V 0"- ‘““.-.—_'I‘ , .- "'_ -nwvat -‘. MEASUREMENT OF ULTRASONIC VELOClTlES IN AQUEOUS SOLUTION-5 OF SEVERAL SALTS Thesis {or the Degree 0! M. 3. MICHIGAN STATE COLLEGE Alton R. Kurtz I942 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 301774 9759 A l"ilIII"‘l"'—v——— ‘- J LIBRARY Michigan State : ,University 7 PLACE IN RETURN BOXto remove this medcoutfromyourrecord. TO AVOID FINE retum on or before date due. MAY BE W with earner due date Ifrequested. DATE DUE DATE DUE. DATE DUE XEASURJESNT OF ULTRASOK C VLLOCITISS IN AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS OF SEVERAL SALTS by Alton R. Kurtz A THESIS Submitted to the Graduate School of Kicbigen State College of Agriculture and Applied Science in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIEN E Department of Physics 1942 A CKI‘TO '. .1. 1:3 D (ELISE-IT I wish to express my most sincere appreciation to Dr. J.W.‘NcGrath who first aroused my interest in ultrasonics and whose keen interest, constant help, and many resourceful ideas have been of great value to me. I am grateful to all the members of the Department of Physics for their encourarement and loan of apparatus. I am indebted to Mr. Grant S. Bennett1 for part of the apparatus used. It was constructed by him in 1940-1941. TABLE OF CO}? LEXIS Introduction Purpose of This Research Method and Apparatus Specific Procedure Equations Involved Data and Results Graphs Analysis of Errors Discussion of Results and Conclusions Bibliography Page 13 14 16, 17, 18 19 25 INTRODUCTION Ultrasonic (or supersonic) waves are sound waves whose frequency is above the audible range. The human ear can hear sounds of frequencies up to about 20 kilocycles and ultrasonic frequencies extend from.there upwards, 500,000 kilocycles being the highest frequency that it is now possible to produce. rhe wave-length range of ultrasonic sound waves in air is from 1.5 to 0.00006 cm. while the wave-length of an audible sound whose frequency is, say, 256 vibrations per second (middle 0 on the musical scale) is more than ‘00 cm. As sound velocity is usually obtain- ed from wave-length measurements, this shortness of ultra- sonic waves greatly simplifies measurement of sound velocities. fhere is a great concentration of energy in ultrasonic waves as compared to audible waves, an intensity of 10 watts per cm? being not uncommon in ultrasonic waves as contrasted with intensities in the order of 10"10 watts per cm? in audible waves. 7 states that a dispersion of sound velocity with Rae frequency has been definitely established in gases but that such a dispersion in liquids, if it exists, is only 1 or ameters per second and thus within the range of eXperinental error. rhus, in general, ultrasonic velocit- ies are the same as audible sound velocities. Fortunately, the laws of sound which are valid for the audible range also hold for the ultrasonic range, although some phenomena appear in the latter which are not observed in the former. Use of ultrasonics for velocity measurements in liquids has three outstanding advantages because of the shortness of the waves. These are: (1) it is possible to make measurements in a small space thus eliminating complicated and cumbersome equip- ment otherwise necessary; (2) the influence of the walls of the containing vessel, which is so difficult to correct for with audible sound waves, is negligible with the short waves; (3) it is possible to make velocity measurements with small amounts of the medium. Because of these ad- vantages it has been possible, for example, to make meas- urements in liquid oxygen and heavy water. h) :3 In C) O. I?) OF THIS RESEARCH Ultrasonic velocity measurements are chiefly important in that they yield values for the adiabatic compressibil— ity of the medium. Given this, and the isothermal com- pressibility derived from static measurements, it is then possible to calculate the ratio of the specific heats of a liquid. There is also a good possibility that when enough data has been accumulated it will be possible to explain completely the changes of volume and compress- ibility which occur when salts are dissolved in water. Velocity measurements have been made in most of the common organic liquids and the compressibilities computed but very little work has been done with aqueous solutions of salts. For this reason the author decided to work in the latter field. a series of velocity measurements in various concen- trations of potassium and sodium halides have been made by FreyerS. Only a few other investigators have made measurements in electrolytic solutions and none of them has dealt with a specific series of salts as did Freyer. In choosing a series of salts for investigation it seemed best to choose a series other than those studies by Freyer in order that there might be a greater range of data from which