—._—- -v __ _._' \ '2C—‘“— —____ THE DESIGN OF A GUARDED RlNG HOT PLAT-E FOR TESTING T'Hi THERMAL CONDUCTIWTY OF HOMOGWEOUS MATERIALS: ; than for the m of M. h 3 ? mama STATE com . , Jam“ Trout Andaman ‘ 1943 11111 vu. . .n.‘ , . , r I KYMkQ‘Et‘h‘...‘ E: I .OJ - . ..,.ln A.|\v. 0“ '1 1%; ’h¢.H 1' I Y a e .m m .m m .u m T thesis entitled he boom of n Wm not Pilate for Testing moral Conductivity of W hteriale. presented by has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Major professor DATE DUE 61 12397 m m5 aw mm flu... mm mm 8 mm E om U mm D mm E T .. ... E N H m w ...... mm m. m m... m 0 Y w ..W t u 0 a e .m .5 .m .v. o m m .0.. x O B m m m 0*! fix.) .4 . 1. .-...i..- .. .I...‘ . . u}... 1 .1. ...... I... 1...... -..- ..1 .. - . . . . 1 1 . .. . .. . . . . . . . . -0 It -‘c YT, .w -..-(.0.... ......r... ..a. ti. ’Junt... .... 0......1... n.r4‘ ...Ao..~vv1h . N‘1Thfuvqmir NIH. TIP-II...) . . ...A .. ... .. . . I . . . 1. . .LIZ .. I 19?... .0.$...I.l‘u. VIrx/VII .970. .. ... «J... n , . - V 1. ' V . . I. a . . . . .. I . . . \ .. . ...! dI. q... .. y. ‘ I..1‘ .... .v r.. . . 0 . . , . | J...’ \— .9..I.N )I‘IMI‘IfD\ I130 l.“‘?... ’ a .w . v ... . . .. . \ A . .. \ 0. . . .. b n I}... .u .I. . ‘I.. ,.... . ,1.. . .. \1 D, \ a I .p ..1 L‘. ..‘4 Q... t... . ..r . . L‘Mu’fl“ h.fi‘.. .rVaYU.J.L.‘. l}: \..) 341k)? 2 )fi-... '1. b .. KI”)! . - p. o ... . ...0. . ...l- . . . v . Is .. . .. .. . . I. . .. .. 10‘. a . 1n. 0.. .. .1 1 . u L .01 ......Q...I.....11I.Jhrfi...!vn., I .Fo AVAW 1.1.13 (....-. n 4W .. (h‘. .“V Kuhn“. Fwy. .....JoI ......i...H.,‘N..JM~.I...4.w _THE DESIGN OF A GUARDED RING HOT PLATE FOR TE STING THE THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY OF HOMOGENEOUS MATERIALS By JAMES TREAT gymsom A THESIS Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of Michigan State College of Agriculture and Applied Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Mechanical Engineering 1948 THESIS ACKNOWLEDGMENT The author wishes to express his appreciation for the advice and assistance of Professor Lorin G. Miller, and for the help given by the other members of the Department of Mechanical Engineering of Michigan State College. 2021.45 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Historical Background Thermal Conductivity Description of Apparatus Guard Ring Principle Standard Test Method Specifications Heating Element Power Measuring Meters Power Supply Guard Ring Power Supply Vapor Proof Hood Dehumidification Apparatus Angle Iron Clamp Bracket Selector Switch Connection Board Multiple Contact Connectors Thermocouple Cold Junction Coolant Supply Coolant Pump Galvanometer Shorting Switch Cold Plate Construction Sample of Test Data Sample of Test Computations Bibliography & References 11 Page 10 11 14 16 26 26 27 27 29 29 3o 30 32 32 34 34 35 35 36 37 38 40 TABLE OF ILLUSTRATIONS Principal Forbes Bar Test Preston's Guard Bung Lees Disc Apparatus Schematic Cross Section of Guarded Hot Plate Enlarged Cross Sectional Views of Heat Flow Lines in Edge of Test Section of Guarded Hot Plate Guarded Hot Plate Electrical Power Circuit Schematic Diagram of Chemical Dehydration System Circuit Diagram For Common Cold Junction Conductivity Plot Temperature Plot Through Enlarged Cross Section of Guarded Hot Plate 111 Page 12 15 28 31 33 39 4O INTRODUCTION Until the year 1945 all testing work on the thermal conductivity of insulating materials was done in a some- what haphazard manner, with each investigator deciding for himself what the test conditions should be, and as a result the information available in tabular form neces- sarily had to be accompanied by explanatory notes as to the conditions. In addition, it was left up to each investigator to set for himself his own limits of accuracy. All in all, this practice led to widely varying data for materials seemingly the same. However, in 1945, the American Society for Testing Materials, in conjunction with the American Society of Heating and Ventilating Engineers and the American Society of Refrigeration Engineers, deve10ped and published a standard method of testing, which should eliminate the aforementioned difficulties. In addition, these organiza- tions instituted a testing program for the purpose of re- vising all available data. To insure uniform and accept- able testing methods and equipment in the 000perating laboratories, a standard sample of corkboard was sent to each laboratory to be tested under the new method. The results from this test along with the corkboard sample were sent to the United States Bureau of Standards for retesting and