3 1.3 .H mm 04%.“ .t It. In R fin L1,... “M“. ..\U 3.. a: Q 1.01.; \ . I, " Quill I... "has “to. C “a.” Q . r- .. K: t. . «.1; as r I “IN C" «Nb ‘3.» m ”I” 3.34..“ 9‘ L .Aal .‘w . 1 a... . m,» We» E .2 ml I'D-.90 nu . 3- .0 os \-.x {Pull (“J45 1" a “SA; ‘amo f,» b in 0! Int ‘1‘ ‘3‘ V . mt I ‘IH. & W‘H“ “Wt! . .mhh 0 ‘h 3 Va “:1“ 1.1L .SI‘ ‘ m H.“ 9%... LY. 33.4. N H: i. . M...” B «M 3. ,1: am a...” mu. s f u. . . . . . 1 . ”a I1 We . a...“ 5‘ Y ‘1“ v .1..- u\ 1 hut. w l . .w l't ‘. .... “D\ ut‘w ”U ”I. I." floa In... 3» i L“. ,lan G s. i .a. h . Lu... Wk DPJL ‘5‘: E W2. as at 4': . .4. 510 3' L .._::_::; E1:52;2:.:2;, 2 Illll1llll lllllllllllllllllll L 01 (0:: N 19 '00 § 13 9669 PLACE DI RETUM BOX to manual: chockoutfi'om your record. TO AVOID FINES Mum on or bdonduo duo. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE MSU Is An Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Induction mun-m ABSTRACT PETROLOGY AND PETROFABRICS OF THE RANDVILLE DOLOMITE IN THE FELCH MOUNTAIN TROUGH, DICKINSON COUNTY, MICHIGAN by Donald A. Dryden Samples were taken of the Randville Dolomite where it outcropped in the Felch Mountain trough between Felch and Randville in Dickinson County, Michigan. The Randville is of Huronian Age and has been metamorphosed to a dolomitic marble. Ten outcrops were used from which thirteen speci- mens were taken. Four specimens were taken from one out- crop to standardize areal deviation. Each outcrop, from which a specimen was taken, was mapped at a scale of l" = 10'. The maps show specimen locations plus joint attitudes and locations. Twenty-six thin-sections were prepared from the 13 samples and were studied under a petrographic microscope. The results showed that dolomite was the major constituent of the marble with tremolite, diopside and talc as major accessory minerals. The thin-sections were also used to do a petrofabric analysis on the dolomitic marble. Standard orientation procedures were used. Donald A. Dryden Orientation analysis of 9530, C-axes of dolomite grains from twenty-four thin-sections revealed a weak fabric pat- tern with maximum orientations lying normal to the regional structural strike (north-northeast) or paralleling the direction of the deforming force. A statistical analysis, using a correlation coefficient as a measure of preferred orientation, substantiated the findings and interpretations of the petrofabrics work. ii PETROLOGY AND PETROFABRICS OF THE RANDVILLE DOLOMITE IN THE FELCH MOUNTAIN TROUGH, DICKINSON COUNTY, MICHIGAN BY DONALD A. DRYDEN A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Geology 1962 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his sincere appreciation to Dr. J. W. Trow for his cooperation and assistance during the preparation of this paper; also to Drs. J. W. Zinn and H. B. Stonehouse for their helpful suggestions and con- structive criticisms. He also wishes to thank James Olmsted for his help in taking and developing of the photomicrographs and to his wife, Genevieve, for her constant encouragement. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEOLOGICAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stratigraphy Structure PETROGRAPHY AND PETROLOGY . . . . . . . . Dolomite Tremolite Diopside Talc Interpretation PETROFABRICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ANALYSIS OF RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . STATISTICAL ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 ll 12 13 14 26 29 47 51 59 LIST OF TABLES Table Page I. Stratigraphic Succession of the Middle Pre- cambrian in the Felch Mountain District, Dickinson County, Michigan . . . . . . . . . . 5 II. Modal Analysis of Dolomitic Marble . . . . . . 9 III. Comparison Grain Size Chart of Outcrops . . . 18 IV. Comparison of the Statistical Findings for Each Point Diagram and the Maximum Contour (Per Cent) for Each Diagram . . . . . . . . . 50 LIST OF PLATES AND FIGURES Plate Page I. Outcrop locations map . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 II. (Figure l) Photomicrograph of dolomite mar- ble, showing pressure twinning taken from slide Ah- Crossed nicols, X90 . . . . . . . . 19 (Figure 2) Photomicrograph of dolomite mar- ble, showing pressure twinning taken from slide Ah. Plain light, x90 . . . . . . . . . 