DELINQ'UENCY AREAS IN THE._ . I _ CITY" AND‘COUNTY - -. .: _ OF' JACKSON, MICHIGAN THESIS TOT THT DTTTTT 0T M T ' . 1 Wllham Hamilton Sewell '- ' A - ’ 1934 H‘f ‘ 7fl3. I I I ‘ . t I I i C. . ‘ 1‘ \: . ‘ N a ’.‘ ,| l . a ‘ 5' 5 . “. I i K E 31293006461093 1 PLACE IN RETURN BOX to remove this checkout from your record. TO AVOID FINES return on or baton date duo. DATE DUE ‘1 DATE DUE DATE DUE MSU Is An Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution “94y; tvtftdé' Y2K ’ “Twp: 9-1: .mmns / Q- “'41 "I "M W..- _‘~‘- “‘ DELINQUENCY AREAS IN THE CITY AND COUNTY OF JACKSON, MICHIGAN by WILLIAM HAIILTON SEWELL A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Sociology :.proved: ‘, Dean STICraduateISchooI EICHIGAN STATE COLLEGE 1934 THFQIS ACKNOWLEDGEIENT / The writer wishes to express his appreciation to Thomas Lovitt, Sheriff of Jackson County, for the use ,of the records of his department, and to Mr. Carl Waltz for assistance.nith the maps. He is indebted to Dr. Eben Xumford, and to Dr. Charles R. Hoffer, of the Department of Sociology, Nichigan State College, for their guidance in the writing of this thesis. T. Fa Mr! 3? a #4: I‘ ‘Q. T. . CHAPTER I CHAPTER II CHAPTER III CHAPTER IV CHAPTER Y CHAPTER VI TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION A HISTORICAL, ECONOHIC, AND SOCIAL DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF JACKSON, MICHIGAN. ANALYSIS OF JACKSON COUNTY JAIL COHHITHENT RECORDS FOR 1935 DELINqUENCY RATES IN JACKSON COUNTY DELINQUENCY AREAS IN THE CITY OF JACKSON SUMMARY BIBLIOGRAPI *U a) go 15 30 43 53 78 82 Map Map Map Map Map LIST OF EAPS I. Birth Place and Residence by States of Persons Committed to the Jackson County Jail in 1933. II. Birth Place and Residence of Michigan Persons Committed to the Jackson County Jail in 1933. III. Commitment Rates by Townships for Jackson County in 1933. IV. Place of Residence of 627 Persons Committed to the Jackson County Jail in 1933. V. Place of Residence by Wards and Enumeration Districts of 627 Persons Committed to the Jackson County Jail in 1933. VI. Commitment Rates by Wards for the City of Jackson, 1933. VII. Commitment Rates by Enumeration Districts for the City of Jackson, 1933. LIST OF TABLES Table I. The POpulation Distribution in Jackson County. Table II. Average Age and Commitment Rates According to Sex and Race of Persons Cowmitted to the Jackson County Jail in 1933. Table III. Marital State According to Sex and Color of Persons Committed to the Jackson County Jail in 1933. Table IV. Occupations of Persons Committed to the Jackson County Jail in 1933. Table V. Classification of Commitments to the Jackson County Jail in 1933 by Types of Offense. Table VI. Commitment Rates and Pepulation Composition and Distribution for Townships in Jackson County in 1933. Table VII. Commitment Rates and.P0pulation Composition by Wards and Enumeration Districts for the City of Jackson in 1933. 44 54 56 57 58 19 35 38 39 4O 46 59 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Whenever and wherever there are groups of humans the group regulates the social activities of its members. In primitive societies custom governs behavior. In more advanced cultures customs are formulated into regulations or laws by the legis- lative groups within the state and are enforced by the state. A crime is committed when those laws are broken. Clayton J. Ettinger defines crime in these words: One might define crime in the United States as an act or omission forbidden by law, punishable upon con- viction by death, imprisonment, fine, removal from office, disqualification to hold office, or other penal dis- cipline. (l) The definition offered by John Lewis Gillin concurs with the foregoing one, but is stated in somewhat more general terms. Gillin defines crime in this way: From the legal point of view any action by an individual in contravention of the law is a crime.(2) It may either be the commission of an act forbidden by law or the omission of an act demanded by 1aw.(3) Crime is often.divided into classes according to its seriousness. Grave crimes such as murder and.robbery armed are called felonies while drunkenness and assault and battery are called misdemeanors. (1) Clayton J. Ettinger, The Problem of Crime, p. 4. (2) John Lewis Gillin, CrithOIOgy_and Pen010gy, p. 11. (3) This definition is used"inifhis thesis since the data used is based upon the legal concept of crime. In a discussion of crime it should be remembered that it is not static but dynamic since it is based upon customs, mores, and beliefs of the group which change to meet the new conditions. Acts‘which were acceptabletand even approved by a group several years ago may now be contrary to the written laws of the group and be classed.as criminal or acts which were formerly regarded as crimes may no longer be considered.as such. While crime is universally found in all societies, there is no set agreement as to what actsmare criminal. .The final Judgment depends entirely upon the social situation of the group. Thus, we see that in one culture polygamy is accepted as the proper form of marital relationship while in another it is contrary to the law. Crime is not only universal but has been in existence ever since the emergence of the most elementary forms of group control. Westermark and others find evidences of violation of law and custom in the most primitive of ancient and modern societies.