— -—_————— _ M Q;Q«600 g- o .0. o.-.¢--. .' \W ‘qoo‘fioQo‘ a... If -1 r.‘ .o_\\qv_Q\.VQ“§” no'leq 'flMwufi“‘-‘7vqu“".wy ‘fiv‘... - coon-looao’(004 ‘. ‘ ‘Q ’ - N. V” . OTATO PROTEIN . _ j A. VARIETY AND ENVIRONMENT AND B. AIR SEPARATION OF THE DRIED FLOUR Thesis for the Degree of M. S. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY . . ORAL!) M. PEARE’ 1973 . n , O o I ‘ h' " O. . I . l .- -.. l ‘ I ' I. ’ F ’i O. Q . . . . .__' _. , .n . . > . ~oa-_--¢o_-_ ".."".‘.".""...‘.(‘-".‘°.‘-'.‘"."-“."‘Q‘t“¢n‘g‘oolfl; with}: -"'a. .-. . . . 4 o . . , ' I V . . . - .I— _ .. ,,I _ 'r' -- , o o , . ,’.._.‘.. .. ..I ' - "‘P‘tuo . a). . ,,'. ‘ ° ’00.— ._ "Ova.(. ,.'. .. o .-a. . . . "--r Oooo;,.. - .... :0 ' I 't o: l{.\WVA.‘Ao-. "uo’ul. ‘ '-’ .’.{"/-'P"' "roov-OJ- r ,, - or- '. v4;'-.-.o‘p.- 9' "‘0I” voo"o, 'cl- “‘__ LIBRARYifi Michigan State University "in" magma av ‘3 "MG & SUNS. 3;: ‘ BIN-3;" INI‘. I; ABSTRACT POTATO PROTEIN AS AFFECTED BY: A. VARIETY AND ENVIRONMENT AND B. AIR SEPARATION OF THE DRIED FLOUR BY Ronald M. Peare Sixteen potato cultivars grown in 10 different states were analyzed for total protein, net usable protein, "available" methionine and protein quality. A micro- biological method utilizing Streptococcus zymogenes was used to estimate "available" methionine content and protein quality. Variety, location of growth and their interaction was found to contribute significantly to the total variabi- lity. Environmental data for each location could not be related to location mean differences in any variable. "Available" methionine (mg met/l6 mg N) was positively correlated with biological value (r = .37) while a negative correlation existed between BV and total protein (r = -.28). No apparent relationship existed between "available" methionine and total protein. A factor indicative of the amino acid balance of the total protein minus the contribution due to the con- tained "available" methionine was found. This factor, Ronald M. Pearo termed "relative protein quality" was negatively correlated with "available" methionine (r = -.77) and total protein (r = -.26). This in combination with "available" methionine content explained differences in BV to a greater extent than either one considered individually. Selection criteria for improved protein quality as influenced by the environment is discussed. Air classification of potato flour was investigated. A protein concentrate flour derived from whole flour, representing 30% of the initial dry matter and containing 33% protein was obtained. Rat and micro-biological evalu— ation of the concentrate and whole flour (of one variety) showed no differences in quality. Based on these assays, the protein quality of the potato variety studied was 75% as effective as casein. The importance and potential of micro-biological assay and air-classification in relation to the potato industry is discussed. POTATO PROTEIN AS AFFECTED BY: A. VARIETY AND ENVIRONMENT AND B. AIR SEPARATION OF THE DRIED FLOUR BY Ronald M. Peare A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Crop and Soil Sciences 1973 .07 :M ,i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. “I" r r?’ The author expresses his appreciation and thanks to Dr. N. R. Thompson for his interest, advice and instruction during my graduate study. My gratitude goes to Drs. O. Mickelsen, D. Penner, S. Wellso, and C. Cress for their time, advice, and labo- ratory facilities essential for this study. For his advice and assistance, a special thanks is extended to Robert Luescher. The author also expresses thanks to Dr. C. M. Harrison for his help in the revision of the draft. I would like to thank Mr. Dick Kitchen for his help with technical aspects of this study. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . V LIST OF FIGURES. . . . . . . . . . . . . Vii Chapter INTRODUCTION 0 O O 0 o 0 O o o o o o o o 1 REVI EW OF LI TE RATURE O O O O O O O O O O O 4 Content and composition of nitrogenous substances. 4 Nutritive value of the nitrogen substances . . . 5 The effect of environment on nitrogen content and composition. . . . . . . 7 Nitrogen content as related to stage of growth. . 8 Effects of water. . . . . . . . 9 Effects of soil properties and fertilizer . . . 9 Effects of storage . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Effects of variety and location on nitrogen content . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 PART I. THE EFFECTS OF VARIETY AND LOCATION AND THEIR INTERACTION ON PROTEIN QUANTITY AND QUALITY INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 MATERIALS AND METHODS. . . . . . . . . . . 20 Determination of total protein . . . . . . . 21 Determination of "available" methionine . . . . 22 Determination of biological value of potato protein . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Discussion of S. zymogenes . . . . . . . . 24 Determination of net protein. . . . . . . 25 Determination of the relative quality of potato protein minus the effects of "available" methionine . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 iii Chapter Page RESULTS AND DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . 27 SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 PART II. PROTEIN QUALITY OF WHOLE POTATO FLOUR AND AIR CLASSIFIED FRACTIONS AS MEASURED BY RAT AND MICRO-BIOLOGICAL ASSAY INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 MATERIALS AND METHODS . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Preparation of whole flour . . . . . . . . . 39 Preparation of concentrate flour . . . . . . . 39 Preparation of diets . . . . . . . . . . . 40 Determination of protein quality . . . . . . . 42 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . 44 SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 LITERATURE CITED . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 APPENDICES Appendix 1. Environmental Data . . . . . . . . . . S3 2. Total Protein, "Available" Methionine, Biological Value, Relative Protein Quality and Total Dry Matter Data of 16 Varieties Grown in 10 Locations in 1971 . . . . . . . . . . 54 3. Total Proetin, "Available" methionine, Biological Value, Relative Protein Quality and Total Dry Matter Data of 8 Varieties in 4 Replications Grown in Michigan in 1972 . . . . . . . 61 4. Analysis of Variance for Available Methionine, Relative Protein Quality, Biological Value, Total Protein and Total Dry Matter . . . . 62 5. Amounts of Added Components Per 1 kg of Potato and Casein Diets . . . . . . . . . . 64 6. Protein Consumption, Weight Gain, NIB, and Percent Body Protein Data of Rat Assay . . . 65 iv Table 1. LIST OF TABLES Influence of increasing N rates on total solids, total protein and non—protein nitrogen . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effect of variety on nitrogen content and composition . . . . . . . . . . . . Effects of variety and location on dry matter, starch and protein content . . . . . . . Percent of total variance in methionine, total protein, and free N/total N contributed by years, locations, varieties and their interactions. . . . . . . . . . . . Effects of variety, location and year on dry matter, starch and protein content . . . . Composition of Rural potatoes as affected by cultural practices. . . . . . . . . . Expected mean squares, their degrees of freedom and F-ratios in the analysis of variance . . Percent contribution by variance components to the total variability in "available" methio- nine, total protein, total dry matter, BV and relative protein quality. . . . . . . . Correlations among "available" methionine, total protein (dry basis), total solids, BV, relative protein quality, total protein (fresh basis), "available” methionine/g dry matter and available methionine/g fresh weight (data from 16 varieties grown in 10 locations . . . . Page 12 14 15 16 17 18 22 28 30 Table Page 10. Mean value of varieties and locations for "available" methionine, relative protein quality, BV, total protein (dry basis), calculated net protein content and theoretical net protein content . . . . . 32 11. Composition of a 1 kg portion of whole potato flour and air-classified fractions derived from it . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 12. Composition of casein, whole, and high protein concentrate potato flours . . . . . . . 42 13. Means and ranges of rat responses as influenced by casein and potato diets. . . . . . . 44 14. Correlations among PER, NIB, protein consumed and weight gain . . . . . . . . . . 45 15. Micro-organism growth and rat responses on potato diets as a percent of casein. . . . 45 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Influence of available methionine and relative protein quality on BV (data from 16 varieties grown in 10 locations) . . . . . . . . 