WEE GiUCOSE WYDROGENASE OF BACRLUS CEREUS: A MODEL FOR THE STUDY OF SPORE HEAT R315? ANCE Thai: for f!» Dear» of M. S. MBCMGAN “ATE UEIVERSITY John Aifrod Bach 1960 ' ‘LIBRARY_ Michigan State University ID FINES mum on orbdonddoduo. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE Wilma-9.1 MSU Is An Affirmative Action/Equal Opponunity Institution f PLACE n RETURN aoxm monthb Momma your ncord. TO AVO [rt—7““ ,Ar‘" T UL :. ‘x ‘ - ~,'“,-". In l‘z 17’. ' \ 2 1‘1 CI-Ij. '5‘; ', {‘1 T'T T ~ . :1 1‘1‘ 1") ";T :‘j . 414.. Joby V...) 4-1.-¢ .. J;.'~..'~r.q....L.q.LJ 4. - \VJ..A'¢-’~_ J A5 .J\ J, n - i,- — , -—- I—‘zn'f .. \ m‘“ . ’5 I“ " v' 1' - f‘ -~ - r‘ fl_ _-. ~— T 1—..1—.“‘-<..‘.‘ 7n ‘ -‘L l.-\...../...J.LJ 4. Li‘i ”I“; .J .V.) ._ J-‘ 4 - 4.”... .. J .J ‘-.L~ I“ This research w(o u1lsrtnben ii an effrrt to siloiify the Stuly rf sgzre teat r distance by heat resastance from viability. ihe assumoticn was aide that the heat resistance of store entymes contributes to the teat reelstance of whole egores. ?rom this it followed thut a heat stable spore enZVLe end its honolcgoue heat labile counter- tart from germinated stores or vevetcti"e cells could Le purified end use; as a model system in the studv of spore heat resisterce. Tor this reason, various er- tracts of Zecillus cereus were examined for a satis- factory enzyme system. in extr cts of DJ :13 Glucose dehydrogeneses vere foun 'egetetive cells, spores and germinated spores, which had different levels of heat resistance but egpeured to be very similer by other criteria. The vegetative cell enzyme,‘which subsequently was shown to be score protein, had a half-life of 15 minutes at gg C and retained this level of heat resistance throughout purification. The enzyue from scores was slightly less heat resistant than the vegetative cell enzyme. The glucose dehvdrogenase from germinated spores‘was heat labile, having a half—life of about one minute at §_ C. Various procedures were employed to test the similarity of the enzymes in an attempt to show that they are homologous proteins. A study of the time course of biosynthesis of glucose dehydrosenase in a growing culture of Bacillus cereus revealed that neither a heat labile nor heat stable enzyme is present in the culture during the exponential growth plase. A heat v r.‘ staole glu C ose denydrogenase appears after the ex- ponential growth phase has ended, and prior to the detection of dipicolinic acid and cellular heat resist- ance. This enzyme is present in sigh concentration in spores and gerainated spores, but, as stated before, the enzyue from germinated spores is markedly heat labile. The glucose dehydrogenases from vegetative cells D and spores were purified extensively and characterized according to their catalytic aid serological preperties. Purification was accomplished by the following steps: extraction by mechanical disruption of vegetative cells or spores, heating to 65 C, protamine precipitation of nucleic acids, ammonium sulfate fractionation, and DEJ< cellulose column chromatography. A purification as high as 560 fold was obtained by this procedure. The hichaelis constants of the vecetative cell enzyme were determined and compare ed to th hichaelis cons t ants of the spore enzyme reported in the literature. The constants for both enzy.xnesxmere very sin ilar. Purified en ymes froni veg etative cells and spores were injected into rabbits to produce specific antisera. Th 1e two enzymes were compared by a modified inmunodiffusion technique and found to be serologically identical On the basis of the results obtain ed by sero- logical and enzymatic comparisons, the coincidence of the )roduction of this enzime with the :roduction of .t- (D spores, and the coincidence of the change in he t resistance of this enzyme with the change in heat resistance of whole spores, it was concluded that the glucose dehydrogenase from vegetative cells, spores and germinated spores is essentially the same enzyme with different levels of heat resistance. The resistant glucose dehydrogenase is easily purified, is stable during storage, and is readily assayed. All of these considerations favor the use of this enzyme ystem as a model for studying spore heat resistance at the molecular level. rv--~.-rwr~a~‘~. - :TH‘ ( ~ .'-‘ L n « 97"“7‘M‘ “ "‘3 '~ "3 '7 77 “'1”- ~T‘ 77' "‘ ”7’7"— ‘ - 1...... J._..,J .41...» -nrl J.L\.ux.....-‘.»l).. kw. 4‘..1\/_._1..: .‘ -/__-i.. D, ‘ “=3 '“.““'.,“' ”‘F‘ ‘i‘ ”‘1'"; “T"‘rsr ”- 1,: g; “‘ '- ",‘A' ~ 'h. "_""‘,r =E—-1’71—.‘~"~‘-‘7§-3. .‘i .' ‘u ‘JJ_«LJ 4‘k-‘I Ah...) -/.‘.\/'_'J.. k. k-)-1‘_’LIJ.\ '_- _.-'L.‘- I." '7 '.L' -ilA"’JQ by (I) :1. U) (a 0 LT JOIEII -llfr -q—V-‘H-g— m A TingQ Submitted to Tichigan State Vniversity n wartial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of H- “-0 «‘m - T0, jfiTw—“UI‘ 7 MJI- 3.1. AB C: usz. :L-".‘UL ,. Department of Xicroticlogy and Public Eealth 1960 . “I- --... .~ -...'.. , ~ O-~«-«~—w-...‘ ' . I " -LV-LA-\/-c-.J IJ'JA "sod-‘10 I wish to exhress .y gratitude to Dr. H. L. badof , Department of licrotiolo;y aid Pttlic Heal h, for his patient guidance and continued interest. His original thought provided the hygothesis on thici this work is based. 1. I would like to thank also Dr. R. .. Costilow, Sebartment of Iicrobiology and Eubli -ealth, for his 0 F helpful suggestions on experinental techniques. - .. Finally, I wish to thank my wife, Virginia, whose c1611 . F1 L 01 at? 1.1511 hasten d all [31"]. ' 1 ‘at' rce a d enc Lr He t * re + e co f etior of this'work. 7n" 'fl-‘T T11 141 A "~ 1 “b 'Tln ' .Lu‘ 0.; VLN 14AM.) II“: THC 313‘ C (PI CI‘I o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o PISTCRICAIJ PLETJIE‘; o o o o o o o o o o o o o :A 1‘! ‘IT 111:1..411 T N. RESULTS I" A. l . “N Iii-1.43 :11. J.'-' -firnl FOL S o o o o o o o o o o o Organism and Iedium . . . . . . . . . Growth of Vegetative Cell and Spore Crops . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q Frenaration of Cell-free Extracts . . 1-. Glucose ue ydroa enase Assay . . . . . DPI‘TH CXidase $1888.), I o o o o o o o o YT ' .' Assay for heat has 1stance . . . . . . Purification of Glucose Dehydrogenase Irotein and Iucleic Acid Assay . . . Chloride Ion Assay . Acetone Extra tion of whole Cells . . Diticolinic acid Assay . . . . . . . Production of nn.une Serums . . . . . Serological Comparison of Enzymes . . Germination of Spores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Screening for Heat Resistant Enzrmes "Activation" of Glucose Dehydrogenase Time Course of Glucose 7ehydrogenase L1093_r.theSis O O O O O O O C O O O O Durification of Vegetative Cell and Spore Glucose Denydrogenase . . . . . J:- ,,"\ 11-7 11 12 13 13 15 18 19 20 N :\D [O {\D a. to F1 +4 I O ()1 ("0 ()1 31 1“ ‘ fin“! ,, -— .1J.) E. Characterization of Yegrtative Cell and Store Glucose Dehydrogenase . . . . . . 54 1. Tea Resistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 'fi 0 2. Lichaelis Constants . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3. Serology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 F. Heat Labile Glucose Dehydrogenase . . . . . 43 DISGtialCN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 SCILARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -1. TD '13:? TT'}"""‘ F .LLQl JQJL‘u‘NJLb o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 M5 TABLE EnGE l. tarification of the glucose dehydro- genase from vegetati'e cells of Bacillus 0938118 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 32 onstants for th el es from vegeta a a - -0 ‘ro .--.-'"!