(4) That crime has'been.a social problem of importance fer a long period of time is demonstrated by the vast amount of theory which has grown up about it. A brief review of this theory from the earliest recorded beliefs to the present theories of crime follows. Theory of Crime The theory of crime began with the early belief that crimina1.acts:resulted from the innate depravity of the (5) individual or the instigation of the devil. About witchcraft (4) E. Westermark, The Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas, vol. 1., chap. VIII. (5) E. H. Sutherland, Criminology, p. 43. -3- there were built up many criminal beliefs. It seemed logical since the devil was the enemy of righteousness to employ corporal punishment to drive him out of the bodies of the unfortunate mortals who were suspected of harboring him. In primitive societies and even down to the time of the Salem Witchcraft days, scourgings, beatings, and other vicious physical punishments were inflicted on criminals. 6 The Egyptians believed that the soul could be cleansed of sin by magical ritual. They were the first to hold the utili- tarian viewpoint that man should do good because it was profitable to him to do so. They felt that the approval of human society was what motivated humans to act in a socially acceptable manner.7) The Babylonians believed in "lex talionis" or "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth." This doctrine was incorporated in the code of Hammurabi ( about 1927 B. 0.). The Early Greeks believed crime to be an offense against society and that the community should punish the individual for his criminal acts.(8) Socrates identified crime with ignorance. Plato held that man was free to choose the direction of his acts but acted.crimina11y because he believed that he would receive more pleasure and less pain than from socially acceptable acts. The Stoics believed that the criminal was not prOperly adjusted to nature and reason. Epicurus claimed that the criminal deliberately broke the social contract intended to restrain men (6) H. Oppenheimer,The Rationale of Punishment, p. 73. (7) E. G. Ettinger, o . cit., p. 40. (8) George M. Calhoun, Tfie Growth of Criminal Law in Ancient Greece, chap. 1. - 4 - from harming one another and.to save them from being harmed. The Romans believed that religious offenders should merit violent punishment by the community so that the Gods would not wreak their vengeance upon the whole group. The medieval theories of crime were greatly influenced by the introduction of Christianity. The New Testament fostered the belief in rewards and.punishments for sins on earth. The individual was held to be publicly accountable for his transgress- ions. The doctrine of free will wasaaccepted by most of the thinkers of this time. Duns Scotus, Thomas Aquinas, St. Augustine, and Pelagius all believed in the individual's right to choose whether he would.act morally or sinfully. Since the sin was committed against God, it was of public concern.and the sinner should be punished publicly. In the latter part of the 18th century, the Classical School arose. It was a reaction.against the penal system based upon repression. A mid-path between determinism and freedom of the will was advocated. Beccaria, Rousseau, Montesquieu, and Voltaire were the leading classicists with.Beccaria as the outstanding member of the group. In 1764, he wrote, I'Crimee and Punishments". This book protested against cruel and inhuman punishments of criminals and the arbitrary power of Judges to set sentences. Beccaria believed that criminals were free moral agents who chose to do evil.rather than good, but that they should be Judged.according to their acts rather than their intent or the circumstances under which the acts were committed. The Rec-Classical School arose as a protest against the impracticability of the classicist'stheory. Rossi, Carroud, -5... and Joly were leaders in this new school of thought. They retained the belief in the theory of freedom.of the will, but recognized that certain persons were unable and incapable of exercising free will. They contended, therefore, that children and persons who were mentally'defective should not be held responsible for their criminalTacts. The Positive School, under the leadership of Cesare Lombroso, Enrico Ferri, and Raffaeli Garofalo, was the first school of thought to break away from the standards of the Classicists. Lombroso was the one who first eXpressed.the beliefs of this group. He believed that criminals are by birth a distinct type. This type could be recognized by physical stigmata. He contended that these stigmata resulted.from reversion to a savage type or from degeneration. Since the criminal possessed these physical deficiencies, he could not keep from committing crime unless his environment were very favorable. He did some work on prisoners and found what he called I'criminal types". From this work, he offered a classi- fication of criminals. Charles Goring, the English criminologist, disproved the existence of a criminal type of his research on English prisoners and control groups. However, Lombroso's work was a.great contribution in that itiwas the first attempt at research to determine the causes of crime and in that it placed the emphasis on the individual committing the crime rather than on the crime itself. The French School seems to have been a reaction.against the biological and.anthropological theories advanced by the Positive School. Cornwale, Tarde, and others believed that crime was the :resultant of the complexity of’social forces Operating on the - 5 - individual. Tarde, especially, insisted that imitation of the higher social classes by the lower classes was responsible for crime. Since those in the lower classes have neither power nor means they are apprehended and convicted while their more fortunate rich brothers go free. Modern criminal theory has probably been influenced more by the teaching of Lombroso than by any other man.