checking. Any laboratory whose test results checked within three per cent of the Bureau of Standards is to be accredited, and will proceed with testing for data revision. This standard methoa of test merely set up condi- tions and limits for testing and did not specify in any way how these conditions and limits were to be accomplished. In this writing, it is hOped that a satisfactory method for accomplishing the prescribed test is presented in such a way that anyone wishing to set up similar equipment will be able to do so without having to have a specialized background in this type of work. As will be seen though, a step by step rigid development is not used, but discus- sion is employed, and latitude of method is left up to the individual. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Ever since Bernoulli1 conceived the molecular motion theorem of heat in 1738, men have tried in various ways to evaluate the amount of heat transmitted under given conditions, by conduction. Among the first of these experimenters was Count Rrumford,2 who, in 1804, set up an iron rod with cepper cups soldered to the ends of it. In the rod, at equal intervals, he drilled small holes for the placing of thermometers, and in the COpper cups he put crushed ice and boiling water, respectively. He was trying to prove that conduction obeyed the same law as radiation, and succeeded in merely finding that tem~ perature distribution in a uniform, homogeneous bar was essentially uniform. The next experimenter of note was Tyndall3 who set up a relatively complicated apparatus for measuring rela- tive conductivities. Roughly this consisted of an elec- trically heated, mercury filled pad butting up against one side of a small cubical sample, with another mercury filled pad butting up against the Opposite side. The re- ceiving pad had a thermocouple built in, connected to a galvanometer. In Operation the heating pad was turned on 1. Tyndall, John, Heat As A Mode 0;;Mopggn, D. Appleton & Co., 1890, p 119. 2. Thompson, Benjamin (Count anford), The WOrks_Q£ Rumford, American Academy of Arts & Sciences, Vol. II, p 1 . 3. Tyndall, 0p. cit., p 245. for exactly sixty seconds; then the galvanometer switch on the thermocouple was closed and maximum deflection noted. Of course, as Tyndall mentioned, this method did not take into account the specific heat of the sample, but it did have some value in determining relative con- ductivities of wood across grain and with the grain. The first really quantitative experimentation was accomplished by Principal Forbes4 in 1850. Forbes setup a long, homogeneous bar, exposed to the atmOSphere with thermometer wells drilled at regular intervals. (See Illustration Page 5.) One end of the bar was heated to a constant temperature and steady state conditions main? tained while temperature readings were taken. The same bar was then heated its entire length to the initial tem- perature, and time-temperature readings for the cooling period, taken under the same atmospheric conditions as the initial test, were made. Now with a knowledge of the specific heat of the bar at all these temperatures, Forbes computed the heat loss per unit length of the bar for any temperature per unit length of the bar for any temperature per unit of time. By taking any given cross section and making a summation of the heat losses from the bar beyond the cross section, he could say this summation must be the heat flow through the cross section and establish the thermal conductivity of the bar. 4. Forbes, Principal, Transactiong of the Royal Society of Edinbur , 1861-1862. K II total area of both faces of central plate t1 = average temperature of hot side of test sample t2 = average temperature of cold side of test sample r = time of test in hours 13 GUARD RING PRINCIPLE Keeping in mind the principle that heat flow is com- pletely dependent upon temperature difference, the reason for keeping the guard ring at exactly the same temperature as the test plate is readily apparent. All heat transfer from the edge of the hot plate assembly is thus supplied by the guard ring. However, the path of the heat flow through the test Specimen is dependent upon three tempera- tures, that of the test plate and guard ring, of the cold plate, and of the atmoSphere surrounding the entire appara- tus. The relatively large temperature differential between the hot plate and cold plate will have the effect of caus-I ing heat to follow a straight line between the plates, while the surrounding temperature will have the effect of diverting the heat flow lines either toward or away from the edge depending upon the relative temperatures involved. (See Illustration Page 15) This latter effect, of course, is minimized by the insulation surrounding all edges of the equipment, but must still be accounted for. Remember- ing that for accurate results in testing for thermal con- ductivity by this method, the heat flow must be as nearly perpendicular to the plates as is practical, the ratio of width of guard ring to thickness of test sample must be considered. This ratio is set at one and one-half by the standard test. A ratio of greater than one and one-half means that a sample thinner than necessary is used and 14 ou>o5um zo.»