”“5““ “WWW RECALL RECORD, FOR ADULT WOMEN: VALIDATION OF THE METHQD’ Thasis for the 099m: cf M. A. MEWGAN STA“ UMVERSITY {Deanna Kebeau 196.5 0".“ J" ’“"‘“"‘ I LIBRA r: Y ‘ Michigan 5 rate Ur :ivergiz y twmd dint" ABSTRACT PHYSICAL ACTIVITY RECALL RECORD FOR ADULT WOMEN: VALIDATION OF THE METHOD by Deann Lebeau The Problem The purpose of this research was twofold: 1. To develop a physical activity recall record for adult women which could be objectively scored and which would encompass homemaking, occupation, and leisure time. 2. To determine the validity of that method. The Procedure Data were obtained through the administration of an interview questionnaire to 38 adult women, ages 20 to 60 at the Human Energy Research Laboratory, Michigan State Univer- sity. The interview forms were designed to estimate the physical activity of each respondent in terms of occupation, leisure, and homemaking during the preceding year. An objective method of scoring the responses was developed based upon energy cost tables. Numerical values were assigned each activity according to intensity and frequency of participation. Each subject was objectively ranked with the most active respondent at the tOp and the \\\ "A -.~ Deann LeBeau least active at the bottom according to numerical values. This was done for each of the four components and a yearly combined or total. The reliability of the interpretation of the record was studied as follows: 1. Two Judges subjectively ranked, independently, the responses of two randomly selected samples from the data. This was done for each component. Each Judge ranked the two samples twice. 2. The first ranking was selected for comparison between Judges. The validity of the obJective scoring system was assessed in the following manner: 1. The mean of the two Judges' subJective ranks for each respondent was calculated for each component for the two samples. These mean ranks formed the criterion. 2. The ranks based on the obJective scoring system were compared with average subJective rank. The results showed a high consistency for each Judge with herself, correlations ranging from 1935 to 1.00. Comparisons of subJective ranking between Judges showed correlations of 1.00 for occupation, .31 to .91 for homemaking, .55 to .79 for leisure, and .27 to .89 for total activity. Deann LeBeau Correlations between mean subJective rating of Judges and obJective scoring on each component and total were found to be from .995 to .998 for occupation, from .67 to .81 for leisure, .37 to .49 for homemaking, and from .64 to .67 for total activity The Conclusions The obJectively scored physical activity recall record used in this research is not, in it's present form, a valid measure of assessing physical activity of women in daily activities. The diversified correlations between Judges (criterion measure) indicates a necessity for a revised questionnaire, particularly related to homemaking activities, which would include more specific answers from responses and permit less interpretative freedom in the Judging process. PHYSICAL ACTIVITY RECALL RECORD FOR ADULT WOMEN: VALIDATION OF THE METHOD F" by Deann Lebeau A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements tor the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation 1965 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The author wishes to express great appreciation to Miss Janet A. Wessel Ph.D. of the Women's Physical Educa— tion Department at Michigan State University. ii Dedicated to: Mrs. Jerry J. Stedman without whose encouragement I may never have had the opportunity to enter graduate school. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENT DEDICATION. LIST OF TABLES LIST OF APPENDICES Chapter I. INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM Purpose Limitations . Definitions of Terms II. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE. III. METHODOLOGY OF RESEARCH Administration of the Questionnaire SubJects . Development of the Scoring Tables Method of Analysis IV. RESULTS Physical Activity Recall Record. Development of Scoring Tables Validity of Recall Record. V. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Summary Source of data. Development of scoring tables. Validity of Recall Record Results of Research Conclusions Recommendations SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY APPENDICES. iv Page ii iii vi H UL)\O\O(IJ (I) J: (JUNK) romamra H F’ FJHFJ r4 H FJOCDK) \o \o OHfikn \3 NM mra NR.) \O-l: Table LIST OF TABLES Classification of Energy Expenditure for Five Work Ranges . . . . Occupational Classifications Leisure Classifications Homemaking Classifications Rank Order Correlations of Judges' Consistancy With Groups Rank Order Correlations Between Judges for Each Group Rank Order Coefficients Comparing Ranks Based on Objective Scoring System with Average Subjective Rank - Page 10 10 ll l2 l7 l7 l8 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix Page A. Questionnaire Forms . . . . . . . . . 30 Homemaking and/or Work Last Week . . . . 31 Homemaking and/or Work Last 3 Months . . . 32 Homemaking and/or Work 9 Months Before . . 33 Leisure Interests and Recreational Pursuits Last Week . . . . . . 3A Leisure Activities and Pursuits Last 3 Months and 9 Months Before. . . . . . 35 B. Coding Procedure . . . . . . . . . . 36 Homemaking Scoring Table For Family Composition . . . . . . . . Al Homemaking Sc -oring Table . . . . A2 Physical Activity Code Sheet—-Homemaking. . AA Points for Arm Work in Occupation . . . . A5 Physical Activity Code Sheet Occupation . . A6 Points for Time Spent Sitting, Standing, Walking in Occupatio' . . . . . . . A7 Points for Leisure Activities . . . . . A8 Leisure Group Classifications . . . . . 52 Physical Activity Code Sheet——Leisure. . . 5A Numerical Rank Card . . . . . . . . 57 Subjective Rank Card . . . . . . . . 57 C. Instructural Procedures for Using Scoring Tables and Code Sheets. . . . . . . . 58 Proposed Physical Activities Recall Record Homemaking (Week Covered) . . . 59 Proposed Physical Activities Recall Record Homemaking ( as 3 Months, Last 9 Months). 60 Proposed Physicalt Activity Recall Record—- Occupation . . . . . . . . . . . 61 Proposed Physical Activity Recall Record-- Leisure . . . . . . . . . . . 62 Occupation Act ivit iles . . . . . . . . 63 Leisure ACtiv it ies . . . . . . . . . 63 Homemaking. . . . - . . . . . . . 6A CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM As our society becomes increasingly mechanized, the amount of physical activity necessary for maintenance of life continues to decrease. More specifically, the average American housewife of today expends far less energy in home maintenance than did housewives of previous generations, and very likely expends more than the housewife of the future. Sufficient evidence has been collected which suggests a relationship between physical activity and health, i.e. cardiovascular diseases, obesity, serum cholesterol levels and others. As the amount of energy expenditure necessary for maintenance of life decreases, there is an increased need for concrete evidence supporting the tenent in question. However, lack of a quantitative measure of energy expendi- ture involved in daily living has been a major limiting factor in this area of research. Very little research has been done to assess physical activity levels in total daily living of women. Previous investigations fall primarily into two patterns: (1'1 fir FA- .- [0-1 1. Energy expenditure has been measured in specific tasks primarily concerned with men in occupation. 