(9) It should not be thought that all modern criminal theory leans toward the belief in a criminal type, however. Sutherland maintains that modern criminal theory can, according to its emphasis, be classified as: (l) biological, (2) personality, (3) primary socia1.groups, and (4) broader social processes.(10) The biological theories emphasize heredity, physical structure, endocrine glands, and inherited mental traits. The personality theories stress the mental deviations, impulses, limitations and drives. Some of these theories recognize the influence of social situation upon the individual personality while others do not. The theory based on the primary social group places the emphasis on the home and the neighborhood. The broader social processes theory is built on the belief that crime results from conditions wrought by the inadequate social and economic organi- zation behind our institutions. This theory is stated in terms of cultural lag, social disorganization, and mobility. It is quite probable that no one of these theories or points of emphasis is the correct one when taken alone. Perhaps some theory taking (9) C. J. Ettinger, o . cit., p. 57. (10) E. H. Sutherlan , PrInciples of Criminology, p. 48. .. -7- cognizance of all of these approachesxwould come nearer to the truth. The Approach Emphasized In This Study In this study there will be no attempt to attack the problems of crime from any one of the four points of view set forth by Sutherland. But, since this is a sociological study, the last two theories stated by him will be emphasized most. There will be an attempt, however, to give adequate attention to the individual in his proper relationship to the group, i.e. as a member of the group. The individual functions only as a member of the groups to which he belongs. He is dependent on one or more groups for his very existence. The behavior patterns that he learns, the habits that he forms, the philosophy he embraces, the religion in which he believes, the political doctrines he follows, in short, everything he does is conditioned by the groups with which he has contacts. Therefore, it seems legical that a study of the nature of the factors influencing these groups would be fundamental to the understanding of the individual delinquent. Purpose It is the purpose of this study to determine the number, kinds and distribution of adult delinquency in the city and county of Jackson, Hichigan, for the calendar year 1933 and to attempt to find the causes of the delinquency in relation to the nature of the physical, social, and economic conditions within the various areas of distribution. The apparent factors influencing delinquency, such as type and location of neighborhood, types of homes, average rents, age, color, nativity and sex of pOpulation, and religious, educations, and recrea- - a - tional facilities, will be briefly summarized. There will be no attempt to make a detailed survey of any of the above mentioned factors or of the many others which influence delinquency, such as standard of living, financial condition, organization member- ship, and education. No doubt such a study would be interesting and of great value in explaining areas, but it lies outside the scape of this thesis. Method The method used in this thesis is primarily ecological, supplemented by the historical, statistical, and survey methods. The data for the study were secured from the Jackson county Jail commitment records for the year of 1933. (January 1 to December 31). For this period there were 1,204 commitments. The records gave the name, address, occupation, place of birth, marital state, sex, color, and age of each person incarcerated, the date of commitment, the nature of the offense, the court committed by, the conditions of commitment, and the department making the arrest. This source seemed to be better suited to the purposes of this study‘than did the records of the City Police: first, because it provided data on both urban and rural peOple; second, because the information on the record.cards was more complete and.more applicable to the problem to be studied; and third, 'because the county Jail records showed.fewer commitments for ‘violations of ordinances and minor offenses. The use of these records may be criticized from the stand- ;point of the fact that many commitments to the county Jail are :for minor offenses which are of insufficient importance to be - 9 - classed as crimes. However, it is the writer's belief that such offenses as drunkenness are of . 7. hfi ”ml .03 2(x H v . m» n A 3 3 w .33 e .4. .1. a .4... “0* 250. .cnuz :3»: 00m . e 2 A. .5 .15.: N £3 .n .0»; a .22.: .K(O .2 .hto m .5203 0” N. £3£JMr f -32- of 72 of the persons committed. The large number from these states may‘be explained by the fact that these persons were either imported into Jackson by industries seeking cheap labor or were attracted to Michigan by the automotive industry. Since little more than half of the persons who were committed to the county Jail in 1933 were born in Michigan, it would seem that mobility may have been.a factor in their delinquency. Data on county of birth were available for 365 of the 495 persons committed who were born in Michigan. The number of persons committed reporting birth places in Michigan is shown by counties in map 2. Jackson county was given as the birth place of 199 or 22 per cent of the persons committed. This fact would tend to show that more than 75 per cent of the delinquent persons came into the county.sometime after their birth and were not products of the county. This is in keeping with the findings of Taft in his study of adult delinquency in Illinois.