31 vii INTRODUCTION It is now recognized that in meeting world food demands, emphasis must be placed on increased crop pro- duction and yield, paralleled by increases in protein content and quality. The alleviation of food shortages and/or protein malnutrition by novel proteins, synthetic foods, amino acid supplementation and new crop introductions have been and will be of importance. However, due to the complexities of distribution, industrialization, governments and cultural backgrounds, progress in this area is inhibited. Though not exempt from deficiencies, the permanent improvement of quantity and quality through the genetic manipulation of crops, in combination with good cultural practices, more closely approach the principles of "putting the food where the mouths are" and maintaining self- sufficiency. Grown everywhere in the world where temperate climatic conditions exist, the potato has been a reliable food source for man and animal. Generally regarded as the "poor man's food," the nutritive value and potential of the potato in contributing to world food demands is often overlooked. Considered to be a good source of carbohydrate, the potato also contains protein ranging from 10% to 17% on a dry basis. Relative to other crop proteins Kuppuswamy (22 31., 1958) reported net protein utilization values of 70 for the potato, 60 for wheat, and 50 for corn. In relation to other crops the potato also ranks high in terms of protein yield per unit area of land. Methionine is the first amino acid which limits the quality of potato protein. Feeding potato diets to voles, Rios (1969) reported increased protein efficiency ratios when diets were supplemented with methionine. Kies and Fox (1972) found mean nitrogen balances of human subjects receiving a potato diet alone or supplemented with methio- nine to be -1.18 and -.27g N per day respectively. Analyzing 16 cultivars micro-biologically, Luescher (1972) found "available” methionine contents to be positively correlated with protein quality. Luescher (1971) found that genetic variability in "available" methionine does exist and later (1972) reported heritability estimates for this trait to range from 79% to 100%. In a breeding program, information regarding the effects of the environment on the trait under study is of prime importance. Since the phenotypic variance of a trait is composed of genetic and environmental variance, the identification and removal of environmental variances, (by sampling increased numbers of localities and/or years) will provide a better estimate of the true genotypic variance. To facilitate improvement of the potato, relation- ships among and variability of protein content, protein quality and "available" methionine as influenced by variety, location and variety-location interaction were studied. A preliminary study concerning the quality of a high protein by-product of the potato industry was con- ducted. Information concerning the comparability of micro- biological and rat evaluation of this material was also obtained. REVIEW OF LITERATURE Content and composition of nitrogenous substances The potato in its fresh state has an average of 2% crude protein, and may range from 10-17% on a dry basis. In identifying the nitrogenous components of the potato, Chick and Slack (1949) and Neuberger and Sanger (1942) found that of the total N of the potato, 89-93% can be extracted with a weak salt solution. Heat coagulation of this extract resulted in precipitation of the protein "tuberin" which accounted for 30-60% of the total soluble N. It was composed of two proteins, one being globulin in nature, retaining the name of tuberin, and the other tuberinin, having characteristics of albumin, in a ratio of 70/30 respectively. Differences in the content of the sulfur amino acids in tuberin from different genotypes were reported by Luescher (1972). The non-protein nitrogen, accounting for 40-70% of the soluble nitrogen, is composed of 20% free amino acids, 40% amides, and 40% basic nitrogen, these values also being subject to variation. Though the free amino acids contribute only 8-14% to the total amino acid pool, Mulder and Bakima (1956) found that free valine, methionine, phenylalanine, and tryptophane may contribute considerably to the total. Luescher (1972) found that 18% to 57% of the total methionine was composed of free methionine. The insoluble N accounting for 7-11% of the total N has been found to consist largely of protein and asparagixe. The high nitrogen content of the peel and outer cortex is due to this fraction, while an increasing concentration gradient of N from the vascular ring to the center is due to soluble nitrogen present in the cell sap (Neuberger and Sanger, 1942). Nutritive value of the nitrogen substances A 100 gram portion of whole raw potato contains approximately 20.2 g total solids consisting of 17.1 g carbohydrate, 2.1 g protein, .5 g fiber, .4 g salts and vitamins and .1 g fat. Approximately 76 calories are derived from this portion, 11% being protein calories. These values vary, depending on the variety and method of cooking (Watt and Merrill, 1963; Goldthwaite, 1925). Quality improvement of the potato protein would add to this very adequate food. Evidence strongly points out that methionine is the amino acid which limits the biologi- cal value of the potato protein (Williams, 1959). Kies and Fox (1972) found mean nitrogen balances of human subjects receiving a potato diet alone or plus methionine, phentla- lanine, leucine, or a combination of these amino acids to be -1.18, -.27, -.91, -.83, and -.30 g nitrogen per day respectively. No differences were found in the digestibi— lity of the potato protein as a result of amino acid supplementation. Studying the amino acid content of six strains of potatoes, Rios (1969) found that of all the essential amino acids, methionine had the lowest chemical score (as com- pared to whole egg). These values ranged from 19-31 for the varieties studied. Potato diets fed to voles resulted in significantly higher protein efficiency ratios for all varieties when supplemented with methionine. These high PER values were associated with a greater digestibility and utilization of the supplemented protein. Food intake was similar in both cases. Finding varietal responses both with and without supplementation, Rios concluded that those varieties giving high PER values were in better amino acid balance than other varieties. No relationship existed between nitrogen content and its ability to support growth. This was found to be true in the case of peas also (Bajaj gt 31., 1971). Luescher (1972) assessed the protein quality of 16 potato selections by measurement of the relative growth of micro-organisms. Significant and positive relationships existed between organism growth and methionine contents (r = .60). Also, increases in nitrogen content (dry basis) were positively correlated (r = .63) with non protein nitrogen (as a percent of the total nitrogen) and negatively correlated (r = -.41) with organism growth. In the same study he found the heritability of available methionine to range from 79% to 94%. Factors other than the relative proportions of protein N and NPN seem to influence the nutritive value of the potato as indicated by Chick and Slack (1949). Separating the protein and NPN from the soluble nitrogen, they found that growth of weanling rats could be supported by feeding the protein fraction alone, but not when the NPN fraction was fed alone. However when fed a diet consisting of unaltered soluble N which contained both the protein and NPN fractions, rats gained weight to the same extent as those whose diet contained the same content of nitrogen from the protein alone. Protein efficiency ratio values for the protein diet and the total soluble N diet were 1.54 and 1.52 respectively. The fact that the total soluble N is digested to a greater extent than the protein N may in part explain this occurrence. In this same study, potatoes fed without the periderm and outer cortex resulted in higher food intakes, N digestibility and weight increases than when fed whole. This is of interest since the major portion of the insoluble N is contained in the periderm and outer cortex. The effect of environment on nitrogen content and composition The content of dry matter in the tuber as well as the relative amounts of the constituents in the dry matter are subject to varietal and environmental influences. Starch normally constitutes 60-80% of the dry matter, while nitroqen, sugars, fat, fiber, and ash account for the remainder. In many cases, the amounts of these latter components have been found to be so consistent that the percentage of starch has been calculated by subtracting a constant from the percentage of dry matter present (Burton, 1966). Marcher (quoted from Burton, 1966) found a constant of 5.8 to give an approximation of starch while Goldthwaite (1925) found this value to be 6.7 for irrigated Coloradc potatoes. Values obtained by other workers for particular lots of potatoes ranged from 2.3-11. Heinze (1955) found an inverse relationship between dry matter and the proportion of nitrogen in the dry matter (n = -.69). Similarly, Cobb (1935) found values which ranged from .321% N in fresh tubers containing 22% dry matter to .332% N in tubers containing 19% dry matter. Thus, on a fresh weight basis, N content becomes more similar. Nitrogen content as related to stage of growth Studying variations in N content during growth of one variety, Fagen (1925) found that potatoes planted in April and sampled in June had a dry matter content of 17.4% and gradually increased to 22.2% in October. N expressed as a percent of the dry weight and protein N as a percent of the total N decreased from 1.49% and 46% in June to 1.06% and 50% in August and again increased 1.35% and 57% in October. Similar results were obtained for the next year. In this case, immature tubers contained more N on a dry basis than mature tubers. On a fresh basis however the highest total N and protein N contents were found in mature tubers. De and Singh (1959) reported similar results. The variety studied decreased in N content from 2.17% at 47 days after planting to 1.19% after 99 days. Willaman and West (1922) reported that early varieties had a higher nitrogen content than later varieties. Effects of water Growing the same varieties in both irrigated and non-irrigated plots, Metzger (35 31., 1937) found that non- irrigated plots had 8% less dry matter, 10% less starch, 2% less fiber, 7% more ash and subsequently 13% more N than irrigated plots. Similarly, Goldthwaite (1923) found that dryland potatoes contained 15% more N and 10% less starch than irrigated potatoes. No marked difference was noted in dry matter content. Effects of soil properties and fertilizer The composition of potatoes as affected by ferti- lizer applications has been a subject of extensive study. The direct affect of applied fertilizer may be obscured