2. Assessment has been largely observational and concerned with only a fraction of a day. In epidemological studies it is not likely that large groups could be assessed quantitatively by indirect calori— metry to determine energy out go in everyday living. There is a definite need, therefore, to develOp a technique with which populations as well as individuals with- in populations can be classified according to physical activ— ity levels. ie: light, moderate, active. In physical edu- cation, the ability to classify activity groups may help in gaining greater insight into the student's needs and aid in the planning of the program. Purpose The purpose of this research was twofold: 1. To develop a physical activity recall record for adult women which could be objectively scored and which would encompass homemaking, occupation and leisure time. 2. To determine the validity of that method. Limitations 1. General limitations of the use of a questionnaire method of research include deliberate lack of co- operation from subjects, the inability of subjects to recall Specific items, and the tendency of subjects to inaccurately estimate time spent in a particular activity or the number of times he/ she did a particular task. The sample size was small, 38 adult women from the greater metropolitan area of Lansing, Michigan. The sample was not randomly selected and consisted of volunteer subjects. Definitions of Terms l. Homemaking. All tasks performed by the subject which are concerned with the care of the home and/or family members. Occupation. All gainful employment apart from the care of the home and/or family (student is listed as occupation). Leisure. All activities in which subjects partici— pate such as gardening, Sports, hobbies, community activities, etc. CHAPTER II REVIEW or THE LITERATURE Many studies have been reported relating physical activity involved in daily living to areas as broadly stated as "positive health" as well as areas which can be considered more specific such as serum cholesterol levels, obesity, heart disease, and many others. Passmore and Durnin (29) reviewed 137 studies relating to energy expenditure, summarizing in tabular form the energy requirements for domestic and industrial work as well as Sports and recreational activities. This work was used extensively in the development of the scoring system utilized in this research. When physical activities interview forms utilized in recent research are examined, it is found that few attempt to assess all components of daily living, and few attempt to quantify the ratings of physical activity numerically (ll, 2A, 33, 37). Wessel and associates (Al) made one of the first attempts to include all significant sources of energy ex— penditure involved in daily living. Reiff (31) extensively studied physical activity and energy expenditure involved in occupation and leisure. He compiled quantitative numerical scales based upon energy expenditure in Cal./min., a standard ratio of 5:2:1 for walking, standing, and sitting, and a common measure of expenditure involved in walking for one hour, on the flat, at a Speed of three miles per hour. He assessed all activ— ities and assigned numerical values based upon expenditure greater or less than this common measure. The information found in his study was utilized to a large extent in the development of scoring tables for this research. The only study involving women and concerned with total activity patterns which also utilized numerical evalu- ations is one done by Herrold (16). She used energy expen- diture expressed in Cal./min. as her basis for evaluation. This work was also utilized extensively in this research. Another attempt at numerical evaluation of energy expenditure is the activity index employed by Johnson and associates (17) based upon caloric intake and physical activity of high school girls. These writers multiplied a caloric factor by total hours per week spent in activity. The products were then totaled and divided by seven to ob- tain and "activity index.” Stefanik and associates (3A) utilized a five day recall record recording time Spent in a particular activity, an estimation of intensity (light, moderate, severe), as well as an estimation of ability (beginning, intermediate, m3. any an . -1 .. advanced). The activities were grouped according to the energy requirements in terms of Cal./hr. From these groups, an average daily expenditure was calculated. Other methods of assessment have been employed, how— ever. One interesting method was used by both Chirico (6) and Stunkard (35). Both assessed the amount of physical activity of their subjects by having them wear pedometers for one or two weeks. The distance walked was then used as a quantitative measure of comparison. Most previous rating attempts broadly classified physi- cal activity by Job title (19, 22, 23 25, 26, 32, 33). This immediately_involves the problem of different types of activ- ities classified under the same Job title. Another charac- teristic of these investigations was the utilization of ex- tremes (sedentary vs. very active). A rather complete list of numerical classifications of job titles can be found in the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (10). Pearl (30) and Lehman (21), concerned only with occu— pation develOped types of scales for energy demands based upon caloric expenditure. Keys (20) has stated that only from Irolonged direct or indirect calorimetric studies can one obtain quantitative accurate data on energy expenditure. 'He points out, however, that the direct or indirect calorimetric studies are limited because they are impractical to conduct under normal living conditions. Many studies have used only a broad subjective classif— ication of energy expenditure in daily living (23, 18, 5, 36). However, the subjective procedure has been adapted to indi— vidual research problems only, and there has been no serious attempt made to validate the procedure. CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY OF RESEARCH Administration of the Questionnaire The physical activity recall record was an interview questionnaire set up in three parts: weekly recall, which encompassed homemaking, occupation and leisure time; last three months preceding the week; and the previous nine months. Each subject was interviewed alone. Each inter- view required approximately BO minutes. The interview be— gan with the weekly physical activity recall form. Upon completion of the questions on this form, the interview proceeded to the activities performed during the last three months. Each subject was asked to recall any activi— ties or any unusual situations which would make the weekly record not necessarily representative of daily activity of the past three months. Items such as seasonal cleaning as well as seasonal recreational activities were included here. The subject was asked to tell how her homemaking activities differed, what leisure pursuits differed and how, the number of times she participated in different leisure activities, and to describe the consistency of her occupation, if she had one listed. The third form was identical to the second with one exception: It was concerned with the nine months prior to the three months. \0 subjects All subjects were interviewed in the Human Energy Research Laboratory at Michigan State University. The questionnaire forms used may be found in the Appendix, page 26. The data was collected by two trained inter— viewers. The subjects were homemakers who lived in Lansing and East Lansing, Michigan. They ranged in age from twenty to sixty. All subjects used in the study were volunteers. Development of Scoring Tables The assignments of numerical values for each occupa— tional, leisure, and homemaking activity was based upon energy expenditure. A search of the literature was made to obtain energy expenditure in Cal/min. for as many occupa— tional, leisure and homemaking pursuits as possible. Most of the values were obtained in Passmore and Durnin (29). The activities were then grouped into five categories as classified by Christensen (7), and reported in Table I. For those activities for which values could not be obtained, a subjective decision in regard to classificatiun was made by estimating energy requirement and by referral to Reiff (31) and a U. S. Department of Labor publication (lO). Examples of the classifications made for certain occupation, leisure, and homemaking activities are presented below. TABLE 1 CLASSIFICATION OF ENERGY EXPENDITURE FOR FIVE WORK RANGES Work Load K Cal/min. Sedentary l 5—- 2 A Light 2 5__ 314 Moderate 3.5—- 4.9 Heavy 5.0—- 7.4 Very Heavy 7.5-—l2 O TABLE 2 OCCUPATIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS Moderate Light Laboratory Technician Student Secretary Sales Clerk Elevator Operator Babysitter Teacher Physical Education Instructor Sedentary Statistition The very heavy, and heavy, categories have been eliminated due to the fact that none of the occupations of the subjects exhibited that high an energy expenditure. 