--—. so” 7“ Gnu S L; 8 DJ. Lak/LJJJJD Cdl o o o o o o o ‘9 Fl 1. ()1 o a, T I J LIST CF FIGURE" TRE The heat inactivation at 69 C of the glucose dehydrogenas in an extract of vegetative cells of scilli cereus . . . A cougarison of the effect of heating at o0 ‘ on t lucose lehydrogenase - s in an x ract of A Line Course of the bi synthesis or heat resistant glUCODB dehydrogenase and dioicclinic acid by a urowing culture of hacillus cereus . . . . . . . The heat inactivation at 69 C of the purified glucose oeiyo13enases from vegetative cells and SpO re: of cillus 083'“??? S O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O The effect of substrate concentration on tne activity of the glucose dehydro- genase from vegetative cells of Bacillus cereUE . Q o o O 0 O O O O O O o 0 O o O A serological comparison of the glucose ehydrogenases from ve3etative cells and stores of Bacillus cereus by the agar gel method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A serological con parison of the glucose dehydrogena see from ve3etative cells and spores of baClllLIS cereus by the cellulose acetate filn method . . . . . . (£1 0 ()1 O. 40 INTRODUCTION Bacterial endosgores are produced, by mehbers of L “ I“ -21 ‘1‘ A 3,—5- .3 . 1‘ the 3enera_3gg_13ds and Clost i§1dm, as a res1stan , ‘— -- ~u— . ‘r—‘o dormant stage in the life cvcle of these cr3arisms. Endospores are formed within ve3etative cells duIin3 the stationary 3rowth phase of the culture. After endospore formation is completed, the su rroundin3 ve3etative cell material (Sporan31um) is usually digested, and the spores are released. In qualitative chemical wmpo:;ition, these rom v33ete tiv ve cells only in their content (I) (1 O H (D U) 94 H. H) “b (l) H ”’b of dipicolinic acid (pyridine 2,6 dicarboxylic acid). Tigicolinic acid has not been found in exgonentia1l1y 3rowin3 eristics, how- d H (u d- C!) d. H. (i U 0 (D H [.1 U2 . ’m b C)” I» C) FJ O 02 ’ Ho (.1 KL H C E H C 0 C1- ve cells, being J '5 *3 r) L. , . <: J.) (‘7; (I. CT Q) (—4- Po ever, spores differ 3rCSS1y 1 almost inactive metabolically, and resistart to many of the physical and chehical a3cn s capable of k llin3 ve3e- tative cells. Durin3 a process called 3er1ination, the typical resistant properties of spores are lost, and certain latent metabc lic ezzyues once a3 ain become active. At the same time, lar3e amounts released from the spores, includin3 peptides and the ca1- cium salt of dipicolinic acid. If environmental conditions are favorable, the 3er minated spores 3row into true ve3e- tative cells which.repeat the life cycle by reprouuc1ng l and sporulatin3 exactly as their predece‘scrs did. Cne of the most unique properties of bacterial spores is their extremely high resistance to heat. The spores of some bacterial species are capable of with- standin3 autoclavin3 at 115 C for as lcn3 as three hours, while, in contrast, the ve3etative cells of this species, and most other sporeformers, are killed in a few minutes at 55 C to 65 C (Curran, 1952). AlthOU3h this is an extreme example, it is, nevertheless, true that most bacterial spores are much more resistant to heat than the ve3 tative cells from which they were formed. (1) To study the effect of any factor on the heat re- sistance of bacterial spores, a suitable means of measur— 1at heat resistance is needed. Up to the present 7““ ing t time, this has been done by enumerating the survivors of a given heat treatment. HOwever, the detection of these survivors depends on the proper functioning of the multitude of reactions involved in 3erninaticn, outgrowth, and reproduction. Although these reactions have nothing to do with spore heat resistance, they may be affected by the factor under study. Thus, the study of spore heat resistance with such a complex, variable system can not be expected to yield reliable information. A more suitable method cf studying heat resistance wculd be one which does not depend on spore viability; capperhaps one O] which does not even depend on whole spores. In fact, L )J the simples , most .irect method of studying heat resist— ance would be at the molecular level, providin3 of course that spore heat resistance is eXpressed at the nolecular level. Because many of the essential components of cells, such as proteins and nuclecproteins, are extremely labile to hea , it is reasonable to suspect that these compounds are protected from heat denaturation in spores, and, con- versely, unprotected in ve3etative cells and germinated spores. If this protective mechanism involves molecular structure, ather than 3 st a change in cell environment, it should be possible to isolate and purify heat resist- ant spore material and homolorous heat sensitive vege- tative cell or germinated Spore material. Together, these / ‘/ two types of cellular material would constitute a simple, cell-free model system for studying spore heat resistance without the problems inherent in Spore viability methods. In fact, if the two types of material were actually homo- logous and could be sufficiently purified, a simple physical-chemical comparison mi3ht indicate at least one mechanism of spore heat resistance. The most reasonable approach to this problem would be to select, for examin- ation, one cellular component which is heat stable in spores and heat labile in ve3etative cells and germinated spores. In addition, this component should be easily purified and must possess some measurable index of denaturation. The obvious choice for such a component is some type of enzyme, since enzyme denaturation is easily detected by loss of enzymatic activity. The enzyme catalase, from vegetative cells and spores of Eacillus cereus, appeared to fulfill the requirements for such a model system, but extensive attempts by Sadoff, Kools, and Ragheb (1959) to crystallize the heat stable enzyme failed because of the low cellular concentration of this enzyme, the poor yields obtained during purification, and the instability of the enzyme during stora3e at low temperatures. It became apparent that, to obtain the amount of pure pro- tein needed for a physical-cheiical comparison, a new model was needed. For this reason, the glucose dehydro- genase from Bacillus cereus was examined as a possible model for the study of spore heat resistance. The isolation, partial purification, and partial character- ization of this enzyme system is the topic of this thesis. HISTORICAL REVIEW Many heat resistant enzymes have been found in resting spores of Bacillus cereus and in cell free extracts of these spores. Host of these enzymes differ greatly in their catalytic specificities and almost as greatly in their level of heat resistance. Although the heat resistance of many of these enzymes has been reported, to the author's knowledge, only catalase has been purified and characterized expressly for the purpose of formulating a mechanism of spore heat resistance. In connection with their studies on the germina- tion requirements of Bacillus cereus spores, Stewart and Halvorson (1955) described an alanine racemase which converted L-alanine to D-alanine. The enzyme was completely resistant to heating at 80 C for two hourswvhile it was in the intact spore. Lawrence and Halvorson (1954) found a heat re- sistant catalase in spores of Bacillus cereus which was completely resistant to heating at 80 C. When this enzyme was extracted from the Spore, its heat resistance was somewhat diminished. In addition to the stable catalase, a heat labile catalase was also present in spore extracts, but the labile enzyme was not active in intact spores. A remarkably heat stable adenosine ribosidase which cleaved adenosine into adenine and ribose was found in spores of Eacillus cereus by Lawrence (1955). This enzyme retained 50 per cent of its activity after heating at 100 C for four hours. Powell and Hunter (1956) reported the same adenosine ribosidase to be stable both in intact and disintegrated spores. These authors also described an adenosine deaminase in Bacillus cereus spores. The deaninase in the intact Spores was stable to heating at 60 C for several hours. However, in spore homogenates or germinated spores, the enzyme was destroyed in 15 minutes at 60 C. Sadoff, Kools and Ragheb (1959) found, in vege- tative cells of Bacillus cereus, a heat stable catalase which had heat resistance similar to that of spore catalase. Recent immunochemical data (unpublished) indicate that the heat stable vegetative catalase is identical to the heat stable catalase found in spores by Lawrence and Halvorson (1954). Church and Halvorson (1955) discovered a DPN- specific glucose dehydrogenase in extracts 0f.