to make conclusions. A series of nitrates seemed the best one to choose because they are easily obtained, the nitrates of practically all metallic ions exist, and especially because of their Very high solubility. The three lowest mono-valent nitrates (potassium, sodium, and lithium) and two di—valent nitrates of high solubil- ity (magnesium and zinc) were the ones chosen for the investigation. both mono—valent and di-valent nitrates were chosen because the change of compressibility with concentration was expected to differ in the two types. METHOD AND AIPARATUS Many different methods have been used for determining the wave-length of ultrasonic waves in liquids and one of the simplest and, strdhely enough, least used methods was chosen. It is an optical method suggested by Bergmanng in which light from a slit source is allowed to diverge through the liquid containing stationary ultrasonic waves and fall on a screen on the other side. The standing acoustic waves also have associated with them, due to standing density waves, standing waves in the Optical index of refraction of the medium. This neans that there is periodically set up in the medium a row of "lenses" more or less of the cylindrical type. These "lenses" app- ear and disappear with a frequency twice that of the ultra- sonic wave and are spaced at intervals of one-half the acoustic wave. There appears then on the screen a pattern of parallel bright and dark lines of arproximately equal width. If each dark line arises from a nodal point in the liquid then the distance between the dark lines is one- half of the wave-length of the sound wave. New 1% the stationary wave pattern be moved parallel to the screen and perpendicular to the light beam by moving the trough, the lines on the screen will move along the screen. If a point is chosen on the screen, at the center of the light beam in order to eliminate all distortion, and the trough moved until one dark line has passed this point, then the distance through which the trough has moved must be one- half of the wave-length of the ultrasonic waves in the liquid. Because of the shortness of the ultrasonic waves it is possible to cause a large number of lines to pass the point on the screen by moving the trough a few centi- meters and the wave-length may then be found by dividing the distance moved by the trough by one-half the number of dark lines passing the chosen point on the screen. if the frequency is Known then the velocity is found by taking the product of frequency and wave-length. The Optical system is shown is figure I. The light source was a 100 watt ribbon filament lamp which was focused on the slit by a strong condensing lens. The trough was mounted on a traveling micrOSCOpe base so that it could be moved perpendicularly to the optical path. The base Was firmly fastened to an Optical bench about 50 cm. from the slit. The position of he screen was not critical as the lines could be seen at any distance within several meters of the trough. However, it was not desirable to have the screen older than 50 cm. because the lines were too close together to be counted easily and, since it was necessary to turn the microscope and count the lines at the same time, the screen was usually placed at about 80 cm. from the traugh. It should be noted that no lenses were necessary between the slit and the screen. a convergent lens may be placed .25an >05be I \cub\&b 5.:be Q {backup .0 35 o Imbotk 3.30 .w\ stew ms‘otobcou wu {OVUDIsUnY .W 09.30% .onEOEK COQQQ .V *—35.0 5.216 I 1.2668 24.8 .0949? 1715.4 26.827 L1N03 1.0 0.145 1.00287 25.0 ,oggg4 1499.9 44.550 " 4.0. 0.594 1.02054 25.2 .08410 1519.0 42,656 " 8.0 1.212 5.04477 25.2 .08525 1559.4 40,391 " 14.0 2.198 1.08276 25.2 .08754 1577.5 37,113 " 24.0 4.007 1.15125 25.5 .08120 1647.6 51.992 Mg(N03)2 2.0 0.156 1.0119 25.0 .08554 1505.5 43,618 " 8.0 ‘0.571 1.0584 25.5 .08540 1542.5 39,709 " 14.0 1.046 1.1079 24.9 .08746 1579.7 55,169 " 20.0 1.565 1.1607 25.1 .08985 1622.8 32,715 " 24.0 1.958 1.1977 25.5 .09174 1657.1 50,400 .n(503)2 2.0 0.11 1.0554 24.9 .08508 1500.7 -—_ " 10.0 0.57 1.0 59 24.9 .08449 1525.7 _-- " 16.0 0.97 1.1445 25.2 .08600 1555.4 --- " 50.0 2.06 1.5029 25.2 .09009 1627.2 -_- TABLE II CO EXPRESS IB ILITY ANALYSI 8 Salt Slope-k* Log KNO3 -.0419 .6518-11 44.85 x 1012 L1No3 -.05652 .6500-11 44.65 x 10 '12 NaNO5 -.0454 .6508-11 44.75 x 10-12 Mgm05);», ‘°0879 o6516-ll 44.85 x 10"12 (it for water - 44.79 x 10-12 average - 44.77 x 10"12 EMPIRICAL FORfiULAE ..k(: .. _. .L Q'ge V~\/oy_§_e’-KC P KNOS Q _ (4., 771/049.) ~.o7b-f¢ V“ .ovtac __ . c: - "M""’f'—‘Z,§l’c 1 _. .os'nc. NaN03 (3 ;(+¢.77X/a” J: 10*“: l/=-I‘f46'9y:i%j7'c 7" -. -— .7471 "WI-C 1.11103 (3 20,407“, )6 ”37¢ V-/+4e.9f_;:e . “.AOABC ,9 . I"«'i8(N03)2 (,7 :: (4+.77/r/04‘JC V 2: H 71...? [17.47/5 "WI-’- * The logarithms are to the base 