NITROSOMONAS mama AND Nlmeamea new: PURE mama swarm, CELL :ENUMERATIQN, AM) THE * mast? 0F PES'EIQEDES 0.34 mmmwon ‘ Thesis far the Degree of» M. 3. WWW 31m umvmsgw . mm LLGARRETSON . 1%? ’ ' I31 III III II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII “mug __ 3 01108 5283 1 Michigan State University 2 E513 PLACE N RETURN BOX to roman thIo checkout from your record. TO AVOID FINES Mum on or More data duo. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE _ I MSU Is An Afflmdivo ActIoNEqual Opportunity Institution Wanna-m ABSTRACT NITROSOMONAS EUROPAEA AND NITROBACTER ASILISx PURE CULTURE STUDIES, GEL: ENUMERATION AND THE EFFECT OF PESTICIDES ON NITRIFICATION by Aline L. Garretson Readily reproducible growth conditions in 250 ml sta- tionary flask cultures were obtained for Nitrobacter agilis and Nitrosomonas europaea. For both organisms a minimal inoculum of 3.13% (by volume) was required for the initiation of growth in Medium A with a lag period of less than 48 hrs. 3. agilis completely oxidized the energy substrate during the exponential growth phase. However, 3. euroEaea cultures terminated the eXponential growth phase leaving 12 to zug of the NHu-N unoxidized to NO -N, depending on the growth condi- 2 tions. 3. agilis grew equally well in Medium AA, containing no insoluble components, at a pH of 10.0 after autoclaving. g. euroEaea did not survive in this medium when Ca012 was added and NOZ-N was replaced by NHu-N. The removal of amines from distilled water used in the preparation of media had no gross effect on the rate of nitrification by Nitrobacter. Three bacterial and 2 streptomyces cultures were isola- ted from a contaminated g. agilis culture. These isolates were heterotrOphic and incapable of utilizing Nan-N, NOZ-N or NO -N. When grown along with pure cultures of either 3 Aline L. Garretson fl. agilis or 3. euro aea, they exerted no adverse effect on either growth or nitrification of the nitrifiers. A membrane filter technique was attempted for the quantitation of cell pepulations by a modified colonial plate count method. However, colonial develOpment was inadequate on the filter to permit easy enumeration and further work will be necessary to enhance colonial size or to facilitate visualization. The nitrification process of g. agilis was sensitive to aldrin, lindane, and rhothane at final concentrations of 1 ug/ml. Complete inhibition for 1a days was obtained with rhothane, aldrin, and parathion at 10 ug/ml. Delayed nitrification occurred with baygon at 10 ug/ml and with lindane at l ug/ml. Malathion caused delayed nitrification at 1000 ug/ml. Lindane, malathion, and baygon were at least 100 times more toxic for Nitrosomonas cultures than for Nitrobacter. NITHOSOMONAS EUROPAEA AND fllTROBACTER AGILIS: PURE CULTURE STUDIES, CELL ENUMERATION, AND THE EFFECT OF PESTICIDES ON NITHIFICATION by Aline L. Garretson A THESIS Submitted to - Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Microbiology and Public Health 1967 407 {3/92 To members of my family, for their constant encourage- ment, assistance, and understanding during the course of my master's program. 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank Dr.'Charles L. San Clemente under whose guidance this thesis was prepared, for his kind atten- tion, interest, and valuable advice in all matters concerned with this study. A portion of this research was supported under a sub- project of the Public Health Pesticide Research program under the guidance of A. R. Holcott of the Department of Soil Science. Sincere thanks are extended to Dr. Wolcott for the many stimulating and enlightening discussions and helpful advice. Sincere appreciation is also extended to Dr. Hans A. Lillevik of the Department of Biochemistry who served on my guidance committee. I also wish to acknowledge my gratitude to Mr. J. L. Davenport and Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc. for granting me a leave of absence during the preparation of this thesis. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viii INTRODUCTION. 