w I
v . .‘ at. .vgim‘. w. ‘: an”? M. ...
' a - - c i 1 ~
‘- . . . ¢-.u;r.:0~,.t:9 q... -5 .‘ -.I fi,.\.\‘

   

I
I.

0

g

' v :‘o u-
-

 

o“.
M”) f.‘ "0
'0‘? I

  
 
  

l
I

 

I

¥

‘
In

I

I

I

I.

I

i

(1 f. #7:.”
. b. .
.\
£‘
I
II
I
O

4 .
b
‘I
.D
.0
O
o.’
I
O
I
..
I
0
0
I
O
I
I
ll.

 

.
IV

   

'-‘ O- .o o _. o
5‘ 06E..'. o' - .lo - Q ‘ . .. ' I
f... - ‘ ' . w.’ - m, - -

   
  
   
   
    
 
 
 
   

p. .— -'u «in .~
'ch :.a~.u-o:.::-‘-hu 8“

 
 

 

-«—- ‘u.
"li'l'r
‘7’"
W:
‘.‘.I\

I
I . I
. . o
:- '
.I
.I.|
.0
'l
I

I
0.:
‘.
0":.

.
J I .2 . . . - 9 .
..I ._ x .. . .
. f :“ ‘ ' I‘ I -. ~ .
" Vi. ‘ ' -o- o '9»4 o
- .'- . I
. — I_ ' a n n
.- n
. I.,,, _ ' _.' z
’ I
In J..( . t- .
'5 . -. . . .
3.03. - .v' . .. . ' l

o
o

I

y
o
0

lllllllllb
1","..‘1‘.
9-“ "£
. Q
.‘*.I V
p
. I
'1
G. .

 

                  
   
    
   
   
       

 
 

 

         

 

.. .V. . - . - . U
L'I' . I; . . . 4 g ' I
J .,'-. ' u
t o . < - I' . . ‘ ~J ‘
.. v n . A . - , . flo~l~¥«n1' b? .. «'u:
=- ; ‘ 5V- W»: 3‘:o os‘ud'
- ‘- «‘Q'uo- C o" .w . h --
.._ . . . .. . _ '. .Q‘ir.‘ 0: o‘- s“ 3:; :*‘..":?:,=
. I ' I I u
t - . -, . ., -. ...<+.“»J.‘-..“'-”'\"
- a '. ;:.::"‘.-~I'i. 3 u'. a...“ ‘
«t. o o 4‘
._,_ _ I. . _ .a_,. _ .,
I'. n I . a ‘ ‘C - v -“ O ~Q‘. . “'I ,
a. . , _ a. . ’1. -.-. .-4-.' .0.
.‘ 7 - ' 7 . . .H. ‘ '.'\‘I g 3...:
F . . .. O ‘ . ¢‘_‘ I r ‘
~‘ - o . ‘ r‘Ifi-I ' o‘. t
'3 -‘ ‘ . r . ' ‘ ‘*
~ ‘ . _ . . . I
‘ 4‘ . - s ‘ t
6 '- ‘ u ‘ ' ‘
' U‘ o ~ - A
.5. .1 - ~
. o 4’1 o-
’o ' - " ' . 4 0‘ -
.O.
t .
_ If L m . -
I . ' - Q ‘ l 9
. - . - 7f.
' ' . . ‘ ' ' ‘ '5 u '8"
I - I . o . . .‘- .Q.
”I q' . - I .. . III .’ z.”- ' , 3::

O

I

o
A

      
     
   
   

     

 

      

     

   

  
 

 

    
 
 
 
 
  
  
  

 
 
 

r: a- ‘ - I. 1' ' '
J . ' .-. -.. ‘- -
' . . .3 _ "I . _ - '- -I‘-:o.. . fa“!-
- . ‘. I _ V ‘v_-' a _.
"I' s .- .- 1‘0 -,
‘3 '3“ ' ; ~ - '
,.:_ . .. . .0 .
5‘ .‘3 I ‘ ' . -«‘ I . ‘c -
o ‘70 ' . o ‘ I
o— 4 . .
‘ u: - I ..; -. -. . . . ._ ,
' I - 0 ‘ .0
- w . . I ...
.. x - - . 3. ..:.
v ' . I.‘ I. . 0" :‘v " -‘I z. - m"'”;x..>.¢".
s ‘ . _ . ,. . o -¢.
~ 1 ' ' o I ' I .-
. - . . . u. .
.v . . ‘a 9'.
J-‘i . . - - g '-‘ .'
0‘ j... r ' to I
- ¢ "3- ' " I'v I O ‘
.p . . - ., . o . .1 .‘
.0 p'.. I . . o ' . . I
n'. ‘3‘ I v‘-. . .
.v .’. ‘ ' .. '1 2‘ ‘ - .
' ‘3‘- ; .x ? ' ' .‘I 'f ' ' ’
x I:.’_‘ o. ' .' 9 .. ’Y ' ‘
gt ‘ . o .- . I. .n ‘ .
‘. ‘. a. . . In... .0 .- .I“-‘ .. .9" 3‘
- - - . . ' <
’. . I '. I . I. h. .. ,gfiho-‘.3.t..o{n‘ 1-9 ‘06
. . n u I . . 1 .4. .. '- ”\‘v c': s: to
.‘. II" _ I . _ " '. a n 0‘ z r I
. ‘ . .
I. ' E x 0 ’b'- '0 w
' . LI . . I . ‘ .-
z - . - . - ‘ v----v
. I A. .' .' o v "
:1 - . . .‘ , ‘ . *‘ ' “I '
‘ . . o .- '. 0- t‘ "to
- o «A . - .u' “

  
 
  
  

 

"‘ '. .I "'2 "2:5"..-
:. 2 _.' :5???" .

        
      
  
  
 
  

.. 4'!» .
I
K
.
.
O
Q

.1.

I
If’I
1.9.739? 'l‘ ‘u
2
O o

N
0

 

  
 
   
     
   
 

a CA '
s .., . . .‘ . O
o “4. ' ‘ -- - a Q o - .
': Qt . ‘ I ‘ ‘ ." I. 3-. '
I . U l a- on .V.
‘.., . a" ‘ o -. ‘.. "
. O o _. ' I. 0' o I." .
x 01.; ‘ ' .t- - - ' o '.
b 6'. .v". e 0" l'. '. I ' .
. I - -_ ‘ h
'I .. , ' '
2 ' a . ! . "' ‘ . .
- . .. . .' _ . '
r o - I- no -
'3‘ .2 ' ' ' ‘ ‘~‘ " z
.. A' - ~ . ‘0. .‘ -- . I P o
g: . . . '- ' ‘ ' ‘.
I.» 7‘. 0 I . . - . . . '
- a .. . . _ . ~
-. -. u- o - . _ o. . .
- {.- o. .' 5 -" .. . - on. ..
" o. ' ' ‘ I .' A”. ' ‘
z. r. g .— 0 .. “ I I. C ‘
, ... - . 0-00 .0 — . .
n.»,:.,- ' . ., . :1 - -. --;-~-'
- . ... I '
.I_ "ff . o ' J I- . . u“ o.:'
K. ”K 7-. . ... J I .' '. '
o . O I~ ' . ' . - .. o'.
.1, t . q ~A .. O . . ._. . I '
- ‘ “‘~ ' . ' ‘ - I n' :4 '0 g"...
- - '~: I u- o. .‘. ..'
..: V " . .9 0 3 .
.. . . .a .0
’4 ' 0 _ . '. o. o ‘-

   

    
  
 

 

2'.
Wufi‘ I -0
.‘O.-

 
 

‘leo

-- vuav..oa-
I can 03‘: .' a“
D

0‘

  
  
  

 
     
  
  

-.--\

  

      
   
 

 

:03 9" IOA ‘-
fg‘...rg..o. ‘«~- o-.‘1v~.“cfin --, «or ion-p.004c-ov .Q. ” O‘
., . . . . o.
‘ .u . .' ... 3' t. 3.3.2:.- ' ”exam-‘1. :-‘:, .:..‘u-:. ‘fl ~€-B:I '“ ' 'r:°~"-' " ""
0 IV.- "‘0 ‘ .0“ v0. ’43.»). ufimm-c:. o.- . .. .zzwf:.. CI“::.
I ...I.-:Toou “.t'..a':‘.“;J-g'v'3'w .. v“:. 00*. mséoo
O

      
  
 
  

   
  
 
   
 
 

   
  

      

  
 
 

'1‘. 2».
.‘ u- -. . I w-
1....P'...;..I'.I“I..-.19... 5-,on o oa- O " W
0‘ - a . . I ~ . 4! .. .;I “‘03.. ... g. 'g... '?‘{Q . “u“...o'. 'I- .> . at. a. .>‘:"‘ 01‘"
a .I .‘;I.M '

     

w o.::.:'~‘”n“ 4".
rand-r».- “Orr-0?...”- 1'9
5?”, w..'.~.
fill-E: .-
T ' :33?“ new... “Mg-Os
~ broac- «-Q
me-IM«-wnw

thnQ". “i W.«4~§

 

a 0..
v . y. 0.
-v . .o;:\A: r: o -‘ in
“-'-...-‘..‘Q" M ‘.......- fl‘...
o -m LI Ia), .I.

  
    

      
  
   
 
 
  

     
 

   
  
  

   

 

         

 

OI
_ I _ 1. ‘70-. 0"
' :-’Oh:‘a$‘0-‘. ' H... o . ‘E"“ 0"...- '1
r,» ‘1
M . «n ‘m myth-m a.“
w ‘l . n- o. o”. 16 ‘- WA mm
4:: 0...»,- mn‘.‘ om IOW:M o.' A - “I’m”. ‘ "g... ~m:.$= q. -. Q [m
3 fit?“- I ma! '. ‘W ‘fiWJR- I “With-5300‘ K? v. ‘ «pi-5 ov-qo m"
.4“... ‘-:I‘.‘ n X.“ . no“ ‘;«a‘ruoguoi. .1: lfi‘tW'. u...,. . . . . :3
I MW T '3’... “Va. W‘m" WW W h. .Ww . A
00‘ 33"". I". i m¥€3:--., ’I'. ." '”‘ «“a‘ “mm“ 00 0-71 - W?.Iiun:u “’04 K A 40 ao-vé em. ' -w;
."‘ k I I :I “H“‘V inn- ,A amigo «no, , ,. n '- ‘ ,.
. 7 o - . Wt F“ ”m l. *4." r _ w.
, . (I “ :4». ma {an n o” ._-,.!cr 0 o it... . 0.500;.fl 08 A. o..- , dgcné. .n «5 « Nuoq “goo-c 94- ~ uo—I 00-
l - . _ . . . . .‘ n I. . J _ c . ' . ‘ .. -I ::€...a’:cw . - n04 . -‘ .“’.>o.o.nz. . .I, o” «10“... p ‘ .q‘“.‘a*.m—t_.wupa - “..' '"1'3‘? .’._-...a,,'..,... I M:
'. .Af- . cub-.11: . k“... 3;... '.g', .I “IV...” I‘M.” ,, r...‘ . - . .. , z. '_n"“‘I A -_ A . ~.._.* 3.13:: ‘ .- -.~;:.::. ‘- ' '. ~31" L van: 3:2" ‘17:, "‘1"; I flm‘w ' ’ ' ‘ ‘ -‘:__g:;_'m'- “24' .
1‘ ’7‘ 1m r.“ v w __ , V _ .

 

 

.\ r...
i” N
ix.» -
:L .
m-
In“

 

 

PERE MARQUETTE
RAIL-TRAIL
OF
MID-MICHIGAN

.11;

.~"\"\" \ }’_ /.

1‘ u I
; . ~ _ a, a ‘ ‘5' ..
. L . , '
/ “ I‘ '. '_' ”I“: ,
ICUJOO A‘h‘... -93.-
.‘h- -‘41- ”'1. to a
n— -A ‘ .A-- ._ 4 It. '4. ‘
-. p— .‘ , > 0—1 : a -—
C ’ ‘ .

."1 .-:=:
-~ ' -" --

 

AN INTRINSIC CASE STUDY
OF A
SUCCESSFUL
RAILS-TO-TRAILS

 

 

 

‘

 

 

DE

AC

PRE

EXT

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DEDICATION ..................................................................................................... i
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ....................... L ............................................................ ii
PREFACE ........................................................... i ............................................... iii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................. v
1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 1
Purpose ......................................................................................... 2

Hypothesis .................................................................................... 4

Research Methodology ................................................................. 5

2. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ........................................................... 7
Literature Review .......................................................................... 8
Greenways ................................................................................... 12
Rails-To-Trails, A Brief History ................................................... 18

3. LEGISLATION

Interstate Commerce Commission Laws and

Regulations ................................................................................. 24
State Transportation Preservation Act ......................................... 24
Michigan Trailways Act ............................................................... 25
Authorizing Legislation ............................................................... 26
Part 721--Michigan Trailways .................................................... 26

Part 733u-Landowner Liability ................................................... 27

Act 28---Transportation Preservation .......................................... 28

Requirements for Trail Designation ............................................. 29

Process for Designation ............................................................... 31

Benefits ....................................................................................... 34

Current Michigan Trailways Designations .................................... 36

Future Michigan Trailways Consideration .................................... 38

Lansing River Trail ...................................................................... 39

Federal Trail System Act ............................................................. 4O

4. PERE MARQUETTE RAIL-TRAIL OF MID-MICHIGAN .............. 42
Description .................................................................................. 43

Trail Data .................................................................................... 51

Trail Survey-«Participants Comments ......................................... 55

Community Support .................................................................... 59

Interview with William C. Gibson ................................................ 74

5. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................ ....79
Conclusion .................................................................................. 80
Recommendations for Future Studies ........................................... 82
BIBLIOGRAPHY .............................................................................................. 85
APPENDD§ES ................................................................................................... 90
Appendix A ............................................................................................. 91
Appendix B ........................................................................................... 101

Appendix C ........................................................................................... 200

 

List of Figures and Tables ..................................................................... 278

SUPPLEMENT ................................................................................................ 279

DEDICATION

This research project is dedicated to my wife Deborah A. F. Knickerbocker and my
daughter Jillian Merewyn Knickerbocker. Deb who moved with me and worked
while I spent two years of our lives getting an education from Michigan State
University. And to Jill who died at the age of 23 on January 25, 1997 fi'om
Multiple Sclerosis, may she never be forgotten and may she always be remembered
with love.

W. C. Knickerbocker, Jr.
May 2, 1997

ii

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Laura Cruce, Program Assistant, Rails-To-Trails Conservancy, Lansing, M].

William C. Gibson, Director, Midland County Department of Parks & Recreation,
Midland, Nfl.

Professor Herbert Norman, Urban & Regional Planning, Michigan State
University, East Lansing, MI.

Professor Miriam Rutz, Urban & Regional Planning, Michigan State University,
East Lansing, MI.

Robert M. Wilson, J .D. Policy Advisor, Senate Majority Policy Office, Lansing,
MI.

Philip Wells, Trailways Program Manager, Forest Management Division, Michigan
Department of Natural Resources, Lansing, MI.

All photographs by W. C. Knickerbocker, Jr.

iii

PREFACE

The structure of this report has five primary sections beginning with an
introduction, an historical perspective, legislation, a detailed study of the Pere
Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan (PMRTMM) and ending with conclusions
and recommendations based on the information gathered. The introduction states
the hypothesis and addresses the methodology used for the study. The historical
perspective section contains a literature review, and examines the history of
greenways and rails-to-trails. The section on legislation gives a thorough review
of Interstate Commerce Commission Laws, State Transportation Preservation Act,
Michigan Trailways Act, and the Federal Trail System Act. These are the basic
statutes that authorize the development of rails-to-trails. The fourth section
examines the PMRTMM. A detailed traveling description of the trail will be used
that was taken fi'om the home page of the Friends of the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail
of Mid-Michigan. Articles from local newspapers, local fiind raising events, and
trail brochures are used to briefly summarize the comments of citizens who have
been involved with the trail. A detailed participants trail survey comments section
was taken fi'om A Vision for a Linear Park in Midland County fiom Midland to
Clare, Michigan, the master plan for the trail. Finally, the report summarizes an
interview with William C. Gibson, the Director of Midland Parks and Recreation.
The report concludes by analyzing the data collected during the study and ofl‘ers
recommendations and strategies which other communities can use when building

their rails-to-trails.

iv

The conclusion suggests that people as advocates and participants are the
key element to a successfiil rails-to-trail. Recommendations for future study
include what are the economic benefits of Michigan rail-trails, how many people
are using the rail-trail, what is the difference between a standard park and a linear
park, how does crime along the trail relate to crime in the community, and how are

property values changed based on adjacency to the rail-trail.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to explain the types of greenways and trails
that are currently being designed in the United States and addresses various issues
that are involved with greenways and trails. These issues include varied concerns
of the citizens who abut greenways and trails, an enormous perception that
trailways cause a lowering of property values, citizens’ concerns about the
potential for crime, that trailways are paths giving access to drug trafiic, that
vandals fi'equent trailways with their cans of spray paint ready to deface private
property and concerns about how the greenways and trails in their community will
survive after being built. The Pere Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan
(PMRTMM) a linear greenway constructed along an abandoned railbed, will be
used as a case study, to address the issues involved with designating, constructing
and maintaining greenways. I I!

This study explains how community involvement has helped to mitigate
these perceptions of trailways development and contribute to the success of the
trailways system. Few studies have been completed that document the relationship
between community involvement and the success of a trailway system. Community
involvement is central to the success and fiiture of a trailway. The major thrust of

this paper is to add to the growing information on rails-to-trails.

Literature Review

Greenways are linear paths which provide recreational opportunities for
such things as boating, biking, hiking, skating, snowmobiling, cross-country skiing,
rollerblading, and birding. They also serve a variety of purposes such as protecting
sensitive environments, allowing plant and animal species a path for movement
fi'om one protected area to another, and allowing a variety of recreational
opportunities. Greenways are found in a variety of environments and are used to
connect city parks to each other, protect the natural plant structure along a river,
connect forest areas together to provide corridors between these forest areas.

Greenways are found along old railroad corridors in the United States.
Over 500 of these railroad corridors have been converted from rails to trails. This
phenomenon started in the 1970’s when local hikers found that old abandoned
railbeds were excellent places to walk. These abandoned railbeds were usually
found out in the countryside and were away from automobile traffic. Eventually,
users organized local groups, called Friends, to develop these railbeds into rails-to-
trails and expand these linear recreational areas to include both rural and urban
areas.

Case Study Site

This case study looks at how successfiil the PMRTMM has become and
looks at how the PMRTMM has grown in the past nine years. Growth does not
mean length, but the variety of opportunities that greet the trail user along the rail-

trail. A successful rails-to-trails will command user interaction and demand

vii

continuous growth and maintenance. Maintenance has become one way that
Friends groups show their commitment to a rail-trail and show involvement with
keeping the rail-trail a viable and useful recreational draw to their communities.
This is a single case study of one excellent trail and can be used as a bench mark

for other trails, although each trail is unique.
Research Methods

Methods used to study the PMRTMM include researching local and area
newspaper articles about the trail, evaluating the trail master plan prepared by The
Pollack Design Associates Consultant Team, and an interview with William C.
Gibson who is the director of Parks and Recreation for Midland County.
Newspaper articles have been found that address trail issues from when the trail
was first proposed, completion of the Coleman Mile and the dedication of the
complete trail. Letters have been received from the Secretary of the Interior, the
Governor of Michigan and many citizens of the State of Michigan. The master
plan is a comprehensive look at the history of the railbed, the design and layout of
the trail and is an indicator of the importance the community placed on good trail
design. Mr. Gibson’s interview is a detailed vision of what he felt the trail could
become and ultimately, what the trail has become.

There are some deficiencies in the study because data were not available
concerning the number of people who are now using the trail and Mr. Gibson feels
this kind of study must be done; however, it is possible to comment on the types of
people who are using the trail and the great distances they are willing to travel to

ride the 21 mile long rail-trail in Midland County.

viii

Findings

The PMRTMM was built because of a strong personal and public
commitment to building a rail-trail for the citizens of Midland County. Strong
leadership was given to the building effort by individuals such as William C.
Gibson, Tom Pounders, and Carl Gerstacker. All of these people believed in a rail-
trail concept and committed themselves to developing the trail. Over time there
has been a strong sense of public priority and public participation. A local Friends
group was formed and the other communities along the trail committed themselves
to trail development. Funding came from the Midland Foundation which relies on
citizen contributions and the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act
(ISTEA). The citizens of Midland County raised the matching funds for ISTEA
money. No tax dollars have been involved with the development of the Pere

Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan.

INTRODUCTION

 

 

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to determine why a community such as
Midland, Michigan, is capable of developing a successful trailways system, the
Pere Marquette Trail of Mid-Michigan, despite a perception that trailways cause a
lowering of property values, that trailways are for elite groups of cyclists and
joggers, that trailways are paths giving access to drug traffic and that vandals
frequent trailways with their cans of spray paint ready to deface private property.

“Rails-to-trails proposal risky

To the Editor:
I read an article posted in a gas station yesterday concerning a
group that is trying to get the counties to take the old CSX railroad
bed and make a hiking and biking trail. On paper that might
sound like a good idea but what about reality? The hikers and
bikers of today are fighters not sportsmen. If the motorcycle gangs
and drug dealers want new territory why not let them buy it? A
decent person or child or animal, wild or otherwise, would not be
safe anywhere near that trail. Talk about highway robberies, how
many people would be robbed or murdered just trying to cross the
trail on a country road? Wake up, America. ” (Letter of protest
early in the Pere Marquette Rail- Trail ’s history).

“In any case we do oppose the creation of any portion of

the trail that may aflect our area. We would fight this to the full

extent of the law. ” (Portion of letter protesting the Kalamazoo

River Valley T rail).

“lhe citizens of Charleston Township also respectfully protest our

tax dollars being spent for such activities that special groups

create. Not only do they waste our tax dollars, they jeopardize the

peace and security of our families, our homes and our pr0perty.

lhe serenity and lack of foot traflic is why we chose this area to

settle. ” (Portion of letter protesting the Kalamazoo River Valley

Trail).

For the complete text of these letters and a response to the Charleston Township
letter, please see Appendix A. In addition, it is the purpose of this study to
determine how community involvement has helped to mitigate these perceptions of
trailways development and determine what relationships exist between community
involvement and success of the trailways system.

The need for this study is based on the lack of analysis of the
successfulness of the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid- Michigan and that no
study has been completed that documents the relationship between community
involvement and the success of a trailways system. Further, there is a need to study
trailways system usage and the types of usage. This will help to create better
system access and a better understanding of the recreational possibilities for

additional systems across the state.

The problems that are being addressed by this study are why has the
Midland trailways system been successful despite opposition to systems in
Michigan and what is the relationship between community involvement and
trailways success in Midland. As an extension of this study, it is hoped that more
studies of other successfiil communities will be done and will be added to the
literature of successful trailways.

Hypothesis

It is expected that there must be strong individual advocates who create the
necessary beginnings for the successful starting of a trailways system. Further, if
there is not strong community advocacy for a trailways system, the trailways
system will be a failure. Therefore, a trailways systems success is based on strong
community involvement from the conception of the project to bring a trailways
system into a community. By using qualitative techniques, the advocacy of
individuals and groups that were involved in the successfirl building of a trailways
system will explain the success of the trailways system. Ifthe community
advocacy groups are not involved in continuing this support, the trailways system
in the community will be in decline. Community involvement must be shown for a
trailway to continue, to develop and grow. Community involvement generates
newspaper articles, correspondence and the necessary financial backing to maintain
a trailway. It creates the publicity necessary to encourage users and a trail must be
used to be sustainable. Without the involvement of individuals, groups and a

broad community efl‘ort, a trailways system will not be successful.

Research Methodology

The primary purpose of this study is to understand why a trailways system
is successful. A case study of a trailways system is being conducted by using
qualitative techniques such as interviews, researching correspondence from trail
advocates and opponents and by researching newspaper articles that relate to
trailways issues. Because a trail is being pre-selected for this study and because of
the author’s interest in the trail, this is an intrinsic case study. (Stake 1995, 4)
There is an intrinsic interest in this trail and why it has become successful.

Key Interview

The case study will interview the leading advocate for the Pere Marquette
Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan (PMRTMM) who has continued working towards
making this trailways system an enduring success. By using a qualitative
interviewing technique, this study is designed to understand the meanings that the
individual is communicating to the interviewer. (Rubin, 1995)

Document Review

Much has been written about the PMRTMM, by selecting this rail-trail
system it is possible to benefit fi'om the amount of information that has already
been prepared. All correspondence, newspaper articles, and survey responses
were gathered fi'om the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, the Midland
County Parks and Recreation office and the Master Plan.

Analysis
The analysis of the qualitative data collected is done by looking for

individual involvement, citizen involvement and community involvement during the

acquisition, construction and the continued growth of the trail after its initial
completion. Continued grth does not mean growth in length, but rather adding

to trail amenities.

HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

 

 

Literature Review

Literature that deals directly with a trailways system success is extremely
limited. Most literature that deals with this success is from the popular media or
from the advocacy groups that are developing the trailways system. Peer reviewed
articles that use sound qualitative or quantitative methods have not been found for
this study. There is extensive literature that discusses what constitutes a greenway
and how greenways should be designed1 and ecological landscape experts are now
developing whole procedures for designing greenways for the whole earth
community’. Even as a trailways system becomes more important to the
community, most of the literature deals with the attachments people have to their
recreational experience3 .

The National Park Service has published a resource book that describes the
Economic Impacts of Protecting Rivers, Trails and Greenway Corridors (US
Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1992). However, not having a
basic example to design a study for a trailways system success should be viewed as
a challenge and an opportunity to extend the literature about trailways. With the

availability of literature that discusses why people are attached to trailways system

 

‘ Flink, Charles A and Robert M. Seams. Loring LaB. Schwarz, ed Greenways: A Guide to
Planning, Design, and Development. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1993. Little, Charles.
Greenways for America. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 1990.

2 Fabos, Julius Gy, and Jack Ahern, eds. Greenways: The Beginning of an International
Movement. The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1995. Smith, Daniel S. and Paul Cawood
Hellmund Ecology of Greenways: Design and Function of Linear Conservation Areas.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.

3 Moore, Roger L. and Alan R Graefe. Attachments to Recreation Settings: The Case of Rail-
Trail Users. Leisure Sciences. (1994) 16: 17-31. Stokols, Daniel. Instrumental and Spiritual
Views of People-Environment Relations. American Psychologist. 45 (1990) 5: 641-646.

and the outdoors, perhaps starting a discussion on why a trailway systems is
successfirl, with relation to a perceived value to the experience, would start the
process towards understanding why people work so hard to establish a trailways
system.

In looking at why people view the success of a trailway as important, there
are two possible and different philosophical views of how people react to their
environment. (A third philosophical view, the minimalist viewpoint, will not be
discussed in this study.) “The instrumental perspective views physical settings as
‘tools’ for supporting individual productivity and organizational effectiveness-«as
the physical means for achieving key behavioral and economic goals....In
contrast....a spiritual orientation in which physical setting are viewed not as tools,
but as ends in themselves-«as contexts in which important human values can be
cultivated” (Stokols, 1990). In the instrumental perspective land is viewed as an
economic resource, whereas in the spiritual perspective land is viewed as a place to
cultivate the human spirit and enrich the experience of living. Table 2.14 addresses
the differences between these two value systems. As this study progresses, it is
suspected that people who have worked hard on a trailways system will exhibit
many of the spiritual characteristics that are listed above.

Roger L. Moore has been able to show that recreationalists develop place
specific orientations and place attachments. These place attachments are

dependent upon the distance a person has to travel to get to a trailways system and

 

4 Table quoted directly from Stokols, Daniel. Instrumental and Spiritual Views of People-
Environment Relations. American Psychologist. 45 (1990) 5: 641-646.

 

82:08

03585:: :5 0382.8: 0. :0>.w 25.880 .280 M25225:
.8 83:3 2: 882.855 :5 8580.5 8.: 000008 a 5

:5 .805 8805035 .8 8.0.2.00 :5 80520.5: 50:05.5
2: 00585 50 5.: 50008 8508:8800 : 5 :0303 £05003.

38:8 5828835 .8 0:5: 88.305588 2.8.5008. 2:
:0 :5 8.28: 023.8 :5 0.32. .8 8.5308. 2: :0 252.8”:

580800 0:82? 0: :080 05 8.: 0.08.028 :85:
80:088. .8 8280.083 2.008 :5 2283.8. 0:82: .8
800: 002:: 2: 5.3 8.2.000. :. :85: 80.80380 :0 2588m—

.282.8 5832.2. :5 $5582.52.
€0,880 :2: 5 :03 5 £8.52: 83.30.00: :5 5080.083:
:2: .8 205.0: 2: .8 8:2 :. :08508 2:088:35 .8 3:25

80:88.80 2: .8 5852 0280.5 :5 2.2.83 :0 25:25.

.:05>:.:0 2. 50 000.2, 582.

80:5 202.088 .8052: 03.50535 :0 :2: 0:88:52:

:0 0.53280 .8808 5:500 580.5: 5.3 :0:800:

:5 :02028 55:»: .208 2: 80: 055:8 :5 .280:
25> 2. 0: :0835 5:38: :0508: ”080.305. 0.52.885
.8 8:50.85 :5 30802: 2: 5 :0303 2.05003.

8:88: 0:. 052.8 :5 0.32. 5.3 85.00.05

80:02: >00. .8 8:22.00 :5 05:88.2: 2: :0 0.5.8.5.
.Am0:..0:3w :85: 80:08:20

:0 005:0: 00.80550 2.008-803 80:5 .8 2:082:80:

33:5 2: 2:3» :805 :. 823088 8805035
:5 85:52.. :85: .8 8228.08: 2: :0 0.02.2.8m

.8080 5.52. :5 £0,880
5832.2. .8 8:2 :. 3.58.2. :0::0: 3.28 8805835.

.808:0._3:0 2: .8 5882 .2858 :0 £5.88...“—

.m.a0w 0.80800 :5 3832.2.

 

 

:02? :. 80800 0 5 £02. :. ::0 5 5 :0303 80:80:35..

.8500

 

832:0: 8.: 052: 5 5 L003: 5 5 :0303 82893:...“

 

 

28.58% ~S=0E=E3=m70300m8 58.5 88.5%. .28 .5208505 50.80% 000=0L0§Q

N .N 0365

 

10

the frequency with which a person uses a trailways system. He finds that age is
important and that the type of activity for which the trailways system is being used
is equally important (Moore and Graefe, 1994). Place identity and place
dependency play a strong role in how a trailways system is used. It is possible that
a trailways system will be more successfirl if it is promoted and identified as a place
where activities take place in a safe environment. People who use a trailways
system identify with the system and the success of the system grows with use. It
becomes more successfirl. “Study results imply that how attachments develop may
in fact vary for place dependence and place identity. The more functional place
dependence may develop relatively quickly as long as the setting is convenient and
good for a user’s chosen activity, whereas the more affective place identity could
require longer periods of time to emerge. This is consistent with the finding that
the users of the oldest trail (the 14 year-old, suburban Lafayette/Moraga Trail) had
significantly higher place identity than the users of the other, younger trails,
whereas no difierences in levels of place dependence were found among trails of
very different ages” (Moore and Graefe, 1994).

Economics also plays a role in developing a trailways system. What does
the community get fi'om the system after it is in place? The National Park Service
has developed a basic table (Table 2.2)5 that shows what a person must spend to
access a system when using a variety of activities. The National Park Service

believes that these kinds of expenditures can stimulate the local economy of the

 

5 Prepared by Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance National Park Service, 1992.

 

 

 

Table 2.2 10-A

ACTIVITY PURCHASE LOW END MID-RANGE
COST COST

Bicycling Bicycle 300.00 800.00
Helmet 50.00 50.00

Lock 30.00 30.00

Bicycle Rack 25.00

Bicycle Pack 50.00

Water Bottle 10.00

Shoes 45.00

Clothing 50.00

Car Rack 150.00

Total m 1210.00
Hiking Shoes/Boots 45.00 120.00
Socks 10.00 45.00

Daypack 20.00 40.00

Water Bottle 5.00 5.00

Total w 210.00
Birdwatching Binoculars $0.00 1 50.00
Spotting Scope 200.00

Field Guide 10.00 50.00

Camera, lenses, etc. 1000.00

Total w 1400.00
Cross-country Siding Skis 85.00 250.00
Boots 40.00 90.00

Bindings 10.00 30.00

Poles 15.00 30.00

Wax 15.00 60.00

Clothing 100.00

Gaiters 25.00

Total 1“ 585.00
Horseback Riding Lessons 250.00 250.00
Hard Hat 40.00 40.00

Boots 100.00 100.00

Crop 15.00 1 5.00

Horse 1000.00

Tack 500.00

Boarding (annual) 2400.00

Total 12;.” 4305.00
Skating lnline Skates 85.00 175.00
Wrist Guards 20.00 20.00

Knee and Elbow Pads 40.00 60.00

Total M 255.00

 

 

11

community and literature from the Rails-To-Trails Conservancy supports this
supposition. This is done by increasing the need for the type of equipment listed.
The economic success of a trailways system may be tied to the kinds of retail -
outlets that are available in the community and could possibly direct the
community to the kinds of businesses that need to be developed.

One of the arguments being used against the trailways system is that these
systems are being used by elitists who peddle around on $1500.00 bikes. From an
economic viewpoint, this is not bad, but it does not address the perception that
these trailways are being used by a limited group of individuals at the expense of
the local land owner. Therefore, more research should be conducted about the real
economic benefits to the community as a whole and not for an elite group of
individuals.

Conflict plays a role in the continued success of a trailways system and this
should be a component of future research. This form of conflict, however, is
between the variety of trailways uses and users. Conflict of this nature could
possibly result in the decline of the successfulness of a trailways system and should
continue to be researched. “The National Recreational Trails Advisory Committee
identified trail-user conflicts on multiple-use trails as a major concern that needs
resolution” (Moore, 1994). There is extensive literature on these kinds of conflicts

and should help add to the body of research on determining why a trailways system

is successful.

12

Finally, the major component of this study is to find out why a particular
trailways system is successful. At this time it appears that no one is conducting
these kinds of studies and an attempt will be made to expand the search for this
information. Because there are limited resources for this study, it makes this study
all the more important. If this study can begin to understand why a community has
succeeded in building a successful trailways system, it may help other communities
when they begin the process of starting their system. Also, it should help firture

researchers with finding ways to view trailways system research.
Greenways

Open spaces grab the eye, charge the senses, accelerate the beating heart
or calm the soul relaxing in meadows lying next to babbling brooks. Experiencing
the pull of open spaces urges the outdoors person to visit new places, leads to the
discovery of the Yellowstone of the West or islands that time forgot in passing.
Open spaces contribute to the reality of being human while maintaining a separate
wildness viewed by experiencing what this wildness brings through interaction with
all of the random possibilities of encounters. However, as populations increase
and open spaces fi'agment, the United States teeters on the edge of destroying its
precious natural heritage and the continuity of wild open spaces. The need for
open spaces continues to grow as the population grows with increased interaction
with members of society and reduced spatial relationships (Stokols, 1972).

