INFORMATION TO USERS While th e m ost advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this m anuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the m aterial submitted. For example: • M anuscript pages may have indistinct print. In such cases, the best available copy has been filmed. • M anuscripts may not always be complete. In such cases, a note will indicate th a t it is not possible to obtain missing pages. • Copyrighted m aterial may have been removed from the manuscript. In such cases, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize m aterials (e.g., maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand com er and continuing from left to right in equal sections w ith sm all overlaps. Each oversize page is also film ed as one ex p o su re a n d is a v a ila b le , for an additional charge, as a standard 35mm slide or as a 17”x 23” black and white photographic print. M ost p h o to g ra p h s rep ro d u ce a c ce p tab ly on p o sitiv e microfilm or microfiche but lack th e clarity on xerographic copies made from the microfilm. For an additional charge, 35mm slides of 6”x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illu stratio n s th a t cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography. O rder N u m b er 8722818 A ease stud y o f how six sm all to w n M ichigan school districts responded to th e excellence m ovem ent o f 1983 Boehme, William Walter, Ph.D. Michigan State University, 1987 UMI 300N.ZccbRd, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 A CASE STUDY OP HOW SIX SMALL TOWN MICHIGAN SCHOOL DISTRICTS RESPONDED TO THE EXCELLENCE MOVEMENT OP 1983 By William W a lte r Boehme A DISSERTATION S u b m itte d t o Michigan S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y in p a r t i a l f u l f i l l m e n t o f t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r t h e d e g r e e of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY D e p a rtm e n t of E d u c a t i o n a l A d m i n i s t r a t i o n 1987 ABSTRACT A CASE STUDY OP HOW SIX SHALL TOWN MICHIGAN SCHOOL DISTRICTS RESPONDED TO THE EXCELLENCE MOVEMENT OF 1983 By William W a lter Boehme The p u r p o s e f o r t h i s s t u d y was t o d e s c r i b e and e x p l a i n how six Michigan s c h o o l d i s t r i c t s in sm a ll towns resp o n d e d to a nationw ide excellence. th ru st That for th ru st, public demand, schools or call to for produce excellence was most c l e a r l y seen with t h e r e l e a s e of t h e 1983 A Nation a t Risk r e p o r t by t h e N a tio n a l Commission on E x c e ll e n c e . The sc h o o l conceptual d istrict framework responses in itiatio n , m o tiv a tio n , in v o lv e m e n t, plans, These concepts describing excellence grow out d e v e lo p e d . rationally For the sensible, how were six of to explore consisted of process, concepts; decision making, r e s u lts — actual the " v e h ic le " T h is em pirical for d istricts individual seven and school movement. used or anticipated. understanding and re sp o n d e d to the d id not c o n c e p t u a l framework research but was logically The c o n c e p t s encompass s e q u e n t i a l s eg m en ts o f a d eve lo pe d continuum f o r t h e researcher, they p r o c e s s o f cha n ge. represented a reasonable, and s e q u e n t i a l way t o d e s c r i b e how s i x Michigan sch o o l d i s t r i c t s re sp o n d e d t o t h e e x c e l l e n c e movement. W illia m W a lte r Boehm e The s i x s c h o o l d i s t r i c t s s e l e c t e d f o r c a s e s t u d i e s were located in cen tral Michigan and had enrollm ents between 1,000 and 4,000 s t u d e n t s . The methodology f o r d e v e lo p in g each c a s e s t u d y was t h a t of in-dep th used. interview ing. In itially , a r e a s s u g g e s t e d by interview s. assistan t community The a Two i n t e r v i e w protocol responses researcher superintendents, leaders, teachers, was procedures d e v e lo p e d . were e x p lo re d interview ed principals, and were A dditional in s u b s e q u e n t sup erintend ents, b oard in dividuals members, serving e x c e l l e n c e com m ittees. Major f i n d i n g s from t h e s t u d y in c l u d e : 1. S u p e r i n t e n d e n t s were t h e p rim a ry i n i t i a t o r s of d i s t r i c t resp o n ses to excellence. 