§é£lll£§ cereus spores. This enzyme was partially purified and characterized by 301, Church and Halvorson (1959) in connection with their study of the intermediate metabolism of aerobic spores. The effect of heat on this enzyme was not reported. '4 ’v( 61 C? 01 MATERIALS ANDZW‘ and Hedium A. Organigp Bacillus pageus T. was the organism used through- out this study. Stock cultures were maintained by allowing the organism to sporulate on nutrient agar slants, and refrigerating the slants at 4 C until needed. All vegetative cell crops, and most of the spore crops, were grown at 50 C, in G medium, as described by ‘tewart and Halvorson (1955). This medium contains the following components per liter: 0.00001 g. ZnSO4 CuSO4 0.00001 g. CaClg 0.00001 g. Fe504.7Eé0 0.000001 g. KQHP04 1.0 g. (KH4)ZSC4 4.0 g. Yeast Extract 8.0 g. MnSO4.H20 0.1 g. MgSO4 0.8 g. Dextrose 4.0 g. 0.7 ml. Antifoam B Some of the score crors were grown at 28 C with the 1 :1 dextrose concentration reduced to three grams per liter. This modification prevented premature lysis of the sporulating cells by lowering their oxygen require- ment, thereby increasing spore yield. 3. Growth of Vegetative_§ell_and gpore Cropg Large amounts of vegetative cells and spores were needed to obtain enou3h glucose dehydrogenase for purification and characterization of the enzyme. All of the vege Ha ive cell crops and some of the Spore crops were produced in three liter fernanters (New ;—h Erunswick Sci ntif 0 Company). The medium in,these fermenters was oxygenated by forced aeration and me- chanical a5it ation. Some of the spore crOps were produced in 18 liter pyrex carboys in which the medium was oxygenated hv forced aeration through six, radially arran 3e d sparger tubes. The force of the air flowing through the s a.rge s rotated and agitated the medium thereby increasinr the efficiency of oxvzenation. The temperature of be 'th the New Prunswick ferme nter and the carboy was maintained by a thernostatically controlled water bath. The large volume of medium use d in either fermenter required a large, actively growing inoculum. This was prepared i11 dign; le d leeks, each contain in3 50 milliliters of G medium. The di pled flasks are 530 milliliter .rleniey r flasks with four depressions, equally spaced around the lower side of the flash. these .epressions , 1 1 -n'v“ 5, cause turtule ence .xren tne linens are blidxul, thereby ‘. " A ‘ . ‘r’ " 4- I‘ ‘ R."'* " " '1‘ " 1“ : r““‘, Lin ‘. --‘ J '3 -‘"\‘.' fl * ,5 . h J‘- ar fin '1 1-;JF-3aSluQ mm:- UA_H.DU'1151L;.L'VL; 01 one A..L§DL;_LQ1110 alt-.11 la]. LIKJDQI -,‘l 9 throng h an increasin; number of dimpled flasks synchrcrizes t? physiological age of he cells and increases the volume of the inoculum. The following specif:c prclcedure was used to grow venetative cell and spore crops. A nutrient agar slant was inoculated from a s,ock culture and incuba ed at n m \ 4-..- .AF A u“ «'1’ fi Y .3 50 e approximat—ly L113 hours. n dllleu ildbm or medium _.., :5A ‘1 .1. ,q ‘. _| 5' L, ,‘l, n. 1- ‘N30 ino elated ire. tie nine nour are: and siaxen for iour hours. gen mill ilit ers of culture from this flasi Jere put into each of two more flasks, and these flasks were shaken for two hours. Ten milliliters of culture from he two flasks were put into each of seven more 01f "1‘- 4 1 $1, w-‘r , ~. 1A.'1" '61 ‘-‘ I.- ~1 .\ r-I‘A ilrsms, and these "13045 were snanen ior two nears. lme ent its con tents of the seven flasks wer2 transferred into ,J -.. I. a Lew Brunswick fermenter tank containing ‘,ECC milli- ‘L' A r‘ *N A 5‘ ~‘ ' " I“ u“ I "‘ ’ '."- ‘ A“ . n ters of isd_un. The tonr: contents were agitated at L F-J H0 450 revolutions per ninute, and aerated 3t 3 rate 0f five liter: per minute. If the 18 liter carb oy ferirnt‘” we used, abort 1.5 liters of a two hour culture from the New Brunswick ferienter were used for inoculation. "egetative cell crops were harvested at about seven 11 and one quarter hours “ft r inocuM ng the fermentor. For spore crops, the cultures were allowed to grow until microscopic examination of stained smears indic ted a large proportion of free spores. The vegetative cell an d (L and spore crops were harvest n a Sher lee Super Centrifuge, type T-41-23 l-l-H (The Sharples Specialty om‘any). Spores .ere cleaned by differential centri- C.) *C: *1 ugation in water or dilute saline until practically 7’ free of vegetative debris and germinated spores. vege- tative cells were washed once or twice 1n 0.1 molar, pH 7.6, tris (trishydroxynethylaninome hane) buffer. The cells and spores were cleaned in the cold in a Servall centrifuge, model SS-l (Ivan So 11, Incorpor- ated). Unless specifically stated otherwise, all further mention of centrifugation implies the use of this centrifuge. The cells and spores were stored at C. Preparation of Cell-free Extracts All cell-free extracts were obtained by mechanical disruption of cells in a Servall Omnimixer (Ivan Sorvall, Incorporated). In most cases, three parts, by weight, of number 110 super ri te beads ( innesota Ti ining and Lanufacturing Con 1pany), one part, wet weight, of cell or spore paste, and enough 0.1 molar, pH 7. 6, tris buffer to fill the 80 milliliter Cmnimixer cup were mixed 12 at top speed for 10 to 30 minutes. The cup was cooled in crushed ice. After breakage, the brei was centri- fuged at 52,700 times gravity for 15 to 60 minutes, and the supernatant liquid was retained for enzyme studies. D. Glucose Dehydrogenase Assay Glucose dehydrogenase was assayed spectrophoto- metrically at 340 millimicrons using DPH and glucose as substrates. This assay is based on the difference in light absorption of DEN and DPXH. Both compounds absorb at 230 millimicrons, but only DPNH absorbs at 540 millimicrons. Since glucose dehydrogenase catalyses the oxidation of glucose and reduction of DPN, the rate of increase in absorbance at 340 millimicrons can be used to express enzyme activity. One unit of glucose dehydrogenase activity is defined as an increase of 0.001 optical density units per one hundred seconds at 540 millimicrons. The assay procedure was the same for almost all experiments. In addition to enzyme, the assay cuvettes contained the following reagents: 500 micromoles of pH 7.6, tris buffer; 100 micromoles of glucose; 2 micro- moles of DPN; and water up to three milliliters. Endo- genous cuvettes contained no glucose but otherwise were the same. Cno exception to this procedure was that used 13 for assaying glucose dehydrogenase in the heat inactiv- ation of vegetative cell extract. The assay cuvettes in this experiment contained the following reagents: 50 micromoles of pH 7.3, tris buffer; 100 micronoles of glucose; 1 micromole of DPT; and water up to three milliliters. All assays were done at approximately 32 C in a Beckman spectrophotometer, model DU (Beckman Instruments, Incorporated). The temperature'was main- tained by heat from the hydrogen lamp. E. DPNH Oxidase Assay DPNH oxidase was also assayed spectrophotometrically, using DENH as the only substrate. The oxidation of DPNH decreased the absorption at 340 millimicrons. One unit of DPNH oxidase activity is defined as a decrease of 0.001 Optical density units per 100 seconds at 540 milli- microns. In addition to enzyme, the assay cuvettes con- tained the following reagents: 500 micronoles of pH 7.6, tris buffer; 0.5 micromole of DPNH; and water up to three milliliters. Endogenous cuvettes contained no DPNH. F. Assay for Heat Resistance Heat inactivation rates were used to screen cell extracts for heat resistant enzymes and to determine the inactivation Kinetics of purified enzymes. In general, these rates*were obtained by heating samples at a fixed temperature for various times and detersining the enzyme 14 activity of each heated sahple. Since the heating times vary widely among samples, the time required for temperature equilibration of the samples constitutes a different percentage of the heating time for each sample. This introduces an error in the tine-temperature value reported for each sample. When screening for heat re- sistant enzymes, this error is unimportant but in kinetic studies it can not be ignored. For this reason, two methods of heating samples were used, one for crude ex- tracts and another for purified enzyme solutions. Crude extractsxwere heated in rubber stoppered, 15 millimeter, pyrex test tubes. Before adding extract, each tube was pre-heated to the inactivation temperature in an unstirred water bath. After adding the extract, the tubes were stoppered and agitated for one.minute to increase the rate of heat transfer. The tubes were with- drawn and iced at various intervals after the addition of the extract and the heated extracts were centrifuged to remove precipitated protein before activity measure- ments. Purified enzyme solutions were heated in thin-walled capillary tubing. The tubes were made by drawing 23 millimeter pyrex test tubes to a diameter of two milli- meters in a gas-oxygen flame. These capillary tubes had xtremely thin walls to facilitate heat transfer and re- F) ()1 duce the temperature la~ suffi01ent volume .I. V U needed for an accurate assay. was drawn into the tubes and melting then in a flame. it were placed inul nebusly in Zach tube and cooled in a 10 C water I. r.,-.