0 e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e 1 HISTORICAL e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e h 3101081031 Nitrification Concept 0 e e e e e e e # Metab011° ACthithS e e e e e e e e e e e e e e 5 Nutrition 0 e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e 7 Pure Culture Methods 0 e e e e e e e e e e e e e 10 Biochemistry of Nitrification. . . . . . . . . . 12 P'Bticides e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e 17 EXPERIMENTAL. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 19 PART I. MAINTENANCE AND PROPAGATION IN PURE CULTURE O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 19 Introduction. 0 e . e e e e e e e e e e e e 19 Materials and MCthOds e e e e e e e e e e e 19 ROSU1t8 e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e 23 Rates or Nitrification e e e e e e e e 23 Incomplete oxidation by Nitrosomonas . 26 MGdIaSDUdIQSOeeeeeeeeeeee 29 Influence or pH. 0 e e e e e e e e e e 32 Removal of amines from distilled water 34 HeterotrOphic contamination. . . . . . 35 Preliminary characterization. . . 37 Non-utilization of NHu-N and NOz'N e e e e e e e e e e e e e 44 DISCUSSIOneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ‘50 PART II. ATTEMPT TO DEVELOP AN IMPROVED CELL ENUMERATION METHOD USING MEMBRANE FILTENS O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 55 Introduction. 0 e e e e e e e e e e e e e e 55 Materials and MGthO’j S e e e e e e e e e e e 56 ReSUIDS e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e 58 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Deve10pment of technique . . . . . . . Quantitation procedure . . . . . . . . Discu5810neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee PART III. EFFECT OF PESTICIDES ON NITHIFICA- TION. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 Introduction. e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e 0 Materials and Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . 338111138 0 e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e The effect of pesticides on Nitrobacter a 11130 e e e e e e e e e e e e e e The ef%ect of pesticides on Nitrosomonas eurOEEeae e e e e e e e e e e e e e DLSCUSSIOne e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e 0 SUMMARY 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 LITERATURE CITED 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Page 53 59 62 65 67 67 72 75 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. The incomplete utilization of NH -N in Medium A by Nitrobacter eurOpaea (Schmigt) after 10 days incubation e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e 27 2. The availability of NH -N for conversion to NOZ-N in Medium A during the late exponential growth phase of Nitrosomonas eurOpaea (Schmidt) 28 3. Similar rates of nitrification by two Nitrobacter agilis cultures in Medium A and MedIum AA 0 e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e 30 u. Dissimilar rates of nitrification by Nitrosomonas eurOpaea (Schmidt) in Medium A and Medium AA 0 e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e 31 5. Influence of pH on nitrification by Nitrobacter 881113 (Fischer) in Medium AA 0 e e e e e e e e 33 6. The influence of amine-free water on nitrification by NItTObfiCtere e e e e e e e e e 36 7. Cultural characteristics of heterotrophs isolated from Nitrobacter a 1113 (Fischer) and grown in Nutrient Broth at 0 C for 48 ane e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e 38 8. Characterization of heterotrOphs isolated from Nitrobacter agilis (Fischer) in various media . 39 9. Growth at 1h days of heterotrophic bacteria isolated from Nitrobacter agilis (Fischer) without carbohydrate fermentation at 37 C . . . #0 10. Colonial characteristics on Nutrient Agar of heterotrOphic bacteria isolated from Nitrobacter agilis (Fischer). . . . . . . . . . 