‘5) Wayne county was given as the county of birth by 22 persons, Kent by 15, Hillsdale by 16, Calhoun by 13, Ingham by 12, and Eaton and Washtenaw by 9 each. That more delinquents migrated to Jackson county from Wayne and Kent counties than from other areas of the state is probably due to the location of the cities of Detroit and Grand Rapids in these two counties, both cities being within 100 miles of Jackson. The other counties referred to above all border on Jackson county and migration is therefore probably quite frequent from one of these counties to the other. The fact that the number of persons committed to the Jackson County Jail residing in these counties is greater than for other counties is no doubt a factor contri- (3) Donald. Re Taft, Op. Cit.- map 2. Birth Place and Residence of Michigan Persons by Counties Committed to the Jackson County Jail, in 1933. p 1. Legend: Black figures indicate residence Red figures indicate place of birth mean / BAR GA LUCI— IRON W DELTA creschn 2 a: a I q “Wt ‘ l f i l orseco' 1 mcv AL NA ‘ ANTRIM J l KALK K mam—W ALCONA OENZ'E -- ”01’ must 1 l MANISTEE mxrono MISSAUKEE aoscowon (SEW—— 0 l 3 "ASON LAKE oscmLA CL ARE GLAowm m l ”N DAY 1 OCEANA ammo m Isa-ELLA We 1 1 3 l l Tuscou “NI-AC WNA Q l G Wu: annc T ‘ " 1 5 i A castes: cum OTTAWA IONIA W ““WAMI 3t 4 2 1 3 l l l 5' l l l oAKLMD IIACOMO m cm sum EATON mom» UV‘"°’T°" l . 3 9 10 4 1 . 2 6 12 l A» mu KALAMA CALHOUN JACKSON WAsHTENAW WAvm27 9 25 844 9 22 3 2 5 15 199 9 ‘ :9 « er. Joscm unfit: mum—— ”° '2 2 9 5 4 j 1 5 15 7 1 buting to the high number of persons reporting them as their counties of birth. Residence The place of residence was given by 1,007 or 98 per cent of the persons committed. The number of persons committed to the Jackson County Jail in 1933 according to residence by states is also shown on Map 1. 0f the 1,007 persons committed, 960 or 95 per cent gave Michigan.as their place of'residence and 41 or 5 per cent states other than.Nfichigan. Ohio, Illinois, and New York each were given by 7 or more persons as their place of residence. All of those residing in New York and Illinois came from the cities of New York and Chicago respectively. Those from Indiana and Ohio can'be accounted.for by the fact that these states border Michigan at a point within fifty miles of Jackson. Of the 960 persons giving Michigan as their place of residence, 955 gave the county of residence. The distribution of these 955 places of residence by counties is shown on map 2. 0f the 955 Michigan persons giving county of residence, 844 or 88 per cent were residents Of Jackson county and 627 or 67 per cent residents of the city Of Jackson. Wayne county was given as the county of residence by 27 persons; Calhoun by 25; Ingham by 10; and Eaton, Washtenaw, and Hillsdale by 9 each. Inasmuch as Detroit is located in Wayne county, the number from that county is naturally large. The other counties mentioned above all border Jackson county. Since their residents live near Jackson, they are more liable to frequent the county than are the residents of counties located farther away. - 35 - Sex,_Color, and Age Data concerning sex, color, and age were available for 1,022 of the 1,038 persons committed. The average age and commitment rates according to sex and race of persons committed to the county Jail in 1933 is shown in Table II. TABLE II. AVERAGE AGE AND CORRITMENT RATES ACCORDING TO SEX AND RAGE OF PERSONS COMMITTED TO THE JACKSON COUNTY JAIL: 1933 (4) : :Number :COmmitments::Average Age :POpulationzPersons :per 1,000 in:of Persons :of County :Committed:POpulation :Committed Total 87,742 1,022 11.2 54.5 Males 44,836 907 20.2 34.1 Females 43,468 115 2.6 32.4 White 86,279 877 10.2 33.5 Males 45,551 785 18.0 54.1 Females 42,728 92 2.2 32.6 Colored 1,455 145 99.1 55.5 Males 723 122 168.7 33.5 Females 740 23 31.1 31.6 The average age at the time of commitment of the 1,022 persons on whom data were available was 34.3 years. The average age for males was 34.1 and for females 32.4. The average age for both sexes of persons committed was slightly less for colored than it was for white persons. The average age for colored males was 33.5 and for colored females 31.6 as compared with 34.1 for white males and 32.6 for white females. These figures on average age run higher than most of the available figures from other studies. (4) All population data used in this study are corrected for the Michigan State Prison p0pulation. - 36 - waever, it should be remembered that they are based upon commit- ment records of both Juvenile and.adult delinquents. The inclusion of Juveniles no doubt brings the average age down considerably. If it were not for this fact these figures would probably conform more closely with those of other studies. Gillen found that the age group from 25 to 35 is characterized by high commitment rates for vagrancy, drunkenness, disorderly conduct and allied offenses, non-support and other crimes against family, embezzlement, and assault. Since the average age of persons committed to the Jackson County Jail falls in this age grouping commitments for these crimes should run high in Jackson county.(5) Colored persons were committed to the county Jail at a frequency ten times,greater than that for whites. This ratio seems to be much greater than that for the country as a whole. Gillette and Reinhardt's statement on this matter, based upon statistics for the entire country, is, "that in proportion to the p0pu1ation more than three times as many Negroes as whites were committed to prisons and reformatories in 1933".(6) Sutherland gives the same ratio, but points out that it is much higher in the northern and western-states.