid Ambiguity: The American College P re s id e n t. New YorlTi McGraw-Hill, 1974. Corbin, Gary. 1979. "Higher Education in Michigan—A Wise Investm ent." Dalkey, N. C. P re d ic tin g the F uture. 1968. P-3S45; The Rand C orporation, October 250 Dowell, Paul E ., J r . "Delphi F orecasting 1n Higher E ducation." Ph.D. d is s e r ta tio n , George Peabody C ollege f o r Teachers, 1975. D ror, Yehezkel. "The Planning P rocess: A F orecast D esign." I n te r ­ n atio n al Review o f A dm inistrative Sciences 29,1 (1963). Drucker, P e te r. "Long-Range Planning: Challenge to Management S cien ce." Management Science 5 (April 1959). Eble, Kenneth E. Bass, 1978. The A rt o f A d m in istratio n . San Francisco: Jossey- Enzer, Selwyn. "A Case Study Using F orecasting as a Decision-Making A id." Futures WP-2 (December 1969). E urlch, A ., and T lckton, S. Long-Range Planning and Budgeting a t Colleges and U n iv e rs itie s . Washington. D.C.: Academy fo r Edu­ c a tio n a l development, 1973. Evans, W alter K eith. "Management Inform ation Systems in Higher E ducation." Ph.D. d is s e r ta tio n , U niversity o f Michigan, 1972. Facts in B rie f. East Lansing: Department o f Inform ation S e rv ic e s, Michigan S ta te U n iv e rsity , November 1980. F arley , William Henry. "A C la s s if ic a tio n o f Academic Departments a t Michigan S ta te U n iv ersity Based on Functional C h a r a c te r is tic s ." Ph.D. d is s e r ta tio n , Michigan S ta te U n iv e rsity , 1972. Farmer, James. Why P lanning, Programming. Budgeting Systems fo r Higher Education? Souider, C o l.: Western I n te r s ta te Commission f o r Higher feducation, February 1970. F eath ersto n e, Richard L.. The Development o f Management Systems fo r th e Academic Department^ Boulder, C o l.: Western I n te r s ta te Commission f o r Higher Education, 1972. Frym ier, Jack R. "A Curriculum M anifesto." In The Future o f Educa­ tio n : 1975-2000. Edited by Theodore W. H ippie. C a lifo rn ia : Goodyear P ublishing C o., 1974. F u lle r, Bruce. "A Framework fo r Academic P lanning." Higher Education 47 (January-February 1976). Journal o f G laser, Barney, and S tra u s s , Anselm L. The Discovery o f Grounded Theory: S tra te g ie s fo r Q u a lita tiv e Research. Chicago: A ldlne, m r — Glenny, Lyman A. e t a l . Jossey-B ass, 1976. ---------------------------------------------------- P resid en ts Confront R e a lity . San F rancisco: 251 Gonyea, M eredith A. "A Study o f the Planning Systems Used in Admin­ i s t r a t i v e Decision-Making by S elected U n iv e rs itie s ." Ph.D. d i s s e r ta ti o n , U n iv ersity o f M ichigan, 1971. Hack, W alter G. e t a l . ing C orp., 1971. Educational Futurism 1985. McCutchan P ublish­ Hanson, Mark. "The Management Inform ation Systems as an Instrum ent o f Planned Change." Educational Technology (November 1976). Harvey, James. "College and U n iv ersity P lanning." c a tio n Research R eport, September 1971. ERIC Higher Edu­ Hass, Raymond M. " In te g ra tin g Academic, F is c a l, and F a c i l i t i e s Plan­ n in g ." Planning f o r Higher Education 5 (October 1976). H avighurst, Robert J . "The Future o f Education: Image and R e a lity ." In The Future o f Education: 1975-2000. Edited by Theodore W. HippYe. C a lifo rn ia : Goodyear Publishing C o., 1974. Hecker, Stanley E ., and Ig natovich, F rederick R. "Michigan Total Public and Non-Public Membership P ro je c tio n s , Based on 1971-72 Through 1977-78 Membership D ata." East Lansing: C ollege o f Education, Michigan S ta te U n iv e rsity , September 1978. Heim, Peggy. "Management Systems and Budgeting Methodology: Do They Meet th e Needs and Will They Work?" NACUBO S tudies in Management 2 (September 1972). Helmer, 01a f . A nalysis o f th e Future: The Delphi Method. C orporation, March 1967. P-3558. The Rand Herzberg, F. The Managerial Choice: To Be E f f ic ie n t and to Be Human. Homewood, 111.” Dow Jones—Irw in , 1976. H ippie, Theodore W. "Some (S p e c ific and Not-So-Spec1f1c) Notions About th e (D ista n t and N ot-S o-D lstant) Future o f E ducation." In The Future o f Education: 1975-2000. Edited by Theodore W. HippTiT C a lifo rn ia : Goodyear P ublishing C o., 1974. H uckfeldt, Vaughn. A F orecast o f Changes in Post-Secondary E ducation. Boulder: National C enter o f Higher Education Management Systems a t Western I n te r s ta te Commission f o r Higher Education, 1972. Huff, Robert A ., and Manning, Charles W. Higher Education Planning and Management Systems: A B rie f E xplanation. Boulder: National Center o f Higher Education Management Systems a t Western I n te r ­ s ta t e Commission f o r Higher Education, January 1972. Ja n tsc h , E. P ersp ectiv es o f Planning. P a ris : O rganization fo r Economic Cooperation and development, 1969. 