10 so that it is nec- essary to multiply k by 2.303 in order to write it in the exponential form. -17... TABLE III VELOCITY FORIULA CHECK Solution Molar Computed Measured Deviation Conc. Velocity velocity KNO3 .0992 ' 1499 1498 {l .6151 1514 1512 {2 1.0980 1551 1528 f5 1.967 1557 1556 41 2.755 1584 1582 {2 NaNO3 .1181 1500 1499 f1 .4825 1515 1515 ' -2 .9912 1554 1557 -5 2.095 1581 1585 -2 5.000 1625 1624 fl **5.216 1745 1715 f28 .145 1501 1500 fl LiNO:5 .595 ‘ 1516 1519 -5 1.212 1558 1559 -1 2.194 1574 1577 -5 4.007 1648 1648 0 Mg(N03)2 .156 1507 1505 f2 .571 1540 1542 -2 1.046 1579 1580 —1 1.565 1626 1625 f3 1.958 1661 1657 f4 _"? ** This point for Nan05 does not appear on any of the curves because it was not convenient to make the scale large - 18 - enough to include it. It was plotted on separate paper land found to be considerably low so that the fact that it is so far off here is not due to an error in the equation but due to an experimental error. ‘1': ‘Vrt‘TI‘ (‘31? TP‘RD"D I‘. u T 5‘ [114214.1 4.1.14) 4,- -1' .11.) m — m Errors occured in taxing the initial and final readings of the position of the trough because of the difficulty in setting a line from the projected stationary have pattern exactly on the fiiducial line. The maximum value of this error was judged to be 0.0020 cm. and, since the trough Was moved between five and six centimeters, the maxi um per- centage error in measuring the wave-length was 1 0.08%. This is for one neasurerent. Since averages of several measurements were obtained, the average wave-lengths have a considerably smaller maximum error. The salts were weiched on a fine chenical balance to 0.001 cm. and, as the minimum amount weished was 5 grams, the maximum error here was I 0.02;. Water was weiehed accurately to 0.1 am. and, the minimum weieht of water used in one c ncentration being 500 grams, the maximum error here was 10.055. Hence the maximum error in concentration was at the rest I 0.055. It is possible that there was an error due to evaporation of water from the solutions while the measurements were being tanen but such an ef ect must have been very small and so it was judged to be a negligible source of error. _ lg _ The frequency of the control crystal was re ed at 1806 t 0.055 vibrations per second. The method used for check- ing the frequency was estimated to be accurate within 2 kilo- cycles per second. heasurenents gave 1506 10.11%. It seem- ed 1ogica1 to assume that the rated control crystal frequency was the actual acoustical frequency within the rated value. The change of frequency when the circuit was being tuned was new noticeable as a beat note in the earphones connected to the electronic mixer but the variation was well below the O . 05,14 . In all but the first few neasurenents (on HR 3) the liquid was carefully stirrrd before every reading. This elim- inated practi‘aily all the possible error due to the existence of a tenperature gradient in the stationary sound beam be- tween the crystal and the reflector. It cannot be assumed that he tenperature is everywhere exactly the same, but, when the velocity change in pure water is only 2 meters per sec— ond per degree (less for concentrated solutions), the error due to temperature may be considered negligible. The temperature always gradually increased while a series of measurerents were being taken on a solution. The temperature or the solutions was therefore taken initially as 240 C. and the readings were taken as the terperature in- creased so that the averaje would be as nearly 250 C. as possible. The average value of the tenpe ature in the sev— eral trials is the value recorded in Table I. The total maximum error in velocity was therefore es- timated to be 10.113. This amounts to a velocity range of 1 1.5 meters per second and a connressibility range of -‘l O A. 10.22% or 10.09 X 10 cm” per dyne (assuming the densi- ties correct). t 2350 c. CD For velocity of ultrasonic waves in water Freyeré gives the value 1498.1 meters per sec .4 nxLO E:e 0 states that his results are not accurate to less than one Q a (u . - neter per second. herjrann g‘ves the veloc1ty as 1494 meters yer sec nd at 240 C. From Freyer's data it can b shown B that the velocity of s und in water changes about a meters per seCond per degree at 240 C. and this correction wvul sake Bergzann's value 1496 meters rer second at 250 C. The valueibr ultrasonic velocity in water was found in this research to be 1496.8 t 1.6 haters per second at 250 0. DISCUSSION ‘F RESVITS and COKCL7SIOUS [‘7 Freyero is the only one who was found to have made a complete series of measurements on electrolytic solutions with the Specific purpose of investigating the relation- ships existinq between concentration, velocity, comrressibil— ity, and temperature. he measured ultrasonic velocities in in the sodium