(7) It should be remembered that when comparisons of rates between colored and white people are made that they not only involve different race groups but also different economic, educational, and social groups and different cultural levels. (5) John Lewis Gillen, Criminology and Penology, 1926, p. 54. (6) John M. Gillette and James M. Reinhardt, Current Social Problems, 1933, p. 702. (7) Eden H. Sutherland, pp. 213: p. 110. Considering the entire group, males were committed at a frequency about eight times as great as for females. White males were committed nearly nine times as frequently as white females, while colored males were committed but five times as frequently as colored females.(8) Since Negroes are committed more fre- quently than whites and males more frequently than females, those areas having a high percentage of Negroes or a noticeable excess of males over females might be expected to show a high commit- ment rate. Marital State Information regarding marital state was available for 1,011 of the 1,038 persons committed. It is quite probable that the data for single and divorced persons are not entirely accurate since divorced persons are frequently recorded as single. However, the data concerning married persons should be accurate for all practical purposes. The number and percentage of the 1,038 persons committed to the countngail who were married, single, or divorced are given.according to sex and color in Table III. Of the 1,038 persons committed more than half (52 per cent) were single, 44 per cent married, and 4 per cent divorced. While no figures.are available as to marital state of persons committed to other county Jails these figures correspond quite closely to similar figures for the Michigan State Prison. The percentage of married prisoners in Michigan State Prison in 1933(gts 36 per cent, single 60 per cent, and divorced 4 per cent. A greater percentage of both the (8) This ratio is in keeping with the usual commitment ratio of males to females. See John L. Gillin, gp..g£y. p. 5', and Edwin H. Sutherland, 22. cit. p. 111. (9) Statistical Report Of MicHIgan State Prison, 1933. -38.. colored.and white males committed were single than were married. More of the females committed were married than single. (10) These facts are also in keeping with Gillin's findings. TABLE III. MARITAL STATE ACCORDING TO SEX AND COLOR OF PERSONS COMMITTED TO THE JACKSON COUNTY JAIL IN 1933 : SIngle : *Married' :‘Divorced :TOtaI:Per :Num- :Per :Num- :Per :Num-zPer : :Cent :ber :Cent :ber :Cent :ber :Cent: ‘ Total Persons Committed 528 52.2 441 43.6 42 4.2 1011 100.0 Males 477 47.2 381 37.7 39 3.9 897 88.7 White 409 40.5 328 32.4 38 3.8 775 76.7 Colored 68 6.7 53 5.2 l .1 122 12.1 Females 51 5.0 60 5.9 3 .3 114 11.3 White 37 3.7 53 5.2 2 .2 92 9.1 Colored 14 1.4 7 .7 1 .l 22 2.2 Occupation Data pertaining to occupation were secured for 572 or 55 per cent of the persons committed. So many occupations were indicated that it was necessary to condense them into general classes. These classes are shown in Table IV. Unskilled laborers constituted the highest number of commitments (224 or 39.2 per cent) followed by those persons engaged in manufacturing and mechanical industries (129 or 22.5 per cent) and those in agriculture (64 or 8.0 per cent). The fewest commitments were for those engaged in.c1erica1.and professional occupations or only 5 and 3 commitments respectively for these grOups. It is difficult to compare occupational figures of different studies (10) John Lewis Gillin, g2, cit. p. 64. -39.. TABLE IV. OCCUPATIONS OF PERSONS COMMITTED TO THE JACKSON COUNTY JAIL IN 1933 Per Per Total Cent Total Cent Agriculture 64 11.2 Miscellaneous Laborers 224 39.2 ‘Farmers 58 Gardeners 6 Housewives 31 5.4 Manufacturing and Trade 46 8.0 Mechanical Industry_ 129 22.6 CIerks 10 Bakers ”' 2 Retail Dealers 9 Blacksmiths 4 Salesman 25 Boiler maker 1 Other laborers 2 Brick Layers 6 Carpenters 6 Professional Service 8 1.4 Electricians 6 Show People 2 Engineers 2 Druggists 1 Firemen 2 Civil Engineer 1 Foreman 1 Lawyers 2 Moulders 7 musician. 1 Machinists 49 Teacher 1 Mechanics ll Painters 17 Students 5 .9 Plasterers 1 Printers 1 Domestic and Personal 16 2.8 Plumbers 5 ‘Barbers 4 Other manufactur- Cooks 2 ing workers 8 Dry Cleaners 2 Housekeepers 2 Transportation and Janitors 5 Communication 46 8.0 Servants l Cfiauffeurs and“ truck drivers 32 Clerical 3 .5 Motormen 4 oo eepers 3 Mail Carriers 1 Telephone Operators 1 Other laborers 8 Total Occupations Given 572 since there seems to be no definitezagreement as to the occupa- tional classification. persons committed to Jails and prisons in 1910 were general laborers and 6.2 per cent farmers and farm laborers. (11) (11) John Lewis Gillin, pp. cit. p. 66. The Gillin reports that 33.3 per cent of all -40.. greater prOportion of the population engaged in the former types of occupation together with their inferior economic, social, educational.and political standing, probably explains the fact that the maJority of persons committed were from those occupa- tional groups. Types of Offense The total number of commitments to the county Jail in 1933 was 1,204. For each commitment there was an offense charged. These offenses have been tabulated according to the classification scheme recommended by the Committee on Uniform Crime Records of the International Aesociation of Chiefs of Police,(12) and appear in the table below (Table V). - TABLE V. CLASSIFICATION OF COMMITMENTS TO THE JACKSON COUNTY JAIL IN 1933 BY TYPES OF OFFENSE *Per cent‘ ‘Per Cent of Total of Total, Commit- Commit- Typc of Offense Number ments Type of Offense Number