11 TABLE 3 LEISURE CLASSIFICATIONS Very Heavy Heavy Wood Chopping Water Skiing Snow Skiing Officiating Basketball Competition Tennis Gymnastics Game Basketball Hiking Competition Badminton Regular Tennis Running Painting House Digging Regular Badminton Non-game Basketball Competition Volleyball Softball Team Play Swimming (if swimmer) SQuash Moderate Light Lawn and Yark Work Fishing (boat or shore) Gardening Bowling Archery Regular Volleyball Swimming (if non swimmer) Non—Team Softball Dancing Table Tennis Bicycling-—Walking Horse Shoes Fishing (stream) Sailing Conditioning Exercises Carpentry Canoeing--Rowing Golfing Horseback Riding Archery Skating Stacking Fire Wood Sedentary Reading Watching Television Playing Cards Playing Table Games Hand Crafts Working Puzzles Knitting TABLE 4 HOMEMAKING CLASSIFICATIONS Very Heavy Heavy Washing Floors Ironing Polishing Floors Washing Windows Hanging Out Clothes Sweeping Shoveling Snow Vacuuming Washing Walls Bedmaking Push-Pulling Wringing Wasy by Hand Putting Wash Through Mangle Moderate Light Machine Wash Dusting Dust Mopping Picking up Clothes Sweeping Vacuuming Ironing Meal Preparation Baking Washing Dishes Marketing Preserving Food Driving a Car Washing Small Clothes (by hand) Defrosting Ice Box Personal Care A numberical weight was assigned to each group based on the approximate per cent of kilocalories per minute re— Quired when compared to the Very Heavy group, Therefore, Heavy activities were weighted approximately YO per cent of the numerical value for Very Heavy activities, Moderate approximately AO per cent, Light approximately 20 per cent and Sedentary approximately 5 per cent. The energy requirement of one hours walking, on the level, at approximately three miles per hour was chosen as a common unit of comparison for all activities and also 3 13 served as a reference for weighting walking, standing, and sitting in occupation and homemaking. A ratio of 5:2:1 for walking, standing, sitting was used in this study as was decided upon and applied successfully by Reiff (31). The same common unit of comparison was also used to give a weighted value to arm patterns used in all components. In summary, all components used the energy expendi— ture for one hour of walking as the basic unit from which weights were derived. The explanation of the coding proce— dure and all of the scoring tables necessary for coding are located in the Appendix. Method of Analysis A physical activity recall interview was developed which inquired about the physical activity involved in the subject's homemaking, occupation, and leisure over the year preceding the interview. Responses were subdivided into other components such as homemaking, occupation and leisure activity for the three months preceding the inter— view. Two randomly selected samples from the data collected, each composed of nineteen completed interview forms, were then subjectively ranked by two judges independently. A subjective decision as to rank order of each subject's physical activity in each of four components (homemaking, lA occupation, leisure, and total yearly combination) was made by consideration of the responses as recorded on the interview form. Each judge arranged each sample twice on each activity component. The Spearman rank correlation coefficients was used to illustrate each judges consistency in ranking within the set for the three components. The same statistical technique was utilized to compare results between judges. Finally a mean was calculated for the two judge's subjective rank for each subject in occupation, leisure, homemaking, and all components. This was done for both groups. These mean ranks were correlated with the rankings based on the point totals. CHAPTER IV RESULTS Physical Activity Recall Record The interview questionnaire form was designed to esti— mate physical activity during the preceding year. Data was obtained for homemaking, occupation, and leisure which included the three—month period preceding the interview. These data were collected by two trained interviewers and provided information on 38 females, age 20 and over. These data form the basis of the present study. Development of Scoring Tables The first step in preparation of the scoring system was the construction of a table of energy costs for various occupation, leisure, and homemaking tasks. These are given in Tables l—ll (Appendix B). The objective scoring proce— dure was based upon energy expenditure expressed in Cal./min. and compared to the energy requirement for Very heavy activities. Other factors considered include the energy requirement for walking on the flat at three miles per hour for one hour. All component classifications were based upon these identiaal units of comparison. Upon these criteria, each activity from each component was assigned a numerical 16 score. Each subject was objectively ranked according to Numerical value. This was done for each component. Validity of Recall Record In investigating the validity of the recall record, it was not feasibile to employ an external criterion such as direct assessment of energy cost or making direct observations. The reliability of the interpretation of the record was studied as follows. Two randomly selected samples from the data collected, each composed of nineteen interview forms, were subjectively ranked by two judges independently with the most active respondent at the top and the least active at the bottom. This was done for each of the four components (occupation, leisure, homemaking, and combined or total) on the basis of responses recorded on the interview forms. Each judge ranked the two samples twice. The rank order correlations illustrating each judge's consistancy in ranking within sets are presented in Table 5. Since the two rankings by each judge within each group correlated to highly, the first ranking was arbitrarily selected for the comparison between judges. The correlations between judges for each group are presented in Table 6. The mean of the two judge's subjective ranks for each reSpondent was then calculated for each component. This was done for both groups. These mean ranks formed the criterion for assessing the validity of the objective scoring system. Table 7 gives the rank order correlation coefficients of the comparison of the two groups of nineteen reSpondents. TABLE 5 RANK ORDER CORRELATIONS OF JUDGES' CONSISTANCY WITHIN GROUPS Judge I Judge II Component Group I Group II Group I Group II N=l9 N=l9 N=l9 N=l9 Occupation l l l ; Leisure 1 .998 969 .998 Homemaking .999 l .966 .977 TOTAL 1 l .983 .935 TABLE 6 RANK ORDER CORRELATIONS BETWEEN JUDGES FOR EACH GROUP Component Group I Group II N=I‘9‘ N=l9 Occupation l l Homemaking .915 310 Leisure .793 .552 TOTAL .888 271 TABLE 7 RANK ORDER COEFFICIENTS COMPARING RANKS BASED ON OBJECTIVE SCORING SYSTEM WITH AVERAGE SUBJECTIVE RANK Component Group I Group II N = 19 N = 19 Occupation ~998 ~995 Leisure .671 .813 Homemaking .370 A90 TOTAL .670 .6uo CHAPTER V SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Summary The purpose of this research was twofold: 1. To develop a physical activity recall record for adult women which could be objectively scored and which would encompass homemaking, occupation, and leisure time. 2. To determine the validity of that method. Source of Data This research was conducted at the Human Energy Research Laboratory, Michigan State University. The sample consisted of 38 adult women, ages PO to 60. All subjeth H- res dad in the greater metropolitan area of lansing, *4: chigan. The subjects were volunteers. The physical activity recall record was an interview questionnaire. A trained interviewer spent from 30 minutes to an hour with each respondent inquiring about physical activity involved in the respondent's occupation, leisure, and homemaking activities. The interview forms were designed to estimate the physical activity during the preceding year. These data form the bases of the present study. 