INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize m aterials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. University Microfilms International A Bell & H o w e l l I n f o r m a t i o n C o m p a n y 3 0 0 N o r t h Z e e b R o a d . A n n Ar b o r . Ml 4 8 1 0 6 - 1 3 4 6 U S A nn-7K i.47nn nnn ^9i.nnnn O rder N u m b er 9 3 0 3 0 4 4 C h a ra cteristics o f ad u lt stu d e n ts ’ m o tiv a tio n t o p a rtic ip a te in h ig h sch ool co m p letio n program s in rural school d istricts in M ich igan Roose, Marybeth Rose, Ph.D. Michigan State University, 1992 UMI 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106 CHARACTERISTICS OF ADULT STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION TO PARTICIPATE IN HIGH SCHOOL COMPLETION PROGRAMS IN RURAL SCHOOL DISTRICTS IN MICHIGAN By Ma r y b e t h Roose A DISSERTATION Michigan S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y in p a r t i a l f u l f i l l m e n t of the requ ir em ents fo r the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department o f Ed uc a ti o na l A d m i n i s t r a t i o n 1992 ABSTRACT CHARACTERISTICS OF ADULT STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION TO PARTICIPATE IN HIGH SCHOOL COMPLETION PROGRAMS IN RURAL SCHOOL DISTRICTS IN MICHIGAN By Ma r y b e t h Roose Th e researcher’s investigate the factors requirements for high (AHS) school investigate program to high the direct programs toward and participants knowl e d g e program of school demographic helped in purpose motivating completion students. participate primary students who p r o g r a m. A secondary characteristics are these allowed to met in an purpose the adult was recruitment presently aimed a t of the re se a rc h e rto AHS to strategies enrolled i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n characteristics to o f AHS c o m p l e t i o n - stu d e n ts’ motivation effective not wa s not participate form ulating techniques demographic ha ve to in d e t e r m i n i n g who t h is study graduation o nc e t h e y h a ve e n r o l l e d the adults Exploration of those in in s uch retaining programs. A completion- identify target p o p u l a t i o n s t o whi c h r e c r u i t m e n t e f f o r t s s h o u l d be d i r e c t e d . A q u e s t i o n n a i r e was d e v e l o p e d and d i s t r i b u t e d r andom s a mp l e o f AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m A, B, and C r u r a l comprised 60 school d i s t r i c t s p a r t i c i p a n t s - - 65% students in Michi gan. of the AHS in to a stratified selected Class The r e s e a r c h s a mp l e completion-program Ma r y b e t h Roose students enrolled during each of t h e d i s t r i c t s spring term of the 1990- 91 how t h e y and why t h e y year in information, to surveyed. P a r t i c i p a n t s we r e a s k e d t o p r o v i d e d e m o g r a p h i c indicate school had become a wa r e had d e c i d e d to of the return to AHS c o m p l e t i o n school program, when t h e y d i d . The d e m o g r a p h i c d a t a i n d i c a t e d t h a t t h e " t y p i c a l " AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m student in this study was a g e s o f 18 and 27 y e a r s , a married the f r om s c h o o l , decided that to AHS c o m p l e t i o n a s we l l return recognition encouragement of to of as school the being friends, in school need and and this for programs in school friends we r e primary Furthermore, study. Dr . R i c h a r d G a r d n e r rural why t h e y to of factors districts had and the in the associated teachers, retention home indicated diploma satisfaction encouragement the sent participants high the t i m e and had information a the b e t we e n i n i t i a l l y became In r e l a t i n g time, and f e l l o w s t u d e n t s we r e r e l a t e d i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n Advisor: friends. at decision to return to school. with Participants program t h ro ug h through family female who was empl oye d p a r t o r f u l l p r e v i o u s l y completed the t e n t h gr ad e. a wa r e o f Caucasian of included family, students in the ACKNO W LE D GM EN T S The s t u d y f i n d i n g s played a primary r o l e complete the indicated that teachers, in encouraging the requirements encouragement o f t e a c h e r s , t o me a s I wor ke d t o these special Special diligent their family, complete students high and f r i e n d s in t h e school s a mp l e t o diplomas. The and f r i e n d s was e q u a l l y i m p o r t a n t my d o c t o r a l dissertation, and it is p e o p l e I wi s h t o r e c o g n i z e . appreciation guidance, dissertation for family, i s e x t e n d e d t o Dr . advice, chairman. and I wa nt Ri cha rd Gardner f o r h i s support to as my a c k n o wl e d g e the committee and contribution of Dr . Howard Hi c k e y and Dr . Cas He i l ma n , who s h a r e d t h e i r e x p e r t i s e i n t h e d e v e l o p m e n t and c o m p l e t i o n o f t h i s d i s s e r t a t i o n . t h a n k Dr . Fo r Ben B o h n h o r s t f o r s e r v i n g on t h e c o m m i t t e e . her professional dissertation, special Howell D istrict Public assistance editor and i s e x t e n d e d t o my p r o f e s s i o n a l S c h o o l s ’ Department Superintendent, and t h e c o n s is t e n t ly offered support, I am i n d e b t e d as typist of this t h a n k s a l s o a r e e x t e n d e d t o Sus a n C o o l e y . Deep a p p r e c i a t i o n the I a l s o wa nt t o for their unending years, the roles of wife A ssistant J i m, patience and Communit y encouragement, t o my h u s b a n d , Stacy, of mother colleagues Education, the Superintendent, who and m o t i v a t i o n . and o u r c h i l d r e n , and understanding. ha ve in been Scott For inextricably and many woven with t h a t of s tu d e n t, t h e m. Special thanks and t h i s also are dissertation extended to is a credit my parents c o n f i d e n c e i n my a b i l i t y t o c o m p l e t e t h i s d i s s e r t a t i o n . v to each of for their TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF T A B L E S ............................................................................................................. LIST OF F I G U R E S ............................................................................................................. viii x Chapter I. II. III. NATURE AND PURPOSE OF THE INVESTIGATION ............................... 1 Introduction ........................................................................................ S t a t e m e n t o f t h e Pr o b l e m ........................................................... P u r p o s e ....................................................................................................... I m p o r t a n c e o f t h e S t u d y ................................................................ .......................................................................... Research Questions R e s e a r c h Me t h o d o l o g y ..................................................................... ....................................... L i m i t a t i o n s and G e n e r a l i z a b i l i t y D e l i m i t a t i o n s ........................................................................................ D e f i n i t i o n o f Terms .......................................................................... O v e r v i e w .................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 8 9 10 REVIEW OF THE L I T E R A T U R E ................................................................. 11 S i g n i f i c a n c e o f A d u l t Hi gh School C o m p l e t i o n P r o g r a m s ............................................................................................. F a c t o r s M o t i v a t i n g A d u l t s t o E n r o l l i n AHS C o m p l e t i o n Pr o g r a ms ..................................................................... Recruitment S t r a t e g i e s F a c i l i t a t i n g the E n r o l l ­ ment o f P o t e n t i a l AHS C o m p l e t i o n - P r o g r a m S t u d e n t s ............................................................................................. Ret en tio n S t r a t e g i e s Encouraging S t u d e n t s ’ C o n t i n u a t i o n i n AHS C o m p l e t i o n P r o g r a ms .................... De mogr a phi c C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f E n r o l l e e s i n AHS C o m p l e t i o n Pr o g r a ms ..................................................................... S u m m a r y ....................................................................................................... 32 34 PROCEDURES................................................................................................... 35 Introduction ........................................................................................ Research Questions .......................................................................... The S t u d y P o p u l a t i o n and S a m p l e - S e l e c t i o n P r o c e d u r e ............................................................................................. 35 35 vi 11 12 20 23 36 Page IV. V. The I n s t r u m e n t ................................................................................... D a t a - C o l l e c t i o n Met hods ............................................................... .......................................................... Data-Analysis Procedures 37 38 39 PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF THE DA T A ................................... 40 ........................................................................................ Introduction Findings P e r t a i n i n g t o th e Research Questions . . . De mogr a phi c C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s ................................................. How P a r t i c i p a n t s Became Aware o f AHS C o m p l e t i o n P r o g r a m s ........................................................................................ I n d i v i d u a l s Who Were I n f l u e n t i a l i n R e s p o n d e n t s ’ R e t u r n t o S c ho ol .................................................................... Fa c to rs That A s s i s t e d in t h e Responde nts’ R e t u r n t o S c hool .................................................................... B e n e f i t s That A t t r a c t e d S t u d e n t s t o Enr oll in t h e AHS C o m p l e t i o n P r o g r a m ............................................ P e r c e i v e d B a r r i e r s t o P a r t i c i p a t i o n ............................. F a c t o r s E n c o u r a g i n g R e t e n t i o n ............................................ S u m m a r y ...................................................................................................... 40 40 40 SUMMARY, FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH ............................. 47 49 53 57 62 64 69 71 S u m m a r y ...................................................................................................... Summary o f F i n d i n g s and Co mp a r i s o n t o P r e v i o u s R e s e a r c h ............................................................................................. R e s e a r c h Q u e s t i o n 1 ...................................................................... R e s e a r c h Q u e s t i o n 2 ...................................................................... R e s e a r c h Q u e s t i o n 3 ...................................................................... R e s e a r c h Q u e s t i o n 4 ...................................................................... R e s e a r c h Q u e s t i o n 5 ...................................................................... R e s e a r c h Q u e s t i o n 6 ...................................................................... R e s e a r c h Q u e s t i o n 7 ...................................................................... C o n c l u s i o n s and Re c omme nda t i ons ............................................ Sugg estions f o r F u r t h e r Research ....................................... 71 72 72 75 77 78 81 84 85 86 92 LETTER OF APPROVAL FROM THE UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS .................................. 95 B. COVER LETTER AND INSTRUMENT ............................................................ 96 C. SUMMARIES OF RESPONSES ONSURVEY INSTRUMENT ........................ 101 APPENDICES A. BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................ vi i Ill LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 Page H y p o t h e s i z e d R e l a t i o n s h i p s Bet ween Some S o c i a l V a r i a b l e s and M o t i v e s f o r P a r t i c i p a t i n g i n A d u l t E d u c a t i o n ................................................................................... 34 4.1 Distribution o f R e s p o n d e n t s by Ge nde r 4.2 Distribution o f R e s p o n d e n t s by A g e ............................. 4.3 Distribution o f R e s p o n d e n t s by L a s t Gr a de Compl e t e d 4.4 Distribution o f R e s p o n d e n t s by Pr ogr a m i n Which They Were E n r o l l e d .............................................................................. 44 4.5 Distribution 44 4.6 Distribution o f R e s p o n d e n t s by S p o u s e s ’ E d u c a t i o n a l L e v e l s ........................................................................................................... 45 4.7 D i s t r i b u t i o n o f R e s p o n d e n t s by R a c e ....................................... 46 4.8 D i s t r i b u t i o n o f R e s p o n d e n t s by Annual 4.9 D i s t r i b u t i o n o f R e s p o n d e n t s by Empl oyment S t a t u s . . . 47 4.10 S o u r c e s Thr ough Which P a r t i c i p a n t s Became Aware o f AHS C o m p l e t i o n Pr ogr a ms ............................................................... 48 P e r s o n s Who Were I n f l u e n t i a l i n R e s p o n d e n t s ’ D e c i s i o n t o R e t u r n t o S c h o o l ...................................................... 50 S i n g l e P e r s o n Who Was Most H e l p f u l i n R e s p o n d e n t s ’ D e c i s i o n t o R e t u r n t o S c h o o l ...................................................... 52 F a c t o r s T h a t He l p e d R e s p o n d e n t s i n T h e i r D e c i s i o n t o R e t u r n t o S c hool ......................................................................... 54 4.14 Why P a r t i c i p a n t s R e t u r n e d t o School When They Did . . 56 4.15 Two Most I m p o r t a n t Re a s o n s f o r R e t u r n i n g t o School . . 58 4.11 4.12 4.13 o f R e s p o n d e n t s by M a r i t a l vi i i .................................... Status 41 42 . . . . . Fa mi l y Income . 43 46 Page 4.16 Co mp a r i s o n o f Two Most I m p o r t a n t Re a s o n s f o r .......................................................................... R e t u r n i n g t o School 59 B e n e f i t s T h a t A t t r a c t e d R e s p o n d e n t s t o AHS C o m p l e t i o n P r o g r a m s ....................................................................................................... 61 4.18 Factors P r e v io u sly Preventing Enrollment ............................. 63 4.19 P r e v i o u s Ter ms D u r i n g Which t h e S t u d y P a r t i c i p a n t s Took AHS C o m p l e t i o n - P r o g r a m C l a s s e s ................................... 64 Le n g t h o f Time R e s p o n d e n t s Had Been E n r o l l e d i n AHS C o m p l e t i o n P r o g r a ms ................................................................ 66 R e s p o n d e n t s ’ D i s c o n t i n u a t i o n o f A t t e n d a n c e During t h e Ter ms They Had Been E n r o l l e d i n AHS C o m p l e t i o n P r o g r a m s ....................................................................................................... 66 Re a s o n s f o r D i s c o n t i n u a t i o n o f A t t e n d a n c e i n t h e AHS C o m p l e t i o n Pr o g r a m ..................................................................... 67 F a c t o r s E n c o u r a g i n g R e t e n t i o n i n AHS C o m p l e t i o n P r o g r a m s ....................................................................................................... 69 4.17 4.20 4.21 4.22 4.23 ix LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1 P l a c e m e n t o f L i f e - S p a c e and L i f e - C h a n c e P a r t i c i p a n t s i n Ma s l ow’ s Need H i e r a r c h y CHAPTER I NATURE AND PURPOSE OF THE INVESTIGATION Introduction A d u l t e d u c a t i o n h a s be e n d e f i n e d a s a " r e l a t i o n s h i p educational and a g e n t and a l e a r n e r i n whi c h t h e a g e n t s e l e c t s , continuously provide between systematic directs a experience participation in production role in so c ie t y " of present-day sequence such adult to achieve activities is (Klevins, education of progressive learning for subsidiary 1976, p. 11). p r o g r a ms was l a i d arranges tasks that those whos e to a primary The f o u n d a t i o n as e a r l y as when e v e n i n g s c h o o l s w e r e e s t a b l i s h e d f o r w o r k i n g c h i l d r e n a ge o f da y 12. The c u r r i c u l u m o f t h e s e program, ( Mi nz e y & Le stabilize, shifted stressing Tarte, reading, 1972). As schools writing, these reflected and evening an 1810, over the that conceptual schools of the skills b e ga n to t h e age o f t h e s t u d e n t p o p u l a t i o n b e i n g s e r v e d g r a d u a l l y to older established teens and young adults. This the foundation for the current adult gradual expansion education programs in the p u b l ic s c hools . Although 1800s, it the adult was n o t u n t i l education 1966 t h a t t h e f e d e r a l t h e need t o fund a d u l t e d u c a t i o n . Title III of the concept Elementary and can be traced to the government r e c o g n i z e d The A d u l t E d u c a t i o n Ac t o f 1966, Secondary 1 Education Amendments 2 (ESEA), became enacted. part of the By v i r t u e of that considered for r e n e wa l largest any federal inclusion, time adult Congress E l e m e n t a r y and S e c o n d a r y E d u c a t i o n A c t . education education considered In e f f e c t , i n t o the mainstream o f educatio n States; Congress education when legislation, a l l Americans, specific training learning programs, courses, not elem entary be programs. encompasses this was needs only such of adults as for renewing be the in t h e United and secondary children, However, variety of concerned have l e d Americanization special- interest completion researcher woul d woul d but for r e g a r d l e s s o f age. The u n i q u e of it enacted ever this legislation moved a d u l t e d u c a t i o n thus, bill programs only with the and though and the classes, classes, even to vocational- high-school- adult education activities, adult formation the high present school (AHS) c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m c o mp o n e n t . S t a t e m e n t o f t h e Pr o b l e m Increasing number s of adults in the United States completed t h e req u i r em e n ts f o r high school g r a d u a t i o n . many o f these e mp l o y me n t , individuals ma n a g i n g t h e i r Researchers have facilitating the encounter personal provided return adults completion o f a high school diploma. and s o c i a l of characteristics population are lacking, affairs, lim ited of the as w e l l . difficulties to into programs not As a r e s u l t , in and c o p i n g insights ha ve obtaining in society. the factors that lead to Studies regarding the personal potential AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m 3 Understanding school diploma formulating factors return tive to return that to ai med th a t motivate classroom at recruitment strategies enrolled in who l a c k a high such programs. to toward a high prerequisite Likewise, prerequisite directed is participants programs. also t h o s e who l a c k classroom retaining those is motivate the i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n to the presently factors techniques ha ve e n r o l l e d the the once they understanding school diploma determining those Furthermore, to who it effec­ are is to not essential t o i d e n t i f y t h e t a r g e t p o p u l a t i o n t o whi c h t h e s e r e c r u i t m e n t s t r a t e ­ gies will be d i r e c t e d . W i t h o u t kn o wl e d g e o f t h e d e m o g r a p h i c c h a r a c ­ t e r i s t i c s o f t h o s e p r e s e n t l y e n r o l l e d i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s , is difficult strategies to identify target populations to whi c h it recruitment s h o u l d be d i r e c t e d . Purpose The researcher’s investigate the requirements factors for high c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a ms primary motivating school in r u r a l programs students, enrolled would as well this who to h a ve as f o r t he r e t e n t i o n for wa s to met the in AHS I t was a s s ume d t h a t encouraging im plications not participate districts. factors study the participation in recruitm ent of o f s t u d e n t s who w e r e a l r e a d y in t h o s e programs. A secondary characteristics districts have in adults graduation school understanding the motivational such purpose in purpose wa s o f AHS s t u d e n t s Mi c h i g a n who we r e to in investigate rural Class participating A, in the demographic B, and C s c h o o l AHS completion 4 programs during considered in the 1990- 91 this study year. included De mogr a phi c gender, last educational s t a t u s of spouse ( i f a p p l i c a b l e ) , conjunction completed, with the family race, enrollment, In grade school a ge i n c o me , purposes variables at time marital of status, and empl oyme nt s t a t u s . of this study, major o b j e c t i v e s we r e a s f o l l o w s : 1. To identify the demographic characteristics of AHS completion-program students. 2. To d e t e r m i n e how p a r t i c i p a n t s we r e made a wa r e o f AHS com­ p l e t i o n programs. 3. To i d e n t i f y person(s) influential in the return to school in t h e r e t u r n to school o f AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s . 4. To i d e n t i f y factors that assisted o f AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s . 5. To identify program s t u d e n t s , 6. students "benefits," as perceived by AHS completion- r e s u l t i n g f r om t h e i r r e t u r n t o s c h o o l . To i d e n t i f y t h e f a c t o r s p e r c e i v e d by AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m as barriers that previously prevented their enrollment in such programs. 7. To d e t e r m i n e t h e f a c t o r s encouraging s tu d e n ts to remain to the in AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s . I mpor tance o f t h e Study The importance of percentage of a d u lts , neither a high school this study is closely related b o t h n a t i o n a l l y and l o c a l l y , d i p l o m a n o r a Ge n e r a l large who ha ve o b t a i n e d Education De g r e e (GED) 5 certificate. Adult A s t u d y c o n d u c t e d by t h e N a t i o n a l Education and reported by Klevins m i l l i o n p eo p le o f l a b o r - f o r c e age, t h a n a high school p e o p l e had a n n u a l It attest is to not the education. A d v i s o r y Co u n c i l ( 1976) identified Approxi mat el y t h r e e - f o u r t h s need f o r own h o we v e r , to rely on n a t i o n a l e n l a r g e m e n t o f AHS c o m p l e t i o n public Michi gan reflects district contains direction of revealed th at reside in m unicipalities the school need to district e xpa nd the Division Livingston a considerable rural public programs; varies potential AHS b e t we e n student This Bureau, school district. 18% and 26%. population of in rural under In (1988), the 12 y e a r s this the nongraduates seven 18 y e a r s of Th e s e p e r c e n t a g e s 5,583 in c o m p i l e d by t h e Commi s s i on fewer than the county the percentage of res id e n ts o f a ge and o l d e r who h a ve c o m p l e t e d to A look a t the rural Ce ns us Planning school figures programs. p e r c e n t a g e o f high in th e d i s t r i c t , schooling a Statistics of the Count y in s uch seven m u n i c i p a l i t i e s . Statistics this of these i n c o me s o f l e s s t h a n $ 5 , 0 0 0 . necessary, Municipalities 54.67 not e n r o l l e d in sc h o o l, with l e s s n e e d ca n e a s i l y be r e c o g n i z e d i n o n e ’ s own c ommuni t y. researcher’s in f o r ma l reflect rural a public school d i s t r i c t . Determining presently districts sim ilar such specific participating will help characteristics programs. in demographic in AHS completion identifying b u t who a r e Recognizing the characteristics target not programs audiences presently most likely e n r o l l m e n t i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a ms i n r u r a l of those in rural who share participating candidates districts in for should help 6 enhance r e c r u i t m e n t of students in strategies. AHS completion t r a d i t i o n a l l y be e n l ow, ha s several the learners advantage the positive h a v i n g p a r e n t s who a r e Statistics indicate educational possible, then, goodwill ha ve not can had a in districts AHS c o m p l e t i o n direct educational to influence on c h i l d r e n Mi nzey (1972). that there is and a direct study that of their developed positive b e t we e n school n e g a t i v e f e e l i n g s toward school program. the p r o g r a ms to One s uc h results f r om education. relationship b e t we e n children. an AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m w i l l be ha s benefits i n and c o n c e r n e d a b o u t i n f l u e n c e on t h e r e g u l a r d a y - s c h o o l that rural according level that the interested that parents’ of adults besides themselves, the in of retention increasing the retention rate . retention advantages is programs the r a t e and t h e f i n d i n g s t h a t e me r ge f r om t h i s may h e l p i n s i g n i f i c a n t l y Increasing In a d d i t i o n , It is have a p o s i t i v e A second advantage school experience and and adults who often is who h a ve and t o w a r d e d u c a t i o n i n g e n e r a l . Research Qu e s t i o n s This study was designed to provide answers to the following questions: 1. What are the demographic characteristics of the AHS completion-program populatio n? 2. How were Who wa s participants ma d e aware of AHS completion programs? 3. influential completion-program stu d e n ts ? in the return to school of AHS 7 4. What factors assisted in the return to school of AHS in AHS completion-program stu d e n ts ? 5. What benefits attracted students to enroll co mp l et io n programs? 6. What f a c t o r s prevented students f r om p a r t i c i p a t i n g in AHS in AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a ms b e f o r e t h i s t i m e ? 