by variables such as previous cropping history, soil type and its nutrient status, weather conditions, variety, and numerous interactions. Schippers (1968) found dry matter 10 content of the four varieties studied to be inversely related to increasing K rates when applied in the form of sulfate. Dunn and Rost (1948) found lower dry matter contents in tubers grown in KCL plots than in tubers grown in K2804 plots. Increasing rates of KCL were associated with increased water contents. The same authors demonstrated that responses to P and K, in terms of dry matter and N contents, are variable in nature and influenced by chemical and physical properties of the soil. Several varieties grown on a "potentially" high or low yield soil, treated with identical rates of P and K alone and in combination were compared to those plots receiving no fertilizer. P applied to the heavy soils decreased the percentage N on a per tuber basis but in- creased total N accumulation (unit area basis) as a result of an increase in dry matter content (per tuber basis). K on the other hand decreased dry matter and N. P and K in combination decreased dry matter and N content but increased N accumulation as a result of increased dry matter pro- duction. It was concluded that initially these soils contained K at sufficient levels. P and K applied alone on the low yield soils had no effect on dry matter content, decreased N content, and increased N accumulation, the latter being a result of an increase in dry matter production. P and K in combination decreased dry matter and N content but increased N 11 accumulation for the same reason as above. It was concluded that these soils were deficient in P and K. Average values for the heavy soil were 20.7% dry matter content, 11.1% crude protein content, and 346 lb crude protein/acre while for the light soil these values were 22.3%, 9.8%, and 279 1b respectively. N content as a percent of the dry matter tended to be higher in all check plots. This agrees with Mulder and Bakima (1956) in that P and K generally decrease total N on a dry weight basis. In contrast to the effects of P and K, increasing nitrogen fertilization tends to increase N content on a dry basis. This may be due to a decreased dry matter content and/or increased accumulation of N in the tuber. De and Singh (1959) reported N contents of the variety studied to increase with N fertilization, average values being 1.04%, 1.19%, 1.09%, and 1.18% at 0, 75, 150, and 225 1b N/acre. Highest yields, on a fresh basis, were found at the 75 lb rate. Higher rates resulted in decreased yields, more vigorous top growth, delayed tuber initation and tuber rot. Murphy and Goven (1959) found that over a period of 13 years tubers of three varieties treated with 60 lb N/acre/year had 18% more dry matter than the same varieties treated with 210 1b N. Schippers (1968) reported both linear and optimum responses with increased N in the four varieties he studied. Table 1 shows the effects of increasing N rates on the variety Superior as reported by Wilcox and Hoff (1970). 12 Table l.—-Inf1uence of increasing N rates on total solids, total protein and non-protein nitrogen. N rate % Dry % Total Dry matter Total (lb/acre) matter protein production protein (DW) (lbs/acre) (lbs/acre) 36 22.4 9.5 7930 307 111 21.6 10.9 8964 401 186 21.3 11.5 8989 434 336 21.3 12.9 8840 479 In the analysis of the non-protein nitrogen fraction, Hoff (23 31., 1971) found that the free amino acid pool doubled when the rate of N was increased from 36 lbs to 336 lbs, 62% of the increase occurring with the first increment of N. A5partic and glutamic acids and their corresponding amides constituted the bulk of the pool and increased from 55% to 65% with increasing N rates. Free methionine in- creased 1.4 times at the highest N rate but its relative proportion in the pool decreased from 2.2% to 1.6%. Free methionine expressed as a percent of the total N increased from .619% to .659% with the second increment, further increasing to .741% and then decreasing to .619% with the fourth increment. Mulder and Bakima (1956) concluded that the effect of mineral nutrition on the amino acid content works mainly through the protein content of the tuber. The N composition of tubers grown in soils poor in N, P, K, and magnesium, fertilized with the deficient element was found to respond in a consistent manner. Responses to P, K, and Mg are 13 similar to those at low levels of N fertilization. The higher N rate resulted in tubers having higher N contents, lower protein/total N ratios and higher amide N/non-protein N ratios. Conversely the higher rate of P, K, and Mg resulted in lower N contents, higher protein/total N ratios, and lower amide N/non-protein N ratios. Amino acid analy- sis indicated no difference in composition of the amino acids in the protein, but considerable variability existed in the composition of the non-protein N fraction primarily due to the amide N. Thus no correlation existed between the amino acid composition of the protein and that of the non-protein fraction. Effects of storage Separating a sample of Katahadin tubers into high, intermediate and low specific gravity classes and storing them for nine months at 38 F, Talley (gt 31., 1961) con- cluded that regardless of the specific gravity class, the N constituents were affected the same. In each class, N content increased with a progressive decrease in dry matter amounting to 7% at the end of the storage period. The ratio protein N: total N also decreased 17% over the entire period. Later (1964) he found an inverse relation- ship to exist between dry matter and free amino acids within any one Specific gravity class over the storage period. When calculated on a fresh basis this relationship was less evident. 14 Effects of variety and location on nitrogen content Neuberger and Sanger (1942) found wide differences in the dry matter and composition of 11 varieties grown in the same field in one year. Table 2 contains those varie— ties representative of the extremes of each characteristic, being ranked on the basis of N content. Table 2.--Effect of variety on nitrogen content and composition. Protein N as % N % N a percent of Variety (DW) (FW) total N % Dry matter Redskin 1.95 .319 37.5 16.37 Arran Banner 1.65 .314 37.0 18.99 Keer's Pink 1.48 .238 58.0 16.82 Golden Wonder 1.38 .305 63.7 21.96 Dunbar Std. 1.16 .236 44.9 20.37 In the analysis of 12 varieties grown in the same field under similar conditions Mulder and Bakima (1956) found total N on a dry basis to range from 1.22-1.97% while the proportion of protein N remained consistent regardless of N content. Nash's data (1941) indicated variety x location interaction for the components studied in eight varieties all grown in three diverse locations in a one year period. Varieties containing the highest and lowest concentrations of N on a dry basis tended to be associated with low and high dry matter contents which in turn were associated with low and high starch contents. Higher proportions of 15 protein N to be associated with those varieties containing lower N contents on a dry basis. On a fresh basis, those varieties containing higher dry matter tended to contain more protein N than those varieties containing lesser amounts of dry matter. Location-wise, opposite effects were noted. Higher proportions of protein N and total N on a dry basis were associated with those locations producing high dry matter tubers. Table 3.--Effects of variety and location on dry matter, starch and protein content (data from Nash, (1941)). Protein N as % N a percent of % Starch Variety (DW) total N % Dry matter (DW) Earline 1.76 58.1 19.25 70.5 Katahdin 1.72 65.6 21.48 73.6 Chippewa 1.70 58.9 18.30 71.9 Warba 1.67 60.2 20.68 75.2 Sebago 1.63 70.7 21.38 72.5 Cobbler 1.53 69.5 21.05 73.2 Green Mt. 1.41 68.4 23.73 75.2 Houma 1.38 66.8 21.93 77.1 Locationa I 1.75 68.6 22.14 75.9 II 1.62 68.6 22.88 73.8 III 1.52 58.7 18.67 71.4 a Silt loam, II Silt loam, III In a similar investigation over a period of three years, Talley (g£_gl., 1970) found that varieties, locations, years, and their interactions all contributed in 16 varying degrees to the total variability in free methionine, total protein and free nitrogen (Table 4). Table 4.--Percent of total variance in methionine, total protein, and free N/total N contributed by years, locations, varieties and their interactions. % Total protein Free Source DF Methioninea (DW) N/total N Replication 1 .3 0.0 0.0 Years 2 9.6 0.0 0.9 Locations 5 8.2 32.6 5.0 Varieties 4 29.0 0.0 31.4 Y x L 10 17.0 15.8 9.2 Y x V 8 2.1 7.6 0.1 L x V 20 8.6 12.3 10.0 Y x L x V 40 11.7 22.0 15.7 Residual 83 13.7 9.7 28.0 aMicromoles free methionine/l g dry matter. Metzger (g£_al., 1937) in studying the composition of the potato found that protein, total solids and starch content differed significantly between varieties, locations and years (Table 5). He did not give reference to inter- action. Eliminating climatogical differences, Goldthwaite (1925) reported compositional differences of tubers of the variety Rural grown by different growers in one specific locality. Her results are reported in Table 6. Making over 5,000 determinations on 12 varieties of potatoes grown under diverse environments she concluded that there is no definite percentage composition of any Table 5.-—Effects of variety, matter, starch and protein content (data from Metzger (33 31., 1937)). 17 location and year on dry .__ Variety % Protein (DW) % Dry matter % Starch (DW) Triumph 11.39 20.45 64.9 Cobbler 10.50 20.01 77.4 Katahdin 9.90 21.82 69.1 Peachblow 9.77 23.13 72.2 Locationa I” 11.22 20.04 65.8 II 10.37 24.32 74.1 III 10.29 21.87 70.6 IV 10.25 20.79 68.9 V 9.24 23.37 71.6 Year 1936 10.70 22.05 69.0 1934b 10.34 20.89 72.5 1935 9.75 23.29 69.9 aCommercial locations within Colorado. bDescribed as arid. 18 Table 6.