43 11. Failure of heterotrOphic contaminants to oxidize NO%-N in Medium AA containing 106 ug Noz-N/ml (& ter 13 dayS) e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e “j 12. Failure of heterotrophic contaminants to effect NOz-N oxidation by Nitrobacter a ilis (Fischer) ‘ in Medium AA containing 106 ug NOZ-N7m1 . . . . A6 LIST OF TABLES (continued) Table Page 13. Failure of heterotrOphic contaminants to oxidize NH -N in Medium A containing 66 ug NHu-N/ml (after 111' d8YS). e e e e e e e e e e e ’4'? lu. Influence of heterotrOphic contaminants on NBA-N oxidation by Nitrosomonas euro aea (Schmidt) in Medium A oonEaInIng 66 ug NHu-N/ml QB 15. Quantitation of various types of micro— organisms in a liquid culture of Nitrobacter agilis (Fischer) by membrane filter technique 0 e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e 60 16. Inhibition of nitrification by Nitrobacter a 1118 (Fischer) in Medium AA containing chIorinated hydrocarbons. . . . . . . . . . . . 66 17. Inhibition of nitrification by Nitrobacter agilis (Fischer) in Medium AA containing organic phosphates and a-methylcarbamate. . . . 68 18. Inhibition of nitrification by Nitrosomonas euroEaea (Schmidt) in Medium A containing various peSDICIdeSe e e e e e e e e e e e e e e 69 vii Figure Page 1. Logarithmic plot of % nitrite-nitrOgen oxidized by various % inocula of Nitrobacter £51118(Pramer)................. 214' 2. Logarithmic plot of % nitrite-nitrogen produced by 3.13 and 12.5 % inocula of Nitrosomonas europaea (Schmidt). . . . . . . . . 25 viii INTRODUCTION Soil nitrification has long been of interest to both the agronomist and theoretical microbiologist. This process is important in agriculture since nitrate or ammonium is the major nitrogen form assimilated by higher plants. Nitrogen assimilated in the inorganic state is then incorporated in the proteinaceous matter of all living tissue. The nitrogenous materials available in the soil exist largely in the organic form. The release of the organically bound element is accom- plished by two separate and distinct microbiological processes, ammonification and nitrification. The latter process is limited to a relatively small number of nitrifying organisms. Their importance in the nitrogen cycle lies in their capacity to produce nitrate. The dominant microbial Species concerned in the oxidation of ammonium to nitrite, and nitrite to nitrate are members of two genera of the family Nitrobacteriaceag, Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter. Only two species of each genera are recognized, Nitrosomonas eurOpaea, Nitrosomonas monocella, Nitrobacter winogradskyi, and Nitrobacter agilis. Up to the present time few reports have appeared concern- ing metabolic studies on the chemolithotrOphic nitrifiers. The carbon metabolism of these organisms still remains to be elucidated. The study of these bacteria not only has practical application to agriculture but also offers a stim- ulating challenge to biochemical investigations. 2 My initial objective was to study the effect of various chemical factors, including pesticides, on the nutrition and physiology of these organisms. Because of their unique prop- erties ordinary microbiological methods were not readily utilizable and the methods applicable were cumbersome and time consuming. The size of colonies formed on a solid medium is so small that visualization without optical magnification is not possible. Turbidimetric measurement of cell numbers is also impossible unless repeated supplementation of both nutrients and buffer are made to prolong the exponential growth phase. Therefore, these methods are not applicable for the prepara- tion of large numbers of replicate cultures. With the excep- tion of an analytical chemical analysis for the three states of nitrogen (NHJ', NOZ', or N037, no other assay method is available for the accurate quantitation of small numbers of microorganisms. Consequently, it_was deemed advisable not only to develop an accurate method of cell quantitation but also to improve on c611 culture conditions for faster rates of reproduction and more efficient utilization of metabolites. During the course of this study, difficulties were encountered in the maintenance of pure cultures. Hetero- trophic contamination therefore became an additional area for attention. There subsequently evolved three major areas for research: (a) pure culture methods, (b) cell enumeration, and (3) the effect of pesticides on nitrification. Although 3 closely interrelated, each area represents a distinct phase of activity and the judgment was made to treat each as a separate unit in this dissertation. The results described in