7. What factors have encouraged students to remain c o m p l e t i o n programs? R e s e a r c h Me t h o d o l o g y Although p r e v i o u s conducted, this AHS s t u d i e s o f AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s none was l o c a t e d descriptive study. we r e structuring (1974), factors to that (1971), assist motivate experiences. The consulted develop to information, in ( b) Ay e s people items of the participate related ( 1980) to motivating above-mentioned and in people to in of literature on social science developing and and Sma r t (1976) was items regarding adult education Tate general return and ( c ) f a c t o r s ( 1971) was demographic to programs influencing the programs. studies q u e s t i o n n a i r e was d e v e l o p e d t o c o l l e c t that Klevins and (a) to Morstain questionnaire Deldin completion, of of of direction r e t e n t i o n of s t u d e n t s in a d u l t ed u c at io n Using types (1979), to similar paucity research developing factors t h a t l e a d t o high school other The research the provide instrument. Burgess consulted to a design of students, investigated the used Be c a u s e completion-program research that h a v e been for direction, the data for t h i s study. a To 8 e sta b lish the internal of the survey, s a mp l e that the consistency, questionnaire consisted completion c l a s s e s The f i n a l of ten clarity, was d i s t r i b u t e d students i n o ne r u r a l and o v e r a l l who to we r e usefulness a pilot enrolled study in AHS school d i s t r i c t . v e r s i o n o f t h e i n s t r u m e n t was d i s t r i b u t e d t o s t u d e n t s e n r o l l e d i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s i n s e l e c t e d Mi c h i g a n C l a s s A, B, and C r u r a l public school districts. T h r e e d i s t r i c t s we r e i n c l u d e d t o p r o d u c e an a d e q u a t e r e s e a r c h s a mp l e . the spring term surveyed, total 1990- 91 allowing population. enrollees The s a mp l e c o m p r i s e d 65% o f f r om e a c h o f t h e generalizations to be The m e t h o d o l o g y is described three d i s t r i c t s formulated regarding i n more d e t a i l the in Chapter I I I . L i m i t a t i o n s and G e n e r a l i z a b i l i t v The s t u d y was l i m i t e d questionnaire. difficulty addition, the settings racial, Th e s e f a c t o r s in securing caution results and by t h e of ethnic, be study geographic include, inherent but exercised because regions in use o f a limited to, cooperation. attempting conditions whose in the are not re s p o n d e n ts ’ complete should this factors to might populations In generalize vary h a ve the in other different and s o c i o e c o n o m i c c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s . Del i m i t a t i o n s The mai n d e l i m i t a t i o n students districts. enrolled Thos e in AHS enrolled of this study completion in other is that programs adult it included in rural education only school experiences, 9 such as grade programs education located designed or in l a r g e for programs people of a urban c e n t e r s , having less postsecondary we r e n o t than an nature, included eighthor in t h i s those investi­ gation. D e f i n i t i o n o f Terms The f o l l o w i n g terms are defined in the context i n wh i c h they a r e used in t h i s d i s s e r t a t i o n . Adult that high requires school the completion successful i s s u a n c e o f a high school five test science) areas (i.e., Retention. completion writing, school) enrollment for this program 18 o r more c r e d i t s social score for o f 45 on t h e studies, math, and C o n s i s t e n t a t t e n d a n c e by an a d u l t e d u c a t i o n s t u d e n t Class A public the accredited E d u c a t i o n De g r e e (GED) p r o g r a m . throu gho ut the term of e nro ll ment ing of An d i p l o m a o r an a v e r a g e reading, f o r t h e Ge n e r a l program. (Cross, school d i s t r i c t . criterion category set (950 by t h e 1981). A p u b l i c school d i s t r i c t meet­ o r more students in Mi c h i g a n Hi gh School the high Athletic Association. Class B public ing the school) enrollment for this school d i s t r i c t . criterion category set (502 A p u b l i c school to 949 students d i s t r i c t meet­ in by t h e Mi c h i g a n High School the high Athletic Association. Class C public ing the school) enrollment for th is Association. school d i s t r i c t . criterion category set (262 A p u b l i c school d i s t r i c t m e e t ­ to 501 students in by t h e Mi c h i g a n High Sc hool the high Athletic 10 Ove r v i e w Chapter of the I contained an i n t r o d u c t i o n p r o b l e m and p u r p o s e o f research, the research the to study, questions, a the study, the importance brief description r e s e a r c h m e t h o d o l o g y and d a t a - c o l l e c t i o n p r o c e d u r e s , delimitations, Chapter study. II contains covered programs, factors programs, recruitment potential AHS a review are motivating of the significance adults strategies to students’ continuation students, the o f d a t a c o l l e c t i o n , and d a t a - a n a l y s i s The r e s u l t s summary o f t h e AHS completion in AHS completion the enrollment retention the strategies programs, in c o n d u c t i n g research the study previous research, pertaining a summary o f AHS c o m p l e t i o n are s a mpl e instrument, met hod procedures. the findings c o n c l u s i o n s dr awn f r om t h e to and of the o f t h e d a t a a n a l y s i s a r e r e p o r t e d i n C h a p t e r IV. study, of i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s . Included are a d e s c r i p t i o n sample-selection procedure, to the of i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n t h a t we r e f o l l o w e d d e s c r i b e d in Chapter I I I . enroll facilitating completion-program The p r o c e d u r e s tions of l i m i t a t i o n s and literature pertinent demographic c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f e n r o l l e e s and t h e of the and d e f i n i t i o n s o f key t e r m s . Topics encouraging a statement programs, f u r t h e r r e s e a r c h a r e p r e s e n t e d i n C h a p t e r V. and comparison findings, and A to r e c omme nda ­ suggestions for C H A PT E R II REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE Introduction I n t h i s c h a p t e r , w r i t i n g s on f i v e t o p i c s r e l a t e d t o t h e p r e s e n t investigation completion enroll are reviewed. programs is First, established. the significance Factors i n s uc h p r o g r a m s a r e c o n s i d e r e d n e x t . facilitating students and continuation findings the of participants enrollment retention in these research of strategies programs on potential also the are motivating of adults AHS to Recruitment s t r a t e g i e s AHS completion-program encouraging discussed. demographic enrollees’ Finally, characteristics the of i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s a r e p r e s e n t e d . S i g n i f i c a n c e o f A d u l t High Sc hool C o m p l e t i o n Pr ogr a ms In Le T a r t e Community (1972) Education: discussed programs w i t h i n t h e From Pr o g r a m t o the s ig n ific a n c e Process. of p u b l i c schoolsystem o f t o d a y . Mi nzey and AHS c o m p l e t i o n They w r o t e : P u b l i c s c h o o l s h a ve a r e s p o n s i b i l i t y t o a s s i s t t h e c i t i z e n r y i n keeping a b r e a s t of changes w i t h in s o c i e t y . Adult e d u c a t o rs have r e c o g n i z e d t h a t s o c i e t y r e q u i r e s n o t o nl y a l i t e r a t e p o p u l a t i o n , b u t an i n t e l l i g e n t one t h a t i s w i l l i n g t o s h a r e r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r s o c i a l p r o g r e s s . . . . P u b l i c s c h o o l s h a ve a r e s p o n s i b i l i t y to provide second-chance o p p o r t u n i t i e s to those i n d i v i d u a l s i n s o c i e t y , who, f o r a v a r i e t y o f r e a s o n s , d i d n o t complete high school. The p r o b l e m s f a c e d by t h e n o n - h i g h s c h o o l g r a d u a t e a r e s e v e r e and w i l l become i n c r e a s i n g l y s o . A d u l t s mus t be g i v e n t h e o p p o r t u n i t y t o o b t a i n t h e b a s i c h i g h school c r e d e n t i a l s t h a t a r e r e q u i r e d in s o c i e t y . . . . Because 11 12 o f t e c h n o l o g i c a l a d v a n c e s and e x p a n d i n g j o b a u t o m a t i o n , t h e public schools should become increasingly involved in v o c a t i o n a l t r a i n i n g , r e t r a i n i n g and r e a d j u s t m e n t , ( p . 85) Likewise, of AHS the federal completion opportunities. N a t i o n a l Ad v i so r y Council to the President of the adopt a n a ti o n a l government has The recognized the recommendations United States in 1975 i n c l u d e d One o f t h e citizens (Klevins, leading to diploma factors high relationships, that school Burgess initial ( 1971) and eight motivational a personal goal, to take need t o 1976). in w r i t e r was c o n c e r n e d was certificate. Morstain motivated adults 70 items A concerning that factor these factors (1974) p r o g r a ms we r e social welfare, career motivational representative of items of responses revealed the to a several Among t h e s e f a c t o r s we r e t h e d e s i r e t o r e a c h d e s i r e to reach a r e l i g i o u s goal, part in the and c o g n i t i v e i n t e r e s t . analysis 70 Smart preliminary we r e for Us i n g enroll social escape/stimulation, eight and to These expectations, clusters. factors. GED Scale, hypothesized identified questionnaire desire and/or completion. external preparation/advancement, clusters w i t h wh i c h t h i s Participation six the t o t h e cla ssroom t o complete t h e r eq u i r em e n ts school Educational identified questions return high the s t a t e m e n t o f p o l i c y a f f i r m i n g t h e need f o r l i f e l o n g Fa c to r s Moti vatin g Adults t o Enroll AHS C o m p l e t i o n Pr ogr a ms their that on E x t e n s i o n and C o n t i n u i n g E d u c a t i o n made learning opportunities for all why a d u l t s importance in a social activity, d e s ire to escape, desire to c ompl y with 13 f o r ma l requirements, d e s ire for personal cultural fulfillm ent, and d e s i r e f o r k n o wl e d g e . A l t h o u g h Houl e ( 1961) three-way typology of conducted his motivation r e s e a r c h 30 y e a r s for adult ago, learning his remains influential. Houl e i d e n t i f i e d g o a l - o r i e n t e d l e a r n e r s a s t h o s e whose participation in a d u l t e d u c a t io n i s r e l a t e d t o f u l f i l l i n g need or interest. participate develop for In the a skill or Houle i d e n t i f i e d sake to are contrast, of learn the the a specific activity-oriented activity subject itself, matter. learning-oriented learners rather The than third individuals, to group who p u r s u e l e a r n i n g f o r i t s own s a k e . Houle’ s ty p o lo g ies described by Morstain escape/stimulation the factors Likewise, and can be c ompa r e d t o t h e and Sma r t and Houle’ s Smart’ s external-expectation factors Houle’ s learners; goal-oriented in social-relationship m otivating Morstain (cited motivational Cross, factors 1981). are the is, factors to learners. preparation/advancement parallel that Their similar activity-oriented career factors and influencing self-motivated learners p u r s u e c a r e e r p r e p a r a t i o n o r a r e m o t i v a t e d by a s i g n i f i c a n t o t h e r t o pursue educational are sim ilar to goals. learners Finally, in Mor st a in Houle’ s l e a r n i n g - o r i e n t e d a d u lt s and S m a r t ’ s c o g n i t i v e - i n t e r e s t and s o c i a l - w e l f a r e c a t e g o r i e s . It Cross s h o u l d be n o t e d t h a t , (1981) and participation in Burgess adult whereas M o rs t a i n (1971) education, addressed Houle’ s and S m a r t the more (cited reasons in for subjective o b s e r v a t io n s served to c l a s s i f y groups of people i n t o l e a r n e r t y p e s . 14 Th u s , although study, the combi ne d we r e s e l e c t e d have Houle’s many wor k typologies f o r use in t h i s reasons remains for of an influential Morstain and Sma r t study because the deciding to return to motivational and Burgess same i n d i v i d u a l school, and may Houle’s subgroups are not s u i t a b l e f o r t h i s type of m u l t i v a r i a t e a n a l y s i s . Yates education high (1982) (ABE), school surveyed general completion 151 participants educational p r o g r a ms in development in the adult (GED), mid-Michigan basic and adult area. The r e s e a r c h e r ’ s pur p os es were: ( 1) t o i d e n t i f y t h e p e r s o n a l and e n v i r o n m e n t a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f women e n r o l l e d i n ABE, GED and h i g h s c h o o l completion p r o g r a m s ; ( 2) t o i d e n t i f y i n t r i n s i c and e x t r i n s i c f a c t o r s whi c h m o t i v a t e d t h e r e t u r n o f women t o f o r ma l e d u c a t i o n , and ( 3) t o i d e n t i f y t h e most s i g n i f i c a n t m a r k e t i n g p r o c e d u r e s which c r e a t e d t h e awa r ene s s o f t h e a d u l t e d u c a t i o n programs f o r women, ( p. 5) R e s p o n d e n t s we r e a s k e d t o i n d i c a t e , expected o u t c o me s The i t e m s on t h e reflecting (a) opportunities mos t commonly decision further to f r om participating checklist the in AHS completion programs. to i mpr ove empl oyment and/or career t h e e x p e c t a t i o n o f i mpr ove d s e l f - e s t e e m . selected participate or expectations f ound i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n career the i n t o one o r more b r o a d c a t e g o r i e s , expectation and ( b) educational fell on a 1 0 - i t e m c h e c k l i s t , plans," to h a ve motivated p r o g r a ms we r e "Expect The "Expect self-enjoyment," the to and " E x p e c t a new j o b . " In h i s study of p e r s i s t e r s completion programs, and s a t i s f a c t i o n persisters Tomlanovich we r e c i t e d as r e a s o n s for versus ( 1988) nonpersisters f ound t h a t in high self-improvement by 95. 3% o f n o n p e r s i s t e r s returning to school. school and 95. 7% o f Bot h g r o u p s listed 15 receipt study of a high of 116 districts ( 1979) enrolled program AHS to complete their Communit y asked checklist of potential students factors for to selected College’s societal requirements we r e a high indicate high i mp r o v e their offered by location. school job Surry adult for skills, personal and Community Twenty-four school diploma. factors f r om items reflecting satisfaction, (c) the College on t h e wanted opportunity," Klevins influenced these to finish and the ( b) 40-item of desire the schedule convenience to of we r e its checked factors return to to f ound school I ha ve c o m p l e t e d h i g h s c h o o l , " school and now I have an and " I wa n t a b e t t e r e d u c a t i o n . " (1976) the identified adults in his specialized and preparation for seven s a mp l e additional to societal return to factors the that classroom in Th e s e f a c t o r s we r e ( a ) t h e ne e d f o r extensive emancipation of various groups, in to Survey a the instrument decision high q u e s t o f a high school diploma. more them (a) t h e d e s i r e t o flexibility survey " I wa n t t o be a b l e t o s a y t h a t always who The i t e m s on t h e c h e c k l i s t students’ "I school completion m otivated to were: this students that The mos t commonly s e l e c t e d influenced 19 school by t e n o r more s t u d e n t s . h a ve in i n f l u e n c e s t h a t had e n c o u r a g e d t hem t o e n r o l l i n t o one o r more b r o a d c a t e g o r i e s , complete choice from high those i n t h e S u r r y Community C o l l e g e p r o g r a m . fell second Mi c h i g a n a r e a . Surry determine participants as s u r v e y e d 30 r a n d o ml y in the diploma completion-program in the c e n t r a l Ay e r s were school education, (b) the social (c) t h e need t o c ompl et e high school schooling, (d) an increasingly 16 technological society, a f e e l in g of personal Nickse ( 1976) participation we r e (e) a c c e s s ib ility of education, satisfaction, cited both and (g) a l o n g e r l i f e internal and e x t e r n a l i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s . e c o n o mi c in nature and (f) included span. motivators Most e x t e r n a l reasons need f o r such as for motivators to increase i ncome and t o r e s p o n d t o p r e s s u r e t o u p g r a d e j o b s o r mee t l i c e n s i n g requirements. need for Internal increased or psychological self-esteem and t h e motivators ne e d t o p e r c e i v e d t o be a p i e c e o f l i f e ’ s b u s i n e s s also cited preparation the decision the classroom. school for college Th u s , the motivating students and participation interests. requirements past Peters b e t we e n alternative Boshier (1976) claimed life that the whereas needs and experience, and Boshier current interests habits, defined state interests experiences. force in return to for a are of the and level motives as learner and interests of and Boshier (1976) chance" According t o th e a u t h o r s , the for a d u lt’s social ga p that some d e s i r e d preference formulate distinguished an immediate "needs" expressions Needs and s t u d e n t s who a r e m o t i v a t e d by " l i f e space." high plan. reflect m o ti v atio n to approach or avoid f u r t h e r e d ucat io nal Peters many i n a d u l t e d u c a t i o n a r e d e t e r m i n e d by a d u l t s ’ n e e d s and system, condition, step of t h e i r educational In c o m b i n a t i o n , situation. "life to the Nickse d i p l o m a f o r t h o s e m o t i v a t e d t o c o n t i n u e on t h e c o l l e g e Peters exists of wha t unfinished. as a s t r o n g completion r e p r e s e n t s only a f i r s t belief conclude left o f many AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m included an among adult’s experience. adult education f r om t h o s e m o t i v a t e d by s t u d e n t s m o t i v a t e d by l i f e 17 chance are motivated by a ne e d t o acquire knowl e dge o r skills, t h e y a r e g e n e r a l l y i nv ol ve d in s a t i s f a c t i o n o f l o w e r - l e v e l defined i n Ma s l ow’ s h i e r a r c h y . motivated by l i f e expression and actualization, a pictorial participate development representation participants seek their or social of those in a d u l t education higher-order in to life-chance and Ma s l ow’ s need hierarchy. i mpr ove their "chances vocational satisfied of horizons, such needs needs or as for self- F i g u r e 2.1 life-space life" life-space and s e e k t o classes Wher e a s in needs, s t u d e n t s who a r e as r e l a t e d t o Masl ow’ s ne e d h i e r a r c h y . p a n t s ’ placement previously space In c o n t r a s t , and is partici­ life-chance by improving participants expand t h e i r ha ve k nowl e dge f o r t h e i n h e r e n t j o y o f p a r t i c i p a t i o n and l e a r n i n g . Li f e - s p a c e par ti ci pants e s t ee m ne e ds l o v e and b e l o n g i n g n e eds Li f e - c h a n c e parti ci pants s a f e t y ne e ds physiological Figure 2.1: As one m i g h t needs P l a c e m e n t o f l i f e - s p a c e and l i f e - c h a n c e p a r t i c i p a n t s i n Ma s l ow’ s n e e d h i e r a r c h y . anticipate, Peters and Boshier the attendance pattern of life-chance p a rtic ip a n ts ( 19 7 6 ) predicted i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n 18 programs to be objectives, sporadic whereas participants is as s uc h the constant students attendance and tends to attain their pattern of continue over short-term life-space a much l o n g e r period. Whe r e a s Peters and s t u d e n t s ’ motivation life-space Boshier for participation classifications, tasks" motivation participation. arising achievement later tasks, individual, tasks" (p. to home, do and He d e s c r i b e d move used the and concept of tasks as while failure by the to his leads society, happiness to and and success unhappiness difficulty in with the later 207). of with developmental selecting finding a a tasks ma t e , job. associated starting However, a with young family, middle-aged adults ma na gi ng persons a find set o f developmental including preparing children to a s s e r t t h e i r i n d e p e n d e n c e and from "free" life-chance developmental t h e m s e l v e s c o n c e r n e d w i t h a somewhat d i f f e r e n t tasks, to a s s e s s i n g AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s ’ o f whi c h l e a d s disapproval Exa mpl e s have ( 1971) completion-program " a t or about a c e r t a i n peri od in t h e l i f e o f t h e i n d i v i d u a l , successful with in AHS according Havighurst "developmental for analyzed home, assuming or l e i s u r e time, physiological changes civic responsibility, creatively a d j u s t i n g to aging p a r e n t s , associated with middle using and a d j u s t i n g t o age. Persons in the l a t e r stages of l i f e f i n d t h e i r c o n c e r n s / i n t e r e s t s c e n t e r i n g on s uc h developmental or reduced social i n c o me , tasks adjusting stages to as adjusting the death to retirement of a spouse, r e l a t i o n s h i p s w i t h a new age g r o u p . and a and d e v e l o p i n g 19 A more r e la te d to specific m otivation experiences, for these developmental participation a s p r e s e n t e d by H a v i g h u r s t in (1971), adult tasks as education follows: Bet ween a g e s 2 0 - 3 0 . A period of seeking social i d e n t i t y and maximum c o n c e r n w i t h o n e s e l f and o n e ’ s i m m e d i a t e , personal l i f e . Educati on i s used c h i e f l y t o p r e p a r e f o r and t o a d v a n c e i n wor k. 2. Bet ween a g e s 3 0 - 4 0 . A pe rio d of r e l a t i v e l y high s t a b i l i t y and g e n e r a l p s y c h o l o g i c a l w e l l - b e i n g w i t h l e s s i n t r o s p e c ­ t i o n and s e l f - a w a r e n e s s . Education is s t i l l w o r k - r e l a t e d , b u t e d u c a t i o n i s a l s o s o u g h t f o r o t h e r r e a s o n s s u c h as e n j o y m e n t o f l e a r n i n g and m e e t i n g new p e o p l e . 3. Bet ween a g e s 4 0 - 5 0 . A p e r i o d o f g r e a t e r p a r t i c i p a t i o n in civic a c tiv itie s. The e f f e c t s o f body c h a n g e s become more noticeable. E d u c a t i o n i n t e r e s t i s b a s e d on s o c i a l and cultural a c tiv itie s. 4. Bet ween a g e s 5 0 - 6 0 . A period of lessened self-confidence and g r e a t e r i n t r o s p e c t i o n . P h y s i c a l and s o c i a l a c t i v i t i e s a r e l e s s f r e q u e n t , e ve n t h o u g h t h e r e i s more l e i s u r e t i m e . Education is mostly f o r non - w o r k -r e la t e d r ea son s. 5. Bet ween a g e s 6 0 - 7 0 . A period of separation of the i n d i ­ v i d u a l f r om s o c i a l a c t i v i t i e s . I n d i v i d u a l h a s l e s s need f o r a p p r e c i a t i o n and t e n d s t o a v o i d b e c o m i n g d e e p l y a t t a c h e d b o t h t o p e o p l e and o b j e c t s , ( p. 219) subconscious participation needs interpreted by H a v i g h u r s t developmental also by Gr abows ki (1971). tasks with catalyze (1975), social adults’ ca n be seen stages of the adult l i f e Implied in t h e m ot iv es surroundings. in values motivation for a s d e s c r i b e d by M c C l e l l a n d i s t h e change in a d u l t a c c o m p a n i e d by a c h a n g e new c a r e e r s . that i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s , th roug ho ut the developmental but of 1. The and description to s pa n d e s c r i b e d ascribed roles, to specific n o t o n l y w i t h age Developmental and g o a l s , fluctuate often change associated is with 20 Fr i e d ma n ( 1976) c o n s i d e r e d adults’ participation occupational into the roles. the "value orientations" motivating i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a ms i n a s s o c i a t i o n w i t h He d i v i d e d t h e c a t e g o r i e s o f o c c u p a t i o n a l following four stages: (a) entry into a career roles for those i n t h e a ge r a n g e o f 20 t o 28 y e a r s , ( b) c a r e e r d e v e l o p m e n t f o r t h o s e i n t h e a ge r a n g e o f 25 t o 50 y e a r s , (c) t h e a ge r a n g e o f 35 t o 60 y e a r s , the a ge r a n g e o f 55 t o s t a g e as f o l l o w s : and 68 y e a r s . In t h e first for vi e we d as prerequisite participation proportionally by many in high. changes in value o r ie n ta tio n s m i g h t be why o l d e r , to AHS for those in ( d) p r e r e t i r e m e n t f o r t h o s e in Fr i e d ma n stage, t h e f u t u r e t o c o n t a i n improvements. is career plateau a better adult’s life adults each expect a change in o n e ’ s a b i l i t y future life, p r o g r a ms The c a r e e r p l a t e a u an described career entry, Th u s , completion further at stage, that this stage h o we v e r , require as o p p o s e d t o a c q u i s i t i o n and m o t i v a t i o n is is mar ke d reformulation of competencies. of This l e s s - e d u c a t e d a d u l t s do n o t t u r n t o c o m p e t e n c y - b a s e d AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s . Recruitment S t r a t e g i e s F a c i l i t a t i n g the Enrollment of P o t e n t i a l AHS C o m p l e t i o n - P r o g r a m S t u d e n t s Th e efforts identification of target populations for recruitm ent i s p e r h a p s t h e mos t i m p o r t a n t a s p e c t o f r e c r u i t i n g p o t e n t i a l AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m students. necessity changing to motivational of the l i f e adapt to force for learning. cycle: responsibility one’ s f i r s t on t h e j o b and Cross life ( 1981) circumstances Universal job, in the suggested is that a the powerful changes r e p r e s e n t phases marriage, communi t y, children, increasing retirement, and so 21 forth. Other changes, job, divorce, h o we ve r , on the life cycle l e a r n i n g has i n d i c a t e d t h a t , moments"; " tr ig g e r events" corroborated with Aslanian fact are Schlossberg by that ( 19 8 4 ) for transition, s uc h as the Havighurst B riek e 11 wor k that trigger the motivation ( 1971) c a l l e d (1980) these referred to These a s s e r t i o n s programs force, today are abound new p a r e n t s , those Transitional assessing that of is an individual’s reentering determined key a r e a s : (a) Model, the by defined readiness f o r ma l measuring the t r a n s i t i o n as for a any educational strengths and or the s it u a ti o n when t h e a d u l t p e r c e i v e s t h e l e a r n i n g s i t u a t i o n a s p o s i t i v e , negative, or dreaded; successfully returning within of and r e t i r e e s . the readiness weaknesses in t h r e e cope loss s u g g e s t e d t h a t r e a d i n e s s f o r l e a r n i n g c a n be applying system itself, and changes in l i f e , AHS c o m p l e t i o n reentering structured Such life a t some p e r i o d s maki ng m i d l i f e c a r e e r c h a n g e s , understood on as p o t e n t m o t i v a t i n g f o r c e s . by t h e women who system. and is e x c e p t i o n a l l y high. "teachable s u d d e n and t r a u m a t i c : and i l l n e s s o r d e a t h o f o n e ’ s s p o u s e . Research for learning are the to with school; to the and educational o n e ’ s c ommuni t y. according ( b) t h e i n n e r s t r e n g t h o f t h e a d u l t s t u d e n t t o Th u s , struggles (c) program an Schlossberg, support systems itself, one’s individual’s is s o me t i me s directly associated (or lack family, readiness correlated and of with t hem) possibly for transition, to his or her r e a d i n e s s f o r r e c r u i t m e n t i n t o t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m. Schlossberg for potential ( 1976) a lso pointed out t h a t i f counseling services AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s c o u l d be e x t e n d e d f r om 22 the traditional the opportunity cautioned, educational for environment recruitment h o we v e r , that into could "counseling be the larger expanded facilities c ommuni t y, greatly. are only She beginning t o make t h e m s e l v e s a c c e s s i b l e t h r o u g h e f f e c t i v e o u t r e a c h p r o g r a m s t o p e o p l e who a r e una wa r e o f t h e i r e x i s t e n c e o r a v a i l a b i l i t y not know how t o concerned with are they not utilize those not able services" potential participating are their in to 74). Schlossberg AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m adult find ( p. educational help in maki ng o r who do students opportunities career and might services that increased well could link of in the with organizations, the p o ten tia l educational counseling having appropriate adults AHS c o m p l e t i o n into an u n d e r s t a n d i n g completion local program religious judicial community-based guidance resources. Th u s , programs might of the b e n e fits t o be among organizations, departments, Such professionals social service and o t h e r s who f r e q u e n t l y s e r v e AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m p o p u l a t i o n . Finally, Schlossberg as a observed socially, AHS by people with begin with e s t a b l i s h i n g associated ideal resolved recruitment attained She be who because d e c i s i o n s and i n d e t e r m i n i n g wha t o p p o r t u n i t i e s a r e a v a i l a b l e . concern was recruitment that for and AHS highlighted strategy foreign-born culturally, recruits (1976) in the individuals educationally completion the importance twenty-first in Ame r i c a century. are disadvantaged. programs and yet of h a ve often They are mi ni mal awareness o f o r a c c e s s t o such o f f e r i n g s . Rachlis enrolled in ( 1981) the studied continuing 100 AHS education completion-program program at Bathurst students Heights 23 S e c o n d a r y Sc hool in adults enroll who m i g h t t o f o r ma l flyers suburban at libraries cable-television children, and available; counselors, announcements Also and important program that consequently, placement adults communi t y channel, centers of letters and the notices placed word in mouth who have is the to locate was that respond and mailed of home w i t h best social with easily. the local school He advertising workers, respond to potential potential of to newspapers. the typically accessibility it to contact recruitment sent communi t y we r e s e n t others who woul d in students interested and advertisements h o we v e r , do n o t u s u a l l y f i l m s p o t a n n o u n c e me n t s shown on t h e c ommuni t y noted, He f o u n d R a c h l i s d i d j u d g e t o be somewhat e f f e c t i v e neighborhood a d d r e s s e e s , also Toronto. i n a c a d e mi c c o u r s e s announcements. posted metropolitan AHS f o r ma l clients. completion school, A central job- allowing location also p r o v i d e s communi t y r e c o g n i t i o n and a w a r e n e s s o f t h e e x i s t e n c e o f t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m. R e t e n t i o n S t r a t e g i e s Encouraging S t u d e n t s ’ C o n t i n u a t i o n i n AHS C o m p l e t i o n Pr ogr a ms Although challenging educators recruiting undertaking, may be t h e in such programs. of th e ir former students f o r AHS c o m p l e t i o n the difficult most retention of students task p r o g r a ms confronting o nc e t h e y is a adult ha ve e n r o l l e d Most AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s d r o p p e d o u t educational Whether past educational negative connotation of experience, associations "school," it is for a variety imprinted wise to of reasons. a positive consider that, or at 24 best, the individual’s first steps back to the classroom are a c c o m p a n i e d by f e e l i n g s o f t r e p i d a t i o n and u n c e r t a i n t y . The competence of AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m staff members-- e s p e c i a l l y t h e c o u n s e l i n g s t a f f - - a p p e a r s t o be c r u c i a l for returning students. importance of the Mi nzey and Le T a r t e adult counseling ( 19 7 2 ) program, underscored the asserting that a sufficiently large s t a f f o f c o m p e t e n t c o u n s e l o r s s h o u l d be a v a i l a b l e d u r i n g t h e i n i t i a l enrollment period. should continue entry to mus t the Also, the counseling beyond t h e program. be m a i n t a i n e d , contact system t h a t made upon t h e C o u n selo rs’ c o n ta c ts with and, during the first year, is established student’s initial the learner an adult individualized p r o g r a m s h o u l d be e s t a b l i s h e d and t h e s t u d e n t ’ s c r e d i t s e v a l u a t e d . Gr a bows ki the Los Acadia ( 1975) Angeles Parish progress discussed the Acadia Parish Adult Schools study. The indicated that City study ( in terms of e d u c a t i o n , the occupation, t h e g r o u p s t h a t we r e n o t c o u n s e l e d . study indicated that existing counseled pilot study findings groups and s o c i a l and of the made more skills) than F i n d i n g s f r om t h e Los A n g e l e s guidance services we r e inadequate to the of me e t t h e n e e d s o f AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s . Erickson ( 1970) conducted a study to determine needs a d u lts returning to school. He f o u n d t h a t 56% o f t h o s e s u r v e y e d had a need not o nl y f o r s p e c i a l a d v i s e m e n t and c o u n s e l i n g b e f o r e comi ng or returning t o an e d u c a t i o n a l environment, but a l s o f o r c o n t i n u in g counseling services. P e t e r s and B o s h i e r ( 1 9 7 6 ) s u p p o r t e d t h e h y p o t h e s i s t h a t a d u l t s ’ needs and interests continue to formulate m otivation for 25 participation authors in or avoidance extended the influence of AHS completion o f needs programs. and i n t e r e s t s on The students’ d e c i s i o n t o r e m a i n i n an AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m by s t a t i n g : U n l e s s t h e i n t e n d e d ou t c o me s o f t h e p r o g r a m c o n f o r m t o t h e a d u l t ’ s n e e d s and i n t e r e s t s , b e l i e f s y s t e m , and c o n c e p t o f r e a l i t y , i t is unlikely th a t the p o ten tia l le a rn e r will accept and make u s e o f i t s c o n t e n t . The e d u c a t i o n a l o r g a n i z a t i o n ca n be o v e r l y p r e s u m p t u o u s i f i t i g n o r e s t h e i d i o s y n c r a s i e s o f t h e a d u l t p a r t i c i p a n t and o f f e r s a t r a d i t i o n a l " c u r r i c u l u m " more s u i t e d t o a c a p t i v e group o f a d o l e s c e n t l e a r n e r s . It is e q u a l l y presumptuous i f i t o f f e r s c o u rse s t h a t merely r e f l e c t t h e i n t e r e s t s and t r a d i t i o n a l c o n c e r n s o f p r o g r a m m e r s , ( p. 199) Thus, the interests, student interaction attitudes to continuing program knowledge, the mutual education if content do attendance content and a skill, satisfaction department not is future l i f e goals, participation develops or p a r t i c i p a n t s ’ needs, education student will whi c h program adults’ needs, and m o t i v e s h a s me a ni ng o n l y t o t h e e x t e n t t h a t t h e a d u l t increases Therefore, of it be r e t a i n e d or the student sponsoring interests, coincide, mandatory of or shapes h is or her is and motives unlikely to that or and the the adult In s i t u a t i o n s be prerequisite t h e s t u d e n t may c o n t i n u e i n t h e p r o g r a m ; may become i n f r e q u e n t the organization. in t h e program. perceived and nonexistent and in for h o we ve r , the student may f i g u r a t i v e l y become a " d r o p o u t " a l t h o u g h a t t e n d a n c e c o n t i n u e s . Wlodkowski saying that completion attitude, agreed addressing programs s uc h p r o g r a m s . student (1985) adult critical Peters needs in to participate stimulation, and and achieving Six f a c t o r s d e li n e a t e d motivation need, is with and affect, Boshier interests student by Wl adkowski remain in competence, such ( 1976) w ithin retention as in AHS in influencing programs are and r e i n f o r c e m e n t . 