20 Development of Scoring Tables An objective method of scoring the responses was developed based.upon energy cost tables. Numerical values were assigned each activity according to intensity and frequency of participation. Each subject was objectively ranked with the most active respondent at the top and the least active at the bottom according to numerical values. This was done for each of the four components, namely, occu— pation, leisure, homemaking, and a yearly combined or total. Validity of the Recall Record The reliability of the interpretation of the record was studied as follows: 1. Two judges subjectively ranked, independently, the responses of two randomly selected samples from the data. This was done for each component. Each judge ranked the two samples twice within a period of three weeks. 2. The first ranking was arbitrarily selected for comparison between judges. The validity of the objective scoring system was assessed in the following manner. 1. The mean of the two judges' subjective ranks for each respondent was calculated for each component for the two samples. These mean ranks formed the criterion. 2. The ranks based on the objective scoring system were compared with average subjective rank. Results The results showed a high consistence for each judge with herself, correlations ranging from -935 to l 00. Comparisons of subjective ranking between judges showed correlations of l.OO for occupation, .31 to .91 for homemaking, .55 to .79 for leisure, and .27 to .89 for total activity. Correlations between mean subjective rating of judges and objective scoring on each component and total were found to be from .995 to .998 for occupation, from .67 to .8l for leisure, .37 to .A9 for homemaking, and from .64 to .67 for total activity. Conclusions The objectively scored physical activity recall record used in this research is not, in it's present form, a valid measure of assessing physical actiVity of women in Q; aily activities. The occupational measure used in this research would appear to be a valid one. However, only a small number of subjects exhibited any occupation other than homemaking. A larger number of subjects would be needed to assess the validity of this measure. 22 The fact that the correlations between judges (the criterion measure) were so diversified would indicate that the difficulty lies in the interpretation of responses on the questionnaire form. A revised questionnaire, particu- larly related to homemaking activities, which would include more specific answers and permit less interpretative free— dom in the judging process is needed. Further calculations indicate that the relationship between the subjective measure and the objective measure of total activity is higher when the subjects exhibiting occu— pation outside of the home are not considered at all. This may indicate a fallacy in the method of combining the scores of those subjects with an occupation. Recommendations Through re—evaluation of the methods of obtaining data, the kinds of data obtained and the interpretation of that data, the author wishes to make the following recommen— dat ions: 1. That a new and mfifé specific questionnaire be divised for both leisure activities and homemaking activities. The new questionnaire should contain all of the possible activities in which the subject could have participated making it necessary for the interviewer to merely check those activities for which she obtains an affirmative response. 23 2. That more data should be obtained on the size and lay out of the home. i.e. number of floors, number of bathrooms, size of kitchen, location and type of washing machine. A weight factor should be devised for use in such calculations in the scoring system. 3. A different weight factor should be devised for combining all components in the objective scoring system. A- That a list of all activities in occupation, leisure and homemaking be divided into general categories of erergy expenditure, i.e. sedentary, light, moderate, heavy, very heavy. These then would be utilized as guide lines in subjective appraisal by judges. It is anticipated that these procedures would yield a valid method for assessing physical activity in women in daily living. SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY UT 10. SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY Adelson, Sadgre and Keys, Ancil. "Diet and Some Health CharacteriStics of 123 Business and Professional Men, and Methods Used to Obtain the Dietary Infor- mation," ABS 62-11, September, 1960. American Mutual Liability Insurance Company. Physical Abilities to Fit the Job. North Abington, Mass.: Sanderson Brothers, 1956. Bonnardel, R. and Laugier, H. "Grids for the Determina- tion and Selection of Occupation,” Le Travail- Humain, Conservatorie Des Arts et Metiers, Paris,, “1933‘. Brouha, L. Physiology in Industry. London: Pergamon Press, 1960. Bruch, H. "Obesity in Childhood" (IV Energy Expendi- ture of Obese Children), American Journal of Dis- eases of Children, 60:1082, 1990. Chirico, A. M., Stunkard, A. J. "Physical Activity and Human Obesity,” New England Journal of Medicine, 263:935, November, 1960. Christensen, E. H. Symposium on Fatigue. London: H. K. Lewis, 1953. Cornell Miscellaneous Bulletin 28, New York State. "Homemaking Units," February, 1958. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. ”A Physical Activity Scale Assigned to the Detailed Occupation Code for Males.” Washington, D. C.: National Office of Vital Statistics, 1957. Division of Occupational Analysis, United States Employ— ment Service. Dictionary of Occupational Titles, Volume II. Washington, D. C.: United States Government Printing Office, 1949. ll. 12. 13. 14. 16. 17. }_.1 \L) 20. 21. 26 Drake, R., Buechly, R. W., and Breslow, L. "An Epi- demiological Investigation bf Coronary Heart Disease in the_California Health Survey Popula- tion," in Symposium: Measuring the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Adult Population Grou s, American Journal of Public Health, A7 33 (Shpp-), 1957. Durnin, J. V. G. A. and Brockaway, J. M. "Determina— tion of the Total Daily Energy Expenditure in Man by Indirect Calorimetry: Assessment of the Accuracy of a Modern Technique,” British Journal of Nutrition, 13:41, 1959. Edholm, O. G., Fletcher, J. G., Widdowson, E. M., and McCance, R. A. "Energy Expenditure and Food In— take of Individual Men," British Journal of Nutrition, 9:286—300, 1955 Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Diseases Methodology, Hypertension and Arteriosclerosis. Supplement to American Journal of Public Health and The Nation's Health, 50: October, 1960. Hanman, B. Physical Capgcities and Job Placement. Stockholm, Sweden: Nardisk Rotogravyr, 1951. Herrold, J. A. ”An Exploratory Study to Investigate the Effectiveness of an Activity in Daily Living Among Homemakers.” Unpublished Master's Thesis, Michigan State University, 1961. Johnson, M. L. Burke, B. S. and Mayer, J. "Relative Importance of Inactivity and Overeating in the Energy Balance of Obese High School Girls," American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 4: 37, 1956? Juel—Nielsen, N. "0n Psychogenic Obesity in Children, II,” Acta Paediatrica, 42:130, 1953. Keys, A. HOccupational and Environmental Factors in the Development of Heart Disease,' in Rosenbaum, F. F. and Belknap, E. L. Work and the Heart, P. B. Holber, 1959. Keys, A. and Brozek, J. "Body Fat in Adult Man,” Physiological RevieW, 33:245, 1953, Lehman, G. Praktesche Arbeitsphysiologie. Stuttgart: Thieme, 1953. 