and "otassium halides for several concentrations and temperatures and cogyuted the adiabatic comoressibilities and the ratio of the syecific heats. he rlotted corrressib- ilities and velocity against per cent concentration but was unable to find any empirical relationship between them. The results of this research check rerfectly with all of his conclusions and in addition two empirical relationships have been deternined. So far as the author has been able :o find, no one has ever previously determined these two empirical formulas. fihen the logarithm of the adiabatic compressibility was plotted against molar conoentration the resulting curve was a straisht line. role is the deternining factor for an exponential relationship and it can be expressed as follows: Q :2 (30 E-KC (1) wherng is the adiabatic compressibility of the solution whos nwlar concentration is C, (goitsthe compressibility at zero 0 ncentration or the comprgssibility of pure water at the ease tenherature, and k is tte slope of the straight line formed when the logarithm of compressibility is plotted again- st the molar concentration. 3ee Table 11 for empirical . l . . . values. Since ,zry -—-— it follo s that the veloc1t is related to molar concentration in the following way: ‘i’KC V: V0 %’ ‘3 (7*) where V is the velocity of the ultrasonic uaves in a solu- tion of molar concentration 3 and densityf’, V0 is the velocity of sound in pure water and (% its density at the same temperature, (Dis the solution density, and k is the same constant as that in the first equation. The relation between logarithm of velocity and molar concentration was found not linear. The cause is obviously the variable dersity factor. Thus it is possible to evaluate K directly only by use of the compressibility—concentration relation. The values found for(g% from Graph # 3 were so nearly equal for the different salts that the average value was taken. rhis average value was 44.77 x 10’12 , While that for pure water as calculated directly form the measured velo- . . -12 , City and denszty was 44.79 x 10 . Tie value found from the graph for k in equation 1 was substituted into equation 2 along with the already known factors and the computed vdues found to check with the neasured ones with-in exoer- imental error. (Table III). This is cansidered to be an absolute check on the correctness of the two formulas. Equation 1 shows that the compres:ibility decreases exponentially with the molar concentration. This means that for any Certain increrent, the addition of each increment of salt to the solution causes the sare fractional decrease in compressibility. This is not true for velocity because the density is a function of the concentration. It is well known that when a soluble salt is dissolved in water the volume of the water decreases. Bergmannz (quoting Debye) suggests the following: when an ion, charged either posi- tively or negatively, is placed in water the water molecules are pulled toward the ion because of their high dipole moment. The electrostatic pressure around the ions is of the gder of 10,000 atm spheres and ceases the contraction of the water. This electrostatic pressure causes a decrease in compressibility in much the same may as does increasing the external pressure. It seems logical that this effect should decrease exponentia ly as the number of ions per unit volume of solution increases. Bergmann shows t?at the compressibility for the monovalent salt so utions is greatest for sodium and potassium and sliaht- ly less for lithium. It is much greater for haanesium. The empirical results listed in Table II indicate that addition of mono-valent positive ions to a solution lowers the compress- ibility exponentially and trat the rower of e is practically the same for all such ions. alt ough calculations have been made on -nly one di-valent ion, from the results one may guess that, in general, di-valent ions lower the compressibil- ity exponentially also but here the exponent Of crcs, twice as large. Thus it a“pears that the effect of increasing concent*ati n on the compressibility depends mainly on the ion charge and not on the mass or size of the ion. I {‘0 r¥> 1 (1) (5) (4) (6) (7) BIBLIOGRAPHY Bennett 0.3. The Production and Velocitv fleas- , ’ urenents of ultrasonics in several Liouids, (1941) Thesis, Kichigan state College. Bergmann, Ludwig, Ultrasonics and Their Scientific and Industrial nopligatigns, (1957), John Wiley and eons, New York Ereyer, E.B., Journal Am. Chem. Soc., 55: 1313 (1931) International Critical Tables, Vol. g: 52, McGraw- Hill Book Company, Raw York Landolt-Eornstein, Physikalisch-Chemische Tabellen, voi. g: 1261 (1925) McGrath, J.W., and hurtz, A.R., Rev. Sci. Inst., lg: 128, (I942) Rao, B.V.R. and Ramaida, D.3.S., Phys. Rev., go: 615 (1941) 111111111111111111111111111111HI 3129 9301