—-Composition of Rural potatoes as affected by cultural practices. — -— w:- % Protein Grower (DW) % Dry matter % Starch (DW) % Ash (DW) I 12.86 22.40 68.0 4.10 II 10.20 20.98 70.5 4.69 III 8.91 20.59 73.3 4.57 variety but when compared between growers or locations, varietal differences do indeed exist. PART I THE EFFECTS OF VARIETY AND LOCATION AND THEIR INTERACTION ON PROTEIN QUANTITY AND QUALITY INTRODUCTION The effects of variety and location on total protein has been reported on by Talley (eg 21., 1970), Goldthwaite (1925), Metzger (EE.21°' 1937), Nash (1941), and Neuberger and Sanger (1942). Luescher (1972) in analyzing numerous selections, related the composition and contents of protein and non-protein nitrogen fractions and available methionine contents to protein quality. He and others (Kies and Fox, 1972; Rios, 1969; Williams, 1959) have demonstrated that methionine is the first limiting amino acid of potato protein. In the same study he reported heritabilities of available methionine to range from 79% to 100%. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of variety, location and their interaction on total protein, available methionine, and protein quality. 19 MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixteen varieties of potatoes, all included in the North Central Regional trials of 1971 were selected for this study. The varieties 36097-9, Neb. 1.57, Norland, Cobbler, ND6925-13, N07196-18, Red Pontiac, W629, B6024-3, B6139-11, 86116-18, La22-111, N49.62-5, N93.55-16, ND6993-13, and W634 each from a common seed source were grown at experiment stations in North Dakota, Kansas, Nebraska, Wisconsin, Missouri, Louisiana, Michigan, Ohio, and two locations in Indiana. General environmental data for each of these locations are described in Appendix 1. At or shortly after the respective harvest date, five tubers of each variety were randomly selected and sent to Michigan State University. Upon arrival, the specific gravity (Appendix 2) of each five tuber sample was deter— mined by the weight in air-weight in water method (Isleib and Thompson, 1957). Four longitudinal slices were cut from the middle of each of the five tubers, quick frozen, com- posited, and freeze dried. Dried samples were ground to to mesh in a Wiley Mill and stored in screw cap bottles. 20 21 To estimate the magnitude of variability contri- buted by locations and the variety--1ocation interaction, mean squares were estimated for replication and variety x replication within location from a similar but smaller set of data (Table 7). This data consisted of a five tuber sample from each of four replications of the first eight above mentioned varieties grown in Michigan in 1972 and were analyzed in the same way as samples from the unrepli- cated experiment. Use of these estimates is based on the assumption that these mean squares are similar for all varieties grown in all locations in 1971. The denominator mean square used to perform the F-test for locations was derived from Satterthwaite (1946) where: Xi V2 L = (MS - MSS) + MS 4 3 and where the degrees of freedom associated with L is: _ L2 V“ 2 2 (VI/V2 x M84) + (M83) /df3 4 where df3 and df4.are the degrees of freedom associated with their reSpective mean squares. Determination of total protein Total protein (N x 6.25) was determined by the semi-micro Kjeldahl method described by Henwood and Gary. 22 Table 7.--Expected mean squares, their degrees of freedom and F-ratios in the analysis of variance. Source df MS EMS F-ratio Location 9 1 02 + r02 + 02 + rv 02L MS /L VR(L) LV v1 R(L) l 1 Variet 15 2 02 + r02 + r02 MS /MS y vaun LY v 2 3 V x L 127 3 02 + :02 MS /MS VRUJ LV 3 5 Rep. 2 2 (M1ch.) 3 4 O VR(L) + v20 R(L) MS4/MS5 V x R (M1ch.) 21 5 O Determinations were made in duplicate and repeated if they differed by more than 3%. Protein values reported in Appendix 2 are adjusted to zero moisture for easier con- version to a fresh weight basis. Determination of "available" methionine The method of Luescher (1971) was adapted for the determination of "available" methionine.1 Samples were weighed to contain an equivalent of 50 mg (N x 6.25). After weighted samples were placed into 4 oz. screw cap bottles, 20 m1 of citrate cyanide buffer was added. The pH was 1Methionine in an enzymayic digest which is avail- able to‘g. zymogenes as measured by growth determined on a methionine stan ar . 23 adjusted to 7.2 with N KOH and the container placed into a water bath at 56 C. Two m1 of 4% W/V crude papain in citrate cyanide buffer at pH 7.2 was added and incubated with intermittent shaking for 3 hours at 56 C. The pH of the digests was adjusted to 7.2, filtered, and diluted to 100 ml with distilled water. Triplicate portions of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 m1 of the standard methionine (5 ug l- met/ml) were distributed into 16 x 150 mm test tubes. Duplicate 2 m1 portions of each sample were pipetted into the same sized test tubes. Two m1 of basal media and 1 m1 of the amino acid supplement were added to each test tube and brought to a final volume of 11 ml with distilled water. After capping each tube, samples were sterilized with flowing steam for 12 min. and then cooled. One drop of inoculum culture (g. gymogenes) diluted 1:10 with .85% saline solution was added and incubated at 37 C for 48 hours. After incubation, tubes were heated in flowing steam for 10 min., stoppered and shaken vigorously, and set aside for 30 seconds. The optical densities of the cultures were then measured with a Hitachi Perkin-Elmer 139 UV-VIS spectrophotometer (flow through cell) at 580 mu. The above analysis was repeated again on a different day. Determination of biological value of potato_protein The method used to determine the biological value of the potato samples is the same as that used in the 24 determination of "available" methionine, except that the amino acid supplement was omitted from the samples. Triplicate portions of 2 and 4 m1 of the papain digest containing 50 mg casein protein/100 ml digest (prepared in the same manner as sample digests) were distributed in 16 x 150 mm test tubes. Two m1 of basal medium was added and the final volume brought up to 10 ml with distilled water. Duplicate 2 and 4 m1 portions of potato sample digest were treated in the same way. The average growth response of the standard casein growth cultures were determined at each concentration. Culture growth in the potato samples as a proportion of the standard casein culture was a measure of the biological value of the potato nitrogen (Appendix 2). Optical density values were determined at 580 mu. The above analysis was repeated again on a different day. Discussion of S. zymogenes _S. zymogenes has an absolute requirement for exogenous lucine, methionine, tryptophane, isoleucine, arginine, histidine, valine, and glutamic acid, the first four amino acids being essential to man. It is powerfully proteolytic and grows quickly with an adequate intact protein as the main source of nitrogen (Ford, 1960). While chemical hydrolysis may cause destruction or unavailability of certain amino acids, or cause destruction of inhibitory substances, enzymatic digestion permits measurement of the 25 available amino acids which may be more indicative of con- ditions in "vivo" (Evans and Butts, 1948). Determination of netgprotein With the exception of sample weight, the average net protein content for each variety and location was determined by the biological value method. After drying, 1 g. of each sample, representing a variety and location, was composited by variety and by location. Digests con— taining 400 mg. of the composited sample were then carried through the same procedure as in the biological value analy- sis. Average sample culture growth as a proportion of the average standard casein culture growth (50 mg casein/100 m1 digest) was a measure of the protein contained in the potato sample which is equivalent to the same amount of casein protein. Net protein per lg of dry matter is calculated as: Absorbance of Sample Growth Absorbance of Std. Casein Growth X 50 mg caseln X 2'5 Determination of the relative uality‘ofgpotatogprotein minus the effects of "available methionine The relative quality of the potato protein minus the effects of available methionine was determined by dividing the average growth of S. zymogenes in the methio- nine analysis by the average growth in the biological value analysis utilizing two m1 concentrations only. As a result of using the same digest in both analyses, the same 26 concentration of methionine was present in each set of tubes. Therefore the greater growth responses of cultures used in the methionine assay are assumed to be a result of the supplemented amino acids present in optimum amounts. Less growth of cultures used in the biological value assay is due to a less than optimum amino acid balance, therefore it is assumed that the magnitude of the difference between the absorbance readings of these two analyses (for each sample) is indicative of the degree of quality of the nitrogen constituents minus the effect of "available" methionine. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Contribution by varieties and location to the total variability in "available" methionine, total protein, total dry matter, BV and relative protein quality was found to be significant. The variety-location interaction also contri- buted significantly to all those variables except relative protein quality (Appendix 4). Thus variety and location means (Table 9) and the observations contributing to them can be placed into high, intermediate and low classes with overlapping of observations between adjacent classes but rarely between the extreme classes (Appendix 2). The variability due to variety, location, variety-location interaction and error, expressed as a percentage of the total variability for each of the above variables, are reported in Table 8. Average values of the eight varieties grown in Michigan over a two year period are reported in Appendix 3. Aside from several weak trends, the parameters included in the environmental data could not be related to differences within varieties grown over all locations (Appendix 2). Specific gravity was highest in those 27 28 Table 8.