this dissertation have estab- lished a necessary foundation for future study of the biochem- istry and physiology of these microorganisms. The need for an effective cell enumeration method also warrants further‘ study. HI STORICAL Biological Nitrification Concept Despite its great economic importance in agriculture, the process of nitrification has received relatively little attention and then only spasmodically during the past eighty- five years. Although Pasteur in 1862 was the first to suggest that the formation of nitrate in soil was micro- biological and perhaps similar to the conversion of alcohol to acetic acid it was not until 1877 that Schloessing and Mfihtz demonstrated that the oxidation of ammonia was indeed microbiological. The experimental evidence was obtained by passing sewage daily through a column of sterile sandy soil and chalk. After twenty days, the ammonia input appeared in the effluent almost completely as nitrate-nitrOgen. This process after inhibition by the addition of chloroform or heating the column could be restored to its former activity by the addition of fresh garden soil washings. Between 1890-1891 the oxidizing organisms were isolated apart from the soil by three independent workers (Frankland and Frankland, 1890; Harrington, 1891; Winogradsky, 1890a,b,c; l891a,b). It followed from the work of Harrington that two kinds of special, aerobic organisms must be responsible,' respectively, for the two stage oxidation, ammonia to nitrite and nitrite to nitrate. His attempts to subculture these organisms from enrichment cultures failed. Winogradsky, however, was able to isolate colonies on an inorganic medium a 5 solidified with silica gel. Two types of nitrifiers were isolated, Nitrosomonas, oxidizing ammonia to nitrite, and Nitrobacter, oxidizing nitrite to nitrate. Metabolic Activities The next advance came in 1916 when Meyerhof extensively investigated the respiratory activity of these organisms and the effect of various inhibitors. By measuring oxidation rates the Optimal pH of Nitrobacter was found to be about the same as that of Nitrosomonas, 8.5 to 8.8 (Meyerhof, 19l6a,b). Meyerhof's early studies (1916a, 1917) also threw light on many other factors influencing the metabolism of these organisms. The extreme sensitivity of these organisms to hydrogen ion concentration requires a bicarbonate buffer. Growth inhibition of Nitrobacter occurs as nitrate accumulates or in the presence of free ammonia, while on the other hand Nitrosomonas is inhibited by both ammonia and nitrite. Both forms are inhibited by divalent metal ions and lowered oxygen pressure (Meyerhof, 1916; Amer and Bartholomew, 1951). This fact suggests that at least one stage of the oxidation involves an oxidase with much less affinity for 02 than cytochrome oxidase. Meyerhof's investigations indicate that ions must freely enter the Nitrobacter cell, since at the Optimal pH both nitrite and bicarbonate are very largely dissociated, and non-ionized-NOZ and -NO groups in the form of metallic complexes or organic nitroso-compounds (Meyerhof, 1917) could not be used. 6 Glaring gaps in the literature on the metabolic activ- ities of the nitrifiers continued until the advent of the first soil perfusion apparatus described by Lees and Quastel (1944) and subsequently modified by Audus (1946) and Lees (1947). In this apparatus, a metabolite is continuously percolated through a soil column, the repeated perfusion permitting direct study of the kinetics of soil nitrifica- tion under controlled environmental conditions. The sub- sequent use of this technique for the study of organic and inorganic conversions was published intermittingly in several reports from 1944 to 1954. It is to be expected that in soil, with its complex microflora and its special physicochemical conditions, the kinetics, possibly even the mechanism of nitrification, could differ materially from what takes place in pure cultures of the nitrifiers. A significant difference between growth in soil and in pure culture is the response to the effect of organic matter. Peptone is far less inhib- itory in sand than in solution cultures (Winner, 1904), and cottonseed meal and ammonium sulfate both are more rapidly nitrified in soil than in solution. The presence of certain heterotrophs develOping symbiotically in soil greatly influences the nitrification process (Desai and Fazal-un-Din, 1937; Pandalai, 1946). The stimulation by colloids in culture media on bacterial behavior (Albrecht and McCalla, 1937, 1938; Conn and Conn, 1940; Nommik, 1957; Zobel, 1943) suggests the possibility of similar effects in soils. 