‘1 . 35101; Salli/1.8 1.43.3 time. ,1 1,: - 'v iCuLu the 'I'ec’iS Wit hdl" Sh-‘l’l after r . -°-L-, . measured W1bh" both ends were .sealed by zero tide, all of the tubes a stirred water bath. the specified time interval G. ~uri ,ation of filucose Behydrg;engse To deteriine the progertier of the :luc ose dehydro- genases frcn ve3ztati 1e cells and Spores, both crude extracts had to be purified. The pur1ifu01tion procedure for both extracts Was sinilar to thzt used by Doi, Church and Ialvorson (1959} in their purification of spore glucose ehydrogenase. 35 C, cooled to remove precipitated material. I e tlfiae- w1tn stirring, until the solut precipitated protein was collec separated one tenth the riei buffer. The pH of the ex The crude extract im1eu iately and rapidly in ice, and centrifuged act was ammonium sulfate slowly, d. was saturate The ted by centrifugation, from the supernatant liquid, and resu spended in nal volume of 0.1 molar, pH 7.6, tris tract was not controlled during the anmoniun sulfate saturation. Nucleic acids were removed from the concentrated ex trac t becaus they inter are with annoniun sulfate fre ctiona tion. They were precioitated by adjustirg the pH 0 the concent ated extract to 5.1 with acet acid and addin5 snall anounts of 2 per cent protanine ate in a fine strean awhile stirring t: e extract. The precipitate was removed by centrif-ga tion, and the 280/260 ratio (see section H. of HAT53IALS n. HST ICE 3) of the supernatant liquid was determined. This pro- cedure was re pe-1ted until a ratio of 0.7 or greater was obtained. The supernatant liquid was then dialysed a m o O 1: d F4 m rr 0 a H 01 against 0.1 nolar, pH 7.6, tris buffer fo cipitation occurred during dialvsis, but, since the preciuitate contained no alucose dehydro: enase, it was ”5 in t1e dialysa d extract was fractionated with ammonium sulfate. The desired satur- (.0 tion pe wcenta5 e was obtained by measuring the volume of the extract before each addition of annonium sulfate, and addin5 a calculated amount of solid Sclt, slowly and vvith constant stirrin5. No attenpt was made to control the pH of the solution during addi tio on of the a:unonium sulfate. Each precipitated fraction was collected by entrifugation and resuspended in 0.1 mole (L) r, pH 7.6, 17 tris buffer. The almonium sulfa fractions which com1 ained glucose dehydro5enase were further fractionated on an anion exch an-e column. Phe material used in the column was KK-diethylamino ethyl cellulose (DEAE cellulose). "fl ,. ‘fW olumn was atproxiaately 20'nilliliters. d— t (D O The almonium sulfate Fractiors containing glucose dehydrOQenase were comoined and dial'sed against 0.05 molar, r4 .) pH 7.6, tris buffer to prepare t en for adsorption on the coluhn. Dial3; is at this buffer concentration pre- bv ci‘itate d a la 'e anount of material, out, since this 1at rial Was enzyaatically inactive, it was discarded. H (1‘ d- The supernatant solution was added to he colunn Eld washed throu-h with bufifer. The effluent from washing contained no lucose dehydroger ase , indicatin5 that the enzyme was adsorbed on the DLAE cellulose. Adsorbed protein was removed from tr a column by ‘ 31a dient elation. The gradient was obtainea by neing o ‘ a l “' ’ 3 'Y‘Vh. “-‘9 two reservoirs in a serles arranpemont. -ne lcm,r reservoir was an aspirator bottle conta1n1aa 1c mill1- liters of bu,Fer, and the ugger res r: ,1 _ .— ."O ‘-I A ‘1 JUL- J. LA. '4 9’7] 343 L V” .4 \‘J _.' L171; ] 0 .--.—~ _“. flyik .1 . r‘ _ _L \le ”1“. .v 1(41" ' __,_ ‘ .- 34-“:(1 v | O 1.4 a 1 '4‘ ‘4 14L ‘ ”C? l».- l ‘7‘ ‘J R] v‘ A .2 ,_ v..LV 3- VP Cu «i quuL a. g Q "a ,u 4— .. .‘ \ \l yur. ‘1 V -\- ' 'v 1 _'V ° , - -_L 4-4 .LL.‘ 1 Ul‘v. .50 a . .\ 51 a V *3 2/} C1 ./ m‘ 19 In samples containing less than 10 per cent nucleic 6* CD acid, protein was determined spectrophotom trically a 280 and 260 millimicrons, according to the method of Warburg and Christian (1942). This method depends on light absorption at 280 and 250 millimicrons by protein and nucleic acid. Both protein and nucleic acid absorb at these wavelenqths, but, since their absorption co- efficients differ, the ratio of absorbance at 280 milli- nicrons to absorbance at 230 millinicrons (280/260 ratio) can be used to determine the relative amounts of each in a given sample. Information on the relative amounts of protein and nucleic acid, plus the optical density at 280 millimicrons, is used to calculate the actual concen- tration of each in the samples. A Becknan DU Spectro- photometer was used for these readings. I. Chloride Ion A§§§X The sodium chloride concentration required to elute each fraction from the cellulose colunn was estimated from the chloride ion concentration of the fractions. This information was used to compare the exchange charac- teristics of both glucose denydrogenases. The chloride ion concentration in each fraction was determined by titration with silver nitrate using potassium chromate as an adsorption indicator. Since protein affects the adsorption endpoint, a correction had to be made for the 20 protein in each fraction. The correction factor was obtained empirically by titrating known concentrations of sodium chloride and protein, with silver nitrate. J. Acetone Extraction of Whole Cells A quantitative method for assaying glucose dehydro- genase in small cell samples was needed to study the rate of formation of this enzyme in growing cultures. Several assay procedures were tried, but most of these were not successful. Whole cells could not be assayed directly because they were impermeable to substrates used in the assay. Heating the cells to 69 C for two minutes did not increase their permeability. Breaking the cells in the Omnimixer diluted the activity excess- ively because of the large cup volume and the large volume cf buffer required to thoroughly wash the glass beads. Acetone extraction of the cell samples increased their permeability to assay substrates and also permitted the assay of small cell samples. Glucose dehydrogenase assay by acetone extraction was done in the following manner. Cell samples were taken from a New Brunswick fermentor at various times during growth, washed by alternate centrifugation and resuspension in 0.5 per cent saline, and suspended in just enough saline to disperse the cells. One part of each suspension was pipetted into ‘7 sl at -lS C, and cent: etone, ."t \J a ten cpany). 0" L1 ("1 ‘J for about 7 dry ,3 oui'nent A .1 4 tional in Cal LVL V1 .L ion, Inter L; ( uga L was crerated "1 ‘J .11 —— 3.9 v1} ‘1‘.”3 re ls 1L Du drie #118 rd: Z81". .p lI‘i-ECE L.- n A l ide. alor' L ssayod for C 4—4 wk 5 C .1 x 1. cent anv cts. - J. 20.ng n1 1 -4. cells e to i Anderso th iron ’5‘ ll \ d from - a D ‘54 J. divalent 1" 1 C L. L GIL; ti l . I‘I 3! Lomb "Spectronic 20" z; .1. D :13 in UP” :1 Kl. ’ 0 color. as -. ,- L‘- .lLij. ULJ» 11—53 e ‘9 I1 OI‘Cil L. L; \.~ ‘ly by t ltOC" cal tri by :1 produce 1W 1 (- N.‘ w ..:e 7 1' mi. N j (“q *" : -II‘LLIL- V‘ " ”Lin 3 ill-KL ve lengt .n CJ. Ianune cl n3 serums, e S 111 .ml «.0 O ~RL .14. 