.2“ 1*“ . '1 3' i ‘ HHI: l l I", MM H i w l l 03—; #00 HYPERFINE STRUCTURE OF ATOMIC COPPER T135)"; £4" ¢ t '1 1" - q- s r ‘ ‘ " . I ‘ p; u . .‘.~E.8 3": - -~. .’\:o\? \. ~.~O 3‘. If 5 (“:1'5": "r. "" '. " "‘ ('0’. ‘. "H’s r A .. , - I- < ‘ u . n xt‘u. “u. 1.). Q . y“; , .- \-\- “A“. J: .'. . ‘ ,o_. . . .I . Q . . O ‘ft:§. ' I a !‘ '7‘.‘ .“ " h (s I‘ ' .F‘ firs“. ’9 13‘ .‘-'¢ sl'.‘ .‘c .w a .xL..-- \‘ ~’ "’ ".‘-‘ \ ' 1‘ ' ' \“L .1» fi 5 g ‘ f 5“. '~ :‘—-' i ‘ ‘ I fiu—Ifi—Tr—r—t"‘ .KT.-r*' 0-169 Illlflalllilllzlfllflllllm lllllllllllllllllllllllfll This is to certify that the thesis entitled Hyperfine Structure of Atomic Copper presented by Malik M. Quraishee has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for __M.._§.__degree inmflinfl. aaam Major professor Q .‘ . - 0 4.; PLACE IN RETURN BOX to remove this checkout from your record. TO AVOID FINES return on or before date due. MAY BE RECALLED with earlier due date if requested. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE 1/98 cJClRC/DateDue.p65-p.14 HYPERFINE STRUCTURE OF ATOMIC COPPER By MALIK MOHAMMED QURAISHEE A THESIS Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of Michigan State College of Agriculture and Applied Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE \ \ Department of Physics \\ i\ \ L~ 1953 L; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my gratitude and appreciation to Dr. C. Duane Hause for the suggestion of this problem and for his very willing and helpful guidance throughout the course of this work. (1 3 O f ’H Vb ‘1 L53 he TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................. General Theory of Hyperfine Structure ............... 63 Hyperfine Structure of Cu ...................... General Experimental Procedure ................... . 63 Procedure With Enriched Cu ..................... Results ..................................... Conclusions .................................. References .................................. 11 15 20 23 27 28 INTRODUCTION Since the development of high resolution interferometers of various types by Michelson, Fabry and Perot, and Lummer and Gehrcke it has been found by these original investigators and others that many spectral lines are not single but are made up of a number of com- ponents. It is now known that this hyperfine structure arises either to the presence of isotopes or from elements whose nuclei possess a nuclear spin. Thus investigation of this structure yields valuable information about the nuclei giving rise to the effects. In this report a brief review of the theory necessary to ac- count for the hyperfine structure of radiation from elements whose nuclei possess spin and quadropole moments will be given. This will be applied specially to copper. Using copper in a hollow—cathode discharge tube in conjunction with a Fabry-Perot interferometer and a constant deviation spectroscope the hyperfine structure of the copper triplet 2D—ZP has been photographed. The data so obtained will be compared with that of previous investigators. In addition a technique suitable to allow the use of enriched ’ 3 Cu0 in the hollow cathode will be described. The hyperfine structure 63 patterns of Cu have been observed visually but not photo- graphed. GENERAL THEORY OF HYPERFINE STRUCTURE The hyperfine structure observed when atomic radiation from an appropriate source is examined with high resolution equipment is known to arise from one of two causes: (1) small shifts in the term values due to the presence of isotopes; or (2) splitting of the terms due to the presence of a nuclear spin and moment which interact with the extra nuclear electrons. The first effect is largely due to the mass difference of the isotopes in light elements. In heavier elements nuclear volume effects seem necessary to explain the large . —1 , ’2' shifts observed. Shifts of the order of 0.08 cm. are (Ref.) observed . . . 