19 III. (Figure 3) Photomicrograph of dolomite marble and tremolite, showing tremolite surrounding dolomite and replacing it. Crossed nicols, X90 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 (Figure 4) Photomicrograph of dolomite mar- ble and tremolite, showing tremolite sur- rounding dolomite and replacing it. Plain light, X90 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 vi Plate IV. VI. VII. VIII. Page (Figure 5) Photomicrograph of dolomite mar— ble, showing clouded appearance from slide E2v' Plain light, X90. . . . . . . . . . . . 21 (Figure 6) Photomicrograph of dolomite mar- ble, showing twinned and untwinned grains under low power objective. Crossed nicols, X35 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 (Figure 7) Photomicrograph of tremolite in diopside, showing long bladed tremolite. Crossed nicols, X70 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 (Figure 8) Photomicrograph of tremolite in diopside, showing long bladed tremolite. Plain light, x70 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 (Figure 9) Photomicrograph of tremolite in dolomite, showing a basal section of tremo- lite exhibiting excellent amphibole cleavage. Crossed nicols, X90 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 (Figure 10) Photomicrograph of tremolite in dolomite, showing a basal section of tremo- lite exhibiting excellent amphibole cleavage. Plain light, X90. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 (Figure 11) Photomicrograph of diopside, showing 90 degree pyroxene cleavage. Crossed nicols, X90 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 (Figure 12) Photomicrograph of talc in mar- ble, showing single plate edges of talc along with fine grained scaly aggregates of talc which resemble sericite. Crossed nicols, X90 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 (Figure 13) Photomicrograph of quartz in dolomite marble and tremolite, showing stringers of quartz with dolomite replaced by tremolite, taken from slide C . Crossed nicols, X70 . . . . . . . . . .h. . . . . . . 25 vii Plate Page (Figure 14) Photomicrograph of quartz in dolomite marble and tremolite, showing stringers of quartz with dolomite replaced by tremolite, taken from slide Ch' Plain light, X70 . . . . . . 25 Figure 15. 400 dolomite axes from sample A . . 35 16. 400 dolomite axes from sample B . 36 17. 400 dolomite axes from sample C . - . 37 18. 400 dolomite axes from sample D . . 38 19. 400 dolomite axes from sample El . . 39 20. 400 dolomite axes from sample E2 . . 4O 21. 400 dolomite axes from sample E3 . 41 22. 400 dolomite axes from sample E4 42 23. 400 dolomite axes from sample G 43 24. 330 dolomite axes from sample H . . . . 44 25. 400 dolomite axes from sample I . . . . 45 26. 400 dolomite axes from sample J . . . 46 27. A one per cent grid used in counting points for the computation of "r" . 48 Plate IX. (Figure 28) Photograph of active quarry at outcrop "B," showing where oriented specimen was taken plus joint face (N 46° E, 43° SE) . 54 viii Plate XI. XII. XIII. XIV. (Figure 29) Photograph of outcrop "B," show- ing joint surface within quarry (Figure 30) Photograph of inactive quarry at outcrop "C," taken at oriented specimen and looking east . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Figure 31) Photograph of quarry "C," look- ing across quarry at oriented specimen. Note parallel fractures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Figure 32) Photograph of outcrop "C," show- ing joint surface in marble (N 420 E, 770 SE). (Figure 33) Photograph at outcrop "C," show- ing joint surface at west end of quarry (N 15° E, 69° NW) . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Figure 34) Photograph of Rian Quarry at outcrop "H," looking across quarry at orient— ed specimen location . . . . . . . . . . . . (Figure 35) Photograph of dolomite at Rian Quarry, showing close-up of oriented specimen location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Figure 36) Photograph of wall in Rian Quarry showing parallel joint surfaces (N 220 W, 72° sw) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Figure 37) Photograph of marble at outcrop "H," showing joint surface in dolomitic mar- ble (N 600 W, 86° NE) . . . . . . . . . . . . Map of outcrop "A" showing specimen location and joint attitudes . . . . . . . . . . . . . Map of outcrop "D" showing specimen location and joint attitudes . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix Page 54 55 55 56 56 57 57 58 58 pocket pocket Plate XVII. XVIII. XIX. Map and Map and Map and Map and Map and of outcrop "E" showing joint attitudes . . . of ourcrop "F" showing joint attitudes . . . of outcrop "G" showing joint attitudes . . . of outcrop "I" showing joint attitudes . . of outcrop "J" showing joint attitudes . . . specimen locations specimen location specimen location specimen location specimen location Page pocket pocket pocket pocket pocket INTRODUCTION The Felch Mountain trough is a fairly narrow structure running roughly east and west between the villages of Felch on the east and Randville on the west in Dickinson County, in the western part of the northern peninsula of Michigan. Geologically, it is a syncline of Precambrian metamorphosed sediments and igneous intrusions. Although the relief is not great, the area is still rather rugged topographically. This is due in large part to the glacial debris and alternation of weak and resistant rocks forming abrupt changes in relief. Furthermore swamps, heavy forest and thick underbrush hinder field study. The West Branch of the Sturgeon River, formed between the low steep-sided knolls, intervening swamps and occasional steep- sided valleys, meanders nearly the length of the trough. The area of greatest relief and elevation is in the Felch Mountain area itself. This report concerns an area which is over 13 miles long and includes the southern portion of T. 42N, R.°s 28, 29, and 30W. The map on page 2, Plate #1, shows the locations of the outcrops from which samples were taken. The samples i no A. N» A. Nu came from ten outcrops already located by the United States Geologic Survey. Detailed sketches of these outcrops, show— ing the location of samples and joint attitudes were taken at a scale of l" = 103 (in pocket). Four oriented samples were taken from outcrop ”E” which were used to standardize areal deviation. The outcrops from which samples were taken consisted of dolomitic marble, some metamorphosed more than others. All outcrops were massive so that strike and dip of beds could not be observed. The field work on the area was done in late June and early July of 1960. Petrofabric and petrOgraphic examin— ations were then made of twenty-six thin sections taken from thirteen samples. Of primary concern was the orienta- tion of the dolomite crystals of the marble in relation to the structural geology and, the correlation of these find- ings with those of Solbeng (1958), who did a similar study on rocks exposed in the Metronite quarry at the eastern end of the trough. Of secondary nature was the study of the petrography and metamorphism of the dolomite. GEOLOGIC SETTING Until recently, little geologic data concerning the trough was available. In 1961, Professional Paper 310 (Geology of Central Dickinson County, Michigan), was re- leased. This work, compiled primarily from works of James, Clark, Lamey and Pettijohn, is partly concerned with the area studied in this problem. Earlier works are incomplete or only partially cover the area. Some of the better works are: 1) Progress report briefly outlining the regional geology, by C. E. Dutton (1950), 2) A portion of a paper by H. L. James (1955), on regional metamorphism in Northern Michigan, 3) An older work by Van Hise and Leith (1911) on the geology of the Lake Superior region. Other monographs pertaining to the area are available. Bailey and Smythe (1899) is perhaps the best, as it includes previous works in the area. Stratigraphy The Felch trough is underlain almost entirely by meta- morphosed Animikie metasediments. These rocks are of Middle Precambrian age and in most stratigraphic successions are included as part of the Huronian series. Table I gives the 4 TABLE 1 (AFTER LAMEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 310) Middle Precambrian: Post-Animikie . . . . . Animikie series: Baraga group . . . Unconformity. Menominee group . . Unconformity. Chocolay group . . Unconformity. Lower Precambrian rocks: "Algoman"(?) . . . . Dickinson group . . . . Unconformity. Pre-Dickinson . . . . . Granite pegmatite. Massive granite. Metadiabase and metagabbro. Badwater greenstone. Michigamme slate. Hemlock formation. Vulcan iron-formation. Felch formation (includes schists of at least four types, believed to be correlative). Randville dolomite. Sturgeon quartzite (includes schist below and above vitreous quartzite). Fern