--Percent contribution by variance components to the total variability in "available" methionine, total protein, total dry matter, BV and relative protein quality. Relative Source of Dry Total protein "Available" variability matter protein BV quality Methionine 02 location 42.5 46.7 34.2 58.4 31.5 02 variety 27.7 20.1 17.8 22.6 42.8 02 var x 10C 16.0 17.2 35.5 8.0 13.2 02 rep (10C) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 02 error 13.8 16.0 12.5 11.0 12.5 potatoes grown in locations described as having optimum growing conditions (North Dakota, Wisconsin, Nebraska) and lowest in Indiana mineral soil, where high temperatures prevailed, Indiana muck, were 300 lb KCL/acre was applied and in Louisiana where poor drainage existed. In Michigan, a very high rate of nitrogen application was associated with high total protein and available methionine contents and a low BV of the contained protein. Potatoes prOduced in Indiana muck expressed the greatest range in BV, available methionine and protein content while potatoes from Missouri ranged least in these variables. The greatest range in relative protein quality was expressed in potatoes from Michigan and North Dakota while potatoes from Louisiana ranged least in this variable. 29 The variety La 22-111 was outstanding in that it expressed the greatest range in each of the above mentioned variables. The variety Neb 1.57-1 expressed the least range in BV and relative protein quality while the varie- ties ND 6993 and B 6139-11 expressed the least range in "available" methionine content and protein content respectively. Considered individually, little relationship existed between BV and "available" methionine and BV and relative protein quality (Table 9), but when considered in com- bination, the influence of these variables on BV becomes more meaningful. When all observations were allocated into classes having high, intermediate, and low relative protein qualities and "available" methionine contents (independent of variety or location), an increasing gradient in BV was observed with increases in these variables (Figure 1). Based on this relationship, differences among mean bio- logical values (Table 10) can be better explained. A low relative protein quality, indicative of a poor amino acid balance, depressed the benefit of higher "available" methionine contents. Similarly, the benefit of a high relative protein quality, indicative of a better amino acid balance was depressed by low methionine contents. While an increased relative protein quality or a higher methionine content would increase the BV, greater responses would be expected when the most limiting component is upgraded. The relationship between relative protein 30 Table 9.--Correlations among "available" methionine, total protein (dry basis), total solids, BV, relative protein quality, total protein (fresh basis), "available" methionine/g dry matter and available methionine/g fresh weight (data from 16 varieties grown in 10 locations). 2 e -r-'I A .2 8%. a a or. "45 v -8 :20 ‘510 c u e u o~ 0". 'H m O>1 -H’- 0\ E‘\ m 'o H p m - E u «IJ u «4 CL-H 4"; 9’ o o o .4 r4 0 0 E .4 E H o o m u .4 .8 04 U) >25 04.1: at? 61 -a 0' m s HE H H 4.) H0 r-l -a m m m a u -H 8 8 8 e .. 82: e 4 B B m A a e "Available" methionine mg met/16 mgN 1.00 Total protein (DB) .11 1.00 Total solids -.14 -.44** 1.00 BV .37** -.28** -.21** 1.00 Relative pro- tein quality -.77** -.26** -.02 .26** 1.00 Total protein (F8) -.01 .62** -.02 -.07 —.28** 1.00 "Available" methionine ug met/g DM .75** .73** -.08 .09 -.72** .42** 1.00 "Available" methionine ug met/g FW .71** .52** -.18** -.O6 -.77** .69** .84** *significant at P = .05. **significant at P .01. 31 BV and relative protein quality co. 1 ca. . .AmGOAumooH oa ca csoum mmwumflnm> ma Scum mumov muaamso cflopoum m>wuwamu one mchoHnumE maanHm>m mo menopamcH .H madman ocficofieeos oumfipoasopcfi ocfl:0fi£poe 30H onwcofleuoe Ame: .e. .. n .1 .. .... l . 1H 1.... . e .1. . u . r .L ”In... .. I e . . r... u .1 . e. em .a n We ........ Tl . .8. .ll . .3. v... Fl ...v m. ..,...r w m“. . Jammy. an. rlll- [ e... .n r e g ocficofifioa manager/4. U v.0...“ i [.l .5293 5530.5 Passage I >m E0 sc.H ue.H euruotqiam GIQB[IBAB Table lO.-Mean values of varieties and locations for ”available” methionine, relative protein 32 quality, BV, total protein (dry basis), calculated net protein content and theoretical net protein content. . a "Calculated" "Theoretical"b mg met/ Relative protein % Protein mg net protein/g mg net protein/g Variety 16 mg N quality BV (DW) dry matter dry matter ND 7196-18 1.16 .490 .66 11.5 81 77 Neb 1.57-1 1.25 .490 .68 13.4 91 92 N 629 1.27 .488 .69 13.9 94 96 N 49.62-5 1.36 .459 .68 12.7 90 88 N 93.55-16 1.23 .455 .63 12.0 73 75 cobbler 1.55 .459 .73 11.2 80 82 B 6024-3 1.41 .452 .69 13.1 91 90 Norland 1.51 .439 .69 14.0 94 96 D 6139-11 1.54 .435 .70 10.9 76 76 Red Pontiac 1.61 .435 .72 12.7 93 91 W 634 1.54 .427 .69 12.3 84 84 8 6097-9 1.63 .429 .72 11.5 84 86 ND 6993-13 1.55 .418 .68 12.7 86 87 La 22-111 1.64 .422 .71 13.6 94 97 ND 6925-13 1.63 .418 .70 13.1 90 92 3 6116-18 1.71 .413 .71 13.3 95 95 Location Ind. Mineral 1.20 .518 71 13.3 95 94 Missouri 1.35 .469 68 12.8 89 87 Nebraska 1.38 .472 71 12.0 86 85 Ind.-Muck 1.49 .459 72 12.6 93 89 N. Dakota 1.38 .444 67 10.9 79 73 Louisiana 1.52 .461 75 12.6 93 94 Wisconsin 1.47 .422 66 11.9 84 80 Kansas 1.59 .435 71 11.1 81 78 Ohio 1.64 .418 70 14.8 100 104 Michigan 1.66 .376 64 14.8 95 94 aRelative protein quality - l/ b averaged). absorbance methionine assay absorbance BV assay/1.1 Theoretical net protein - BV x % protein (calculated for each observation and 33 quality and "available" methionine (r = -.77) suggests difficulty in developing a variety with such an optimum balance, however the variety Cobbler approaches this. Though the magnitude of the relative protein quality was indicative of amino acid balance, factors influencing it were not identified in this study. In discussing the cause of variation in "available" methionine in potato protein, Luescher (1972) reported that free methionine was highly correlated with available methionine (r = .96) and accounted for 93% of the total variability in "available" methionine contents. While free methionine tended to increase with increasing non-protein N contents (r = .30), the EV of the non-protein N decreased as non-protein N contents increased (r = -.96) the latter also increasing as total protein increased (r = .63). A correlation of (r = -.69) between the EV of the total protein and total protein content was also found. These trends indicate that as non-protein N in- creases, the amino acid composition becomes less balanced. In regards to the study of Mulder and Bakima (1956, this lack of balance may be due in part to increasing amide/non- protein N ratios. If the above is considered in this study, then the observed negative correlations between the relative protein quality and total protein (r = -.26) and BV and total protein (r = 0.28) are logical. However, varieties (N 1.57-1 and W 629) and locations (Indiana muck) can be 34 identified as having both a high total protein content and a high relative protein quality. In these cases an increase in "available" methionine would seemingly increase the BV of the protein also resulting in an increased net protein content. The calculated net protein contents of composited samples by variety and location were within the range of theoretical net protein contents (Table 10). Thus it can be assumed that for any one sample, the net protein content can be calculated by obtaining the product of BV and total protein content. It follows that potatoes, of a variety or from a location, having a high BV will not necessarily contain high amounts of net protein due to differences in total protein content. From a nutritional point of View a potato containing large quantities of protein high in BV is to be desired but from a breeding point of view, difficulty in developing a variety with such a combination (both on a dry and fresh basis) is suggested from inverse relationships occurring among the involved factors. In a breeding program for improved protein quality, the variation due to varieties, and the environment in which they are grown and the possible variety-environment interactions must be considered. Based on this study, all of these factors contributed in varying degrees to quality and quantity components. 