22. 23. 24. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 27 Master, A. M. "Effort, Trauma, Occupation and Compen- sation in Heart Disease,’ Bulletin of New York Academy of Medicine, 17:778: 1941. Miller, D. C., Turlson, M. F., McCann, M. B., White, P. D., and Stare, F. J. "Diet, Blood Lipids and Health of Italian Men in Boston," Annals of Internal Medicine, 49:1178, November, 1958. Morris, J. N. Unpublished Physical Activities Inter- view. Social Medicine Research Unit, London, England, 1957. Morris, J. N., Raffle, P. A., Roberts, C. C., and Parks, J. W. "Coronary Heart Disease and Physical Activity of Work," Lancet, 2 1053, 1953. Morrison, S. L. HOccupational Mortality in Scotland." British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 14:130, 1957. Orr, J. B. and Leitch, I. "The Determination of the Calorie Requirements of Man,” Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, 7:509, 1938. Passmore, R., Thomson, J. G., and Warnock, G. M. ”A Balance Sheet of the Estimation of Energy Entake and Energy Expenditure as Measured by Indirect Calorimetry, Using the Kofranyi-Michaels Calori— meter," British Journal of Nutrition, 6:253—264, 1952. Passmore, R. and Durnin, J. V. G. A. ”Human Energy Expenditure,” Physiological Reviews, 35:1955. Pearl, R. Studies in Human Biology, Chapter XI. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins Company, 1942. Reiff, G. G. ”The Relationship of Physical Activity to Serum Cholesterol and Skinfold Fat in Adult Males." University of Michigan, School of Public Health, Department of Epidemology and the Tecumseh Community Health Study, 1964. Spain, D. M., and Bradess, V. A. "Occupational Physical Activity and the Degree of Atherosclerosis in 'Normal' Men. A Post Mortem Study," Circulation, 22 239, August, 1960. 33. 34. 39. 40. Spain, D. M., and Bradess, V. A. "Relation of Sex, Age, and Physical Activity to Sudden Death from Coronary Arterial Occlusion," published in Rosenbaum, F. F., and Belknap, E. L. Work and the Heart, p. 283. New York: P. B. Hoeber, 1959. Stefanik, P. A., Bullen, B., Heald, F., and Mayer, J. ”Physical Performance, Skinfold Measurements, Activity Expenditures, and Food Consumption of College Women," Research Quarterly, 32:229, 1961. Stunkard, A. ”A Method of Studying Physical Activity in Man," American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 8: 5953 1960. Tolstrup. Acta Paediatrica, 42:130-1953. United States Employment Service. Estimates of Worker Trait Requirements for 4,000 Jobs. Washington, D. C.: U. S, Government Printing Office, 1955. War Manpower Commission, Division of Occupational Analysis and Manning Tables. Physical Demands and Capacities Analysis. Oakland, California: Permenente Foundation, 1944. Weight Control. A Collection of Papers Presented at the Weight Control Colloquim. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State College, 1955. Weddowson, E. N., Edholm, O. G., and McCance, R. A, "The Food Intake and Energy Expenditure of Cadets in Training," Britisn Journal of Nutrition, 8:147—155, 1954. messel, J., Montoye, a, J,, and Mitchell, H. “Physical Activity Assessment: By Recall Record,” To be published in American Journal of Public Health, Spring, 1965. A P F El. D l {'7 ES APPENDIX A QUESTIONNAIRE FORMS Code No. HOMEMAKINO AND/OR wonx LAST WEEK Name Date Week Covered to Last First Initial Interviewer Homemaking and/or Work Last Week How often did you do these activities? Connent Regular Care‘s; gone . Mopping-Sueoping-vacuum Picking up house (dusting) Washing Floors Washing Dishes Meal Preparation Washing Clothes (tubruls) Ironing Clothes Anyocher Aotivitiea requiring physical effort that you did last week? What donnunity work did you do last week? Average Number per day of People ___ Average Number of Poople served per day No. or Tubruls per week Average Time Spent per week Work other than homemaking? Occupation Where employed. How ions On your Job other than homemaking Total hours spent per week number or days per week Hours per day m how much time did you spend on your Job? ' Hours Seated Standing Walking In vigorous activity Code No. Name :92 HOMEMAKING AND/0R WORK LRST THREE MONTHS Last First Initial Interviewer Interview No. Week Covered_____to Were your homemaking and/or work activities during this week usual for this time of year (last 5 months)? If no, how was it different? K I‘D 0‘) Washing dishes Preparing meals Physical care of family Washing clothes Ironing clothes Regular care of house Other homemaking Other work (occupation) Community work Were there anyother activities you did not cover here that required physical activity? Yes No llHllHl If yes, what were these activities? Activities How was it different? 'During which months? lllllllllg About how often did you do During which months? during the last 3 months? Thinking about the things you do at home or at work together - how would you rate yourself as to the amount of physical activity you get compared to other women your age? l. 2. I am much less I am somewhat less active than active than others others NOTE: 3. I am about the same as others 4. 5. I am somewhat more I am much more active than others active than others If other occupations, list name. place of work, hours per day. hours per week, and how long employed. Did you do any of these activities last week? LEISURE INTERESTS AND RECREATIONAL PURSUITS LAST WEEK Hobbies and Leisure Interests \n-FVNH \ooosim 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Card playing Ceramics Checkers. chess Collecting objects Drawing Leather crafts Painting' Sewing and/or knitting Listening to records. TV. radio Weaving Working puzzles Billiards Carving woodcrafts Croquet Dramatics Playing musical instrument Playing with children (give kind of activity) Any other hobbies or interests Yes lllllll II III II IIIH IE lllll Other Leisure 23 Recreational Pursuits \n-FVNH OWCDNG g..- 12. 1}. in. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 2H. 25. Lawn work and yard care Work in flower or vegetable garden Archery Swimming Skating Dancing Bicycling (pleasure) Walking (pleasure) Fishing Hunting Bowling Basketball Volleyball Softball or baseball Conditioning exercises Golf Handball or squash Tennis Badminton ' Table tennis Sailing Canoeing or rowing Snow skiing Water skiing Other sports - games? K m lllll Hill | I I? Code No. LEISURE ACTIVITIES 3ND PURSUITS LLST THREE MONTHS AND NINE MONTHS BEFORE Name Interviewer Last First Initial Interview No. Date Week Covered to Did you do any of the following during the last 3 months? Complete the questions below - then ask above question pertaining to nine months before. I I ‘During which iDid you play in Enter Name of Inbout how often IDid you play INow to cover 1 activity did you part- (in any tourna-Irest of year, I months? fany tournaments I icipate during Iments during Iabout how Iduring last 9 last three .last 3 months?Ioften did you imonths? months? I Iparticipate Yes__, No__ I iduring the 9 .If yes - how many: I (months before I I Ithat? I I g l T f“ I t . I I : . I I .1 L I l g I I z : I vii I I : . I I I I I . I I ; T I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I , . ' L_Ai 1. How important do you consider physical recreational activity as part of your personal recreation or leisure compared to other women your age? l. 2. 