31317.8 I’ o ‘0 .5 IA .1 follow ‘« J Le d t' d 22 centrated enzyme and one part of Freund's complete adjuvant (1944) were emulsified by forcing in and out of a one cubic centimeter tuberculin syringe and in- jected subdermally in the necks of rabbits. These rabbits had been heart bled prior to injection to obtain normal serum for serological controls. Twenty- four days after injection, the rabbits were heart bled to obtain immune serums. The blood was incubated at room temperature for three hours to start clot re— traction and refrigerated for about three days to finish the retraction. The serum was poured off, centrifuged to remove blood cells, and stored at -°O C. Forty-six days after the first injection, a second, smaller in- jection of enzyme plus Freund's incomplete adjuvant (1944) was given to keep the antibody level high. At fifty—six days, the rabbits were bled again to obtain more immune serum. M. Serolggical Comparison of Enzymes The serological comparison of spore and vegetative cell glucose dehydrogenase was accomplished by the Cuchterlony agar gel diffusion method (1949a, 1949b) and by Consden and Kohn's (1959) modification of this method. In the agar gel diffusion method, several wells are cut in a layer of solid agar, sealed with melted agar, and filled with various antigens and antisera. The antigens 23 and antisera diffuse through the agar, until, in a region of optimal proportions, they combine and precipitate, forming a visible line. Since various antigens and anti- sera differ in diffusion rates and optimal proportion values, this method is capable of separating the com- ponents of a compound antigen-antibody reaction. Consden and Kohn's modification of the Ouchterlony technique is the substitution of cellulose acetate film for the agar gel. In this method, moist cellulose acetate film is spotted with very small amounts of antigens and antisera, and incubated under mineral oil to isolate the aqueous phase. During incubation, the antigens and antisera diffuse through the aqueous phase, and precipitate in the cellulose aCetate matrix. After ~’ncubation, the film is washed and stained with a suitable dye to reveal the precipitin lines. A slight modification of the cellulose acetate technique, especially useful in this study, is the en- zymatic identification of precipitin lines. This method depends on the enzymatic reduction of DPN (in the presence of glucose) by serologically precipitated glucose dehydro- genase, and the fluorescence of DPNH under a Black-ray ultraviolet lamp (Ultraviolet Products, Inc.). The pro- cedure consists of spreading a solution of glucose and DPN on the completed cellulose acetate film, and examining the film for fluorescent precipitin lines. N. Spore germination The heat labile glucose dehydrogenase was present only in germinated spores. Germination was accomplished by the following procedure. Five grams, wet weight, of partially germinated spores, which had been stored at -20 C for about five months, were suspended in 50 milli- liters of germinating solution, and heat shocked at about hating solution contained '0 F'- 70 C for ten minutes. The germ enosine in 0.07 d- C0 L1: 0.2 per cent alanine and 0.02 per cen molar, pH 7.0 potassium phosphate buffer. After heat shock, the suspension was incubated at 50 3 for five hours, and then refrigerated at 4 C for 12 hours. At the end of this time, almost all of the spores were germinated, as indicated by their permeability to crystal violet stain. In addition, a small number of germinated spores had grown into vegetative cells. A. Screening for Heat Pa esi stant dQZXLjfi The purpose of this study was to ide tify and purify an enzyme sys teanhich could be used as a model in the study of spore heat resistance. my enzyne would be useful, as long as it had a heat stable and heat labile form. Results of experiments on the catalase of Bacillus cereus suggested that heat labile enzymes are present during all stages of vegetative growth, and that heat stable enzymes appear near the beginning of the station- ary phase. For this reason, stationary phase cell ex- tracts were screened for heat resistant enzymes by the method given in Section F. of MATERIALS iND l3 THODS. The heat inactivation curve for glucose dehydro- genase, the first enzyme examined, is given in figure 1. This graph of enzyme activity versus time of heating indicates that the glucose dehydrogenase loses half of its activity in about 15 minutes at 69 C. A half-life of this magnitude means that the enzyme has a greater than average resistance to heat. B. "Activation" of Glucose Dehydrggenase An interesting feature of the curve in fig ure 1 is the large increase in activity during the first minute of heating. This increase was reminiscent of the activ- ation of glucose oxidation in spores of Bacillus cereus, UNITS ENZYME/ ML OJ 300 200 IOO l l J 0 IO 20 3O 40 TIME OF HEATING- MINUTES h=‘+ inactivatio .13 _;:;u_; ~. Th. head n at 09 C of the ease dehyireguazae in an extract cf ve etat‘ve cells vaillus cef“ns. This curve also shows the a arent t activatiti of the enzyme. M \1 reported by Church and Halvorson (1957). This increase could be the result of true activation or merely an expression of the difference in heat stability of two p. coupled enzymes - n this case, glucose dehydrog enase and DPNH oxidase. To test the latter possibility, s mples of extracts were heated to 60 C for various times, and assayed for both glucose dehydrogenase and DENH oxidase. The lower temperature was used to slow the apparent activation to a measurable rate. The results are plotted in figure 2, which shows the activity for each enzyme versus heating time at 60 C. As DPNH oxidase activity decreases due to thermal inactivation, the activity of glucose de hydro- genase increases. Apparently the loss of the oxide se permits DEER to accumulate at a faster rate. J C. Time Course of Glucose Dehydrog “a e Bio vnthesLs L Although glucose dehydrogenase had been found in spores of Bacillus cereus (Church and Halvorson 1955) and in stationary phase cells or forespores of the same [—10 organ am, either a heat labile nor heat stable glucose dehydrogenase could be found in exponentially growing at {31 cells. Therefore, biosynthesis had to be initiate a time between the exponential and stationary growth phase of this organism. In order to observe the appearance of the enzyme 800 600 GLUCOSE DEHYDROGENASE . 400L 0 UNITS ENZYME / ML DPNH OXIDASE ZOO 1 1 l a O 30 60 9'0 IZO HEATING TIME -- SECONDS ‘ - - n . -._-. ’_ an 1.1.. -00 - .9... Q’UIE é° A-conrarison o ane allaot cf Leatin at . -‘ Tm, ‘ x~ ‘ I a .‘ a w 03 (‘2! _j \ ‘ 1" \ ~ ‘ 5 .~. " " I ‘ i "‘ IA > T 7“ V I“ " (11 tie glinnose de,vdrrfgenlse and the handic. 1 4- +- ' t - - ' . , n eitracc of verétati e ce s of :qoll.lfi cetets. {U (0 and to follow its concentration throughout the sporulation process, cell samples were harvested from the New Brunswick fermentor at various times during growth. The cells were acetone dried, heated, and assayed for glucose dehydro- genase activity. The results are shown in figure 3 as a graph of glucose dehydrogenase activity and dipico- linic acid concentration versus culture time. The curve for dipicolinic acid is included as a parameter of sporulation. Glucose dehydrogeLase increased rapidly after six hours, but then appeared to decline after eight hours. However, the decline in glucose dehydrogenase corresponds to an increase in the number of Spores, as indicated by increased di icolinic acid concentration. I’C) This suggested that spores are more refractory to acetone extraction than vegetative cells and thus remain impermeable to the assay substrates in spite of the acetone treatment. To check the validity of the acetone extraction pro- cedure, an alternate extraction method was employed. Two large samples were taken from a fermentor at nine and thirteen hours after inoculation, ruptured in the omnimixer, heated at 69 C for two minutes and assayed for glucose dehydrogenase. The enzyme concentration of the culture, obtained by this procedure, was consider— ably higher than the concentration obtained by acetone I.) C) 1w1vaa°n 8 o 4 ‘HD I d MECHANICAL DISRUPTION EXTRACTION ‘---o ACETONE Q GLUCOSE DEHYDROGENASE IO I2 l4 s ROWTH TIME - Hou'Rs GOOr 1 O 0 O v N WWI HWAZNB Slan OO»- . . . 