35 Due to the diversity of the environments in which these varieties were grown, it is not surprising that environmental data could not be related to locational differences in protein quality and quantity. Thus the nutrient availability of the soils and environmental factors influencing nutrient accumulation and its distribution 1n the tuber become important. Equally important is the fact that varietal differ- ences exist in protein quality and quantity and that accumulation and distribution of nitrogenous constituents as influenced by variety are subject to variation due to environmental influences. The fact that some varieties do not respond in a consistent manner relative to other varieties when grown over different locations should also be considered. Since locations dictate to a great extent the relative protein quality and available methionine contents, selection of parents and offspring for improved protein quality should be conducted where cultural methods are representative of the area of production and should be based on upgrading the methionine content and/or relative protein quality. Identification of factors influencing the latter merits further study. The fact that large differences in quantity and quality factors were detected among genotypes grown in diverse locations is significant in that a great potential 36 exists for improvement of these factors through breeding. If the variety-year interaction is small, gain within any one location would be actual. SUMMA RY Variability due to variety, location of growth and their interaction contributed in varying degrees to the total variability found in total protein and "available" methionine contents, relative protein quality and BV of the protein of 16 potato varieties grown in 10 state locations. Environmental data could not be related to noted differences between locations for any one variable. Relationships among the above variables in addition to net protein contents are discussed. Based on these relationships, both an increase in ”available" methionine content and the relative protein quality should be con- sidered in a breeding program aimed at improving the utilization of potato protein. Ultimately, a potato con- taining high amounts of total protein of high quality should be sought. Due to environmental influences, it is sug— gested that such a program be confined to a locality representative of the area of production. 37 PART II PROTEIN QUALITY OF WHOLE POTATO FLOUR AND AIR CLASSIFIED FRACTIONS AS MEASURED BY RAT AND MICRO-BIOLOGICAL ASSAY INTRODUCTION Chick and Slack (1949) studied potato protein quality of the total protein and various fractions of it as measured by rat assay, however a standard was not utilized. Rios (1969) found varietal differences in potato protein quality as measured by vole assays and concluded that supplemented methionine increased the quality of the protein. Shaw and Shewy (1972) reported on the production of potato starch utilizing air classification and thus collecting a solid, high protein by-product. Though feeding experiments were not conducted, they suggested the possible use of this by-product as a feed supplement. The purpose of this study is to: (a) compare the protein quality of air-classified potato flour to that of unaltered whole flour; (b) determine the quality of the potato protein relative to casein; and (c) compare protein quality as determined by rat assay to protein quality as determined by micro-biological assay. 38 m0 tc f1 we re s] MATERIALS AND METHODS The cultivar Merrimack 58, previously stored for 4 months at 45 F was selected for this study. The average total solids and crude protein content of this lot was found to be 21.6% and 3% (fresh weight) respectively. Preparation of whole flour Approximately 18 kg of large and small washed tubers were autoclaved at 15 p.s.i. for 15 and 10 minutes respectively. After removing the periderm, tubers were sliced, quick frozen and freeze-dried. This material was then milled to 30 mesh and stored in plastic bags at -10 C. Preparation of concentrate flour Approximately 23 kg of tubers were washed, lightly peeled, sliced, quick frozen and freeze-dried. This material was milled to 30 mesh, dried at 30 C and classified utilizing the Walther laboratory air classifier. Air classification yielded two fractions, namely, a fine fraction containing cell wall material and small starch grains, and a coarse fraction containing small amounts of cell wall material and large amounts of medium and large 39 40 starch grains. It was necessary to reclassify the coarse fraction in order to obtain maximum yields of crude protein in the fine fraction. Periderm material was largely un- millable as evidenced by large amounts of periderm residue within the mill after a milling operation. Aside from periderm losses the efficiency of the operation, as reflected by the composition of the whole flour and air-classified fractions derived from it, are .reported in Table 11. Table 11.--Composition of a 1 kg portion of whole potato flour and air-classified fractions derived from it. Protein as a Grams Grams percent of dry total initial total Percent Component matter protein protein moisture Whole flour 1000 131.9 5.0 Fine fraction 292 91.5 69.5 5.0 Coarse fraction 678 33.6 25.5 5.0 Preparation of diets In a preliminary study, weanling rats fed the raw concentrate at a level of 9% protein for a period of 5 days, barely maintained their initial weight. It was noted that food consumption was very low, but when fed the con- centrate in a cooked form, feed intake and weight gain resumed to normal levels. It was noted that the uncooked 41 version had a very sharp bitter taste which disappeared after cooking. Also the adverse effects of feeding larger sized starch grains, characteristic of potato starch, were considered (Harper, 1971; Morrison, 1936). Thus before incorporation into the diets, it was necessary that both the whole and concentrate flours be cooked. Due to the destruction of physical properties upon cooking, air classification of whole cooked flour is not possible. Therefore it was necessary that the concentrate be cooked after air classification. This was done by adding the concentrate to boiling water in a ratio of 1:4 and heating over an open flame for 7 minutes. The resulting smooth paste was then freeze-dried and milled to 30 mesh. With slight modifications, diets were made up in accordance with AOAC (1970). The whole and concentrate potato flours and casein were analyzed for nitrogen (Henwood and Gary) and moisture content prior to incorporation into the diets (Table 12). So that all diets contained calories derived from potato starch, commercial potato starch was added in necessary amounts to the concentrate flour and casein diets to equal that present in the whole flour diet. Before addition to the diets, the starch was gelatinized, dried and milled to pass a 35 mesh sieve. The amounts of added components and final composition of the diets are reported in Appendix 5. Small differences in caloric values are due to the crude fiber in the potato diets. 42 Table 12.--Composition of casein, whole, and high protein concentrate potato flours. % a % % % % % Starch Protein Ashb Watera Fiberb Fatb + sugarC Whole flour 13.10 3.70 7.0 1.60 .8 73.80 Fine d fraction 32.93 3.70 5.0 5.25 .8 52.32 Casein 87.00 .71 9.6 -0- 1.2 1.40 aAverage of six determinations: Protein = Kjeldahl N x 6.25. bApproximate values; Watt and Merrill, 1963. cEstimated by assuming all nitrogen is protein in nature and substracting values of other components from 100. dCrude fiber expected to increase 3.3 fold since fine fraction contains 30% of initial dry matter and major portion of cell wall material. Determination of proteinuguality Protein efficiency ratios (PER) and nitrogen incor— poration efficiencies (NIE) (Stucki and Harper, 1962) were used to evaluate the quality of the test diets as compared to casein, where: PER = Weight gain (g)/g (N x 6.25) consumed and N retained in carcass x 199 NIE = N consumed 43 For three days before starting the test diets, 21 day old male Sprague Dawley rats were fed a starter diet. At the end of this period, 10 rats were assigned to each of four groups such that the range in weight of any one group was not greater than 11 g while mean weights between groups did not vary by more than .49. Food and water was provided 29.112.t° three of these groups while the fourth group was killed (body composition controls). The weighed carcass (minus the gastrointestinal contents) of each of these rats was autoclaved, homogenized, and diluted to a final volume of 1400 ml. with distilled water. Duplicate 50 m1 portions of the homogenate were predigested with an equal volume of concentrated sulfuric acid and after cooling brought up to a final volume of 100 ml with distilled water. Duplicate 2 m1 portions of each predigest were then analyzed for total nitrogen. The remaining rats were killed at the end of a 26 day period and the carcasses treated in the same manner. The nitrogen retention was calculated as the body nitrogen content of the test animals minus that in the body compo- sition controls. The method used in this study to determine protein quality as measured by enzymatic digestion and micro- biological techniques is the same as in Part I of this thesis. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Results of this study are presented in Tables 13, 14, and 15. Raw observations are reported in Appendix 6. Table 13.--Means and ranges of rat responses as influenced by casein and potato diets. Meansa and Diet Variable Their S.D. Range Whole flour 2.34a : .21 2.10 2.73 Concentrate PER 2.23a i .12 2.05 2.40 Casein 3.02b i_.22 2.71 3.29 Whole flour .436a : .046 .358 .488 Concentrate NIE .434a :_.041 .354 .498 Casein .587b i .042 .535 .662 Whole flour 32.0a ‘1 3.8 27.5 38.4 Concentrate Protein 31.4a : 4.2 25.3 39.2 Casein Consumed (g) 35.3a 1’3.5 30.8 40.7 Whole flour 75.0a ‘1 12.2 63.0 99.0 Concentrate Weight gains 69.7a i_1l.l 60.0 94.0 Casein (g) 106.6b i 13.6 90.0 132.5 aMeans followed by the same letter are not signifi- cantly different at the .01 probability level using Tukey's test. 44 45 Table l4.--Corre1ations among PER, NIE, protein consumed and weight gain. PER NIE Protein consumed NIE .92** Protein consumed .42* .31 Weight gain .88** .77** .79** *Significant at P = .05. **Significant at P = .01. Table 15.--Micro-organism growth and rat responses on potato diets as a percent of casein. a BV PER NIE Weight gain Whole flour 73 77.5 74.3 70.4 Concentrate 76 73.8 73.9 65.4 Average 74.5 75.7 74.1 67.9 aAverage of 6 determinations/sample. 