2. The m o tiv a tio n t o i n i t i a t e r e s p o n s e s came from nee d s to s o lv e immediate pro b lem s and concerns. 3. The u s e o f com m ittees was t h e p r e f e r r e d p ro c e ss fo r ad d ressin g th e excellence issu e . 4. Committees were named as d e c i s i o n makers. 5. C u rric u lu m ch a n g es d i s t r i c t s a f te r the Risk.. 6. T h ere were no v e r i f i e d a c h ie v e m e n ts , b u t many acco m p lish m en ts were attrib u ted to the excellence movement as u n v erified a c h ie v e m e n ts . occurred in all six r e l e a s e of A Nation a t on DEDICATION To my m other and my f a t h e r , who h ave lo v e d and c a r e d f o r me in a v e r y s p e c i a l way. That u n d y i n g and u n s e l f i s h l o v e h a s k e p t me g o in g . My fa th e r's in sp iratio n has resulted in c o u n tle s s m ilestones. Dad, t h i s Ph.D. g i v e n t o William W a lte r Boehme. i s f o r t h e one t h a t World War I I k e p t from you. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS T h i s d i s s e r t a t i o n was made p o s s i b l e t h r o u g h t h e e f f o r t s o f many p e o p l e . me. M ario n , my w i f e f o r She s u p p o r t e d 15 y e a r s , b e lie v e d in and e n c o u r a g e d my d o c t o r a l p rogram front t h e b e g i n n i n g - o f t e n w i t h h e r own p e r s o n a l s a c r i f i c e s , I s h a l l f o r e v e r be g r a t e f u l t o Dr. K e i t h Goldhammer f o r giving me t h e Ph.D. stu d ies and guiding ch allen g e, me o v e r s e e i n g my through the graduate com pletion of my d issertatio n . A s p e c i a l thank th eir support* ch airp erso n , you i s e x t e n d e d t o my co m m itte e f o r S incere D r. L o u is ap p reciatio n Romano. e x p r e s s e d t o Dr. Samuel Moore docto ral stu d ie s . A deep for h is to my g ra titu d e is guidance d u r i n g my The same g r a t i t u d e i s g i v e n t o Dean James R a in e y f o r h i s g u i d a n c e sp ecial i s given reco g n itio n is i n my Management c o g n a t e . given A very t o Dr. Norman W einheim er, a t r u s t e d f r i e n d and r e s p e c t e d a d v i s o r f o r many y e a r s . My g en tle d e e p e s t a p p r e c i a t i o n go es in sp iratio n would f i n i s h . day s th at she and How c a n I got up t o Ruth encouragem ent. ev er repay at 4:30 Lindman f o r her She alw a y s knew I her fo r the c o u n t l e s s a.m . t o t y p e and e d i t an e n d l e s s number o f d r a f t s . F i n a l l y , I w ish t o Jesus C h rist, m a jo r p r a y e r s . who acknow ledge m iraculously my Lord and S a v i o u r , a n sw e red a t l e a s t a dozen TABLE OF CONTENTS I. II. III. C hapter I - In tro d u c tio n (a) B ack g ro u n d (b) P u r p o s e (c) C o n c e p t u a l Framework (1) D e f i n i t i o n s of C o n c e p ts in C o n c e p t u a l Framework (d) E x p l o r a t o r y Q u e s t i o n s (e) Summary C h a p t e r I I - Review o f t h e L i t e r a t u r e (a) In tro d u c tio n Statem ent (b) P a r t i c i p a n t s I n f l u e n c i n g C hange (1) I n t e r n a l P a r t i c i p a n t s (2) E x t e r n a l P a r t i c i p a n t s (c) Review of E i g h t Major E x c e l l e n c e R e p o r t s (1) P a i d e i a P r o p o s a l (2) A N ation a t Risk (3) Making t h e Grade (4) Academic P r e p a r a t i o n f o r C o lle g e (5) H o ra c e 's Compromise (6) A ction f o r E x c e l l e n c e {7} A P l a c e C a lle d S c h o o l (8) High S ch o o l (d) Summary C h a p t e r I I I - Methodology (a) In tro d u c to ry Statem ent (b) Methodology