1 N 1 1 i '3 . culture Cf heat -, . _ .9 5.3. 13wa 1 51-3 . . . 3 sell by a 31 extraction. These data point out the fact that the apparent enzyme concentration can be grossly altered by changing the extraction method. D. Purification of Vegetative Cell and Spore Glucose Dehydrogenase The results for the purification of vegetat ve cell and spore glucose dehydrogenase are summarized in tables 1 and 2. The meaning of the various columns is as follows: Specific activity is defined as units of en- zyme per milligram of protein; purification number is the ratio of specific activity in a particular step to the specific activity in the heated extract; and yield is the percentage of total enzyme activity remaining at a particular step, relative to the total activity in the cell extract. The total activity of the crude extracts cannot be determined directly, because they contain DPNH oxidase. Loss of the oxidase during purification results in an apparent increase in the total amount of glucose dehydrogenase, while, at the same time, glucose dehydro- genase is lost by inactivation. To obtain an estimate of the total amount of glucose dehydrogenase in the extracts, all increases in activity, throughout the purification, were added to the apparent total activity of the crude extracts. TABLE 1 Purification of the glucgse dehydrogenase from vegetative cells of Bacillus cereus » . Specific Purifi— Yield krocedure activity cation % Heated Extract . 44 l 62 Protamine and Dialysis (0.1 n. tris) 195 4 72 Amflonium 54-75% 155 4 Sulphate fractionation 75-86% 1,720 59 44 55-96% 554 a Combined, Reheated, Dialysed (0.05 M. tris) 3,420 75 46 DEAE Fract. 9 29,400 660 17 Cellulose Chromatography Fract. 10 12,600 290 13 Fract. 11 2,240 51 7 . A ‘) +1.- , n Oh 4 ...0 7 SO 7 0.~ l 3 4 8 l 4 ..J 1!. 8 9d 0 O E 7 AU 70 Cu 8 .3 AU 1 l - A. 5 4..., 4,0: fl. 0 o S .4. fix +4 +... ...... E... «I. flu C ...: _ _ o; C. VJ O 4. T r l c... Tl w. l a. L t C r A n vi .T .1 LL Lb v. u 1C ..1 . 3 H ...w e T. .1; 1“ LL (._ Eu .. . 3+ 0% o. .. A...” n. n 1. u .74 .T. .1... 1L «t. 1 Ab “1w n.“ FL 4 a; (Q . J 0. hi H. 1.. m u U C; I.\ L n x. W . A I," 16 8:) a _1 T cific activity and purification number of the heated spore extract are not prese ed because the protein concentration of the extract was not deter- mined. Instead, the specific activity of the protar ins and dialysis step is considered a purification of one. The heated spore extract probably iid not have a specific activity much lo'er than tha.t cf the uialys 3d ex tract because very little precipitation occurred during the protamine and dialysis step. Al hough the purif ication obtained in the 75-85 per cent saturated ammonium sulphate fraction was far sreater than that in both the 54-75 and 85-96 per cent _7 p saturated fractions, all three fractions were combined before cellulose chromatography in order to conserve total activity. The similarity between vegetative cell and spore glucose dehydrogenase was indicated by their solubility and charge properties. Both enzymes were prec cipitated at an ammonium sulfate conce entration cf approximately 80 per cent of saturation (see Doi, Church and Kalvorson, 1959, for data on spore enzyme), and both enzymes were eluted from the cellulose column at a sodium chloride concentration cf abcut 0.1 molar. E. Charac éterization of Vegetative Cell and Score Glucose Dehydro crenase T‘) stability of some proteins is increased L .L .LLV when they are conjugated with nucleic acids. Since the crude vegetative cell and spore extracts contained a large amount of nucleic acid, the heat resistance of -1 H- .- :1- the glucose c .3tr ‘,_'_‘IV\Q ’.J~¢K U) e in these extracts might have C) If‘ been due to binding with this material. To elizhlnate his possibility and to compare the heat resistance of L .. — .,.-,..-, ..., - 39:. - -_,._. ,Lg- ... ., ,1 . the two enzymes, pur111ed VCSGtQU1V8 cell and spa: (D enzymes were tested for heat resistance by the capil- lary tube method. The vegetative cell enzyme used in this ex xperi dent had been purified 290 times and con- tained less than 1 per cent nucleic acid. The Spore enzyme had been purified 20 fold and contained about 6 per cent nucleic acid. Inactivation data for both enzymes are presented in fioure 4 as the logarithm of activity versus time I}( (3 of he atinl" at 59 C. The purified vegetative cell :1 enzyme has a half-life of 17 minutes compared to a q half-life of 15 minutes for the crtae mgetative cell 1.). extract. The inactivation of the puril ed vegetative cell enzyme follows first order reaction kinetics very closely. 0n the other hand, the inactivation of purified spore slucose dehy dro.enase does not appear to follow first order kinetics and this enzyme has a half-life of only one minute at 69 G. Since the removal of practically a l nucleic acid LOG UNITS ENZYME / ML 4.0 - VEGETATIVE CELL ENZYME 3.0 SPORE ENZYME 2.0 i J _A O 20 4O 6O HEATING TIME -- MINUTES 57 from the vegetative cell extract does not lower the heat stability of glucose dehydrogenase from this source, it is unlikely that nucleic acids contribute to the heat stability of this enzyme. 2. Liohaelis constants ..3 To prove the enzytatic sim larity of vegetative cell and spore lucose dehydrogenase, the Lichaelis constants of the two enzymes were compared. The Iichaelis constants of the vegetative cell glucose dehydrogenase were deternined from the data in figure 5. These are Lineweaver-Eurke plots (1954) of enzyme activity versus substrate concentration. The enzyme preparation used for this experiment was an 86 per cent saturated amnonium sulfate fraction, having a specific activity of 11,700. The Spore glucose dehydrogenase Iichaelis constants were reported by Doi, Church, and Halvorson (1959). Table 3 is a compilation of results obtained for both enzymes which shows that the enzymes have similar substrate affinities. 3. Serology The vegetative cell and Spore glucose dehydro- genases were compared serologically to test the structural similarity of the two enzymes. The results obtained by the agar gel diffusion technique are shown in the photo~ graphs in figure 6. These plates demonstrate clearly that 3 -Km 0 -2 GLUCOSE MOLES /L|TER x lo2 — x I02 S DPN MOLES /LITER x :03 0. A cs” ..I. m u Lla. ....U .... ,K. . .H .4. « .... L1,. .-1 .. , t, a. . 3 .1 l - _ _..; 0—1 .. I+IJ d1. .1 V II\ LII YV cl .. A. an . I. t ...- T. ”1‘ 1.; I. I o O .. ml. WJ D... D 11 C o. i O. J fl 5 6 FV ...... V 1 Q be .u .4 w ”I. .....t .71. a :1. .l ....u LI; ..., .1. n. . Ll .u. a C C I F a t 7.4.4. 0. . JJ 7“ r - h... . 1.. 1 »A sell 1?. t1. 1 J L 1 ; P. 9 S 2 ... H S T. A 01 a... a... C . V _I\_ . Lb flvl.n14 ...... U. .L w. a: 1 a L ..A . . . no uIrJ‘ ._‘l a. LIU 1; “I..-” IL t .I e. mi n11 _..... . A:\ “.L. I VI: ‘1 5 a» w L m I,“ e l "a “1’1 Z - \1 J 1,} $1 :1. ‘ IA «1 Eu .1 r m P\‘v ‘ I (in; ‘9. ‘q 1 O ‘_ J- n f . "w 1 - ' r: '- 1 .1, r "'1 4‘ - ~ . A. 111.” H —‘—_—‘-‘—"_:..—.. ~ ._.“...r- _ — — - ‘.- _..---.-—'-.’ - 33—7.:-'-. -- ---- -.‘v ‘1 I ‘ ye. . ~ 1: \I I ._J . A . . A 1 J . _..—_....._-._. v— — . -_ -.. 4- —--~——~n—— -_—-..—._—-—-—_.___—. _ _— 1 _ ~~ ' 1 w . cl .' : ‘ rt "‘ v ‘u I. -_J [‘.1‘ : ._ .n - A _ ._ L x.) ‘ . l *5 P1 -1, . 7'1? 75, # v - ‘ L‘f 1. t -. 1.1123? '18 JULIO-173 ‘3 : ‘ ‘~ n‘! ,,.,-..-.. ‘, . --‘ , ILL .. L» .7 I73 7 o :1 Spore Enzyme DLN 9.1 X l 1% Figure 6. A serological comparison of th glucose . dehydrogenases from vegetative cells and spores of bac1llus cereus by the agar gel method. See page 42 for key to well contents. 