3. u. 5. More important Somewhat more important About the same Somewhat less Much less important important (“Q How much of your leisure time do you devote to physical recreational activities compared to other women your age? l. 2. 3. N. 5. I am much less I am somewhat less I am about the I am somewhat more I am much more active than others active than others same as others active than others active than others 3. To what extent do you have skills to participate in active sports and games during your recreation or leisure time compared to other women your age? l. 2. 3. u. 5. I am more skilled I am somewhat ski1led I am about the some I am somewhat less I am much than others than others as others skilled than others less skilled than other ‘ D -‘ I» APPENDIX B CODING PROCEDURE 37 Instructions for Use of Homemaking Scoring Tables and Code Sheets Homemaking code sheets are for all homaking activities combined. From the weekly data form, place all activities in designated place on code sheet. Turn to the homemaking scoring tables, find the item to be considered and obtain a point value based upon the number of times the activity was done that week. Place point value opposite item in appropriate Space provided on the code sheet. From the three month form enter all changes on the code sheet. From the previous nine months enter all changes. Assign homemaking units based upon size of family or times done, which ever is appropriate. Obtain a subtotal by adding point value to unit value. Return to data sheets and enter number of weeks done in appropriate column. Multiply subtotals by weeks done and add final column to obtain a grand total for homemaking. Instructions for Use of Tables and Occupation Code Sheet 1. From Table 2 enter the apprOpriate number of points on code sheet for the number of hrs./day Spent in each of the activities; sitting, standing, walking. 38 Example: A sales clerk states on her interview form that she walks for 4 hours, stands for 3 hours and sits for one hour in an 8 hour day. She then receives on her code sheet: 1. Walk 20 2. Sit l 3. Stand 6 Total this score and multiply by the number of days worked. This gives subtotal #1. From Table 1 enter appropriate number of points on code sheet for the part of day Spent in various types of arm patterns. Example: A sales clerk Spends part of her day stocking shelves, part carrying light objects, and part using no arm activity at all. She receives on her code sheet: l. No points for no arm activity 2. 5 points for less than l/M day stocking shelves. 3. 3 points for less than l/fl day lifting and carrying objects under 15 lbs. Total this score and multiply by the number of days worked. This gives subtotal #2. Add subtotals #1 and #2, multiply by the number of weeks worked during the past three months giving total occupational points for the last three months. Repeat procedure for previous 9 months if different. If the same, simply multiply by number of weeks worked during previous 9 months for total occupa— tional points for that period. Add both total occupations to get grand total occu- pation for the last complete year. Instructions for Scoring Leisure Activities From Table 3, obtain a point value based upon the activity and the number of times done. Enter the name of the activity and the point value under "activity" and "points” in the appropriate group. Choice of time here is governed by the reSponse on the questionnaire as to whether it falls on the scoring table under number times/week or number times/month. Example: The subject played badminton (a group II activity) twice a week during December, January, and February. From the table she is given 120 points for participating twice a week. Then multiply by number of months. In the event that She did not play regularly for the entire 3 month period, multiply the value listed under ”each time” by the number of times she participated. Repeat procedure and multiply by appropriate length of time for previous 39 weeks. 39 E’- 'u JP: :x‘jirvi‘m \fl “0 Repeat for all activities listed. NOTE: be sure to enter activity in proper group. Add columns down to get subtotal in each group for 13 weeks and 39 weeks. Add these two values for total year in each group. Jotal all groups to obtain total leisure points for HOMEMAKING SCORING TABLE FOR FAMILY COMPOSITION Activity ' Point Value I. Dishwashing 2 Persons 3 Persons 4 Persons 5 Persons 6 Persons O\\Jl JED.) ID II. Washing Clothes .5 per tub III. Ironing l- 9 Pieces lO-29 Pieces 30 or more Pieces ODO\I\) IV. Bedmaking Persons Persons Persons Persons Persons O\\)"| .IE‘LUIU O\U‘] J::l\.)|—I V. Mean Preparation 2 Persons 1 3 Persons 2 u Persons 3 5 Persons 4 6 Persons 5 ma ma ma m m m wcflcopH m>fipo¢ .HHH ma 04 m o z m msHESSOM> ma as m o n m mUmm wcflhufle md 09 w o z m mcaammzm .mcapmsa omsom Q: mcHxOHm ma me ma m w m mqmc-sxcmm3 mcfinomz ma OH m o x m aflpwsopsd cmmz ocfinomz msmgmpoz .HH 0 m z m c a meatbxmmz o m a m m a wcflnbmmsmcn o m a m m H mm; ..o namEm m2HEmm2 m o a m m a magmas waEsz m m a m m a weaxmm o m a m m H cofipmpmooam awe: pamfiq .H whoa so ma mauma manoa min on: mIH ssxwmznsflfimannspfl>aboa mqm¢e wzflmoom 02Hm<2mzom ’43 C) (\J "J m r—i ~\J ”‘i v-w O\ O\O\O\ O\ I’M ix \0 \O \0 KO \0 -f\ L!\ .-. ch ‘Y 3 Y3 wcfi>somonm meflxmm pswfiq .H4H '1‘ J. . \l) 1 n I1. . ma3n+husm acagmsm wc.>oz afiecam>ocm ,fizxw mbapagw .HH x --.3 mc+xsemmm muameImcHgmmznmsflonspom mpwpouoz .H cpsoa\mmsap m QpCOEXmmEHp w %Hnugozlmflxmm3llmpfi>fipo¢ N flamsefibeoov mqm¢B QZHmoom 02Hm¢zmzom FEYJICAL ACTIVITY CODE SHEET HOMEMAKING All; No. Adults No. Children ____._.—————-—— Ann ": h h‘n NJ Unit (=} Value TOTAL (x) Point (t) Value Weeks t=) Number TOTAL POINTS meal Preparation Baking Washing Dishes Washing Small Clothes Chauffering Marketing Machine Wash Automatic w/mangle Picking up House Dusting—Sweeping Tidying beds Vacuuming Ironing Unit (=) Value Point (t) Value (Monthly) TOTAL (X. Number Months (=) TOTAL POINTS Scrubbing, washing, wax Floors Walls Windows Bed Making (changing) Snow Shoveling Moving, Pushing Furniture Baking Preserving, Freezing GRAND TOTAL PAST YEAR A5 POINTS FOR ARM WORK IN OCCUPATION Part of Day Spent at Task Less l/A to Than less l/2 or l/A Than more Activity Day l/2 Day Per Day I. Assembling or Manipulating 1. Light Objects 2 A 6 2 Heavy Objects 3 5 8 3. Using Small Tools 3 6 10 A. Lifting or Handling 3 6 10 Light Objects (less than 15 pounds). II. Packing or Stocking Shelves 5 9 15 III. Pushing-Pulling 1. Hand Cart 3 5 8 2. Objects A5—7A pounds 3 6 10 3. Objects 20—44 pounds 2 A 6 IV. Other Responses 1. Scrubbing, Washing, Waxing 3 6 IO 2. Carrying and Lifting 3 6 10 (less than 15 pounds) PHYSICAL ACTIVITY CODE SHEET Occupation Subj. no. Int. date Age OCCUPATION last 13 weeks OCCUPATION rest of year (39 wks.) 1. Walk 1. 2. Sit 2. l 3. Stand 3. I l Total Total i days days worked worked Total Total A. Moderate Arm 4. I Jr 5. Heavy Arm 5. : i 6. Lift—Carry , 6. g I z Total Total days days worked worked Times Weeks Grand Grand Worked Total Total _____4L. 7. Last 3 months total 7. occupation 8. Last 39 weeks total 8. occupation 9. Grand total, occupation 9. 1:7 POINTS FOR TIME SPENT SITTING, STANDING, WALKING IN OCCUPATION Numbers of Hours Per Day Activity 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 8 9 10 Walk 5 10 15 20 25 3o 35 no A5 50 Sit l 2 3 A 5 6 7 8 9 10 Stand 2 A 6 8 10 12 IA 16 l8 20 iNOIE: If response is less than one hour, calculate that fraction of points for one hour. A8 m am @H w m as m asap mH NH m a m m H s .:moa m;HH33m .% was ass on as am am as amatsm aaaa mm :m wH @ m a m Stop so seam maHEaHs .