¢anmz. meow uhqaa so: ououaaw.uo zo_huum emu» no usau z. muz_4 roam yam: uo mew.) Jazo.poum mmoco oueuaazu rum» ucab\..\..,\>/\<>.\.<» ..fpilli- O 1 .i av o - M _ _ wakes... med 1i... a A ,, Ammo» er W m H ‘ . w _ fl is«.# unma-a W A _ a m J .. a __ .. A m r. J __ JV Col V 1 i 4:: 14,1159Iplrlv! .. 1) Jul: ,3: IIIIIIJ \¥ «uq .\ .. - ll).l.\1 1;. _ _ . _ I I _ H \Ytiw 10(li..-...l ( . . 7.. A if. \..\<....\ .... . ,\.\ \./\ .- to-) i.\ ....w mwkde or ..m A._ M.-_.~_fl--- _ 4- ---“. -,_,,_..-__ r p! I'll, quwuuxm chalk ..waau: pqrmomxa UFQ JrL :UTma..UU: A . M _ A (>>8<()\xmm see.:mru 1.15%.! 1 .fi 3.. A A -.— -r..- \- ltllL 1).,b . i F. ..l. o.-a e «Areas» owwemyzmozno H ; .1, u ,_ malemoxu 2,,OAqu w 4 l : 31 any oxidation that commonly affects the COpper contact switch. This type of switch is also compact, does away with possibilities of shorts, and uses soldered connec- tions. All in all, it makes a more permanent, foolproof setup. Switches of this type may be Obtained from the Shallcross Manufacturing Company, Collingsdale, Pennsyl- vania. CONNECTION BOARD Installation of a connection board or terminal board on the back of the fixed side of the hot plate would facili- tate the replacement and orderly arrangement of thermocouple leads coming from the hot plate. Use of soldered connec- tions is recommended for trouble-free Operation. This terminal board would make the replacing of a defective or broken thermocouple lead very easy. One word of caution, make sure this board is at equi-temperature from one end to the other. From the board to the selector switch ordi- nary OOpper leads may be used. (See Illustration Page 33.) MULTIPLE CONTACT CONNECTORS For ease of Operation, removing the galvanometer, potentiometer, and consequently the data station, a short distance away from the hot plate is advisable. To keep from a tangle of extension leads a multiple conductor cable with suitable connectors may be used. 32 zo.»uzmp oaoo 201500 and :«ace.o p.2oc.o um»w:o.»zwhoa A AY.I.!:.I/ . 1 I . I My (\Mv zo.»ozaa e pt: 4 M (c o ou l 7 new cuegoo meow . . - . . aesz >>.> .onn. 1 1 . 1 oc¢o¢ucou haw» + . . ..,. .1 1.: 1 .0.. W ....h... __1_ — .J...__—-.__.._-._1._-. H 1 _ _ lieil +i++é.!lii+%+.1-:iii++$iillzéil+; 1 1 :Iallllri 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,_ . . 1 1 1 1 1 _ 1 11 1 . v v . 1 . 1 1 _ 1 1 1 1 ah '.' mk¢4q 1 1 POT ouacenu a» u “LE ./— ‘sok’r / —~ ... . r 1 r2. ,. DAMDLE . Z ......Gzn .- ....» LiLam? C wmnranmefiuk . — L 1 l k C r I: ..h. 2. .k p. m11 I vi“ 1.. (0. — .15.... a hi‘ 0 oh mwwacuo w1eo» meeeqeueeu» 4O a”. BIBLIOGRAPHY & REFERENCES American Institute of Physics, Temperature, Its M asur - ment and Control in Science and Indust , Reinhold Publishing Corp., 1941, p 201. American Society of Heating and Ventilating Engineers, Guid , 1948, p 97. Brown and Marco, Introduction to Heat Transfer, Chapter 2, McGraw Hill. . Forbes, Principal, Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburg, 1861-1862. Lander, Robert M., Factors Affect1gg,Thermal Conductivit , University of Minnesota Technical Paper No. 49, 1944. Maxwell, J. Clerk, Theory of Heat, Longmans, Green & Co., 1888, p 268. Poynting, J. H., and Thomson, J. J., Heat - A Textbook of Ph sic , Charles Griffin & Co., 1904, p 102. Preston, Thomas, Theory of Heat, MaoMillan & Co., 1894, p 527. Rowley, R. B., and Algren, A. B., Heat Transmission Through Buildin Materials, University of Minnesota Bulletin No. 8, 1932. Rowley, R. B., Jordan, R. C., and Lander, R. N., Low Temperature Thermal Conductivity Studies, University of Minnesota Technical Paper No. 59, 1947. Saha, M. N. and Srivastava, B. N., A Textbook of Heat, Indian Press Ltd., 1931, p 316. Thompson, Benjamin ( Count Rumford), The Whrks of Rumforg, American Academy of Arts & Sciences, Vol. II, p 144. Tyndall, John, Heat As a Mod of Motio , D. Appleton & Co., 1890, pp 119-245. 41 n O 8 r e d n HICHIGQN STQTE UNIV. LIBRRRIES 31293010939761