41 at least two heat resistant proteins are present both in vegetative cells and spores. To determine if one Q eenase, a mixture p ‘- of the proteins was glucose dehydro of DPH and glucose was Spread over the agar, and the precipitin lines were examined for fluorescence under an ultraviolet lamp. although fluorescence was ob- served, it could not definitely be attributed to the precipitin lines, because of the large anount of un- precipitated glucose dehydrogenase in the agar. The serological identity of the two enzymes was proved by using cellulose acetate film in place of agar and developing the precipitin lines with a DPH- nd s glucose mixture. The arrangement of antigens antisera on the film was essentially the same as the arrangenent used for the agar di.fusion experiment, but, when a DPN-glucose mixture was used to develcp the washed film, the only visible precipitin lines were those produced by the reaction of glucose dehydrogenase with its homologous antibody. After spreading the glucose-DEN mixture on the washed films, distinct fluorescent lines appeared between the ant1gens and each antiserum, but not between the antigens and the normal serum controls. These results are presented diagrana- tically in figure 7, where the inked lines represent fluorescence. ABV ' ABV CV VE ABS CV SE ABS (38 (38 '- rrv mi d'e azainst vevetative m G ABV - Serum containing antibo cell enzyme abs - serum containing antibodies against spore enzyme VB - Vegetative cell enzyme SE - Spore enzyme CV - Control serum from rabbits receiving vegetative cell enzyme 0° Control serum from rabbits receiving spore enzyme Figure 2. A serological comparison of the glucose .1. dehydrogenases from vegetative cells and spores o Bacillus cereus by the cellulose acetate film method. 45 F. Heat labile Glucose Dehydrogenase Because veg (D tative cells contained no heat labile glucose dehydrogenase, a germinated Spore extract was exanined for this enzyme. A :luccse d hydrogenase is s was found, in this extract, which was completely inactivated in less than one ndnute at both 70 and 60 C. At go C, this enzyme had a half-life of less than one minute, compared to a half-life of seventeen minutes at 69 C for the vegetative cell enzyme. DISCUSSICE Following the exponential growth of Bacillus cereus cultures, a complex series of events occurs resulting in the production of heat resistant spores. Heat resistant glucose dehydrogenase is synthesized by these cells early in the sporulation process and (D 1‘ tr— 0‘) L U is eventually incorporated into spores. Aft mination, when the spores have completely lost their heat resistance, the glucose dehydrogenase is still present in high concentration but it too has lost its heat resistance. The glucose dehydrogenase can not be detected after vegetative growth commences because it is diluted by the multiplication process. The results of serological and enzymatic com- parisons, the coincidence of the production of this enzyme with the production of spores, and the coincidence of the change in heat resistance of this enzyme with the change in heat resistance of spores, all indicate that the glucose dehydrogenase in vegetative cells, spores, and germinated spores is the sage enzyme with different levels of heat resistance. For this reason, if both the heat labile and heat stable forms can be completely purified, this enzyme system should provide an excellent model for studying spore heat resistance. However, as stated in the introduction, the purpose of this study was not merely to obtain any model system, 'but one in which the enzymes are plentiful, easily purified, and we sonably stable during store as EnzyneS'with these U .2 characteristics can be accumulated in sufficient quantity to permit physical-chemical characterization. "1 ins ve‘e tative cell glucose dehydrogenase appears to meet these requirements since it is very stable, and can be purified easily and in high yields. Although its cellular concentration is not especially high, its stability during storage will permit the accumulation of the large amount of pure enzyme needed for its complete characterization. In fact, a partially puri- fied preparation of this enzyme has been stored for eight months, at -20 C, without losing appreciable activity. On the other hand, the accumulation of germinated spore glucose dehydrogenase may not be as easy because this enzyme is heat labile. Enwever, since the spore enzyme is much more stable, large amounts of unger- minated spores, rather than germinated Spores, could be accumulated. Germination of the spores and purification of the heat labile enzyme could then be accomplished in a short time, with minimum loss of enzyme activity. The aberrant inactivation kinetics of the spore Q “t to .J.‘ «.4 ° 1a)." Yul ‘1‘ .4‘” V \J$«L._' TL .. ” LL QJ‘ALB S \I A a.‘ la, .- swva-t -- “U.L 4--.l" ‘J‘vs ~ 'J"‘\'a' (/Ls; .‘ .7 {-.‘r L1 0 iiLLA "1 . \JQ 1 51’ CAL-L.) I” a d —4 V ‘3 . \’\ ‘Lli; \— _l. i,-,.,.1., CU bC/ll‘o J -', «a: g‘ll—‘A ) ‘1-jlfi 0 ~ Pu a... DWI» ..‘l. I- .(4 UL . «A " _l l ”x. .LLA ‘ 4 .J \JILKI _. a t \ .. .4 ~-; I . 8 no 4.» 8 C .- '1 :1 1. . H - I: ": vbais.“ -.stvz V .U 1.. U n ‘ "l .L .«K/ +~~ \) "1k? ..4 ‘. CJ url. all“ .. .‘LJ L..- q (:6 .2‘ \J L) .‘1 . ... Lu, 23—1— ~ Q i 'is J- ‘- UAL Tr true, 10 l C said. a? at will by conditions sinilar to those required for germination of whole Spores. Such a syste a would era 1t one to study loss of heat resistance by a *(i "dynamic" method rather than by a "static“ comparison of heat stable and he at labile e11zyme 8. Much more lg. in Mornation about the Inec1anism of heat resistance could be obtai: ed from a dynamic system than from a a static one because loss in heat resistance may involve (D more tr an one simpl step. In fact, the loss of heat resistance by a series of events is suggested by the Spore enzyme inactive mi n etrve shown in fi5ure 4. If only two levels of heat resistance were possible for each glucose dehydrogenase molecule - those of the Vegetative cell and germinated spore enzyme - the bend in this curve would be extremely sharp at 69 C, because of the large difference in inactivation rates of the two enzymes. Instead, the rather broad bend observed indicates the pose sibi li 1ty of glucose dehydrogenase with heat resistance intermediate to that of the vegetative cell and germinated spore enzymes. Thus, tr 1e loss of heat resistance by this enzyme may be a sequential phenomenon, requiring more than one unit event for the change from maximum to minimum heat resistance. This statement, however, should be considered as no more 1 than an hypothesis, since the meager inact 1v vation data 48 Ho in gure 4 can not support any real conclusions. The (D v rtheles (L‘ (0 heat inactivation results in figure 4 do, n , contain l? portant inplications for the purification of this model system. If phm ical-c hemical comparisons of the heat stable and heat labile enzymes are to be made, W the stable enzyme must be obtain1ed from vegetative cells because the enzyme at this stage of Spore developALnt retains its heat stability during storage. On the other Lani, since loss of heat resistance by purifled enzyme appears to depend on the raturity of the spores from which the enzyt1e is isolated, the heat ste ble en: :yute from 1 ature spores would be useful in "cell-free germination" studies Compared to other heat resist ant spore enz 1nes and to the whole spores th mselves, the stability of the zlucose dehydrogenase1rom.vegetativ e cells and spores of Bacillus cereus is rather low. For example, the adenosine ribosidase found in Eacillus cereus spore extracts by Powell and Hunter (1956) had a half-life of four hours at 100 C, compared to a half-life of fifteen minutes at 69 C for the gl lucose dehydrogenase. However, the glucose dehydrogenase has both a heat stable and heat labile form, and the difference in heat stability of the two forms is quite large. Thus, the glucose dehydrogenase appears to be a reasonable model for the study of heat resistance. The fact that t1mchange in heat resistance of the glucose dehydrogenase parallels the Change in heat resistance of whole Spores during germination 13 additional proof of its usefulness as a model system. Sorrelation with the heat res 1s stance of whole spores is, in fact, a requirement for any enzyme 5 stem to be used for the study f spore heat resistance, O stant enzyme 1n t3” \ cf (I) H. since the mere presence of a re re 1 spores does not necessar11y m (D an it contributes to Spore L 11 (I) at resistance. For exa1tple, a very heat stable in- organic pyrophosphatase was found by Johnson and Johnson (1959) in azotoba a2 lis, a