@ @H mH w a m m H oHHE mxH Cmcp mmoH mm am @H m m a m aaae H as aHHe mxH mcHNHm3lumzHHoonm .S no w: mm OH NH w a ogmswm m: mm :m NH 9 w m HtHoom mcHoch .w m: mm am NH m a m maasmem .m mm am @H w a a m seesaam-aaz CH :0 @: mm ©H mH m : LoEEHzm CH wcHEEHzm .3 mm am oH m m a m Atacaaa .m mH NH @ z m m H meHcoULmU .m mm :m mH @ m J m aboz ppmw paw czmH .H xmoz gooz gooB gooz cpsoz cacoz oEHE apH>Hpo< moEHB moEHB moEHB oEHH moEHB moEHB nomm : m m H m m mmHHH>HPQ< mmDonq mos terei A9 omH omH cm 0: om om OH aaHoa mH mm as as am mH mH w maHoe a CHOU .mH wH mH m a m m H =oH ewes maaH we mm am mH m m m .cHe om-oH om ms me am mH mH m =om cats aaoz Empwopm UoNHmeLO poz mm am 0H m o a m =oH eats mamH am we mm 0H NH m a =om OH OH mHH aw mm mm Hm aH s zom saga mac: Empmopm pomHsmwso momHogoxm NGHQOHpHpcoo .HH we mm am mH a a m saHa sate coz cam omH omH om ma om mH HmHa Same HHapsHom mmH HHH mm we mm am mH aoHsHaaano ma mm :N NH 0 m m LmHsmom HHmasaHHo> om om o: om mH 0H m mama Caz omm cam omH om om o: om HaHm mama HHaaamXaam HHaasHom .HHapHaHHo> .HHaaaaxmmm .oH gab: saw: eaaz eta: spec: asses aeHe HHH>Hpaa moEHB moEHE moEHB oEHE moEHE moEHB comm : m m H m m ApmschsooV 50 mm am pH w m a m maHHHam .om omH omH om as om om 9H HHapatxaam wcHHaHaHseo .NH mm am @H w m a m maocaaaaom .wH am we mm mH mH m a maHaHm xampaaaom .SH ow op 03 om mH OH m mcHxH: .mH ooH omH om on om om oH aoHamaaesu .mH so NJ NM 0H NH m : magmmon zomunoosmo .HH ow om oa om mH 0H m aoHSHsaano m: mm :N NH 0 m m pmstom mHssoB oHme 00: com com ooH ms om mm HOHCHsaaer cam omH omH om ma om mH aaHsmam CoucHEpmm 00: com com ooH ms om mm coHpHpaano cam owH omH om ma om mH aaHamam mHCCSB mHCCoB pomB .cochspmm .mHQQoH .mH eats amt; eat: eta: tacos apes: aeHe ACH>Hbaa moEHB moEHE mmEHE oEHE meHB moEHs gun? a m m H m m 51 0am omH omH om ma om mH amaaam .mm :m w: Nm 0H NH m : mmsom wchchm .mN m m a N m.H H m. HapmcHoom somm .HN omm 0am omH om om o: om amaH to aaoe H mcHaaoeo @003 .mm omH omH om o: om om oH meHme swam: .mm 00: com com ooH ms om mm aoHSHsaaaoo 0mm cam omH om om o: om aaHamam maHme 20cm .Hm eta: saws eat: eat: Essa: ease: weHe HHH>Hsoa moEHB moEHB moEHH oEHE moEHB moEHB zoom 3 m m H m m AUQSCHCCOU 52 LEISURE GROUP CLASSIFICATIONS Leisure Group I (Very Active) Wood Chopping Snow Skiing Competition Tennis Competition Badminton Game Basketball Leisure Group II (Active) Water Skiing Officiating Basketball Gymnastics Hiking Regular Tennis Regular Badminton Non Game Basketball Competition Volleyball Softball Team Play Swimming (if swimmer) Painting House Squash Leisure Group III (Moderate) Lawn and Yard Work Gardening Archery Swimming (if non swimmer) Dancing Bicycling—Walking Fishing (Wade Stream) Conditioning Exercises Golf Canoe—Row Horseback Riding Skating 53 (Continued) Leisure Group IV (Light) Fishing (Boat or Shore) Bowling Volleyball (Regular) Softball (Non Team Play) Table Tennis Horse Shoes Sailing Groups based upon average energy expenditure in Cal/min. These values taken from and based upon Passmore and Durnin, Christensen. Any activities for which definite values could not be found were subjectively placed witt activities of similar intensity. 54 HaSOp HH agape Haqu H Qsopw Hapoa HasOp .mxz mm m30H>me .mxz MH ummH Am>Huomv HH Naomw Hmsoa Hmaos Haeoe mmezoz x mzoo x mezHoa Haeoa mmezoz x mzoa mmzHe x mazHoa HBH>Heoa .oz mmzHa .oz .mxz mm msOH>aaa .wxa mH pmaH Hm>Hpoa sam>v H msomm owm .oc mcoo mmsmHMH 8mmmm maoo MBH>HBO¢ H¢0Hmwmm 55 Have» >H Quota H33 HHHazoao . HMpOp HmpOp .mxa mm m50H>maa .mxz mH pmaH ApsmHHv .>H macaw Hmaoa Hapos Haeoe mmezoz x mzom x mezHom Hagan mmezOz x mzoa mmzHe x mezHoa H9H>Heoa .oz mmzHe .oz .mxz mm m50H>me .mxz mH ummH Amumpocosv HHH moomw AUmSCHpCoov mmDmHmH .oc mcoo 56 mufibapom coca onsumoona beam on» mm: .npcos\oEHu oco can» mmoH CH ompmqaoapnmq soon was .mcov mesa» no hopes: on» an pH zHaHuHse ocm =mEHp some: pops: oSHm> on» om: .om mH mHsp NH .Qsopw 20mm.cH mxmos HHm no msucos HHm mpH>Huom mcoo o>mn no: has poohn3m one .3909 no mayo» CH nucaoq mm>Hw ummnm wchoom map mmSMooo amoeba mH mnpcoe ho amass: so mxmoz no nonssz "meoz Hopes Gamma oASmHmH Hana» > macaw HMpOp HmUOp HHBO< mxmms mm m50H>mno Acmscfipcoov mmDmHmH mama: mH pmaH AeneacHemmv > mpomo .oc ovoo NUMERICAL RANK CARD 57 Code’No. Occup. Leis. Home. All 3 Numerical Rank Total Points SUBJECTIVE RANK CARD Code No. Occupation Leisure Homemaking Occupation, Leisure Homemaking First Rank Second Rank Rater's Name APPENDIX C INSTRUCTURAL PROCEDURES FOR USING SCORING TABLES AND CODE SHEETS PROPOSED PU.SICAL LCTT’ TY R_CaL; PsiiR- C‘EaA.; . e ‘ «a' c. a ~ ~r bVQ O :»K vv -r‘su bv Date Inter lerrr .ame fl rw - last llrst liltlal 1~],.‘. v I 8.5 a do. lr .CL an ‘d ‘\ ‘1 La '.q n ‘ +—.-~ No floors in More no. dCUlbu To bathrooms No. children Size of kitchen ares No. beds used Type cf washing machine dryer? location Average Duration Done Last Day Done of Time Spent ACTIVITY Year Vast Week Min. Hours Comments Washing Floors 1 3 A 5 6 7 Polishing Floors 1 2 3 A 3 6 7 Hanging Out Clothes 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Shoveling Show 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Washing Walls 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Push—Pulling 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Wringing Wash by Hand 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Wash Through Mangle l 2 3 A 5 6 7 Ironing l 2 3 A 5 6 7 No. Pieces Last Week Washing Windows 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Sweeping 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Vacuuming 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Bedmaking (changing) 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Defrosting Ice Box 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Machine Wash 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 No. Tubfuls Last Week Dusting l 2 3 A 5 6 7 Dust Mopping l 2 3 A 5 6 7 Picking Up Clothes 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Meal Preparation 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 No. People Per Day Marketing 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Small Hand Washing l 2 3 A 5 6 7 Baking 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Preserving Food 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Washing Dishes 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 No. People Per Day Driving a Car 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Others (Please List) 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A 5 6 7 6C) PROPOSED PHYSICAL ACTIVITY RECALL RECORD - EOMEMAKING “ode No. La:t 3 Months Date Last 7 Months c1171? Days Done Days Done Average Duration Last 3 Last 3 of Time Spent ACTIVITY ‘onths Months Min. hours Comments Washing Floors 1 2 3 ' 5 6 7 l 2 3 A ; b 7 :olishing Floors 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 l 2 3 A 5 6 7 Hanging Out Clothes 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A . h 7 Shoveling Snow 1 2 3 A 5 h 7 1 3 3 A . b 7 Washing Walls 1 2 3 A 5 o 7 l 2 3 A 5 6 7 Push—Pulling l 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A 5 6 7 Wringing Wasy by hand 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A 5 6 7 Wash Through Mangle 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A 3 6 7 ., DAD _, v; *- Ironing l 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A i 6 7 ”C'wégic's L*“t Washing NindOWS l 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A 5 6 7 Sweeping l 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A 5 6 7 Vacuuming l 2 3 A 5 6 7 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Bedmaking (changing) l 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A 5 6 7 Defrosting Ice Box 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Machine Wash 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A 5 6 7 No°wggifU1s Lai‘ Dusting l 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A 