7 Nutrition Although considerable attention has been given to the nutrition of the nitrifying chemolithotrOphs these studies often have been incomplete and ambiguous. Many of the earlier investigations performed in impure media and in mixed culture should be verified under improved cultural conditions now available. Most studies were concerned with the influence of organic compounds on both growth and nutri- tion of the nitrifiers as a group, and the effect upon the overall oxidation of ammonium ion to nitrate (Bomeke, 1950; Lees and Quastel, 1946a,b,c,; Meiklejohn, 1951, 1952a; Quastel and Scholefield, 1949). Using pure culture methods in a defined medium recent studies have been sharply focused on the possible effects of organic supplements. In the light of these recent experiments no sugar, organic acid or other organic molecule will serve as sources of either carbon or energy for the growth of N. agilis (Delwiche and Finstein, 1965; Ida and Alexander, 1965). A stimulatory effect on nitrification and growth of this strain is obtained with supplements of yeast extract, Vitamionree Casamino Acids, and certain amino acids, while a strong stimulation limited to growth is obtained with acetate (Delwiche and Finstein, 1965). Both acetate and glycine contribute to cell carbon. These same workers demonstrated that the organism is permeable to certain organic acids. At least some of the enzymes for organic metabolism must also be present. No stimulation of nitrite production by N. eurogaea by either B vitamins or 8 amino acids (Gundersen, 19553) has been found and similar . negative responses have been obtained with N. agilis (Aleem and Alexander, 1960). Krulwich and Funk (1965), however, have more recently reported enhancement of both nitrite utilization and growth with biotin using four strains of N. agilis. It is quite certain that Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter do develOp in inorganic solutions from which all traces of organic matter is removed. The sole energy sources support- ing growth are nitrogenous, typically ammonium or nitrite salts. The nitrogen of amino acids, amides, proteins or urea is not oxidized by N. eurOpaea although some of the nitrogen in certain purines may be converted to nitrite by some strains; the purines are likely deaminated prior to nitrification (Ruban, 1958). Engle and Alexander (1960) and Silver (1960) have demonstrated hydroxylamine and formic acid oxidation by this bacterium but there is no evidence that these compounds are energy sources for proliferation. The mineral requirements, except for the carbon and energy sources, resemble those known for heterotrOphs. The nutrient demand in laboratory studies is low since the num- ber of cells is relatively small. Specific requirements for magnesium, phOSphate, and nitrite have been reported (Bomeke, 1950; Meiklejohn, 1952b; Meyerhof, 1916a) but under question- able cultural conditions. The optimal iron concentration for growth of N. winograd sky}. is reported to be about 6 ug/ml for the oxidation of 200 ug/ml nitrite-nitrogen (Meiklejohn, 1953) but this iron level exceeds the amount of cell carbon 9 formed (Meyerhof, 1916a). The use of well-defined culture methods has been recently initiated for nutritional studies of N. agilis (Aleem and Alexander, 1960). Using an alumina purified inorganic medium, the requirements for each nutrient is studied by omitting the nutrient under study and adding graded amounts to flasks in a standard series. Using these methods the Optimal nutrient levels now appear to be approx- imately 5 ug/ml for both phOSphorus and magnesium and at least 0.005 ug/ml for iron with N. agilis. These data con- flict with the findings of Meiklejohn who reported the iron requirement as high as