26 These can factors, be whi c h used instruction in have a p o we r f u l designing that directly influence effective on adult motivational and p o s i t i v e l y affects learning, strategies student for retention i n t h e p r o g r a m. Wlodkowski strategies, instructor Th u s , in (1985) accompanied behavior, in a d d i t i o n the presented to to by AHS c o m p l e t i o n related enhance adult 68 specific learning adults’ m otivational activities motivation for students’ inherent motivation p r o g r a m, the teacher becomes an and learning. to remain effective determinant of student re te n tio n . The c o n c e p t o f c o n g r u e n c e learning environment and B o s h i e r ( 1 9 7 6 ) . and t h e b e t we e n t h e adult physical aspects s t u d e n t was d i s c u s s e d by of the Peters I n c o n g r u e n c e ca n o c c u r when a d u l t s a r e e x p e c t e d t o u s e f u r n i t u r e made f o r c h i l d r e n o r a r e e x p e c t e d t o f u n c t i o n i n an environment is r e p l e t e with manifested teach at s ymbol s psychologically high levels of education. by i n s t r u c t o r s abstraction, s t u d e n t s in t h e l e a r n i n g p r o c e s s . the learning of child and Incongruence who l e c t u r e do not too actively Co n g r u e n c e b e t w e e n a l l e n v i r o n m e n t and t h e n e e d s and i n t e r e s t s long, engage aspects of of students is t h o u g h t t o h a ve a p o s i t i v e i n f l u e n c e on t h e r e t e n t i o n o f s t u d e n t s i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s . Gr abows ki standpoint continued ( 1975) of approached a d i s c u s s io n o f r e t e n t i o n obstacles participation this author, the types from participating in in that lessen the AHS c o m p l e t i o n of obstacles that AHS c o m p l e t i o n chance programs. prevent programs of f r om t h e students’ According motivated arise to adults from the 27 individual, from the course environment. Obstacles arising stem from life situations and attitudes amount regarding s uc h o f time as content, f r om t h e the to from individual AHS c o m p l e t i o n insufficient required and time, finish the the are thought program home social or to f r om responsibilities, AHS c o m p l e t i o n program. O b s t a c l e s a r i s i n g f r om c o u r s e c o n t e n t o c c u r i f a d u l t s t u d e n t s do n o t p e r c e i v e AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m c o u r s e s and i n t e r e s t s . The s o c i a l as relevant to their e n v i r o n m e n t may p r e s e n t o b s t a c l e s needs such as i n a d e q u a t e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n a n d / o r c o n f l i c t i n g wor k h o u r s . Wi t h regard program s t u d e n t s , to encouraging Gr abows ki the retention of AHS c o m p l e t i o n - advised: T e a c h e r s ought t o o r g a n i z e t h e l e a r n i n g e x p e r i e n c e s so as t o t a k e f u l l a d v a n t a g e o f t h e maximum p e r f o r m a n c e t h a t l e a r n e r s are capable of giving. The way t o r e a l i z e t h e f u l l p o t e n t i a l o f l e a r n e r s i s t o m o t i v a t e t hem by a p p e a l i n g t o t h e i r n e e d f o r a ut onomy and s e l f - f u l f i l l m e n t , n o t m e r e l y by a p p e a l i n g t o t h e i r b a s i c n e e d s and t h e r e b y i mp o s i n g e x t r i n s i c f o r ms o f m o t i v a t i o n and e n c o u r a g e m e n t . A good t e a c h e r l o o k s f o r s p e c i f i c i n t e r e s t s and m o t i v e s o f i n d i v i d u a l a d u l t l e a r n e r s and t r i e s t o a r r a n g e t h e c o u r s e t o f i t t h e s e i n t e r e s t s and m o t i v e s . A t e a c h e r mus t f i r s t become a wa r e o f t h e n e e d s whi c h m o t i v a t e t h e a d u l t l e a r n e r [ i . e . , t h e m o t i v a t i o n f o r p a r t i c i p a t i o n ] , ( p . 221) Cross students ( 1982) s u g g e s t e d t h a t r e t e n t i o n o f AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m depends institutional, Dispositional themselves; particular those on students’ and situational barriers result situational times associated in with ability their are lives; policies, ove r c ome barriers f r om t h e barriers to and to attitudes specific dispositional, participation. people to institutional procedures, and have about individuals barriers activities of at are the 28 educational o r g a n i z a t i o n o r AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m t h a t e n c o u r a g e o r discourage student r e te n tio n . Before a p r o f e s s i o n a l , competent i n s t r u c t o r determines c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t ’ s n e e d s and i n t e r e s t s , counselor classes. Goldberg programs, t h e c o u n s e l o r p r o v i d e s g ui d a n c e t h a t t h e r e c i p i e n t us es in relatively prim arily the student in particular ( 19 8 0 ) s t a t e d t h a t , w i t h r e g a r d t o AHS c o m p l e t i o n short time; voluntary, meaningful. places an a d u l t e d u c a t i o n program a initially t h e AHS the and decision the to services use such are, in services general, is more T h u s , t h e c o u n s e l o r becomes an e f f e c t i v e r e t e n t i o n t o o l with the p o t e n t i a l t o i n c r e a s e t h e number s o f AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s who r e m a i n i n t h e p r o g r a m u n t i l for graduation. t h e y me e t t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s The f o l l o w i n g d i s c u s s i o n u n d e r s c o r e s t h e i m p o r t a n c e o f t h e c o u n s e l o r i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s . Goldberg (1981) a s s e r t e d t h a t a d u l t s ( b) wi s h become thus to better themselves disillusioned need as they s omeone who w i l l with helpful advice. need t o information. In a d d i t i o n , educational often achieve be do n o t greater a good and (c) self-realization and listener know how, and respond kindly A d u l t s ha ve a ne e d t o a c h i e v e i mm e d i a t e g o a l s and t h e r e f o r e an but ( a ) n e e d t o be s t i m u l a t e d , obtain situation specific educational and o c c u p a t i o n a l many a d u l t s l a c k c o n f i d e n c e when e n t e r i n g and t h e m s e l v e s and t h e i r p r o g r e s s . often tend to be unrealistic about Goldberg f u r t h e r s t a t e d : Memor i es o f p a s t s c h o o l e x p e r i e n c e s and f a i l u r e s c a n c a u s e a d u l t s t o be a p p r e h e n s i v e and a n x i o u s and i n t e r f e r e w i t h t h e a b il it y to learn. They f e e l t h e p r e s s u r e o f t i m e - - t h e l a c k o f i t - - t o a c c o m p l i s h e v e r y t h i n g t h e y wa n t as o p p o s e d t o how l o n g i t w i l l t a k e t hem t o r e a c h t h e i r g o a l s . Be c a u s e o f t h e i r many 29 o t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s , t h e y mus t b a l a n c e t h e i r t i m e b e t we e n s t u d i e s and a m y r i a d o f o t h e r o b l i g a t i o n s , s o me t i m e s m e e t i n g r e s i s t a n c e f r om b o t h f a m i l y and e m p l o y e r . Lack o f c o n t i n u o u s c o n t a c t w i t h f a c u l t y , c o u n s e l o r s , and a d m i n i s t r a t i o n i n d i c a t e s a need f o r l o n g e r c o u n s e l i n g s e s s i o n s t o compensate f o r t h e i r i n f r e q u e n c y , ( p . 71) Adulthood security, tically often maturity, is characterized and certainty. seen as a time o f change. as a time However , it Schlossberg of is stability, more realis­ (1976) n ot ed t h a t t h e a d u l t n e e d s s u p p o r t and g u i d a n c e i n c o p i n g w i t h t h e c r i s e s he o r s h e experiences, life, and especially c ommuni t y Schlossberg pointed c o mpl e ti on program, in t h e life, out areas and that in of vocation, dealing it is with common, intimacy, one’s upon inner entering to ta k e stock o f one’ s accomplishments, o f t h e m, and t o r e a s s e s s t h e d i r e c t i o n Feelings of anxiety family life. an or lack i n l i f e one w i s h e s t o p u r s u e . and d e s p a i r may s u r f a c e as t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n - program s t u d e n t d e t e r m i n e s t h a t t h i s i s his or her l a s t chance, there and are no mor e opportunities, AHS that he or she that has not f u lf ille d certain expectations, e i t h e r o n e ’ s own o r t h o s e i mpos e d by significant counselor mentor or others. coach if Thus, he o r the she is to be might a s s ume effective in the role retaining of AHS completion-program students. Wi l s o n (1980) highlighted the importance c o mp l et io n programs b ec au s e r e s o u r c e attendance patterns. considering having a second f u l1-tim e-equivalent programs; this Th e ( FTE) possibility allocation Michigan count date students increases of retention often is in related Legislature currently to the determine attending adult AHS AHS to is number o f completion e d u c a t o r s ’ concern about 30 retention. out, e ve n morale A secondary temporarily, decreases noticeably smaller as result of the tendency of stu d e n ts f r om AHS c o m p l e t i o n the as number the of semester programs students is t o drop that group remaining becomes Wi l s o n asserted progresses. that: E a r l y i d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f t h o s e who p o s e a h i g h d r o p o u t r i s k woul d a s s i s t i n t h e s o l u t i o n o f t h e a t t r i t i o n p r o b l e m . Such i d e n t i f i c a t i o n c o u ld he lp t h e a d u l t e d u c a t o r in a c c o m p l i s h i n g a b e t t e r ma t c h o f t h e p e r s o n o l o g i c a l n e e d s o f p a r t i c u l a r s t u d e n t s t o t h o s e e d u c a t i o n a l e n v i r o n m e n t s and e x p e r i e n c e s mo s t l i k e l y t o f o s t e r p e r s i s t e n c e and r e t e n t i o n , ( p . 174) Wi l s o n we nt on t o suggest d i f f e r e n t i a t e educational Us i n g (1980) the found rebellious, irresponsible. Adjective that less that personality instruments be used to p e r s i s t e r s f r om n o n p e r s i s t e r s . Check L i s t dropouts (ACL) described socialized, in his themselves impulsive, research, as Wi l s o n hostile headstrong, and and In W i l s o n ’ s w o r d s , D r o p o u t s we r e s e e n a s i n d i f f e r e n t t o t h e f e e l i n g s and n e e d s o f o t h e r s and a s a s s e r t i v e , l e s s w i l l i n g t o s u b o r d i n a t e s e l f and more d e s i r o u s o f a t t e n t i o n and a u t h o r i t y . They s e e k succorance. Wh i l e b e i n g i n a t t e n t i v e t o t h e n e e d s o f o t h e r s , t h e y may d e s i r e more s u p p o r t i v e and d e p e n d e n t r e l a t i o n s h i p s than p e r s i s t e r s . P e r s i s t e r s w e r e s e e n a s more o b l i g i n g , t a c t f u l , d i l i g e n t , p r a c t i c a l and c o m p l i a n t t h a n t h e d r o p o u t . They w e r e more i n t e r e s t e d i n s t a b i l i t y and r e d u c i n g r i s k . In r e l a t i o n s h i p s they we r e mor e c o n c e r n e d a b o u t t h e n e e d s o f o t h e r s , more s u p p o r t i v e , more p e r s e v e r i n g , and more a b l e t o y i e l d t o t h e r e a s o n a b l e r e q u e s t s o f o t h e r s , ( p . 183) In c o n c l u s i o n , Wi l s o n ( 1980) r e i t e r a t e d t h e i m p o r t a n c e o f u s i n g AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m profiles students’ self-described in a tt e m p t i n g t o i n c r e a s e r e t e n t i o n . personological He w r o t e : I f t h e n o n - p e r s i s t e r i s t o be r e t a i n e d , more u n d e r s t a n d i n g and s u p p o r t w i l l be n e e d e d . P a s t f a i l u r e s and p r e s e n t a n x i e t i e s 31 r e q u i r e g r e a t e r e f f o r t s and c o n s i d e r a t i o n s f r om t h e t e a c h e r , l e a r n i n g p e r i o d s may ne e d t o be s h o r t e n e d and t h e number o f su c ce ss e x p e r i e n c e s i n c r e a s e d in o r d e r t o r e t a i n t h e s e p e r s o n s . P e e r r e l a t i o n s h i p s may be e n c o u r a g e d and f o s t e r t o i n c r e a s e bo nds t o t h e p r o g r a m . Above a l l , n o n - p e r s i s t e r s w i l l n e e d i n s t r u c t o r s who a r e m a t u r e and w i l l i n g t o a b s o r b some o f t h e j o l t s and j a r s e n c o u n t e r e d when w o r k i n g w i t h p e r s o n s who may t e n d t o be s e l f - c e n t e r e d and i n s e n s i t i v e , ( p . 184) Wi l s o n (1980) the r e t e n tio n the further suggestions a i med r a t e o f AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s . importance the school. offered of the interested candidate’s initial at increasing He s t r e s s e d contact with In W i l s o n ’ s w o r d s : A d u l t s who ha ve made t h e d e c i s i o n t o r e t u r n t o s c h o o l ha ve o v e r c o me wh a t i s f o r t hem a f i r s t m a j o r h u r d l e . They a r e f e e l i n g v u l n e r a b l e and n e e d e n c o u r a g e m e n t a t t h i s s t a g e . Their initial contact w i t h t h e school i s c r u c i a l - - a cranky, or preoccupied, or l e s s - t h a n - k n o w l e d g e a b l e r e c e p t i o n i s t on t h e telephone or at the office counter is e nough t o make many o f t hem l o s e t h e i r c o u r a g e . A f e a r o f s c h o o l f r om p a s t f a i l u r e s i s r e i n f o r c e d by i n i t i a l r e d t a p e . I t is important th a t t h e i r f i r s t c o n t a c t be w i t h a c o n c e r n e d and i n t e r e s t e d s t a f f member, be i t a s e c r e t a r y , c o u n s e l o r , o r t e a c h e r . A d u l t s t u d e n t s ’ f i r s t e x p e r i e n c e s s h o u l d be p o s i t i v e , p r a c t i c a l and n o n - t h r e a t e n i n g . T e s t i n g s h o u l d be p o s t p o n e d . A short discussion about the students’ backgrounds and e x p e c t a t i o n s w i t h a c o u n s e l o r o r t e a c h e r i s a good s t a r t i n g point. As t h e c o u n s e l o r o r t e a c h e r h e l p s t hem f i l l o u t a s h o r t f o r m, a q u i c k e v a l u a t i o n o f t h e s t u d e n t s ’ l i t e r a c y c a n be made. The d i s c u s s i o n c a n i n c l u d e wha t s t u d e n t s e x p e c t f r om t h e p r o g r a m and wha t t h e i r a s p i r a t i o n s a r e . Finding out i f the s t u d e n t s and p r o g r a m a r e s u i t a b l e f o r e a c h o t h e r s h o u l d s t a r t a t t h e b e g i n n i n g , ( p . 377) Furthermore, much more teachers life retention of likely when school recognize that adults experiences and when make r e a s o n a b l e c o n c e s s i o n s . these AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m adm inistrators, are mature school counselors, individuals personnel students are with is and varied prepared to Wi l s o n ( 19 8 0 ) s t a t e d : The s c h o o l mus t a l s o be p r e p a r e d t o make c l e a r wha t i s e x p e c t e d o f a d u l t s t u d e n t s a n d be p r e p a r e d t o s u b s t a n t i a t e t h e s e 32 expectations. T h u s , e n t e r i n g t h e p r o g r a m c a n be c o n s i d e r e d entering into a contract. The r e t u r n i n g a d u l t s t u d e n t s , by t h e i r e nrollm ent, agree to t h e r u l e s and c o n d i t i o n s o f t h e s c h o o l . ( p . 377) C larification of the school’s expectations for AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s p r o v i d e s a d u l t l e a r n e r s an o p p o r t u n i t y t o d e t e r m i n e their chances for success at the outset of the program--a strong fa c to r for continued r e t e n ti o n . De mo g r a p h i c C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f E n r o l l e e s i n AHS C o m p l e t i o n Pr o g r a ms In answer t o programs?" typifying school the question several those writers students "Who p a r t i c i p a t e s have who suggested return to i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n general school characteristics to obtain a high d i p l o m a a n d / o r a GED c e r t i f i c a t e . In a s t u d y o f GED s t u d e n t s c o n d u c t e d by t h e f a c u l t y o f Mo r a i n e Valley Community College (1982), the "typical" student was i d e n t i f i e d a s a w h i t e , m a r r i e d f e m a l e who was a p p r o x i m a t e l y 32 y e a r s of age a t her initial the t i m e o f e n r o l l m e n t and school experience. s t u d e n t s were found t o w i t h an a v e r a g e a n n u a l N i c k s e ’ s ( 19 7 6 ) Mo r a i n e Valley be In e mpl oye d had c o m p l e t e d addition, either full the tenth grade majority time or of part in GED time, i ncome o f $ 1 2 , 0 0 0 . f i n d i n g s were s i m i l a r t o t h o s e r e p o r t e d Communit y College study. " t y p i c a l " AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t Nickse in t h e identified as a w h i t e , married the female who was a p p r o x i m a t e l y 40 y e a r s o f a ge a t t h e t i m e o f e n r o l l m e n t and had The completed 10.5 grades in her initial school experience. 33 m a j o r i t y o f s t u d e n t s i n t h i s s t u d y we r e e mp l o y e d ; t h e y had an a n n u a l i ncome o f $ 1 4 , 0 0 0 . Mi ze ( 1 9 8 3 ) r e p o r t e d on t h e d e m o g r a p h i c c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f students at Seminole Community College in Sanford, f o u n d t h e " t y p i c a l " GED s t u d e n t t o be a w h i t e , Florida. tenth grade in her initial f i v e p e r c e n t o f t h e s t u d e n t s in t h i s school adult (1982) basic completion city. conducted education, programs Fifty-seven 19.3% were Ame r i c a n black, Indian. u n e mp l o y e d , in five percent of the with an of relationships and between for participating in Table 2.1 . Boshier we r e surrounding found o f a ge a t (1976) social participating development, women we r e or the i ncome o f completed t e n t h grade in t h e i r i n i t i a l Peters 151 women $5,000 AHS mid-Michigan or Caucasian, and 2.2% we re typically time o f and in to the or be single, study. less, They and had school e x p e r i e n c e . cited previously demographic in a d u l t e d u c a t io n . a white M exican/Hispanic, annual Seventy- i ncome we r e n o t a v a i l a b l e . locations Respondents experience. educational 16.3% were and 2 7 . 1 y e a r s w e r e u n e mp l o y e d , a study general and who had s t u d y we r e e mpl oye d e i t h e r f u l l t i m e o r p a r t t i m e ; d a t a on t h e i r a n n u a l Yates He s i n g l e f e m a l e who was a p p r o x i m a t e l y 36 y e a r s o f age a t t h e t i m e o f e n r o l l m e n t completed GED variables hypothesized and motives T h e s e r e l a t i o n s h i p s a r e shown 34 T a b l e 2 . 1 . - - H y p o t h e s i z e d r e l a t i o n s h i p s b e t we e n some s o c i a l v a r i ­ a b l e s and m o t i v e s f o r p a r t i c i p a t i n g i n a d u l t e d u c a t i o n . Variable Life-Chance Motivation Life-Space Motivation Young Ol d Low Hi gh Low Hi gh Low Hi gh Age Occupational status Income Educational attainment Low ( S p a s mo d i c ) Previous p a r t i c i p a t i o n in a d u lt education Source: Hi gh (Continuous) J ames M. P e t e r s and Roge r B o s h i e r , " A d u l t Ne e d s , I n t e r e s t s and M o t i v e s , " i n M a t e r i a l s and Met hods i n C o n t i n u i n g Edu­ c a t i o n . e d . C h e s t e r K l e v i n s (New Yor k: Klevins P ublic a ­ t i o n s , 1976). Summary This cance of enroll chapter contained AHS completion in such pr ograms, a review of l i t e r a t u r e programs, recruitment t h e demographic c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s The me t h o d s and p r o c e d u r e s factors and on t h e motivating retention signifi­ adults strategies, to and o f AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s . used in c o nd u c t i n g t h i s study, including t h e p i l o t s t u d y and r e s e a r c h s a m p l e , t h e i n s t r u m e n t , data-collection methods, in Chapter I I I . and d a t a - a n a l y s i s p r o c e d u r e s , are described CHA PT E R III PROCEDURES Introduction This descriptive study was undertaken to a b o u t s t u d e n t s who we r e p a r t i c i p a t i n g gather information i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s s e l e c t e d C l a s s A, B, and C r u r a l p u b l i c school d i s t r i c t s during the D a t a we r e c o l l e c t e d 1990- 91 s c h o o l m otivating adults to year. enroll in AHS completion demographic c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of e n r o l l e e s (c) recruitment strategies completion-program reten tio n of students In this and the research described. The p o p u l a t i o n and sam ple-selection collection of factors programs, (b) enrollment of potential AHS strategies encouraging the procedures are me t h o d s research questions the procedures on ( a ) i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s . chapter, development ( d) i n Mi c h i g a n i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s , facilitating students, in are r e s t a t e d , procedures survey instrum ent are and explained, and the are described, is discussed, the study the data-analysis datame t h o d s are d e lin e ate d . Research Questions The f o l l o w i n g data for th is q u e s t i o n s we r e p o s e d t o g u i d e study: 35 the collection of 36 1. What are the demographic characteristics of the AHS completion-program population? 2. How were Who wa s participants ma d e aware of AHS completion programs? 3. influential in the return to school of AHS completion-program students? 4. What factors assisted in the return to school of AHS completion-program students? 5. What benefits attracted students to enroll in AHS c o m pl e ti o n programs? 