46 PER determinations of this study are very meaningful as a result of nearly equal food consumption by all test groups. No differences in protein quality or food consump- tion were noted between the whole and air classified potato flours, therefore it can be assumed that air classification neither added nor detracted from the protein quality nor other characteristics which might alter consumption when fed in a cooked form. Both PER and NIE appeared to be equally effective measurements for evaluating potato protein quality. The high correlation coefficient (r = .92) between them is in agreement with that of Bajaj (25 21., 1971). Thus, due to the added labor required to determine NIE, the PER method would seem to be preferred especially when food consumption is nearly the same in all test groups. Of significance is the fact that very similar results were obtained by the BV method utilizing g. zymggenes. This is not surprising for several reasons. This organism has an absolute requirement for exogenous leucine, methionine, tryptophane, arginine, histidine, isoleucine, valine, and glutamic acid (Ford, 1960) while all of these except glutamic acid are essential for the rat. Further, enzymatic digestion does not cause destruction of amino acids or inhibitory substances as does chemical hydrolysis (Evans and Butts, 1948). Thus growth of this organism, (described as being powerfully proteoly- tic and growing quickly with an adequate intact protein 47 (Ford, 1960)) in such a digest may closely correspond with results in "vivo." Though meriting further study, the potential of this method in evaluating protein is great. In a potato breeding program for improved protein quality, literally thousands of selections could be evaluated due to low labor, time and cost factors. Present day starch production operations, utilizing wet methods results in waste of and pollution by a potenti- ally recoverable, high quality, high protein by-product. Aside from important economic considerations, the fact that large quantities of a ”flour” containing up to 35% protein derived by air classification is of importance. The relatively high quality of the contained protein, when cooked, could be utilized in a food or feed supplement. Further increases in its quality by up-grading components influencing its quality through supplementation (Part I of this thesis) would add to its dollar value. SUMMARY By air classification techniques, a concentrate flour containing 33% protein was derived from whole potato flour containing 13% protein. When fed to weanling rats in a cooked form, no differences were found in food consumption or protein quality between whole potato flour and the con- centrate derived from it. Based on protein efficiency ratios, nitrogen incorporation efficiencies and weight gain measurements, the responses of rats fed potato diets as a percent of the responses of rats fed casein were 76%, 74%, and 68% respectively. The protein quality of the potato flours as determined by a micro-biological method utilizing g. zymogenes were very comparable to those values determined by rat assay. The potential of air classification in the potato industry and of micro-biological evaluation of potato protein is discussed. 48 LITERATURE CITED LITERATURE CITED Association of Official Agricultural Chemists 1970. 11th ed. Washington, D.C.: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, p. 801. Bajaj, S., Mickelsen, 0., Baker, L. R., and Markarian, D. 1971. The quality of protein in various lines of peas. Br. J. Nutr. 25, 207-212. Burton, W. G. 1966. The Potato: A Survey of its history and of factors influencing its yield, nutritive value, quality and storage. 2nd ed. In the distri- bution and composition of the dry matter in the potato tuber. H. Veenman and Zonen N. V., Wagenin— gen, Holland, pp. 143-169. Chick, H., and Slack, E. B. 1949. Distribution and nutritive value of the nitrogenous substances in the potato. Biochem. Jour. 45, 211-221. Cobb, J. S. 1935. A study of culinary quality in white potatoes. Amer. Potato J. 12, 335-346. De, R., and Singh, R. 1959. Effect of nitrogen fertili- zation on yield and chemical composition of potato. Indian Potato J. 1, 76-83. Dunn, L. E., and Rost, C. O. 1948. Effect of fertilizers on the composition of potatoes grown in the Red River Valley of Minnesota. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 13, 374-379. Evans, R., and Butts, H. A. 1948. Studies on the heat inactivation of lysine in soybean oil meal. J. Biol. Chem. 173, 15-20. Fagen, T. W. 1925. The variation in the moisture and nitrogen content of the potato during growth and storage. Welsh J. Agric. 1, 110-115. 49 50 Ford, J. E. 1960. A microbiological method for assessing the nutritional value of proteins. Br. J. Nutr. Goldthwaite, N. E. 1925. Variations in the composition of Colorado potatoes. Colorado Exp. Sta. Bull. No. Harper, A. E. 1959. The Yearbook of Agriculture. Y.S. Dep. Agr. p. 91. Heinze, P. H., Kirkpatrick, M. E., and Dochterman, E. F. 1955. Cooking quality and compositional factors of different varieties from several commercial locations. U.S.D.A. Tech. Bull. No. 1106, 1-69. Henwood and Gary. The Hengar Company. 6825 Greenway Ave. Philadelphia, Pa. Hoff, J. E., Jones, C. M., Wilcox, G. E., and Castro, M. D. 1971. The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the composition of the free amino acid pool of potato. Amer. Potato J. 48, 390-394. Isleib, D. R., and Thompson, N. R. 1957. Potato handling equipment for use in experimental work. Amer. Potato J. 35, 70-71. Kies, C., and Fox, H. M. 1972. Effect of amino acid supplementation of dehydrated potato flakes on protein nutritive value for human adults. Jour. Food Sci. 37, 378-380. Kuppuswamy, S., Srinwasan, M., and Subrahmanyan, V. 1958. Spec. Rep. Ser. Indian Coun. Med. Res. No. 33. Luescher, R. 1971. Evaluation of methods to determine the sulfur containing amino acids in potatoes. Master's Thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. Luescher, R. 1972. Genetic variability of "available" methionine, total protein, specific gratity and other traits in tetraploid potatoes. Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. Metzger, C. H., Tobiska, J. W., Douglass, E., and Vail, C. E. 1937. Some factors influencing the composi- tion of Colorado potatoes. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc. 35, 635-643. 51 Morrison, F. B. 1936. Feeds and Feeding. 20th ed. The Morrison Publishing Co., Ithaca, New York, p. 313. Mulder, E. G., and Bakima, K. 1956. Effect of the nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and magnesium nutrition of potato plants on the content of free amino acids and on the amino acid composition of the protein of tubers. Plant and Soil, 7, 135-165. Murphy, H. J., and Goven, M. J. 1959. Factors affecting the specific gravity of the white potato in Maine. Maine Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 583, 1-24. Nash, L. B. 1941. Relation of variety and environmental conditions to partial composition and cooking quality: Potato quality. IV. Amer. Potato J. 18, 91-99. Neuberger, A., and Sanger, F. 1942. The nitrogen of the potato. Biochem. Jour. 36, 662-671. Rios, B. J. 1969. Protein value of potato and navy bean powders: Nutritional evaluation using the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Master Thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. Satterthwaite, O. B. 1946. An approximate distribution of the estimates of variance components. Biometrics 2, 110-114. Schippers, P. A. 1968. The influence of nitrogen and potassium application on the yield and specific gravity of four potato varieties. Europ. Potato J. 11, 23-33. Shaw, R., and Shuey, W. C. 1972. Production of potato starch with low waste. Amer. Potato J. 49, 12-18. Stucki, W. P., and Harper, A. E. 1962. Effects of altering the ratio of indispensable to dispensable amino acids in diets for rats. J. Nutrition. 78, 278-286. Talley, E. A., Fitzpatrick, T. J., and Porter, W. L. 1961. Chemical composition of potatoes. I. Preliminary studies on the relationships between specific gravity and the nitrogenous constituents. Jour. Food Sci. 26, 351-355. . 1964. Chemical composition of potatoes. IV. Relationships of the free amino acid concentration to specific gravity and storage time. Amer. Potato J. 41, 357-366. 52 . 1970. Chemical composition of potatoes. VIII. Effect of variety, location, and year of growth on the content of nitrogen compounds. Amer. Potato J. 47, 231-244. Watt, B. K., and Merrill, A. L. 1963. Composition of Foods. U.S. Dep. Agr. Handbook No. 8. Wilcox, G. E., and Hoff, J. 1970. Nitrogen fertilization of potatoes for early summer harvest. Amer. Potato J. 47, 99-102. Willaman, J. J., and West, R. M. 1922. Composition of potato tubers. Rep. Minn. Agric. Exp. Stn., p. 44. Williams, H. H. 1959. Amino acid requirements. J. Amer. Dietet. Assoc. 35, 929-933. APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 ENVIRONMENTAL DATA ohsumwoa Hwom umzms< a“ camuamMuum :m onfi Haamsmuh :n.mm ooN-oo~-ooH anH uHmw numpmoozu owzo mm mcofiuaufifinnm N :w :2 .:N .m+ nowpumahpa :m.