5 6 7 ' Dust Mcpping l 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A 5 6 7 Picking up Clothes 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A 5 6 7 Meal Preparation 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A 5 6 7 ”O'DSSOple Per Marketing 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 ' Small Hand Washing l 2 3 A 5 6 7 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Baking l 2 3 A 5 6 7 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Preserving Food 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A 5 6 7 washing Dishes 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A 5 n 7 ”0 Diiople PCP Driving a Car 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 by ' Others (Please List) 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A ) 6 7 l 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A 5 6 7 l 2 3 A 6 6 7 PROPOSED PHYSICAL ACTIVITY RECALL RECORD OCCUPATION Code No. Date Name 61 Occupation Where employed? How Long? Total hours Spent per week Hours per day Days per week How much time per week do you spend on your job: Hours Seated Standing Walking In vigourous activity Describe your duties. Did you have a vacation within the last year? If so, how long was your vacation last year? W .m—v— , - €32 LQIAUFE C- 30 Na . Sate are Average Duration Times Done Times Done Done Last Times Done of Time Spen Last 3 Last 9 ACTIVlT' Year Last Week Min. Hours Months Months COG Chopping l 9 3 A 5 6 7 _ Sno. Skiing 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Competition Tennis 1 3 3 A 5 5 7 Game Basketball 7 I Y 3 A a 6 7 Competition Badminton l 3 3 A 5 6 7 Water Skiing 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Officiation Basketball 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Gymnastics 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Hiking l 3 3 A h 6 7 Regular Tennis 1 3 3 A 5 b 7 Painting House 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Regular Badminton l 2 3 A 5 6 7 Hon-Game Basketball 1 2 3 A 5 b 7 Competition Volleyball 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Softball Team Play 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Swimming (if swimmer) l 2 3 A 5 6 7 Squash 1 2 3 A 6 7 Lawn and Yark Work 1 2 3 A J b 7 Gardening 1 2 3 A 5 o 7 Archery l 3 3 A 5 b 7 Swimming (non—swimmer) l X 3 A 6 7 Dancing 1 3 3 A h b 7 Bicycling--Walking l 2 3 A 5 6 7 Fishing (stream) 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Conditioning Exercises 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Canoe—-Rowing l 2 3 A 5 6 7 Horseback Riding 1 2 3 A i 6 7 Skating 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Fishing (boat or Shore) 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Bowling 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Regular Volleyball 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Mon-Team Softball 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Table Tennis 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Horse Shoes 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Sailing 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Reading 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Watching TV 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Playing Cards 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Playing Table Games 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 Hand Crafts 1 2 3 A 5 6 7 jerking Puzzles L 3 A ” 6.. LI .1! “a 3'; L" "—~ Zr! (.13 , ' 3’ in '3 d3 «1 i r . to -“~ w 4-3 k“ :I: rt 1‘; $) '1'1 ‘7. --’ I) ") "—4 ;J - {71 vi ’ J r“ -4 a: ti: hi) l) '0 ‘-—J ,2.) I r c ' 3 $7, '7“ i-I \I) m J c -. ~: E ‘n 31) h! u 51 ..1 . : g; r: .r‘, :- ;' g :1 JJ "3 ‘fi \l.“ J ‘i "—7 (U .d '3 , U) L ‘ I} 1) 43 6) 37¢ x) '3: 44' '.l )ni L L: C; ml Y! 7‘ l . . .1 [1? W4 - 1 .J H ’ l ‘ ~ ‘ l IL. 11 '3 *le ‘4) C l ‘< .I :4 C, —‘ b.) 37: C) L‘L 7) ‘0 f. i i‘ w 17': ML) :4 ’u-m L‘ '1 ‘u 3.1 J L‘J .' M wt L’. .1 L. s: 1 -1 H‘ »,—1 . J 1) ll H-1d-lw" CU-v‘ 114 C :"I 2‘: '7 : t3 0 I. i ’U r‘ c; u o -.-1 ' S. :.-« i: ; L. .1 C. L 93 13 21 U) .1‘ ."S M ’4 u" 1 .4 L. .L‘ J A +3 ‘x '1) lf‘.~L'-").i):;.1[l.(,)'ct'.'::'_.‘il) r—4 [5 n J n U 8 £1} if 0) (1) H - ’0 H N LA: > L‘ {J L. N I E—' (U m p :3 if 1’) E. t... 114 I '4‘ AU t4!) * r—< ti} {2 CL L.” L til {I M LZ-HCCQC-fi - w" I: H 'r'4 "‘4 J») r m :> "C '2) :,,.;‘oxp k 7‘ - 5-1 LU 4—> CU kt! C i—v H S. .' L? LU r1; Ki .--4 r1 Li‘- 0 E - 1 M r -m w L): 3 LL Ll. "‘ 3 :11 H H {u 2L ’ ' F" C 4 l g: '_ 1 i g 7“. r1 :"‘1 vi w! I! ~ 'r ‘ l \J US $4 ’0 ll -. I -‘\ I- 1 1 L4 « 4 ‘0 l1) 11 l U '-. 7‘ :1 c) +3 .-1 >, 3. E; L"; '5 w" ’u‘ C L) i ‘ (u C. .‘L‘ I1) "d t: L. .2: ‘.I a 1 g) [’1 « AI .2 a :3 -‘ 1 - 1 4 ~ .:.~..L. (\. . t; .JU"L_;,3 x) ‘1) "fl '3] ’1] <1: [‘ EU ’1 l" L I C) (A) C Cu w-w $4 U; I Li; *4 C.: -'1 ,‘t: :> AI: 8‘ E‘! [17. {.1 OJ {1; “ '5}. {I 1: L-J LU Q4. . 1 f}: . 4. (’7 g." ' L: is. > ‘7‘" :1 LU- : LL "7‘ J S. 5.. DJ (:1 L) f n L. \ "I .2 3 :‘1' _' " Bil \) H " ‘1) '3‘ L y, \——' 1 A "1 -,—q u E—i LU "—1 .. wu'o Li. H \Hd Lo vavihu u no u p .11 O 2‘ 7.. .7 L) .13 n L. l: L F; ‘1'”‘4 f: . =‘,‘. w m +4 +2 in .‘1 r: .... . n LU "—i m :0 w m 4 C '11 1'; U; L 7;) i} i. in i. L-» Li .' ---4 w . ‘CJ <1I . .r5 :2 w. "(J (L- 2'» (.3 i. Z-h L) J; lb ... {,2 an .‘S .1 'J I L). p F: U » :l L3 -4 i4 i; U Cl) ;U l +3 rv-i t‘: inf hJ-v'! tn L: E ('4 H J +4 LG 01 of W :3 .D d} ".2. f»; ”—1 r,“ .[Y .1! C) L; U .£ ’7“ 0’} i") m » l “J In] E-« :s v :37 :1‘. n: L14 at. 2 (.3 0') U) cf; hore) Cal/ 1 1s -oftbal eni: nnis :oes Q L. 8P0 r - 3 Boat or Vollevball w 0 cm A ~’ 3 m i: L ‘ . E. 31) ‘2 , \. r. 1) ‘J‘A’hmhpg‘dfiwfi’o M J - u CCLCLCUQJ L. a: L . 41 ‘1‘ w a) w «4 *4 t4 a) a) H 43 H r l? QHECHSIr-imr4i1 d (I .14 .—1‘ Lr490)7£U)ED£-;'gb‘d :7: , 5. f: F1 CU O H ..4 Q «13:; (’3 '(i' 3‘ :1! I H q ouccmaht‘aBJ-UJ . *5.) r4 .' p .1 i; a5 -~4 C‘. - i 3 (y ,‘ mi "1‘ .4 N u i L L: ‘J [{ 1;) ’7 t) ."5 its . u) E4 M L.‘ 0—) U E‘- ,7: L4 pl '3 'J .74 L1) , w x a #7:.‘.:; T} ‘,,‘,a,-‘ - i \i av' .1 LA ‘I - ‘-J ) . i u ~ 1 g; x - 1 i w '4‘ 'u‘ A 3:0 c) ', in w .‘1 .J L Q '1 ,3 .4 .l—q 7;»- ,2. T3 ;: r: '. .1 :1 ’«D #1 v3 .: ; r 23 F:- .‘t hi) i‘. ;.t 7" . 33 C: :3 and '3-2‘ ' “4i '371'31-471 -9 AA I . 7 .ouscuE Lms mmmhofimo ufl omuummem «Lawmnsy Na ,immcm m3;3 Ions; mundwnqmm .Lcngwp o>fi I $_) ,. \_. \l] 'r— .1 ”‘5 1') F. .. *1 A A l ‘2 (j J a, 7 A) Ii I .1 L x v C ‘7. CI "-1 M (L) 4 J 'I A 4 C ) G U ('1 Cl ’3 {I A} | {43‘} . l . Ii l. I\I , (UN! JIIH «3.714) 4 SIEL d IC,L In? .._\~_ .I...\H.. . «Lfitk 14:041. . . o 7. rk I L ‘I . I 17,7..JJI\ A< \«u..vII... .\ i«.1II« . .) I ‘Ir “I\ 1.. I llaalnj. r]..\,.h .AH LLHLIA.“ Baha’i; .ui Wflix..\,rr\ iii INC- ..3. . , I . .IV . i 77.7 c . .4 .1: .1, I a 7i.‘«¢ 1 Ill (74¢ “Husk.” qu...._./..)J.I7Il.c>lh ., ”.HLQKACHUE.» 7 4 ..1I {U I .r.. .LL LIHIv rmfi. Iii; will . . I 1 I JI i .II.) R, 7:, .irruvi I.HH .3 . _ I 0. V . 1( \). vA-ul a l ,2 1.1I _ IV V I A..\. fixL , ,K H .7 > 37:. H...I.luv.-) I L .I. \ I p r I . IIII xii II. I y H I x I I . 7 I. I! I ,Idd.., I. 41)},4I.‘ IIJH»; I.«.JI) 4) I iIa.) U<-4.l.h.‘ II. Pidt.4.> ‘ip. ....,..~.\p .rbL L: .I r M., H .. 7 b .w I-.. A 4.7 :11; 17:7i I,.. 17.1..-- -3, «.13: K ... .V A ‘77,: . up ..r|I . .v.\r . L7w7Ll \ I.\ {G., . 7i» I.) . .41..~ 7:) .JI 7.744.!) I, I.«.«II.IJ‘II) 1 .p I Li: . fr} I .I II7 I. l ,7 H i II . . \l I u.!. I'd-a 1.1. [Allgi a I I‘IIIJII III .15 [id 71, ,I 4 l (A I I. r\ <1 II T» \ : v; II AI. I s I v u u k ILI - ‘5 I a\ 11 I1) > .7 n I i!) «I; «\I d ~J I .7 i 4‘ I I‘I 5‘11. ,cxl - 1 u .Iu .«I all. . - 7. u, ,p IIAI< .l 3 9;]! I l vI I. . . . V II I ,,I 711i » . III .rk , nvI IJL.xHIrkII._ h...«I¢.\ F».r\ IN N. L ...yk 7v Ln.” I .. .. [ LIIi; .# .wlIfldi‘ii)I. . .ri. .Iiw. ) I i , , .747 2,. .u , IILrLrII.rIir\I ,Ir—itk c Ir I IIII III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 31293 01733 8900