Greenways are linear open spaces established along natural corridors or

railroad right-of-ways and are used by humans, animals and plants (Little, 1990).

13

These corridors link recreational areas, natural areas, cultural features or historical
sites and can be located in either rural or urbanized areas. Millions of Americans
enjoy greenways each year and, along with the recreational benefits, provide
connecting links for many animals and plants in an increasingly human trodden
environment. However, notwithstanding the obvious benefits of greenways to
both the public and the natural environment, greenways are not without vocal and
violent detractors. Active private property rights groups are becoming
increasingly vocal and violent in their verbosity and in their outrage at the public’s
access to a variety of land types that traditionally have been left to the farmer and
rancher. Planners must create a better understanding of the ways needed to
mediate this divisive process while showing how greenways benefit both the
private property advocate and the public access advocate by the economical
development that springs from the additional people who enter a community via
the greenway system.

Greenways connect the fragmented landscape broken by human uses found
throughout the United States. Most people experience greenways without a
cognizant realization of this use. Walking along the banks of the Red Cedar River
in East Lansing, Michigan, the trees lining the bank spreads a canopy over the river
and the casual jogger or avid bird watcher. In the simplest terms possible, a
greenway is a linear space following a linear physical feature of the landscape.
Greenways can be used to create a connection between multiple parks or natural

areas in the landscape (Smith and Hellmund, 1993). “Greenways can range in

14

form fi'om narrow urban trail corridors to winding river corridors to very wide,

wilderness-like landscape linkages. They can straddle waterways, traverse

ridgelines, or cut across upland areas independent of natural geomorphic features.

They occur in different types of landscapes, from cities and suburbs to farmland

and commercial forests” (Smith and Hellmund, 1993).

Greenways variety is not limited to either city or rural community, river or

railroad bed, or road or highway. Greenways move people and wildlife through a

maze of trails that resist categorization (Little, 1990). Little lists five major project

types of greenways being developed by communities:

1.

“Urban riverside greenways, usually created as part of (or
instead of) a redevelopment program along neglected, ofien
run-down city waterfronts.

Recreational greenways, featuring paths and trails of various
kinds, often of relatively long distance, based on natural
corridors as well as canals, abandoned railbeds (there are many
of these, as we shall see), and other public rights-of-way.
Ecologically significant natural corridors, usually along rivers
and streams and (less often) ridgelines to provide for wildlife
migration and “species interchange,” and hiking.

Scenic and historic routes, usually along a road or highway (or

less often, a waterway), the most representative of them making

15

an effort to provide pedestrian access along the route or at least
places to alight from the car.

5. Comprehensive greenway system of networks, usually based on
natural landforms such as valleys and ridges but sometimes
simply an opportunistic assemblage of greenways and open
spaces of various kinds to create an alternative municipal or
regional green infrastructure” (Little, 1990).

In the United States, a community movement has developed around
creating trailways to establish links connecting parks and other green spaces.
Generally, these areas are linear in nature and are collectively called greenways.
Greenways support a number of specific functions such as protecting riparian
areas, forming corridors for wildlife to move fi'om one green island to another
green island or connecting a broken landscape created by human settlement
patterns. Increasingly, greenways are being developed with a recreational function
in mind and with a thought towards the peacefirl enjoyment of quiet green spaces.
Nevertheless forming community trailways is not without criticism and is
inheremly diflicult for any trailways association.

Charles E. Little, the leading advocate for greenways and author of
Greenways for America, has spent a significant part of his life researching how
communities are developing greenways and the excitement being generated by
successful greenways development; however, in the literature leading to trailways

and greenways development, there are few specific studies being done on

16

successful trailways. Numerous references can be found where conflict has

become a major component of trailways and greenways articles and, in general, the

current political climate is strengthening an anti-trailways movement which is

responsible for some of the conflict being seen in trailways growth.

The following are examples of the conflict between trailways advocates and

the anti-trailways movement. These examples are one form of greenways-«rails-

to-trails:

“Hundreds of miles of potential rails-to-trails in Indiana are suffering from a
backlash created by the Indiana Farm Bureau and a handful of adjacent
landowners in the center of the state. The anti-trail groups have been given
extensive coverage in local newspapers following a court decision in their
favor. In June, 1996, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled in favor of adjacent
landowners who challenged Conrail’s ownership of the Sugar Creek and
Wabash Heritage Trail, a 29-mile corridor between Crawfordsville, Indiana and
the Wabash River. The court held that any railroad deed referring to a
property as a “right-of-way” will be construed as an easement that
automatically reverts to adjacent landowners upon the abandonment by the
railroad” (Trailblazer, 1996).

In Michigan, “Corn does not appear to grow well in old rail-trail beds,’ said
Rails-to-Trails Conservancy’s Michigan Chapter Director Ann Beaujean after
touring blockaded sites along the Fred Meijer Heartland Trail August 28 with

Franz Mojdis, Stanton City Manager and Friends of the Trail President. The

17

sporadic blockades along the RTC-owned and Friends of the Trail-operated
corridor have been erected by adjacent landowners who sued for ownership of
the trail and lost. All sections of the trail are passable, despite the sewage
drainage pipes and the plowing and planting of the corridor” (Trailblazer,
1996)

Bombastic verbiage abounds in the local media of communities who have
or who are thinking of trailways, about private property rights being usurped or
that crime is a problem along trailways. According to the Burlington Vermont
Police Department, the Stowe Recreation Path is one of the safest places in the
town because it is generating only 0.0013% of calls to police over a 27 month
period. (Trailblazer, 1996). With this one exception, there is neither evidence to
support or contradict these assumptions about trailways. Along with this lack of
evidence, there appears to be little analysis of a community’s perception of
trailways or the perception of trailways in the areas surrounding trailways. A
trailways success is based on a community’s willingness to compromise and
willingness to work continually in the community to keep the trailways successful.

Even though there is a lack of specific evidence to indicate how successful
trailways can be, a number of trailways are being developed in the United States.
Mth a number of major national trailways organizations and many local groups
involved in trailways development, trailways enjoy wide support and wide usage
by the general public. Many books and articles have been written about trailways

development during the past 30 years; however, little has been written about the

18

data needed to support the amount of crime on trailways, the economic benefits of
trailways development or how communities bond together to develop a successful
trailways system. By communicating with successful communities and collecting
data surrounding successful trailways, it will be possible to start the process of
describing the trailways movement in the United States and helping communities
with the process of convincing their citizens how important trailways are to the

recreational needs and the preservation needs of their community.
Rails-to-Trails, A Brief History

Rails-to-trails began quietly in the 1960s when railroad companies started
to experience increased financial difliculty and began to abandoned various rail
corridors across the United States. The first trail users were people who realized
that they could take a quiet walk along a safe path and would find themselves
traveling through undeveloped rural areas, crossing over old trestles, going
through old railroad tunnels and going through natural areas that were still similar
to the original natural areas of their community before development took place.
The fledgling rails-to-trails movement began when advocates for recreation and
advocates for environmental preservation began to realize that this was a resource
that could be used by the community and, at the same time, preserve natural areas
(Nevel and Hamik, 1990).

The first rails-to-trails were purchased with state moneys such as the
Illinois Prairie Path in Chicago, the Elroy-Sparta Trail in Wisconsin and the Burke-

Gilman Trail in Seattle, WA. The importance of these rails-to-trails is as varied as

 

19

the trails themselves. The Illinois Prairie Path in Chicago provided a much needed
greenway in the urbanized area of Chicago while the Elroy-Sparta Trail in
“fisconsin brought needed tourist dollars to a rural area that is scenically beautifirl,
but lacked enough attractions to bring tourists into the communities along the trail.
The major importance of the Burke-Gilman Trail was that it introduced the
concept of rails-to-trails to the country as a whole. When people at the University
of Washington realized that they had an abandoned railroad running beside their
campus, they asked the Burlington Northern Railroad to donate the property to
them for trail development. The railroad company refirsed and the Interstate
Commerce Commission stepped in with binding arbitration and ultimately this
rails-to-trails was developed (N evel and Harnik, 1990).

In 1976, Congress enacted the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory
Reform Act which added the Rails-to-Trails Grant Program under the Department
of the Interior. The act was passed to provide much needed reform to the railroad
industry that was experiencing difficult times with competition from the trucking
industry. It set up grants to entities that wished to build rails-to-trails and helped
the railroad with the abandonment of rail corridors that were no longer profitable.
Also, it included the provision that allowed for the possible reactivation of rail
service along these corridors.

“(b) Information and Funding - The Secretary of the Interior, after
consultation with the Secretary of Transportation, shall, in

accordance with this subsection, provide financial, educational, and

20

technical assistance to local, State, and Federal governmental
entities for programs involving the conservation of abandoned
railroad rights-of-way to recreation and conservation used, in such
manner as to coordinate and accelerate such conversion, where
appropriate. Such assistance shall include --

(l) encouraging and facilitating exchanges of information dealing
with the availability of railroad rights-of way, the technology
involved in converting such properties to such public purposes, and
related matters;

(2) making grants, in consultation with the Bureau of Outdoor
Recreation of the Department of the Interior, the State and local
governmental entities to enable them to plan, acquire, and develop
recreation or conservation facilities on abandoned railroad rights-
of-way, which grants shall cover not more than 90 percent of the
cost of the planning, acquisition, or development activity of the
particular project for which funds are sought;

(3) allocating firnds to other Federal programs concerned with
recreation and conservation in order to enable abandoned railroad
rights-of-way, where appropriate, to be included in or made into
national parks, national trails, national recreation areas, wildlife
refuges, or other national areas dedicated to recreation or

conservation uses; and

21

(4) providing technical assistance to other Federal agencies, States,

local agencies and private groups for the purpose of enhancing

conversion projects. To increase the available information and

expertise, the Secretary may contract for special studies or projects

and may otherwise collect, evaluate, and disseminate information

dealing with utilization of rights-of-way” (N evel and Harnik, 1990).
Although $20 million was originally authorized by the act, only $5 Million was
actually spent in grant money. This act was the compelling force behind the start
of the rails-to-trails movement and ultimately nine rails-to-trails received federal
grant money. Since this act expired, no direct federal dollars have been spent on
rails-to-trails. State and local governments are now doing most of the firnding for
rails-to-trails conversions (N evel and Harnik, 1990).

The original rails-to-trails that were firnded by these grants are Mill Valley-
Sausalito Path (Marin County, California), Northern Central Railroad Trail
(Baltimore County, Maryland), M-K-T Nature/Fitness Trail (City of Columbia,
Missouri), Delaware and Raritan Multi-Use Trail (Central New Jersey), Mohawk-
Hudson Bikeway (Albany and Schenectady Counties, New York), Little Miami
Scenic Park (Southeastern Ohio), National Trails Towpath Bike Trail of Palmer
and Bethlehem Townships (Northampton County, Pennsylvania), Washington and
Old Dominion Railroad Regional Park (Northern Virginia) and the Preston-
Snoqualnrie Trail (King County, Washington). As with all rails-to—trails, these
initial trails had problems and successes that were related to public opinion and the

perception of the trail (N evel and Harnik, 1990).

22

Problems cover a wide spectrum from the fear of misuse of the trail by
vandals, fear of misuse by motorized vehicles and motorcycle hoodlums, fear of
misuse by hunters, littering, abuse by carousing fraternity students, unsightly and
unsafe conditions, fear that property values will decrease, and a fear that homes
will be unsafe from users. Successes include a willingness by the public “to trust
the government to spend its money wisely on programs that will benefit the whole
community”, adoption of the trail by the community and taking personal
responsibility for protecting the trail, location in an area because of the recreational
opportunities provided by trails in the area, increased property values along trails,
expansion of private business to supply users of trails, access to fishing areas, and
the addition of new restaurants (N evel and Harnik, 1990). The problems and
successes of these rails-to-trails can help with understanding what areas need to be
addressed when starting the process to develop a new trail.

None of these rails-to-trails would have been successful if not for citizen
involvement. These rails-to-trails have been supported by bicyclists, naturalists,
equestrians, joggers, local businesses, local, state, and federal politicians and the
US Supreme Court. Local citizen involvement is repeatedly indicated as the major
reason these nine trails were built (Nevel and Harnik, 1990). The major
impediment to the successful building of a rails-to-trail has been the strong public
distrust of the trail system and the perceived problems that come with trail

development.

LEGISLATION

 

 

24

In the State of Michigan the legal fi'amework for rails-to-trails is covered
by a variety of laws and acts which are described by the Interstate Commerce
Commission, State Transportation Preservation Act, Michigan Trailways Act and

the Federal Trail System Act (Michigan Statewide Trails Initiative, 1992).
0 Interstate Commerce Commission Laws and Regulations.

“The Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) regulates railroad operations
across the nation. ICC procedures govern the roles and actions of all involved
in the rail abandonment process, including public agencies and organizations
interested in possible conversion of corridors to public recreation use”
(Michigan Statewide Trails Initiative, 1992).

0 State Transportation Preservation Act.

“A section of the State Transportation Preservation Act (Act 295, 1976) had a
direct impact on rails-to-trails efforts. This act requires railroad companies,
when selling an inactive railroad right-of-way in Michigan, to ofi‘er it on
reasonable terms first to the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT)
and second to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). WOT’s interest
in acquisition is in the potential for continued or firture railroad or other
transportation use. The DNR’s interest in acquisition is based on the
recreation potential of the corridor. The Act also requires MDOT to offer
inactive right-of-ways it owns to the DNR” (Michigan Statewide Trails

Initiative, 1992).

 

 

 

  
  

      
  
 
 
  
     

 

 

   
    

 

 

 

       
 
  

Page 25-A
POTENTIAL MICHIGAN TRAILWAYS MlCh lgCl l1 i-TO l iWCIYS
(LENGTH (MILES) INVOLVED LOCAL
NAME/IDENTITY OF TRAILWAY (PROPOSED) MANAGER TOTAL SURFACED ORGANIZATIONS . . .
Trailways Complete Llnklng Oppor—runlfles
1 Hart—Montague Trail St.Pk.' DNR Parks & Rec. 21 21 Oceana—Muskegon Trlwys Comm.
2 Kal-Haven Trail St.Pk.° DNR Parks & Rec. 34 34 Friends of the Kal-Haven Trl.
3 Kent Trails Kent Co. 9 9
4 Mackinac lsland—-main roads State Park & village 8 8
5 Macomb County Bike Path Local gov.\agencies 5 5
6 Paint Creek Trail P.C. Trailways Comm. 1O 10 P.C. Trailways Comm.
7 Pere Marq. Rail-Trl.of Mid-Mi. County\City of Midland 21 21 Friends of the P.M. Rail-Trl. ,
8 Traverse Area Rec. Trail City of Traverse City 7 7 Friends of TART Sau/tSte. Mane
9 West Bloomfield Rail—Trail West Bloomfield Twp. 4 4
TRAILWAY MILEAGE COMPLETE 119 119
Trailways Under Development
10 Fred Meijer Heartland Trail Local commission 33 Friends of F.M.Heart|and Trl.
11 Huron Valley Trail Phase I Loc.gov.\agen.,DNR P&R 11 W.Oakl.C0.Rd.& Bike Path Dev.Com.
12 Ionia-Lyons Trail City of Ionia\DNR 4 lonia-Grand Ledge Trail Group ""
13 Jackson trailway City of Jackson 3 2 Jackson Rec.Trls.Coalition 5’ Ignacea '
14 LakeLands Trail State Park DNR Parks & Rec. 31 12 P Weekmw CW-
15 Leelanau Trail Private org. 13 1 Leelanau Trails Association I (
16 Muskegon Lakeshore Trail City of Muskegon 8 2 (if
17 Ottawa-Muskegon Trail Ott\Musk.Co,City 27 Friends of the Ottawa-Musk.Trl.
l8 Pere Marquette State Trail DNR For.Mgmt.\local gov. 56 4 Various /§/O
19 Riverside Trail City of Grand Rapids 5 . $0
20 Van Buren Trail State Park DNR Parks & Rec. 15 , ’ Hawm ¢
21 White Pine Trail State Park DNR Parks & Rec. 93 2 Various IIIIlIiII‘I‘II. swirrlil-II 4 _ “
TRAILWAY MILEAGE UNDER DEVELOPMENT 299 23
Corridors Acquired LEGE N D ,.
22 Bill Nicholls Trailb DNR Forest Mgmt. 55 Traverse City,
23 Chatham Trailb DNR Forest Mgmt. 33
24 Hancock-Calumet Trailb DNR Forest Mgmt. 17 Frankfort
25 Mackinaw City—Alanson DNR FM, local gov. 23 Top of Michigan Trails Council . , ' ‘
26 Mackinaw City—Hawks DNR FM,Mac.lsl.,local so Top of Michigan Trails Council Acqun’ed for TrOIiWOy U38 or
27 Manistee-Traverse(segmnts)c DNR FM, local gov. 24 Kg?
2: Pere Marq.Trl.-lsabe|la Co. Local gov. : Clare-Coleman RTT Committee A . f O [’1‘ “1' Hams”; .3 l.” '
2 Sidnaw-Bergland DNR Forest Mgmt. 4 _ _ .. _ _ _ Unl [es .. I'I I II "
3O Soo-Strongsb DNR Forest Mgmt. 32 CUI’I’BI’II chlS IOR ppo Manisree . W 4‘ I‘I“ E ”I; ‘ ’1? TBWES CW
31 Thornapple Trail Private org. & local gov. 16 Thornapple Trail Association I‘ “WI“ II J
______ O , , . ,.l,,, .l‘ r:
CORRmOR WEAGE ACQUMED 313 @ Trdll ldenllflcq’rlon N umber rise. '. .
Ludington ' _ “y"‘ffii'i I‘M”
Current Acquisition O ortunities .. .- I . “ ll: '
32 Betsie Valley Trailpp Local comm., DNR FM 23 Friends of the Betsie Valley Trl. ‘ 81018 PO Fi< & , “F II - IIIIIIIII
33 Blossomland River Trail Local gov\commission 33 Blossomland Trail Association . Hart A 43%;. Jill-"‘1 . , — -- ' “‘
34 Cheboygan-Gaylord DNR FM, local gov. 47 TOP Of Michigan Trails COUNC” Recreoilon Areas A ocenmv‘ i 1 HECOSTA I ISABELLA “I1 Md/ (1*) T
35 Falling Waters Trail Jackson Co. 13 Falling Waters Trail Association 0‘ 'II'r "j" “Y ,FH' l “6* I an i “I“ I‘
36 Ott.-Musk. Trl.-~Musk.link City\Co. of Muskegon 4 Friends of the Ottawa-Musk.Trl. WI 7'3“ ilk, —— - .J_.— — —L — mm - j-4 rusm .
37 Petoskey-Alanson Loc.,DNR FM\P&R 9 Top of Michigan Trails Council 0 Cliies and Towns Montague 4 (3‘9 . m II". 1! @ EEQFG .’ A) Sag/flaw SANILAC
38 Polly-Ann Trail Local gov\commission 30 Friends of the Polly-Ann Trail .543" __L ( GRATIOT WWW ‘ "T ' ‘L -
:9 Saginaw Valley Trail Saginaw Co. 18 Mus/(ego OhIIIIIlsKEcoNl—T em “I It) _ __l,._i i
o Wadhams-Avoca Rail—Trail St. Clair Co. - Horrcm+ _ _ LAPEER ‘ " ‘
______ National Forest, Park - |—-—- -4 -—. Hm, - mm,” W
MILEAGE: CURRENT ACQUISITION OPPORTUNITIES 179 @ Grand Fla 'd . o i srsw .
LC] keShore and RETUge onmm [DC/5 I’IIa i CLINTON i snmwnssse GENESSEE l‘ A. I L61 Port
Corridors Under Consideration (not on map) ‘T‘QDI GI I I TA A TIT/(a Onoil Huron
lonia-Owosso Local gov\commission 41 S F 1, _ __ _ L“ L_ m” _l_ _ - _IL— — -—-L - —‘
Kalamazoo Riv.Va|ley Trlway Local gov\commission 60 K’zoo R.Val|ey Trlway Partners 1.01.8 ores TA 3 I— A ‘
Lyons-Eagle Local gov\commission 20 lonia-Grand Ledge Trail Group I ~ " ' Lane/n9 l lemosrori A I'qup/wsle 1’
Oakland Co. Trailways DNR P&R; local gov 20 Various 03.9 million acres RLLEGPN IA BARRY I 5970" ! INGHAH.| r®' @
""" 0150 campgrounds L ' L. A :1 o~<L_fl_ilo AMEN
CORRIDOR MILEAGE UNDER CONSIDERATION 141 .575 + mi. hiking trails South Haven '—@_ ' - T - - -— T— ®-—-A - A“ ‘4: '. a
GRAND TOTAL MILEAGE 1051 142 .228 + ml.CTOSS country Skl trails Hartford I ‘bag/e-II— Creek @b i O | WAYNE Delia/t
03000 + mi. ORV trails and routes StJoseph Kalamazoo . . Jackson . An” “W” i
: Designated as Michigan Trailway by Natural Resources Commission in 1996 .5500 + mi. groomed snomobile trails ' l

   
 

There are thousands of miles of trails in Upper Peninsula. These five trails may have greatest potential to be improved , , . .
for multiple uses and designated as Michigan Trailways. Local partnerships will be needed. .343 + m'- horseback t'd'ng trails . h'
Aquisition expected to be finalized soon ONumerous boatlng,SWImmlng & fls lng

Rev.J/97 opportunities

vm BUREN Knurlinzoo CALHOJNT L‘_ Jncxsou_ 1’23“!le - _L__ —
s ‘ " ‘ A I i
\‘I - Michigan
BRANCH
mm" - “JOSE?” . . Transom l LENAHEE l “OWE D N R
A @+ NilesCA3 | A

c

 

Figure 3.1 '\

 

25

0 Michigan Trailways Act.

“The Michigan Trailways Act (Act of 1993) gives the DNR and other trail

managing agencies a strong incentive to address local concerns. The act

allows the Natural Resources Commission to designate long-distance multi-use

trails as ‘Michigan Trailways’ (Figure 3.1). A trail receiving this designation

will be publicized as part of the trailway system and be eligible for trailways

funding. For a trail to receive the designation, the DNR or other managing

agency must ensure that local concerns have been addressed. Specific

provisions of the act include:

Potential negative impacts of trailway development on owners or
residents of adjacent property must be minimized through. . .adequate
enforcement of trailway rules and regulations; continuation of access
for trailway crossings for agricultural and other purposes; construction
and maintenance of fencing, where necessary, by the owner or operator
of the trailway; and any other means.

Where feasible, the trailway must offer adequate support facilities for
the public-~including parking, sanitary facilities, and emergency
telephonesuat reasonable frequency along the trailway, that are
accessible to people with disabilities.

A public hearing must be held in the vicinity of the proposed Michigan

Trailway to gather public opinion on the designation, including what

26

uses will be allowed on the trail. Local units of government must be
consulted in establishing uses to be permitted on the trail.

0 A Michigan Trailway may be temporarily closed by the entity operating
the trailway to allow pesticide application on lands adjoining the
trailway"’.

Authorizing Legislation

In 1993, the Michigan senate passed legislation that authorized the
formation of a Michigan trailways system. The Public Acts of 1993 that deal
directly with trailway designation are Act No. 27 (recodified in 1994 by PA 1994
Act 451 Part 721), Act No. 26 (recodified in 1994 by PA 1994 Act 451 Part 733)
and Act No. 28 which were approved by the Governor on April 20, 1993. PA
1994 Act 451 Part 721 establishes the Michigan trailways designation process. PA
1994 Act No. 451 Part 733 deals with the liability that an adjacent landowner will
or will not experience while living next to the trailway. Act No. 28 is a necessary
change to the transportation Act No. 295 of the Public Acts of 1976. Acts 26 and
27 were recodified in 1994 as amended to Part 733 and 721. A synopsis of these

acts follows:
PART 721—Michigan Trailways2

Sec. 324.72102. “The legislature finds and declares that a statewide

system of trailways will provide enjoyment, health, and fitness; encourage

 

‘ Michigan Department of Natural Resources Brochure Trailway Impact on Local Citizens:
Questions and Responses. Revised January 1994.
2 Appendix B; PA 1994 No. 451 Part 721.

27

constructive leisure time activities; protect open space, cultural and historical
resources, and habitat for wildlife and plants; enhance the local and state
economies; link communities, parks and natural resources; create opportunities for
rural-urban exchange, agricultural education, and marketing of farm products; and
preserve corridors for possible future use for other public purposes. Therefore, the
planning, acquisition, development, operation, and maintenance of Michigan
trailways is in the best interest of the state and is declared to be a public purpose.”

PART 733—Landowner LiabilityJ

“An ACT to amend section 1 of Act No. 201 of the Public Acts of 1953,
entitled as amended “An act restricting suites by persons coming upon the property
of another for certain purposes; and to declare the limited liability of owners of
property within this state. Sec. 1. (2) A cause of action shall not arise for injuries
to a person who is on the land of another without paying to the owner, tenant, or
lessee of the land a valuable consideration for the purpose of entering or exiting
fi'om or using a Michigan trailway or other public trail, with or without permission,
against the owner, tenant, or lessee of the land unless the injuries were caused by
the gross negligence or willful and wanton misconduct of the owner, tenant, or
lessee. For purposed of this subsection, a Michigan trailway or public trail may be
located on land of any size including, but not limited to, urban, suburban,

subdivided, and rural land.”

 

3 AppendixB; PA 1994 No. 451 Part733.

28

Act 28—Transportation Preservation4

“An Act to amend section 10 of Act No. 295 of the Public Acts of 1976,
entitled as amended “An act to improve and maintain transportation services in this
state; to provide for the acquisition and use of funds; to provide for the acquisition
of certain railroad facilities and certain property; to provide for the disposition and
use of facilities and property acquired under this act; to provide for financial
assistance to certain private transportation services; to prescribe the powers and
duties of certain state departments and agencies; to provide for the transfer of
certain firnds; to provide for the creation of a firnd; and to provide for
appropriations,” as amended by Act No. 210 of the Public Acts of 1984, being
section 474.60 of the Michigan Compiled Laws. Section 10 (3) In preserving the
right-of-way for future rail use, the department may do one or more of the
following: (b) Transfer, for appropriate reimbursement, the right-of-way to the
Department of Natural Resources for use as a Michigan Trailways pursuant to the
Michigan Trailways act, if the deed includes restrictions on the use of the property
that assure that the property remains viable for future rail usage, and includes a
clause that provides that the Department of Natural Resources shall transfer, for
appropriate reimbursement, the right-of-way to the department, upon a
determination of the director of the State Transportation Department that the

right-of-way is needed for use as a railroad line.”

 

‘ AppendixB; ActNo. 28 Public Acts of 1993.

29

Requirements for Trail Designation

Sec. 324.72103 (1) “Upon petitions, by any person or on its own motion,

the commission may designate a trailway in the state as a “Michigan trailway”.

The petition or motion shall propose permitted uses of the trailway. The

commission shall not designate a trailway a Michigan trailway unless it meets, or

will meet when completed, all of the following requirements:

(a) The land on which the trailway is located is owned by the state or a
governmental agency, or otherwise is under the long-term control of the state
or a governmental agency through a lease, easement, or other arrangement. If
the land is owned by a governmental agency, the commission shall obtain the
consent of the governmental agency before designating of the land as part of a
Michigan trailways.

(b) The design and maintenance of the trailway and its related facilities meet
generally accepted standards of public safety.

(c) The trailway meets appropriate standards for its designated recreation
uses.

((1) The trailway is available for designated recreation uses on a
nondiscriminatory basis.

(e) The trailway is a multi-use trail suitable for use by pedestrians, by people

with disabilities, and by other users, as appropriate.

 

Appendix B; Letter to Philip Wells from William Gibson requesting trailway designation.

 

30

(f) The trailway is, or has potential to be, a segment of a statewide network of
trailways, or it attracts a substantial share of its users from beyond the local
areas.
(g) The trailway is marked with an official Michigan trailway sign and logo at
major access points.
(h) The trailway is not directly attached to a roadway, except at roadway
crossings.
(i) Where feasible, the trailway offers adequate support facilities for the public,
including parking, sanitary facilities, and emergency telephones, that are
accessible to people with disabilities and are at reasonable fi'equency along the
trailway.
(j) Potential negative impacts of trailway development on owners or residents
of adjacent property are minimized through all of the following:
o (i) Adequate enforcement of trailway rules and regulations.
0 (ii) Continuation of access for trailway crossings for agricultural and
other purposes.
0 (iii) Construction and maintenance of fencing, where necessary, by the
owner or operator of the trailway.
0 (iv) Other means as considered appropriate by the commission.

(k) Other conditions required by the commission.

(2) The commission shall not designate a trailway a Michigan trailway under

subsection (1) unless a public hearing has been held in the vicinity of the proposed

 

31

Michigan trailway to take testimony and gather public opinion on the proposed
designation including, but not limited to, the proposed used of the trailway and
whether or not motorized uses are appropriate for the trailway. The public hearing
shall be held at a location and at a time calculated to attract a fair representation of
opinions on the designation. A transcript or a summary of the testimony at the
public hearing shall be forwarded to the commission.

(3) At the time a Michigan trailway is designated under subsection (1), the
commission shall, in consultation with governmental agencies in which the trailway
is located, establish uses to be permitted on the trailway. In establishing permitted
uses, the commission shall consider all of the following:

o (a) The safety and enjoyment of trailway users.

0 (b) Impacts on residents, landowners and businesses adjacent to the trailway.

o (c) Applicable local ordinances.”

Process for Designation

What really happens? The process for getting an existing trailway
designated begins when a person, an organization such as a Friends group or the
Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) requests that an existing
trailway be designated a Michigan trailway. Generally, the MDNR can request
that a state owned trailway be designated, but it is important that locally owned
trails request designation. This can be done through a multitude of ways. It can be

done by phone or letter“, but is not restricted to these methods and the process for

 

6 Appendix B; Letter to Philip Wells from William Gibson requesting trailways designation.

32

designating a trailway a Michigan trailway is an ongoing cooperative process
between multiple entities. Trailway designation requires involvement.

After a request has been made, the MDNR Recreation and Trails Section
will begin the evaluation process by having s staff evaluator visit the trailway and
conduct a determination of the fitness of the trailway for designation. Meetings
with the local trailway manager will be made to explain how the determination
process works. After this meeting, an assessment of the trailway will be done
using a determination assessment form7. The determination assessment form is an
extensive evaluation tool that describes what an evaluator must look for on the
trailway and explains why it is important to look at this part of the trailway. After
careful consideration and if the trailway meets all of the requirements, the staff
evaluator will make a recommendation.

It is likely that a trailway will be recommended and probable that the
trailway will be recommended with some modifications to the trailway. An
example would be some additional fencing, repairs to some parts of the trailway
due to erosion or additional signage. Because a trailway does not meet all of the
requirements at the time of assessment does not mean the trailway will not be
recommended Designation may require that certain changes and improvements be
made through time by trailway management. An agreement by trailway
management to meet needed improvements would become part of the designation

agreement. This should be viewed as part of the designation process and normal

 

7 Appendix B; Stafi' Deternrination of Eligibility for Michigan Trailways Designation.

33

to any trailway designation. And, if the requirements for designation are not met,
trailway designation can be removed.

After a trailway has been recommended for eligibility by MDNR staff, a
public meeting must be held and shall be held in an area close to the trailway
seeking designation. These public meetings are required by statute and are
considered necessary to the determination process. Public meetings give access to
local citizens in the determination process and give adjacent landowners the
opportunity to express concerns about the designations.

Once public meetings have been held and concerns of the local citizens
have been addressed, a Michigan Trailway Designation Agreement9 will be drafted
with mutual coordination between the State Trails Coordinator and trailway
management. Trailway management will agree to secure firnding and design
assistance to carry out trailway improvements as described in the agreement.
Trailway management will agree to meet, on a continuing basis, the requirements
of Sec. 4 (l) and 8 of the Michigan Trailways Act. This agreement will also
recommend to the Natural Resources Commission that trailway designation be
made. As part of this recommendation, it will be noted how the trailway will be
used. Finally, the Natural Resources Comnrission will approve the

recommendation.

 

8 Appendix B; MDNR announcement of public hearings for Hart-Montague and Kal-Haven
Trailways.
9 Appendix B; Michigan Trailways Designation Agreement for Kal-Haven Trail.

34

Benefits

Is there a benefit to a trailway if it is declared by the state to be a Michigan
Trailway? One of the first benefits of being designated a Michigan trailway, is that
designation is a specific measure of success. After carefillly analyzing the trailway
designation requirements, a trail is deemed safe and suitable for public use. It
meets with the requirements that it have a variety of recreational and ecological
considerations in place at the time of designation.

Although separate state and local actions to develop individual trailways
have great public benefit, creating a statewide system of designated Michigan
trailways would have a number of additional benefits. These include:

o “Encouraging the development of an interconnected network of trailways.

o Allowing for consistent identification of trails that cross jurisdictional
boundaries.

0 Assuring that the segments of the statewide system are developed to consistent
standards, and helping to standardize rules and fees for trailway use.

0 Creation of the Michigan Trailway system would give the “product” a clear
identity to residents and visitors (like “Holiday Inn”): they would know that
any trail with the Michigan Trailway designation is a broad trail with gentle
grades, usually separate fiom roadways, with adequate support facilities, and
with a surface suitable for multiple uses; standard language because most
agencies would use a variety of terms for various kinds of trails, which would

tend to confuse the public.

35

Facilitating clear understanding of the network concept in the minds of the
pubhc.

Without the concept of Michigan Trailway designation, it would still be
possible to develop a publication with maps and other information on trailways
in Michigan; but the Michigan Trailway designation would give the public a
clear focus and would highlight the concept of an integrated network. this
would help in building public support and recognition.

Giving agencies and local units an incentive to develop high-quality trailways,
i.e., those that meet Michigan Trailway standards.

The possibility of Michigan Trailway designation would provide incentives
including publicity in statewide publications and possible funding assistance
Providing a mechanism for trailway firnding and user fees.

Designation as a Michigan Trailway would make a trail eligible for firnding
fiom the proposed Michigan Trailway Trust Fund. This proposed firnd would
derive revenue from a variety of sources, and money fi'om the refund would be
apportioned to the various agencies managing Michigan Trailways. One
revenue source may be a Michigan Trailway annual pass. The pass could be
used on Michigan Trailways in lieu of other fees that might be charged for use
of a particular trail. The annual pass approach would reduce administrative
costs for managing agencies, prevent public confirsion over fee requirements,

and make it easier for trail users to contribute to trailway upkeep.”