6. What f a c t o r s prevented students f r om p a r t i c i p a t i n g in AHS in AHS all AHS c o m pl e ti o n programs b e f o r e t h i s t ime? 7. What factors have encouraged students to remain c o m pl e ti o n programs? The S t u d y P o p u l a t i o n and S a m p l e - S e l e c t i o n P r o c e d u r e The target population completion-program students The s a mp l e was selected for in rural f r om the s t u d e n t s f r om one C l a s s A r u r a l rural public district. school district, Us i n g a s t r a t i f i e d sample. study school consisted public school Class of districts accessible and one in enrolled district, C rural y e a r in each d i s t r i c t during Michi gan. population spring of AHS one C l a s s B public random s a m p l i n g t e c h n i q u e , AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s 1990- 91 s c h o o l this school 65% o f t h e term of the s u r v e y e d we r e s e l e c t e d f o r t h e 37 Us i ng a t a b l e o f random nu mb e r s , drawing an i n i t i a l starting a random s a mp l e f r om e a c h d i s t r i c t was c h o s e n . f o r b o t h day and e v e n i n g c l a s s e s , courses, we r e arranged as we l l as v o c a t i o n a l alphabetically, and every and a c a d e m i c third i n e a c h AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m d u r i n g s p r i n g been o b t a i n e d . The t o t a l the Class A d i s t r i c t , Class C district. provided for enrollees Selection for each of of the analysis, The r e s e a r c h the class three whi c h t e r m 1991 had school not s a mpl e o f 65% o f t h e three rural 30 f r om and 10 f r om t h e rural woul d districts of 65% o f t h e i n c l u d e d 60 r e s p o n d e n t s : 20 f r om t h e C l a s s B d i s t r i c t , comparative been p o s s i b l e . s a mpl e for Class l i s t s s t u d e n t s was s e l e c t e d t o c o m p l e t e t h e q u e s t i o n n a i r e u n t i l students point districts otherwise spring term surveyed g e n e r a l i z a t i o n s t o be f o r m u l a t e d r e g a r d i n g t.he t o t a l ha ve 1991 allowed population. The I n s t r u m e n t The r e s e a r c h e r f i r s t d e v e l o p e d a p i l o t s u r v e y i n s t r u m e n t , whi c h was a d m i n i s t e r e d t o t e n AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s i n t h e C l a s s A school d i s t r i c t of these selected for this students, study. and a f t e r d e t e r m i n i n g Bas ed on t h e s u g g e s t i o n s the approximate time r e q u i r e d t o complete the survey i n st r u m e n t, slight m odifications a c c o mp a n y i n g and cover the in survey. letter to the instrument The r e s e a r c h e r university and then professors, administrators, and t e a c h e r s in education, reviewed questionnaire val i d i t y . who the the field of to length of t h e r e s e a r c h e r made the gave cover the instrument c ommuni t y adult and ensure letter education continuing its content 38 The final version of the t h a t we r e d e s i g n e d t o e l i c i t Ap p e n d i x B ) . questionnaire contained the necessary data for t h i s before study enrolling in the AHS c o m p l e t i o n age, spouse’s educational level, race, last program, c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m i n wh i c h r e s p o n d e n t s we r e e n r o l l e d , status, items (see De mogr a phi c i n f o r m a t i o n was g a t h e r e d t h r o u g h a s e r i e s of q u e stio n s p e r t a i n i n g to the res p o n d e n ts ’ gender, completed 20 grade the AHS t h e i r marital fam ily income, and e mpl oyme nt s t a t u s . Data students also we r e pertaining the ways in those people respondents to return had return to helped the to school the as retention we l l asked whe n as they barriers whi c h 1990- 91 academic y e a r , whether they had p e o p l e who students terms the did. that to Additional decision. had number o f y e a r s had c h o s e n survey items i n t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n enrollment. attending and f a c t o r s t h a t had e n c o u r a g e d of e n ro llin g respondents discontinued t h e y had be e n e n r o l l e d , make c l a s s r o o m and why s t u d e n t s concerned the perceived b e n e f i t s program, whi c h in s t u d e n t s ’ d e c i s i o n s t o r e t u r n t o s c h o o l, F u r t h e r items ad dressed t he m o t i v a t i o n a l to to had become a wa r e o f t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m , had b e e n i n f l u e n t i a l how gathered Items attending related during t h e y had t a k e n during any term to the classes, in whi c h and f a c t o r s t h a t e n c o u r a g e d t hem t o s t a y in school. D a t a - C o l l e c t i o n Met hods the Before c o l l e c t i n g the data for th is study f r om was sought the study, University approval Co mmi t t e e to on conduct Research 39 Involving Human S u b j e c t s Appendix A) . directors of Class AHS B, The the researcher communi t y and C l a s s gave t h e i r That then in permission. was g r a n t e d permission departments districts students approval sought education C school completion-program directors (UCRIHS). to those in the districts. The r e s e a r c h e r f r om the administer (see the Class A, survey to Al l and t h e three communi t y education d i r e c to r s a g r e e d on t i m e s and d a t e s f o r a d m i n i s t e r i n g survey instrum ent. Each communi t y e d u c a t i o n d i r e c t o r was p r o m i s e d a copy of the completed dissertation in appreciation of the their anticipated cooperation. The i n v e s t i g a t o r p e r s o n a l l y during class times administering the cover l e t t e r , to survey, administered insure a 100% the survey return instrument rate. Before the r e s e a r c h e r read aloud t o s tu d e n t s the s t r e s s i n g t h a t t h e i r a n o n y m i t y and t h e c o n f i d e n t i a l i t y o f t h e i r r e s p o n s e s wo u l d be m a i n t a i n e d . After students, the completed survey instruments we r e collected f r om t h e s u r v e y s w e r e number e d and c o l o r c o d e d by d i s t r i c t , for d a ta - a n a ly s is purposes. Data-A nalvsis Procedures The q u e s t i o n n a i r e for computer mode s , and Statistical r e s p o n s e s we r e e n t e r e d analysis. frequencies, Package analyzing the d ata. for Descriptive we r e the used Social onto statistics, in analyzing Sciences IBM punch such the (SPSS-X) as cards mea ns , data. was The r e s u l t s a r e p r e s e n t e d i n C h a p t e r IV. used The in CHA PT E R IV PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF THE DATA Introduction The data that were q u e s t i o n s posed in t h i s collected to answer the each r e s e a r c h q u e s t i o n i s r e s t a t e d , results data supplement the the research study are presented in t h i s c h a p t e r . following pages, of seven analysis narrative pertaining report, the data In t h e f o l l o w e d by t h e to that question. are also presented To in a ta b u la r format. The t o t a l rural and school 10 random f r om s a mp l e i n c l u d e d 60 r e s p o n d e n t s : district, 20 f r om t h e the C rural s a mp l e Class represented program s t u d e n t s enrolled Class school 65% o f the 30 f r om t h e C l a s s A B rural school district, district. This stratified number AHS in t h o s e d i s t r i c t s of during completion- spring term of t h e 1990- 91 s c h o o l y e a r . Findings P e r ta i n in g to the Research Questions De mo g r a p h i c C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s Research Question 1 : What are the demographic characteristics of the AHS completion-program population? The q u e s t i o n n a i r e characteristics addressed in the of the study contained nine respondents. we r e gender items The (Item 40 pertaining to demographic 1), age (Item personal variables 2), last 41 grade completed at respondent wa s educational level family i ncome findings time of enrolled enrollment (Item 4), (Item m arital of r e s p o n d e n t ’ s spouse (Item regarding 11), each and of program status (Item 9), e mpl oyme nt these 3), status characteristics race (Item are in wh i c h (Item 8), (Item 10), 12). The discussed in the following paragraphs. Gender. Of t h e t o t a l male. Similarly, tions, a district, in each o f t h e preponderance of 72% w e r e f e m a l e and 28% ( 1 7 ) we r e three females school was district found. In 26% more f e m a l e s t h a n m a l e s p a r t i c i p a t e d the Class B d i s t r i c t , ents, sample, and i n t h e C l a s s ma l e r e s p o n d e n t s classifica­ the Class in t h e st u d y . A In t h e r e we r e 50% mor e f e m a l e t h a n ma l e r e s p o n d ­ C district, there we r e 80% more f e m a l e t h a n (see Table 4 . 1 ) . T a b l e 4 . 1 . - - D i s t r i b u t i o n o f r e s p o n d e n t s by g e n d e r (N = 6 0 ) . District Total Ge nde r Class B Class A No. Femal e Male Total % No. Class C % No. % 19 11 63.0 37.0 15 5 75.0 25.0 9 1 90.0 10.0 30 100.0 20 100.0 10 100.0 No. % 43a 17 72.0 28.0 60 100.0 a Modal c a t e g o r y . Age. 18- 27 y e a r s , F i v e age c a t e g o r i e s 28-37 y e a r s , we r e 38-47 y e a r s , included on t h e 48-57 y e a r s , questionnaire: and 58 y e a r s and 42 above. Most o f t h e r e s p o n d e n t s (55% o r 33) we r e 18 t o 27 y e a r s o l d . Onl y 3% ( 2) we r e 58 y e a r s o r o l d e r ( s e e T a b l e 4 . 2 ) . T a b l e 4 . 2 . - - D i s t r i b u t i o n o f r e s p o n d e n t s by a ge (N = 6 0 ) . District Total Class A Age No. % 20 5 4 1 0 67.0 17.0 13.0 3.0 0.0 30 100.0 18-27 y e a r s 28-37 y e a r s 38-47 y e a rs 48-57 y e a r s 58 and o l d e r Total Class B No. Class C No. % 40.0 20.0 10.0 30.0 0.0 33a 10 9 6 2 55.0 17.0 15.0 10.0 3.0 100.0 60 100.0 % No. % 9 3 4 2 2 45.0 15.0 20.0 10.0 10.0 4 2 1 3 0 20 100.0 10 aModal c a t e g o r y . Last response grade com pleted. categories for The last questionnaire grade completed a t i n t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m: eighth, other. 33. 3% Of the respondents respectively. completed enrolling the total had Just sample, completed 13. 4% ( 8) eighth and the ninth, ( 20) tenth and and contained time tenth, of enrollment eleventh, 28. 3% ( 17) eleventh of grades, respectively, i n t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m ( s e e T a b l e 4 . 3 ) . and the grades, and 18.3% ( 11) o f t h e r e s p o n d e n t s ninth five had before 43 T able 4 . 3 . --Distribution of respondents by last grade c ompleted (N = 60). D istrict Total Class A L a s t Gr a de Co mp l e t e d No. Eighth grade Ninth grade Tenth g r a de Eleventh grade Other Total Class B % No. Class C % No. No. % 8 11 20d 17 4 13.4 18.3 33.3 28.3 6.7 % 3 5 10 12 0 10.0 17.0 33.0 40.0 0.0 3 4 6 5 2 15.0 20.0 30.0 25.0 10.0 2 2 4 0 2 20.0 20.0 40.0 0.0 20.0 30 100.0 20 100.0 10 100.0 60 100.0 a Modal c a t e g o r y . Pr ogr a m contained both. i n wh i c h three respondent response According to was categories the enrolled. The for enrollment: questionnaire responses, questionnaire GED, AHS, 60% ( 36) of and the r e s p o n d e n t s had d e t e r m i n e d t o p u r s u e an AHS d i p l o m a a s o p p o s e d t o a GED c e r t i f i c a t e . that their goal However , was to 27% ( 16) attain of both the respondents a GED c e r t i f i c a t e indicated and an AHS diploma (see Table 4 . 4 ) . Marital The response wi dowe d, single, status and choices and d i v o r c e d . 46. 7% ( 28) educational for marital level status Forty percent we r e m a r r i e d , ( 24) 11.6% ( 7) ( 1) had b e e n wi dowed ( s e e T a b l e 4 . 5 ) . of respondent’s we r e of the single, spouse. married, r e s p o n d e n t s we r e we r e d i v o r c e d , and 1.7% 44 Table 4 . 4 . --Dis t ri b ut io n of respon de n ts by progr a m in w hich they were enrolled (N = 60). D istrict Total Place Pr o g r a m A Class B Place P No. No. % No. % No. % % AHS Bot h GED 22 4 4 73.4 13.3 13 . 3 7 9 4 35.0 45.0 20.0 7 3 0 70.0 30.0 0.0 36a 16 8 60.0 27.0 13.0 Total 30 100.0 20 100.0 10 100.0 60 100.0 a Modal c a t e g o r y . T a b l e 4 . 5 . - - D i s t r i b u t i o n o f r e s p o n d e n t s by m a r i t a l status (N = 6 0 ) . District Total Marital Place Status A Class B Place P No. No. % No. % No. % % Married Single Divorced Widowed 12 13 5 0 40.0 43.0 17.0 0.0 9 8 2 1 45.0 40.0 10.0 5.0 7 3 0 0 70.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 Total 30 100.0 20 100.0 10 100.0 28a 24 7 1 60 46.7 40.0 11.6 1.7 100.0 a Modal c a t e g o r y . Response follows: diploma, choices for spouse’s did not complete high sc h o o l, some c o l l e g e c o u r s e s , educational level were GED c e r t i f i c a t e / h i g h b a c h elo r’s degree, and o t h e r . as school Of t h e 45 28 m a r r i e d not respondents, completed high 43% ( 1 2 ) school. indicated Thirty-two that percent their ( 9) spouses said that had their s p o u s e s had f i n i s h e d some c o l l e g e wor k ( s e e T a b l e 4 . 6 ) . T a b l e 4 . 6 . - - D i s t r i b u t i o n o f r e s p o n d e n t s by s p o u s e s ’ e d u c a t i o n a l l e v e l s (N = 2 8 ) . District Total Marital Status Class A No. Di d n o t c o m p l e t e high school GED/ di pl oma Some c o l l e g e Bachelor’ s degree Total Class B % No. Class C % No. % 4 3 4 1 33.3 25.0 33.3 8.4 5 2 2 0 56.0 22.0 22.0 0.0 3 1 3 0 43.0 14.0 43.0 0.0 12 100.0 9 100.0 7 100.0 No. % 12a 6 9 1 43.0 21.0 32.0 4.0 28 100.0 a Modal c a t e g o r y . Race. The identification; respondents were homogeneous 97% ( 58) we r e C a u c a s i a n . included income. response in t h e q u e s t i o n n a i r e : $14,001-$18,000, percent Five ( 21) than $10,000, $18,001-$22,000, of the respondents for family $10,000, over had an a n n u a l and a n o t h e r 35% ( 21) i ncome a bove $ 2 2 , 0 0 1 than and of i ncome (8%) we r e $ 1 0 , 0 0 1 - $ 1 4 , 0 00, $22,001. family Thirty-five i ncome o f l e s s r e p o r t e d h a v i n g an a n n u a l (se e Table 4 . 8 ) . racial (see Table 4 . 7 ) . choices less terms J u s t t wo r e s p o n d e n t s i d e n t i f i e d t h e m s e l v e s a s Ame r i c a n I n d i a n s Family in family 46 Table 4 . 7 . --Distribution of res po n de n ts by race (N = 60). D istrict Total Class A Race Class B Class C No. Caucasian Ame r i c a n I n d i a n Total No. % No. % 29 1 97.0 3.0 19 1 95.0 5.0 10 0 100.0 0.0 58a 2 30 100.0 20 100.0 10 100.0 60 No. % % 97.0 3.0 100.0 a Modal c a t e g o r y . T a b l e 4 . 8 . - - D i s t r i b u t i o n o f r e s p o n d e n t s by a n n u a l (N = 6 0 ) . f a m i l y i ncome D istrict Total F a m i l y Income Class A No. Le s s t h a n $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $10,001-$14,000 $14,001-$18,000 $18,001-$22,000 Over $ 2 2 , 0 0 1 Total % Class B No. Class C % No. No. % 21a 10 6 2 21a 35.0 17.0 10.0 3.0 35.0 % 12 6 4 0 8 40.0 20.0 13.0 0.0 27.0 6 3 0 2 9 30.0 15.0 0.0 10.0 45.0 3 1 2 0 4 30.0 10.0 20.0 0.0 40.0 30 100.0 20 100.0 10 100.0 60 100.0 a Modal c a t e g o r i e s . Employment s t a t u s . f o r e mpl oyme nt s t a t u s : off, and u n e mp l o y e d . The q u e s t i o n n a i r e c o n t a i n e d f o u r c a t e g o r i e s e mpl oye d f u l l time, e mp l o y e d p a r t t i m e , Most o f t h e r e s p o n d e n t s (60% o r 36) laid indicated 47 that they time, and percent we r e employed. another ( 22) of Thirty 30% ( 18) the we r e percent working respondents, (18) part h o we v e r , we r e working time. we r e full Thirty-seven une mp l o y e d (see Table 4 . 9 ) . T a b l e 4 . 9 . - - D i s t r i b u t i o n o f r e s p o n d e n t s by e mpl oyme nt s t a t u s (N = 6 0 ) . D istrict Total Empl oyment Status Class A No. Empl oyed f u l l t i m e Empl oyed p a r t t i m e Laid o f f Unempl oyed Total Class B No. % Class C No. % No. % 18a 18a 2 22 30.0 30.0 3.0 37.0 % 9 8 2 11 30.0 26.7 6.7 36.6 6 6 0 8 30.0 30.0 0.0 40.0 3 4 0 3 30.0 40.0 0.0 30.0 30 100.0 20 100.0 10 100.0 60 100.0 a Modal c a t e g o r i e s . How P a r t i c i p a n t s Became Aware o f AHS C o m p l e t i o n Pr o g r a ms Research Question 2 . How were participants made aware of AHS completion programs? Eleven sources through a wa r e o f AHS c o m p l e t i o n (Item 13). friends, radio, information other. T h e s e we r e given whi c h programs a teacher television, respondents we r e or in the administrator newspaper, t o you f r om t h e listed could flyer school, or in h a ve questionnaire the pamphlet, billboards, were ranked first among the sources of program, family, posters, R e s p o n d e n t s c o u l d i n d i c a t e more t h a n one s o u r c e . pamphlets become and Flyers or inform ation 48 regarding AHS c o m p l e t i o n programs ( 32 o f 125 Ra n k i n g s e c o n d and t h i r d we r e i n f o r m a t i o n friends, with 18. 4% ( 2 3 ) and 17.6% ( 22) tively. At t h e o t h e r end o f t h e s c a l e , responses or 2 5 . 6 %) . s e n t home f r o m s c h o o l of the radio, responses, television, and respec­ posters, and b i l l b o a r d s r a n k e d e x t r e m e l y l ow; j u s t t h r e e o r f e w e r r e s p o n d e n t s indicated that prompting t h e i r these publicity return to school. avenues had been The r e s p o n s e s meaningful to this in item are shown i n T a b l e 4 . 1 0 . T a b l e 4 . 1 0 . - - S o u r c e s t h r o u g h whi c h p a r t i c i p a n t s became a wa r e o f t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s (N = 6 0 ) . District Total Source Class A No. Flyer/pamphlet I n f o , f r om s c h o o l Friends F a mi l y Ne ws pa pe r Teacher/admin. Billboards Posters O t h e r 13 Total Note. % Class B No. % Class C No. No. % 32a 23 22 18 13 10 2 2 3 25.6 18.4 17.6 14.4 10.4 8.0 1.6 1.6 2.4 % 20 13 12 7 6 5 2 2 2 29.0 19.0 17.0 10.0 9.0 7.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 10 7 7 7 5 3 0 0 1 25.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 13.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2 3 3 4 2 2 0 0 0 13.0 18.0 18.0 25.0 13.0 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69 100.0 40 100.0 16 100.0 125 100.0 R e s p o n d e n t s c o u l d c h e c k more t h a n one a n s w e r . aModal c a t e g o r y . ^ R e s p o n s e s w r i t t e n i n u n d e r " o t h e r " we r e " a w a r e n e s s t h r o u g h j u d i c i a l s y s t e m " (1 r e s p o n d e n t f r om t h e C l a s s A d i s t r i c t and 1 r e s p o n d e n t f r o m t h e C l a s s B d i s t r i c t ) and " a w a r e n e s s t h r o u g h e m p l o y e r " (1 r e s p o n d e n t f r om t h e C l a s s A d i s t r i c t ) . 49 Three respondents AHS c o m p l e t i o n indicated program t h r o u g h made a wa r e o f t h e that t h e y had become a wa r e other program through sources. Two s a i d the ju d ic ia l system, of they the we r e and one was made a wa r e o f t h e e x i s t e n c e o f s u c h a p r o g r a m by an e m p l o y e r . I n d i v i d u a l s Who Were I n f l u e n t i a l R e s p o n d e n t s ’ R e t u r n t o Sc hool in Research Question 3 . Who was influential school of AHS completion-program students? Survey p a r t i c i p a n t s we r e a s k e d t o who ha d be e n i n f l u e n t i a l 14). Possible friends, all of the persons in t h e i r d e c i s i o n t o r e t u r n to school responses relatives, identify in the return to included parents, school children, counselor, spouse, and (Item teacher, other. The r e s p o n s e s a r e shown i n T a b l e 4 . 1 1 . Parents influential total we r e ranked with 16% ( 19) Th o s e who we r e l e a s t However , and Sixteen respondents school. place to friends 14% ( 17) influential t o s c h o o l we r e c h i l d r e n , listed first in r e s p o n d e n t s ’ r e t u r n 120 r e s p o n s e s . behind, in as school, and of the the with person(s) 17% ( 20) relatives responses, ranked of the close respectively. in r e s p o n d e n t s ’ d e c i s i o n w i t h 7% ( 8) o f t h e t o t a l mos t to return responses. i n d ic a te d t h a t i n d i v i d u a l s o t h e r than those in t h e q u e s t i o n n a i r e had be e n i n f l u e n t i a l in t h e i r r e t u r n to Ten o f t h e s e r e s p o n d e n t s s a i d t h a t t h e i r e m p l o y e r s had been influential, three c ite d a judge, and t h r e e m e n t i o n e d a m i n i s t e r . 50 T a b l e 4 . 1 1 . - - P e r s o n s who we r e i n f l u e n t i a l i n r e s p o n d e n t s ’ d e c i s i o n t o r e t u r n t o s c h o o l (N = 6 0 ) . D istrict Total Class A Person No. Parents Friends Relatives Sc hool c o u n s e l o r Spouse Teacher Children Other Total Note. Class B % No. Class C No. % No. % 20a 19 17 15 13 12 8 16 17.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 11.0 10.0 7.0 13.0 % 10 11 11 9 8 9 3 7 15.0 16.4 16.4 13.4 12.0 12.0 4.4 10.4 6 6 4 6 3 2 4 7 16.0 16.0 10.5 16.0 8.0 5.0 10.5 18.0 4 2 2 0 2 2 1 2 26.7 13.3 13.3 0.0 13.3 13.3 6.8 13.3 67 100.0 38 100.0 15 100.0 120 100.0 R e s p o n d e n t s c o u l d c h e c k more t h a n one a n s w e r . a Modal c a t e g o r y . ^Responses w r i t t e n in under " o th e r " were "em ployer" (4 r e s p o n d e n t s f r om t h e C l a s s A d i s t r i c t , 5 r e s p o n d e n t s f r o m t h e C l a s s B d i s t r i c t , and 1 r e s p o n d e n t f r om t h e C l a s s C d i s t r i c t ) , " j u d g e " (1 r e s p o n d e n t f r om e a c h o f t h e t h r e e d i s t r i c t s ) , and " m i n i s t e r " (2 r e s p o n d e n t s f r om t h e C l a s s A d i s t r i c t and 1 r e s p o n d e n t f r om t h e Class B d i s t r i c t ) . As shown differed in Table Respondents primarily by f r i e n d s or 10). from and Class the counselor (all Class relatives in the with B r e s p o n d e n t s who c h o s e A district (both B respondents i n f l u e n c e d p r i m a r i l y by o t h e r s school respondents three districts i n t e r m s o f t h e p e r s o n s who mos t i n f l u e n c e d t h e i r r e t u r n t o school. (15% 4.11, 16. 4% o r indicated 11) "other" category, influenced and that (18% o r 9) and p a r e n t s , 16% o r 6 r e s p o n s e s ) . the we r e parents they friends, were and Of t h e s e v e n C l a s s five we r e influenced 51 t o r e t u r n t o school minister. Class influential. found to by t h e i r e m p l o y e r s , C respondents listed one by a j u d g e , parents ( 26. 7% o r 4) Five o f t h e seven remaining c a t e g o r i e s , be e q u a l l y influential in these and one by a a s mos t h o we v e r , we r e respondents’ decision to return to school. Respondents a l s o were asked t o had h e l p e d t hem t h e mo s t to specify option how t h i s of parents, choosing children, respondents relatives. in t h e i r d e c i s i o n person school the had t hem the to single return (Item teacher, of "other," tabulation of to friends, who school and Gi ve n the relatives, 23% ( 14) o f t h e whereas responses person 15). o r o t h e r a s mos t h e l p f u l , category A complete helped counselor, spouse, chose identify 22% ( 13) to this chose item is the 14 p resented in Table 4.12. Wi t h regard respondents listed their to in t h e "employer" decision responses total in the "other" category, s a mp l e who c h o s e t h i s response, of 57. 2% (8) a s t h e s i n g l e p e r s o n who had b e e n mos t h e l p f u l to return to school. "Judge" and "minister" in we r e l i s t e d by t h r e e r e s p o n d e n t s e a c h ( 2 1 . 4 %) . A c o m p a r i s o n o f t h e r e s p o n s e s o f C l a s s A, B, and C p a r t i c i p a n t s indicated that the relatives as t h e decision to return checked t h e the seven identified largest single person to school. category of Class percentage who had "other" one be e n mo s t helpful in chose their The m a j o r i t y o f C l a s s B p a r t i c i p a n t s B respondents "employer," of Class A respondents in response who identified chose to this this "judge," and question. category, one Of five identified 52 "minister" their as the decision respondents relatives, single to were parents, person return to equally who had been school. The distributed spouse, mo s t influential answers among of four in Class C categories: and o t h e r . T a b l e 4 . 1 2 . - - S i n g l e p e r s o n who was mos t h e l p f u l i n r e s p o n d e n t s ’ d e c i s i o n t o r e t u r n t o s c h o o l (N = 6 0 ) . District Total Class A Person No. Relatives Friends Spouse Sc hool c o u n s e l o r Parents Teacher Children O t h e r 13 Total Class C Class B % No. % No. No. % 13 9 8 6 5 3 2. 14b 22.0 15.0 13.0 10.0 9.0 5.0 3.0 23.0 % 9 6 4 3 0 2 1 5 30.0 20.0 13.3 10.0 0.0 6.7 3.0 17.0 2 2 2 3 3 1 0 7 10.0 10.0 10.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 0.0 35.0 2 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 20.0 10.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30 100.0 20 100.0 10 100.0 60 100.0 a Modal c a t e g o r y . ^Responses w r itte n in under " o th e r " were "employer" (2 r e s p o n d e n t s f r om t h e C l a s s A d i s t r i c t , 5 r e s p o n d e n t s f r om t h e C l a s s B d i s t r i c t , and 1 r e s p o n d e n t f r om t h e C l a s s C d i s t r i c t ) , " j u d g e " (1 r e s p o n d e n t f r om e a c h o f t h e t h r e e d i s t r i c t s ) , and " m i n i s t e r " (2 r e s p o n d e n t s f r om t h e C l a s s A d i s t r i c t and 1 r e s p o n d e n t f r om t h e Cl a s s B di s t r i c t ) . In the describe in influential helped t he m. second their in part own their For of Item wo r d s decision analysis how to 15, the participants person return purposes, to who school we r e had asked be e n actually respondents’ written to mos t had answers 53 we r e c a t e g o r i z e d a s ( a ) t h i s p e r s o n p r o v i d e d e n c o u r a g e m e n t , ( b) t h i s p e r s o n h e l p e d me k e e p my own m o t i v a t i o n , and ( c ) this me the respondents stay out identified of jail. Forty-two of "providing encouragement," " h e l p e d me keep my own m o t i v a t i o n , " "staying out influential of in jail" the as the decision 17 r e s p o n d e n t s and way to 60 person helped ( 28. 3%) listed ( 1. 7%) listed 1 respondent in which return to (70%) the person school had most been of assistance. F a c to rs That A s s i s t e d in the R e s p o n d e n t s ’ R e t u r n t o Sc hool Research Question 4 . What factors assisted in the return to school of AHS completion-program students? In Item check a l l return 16 on the of the f a c to rs to school. diploma, increase family job but that school, or feel takes to had h e l p e d promotion, listed were t hem i n t h e i r for asked to decision to respondents me e t to gain new p e o p l e general and information i n y o u r c ommuni t y and s o c i e t y , about y o u r s e l f , special obtain participants to check h e l p c h i l d r e n w i t h s c h o o l wor k, wa nt a h i g h i n c o me , t o become more u s e f u l you t h i n k that Categories included the following: school questionnaire, training, e mp l o y me n t , and to go i n t o your job other make and k n o wl e d g e , to i mp r o v e how a field pays reasons friends, you wh i c h for I like being (respondents in we r e asked t o s p e c i f y ) . As shown i n T a b l e 4 . 1 3 , 19.1% ( 50) of the 261 total " wa nt a h i g h s c h o o l responses as a diploma" factor received influencing 54 respondents’ decision concept 16% (to ( 42) of to return the school. i mp r o v e how you t h i n k o r f e e l the responses as p a rtic ip a n ts ’ decision to return of to responses, "gaining chosen as being i n f l u e n t i a l an I mpr ove me nt about y o u r s e l f ) influential to school. general of factor However , information and self- received affecting i n 13. 8% ( 36) k n o wl e d g e " was in t h e d e c i s i o n t o r e t u r n t o sc ho ol . Table 4 . 1 3 . - - F a c t o r s t h a t helped re s po nd e nt s in t h e i r d e c i s i o n to r e t u r n t o s c h o o l (N = 6 0 ) . D istrict Tr>+ a 1 Factor Place No. Hi gh s c h o o l d i p l o m a I mpr ove s e l f - c o n c e p t Ga i n i n f o r m a t i o n Special t r a i n in g for preferred field Meet p e o p l e O b t a i n empl oyme nt I n c r e a s e i ncome Job promotion Be u s e f u l i n com­ munity He l p c h i l d r e n w i t h s c h o o l wor k Job pays t o a t t e n d Otherb Total Note. A % Place No. R % Place No. P No. % 19. 1 16.0 13.8 % 26 19 16 19.0 14.0 11.3 16 14 12 20.8 18. 1 15.6 8 9 8 18.2 20.4 18.2 50a 42 36 13 12 12 12 9 9.0 8.5 8.5 8.5 6.0 9 5 5 5 6 11.7 6.5 6.5 6.5 7.8 2 5 5 2 0 4.5 11.4 11.4 4.5 0.0 24 22 22 19 15 9.2 8.4 8.4 7.3 5.7 12 8.5 1 1.3 1 2.3 14 5.4 6 1 2 4.3 1.0 1.4 2 2 2.6 0.0 2.6 3 1 0 6.8 2.3 0.0 11 2 4 4.2 1.0 1.5 140 100.0 77 100.0 44 100.0 261 100.0 0 R e s p o n d e n t s c o u l d c h e c k more t h a n one a n s w e r . a Modal c a t e g o r y . ^ R e s p o n s e s w r i t t e n i n u n d e r " o t h e r " we r e " c o l l e g e p r e p a r a t i o n " (1 r e s p o n d e n t f r om t h e C l a s s A d i s t r i c t ) , " g r a d u a t e b e f o r e my d a u g h t e r (1 r e s p o n d e n t f r o m t h e C l a s s B d i s t r i c t ) , " k e e p p r o m i s e t o my f a m i l y " (1 r e s p o n d e n t f r om t h e C l a s s A d i s t r i c t ) , and "new a s p e c t s o f j o b " (1 r e s p o n d e n t f r om t h e C l a s s B d i s t r i c t ) . 55 Categories with the fewest responses included you f o r being responses), in and responses). school (c) helping In t h e influencing these (1% o r 2 r e s p o n s e s ) , children category four of with "other," respondents’ ( b) other school wor k ( 1. 5% o r ( 4. 2% o r the motivational decision we r e ( a ) t o c o n t i n u e my e d u c a t i o n i n c o l l e g e , my d a u g h t e r , (a) y o u r j o b pays to return 4 11 factors to school (b) t o g r a d u a t e b e f o r e ( c ) t o ke e p a p r o m i s e made t o my f a m i l y t e n y e a r s ago, and ( d) new a s p e c t s o f my j o b and i n c r e a s e d r e s p e c t o f c o - w o r k e r s . A c o m p a r i s o n o f t h e r e s p o n s e s o f C l a s s A, B, and C p a r t i c i p a n t s w i t h r e g a r d t o f a c t o r s t h a t we r e h e l p f u l to school chose showed t h a t "high Nine Class motivational listed school a majority of the diploma" prime C participants factor, "high on Class A and m otivational "improved possible, diploma" whole, and "acquisition 21). diploma, Their be there chose answers a model needed a b e t t e r j o b , in Table 4.14, as a of to were for my information" as in t h e i r d e c i s i o n t o r e t u r n t o s c h o o l. was no m e a n i n g f u l a l s o we r e a s k e d t o why t h e y factor. self-concept" difference r e s p o n s e s o f C l a s s A, B, and C p a r t i c i p a n t s t o t h i s Respondents B respondents and e i g h t r e s p o n d e n t s f r om t h e C l a s s C d i s t r i c t school the asa chose f a c t o r s t h a t had been h e l p f u l However , in t h e i r d e c i s i o n t o r e t u r n return indicate, to grouped t o go t o c o l l e g e , no a s much d e t a i l they six categories: other and l e a r n the item. s c h o o l when into children, in in did as (Item get a responsibilities, to read. As shown 37% ( 22) o f t h e r e s p o n d e n t s s a i d t h e y c h o s e t o r e t u r n t o s c h o o l when t h e y d i d t o e a r n a d i p l o m a . The a t t a i n m e n t o f a h i g h 56 s c h o o l d i p l o m a may n o t a p p e a r t o be a m o t i v a t i o n a l with a s p e c i f i c time frame. high school wa s , for respondents ne e d t h a t we i g h e d h e a v i l y they did. The r e a s o n (7% o r 4 ) . need to Once learn enrollment, cited least although read only a t t h i s i t m i g h t be t h a t c o m p l e t i o n o f citing this in t h e d e c i s i o n again, to However , for a factor associated to frequently factor, return was an to i mm e d i a t e school learning to when read respondents may ha ve p e r c e i v e d relatively long period a before p o i n t had i t become a s t r o n g e nough n e e d t o motivate t h e i r return to school. T a b l e 4 . 1 4 . --Why p a r t i c i p a n t s 60). r e t u r n e d t o s c h o o l when t h e y d i d (N = D istrict Total Re as on Class A Class B Class C No. No. Get d i p l o m a Needed b e t t e r j o b Model f o r c h i l d r e n No o t h e r r e s p o n sibilities To go t o c o l l e g e Learn t o r e a d Total a Modal c a t e g o r y . No. 13 8 5 43.0 27.0 17.0 6 5 1 30.0 25.0 5.0 3 2 1 30.0 20.0 10.0 22a 15 7 37.0 25.0 11.0 3 1 0 10.0 3.0 0.0 3 4 1 15.0 20.0 5.0 1 0 3 10.0 0.0 30.0 7 5 4 11.0 9.0 7.0 30 100.0 20 100.0 10 100.0 60 100.0 % No. % % % 57 B e n e f i t s That A t t r a c t e d S t u d e n t s t o E n r o l l i n t h e AHS C o m p l e t i o n Pr ogr a m Re se a r c h Q u e s t i o n 5 . What benefits a t t r a c t e d s tudents to enroll in AHS completion programs? Respondents’ (i.e., selections perceived benefits) of for are p r e s e n t e d in Table 4. 