ments Felonious Homicide 2 .2 Violation of Drug Rape 12 1.0 Laws 2 .2 Robbery 22 1.8 Driving While Aggravated Assault 12 1.0 Intoxicated 21 1.7 Burglary 48 4.0 Violating Liquor Laws 17 1.4 Larceny 143 11.9 Drunkenness 322 26.7 Other Assaults 66 5.6 Disorderly Conduct Forgery and Counter- and Vagrancy 13 1.1 feiting 12 1.0 Gambling 7 .6 Embezzlement and Fraud 28 2.3 Violation of Traffic Weapons, Carrying, etc. 1 .1 Laws 12 1.1 Sex Offenses (other Other Offenses and than rape) 84 7.0 Investigation 272 22.6 Offenses against Family and Children 119 9.9 Total I720? (12) International Association of Chiefs of Police, Committee on Uniform Crime Records. A Guide for Preparing Annual Police Reports, New York, 1930, pp. 11 - l4. -41.. From Table V it will be seen that Of the 1,204 commitments 332 or 26.7 per cent fell in the general classification of drunkenness. All cases of intoxication, habitual drunkenness, and drunk and disorderly conduct are included in this group. Other Offenses and Investigation constituted 274 cases or 22.6 per cent of the commitments; included in this class are all offenses not otherwise classified such as arson, malicious destruction of prOperty, and violation of parole. Larceny ranked next with 143 cases or 11.9 per cent of the total commit- ments. Included in this group are all cases of theft. Offenses Against Family constituted 119 cases or 9.9 per cent of the total commitments. Included in this classification are all cases of non-support, desertion, non-payment of alimony, abandonment, and the like. Sex Offenses (other than rape) constituted 88 cases or 6.9 per cent of the total commitments. Included in this classification are adultery, prostitution, Operating and fre- quenting a disorderly house, and indecent exposure, and bastardy. In general, commitments for crimes in the more serious classi- fications were fewer than for those of less seriousness. There was but one commitment for Felonious Homicide; 22 cases, or 1.8 per cent of the total commitments for Robbery; 12 cases, or 1 per cent of the total commitments for the general classifications Rape and Aggravated Assault. The distribution of commitments seems to be in keeping with the distribution for various offenses as summarized by Gillin.(13) It is in general agreement with the statement regarding types of offense made on page seven of this chapter. The only disagreement (13) John Lewis Gillin, pp. cit., Table I, p. 53. is the low percentage of commitments for Vagrancy (1 per cent). This may be explained by the fact that many of the commitments for this offense may have been listed as Investigation by the record clerk. Summary and Conclusions Since the findings of this chapter are important to the understanding of this thesis, they will be briefly summarized. Of those reporting place of birth, 91 per cent were born in the United States, and 9 per cent in foreign countries. Of those born in the United States, 54 per cent were born in Michigan, and 22 per cent in Jackson county. Of those reporting place of residence 95 per cent were residents of Michigan and 5 per cent of other states. About 85 per cent of those who gave their place of residence by county in Michigan were residents of Jackson county and 67 per cent were residents of the city of Jackson. The average age of all persons committed.was 34.3 years. The rates of commitments per 1,000 p0pu1ation for races were: 11.6 for all races, 10.2 for whites, and 99.1 for Negroes. The rates by sex were: 22.2 for males, and 2.6 for females. Of the persons committed, 52 per cent were single, 44 per cent married, and 4 per cent divorced. Concerning the occupations reported by persons committed, the greatest numbers were: common laborers 39.2 per cent; those in manufacturing.and mechanical industries 22.5 per cent; and those in agriculture 8 per cent. The highest percentages of‘commitments were for the classi- fications of Drunkenness, 26.7 per cent; Other Offenses and Investigation, 22.6 per cent; larceny, 11.9 per cent; Offenses Against Family, 9.9 per cent, and.Sex.Offenses, 6.9 per cent. These findings are in agreement with those of other studies Of commitments. With this in mind, the next step will be to point out the areas of delinquency within Jackson county. - 43 - CHAPTER IV DELIEQTENCY RATES IN JACKSON COUNTY The studies of Shaw, Hayner, Phelger, Taft, and others have shown that there are wide variations in the concentration of homes of delinquents among Specific areas in large cities, small cities, and counties. It is the purpose of this chapter to determine whether such variationszire to be found among areas in Jackson county. In order to show which areas of the county revealed the greatest concentration of delinquency the place of residence for all of the 217 persons committed to the county jail who lived within the county was determined. Since it was not possible to locate the exact place of residence of those living outside of the city of Jackson, tabulations were made on the basis of resi- dence in townships. The commitment rate for each township was figured by determining the number of commitments per 1,000 p0pu- 1ation over 15 years of age. These rates, and the numbers on which they are based, are shown on the rate map 3. From this map it can be seen that there is a rather marked variation among the commitment rates of several of the townships. Rates are found to range from O for Pulaski township to 13.3 for Summit township. Since the rate for the entire county exclusive of the city is 9.3, it is apparent that there are 4 townships with commitment rates higher and 15 with rates lower than the rate for the county. The 4 townships having rates higher than the county rate were: Summit, 13.3; Blackman, 13.2; Napoleon, 10.8; Parma, 10.2. The 15 townships which had the same or lower commitment rates than did the county were: Leoni, 9.1; Liberty, 8.8; Rives, 8.2; 44 - '1 lal'llll I51- n. .anwmw- ufipsdoo somxomw Mow lawnmssoe hp mcpmm “#:0538800 .0 m3.