6 65 in the radiation from Cu and Cu The second effect is of primary concern here. In general hyperfine structure may be due to four types of interaction. a. Interaction of electron orbit and nuclear spin (orbit spin inte raction) . M¢zaf--f (1) where a is a constant, L and I are orbit and nuclear quantum num— ‘-""'""'—'7 bers, with the magnitude of JL(L+I)% and /I(I+i)7_.L' ‘ an L takes zero and integral numbers, but I may be integral or half integral. In order to derive (1) one can consider a field H at the nu- cleus, produced by the motion of the orbital electron, about which the nuclear magnetic moment precess. ”a. e E - 2. (2) “"1 (4) 1'" where L is the electric field and r is the distance of electron from nucleus. F rom Bohr's relationship I.” (5) thus where m and e are the mass and charge of the valence electron. a If one represent the magnetic moment of the nucleus by/') the ratio of the magnetic to the mechanical moment will be /% jln. Ln - e — Z. R ( :3 where Z, is the nuclear g factor, and M is the proton mass. From (7) . eh f yaw/WC (8) fl"); The potential energy of this nuclear magnetic moment, in the mag- netic field which is produced by the electron orbital motion is \/a4 =g‘f; \4. =J.(S-~--".MC)L(.-,'i-_i1_._ ) . [j 1" ' 9” finmm :7 ' um According to the definition of nuclear and Bohr magnetons, ‘_ sin . 9L fl” *1/er I /B =‘yfl’vhc b. Electron spin-nuclear spin interaction. -9 --+ (12) V04“: 0[;~——:~«-—— -I.S This term arises because both the electron and the nucleus are like little magnets. The interaction between two dipoles of magnetic moment /(_7 . “H and /“s is" —9 f, '7 1 ~ .— 3 (I ‘ z '5 ‘ —’ -¢ v/ —--i .- ._-_ -/«, w] (13) The magnetic moment in terms of‘nuclear and Bohr magnetons are 4.4-, 4 n =1; M .un. [is =_——:./',3 S Then (12) becomes V .t /"~/'.,[3T.f§’.f 4—9] — j} 1‘ ““"' L «I S ”L m? .4 "" 4’ . 31.2 3.1 «a «I» or \{AX—s a -—~———_1.}--__ .-_. - 1 i S] (14) KJ These interactions (a) and.(b) may be combined and written in the following simplified form: __, 4 \/ ‘=' “II‘ I ' where .I is a good quantum number. This equation can be obtained as follows: It is known that the quantum mechanical average of a vector L in the direction of another vector suppose J is just the component of L along J if L precesses about J. From the diagram, the magnetude of the component of L along I is ”*9 --9 —- ——4 i L . L3" ~---~-~—3; and since the unit vector along J is T-then iTi iii“! “E 3’ “' 7- - (L >-=-.......l....-u.3 where .I has been replaced by j( 32H) ; 1.8., °’" INT“) This reduced to: QLI= [3"(I-H/ +L(LH) —-S($-HUI I LTITM) (15) Bethe (Ref.) shows that (12) reduces to the form: =(LL.+3)(.LL-i)3’( T:f)"[11{3’13'+l)- UL“) - S! 5+0} \ééx {I(T+l/+L(L¢I)—S(S+’)}‘L(L+i/{I(J*'I+5(5t') —L(L+I{}]Iff (15) and hence the total interaction, V , is total -9 ‘9 Vi?! = “II.I (17) where a” [ ( ) L / a a = c T aw i (Lu — 5(5 I]~-----——~-~----=~ - I 1.3(3'oi) 15/ {1.1.4. 32,){ -;i_)I(T+I) [3- {Iw’ui « LIL“) —Sis+i)J?§I(r+i)+L(L.i/-sun/j-LiLu) {II 3-H} uHui—ULH/E] c. There is another term in the interaction potential which was discovered by Abrahm (Ref.) and Carr independently. It is of the form ‘“ .‘s" \4=0L31. It is of importance if the state concerned is an S state or contains an appreciable admixture of an S state. Following the previous method: .. s a? - 5a.»: __.--.r - _ I - Tint) -~ -+ 9‘3 =1‘ 5 =7.:rr7q—[I¢mmmo Eummca :L LLL L a L: LL. L L L 8.55m ecu 5.95m 32380 28sz 14.34315 1. 13% 1L. iljfi. L1. :85! 565m nee 855m 233m 09.4.5340 5.103 magma CONCLUSIONS 1. The theory of hyperfine structure has been discussed briefly. 2. Using the Fabry and Perot interferometer with a 15 mm separator, three components of the 5100.5 A. line are resolved. In 5782 A and 5700 A four components are sufficiently well resolved to allow measurements. 3. Comparison of this work with results of Ritschl and Schuler and Schmidt indicates a variation in the 5105 line and gives a different value for the isotope shift and the interaction constant. 4. The procedure for using the small sample in the hollow cathode is satisfactory. Using Cu63 the hyperfine structure for Z 2 P- D lines has been observed but not photographed. REFERENCES White, H. Introduction to Atomic Spectra (McGraw—Hill, 1934),. p. 353, 418. R. C. McBride. Thesis. High Resolution and Hyperfine Struc- ture (1951). _Tolansky, S. High Resolution Spectroscopy (Pitman, 1947), p. 133. Weatherburn, C. E. Advanced Vector Analysis (Bell, 1944), p. 161. H. Kopfermann, Kernmoment (19405, p. 63, 67. Arroe, M.,,and Mack, J. J. O. S. A. 30, 387 (1950). Schuler and Schmidt. Zeitschrift for Physik 100, 1936, 530. 5 Z 48. Pauling and Goudsmit. Structure of Line Spectrum. p. 202. Candler. Atomic Spectrum. Vol. II, p. 166. mngunygngulnjmg "((111le "1111171155 9585