1 5 . the t wo t hem t o mos t return important to school reasons (Item 17) A c o m p a r i s o n o f r e s p o n d e n t s ’ f i r s t and s e c o n d r e a s o n s i s shown i n T a b l e 4 . 1 6 . A review of r e s p o n d e n ts ’ f i r s t to school choice of reason for returning i n d i c a t e s t h a t 41. 7% o f t h e r e s p o n d e n t s w e r e a t t e n d i n g t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m p r i m a r i l y t o e a r n t h e i r h i g h s c h o o l d i p l o m a s . A review school of 1\spondents’ indicates second cho ice of reason for returning t h a t 21. 7% p e r c e i v e d an i mp r o v e d s e l f - c o n c e p t a s to a secondary b e n e f i t . These r e s u l t s 4.13, wh i c h are c o n s i s t e n t with illustrates that the chose r e c e i p t o f a high school decision highest which to return response is also to The as a m o t i v a t i n g as with the largest findings percentage shown of in Table respondents d i p l o m a as a f a c t o r m o t i v a t i n g t h e i r school. consistent the category factor was receiving i mp r o v e d respondents’ i mp r o v e d self-concept highest enrolling i n an AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m. rated the second self-concept, identification secondary benefit of of 58 T a b l e 4 . 1 5 . --Two mos t i m p o r t a n t r e a s o n s f o r r e t u r n i n g t o s c h o o l 60). (N = D istrict Total Reas on Class A Class B Class C No. No . % No . % No. % % Re a s on L i s t e d a s 1F i r s t Hi gh s c h o o l d i p l o m a I mp r o v e s e l f - c o n c e p t Ga i n i n f o r m a t i o n Preferred fie ld He l p c h i l d r e n w i t h s c h o o l wor k Meet p e o p l e O b t a i n e mpl oyme nt I n c r e a s e i ncome Job promotion Be u s e f u l i n c ommuni t y Job pays t o a t t e n d Total 17 2 4 1 56.7 6.7 13.4 3.3 8 4 1 4 40.0 20.0 5.0 20.0 0 2 2 0 0.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 1 0 2 1 0 1 1 3.3 0.0 6.7 3.3 0.0 3.3 3.3 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0.0 5.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 40.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30 1 0 0 . 0 20 1 0 0 . 0 10 1 0 0 . 0 25a 41.7 8 13.3 7 11.6 5 8.3 5 3 2 2 1 1 1 8.3 5.0 3.3 3.3 1.7 1.7 1.7 60 1 0 0 . 0 Re a s o n 1. i s t e d a s Second I mp r o v e s e l f - c o n c e p t O b t a i n empl oyme nt Ga i n i n f o r m a t i o n Special t r a i n i n g for preferred field Meet p e o p l e I n c r e a s e i ncome Hi gh s c h o o l d i p l o m a Job promotion Be u s e f u l i n c ommuni t y Job pays t o a t t e n d Total a Modal c a t e g o r y . 4 7 3 13.3 23.3 10.0 5 2 6 25.0 10.0 30.0 4 2 2 40.0 20.0 20.0 13a 2 1 . 7 11 1 8 . 3 11 1 8 . 3 7 4 3 0 2 0 0 23.3 13.3 10.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 2 0 1 3 0 0 1 10.0 0.0 5.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10 4 4 3 2 1 1 30 10 0 . 0 20 1 0 0 . 0 10 1 0 0 . 0 16.7 6.7 6.7 5.0 3.3 1.7 1.7 60 1 0 0 . 0 59 T a b l e 4 . 1 6 . - - C o m p a r i s o n o f two mos t i m p o r t a n t r e a s o n s f o r r e t u r n i n g t o s c h o o l (N = 6 0 ) . F i r s t Reas on Se c ond Reas on Reas on Hi gh s c h o o l d i p l o m a I mpr ove s e l f - c o n c e p t Ga i n i n f o r m a t i o n He l p c h i l d r e n w i t h s c h o o l wor k Special t r a i n in g for preferred field Meet p e o p l e I n c r e a s e i ncome O b t a i n empl oyment Be u s e f u l i n communi t y Job pays t o a t t e n d Job promotion Total No. % No. % 25a 8 7 5 41.7 13.3 11.6 8.3 3 13 11 0 5.0 2 1 . 7a 18.3 0.0 5 3 2 2 1 1 1 8.3 5.0 3.3 3.3 1.7 1.7 1.7 10 4 4 11 1 1 2 16.7 6.7 6.7 18.3 1.7 1.7 3.3 60 60 a Modal c a t e g o r i e s . A review perceived to of Tables be t h e r e t u r n t o school 4.15 least we r e "to and 4.16 important reveals reasons those prompting become more u s e f u l s o c i e t y " and " y o u r j o b p a y s you f o r b e i n g that factors respondents’ i n y o u r c ommuni t y and in s c h o o l," e a c h o f whi c h was c h o s e n by j u s t one r e s p o n d e n t ( 1 . 7 % ) . In c o m p a r i n g t h e responses o f C l a s s A, B, and C p a r t i c i p a n t s , i t c a n be s e e n t h a t t h e l a r g e s t p e r c e n t a g e s o f s t u d e n t s A and B d i s t r i c t s t o school was a c q u i s i t i o n respectively). in the indicated that Class C district t h e i r primary reason f o r r e t u r n in g of a high In c o n t r a s t , the (40%) in t h e Class school largest chose diploma percentage "helping ( 56. 7% and 40%, of respondents children s c h o o l wor k" a s t h e i r p r i m a r y r e a s o n f o r r e t u r n i n g t o s c h o o l . with 60 Further district, chose for investigation returning A and the school to diploma" school. Class returning to in responses a s shown i n T a b l e 4 . 1 5 , "the high Class of those as e i t h e r a first whereas C school the Class C second reason students the primary districts district or for s c h o o l was a c q u i s i t i o n o f a h i g h Class in i n d i c a t e d t h a t no s t u d e n t s u r v e y e d Th u s , B school by school attached in both reason diploma, minor the for those importance to a c q u i r i n g a high school diploma. Differences a l s o w e r e n o t e d among r e s p o n d e n t s f r om C l a s s A, B, and C d i s t r i c t s w i t h r e g a r d t o t h e i r s e c o n d a r y r e a s o n s f o r r e t u r n i n g to school. Wher e a s 23. 3% o f C l a s s A r e s p o n d e n t s m e n t i o n e d training for preferred field" those f r om t h e (30% and 20%, Class 40%, r e s p e c t i v e l y ) and " e mp l o y me n t " a s s e c o n d a r y r e a s o n s , B and C d i s t r i c t s respectively), "special and chose "improving "gaining information self-concept" (25% and as s e c o n d a r y r e a s o n s f o r t h e i r d e c i s i o n t o r e t u r n to school. When a s k e d t o c h e c k a l l t hem to times" ( 31) the of the adult and " c l o s e n e s s the respondents the adult of wrote in th e program cited respectively. education the child offered that (Item home" w e r e c h o s e n chose f i n a n c i a l responses to t h i s F our to respondents, and o n l y 2.6% ( 3) to education of the b e n e fits 18), by 32. 5% ( 37) However , assistance as c a r e as a b e n e f i t program. "variety only Atabulation of class and 27. 2% 1.8% ( 2) a perceived that attracted benefit, attracted of all of t hem of the qu e s tio n is pr e s e n te d in Table 4.17. five respondents who c h o s e " o p p o r t u n i t y t o me e t p e o p l e " the "other"category as a p e r c e i v e d b e n e f i t of 61 t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n jail" program. One r e s p o n d e n t listed "staying out of as a p e r c e i v e d b e n e f i t o f e n r o l l i n g in t h e program. T a b l e 4 . 1 7 . - - B e n e f i t s t h a t a t t r a c t e d r e s p o n d e n t s t o AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s (N = 6 0 ) . Di s t r i c t Total Benefit Class A No. Variety of class times C l o s e n e s s t o home Special courses Job i n fo rm a tio n Counseling Child care Financial a s s i s t . Otherb Total Note. Class B % No. Class C % No. No. % 37a 31 16 11 9 3 2 5 32.5 27.2 14.0 9.6 7.9 2.6 1.8 4.4 % 22 14 8 6 4 2 2 3 36.1 22.9 13. 1 9.8 6.6 3.3 3.3 4.9 10 12 5 3 4 0 0 1 28.6 34.3 14.3 8.6 11.4 0.0 0.0 2.8 5 5 3 2 1 1 0 1 27.7 27.7 16.7 11.1 5.6 5.6 0.0 5.6 61 100.0 35 100.0 18 100.0 114 100.0 R e s p o n d e n t s c o u l d c h e c k more t h a n one a n s w e r . a Modal c a t e g o r y . ^ R e s p o n s e s w r i t t e n i n u n d e r " o t h e r " we r e " o p p o r t u n i t y t o me e t p e o p l e " (2 r e s p o n d e n t s f r o m t h e C l a s s A d i s t r i c t , 1 r e s p o n d e n t f r om t h e C l a s s B d i s t r i c t , and 1 r e s p o n d e n t f r om t h e C l a s s C d i s t r i c t ) and " s t a y i n g o u t o f j a i l " (1 r e s p o n d e n t f r om t h e C l a s s A d i s t r i c t ) . In c o m p a r i n g t h e it c a n be s e e n t h a t chose responses students "variety of class o f C l a s s A, f r om a l l times" B, three g r o u p s mo s t f r e q u e n t l y and " c l o s e n e s s t o home" a s b e n e f i t s a t t r a c t i n g t he m t o t h e a d u l t e d u c a t i o n p r o g r a m . ( 22) Class of the respondents B district, and in t he 27. 7% and C p a r t i c i p a n t s , Class A d i s t r i c t , ( 5) in the Class Specifically, 28. 6% ( 10) C district 36. 1% in the chose 62 " v a r i e t y o f c l a s s t i m e s " a s a b e n e f i t t h a t a t t r a c t e d t he m t o t h e AHS completion program. Furthermore, the Class A d i s t r i c t , ( 5) 34. 3% ( 12) in the Class C d i s t r i c t 22. 9% ( 14) of the respondents in t h e Class B d i s t r i c t , chose "closeness to home" a s in and 27. 7% a benefit t h a t a t t r a c t e d t hem t o t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m. Perceived B arriers to P a r tic ip a tio n Research Question 6 . What factors prevented students from participating in AHS completion programs before this time? R e s p o n d e n t s we r e a s k e d t o indicate the factors they perceived t o h a v e be e n b a r r i e r s t o t h e i r e n r o l l m e n t i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s previously (Item 19). categories c h e c k e d mos t interested previously" whi c h r e c e i v e d tively. Responses are frequently as and 23. 7% ( 22) In c o n t r a s t , "child shown Table perceived and 22. 6% ( 21) 4.18. barriers care/family The were "not responsibilities," of the the category of " i l l the fewest respondents in responses, respec­ h e a l t h " was p e r c e i v e d by ( 3. 3% o r 3) t o h a ve b e e n a b a r r i e r t o e n r o l l ­ ment. Examination o f t he ten r es pon se s of " ot her" of the been persons a checking barrier to this response enrollment. in dicates t h a t four found t r a n s p o r t a t i o n Three of the to h a ve respondents had p r e v i o u s l y a t t e n d e d r e g u l a r high school as f u l l - t i m e s t u d e n t s , woul d of h a ve completion precluded programs persons indicated finish, and t h u s enrollment. the due possibility to state-mandated t h e y had assumed this Last, perception one their it had respondent woul d served said age enrollment in requirements. take as whi c h t hem t o o a barrier incarceration had AHS Two long to to their been a 63 barrier at to enrollment. Livingston Co u n t y c lo se st to the s it e s S i n c e AHS c o m p l e t i o n Jail and Jackson invo lve d in t h i s programs State study), Prison are provided (the jails i t c a n be a s s ume d t h a t t h e r e s p o n d e n t had be e n un a wa r e o f t h e e x i s t e n c e o f s uc h p r o g r a m s o r had be e n i n c a r c e r a t e d e l s e w h e r e . T a b l e 4 . 1 8 . - - F a c t o r s p r e v i o u s l y p r e v e n t i n g e n r o l l m e n t (N = 6 0 ) . District Total Factor Class A No. Not i n t e r e s t e d Child care/fam ily responsibilities Inconvenient p lac e s/ times fo r c la sse s Unawar e o f p r o g r a m previously Lack o f f a m i l y support to attend 111 h e a l t h 0therb Total Note. Class B % No. Class C No. % No. % % 8 17.5 8 28.6 5 35.7 22a 23.7 14 27.5 5 17.9 2 14 . 3 21 22.6 8 15.6 2 7.1 3 21.5 13 13.9 5 10.0 7 25.0 1 7.1 13 13.9 6 3 6 11.8 5.8 11.8 4 0 2 14.3 0.0 7.1 1 0 2 7.1 0.0 14 . 3 11 3 10 11.8 3.3 10.8 51 100.0 28 100.0 14 100.0 93 100.0 R e s p o n d e n t s c o u l d c h e c k more t h a n one a n s w e r . a Modal c a t e g o r y . ^ R e s p o n s e s w r i t t e n i n u n d e r " o t h e r " we r e " t r a n s p o r t a t i o n " (2 r e s p o n d e n t s f r o m t h e C l a s s A d i s t r i c t and 2 f r om t h e C l a s s C d i s t r i c t ) , " i n d a y s c h o o l " (2 r e s p o n d e n t s f r om t h e C l a s s A d i s t r i c t and 1 f r o m t h e C l a s s B d i s t r i c t ) , " a n t i c i p a t e d t o o l o n g t o f i n i s h (1 r e s p o n d e n t f r o m t h e C l a s s A d i s t r i c t and 1 f r om t h e C l a s s B d i s t r i c t ) , and " i n j a i l " (1 r e s p o n d e n t f r om t h e C l a s s A d i s t r i c t ) . A comparison o f t h e r es pon se s of p a r t i c i p a n t s and C districts reveals that a majority of the f r om C l a s s A, Class B and B, C 64 respondents previous ( 28. 6% [ 8] interest" and 35. 7% [ 5 ] , respectively) Class A district, responsibilities" "lack of as t h e b a r r i e r t h a t p r e v e n t e d t h e i r e n r o l l m e n t in AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s b e f o r e t h e t i m e o f t h i s from t h e cited mos t h o we v e r , frequently chose ( 27. 5% study. "child or Participants care 14) as and family the factor previously preventing t h e i r enrollment. Fa c to r s Encouraging R e te nti on R e s e a r c h Q u e s t i o n 7 . What f a c t o r s r e m a i n i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s ? Before remain tion discussing is presented. term, that program, encouraged related Table 4.19 c o n ta i n s 60% ( 36) had in t h i s also students demographic 1991-92 school informa­ year s t u d y who we r e a t t e n d i n g attended during fall term, to to i n f o r m a t i o n on t h e t e r m s took c la sse s during the Of t h e 60 r e s p o n d e n t s spring factors i n t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n wh i c h r e s p o n d e n t s 5). the have e n cour age d s t u d e n t s in (Item during and 68% (41) were in a t t e n d a n c e d u r i n g w i n t e r t er m. T a b l e 4 . 1 9 . - - P r e v i o u s t e r m s d u r i n g wh i c h t h e s t u d y p a r t i c i p a n t s t o o k AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m c l a s s e s (N = 6 0 ) . D istrict Total Term Class A No. Fall Winter Spring a Modal c a t e g o r y . 15 17 30 % 50.0 56.0 NA Class B No. 12 16 20 % 60.0 80.0 NA Class C No. 9 8 10 No. % 36 41a 60 60.0 68.0 NA % 90.0 80.0 NA 65 In c o m p a r i n g t h e a t t e n d a n c e p a t t e r n s o f p a r t i c i p a n t s f r om C l a s s A, B, and C d i s t r i c t s , participants also respectively; 60% i t was f o u n d t h a t had and attended during f a l l attended 80% of terms, during the respectively. had fall Class and w i n t e r t e r m s , o f t h e C l a s s A s a mp l e members 90% and 80% o f t h e C l a s s C and winter B respondents respectively; attended terms, also had and 50% and 56% during fall Thus, t h e s m a l l e r t h e d i s t r i c t , and w i n t e r t h e h i g h e r was the re te n tio n r a t e . Table respondents None o f the four years. 4.20 inform ation had b e e n e n r o l l e d respondents for 11. 7% ( 7) had had be e n a t t e n d i n g been for B, any one Table of 4.21 sample, a l s o were their the contains 76. 7% (46) for enrolled. 21. 7% ( 1 3 ) length of programs her (Item 6). p r o g r a m more than of the respondents had be e n a t t e n d i n g for time three years, No m e a n i n g f u l f o r two and 3. 3% differences as r e g a r d s had the (2) we r e length i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s . asked t o i n d i c a t e whether they in the wh i c h the answers of the discontinued attending the and C r e s p o n d e n t s attendance terms or 63. 3% ( 3 8 ) attending o f t i m e t h e y had b e e n e n r o l l e d discontinued his four years. a p p a r e n t among C l a s s A, Respondents in sample, one y e a r , on i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n had b e e n Of t h e t o t a l be e n a t t e n d i n g years, contains they to AHS c o m p l e t i o n had this respondents be e n said that ever program dur ing enrolled question. had Of they (Item the had 7). total not f o r any o f t h e t e r m s f o r whi c h t h e y had been 66 T a b l e 4 . 2 0 . - - L e n g t h o f t i m e r e s p o n d e n t s had b e e n e n r o l l e d i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s (N = 6 0 ) . District Total L e n g t h o f Time Class A Class B Class C No. No. 1 2 3 4 year years years years Total % No. % No. % % 21 6 3 0 70.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 10 5 4 1 50.0 25.0 20.0 5.0 7 2 0 1 70.0 20.0 0.0 10.0 30 100.0 20 100.0 10 100.0 38a 13 7 2 60 63.3 21.7 11.7 3.3 100.0 a Modal c a t e g o r y . Table 4 . 2 1 . --Respondents’ d i s c o n t in u a t io n of attendance during the t e r m s t h e y had be e n e n r o l l e d i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s (N = 6 0 ) . District Total Discontinuation Class A Class B Class C No. No. Yes No Total % No. % No. % % 22 8 73.3 26.7 17 3 85.0 15.0 7 3 70.0 30.0 30 100.0 20 100.0 10 100.0 46a 14 60 76.7 23.3 100.0 a Modal c a t e g o r y . The reasons discontinued th e ir for interruption attendance given by i n t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n those who had programs d u r i n g 67 one o r more o f t h e t e r m s f o r whi c h t h e y had b e e n e n r o l l e d a r e in Table 4.22 . who said cited Of t h e that their "personal another remaining three t wo 14 r e s p o n d e n t s attendance problems," ( 21. 4%) ( 14. 3%) three listed gave had been of health" the total s a mp l e ) six ( 42. 9%) interrupted, ( 21. 4%) "lack "ill ( 23. 3% o f stated " wor k schedule," transportation," as reasons shown for and the temporarily d i s c o n t i n u i n g t h e i r a t t e n d a n c e i n t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m . T a b l e 4 . 2 2 . - - R e a s o n s f o r d i s c o n t i n u a t i o n o f a t t e n d a n c e i n t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m (N = 1 4 ) . D istrict Total Re as on Class A Total Class C No. % 33.3 33.3 6a 3 42.9 21.4 1 0 33.3 0.0 3 2 21.4 14.3 3 99.9 14 100.0 % No. % No. % 3 1 37.5 12 . 5 2 1 66.7 33.3 1 1 2 2 25.0 25.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 8 1 0 0. 0 3 100.0 No. Pe rso na l problems Work s c h e d u l e Lack o f t r a n s p o r ­ tation 111 h e a l t h Class B aModal c a t e g o r y . A c o m p a r i s o n o f t h e r e s p o n s e s o f C l a s s A, B, and C p a r t i c i p a n t s reveals that interrupted However , districts between their b e t we e n had temporarily. attendance 15% found The 70% a n d and it Class 30% 85% of all respondents in t h e AHS completion of the respondents necessary B district to discontinue had t h e in their lowest had not program. the three attendance discontinuance 68 rate ( 15%) , whereas discontinuance the ( 30%) . Class C district districts the highest rate of The p e r c e n t a g e s f o r t h e C l a s s A d i s t r i c t we r e very c lo s e to those of the Class three had we r e very C district. similar in Respondents the reasons f r om t h e they gave for the AHS discontinuance. Factors that encouraged c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m ( I t e m 20) to the total sample, encouraged by 22. 4% their p a rtic ip a n ts ’ continuation are ( 40) shown i n T a b l e 4 . 2 3 . of teachers the to respondents remain in F o l l o w i n g c l o s e l y we r e f a m i l y and f r i e n d s ( 18. 9% o r 34 17. 3% (31) each) said continuation indicating and the the "other" cited and that the their retention as a six completion and c l a s s m a t e s retention. factor the AHS Another encouraging (3.4%) their respondents t h r e e c i t e d " ar med s e r v i c e s e l i g i b i l i t y " "court mandate" as o f C l a s s A, percentages respectively, continuation whereas t h e h i g h e s t perc enta ge classmates Of responses highest B respondents, encouraging was on t h e y we r e factors encouraging i n t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m. Co mp a r i s o n o f t h e reveals influences program. factors, three th eir retention positive self-satisfaction in other as Wi t h r e g a r d said the program. in having been an in B, and C p a r t i c i p a n t s ( 21. 9% and 24. 1%) chose the teachers as AHS c o m p l e t i o n of Class a i n t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m . factor factor program, ( 27. 6%) o f C l a s s C r e s p o n d e n t s influential A promoting chose their 69 T a b l e 4 . 2 3 . - - F a c t o r s e n c o u r a g i n g r e t e n t i o n i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s (N = 6 0 ) . District Total Class A Factor No. Teachers Classmates Family/friends Self-satisfaction College attendance O b t a i n e mpl oyme nt O t h e r 13 Total Note. Class B Class C % No. No. 21 21 20 17 12 9 2 21.9 15.6 20.8 17.7 12.5 9.4 2.1 13 11 10 11 6 2 1 24.1 20.4 18.5 20.4 11. 1 3.7 1.8 6 8 4 3 2 3 3 20.8 27.6 13.8 10.3 6.9 10.3 10.3 96 100.0 54 100.0 29 100.0 % No. % 40a 34 34 31 20 14 6 22.4 18.9 18.9 17.3 11.2 7.9 3.4 % 179 100.0 R e s p o n d e n t s c o u l d c h e c k more t h a n one a n s w e r . a Modal c a t e g o r y . ^ R e s p o n s e s w r i t t e n i n u n d e r " o t h e r " we re "armed f o r c e s e l i g i b i l i t y " (1 r e s p o n d e n t f r om e a c h o f t h e t h r e e d i s t r i c t s ) and " c o u r t m a n d a t e " (1 r e s p o n d e n t f r om t h e C l a s s A d i s t r i c t and 2 f r om t h e Cl a s s C di s t r i c t ) . Summary The f i n d i n g s o f t h e d a t a a n a l y s e s c o n d u c t e d f o r t h i s presented in Chapter questionnaires programs research in three question study, research, The d a t a we r e o b t a i n e d distributed findings pertaining of the IV. public posed in to 60 school the participants districts study to th a t question. a summary o f t h e conclusions drawn was f r om r e s p o n s e s in in stated, AHS to completion Michigan. followed Each by the C h a p t e r V c o n t a i n s a summary findings from t h e s t u d y we r e and c o m p a r i s o n t o findings, previous recommendations 70 pertaining research. t o AHS c o m p l e t i o n programs, and suggestions for further CHAPTER V SUMMARY, FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH Summary The researcher’s investigate the requirements completion a s s ume d recruitment are high programs in school in r u r a l of s uc h as enrolled in adults school the ha ve wa s not participate districts in Michigan. motivational we l l study to woul d in this who graduation programs students, already purpose motivating understanding participation who factors for that primary as ha ve for such the factors to met the in AHS It was encouraging implications for retention students programs. The of the research er’s s p e c i f i c o b j e c t i v e s we r e as f o l l o w s : 1. To identify the demographic characteristics of the AHS completion-program p opulation. 2. To d e t e r m i n e how p a r t i c i p a n t s we r e made a wa r e o f AHS com­ p l e t i o n programs. 3. To i d e n t i f y person(s) influential in the return to school in th e return to school o f AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s . 4. To i d e n t i f y factors that assisted o f AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s . 5. To identify program s t u d e n t s , "benefits," as perceived by AHS r e s u l t i n g f r om t h e i r r e t u r n t o s c h o o l . 71 completion- 72 6. To i d e n t i f y t h e f a c t o r s p e r c e i v e d by AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m students as barriers that previously prevented their enrollment in s uc h p r o g r a m s . 7. To d e t e r m i n e t h e f a c t o r s encouraging stu d e n ts to remain in AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s . A q u e s t i o n n a i r e was u s e d t o o b t a i n information f r om a s t r a t i ­ f i e d r andom s a mp l e o f 60 AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s i n s e l e c t e d C l a s s A, B, and C r u r a l school d i s t r i c t s in Michigan. Summary o f F i n d i n g s and Co mp a r i s o n t o P r e v i o u s R e s e a r c h Research Question 1 What are the demographic characteristics of the AHS completionprogram population? According to profile of the t h e demographic d a t a g a t h e r e d AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m b e t w e e n t h e a g e s o f 18 and 27, time; who was w o r k i n g was a either study, white part the female or full s h e had p r e v i o u s l y c o m p l e t e d t h e t e n t h g r a d e and was p u r s u i n g a high this student in t h i s school diploma as opposed to a GED c e r t i f i c a t e . Further, f e m a l e was m a r r i e d t o a man who a l s o had n o t c o m p l e t e d h i s h i g h school graduation requirements. provide conclusive $10,000" and "over The f a m i l y in fo rm atio n because the $22,001" both received i ncome c a t e g o r y d i d i ncome l e v e l s 21% o f "less the not than responses, whi c h we r e t h e h i g h e s t r e s p o n s e f i g u r e s f o r t h i s q u e s t i o n . De mo g r a p h i c findings f r om t h i s study Mo r a i n e V a l l e y Communit y C o l l e g e f a c u l t y Mize grade ( 1983) in regard completed. In to race, all gender, three paralleled (1982), Nickse e mpl oyme nt studies, the those of the (1976), and status, and l a s t preponderance of 73 students tenth we r e grade identified as white before en ro llin g Mo r a i n e Valley females who had and we r e e mp l o y e d a t Community College faculty completed least part (1982) the time. found the a v e r a g e AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t t o be 32 y e a r s o f a ge a t t h e time o f e n ro llm en t, enrollees, students age at Yates Nickse ( 1982) and Mize participants l i k e l y to e n r o l l . recent participants AHS study, the be t h e ( 19 8 3 ) in In t h i s t o 27 y e a r s o f age a t f o u n d 40 t o be t h e f ound 27 t o in her stud y, whi c h ( 1976) a ge o f identified completion a v e r a g e age o f the majority 26 y e a r s programs as we r e of the most a m a j o r i t y o f r e s p o n d e n t s we r e 18 time o f e n r o l l m e n t , i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n indicating programs tend to that more be y o u n g e r than t h e i r predecessors. As r e g a r d s the family V a l l e y Communit y C o l l e g e program participants ( 1976) of Although present study i ncome ("less mean of the $16,000. t wo an $10,000" 1982 and $ 1 4 , 0 0 0 and $16,000 in 1991 that respondents Y a t e s ( 1982) found in in this the had an in of $12,000, annual respondents categories $22,001"), an Mo r a i n e AHS c o m p l e t i o n - i ncome of lowest "over yields in annual number s Gi ve n t h e wage d i f f e r e n t i a l in of and categories that participants highest $12,000 found average identical the program p a r t i c i p a n t s , (1982) found t h a t checked than faculty had whereas Nickse $14,000. i ncome o f average annual 1976, the average study may be annual considered two a b o v e - m e n t i o n e d in of the a nn u a l calculating annual average i ncome i ncome the of i n c o me s o f i ncome of similar to studies. f o u n d $ 5 , 0 0 0 o r be l ow t o be t h e a v e r a g e a n n u a l Although i nc ome , 74 the majority u n e mp l o y e d , of respondents in whereas p a r t i c i p a n t s e i t h e r p a r t time or f u l l In t er ms ( 1982) ( 1976) to spouses Yates cant were not (1982), others" study pants in the e x a mi n e d t h e and f ound t h e had c o m p l e t e d r e q u i r e m e n t s this to to be largest for i t was f o u n d t h a t Valley Community found t h e p r e p o n d e r a n c e o f whereas be s i n g l e . Mize ( 1983) In t h i s study, and 40% we r e s i n g l e . educational included though, found s t u d y we r e e mpl oyed be m a r r i e d , students 46. 7% o f t h e s t u d e n t s we r e m a r r i e d , the also b o t h t h e Mo r a i n e and N i c k s e f o u n d mos t Da t a r e g a r d i n g we r e in t he p r e s e n t status, AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s ( 1982) study time. of marital College f a c u l t y and Y a t e s her level of studies the cited educational response a high school married students’ in research. this status category of (i.e., diploma. a majority of the 33. 6%) However , spouses i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s had n o t c o m p l e t e d t h e "signifi­ in of p a r t i c i ­ requirements f o r high school g r a d u a t i o n . Previously cited did not address studies, whether with the the exception educational of Yates (1982), aspirations of c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s we r e t o o b t a i n a GED c e r t i f i c a t e , school diploma, of respondents, as opposed obtained to or possibly across ABE o r all both. Yates e th n ic groups, AHS c o m p l e t i o n ( 1982) a high found t h e m a j o r i t y t o be e n r o l l e d programs. AHS However , i n t h e GED the data i n t h e s t u d y r e v e a l e d t h a t t h e m a j o r i t y o f AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s we r e p u r s u i n g a h i g h s c h o o l d i p l o m a . 75 Research Q uestion 2 How were participants made aware of AHS completion programs? Although previously cited researchers presented a clear d e m o g r a p h i c p i c t u r e o f t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t , they did not a wa r e address such t h e ways programs, "friends" been to ma d e with be and whi c h the the aware "Television," third, in exception primary of h o we v e r , study. Yates through and AHS "personal respectively, you f r om t h e c e n t e r " that GED, and awareness f o r p a r t i c i p a n t s in of means ABE, "fam ily," fourth, participants as in Y a t e s 's had b e e n (1982). whi c h Yates completion avenues of found participants contacts" study. made had programs. ranked second, providing program "Information given to r e c e i v e d o n l y a 4. 