“ 4.53.02 (5.2 34 cu >530: mm>oz<1 33243.. a . . E o. n.§ 0.0 a 0.0 . 0.0 .mfismqaop me,» How D 20u40aoqam 0.0 0 0. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Hm.H 000.H oaaH mmea0 0.0 0 0. 0.00 0.00H 0.00 000 000.H anooeoo 0.0 0H H. 0.0H 0.0HH 0.00 0sn.H 000.H erasHoo «.0H 0a 0.0 H.0m n.e0H 0.0H H00.0 000.0 nesaeme mHzmssoa 0.0 sHm H.H H.Hm 0.00H 0.00 000.00 000.00 nacho 00 o>Hm0H0x00 hpqdoo somxomm 0.0H 000 0.0 0.0H 0.00H 0.0H 000.00 was.s0 100 apcsoo nomgows ovum" muses“ meonmoz“ Moopm" moamsom" QOHpmHs“ 000 we“ noHpmH“ uses. upHssoo« no“ steaouu 00H somuumom sham“ mama» 0H" vasom“ upHsaoo. no amnesz.psmo Hem. Moumeama you Hmadm monampo noHp" H0909“ . “ .Pnco Hem. panama“ When new» nMHdmom“ u 30H .Ezboo 20985. 2H mmHmmEBe . mow 23.535qu 52 aoEHmoaHoo 2033.33 82 mafia Mozmbdzguq .H> mama -47- the delinquency directly,‘but also have a demoralizing and disorganizing influence on the neighborhood.(2) The concentration of delinquency in the village of Vandercook Lake was a major factor in.the high rate for the township since 15 cases or 25 per cent of the total commitments from the township were from this village while its portion of the population was about 12 per cent.(d) This village is located on a lake three and one- half miles from the city and not only serves as one of its suburbs but also as a cheap resort for Jackson peOple. The influence of these two features probably account for much of the social disorganization.apparent in this community. Blackman township had the next highest commitment rate with 13.2. Its p0pu1ation is 4,722; 5 per cent are Negroes and 28.1 per cent of foreign stock. There are 107.3 males to every 100 females in the township. Only 13.4 per cent of the population are in the rural-farming class. This township borders the city of Jackson and serves as its suburban area. There are no villages in this township. Probably the most important reason for its high commitment rate is that the suburbs in this district are of a very poor type. The presence of several roadhouses in the township and its high percentage of Negroes and persons of foreign stock are other reasons. The high rate found in Napoleon township (10.8) is interest- ing because there seems to be no apparent eXplanation for it. The township is not a suburb of Jackson and its only village, (4) Napoleon, is quite small. 0f its 1,204 inhabitants, less than (2) Walter C. Reckless, Vice in Chicago, p. 120. (3) Estimated p0pu1ation of:750. (4) An unincorporated village. - 48 - .1 per cent.are Negroes. In comparison with the other townships in the county, its percentage of foreign born (16.5) is unusually low. About one-half (51.7 per cent) of its p0pu1ation is classed as rural-farm. The village of Napoleon may be a contributing factor to the township's high rate since it is a rather dis- organized village. It is probable that some very good reason for the unusual rate in this township could be found if it were fully studied. Leoni township has a commitment rate of 9.1. The p0pu1ation of the township is 4,794, less than .5 per cent Negroes and but 19.2 per cent of foreign stock. There are 109.5 males to 100 females in the township. Less than 20 per cent of its p0pu1ation is classed as rural-farm. Since the township is within two miles of the city much of its area iatdevoted to suburbs. Michigan Center, the only village in the township, is located on the Michigan Center mill pond. It was formerly a resort village, but is now a suburb of Jackson. Years ago it was one of the most p0pular resorts in the county but it has declined very rapidly in recent years. This village is not incorporated, but a very liberal estimate of its p0pu1ation would be 800 or 16 per cent of the total township p0pu1ation. In spite of that, it furnished over 50 per cent of its commitments. It would seem that the presence of this village and the suburbs of Jackson were the major factors in the high rate of’this township. The townships of Liberty (8.8) and Rives (8.2) have about the same rate as the rate for the county as a whole. They are located at equal distances from the city of Jackson on the south and north boundaries of the county respectively. Both are mainly agricultural townships; 89.0 per cent of Liberty'and 81.1 per cent - 49 - of Rives pepulation are rural-farm. There are no suburbs of Jackson within their boundaries and.cnly one hamlet of any size in each of the townships.(5) The percentage of colored people is very low with less than .1 per cent in either township. The percentage of persons of foreign.stock is 19.7 for Rives and 12.1 for Liberty. The figure for Rives is about average when compared with the other townships of the county, while the figure for Liberty is the lowest in the county. Parma township has a rate of 10.2. Its p0pu1ation is 1,066, 21.3 per cent of‘whom.are foreign-born. There are no Negroes in the township. The ratio of males to females is 118.4 to 100. Parma is primarily an agricultural township. About 67.5 per cent of its population.is listed.as rural-farm. The village of Parma is located in the township. It is incorporated and has a p0pu- 1ation of 615. The village is situated about ten miles from Jackson and is not a suburb of the city. It is about the same distance from Albion. It may be that the rate of the townships is influenced by its contacts with these two cities. The village itself