nonsporeforming meso- phile. This enzyme Ob'v iously bears no relation to "-v-J :1. O :7 P. C’- cellular heat resistance because the cell from w is derived is not heat resistant. In spite of the foregoing considerations, a certain amount of caution must be exercised in predictions of the usefulness of this model system for determining the mechanism of spore heat resistance. Since the purified heat stable glucose dehydrogenase is rapidly inactivated at temperatures used to heat shock spores prior to ger- nination, and the heat labile glucose dehyer enase is abundantly present in these germinated Spores, it is obvious that differences in structure of these two puri- fied enzymes cannot completely account for the heat (51 C) resistance of the enzyme in intact Spores. It is possible that the structural differences between these enzymes are diminished when they are extracted, or that intraspore environment also plays a role in the pro action of this enzyme‘while it is in the spore. In any event, the author feels that the application of the model systei, described in this thesis, to the study of spore heat resistance is almost certain to yield infornation of a fundamental nature, and to provide at least the beginning of a theory for the mechanism of spore heat resistance. (“YT '7" ' " ' T“, T JUliliu”h—L\1 A model system for the study of the heat resistance of spores of Bacillus cereus has been described. T113 system consists of a heat stable glucose dehydrogenase from vegetative cells and Spores, and a heat labile glucose dehydrogenase from germinated spores. In crude extracts, the vegetative cell enzyme has a half—life of about fifteen minutes at g3 C, while tre spore enzyme has a ha f-life of about one minute at An increase in the g1ucose dehydrogenase activity of vegetative cell extracts was obser ed during the A first minute of heating at 69 o. This app d" heat on I‘ (D I1 0.1 activation was investigate because of its possible connection with the heat activation of glucose oxidation in whole spores. It was concluded that the heat in— activation of DPNH oxidase, without grossly affecting the glucose dehydrogenase activity, was reSponsible for the apparent heat activation of the extracts. Biosynthesis of the heat stable glucose dehydro- genase is initiated shortly after the exponential growth of cultures ceases and before any dipicolinic acid can be detected in the cells. The heat stable enzyme is present in the cells during most of the sporulation pro- 0 cess but a true measure of its concentration during this period was impossible with the extraction procedures available. The enzyme from vegetative cells was purified about 30 t C} Pa mes, and the enzyme from spores was purified about ...4 Q (11 mes by the following steps: extraction by mechan- H0 t H. cal disruption of cells or spores, heating to 65 C, protamine precipitation of nucleic acids, anmonium “fig-3,1 nation, and nzns cellulose colunn chro- U) :1 pa *0 :3” $13 C,- (D F9 ‘fi CD (D d. F“ O 1he purified enzymes from vegetative cells and spores had almost identical substrate affinity and serological characteristics, but differed in heat stability and kinetics of heat inactivation. The difference in heat stability and heat inactivation kinetics was attributed to a partial conversion of the heat stable enzyme to the heat labile enzyme. The possibility of completely purifying the glucose dehydrogenase system and using it as a model for studying spore heat resistance was discussed. D R4 ..C . 'V’VV (W 1 .LL1411 v.14. O 115 .l ..J Lu 6 o VJ .... a .. .1... n1- 1 .c .1 ...c .11. 9 S . ._1 v S_..o_ C a . o . ...: ..1 . .111... 3.7 e ....a ..-. Ugo- t .1 s .... .1 . J _ u _.1. ..1 .1. .217... S e 1.. ..1__ e . ..J ... c 31:0 a .. 11 .1 e O a. a 1:... O C in C 1-1.1 .. C S 1.1:: m1 0 ..1........ c. o C 7 .a .4. 1.1.1.. ._.1 u 1.: _ 1.... ..1 f .c. .l . a i O 1. 9 .1.» .. ... . 41 L .l 9.” C ...-a a r. --. .1 ...1 N b . e c .1 O l C 5 ._. ... .1... 1-.. 1: C ..-.1.,. .... ._.. n c ”.... ...; U l ..T; .15 U” Q 1.: ....“ Q .... Cu 1...... 1.. w _...I u. ’31. ..--H. .«u .A. .To ..w. mu 1. M141 D. - . LT 2.13 .l ..b . ..1 .. fl 1 a .. . C 1.1.. G T11"... I O A... T, l C no pl ... 1- 0 ... e .3. ...... Q 41 o a a a f1 1.. l .. n1 ..1 a O 7. n s .. c :J ...w .... . r... .-. f. E 5 _..; 7 . C .6 u e .l l . .1; ... 7. T r .l .... C C a l .. 3 5 F... 5 I c l n ..1. ..-.1 Q s. - a D. e C a.-. t... f. 1 A1,...” .( C. 0,. S a «l O t 2b 1 T P. +U c. a u. 2 -1 .L 1... ..(1 :1 ..U S 3 l .....— .J. . 11.1 e ...1 C .0 : 6 a... C . I n no 8 C . G . S S r. C S n I. 11 n .1 C n... l .1. 1. . .1... T . ...-1 I l a. a S C . U 0 a C U r. O . r I .o “.1... C ..1. Q C o n. . o T 31.3. «.1 +1. 2 o). n. .h t .1 ... C .C. ..1 r11 11 .391 a C C n... ..... ...... 9 n ..H a . r. Cl r n n... . . 1.. ..l a ..1 $10 1.. E .l .... .11 .... U 1.18 1...... .a S . .1 .a C . H ..., .. Q. Ca ml ca Ow n a Cu Pu. .11. r... V. V 1T”. 4.11.1 "J a .A :1. ..3 ....A LU n 1.1 n i s l C ...... a, e 1 s f n c 4. . a r ....1 n..1 .....c C c O 3 O C ..1 .1. 31..” ... Li 0.. 3 3. .u 3 Q T. r .1... Z r. -a S T. . .1... .. ...1. 11 ”a ....1 .1 .1 .1 7. ...... . 1 C a 3.] C C n; 1 . ...L 01.4.11. .I1 uU ru “3 o ”A 1 o 0 AL I.“ n O 0.. H. «.0 LU T. ..VQ Cu :11 C t O C 0.1 A 7. _.n . v..."....w1. an... to 3 3 o y 1. ....1. .... C a; “110 é n. V S .11 _.v ..I t .l .1 3 .1 .. O n E .. .1. To C C l I.” .. H C Q .... O 71. e f. .1 1: ... : ..-. S ..1 5.16 31... t. ....-. a... C ..1 .1..- V T; .... m1 1.... ...a ...o an P. H. T. C 9.. r1 6 .... ...“. .u 1.11 Tm a ..1 .1 9.1.1. o w ....u H 1 ...1 .. . .n C 111 ON 1n... 3 o ...H ....” ..w... a ...; H +.. r x... .Tu -1“ L. ...... ..u T... V. C n.-. EM 0 n... r... C t 1 O .l S 1.... «a C 3 .1 ....1 v.-. ..c ..... .3 .Q ..U ...... J1 C C ...... a 9 _. C e a... .1... .8 C I. 1111 ..-“ ..a . a..- a. «.1. ..L . ..1. n... l E .1. 21...... .... C T Z .1 C ....1 ....1. 11131:; 1.1 C .... . a 11 ...... .-M P. ._.1 a...“ _.d 1.: 2.. h a G .. T .u. S. 1.. ...... .1. .E s s ....1. .1. n .l .1 11 C .l .... e :1 .0. . C b . ..1 1 7 ... s -. .1 . .l o . .l C V o a ..d o .....a I d t S ....1. .-.. 71 7. S C _ 1: V11. 11. hJ 11.1 VJ l C .U 2.1.. 3 311.1. 0 u 3, a H... .3 m... n n 9 7Q. J o ”.1 a 11.. Cl 0 h 8.7 . .1... e _..1 ...o 1.1. .... q: .«11 .l. o O 1.1 11.1.1). .... 1.110 ...1. o a.) _i o 10 xi 3...... _K T o 1 .8 ~11. T .... U... o T1 1.11.11 7 .t ...... ._Jn L 8. ..1. .5 a... :1..." _ u ”a .... E r 1c o 3.. 1L 7. . R. .- t. .3 ...“. .. ...... .11 m. .1 C t n _C a t C C 111.11 C 1.-. 1...... :5 .11 .. ....1 .... Q ., e S ...; 3 e ...... a a... n1 1.. ml 3 .0 ..1 2 n1. w... . .1...“ T; an 1...“ )....~ 3 Cu O «1. 7.. 1...... T DU 0 fl 1... 1... h ...... b h : C c 4. e ..c. w .. n b 3 h :1 :10 .1. 3 e l. .... 0.1.. .117 n O r .... O C .u a 2 s. S _d P T S F : u. S L .1 U. 14. H T ._1 ...: H 1. .1. ....1 a...“ O ....1 O r. a O a C ..-u «.1 no 3 7.. _... .... 1L 0 O O O I C O O 0 l 2 3 a. 5 .C 7 1C 9 10. ll. 13. 14. I: \ U C 17. 18. Lawrence, F. L. 1955a The cleavexe of adenosine by spores of Bacillus cereus. J. of Bacteriol., 73, 577-582. L138.€&V8T, ?. and Burk, D. 1954 The deter— mination of enzym dissociation constants. T A 'r‘. ‘ ,«~‘ A (”A f) O .1124. Cfldlll. .DCC. , 55’ 658-6CO. ' Iowrv, C. 3., Posebrougu I J. *Ure, A. L. .. t ' : 9* and iandall, R. I. 1951 Protein measure- ment with the Folin p a r gent. J. Biol. Chem., 193, 265-27 Cuchterlory, 0. 19491 antigen-antibody reactions in gels. Arkiv. Yemi, Kin. Cch Tecl. 2%3, l-v Cuchterlony, O. 1949b eatiren-antibod' reactions in gels. Acta gath. e: microbiol. 3.9:fli:av., Iowell, J. F. anl 7untsr, J. F. 1956 uierosine dea.inase and ribosiiase in spores of Eacillgs Careus. Eiocheg. 3. (London), 62, 381-387. ’T Eadcff, F. L. Fools J. 3. ani Rasheb, a. S. e 6 ant catalase of Bacillus Stewart, E. T. and Halvorson, H. C. 1953 Studies on the spores of aerobic bacteria. I The occurance of alan ae racemase. J. of 6 1. . 1?!‘ _h\ Warburg, C. and Christian, K. 1942 Isolierung and kristallisatian des garungsferments enolase. Biocren. 2., 310, 384-421. k AZT' ":r’j1 ‘Md'fl! USE emLY HICHIGAN STATE UNIV. LIBRRRIES | Illl 9 (LI mu llll I 312 30 0575094