36

Current Michigan Trailways Designations

The Hart-Montague Bicycle Trail State Park10 and Kal-Haven
Sesquicentennial Trail State Park11 were considered together for Michigan
Trailways designation. The following is a brief history of the designation process
for these two trailways and should be considered a good example of the
designation process. Please note that each trailway is unique and that no two trail

designations will be like any other”.

Early l994--Proposal for First Round of Michigan Trailway Designation---

inter-ofiice memo from Phil Wells to Hector Chiunti---not dated or signed.

0 May 27, l994--Stafi‘ Determination of Eligibility for Michigan Trailway
Designation for Kai-Haven trail. Signed by State Trails Coordinator Hector
Chiunti on September 15, 1995.

0 October 25, l994---Staff Determination of Eligibility for Michigan Trailway
Designation for Hart-Montague trail. Signed by State Trails coordinator
Hector Chiunti on September 15, 1995.

0 March 9, l995—«Interoffice Communication from Philip Wells (Trailways

Program Leader) to Hector Chiunti (Section Leader, Recreation and Trails

Section). Proposed process for Michigan Trailway Designation using Hart-

Montague as a “trial-run”.

 

‘° Appendix B; Michigan Trailways Designation Agreement for Hart-Montague Bicycle Trail
State Park between State Trails Coordinator and MDNR Parks and Recreation Division. 9-18-95.
" Appendix B; Memorandum to the Natural Resources Commission. Subject: Desigrmtion of
Hart-Montague and Kal-Haven Trails as Michigan Trailways. Resubmitted 12-11-95.

'2 Appendix B; Letters in chronological order on Michigan Trailways approval for Kal-Haven
and Hart-Montague Trail.

37

April 25, l995---Interoffice communication from Hector Chiunti (State Trails
Coordinator, Forest Management Division) to 0.]. Scherschlight (Chief, Parks
and Recreation Division). Proposed process for first set of Michigan Trailway
Designations using Hart-Montague and Kai-Haven trails. Other trails were to
be considered, but were later dropped.

September 14, 1995---Interof’rice communication from Philip Wells to Hector
Chiunti. Letter addresses continuing problems with pesticide use next to ,
trailways, but recommends that the designation agreements on Hart-Montague
and Kal-Haven proceed. A proposed schedule is listed.

September 18, 1995--Michigan Trailway Designation Agreement for Hart-
Montague Bicycle Trail State Park between State Trails Coordinator and DNR
Parks and Recreation Division.

September 18, 1995-«Michigan Trailway Designation Agreement for Kal-
Haven Trail Sesquicentennial State Park between State Trails Coordinator and
DNR Parks and Recreation Division.

October 19, 1995---DNR NEWS-"Media Release-«DNR Hosting Public
Hearings on Michigan Trailway Designations.

October 20, 1995--DNR Department Calendar-«November 1 meetings in
area on trailway designation.

November 9, 1995 Resubrrritted: December 11, 1995-«Memorandum to the
Natural Resources Commissionn-Designation of Hart-Montague and Kal-

Haven Trails as Michigan Trailways fi'om O. J. Scherschlight (Chief Parks and

38

Recreation Division), Gerald J . Thiede (Chief Forest Management Division),
Hector Chiunti (State Trails coordinator Forest Management Division), C.
Edwin Meadows, Jr. (Deputy Director) and Michael D. Moore (Director,
December 13, 1995).

0 December 6-7, l995---Agenda for Natural Resources Commission.

0 January 11, l996---Michigan Natural Resources Commission Approval of
designation. Stamped on top right of November 9, 1995, Memorandum to the

Natural Resources Commission.
Future Michigan Trailways Consideration

On July 30, 1996, William C. Gibson requested that the Pere Marquette
Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan be designated a Michigan Trailway. This process had
been started when Philip Wells of the MDNR suggested that Mr. Gibson request
trailway designation. The designation process has begun. The Pere Marquette
Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan is locally owned and managed by Midland County. It
will become the first Michigan trailway that is not managed by the MDNR or
managed as a state park. Being owned by the state of Michigan is not a
prerequisite for trailway designation and shows how effective the management of
the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail has been. Additionally, the Paint Creek Trail, the
White Pines Trail, the Polly Ann Trail and LakeLands Trail will be recommended

for trailways status.

 

 

39

Lansing River Trail

In 1993 Mayor James A. Crawford requested that the Lansing River Trail
be designated a Michigan trailwayl3 . The MDNR responded that the “Lansing
River Trail is an outstanding asset to the Lansing area” and that this “proposal will
receive prompt and careful consideration.” After discussion between the MDNR
and the Mayor’s ofice it was decided not to designate this trail as a Michigan
trailway.

In an interview with Philip Wells of the MDNR, he noted that the Lansing
River Trail does not meet with two of the criteria set by the enabling legislation
that would allow a trail to be designated a Michigan trailway. Section 72103 (I) (f)
states “the trailway is, or has potential to be, a segment of a statewide network of
trailways, or it attracts a substantial share of its users fi'om beyond the local area.”
At this time, the Lansing River Trail does not appear to be drawing users from
outside the Lansing area and the Lansing River Trail does not have the potential to
link with the statewide trailway system. Section 72103 (1) (i) states “where
feasible, the trailway offers adequate support facilities for the public, including
parking, sanitary facilities, and emergency telephones, that are accessible to people
with disabilities and are at reasonable frequency along the trailway.” The Lansing
River Trail relies on local users with knowledge of the facilities along the trail or

their facilities at home. Additionally, no emergency telephones are located on the

 

'3 Appendix B; Letters on Lansing River Trail designation.

 

40

trailway. No letters exist that have addressed these issues with the City of
Lansing. At least there are no copies available for this report. .
Additionally, Mr. Wells noted that ultimately the Lansing River Trail will
probably be considered for designation. The state trailway system will continue to
develop and the Lansing River Trail will provide access to the interior of the city.
It will also provide access to other trails in the state system and could become an
important access point to the center of the Michigan trailways system.
Additionally, the Lansing River Trail has strong local support and this alone could

convince the MDNR to proceed with Michigan trailway status.

9 Federal Trail System Act.

“The passage of the Federal Trails System Act provided trail advocates with an
opportunity to preserve rail corridors through “railbanking.” This approach
avoids actual abandonment and thus the problem of reversionary property
rights. Specifically, Section 8 (d) of that law provides that a rail corridor can
be designated for ‘interim trail use.’ The use of the corridor is transferred to
the entity intending to manage it for recreation. The concept of railbanking is
the railroad rights-of-way have an inherent potential to be used as a railroad or
for other transportation purposes sometime in the future. For this reason they
are to be considered a national asset worth preserving. In the fall of 1989, the
US Supreme Court upheld the railbanking concept. The court’s decision may
have positive implications for rail-trails in Michigan. The DNR has begun to

pursue railbanking of rail lines when railroads propose abandoning rail service.

41

Railbanking does not apply to past abandonments” (Michigan Statewide Trails

Initiative, 1992).

 

PERE MARQUETTE

 

RAIL-TRAIL
OF
MID-MICHIGAN

 

 

 

 

 

- w—

43

Description

Rails-to-trails in Michigan are hybrid greenways that encompass a mixture
of characteristics of greenways. Recreational greenways, ecologically significant
natural conidors, scenic and historic routes and a comprehensive greenway system
or networks describes some of the rails-to-trails in Michigan (Figure 4.1, Michgan
Counties). The Pere Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan is a rails-to-trail and is
used primarily as a recreational greenway. It is 27 miles long, running fi'om
Midland to Clare, and is jointly owned and managed by Midland County (Figure
4.2, Midland County) and the City of Midland. This trail is paved with asphalt on
its whole length and is described by the Department of Natural Resources as the
cadillac of Michigan trails.

“The park is situated on the abandoned CSX Railroad property (originally
the Pere Marquette Railroad). The park parallels Saginaw Road (Old US. 10) for
almost the entire distance as it passes through a variety of landscapes, over rivers
and streams, beside existing parks and through small communities. The trail itself
is designated for year-round non-motorized recreation and alternative
transportation. The park, which totals about 400 acres, includes the 100 foot
minimum width right-of-way for most of its length, widths of 200 feet to 300 feet
in Sanford and Coleman, and a few parcels of varying size which are contiguous
with the right-of-way” (Master Plan, 1992).

Additionally, the Friends of the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail have now

established a home page on the Internet (http://usersmdn.net/formrt/midlandhtm)

 

 

COUNTY MAP OF MICHIGAN

l
was
man I I-I
,_l in... ,_'I
-— ' . ' o °—'—‘1
m L— II—‘J-I-OO— -1 MI “3" —-!
~ .1 Incit30'u1 I I sarcoma-an _ .....
\“K‘ I— I_ sir —"I
I E‘I—Il— II
ml
a ° 9

l I i l I
----h--é--d-—L--;-- —-

Figure 3.1

43-A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$0000 ©:::®C33@

W

UNIMPROVED ROAD

GRADED AND DRAINED ROADS
DIVIDED ROADS

DIVIDED HIGHWAY

SOIL SURFACED ROAD

GRAVELED OR SIMILAR ROAD
DIVIDED HlGHWAY WITH FRONTAGE
ROAD

PAVED ROADS

GRAVELED ROADS

BITUMINOUS SURFACED ROADS
GOOD DIRT ROADS

POOR DIRT ROADS

TRAILS

FIRE BREAKS

INTERSTATE HIGHWAY

UNITED STATES HIGHWAY
STATE HIGHWAY

BUSINESS LOOP

BUSINESS ROUTE

BUSINESS SPUR

MILITARY FIELD (SOME FACILITIES
AVAILABLE)

AIDS TO NAVIGATION
AIRPLANE LANDING FIELDS

AIRPORT. COMPLETE FACILITIES
(COMMERCIAL OR MUNICIPAL)

AIRFIELD, LIMITED FACILITIES

LANDING AREA OR STRIP
INCLUDING PRIVATE AIRFIELDS

TOWNS

RAILROAD (ANY NUMBER TRACKS)
USED BY SINGLE OPERATING
COMPANY

RAILROAD (ANY NUMBER TRACKS)
USED BY MORE THAN ONE
OPERATING COMPANY ON SAME
OR ADJACENT RIGHTS OF WAY
(NOT TRACKAGE RIGHTS)

RAILROADS

RAILROAD STATION

RAILROAD ABOVE ROAD

RAILROAD BELOW ROAD

RAILROAD TUNNEL

NARROW GAUGE RAILROADS
ABANDONED RAILROADS

UTILITY UNES (LABELED AS TO TYPE)

LEGEND

BRIDGES
GENERAL BRIDGE
DRAWBRIDGE

SUSPENSION BRIDGE

ARCH

TRUSS OR GIRDER
INTERCHANGES

GRADE SEPERATIONS
HIGHWAY GRADE SEPARATION
INTERCHANGE SHOWING RAMPS
NARROW STREAM

WIDE STREAM (over 250 1801)
FREE FERRY

TOLL FERRY

FERRIES

DAMS

DAM WITH ROAD

DAM WITHOUT ROAD

LAKES

INTERMITTENT LAKES
RIVERS AND STREAMS
INTERMITTENT STREAMS
DRAINAGE DITCHES

FALLS

RAPIDS

SPRINGS

FLOWING WELLS

NATIONAL BOUNDARY
STATE BOUNDARY

COUNTY BOUNDARY

CIVIL TOWNSHIP BOUNDARY

CONGRESSIONAL (U.S. LAND)
TOWNSHIP BOUNDARY

SECTION LINE

STATE CAPITAL

COUNTY SEAT

TOWNS

UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES
INCORPORATED CITY OR VILLAGE

COUNTY SEAT

RECREATIONAL LODGES OR CAMPS
LANDMARKS, FOURCORNERS. ETC.
TOWN HALLS

Lu.).;-. 5; A

    

5‘1
Ll

  

' a.

.2}

1’

not»; 11@».:<>|».oxewo+~..

,

--,

'~‘ -

tr f‘. ‘ I.
“Wt:

SCHOOLS

CHURCHES

CEMETERIES

FOREST FIRE TOWERS
GOLF COURSES
OBSERVATION TOWERS
MINES, OUARRIES AND PITS
SUMMITS OR PEAKS

FORTS OR ARMY CAMPS
DNR FIELD OFFICE

BOUNDARIES. STATE AND NATIONAL
PROJECTS

CAMPGROUNOS

OUTDOOR CENTERS

ROAD AND REST AREA
STATE ROADSIDE PARKS
STATE SAFETY REST AREAS

COUNTY. TOWNSHIP. MUNICIPAL
PARK SAND PICNIC AREAS

PUBLIC ACCESS SITES

WILDLIFE FLOODING AREAS
RECREATIONAL HARBORS
STATE HOLDS EASEMENT FOR
PUBLIC FISHING ALONG SETSREAM

BANKS OVER THE 40 ACR
INDICATED

STATE LAN D

     
 

FEDERAL LAND

  

SCALE IN MILES
On all c0unly maps contained In lhls
book 318 inch equals 1 mile.

 

 

T.l6 N.

T.l.'>N.

T.l4 N.

 

T.l3 N.

w alnfild

COUNTY

ISABELLA

GLAOWIN

CRATIOT

R.2W.

J5

#0
COUNTY

MICHIGAN

MIDLAND COUNTY

SAGINAW

R.IE.

 

J FUN‘ION

—tr
Lorain

J

Lochport
\v- .

zo

 

 

 

 

 

COUNTY

COUNTY

\———
Brlu Mir.
I

-"I4

Moth Ch

.57/

Loporta
Cam

SACINAW

COUNTY

 

T.l6N.
TISN.
T.14N.

)—
l-
2
D
,O
-U

T.l3N.

 

'886l

scornoseg [terms N 30 ruerulredaq uefirqoiw

sallunog uefirqorw go )Iooqdew

C

‘Aew fsserd eInsuiuedoml Aq poqsrlqnd

 

"“‘lll -.-‘.

33211108

6

znfiew seornoseg [arms N uefiiqorw

our

C

a-sv 989d

 

44

that describes the PMRTMM in great detail. The text of their homepage is quoted
directly and is as follows:

The Pere Marquette Rail- Trail of Mid-Michigan (Figure
4. 3, PMRTMM) is a linear park that extends from downtown
Midland Michigan, to Clare, Michigan. Currently the trail is
fully paved fiom Midland to Coleman, Michigan, 21 miles. The
Park is situated on the abandoned CSX Railroad property
(originally the Pere Marquette Railroad). It is designated for year
round non-motorized recreation and alternative transportation.
Those using the park are walkers, hikers, runners, bicyclists,
wheelchair users, cross country skiers and roller skaters.

The trailhead is situated in the downtown area of Midland
at the confluence of the T ittabawassee and Chippewa Rivers. This
area has become a central part of the Downtown with the addition
of the T ridge, (a unique three branched bridge) which joins three
park areas, the Chippewasee Park, St. Charles Park and the
Downtown area and Farmer ’s Market. Farmer ’s Market is open
on Wednesday morning and Saturday morning during the spring
and summer months. There are canoe rentals and fishing areas
also located along the rivers. Starting at the Farmer ’s Market the

trail winds northwesterly running parallel to Main Street. It

'.. ‘7‘

 

_‘_ I EL»... *——~ —~

 

 

.8: 3%: Ex?— m=§___..._z .25 2 e583 sou

@550 23.22 s a... as: a E 52> < M...2_w_8...3. .52 “.58 "HESS

93 22:8

 

 

./ \ =S._...=am mama—Ems. 98a.

I
b I
90%.!

 

II 3:00..— W

I
I
I
I'll
II
II

 

Nama Hfiumc em

 

E. 0?.

 

:auasoazicfiz no Haauainuaz oauoavunz anon

 

45

actually joins the former railbed as it crosses under the Robinson
Bridge W20) as it heads west from Midland

The first portion of the trail follows the T ittabawassee
River, until it reaches Emerson Park as Currie Parkway. Currie
Parkway is the fist intersection, and crosses the T ittabawassee
River via the Upper Bridge. This Bridge is a State of Michigan
Historical Site, and is an example of Pratt-through Truss design.
The arches were added recently to provide additional re-
enforcement to the bridge and allow its continued access to the
recreational facilities across the T ittabawassee River. At one time
this bridge was the main north west route of the city until the
Robinson bridge was completed in 195 6. The trail then goes
across the north side of Emerson Park. Emerson Park contains the
Currie Stadium and additional softball diamonds used extensively
for tournaments and championships from Scholastic, State,
National and International. Emerson Park has been the site of the
[SF World Championships in 1984 and again in 1996. Teams
representing 22 countries competed for the World Championship.
As the trail continues fiom Emerson Park, twa significant
historical sites are on the left, The Bradley House, a turn of the
century home that is often the center of many of the Midland

Historical Society activities about early life in the Midland area.

46

The Herbert H. Dow Museum is a replica of the first brine well
and plant that was the beginnings of the Dow Chemical Company.

The trail begins to show the natural settings as it leaves the
city area and heads to Dublin Road The trail runs along the
Northwood University campus to the south and the H. H. Dow
High School on the north. An observation platform is located as a
wetland site. This site is nature ’5 musical paradise in the Spring
as flags and birds are heard making their seasonal calls in the
evenings. It is quite common to see deer and wild turkeys along
this portion of the trail, even though it is technically within the city
limits.

As the park crosses Dublin Avenue (three miles from the
T ridge) it leaves the city limits and becomes a Midland County
park. From here the trail parallels Saginaw Road (nowhere is the
trail in contact with Saginaw Road) for almost the entire distance
as it passes through a variety of landscapes, over rivers and
streams, along existing parks and through small communities.
Numerous small businesses are located along Saginaw Road and
in the communities and provide services to trail users.

Heading westward fiom Midland a wooded character is

evident as there are woodlands on the side of the trail and the

 

 

 

north side of Saginaw Road Adjacent to the Rail— Trail are woods
rich in pine, maple, oak and birch with an interesting understory.

About 5 miles fiom Midland is the Averill rollaway. A
short gravel trail leads to the placard that celebrates this area
originally. The Midland area was a lumber center during the 19th
century, and the T ittabawassee River was used to float the logs to
Midland and on to Saginaw and Bay City. Logs were stored at the
rollaway during the winter months and the river was frozen. With
spring came the thaw, the logs were rolled down the banks into the
river, heading to the mills downstream.

The trail enters Sanford Michigan, on the south side and a
staging area and rest area are located here. There are numerous
establishments where food and drink are available. A fler crossing
the T ittabawassee River Bridge, several attractions are near the
intersection with 7 mile road Across the road is the Sanford
Historical Park. Several rehabilitated historical buildings from
Midland County ’s past are here and are open to the public at
certain times. Also, here is a steam locomotive and a caboose
fiom the Pere Marquette Railroad Signs also point the way to
Sanford Veterans Memorial Park, the entrance is a short distance
fiom the Rail- Trail. Sanford Lake Park is on the north side of

Saginaw Road signs also point the way. Here swimming is

47

48

available and picnic areas and a relaxing beach on Sanford Lake.
During the summer season a refieshment stand is open. Admission
is free although there is a parking fee for motorized vehicles.

Sanford Veterans Memorial Park has a nature trail and has
some of the few remaining Old Growth trees in this part of
Michigan. The Pine Haven, Midland County Recreation Area is a
forested area with trails for mountain biking and cross country
skiing, depending on the season. Wilchlowers are prevalent in Pine
Haven as they are along the Rail- Trail. Between the crossing of 8
mile road and 9 mile road a small gravel pathway leads to Arbutus
Bog. This is a pristine floating bog of state-wide significance.
Please do not leave the wooden walkway and playorm. The
platform and walkway were established to allow visitors to
experience the bog with minimal damage or interference.

The next several miles of the trail are evident of a Wet
Sand Prairie that features a rare plant community with State
Threatened and special concern species, this is also of state-wide
significance. Please do not pick or damage flowers along the trail,
efforts are being extended to preserve this setting for future
generations to enjoy. Please take plenty of pictures, they do not
wilt or change color. The wooded land continues to the North

Bradley area. The trail has had a slight elevation to it. Just

49

before North Bradley is the West Salt River Bridge. This is the
highest point on the Rail- Trail, not due to its elevation, but
because the West Salt River has cut a valley through this part of
the county. From North Bradley to Coleman the adjacent land use
is primarily agricultural. There are some wooded areas along the
fields. Pere Marquette Road now runs parallel to the Rail- Trail
south of the trail. As you enter Coleman from the east you see the
evidence of the agricultural basis of the community. The silos of
the grain elevator are observed fiom outside the city limits. The
City of Coleman is representative of a small agricultural
community. Commercial development is along the north side of
Saginaw Road and residential on the south side of the trail.
Several projects have recently enhanced the Coleman
downtown area in addition to the Rail- Trail. A streetscape project
was recently completed and restoration of the old railroad station
is underway. A senior center has been constructed to the south
side of the trail. (This senior center was named after the trail). A
full staging area for the Rail- Trail is also in the Coleman area.
The section of the trail through Coleman is known as the Coleman
Mile. This is in tribute to excellent participation of the citizens of
Coleman in helping develop the Pere Marquette Rail- Trail. A

separate fimd raising campaign was conducted by the citizens of

 

50

Coleman to pave the one mile section of the trail passing through
their community. A challenge grant from the Gerstacker
Foundation guaranteed half the funding If the citizens could make
up the second half In a very short time they had reached their
goal and the Coleman Mile was completed in 1994. (They needed
$25, 000. 00 and easily raised $31,000.00). It was I 995 before the
rest of the trail connected to the Coleman Mile. The paved portion
of the Pere Marquette Rail- Trail now is 21 miles long.

The balance of the trail, about 8 miles will reach the Clare
city limits. Construction plans for this section of the trail are
incomplete, however fund raising eflorts are underway to complete
this portion in ‘98 or ‘99.

Thank you for enjoying our trail. The Pere Marquette
Rail- Trail exists because the citizens of Midland County and now
Clare and Isabella County have worked hard to provide this
unique recreational opportunity. The Rail- Trail has only begun to
make the connections to many of the previously under used
recreational facilities available in our counties. The Friends of
the Pere Marquette Rail- Trail invite you to be part of the
continued enhancement and improvement of our fine park. Join
the Friends by completing the membership form. Contributions

can also be accepted the Friends are a Not-For-Profit-

51

Organization (501 c(3)) and can be deducted on your income tax.

Donation boxes are also strategically located along the trail.
Trail Data

The following is the text of a letter from Rick Sigsby, a seasonal ranger on
the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan (PMRTMM) to Paul Pounders,
Parks Manager, and Bill Gibson, Parks and Recreation Director. This letter talks
about the encounters Rick Sigsby has along the PMRTMM. Quantitative data do
not exist for the number of trail users along the PMRTMM, but this letter does
address the kinds of people who are using the trail and the distances these people
will travel to get to the trail.

Encounters with Rail Trail Users

“As you know, Rail-Trails have seen a dramatic increase in popularity in
recent years.”

“The PMRTMM is rapidly becoming a major attraction in Midland,
Michigan, and throughout the Midwest. Word of mouth and promotions in
regional/national publications have provided a tremendous boost in exposure for
Midland County.”

“Through my work on the PMRTMM, I’ve had the pleasure of meeting
many interesting people on the Trail enjoying “the sights”. They come from afar
and close to home.”

“The distance record has to be a couple cycling from Vancouver, British

Columbia, on their way to “probably Nova Scotia”. Twenty two miles of smooth

 

52

pavement, after riding over hundreds (many hundreds) of rough miles was a real
treat.”

“A man riding a fold-up bicycle stopped me to ask directions just North of
Sanford. Although he was a veteran Rail-Trailer from Brainerd, Minnesota, he
wasn’t lost but he didn’t know where ‘the Trail’ ended either. He and his wife
were staying at the Ashman Court Hotel. The wife went shopping so he went for
a ride on the PMRTMM. Unfortunately his information came from a I994 Rails-
To-Trails book which showed the trail being only 3 miles long. I pointed out the
book was correct but out dated. In fact he had already traveled 9 miles and had
still 12 miles to reach trail’s end. He greeted the news with joy, as now he would
be one adventure up on his wife.”

“An encounter with an elderly couple proved very informative. First, they
were rollerblading - second, they were from Petoskey and this was their third trip
to the PMRTMM. They had brought roller blades for their daughters who now
lived in Massachusetts and they were going to visit them soon. Their trips to the
PMRTMM were to practice and develop their rollerblading skills so they could
keep up with their daughters. Although there is a Rail-Trail fi'om Petoskey to
Harbor Springs, I was told it is narrow and hilly. They liked the PMRTMM
because it is much wider and relatively flat. Easier going for the oldies!”

“Several Boy Scout Troops from the surrounding area, i.e, Saginaw, St.
Louis, Alma, Mt. Pleasant, etc. have used the PMRTMM as proving grounds for

their hiking and cycling merit badges. The Trail is also quite popular with church

53

youth groups for weekend outings. So far I’ve met the Mennonites from Gratiot
County; the Lutherans from Kent County and the Mormons from Isabella County.”

“The PMRTMM has an excellent reputation for wheelchair users. Two-
individuals I’ve met are prime examples. One gentleman fiom Alma is a regular -
he uses two different wheelchairs. One is for leisure trips with his wife (she
accompanies him on bicycle), the other is a racing wheelchair that he uses on
training trips from Coleman to Sanford and back. His wife follows in the car
because she can’t keep up.”

“I met a couple from Edmore who bought a special wheelchair for their
handicapped son, one with a hand crank to help build up his upper body strength.
The PMRTMM has provided an ideal setting for family outings-«their goal is a
day trip from Coleman to Midland-«maybe next year.”

“People with cottages at Sanford, Wixom, Five Point, Smallwood and
Secord Lakes all have made summer side trips to the PMRTMM. Many seem to
originate fi'om the Southeast Michigan area. I encounter quite a few Midlanders
out showing visitors the Trail with many commenting on return trips specifically to
use the Trail. The Ashman Court Hotel has also used the PMRTMM efl‘ectively in
promoting weekend packages and rentals.”

“Bicycling and rollerblading are the two most popular activities but a
surprising number of hikers, runners, bird watchers, berry pickers and sightseers
have been spotted. I met a few patrons that were there on doctors orders.

Obviously, they recognize the benefits.”

54

“Overall, the comments most often heard are that the PMRTMM is wider
than most other trails, patrons are impressed by the cleanliness and lack of ground
litter; and the fiiendly atmosphere. Many have commented about looking forward
to the next trip to use the Trail. That certainly is encouraging.”

Along with Rick Sigsby’s letter, Bill Gibson has had a couple from Butler,
Pennsylvania call and ask about the trail. They wanted to know where they could
stay and how they could get access to the trail from their hotel. After using the
PNfllTMM, they were going to Mackinac Island to ride the trails there. Bill
Gibson had never heard Midland and Mackinac Island used in the same sentence
and finds this exciting.

Recently, two gentlemen in their early 7 0’3 approached Bill Gibson and
Paul Pounders in Coleman, Michigan. They expressed how happy they were with
the trail and the distance of the trail. Having left Midland for a trip to Sanford,
they felt so good that they continued on to Coleman for lunch. This means that
these two gentlemen would be making a round trip of 42 miles.

Even without the support of specific numbers to indicate how the trail is
being used, it is obvious to the managers and rangers along the trail that it is
getting heavy use. The City of Midland keeps the trail clear in the winter and even
on the worst days people are seen using the trail in the city. On any day where
there is a break in weather, the trail is busy. It is estimated that 100,000 people
use the trail every year and the numbers are growing. This is a remarkable number

considering that most people are only aware of the trail through word of mouth.

 

55

Trail Survey—Participant Comments

The following are public comments from various meetings held by the

county and from letters received during the early days of trail history. These

selected comments are found in Midland County’s master plan A Vision for a

Linear Park in Midland County from Midland to Clare, Michigan. All comments

were separated by topic. The master plan has been placed in the Planning Library

of Michigan State University. All comments are quoted directly.

Special places that others would enjoy knowing about.

The Red Keg in Averill.

High back area at Averill.

The confluence of the Salt River and Tittabawassee River.
Buttonville.

Historic society, nature center, Dow Gardens.

Indian artifacts, digs, etc.

Pine Haven.

Down along the river banks.

Attractive scenery around Salt River, beautiful fall colors west of Midland and
approaching Clare.

Upper and lower Vets Park.

Yoder’s Amish Auction.

Suggested park features.

Covered wooden bridge, with benches and tables.
Maybe a place to have a BBQ.

Party store in or near the park .

Playground for the children.

Baseball diamond.

Picnicking.

Fishing areas, fishing platforms, river views and access.
Gardens.

Comfort stations, places to get water.

Repair station.

Mile markers.

Skiing trails, mountain biking trails.

Frisbee golf course.

Birdhouses, natural habitats, place to buy food for birds.

56

An activity or site at the destination end to encourage use.

Nearby parking at several spots so hikes of 1-5 miles are available.
Camping areas.

Curves, zigzag so you can’t see all along a straight trail. -
Ski rental place, horse rental place.

Emergency phones, or directions to the nearest phone.

Maps, brochures.

First aid stations.

Comments on trail surfaces.

Dirt or woodchips are inappropriate for bikers.

Bike blacktop trail, lO-feet wide, smooth paths.

Paved trail for wheelchairs, roller-skating, bicycling. Side trails could remain
rustic.

Hard surfaced, smooth path.

(would least like to have) big wide trails, cemented walkways.

Desired park character.

Trees. Trees. Trees. More trees and shrubs.

Wildlife, the more the better.

Safety, quiet, natural and police protected.

Right-of-way wide enough to keep the trail from being spooky.

Keep it as natural as possible, let it grow back the way nature takes it.
Peacefirl wilderness, natural beauty.

Features to avoid in/uear the park.

Views of commercial businesses

Views of large buildings, homes, modern things, “city places”.
Motorized/offload vehicles, motorcycles, snowmobiles (*NOTE: there were
a few who wanted to accommodate these).

Horse trails (*NOTE: there were a few who wanted to accommodate these).
Irresponsible users, noisy music, unsafe partying.

Criminals.

Unnecessary development.

Cutting down trees, damage to the natural scenes, littering. Billboards,
advertising along the parkway, too many signs.

Positive comments, looking forward to the park.

I think it’s wonderfirl if the wide diversity of outdoor interests can be
addressed.

I’m proud we had the opportunity to preserve a part of our history.

Our senior citizen biking group could safely ride to Sanford and we would
probably eat there.

57

We think it’s great people are finally realizing that people want more out of life
than malls and fast food places. We all have taken so much out of nature, it’s
time to start giving it back.

We would enjoy using long stretches of this trail for bicycling; shorter stretches
which are accessible to cars for cross country skiing, hiking, birdwatching;
scenic areas of the trail or adjacent to the trail for other nature activities and
photography.

It’s a great plan.

It sounds like a wonderfirl park to enjoy and relax in, also away from city
traflic and the “hustle bustle”.

(The park) has the potential of drawing thousands of people a year to use it
thank you for allowing me to participate - if you need volunteers call me!
(name and phone number).

Cooperative arrangements between landowners and interested clubs (e.g.
Nature Center, Nature Conservancy, Audubon Society, Ducks Unlimited)
could result in specially set-up wetlands, prairie, forest, etc. habitats for
everyone’s benefit and enjoyment (signed).

Owner’s concerns.

I don’t like the location of the park it is out my back door and I like my peace
and quiet and when the park goes in you can forget the peace.

A lot of the property owners aren’t thrilled about people walking almost on
their doorstep...it’s a shame that certain people in Midland are trying to force
something on us people in the outlying districts that we don’t want.

(I’m) too old for these projects. See too many problems ahead. More police
patrol.

Any property owner who wants a fence between this and his property should
have it free. Property rights, no rezone or effect on adjoining property.

The biggest concern that I have, is how to prevent motorcycles, RV, etc. . .from
using this park? In the area in which I live, they are constantly waning down
this trail.

If this is developed I feel it will be impossible to keep the privacy of the
property owners along the railroad right of way. Will the Parks and Recreation
be responsible for damage to the owners of private property?

Design it just as if it were 50 ft. from your front door, with a high fence to
keep people ofi' our property.

(I would like a) meeting of all residents and taxpayers of abutting or nearby
PTOPCTIY-

Ifyou are going to go against the will of the people, enclose each side with
about a 12 foot fence.

Money concerns.

I feel that the money is not being used wisely.

58

o I believe that the taxpayers money is being used unwisely and unjustly. We
have enough parks and recreational places to go and I do not believe that if
you go through with your plans that it will help anyone or turn a profit!

a If it cost $1 of public money to build or maintain then this should never
happen. With all the real problems in the world county and state at this time,
how can spending on this be explained. Scrap the idea! (Signed)

0 Two parks in our county was closed due to lack of funds. This project will
cost thousands of dollars.

Who’s paying for this? And who gets to use it?
If you have so much money why don’t you fix up our terrible roads?

Miscellaneous.

0 I would like to see at least some consideration for people who own and like to
ride ofi‘road vehicles. If they are banned fiom the trail there will still be people
that will ride on it. As long as people were required to have an ORV sticker
and ride with some common sense I don’t see a problem. I myself ride on the
old railroad tracks and from my experience my motorcycle wouldn’t do any
more damage to the trail that a horse would.

0 I have no good to say about your whole project. You are creating a haven for
alcoholics and drug addicts from the larger city. I think we in the country
deserve better, fiom all my contacts I have found NO ONE who wants it.
Thank you.

0 Tell how the PM Railroad opened this part of Michigan. This linear park is
“hallowed ground” it took our boys to two wars and brought the dead home.

Comments such as the ones that have been listed above have been
answered in many ways since these comments were incorporated into the master
plan. Many of the ideas for what to do with the park have been done. None of the
concerns of the abutting landowners has been realized. One letter cited during a
conversation with Bill Gibson, stated that if there was one rape on the trail, the
parks and recreation employees would be held responsible. This is the kind of
sobering comment that made the process of supporting the trail very dificult for
the parks and recreation employees. The individual who wrote this letter ran for
political omce recently and now fully supports the trail. Appendix C has the

newspaper article that cites his comments.

59

The county parks and recreation department arranged for trips to see other
operational trails in Michigan. All parties including those who were against the
trail were invited to go by bus to the Kal-Haven and the Hart-Montague Trails. In
general this was successfirl and either reinforced already convinced people or
helped remove people who were on the fence. None of the people who opposed

the trail attended this outing.
Community Support

This section of the report deals with public comments on the Pere
Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan (PMRTMM) and uses articles from
newspapers, letters, brochures and newsletters of the Friends to show how the
PMRTMM has grown and become successful over the past 10 years. Copies of all
documents are in Appendix C. What follows are small clips fiom the various
articles, letters, brochures and newsletters. All are quoted directly fi'om the
articles without using additional quotes of people being interviewed in the articles.
Your are invited to read the articles to get a sense of the context in which these
statements were made to the various reporters who wrote these articles.