is located in a prosperous farming community. It has a twelve-grade approved high school and two churches. Community standards are high.and there appear to be no indications of community'disorganization. Springport and Columbia both have commitment rates slightly below that of the county outside of Jackson. Springport, with a rate of 7.8, and Columbia, with.a rate of 7.3, have a p0pu1ation of 1,212 and 1,830 respectively. Both have low percentages of -—_ (5) Less than 50 persons. - 5o - Negroes and persons of foreign-stock. The prOportion of males to females for Springport township is 105.8 to 100, and for Columbia, 100.7 to 100. Each township has about half of its p0pu1ation living on farms. There is one incorporated village in each township; Brooklyn, in Columbia township, has a p0pu- 1ation of 733, and Springport, in Springport township, a p0pu- 1ation of 562. Both of these villages are prosperous farming towns. Neither is near enough to a large city to be greatly influenced by it. There are twelve-grade high schools in both towns. Community life centers about the schools and churches of the'villages. Concord.and.Grass Lakezire two of the larger townships having low commitment rates. Their rates are 3.0 and 5.0 respectively. The population of Concord township is 1,394 and of Grass Lake township, 1,659. Neither have any colored persons and both p0pu1ations are composed of about 20 per cent of persons of foreign stock. Each township has an incorporated village with the same name as the township. Grass Lake has a p0pu1ation of 804 and Concord a population of 603. Both of these towns are located in the better agricultural areas of the county and nearly all of the p0pu1ation of these townships outside of the villages are farmers. Farms are of the better type. Community activities for the township and village are centered about the village high schools and churches. These factors probably help to account for the low commitment rates in these townships. Waterloo with a commitment rate of 5.2, Hanover with 5.6, Henrietta and Norvell both with 6.6, are all mainly agricultural townships. Their percentage of persons of foreign stock runs low and there are no Negroes in these townships. In each town- {'4 .1 .', ‘v ' kiln". 'k! -51.. ship from 50 to 80 per cent of the p0pu1ation are rural-farm people. None of these townships are near enough to Jackson to be influenced greatly by its delinquency situation. Spring Arbor'and Sandstone townships are located within five miles of the city of Jackson. Their low commitment rates may be partially explained by the fact that neither is a suburban area. of Jackson. Both are mainly agricultural, and both have very low percentages of persons of foreign stock. Neither are there any Negroes in these townships. There is no village in Sandstone township and only a small unincorporated town in Spring Arbor. Tompkins and Pulaski townships have the lowest commitment rates in the county, with 1.6 and .0 respectively. Both townships have a very low percentage of persons of foreign stock. They are Purely agricultural townships and are located at quite a distance from the city. Tompkins has a rural farm p0pu1ation of 80.5 per cent and Pulaski has a rural farm p0pu1ation of 85.0 per cent. Summary Commitment rates were computed for the county (exclusive of the city) and for the townships within the county to determine the differences in concentration of adult delinquency in these areas. It was shown that the rates ranged from 0 in the township having the lowest rate to 13.3 in the township having the highest rate. With one exception, those townships on the boundary line of the county and farthest from the city of Jackson had lower commitment rates than that for the county exclusive of the city. Four of the six townships nearest to the city showed rates considerably higher than that for the county. The two townships having the highest rates were those having certain undesirable suburbs of the city within their boundary. In general, the townships having the -52.. lowest commitment rates had the highest percentage of rural-farm p0pu1ation. These findings conform with the findings of studies of Juvenile delinquency.(6) The next chapter will be devoted to a study of delinquency areas in the city of Jackson. (6) See mary Phleger and E. A. Taylor, 22. cit. p. 149. -53- CHAPTER V DELINQUENCY AREAS IN THE CITY OF JACKSON The commitment rate (15.1) of Jackson city is higher than that for the county as.a whole (11.8) or for any of the townships within the county. It is apparent that the city of Jackson is the most important single factor influencing the commitment rate of the county. That certain areas of the city furnish much and other areas little of the delinquency in the city is common knowledge. The members of the Police and Sheriffs' Departments and even the private citizens of the city often refer to certain areas as "bad" and can point out specifically the section of the city from which most of the delinquency comes. It is the purpose of this chapter to show, by means of spot maps based on the place of residence of persons committed to the county Jail and commitment rate maps'based on the ratio of commitments to p0pu- 1ation, the areas of the city in which delinquency tends to be concentrated. After these areas have been determined they will be described briefly and some of the factors influencing de- linquency within their boundaries will be considered. Map AI shows the place of.residence of each person committed to the Jackson.county Jail in 1933.(l) The areas in which these dots tend to concentrate are spoken 0f£18 delinquency areas and it is apparent at once that these