8% r e s p o n s e f r o m p a r t i c i p a n t s According "information to the data collected s e n t home f r om s c h o o l " in this and " f r i e n d s " study, we r e t h e p r i m a r y means t h r o u g h whi c h s t u d e n t s had be e n made a w a r e o f t h e AHS completion program in their communities. might s e r v e t o r e i n f o r c e t h e o t h e r . pamphlet s e n t home f r om s c h o o l AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s , the Each of these factors For e x a mp l e , w h e r e a s a f l y e r o r provides necessary information received information about from a f r i e n d may p r o v i d e t h e e n c o u r a g e m e n t and m o t i v a t i o n n e c e s s a r y f o r a p r o s p e c t i v e s t u d e n t t o a c t on In a d d i t i o n , con stan t reminder s uc h i n f o r m a t i o n . information it. r e a d i l y a v a i l a b l e in t h i s television, f r om s c h o o l o f s uc h p r o g r a ms u n t i l consciously discards radio, s e n t home Specific and s uc h t i m e a s t h e information about t h e literature. posters, may s e r v e In c o n t r a s t , billboards was as a recipient program is the influence of deemed relatively 76 insignificant, according participants, in terms completion programs. posters, of in f l y e r s that television, posters, community awareness programs, is not literature This present and/or of means sim ilarity in marketing tool students is in not b e t we e n one’s as recruitm ent Wher e a s effective Secondary programs, Yates found television, a s wha t may information radio, might AHS wor d study contact heighten completion of AHS means h o we v e r , means in th e p r e s e n t r e s e a r c h . attributed "information sent wa s and to mout h or the present a primary be completion-program found to differed "television" insignificant to in as ( 1982) prospective this AHS students. of strategy, of Although interest personal soliciting h o me . announcements Yates’s significant. studies. awareness study i t as r e a d i l y a c c e s s i b l e a s t h e public determining in the N e i t h e r can such billboard and are p a r t i c i p a n t s ’ awareness t wo nor is sent to prospective rural investigation their by as compl ete o r d e t a i l e d and p a m p h l e t s . is these provided heightening s e r v e as a c o n s t a n t r emi nder , literature responses The i n f o r m a t i o n r e l a y e d by r a d i o , and b i l l b o a r d s be i n c l u d e d to to found be to Furthermore, home f r om s c h o o l " heighten between the an e f f e c t i v e be relatively the in t h i s importance s t u d y was n o t e v i d e n t i n Y a t e s ’ s wor k. An "urban" explanation context for s uc h of Yates’s a ( 1982) discrepancy study may and t h e be "rural" wh i c h t h e p r e s e n t s t u d y was c o n d u c t e d . "Information school" in school in t h i s study is often included found in setting the in s e n t home f r om n e w s l e t t e r s or in 77 communi t y e d u c a t i o n p u b l i c a t i o n s with the public population plausible school served that district. in rural a sense o f associated With as rural and i d e n t i f i e d a relatively opposed familiarity, may be a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e its directly to urban comfort, school areas, and district smaller K-12 it is identification more s o t h a n w i t h urban c o u n t e r p a r t . Another d i s t i n c t i o n b e t we e n t h e s e t wo s t u d i e s is that Yates’s ( 19 8 2 ) s t u d y i n c l u d e d an ABE p r o g r a m c o mp o n e n t , wh i c h i s d e s i g n e d t o s e r v e a d u l t s w i t h l e s s t h a n an e i g h t h - g r a d e e d u c a t i o n . the present students. study It included may we l l be lacked the reading s k i l l s only that GED the and AHS In c o n t r a s t , completion-program ABE s t u d e n t s in Yates’s study n e c e s s a r y t o u n d e r s t a n d and i n t e r p r e t the i n f o r m a t i o n g i v e n t o t hem f r om t h e c e n t e r . Research Question 3 Who was influential in the return to school of AHS completionprogram students? The d a t a f r om t h i s r e s e a r c h r e v e a l e d t h a t p a r e n t s , relatives we r e mos t influential completion-program s tu d e n ts . Cross (1981), Houl e ( 1961) pursue as being educational categorized in who d e s c r i b e d adult interest, as in the goal-oriented p r im a r i ly motivated goals. is return to school The related AHS defined by others to by s i g n i f i c a n t participants to subgroup in learners, fulfilling this whos e a study t h e i r need f o r a high school may be participation specific be ca u s e t h e overwhelming m a j o r i t y o f r e s p o n d e n t s that fu lfillin g of and This fin d in g c l o s e l y p a r a l l e l s t h a t of Houle’ s g o a l- o r ie n te d education the friends, need or indicated d i p l o m a was t h e reason 78 they returned to school. This aspect is discussed further in r e f e r e n c e t o R e s e a r c h Q u e s t i o n 4. A number o f r e s p o n d e n t s a l s o i d e n t i f i e d e m p l o y e r s a s a p o s i t i v e i n f l u e n c e on t h e i r d e c i s i o n t o employers as s ume d t h e role ( p r i m a r i l y a ge d 18 t o 27, return to school. o f mentors to influence according to this It might their research) be t h a t e mp l o y e e s to return to school. Data r e l a t e d to way i n whi c h t h i s to return to is this research to also revealed that the s i g n i f i c a n t o t h e r helped in r e s p o n d e n t s ’ d e c i s i o n school was by p r o v i d i n g e n c o u r a g e m e n t . such encouragement e x t r e m e l y to return question school, but continued p a r t i c i p a ti o n it is beneficial also Thus, not only initial decision in promoting students’ in helpful the i n t h e p r o g r a m. Research Question 4 Wha t factors a s s i s t e d in the completion-program students? return Of the all participants the factors mos t often listed chose in "wa nt f a c t o r t h a t helped in t h e i r d e c i s i o n mo s t f r e q u e n t r e s p o n s e was yourself." that The third respondents "to mos t chose to a to school of AHS questionnaire, high school to return study diploma" to school. return checked to school response "to a The n e x t i mpr ove how you t h i n k o r f e e l frequently as about indicates gain general i n f o r m a t i o n and k n o w l e d g e . " Each o f t h e s e items or reasons three for responses enrollment seems in AHS to be r e l a t e d completion to the programs six that 79 Marstain and Educational Sma r t ( 1974) Participation relationships, Scale. external preparation/advancement, However, several derived responses to response to preferred social of attend," w elfare, field" in Table indicated promotion," 4.16 program s t u d e n t s ’ d e c i s i o n woul d that spur economic Combi ni ng and yielded "obtain "special responses respectively, of for Th u s , e c o n o mi c s as r e l a t e d t o i n c r e a s e d i ncome ca n be vi e we d a s a s i g n i f i c a n t m o t i v a t i o n a l postulated social career income," 18.3% and 46. 7% f o r p r i m a r y and s e c o n d a r y r e a s o n s , returning to school. the and c o g n i t i v e i n t e r e s t . "increase "job of include i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s . pays training analysis factors categories categories "job six escape/stimulation, the employment," for Th e s e factor expectations, motivation for p a r t i c i p a ti o n the f r om difficult increased to return to school. e c onomi c t i m e s number s of f o r c e i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n It (i.e., students may be f u r t h e r high to un e mp l o y me n t ) participate in AHS completion programs. Yates of career three and ( 1982) a l s o i d e n t i f i e d a h i g h s c h o o l and i ncome opportunities, primary m oti v at i o n al AHS completion categories related participation respondents in factors programs. and for self-esteem However , issues s uc h p r o g r a ms indicated i mpr ove me nt o f t h e i r in combining e c onomi c as a i mp r o v e me n t issues participating to vi e we d diploma, that e c o n o mi c ABE, the causal the as GED, response factor majority status the as for of a p r i me de te r m i n a n t in t h e i r d e c i s i o n to r e t u r n t o sc h o o l. Burgess ( 1971) t h o s e who had n o t found finished eight high motivational school to factors return to the encouraging classroom. 80 Of t h e s e e i g h t m o t i v a t i o n a l goal, desire personal to c ompl y fulfillm ent factors, with the d e s i r e to reach a personal f o r ma l paralleled requirements, this study’s and d e s i r e findings for regarding p a r t i c i p a n t s ’ motivation to return to school. Houle’s participate (1961) in adult interest, s eems indicated that motivational identified for its education applicable to "wanting force the a of to goal-oriented fulfill a participants in high behindt h e i r school return Participants information and decision return in t h i s k n o wl e d g e " a s to oriented particip an ts complete response high school study, was the school. the may be motivational likened for mo s t personal-satisfaction choice who primary Ho u l e a l s o force to or learning "to gain in Houle’s their learning- i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n c l a s s e s . school categories response this who need s t u d y who c h e c k e d In t h e S u r r y Communit y C o l l e g e s t u d y to specific diploma" to learners, l e a r n i n g - o r i e n t e d p e r s o n as one who p u r s u e s own s a k e . to identification personal frequently category in the present of (Ayers, 1979), satisfaction chosen Ayers’s by wor k the desire was one o f t h r e e respondents. is similar s t u d y - - " h o w you t h i n k The to or feel the about y o u r s e l f " - - w h i c h a l s o r e c e i v e d a high p e rc e n ta g e o f r e s p o n s e s . In return addition to to school, being asked participants whi c h factors assisted in their we r e a s k e d why t h e y c h o s e t o return t o s c h o o l when t h e y d i d . R e s p o n s e s t o t h i s o p e n - e n d e d q u e s t i o n we r e categorized (a) model for as follows: children, (c) n e e d a d i p l o m a now, h a ve no o t h e r ( b) need responsibilities, ( d) to be a need a 81 better job, (e) need to go to college, and (f) need to learn to read. Each o f t h e s e r e s p o n s e s m i g h t be c o n s i d e r e d t o h a v e a r i s e n f r om changing said circumstances constitute in the a powerful students’ and in life to marriage, the children, c ommuni t y, moment s" about AHS wh i c h learning. Such r e p r e s e n t phases of the l i f e cycle: force for increasing resp o n sib ility that and so forth. on t h e j o b Research school completion 1972). The awareness me a n s , of has o c c u r r e d ; described as a the AHS this d r o p o u t who r e c e i v e s p r o g r a ms changing l i f e c y c le , completion period teachable the over moment rise teachable-moment an promotional extended c h o o s e s a p a r t i c u l a r s e m e s t e r i n whi c h t o r e t u r n t o s c h o o l . time, on s uc h c h a n g i n g c i r c u m s t a n c e s g i v e (Havighurst, t h e o r y e x p l a i n s why a h i g h materials ( 1981) retirement, c y c l e has i n d i c a t e d "teachable Cross motivational c h a n g i n g c i r c u m s t a n c e s may we l l f i r s t job, lives, At t h i s through whatever in the p a r t i c i p a n t ’ s l i f e woul d be by p r o g r a m, period Havighurst or related to the a s d e s c r i b e d by C r o s s . Research Question 5 What b e n e f i t s programs? Participants reasons for considered Results we r e their indicated (i.e., students asked return perceived requirements improved attracted to to of were of the a the AHS of high t wo enroll The the completion receipt self-concept record school. benefits that to in two AHS c o m p l e t i o n mos t answers important given completion high school factors school were program. graduation diploma) and respondents an most 82 fre q u e n tly perceived as b e n e f i t s , with the exception of respondents from t h e C l a s s C d i s t r i c t . Those surveyed in t h e Class r ea son f o r r e t u r n i n g to school C district chose as t h e i r "helping c h ild r e n with primary school work." A n a l y s i s o f t he demographic d a t a o f f e r e d a p l a u s i b l e e x p l a n a t i o n f o r this response tendency of those r e s p o n d e n t s f r om t h a t d i s t r i c t , a nd B districts had 75% and This researcher has found male AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m f r om t h e C l a s s Of t h e 90% we r e f e m a l e , w h e r e a s t h e C l a s s A 63% f e m a l e respondents, f r om e x p e r i e n c e students h e l p i n g c h i l d r e n with school C district. wor k. that express respectively. female a rather than responsibility for The h i g h e r p e r c e n t a g e o f f e m a l e r e s p o n d e n t s f r om t h e C l a s s C s c h o o l d i s t r i c t t h a n f r om t h e o t h e r two d i s t r i c t s may p a r t i a l l y e x p l a i n t h i s r e s e a r c h f i n d i n g . The d e m o g r a p h i c v a r i a b l e o f " a g e " may p r o v i d e some i n s i g h t i n t o why n one o f t h e respondents school as diploma" to school. their f r om t h e primary or Class C district secondary reason for T h r e e p e r c e n t and 20% o f t h e r e s p o n d e n t s A and C l a s s B school districts, respectively, we r e categories. Boshier, needs may be The 1976) and Ma s l o w’ s h o we v e r , 30% o f t h e discussion satisfying life-chance safety and relevant in of in life-space participants physiological explaining the in t h e s e self-actualization being needs Class combi ne d In t h e C l a s s we r e participants returning the respondents Ma s l o w’ s in C district combi ne d (Peters and concerned with (discussed "high f r om t h e C l a s s a g e c a t e g o r i e s o f " 4 8 - 5 7 y e a r s " and "58 y e a r s and u p . " C district, chose & esteem satisfying Chapter II) respondents’ 83 failure to cite secondary "high reason for school diploma" participating in as either the given participating in as AHS respondents indicate opposed life-chance Boshier to (1976), actualization physiological primary completion that wor k" and secondary programs by t h e y ca n be c a t e g o r i z e d participants, because and and they esteem as were needs primary AHS c o m p l e t i o n The r e s p o n s e s o f " h e l p i n g c h i l d r e n w i t h s c h o o l self-concept" a more as for group of life-space by concerned opposed program. reasons as to a "improving this defined or as Peters with and self- safety and n e e d s i n Ma s l o w’ s h i e r a r c h y . Klevins ( 1976) identified societal factors that influenced a d u l t s t o r e t u r n t o t h e c l a s s r o o m in q u e s t o f a high school di ploma. These s o c i e t a l factors in t o d a y ’ s s o c i e t y , and c o n s e q u e n t a p p e a r t o ha ve an e q u a l for more perceived benefits specialized logical for society, additional (e) feelin g of personal that AHS s t u d e n t s Th e s e s o c i e t a l and e x t e n s i v e emancipation of v arious groups, preparation influence and t h e y g i v e r i s e t o t h e p e r c e p t i o n o f n e e d f o r f r om t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m . need or g r e a te r (c) factors education, to gain include ( b) the (a) social need t o c ompl et e high school schooling, accessibility satisfaction, expect ( d) of an increasingly education, in techno­ (f) need and ( g) a l o n g e r l i f e span. for a Th u s , AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s r e c o g n i z e t h a t a t t a i n m e n t o f a high school diploma w i l l extensive education, individuals, will will open p r o v i d e a c c e s s t o more s p e c i a l i z e d and assist avenues in for social emancipation additional n e c e s s a r y i n an i n c r e a s i n g l y t e c h n o l o g i c a l schooling, society, will for will some be provide for 84 a fe e l in g of personal satisfaction, a n ti c ip a t e a longer l i f e to their 4.9, respondents c ite d homes as being 60% o f t h e t o t a l s e r v e t he m w e l l attracted t hem t o t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n the v a rie ty of c la ss times of primary influence. As s a mp l e we r e m a r r i e d of children experience shown is with not known, the in researcher AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m Table or p a r t time. (Table 4 . 5 ) . t h e p e r c e n t a g e o f r e s p o n d e n t s who we r e r e s p o n s i b l e her and p r o x i m i t y s a m p l e we r e e mp l o y e d e i t h e r f u l l A l s o , 46. 7% o f t h e t o t a l welfare as t h e y span. When a s k e d whi c h b e n e f i t s program, and w i l l Although f o r t h e c a r e and assumed, b a s e d on that the m a j o r i t y o f p a r t i c i p a n t s d i d have such r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s . Th u s , the constraints household on o n e ’ s t i m e t h a t responsibilities, and variety times of class students enrolled are possibly and students, i mpos e d by e mp l o y me n t , child closeness care to help home explain are why important the to i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s . Research Question 6 What factors prevented students from completion programs before this time? participating In t h i s perceived participation study, the t wo mos t frequently in this inclined chapter, to enroll these credentials is associated barriers i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s we r e "no p r e v i o u s and " c h i l d c a r e and f a m i l y r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s . " people in who lack high AHS c o m p l e t i o n with major life changes, programs such to interest" As m e n t i o n e d e a r l i e r school become i m p o r t a n t t o t h e m. in AHS credentials until such This awareness as first job, are time not as usually marriage 85 and f a m i l y , divorce, and s o f o r t h (Aslanian & B r i c k e l l , 1980; C r o s s , 1981). "Child highest care and response family as responsibilities" previous barriers received to enrollment completion programs. De mogr a phi c d a t a f r om t h i s the completion-program majority through of 27 AHS years responsibilities respondents of age. child are a s s o c i a t e d with t h i s indicating child care and we r e care age g r o u p , family second in AHS study in d ic a te th a t students Because the females and it 18 family may be t h a t responsibilities as f a c t o r s p r e v i o u s l y p r e v e n t i n g p a r t i c i p a t i o n might not have p e r c e i v e d c o m p l e t i o n o f high school g r a d u a t i o n r e q u i r e m e n t s t o be a s i m p o r t a n t a t an e a r l i e r t i m e a s t h e y d i d upon e n r o l l m e n t . Research Question 7 What factors have encouraged students to remain in AHS comple­ tion programs? A review of related demographic information illustrates o f t h e p a r t i c i p a n t s who we r e a t t e n d i n g s p r i n g t e r m , during total ha d fall t e r m and 68% had a t t e n d e d sample, the t wo respondents indicated that during of demographic study 60% had a t t e n d e d winter term. 63. 3% had a t t e n d e d f o r one y e a r p r e v i o u s l y , attended any during for the terms information followed a steady o ne s e m e s t e r t o t h e n e x t . previous they for Also, not discontinued which indicates and years. had that consistent they the had Of t h e and 21. 7% 76. 7% of of the attendance enrolled. participants pattern that, This in this attendance f r om 86 In response to e n c o u r a g e d t hem t o a ge me n t of with," stay teachers, as we l l school." the questionnaire in school, family, as "the The r e t e n t i o n item asking respondents friends, and satisfaction wh a t factors "the encour­ attend school listed those I associated with being o f AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s m i g h t in be i n c r e a s e d by p l a n n e d a c t i v i t i e s t h a t c e n t e r on i n v o l v e m e n t o f f a m i l y and f r i e n d s . Providing o p portunitie s for students know and e n c o u r a g e one a n o t h e r m i g h t a l s o the retention can be rate. heightened esteem and individual Satisfaction through through h a ve a p o s i t i v e e f f e c t associated activities independent-study in t h e program t o with designed projects being to in school increase designed to on self­ p r o mo t e s t u d e n t s ’ i n t e r e s t and c o n s e q u e n t s a t i s f a c t i o n . C o n c l u s i o n s and Re c omme nda t i ons As a result objectives of this established in study, this and in relation research, the to the following specific conclusions we r e dr awn and r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s made. 1. Written effective strategies advertisements for recruiting and the adults influence into high of friends school comple­ tio n programs. In e f f o r t s t o r e c r u i t s t u d e n t s f o r AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s , audience p ro file d targeted such in t h e f l y e r s , programs. placed in in t h e demographic d a t a o f t h i s It locations supermarkets, is brochures, and o t h e r r ecommended that laundromats, are that frequented nurseries s t u d y n e e d s t o be literature promotional by t h i s and da y c a r e the publicizing materials audience, centers, such be as selected are 87 e mpl oyme nt sites, social service agencies, and other appropriate c ommuni t y l o c a t i o n s . Literature may be m a i l e d t o larg e percentage of t h i s posters types selected neighborhoods p o p u l a t i o n c ompone nt l i v e . and b i l l b o a r d s we r e f o u n d t o ha ve l e s s of publicity in the d e c is i o n such a p pr oa c he s a r e used, to return i n wh i c h In t h i s a study, in flu en ce than o th er to school. t h e y s h o u l d be p l a c e d c l o s e Thus, to the if loca­ t i o n s f r e q u e n t e d by t h i s a u d i e n c e o r i n t h e n e i g h b o r h o o d s wh e r e t h e y live. Likewise, although influencing the decision should be aired l i k e l y to hear. at radio a n n o u n c e me n t s to return times and However , to school, on stations identification we r e rated l ow in i f t h e y a r e used t h ey this audience is mos t of the category of frie nds a s a p r i m a r y means t h r o u g h whi c h s t u d e n t s had been made a wa r e o f t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s i n t h e i r c o m m u n i t i e s pr o mp t e d t h e following recommendations. Students who c u r r e n t l y m i g h t h a v e f r i e n d s who a l s o are attending AHS c o m p l e t i o n diplomas, b u t who ha ve n o t d e t e r m i n e d p u r s u i t o f a d i p l o m a t o be a l i f e g o a l . Invitations by c u r r e n t provided students with the AHS Administrators opportunities events this such nonthreatening, acquainted staff. to that purpose. to first-hand completion join planned such as or t hem a t school opportunities p r o g r a m, by e n c o u r a g i n g already Events friends o f AHS c o m p l e t i o n available are l a c k high school programs other p r o g r a ms could an AHS open designed house become students, students to bring those to woul d make s uc h friends especially might and afford to for the 88 personal interaction p o s s i b l y commi t t o , Current required some individuals to consider, or c o mpl e ti on o f high school c r e d e n t i a l s . students also could number s o f f r i e n d s who do increase by potential not telephone provide ha ve their the names high school recruitment. Current a l s o c o n s i d e r s e r v i n g as t e l e p h o n e r e c r u i t e r s who h a ve n e v e r be e n e n r o l l e d and telephone diplomas, students in c o n t a c t i n g i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s , to might friends a s we l l as t h o s e s t u d e n t s who a r e n o t c u r r e n t l y e n r o l l e d b u t w i t h whom t h e y had e s ta b lis h e d friendships during previous semesters. Door-to-door canvassing neighborhoods with the interaction personal whi c h by teacher-student students that are the familiar students t e a ms might in also participating selected provide in s t u d y c o n s i d e r e d t o ha ve be e n a p r i m a r y s o u r c e o f i n f o r m a t i o n this about AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s . 2. well as Significant employers are others primary (parents, sources relatives, influencing and friends) prospective students to return to school. It the i s t h e r e f o r e recommended t h a t t h e s e p e o p l e be made a wa r e o f AHS c o m p l e t i o n program in their c ommuni t y. Identification e m p l o y e r s who h i r e p e o p l e w i t h o u t a h i g h s c h o o l d i p l o m a , a personal program, contact with i s r ecommended. a representative of the AHS of f o l l o w e d by completion The a v a i l a b i l i t y o f l i t e r a t u r e a t wor k and t h e e n c o u r a g e m e n t o f o n e ’ s e m p l o y e r and p o s s i b l y c o - w o r k e r s c o u l d be an e f f e c t i v e recruitment m i g h t a l s o be a r r a n g e d . strategy. In some c a s e s , on-site classes as 89 It might accredited to job also as completion present develop higher a course courses positions in e mpl oyme nt to result increase that the to Certainly retention the AHS students’ this AHS of in met hod of student in be place results related in a high le ve l will specifically within reading positions. student that that relate c o u l d be b a s e d on m a t e r i a l s desired possible to and so f o r t h , in For e x a m p l e , c o u l d be a n t i c i p a t e d and math, required credit or possible English, skills e mp l o y me n t . be interest completion program. 3. Awa r e n e s s o f t h e n e e d t o a c q u i r e a h i g h s c h o o l self-esteem issues (i.e.. to think are primary reasons fo r e n r o l l i n g The l i t e r a t u r e ing life needs. trate advertisements completion adjustment to often of a high changing recruitment strategy. feel about oneself) study pointed out t h a t catalyze people’s or promotional school diploma life better i n an AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m . reviewed f o r t h i s circumstances Thus, and d i p l o m a and awareness materials as circumstances a first may be chang­ of s uc h that illus­ step in a the successful Such i n f o r m a t i o n c o u l d a l s o be u s e d t o a t t a i n h i g h e r l e v e l s o f r e t e n t i o n o f s t u d e n t s i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s i f AHS t e a c h e r s a r e a wa r e o f and s e n s i t i v e t o t h e c h a n g i n g l i f e c i r c u m ­ s t a n c e s t h a t p r o mp t e d t h e i r s t u d e n t s ’ r e t u r n t o t h e c l a s s r o o m . It is important program s t u d e n t s until they knowing are wh e n to might affected these recognize not by types choose that to participate life-cycle of potential changes changes. will AHS c o m p l e t i o n in such Havi ng influence programs no way of potential 90 students’ lives, the AHS recruiting and/or promotional materials mus t c o n t i n u o u s l y be made a v a i l a b l e f o r t h e s e p r o g r a m c a n d i d a t e s . I t a l s o mus t be r e a l i z e d a c q u i r e high school of potential that credentials students. the p e r c e i v e d d e g r e e o f ne e d t o is not c o n s ta n t throug ho ut th e l i v e s Te mp o r a r y or partial c h a n g e s i n t h e i r l i f e c y c l e may, f o r a t i m e , need to another complete reason high to school encourage graduation a continuous program i n f o r m a t i o n t o p o t e n t i a l perceived need t o obtain high to the obscure or diminish the requirements. flow students. school adjustment of This AHS c o m p l e t i o n - An i n c o n s i s t e n c y credentials is is also in the reflected i n t h e t e n d e n c y o f some s t u d e n t s t o d r o p o u t o f t h e p r o g r a m , o n l y t o re-enroll for completion ne e d the next programs become s consistently greater particular life and s o f o r t h , semester. than situation. initially fluctuating rise to regularly obstacles to to when attend the perceived attendance Onl y t h e n a r e t h e h a r d s h i p s , AHS in their sacrifices, by many AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s as return degree the and begin c o n s i d e r e d w o r t h w h i l e t o o b t a i n a high school di ploma. The t r e p i d a t i o n f e l t they the Students need of to an perceived for educational need to professional environment complete high and school the give guidance and/or counseling o f a high school diploma s e r v i c e s t o be a v a i l a b l e o n - s i t e . Recognizing t h a t improved the self-esteem i n t e r n a l i z e d as p e r s o n a l materials meaningful that to address an acquisition are based on societal conditions and and needs encourages development o f promotional these audience societal of factors potential because they will be AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m 91 students. through Likewise, messages counselors, increase a (printed and g u e s t the program promoting or spoken) speakers retention rate these from perceived teachers, guidance t h r o u g h o u t t h e AHS s t u d e n t of students within the benefits body may AHS c o m p l e t i o n program. 