Bike, foot trail proposed to link county parks

“Midland County park ofiicials are hoping they can use abandoned railway
lines for pedestrian and bike trails to link city and county parks...Now William
Gibson, county parks and recreation director, says the elimination of railway lines

also could be a boon to park operations...and would be a meaningful investment in

60

the community’s quality of life.” (Tuesday, November 17, 1987, Midland,
Michigan)
Park plan is on track

“If Midland County decides to build a rails-to-trails ‘linear park’ it will join
an effort to criss-cross the nation with hiking and biking paths that follow
abandoned rail lines. . .Midland’s rail-trail plan is in its infancy, says County Parks
and Recreation Director William Gibson. The Midland Foundation is in the
process of acquiring the right of way from C SX Transportation Inc. and
formulating plans. . .Trail system opponents cite problems including trespassing,
vandalism and littering by users, a decline in adjacent property values and lack of
control. . .Gibson said such concerns are not well documented. . .On trails in
operation, he said, the users have not littered or trespassed. . .right-of-way abuses
by motorized vehicles declined after the path opened.” (Article by Cathy Heng, not
dated)
Abandoned track switched to trails a national trend

“No cost estimates are developed but work along the 261/2 miles of
abandoned railway likely must occur in phases, Gibson said. . Proponents say the
chance to provide linear parks shielded by a buffer of greenery is the wave of the
future for both urban and rural areas. Just 200 acres of railroad right of way can
create a park 20 miles long for use by a variety of outdoor enthusiasts.” (Saginaw

News, April 26, 1990 by Cathy Heng)

61

County parks board discusses trails financing

“Members of the Midland County Parks and Recreation Commission are
looking at how the county will pay to maintain the proposed biking and hiking trail
that may be built along the old CSX railway right-of-way fiom Midland to
Clare...Most likely the property, if it reverted back to the surrounding land owners,
wouldn’t create a noticeable increase in property values, said Scott Meyers,
president of the New Era Chamber of Commerce. . .The Hart-Montague Trail runs
past New Era in Oceana County... Meyers said the trail had been good for
business...He said he is part owner of an ice cream store near the trail...20 percent
increase in business over the prior year. . .bicycle sales in our area are up
tremendously. . .The Hart-Montague Rail Trail has had a definite, positive economic
impact on our area. . .said Eleanor Polley, executive director of the White Lake
Area Chamber of Commerce in nearby Whitehall. . . .Gibson said law enforcement
personnel in that part of the state had few problems with crime along the trail. . .It
doesn’t attract that kind of person.” (Article by Mark Ranzenberger Midland Daily
News, June 7, 1990)
County accepts trails-to-trails gift

“Midland County today accepted the Midland Foundation’s offer to pay for
the CSX Transportation right-of-way between Midland and Clare for use as a
biking and hiking trail. . .The acceptance hinges on an environmental report which is

expected to be finished by the end of the month....The Midland Foundation will

62

pay CSX Transportation $225,000.00 to purchase the long strip of land.” (Article
by Mark Ranzenberger Midland Daily News, July 24, 1990)
Community meetings for the linear park project

“The Midland County Linear Park Advisory Committee invites you to
participate in a community meeting for the linear park being planned for the former
CSX railroad right-of-way that runs parallel to Saginaw Road between Midland
and Clare. (Midland County Parks and Recreation Commission, November 22,
1991)
Hikers jump the gun on rail-trail

“Although the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan won’t officially
open until mid-July, bicyclists and other outdoor enthusiasts already are gearing up
to use the trail’s first completed portion...Last week, I counted 13 people using it
between Currie Parkway and Cook Road, said William C. Gibson...Technically,
they’re not supposed to, but they just go around the barricades” (Article by Tracy
Calabrese, Saginaw News, April 25, 1993)
Letter from Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt

“Congratulations! I applaud your hard work and dedication in developing
the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail, a 27 mile trail and greenway linking the cities of
Midland and Clare. By breathing new life into an abandoned rail corridor, you
have created a linear park which will be appreciated by thousand of Michigan
citizens, whether they are bicyclists, hikers, equestrians, commuters, small business

owners, or people with disabilities.” (Letter dated July 15, 1993).

63

Letter from Governor John Engler

“You must be extremely proud of the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid-
Michigan as it has not only been a wonderful expansion for your community, birt
has influenced many cities across our state to transform their abandoned rail
corridors into trail networks like the one in you community. In showing your
commitment and dedication to the City of Midland, you have provided your area
with state-wide recognition of its rails-to-trails system that will be enjoyed by the
citizens of our state for many years to come.” (Letter dated July 15, 1993).
Letter from 4th District Congressman Dave Camp

“There are approximately 150 parks throughout the United States which
have converted unused railroads to the rails-to-trails program. In fact, the idea is
even catching on in Great Britain as more and more individuals the world over are
making use of the benefits of recreation, paired with conservation and the
appreciation of nature. However, obtaining these old railways to convert them to
parks can sometimes be difficult, and the efi‘orts that have gone into the Pere
Marquette Rail-Trail should be recognized.” (Letter dated July 14, 1993).
Raise money for rail-trail? No problem, Coleman says

“By the time the money counting is done, people in the little city will have
raised $31,000 to $32,000 for a mile of rail-trail, said Charles Amble, part of the
l9-member committee that headed the drive. . .The city was assured of getting
$150,000 of the “Coleman mile” from the Rollin M. Gerstacker Foundation. The

challenge was raising $25,000...How did the people of Coleman do it? They

64

divided up the territory-"schools, churches, organizations, businesses. And they
took the “direct approach” with mailings and personal visits, Amble said...”We
asked for specific amounts from different groups. . .We informed them that this
project is something that every member of the community could use and enjoy.”
(Article by Cheryl Wade, Midland Daily News, December 27, 1993)
Coleman deserves pat on the back

“Give the City of Coleman credit...Residents there needed to raise $25,000
to help pay for construction of a mile of rail-trail through the city. . .but came up
with an extra $6,000 or $7,000...And the city received its support from a number
of areas, such as the Coleman Veterans of Foreign Wars, Chemical Bank Coleman
and Coleman Lions Club. Local resident Donald McClive and others also donated
to the cause...The rail-trail will be an asset to Coleman, as it has proven to be in
Midland, thanks to those who came forth with donations to make the project a
reality.” (Opinion Midland Daily News, December 27, I993)
Rail-trail to Sanford takes riders back to the future on a bike

“This time, the spot was mid-Michigan’s Pere Marquette Rail-Trail. My
transport was an efiicient mountain bike--a quantum leap fi'om the one-speed,
pedal brake variety of childhood. . .That was proof that things have gone full circle
in our family. The kids are driving; maw and paw are pedaling...This won’t be my
last trip on the smooth highway reserved for bicyclists of all ages and athletic in-
line skaters. . .Why? Simple. . .It’s a welcome escape from the hectic highway to the

more tranquil time I left long ago.” (Opinion Chris Thompson, undated)

65

You School can help the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail Close the GaP to
Coleman!

“The Midland County Youth Action Council (MCYAC) is an organization
affiliated with the Midland Foundation established to promote philanthropy
amongst the youth of Midland County. Operating with an annual income
generated by a $1,000,000 youth endowment fund, MCYAC makes grants,
sponsors events and helps raise firnds for projects which affect the youth of
Midland County. . .Fund raising is an important aspect of philanthropy. Therefore
MCYAC pledged to aid the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail “Close the GaP” fund
raising program. . .To reach our goal of $10,000 fiom eleven schools in Midland
County, MCYAC is sponsoring a firnd raising opportunity for all participation
schools.” (Midland Foundation, 5 pages, 1994)

Show your School Spirit for Earth Day ‘94

“Close the GaP

Recycling...Save plastics numbered 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7 ...Help your school win
a recycled plastic lumber bench that will be donated to the Rail-Trail. . .What a great
feeling to know that you have helped save landfill space, conserve natural
resources and you get a chance to win great prizes!” (Flyer, Earth Day 1994)
Drive starts to fill GaP

“The Friends of the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail want to “F ill the GaP” in the
linear park between Sanford and Coleman...The group, formed in January 1993, is

heading up a fund-raising campaign to raise $320,000 over the next 10 weeks to

66

complete Phases III and IV of the project. . .Cliff Miles, former Midland city
manager and a charter member of the Friends group, will direct the fund-raising
effort. He said the goal is to collect a million pounds of glass and 4,500 pounds of
plastic.” (Article by Ted O’Neil, Midland Daily News, February 15, 1994)
Everyone can help with rail-trail project

“Friends of the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail have come up with a way
everyone can take part in the linear park project---through recycling. . .That’s right,
recycling...The glass will be used in what is being called “glassphalt,” a form of
blacktop using glass instead of sand that will be used for the trail. The recycled
plastic will be used to make signs and benches, and the red poles used at
intersections to keep motorized vehicles off the rail-trail. . . So mark your calendars
and give the project a hand. You’ll be helping the environment at the same time.”
(Opinion, Midland Daily News, February 16, 1994)
You can help Close the GaP to Coleman

A letter and brochure explaining what the Friends group is and how local
community can support rail-trail. Send money.
Pere Marquette is a model rail-trail

“Although it is designed for non-motorized use only, the Pere Marquette
Rail-Trail is becoming known as the “Lamborghini” of linear parks. . .Roger Storm,
director of the Michigan Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, said the Pere Marquette is
looked at as a model rail-trail throughout the state. . .This July will mark the third

annual Michigander, a 250 mile bike ride across Michigan. . .and the ride will end up

67

in Midland on the Pere Marquette.” (Article by Ted O’Neil, Midland Daily News,
April 23, 1994)
Coming through-Coleman gets ready as rail-trail grows

“Bicycles, like cars, tend to break down. But a business here has expanded
to specialize in fixing both in anticipation of more traffic through town...Coleman
Auto Supply, 113 Railway St., has added a bike sales and repair shop to cater to
firture users of the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail. . .Cassidey said he has converted
about one-third of his display area to a bike shop...Chuck Amble, treasurer of the
Coleman Downtown Development Authority, agrees that there will be_more
people passing through Coleman than ever before and that businesses need to
adjust...”We have a slush machine and popcorn and we sell snack food”, said Ron
Klump, manager of the Coleman Pharmacy, 201 N. Fourth St...” We are also
going to add juices and some healthier things like that.” (Article by Ted O’Neil,
Midland Daily News, June 28, 1994)
You can help the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail Close the “Recycling” GaP to
Coleman

“Construction of the Rail-Trail will use one million pounds of recycled
glass and 4,500 pounds of recycled plastic. The Midland Volunteers for Recycling
will be co-sponsoring a county-wide collection of glass and plastic to Close the

Recycling GaP...Three Saturdays.” (Letter from Group, April 1994)

68

$3.3 million path really sparkles

“Some people using the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan are
jarred by seeing chunks of glass on potions of the 26 mile path. . .However, most of
the chunks actually are in the $3 .375 million trail, not on it...County residents
donated more than 1 million pounds of class in various colors, which was mixed
into standard paving material to create glassphalt...The proof is in the
pavement. ..Bits of blue, green, brown and transparent glass are clearly visible on
the trail.” (Article by Tracy Calabrese, Midland Daily News, undated)

Letter

“The Michigan Society of Planning Officials is pleased to announce the
“Pere Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan” prepared by the City of Midland,
County of Midland and the Midland Foundation for the Community of Midland,
has been selected as one of five MSPO Community Honor Award Winners for
1994.” (Letter fi'om Michigan Society of Planning Officials, September 8, 1994
with attachment and letter from William C. Gibson to Pollack Design Associates)
Top news stories in mid-Michigan in 1994

Picture of City of Midland Section of Pere Marquette Rail-Trail.

“Efi‘orts to complete the Pere Marquette Rail Trail of Mid-Michiganu-26
miles of abandoned railroad tracks from Midland to Coleman paved for
recreational use-«got a boost this year fi'om a fundraising campaign that exceeded
its goal....The project also started wheels turning in the heads of Coleman ofiicials,

who won nearly $1 million in grants fiom foundations and governments, as well as

69

a $150,000 donation fi'om the town’s Downtown Development Authority. . .The
fact that the new look is a hit with retailers and residents alike didn’t surprise
William Cozat, Jr., chairman of the downtown group and the city’s fire chief and
public works director. . .It’s a lot more appealing place to move to than it was prior
to this.” (Article by Tracy Calabrese, Saginaw News, December 25, 1994)
Midland County Economic Growth and Development

“Improved arteries of transportation will lure Midland people to other
areas of the county, Bevirt said. One such means of travel is the rail-trail. . .The
rail-trail, in its own little way, is tying the county together, Bevirt said. That’s
good news for communities such as Coleman and Sanford, which now are
improving themselves, Bevirt said. . .Coleman was going the wrong way for a long
time. .it was just slowly deteriorating. . .But the city that will be connected to
Midland by the rail trail by early summer has done its own streetscape and should
grow.” (Article by Doug Henze, Midland Daily News, January 1, 1995)
Ho—hum Rail-Trail almost finished

“With little fanfare, Pere Marquette Rail-Trail users soon will find they can
travel fi'om the Tridge to Coleman without encountering construction along the
way. . .Crews will finish concrete work where the Rail-Trail crosses 11 roads
between Sanford and Coleman by Saturday, July l...We have no real counts and
don’t know the turnover. But on the city stretch, I recently counted 100 we could
see. With ideal conditions, maybe 20,000 a month will use the trail...That is good

since the trail reflects life in the Midland area. . .people can enjoy great views at

7O

restored railroad bridges over the Tittabawassee River and east Salt River. With a
jog ofl‘ the main trail, users may visit the Dow Museum and Bradley House on
Cook Road. . .The trail also meanders through farm fields that stretch as far as the
eye can see near Coleman.” (Article by Cathy Heng, Saginaw News, 1995)
Towns welcome bikers with open tills

“New signs grace the backs of businesses along the Pere Marquette Rail-
Trail, facing its non-motorized travelers. . .A trash can carries the message, “Watch
for Bikers”. . .Business is picking up along the nearly completed 22-mile Rail-Trail,
merchants say. . ”The restaurants have definitely seen an increase in business,” said
Earl Crawford president of the Sanford Area Chamber of Commerce... And it’s
not just local. We have a group come regularly from Saginaw who park their cars
and bike the trail here, stopping for meals. . .Both the Coleman Restaurant and the
Cherry Land Market in Coleman have a “lot more activity,” said Coleman Mayor
Harvey Gene Robinson.” (Article by Cathy Heng, Saginaw News, 1995)
Parks create recreation, business opportunities

“Gibson said he thinks the county parks system, especially the Pere
Marquette Rail-Trail and Sanford Lake Park, brings more dollars into the
community than what the county spends on his department. . Places like restaurants
along the rail-trail and bike shops have seen a huge increase in business. We’ve
never done a study on the exact amount, but the parks bring people into the
community and they spend money on other things like lodging and food. Gibson

said a restaurant like Alex’s Railside in Sanford, which backs up to the linear park,

71

has 15 to 25 bikes parked outside on weekend mornings during warm weather...A
new business on Saginaw Road near Dublin Avenue, Blazing Saddles, opened
solely in response to the rail-trail. It rents bikes and in-line skates. Other bike
shops in town have seen an increase in business and a Coleman auto parts store
began selling bikes.” (Article by Ted O’Neil, Midland Daily News, February 5,
1996)
Rail-Trail Attracts Family Excursions

“Recreationalists are filling the rail-trail this spring with roller blades,
hiking gear and bicycles. Sanford area businesses and organizations are the
beneficiaries of rail-trail recreationalists stopping over for ice cream cones,
restaurant food and visits to the Sanford Centennial Museum...Jordan M. Garver,
2, rides the rail-trail in a child carrier with his grandparents. He enjoys an ice
cream cone in Sanford at the end of the rail-trail. . . .The rail-trail is safer said Diana
Carey. Take your kids there. It’s good for them and it’s fun.” (Article by Kim J.
Kent, The Coleman Tribune ~ The Sanford Express, June 7, 1995)
Foundation’s $500,000 to help with rail-trail upkeep

“Financial worries for the Midland County portion of the Pere Marquette
Rail-Trail are over. . .The Board of Commissioners Tuesday voted 9-0 to accept a
$500,000 gift from the Rollin M. Gerstacker Foundation for maintenance of the
linear park. . .The foundation specified the gift must be used only for the
“preservation, improvement, maintenance and repair” of the rail-trail. . .The social

contract between the foundations and the citizens of Midland has shown we can

72

husband these resources like the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail, Wilson said. It is a
resource that can be enjoyed by city and county residents, as well as visitors.”
(Article by Ted O’Neil, Midland Daily News, October 11, 1995)
A building boom hits Coleman

“The development follows the 1992 opening of a new fire station in the
heart of town, a fresh landscape for Coleman’s main street in 1994 and completion
of the Pere Marquette Rail—Trail of Mid-Michigan through town in 1995, Bevirt
said.” (Article by Cathy Heng, Saginaw News, undated)
Two battle for District 3 seat on Midland County board

“Snyder said he was against the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail when the idea
was proposed, but now favors it. . .it runs by my house and I’m surprised how
popular it is. I didn’t think many people would use it.” (Article by Ted O’Neil,
Midland Daily News, undated)
Rail-Trail Draws Family Groups

“Tim J. Little, of Midland County, brought his family from his residence on
Gratiot County Line Road to the Sanford area for a recreational outing. It was a
beautiful day and the girls wanted to roller blade and ride their bikes. We don’t
have nice paved trails like this where we live...This is our first time on the Rail-
Trail in Sanford.” (Article by Kim J. Kent, The Sanford Express, May 1, 1996)
Friends letter for the Friends of the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail

Information

73

Coleman’s downtown experiences boom

“The Rail-Trail is a 26-mile long park which nms between Midland and
Coleman, and is a paved trail used by residents for hiking, biking, roller blading
and other outdoor activities. Any non-motorized mode of transportation is
allowed on the trail, which is still a couple of years away from being expanded to
include a trail between Coleman and Clare...A lot of people are interested in
outdoor activities and are looking to get exercise these days. . .It is one of the
higher classes of trails in the nation and has served as a model for communities
looking to upgrade a similar idea in their area.” (Article by Mike Scott, Central
Michigan Business Monthly, June, 1996)
Rail-Trail Links Greenways

“In many ways the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail is the “ideal” community
project. Like the railroad track it follows, the trail is linear, collecting and moving
people through a variety of Midland County and Mid-Michigan settings ranging
from large to small town, including urban/built and rural/natural
landscapes. . .Midland’s rail-trail is a successfirl adventure because of the efl'orts of
many citizens and agencies. But the best is yet to come, for as more people use
the trail, more ways for its use will be discovered. Some positive community
impacts already evident include an increase in economic activity on adjacent
property in the towns and villages and the attitude of those using the trail.”

(Article by Peter M. Pollack, Michigan Planner, Fall, 1996)

74

Spring time means Rail-Trail time

“When the first signs of spring hit mid-Michigan-usometimes even before
the first signs appear-«area residents are headed for the Pere Marquette Rail-
Trail...When we get a nice day, there are people out there no matter what, County
Parks and Recreation Director William Gibson said. In fact, they never really stop.
I’ve seen people out on the city portion of the trail when the snow is flying.”
(Article by Jefl‘ Aldrich, Midland Daily News, March 30, 1997)

All of the articles used here are found in Appendix C and additional articles
may be found in the supplement of this paper. All of these articles were gathered
from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and the Midland County

Parks and Recreation ofices.

Interview with William C. Gibson

0 How long have you been with Micfland County? Bill has been with Midland
County since 1974 and has worked with the parks and recreation department
for approximately 14 years. He is the director of the department.

0 How long have you been involved with the Pere Marquette Rail- Trail of Mid-
Michigan? The trail has officially been opened since August of 1990;
however, Bill has been involved with the trail since its inception and first
started considering the idea of the trail in the early 1980’s.

0 What was the old railroad bed like? The railroad bed was and is still in good
shape. It had not been abandoned long. CSX removed the railroad ties, rails

and ballast from the right-of-way.

75

Who decided to buy the railroad bed? Bill decided that it would be a great
way to connect county parks and create a linear park at the same time.

Where did the money come from? The Midland Foundation has provided most
of the money to buy the old railroad bed. Carl Gerstacker, who recently
passed away, also saw that funds were directed to the trail. Mr. Gerstacker
was a strong supporter of the trail concept. Many other community
foundations have supported the trail.

What are the leading reasons that the trail got started? The need for a place
to ride bicycles and skate. Also, the need to keep people off the road where
they were competing with automobiles.

When you got started what kind of brainstorming did you do? Most of the
brainstorming occurred over time and was with another of the parks
employees, Paul Pounders. Both Bill and Paul have contributed many of the
ideas that can be seen on the trail today.

Who were the key players? From the beginning, Bill Gibson, Paul Pounders
and Carl Gerstacker have shown the most support and done a lot of the work.
As time has gone along, many other people have been involved. It has been a
community efl‘ort.

With Whom did you work? Bill has worked with many of the city ofiicials,
township omcials, Hamlet officials, Village officials, citizens and the DNR.
How did you meet the people with whom you worked ? Bill has met most of

these people through his job.

76

What kind of opposition did you meet when the trail was first proposed? This
question is answered in the section on public comments.

How did you overcome this opposition? By setting up bus trips to other trails,
setting town meetings in Coleman, Sanford and Midland (in this order) and by
addressing problems in a straight-forward and honest way.

What are the leading reasons the trail has grown? The trail is a great addition
to the community and Bill has kept coming up with new and creative ideas to
add to the overall charm of the trail.

Paint Creek has a $40,000.00 a year manager. How have you managed not to
have a manager for the trail? They have kept the trail under the management
of the department and have treated it like any other park.

What is your system for obtaining grants, endowments etc. for the trail?
Working very closely with the Midland Foundation.

How important has the trail been to the other smaller communities in Midland
County? Hard to quantify, but he believes that the trail has had a number of
direct benefits for the communities along the trail. During a drive along the
trail, new bike shops and restaurants are being built. One of the restaurants is
licensed by the county to operate along the trail. This needs more study.

How did you get schools involved? Once again through the Midland
Foundation. One of the trustees is involved with the school system and was

able to go to the schools.

77

Do you think that the people of Midland County have taken ownership of the
trail? Yes the people of Midland County have taken ownership of the trail.
How has this been shown? While riding behind a county parks vehicle on an
inspection trip, the vehicle was stopped by an elder man and his granddaughter.
The driver was told that he was not allowed on the trail. On another occasion,
a lady was seen picking up glass in an intersection. She was concerned that
cyclists might get a flat tire. Trees were planted between an auto parts dealer
and the trail. At a later date, an inspection revealed that the trees had been cut
down. When asked what happened, the manger confessed to cutting the trees
down because it blocked the view of the trail and the “rollerbabes” that were
using the trail.

How much citizen involvement is needed? There can never be enough citizen
involvement.

How have you managed to keep people involved with the trail? People have
taken ownership of the trail and have done many things on their own.

How did you come across the idea for the glass? Glassphalt was seen as a
more durable product for the trail. It has not worked well because the glass
was not ground up enough and pops out of the trail under pressure. The
jagged edges may be cutting some of the bicycle tires.

What are some of the current problems you are having on the trail? Some
vandalism and the bollards that were originally designed from recycled plastic

have not worked well. Once people realized that they were not dealing with a

78

railroad company, we have had a number of requests to grant easements across
the trail.

How do you plan to address these problems? Vandalism is hard to stop. The
bollards will be replaced with a better product that is being researched and new
bollards firrther down the trail are steel. We have not granted easements and
the parks and recreation commission has stuck to their guns. If we started
giving in to every request for an easement, we would end up with a park that
looks like a sidewalk with a lot of driveways cutting across it. It would affect
the quality of the trail.

What are some of the problems you anticipate in the future? Shrinking tax
dollar and the fact that the endowment for maintenance will not quite cover
what is needed each year.

How was the Micfland Foundation created? Carl and Esther Gerstacker
started the foundation about 25 years ago and is modeled after the community
foundation in Cleveland, Ohio. This is a community foundation. There are
other similar foundations in the state.

What would be your requests for the future? Bill suggests that a study should
be done on the economic benefits of Michigan rails-to-trails, on who is using
the PMRTMM and a study should be done that looks at when the PMRTMM
is being used. how long people are on the trail and where do the people come

from who are using the trail.

CONCLUSIONS

 

AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

-m .m-

 

 

80

Conclusion

It is expected that there must be strong individual advocates who create the
necessary beginnings for the successfirl starting of a trailways system. Conversely,
if there is not strong community advocacy for a trailways system, the trailways
system will be a failure. Therefore, a trailways system’s success is based on strong
community involvement from the conception of the project to bring a trailways
system into a community. If the community advocacy groups are not involved in
continuing this support, the trailways system in the community will be in decline.
Community involvement must be shown for a trailway to continue, to develop and
grow. It creates the publicity necessary to encourage users and a trail must be
used to be sustainable. Without the involvement of individuals, groups and a
broad community efi’ort, a trailways system will not be successful.

Midland County has become attached to the trail. The trail has become
more than just a place. It has become a place which is developing a separate social
system and cultural network where relationships with the other users of the trail
and the relationship with the trail goes beyond a paved bike trail in Midland
County. (Moore and Graefe, 1994) Here is where the environment of the trail is
seen as a place where human values can be cultivated. Values such as picking up
litter, defending the trail fi'om motorized vehicles, or donating money and time to
build the trail or help maintain the trail. The trail takes on a sense of place that is

its own. (Stokols, 1990)

81

The results of this study were more than expected. William C. Gibson,
Tom Pounders and Carl Gerstacker provided the individual advocacy for the Pere
Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan (PMRTMM) to become successfirl. These
individuals have been a part of the trail since the beginning and even though Mr.
Gerstacker has passed away the foundation he helped create is still supporting the
trail with necessary firnds. The Friends of the PMRTMM group has raised
thousands of dollars to help build the trail and maintain the trail. School children
in Midland County helped provide 1 million pounds of glass and 4,500 pounds of
plastic to help construct the trail. The community in Midland County is deeply
involved with the trail.

The numerous stories about the trail and the way the Pere Marquette Rail-
Trail of Mid-Michigan (PMRTMM) has directly afl‘ected the communities along
the trail is well represented by newspaper articles and the new businesses that line
the trail fiom the City of Midland to the City of Coleman. The PMRTMM
belongs to the people of the City of Midland and the people of Midland County.
To read the articles about the PMRTMM is to read about individuals who see the
success of the trail and understand how the trail can afi‘ect the economic well being
of their communities; however, it is apparent by their actions and thoughts that the
trail means more to them than an economic investment for the future. The trail
links communities together. It ties the future of the communities to each other and
the destiny of the trail is tied to the continuing advocacy of the communities that

are linked by the trail. The comments of the people who talk about this trail

82

indicate a love for the trail. It is no longer just an old abandoned railroad. The trail

stands by itself as an entity ready to offer economic growth, recreation and a place

to walk or ride with a person’s family. It shares itself with the community that

helped build it. The Pere Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan is a success.

Recommendations for Future Studies

Five firture areas of study should be considered to aid the planners of rails-

to-trails:

1.

Economic development as it relates to the trail and the economic benefits that
the trail brings in to the community once it has been established. In comments
from the public, the esthetic reasons, the recreational reasons and even the
health reasons for the need of trail have been used to justify a trail being built;
however, the practical public wants to see the dollars and cents or the
economic benefits of spending the meager resources with which many
communities are now struggling. Having good sound economic numbers fi'om
the area of the trail will aid the advocates when trying to win approval for the
trail. A linear park tends to spread the economic benefits over a dispersed area
and spreads the economic benefits over linear distance.

There is a need to study who is using the trail, how long they are on the trail
and how far they travel on the trail. No studies have been done about how the
trail is being used once people have this resource in their community.

Knowing this kind of information will aid parks and recreation and the planners

in a community who are having to design the trail for multiple uses, who are

83

having to design trailside facilities. This will help the designers to understand
where they need to locate trailside facilities. Having concise information on
the trail will also aid advocates who can describe the public who are using the
trail and then being able to show just how important rails-to-trails are to local
and regional communities.

. The distinction between density and crowding should be considered as an
alternative study. Linear parks offer a long narrow corridor which spreads the
users out over long distances. Traditional parks tend to be of a completely
different configuration i.e. square, rectangle and circular. In a 1972 article,
Daniel Stokols discusses the need to change how density and crowding are
studied. . .On The Distinction Between Density and Crowding: Some
Implications for Future Research. A linear park that is 21 miles long and
averages 58,000 users per year might see an average of three people per hour
per day spread out over a mile. The usage sounds high, but the actual usage or
density in a given area is low. However, a square park with the same area,
which could be approximately 2100 feet x 5820 feet, would have 63 people in
the park per hour and these people would be visible to each other.

. A study on the amount of crime on trails versus the amount of crime in the area
of the trail and the amount of crime in the community where the trail is located
would help trail advocates to address the fear of crime associated with trails in

general. Crime is probably less on a trail and reduced more once a trail is

opened.

84

5. Studying property values and how the trail effects property values would be an
important study. It is suggested that property values tend to go up once the
trail is opened and adjacency to the trail is used as a benefit to sell property-
once the trail is finished. In the City of Midland, a home near the Tridge and
on the trail is for sale and emphasizes this fact by placing a “for sale” sign in
the back of the house so trail users can see the sign

Lastly, it is important not to forget the human side of trail issues. Social
scientists should continue to study the pe0ple who are involved in the trail
advocacy process. These are important people who have a lot to offer to the
social learning process of advocacy. Additionally, the opinions of people who are
opposed to trails should be studied. There are two sides to a trail and it will help
to understand both sides. There seems to be little middle when a trail is being
considered for a local community. Groups and individuals either love the trail or

hate the trail.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

£01020}!
s '4

 

86

Ahem, Jack. Greenways and Ecology. Proceedings of the American Society of
Landscape Architecture Open Committee on Landscape/Land Use
Planning. Kansas City, Missouri, October 19-22, 1991.

American Hiking Society. Trails for All Americans. Report of the National Trails
Agenda Project. Washington, DC: National Park Service, 1990.

Brick, Phillip D. and R. McGreggor Cawley, eds. A Wolf in the Garden: The Land
Rights Movement and the New Environmental Debate. Lanham: Rowman
and Littlefield, 1996.

Carroll, Mathew S. and William G. Hendrix. Federally Protected Rivers: The
Need for Effective Local Involvement. Journal of the American Planning
Association. 58 3 (1990): 346-353.

Cook, EA. and H.N.Van Lier. Landscape Planning and Ecological Networks.
Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1994.

Corbett, Marjorie R., ed. Greenline Parks: Land Conservation Trends for the
Eighties and Beyond Washington, DC: National Parks & Conservation
Association, 1983.

Coughlin, Robert E. Forests Fields, and Urban Development: Planning as
Though Vegetation Really Mattered Philadelphia: University of
Pennsylvania, 1983.

Driver, BL, and J. R. Bassett. 1975. Defining Conflicts Among River Users: A
Case Study of Michigan’s Au Sable River. Naturalist. 26 2 (1975): 19-
23.

Dunlap, Riley E. Trends in Public Opinion Toward Environmental Issues: 1965-
1990. Society and Natural Resources. 4 (1991) 3: 285-312.

Elson, Martin J. Greenbelts: Conflict Mediation in the Urban Fringe. London:
Heinemann, 1986.

Ely, James W., Jr. The Guardian of Every Other Right: A Constitutional History
of Property Rights. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.

Engwicht, David. Reclaiming Our Cities and Towns. Philadelphia: New Society
Publishers, 1993.

Erickson, Donna L. and Anneke F. Louisse. Greenway Implementation in
Metropolitan Regions: A Comparative Case Study of North American
Examples. The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1997.

87

Fabos, Julius Gy, and Jack Ahem, eds. Greenways: The Beginning of an
International Movement. The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1995.

Flink, Charles A. and Robert M. Seams. Loring LaB. Schwarz, ed. Greenways: A
Guide to Planning, Design, and Development. Washington, DC: Island
Press, 1993.

F reilich, Robert H. and Roxanne Doyle. Takings Legislation: Misguided and
Dangerous. Land Use Law. 46 (1994) 11: 3-6.

Gramann, J. H. and G. A. Vander Stoep. Prosocial Behavior Theory and Natural
Resource Protection: A Conceptual Synthesis. Journal of Environmental
Management, 24 (1987): 247-257.

Jacob, G. R. and R. Schreyer. Conflict in Outdoor Recreation: A Theoretical
Perspective. Journal of Leisure Research. 12 (1980): 368-380.

Jacobs, Harvey M. Whose Rights, Whose Regulations? Land Theory, Land Policy,
and the Ambiguous Future of the Private Property Rights Movement in the
US Environmental Planning Quarterly. 13 (1996) 3: 3-8.

. Debates in Rural Land Planning Policy: A Twentieth Century
History from New York State. Journal of Rural Studies. 5 (1989) 2: 137-
148.

 

Keller, K. Mountain Bikes on Public Lands: A Manager ’s Guide to the State of
Practice. Washington, DC: Bicycle Federation of America, 1990.

Kent, T. J. Open Space for the San Francisco Bay Area; Organizing to Guide
Metropolitan Growth. Berkeley: University of California, 1970.

Kriz, Margaret. Taking Issue. National Journal. 28 (1996) 22: 1200-1204.

Kunstler, James Howard. The Geography of Nowhere: The Rise and Decline of
America ’s Man-Made Landscape. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1993.

Leopold, Aldo. A Sand County Almanac. New York: Oxford University Press,
1949.

Little, Charles E. Challenge Of the Land New York: Open Space Action Institute,
1968.

. Greenways for America. Baltimore: The John Hopkins
University Press, 1990.

88

. Making Greenways Happen. American Forests. 95 (1989) 1&2:

 

37-40.

Lyle, J. H. Design for Human Ecosystems. New York: Van Norstrand Reinhold
Company, 1985.

Mertes, James D. Park, Recreation, Open Space and Greenway Guidelines.
Arlington: National Recreation and Park Association, 1995.

McHarg, Ian L. Design With Nature. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1969.

Moore, Roger L. and Alan R. Graefe. Attachments to Recreation Settings: The
Case of Rail-Trail Users. Leisure Sciences. 16 (1994) 17-31.

. Conflicts on Multiple-Use Trails: Synthesis of the Literature and
State of the Practice. Federal Highway Administration. Washington,
DC , 1994.

Morris, David. Self-Reliant Cities: Energy and the Transformation of Urban
America. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books, 1982.

Nevel, Bonnie and Peter Harnik. Railroads Recycled: How Local Initiative and
Federal Support Launched the Rails-to- T rails Movement 1965-1990.
Washington DC: National Park Service, 1990.

Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program. Economic Impacts of
Protecting Rivers, Trails and Greenway Corridors. Washington, DC:
National Park Service, 1992.