~ mc~-NmH-NwH sacs xecam Amoccoucpso auwwvch «we cowuamautm 0: maum\goe pH oom+ m~-oom-mn xuaz Anson susomv anmmvcm :mcoauaacou mausotm essence: an“ oq-ow-om son xafio finance eschew muoxan .z macauaumfinnm NN :w cowumwmuhw :u.o~ Axooucmxv ova “Housman :o.fi~ Nvm-em-NmH pcum camCOUmwz oocomaoEo ucmfin puma u:khv paw won: sea :ofipammnum :mH m: ukuw\nfiofi+ nanomhucmv Hmecfiuh :m.o ~m~-~aH-NmN Ewoa chmm :achomz meson» flouaapfiamw: “pom hobs» mcfiuzv mohsuauonEou gm“: ”oucowuoEo pagan oumH mmH o--ww-on Ema” uHmm Aswaxcuum 362V “unemmwz coauamwuua :H Hashes Acauuugcuzv owe o>ona guns nflmmnwmh ooH-ocH-omH smoH Accam names: fiewaom couamv omucfiauv noon oNH oo-o~a-om HBM>SHH< «cawmwsoq umo>uag hmogucm Hauouv on mewucuan camummwuum oNx.moN uoguo scam man: can "Hamcmmm ouuuxna honmamuaom Hwow namuauog «paw Hmucosq0hw>cu "H xfipcomm< 53 APPENDIX 2 TOTAL PROTEIN, "AVAILABLE" METHIONINE, BIOLOGICAL VALUE, RELATIVE PROTEIN QUALITY AND TOTAL DRY MATTER DATA OF 16 VARIETIES GROWN IN 10 LOCATIONS IN 1971 TOTAL PROTEIN, Legend: total protein "available" methionine biological value relative protein quality total dry matter Variety VALUE, \IO‘U‘DWNH "AVAILABLE" 54 APPENDIX 2 METHIONINE, BIOLOGICAL RELATIVE PROTEIN QUALITY AND TOTAL DRY MATTER DATA OF 16 VARIETIES GROWN IN 10 LOCATIONS IN 1971 mg (Nx6.25)/100 mg dry matter mg available met/16mg N growth produced by 50 mg potato protein as a percent- age of growth produced by 50 mg casein the reciprocal of the per- centage increase in growth as a result of supplementing all essential amino acids except methionine dry matter/100 9 whole potato calculated from specific gravity where specific gravity is determined by; (wt. in air)/(wt. in air - wt. in water) 86024-3 36097-9 86139-11 86116-18 Cobbler La 22-111 Neb 1.57-1 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Location A LIHIEQ'UMUOED 55 : N49.62-5 N 93.55-16 Norland ND6925-13 ND6993-13 ND7196-18 Red Pontiac : W 629 : W 634 Louisiana Kansas Missouri Nebraska Michigan Wisconsin North Dakota Indiana sandy loam Indiana muck Ohio 13 Aver. J 56 L 0 C A T I 0 N ”Availabl€ Methionine A F 1.79 1.87 1.78 1.61 1.93 1.77 1.89 1.75 1.65 1.69 2.41 1.62 1.51 1.78 1.64 2.01 1.58 1.74 1.47 1.87 1.76 1.79 1.68 1.43 1.62 1.66 1.48 2.04 1.80 1.69 1.59 1.48 1.51 1.56 1.22 1.57 1.74 1.74 1.70 1.39 1.50 1.47 1.43 1.71 1.68 1.68 1.44 1.51 1.49 1.24 1.89 1.59 1.60 1.17 1.63 1.96 1.71 1.48 1.58 1.52 1.43 1.49 1.23 1.84 1.66 1.49 1.52 1.40 1.74 1.44 1.21 1.35 1.65 1.61 1.56 1.25 1.51 1.34 1.19 1.29 1.22 1.66 1.57 1.40 1.43 1.34 1.22 1.29 1.37 1.22 1.10 1.39 1.48 1.35 1.39 1.27 1.24 .99 1.25 .96 1.66 1.29 1.40 1.22 1.21 1.16 1.04 Aver. 1.71 1.64 1.63 1.63 1.61 1.55 1.55 1.41 1.36 1.27 1.25 1.46 1.23 1.43 1.18 1.18 1.08 .99 1.23 1.38 1.36 1.13 1:66 1T5? “ii—55‘ 1.14 .94 1.24 1.01 1.16 1.38 1.38 1.35 1.20 Total protein 10 15 11 14 12 16 13 L"! Aver. E J H 57 L 0 C A T I 0 N C H A D G 16.6 17.2 15.0 13.9 12.0 14.3 11.8 15.2 11.5 12.6 15.3 16.5 14.6 13.9 13.7 13.7 13.6 13.5 13.7 10.6 16.4 18.0 14.2 13.6 9.4 13.0 13.7 12.8 13.2 11.9 Aver. 14.0 13.9 13.6 15.3 15.1 13.7 13.4 13.3 13.9 13.4 13.8 11.4 10.5 13.4 14.1 14.5 14.7 13.5 15.3 11.6 14.0 11.0 11.2 13.3 14.8 15.0 13.9 12.3 12.4 12.2 11.7 13.4 12.4 13.1 17.7 16.3 13.3 12.4 14.5 11.5 11.6 11.3 10.3 11.5 13.1 14.6 13.6 13.4 13.8 13.7 13.1 11.8 10.9 11.8 10.6 12.7 14.6 15.7 14.0 12.8 12.4 10.9 12.7 11.2 10.3 12.5 12.7 15.6 12.5 12.2 13.5 13.2 12.0 11.7 12.5 11.5 10.1 12.7 14.1 02.5 12.2 12.3 13.2 13.2 13.2 10.1 11.8 10.1 12.3 16.2 14.0 1.6 11.3 13.6 11.6 10.8 12.0 9.2 9.6 12.0 12.7 13.5 11.9 13.5 11.9 12.0 9.2 10.1 11.5 13.3 12.9 12.0 11.3 12.0 12.3 10.6 10.5 10.1 11.5 12.2 13.0 12.3 10.9 11.1 11.3 9.8 10.9 10.7 11.2 12.9 10.6 11.8 10.5 9.1 10.9 14.8 14.8 13.3 12.8 12.6 12.5 12.0 11.9 11.1 10.9 8V 0'! 14 11 10 15 16 12 13 Aver. 58 L 0 C A T I 0 N I J C E 81.0 78.1 77.0 77.4 71.9 71.2 69.6 70.0 68.7 69.3 75.2 71.5 72.8 74.5 73.3 77.6 71.5 67.9 69.2 65.6 71.8 72.5 74.6 74.0 72.6 71.8 63.6 70.0 68.6 homo 74.3 73.1 74.1 71.2 73.2 67.0 68.0 67.3 76.4 L4. 69.1 68.2 68.7 66.9 66.5 67.9 67.3 64.5 78.5 67.9 72.8 73.1 74.4 70.8 69.7 67.9 65.0 61.4 71.8 73.6 68.6 72.6 65.6 73.8 71.5 72.1 71.2 72.9 65.4 64.1 68.3 70.7 64.5 75.2 66.8 68.4 70.3 67.9 69.0 73.3 65.7 70.2 67.3 70.3 69.0 67.3 70.0 73.3 71.8 68.1 69.6 66.4 62.4 70.3 69.4 71.4 69.7 72.6 67.6 64.0 66.6 61.1 78.2 84.6 71.8 69.0 64.4 68.3 63.7 67.5 58.3 Aver. 73.3 71.8 71.5 71.3 70.9 70.1 70.1 69.4 69.3 68.7 68.6 68.4 73.1 69.2 71.5 67.3 64.4 73.3 66.5 68.2 64.0 66.9 68.3 76.7 70.6 66.9 68.7 71.3 68.3 65.1 66.8 61.4 65.8 67.5 65.6 71.8 70.1 65.1 66.6 62.3 61.1 69.8 61.9 69.4 64.8 65.8 59.3 63.3 62.2 61.5 54.8 74.8 72.3 70.9 70.8 70.5 69.6 68.0 66.5 66.4 63.7 Relative 13 15 7 8 5 V 9 A 1 R 10 I 3 E 14 T 2 Y 16 6 11 12 4 Aver. protein quality 59 L 0 C A T I 0 N A H G B .578 .503 .483 .498 .524 .524 .490 .483 .441 .413 Aver. .494 .575 .459 .529 .500 .465 .541 .483 .452 .444 .452 .515 .526 .505 .483 .472 .498 .478 .472 .488 .452 .549 .472 .478 .500 .472 .442 .457 .474 .424 .365 .521 .483 .498 .467 .478 .444 .457 .450 .420 .403 .546 .508 .503 .455 .442 .465 .472 .427 .427 .356 .526 .478 .476 .493 .461 .442 .424 .442 .364 .498 .474 .485 .459 .476 .444 .455 .392 .392 .364 .543 .457 .441 .418 .356 .532 .478 .442 .433 .439 .433 .420 .435 .407 .365 .493 .461 .461 .444 .402 .391 .412 .437 .388 .529 .461 .435 .446 .418 .439 .410 .412 .388 .375 .535 .457 .452 .441 .442 .431 .405 .403 .382 .348 .478 .433 .476 .452 .444 .408 .413 .388 .405 .336 .427 .483 .410 .444 .478 .418 .397 .391 .420 .355 .495 .448 .444 .422 .379 .415 .364 .397 .378 .490 .489 .463 .462 .460 .456 .444 .443 .438 .432 .431 .430 .423 .422 .521 .473 .472 .465 .459 .449 .438 .425 .421 .379 Total dry matter 16 12 15 13 11 10 14 Aver. G F D 60 L 0 C A I I 0 N J C B E H 19.4 21.4 19.7 18.8 22.4 24.8 20.3 18.0 20.3 19.7 27.8 19.2 18.0 17.7 17.5 23.3 22.2 19.7 20.5 18.2 18.2 20.3 19.1 19.7 23.5 20.7 21.4 19.7 18.0 19.7 19.0 17.3 20.3 18.8 23.1 22.4 19.7 19.2 18.8 18.8 19.2 19.2 19.9 17.1 24.6 22.9 20.7 19.0 18.4 16.7 18.4 19.2 18.0 16.7 24.2 19.9 19.9 18.0 20.3 18.6 18.4 18.2 18.0 17.7 24.2 22.2 20.7 18.8 19.4 16.9 18.2 18.4 17.1 16.9 22.7 19.4 20.1 19.4 19.0 17.5 18.0 16.2 17.3 22.0 20.3 20.7 18.8 17.1 18.2 18.4 16.0 18.6 16.2 23.1 20.1 19.7 18.4 16.9 17.5 16.9 17.5 16.9 17.1 23.1 18.8 18.8 18.4 17.3 17.1 17.3 17.1 17.1 17.1 Aver. 20.3 20.3 20.0 19.8 19.7 19.5 19.3 19.3 18.7 18.6 18.4 18.2 20.9 17.5 18.6 16.7 16.5 15.0 0 15. 16.9 17.1 13.9 19.9 18.8 22.0 18.2 14.3 13.7 16.2 14.3 15.4 16.8 16.3 20.7 18.2 16.9 15.4 16.5 16.7 11.4 14.1 15.0 r-rj‘ 15.6 L1‘7.B'JL17.3"L'1"'7.5 17.1 ' 16.5 16.1 APPENDIX 3 TOTAL PROTEIN, "AVAILABLE" METHIONINE, BIOLOGICAL VALUE, RELATIVE PROTEIN QUALITY AND TOTAL DRY MATTER DATA OF 8 VARIETIES IN 4 REPLICATIONS GROWN IN MICHIGAN IN 1972 TOTAL PROTEIN, APPENDIX 3 "AVAILABLE" METHIONINE, BIOLOGICAL VALUE, RELATIVE PROTEIN QUALITY AND TOTAL DRY MATTER DATA OF 8 VARIETIES IN 4 REPLICATIONS V A R I E T Y "Available" methionine Rep 2 5 7 1 1.95 1.58 1.40 2 2.00 1.75 1.30 3 1.98 1.75 1.25 4 1.98 1.60 1.30 Relative protein quality 1 .385 .461 .441 2 .379 .425 .459 3 .390 .431 .461 4 .420 .446 .455 Biological value 1 72.5 76.1 68.1 2 72.5 75.4 67.4 3 73.9 76.1 65.9 4 76.1 74.6 66.7 Total protein 1 13.0 14.9 15.3 2 13.3 13.0 16.6 3 11.8 13.4 16.0 4 12.5 13.8 15.8 Dry matter 1 19.7 17.5 18.0 2 18.2 18.4 16.7 3 20.1 18.2 16.9 4 19.7 18.0 17.5 10 1.88 1.73 1.80 1.55 .385 .397 .389 .392 70.3 68.8 69.6 64.5 15.8 15.9 16.7 16.5 19.0 16.0 15.4 14.8 61 11 1.95 1.93 1.75 1.88 .351 .357 .392 .372 65.9 66.7 68.8 68.1 14.8 15.1 15.6 14.7 17.3 17.3 16.7 18.2 GROWN IN MICHIGAN IN 1972 13 1.13 1.20 1.35 1.13 .493 .439 .441 .459 66.7 61.6 65.9 62.3 14.9 13.1 13.8 12.6 16.7 18.6 16.7 18.0 14 2.05 1.90 2.03 1.95 .361 .388 .364 .366 70.3 71.7 70.3 68.8 13.3 14.2 12.4 12.7 17.3 17.7 18.4 17.7 15 1.25 1.18 1.23 1.33 .441 .465 .444 .444 63.0 64.5 63.0 66.7 16.2 15.3 17.4 14.9 17.7 17.1 16.5 17.5 APPENDIX 4 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE FOR AVAILABLE METHIONINE, RELATIVE PROTEIN QUALITY, BIOLOGICAL VALUE, TOTAL PROTEIN AND TOTAL DRY MATTER APPENDIX 4 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE FOR AVAILABLE METHIONINE, RELATIVE PROTEIN QUALITY, BIOLOGICAL VALUE, TOTAL PROTEIN AND TOTAL DRY MATTER Legend: L : locations V : variety VxL : variety-location interaction R(L) : replicationwithin location RxV(L) : replication-variety interaction within location Source df SS MS FS L 9 2929.38 325.49 28.11** V 15 4242.11 282.81 17.59*** VxL 127 2042.25 16.08 2.88** R 3 16.75 5.58 ns RxV(L) 21 164.53 7.83 Relative protein quality L 9 2070.76 230.08 605.49*** v 15 903.82 60.25 12.91*** VxL 127 592.68 4.67 1.73 ns R(L) 3 1.66 .55 ns VxR(L) 21 56.62 2.70 62 63 Source df SS MS FS Biological L 9 1360.09 151.12 18.53*** V 15 886.45 59.10 4.72*** VxL 127 1589.26 12.51 3.86*** R(L) 3 3.19 1.06 ns VxR(L) 21 68.11 3.24 Total protein L 9 2525.72 280.64 27.17* V 15 1265.46 84.36 7.10*** VxL 127 1509.99 11.89 2.06* R(L) 3 14.98 4.98 ns VxR(L) 21 120.96 5.76 Total dry matter L 9 4143.30 460.37 12.46*** V 15 2871.39 191.43 10.30*** VxL 127 2359.22 18.58 2.16* R(L) 3 13.00 4.33 ns VxR(L) 21 181.00 8.62 * : significant at P = .05. ** : significant at P = .01. *** : significant at P = .001. APPENDIX 5 AMOUNTS OF ADDED COMPONENTS PER 1 kg OF POTATO AND CASEIN DIETS APPENDIX 5 AMOUNTS OF ADDED COMPONENTS PER 1 kg 0F POTATO AND CASEIN DIETS Grams in Sample Grams Added Composition Whole Flour 687.0 Protein 90.0 9.0 Fat 5.5 74.5 8.0 Salts 25.4 24.6 5.0 Vit. . . 10.0 1.0 Cellulose 11.0 1.1 Water 48.1 1.9 5.0 Starch 507.0 50.7 Sucrose 202.0 20.2 Concentrate Flour 273.3 Protein 90.0 9.0 Fat 2.2 77.8 8.0 Salts 10.1 39.9 5.0 Vit. 10.0 1.0 Cellulose 14.3 1.4 Water 13.7 36.3 5.0 Starch 143.0 364.0 50.7 Sucrose 198.7 19.9 Casein 103.4 Protein 90.0 9.0 Fat 1.2 78.8 8.0 Salts .7 49.3 5.0 Vit. 10.0 1.0 Cellulose 10.0 1.0 Water 9.9 40.1 5.0 Starch 507.0 50.7 Sucrose 201.4 20.1 64 APPENDIX 6 PROTEIN CONSUMPTION, WEIGHT GAIN, NIE, AND PERCENT BODY PROTEIN DATA OF RAT ASSAY APPENDIX 6 PROTEIN CONSUMPTION, WEIGHT GAIN, NIE, AND PERCENT BODY PROTEIN DATA OF RAT ASSAY Protein Weight 8 Body Diet NIE consumed(g) gain(g) protein Whole potato .358 32.5 73.5 16.20 flour .464 34.3 83.5 17.90 ” .436 35.3 87.5 16.74 " .362 35.6 74.5 16.66 " .428 29.3 63.0 17.26 " .488 27.9 76.0 17.64 " .444 29.9 69.5 17.52 " .476 38.4 99.0 16.64 " .424 27.5 59.0 22.10 .480 29.1 64.5 17.88 Concentrate .404 37.7 85.0 17.26 " .456 29.3 67.5 18.32 ” .454 27.5 61.0 17.66 ” .418 30.8 71.0 17.16 " .354 31.4 63.0 17.04 " .404 29.5 65.5 17.04 " .498 25.3 60.0 18.16 " .444 31.7 65.0 17.94 " .428 31.4 65.0 18.06 " .476 39.2 94.0 17.90 Casein .572 30.9 90.0 18.38 " .580 30.8 95.0 17.96 " .535 35.1 105.0 17.86 " .648 35.9 117.5 18.08 " .602 40.2 132.5 17.18 " .546 36.1 97.5 18.88 " .554 36.3 99.0 18.48 " .566 35.5 102.5 17.86 ” .608 40.7 123.5 18.22 " .622 31.4 103.0 18.08 65 "11111111111111111115