4. Variety of class times and proximity to one’s home are i m p o r t a n t t o s t u d e n t s e n r o l l e d i n AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s . Realizing one’s home flexible that are the variety important scheduling woul d p r o m o t e rate. the to system increased of AHS and class and and p o s s i b l y variety would of class classroom site times near findings of th is incorporated provide and their study t h a t , into an AHS likelihood that potential for a higher the residence. likelihood It woul d t h e more f l e x i b i l i t y completion students will program, enroll a p r o g r a ms retention located throughout AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m increase to students, locations Day and e v e n i n g l e a r n i n g c e n t e r s and s i t e s community proximity completion-program satellite enrollment times students of a school appear f r om a or the and a c c e s s i b i l i t y the greater the and r e m a i n i n t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n program. 5. Lack o f i n t e r e s t we r e b a r r i e r s and c h i l d c a r e and f a m i l y r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s to the previous enrollment of students i n AHS c o m p l e ­ tio n programs. Therefore, it is r ecommended t h a t the provision of child care f o r AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s be e x p l o r e d and p o s s i b l y removed 92 as a perceived barrier to participation with establishment of on­ s it e child care f a c i l i t i e s . Su g g e s ti on s f o r F u r t h e r Research Although t h i s r e s e a r c h e r a d d r e s s e d t h e e d u c a t i o n a l s p o u s e s o f m a r r i e d AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m s t u d e n t s , we r e f o u n d t h a t in t h i s included this variable. AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m students is suggested. AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m students for their research level The information importance placed family on structure stressing in and possibly of century through l i f e l o n g , participants be e n reveal generation topic. with successful a wa r e encompassing development cooperative of trends States the tw enty-first the system experiences. w r i t e r d i d a d d r e s s t h e ways i n whi c h of recruitment stra te g ies United of for AHS completion g r a d u a t e s in t h e i r communities, Current educational the within programs, being include learning, critical-thinking no s t u d y we r e f o u n d I f AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s a r e t o e f f e c t i v e l y the non-high-school through degree value o t h e r s t u d i e s w i t h t h e e x c e p t i o n o f Y a t e s ’ s ( 1982) on t h i s the research. emerging continuing educational made of educational/ achievement an only aspirations children’s woul d uncover each although t h i s had areas educational/academic preparation Once a g a i n , these not of parents of a c a d e m i c a t t a i n m e n t a l s o s h o u l d be t h e s u b j e c t o f f u r t h e r Additional of the no o t h e r s t u d i e s Further area but a ls o reg a r d in g th e educatio nal level serve research dealing is required. introduced an in t h e K - 12 s y s t e m outcome-based curriculum integration skills, and of subject areas, new a s s e s s m e n t tools, 93 such as t h e s t u d e n t p o r t f o l i o . instructional AHS techniques, and a s s e s s m e n t n e e d t o be i n f u s e d i n t o t h e completion-program classroom following development of these areas i s needed t o instructional Michigan, candidates to mos t the program wi t h 1993, the Currently, being of the toward t h e high with f ew, if any, can no Michi gan as regarding used not certificate, school but an credits diploma. instrument in to of credit be toward used the Assessment alternative test determine determining the accuracy Carnegie as a program s t u d e n t s ’ f u l f i l l m e n t of requirements for enter June vehicle for school Pr ogr a m toward is In diploma. (MEAP) is Following research will appropriateness credit grant who school. instrument. and to students high Educational qualify The GED t e s t f r om h i g h longer to also i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f t h e MEAP o r a n o t h e r a s s e s s m e n t t o o l , be n e c e s s a r y each in enhancing only AHS c o m p l e t i o n - p r o g r a m Carnegie considered te s t is GED GED t e s t accumulation GED the commonly u s e d Research completion programs. the receive Carnegie c r e d i t s staff. adequate pro fessio n al determine t h e i r e ffe c tiv e n e s s s t u d e n t s ’ s u c c e s s i n AHS In T h e s e new a p p r o a c h e s t o c u r r i c u l u m , of the AHS completion- the high school diploma. Another t o p i c f o r f u r t h e r r e s e a r c h i s the r o l e o f t h e c o un s el or i n t h e AHS c o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m . we r e c i t e d who a d v o c a t e d Throughout t h i s expanding the notably, with regard to However , the types of counseling th a t role student retention, study, many a u t h o r s of the counselor--most but a ls o in r e c r u i t m e n t . a r e mos t e f f e c t i v e w i t h t h o s e 94 who fit the demographic profile s t u d e n t have n o t y e t been d e t e r m i n e d . of the AHS completion-program APPENDICES APPENDIX A LETTER OF APPROVAL FROM THE UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS 95 M I C H I G A N S T AT l i U N I V E R S I T Y ( i m AND a of v k D I-AN .i : i u f i s i d i .n i OF fo r 1 II I - : C . K A D U A T I - J u n e 13, FAST k f s i .a k c m LANSING • M ICH IGA N • -1KH2-I-1(116 SC IIO O I. 1991 Ma rybe t h Roose 865 Davis Howell, MI 48843 RE: CHARACTERISTICS OF ADULT PARTICIPATION, IRB #9 1- 289 HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION FOR Dear Ms. Roose: The above p r o j e c t i s exempt from f u l l UCRIHS r e v i e w . The p r o p o s e d r e s e a r c h p r o t o c o l has been r e v i e w e d by a n o t h e r c o mm i t t e e member. The r i g h t s and w e l f a r e o f human s u b j e c t s a p p e a r t o be p r o t e c t e d and you have a p p r o v a l t o c o n d u c t t h e research. You a r e r emi n d e d t h a t UCRIHS a p p r o v a l i s v a l i d f o r one c a l e n d a r y e a r . I f you p l a n t o c o n t i n u e t h i s p r o j e c t beyond one y e a r , p l e a s e make p r o v i s i o n s f o r o b t a i n i n g a p p r o p r i a t e UCRIHS a p p r o v a l one month p r i o r t o J un e 11, 1992. Any c h a ng es i n p r o c e d u r e s i n v o l v i n g human s u b j e c t s must be r ev i e w e d by UCRIHS p r i o r t o i n i t i a t i o n o f t h e c h a n g e . UCRIHS must a l s o be n o t i f e d p r o m p t l y o f any pr ob le m s ( u n e x p e c t e d s i d e e f f e c t s , c o m p l a i n t s , e t c . ) i n v o l v i n g human s u b j e c t s d u r i n g t h e c o u r s e o f t h e work. Thank you f o r b r i n g i n g t h i s p r o j e c t t o my a t t e n t i o n . h e l p , p l e a s e do n o t h e s i t a t e t o l e t me know. S Ufl CJ D; 'i g h t , Ph.D., Chair U n i v e r s i t y Committ ee on Resea Human S u b j e c t s (UCRIHS) DEW/deo cc: Dr. R i c h a r d G a r d n e r I f I can be o f any f u t u r e APPENDIX B COVER LETTER AND INSTRUMENT 96 You a r e b e i n g a s k e d t o p a r t i c i p a t e i n a s t u d y u n d e r t a k e n by Ma r y b e t h Ro o s e , a g r a d u a t e s t u d e n t a t Mi c h i g a n S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y i n E a s t Lansing, Michigan. The s t u d y w i l l c o n c e r n i t s e l f w i t h a n s w e r i n g these questions: 1. Who a r e t h e s t u d e n t s p a r t i c i p a t i n g i n A d u l t High School programs? ( i . e . , age, s ex, r a c e , e t c . ) 2. Why h a v e t h e s e a d u l t s c h o s e n t o p a r t i c i p a t e Hi gh Sc hool C o m p l e t i o n p r ogr a m? in t h e Adult In o r d e r t o g a t h e r i n f o r m a t i o n n e c e s s a r y f o r t h i s s t u d y , t h e a t t a c h e d q u e s t i o n n a i r e i s being d i s t r i b u t e d t o s e l e c t e d c l a s s e s in A d u l t Hi gh S c hool C o m p l e t i o n p r o g r a m s . Completion time f o r t h i s q u e s t i o n n a i r e i s a p p r o x i m a t e l y 15 m i n u t e s . C o m p l e t i o n o f t h e q u e s t i o n n a i r e w i l l be y o u r f r e e c h o i c e and w i l l n o t i n a ny way a f f e c t t h e c o m p l e t i o n o f c l a s s e s i n whi c h you a r e e n r o l l e d o r c o mp l et io n o f r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r a high school e q u i v a l e n c y c e r t i f i c a t e o r high school diploma. Names a n d / o r any o t h e r i d e n t i ­ f y i n g i n f o r m a t i o n w i l l n o t be u s e d on t h e q u e s t i o n n a i r e , and anonym­ i t y is guaranteed to a ll those f i l l i n g out the q u estio n n a ir e. You may, a t any t i m e , d i s c o n t i n u e y o u r c o m p l e t i o n o f t h e q u e s t i o n ­ n a i r e w i t h o u t p e n a l t y , and a r e n o t o b l i g a t e d t o a n s we r any q u e s t i o n s wh i c h a r e f e l t t o be o b j e c t i o n a b l e . Al l r e s u l t s o f t h i s q u e s t i o n ­ n a i r e w i l l be t r e a t e d w i t h t h e s t r i c t e s t c o n f i d e n c e . You i n d i c a t e v o u r v o l u n t a r y a g r e e m e n t t o p a r t i c i p a t e by c o m p l e t i n g and r e t u r n i n g t h i s q u e s t i o n n a i r e . C o m p l e t i o n and r e t u r n o f t h i s q u e s t i o n n a i r e a l s o i n d i c a t e s t h a t you h a v e u n d e r s t o o d t h e e x p l a n a t i o n and t h e purpose of t h i s study. R e s u l t s w i l l be f u r n i s h e d upon r e q u e s t . If you h a ve q u e s t i o n s o r c o n c e r n s r e g a r d i n g y o u r p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n t h i s s t u d y a t a l a t e r d a t e , p l e a s e c o n t a c t me a t ( 517) 54 8 - 6 2 3 3 d u r i n g business hours. Sincerely, Ma r y b e t h Roose A P P EN D IX C SUMMARIES OF RESPONSES ON SURVEY INSTRUMENT Q u e s t i o n n a i r e Number Cl a s s A B C P lea se i n d i c a t e your sex: Male Female P l e a s e i n d i c a t e y o u r p r e s e n t age: _ _ _ 18- 27 y e a r s 28-37 y e a r s 38-47 y ea rs 48-57 y e a r s 58 and up P l e a s e i n d i c a t e t h e l a s t g r a d e you c o m p l e t e d b e f o r e e n r o l l i n g i n A d u l t High School Co m p l et i on c l a s s e s : _ _ _ 8th 9th 10th 1 1t h Other P l e a s e i n d i c a t e t h e pr ogra m in which you a r e e n r o l l e d : GED AHS Both P l e a s e i n d i c a t e which t e r m s you h av e t a k e n c l a s s e s t h i s y e a r : Fall Winter Spring P l e a s e i n d i c a t e how l o n g you have t a k e n A d u l t High School Compl et ion cl a s s e s : 1 year 2 years __ _ _ _ 3 y e a r s 4 years 5 years More t h a n 5 y e a r s P l e a s e i n d i c a t e w h e t h e r you have e v e r d i s c o n t i n u e d a t t e n d i n g d u r i n g any o f t h e t e r m s f o r which you were e n r o l l e d . _ _ _ No Yes I f you a n s we r e d " y e s" t o t h i s q u e s t i o n , p l e a s e e x p l a i n why you c o u l d n ’ t co n tin u e to a t te n d c l a s s e s at t h a t time. 98 8. Please i n d i c a t e your m a ri ta l status: Single Married Widowed D i v o r ce d 9. I f married, please in d ic a te the educational level o f your spouse: Did n o t c o m p l e t e h i g h sc ho ol GED c e r t i f i c a t e / h i g h s c h o o l d i p lo ma Some c o l l e g e c o u r s e s B a c h e lo r ’ s degree Other 10. Please i n d i c a t e your rac e: Amer ican I n d i a n Bl a c k Whi te Asian Mexican/Hispanic A s i a n American O t h e r ( p l e a s e s p e c i f y ) ______________________________ 11. P l e a s e i n d i c a t e y o u r f a m i l y income: L ess t h a n $ 10, 0 0 0 $10,001-$14,000 $14,001-$18,000 $18,001-$22,000 Over $22, 001 12. P l e a s e i n d i c a t e y o u r employment s t a t u s : Employed f u l l t i m e Employed p a r t t i m e Lai d o f f Unemployed 13. How d i d you h e a r a b o u t t h e a d u l t e d u c a t i o n c l a s s e s ? Check a l l t h a t a p p l y . From a t e a c h e r o r a d m i n i s t r a t o r in t h e pr ogra m Through f r i e n d s Through r a d i o Through t e l e v i s i o n Through n ews pa p er Through f l y e r o r p am p h l e t Through f a m i l y Through i n f o r m a t i o n g i v e n t o you from t h e s c h o o l Billboards Posters ___ O t h e r ( p l e a s e s p e c i f y ) _____________________________ 99 14. Who o f t h e p e r s o n s l i s t e d bel ow h e l p e d you in y o u r d e c i s i o n t o r e t u r n t o s c h o o l ? Check a l l t h a t a p p l y . S chool c o u n s e l o r Teacher Friends Relatives Parents Children S pouse O t h e r ( p l e a s e s p e c i f y ) ______________________ 15. Of t h e a b o v e , who was t h e s i n g l e p e r s o n who h e l p e d you most i n y o u r d ecisio n to re tu rn to school? (Please specify) D e s c r i b e how he o r s he h e l p e d yo u: 16. Of t h e l i s t b e l o w, whi ch f a c t o r ( s ) t o s c h o o l ? Check a l l t h a t a p p l y . h e l p e d you in y o u r d e c i s i o n t o r e t u r n Help c h i l d r e n w i t h s c h o o l work Want a h i g h s c h o o l d i p l o m a Job promotion Meet new p e o p l e and make f r i e n d s I n c r e a s e f a m i l y income To g a i n g e n e r a l i n f o r m a t i o n and knowledge ____ To become more u s e f u l i n y o u r community and s o c i e t y _ _ _ To i mp r ove how you THINK o r FEEL abouty o u r s e l f b ut t a k e s s p e c i a l t r a i n i n g To go i n t o a f i e l d which I l i k e , Your j o b p ay s you f o r b e i n g in school To o b t a i n employment O t h e r r e a s o n s ( p l e a s e s p e c i f y ) __________________________________ 17. Which o f t h e abo ve wer e t h e two most i m p o r t a n t r e a s o n s f o r you t o r e t u r n to school? ( p l e a s e s p e c i f y ) __________________________________________________ 18. Which b e n e f i t s o f f e r e d a t t r a c t e d you t o t h e a d u l t e d u c a t i o n program? Check a l l t h a t a p p l y . Child ca r e Financial assista n ce C l o s e n e s s t o y o u r home V a r i e t y o f t i m e s when c l a s s e s a r e o f f e r e d Counseling Job in f o r m a t i o n S p e c i a l c o u r s e s i n r e a d i n g , math and w r i t i n g O t h e r ( p l e a s e s p e c i f y ) ______________________________________________ 100 19. Which o f t h e f o l l o w i n g p r e v e n t e d you frofii e n r o l l i n g b e f o r e ? that apply. Check a l l Child ca re and/or family r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s H u s b a n d / w i f e / s i g n i f i c a n t o t h e r d i d n o t want me t o a t t e n d 111 h e a l t h C l a s s e s n o t o f f e r e d a t t i m e s o r p l a c e s c o n v e n i e n t f o r me D i d n ’ t know t h e p r ogra m e x i s t e d Not i n t e r e s t e d b e f o r e O t h e r ( p l e a s e s p e c i f y ) _______________________________________________ 20. Which f a c t o r s have e n c o u r a g e d you t o s t a y i n s c h o o l ? apply. Check a l l that Encour agement o f f a m i l y and f r i e n d s Encour agement o f t e a c h e r s Encour agement o f t h o s e I a t t e n d sc h ool w i t h I have t o f i n i s h s c h o o l i n o r d e r t o g e t a j o b S a t i s f a c t i o n a s s o c i a t e d w i t h b e i n g i n s c h o o l ke e ps me coming bac k I have t o f i n i s h s c h o o l i n o r d e r t o go on t o c o l l e g e Other ( p lea se sp e cify ) 21. P l e a s e e x p l a i n , i n as much d e t a i l as p o s s i b l e , why you c h o s e t o r e t u r n t o sc ho ol when you d i d . ____________________________________________________________ 101 A bsolute Freq. + 1. Relative Freq. + Please i n d i c a t e your sex: 17_ H a l e A3 F e m a l e 28% 72% P l e a s e i n d i c a t e y o u r p r e s e n t age: 33 TF 9 6 2 18- 27 y e a r s 28-37 y e a r s 38-47 y e a r s 48-57 y e a r s 58 a n d up 55% 17% 15% 10% 3% P l e a s e i n d i c a t e t h e l a s t g r a d e you c o m p le te d b e f o r e e n r o l l i n g Hi gh S c h o o l C o m p l e t i o n c l a s s e s : 8 11 20 17 A 4. 8th 9th 10th 11th Other 60% 68% 100% ( w h o l e th is year: sample) P l e a s e i n d i c a t e how l o n g y o u h a v e t a k e n A d u l t Hi g h S c h o o l classes: 38 13 7 2 0 0 7. 13% 60% 27% P l e a s e i n d i c a t e wh i c h t e r m s y o u h a v e t a k e n c l a s s e s 36 F a l l 41 W i n t e r 60 S p r i n g 6. 13 • A9/ 18.3? 3 3 . 39 2 8 . 39 6 . 79 P l e a s e i n d i c a t e t h e program in which you a r e e n r o l l e d : 8 GED 3 6 AHS 16 Bot h 5. in Adult 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years More t h a n 5 y e a r s Completion 63.3% 21.7% 11.7% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% P l e a s e i n d i c a t e w h e t h e r y o u h a v e e v e r d i s c o n t i n u e d a t t e n d i n g d u r i n g any o f t h e t e r m s f o r wh i c h yo u w e r e e n r o l l e d . A6 No 1A Yes 76.7% 2 3 . 3% I f y o u a n s w e r e d " y e s " t o t h i s q u e s t i o n , p l e a s e e x p l a i n why y o u c o u l d n ’ t c o n tin u e to a tt e n d c l a s s e s a t t h a t time. 6 3 3 2 Personal problems Work s c h e d u l e T ransportation 111 h e a l t h 42.9% 21.4% 21.4% 14.3% 102 A b s o l u t e Freq. R e l a t i v e Freq. + 8. + Please 24 28 1 7 9. Please 21 “n rr T 21 12. in dicate the educational level o f y our spouse: Di d n o t c o m p l e t e h i g h s c h o o l GED c e r t i f i c a t e / h i g h s c h o o l d i p l o m a Some c o l l e g e c o u r s e s B a ch e lo r’ s degree Other 43% 21% 32% 4% 0% American I n d ian Black White Asian Mexican/Hispanic A s ia n American O t h e r ( p l e a s e s p e c i f y ) ________________________________ 3% 0% 97% 0% 0% 0% 0% i n d i c a t e y o u r f a m i l y i n c o me : Less t h a n $10,000 35% $io,ooi-$i4,ooo $14,001-$18,000 $18,001-$22,000 Over $ 2 2 , 0 0 1 17 % 10% 3% 35% P l e a s e i n d i c a t e y o u r e mp l oy me nt s t a t u s : 18 18 2 22 13. please 40.0% 46.7% 1.7% 11.6% Please in d ic a te your race: 2 IT 58 0 0_ 0_ 0 11. status: Single Married Widowed Divorced If married, 12 6 9 1_ 0 1 0. in d ic a te your m arital Empl o y e d f u l l t i m e Empl o y e d p a r t t i m e Laid o f f Un e mp l o y e d 30% 30% 3% 37% How d i d y o u h e a r a b o u t t h e a d u l t e d u c a t i o n c l a s s e s ? 10 22 0_ 0_ Ch e c k a l l From a t e a c h e r o r a d m i n i s t r a t o r i n t h e p r o g r a m Through f r i e n d s Through r a d i o Through t e l e v i s i o n 13 Through ne wspaper 32 T h r o u g h f l y e r o r p a m p h l e t 18 T h r o u g h f a m i l y 23 T h r o u g h i n f o r m a t i o n g i v e n t o yo u f r o m t h e s c h o o l 2_ B i l l b o a r d s 2_ P o s t e r s 3_ O t h e r ( p l e a s e s p e c i f y ) ________________________________ 2 1 A w a r e n e s s /ju d ic ia l system Awareness/employer 67% 33% th at apply. 8.0% 17.6% 0.0% 0.0% 1 0 . 4% 25.6% 14.4% 1 8 . 4% 1 . 6% 1 . 6% 2.4% 103 A bsolute Freq. R elative 'I' 14. Who o f t h e p e r s o n s l i s t e d b e l o w h e l p e d you i n y o u r d e c i s i o n school? Ch e ck a l l t h a t a p p l y . 15 12 17 20 8 13 16 to re tu rn Sc h o o l c o u n s e l o r Teacher Friends Relatives Parents Children Spouse Other (please specify) 10 3 3 15. Freq. T Employer Judge M inister to 12% 10% 16% 14% 17% 7% 11% 13% 6 2 . 6% 18.7% 18.7% Of t h e a b o v e , who was t h e s i n g l e p e r s o n who h e l p e d y o u m o s t i n y o u r d e c isio n to re tu r n to school? (Please specify) 13 9 8 6 5 3 2 14 R elati ves Fri ends Spouse School c o u n s e l o r Parents Teacher Chi 1 d r e n Other 22% 15% 13% 10% 9% 5% 3% 23% ( Empl oy e i — 3 / 2 1 . 4 % , mi how he o r s h e h e l p e d y o u : 42 17 1 16. Of t h e l i s t to school? 11 50 15 22 19 36 14 42 24 2_ 22 4_ Provided encouragement H e l p e d " k e e p my own m o t i v a t i on " H e l p e d me s t a y o u t o f j a i l b e l o w , wh i c h f a c t o r ( s ) Ch e ck a l l t h a t a p p l y . 70.3% 2 3 . 0% 1 .7% h e l p e d you in y o u r d e c i s i o n t o r e t u r n H e l p c h i l d r e n w i t h s c h o o l wo r k Want a h i g h s c h o o l d i p l o m a Job promotion Me e t new p e o p l e and make f r i e n d s I n c r e a s e f a m i l y i ncome To g a i n g e n e r a l i n f o r m a t i o n and k n o wl e d g e To become mor e u s e f u l i n y o u r c o mmu n i t y a nd s o c i e t y To i m p r o v e how yo u THINK o r FEEL a b o u t y o u r s e l f To go i n t o a f i e l d w h i c h I l i k e , b u t t a k e s s p e c i a l t r a i n i n g Your j o b p a y s yo u f o r b e i n g i n s c h o o l To o b t a i n e mp l oy m e n t O t h e r r e a s o n s ( p l e a s e s p e c i f y ) ____________________________________ 1 1 1 1 College p re p a ra tio n Graduate b efo re daughter Ke ep p r o m i s e t o f a m i l y New a s p e c t s o f j o b 25% 25% 25% 25% 4 . 2% 19.1% 5.7% 8. 4% 7.3% 13.8% 5A°& 16.0% 9 . 2% 1. 0% 8.4% 1. 5% 104 R elative A bsolute Freq. ^ ------ 17. Which o f t h e a b o v e w e r e t h e t wo m o s t i m p o r t a n t r e a s o n s f o r y o u t o r e t u r n to school? ( p l e a s e s p e c i f y ) _____________________________________________________ 2n d Freq. 1st Freq. Want h i g h s c h o o l d i p l o m a Improve s e l f - c o n c e p t Cain i n f o r m a t i o n Help c h i l d r e n w i t h sc hool Special t r a in in g Me e t p e o p l e / m a k e f r i e n d s I n c r e a s e income O b ta in employment Job p rom otion Job pays t o a t t e n d Be u s e f u l i n c o m m u n i t y 18. wo r k A1 . 7 13.3 11.6 8.3 8.3 5.0 3.3 3.3 1 .7 1 .7 1 .7 3 13 11 0 10 A A 11 2 1 1 3.3 21 . 7 18.3 0.0 16.7 6.7 6.7 18.3 3.3 1.7 1.7 80% 20% Which o f t h e f o l l o w i n g p r e v e n t e d y o u f r o m e n r o l l i n g b e f o r e ? that apply. 21 11 3 13 13 7? 10 Check a l l 22. 6% 1 1 . 8% 3 . 3% 1 3 . 9% 1 3 . 9% 2 3 . 7% 10.8% Child care and/or family r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s H u s b a n d / w i f e / s i g n i f i c a n t o t h e r d i d n o t w a n t me t o a t t e n d 111 h e a l t h C l a s s e s n o t o f f e r e d a t t i m e s o r p l a c e s c o n v e n i e n t f o r me D i d n ’ t know t h e p r o g r a m e x i s t e d Not i n t e r e s t e d b e f o r e Other (please specify) A 3 2 1 Which f a c t o r s apply. 3A A0_ 3A 1A 31 20 6 2 . 6% 1. 8% 27.2% 32.5% 7.9% 9.6% 1 A. 0% A. A% Child care Financial a ssistan ce C l o s e n e s s t o y o u r home V a r i e t y o f t i m e s when c l a s s e s a r e o f f e r e d Counseling Job in fo rm a tio n S p e c i a l c o u r s e s i n r e a d i n g , mat h and w r i t i n g Other (please specify) O p p o r t u n i ty t o meet p e o p le A ltern ativ e to in carceratio n 20. 25 8 7 5 5 3 2 2 1 1 1 Which b e n e f i t s o f f e r e d a t t r a c t e d y ou t o t h e a d u l t e d u c a t i o n p r o g r a m ? Check a l l t h a t 3 dd 1 v . 3 2 31 37 9 11 16 5 19. vF r e q . T ransportation A0% In da y s c h o o l 30% A n t i c i p a t e d t o o long t o f i n i s h 20% In j a i 1 10% have e nc o u r a g e d you t o s t a y in s c h o o l ? Check a l l that E n c o u r a g e m e n t o f f a m i l y a nd f r i e n d s Encouragement o f t e a c h e r s Encouragement o f t h o s e I a t t e n d school w it h I have t o f i n i s h school in o r d e r t o g e t a j o b S a t i s f a c t i o n a s s o c i a t e d w i t h b e i n g i n s c h o o l k e e p s me c o mi n g b a c k I h a v e t o f i n i s h s c h o o l i n o r d e r t o go on t o c o l l e g e Other (please specify) 3 3 E l i g i b i l i t y f o r a r me d f o r c e s C o u rt mandate 50% 50% 18.9% 2 2 . A% 18.9% 7.9% 17.3% 11.2% 3.A% 105 A bsolute 21. Freq. R elative ^ Freq. P l ea se e x p l a i n , in as much d e t a i l as p o s s i b l e , why you chose t o r e t u r n to school when you di d . _______________________________________________________ 22 15 7 7 5 A Get diploma Needed b e t t e r j o b Model f o r c h i l d r e n No o t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s To go t o c o l l e g e Learn t o read 37% 25% 11% 11% 9% 7% 106 Total Total Please 17 43 2. Please 36 41 60 Mal e F e ma l e 5 15 1 9 18-27 y e a r s 28-37 y e a r s 38-47 y e a r s 48-57 y e a r s 58 a n d up 20 5 4 1 0 9 3 4 2 2 4 2 1 3 0 8th 9th 10th 11th Other 3 5 10 12 0 3 4 6 5 2 in Adult 2 2 4 0 2 GED AHS Bot h 4 22 4 4 7 9 0 7 3 i n d i c a t e w h i c h t e r m s y o u h a ve t a k e n c l a s s e s Fall Winter Spring 15 17 30 12 16 20 th is year: 9 8 10 P l e a s e i n d i c a t e how l o n g y o u h a v e t a k e n A d u l t Hi gh S c h o o l classes: 38 13 7 2 0 0 7. 11 19 i n d i c a t e your sex: P l e a s e i n d i c a t e t h e p r o g r a m i n wh i c h y o u a r e e n r o l l e d : 8 36 16 6. C P l e a s e i n d i c a t e t h e l a s t g r a d e yo u c o m p l e t e d b e f o r e e n r o l l i n g Hi gh S c h o o l C o m p l e t i o n c l a s s e s : 8 11 20 17 4 4. B P l e a s e i n d i c a t e y o u r p r e s e n t age: 33 10 9 6 2 3. A 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years More t h a n 5 y e a r s 21 6 3 0 0 0 10 5 4 1 0 0 Completion 7 2 0 1 0 0 P l e a s e i n d i c a t e w h e t h e r y o u h a v e e v e r d i s c o n t i n u e d a t t e n d i n g d u r i n g any o f t h e t e r m s f o r which you were e n r o l l e d . 46 14 22 8 No Yes 17 3 7 3 I f y o u a n s w e r e d " y e s " t o t h i s q u e s t i o n , p l e a s e e x p l a i n why y o u c o u l d n ’ t c o n tin u e to a t t e n d c l a s s e s a t t h a t time. Personal problems Work s c h e d u l e Lack o f t r a n s p o r t a t i o n 111 h e a l t h 3 1 2 2 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 107 Total A B C 13 12 0 5 8 9 1 2 3 7 0 0 4 3 4 1 O 5 2 2 0 O 3 1 3 0 0 1 0 29 0 O O 0 1 O 19 0 O O 0 0 O 10 O 0 0 O 12 6 4 0 8 G 3 0 2 9 3 1 2 O 4 9 8 2 11 6 6 0 8 3 4 0 3 Total 8. Please i n d ic a te your m arital 24 28 1 7 9. 9 1 0 10. 0 0 0 o f your spouse Di d n o t c o m p l e t e h i g h s c h o o l GED c e r t i f i c a t e / h i g h s c h o o l d i p l o m a Some c o l l e g e c o u r s e s B achelor’s degree Other American I n d i a n Black Wh i t e Asian Mexican/Hispanic As ian American Other (please specify) Less t h a n $10,000 $10,001-$ 14,000 $14,001-$18,000 $18,001-$22,000 Over $22,001 P l e a s e i n d i c a t e y o u r e mp l o y m e n t s t a t u s : 18 18 2 22 13. level P l e a s e i n d i c a t e y o u r f a m i l y i n c o me : 21 10 6 2 21 12. please in d ic a te the educational Please in d ic a te your race: 2 0 58 0 11. Sinqle Harried Widowed Divorced I f married, 12 6 status: Empl oyed f u l l t i m e Empl oye d p a r t t i m e Laid o f f Une mpl oye d Hnw d i d vou h e a r a b o u t t h e a d u l t , e d u c a t i o n c l a s s e s ? 10 22 O 0 13 32 18 23 2 2 3 Check a l l From a t e a c h e r o r a d m i n i s t r a t o r i n t h e p r o g r a m Throuqh f r i e n d s T hr ough r a d i o T hrouqh t e l e v i s i o n Through n e w s pa p er T hrough f l y e r o r p a m p h l e t T hr ough f a m i l y T h r o u g h i n f o r m a t i o n g i v e n t o you f r om t h e s c h o o l B illboards Posters Other (please specify) t h a t aoolv. 5 12 O O 6 20 7 13 2 2 2 3 7 O O 5 10 7 7 O 0 1 2 3 0 0 2 2 4 3 0 O O 108 Total A B C 9 8 11 11 10 3 8 7 6 2 6 4 6 4 3 7 0 2 2 2 4 1 2 2 9 6 4 3 0 2 1 5 2 2 2 3 3 1 0 7 2 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 2 16 b 5 5 12 1 14 9 0 5 2 3 8 0 5 2 8 1 9 2 1 5 U Total 14. Who o f t h e p e r s o n s l i s t e d b e l o w h e l p e d yo u i n y o u r d e c i s i o n school? Ch e c k a l l t h a t 3 dd 1 v . to re tu rn 15 12 Sc h o o l c o u n s e l o r Teacher 19 Friends 17_ R e l a t i v e s 20 P a r e n t s 8 Children 13 Spouse 16 O t h e r ( p l e a s e s p e c i f y ) 15. to Of t h e a b o v e , who was t h e s i n g l e p e r s o n who h e l p e d y o u m o s t i n y o u r d e cisio n to re tu rn to school? (Please specify) 13 9 8 6 5 3 2 14 Relati ves Fri ends Spouse School c o u n s e l o r Parents Teacher Chi 1dren Other D e s c r i b e how h e o r s h e h e l p e d y o u : 16. Of t h e l i s t to school? 11 50 15 22 19 36 14 42 24 2 22 4 below, which f a c t o r ( s ) Ch e c k a l l t h a t a p p l y . h e lp e d you in y o u r d e c i s i o n t o r e t u r n He l p c h i l d r e n w i t h s c h o o l wor k Want a h i g h s c h o o l d i p l o m a Job promotion Meet new p e o p l e and make f r i e n d s I n c r e a s e f a m i l y i ncome To g a i n g e n e r a l i n f o r m a t i o n and k n o w l e d g e To become mor e u s e f u l i n y o u r c o mmu ni t y and s o c i e t y To i m p r o v e how yo u THINK o r FEEL a b o u t y o u r s e l f To go i n t o a f i e l d w h i c h I l i k e , b u t t a k e s s p e c i a l t r a i n i n g Your j o b p a y s y o u f o r b e i n g i n s c h o o l To o b t a i n e mp l o y me n t Other reasons (please specify) 6 26 9 12 12 16 12 19 13 1 12 2 109 Total A __B _C Total 17. you t o Ir e t u r n to sc hool? (please specify) 2n d 1 St A 18 . 