Peterson, G. L. Evaluating the Quality of the Wilderness Environment:
Congnrence Between Perception and Aspiration. Environment and
Behavior. 6 (1974) 2: 127-142.

Platt, Rutherford H. Open Land In Urban Illinois: Roles of the Citizen Advocate.
DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 1971.

Pollack Design Associates Consultant Team. Pere Marquette Rail- Trail of Mid-
Michigan: A Vision for a Linear Park in Midland Countyfiom Midland to
Clare, Michigan. Midland: The Midland Foundation, 1992.

Popper, Frank J. Understanding American Land Use Planning Since 1970: A
Revisionist Interpretation. Journal of the American Planning Association.
54 (1988) 3: 291-301.

89

Rasor, Robert. The Trails Network: New Directions. American Forests. 94
(1988) 3&4: 58-61.

Rubin, Herbert J. and Irene Rubin. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing
Data. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1995.

Ryan, Karen-Lee and Julie A Winterich, eds. Secrets of Successful Rail-T rails: An
Acquisition and Organizing Manual for Converting Rails into Trails.
Washington, DC: National Park Service, 1993.

Siderelis, Christos and Roger Moore. Outdoor Recreation Net Benefits of Rail-
Trails. Journal of Leisure Research. 27 (1995) 4: 344-359.

Soule, Michael E. Land Use Planning and Wildlife Maintenance: Guidelines for
Conserving Wildlife in an Urban Landscape. Journal of the American
Planning Association. 57 (1991) 3: 313-323.

Smith, Daniel S. and Paul Cawood Hellrnund. Ecology of Greenways: Design and
Function of Linear Conservation Areas. Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press, 1993.

Stake, Robert. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage
Publications, 1995.

Stokols, Daniel. On the Distinction Between Density and Crowding: Some
Implications for Future Research. Psychological Review. 79 (1972) 3:
27 5-277.

. Instrumental and Spiritual Views of People-Environment
Relations. American Psychologist. 45 (1990) 5: 641-646.

. Establishing and Maintaining Healthy Environments. American
Psychologist. 47 (1992) 1: 6-22.

Trailblazer. Volume 11, Number 4. October-December, 1996.

Vento, Bruce F. Trails - A Nationwide System: A National Priority. Trends. 28 4
(1991): 7-9.

Williams, Edward A. Open Space: The Choices Before California: The Urban
Metropolitan Open Space Study. San Francisco: Diablo Press, 1969.

Yandle, Bruce, ed. Land Rights: The 1990s Property Rights Rebellion. Lanham:
Rowman and Littlefield, 1995.

APPENDIXES

 

‘5 (= 414; j I.
\ ‘0’: 'I .
'r‘ .

‘ l '3 l

e .l .' . ~ "\\' ; ‘ ‘ . I;
' A '3 \ .1

r .‘ ‘g - . - ,5 C - _ ,'4_, s 1' ’m‘)’: I? .
. ' : ,3: . -. .‘r ' _. ' .. ‘ J x. . ti." ’.
F v . . ,- -. ‘ ~ I‘ ‘ ' q
)1”. . , ‘. ..- , . _ _ ‘ ‘ ~ I
- s ,- ; .

 

Appendix A

91

' Ralls—to-tralls

proposal risky
the editor:
Ireadansrticlepostedin ages
station yesterday concerning a
group. that is
counties to take old t0C rail;
road bed and make a hiking and
b trail. On paper that mi
soun like a good idea but w
about reality?
The hikers and bikers of today

are fighters not sportsmen. If the
motorcycle gangs and drug deal-
ers want new territory why not let
them buy it? A decent person or
child or animal, wild or otherwise,
would not be safe anywhere near
that trail. Talk about highway
robberies, how many people
would be robbed or rendered Just
tryingtocrossthetrailonscoun-
try road?__ Wake up,- America.

92

93
Barbara Hettich
Eric M. Prechtel
4059 San Juan Ave
Battle Creek MI 49017
February 6, 1994

Patrica Adams

River Partners Program
1327 Academy St
Kalamazoo MI 49007

Dear Ms. Adams:

We are writing to express our opinion about the proposed re-
creational trail along the Kalamazoo River from Battle Creek
to Allegan. We feel it is a well-intentioned, but bad idea.

We live in a small residential area in Battle Creek, and our
back yard lepes down to the river. We have already had

several years of experience with open access to the river in

our back yard in the form of cancers. Many cancers are nature
lovers and respect the river. Unfortunately, too large of a
prcporticn of this population represents the opposite. They are
loud and frequently use vulgar language--scaring and harassing
wildlife, not to mention property owners. The river becomes the
dumping ground for tremendous amounts of trash. Since we take
the time and trouble to clean up the river around our home, we
can verify that it's not pretty. Compounding the problem,

some of these individuals trespass on our back yard, and we

have even been asked access to our bathroom! We have also
experienced hunters firing their weapons much too close to our
home. We love the river and were willing to pay the price to
live here, but our privacy certainly does not compare to others
who do not have water accessible in their back yards. Everyone
deserves the privacy of their own property.

It is a waste of a rare and wonderful natural resource to open
it to those who won't assume responsibility for protecting it.
Our wild areas continue to shrink and should be protected--
not developed in the name of "progress." Perhaps a compromise
would be to create parks, or areas of access, and charge con-
sumers for the use of this. At least this way there could be
funding for clean-up.

In any case we do cppcse the creation of any portion of the trail
that may affect our area. We would fight this to the full extent

of the law.

Sincerely, . .
3 Cave/é? - /‘;"v/‘<. ’é‘e‘ i.- /‘

l ‘ ,

r , J
Cucaachtl
Barbara Hettich
Eric M. Prechtel

 

94

Iral‘l”

Mon Dace 1996 (.J A

s a . kmrf 5’.
manna: given-aim {Nelle J

: . rector
aeven‘s T-Mason Building [7) 9“}7!’
Lansing MI Ileana-Isle
DearDirector:

i am writing in regards to the Kalamazoo River Valley Trailway running through the Fort
Coater Recreational Area in Charleston Township of Kalamazoo County.

At a public hearing held by the “Forum of Kalamazoo' on Sept. 18.1998 at Galasburg High
School. the citizens of Charleston Township voiced their opposition in the location of the
proposed trail exiting the state park recreational area t 40th Street and Fort Custer Drive.
The area is a quiet residential neighborhood which is approximately 65% of the voting
public of Charleston Township (according to Mr. Whitehead . Township Treasurer).

During this meeting we were told by Mr. Koznider (Ranger. Fort Dieter Recreational Area)
that this is a proposed plan. homing is set in stone and WW
seasick-ced-

Speaking twice by phone since the meeting about alternative routes. l was told these trails
are already existing and nothing is going to change that (no problem). but again nothing is
set in stone. On or around Wed. 9/25. Mr. Kozmider invited me to attend the next

meeting of the Augusta Trailway Committee. which I acceptable gratefully. He asked for my

phone number so he could call me when this meeting was to take place. On Wed. 1 1/6
at 8:05pm. Ms. Pat Adams (Kalamazoo River Trailway Partnership Program Director.
Kalamazoo Forum) called to Invite me to the Augusta Trailway Committee meeting at
6:30pm on 1 1/7. I do not know if this was their next meeting or not but Mr. Kozmider
never called me back.

Upon arriving atthe 11/7 meeting I took myaeat atthe back wall beingthethird person
there. The Battle Creek City Parks s Recreation Representative came in asking Mr.
Kozmider how the trailway was going. Mr. Kozmider replied that it was going great in
Battle Creek and Galesburg. but there were big problems in Charleston Township - they
don't like where we are putting the trail - and then he chuckled. Mr. Kozmider replied that
it is too bad because it is the easiest way for them to go. Then. the Business
Representative of the Village of Augusta who lives in Comstock Townsz expressed that it
was too bad. but they had done their job. They were quite surprised when we introduced
ourselves as the two Charleston Township Citizens Committee persons. Evidently Ms.
Adams mom told them she had asked us to attend.

That evening. Mr. Kozmider explained how a local bike club had agreed to absorb the
expense of construction of a parking lot within the north entrance of the park. We
expressed ourconcerns aboutthe trail exitingthe south end ofthe park at40h Streets.
Fort Custer (Charleston Township). Two members of the Augusta Trailway Committee
suggested alternate routes away from 40th Street and Fort Custer Drive. going west to
Galesburg but were quickly redirected by the trained facilitator Mr. Kozmider.

At the present time. the proposed trailway is to enter the north gate of the Fort Custer
Recreational State Park. traveling east from Dickman Road. People are to enter the park .
enjoy the 22 miles of trails in the recreational area. exit at the north gate. proceed west to

95

the Village of Augusta. head back east to the front gate of the recreational area.
proceed south through the recreational area and exit through the 300+ acres designated
as a protected fowl area.

These 300+ acres is used year-round by local farmers. small game hunters and deer
hunters during deer season. We (local residents) do not use this area during deer hunting
season for obvious reasons. This area also consists of a dirt service road for farm
equipment: sprayera/ammonia. tillers. combines. grain haulers. semi trucks and has
hives

Mr. Kozmider calls these existing trails. the farmers and citizens of Charleston Township
call it a farm service road which leads to the corner of 40th Street 8 Fort Custer Drive
(Charleston Township). where there is a gate closing it off to all other vehicle traffic. This
service road doesn't meet the descriptlon of a trailway per Mr. Kozmider's comments at
the 1 1 /7 meeting. Mr. Kozmider stated that trailways do not allow the use of materized
vehicles. We agree and would like to remind Mr. Kozmider that this proposed trail leads to
vehicular traveled roads (sem'ce and county roads).

My question is that since the Augusta Trailway Committee has already brought the trail to
the Village of Augusta. why does Mr. Kozmider insist the trail be brought back to the
recreational area instead of proceeding west from Augusta to Galasburg where it was
intended to go? We are prepared to pick the trail up at. die village limits and proceed to
Galesburg according to die Kalamazoo River Valley Partnership‘s Plan.

lwouldliketoknowhowthestatapark’sdetermlnediehindingofindividualparks. Dothe'
numberofpeoplecomingthroughthegatedecidewhichparksstayopenandwhichones
are closed/receive fewer funds?

Charleston Township has worked successfully with the Dept. of Natural Resources (DNR)
since the conception of the recreational area. We consider you part of our wwnship even
though you are a separate entity... if noan else. a beautiful neighbor.

Mr. Kozmider has assured me that his position on the Augusta Trailway Committee has
nothing to do with their decision not to run the trail south of the Village of Augusta. Since
the authority to run this trail from Augusta back east through our state park had to come
from the DNR. we request the same authority for the citizens of Charleston Township. that
we may also nemrn the trail to its point of origin (our state park).

Werequestsometypeofassurancedietodierspecialinterestgroupswillnotbeallowed
tofund a parking lot atthe south endofourparkl40th StreetSFortCuster Drivel asthe
bike club has been allowed to at the north end. We would at least appreciate it if the DNR
would appoint someone who would represent our views and concerns. This way we won‘t
feel the need to constantly remind Mr. Kozmider that the citizens of Charleston Township
pay his wages just as much. if not more so. as the citizens of the Village of Augusta.

We also requestthatthese sen/ice roadsnmmdto be designated as partofthe
Michigan Trailway package. We wish to protect them from trailway traffic disrupting their
current uses.

lftheCltyofGele'sburg. VillageofAugustsend Charleston Township can work together on
Me inmrmediam school districts and a combined high school. why are we having trouble
working together on this issue?

‘-—I“" .' A."

ZBB'BSUs-l iNENBBUNUl-l 153803 N033 917:” 36. H 330

°£x eee°asue 16101 ** 96

TheddzensofChadesmnTownsmpdmmspecduuypmmwrmdollusbdngspuMw
such activities that special groups create. Not only do they waste our tax dollars. they
jeopardize the peace and security of our families. our homes and our property. The
serenity and lack of foot traffic is why we chose this area to settle.

Enclosed is a copy of the petition we presented to the Charleston Township Board at their
October meeting. The citizens who signed it are requesting that they seek alternsdve
routers) for this trail if it is going to participate in die Kalamazoo River Valley Trailway
program. The petition is signed by 103% of the residents on 40m Street and 97% of the
residents on Fort Custer Drive. Also enclosed is a copy of the motion the board made to
form our committee to seek alternate routes. '

I look forward to your response. God bless you and thank you for your time.

Regards.

Dennis K. Ward
Citizens Committee
Charleston Township

859 N. 40m Su‘eet
Galesburg. Ml 49053

BBB'BEJUd iN3N39UNUli-l 15330:! N035 L7”! 88. ii 330

The 97
v\~.
«W
L0 N

_—

—.——_¥
T

   

—__:
I

FOR KALAMAZOO COUNTY

 

 

 

(616) 337-7002 1327 Academy Kalamazoo. Ml 49006-3200
===

 

January 29, 1997

Michigan Department of Natural Resources
Mr. K. L. Cool, Director

Box 30028

Steven T. Mason Bldg.

Lansing, MI 48909

Dear Director Cool:

On behalf of the Kalamazoo River Valley Trailway Program of the Forum for Kalamazoo
County, we are responding to the letter written to you by the Citizens Committee of
Charleston Township through Mr. Dennis Ward. We would like to share with you the
Kalamazoo River Valley Trailway project, the manner in which we have taken it to the
communities along the river and our results to date.

We also would like to express our concern over the unjustified attacks on Mr. William
Kosmider, the Director of the Fort Custer Recreation Area and the chair of the Battle
Creek to Fort Custer and Augusta segment of the trailway.

KALAMAZOO RIVER VALLEY TRAILWAY (KRVT) HISTORY AND PROGRESS:
The Forum for Kalamazoo County is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to
improve the quality of life for all residents in this region. Our vision is to help
communities build the capacity to identify issues and opportunities, create consensus-
based change, and monitor the results of the change efforts. We operate through
principals of: open dialogue, democratic discussion, inclusion and respect for diverse
individuals and interests of the community in all phases of the change process, concerted
action and results based on consensus.

Five years ago, about 80 community leaders unanimously recommended that The Forum
take a leadership role in restoring the Kalamazoo River as a community resource. Forum
received a River Partners grant from the DNR, organized the first vision conference in the
area to ask 300 people what they wanted for the future of the river (Vision results
enclosed). A common theme in the 17 groups was that of a linear greenway/trailway
allowing people to enjoy and recreate along the river and bring economic dollars to those
communities. We received 20 resolutions of support, formed the KRVT Steering
committee of 33 area people from business, government and local citizens, created a

“Bringingldeos and Hormonyfo Kalamazoo County" “’

98

The second community meeting was held in the Kal-Haven - Kalamazoo Township
area; then we went to Galesburg/Charleston, next to Comstock, back to
Galesburg/Charleston and finally on to Parchment/Kalamazoo Township/Cooper area.

The product of each of our community meetings included a local Trailway team for
each area with the exception of Galesburg/Charleston. Quite fi'ankly, there was so much
negativity and antagonism that we were unable to conduct the meeting. Instead we
listened to those present and their concerns about “outsiders coming into the area”,
liability, parking, “not in my backyard”. We then designed a second meeting to address
those concerns instead of trying to go ahead with a consensus-based process.

The second meeting was held on a date of their choice with presenters from DNR (Phil
Wells), a Kal-haven landowner previously opposed to the trailway, and others who spoke
to the concerns we heard at the first meeting. We asked people to conduct small group
discussions to explore alternatives. Again, it was difficult to get away from a public
hearing format and the previous problems and anger created by siting landfills in
Charleston township and the anger created. Our repeated attempts to engage in open
dialogue and discussion of issues have resulted in negative reactions and anger at
“outsiders” coming into our area and apparently heated discussions at the local 4O"I street
group meetings. The Charleston Township residents do not want ANY bikers, hikers or
strangers coming through their area. We realize Charleston Township has been through
a lot in the past 2-3 years with sitings of landfills which citizens have fought fiercely.

We respect their point of view, but do not want the good efi‘orts going on in the other
communities to suffer because of this one area.

To continue to address the concerns of the 40"I street group we are taking the following
actions:

0 Our KRVT Executive committee and Fort Custer team members are meeting
with National Guard leadership at Fort Custer to explore trailway options to
the 40‘” street exit

0 The Fort Custer February Team meeting has been scheduled for February 5'll
and will be held at Charleston Township Hall.

0 A report on the results of the meeting with military will be given. We may try
to look at some maps depicting POSSIBLE alternative routes.

0 The regular agenda of the Fort Custer team meeting will also take place and
that is to work on spring c construction planning.

0 We will work our what is possible with the Charleston Township Citizens
Group

One area that is at stake is the relationship between the City of Galesburg and Charleston
Township. The City of Galesburg has already constructed a riverfi'ont park with a
trailway segment and is preparing to construct a footbridge crossing the river as part of
their park and trailway initiative. This footbridge crosses into Charleston Township.
Also, to save funds, a new sewer system to service the Galesburg/Charleston area would
be constructed at the same time.

 

99

vision for connecting the Battle Creek linear parkway along the river where possible, to
the Kal-Haven Trail and Kai. County’s Maple Glen Park and eventually to Allegan.

The Steering Committee looked at many aspects of the trailway concept. Out of their
work came: -:

*A design standard which, in turn, was applied to a 3/4 mile section of trail along
the Kalamazoo River in Sutherland Park;

* A regional Partnership Workshop (designed by the R,C,D Council & funded by a
Kellogg Foundation grant) which was held at the Kalamazoo Nature Center

*A Partnership Agreement document was established and awaits use this year

* An agreement with the National Park Service to be our consultant and to create a
photo preference survey on trailway designs which is being presented in conjunction with
the River Partners local Trailway team formation and The Forum Greenways initiative

We realized our next step was to hold community meetings. We began upriver
with an innovatively designed community process to invite the public and area landowners
to participate in identifying issues, positives & negatives about a trailway in their area
Included in the meeting was a small group mapping process to find out where the
community thought a trailway should and should not go. At the end of each meeting,
citizens were asked to form their own steering committee (which we refer to as a Trailway
team) to research the mapping ideas, come to some consensus on a trailway location in
their area, give assistance and provide input for the completion of the I STEA grant, and
lastly help with implementation. We have made what we feel is an extraordinary effort to
reach large numbers of local residents and landowners in all the communities along the
river area. For each meeting we have sent out 2,000 to 3,000 notices inviting them to
the first meeting and subsequent local team meetings.

Our first meeting outside the City of Kalamazoo was held at the Augusta Middle
School. The Fort Custer Trailway Team was formed as a result of this meeting. Its 14
members looked at all the alternate routes mapped at the meeting by the public and chose
what they felt was the best route connecting Dickrnan Road to the F ort’s extensive system
of mountain bike trails with a spur into Augusta. The Team, under the capable and
professional leadership of Bill Kosmider, has worked with MDOT to obtain consent to
build the required crossing of Dickrnan Road into the Fort as part of their road
renovations within the next two years. The Team has produced a video on the future
trailway route and scheduled work to begin on trailway construction along the old
Harmonia Road for spring, doing what they can on public land while the site planning
grant is completed.

IOO

Lastly, we strongly urge that no negative effect on the state level be targeted towards Mr.
Kosmider. His primary objective has always been and continues to be the Fort Custer
Recreation area. His support of the trailway effort compliments his goals and objectives.
We respect, support and admire him and the work he does.

We realize there are some questions and issues we cannot give answers to regarding the
Fort Custer-Charleston Township area. We hope things will be clearer alter the February
5 meeting. If you wish, we will keep you posted on progress with the current trailway
and local situation. We welcome any suggestions, input or direction you can give. We
would appreciate a copy of your reply to the Charleston Township letter by Mr. Ward.

’6 QLQW 42‘“ 5""

- . . . Toni Thompson, esident
Executive Director Kalamazoo River Valley Trailway

@Coury, DnectoafK/w/

I A Potawatomie Resource, Conservation, Development Council
Member: KRVT Executive Committee and Fort Custer Trailway Team

   

  

101

Appendix B

102

MICHIGAN PA 451 OF 1994, AS AMENDED

PART 721
MICHIGAN TRAILWAYS

324.7210] Definitions.
Sec. 72101. As used in this part:

(3) “Advisory council” means the Michigan trailways advisory council created in section 72110.
(b) ”Council” means a Michigan trailway management council established pursuant to section 72106.
(c) “Fund“ means the Michigan trailways fund created in section 72109.

(d) ”Governmental agency“ means the federal government, a county, city, village, or township, or a
combination of any of these entities.

(e) "Michigan trailway” means a trailway designated by the commission pursuant to section 72103.

(t) ”Trailway" means a land corridor that features a broad trail eapable of accommodating a variety of public

recreation uses.
um Addl995.Aet58.1md ca. mu. r995.

324.72102 Legislative findings and declaration.

Sec. 72102. The legislature finds and declares that a statewide system of trailways will provide for public
enjoyment, health, and fitness; encourage constructive leisure-time activities; protect open space, cultural and
historical resources, and habitat for wildlife and plants; enhance the local and state economies; link communities,
parks, and natural resources; create opportunities for rural-urban exchange, agricultural edueation, and the
marketing of farm products; and preserve corridors for possible future use for other public purposes. Therefore, the
planning, acquisition, development, operation. and maintenance of Michigan trailways is in the best interest of the

state and is declared to be a public purpose.
14mm 1995.Aasr.umuq24. r995.

324.72103 Designation as trailway; public hearing; establishing and changing permitted uses;
revocation of designation.

Sec. 72103. (1) Upon petition by any person or on its own motion, the commission may designate a trailway in
this state as a "Michigan trailway". The petition or motion shall propose permitted uses of the trailway. The
commission shall not designate a trailway as a Michigan trailway unless it meets, or will meet when completed, all
of the following requirements:

(a) The land on which the trailway is located is owned by the state or a governmental agency, or otherwise is
under the long-term control of the state or a governmental agency through a lease, easement, or other arrangement
If the land is owned by a goverrunental agency, the commission shall obtain the consent of the governmental
agency before designating the land as part of a Michigan trailway.

(b) The design and maintenance of the trailway and its related facilities meet generally accepted standards of
public safety.

(c) The trailway meets appropriate standards for its designated recreation uses.
((1) The trailway is available for designated recreation uses on a nondiscriminatory basis.

(e) The trailway is a multiuse trail suitable for use by pedestrians, by people with disabilities, and by other
users, as appropriate.

103

(t) The trailway is, or has potential to be, a segment of a statewide network of trailways, or it attracts a
substantial share of its users from beyond the local area.

(g) The trailway is marked with an oflicial Michigan trailway sign and logo at major access points.

(h) The trailway is not directly attached to a roadway, except at roadway crossings.

(i) Where feasible, the trailway ofl'ers adequate support facilities for the public, including parking, sanitary
facilities, and emergency telephones, that are accessible to people with disabilities and are at reasonable frequency
along the trailway.

0) Potential negative impacts of trailway development on owners or residents of adjacent property are
minimized through all of the following:

(i) Adequate enforcement of trailway rules and regulations.

(ii) Continuation of access for trailway crossings for agricultural and other purposes.

(iii) Construction and maintenance of fencing, where necessary, by the owner or operator of the trailway.
(iv) Other means as considered appropriate by the commission.

(k) Other conditions required by the commission.

(2) The commission shall not designate a trailway a Michigan trailway under subsection (1) unless a public
hearing has been held in the vicinity of the proposed Michigan trailway to take testimony and gather public
opinion on the proposed designation including, but not limited to, the proposed uses of the trailway and whether or
not motorized uses are appropriate for the trailway. The public hearing shall be held at a loeation and at a time
calculated to attract a fair representation of opinions on the designation. A transcript or a summary of the
testimony at the public hearing shall be forwarded to the commission.

(3) At the time a Michigan trailway is designated under subsection (1), the commission shall, in consultation
with the governmental agencies in which the trailway is located, establish uses to be permitted on the trailway. In
establishing permitted uses, the commission shall consider all of the following:

(a) The safety and enjoyment of trailway users.
(b) Impacts on residents, landowners, and businesses adjacent to the trailway.
(c) Applieable local ordinances.

(4) A change in the permitted uses of a Michigan trailway established under subsection (3) relating to whether
or not a motorized use is allowed on the trailway shall not be made without approval of the conunission afier a
public hearing held in the same manner as provided in subsection (2).

(5) The commission may revoke a Michigan trailway designation if it determines that a trailway fails to meet
the requirements of this section. Before revoking a Michigan trailway designation, the commission shall provide
notice to all entities involved in the management of the trailway. If the trailway is brought into compliance with

this section within 90 days after providing this notice, the commission shall not revoke the designation.
mm l995.Act$8.1rndEfl’.May24.l995.

104

324.72104 Designation as trailway connector.

Sec. 72104. (1) Upon petition by any person or on its own motion, the commission may designate a trailway,
bicycle path, sidewalk, road, or other suitable route that does not meet the requirements of this part for a Michigan
trailway as a ”Michigan trailway connector" if the connector meets all of the following:

(a) The connector meets appropriate safety standards and appropriate design standards for its designated uses.
(b) The connector connects directly to a Michigan trailway.

(c) The public agency having jurisdiction over the connector has consented in writing to the designation.

(d) The connector is marked with an ofiicial Michigan trailway connector sign and logo at major access points.

(2) An aquatic corridor eapable of accommodating watercraft that connects to a Michigan trailway may be

designated as a Michigan trailway connector if it meets the requirements of subsection (1)(a) to (d).
mm l995,Aa$8.ldefl'.May24. 1995.

324.72105 Operating and maintaining trailway; agreement; provisions.

Sec. 72105. The department may operate and maintain a Michigan trailway that is located on state owned land
or may enter into an agreement with a council or 1 or more governmental agencies to provide for the operation and
maintenance of the Michigan trailway. An agreement entered into under this subsection may include provisions for
any of the following:

(a) Construction, maintenance, and operation of the trailway.
(b) Enforcement of trailway rules and regulations including permitted uses of the trailway.

(c) Other provisions consistent with this part.
14mm r995.mss.1marr.my24. 1995.

324.72106 Michigan trailway management council; establishment; purpose; adapting operating
procedures and electing officers; powers; dissolution.

Sec. 72106. (1) Two or more governmental agencies may establish a Michigan trailway management council
for the development and management of a Michigan trailway pursuant to the urban cooperation act of 1967, Act
No. 7 of the Public Acts of the Extra Session of 1967, being section 124.501 to 124.512 of the Michigan Compiled
Laws.

(2) Upon formation, a council shall adopt operating procedures and shall elect oflicers as the council considers
appropriate.

(3) A council may do 1 or more of the following as authorized in an interlocal agreement entered into pursuant
to Act No. 7 of the Public Acts of the Extra Session of 1967:

(a) Operate and maintain that portion of 1 or more Michigan trailways that is owned or under the control of the
governmental agencies establishing the council.

(b) Pursuant to an agreement under section 72105, operate and maintain that portion of l or more Michigan
trailways that is loeated on state owned land.

(c) Coordinate the enforcement of trailway rules and regulations and other applicable laws and ordinances,
including permitted uses of the trailway on trailways owned or under the control of the governmental agencies
establishing the council or, pursuant to an agreement under section 72105, trailways that are loeated on state
owned land.

105

(d) Receive any grant made from the fund or other funding related to that portion of a Michigan trailway within
its jurisdiction.

(e) Acquire or hold real property for the purpose of operating a Michigan trailway.
(1) Perform other functions consistent with this part.

(4) A council may be dissolved by the governmental agencies that participated in creating the council. However,
if a council has entered into an agreement with the department under section 72105, the agreement shall specify

how the council may be dissolved.
“mm 1995.Aet58. rm EfliMay24. r995.

324.72107 Closure during pesticide application.

See. 72107. In agricultural areas, a Michigan trailway may be temporarily closed by the entity operating the
trailway to allow pesticide applieation on lands adjoining the trailway. The entity operating the Michigan trailway
shall post the closure of the trailway or arrange with a landowner or other person for the posting of signs and the

closure of the trailway during pesticide application and appropriate reentry periods.
l-IiatoryzAdd 1995.Aass.mmu.y24.1995.

324.72108 Commission; powers.
Sec. 72108. (1) The commission may do any of the following:

(a) Grant easements or use permits or lease land owned by the state that is being used for a Michigan trailway
for a use that is compatible with the use of the Michigan trailway.

(b) Enter into contracts for concessions along a state owned Michigan trailway.

(c) Lease land adjacent to a state owned Michigan trailway for the operation of concessions.

(2)1fthe commission approves of the acquisition of land by the department, the commission may state that the
specified land is acquired for use as a Michigan trailway. Following acquisition of land that the commission states

is acquired for use as a Michigan trailway, any revenue derived from that land pursuant to subsection (1), except as

otherwise provided by law, shall be deposited into the fund.
mml”5.M58.lmiEflW24.l995. '

324.72109 Michigan trailways fund.
Sec. 72109. (I) The Michigan trailways fund is created within the state treasury.

(2) Except as otherwise provided by law, the state treasurer may receive money or other assets from any of the
following for deposit into the fund:

(a) Fees collected from users of trailways on state forest lands.

(b) Payments to the state for easements, use permits, leases, or other use of state owned Michigan trailway
P70130117-

(c) Payments to the state for concessions Operated by private vendors on state owned property located on or
adjacent to a Michigan trailway.

(d) Federal funds.
(e) Gifls or bequests.

(1) State appropriations.

106

(g) Money or assets from other sources as provided by law.

(3) The state treasurer shall direct the investment of the fund. The state treasurer shall credit to the fund interest
and earnings from fund investments.

(4) Money in the fund at the close of the fiscal year shall remain in the fund and shall not lapse to the general
fund.

(5) Money in the fund may be expended for any of the following purposes:

(a) The expenses of the department in operating and maintaining the Michigan trailway system and enforcing
Michigan trailway rules and regulations.

(b) Grants to or contracts with councils or governmental agencies to operate and maintain segments of
Michigan trailways and to enforce Michigan trailway rules and regulations.

(c) Funding Michigan trailway construction and improvements.

(d) Acquisition of land or rights in land.

(e) Publications and promotions of the Michigan trailways system.

(6) In determining the expenditure of money in- the fund, the department shall consider all of the following:
(a) The need for funding for each of the purposes listed in subsection (5).

(b) The estimated cost of Michigan trailway management for each governmental agency that manages a
Michigan trailway, based on previous costs, trailway mileage, level of use, and other relevant factors.

(c) The need of each governmental agency that manages a Michigan trailway for financial assistance in
managing that trailway, and the amount of money from the fund received by that agency in the past.

(d) The amount of revenue accruing to the fund that is generated from each Michigan trailway.
(e) Other factors considered appropriate by the department.

(7) The department shall submit a report to the legislature on or before December 1 of each year describing the

use of money appropriated from the fund in the previous fiscal year.
3mm 1995.Aasahuaan‘.M-y24.1995.

324.72110 Michigan trailways advisory council; creation; appointment and terms of members;
vacancy; removal; meetings; quorum; conduct of business; writings; compensation and expenses;
dug: 72110. ( 1) The Michigan trailways advisory council is created within the department of natural resources.

(2) The advisory council shall consist of the following members appointed by the commission:

(a) One individual who is involved with the establishment or operation of a multiple use trailway.

(b) Two individuals who represent Michigan trailway user groups.

(c) One local government official from a governmental agency in which a multiple use trailway is located.

107

((1) One member of the general public.
(3) The members first appointed to the commission shall be appointed within 90 days after April 21, 1993.

(4) Members of the advisory council shall serve for terms of 4 years, or until a successor is appointed,
whichever is later, except that of the members first appointed, 2 shall serve for 1 year, 1 shall serve for 2 years, and
1 shall serve for 3 years.

(5) If a vacancy occurs on the advisory council, the commission shall make an appointment for the unexpired
term in the same manner as the original appointment

(6) The commission may remove a member of the advisory council for incompetency, dereliction of duty,
malfeasance, misfeasance, or nonfeasance in office, or any other good cause.

(7) The first meeting of the advisory council shall be called by the commission. At the first meeting the advisory
council shall elect fiom among its members a chairperson and other oflicers as it considers necessary or
appropriate. After the first meeting, the advisory council shall meet at least annually or more frequently at the call
of the chairperson or if requested by 3 or more members.

(8) A majority of the members of the advisory council constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business at a
meeting of the advisory council. A majority of the members present and serving is required for ofi'rcial action of the
advisory council.

(9) The business the advisory council may perform shall be conducted at a public meeting of the advisory
council held in compliance with the open meetings act. Act No. 267 of the Public Acts of 1976, being sections
15.261 to 15.275 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

(10) A writing prepared, owned. used, in possession of, or retained by the advisory council in the performance
of an official function is subject to the freedom of information act, Act No. 442 of the Public Acts of 1976, being
sections 15.231 to 15.246 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

(1 1) Members of the advisory council shall serve without compensation. However, members of the advisory
council may be reimbursed for their actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of their ofl'rcial
duties as members of the advisory council.

(12) The advisory council shall do both of the following:
(a) Make recommendations to the commission and the department on the expenditure of money in the fund

(b) Advise the commission and the department on the implementation of this act and the establishment and
operation of Michigan trailways.
mm l995,Aet58.Irnd.Efl‘.May24, 1995.

324.72111 State agencies; duties.

Sec. 72111. All state agencies shall cooperate with the commission and the department in the implementation
of this part

HistoryzArlrl. 199$.Aa5tldefliMay24. 1995.

324.72112 Rules.

Sec. 72112. The commission may promulgate rules as it considers necessary to implement this part.
mm I995.Act$l.lmd.fifl'.May24. 1995.

108

PART 733
LIABILITY OF LANDOWNERS

324.73301 Liability of landowner, tenant, or lessee for injuries to persons on property for purpose of
outdoor recreation or trail use, using Michigan trailway or other public trail, gleaning agricultural or
farm products, fishing or hunting, or picking and purchasing agricultural or farm products at farm
or "Ir-pick" operation; definition.

Sec. 73301. (1) Except as otherwise provided in this section, a cause of action shall not arise for injuries to a
personwhoisonthelandofanotherwithoutpayingtotheowner,tenant, orlesseeofthelandavaluable
consideration for the purpose of fishing, hunting, trapping, camping, hiking, sightseeing, motorcycling,
snowmobiling, or any other outdoor recreational use or trail use, with or without permission, against the owner,
tenant,orlesseeofthelandunlesstheinjurieswerecausedbythegrossnegligenceorwillfirlandwanton
misconduct of the owner, tenant, or lessee.

(2) A cause of action shall not arise for injuries to a person who is on the land of another without paying to the
owner, tenant, or lessee of the land a valuable consideration for the purpose of entering or exiting from or using a
Michigan trailway as designated under part 721 or other public trail, with or without permission, against the
owner, tenant, or lessee of the land unless the injuries were caused by the gross negligence or willful and wanton
misconduct of the owner, tenant, or lessee. For purposes of this subsection, a Michigan trailway or public trail may
be located on land of any size including, but not limited to, urban, suburban, subdivided, and rural land.