the P and K levels. It is suggested that the data of Meiklejohn may result from reactions with CaCOB rendering most of the iron unavailable to the microorganisms. The investigations of Aleem and Alexander (1960) also reveal that the effect of nitrate on rate of nitrite oxidation is one of retarding the initiation of growth, results which are similar to those obtained in soil (Stojanonic and Alexander, 1958). The toxicity of ammonium salts in alkaline environments seems to be a generic property since N. gg;lis is markedly inhibited as are other Nitrobacter isolates (Bomeke, 1950; Boullanger and Massol, 1903; Meyerhof, 1916b). Cell-mass development and concomitant nitrite oxida- tion is enhanced in freshly inoculated cultures if the medium contains small amounts of molybdenum (Finstein and Delwiche, 1965; Zavarzin, 1958). Zavarzin postulated that a molybdo- flavOprotein is concerned in the energy yielding reaction of these autotrOphs. According to investigations of Finstein 10 and Delwiche the enhancement may simply be a response to the development of greater cell mass and not a direct molybdenum function in enzymatic nitrite oxidations. A function of molybdenum in nitrate reductase (Nicholas, Nason and McElroy, 1953) does suggest, but does not establish, a function in the ‘reverse direction. Winogradsky (1890a, 1891) used MgCOB, instead of CaCOB, in his original medium. When made up with purified reagents this medium gave poor growth and nitrifica- tion. Kingma Boltjes (1935) established Ca ion as the missing factor which was essential for NNtrosomonas but not necessary for Nitrobacter (Meyerhof, 1916a,b). However, Alexander (1965) believes there is no valid evidence for a requirement for significant quantities Of calcium and cited several reports in support of his argument (Aleem and Alexander, 1960; Bomeke, 1950; Lees and Meiklejohn, 1948). Potassium.(Welch and Scott, 1959) and sulfur are also required elements, and cOpper is reported to be stimulatory to Nitrobacter (Kiesow, 1962; Zavarzin, 1958). Pure Culture Methods After gelatin proved to be useless for the colonial develOpment of the nitrifiers from enrichment cultures, Winogradsky (1891a,b), using an inorganic medium solidified by silicic acid, finally isolated Nitrosomonas and Nitgobacter in monoculture. Since Winogradsky's time the isolation and pure culture of nitrifying bacteria were repeatedly reported (Bisset and Grace, 1954; Bomeke, 1939; Gibbs, 1919; Gould and 11 Lees, 1960; Kingma Boltjes, 1935; Lees, 1952; Lewis and Pramer, 1958; Meiklejohn, 1954; Nelson, 1931). Considerable difficulty still exists, however, in obtaining monocultures free of contaminating microorganisms. These contaminants often remain undetected because of the morphological similar- ity to the predominant organism and some may be incapable of developing on conventional laboratory media. Common contam- inants in the final enrichments include species of Pseudomonas, Nyphomicrobium, Mycobacterium, Flavobacterium and Serratia as well as an occasional myxobacterium (Gundersen, 1955b; Stapp, 1940; Ulyanova, 1960). A symbiotic relationship may exist which might explain the growth of the autotrOph in an unfa- vorable soil environment. Many methods have been described to separate the auto- trOphs from their contaminants. In some of these procedures, the autotrOphic pOpulation is increased by addition of succes- sive increments of nitrogen and thereby increasing the ratio of autotrOphs to heterotrOphs. The enrichment culture is then diluted, and pure cultures made by single-cell technique, either by plating or by tube dilution to a heterotroph free endpoint. Several modifications have been devised, one modification entails bubbling carbon dioxide through the cultures to remove the cells from the carbonate particles (Meiklejohn, 1950). Inhibitory compounds such as antibiotics and dyes are also employed (Gould and Lees, 1958, 1960; Prouty, 1929) for suppression of contaminating Species. 