28 Want a h i g h s c h o o l d i p l o m a 17 8 2 k 21 To i m p r o v e how y o u THINK o r FEEL a b o u t y o u r s e l f k 1 18 To g a i n g e n e r a l i n f o r m a t i o n a n d k n o w l e d g e 1 k 15 To g o i n t o f i e l d I l i k e , t a k e s s p e c i a l t r a i n i n g 13 To o b t a i n e m p l o y m e n t 2 0 7 Me e t new p e o p l e a n d make f r i e n d s 0 1 1 1 6 I n c r e a s e fa m ily income 5 H e l p c h i l d r e n w i t h s c h o o l wo r k 1 0 3 Job prom otion 0 1 2 To b e c o me u s e f u l i n c o m m u n i t y a n d s o c i e t y 1 0 2 Your j o b p a y s y o u f o r b e i n g i n s c h o o l 1 0 Which b e n e f i t s o f f e r e d a t t r a c t e d y o u t o t h e a d u l t e d u c a t i o n p r o g r am ? Ch e ck a l l t h a t a p p l y . 3 2 31 37 9 11 16 5 19. A B C 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 k 2 0 0 0 k 3 7 7 k 3 0 k 0 0 3 5 6 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 k 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 1k 12 22 10 k k 6 3 8 5 3 1 1 5 5 1 2 3 1 1k 6 3 8 5 9 6 5 k 0 2 7 8 2 2 1 0 3 1 5 2 10 13 11 2 11 6 1 k 6 8 3 3 2 3 0 Check a l l Child c a r e a n d /o r fa m ily r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s H u s b a n d / w i f e / s i g n i f i c a n t o t h e r d i d n o t w a n t me t o a t t e n d 111 h e a l t h Classes not o ffere d at times or p lacesconvenient f o r me D i d n ’ t know t h e p r o g r a m e x i s t e d Not i n t e r e s t e d b e f o r e Other (please sp e c ify ) Which f a c t o r s h a v e e n c o u r a g e d y o u t o s t a y i n s c h o o l ? apply. 3k kO 3k Ik 31 20 6 C Child c are Financial a ssista n ce C l o s e n e s s t o y o u r home V a r i e t y o f t i m e s when c l a s s e s a r e o f f e r e d Counseling Job in fo rm atio n S p e c i a l c o u r s e s i n r e a d i n g , mat h and w r i t i n g O t h e r ( p l e a s e s p e c i f y ) _________________________________________________ Which o f t h e f o l l o w i n g p r e v e n t e d y o u f r o m e n r o l l i n g b e f o r e ? th at apply. 21 11 3 13 13 22 10 20 . B Check a l l that E n c o u r a g e m e n t o f f a m i l y and f r i e n d s Encouragement o f t e a c h e r s Encouragement o f t h o s e I a t t e n d sc ho ol w i t h I have t o f i n i s h school in o r d e r t o g e t a j o b S a t i s f a c t i o n a s s o c i a t e d w i t h b e i n g i n s c h o o l k e e p s me comi ng b a c k I h a v e t o f i n i s h s c h o o l i n o r d e r t o go on t o c o l l e g e Other (please sp ecify ) 20 21 15 9 17 12 2 110 T otal Total 21. A B P l ea se e x p l a i n , in as much d e t a i l as p o s s i b l e , why you chose t o r e t u r n to school when you d i d . ________________________________________________________ 22 15 7 7 5 E n c o u r a g e m e n t of f a m i l y and f r i e n d s S a t i s f a c t i o n a s s o c i a t e d w i t h b e i n g i n s c h o o l k e e p s me coming ba ck Encouragement of th o s e 1 a t t e n d school w ith 1 have t o f i n i s h school in o r d e r t o g e t a j o b 1 h a v e t o f i n i s h s c h o o l i n o r d e r t o g o on t o c o l l e g e Other 13 8 6 5 15 11 3 3 1 4 0 1 C BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY A d u l t and Community E d u c a t i o n , F l o r i d a S t a t e D e p a r t m e n t o f Education. Accomplishments o f F l o r i d a ’ s A d u l t E d u c at i on Pr ogr a m 1 9 8 0 - 8 1 . T a l l a h a s s e e : F l o r i d a S t a t e Department of E d u c a t i o n , 1982. Adult Stud en t Personnel A s s o c i a t i o n . Counseling the Adult S t u d e n t . P r o c e e d i n g s o f t h e S i x t h Annual C o n v e n t i o n , M o n t i c e l l o , New Yor k, 1968. A s l a n i a n , Ca r o l B . , and B r i c k e l l , Henr y M. A m e r i c a n s i n T r a n s i t i o n : L i f e Cha nge s a s Re a s o n s f o r A d u l t L e a r n i n g . New Yor k: College E n t r a n c e E x a m i n a t i o n Bo a r d , 1980. A t c h l e y , R. C. "The L i f e C o u r s e , A g e - G r a d i n g and A g e - L i n k e d Demands f o r D e c i s i o n Ma k i n g . " In L i f e - S p a n D e v e l o p m e n t a l P s y c h o l o g y : N o r m a t i v e L i f e C r i s e s . E d i t e d by N. Da t a n and L. G i n s b e r g . New Yor k: Aca de mi c P r e s s , 1975. A y e r s , C. " S o c i e t a l F a c t o r s Which I n f l u e n c e A d u l t s t o Co mp l e t e High School." U n p u b l i s h e d r e p o r t , S u r r e y , N o r t h C a r o l i n a , March 1979. Baldwin, J a n e t . "GED P r o f i l e s : A d u l t s i n T r a n s i t i o n - - R e a s o n s GED C a n d i d a t e s Gi ve f o r L e a v i n g S c h o o l . " GED T e s t i n g S e r v i c e o f t h e Ame r i c a n Co u n c i l on E d u c a t i o n , November 1991, p. 10. B a l t e s , P . , and S c h a i e , K. W. "The Myth o f t h e T w i l i g h t Y e a r s . " In The A d u l t L i f e C y c l e : T r a i n i n g Manual and R e a d e r . E d i t e d by V. McCoy, C. Ryan, and J . L i c h t e n b e r g e r . L a wr e n c e : University o f K a n s a s , A d u l t L i f e R e s o u r c e C e n t e r , 1978. B a r k e r , B. 0. " U n d e r s t a n d i n g Rur a l A d u l t L e a r n e r s : Characteristics and C h a l l e n g e s . " J o u r n a l o f t h e Ame r i c a n A s s o c i a t i o n o f A d u l t and C o n t i n u i n g E d u c a t i o n 2 ( O c t o b e r 1 9 8 5 ) : 4 - 7 . B e r k e r , H. S. " P e r s o n a l Cha nge s i n A d u l t L i f e . " In M i d d l e Age and A g i n g . E d i t e d by B. N e w g a r t e n . Chicago: University of C h i c a g o P r e s s , 1968. Ber man, Eleanor. Re-entering. New Yor k: Bernard, J . Women. Wives and M o t h e r s : Chicago: A l d i n e , 1975. Ill Playboy P a p e r b a c k s , Va l u e s and O p t i o n s . 1980. 112 Be rri d ge , Robert I. The Community E d u c a t i o n Ha n d b o o k . P e n d a l l P u b l i s h i n g , 1973. M i d l a n d , MI: Bock, L i n d a K. "Participation." In D e v e l o p i n g . A d m i n i s t e r i n g , and E v a l u a t i n g A d u l t E d u c a t i o n . E d i t e d by Al a n B. Knox and A s s o c i ­ ates. San F r a n c i s c o : J o s s e y - B a s s , 1980. Bocknek, Gene. "A D e v e l o p me n t a l Ap p r o a c h t o C o u n s e l i n g A d u l t s . " Counseling Ps yc holo gis t 6 (1976): 37-40. Boo, Mary R i c h a r d s o n , and D e c k e r , L a r r y . The L e a r n i n g Communi t y. W a s h i n g t o n , D. C . : N a t i o n a l Communit y E d u c a t i o n A s s o c i a t i o n , 1985. Boone, Edga r J . ; S h a r o n , Rona l d W.; W h i t e , E s t e l l e ; and A s s o c i a t e s . S e r v i n g P e r s o n a l and Community Needs Th r o u g h A d u l t E d u c a t i o n . San F r a n c i s c o : J o s s e y - B a s s , 1980. Bo o t h , A . , and Knox, A. " P a r t i c i p a t i o n in Adult Education Agencies and P e r s o n a l I n f l u e n c e . " Sociology of Education 40(3) (1967): 275-77. Bo r d e n , L a r r y , and W h i t t , R o b e r t L. The Communit y Sc hool P r i n c i p a l --New H o r z o n s . Mi d l a n d , MI: P e n d a l l P u b l i s h i n g , 1973. B o r u s , Mi c ha e l E . , and C a r p e n t e r , S u s a n A. "A Not e on t h e R e t u r n o f D r o p o u t s t o High S c h o o l . " Yout h and S o c i e t y J o u r n a l 14 ( J u n e 19 8 3 ) : 5 0 1 - 5 0 7 . B o s h i e r , Roger. "The De v e l o p me n t and Use o f a D r o p o u t P r e d i c t i o n Scale." A d u l t E d u c a t i o n J o u r n a l 22 ( 1 9 7 2 ) : 8 7 - 9 9 . _________ . " E d u c a t i o n a l P a r t i c i p a t i o n and D r o p o u t : A Theoretical Mo d e l . " A d u l t E d u c a t i o n J o u r n a l 23 ( 1 9 7 3 ) : 2 5 5 - 8 2 . B r e e n , Ge or ge J . " A c t i v e - D i r e c t i v e C o u n s e l i n g i n an A d u l t E d u c a t i o n Setting." J o u r n a l o f C o l l e g e S t u d e n t P e r s o n n e l 11 ( 1 9 7 0 ) : 27983. B r i d g e s , W. E. Transitions: Making S e n s e o f L i f e ’ s C h a n g e s . Reading, Mass.: A d d i s o n - W e s l e y , 1980. Brookfield, Stephen. A d u l t L e a r n e r s , A d u l t E d u c a t i o n and t h e Communi t y. New Yor k: T e a c h e r s C o l l e g e P r e s s , 1984. _________ . L e a r n i n g De mocr acy: Edward Li ndeman on A d u l t E d u c a t i o n and S o c i a l C h a n g e . W o l f e b o r o , N. Y . : Croom Helm, 1987. Brown, Ge o r g e , J r . "The R e s o u r c e o f H i g h e s t V a l u e : Tapping t h e Experience of Adult L e a r n e r s ." Michigan A s s o c i a t i o n f o r Adult and C o n t i n u i n g E d u c a t i o n . j o u r n a l 5 ( S p r i n g - S u m m e r 1 9 9 0 ) : 7 - 9 . 113 B u i s t , Ma u r e e n . "Truants Talking." (May 1 9 8 0 ) : 4 0 - 5 1 . S c o t ti s h Educational Revi ew 12 B u r g e s s , P. " Re a s o n s f o r A d u l t P a r t i c i p a t i o n i n Group E d u c a t i o n a l Activities." A d u l t E d u c a t i o n 22 ( 1 9 7 1 ) : 3 - 2 9 . B u t l e r , Linda. "GCE f o r A d u l t s : A Cas e o f C o n f l i c t i n g M y t h o l o ­ gies." A d u l t E d u c a t i o n J o u r n a l 53 ( J a n u a r y 1 9 8 1 ) : 2 9 7 - 3 0 4 . C e r v e r o , R . , and P e t e r s o n , H. L. A f t e r t h e GED T e s t s : Employment and T r a i n i n g A c t i v i t i e s o f GED Exa mi ne e s (GED T e s t i n g S e r v i c e R e s e a r c h No. 4 ) . W a s h i n g t o n , D. C . : Ame r i c a n Co u n c i l on E d u c a t i o n , November 1982. Coml y, Lucy T. Communi t y- Bas e d E d u c a t i o n a l and C a r e e r I n f o r m a t i o n and C o u n s e l i n g S e r v i c e s f o r t h e A d u l t P u b l i c . Al b a n y : New York S t a t e E d u c a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t , 1975. Cranton, P a t r i c i a . Planning I n s t r u c t i o n f o r Adult L e a r n e r s . O n t a r i o , Ca na da : Wall and Thompson, 1989. C r o s s , K. P. 1981. A d u l t s as L e a r n e r s . San F r a n c i s c o : Jossey-Bass, D e l d i n , B. "A D e s c r i p t i o n and A n a l y t i c a l S t u d y on A d u l t S t u d e n t s Who V o l u n t a r i l y Wi t h d r a w From Mi c h i g a n S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y F a l l Term, 1 9 7 9 . " Unpublished r e p o r t , East Lansing, Michigan, Fall 1980. Dy c h t w a l d , Ken, and F l o w e r , J o e . Age Wave: The C h a l l e n g e and O p p o r t u n i t i e s o f an Agi ng A m e r i c a . Los A n g e l e s : J . P. T a r c h e r , 1989. Eble, Ke n n e t h E. B a s s , 1982. The C r a f t o f T e a c h i n g . San F r a n c i s c o : Jossey- E l l i s , Sus a n S. "Introducing Cooperative Learning." Journal of the A s s o c i a t i o n f o r S u p e r v i s i o n and C u r r i c u l u m De v e l o p me n t 47 ( December 1 9 8 9 / J a n u a r y 1 9 9 0 ) : 3 4 - 3 7 . E r i c k s o n , M. B. " C o u n s e l i n g Needs o f A d u l t S t u d e n t s . " Paper p r e ­ s e n t e d a t t h e APGA C o n v e n t i o n , New O r l e a n s , L o u i s i a n a , March 1970. Friedman, P h i l i p . " M o t i v a t i o n a l and P a r t i c i p a t i o n P a t t e r n s . " In M a t e r i a l s and Met hods i n C o n t i n u i n g E d u c a t i o n ( p p . 2 1 3 - 2 2 1 ) . E d i t e d by C h e s t e r K l e v i n s . New Yor k: Klevins P u b l ic a ti o n s . F u l t o n , Rodney D. , and Gr e g g , G l o r i a A. "Does P l a c e Count ? " Communit y E d u c a t i o n J o u r n a l 18 ( W i n t e r 1 9 9 1 ) : 9 - 1 0 . 114 G i lle s p ie , Jacquelyn. "The ’ P u s h o u t s ’ : Aca de mi c S k i l l s and L e a r n i n g D i s a b i l i t i e s i n C o n t i n u a t i o n Hi gh S c hool S t u d e n t s . " J o u r n a l o f L e a r n i n g D i s a b i l i t i e s 15 ( November 1 9 8 2 ) : 5 3 9 - 4 0 . G o l d b e r g , J o a n C. "Counseling the Adult Learner: A Selective Revi ew o f t h e L i t e r a t u r e . " A d u l t E d u c a t i o n J o u r n a l 30 ( 1 9 8 0 ) : 67-81. Go o d l a d , J ohn I . A Place Called School. Mc Gr a w - H i l l , 1983. Gough, H. G. The A d . i e c t i v e Check L i s t . s u l t i n g P s y c h o l o g i s t P r e s s , 1952. Engl ewood C l i f f s , Palo A lto , N.J.: Calif.: Con­ _________ , and H e i l b r u n , A. B. The A d . i e c t i v e Check L i s t M a n u a l . Palo Al to , C a l i f . : C o n s u l t i n g P s y c h o l o g i s t P r e s s , 1965. Go u l d , R. Transformations: Growt h and Change i n A d u l t L i f e . Yor k: Simon and S c h u s t e r , 1978. New Gr a b o w s k i , S. "Educational Counseling of Adults: Where I t ’ s A t . " P a p e r p r e s e n t e d a t t h e C o n f e r e n c e on A d v i s i n g and C o u n s e l i n g A d u l t L e a r n e r s , Al b a n y , New Yor k, O c t o b e r 1975. G r i s w o l d , Ke n n e t h W. " C o u n s e l i n g Wi t h A d u l t S t u d e n t s . " L e a d e r s h i p 20 ( 1 9 7 1 ) : 1 0 3 - 1 0 4 . Gubr i um, J . T . , Francisco: and B u c k h o l d t , D. R. J o s s e y - B a s s , 1977. Toward M a t u r i t y . H a r r i n g t o n , F. H. The F u t u r e o f A d u l t E d u c a t i o n . J o s s e y - B a s s , 1977. Adult San San F r a n c i s c o : H a r t w i g , J o h n E. "A Co mp e t e n c y - Ba s e d Ap p r o a c h t o A d u l t C o u n s e l i n g and G u i d a n c e . " C o u n s e l o r E d u c a t i o n and S u p e r v i s i o n 15 ( 1 9 7 5 ) : 12-19. H a v i g h u r s t , R. J . D e v e l o p me n t a l T a s k s and E d u c a t i o n . Yor k: McKay, 1972. Hill, 3rd ed. Don. "Tasting Failure: T h o u g h t s o f an A t - R i s k L e a r n e r . " D e l t a Ka p p a n , December 1991, pp. 3 0 8 - 1 0 . New Phi Hor d, S. M.; R u t h e r f o r d , W. L . ; H u l i n g - A u s t i n , L . ; and H a l l , C. E. T a k i n g Ch a r g e o f C h a n g e . A r l i n g t o n , V i r g i n i a : Association for S u p e r v i s i o n and C u r r i c u l u m De v e l o p me n t , 1987. H o u l e , C. 0 . The I n g u i r i n g Mi n d . P r e s s , 1961. Ma d i s o n : U n i v e r s i t y o f Wisconsin 115 Inas, Edwar d; C o r s i n i , Raymond J . ; and C o n t r i b u t o r s . Comparative Education Systems. I t a s c a , 111.: P e a c o c k , 1981. I r o n s i d e , D i a n a , and J a c o b s , Dor ene E. T r e n d s i n C o u n s e l i n g and In forma tion S e r v ic e s f o r th e Adult L e a r n e r . Toronto: The O n t a r i o I n s t i t u t e f o r S t u d i e s i n E d u c a t i o n , 1977. I r w i n , M a r t h a , and R u s s e l l , Wilma. The Community I s t h e C l a s s r o o m . M i d l a n d , MI: P e n d a l l P u b l i s h i n g , 1971. J a r v i s , P. Yor k: Tw en t ie th Cent ury Th i nk e rs in Adult E d u c a t i o n . Croom Helm, 1987. New J o h n s t o n e , J . W. C . , and R i v e r a , R. J . Volunteers fo r Learning: A S t u d y o f t h e E d u c a t i o n a l P u r s u i t s o f Ame r i c a n A d u l t s . C h i c a g o : A l d i n e , 1965. K e r e n s k y , V a s i l M., and Me l by, E. 0. Education I I : I m p e r a t i v e . M i d l a n d , MI: Pendall P u b l is h i n g , Ki d d , J . R. How A d u l t s L e a r n . New Yor k: A Social 1971. Association Press, 1973. Ki mmel, Do u g l a s C. " A d u l t De v e l o p me n t : Challenges fo r Counseling." P e r s o n n e l and G u i d a n c e J o u r n a l 55 ( 1 9 7 6 ) : 1 0 3 - 1 0 5 . K l e v i n s , C., ed. M a t e r i a l s and Met hods i n C o n t i n u i n g E d u c a t i o n . New Yor k: K l e v i n s P u b l i s h i n g , 1976. Knowl e s , M. The A d u l t L e a r n e r : G u l f P u b l i s h i n g , 1973. A Neglected S p e c i e s . Ho u s t o n : Knowl e s , M. The Modern P r a c t i c e o f A d u l t E d u c a t i o n From Peda gogy t o Andraqoqy. Chicago: F o l l e t t P u b l i s h i n g , 1980. Knox, Al a n B. A d u l t De v e l o p me n t and L e a r n i n g . J o s s e y - B a s s , 1978. San F r a n c i s c o : __________, and A s s o c i a t e s . D e v e l o p i n g , A d m i n i s t e r i n g , and E v a l u a t i n g A d u l t E d u c a t i o n . San F r a n c i s c o : J o s s e y - B a s s , 1980. Knox, A. B . , and S j o g r e n , D. D. Le a r n i n A d u l t E d u c a t i o n . " 238-243. " M o t i v a t i o n t o P a r t i c i p a t e and A d u l t E d u c a t i o n J o u r n a l 12 ( 1 9 6 2 ) : K r i n g s , Donna. " Me e t i n g t h e C o u n s e l i n g N e e d s . " (1976): 311-13. A d u l t L e a d e r s h i p 24 Kr upp, J . A. A d u l t De v e l o p me n t : I m p l i c a t i o n s f o r S t a f f De v e l o p me n t ( A d u l t De v e l o p me n t C e n t e r P r o j e c t RI SE) . Connecticut: Adult De v e l o p me n t C e n t e r , 1981. 116 _________ . The A d u l t L e a r n e r : A Uni que E n t i t y . De v e l o p me n t C e n t e r , 1982. Connecticut: Adult _________ . " A d u l t s Ar e P e o p l e T o o ! : A H o l i s t i c View o f t h e A d u l t Learner." The D e v e l o p e r : N a t i o n a l S t a f f D e v e l o p me n t C o u n c i l (May 1 9 8 1 ) : 1 - 7 . Le T a r t e , C . , and Mi nz e y, J . D. Communit y E d u c a t i o n : From Pr ogr a m t o P r o c e s s . M i d l a n d , MI: P e n d a l l P u b l i s h i n g , 1972. Levinson, D. The S e a s o n s o f a Man’ s L i f e . New Yor k: Kn o p f , 1978. L i l l e y , Le ona r d D. , J r . , and P e r k i n s , J o h n s i e A. A P r a c t i c a l Gui de f o r t h e A d u l t B a s i c E d u c a t i o n I n s t r u c t o r . New Yor k: Motiva­ t i o n a l R e s e a r c h A s s o c i a t e s , 1977. L i v i n g s t o n Count y P l a n n i n g Commi s s i on. Ce ns us B u r e a u , M u n i c i p a l i ­ t ie s S t a ti s ti c s Division. Unpubl ished r e p o r t , Howell, M i c h i ­ g a n , March 1983. L o w e n t h a l , M.; T h u r n b e r , M . ; C h i r i b o g a , D . , e t a l . L i f e . San F r a n c i s c o : J o s s e y - B a s s , 1975. Madsen, K. B. Theories of M otivation. P u b l i s h i n g , 1964. Ma her , N. The Male M i d l i f e C r i s i s : Yor k: Do u b l e d a y , 1978. Masl ow, A. 1970. Cleveland, New Yor k: McCannon, R. S. " S e r v i n g t h e Rur a l A d u l t : o f Rur a l A d u l t L e a r n e r s . " Manhattan, P r o j e c t , 1981. C. Oh i o : Allen Fresh S t a r t s A f t e r F o r t y . M o t i v a t i o n and P e r s o n a l i t y . McCullers, J. 1978. Four S t a g e s o f New H a r p e r and Row, A De mo g r a p h i c P o r t r a i t Ka n s a s : A c t i o n Agenda The Hi dde n C o s t s o f R e w a r d s . New Yor k: Wi l e y , Mi nz e y, J a c k D. , and Le T a r t e , Cl yde E. Communit y E d u c a t i o n : From P r ogr a m t o P r o c e s s t o P r a c t i c e . M i d l a n d , MI: Pendall P u b l i s h ­ i n g , 1979. Mi z e , J . P. "An E v a l u a t i o n o f t h e GED Pr ogr a m a t S e m i n o l e Communit y College, Sanford, F l o r i d a . " Unpublished r e p o r t , Seminole Community C o l l e g e , S a n f o r d , F l o r i d a , J u n e 1983. Moody, H. R. 191-210. " E d u c a t i o n i n an Agi ng S o c i e t y . " Dae da l us 115 ( 1 9 8 6 ) : 117 Mo r a i n e V a l l e y Community C o l l e g e . "We’ r e Making Tomorr ow: Adult Basic Education." U n p u b l i s h e d r e p o r t , Mo r a i n e V a l l e y Community C o l l e g e , March 1982. M o r s t a i n , B. R . , and S m a r t , J . C. " Re a s o n s f o r P a r t i c i p a t i o n i n Adult Education Courses: A M u l t i v a r i a t e A n a l y s i s o f Gr oup Differences." Adul t Education 24(2) (1974): 83- 98. N e u g a r t e n , B. L. "Successful Aging." P a p e r p r e s e n t e d t o t h e Annual Me e t i n g o f t h e Ame r i c a n P s y c h o l o g i c a l A s s o c i a t i o n , A u g u s t 1982. N e u g a r t e n , B. L . , and N e u g a r t e n , D. A. "The Ch a n g i n g Me ani ng o f Ag e . " P s y c h o l o g y Today 21 (May 1 9 8 7 ) : 5. N i c k s e , R. "A R e p o r t on A d u l t L e a r n e r s : A P r o f i l e o f F i f t y Adult L e a r n e r s Wit h T h e i r R e a c t i o n s t o an A d u l t L i f e S k i l l s , Co m p e t e n c y - B a s e d , A p p l i e d P e r f o r m a n c e A s s e s s m e n t S y s t e m . " U n p u b l i s h e d r e p o r t , Re g i o n a l L e a r n i n g C e n t e r o f C e n t r a l New Yor k, S y r a c u s e , New Yor k, J a n u a r y 1976. O j a , S. N. " A d u l t De v e l o p me n t I s I m p l i c i t i n S t a f f D e v e l o p m e n t . " J o u r n a l o f S t a f f De v e l o p me n t 1 ( 1 9 8 6 ) : 2. O l s e n , Edward G . , and C l a r k , P h i l l i p A. Life-Centering Education. M i d l a n d , MI: P e n d a l l P u b l i s h i n g , 1977. P a r k e r , B . , and P a i s l e y , J . " P a t t e r n s of Adult In fo rm at io n Seeking." F i n a l R e p o r t on U. S. O f f i c e o f E d u c a t i o n P r o j e c t No. 2583. Stanford, C a lif.: S t a n f o r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1966. P e a r l m a n , B e r t T. "The Ca s e f o r Local O p t i o n on t h e Use o f E x c e s s Classroom Space." S t a t e m e n t t o t h e E d u c a t i o n Co mmi t t e e o f t h e C a l i f o r n i a S e n a t e , O c t o b e r 16, 1981. P e t e r s , J ohn M., and B o s h i e r , Roge r . " A d u l t Ne e d s , I n t e r e s t s and Motives." In M a t e r i a l s and Met hods i n C o n t i n u i n g E d u c a t i o n (pp. 197- 212) . E d i t e d by C h e s t e r K l e v i n s . New Yor k: Klevins Publications. P o r t e r , Lee. " A d u l t s Have S p e c i a l L e a d e r s h i p 18 ( 1 9 7 0 ) : 2 7 5 - 7 6 . P u t r o w , Mary L o u i s e . Optians Journal Counsel ing Needs." Adult " A d u l t E d u c a t i o n - - I s T h e r e a P l a n n i n g Mode l ? " 1 (1986): 10-12. Rachlis, Lome. " A d d r e s s i n g t h e Needs o f R e t u r n i n g A d u l t S t u d e n t s . " C l e a r i n g h o u s e J o u r n a l 54 ( A p r i l 1 9 8 1 ) : 3 7 6 - 8 0 . Rich, John M a r t i n . I n n o va t i on in Educ at ion: R e f o r m e r s and T h e i r C r i t i c s . Boston: A l l y n and Bacon, 1978. 118 Rimmer, S. M., and K a h n w e i l e r , W. M. "The R e l a t i o n s h i p Among Work, L e i s u r e , E d u c a t i o n , F u t u r e and S e l f : An E m p i r i c a l I n v e s t i g a ­ tion." V o c a t i o n a l G u i d a n c e Q u a r t e r l y 30 ( December 1 9 8 1 ) : 10916. R o s e n f e l d , A . , and S t o r k , Today 21 (May 1 9 8 7 ) : E. 5. "The Pr i me o f Our L i v e s . " Psychology R u b i n , L. Women o f a C e r t a i n Age: The M i d l i f e S e a r c h f o r S e l f . New Yor k: H a r p e r and Row, 1979. Rudolph, F r e d e r i c k . The Ame r i c a n C o l l e g e and U n i v e r s i t y : H i s t o r y . Headlesburg, C a l i f . : V i n t a g e Books , 1962. A S a i n t y , G. E. " P r e d i c t i n g Dropouts in Adul t Educ ati on C o u r s e s . " A d u l t E d u c a t i o n J o u r n a l 21 ( 1 9 7 1 ) : 2 2 3 - 3 0 . S c h a r l e s , He n r y . "The R e l a t i o n s h i p o f S e l e c t e d P e r s o n a l i t y Needs t o P a r t i c i p a t i o n , D r o p - O u t , and Ac h i e v e me n t Among A d u l t L e a r n e r s . " Ph. D. d i s s e r t a t i o n , F l o r i d a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y , 1966. S c h l o s s b e r g , Nancy K. "The Ca s e f o r C o u n s e l i n g A d u l t s . " P s y c h o lo g is t 6 (1976): 33-36. _________ . Counseling Adults in T r a n s i t i o n . P u b l i s h i n g , 1984. New Yor k: Counseling Springer _________ . " F i v e P r o p o s i t i o n s About A d u l t D e v e l o p m e n t . " Journal of C o l l e g e S t u d e n t P e r s o n n e l 19 ( S e p t e m b e r 1 9 7 8 ) : 4 1 8 - 2 3 . _________ . " U n d e r s t a n d i n g and Re a c h i n g A d u l t L e a r n e r s . " Ke ynot e s p e e c h a t t h e N a t i o n a l Academi c A d v i s i n g A s s o c i a t i o n , O c t o b e r 12, 1986. _________ ; A n s e l l o , E. F . ; Readiness Q u o t i e n t . 1986. and P o l l a c k , S. K. Your T r a n s i t i o n R o c k v i l l e , Md.: The T r a n s i t i o n s Gr oup, S c h l o s s b e r g , Nancy K. ; F a r me r , M a r t h a ; and Ka ba c k, G. R. Perspec­ t i v e s on C o u n s e l i n g A d u l t s : I s s u e s and S k i l l s . Mo n t e r e y , Calif.: B r o o k s / C o l e , 1978. S c h l o s s b e r g , Nancy K. , and Wa r r e n , B. Gr owi ng Up A d u l t : Reactions t o N o n t r a d i t i o n a l L e a r n i n g E x p e r i e n c e s . Co l u mb i a , Md.: C o u n c i l f o r Adva nc e me nt o f E x p e r i e n t i a l L e a r n i n g , 1985. Se a y , M a u r i c e F . , and A s s o c i a t e s . Community E d u c a t i o n : A Develop­ i n g C o n c e p t . M i d l a n d , MI: P e n d a l l P u b l i s h i n g , 1974. 119 S e b r i n g , Penny A . , and H a n n i f o r d , B a r b a r a E. " R e a c h i n g t h e ABE Target Population: How Ar e We Doi ng? P l a n n i n g S t u d i e s i n Continuing Education." Paper p r e s e n t e d a t t h e L i f e l o n g L e a r n ­ i n g R e s e a r c h C o n f e r e n c e , C o l l e g e P a r k , M a r y l a n d , F e b r u a r y 1, 1980. Sh e e h y , G a i l . Passages: Yor k: Bant am Books , S h u t t l e w o r t h , Da l e E. Education Journal P r e d ic t a b l e C rises of Adult L i f e . 1977. "The Community a s C l a s s r o o m . " 15 ( J u l y 1 9 8 8 ) : 1 2 - 1 5 . New Communit y S l a v i n , R o b e r t E. " R e s e a r c h on C o o p e r a t i v e L e a r n i n g : C o n s e n s u s and Controversy." J o u r n a l o f t h e A s s o c i a t i o n f o r S u p e r v i s i o n and C u r r i c u l u m De v e l o p me n t 47 ( December 1 9 8 9 / J a n u a r y 1 9 9 0 ) : 5 2 - 5 5 . S m i t h , E r i c C. "Communi ty E d u c a t i o n i n 1999: The B e s t I s Ye t t o Come." Community E d u c a t i o n J o u r n a l 17 ( S p r i n g 1 9 9 0 ) : 29. S m i t h , F r a n c e s k a B. "Hi gh School E q u i v a l e n c y P r e p a r a t i o n f o r R e c e n t Dropouts." New D i r e c t i o n s f o r C o n t i n u i n g E d u c a t i o n 21 (March 1984): 41-54. Sp a r k s , Dennis. "Creating Cooperative Schools: An I n t e r v i e w Wi t h Da vi d and Roge r J o h n s o n . " J o u r n a l o f S t a f f De v e l o p me n t 2 (Wi nt er 1990): 44-45. S t e w a r t , D. W. A d u l t L e a r n i n g i n Ame r i c a : Edward Li ndeman and Hi s Agenda f o r L i f e l o n g L e a r n i n g . M a l a b a r , F l a . : Krieger P u b l i s h i n g , 1987. Tate, M. C. "An A n a l y s i s o f t h e R e l a t i o n s h i p Bet ween S e l e c t e d P e r s o n a l S o c i o - E c o n o m i c C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f a Random Sa mpl e o f A d u l t Women and T h e i r Re a s o n s f o r E n r o l l i n g i n an Ur ban Commu­ nity College." Unpublished Report, East Lansing, Michigan, F a l l 1971. Taylor, Harold. On E d u c a t i o n and F r e e d o m. P r e s s , 1954. New Yor k: Aca de mi c T a y l o r , Nancy. "A S t u d y o f L o w - L i t e r a t e A d u l t s : Personal, Environ­ m e n t a l and Pr ogr a m C o n s i d e r a t i o n s . " Ur ban Re vi ew 12 (Summer 1980): 69-77. Thor man, E. C. New Yor k: V o c a t i o n a l C o u n s e l i n g o f A d u l t s and Young A d u l t s . H o u g h t o n - M i f f l i n , 1968. Ti e d e ma n , S h a n e . " A s s e s s i n g Community E d u c a t i o n O u t c o m e s . " Community E d u c a t i o n J o u r n a l 18 ( S p r i n g 1 9 9 1 ) : 2 8 - 3 0 . 120 Tomlanovich, J . " A d u l t L e a r n e r P e r s i s t e n c e i n Hi gh School Compl e ­ t i o n Programs." Ph. D. d i s s e r t a t i o n , Mi c h i g a n S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y , 1988. T o t t e n , W. F r e d . The Power o f Community E d u c a t i o n . P e n d a l l P u b l i s h i n g , 1970. M i d l a n d , MI: Tough, A l l e n . The A d u l t ’ s L e a r n i n g P r o j e c t s : A F r e s h Ap p r o a c h t o T h e o r y and P r a c t i c e i n A d u l t L e a r n i n g . O n t a r i o : In stitu te for S t u d i e s i n E d u c a t i o n , 1979. U. S. D e p a r t m e n t o f Commerce, O f f i c e o f F e d e r a l S t a t i s t i c a l P o l i c y and S t a n d a r d s . S o c i a l I n d i c a t o r s 1976: S e l e c t e d Da t a on S o c i a l C o n d i t i o n s and T r e n d s i n t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s . W a s h i n g t o n , D. C . : Gove r nme nt P r i n t i n g O f f i c e , December 1977. Waters, E l i n o r , e t a l . " S t r a t e g i e s f o r T r a in i n g Adult C ou ns elo rs ." Counseling P s y c h o lo g i s t 6 (1976): 61-66. W i g g i n t o n , E. " F o x f i r e Grows Up. " (1989): 24-29. Harvard E d u c a t i o n a l Revi ew 5 9 , 1 W i l h o i t , Gene. "The Demands o f De m o g r a p h i c s : New O p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r Community E d u c a t i o n . " Community E d u c a t i o n J o u r n a l 15 ( J u l y 1988): 9-11. W i l l i a m s , G e r a l d D. , e t a l . " Ur ge nc y and Type s o f A d u l t C o u n s e l i n g Needs Among C o n t i n u i n g E d u c a t i o n S t u d e n t s . " Journal of College S t u d e n t P e r s o n n e l 14 ( 1 9 7 3 ) : 5 0 1 - 5 0 6 . W i l l i a m s , R . , and W i r t h s , A t h e r t o n , 1965. C. L i v e s Thr ough t h e Y e a r s . New Yor k: W i l s o n , R u s s e l l C. " P e r s o n o l o g i c a l V a r i a b l e s R e a l t e d t o GED R e t e n t i o n and W i t h d r a w a l . " A d u l t E d u c a t i o n J o u r n a l 30 ( 1 9 8 0 ) : 173-85. Wl odkows ki , Raymond J . Enhancing Adult M o t i v a t i o n t o L e a r n . San F r a n c i s c o : J o s s e y - B a s s , 1985. Yates, Doris Denise. "An E x p l o r a t o r y S t u d y o f Women Who R e t u r n t o Co mp l e t e a Hi gh Sc hool E d u c a t i o n . " Ph. D. d i s s e r t a t i o n , Mi c h i g a n S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y , 1982.