(3) A cause of action shall not arise against the owner, tenant, or lessee of land or premises for injuries to a
person who is on that land or premises for the purpose of gleaning agricultural or farm products, unless that
person's injuries were caused by the gross negligence or willful and wanton misconduct of the owner, tenant, or
lessee.

(4) A cause of action shall not arise against the owner, tenant, or lessee of a farm used in the production of
agricultural goods as defined by section 35(1)(h) of the single business tax act, Act No. 228 of the Public Acts of
1975, being section 208.35 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, for injuries to a person who is on that farm and has
paid the owner, tenant, or lessee valuable consideration for the purpose of fishing or hunting, unless that person's
injuries were caumd by a condition which involved an unreasonable risk of harm and all of the following apply:

(a) The owner, tenant, or lessee knew or had reason to know of the condition or risk.

(b) The owner, tenant, or lessee failed to exercise reasonable care to make the condition safe, or to warn the
person of the condition or risk.

(c) The person injured did not know or did not have reason to know of the condition or risk.

(5) A cause of action shall not arise against the owner, tenant, or lessee of land or premises for injuries to a
person, other than an employee or contractor of the owner, tenant, or lessee, who is on the land or premises for the
purpose of picking and purchasing agricultural or farm products at a farm or "u-pick" operation, unless the
person's injuries were caused by a condition that involved an unreasonable risk of harm and all of the following
apply:

(a) The owner, tenant, or lessee knew or had reason to know of the condition or risk.

(b) The owner, tenant, or lessee failed to exercise reasonable care to make the condition safe, or to warn the
person of the condition or risk.

(c) The person injured did not know or did not have reason to know of the condition or risk.

 

109

(6)Asusedinthissection, 'agrimdnnalorfampmducts'meansthenamralpmductsofthefamnursery,

grove, orchard, vineyard, garden, and apiary, including, but not limited to, trees and firewood
MAddlM.Act58.lnuiEfliMay24,l995.

110

Act No. 28
Public Acts of 1993
Approved by the Governor
April 20, 1993

Filed with the Secretary of State
April 21, 1993

STATE OF MICHIGAN
87TH LEGISLATURE
REGULAR SESSION OF 1993

Introduced by Senators Prldnla, Geake, Ehlers, Mcflauus, Emmons, Cisky, Wartuer, Honlgrnan and
Gut

ENROLLED SENATE BILL No. 225

AN ACI‘ to amend section 10 of Act No. 295 of the Public Acts of 1976, entitled as amended “An act to improve and
maintain transportation services in this state; to provide for the acquisition and use of funds; to provide for the
acquisition of certain railroad facilities and certain property; to provide for the disposition and use of facilities and
property acquired under this act; to provide for financial assistance to certain private transportation services; to
prescribe the powers and duties of certain state departments and agencies; to provide for the transfer of certain funds;
to provide for the creation of a fund; and to provide for appropriations,” as amended by Act No. 210 of the Public Acts of
1984, being section 474.60 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

ThePeopleoftheStateofMichigonmct'

Section 1. Section 10 of Act No. 295 of the Public Acts of 1976, as amended by Act No. 210 of the Public Acts of 1984,
being section 474.60 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, is amended to read as follows:

Sec. 10. (1) In weighing the varied interests of the residents of this state, the department shall give consideration to '
the individual interest of any person, public or private corporation, local or regional transportation authority, local
governmental unit, private carrier, group of rail users, state agency, other public or private entity, including a port
authority established under the Hertel-Law-T. Stopczynski port authority act, Act N o. 639 of the Public Acts of 1978,
being sections 120.101 to 120.130 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, or any combination of these entities, expressing a
desire to acquire or lease or secure an easement for the use of a portion or all of the real property owned by a railroad
company. The property acquired by the department under this act may be conveyed or leased to an entity or
combination of entities listed in this subsection with appropriate reimbursement, as determined by the department.

(2) Upon acquisition of a right-of-way, the department may preserve the right-of-way for future use as a railroad line
and, if preserving it for that use, shall not permit any action which would render it unsuitable for future rail use.
However, if the department determines a right-of-way or other property acquired under this act is no longer necessary
for railroad transportation purposes, the department may preserve and utilize the right-of-way for other transportation
purposes or may dispose of the right-of-way or other property acquired under this act for the purposes described in
section 6, or may dispose of or lease the right-of-way or other property for other purposes, as appropriate. However, the
department shall not dispose of or lease a right-of-way without first offering to transfer the right-of-way to the
department of natural resources. If the department of natural resources desires to lease or purchase the right-of-way,
the department of natural resources must indicate their desire within 60 days and accept the offered transfer within
lyearaftertheofi'erismade. Ifthedepartmentofnaturalresourcesdoesnot indicatetheirdesires withinGOdays,the
department may dispose ofor lease the right-of-way as otherwise provided for in this act. Ifthe department ofnatural

(12)

 

resources does not accept the ofl'ered transfer within 1 year after indicating their desire to lease or purchase the right-
of-way, the department may dispose of or lease the right-of-way as otherwise provided for in this act. When
appropriate, a right-of-way or other property shall be transferred or leased to a public or private entity with
appropriate reimbursement, as determined by the department.

(3) lnpreservina a right-of-way for future rail use. the department may do 1 or more of the followi_n§

(a) Develop the right-of-way for use as a commuter trail where the use is feasible and needed or lease the right-of-
way to a county, city, village. or township expressing a desire to develop the right-of-way as a commuter trail. The lease
shall be for an indefinite period of time, cancelable by the department only if the right-of-way is needed for rail usage.

The trails, unless leased to a county, city, village, or township, shall remain under the jurisdiction of the department.

(b) Transfer. for appropriate reimbursement, the right-of-way to the department of natural resources for use as a
Michigan trailway pursuant to the Michigan trailways act, if the deed includes restrictions on the use of the property
that assure that the property remains viable for future rail usage, and includes a clause that provides that the
department of natural resources shall transfer, for appropriate reimbursement, the right-of-way to the department.
upon a determination of the director of the state transportation department that the right-of-way is needed for use as a
railroad line. '

 

 

(c) Lease the right-of-way to the department of natural resources, or upon approval of the department of natural
resources, to a county, city, village, or township for use as a recreational trail. The lease shall be for an indefinite period
of time, cancelable by the department only if the right-of-way is needed for rail usage. A recreational trail shall be
reserved for non-motorized forms of recreation or snowmobiling only. Snowmobiling shall not be allowed on more than
50% of the mileage of the recreational trails established pursuant to this act.

(d) In cases where a trail serves both a significant commuter and recreation function, authorize the joint
development of the trail by the department and the department of natural resources. or the department and any
interested county, city, village, or township. Administration of the trail shall be determined jointly by the department
and the department of natural resources.

SectionZThisamendatoryactshallnottakeeffectunlessSenateBillNo.2240fthe87th Legislatureisenactedinto
law.

'I‘hisactisorderedtotakeimmediateefl'ect.

 

 

 

Co-Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Approved

 

 

' DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATIlcliN

 

 

 

UAW

ensue
ammo.
con-sacs

MIDLAND comm! SERVICES BUILDING - 220 WEST suswormr STREET
MIDLAND, MICHIGAN 48640-5194 - PHONE (517) 832-6870

 

'lLLlAM C. GIBSON
DIREcron

July 30, 1996

Philip Wells, Trailways Program Manager
Michigan Department of Natural Resources
Forest Management Division

PO. Box 30028

Lansing, MI 48909

ié‘s‘k

DearW

After review and discussion with the Midland County Parks and Recreation Commission, I am
pleased to request, on their behalf, that the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan be
considered for Michigan Trailways designation. The Commission feels that the Pcre Marquette
fulfills the requirements for inclusion, and looks forward to providing you with any information
necessary to document same.

It would be an honor for the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail to be part of the Michigan Trailways
system. I look forward to hearing from you on the Commission’s request.

Sincerely,

mfi @Q

William C. Gibson
Director

xc Craig Gosen, President, Parks and Recreation Commission
Marc McGill, Administrator/Controller

WCG

File: c:\..\gn.mrl

STAFF DETERNIINATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR 112
MICHIGAN TRAILWAY DESIGNATION

Michigan Department of Natural Resources
Forest Management Division
Recreation and Trails Section

Name of Trailway

 

Trailway Manager (i.e. , managing agency or agencies)

 

Authorized Representative: Name

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Title Address

City ZIP Phone
DNR Staff Evaluator: Name Title
Date of Field Evaluation Other Staff Present

 

Representative of Trailway Manager Present
3**tttttttttttttttttttttttit*ttttttttttttttt8titt*tt8*tttttttitttttttttttttttt

Staff Recommendation: This trail is (check one):

 

Eligible for Michigan Trailway designation (meets all requirements of the act)

Not currently eligible for Michigan Trailway designation because it does not meet
definition of trailway stated in Sec. 3 of the Michigan Trailways Act (”a land corridor
that features a broad trail capable of accommodating a variety of public recreation
uses”).

Explain

 

 

The corridor generally must not be shared with a street or road that is open to motor
vehicles.

Not currently eligible for Michigan Trailway designation because it does not meet one or
more requirements of the Michigan Trailways Act as described on pages 4-9 (circle one
or more letters):

abcdefghijkl

t*******$****$************ttttttttt8*tttt3**88t8*ttt3********#*********8*#8**

State Trails Coordinator (print)

 

Signature Date

 

-2- 113

LEGAL AUTHORITY AND DESIGNATION PROCESS

Under authority of Section 4(1) of Michigan Trailways Act (Act No. 2 7 of Public Acts of
1993), Natural Resources Commission (NRC) may designate a trailway in Michigan as a
"Michigan Trailway. " "Trailway " is defined in Section 3 as "a land corridor that features a
broad trail capable of accommodating a variety of public recreation uses. " To receive
Michigan Trailway designation, trail must meet definition of trailway and all of the
requirements presented in Sec. 4(1) and Sec. 8 of the act, as elaborated on the following
pages.

Developed trailways must either meet all requirements at time of designation, or trailway
manager must have written agreement with DNR Trailways Program Leader describing plan
and schedule for meeting any requirements not currently met; failure to meet this schedule
may result in revocation of designation. For trailways not yet developed, trailway manager
must have approved master plan or other approved document describing how and when
requirements will be met; failure to meet this schedule may result in revocation of
designation.

If stafi' makes tentative finding that trail is eligible for Michigan Trailway designation,
trailway manager must, per Sec. 4(2) of the act, hold public hearing in vicinity of trailway to
take testimony and gather public opinion on proposed designation including, but not limited
to, proposed uses of trailway and whether or not motorized uses are appropriate for trailway.
Hearing must be held at location and time calculated to attract a fair representation of
opinions on the designation. Transcript or summary of testimony must be forwarded to NRC
with designation request.

Following the public hearing, any individual, organization, or governmental agency that
wishes to comment on a stat?” determination of eligibility for Michigan Trailway designation
should comment to the NRC. Generally, the NRC will make decision on a proposed
Michigan Trailway designation 30-60 days following the public hearing required by Sec.
4(2).

17w Michigan Trailways Advisory Council (MTA C) may also review the proposed designation
before or afier the public hearing. Any individual, organization, or governmental agency
that wishes to comment on a staff determination of eligibility for Michigan Trailway
designation may also comment to M TA C.

Section 5 of the act provides for designation of "Michigan Railway Connectors. " Ibis
determination form does not address connector designation.

-3- 114

Description of Property To Be Designated (Trailway Boundary):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attach legal description (s) and map(s).

-4- 115

Staff Determination of Compliance With
Michigan Trailway Designation Requirements
Michigan 1993 Act 27, Sec. 4(1) & 8

For each requirement (a-l), attach fitrther explanation as necessary.

a)

The land on which the trailway is located is owned by the state or a governmental
agency, or otherwise is under the long-term control of the state or a governmental
agency through a lease, easement, or other arrangement.
("Long-term control "' is defined as at least 20 years from date of designation.)

Yes No

Agency(-ies) controlling property

 

 

Nature of long-term control (fee simple ownership, easement, lease, etc.).

 

 

If more than one agency, indicate length and end points of each agency’s control.

 

 

Attach maps and other documentation as appropriate.

If the land '5 owned by [non-state] governmental agency(-ies), the governmental
agency(-ies) has given its consent for Michigan Trailway designation.

Yes No N/ A

Explain

 

 

Attach documentation.

-5- 116

b) Design and maintenance of trailway and related facilities meet generally accepted
standards of public safety.
Yes No

Explain

 

Key considerations include (but may not be limited to): motor vehicle crossings (roads,
streets, driveways); separation of trail from motor vehicles (including parking areas);

bridges, sideslopes, signage, security.
*ttttttttttttttttttttt*8ttt8ttitttttttttttttttttttttt*tttttttttttttttttttittt

c) Trailway meets appropriate standards for its designated uses.
Yes No

Explain

 

 

 

Designated uses:

 

 

 

List need not be exhaustive, but must include all motorized uses and must indicate
whether general bicycling (as opposed to "mountain biking ") is a designated use.

"Appropriate standards " are defined as design guidelines found in Trails for the Wenty-
I'irst Century, published by the Rails-to- Trails Conservancy (1993), Chapter 3; and, for
trail designated for general bicycle use, Planning Surfaced Bicycle Paths, published by
WNR (1991), and Guide for Development of Bicycle Facilities published by American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Ofi'icials (I991).

-6- 117

d) Trailway is available for designated uses on a nondiscriminatory basis.
Yes No

Explain

 

 

Trailway must be open to all citizens. If a nonresident user fee, or higher nonresident
fee, is charged, fee or fee difl"erential must be reasonable.

***********8*8***************tt**#****3*8*******titttttttttttttttttttttttttt

e) Trailway is a multi-use trail suitable for use by pedestrians, by people with
disabilities, and by other users, as appropriate.

Yes No

Explain

 

 

Trail must be planned, designed, operated, and publicized for multiple use, to include, at
a minimum, walking. It must meet standards for accessibility to people with disabilities
as presented in the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and guidelines issued

pursuant to that act. .
#33tittttttttttttttttttttt*ttttttttttttttttttttttt##tttttittttttttttttttttttt

f) Trailway is, or has potential to be, a segment of a statewide network of trailways,
or it attracts a substantial share of its users from beyond the local area.
Yes No

Explain

 

 

Trail must be of more than local significance, as measured by the criteria stated in 0).
Reasonable evidence or projections of substantial use by people from beyond the local
area will be accepted, i. e. , scientific studies and quantitative data are not required.

-7- 118
g) Trailway is marked with official Michigan trailway sign and logo at major access
points.
Yes No

Explain

 

 

Trailway manager must agree to sign trailway at its expense if designated, and maintain
designation signs.
*tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt#83t#33*******ttttt#3383##ttttttttttttttttttt

h) Trailway is not directly attached to a roadway, except at road crossings.
Yes No

Explain

 

 

Roadways open to motor vehicles are not eligible for Michigan Trailway designation.
This includes paved shoulders.

33*8‘833*8tt3ttt#8*t******8****#***t*****3*tt*8*8titttttttttttttttt********$$

i) Where feasible, trailway offers adequate support facilities for the public, including
parking, sanitary facilities, and emergency telephones, that are accessible to people
with disabilities and are at reasonable frequency along the trailway.

Yes No

Explain

 

 

A reasonable effort must be made to meet needs for support facilities. These needs can
be met by facilities provided by a public agency or private organization/business, as long
as the facilities are open to all trails users, not just customers of the business. See

Trails for the Wenty-Ivirst Century, published by the Rails-to- Trails Conservancy
(1993). Pages 130-142.

.i)

-3- 119

Potential negative impacts of trailway development on owners or residents of
adjacent property are minimized through all of the following:

i) Adequate enforcement of trailway rules and regulations.
Yes No

Explain

 

 

Trailway manager must document enforcement accountability and procedures.

ii) Continuation of access for trailway crossings for agricultural and other
purposes.

Yes N 0

Explain

 

 

Trailway manager must document policies and procedures allowing established crossings
to be continued.

iii) Construction and maintenance of fencing, where necessary, by the owner or
operator of the trailway.
Yes No

Explain

 

 

Trailway manager must document policies and procedures (I) for deciding where fencing
is necessary and (2) Providing for construction and maintenance of fencing, where found
to be necessary, at trailway manager ’s expense.

*3883t3t333333838tt!*$*$***#$*$t*t¥****t8*3*ttttttttttttttttttttttt*tttttttttt

k) (Allows for establishment of other requirements; none have been established)

-9- . 120

l) i) In agricultural areas, a Michigan trailway may be temporarily closed by the
entity operating the trailway to allow pesticide application on lands adjoining the
trailway [Act 27, Sec. 8].

Describe policies and procedures for responding to and evaluating requests for temporary
trailway closure for pesticide application:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ii) The entity operating the Michigan trailway shall post the closure of the trailway
or arrange with a landowner, or other person, for the posting of signs and the
closure of the trailway during pesticide application and appropriate reentry periods
[Act 27, Sec. 8].

Describe procedures for implementing temporary closures at sites where decisions are
made to temporarily close the trailway for pesticide application.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

121

4..-
DNRI

 

- ./
Department Calendar 9”” .
Vol. 3 No. 22
October 30, 1995 i f 9
, Z-l »

Publication Schedule
The DNR Calendar is published every two weeks, on alternate Mondays, by the Michigan Department
of Natural Resources. We welcome your comments on style, format and information to ensure that this

calendar is as informative as possible.

New DNR and DEQ Calendars
Pursuant to Executive Order 1995-18, a new Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and a new

Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) are created, effective October 1, 1995. The DEQ has a
separate calendar dealing with matters pertaining to environmental issues, permitting and related
regulations. Both calendars will be sent to those on the 'old' DNR Calendar mailing list except for
individuals who request otherwise.

Calendar Mailing Lists
For any changes or corrections to the DNR Calendar mailing list, call Tina Kellogg at 517-373-2997,

or send your correct name and address to:

DNR Calendar

Michigan Department of Natural Resources ,
PO. Box 30028

Lansing MI 48909-7528

For any changes or corrections to the DEQ Calendar mailing list, call 517-335-3153, or send your
correct name and address to:

DEQ Calendar

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
PO. Box 30473

Lansing MI 48909-7973

lntemet Access

The DNR Calendar is now available on the lntemet on the DNR home page, which is at
HT'l'P:/NVWW.DNR.STATE.MI.US, and at the DNR's anonymous FTP site, which is
lNFOLlNE.DNR.STATE.MI.US. If you would like to remove your name from the "paper" mailing list,
call Tina Kellogg at 517-373-2997.

Dial-Up Bulletin Board System (BBS) Access

This calendar is also available on the DNR's dial-up bulletin board system (BBS). To use this system,
call 1-800-699-MDNR, or locally call 517-373-3081. Set your modem to no parity, 8 data bits and 1
stop bit. All speeds up to 14.4 are supported. ANSI BBS protocol works best, but most others are
supported.

 

 

PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF: Michigan Department of Natural Resources TOTAL COST: $378.28
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES PRINTED: 3.600 COST PER COPY: $0.105

 

 

122

Timetable for Decisions
No decision listed in the DNR Calendar will be made prior to seven days after the initial calendar

publication date.

Game and Fish Orders

1996 SPRING WILD TURKEY HUNTING SEASON. Information Contact: John Urbain, 517-373-1263.
Decision-maker. DNR Director.

DEER MANAGEMENT UNIT 215 REGULATIONS. Information Contact: Ed Langenau, 517-373-1263.
Decision-maker: DNR Director.

LEGALLY BLIND HUNTERS. Information Contact: David Purol, 517-335-3411. Decision-maker:
DNR Director.

USE OF GROUND BLINDS ON PUBLIC LANDS. lnfonnation Contact: Ed Langenau, 517-373-
1263. Decision-maker: DNR Director.

Land Transactions

DIRECT CONVEYANCE OF DEDICATED LAND: Pigeon River State Forest, Otsego County.
Information Contact: David A. Yankee, 517-373-1241. Decision-maken DNR Director.

DIRECT OIL AND GAS LEASE (NONDEVELOPMENT): Rapid River Township, Kalkaska County;
Croton Township, Otsego County. Information Contact: Gina Parks cho, 517-373-7666. Decision-

maker. DNR Director.

EXCHANGES: Ottawa Muskegon Trail, Ottawa County. Information Contact: David A. Yankee, 517-
373-1241. Decision-maker. DNR Director.

FORESTRY LAND ACQUISITION: Pete Marquette State Forest, Wexford County. lnfonnation
Contact: David A. Yankee, 517—373-1241. Decision-maker DNR Director.

MUNICIPAL CONVEYANCE OF UNDEDICATED STATE-OWNED LAND (326 LOTS 8. PARCELS):
City of Algonac, Port Huron Township, St. Clair County; Cities of Detroit, Ecorse, Melvindale, Wayne
and Wyandotte, Redford Township, Wayne County; Blue Lake Township, Village of Lakewood Club,
Muskegon County; Village of Mancelona, Antrim County; City of Saginaw and Carrollton Township,
Saginaw County; Village of Marcellus and Newberg Township, Cass County; Cities of Mt. Clemens and
Warren, Macomb County; City of Jackson, Jackson County; Somerset Township, Hillsdale County.
Information Contact: Lois Hinkle, 517-373-1251. Decision-maker: DNR Director.

OIL AND GAS LEASE SALE, DECEMBER 12, 13, 14, 1995 - 26 COUNTIES. lnforrnation Contact:
Gina Parks cho, 517-373-7666. Decision-maker: DNR Director.

PARKS AND RECREATION LAND ACQUISITION: George Lake Access Site No. 65-9, Ogemaw
County. Information Contact: David A. Yankee, 517-373-1241. Decision-maker: DNR Director.

WILDLIFE LAND ACQUISITIONS: Rose Lake \Mldlife Research Area, Clinton County. Allegan State
Game Area and Kalamazoo Mini-Vlfildlife Area, Allegan County; Maple River/Gratiot-Saginaw

Connector, Gratiot County. Information Contact: David A. Yankee, 517-373-1241. Decisiqflnakerz
DNR Director.

Other Decisions Before the Office of the Director

 

INTENT TO SELL STATE PARK USER DATA BASES. Information Contact: Neil LaCasse, 517-
335-3025. Decision-maker: DNR Director.

RECREATION BOND FUND APPLICATIONS FOR LOCAL RECREATION DEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS. Consideration of DNR staff recommendation to fund applications received April 1, 1995.
Information Contact: Michael McDonald, Administrative Services Division, 517-335-3042.
Decision-maker: DNR Director.

 

Public Hearings, Meetings, Events

Note: Persons with disabilities needing accommodations for effective participation in any of the
meetings noted in this calendar should call or write the appropriate meeting information contact
listed below at least a week in advance to request mobility, visual, hearing, or other assistance.

NOVEMBER 1
BY THIS DATE, 165 SUCCESSFUL ELK HUNTERS WILL BE NOTIFIED THAT THEY CAN

PARTICIPATE IN THE DECEMBER 12-19 HUNT.

BY THIS DATE, APPROXIMATELY 295.000 SUCCESSFUL APPLICANTS WILL RECEIVE THEIR
ANTLERLESS DEER HUNTING LICENSES IN THE MAIL.

CANADA GOOSE SEASON CLOSES IN THE NORTH ZONE.

RESIDENT MUSKRAT AND MINK TRAPPING SEASON OPENS IN ZONE 2.
RESIDENT RACCOON TRAPPING SEASON OPENS IN ZONE 3.
RESIDENT BADGER TRAPPING SEASON OPENS IN ZONE 3.

7:00-9:00 pm. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED MICHIGAN TRAILWAY DESIGNATION FOR
HART-MONTAGUE BICYCLE TRAIL STATE PARK. Hearing to take public comment on proposed
designation of the trail as a Michigan Trailway under the Michigan Trailways Act, to be held at the
Shelby Village Hall, 189 Maple, Shelby (Oceana County). To obtain a copy of the designation
materials, call 517-373-9483. Information Contact: Philip Wells, 517-335-3038.

NOVEMBER 2
CANADA GOOSE SEASON CLOSES IN THE SOUTH ZONE, EAST OF US-27/127. (See exceptions

for goose management units in the Michigan Waterfowl Hunting Guide.)

7:00-9:00 pm. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED MICHIGAN TRAILWAY DESIGNATION FOR
KAL-HAVEN TRAIL SESQUICENTENNIAL STATE PARK. Hearing to take public comment on
proposed designation of the trail as a Michigan Trailway under the Michigan Trailways Act, to be held
at the Gobles High School library, 409 North State Street, Gobles (Van Buren County). To obtain a
copy of the designation materials. call 517- 373-9483. Information Contact: Philip Wells 517- 335-
3038.

124
NOVEMBER 7
4:30 pm. PUBLIC HEARING OF THE BETSIE RIVER ZONING REVIEW BOARD at the Weldon
Township Hall, Thompsonville, to decide on a request for variance from the Natural River Zoning
Standards on the Betsie River. Information Contact: Jan Fenske, 517-275—5151.

NOVEMBER 8

9:00 am. MICHIGAN FOREST ROUNDTABLE with objectives to develop a shared vision, a set of
principles, and a recommendation for action that will result in improved policies for our nation’s forests.
The roundtable will be held at Treetops Sylvan Resort, Gaylord (Otsego County). Information Contact:
Wanda Stevens, Forest Management Division, 517-373-1056.

6:30 pm. OFF-ROAD-VEHICLE (ORV) ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING at the Ralph A.
MacMulIan Conference Center, 104 Conservation Drive, Roscommon (Roscommon County).
Information Contact: Margo Fuller, Forest Management Division, 517-373-9483.

NOVEMBER 9
1 :00 pm. NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING, Library of Michigan, 717 W. Allegan,
Lansing. Public appearances before the NRC may be scheduled by calling Teresa Gloden.

Information Contact: Teresa Gloden. 517-373-2352.

NOVEMBER 10
RESIDENT BEAVER AND OTTER TRAPPING SEASONS OPEN IN UNIT B. See Michigan Hunting and

Trapping Guide for open and closed areas.
MUSKRAT AND MINK TRAPPING SEASON OPENS FOR RESIDENTS IN ZONE 3.

NOVEMBER 11
A DEER SEASON INFORMATION CENTER will be staffed by DNR personnel at the Carl T. Johnson

Center at Mitchell State Park, Cadillac, from 10: 00 a. m. to 5: 00 p. m.

- NOVEMBER 12

DEER SEASON INFORMATION CENTERS will be staffed by DNR personnel at the Carl T. Johnson
Center at Mitchell State Park, Cadillac, from 10:00 am. to 5:00 pm, and at the Clare and St. Ignace
MDOT Welcome Centers from 8:00 am. to 5:00 pm.

CANADA GOOSE SEASON CLOSES IN THE SOUTH ZONE, WEST OF US-27/127. (See exceptions
for goose management units in the Michigan Waterfowl Hunting Guide.)

NOVEMBER 13 .

DEER SEASON INFORMATION CENTERS will be staffed by DNR personnel at the Clare and St. Ignace
MDOT Welcome Centers from 8:00 am. To 5:00 pm.

NOVEMBER 14

DEER SEASON INFORMATION CENTERS will be staffed by DNR personnel at the Clare and St. Ignace
MDOT Welcome Centersfrom 8:00 am. to 5:00 pm.

ARCHERY DEER SEASON CLOSES UNTIL DECEMBER 1.

PHEASANT SEASON CLOSES IN ZONES 2 AND 3.

WOODCOCK, CROW, SHARPTAIL GROUSE, AND RUFFED GROUSE SEASONS CLOSE.

(NOVEMBER 14, continued) 125
COYOTE HUNTING SEASON CLOSES IN ZONE 1.

BADGER TRAPPING SEASON CLOSES IN ZONE 2.

CANADA AND OTHER GEESE SEASONS CLOSE IN THE MUSKEGON WASTEWATER GOOSE
MANAGEMENT UNIT. This area may be closed earlier if the quota has been reached.

RAILS AND COMMON SNIPE SEASONS CLOSE STATEWIDE.

NOVEMBER 15
FIREARMS DEER SEASON OPENS.

NONRESIDENT FUR HARVESTER SEASON OPENS. (See Michigan Hunting and Trapping Guide.)

NONRESIDENT BEAVER AND O‘ITER TRAPPING SEASONS OPEN IN UNIT A. See the Michigan
Hunting and Trapping Guide for open and closed areas.

CANADA GOOSE SEASON CLOSES IN THE MIDDLE ZONE.

9:30 a.m. MEETING OF THE MICHIGAN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FINANCIAL
ASSURANCE (MUSTFA) POLICY BOARD at the Lansing Center, 333 E. Michigan Avenue, Lansing.
lnfon'nation Contact: Patty Morlock, 1-800-4-MUSTFA or 517-373-6247.

NOVEMBER 16
DEER CHECK STATIONS will be open November 16-19, 10:00 am. - 6:00 pm, at the Big Rapids and

Shepherd rest areas and the Birch Run weigh station.

NOVEMBER 17
DEER CHECK STATIONS will be open November 16-19, 10:00 am. - 6:00 pm, at the Big Rapids and

Shepherd rest areas and the Birch Run weigh station.

NOVEMBER 18
DEER CHECK STATIONS will be open November 16-19, 10:00 am. - 6:00 pm, at the Big Rapids and

Shepherd rest areas and the Birch Run weigh station.

NOVEMBER 19
DEER CHECK STATIONS will be open November 16-19, 10:00 am. - 6:00 pm, at the Big Rapids and

Shepherd rest areas and the Birch Run weigh station.

DECEMBER 6
4:30 pm. NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING, Lansing Center, 333 E. Michigan
Avenue, Lansing. Public appearances before the NRC may be scheduled by calling Teresa Gloden.

Information Contact: Teresa Gloden. 517-373-2352.

DECEMBER 7
9:00 am. NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING, Library of Michigan, 717 W. Allegan,

Lansing. Information Contact: Teresa Gloden. 517-373-2352.

DECEMBER 12

10:30 am. SNOWMOBILE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING at the Ralph A. MacMulIan
Conference Center, 104 Conservation Drive, Roscommon (Roscommon County). Information Contact:
Margo Fuller, Forest Management Division, 517-373-9483.

126

MICHIGAN TRAILWAY DESIGNATION AGREEMENT
for
KAL-HAVEN TRAIL SESQUICENTENNIAL STATE PARK
between
STATE TRAILS COORDINATOR
and

one PARKS a RECREATION DIVISION

This agreement between the State Trails Coordinator and the DNR Parks and Recreation
Division IP&RDI is entered into pursuant to the Michigan Trailways Act (Public Act 451 of
1994, as amended. Part 721)

The State Trails Coordinator (STC) agrees to recommend to the Natural Resources
Commission immediate designation of the Kai-Haven Trail Sesquicentennial State Park as a
Michigan Trailway. The STC also agrees to help P&RD secure funding and design
assistance to carry out trail improvements as described below.

If the Natural Resources Commission designates the trail as a Michigan Trailway, P&RD
agrees to meet. on a continuing basis, the requirements of Sec. 4(1) and 8 of the Michigan
Trailways Act. which become part of this agreement. and to meet design requirements on
any improvements to or extensions of the trail.

Permitted uses of the trail will include snowmobiling (except for east two miles of the trail)
and all nonmotorized uses including general bicycling. Horseback riding may be limited to
specified segments of the trail.

P&RD also agrees to the following:'

1. As soon as the necessary funds and/or lands can be secured:

A. Redesign and modify parking area at 66th St. (CR687I in Kibbie so trail does
not pass through parking lot. Ibl .

8. Provide direct trail connection to road at east trailhead so users arriving at
trailhead by bicycle do not have to go through parking lot to access trail. Ibl

C. Explore and pursue options to reduce grades and increase curve radii on both
sides of Blue Star Highway underpass. to)

D. ' Redesign and modify trail approaches to CR653 to reduce trail grades Ito 5%
' or less if possible from current 10-12961 (cl

Michigan Trailway Designation Agreement for Kai-Haven Trail: Page 2 127

E. Insure that east approach to railroad crossing in Grand Junction has grade of
less than 10% (from current 14%). (C)

F. Insure safest possible snowmobile route through Grand Junction. lb)

G. Add diagonal ”wings” to all four corners of bridge railing at Silver Saddle ,
Drain. lb)

H. Redesign and rebuild trail crossing of CR388 (Phoenix Highway) just east of

Bloomingdale to increase inside curve radius of trail on both sides of crossing
to at least 40 feet (c)

I. When new west trailhead completed in So. Haven, eliminate nonacce'ssible
toilets at temporary trailhead on Blue Star Hwy. (i)

2. When railings are replaced or added in future on any trail bridges or along the trail.
build railing to height of 54", with rub-rail at 42" (as per AASHTO bicycle guidelines).

to)

3. When camel-back bridge at Silver Saddle Drain is replaced in future, insure new bridge
deck has maximum grade of under 10% (from current 14% max.). (c)

714030)
' Letters in parentheses following items identify requirements of SecfiM‘TI' of the
Michigan Trailways Act.

State Trails Coordinator: ‘ Perks & Recreation Division Chief:
Name (typed) m .Name (typed) °°J° sener'cmj'gt

CC .V _____ ,
Signature Signature —

Date is! ‘ I f) ' (I {- Date 9-18-95

 

  

   
 

_- ' II. - i ”We, ‘-—' -. '-
—. _ .k - _ .__... - -.--_ ‘l_*—.J-‘_I_ --r».. . -. .m-3.-’ .7 -g‘ ’ "" ——- ~ -—~-———.-—-- ~ __ - _.

_..-_.___._ .L- __, _ 77 —- ,.,__‘.____ -.., ,_ _ ‘ , , ' - ' ‘ ‘
‘- —* —___-____ —-——— ~~A-——L—~._4_____L - -

-4 *Wm.__~ - n - ~_ I II ' ‘ ’> A . A - -. . _._

_.... -_ -.~......-M——.N_4...__-__._._

 

 

128

MICHIGAN TRAILWAY DESIGNATION AGREEMENT
for
HART-MONTAGUE BICYCLE TRAILSTATE PARK
between
STATE TRAILS COORDINATOR
and

DNR PARKSBI RECREATION DIVISION

This agreement between the State Trails Coordinator and the DNR Perks'end Recreation
Division (P&RD) is entered into pursuant to the Michigan Trailways Act (Public Act 481 of
\ 1994. as amended. Part 721).

The State Trails Coordinator (STC) agrees to recommend to the Natural Resources
Commission immediate designation of the Hart-Montague Bicycle Trail State Park as a
Michigan Trailway. The STC also agrees to help PBRD secure funding and design
assistance to carry out trail improvements as described below.

If the Natural Resources Commission designates the trail as a Michigan Trailway, P&RD
agrees to meet, on a continuing basis. the requirements of Sec. 4(1) and B of the Michigan
Trailways Act, which become part of this agreement. and to meet design requirements on
any improvements to or extensions of the trail.