Creek formation. Gneissic granite. Six~mile Lake amphibolite. Solberg schist and Skunk Creek Member. East Branch arkose. Granite gneiss. probable stratigraphic succession of the Middle Precambrian in the Felch Mountain District as interpreted by Lamey (1961). The sedimentary rocks, as well as the younger meta— diabase, are cut by granite and granite pegmatite dikes. Structure Although the local structure has been interpreted by a few workers, the best is perhaps the oldest by Van Hise (1911). It is a very general but accepted report. "The structure is an east-west synclinorium constitut- ing a narrow strip nowhere more than 1 1/2 miles and usually less than a mile wide, which as a whole runs over 13 miles. Although the general structure is synclinal, a single fold of simple type has nowhere been found to occupy the whole cross-section of the Algonkian formation, but usually two or more synclines occur, separated by anticlines, which may have different degrees and directions of plunge and different strikes, complicated besides, both, by subordinate folds and by faults" (p. 302). It might be well to note here that all of the local synclines have a northeast to east trend. The Randville Dolomite outcrops over a larger part of the trough's surface than any other member of the succession. It is probable that the thickness of the formation is not uniform, but increases from east to west. PETROGRAPHY AND PET ROLOGY The major rock unit of study is a dolomitic marble with the formational name of Randville Dolomite and of lower Huronian Age. The Randville has certain mineral assem- blages and characteristics that identify it. Here it will be called "dolomitic marble" or "Randville formation." Detailed study of the marble was limited to samples taken along a fourteen-mile east—west strike at varying distances from each other. Where there were not enough outcrops the spacing was as far apart as five and one-half miles. The dolomite outcrops are identifiable by their massive knobbish form and the gray to black weathering sur— face. Field study supplemented the thin section observation. There is no visible foliation. Megascopically, dolomite is the main constituent of the marble, with tremolite occurring in most samples in varying quantities. Talc, diopside, and quartz are present in minor amounts in many samples, with diopside becoming the main constituent in sample "F". Samples "E” and "H” were taken from outcrops on the south side of the trough and the rest were taken from out— crops believed to be on the north side. 8 @UMHU H x mm.mm oo.ooa oo.ooa oo.ooa oo.ooa Ho.ooa o.ooa o.ooa o.ooa oo.ooa o.ooa H.00H m.mm A13 :5» >20 :5» -~—‘\’\ - \-\, Mr“ -\ . ~/\- ‘\—— ‘5‘ '\,~_. ‘\¥L—‘~ \l'\ ~N,~ V-‘d fi \ A 1V-.. .AN' \- 55 PLATE XI Figure 32. Photograph of outcrop "C," showing joint surface in marble (N 42° E, 77° SE). Figure 33. Photograph at outcrop "C," showing joint surface at west end of quarry (N 15° E, 69° NW). ,"f_ >CO :5“ >ZO :5» 56 PLATE XII Figure 34. Photograph of Rian Quarry at outcrop "H," looking across quarry at oriented specimen location. Figure 35. Photograph of dolomite at Rian Quarry, showing close-up of oriented specimen location. ‘901 011V 396! 011V m.\__ 3“.“ ,NF \.'M-———‘\ K ”1‘ M 57 PLATE XI I I Figure 36. Photograph of wall in Rian Quarry, showing parallel joint surfaces (N 22° W, 72° SW). Figure 37. Photograph of marble at outcrop "H,” show- . o 0 ing joint surface in dolomitic marble (N 60 W, 86 NE). «Q: 32¢. «2: 3: < 58 Turner, F. J., and Verhoogen, J. (1951); Igneous and Meta- morphic Petrology, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York. Van Hise, C. L., and Leith, C. K. (1911); The geology of the Lake Superior region, USGS Mon. 52. 60 M We it ( V\ ‘3 aft 31’; (fill-I - DECQICU ()5? OIIICCIOD 1“. PM FE L‘ifiVIi NI5’°W d T 6¥°NE N3 0°E T 8 0°55 FEGMA TI TE ' Scale —-- l” 110' Sketch of outcrop E. iflliffi XVI Scale-l” 10' Sketch of outcrop D. i) I- I l‘ E K V Iomr FACE mrrws 52‘Nw RIVII? j ‘ N75“! Lulu. Scale — 1” = 10' ,.__~_ -___.__._—_..__._.__.___. .—. --._.. Sire tc‘a‘l oi" ou tcrop A. /’\ N-S 1:305 Sketch of outcrop J. ~54": 7w NAS‘E I’-Iflf$E PLATE XX O N35°W Scale — 1H 10‘ Sketch of outcrop I. QUAR rzz Pip/3 12: III Scale III 10' Sketch oi outcrop G. (f N 90% "I" %r FfiT / l N85°E "-"' 55f HICHIGRN STATE UNIV. LIBRARIES llll lll III II III III llll llll 1 6 31293010 39 69