252 Johnston, Thomas E a rl. "An Assessment o f A ttitu d e s o f S ta te and I n s t i ­ tu tio n a l and A ssociation P olicy Makers on th e Coordination and Planning o f Higher Education in M ichigan." Ph.D. d is s e r ta tio n , Michigan S ta te U n iv ersity , 1977. Katz, D aniel, and Kahn, Robert L. The Social Psychology o f Organi­ z a tio n s . New York: John Wiley, 1966. K err, C lark. "D estiny—Not So M anifest." Address presented a t the 26th N ational Conference on Higher Education, American A ssocia­ tio n f o r Higher Education, Washington, D .C., 1971. . "Policy Concerns f o r th e F u tu re." In The Expanded Campus. E dited by D. Vermilye. San F rancisco: Jossey-B ass, I n c ., 1972. Lee, Eugene C ., and Bowen, Frank M. Managing Multi-Campus Systems. San F rancisco: Jo ssey -B ass, 197FI Lee, T ra n sie r. "A M ulti-Dimensional Study U tiliz in g a Modified Delphi Technique to A scertain P o ssib le Future Developments 1n Higher Continuing Education, P erceptions and P o ssib le Perceptual Changes Among S elected A d m in istrative P o p u latio n s." Ph.D. d is s e r ta tio n , Temple U n iv e rsity , 1977. L in sto n , Harold A ., and T u ro ff, Murray. The Delphi Techniques and . A p p lic a tio n s. London: Addison-Wesley Publishing C o., 1975. Lockwood, G eoffrey. "Planning in a U n iv e rsity ." (November 1972). Higher Education 1 Long-Range Planning C ouncil, Michigan S ta te U n iv ersity . "Report to th e P re sid e n t." March 1978. (Mimeographed.) Ludlow, John Duer. "The Delphi Method: A System Approach to the U tiliz a tio n o f Experts in Technological and Environmental Fore­ c a s tin g ." Ph.D. d is s e r ta tio n , U n iv ersity o f Michigan, 1971. Lynd, A lb e rt. "The I d e n tif ic a tio n o f C r ite r ia f o r Evaluating Gradu­ a te Programs In Higher Education a t B1g Ten I n s t itu t io n s ." Ph.D. d is s e r ta tio n , Michigan S ta te U n iv e rsity , 1976. Management Improvement Program, Ohio Board o f Regents. Planning: U n iv e r s itie s . Columbus: Ohio Board o f Regents, 1974. ________ . Program Budgeting: Un1v e r s i t i e s . o f Regents, 1974. Columbus: Ohio Board Mandelbaum, Seymour J . "Not in Tandem: The Need fo r F aculty/ A dm inistration C oordination in U niversity Management." Planning fo r Higher Education 4 (December 1975): 1. 253 McCall, George J . , and Simmons, J . L ., ed s. Issues in P a rtic ip a n t O bservation. Reading, M ass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969. Michigan S ta te U n iv ersity . Annual Evaluation and Report 1980-1981. East Lansing: Michigan S ta te U n iv e rsity , 1980. M iyatakl, Glenn K., and Byers, Maureen L. Academic U nit Planning and Management. Technical Report 75. Boufder, C o l.: N ational Center fo r Higher Education Management Systems, Western I n te r s ta te Commission f o r Higher Education, 1976. Mood, Alexander M. The Future o f Higher Education; Some S peculations and Suggestions" New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973. N ational A sso ciatio n o f College and U n iv ersity Business O ffic e rs . A College Planning Cycle: P eo p le.R eso u rces and P ro cess. Washington, b . t . : N ational A ssociation o f College a n d J n 1 v e rs i t y Business O ffic e rs , 1974. Neiswender, R. "The E xploration o f th e Future R e a li t i e s ." Trans­ la te d from th e French. No. 245 (June 1966): 56-58. Rand Co. P-3540. N1e, Norman H. e t a l . S t a t i s t i c a l Package f o r th e Social S cien ces. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Bo o k C o., 1975. O 'C onnell, John Howard. "Delphi A ssistance to A dm inistration: The Development and T esting o f an Aid to Educational Decision Making." Ph.D. d is s e r ta tio n , North C arolina S ta te U n iv ersity a t R aleigh, 1974. O ffice o f I n s titu tio n a l R esearch, Michigan S ta te U n iv e rsity . "Analysis o f Components Used 1n P ro je c tin g Future E nrollm ents." East Lansing: OIR, Michigan S ta te U n iv e rsity , 1979. Ohio Board o f Regents. "Planning U n iv e r s itie s ." ment Program, Ju ly 1, 1973. Management Improve­ P a lo la , E rnest G ., and P ad g ett, W illiam. Planning fo r Self-R enew al. B erkeley, C a l i f .: C enter f o r Research and Development In Higher Education, 1971. P e te r, Laurence J . P e te r 's Q uotations; Ideas f o r Our Time. York: W illiam Morrow and C o., 1977. New P oulton, Nick L. "Impact o f Planning A c tiv ity on Resource A llo catio n and Programs in th e Research U n iv e rsity ." Ph.D. research pro­ p o sa l, Western Michigan U n iv e rsity , 1979. P rin ce, G. M. The P ra c tic e o f C r e a tiv ity . Row, 1970. New York: Harper and 254 Roach, James H. L. "The Academic Department C hairperson: Functions and R e s p o n s ib ilitie s ." Educational Record, W inter 1976. Robl, Richard M.; Kalman, Thomas A .; and Boggs, James H. and V ita lity Through R ea llo ca tio n : A Case H isto ry ." fo r Higher Education 5 (October 1976): 1. "Q uality Planning Robson, Donald L. "An Inventory o f Perceived Management S k ills o f P ra c tic in g School S uperintendents in M ichigan." Ph.D. d is s e r ­ t a t i o n , Michigan S ta te U n iv e rsity , 1976. Roose, K. D ., and Anderson, C. J . "A Rating o f Graduate Programs." Washington, D.C.: American Council on E ducation, 1970. Salmon, Richard e t a l . "A Computer Sim ulation Modeling Tool to A s sis t C olleges 1n Long-Range Planning: Final R eport." Kansas C ity , Mo.: Midwest Research I n s t i t u t e , Ju ly 1969. ED 03213. S ch m id tlein , Frank A. "D ecision Process Paradigms in E ducation." Educational R esearcher 3 (May 1974): 4-11. S chroeder, Roger G. “A Survey o f Management Science in U niversity O p eratio n s." Management S cien ce, A pril 1973, pp. 895-906. S h irly , Robert C ., and Volkweln, J . F red erick . "E stab lish in g Academic Program P r i o r i t i e s . " Journal o f Higher Education 5 (1978): 49. Shoemaker, W illiam A. Systems Models and Programs f o r Higher Educa­ t i o n . Washington, D .C .: Academy f o r Educational Development, BpTTl 1973. Shuck, E. C. "The New Planning and Old Pragmatism." Higher Education 48 (1977): 594-602. Journal o f S tu rn e r, W illiam F. Action Planning on th e Campus. Washington, D.C.: American A sso ciation o f S ta te C olleges and U n iv e r s itie s , December 1974. T o f f le r , A lvin. Future Shock. New York: Random House, 1970. W eathersby, George B. "The P o te n tia ls o f A nalytical Approaches to Educational Planning and D ecision Making." In Inform ation and A nalysis in the Context o f I n s titu tio n a l S ta te R elatio n sh ip s: The Tie That Divides Us. B oulder, Co.: NCHEMS a t WICHE, 1976. . "Tools and Techniques f o r Planning and Resource A llocat io h ." In Planning and Management P ra c tic e s in Higher Education: Promise o r Dilemma? Report No. 26. Denver, C o l.: Education Commission o f th e s t a t e s , May 1972. 255 . , and W einstein, M. C. "A S tru c tu ra l Comparison o f A n aly ticaT Models f o r th e U n iv e rsity ." Paper presented a t th e Ford Research Program in U n iv ersity A d m in istratio n , B erkeley, C a li­ f o rn ia , August 1970. W eingartner, C harles. "Schools and th e F u tu re." In The Future o f Education: 1975-2000. Edited by Theodore W. H ippie. C a lifo rn ia : Goodyear P ublishing Co., 1974. W hinfield, Richard W. Developinq Leadership Through Understanding Management Systems" Proceedings o f th e N ational Vocational Education Conference on Management Systems, th e School o f Education, th e U n iv ersity o f C onnecticut a t S to r r s , June 1975. Yeager, John L ., and Morrow, P a tr ic ia J . "Academic Planning In Higher Education." Management Forum 3 (September 1974): 1. * >