Permitted uses of the trail will include snowmobiling and all nonmotorized uses including
general bicycling. Horseback riding may be limited to specified segments of the trail.

P&RD also agrees to the following:'

1. As soon as the necessary funds and/or lands can be secured:

A. Realign trail crossings of roads to improve crossing angle and decrease
crossing distance at three locations: lb)

Walsh Rd. just north of south trailhead

Old US-31 (Oceana Or.) on south side of Shelby (Lend acquisition may be
necessary)

Buchanan Rd. no. of Shelby

Michigan Trailway Designation Agreement for Hart-Montague Trail: Page 2 129

B. Add diagonal 'wings" to ends of railings on two bridges: north of M-20 and
cattle crossing north of Shelby. (bl

C. Increase trail curve radius approaching Business 31 from south near north
trailhead in Shelby. (c)

D. Increase curve radius of four curves around Kurdzick Co. parking lot in
Rothbury to at least 40 feet (inside radius). (c)

E. Increase parking at south trailhead. (i)

2. When trail is resurfaced in the future. increase surfaced trail width from 8 to at least
10 feet (as per AASHTO bicycle guidelines). to)

3. When railings are replaced or added in future on any trail bridges or along the trail,
build railing to height of 54", with rub-rail at 42" (as per AASHTO bicycle guidelines).
(cl

 

724636!)
' Letters in parentheses following items identify requirements of Sacra-l1 of the
Michigan Trailways Act.

State Trails Coordinator: Parks 8: Recreation Division Chief:

, Name (typed) Hector Chianti Name (tngd) 0.3. Scherschligt

$39Mtum ELM/K \ Signature — ~~.--

Date 9-18-95 Date 9-18-95

  

STAFF DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR 130
MCHIGAN TRAILWAY DESIGNATION

Michigan Department of Natural Resources

Forest Management Division
Recreation and Trails Section

Name of Trailway: Kan-lam Im'l Sgsgm'ggmgnm'a] Star; Bar];
Trailway Manager (i.e. , managing agency or agencies)
1: HE E I i E . D. . .
Auflwfiud Repmmtive: Name WW Div
Title W Address WW...
City Waxen— ZIP 49090 Phone 616-637-4984

DNR Staff Evaluator: Name Ehililelr-Ils__ Title W
Date of Field Evaluation W Other Staff Present Ngne

 

 

 

 

 

Representative of Trailway Manager Present mm

IOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOIOOOCOOOOIOO83......OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Staff Recommendation: This trail is (check one):
X_ Eligible for Michigan Trailway designation (meets all requirements of the act)

Not currently eligible for Michigan Trailway designation because it does not meet
definition of trailway stated in Sec. 3 of the Michigan Trailways Act ('a land corridor
that features abroad trail eapable of accommodating a variety of public recreation
uses”).

Explain

 

 

The corridor generally must not be shared with a street or road that is open to motor
vehicles. ‘

Not currently eligible for Michigan Trailway designation beeause it does not meet one or
more requirements of the Michigan Trailways Act as described on pages 4-9 (circle one
or more letters):

abcdefghijkl
CIICCOOOCCCCCOCOOOttttttttttttttttttittttttttttttttttttttttttttlttttttftttttt
StateTrailsCoordinator(print)_Hegtgr_Chjnmi
Signature us .Date PINES?

-2- 131

LEGAL AUTHORITY AND DESIGNATTON PROCESS

Under authority of Secrion 4(1) of Michigan Trailways Act (Act No. 27 of Public Acts of
1993), Natural Resources Commission (NRC) may designate a trailway in Michigan as a
'Michigan Trailway. " ”Trailway ' is defined in Section 3 as 'a land corridor that features a
broad trail capable of accommodating a variety of public recreation uses. " To receive
Michigan Trailway designation, trail must meet definition of trailway and all of the
requirements presented in Sec. 4(1) and Sec. 8 of the act, as elaborated on the following

pages-

Developed trailways must either meet all requirements at time of designation, or trailway
manager must have written agreement with DNR Trailways Program Leader describing plan
and schedule for meeting any requirements not currently met; failure to meet this schedule
may result in revocation of designation. For trailways not yet developed, trailway manager
must have approved master plan or other approved document describing how and when
requirements will be met; failure to meet this schedule may result in revocation of
designation.

if stqfl’ makes tentative finding that trail is eligible for Michigan Trailway designation,
trailway manager must, per Sec. 4(2) of the act, hold public hearing in vicinity of trailway to
take testimony and gather public opinion on proposed designation including, but not limited
to, proposed uses of trailway and whether or not motorized uses are appropriate for trailway.
Hearing must be held at location and time calculated to attract a fair representation of
opinions on the designation. Transcript or summary of testimony must be firrwarded to NRC
with designation request.

Following the public hearing, any individual, organization, or governmental agency that
wishes to comment on a stafl“ determination of eligibility for Michigan leay designation
should comment to the NRC. Generally, the NRC will make decision on a proposed
Michigan Trailway designation 30-60 days following the public hearing required by See.
4(2).

The Michigan Trailways Advisory Council (MTAC) may also review the proposed designation
before or alter the public hearing. Any individual, organization, or governmental agency
that wishes to comment on a staff determination of eligibility for Michigan Trailway
designation may also comment to MTAC.

Section 5 of the act provides for designation of “Michigan Trailway Connectors. " This
determination form does not address connector designation.

-3- 132

Description of Property To Be Designated (Trailway Boundary):

a, Dull our-J 'UJk-il\ -H' rm» (- 9.“ 'rd ..‘mc 1' run in -.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attach legal description (s) and map(s). See attached map.

Legal description on file with DNR, Real Estate Division.

.4- 133

Staff Determination of Compliance With

Michigan Trailway Designation Requirements
Michigan 1993 Act 27, Sec. 4(1) & 8

For each requirement (a-l), attach fitrther explanation as necessary.

a)

The land on which the trailway is located 8 owned by the state or a governmental
agency, or otherwise is under the long-term control of the state or a governmental

agencythroughalease, easement, orotherarrangement.
(”Long-term control' is defined as at least 20 yearsfrom date ofdesignation.)

N.

Agmcy(-ies) controlling W W

 

 

Nature of long-term control (fee simple ownership, easement, lease, etc.).

 

 

If more than one agency, indicate length and end points of each agency’s control.

CELL

 

Attach maps and other documentation as appropriate.

If the land is owned by [non-state] governmental agency(-ies), the governmental
agency(-ies) has given its coment for Michigan Trailway designation.

Yes No N/A

Explain

 

 

Attach documentation.
Note: City of Hart’s extension of trail could be considered for designation in future.

-5- 134

b) Design and maintenance of trailway and related facilities meet generally accepted
standards of public safety.

N.

Explain \0 Ottn- 01in '. 6." arstorwuxwr'r 0 favor-90

v future.

 

Key considerations include (but may not be limited to): motor vehicle crossings (roads,
streets, driveways); separation of trail fi'orn motor vehicles (including parking areas);
bridges, sideslopes, signage, security.

3.3.33.8tttttttttfittttttt..$t¥$¥tt8$8‘3‘.8fittttttt$$8.Itttlltttttttttttfittttt

c) Trailway meets appropriate standards for its designated uses.

 

 

 

 

, . o g a no ‘
-0.'-.' H 0; ‘.‘-r'll-:l mu no .0 - unit's-- ‘u ° rum... 0‘ .~.-:-

E 2.°1' 'llll'

 

List need not be exhaustive, but must include all motorized uses and must indicate
whether general bicycling (as opposed to 'mountain biking ') is a designated use.

"Appropriate standards " are defined as design guidelines found in Trails for the Nenty-
First Century, published by the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy (1993), Chapter 3; and, for
trail designated for general bicycle use, Planning Surfaced Bicycle Paths, published by
WM? (1991), and Guide for Development of Bicycle Facilities published by American
Association of State Highway and Dansportation Ofl‘icials (1991).

-6— 135

d) Trailway is available for designated uses on a nondiscriminatory basis.

 

 

Trailway must be open to all citizens. If a nonresident user fee, or higher nonresident
fee, is charged, fee or fee drferential must be reasonable.

fitttttttttttttttttttit$.33$38##8##.t.O.3..33......Otttttttttttttttttt‘ttt.8.

e) Trailwayisamulti-usetrailsuitableforuseby pedestrians, by peoplewith .
d'sabilities, and by other users, as appropriate.

N.

Explainfl'°fi lfi' ..

 

 

Trail must be planned, designed, operated, and publicized for multiple use, to include, at
a minimum, walking. It must meet standards for accessibility to people with disabilities
as presented in the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and guidelines issued

pursuant to that act.
$3ttitttttlttttttttttt.tttttt$1...ttttittttttttttttttttttttttttttttfittttttttt

f) Trailway is, or has potential to be, a segment of a statewide network of trailways,
or it attracts a substantial share of its users from beyond the local area.

 

 

Trail must be of more than local significance, as measured by the criteria stated in @-
Reasonable evidence or projections of substantial use by people fiom beyond the local
area will be accepted, i.e., scientific studies and quantitative data are not required.

-7- 136

g) Trailway '5 marked with official Michigan trailway sign and logo at maior access
points.

Explain

 

 

 

Trailway manager must agree to sign trailway at its expense if designated, and maintain
designation signs.
fitttttttttttttitttttttttIt...$333!...tittitt#33...$3.3titttttltttttttttfltttttt

h) Trailway 8 not directly attached to a roadway, except at road crossings.

Roadways open to motor vehicles are not eligible for Michigan Trailway designation.
This includes paved shoulders.

33“...it...$3...It...$$33$¥..$t$.3$3$3tttttttO$3....ttttiIlttttfittttttt3tttt

Explain

 

v

 

i) Where feasible, trailway offers adequate support facilities for the public, including

parking, sanitary facilities, and emergency telephones, that are accessible to people
with disabilities and are at reasonable frequency along the trailway.

 

 

A reasonable eflbrt must be made to meet needs for support facilities. These needs can
be met by facilities provided by a public agency or private organization/business, as long
as the facilities are open to all trails users, not just customers of the business. See
Trails for the meaty-M Century, published by the Rails-to—Trails Conservancy
(1993), pages 130142.

i)

-3- 137

Potential negative impacts of trailway development on owners or residents of
adjacent property are minimized through all of the following:

i) Adequate enforcement of trailway ruls and regulations.

 

O O I
.-:= ‘.011.- ‘1?- t 1.- r-0 01:. 01011.5" 011 r .t-s ' 0.. . v. , 1 ‘ 11m.) x '1 mm

 

 

Trailway manager must document enforcement accountability and procedures.

ii) Continuation of access for trailway crossings for agricultural and other

 

 

Trailway manager must document policies and procedures allowing established crossings
to be continued.

hi) Construction and maintenance of fencing, where necemary, by the owner or
operator of the trailway.

Yes No

 

 

Trailway manager must document policies and procedures (1) for deciding where fencing
is necessary and (2) providing for construction and maintenance of fencing, where found
to be necessary, at trailway manager ’s expense.

.3.33......ttt.Ct.t3COOCOOCOQ.3$.330.883$$$$.Itttitttfittttttttttttttttittttttt

it) (Allows for establishment of other requirements; none have been established)

I)

-9- 138

i) In agricultural areas, a Michigan trailway may be temporarily closed by the
entity operating the trailway to allow pesticide application on lands adjoining the
trailway [Act 27 , Sec. 8].

Describe policies and procedures for responding to and evaluating requests for temporary
trailway closure for pesticide application:

ir- 11.- 1- "-1 1- 1+1 '-1 1~.~.-1 1.1 1v.I '5 I 5111-1 1'- a I 1 1 .1 .-1' 11 ~11 I 1' 1r- .r-
1IW -1 '1'- . 11'1v-1‘-:'-II1'1 1.... I1 u-1~'11-11 U I11- I-i’IJI-v-I 1
I I ‘. ' I‘I ”II. . ' . I. ' I 6‘ ° I. I. .' Q. I‘I r ‘ I ‘ . ”I If... .I . _ \l ' ‘ .'

1'] II! III I" .

 

 

11 ' 1' -1 r. .r- 11.- 1.- ' v-I 1 '1- .t 1- {um-5 1.111 '1 11"111 1 111-s1 11- 1_-' 11 -11
|1m111 1’ 41115.1 11- - . 1 11'- .r- 11-1.' 1.- -1r-1' 11-11'1. 11.-.I .1 11111.
I - 11 1.1 r- a I 1 I - '.-1' 11 -11 1 1 Ir- .r I 11 ' .111 ° .111 .11 -111 111111-
1v.-11Ia 1- 1'1-I 1 11 - I1 ' ' 1 - 1--1 ~11 .1 .111 .1" .1 1.. 1 11 11 1 '11 111.- .111
. 1,1 1 1 1111-11-2I -111 '1“ 1.111 .111" . In. -21 1.15.111' 1121 -11 11 11 .1I.I' -111
. .-11 I -111 .I" II 1' 511.1 I I.-.~ IIsI 1 .-.I I 1.11 11-111’- II11 I 1x". 1 1.- r. U I-I .v.I I
11 1.; 1111 '5 -1I 11-11 1-1'4 .I'I11' I1 . I 11 . '.'.~‘i'°l'.'.\' I1 1' 1° 11 :1.-
-1r- .. 11' '1 I 1111-1111 .1 . .-.~'. 1 I ' ' 1--. 11° 1 .1 1r- _-11~' 1.1 .v.1 1 1' .111 '1'1111

V. ‘IQ ' .I I ._A‘I I ' .. I .H II. I ‘I ‘06.. O . . I). .V I Q \_ .H I _. I If.

I 11' 1.11. 1'1 1-. ”111:: I I 1111!» 11 -111 v.11. $11. 1 16 I1-:'-.1 11111 -1-.<
11v v.1 ..-11 I '1:- 1 1-1 1- z-11Ir- -11 1'6, 11' -1-:'- -1I 11-1 1-1111
n- .1 1 1 . 1r. -. .‘111-I)r- a I 1 ,.__ I- .1111 1v-I . .- 1..1 1 :11 -111v-I 111 I11 '
.1 I‘ 1.1 I1' I '1 1wa'41 1r- Ir11'11-5- ‘. r. -.1.11 {.1-1I

 

 

ii) The entity operating the Michigan trailway shall post the closure of the trailway or
arrange with a landowner, or other person, for the posting of sign and the closure of
the trailway during pesticide application and appropriate reentry periork [Act 27, Sec.
8].

Describe procedures for implementing temporary closures at sites where decisions are made
to temporarily close the trailway for pesticide application.

Im11111' 1. 1-1 111.-.I 1 I 1.11' 1.11I111 1-1'41111' 111 -111~111<.I111 1 .11 use
124 -111 11’-.1 .1- 11. 11.1 r° .r. I.11v.1 -11 11 111--1r- .21 1 1 Im'1111'
11.1..111 .-11111-.~ 1.. 1.3511- .111-11ra I 1 ' .r-1r-1 .v-I Ir- ...,,-., 1-
1"II-. -1-'1v.11-11 1.1 1'-1111r-1- 111. .1 1 11' 1.111111113-I
1 ..'41-'11-11 '11 .111 «111 I '- '1» ..1 1 '1 . Ir- -.11 1.11. 1 11'-1
1.11 .1' 111 I 111. 11' '11'- 1' -11 11-11111' .1 '11'4<_. .1 111-111 1 1'
Dull I1 1'-- 11-11 11- - I . 1 .111 ' I .I 1 . '- .. -1I. I 1.1 1'1 .1-11
1.211111 -111 '11. ° 11111-11 111-'11:; .1-11-1 1' -111 ° 1 1 -. '..'-1~ I
1.1 '41 1 -111 ' .- I 1.- I.’ 1-.I 1'v.I .I II-~11 1 '- .. -1I. I 1 1111 1' '41 -i.-1

l . 'i.

 

139

Support Facilities along Ital-Haven Trail
(location and type)

New east and west trailheads will be constructed in 1996-97 at 10th St. (near Kalamazoo)
and in South Haven.

Parking:

Current: east trailhead-4'10 cars; temporary west trailhead-35 cars. Gables.
Bloomingdale, and Grand Junction have considerable free public parking lots and/or on-
street parking. Small parking lot on trail corridor at C8687 (Kibbie).

New east trailhead will provide 75 parking spaces plus an overflow area for another 75
cars. New west trailhead will provide approx. 110 spaces.

Toilet facilities:

Current: 12 vault toilets: 2 at east trailhead. 2 at temporary west trailhead. 2 at
Bloomingdale. 6 at intermediate locations along trail. All except temporary west trailhead
are accessible.

New west trailhead will include modern toilet building.

Telephones:

Each town has at least one public phone near the trail.

STAFF DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR ‘40
MICHIGAN TRAILWAY DESIGNATION

Michigan Department of Natural Resources

Forest Management Division
Recreation and Trails Section

Name of Trailway: Han-Montague Bicycle flail State Bank
Trailway Manager (i.e. , managing agency or agencies)
llEH|[Il 1 SE . D...
Authorized Representative: Name militate-Wan Div
Title WM Address WW
City MEIL— ZIP 49436 Phone 615-873-3083

DNR Staff Evaluator: Name me— Title 131W
Date of Field Evaluation m Other Staff Present Hone

 

 

 

 

Representative of Trailway Manager Present W

833$t88333383$$t$¥$¥$¥¥338$$$¥$33333338$8¥$t88$$$t$$$$338333338313ttlttttttttt

Staff Recommendation: This trail is (check one):
X_ Eligible for Michigan Trailway designation (meets all requirements of the act)

Not currently eligible for Michigan Trailway designation because it does not meet
definition of trailway stated in Sec. 3 of the Michigan Trailways Act (”a land corridor
that features a broad trail capable of accommodating a variety of public recreation
uses”).

Explain

 

 

The corridor generally must not be shared with a street or road that is open to motor
vehicles.

Not currently eligible for Michigan Trailway designation because it does not meet one or
more requirements of the Michigan Trailways Act as described on pages 4-9 (circle one
or more letters):

abcdefghijkl

C.3.ttfittt‘lttttlttttttttttttilttttttttttItttttittttttttttttttttttttttttttttt

State Trails Coordinator (print) Wiunfi

Simmmibm ‘3- V’s-‘1‘?

 

141
-2-

LEGAL AUTHORITY AND DESIGNATION PROCESS

Under authority of Section 4(1) of Michigan Trailways Act (Act No. 27 of Public Acts of
1993), Natural Resources Commission (NRC) may designate a trailway in Michigan as a
"Michigan Trailway. " 'T'railway ' is defined in Section 3 as 'a land corridor that features a
broad trail capable of accommodating a variety of public recreation uses. " To receive
Michigan Trailway designation, trail must meet definition of trailway and all of the
requirements presented in Sec. 4(1) and Sec. 8 of the act, as elaborated on the following

Page‘-

Developed trailways must either meet all requirements at time of designation, or trailway
manager must have written agreement with DNR Trailways Program Leader describing plan
and schedule for meeting any requirements not cunemly met; failure to meet this schedule
may result in revocation of designation. For trailways not yet developed, trailway manager
must have approved master plan or other approved document describing how and when
requirements will be met; failure to meet this schedule may result in revocation of
designation.

If stafl" makes tentative finding that trail is eligible for Michigan Trailway designation,
trailway manager must, per Sec. 4(2) of the act, hold public hearing in vicinity of trailway to
take testimony and gather public opinion on proposed designation including, but not limited
to, proposed uses of trailway and whether or not motorized uses are appropriate firr trailway.
Hearing must be held at location and time calculated to attract a fair representation of
opinions on the designation. Transcript or summary of testimony must be forwarded to NRC
with designation request.

Following the public hearing, any individual, organization, or governmental agency that
wishes to comment on a stqfl’ determination of eligibility for Michigan Trailway designation
should comment to the NRC. Generally, the NRC will make decision on a proposed
Michigan Trailway designation 30-60 days following the public hearing required by Sec.
4(2).

The Michigan Trailways Advisory Council (MTA C) may also review the proposed designation
before or afier the public hearing. Any individual, organization, or governmental agency
that wishes to comment on a stafl" determination of eligibility for Michigan Trailway
designation may also comment to MTA C.

Section 5 of the act provides for designation of "Michigan Trailway Connectors. " This
determination form does n0t address connector designation.

-———.-—~‘..—p—' —- - __ ‘* ~ u - I —

_3_ 142

Description of Property To Be Designated (Trailway Boundary):

.'. Dali-I 1~.I 1111;11-11' 1111‘ 1111.-I'r-1"..'111'111111‘ t I 111
1.1.11 1-1 1 111 0.1.41 I11 1.1 '11 1111_.'5 ‘v. I1 1'1-.

1.1111 u . '11 1111'1 11'-11.1-11- '1 ,1’ 11 1.‘ 1 111.1111.I 111

MW

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attach legal description (s) and map(s). See attached map.

Legal description on file with DNR, Real Estate Division.

143

Staff Determination of Compliance With
Michigan Trailway Designation Requirements
Michigan 1993 Act 27, Sec. 4(1) & 8

For each requirement (a-l), attach further explanation as necessary.
a) The land on which the trailway is located is owned by the state or a governmental

agency, or otherwise is under the long-term control of the state or a governmental
agency through a lease, easement, or other arrangement.

('Long-term l " is defined as at least 20 years from date of designation.)
2 Yes > No

 

Agnew-ks) controlling progeny MichiganDNR -

 

Nature of long-term control (fee simple ownership, easement, lease, etc.).

W1?

 

 

If more than one agency, indicate length and end points of each agency’s control.

H/A

 

 

Attach maps and other documentation as appropriate.

If the land k owned by [non-state] governmental agency(-ies), the governmental
agency(-i6) has given its consent for Michigan Trailway designation.

Yes No

Explain

 

 

Attach documentation.

Note: City of Hart’s extension of trail could be considered for designation in future.

144

b) Design and maintenance of trailway and related facilities meet generally accepted
standards of public safety.

Explain u1 I .-11.- 1‘1 ‘1 . ‘v. .a‘ '1-I°11 a'1v.11'1 I I‘.11111 I
Wmmm

Key considerations include (but may not be limited to): motor vehicle crossings (roads,
streets, driveways); separation of trail fiom motor vehicles (including parking areas);
bridges, sideslopes, signage, security.

fittttttttttttttttfitttttttittittttttttttttt3.33....ttfitttttfitfittttttttttt.Ittt

 

c) Trailway meets appropriate standards for its designated uses.

Yes No

 

 

 

Di Maw!" _ 'l'll' ”.1.“ 111.

-‘.'.' 'l '1! ' ll .‘Il'il DU" '1'}. t .‘ I \f- 1' . ‘il‘dll" |'

List need not be exhaustive, but must include all motorized uses and must indicate
whether general bicycling (as opposed to "mountain biking ') is a designated use.

”Appropriate standards " are defined as design guidelines found in Trails for the Tlventy-
First Century, published by the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy (1993), Chapter 3; and, for
trail designated for general bicycle use, Planning Surfaced Bicycle Paths, published by
WM? (1991), and Guide for Development of Bicycle Facilities published by American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Ofl‘icials (I991).

-6- 145

d) Trailway is available for designated uses on a nondiscriminatory basis.

 

Explain ° 11 w
1r- 1r- 1.6.1.11 .‘ 1IW11II 1 '° Ir- 11 .11 1.111 1;. 11.11 11'- II.'r-II1

Trailway must be open to all citizens. If a nonresident user fee, or higher nonresident
fee, is charged, fee or fee drferential must be reasonable.

OttttIQIIIIIIIIOIIO*tttttttttttltttltIttlttlttttttttfittttttttttttttttttttttt

e) Trailway is a multi-use trail suitable for use by pedestrians, by people with
disabilities, and by other users, as appropriate.

.1.

Explain N9 significant defigigngigs.

 

 

Trail must be planned, designed, operated, and publicized firr multiple use, to include, at
a minimum, walking. It must meet standards for accessibility to people with disabilities
as presented in the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and guidelines issued

pursuant to that act.
tttttttlttttttlttttttt3t$8ttittttttttttttltlttttttttltttttttttttItttttttttttl

f) Trailway k, or has potential to be, a segment of a statewide network of trailways,
or it attracts a substantial share of its users from beyond the local area.

0’:- No

Explain 1.1.1.11- I I: 1 181 -11 1.121 1 1-.~ '1 .11'1' 111.?- II. 11-11

 

 

Trail must be of more than local significance, as measured by the criteria stated in (f).
Reasonable evidence or projections of substantial use by people fiom beyond the local
area will be accepted, i. e. , scientific studies and quantitative data are not required.

146
-7-

g) Trailway is marked with official Michigan trailway sign and logo at major access
points.

@3 No

Explain .. w v'

 

 

 

Trailway manager must agree to sign trailway at its expense if designated, and maintain

designation signs.
tttttttttttttttttttttttttititit...Ittttittit$338#3.!$33.8.ttlttttttttttttttttt

h) Trailway is not directly attached to a roadway, except at road crossings.

Gab No

Explain

 

 

Roadways open to motor vehicles are not eligible for Michigan Trailway designation.
This includes paved shoulders.

#‘ttttittttitttttttttttttittttttttttttfitttttfitttttOttfitttttttttttttttttttttIt

i) Where feasible, trailway offers adequate support facilities for the public, including
parking, sanitary facilities, and emergency telephones, that are accessible to people
with disabilities and are at reasonable frequency along the trailway. '

Explain 11 ' 1 .-.II.« I 111-1111a '-.' .111 1'v.I m- I I .1111111 I 111.11
11.11 I'. v. D. '41.-II1a'1v.11'-11 I 1.3111111 I 11111 11‘-11- I 1. “-1
inhum-

 

A reasonable efl'ort must be made to meet needs for support facilities. These needs can
be met by facilities provided by a public agency or private organization/business, as long
as the facilities are open to all trails users, nor just customers of the business. See
Trails for the Tiventy-First Century, published by the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy
(1993), pages 130-142.

_8- 147

j) Potential negative impacts of trailway development on owners or residents of
adjacent property are minimized through all of the following:

i) Adequate enforcement of trailway rules and regulations.

3e}. , No

V
Explain 111 11 .111 ' 1 I.- .1 11 ~. -11= 1‘~.I‘ 11111 0.2111. 11

41111111 11.11-1111'..1 .1111.1. 0.11 1.11...111'~111 'i'

Trailway manager must document enforcement accountability and procedures.

ii) Continuation of access for trailway crossings for agricultural and other
purposes.

{is No

Explain 11-11 1.1 I I-.I1I1‘- $111.1 1~.I 1111. 1"1 . 1' 11~. .11.-

Trailway manager must document policies and procedures allowing established crossings
to be continued.

 

iii) Construction and maintenance of fencing, where necessary, by the owner or
operator of the trailway.

 

11111 .1111 141-1. ~11111' 1~.I ~11. -11 11-.'.' 1'~.~.I1111'1I.-1111 I 11’- 11-1.,"~1
I1~11 1.. I.~.~11 111 I ~11111' 1‘-I . _ 1 . ' all - I , 1-I .InII a 1’-
111~.I 11.11 1.~.15 '. 1111.11‘ .111.~.1 I~.Ir-I 111v. ~.III .r-r 'r-_1~.I -11

 

Trailway manager must document policies and procedures (I) for deciding where fencing
is necessary and (2) providing for construction and maintenance of fencing, where found
to be necessary, at trailway manager ’s expense.

$3.833$..33....It.CI#ttttttt$.33Ittttttitittttttttttttttt$¥88$$ttttttttttttttt

k) (Allows for establishment of other requirements; none have been established)

_9_ 148

l) i) In agricultural areas, a Michigan trailway may be temporarily closed by the
entity operating the trailway to allow pesticide application on lands adjoining the
trailway [Act 27, Sec. 8].

Describe policies and procedures for responding to and evaluating requests for temporary
trailway closure for pesticide application:

 

'-.11.1-" 1..1' ‘ 1‘-.‘ ‘--11'-.1 I '111.Ir-a I 1 1-1 ."1111 1 1r-°.1<
.I. ' int. 1.1-.1411Dm11-11 I1 11-1-'111 1. 1-1 II.-.I .1
I I‘ll‘ I‘I ..II l°'. II. IiHII II °IIIAI.’-. I I .II.'_'-I° .I . U. I.‘.I
v 'ns.
‘1'. [a gay 11 'ur.' 1,‘g°°e,1 .11,.1°1. 1 1" ° 1‘ .1 ..1 .1°.‘1 1 .
.i°'-._1r_°le-_1-'-.I 1 ‘- . ~'. "- ‘-:'-II1 D°°°1111 11 11.11'11'1
1' 11 111 1‘.r=w-. 1111-." 1-111=1"11‘1 I.‘11oI‘ 11111”
er'11A1 1| 1 l' 1 . .'-u'| 1 1' r° ._ 1 .°|' .11“...1g ..1.11l11g°..
'-'1a 1.11.1 111-.I1' 1.1-1' 1' -11°I:'-I 1. 11 °1 11111-111
,1A1 ' 1 151.151 .11H,.11 °1 11" [1... gr 1“.1°1g ['51 '| II' [1.1 '1'
, ‘1 1 .11.111"1,' 1 1,“ ° 1' 3.1 11, "'1 .111 1 I631 11. «1' 1.1.151 1
11" 1" ° 1' ._|1 g‘. l" he. 1. .' 1 11. 1" 1° °1I| 1°°°111 l-
°Ve .'. g I. ° I 'Ilo II I o . I I ° ' i; I '° 1 I If: .° .1 I‘I .O.I I I. 1 I I ° .1...
.1.I_°°1'11-_ I1 1‘°°11111..I1 111 I'-111 1' -111.1'- 11 ° -_1111 1 Ir-
I. ° ' 11' 1'1 I.‘ ° 1' WI 1 tulle: 1. .11 -.1 1° .-..1 1 11'- 11-111 11111 - ‘~:'-
I-. “-.I ' '1 I '.1 ‘ I.'W'-.‘1 rt. -11 1111' -1-:'- -11 I1‘ 1" -1
.1r 1..- -..' 'mIaIr-J I 1' -_. I.‘ I 1'1-.1- -. 1‘ .11 '11 ‘1'-.I IIIII
°1l 1'1-1 ° ' I in -. '1' ° . .r-._ 111. 1' are-- .' r° - 01.11 '° " -1I

 

ii) The entity operating the Michigan trailway shall post the closure of the trailway or
arrange with a landowner, or other person, for the posting of sign and the closure of
the trailway during pesticide application and appropriate reentry periods [Act 27, Sec.
8]. ‘

Describe procedures for implementing temporary closures at sites where decisions are made
to temporarily close the trailway for pesticide application.

'1 I°°°1I1 1- 1-1 11.'-.1_1 I 1.1°1'1.I°°1111'-11°°1'111 11-111<1°I11 .111.Ir-a
1 a}. .11,.1 1. 11° .1.. r° .r. 1,“..1 ..1 1 15.1.31 1 .1 1° °°11'
'111°V°°1' ‘1111‘ -. 1..I:'-. 111. ‘111.Ir-._a I 1‘ .111111 -.1 11'- 1111-" 1-
1"I-_'-.1-."-.'11‘1 .11'111-1- 111W1' I '.° 1.111'11'1'-.I
1‘ -.' '-.'1'1 °11‘ °1.-. -_111 '-.' -.11.1 '1 - 111. 1 ' 1.11. I I1‘
I.I1 h I I 1 I. , 'n- °1 .-.. ° '-._11 1-._il°°.-.11' 1' '1 '-_‘ w' 1.'1.111' I 1'
Isl: '1' -."-.‘11'1 11-. -.-I 1'111.-1 I I.‘ -1II 1.1 °'1 .11
I‘: ° .I ° 0. I I . -_ °I ° °l III °I ‘I -_ ‘ ..‘I ‘ II ° I '. I I . ‘1 I I .° ' 1 ° I
1.11'1 1'11111 1-.-1.‘ '-.11'-.1 111.1 1' '-.‘ -1II 1111' 1' '1 - f

149

Support Facilities along Hart-Montague Trail
Support facilities are located in each town along the trail. These towns are spaced
about four miles apart on average.
Current parking:
Montague: south trailhead parking is very limited. Negatiations with adjacent
landowner not successful. Division is now working with City of Montague to
extend trail south into city to a new south trailhead with a large parking area.
Rothbury: adequate parking at community park and along streets.
New Era: adequate parking at adjacent shelter and along streets.
Shelby: adequate parking on public land along trail. ‘
Hart: paved parking at north trailhead
Current toilet facilities:
Montague: shelter with accessible rest rooms on city property adjacent to trail

Rothbury: shelter with nonaccessible vault toilets

New Era: shelter with porta-johns (not accessible); sign directs trail users to
accessible toilet at nearby business

Shelby: shelter with nonaccessible vault toilet
North trailhead (Hart): porta-johns (not accessible)
Planned accessibility improvements:

By the Fall of 1995, DNR plans to make nearly $80,000 in accessibility
improvements to trail support facilities. Funds are from the Michigan Natural
Resources Trust Fund. This includes accessible vault toilets at four sites: Polk
Road trailhead, Buchanan Road trailhead, New Era rest area, and Meinert Road
rest area. It also includes several barrier-free picnic areas and tables, drinking
fountains, surfaced bench areas along certain stretches of trail near parking
areas. and water pumps.

Telephones: public phones are available near the trail in all towns. Area has 911
system. ‘

 

 

 

 

 

1 STATE or MICHIGAN ’1 P P R O V 3130

1TURAL nesouacas a—- __L4,‘_;__JL_A_, 192K-

commssm ‘5’39" 2 ““25“”

JERRY c. BARTNle g " Z. ’54 “‘2’ {bf/Actu- 1\_

1(an .1. cum ~ (Incu-rm 1m to a: mason)

$2,322,555 _ JOHN ENGLER. Governor

mew DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL R SOURCES

JOEY M. SPANO STEVENSTMASON BUILDING. POBOX 30021. LANSING“ “7520

10255
EV 1095

MICHAEL D. MOORE. Diroclor -

November 9, 1995
Resubmitted: December 11, 1995

Memorandum to the Natural Resources Commission

SUBJECT: Designation of Hart-Montague and Kal-Haven Trails as Michigan Trailways

Agghgritx:

The Michigan Trailways Act of 1993 (now Part 721 of PA 451 of 1994. as amended).
authorizes the Commission to designate a trailway in Michigan as a "Michigan Trailway“ if it
meets the requirements of the act.

Di inanrun:

The State Trails Coordinator has evaluated the Hart-Montague Bicycle Trail State Park and the
Kai-Haven Trail Sesquicentennial State Park, and found that they meet the requirements of
the act. These are the first trails proposed for Michigan Trailway designation. The State
Trails Coordinator and the Chief of the Parks and Recreation Division have signed a
designation agreement listing certain improvements to be made in both trails in the future.