12 Lewis and Pramer (1958) eliminated the problem of adsorption of contaminant and nitrifier Ammonium Hydroxyl- Nitroxyl Dihydroxy- Nitrite hydroxide amine ammonia Hydroxylamine (NH2OH) is commonly considered to be the initial product of ammonia oxidation. Some weak evidence in support of hydroxylamine as an intermediate is provided by several 1c investigators. Added hydroxylamine is oxidized by N. europaea cell suspensions to nitrite rapidly and stoichiomet- rically without any time lag (Engle and Alexander, 1958a). Hydroxylamine is identified as the accumulated nitrOgenous compound when Nitrosomonas is incubated with ammonium sulfate in the presence of hydrazine (NZHQ), which inhibits the oxida- tion of hydroxylamine (Yoshida and Alexander, 1964). N. europaea cells contain an enzyme catalyzing the oxidations of hydroxylamine (Burge, Malavolta, and Delwiche, 1963; Engle and Alexander, 1959; Nicholas and Jones, 1960). These enzyme preparations show no detectable oxidation of ammonium but in the presence of some suitable electron acceptor produced about three-fourths of the eXpected quantity of nitrite. In this reaction, neither nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAP) nor nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP) is reduced. The intermediate at the next higher oxidation state remains completely obscure. Although hyponitrous acid (HO-NZN-OH) is a possible intermediate, no microbial conver- sion of hyponitrite to nitrite is noted with either cell suspension or enzyme extracts prepared from Nitrosomonas (Lees, 1954; Nicholas and Jones, 1960). Reduction of cytochrome c, in the absence of oxygen, takes place during hydroxylamine oxidations with cell-free extracts (Nicholas and Jones, 1960). In this process nitrous oxide is evolved which is probably a degradation product of the unknown intermediate formed between hydroxylamine and 15 nitrite (Falcone, Shug, and Nicholas, 1962). Aleem 23 ai. (1962) propose that this intermediate is nitrohydroxylamine (NOZ'NHOH). These investigators observed that one mole of nitrite is formed for each mole of nitrohydroxylamine metab- olized. It is suggested that nitrohydroxylamine is generated in a reaction between hydroxylamine and endogenous nitrite, and the resulting product is then oxidized by the bacterium to 2 moles of nitrite. 1/2 0 1/2 0 NH 01—1 ,1 HNO —_—$ NO 'NHOH __..._._...2..;., ZHNO 2 2 .H20 2 2 Anderson (1964) reports negligible amounts of nitrite formed from hydroxylamine anaerobically in the presence of Nitrosomonas extract and methylene blue. Nitric oxide and nitrous oxide are produced in amounts equivalent to the hydroxylamine added. Nitrite is rapidly metabolized by extracts of N. agilis cells with complete conversion to nitrate and the consumption of oxygen is essentially equal to the theoretical amount expected according to the following equation: N02- g 1/2 02 .___.._; ”03‘ The enzyme isassociated with the particulate constit- uents of the cell (Aleem and Alexander, 1953). Laudelot and Van Tiechelen (1960) report the Michaelis constant, Km, to be 6.7 x 10‘“ M at 320C. Aleem and Nason (1959) report the enzymic oxidation of nitrite is catalyzed by a cytochrome- containing electron transport particle via cytOchrome c and 16 cytochrome oxidase-like components. This oxidation is coupled with the generation of high-energy phOSphate bonds identified as adenosine triphosphate, ATP (Aleem and Nason, 1960). The overall reaction is : cytochrome electron n62 / 1/2 02 / nADP # nPi transport chain 7— N03 {.nATP The energy liberated by the above equation is available for the reduction and assimilation of carbon dioxide (Aleem, 1965) and for the reduction of pyridine nucleotides essential for the Operation of the carbon reduction cycle (Aleem, 1965; Aleem, Lees and Nicholas, 1963). This process of chemosyn- thesis appears to be analogous to photosynthesis. As in photosynthesis, water must be the hydrogen donor for the pyridine nucleotide reduction. Aleem, Hoch, and Varner (1965) report that water, and not molecular oxygen participates in the nitrite oxidation and that the hydrOgen donor for the concomitant reduction of pyridine nucleotides is also water: - . 18 -;s 18 N02 / HZO / A <2- No3 / AH2 From their results it appears that a hydrated nitrite molecule, or some activated form of it, may be the substrate for a dehydrogenation: ( OH)-2H H o HO-N=O l.§.__s> EHO'MQ~§""""*> HO-‘ :1