The act requires the Commission, in consultation with the governmental agencies in which
the trailway is located. to establish uses to be permitted on the trailway. The act also
requires that a public hearing be held in the vicinity of the trail to take public testimony on the
proposed designation including, but not limited to. the proposed uses of the trailway and,
whether or not motorized uses are appropriate for the trailway.

The Department conducted a public hearing for the Hart-Montague Trail in Shelby on
November 1, 1995, and for the Kal-Haven Trail in Gobies on November 2, 1995. The
hearings were publicized through the Department calendar. a general news release, and
special notification to local news media. All local units of government through which the trails
pass were invited to send representatives to the local public hearing and/or to submit written
comments.

No objections to designation were voiced. either at the hearings or in writing. No local unit
or citizen proposed changes in the current permitted uses of the trails, which are as described
in this memo.

The Michigan Trailways Advisory Council, appointed by the Commission, chaired the public
hearings and supports the proposed designations.

A report will be provided to the Commission presenting the text of the Michigan Trailways
Act, transcripts of the public hearing testimony, and other information supporting designation.

I

 

151

R mmn in:

The‘Director recommends that the Commission designate the Hart-Montague Bicycle Trail
State Park and the Kai-Haven Trail Sesquicentennial State Park as Michigan Trailways, and
that the Commission approve the following designated uses of the trails:

Hart-Montague: Snowmobiling and all nonmotorized uses. (Horseback riding may be limited
to specified segments of the trail.)

Kal-Haven: Snowmobiling and all nonmotorized uses. (Snowmobiling and horseback riding
may be limited to specified segments of the trail.)

(6.7 . R U MM . 7A

0. J. cherschligt. Chief Hector Chiunti. State rails Coordinator

Parks and Recreati n Division Foreqst Mayge nt Division
. ‘ l/‘X/
, _/;/. X xxx/-

Gerald J. Thiede. Chief C. Edwin Meadows. Jr.
Forest Management Division Deputy Director

 

 

 
     

I have analyzed and discussed this recommendation with staff and concur.

)LMSXW 12/5/75

ichael D. Moore
Director ’ Date

 

152

Proposal for First Fund of
Michigan Trailway Desimatims

(fish: PFC to designs ts rive:- HF: Fail--tz-"s-3J_la=. :5 MI ”i"r".=3.il.'.~.taf.--‘s at their 21.4:- 1.1.11“.
1 €945 1'1'r-.'-:ur-.-.-"'i;il"1(:.1. The? 11" .ir'1«:::lL(cl(~:: H's-:1 'i11::d...2.r Ei tats Pearl: i -
'4=1r"'-4‘&_1'1i_-_1L.L1._ _. i..£i.ir'!EET-i_-.§1["uijii _. an White-3 F‘ HEP—":31: {‘5 Uttavui—i'iis.iz'E-qcr': (prawns: :d
pu:1l’"ztl"ffi Frau; t:'-=il). Tl"'.~.+:-:»:-:e-9 trails all ("eve at 1..... .-:. master“ plan, e:--:;.-:’" 1“
elm. te1 Fil‘u‘- . Tl'.:: "11"e':;vj:."v'-_=.'-:-j cit-351.95" iatia'i 'tiurzinc; amtzuld c:-;"ii'1(:ide:« with the“: NFEC’ 5
5:424 ' :‘tE‘d a]: pr Cw 511 C11 the White: Pines: master $2151.“: a -: 1+... same il'rii;'til“zg .

‘ ‘ r” 1'4. '3. l 1..-at " ",.-"€E:‘:-"“"i=l.£;i 1 “ii-.51. -."'1..

CL

1
"1

TI“: '2 fol lcmin ng scrszcrlu 11.2. will (TEEt this tars-e41:

CCnclec t Cicmpl eta Sign Hold
- ield Staff Eesignatim - Fubl i:
Ffeview Eva l LlatiCfi Pg rte-amen 1: Hearing ( s )

 

blhi ts Pine :.-"'51 DPS—94 1 1-4-‘?4 113—2‘..- 26/ '27-94
Hal —Haven. Er; --7~'—? 4 1C?-5-'?4 11—4—94 1 l—lEr-’-?4
O'ttawa-ivkislziegcn n .3 1C i-E e-C'4 l l—l'lIr-Cr‘4 .11-16.14334
LalzzeLands liii-l'l-G‘il 1(211-2 ‘Er-‘:.‘4 1 1—4-9‘4 1 1- ~ZZ~ 94

H: -."r tmtague 11:j:--17—Q4”l11—25r-94 11'-4494 12~12—‘?4

.Ic'-

 

Evaluaticns of blhi t1: Pine and Dtta 1a-iizskzsgcn will be based entirely (:11 “the
waster- plans since the trails are not yet developed.

eMI Trailwaws Adviser-v Camcil meets in Lansing liir—El-‘E’ii. tab will :r'E [sent
tine them this preliminary s t'aff eve =11L..I.—3tinns for white Pine, Hal-Haven, and
31“ tame-+115 l::egcn .

STAFF DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR 153
MICHIGAN TRAILWAY DESIGNATION

Michigan Department of Natural Resources

Forest Management Division
Recreation and Trails Section

Name of Trailway: Isa-Hagen Iran Sesam’cemennial Sm; Bark
Trailway Manager (i.e. , managm' g agency or agencies)
D113 2 1 E E . D' . .
Authorized WWW: Name WEI!
Title W Address WW1—
City Millim— HP 49090 Phone 616-637-4984

DNR Staff Evaluator: Name WL— Title We:
Date of Field Evaluation W Other Staff Present Hone

Representative of Trailway Manager Present MM

3...tittltttt$ttttttttit.0...fittttttttOit.Cttttfitttttttt3$$$OtOOOOO$OIQOOODQ.C

Staff Recommendation: This trail is (check one):

 

 

 

 

 

x_ Eligible for Michigan Trailway designation (meets all requirements of the act)

_ Not currently eligible for Michigan Trailway designation because it does not meet
definition of trailway stated in Sec. 3 of the Michigan Trailways Act ('a land corridor
that features abroad trail capable of accommodating a variety of public recreation
uses').

Explain

 

 

Ihe corridor generally must not be shared with a street or road that is open to motor
vehicles.

Not currently eligible for Michigan Trailway designation because it does not meet one or
more requirements of the Michigan Trailways Act as described on pages 4-9 (circle one
or more letters):

abcdefghijkl

$3..tttttttttttItttfittttttfittttfittttt$3#3$8$33.33$$¥ttttttttttttt$$$3338$¥$$$

State Trails Coordinator (print) mmn

Simmfiegfigiesfix'm fl ' “=5 “\‘5'

 

-2- l 54

LEGAL AUTHORITY AND DESIGNATION PROCESS

Under authority of Section 4(1) of Michigan Trailways ACt (Act No. 27 of Public Acts of
1993), Natural Resources Commission (NRC) may designate a trailway in Michigan as a
"Michigan Trailway. " ”Trailway" is defined in Section 3 as "a land corridor that features a
broad trail capable of accommodating a variety of public recreation uses. " To receive
Michigan Trailway designation, trail must meet definition of trailway and all of the
requirements presented in Sec. 4(1) and Sec. 8 of the act, as elaborated on the following

pages.

Developed trailways must either meet all requirements at time of designation, or trailway
manager must have written agreement with DNR Trailways Program Leader describing plan
and schedule for meeting any requirements not currently met; failure to meet this schedule 1
may result in revocation of designation. For trailways not yet developed, trailway manager
must have approved master plan or other approved document describing how and when
requirements Mllbemet;failuretomeetthisschedulemayresultinretocation of
designation.

if stqfl‘ makes tentative finding that trail is eligible for Michigan hallway designation,
trailway manager must, per Sec. 4(2) of the act, hold public hearing in vicinity of trailway to
take testimony and gather public opinion on proposed designation including, but not limited
to, proposed uses of trailway and whether or not m0torized uses are appmpriate for trailway.
Hearing must be held at location and time calculated to attract a fair representation of
opinions on the designation. Transcript or summary of testimony must be firrwarded to NRC
with designation request. -

Following the public hearing, any individual, organization, or governmental agency that
wishes to comment on a stat}r determination of eligibility firr Michigan Trailway designation
should comment to the NRC. Generally, the MRC will make decision on a proposed
Michigan Trailway designation 30-60 days firllowing the public hearing required by Sec.
4(2).

The Michigan Trailways Advisory Council (MTA C) may also review the proposed designation
before or afier the public hearing. Any individual, organization, or governmental agency
that wishes to comment on a stqfl' determination of eligibility for Michigan Trailway
designation may also comment to MTA C.

Section 5 of the act provides for designation of ”Michigan Trailway Connectors. " This
determination form does not address connector designation.

_3_ 155

Description of Property To Be Designated (Trailway Boundary):

 

a lull 0 Ali-J 0 tm.‘ u -, 01° 0 11H (1, 1011 s ' t1 ' . .611! 1' H. H 01.! v.
0 9-". .4. \fl, .n- .u I n I .l t 0 on , ~21 r (I 0 u
0 -I _-H l~ n- .I .l t t t' 0. .I nutty) is I' ”.0 or.» 0.0 J..-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attach legal description (s) and map(s). See attached map.

Legal description on file with DNR, Real Estate Division.

.4- 156

Staff Determination of Compliance With
Michigan Trailway Designation Requirements
Michigan 1993 Act 27, Sec. 4(1) & 8

For each requirement (a-l), attach fitrther explanation as necessary.

a) The land on which the trailway is located is owned by the state or a governmental
agency, or otherwise is under the long-term control of the state or a governmental
agencythroughaleese,easement, orotherarrangement.

('Long-term control" is defined as at least 20 years final date of designation.)

,.

Agmcyoiw) controlling Pm W

 

 

Nature of long-term control (fee simple ownership, easement, lease, etc.).

 

 

If more than one agency, indicate length and end points of each agency’s control.

N/A

 

Attach maps and other documentation as appropriate.

If the land 3 owned by [non-state] governmental agency(-ies), the governmental
agency(-i6) has given its consent for Michigan Trailway designation.

Yes No N/A

 

Explain

 

Attach documentation.

Note: City of Hart’s extension of trail could be considered for designation in future.

-5- 157

b) Design and maintenance of trailway and related facilities meet generally accepted
standards of public safety.

No

Explain \I r .1'.‘ 0's 49' v. " 'I-I°H -'41'-.Is‘t 0 rum-In o

 

 

Key considerations include (but may not be limited to): motor vehicle crossings (roads,
streets, driveways), separation of trail fiorn motor vehicles (including parking areas);
bridges, sideslopes, signage, security.

fitttttttttttt3...fitttltttttttttttttCtt3..tttttttttttttttttttttttttt‘tt3......

c) Trailway meets appropriate standards for its designated uses.

/
No

 

 

 

 

. . e a .0
-~.v.l or H “.v'urvn tun not .0 . mu r'r. ‘n ‘ sums.- l' .m-

E 2.1. .11“.

 

List need not be exhaustive, but must include all motorized uses and must indicate
whether general bicycling (as opposed to ”mountain biking ') is a designated use.

"Appropriate standards " are defined as design guidelines found in Trails for the meaty-
first Century, published by the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy (1993), Chapter 3; and, for
trail designated for general bicycle use, (Planning Surfaced Bicycle Paths, published by
bflJNR (1991), and Guide for Development of Bicycle Facilities published by American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Ofi‘icials (1991).

 

-6. ' 158

d) Trailway is available for designated uses on a nondiscriminatory basis.

 

 

Trailway must be open to all citizens. If a nonresident user fee, or higher nonresident
fee, is charged, fee or fee difi’erential must be reasonable.

8$$$¥¥Ctttttttttt$tttt8383333.$333338$O$831$OQQOID$38ttttttttttttttttttttttt

e) Trailway k a multi-use trail suitable for use by pedestrians, by people with
disabilities, and by other users, as appropriate.

N.

Explainfl'fi lfi"

 

 

Trail must be planned, designed, operated, and publicized for multiple use, to include, at
a minimum, walking. It must meet standards for accessibility to people with disabilities
as presented in the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and guidelines issued

pursuant to that act.’ '
.33tttttttttttttttttttitfi$..CtttfittttIttttttttt’t$.tttttfittttt.tttttttttttttt

f) Trailway is, or has potential to be, a segment of a statewide network of trailways,
or it attracts a subflntial share of its users from beyond the local area.

 

 

Trail must be of more than local significance, as measured by the criteria stated in 09.
Reasonable evidence or projections of substantial use by people fiorn beyond the local
area will be accepted, i. e. , scientific studies and quantitative data are not required.

-7- l 59

g) Trailway is marked with official Michigan trailway sign and logo at major access
points.

No

Explain

 

 

 

Trailway manager must agree to sign trailway at its expense tf designated, and maintain

designation signs.
tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt.tttttttttttttttttttttt.tttttttttttttttttttttt

h) Trailway is not directly attached to a roadway, except at road crossings.

Roadways open to rnoror vehicles are not eligible jbr Michigan Trailway designation.
This includes paved shoulders.

tttttltttttfitttttt.tttfitttttttttttt.ttttfit’8.I..880ttttttttttttttfititttttfi.3.

 

Explain

v

 

i) Where feasible, trailway offers adequate support facilities for the public, including
parking, sanitary facilitis, and emergency telephones, that are accesible to people
with disabilities and are at reasonable frequency along the trailway.

 

 

A reasonable efiort must be made to meet needs firr support facilities. These needs can
be met by facilities provided by a public agency or private organization/business, as long
as the facilities are open to all trails users, not just customers of the business. See
Trails for the Tiventy-First Century, published by the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy
(1993), pages 130-142.

.i)

-3- 160

Potential negative impacts of trailway development on owners or residents of
adjacent property are minimized through all of the following:

i) Adequate enforcement of trailway rules and regulations.

 

 

Trailway manager must document enforcement accountability and procedures.

ii) Continuation of access for trailway crossings for agricultural and other

 

 

Trailway manager must document policies and procedures allowing established crossings
to be continued.

iii) Construction and maintenance of fencing, where wry, by the owner or
operator of the trailway.

Yes No

 

 

Trailway manager must document policies and procedures (I) for deciding where fencing
is necessary and (2) providing for construction and maintenance of fencing, where found
to be necessary, at trailway manager ’s expense.

$33....tttt$ttt¢fittttifittttttt$833$Ctttfittttfittttttttfitttttttfittfifitttfii$fittttt

k) (Allows for establishment of other requirements; none have been established)

l)

-9- 161

i) In agricultural areas, a Michigan trailway may be temporarily closed by the
entity operating the trailway to allow pesticide application on lands adjoining the
trailway [Act 27, Sec. 8].

Describe policies and procedures for responding to and evaluating requests for temporary
trailway closure for pesticide application:

ir- II.- I - ' II I- I'vl‘ (IA-9 I.I II.I Is I .' II I.I I’- a I I I - I .II‘ II In I I" It'- ..
I IW II '1'- . J. {vat-2’- I II ' I II - I I I I“ u.- I -‘ II III D II In I IJI.I.I I
I I ll‘ IrI III I '-II l‘ II. II II .'III.Ir-a I I IUD Ir-I -I - u. I an

.11

 

.II III .I II I.II .II . II I .- -Is I.IIII.I -ItI .I" "ll I I.-s1IIII Is .I -l" -.I-_I.-:I .I
u. I't-I r-s .t U-l-‘t' I it’- .' {-.IrI-r-III '1 ‘III I Its-s1 u_-I.-‘ III-II
'1' .'l I' -ItI.I:= I II- - I. I It’- .r- Il-l-‘ ,I- ~O!’-l' IIIII I. II-.I .I 't'l'.
I -Il'JFI I‘ I I - .‘ll-H I I It’- .r- I II' -ItII:<III -II Animus».
II.-II Ia I.-III.I I II- .II' I - t-.I Is1 I .ItI 'I' .I I.- no II I .l UNI» II.I
4,. I ItItI.I .I.I -ItI °v IItI .I II' .I.I. .I.I Ix. l'll‘ II-.I .IIIIs Hvil‘." II
II. III I -IJI ' III III. I I..1IIII-s‘ .I.I II.I1 II IIIIIIII I I-:< I I» I:- II I.I .I.I I
II . I.-sI' I'. -II II “In I' -"ll‘ II ‘- I IIs‘. I.-s‘I°ItI-s' II 'ml‘h‘l ‘.I.«
Isr- .I .l I)III.-III .I - ..Is‘ .I I up. I I. .. .I Ir- .-II~ I.I‘.I.I I l‘ .m 'v'Im
V-Sl' I.I -...I I I .l IIII-III Il'l'v.‘ I I .ItIIr-JI I. -III .I I Ir.

I II' IIIIs HI I.’ IIII-s‘ .I I uIIr- I. -U' I.I '1Klr‘. I In. It-r-I IIIII «Ir-
‘mr- I.I .-III I " IV I I-3 I. I.I.I2I Ir- -II 1Ir-II' -|-."- -II I l-i t‘ Ist-I
I<II.II~ I - '2‘...) .' II I.Itr-a I l ‘l- I. .II1IIIII.I - .- I..I)I in IIIIIJ IJIIII‘
.l I'I-III'I 'I I. .'.'I Ir- IFII‘il'fl" . r. - h.rI{.-II

   
 

ii) The entity operating the Michigan trailway shall post the closure of the trailway or
arrange with a landowner, or other person, for the posting of signs and the closure of
the trailway during pesticide application and appropriate reentry periock [Act 27, Sec.
8].

Describe procedures for implementing temporary closures at sites where decisions are made
to temporarily close the trailway for pesticide application.

..l.‘1')l' I.- 'd I1I.-.I I I . I .u‘ I.I1IIJI l-i'-('l' III ll-ti”"rl I . II I.Itr<a
t-s‘ .ItI .I' I .I - u l' -I r. .r I .AI-.I -l',. I marr- .I.I I I I.1. In '

,I I°i In I’ .IIIIII .‘ .I_- I. .Is 1IJI- . II we a I t ' .r- IF I .I.I Ir-. II.-I-'Ir .I.-
l-r"'-. -I-'4II.‘II'I III -IJII:<I .. III. .I I (.1 Il‘III'II'IxI
I "l". "'1! °I I‘ .1?- .III I 'w -_.II I 'I - II: I.II_ I II
I.II. I' .I I IIIA I!‘ .l - I‘ -II I -,,I -II‘ .I‘ an . ‘. I. I.’ m II I I‘
3 \li II' -utI. IIIII II- - I . I -ItI 'I" .I .I I . -II I I.I "I . I-II
I.Is1IIrI’ -U' IsIII ° II IIIIII .I -'II.I.I I'll II I -ItI 'w I I .-s '-.-s I
I.I‘ '4.‘ .l -IJI ' .I I- I. w II.I .I IJI.III .I Is -II. I I III ‘ ,I 'l It»

I . '1-

 

162

Support Facilities along Kal-l-Iavan Trail
(location and type)

New east and west trailheads will be constructed in 1996-97 at 10th St. (near Kalamazoo)
and in South Haven.

Parking:

Current: east trailhead-50 cars; temporary west trailhead-35 cars. Gables,
Bloomingdale, and Grand Junction have considerable free public parking lots and/or on-
street parking. Small parking lot on trail corridor at CR687 (Kibbie).

New east trailhead will provide 75 parking spaces plus an overflow area for another 75
cars. New west trailhead will provide approx. 110 spaces.

Toilet facilities:

Current: 12 vault toilets: 2 at east trailhead, 2 at temporary west trailhead, 2 at
Bloomingdale, 6 at intermediate locations along trail. All except temporary wast trailhead
are accessible.

New west trailhead will include modern toilet building.

Telephones:

Each town has at least one public phone near the trail.

STAFF DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR ‘63

MICHIGAN TRAILWAY DESIGNATION

Michigan Department of Natural Resources
Forest Management Division
Recreation and Trails Section

Name of Trailway: WM
Trailway Manager (i.e. , managing agency or agencies)
“$2153 .11..."
Authorized Representative: Name WWW Div
Title Mgr, Mgmt Unit. Silm Lk 5.2. Address Silm Lake 5; 21k. 26:22-W 5; 21:]; Rd
City ML— ZIP 49436 Phone 616-873-3083

DNR Staff Evaluator: Name W Title MW
Date of Field Evaluation 4021124 Other Staff Present lime

Representative of Trailway Manager Present W

$8.tltttittttt.8Ctttttfit313$$8$8.33!.83*333888.33$38.8$33$3333$8$$833$$$3333.8

Staff Recommendation: This trail is (check one):

 

 

 

 

 

X_ Eligible for Michigan Trailway designation (meets all requirements of the act)

Not currently eligible for Michigan Trailway designation because it does not meet
definition of trailway stated in Sec. 3 of the Michigan Trailways Act (“a land corridor
that features a broad trail capable of accommodating a variety of public recreation
uses“).

Explain

 

 

The corridor generally must not be shared with a street or road that is open to motor
vehicles.

Not currently eligible for Michigan Trailway designation because it does not meet one or
more requirements of the Michigan Trailways Act as described on pages 4-9 (circle one
or more letters):

abcdefghijkl

I3.0......ttttttttttttttfi$¥¥t3...it...tittt.tttfitttttttttttt33$titttttttttttt

State Trails Coordinator (print) Wand

assumes n- Isa-3'

 

164
-2-

LEGAL AUTHORITY AND DESIGNAUON PROCESS

Under authority of Section 4(1) of Michigan Trailways Act (Act No. 27 of Public Acts of
1993), Natural Resources Commission (NRC) may designate a trailway in Michigan as a
"Michigan Trailway. " "Trailway ' is defined in Section 3 as 'a land corridor that features a
broad trail capable of accommodating a variety of public recreation uses. " To receive
Michigan Trailway designation, trail must meet definition of trailway and all of the
requirements presented in Sec. 4(1) and Sec. 8 of the act, as elaborated on the following

Developed trailways must either meet all requirements at time of designation, or trailway
manager must have written agreement with DNR Trailways Program Leader describing plan
and schedule for meeting any requirements not currently met; failure to meet this schedule
may result in revocation of designation. For trailways not yet developed, trailway manager
must have approved master plan or other approved document describing how and when
requirements will be met; failure to meet this schedule may result in revocation of
designation.

(f stqfl“ makes tentative finding that trail is eligible for Michigan Trailway designation,
trailway manager must, per Sec. 4(2) of the act, hold public hearing in vicinity of trailway to
take testimony and gather public opinion on proposed designation including, but not limited
to, proposed uses of trailway and whether or not motorized uses are appropriate firr trailway.
Hearing must be held at location and time calculated to attract a fair representation of
opinions on the designation. Transcript or summary of testimony must be forwarded to NRC
with designation request.

Following the public hearing, any individual, organization, or governmental agency that
wishes to comment on a surf determination of eligibility for Michigan Trailway designation
should comment to the NRC. Generally, the NRC will make decision on a proposed
Michigan Trailway designation 30-60 days following the public hearing required by See.

4 (2).

The Michigan Trailways Advisory Council (MTA C) may also review the proposed designation
before or afler the public hearing. Any individual, organization, or governmental agency
that wishes to comment on a stat?“ determination of eligibility for Michigan Trailway
designation may also comment to MTA C.

Section 5 of the act provides for designation of "Michigan Trailway Connectors. ' This
determination form does not address connector designation.

165

Description of Property To Be Designated (Trailway Boundary):

a Dull 0 It“ nut-tn -0i° om' r-h 0.4 'r-r ‘.‘ut‘ mu l‘ ° 0 e-l
v.90: e-l I ll' Org-t o u 01‘ ' 0 any." a u I 't.

I.“ l' u .‘H 0 na- H' -l' .l- n. IAI‘ Ill" u l'lh'flx' to t‘

W

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attach legal description(s) and map (s). See attached map.

Legal description on file with DNR, Real Estate Division.

166

Staff Determination of Compliance With
Michigan Trailway Designation Requirements
Michigan 1993 Act 27, Sec. 4(1) & 8 "

For each requirement (a-l), attach fitrther explanation as necessary.

a)

The land on which the trailway is located is owned by the state or a governmental
agency, or otherwise k under the long-term control of the state or a governmental
agency through a lease, easement, or other arrangement.

("Long-term l' is defined as at least 20 years fi'am date of designation.)
2 Yes > No

Agoncyoies) controlling property Michigan DNR

 

 

. Nature of long-term control (fee simple ownership, easement, lease, etc.).

Warship

 

 

If more than one agency, indieate length and end points of each agency’s control.

NIA

 

Attach maps and other documentation as appropriate.

If the land k owned by [non-state] governmental agency(-ies), the governmental
agency(-ies) has given its consent for Michigan Trailway designation.

Yes No

Explain

 

 

Attach documentation.

Note: City of Hart’s extension of trail could be considered for designation in future.

167
-5-

b) Design and maintenance of trailway and related facilities meet generally accepted
standards of public safety.

Explain so 0 ..t.- riot H. ‘v.’ D; “.140: runs 0 rte-010
immmcnmhemadeinflfiumre.

Key considerations include (but may not be limited to): motor vehicle crossings (roads,
streets, driveways); separation of trail from motor vehicles (including parking areas);
bridges, sideslopes, signage, security.

Cttttttttttttttttttttttt33"...tttttttttOttttttttttttiltttt‘fittttttttttCt.it.

 

c) Trailway meets appropriate standards for its designated uses.

Yes No

 

 

 

Designated uses: An ngn-mgmm including general hicxdinz mmn]; riding
. ..x' ‘I Hi ' ll .‘H'll H.” {..l' I ' [\f- 1' . ‘1'.A"..A.H...
. I I l I . .

List need not be exhaustive, but must include all matorized uses and must indicate
whether general bicycling (as opposed to "mountain biking ') is a designated use.

 

"Appropriate standards ' are defined as design guidelines found in Trails for the menty-
Hrst Century, published by the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy (1993), Chapter 3; and, for
trail designated for general bicycle use, Planning Surfaced Bicycle Paths, published by
WNR (1991), and Guide for Development of Bicycle Facilities published by American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Ofi‘icials (I991).

168
s

d) Trailway is available for designated uses on a nondiscriminatory basis.

Explain ' n w

 

W- o.- 03x. .' HWuH' l" m.” -l‘ um v.4 no.” or- H.‘r: H

Trailway must be open to all citizens. If a nonresident user fee, or higher nonresident
fee, is charged, fee or fee dtferential must be reasonable.

3..Ittltttfitt$tttttttttttttttttttttOCCCOQCIt...t#3Itttttttttttttfifittltttt$83

e) Trailway is a multi-use trail suitable for use by pedeflriam, by people with
disabilities, and by other users, as appropriate.

N.

Explain]! . 'fi ‘5' .

 

 

Trail must be planned, designed, operated, and publicized firr multiple use, to include, at
a minimum, walking. It must meet standards for accessibility to people with disabilities
as presented in the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and guidelines issued

pursuant to that act.
ttttttttttttttttttttitttttttttttt#8It!tIt!tIttIit.ttttttttttttttttttttttttit.

f) Trailway is, or has potential to be, a segment of a statewide network of trailways,
or it attracts a substantial share of its users from beyond the local area.

($1 No

‘\_/
Explain Ari-21 t- 0 n“- . it! «I! I):- 0, in). l '1' 0 ldl!‘ Hr um

 

 

Trail must be of more than local significance, as measured by the criteria stated in (f).
Reasonable evidence or projections of substantial use by people from beyond the local
area will be accepted, i. e. , scientific studies and quantitative data are not required.

1 69
-7-

g) Trailway is marked with official Michigan trailway sign and logo at major access
points.

Explain

 

 

 

Trailway manager must agree to sign trailway at its expense if designated, and maintain
designation signs.

fitttttit.38ttt.3ttttttt..Otttltlt.tIttttttIt.It333$.CCCCCCIOO¥CCCCCCCQCCCOCCOQ

h) Trailway b not directly attached to a roadway, except at road crossings.
(£6) ' No

Explain

 

 

Roadways open to motor vehicles are not eligible for Michigan Trailway designation.
This includes paved shoulders.

t.$3..it.It.I$3..fittttttlttttttfittttt.33...it....83....CCOCCOCCIQIQICCCCQCCCC

i) Where feasible, trailway offers adequate support facilities for the public, including
parking, sanitary facilities, and emergency telephones, that are accesible to people
with disabilities and are at reasonable frequency along the trailway.

 

 

A reasonable efl‘ort must be made to meet needs for support facilities. These needs can
be met by facilities provided by a public agency or private organization/business, as long
as the facilities are open to all trails users, not just customers of the business. See

Trails for the Tiventy-I'irst Century, published by the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy
(1993). Pages 130-142.

.i)

-.'Ill!t’-' H. menu“ . .0 .Inr-t. '1: Lot. Art-n I )

170
-3-

Potential negative impacts of trailway development on owners or residents of
adjacent property are minimized through all of the following:

i) Adequate enforcement of trailway rules and regulations.

@‘ No

\J
Explain no to .111. v 0.. t 1.1-. a) ‘t' sun's—:1:- '1

IO,

Trailway manager must document enforcement accountability and procedures.

ii) Continuation of access for trailway crossings for agricultural and other
purposes.

<_ Yes) No
Explain out ma . .o 'Jl'l . .1"! lv.‘ om l' 0 ‘.‘ll' u-. tn -
Willi-

Trailway manager must document policies and procedures allowing established crossings
to be continued. ’

 

iii) Construction and maintenance of fencing, where necessary, by the owner or
operator of the trailway.

 

cnn can use. emr u! xx. tic ll-t-b lx'l'llll-il'xl'l .oor- n-iv-l
II.“ I- t org-1| u 0 mar (v.0 ._ l“. .\|.\ -..r 11' Jun e .r-
tanHu-r-x- x Judi-J if-lx"')l‘fv!, ~21“. mu- .r-"r-t.-.'-H

 

Trailway manager must document policies and procedures (I) for deciding where fencing
is necessary and (2) pmviding for construction and maintenance of fencing, where found
to be necessary, at trailway manager 's expense.

it.tttttttttttfiCtttttttttttt.Itttttttttttttltt3*.38$it!tttttttttttttttt$tttttt

k) (Allows for establishment of other requirements; none have been established)

_9- 171

l) i) In agricultural areas, a Michigan trailway may be temporarily closed by the
entity operating the trailway to allow pesticide application on lands adjoining the
trailway [Act 27, Sec. 8].

Describe policies and procedures for responding to and evaluating requests for temporary
trailway closure for pesticide application:

 

'..II-I-" I- I' ' I'v.“v.II‘v.I I III.Ir-a I I I -I ."ll I I I'Ir..r-
nI. ' int. {-.. in.” 'l' II-s u-l«' III I- I-I II.v.I .l
C .‘I‘ 0‘. ..CI ['. II' .vAHII CI _‘III‘.f'-. O I .00“. A. . u. I'.I
'I JI’V‘CI' .I 'IIO- ”"0“ 9......IOI O I" ..O 0 .II .O.U‘I I .
l‘ol -.-W- -.I-,'-.I I '1'- .. I'. 'v. '-:=III 3‘ “II I II' uII-J'II‘I
.II.V.. '-II.II Ila. -..l'|.r-W- II-.I-." It -u¢I"II'I I.‘ II-.I‘.I III I‘
er' 0‘. .g e g‘ e . g-u'j e l' p‘. I II' .0..._0| .IO .IIuI.._'
'-.'I a I.‘eI.I I II-.II' I -. I'v.I ' I’ -II 'v I I-. I I I‘ .l “Ill-9.1
90‘. ‘ I es‘egs .OO‘.O| .I III“ ,0... as ”pie. (as I "-10.0 .II
. ‘1 e .IIQiflij u; e I" ' s' gs so. “'I .QII 0 I632 II- .- I kegs I
Is; I“ . e' .VQI I'l '° ..0| 0. .' e '0. I" 0.0‘ 't' I. ..H I.
‘V, .‘ I. . e_gu.eI e . y l' I"('o" e g. ( e r. _‘9. next I I. .II..I.O|
-I..I_I'II-. II I‘ml'lll-Ol'fl'ili I' ..IIIr-I .' -III I I r.
I.lI' II' WI'I I.‘ ' I' I I union I.“ -_II ~.I I' .-_I I II: II-r-I IIIII - Ir.
I-.'~.I ‘ ‘I I --_.-. ' It'WA‘I r-r -II Ir-II' ..5 -IIII' I" «l
of la, 1; ' I‘ef.‘ e l . 0" e s‘gge . ._, “e. a; ‘gge ese
. g . . . . ,

 

 

ii) The entity operating the Michigan trailway shall post the closure of the trailway or
arrange with a landowner, or other person, for the poaing of signs and the closure of
the trailway during pesticide application and appropriate reentry periods [Act 27, Sec.
8].

Describe procedures for implementing temporary closures at sites where decisions are made
to temporarily close the trailway for pesticide applieation.

II' 'ml‘lOI I- I-I II.’v.I .l I I.II' I.I III l'-l'l° III II IIIIII I .III.Ir-s
II I-s -II.«I .I- Ul‘-l r'm I.IIv.I-III II.'r-.v.II I
.l"m‘30l" Illlrr .I- yer-In. .‘III.Ir-a I I ' .(olr-IVJ Ir- ll~l-'-l l.-
I'q'III.’-I-'I‘v.'II'I Jib-1).!“ - III. I' I I .I I.III'II'I'~.I
I' ..‘I’ngI I .l .I‘ .l _-. -III I -II I 'l - Ir- - . I.II I II
I.II. I‘ I I IIl ' ' '1 .-. WP-l'lI-lwll' .I‘ 'l ° I.‘I.III'I I’
'sli II‘ -.'Iv.II'I II- - I. I' -III.~'-I I I. '-'!I -III I.I .'l. .I‘I
I; 'I' ..IIIr-III ' IIIII'I .I -.'I'v.'-.I .I I .I -III!- I I.‘. a.» I
I.I 'l I's'l‘fi' I- It l'Jlir.‘ III.'I I vl" IIII ' I ‘l

| . 'I.

 

172

Support Facilities along Hart-Montague Trail.

Support facilities are located in each town along the trail. These towns are spaced
about four miles apart on average.

Current parking:
Montague: south trailhead parking is very limited. Negotiations with adjacent
landowner not successful. Division is now working with City of Montague to
extend trail south into city to a new south trailhead with a large parking area.
Rothbury: adequate parking .at community park and along streets.
New Era: adequate parking at adjacent shelter and along streets.
Shelby: adequate parking on public land along trail.
Hart: paved parking at north trailhead

Current toilet facilities:
Montague: shelter with accessible rest rooms on city property adjacent to trail

Rothbury: shelter with nonaccessible vault toilets

New Era: shelter with porta-johns (not accessible); sign directs trail users to
accessible toilet at nearby business

Shelby: shelter with nonaccessible vault toilet
North trailhead (Hart): porta-johns (not accessible)
Planned accessibility improvements:

By the Fall of 1995, DNR plans to make nearly $80,000 in accessibility
improvements to trail support facilities. Funds are from the Michigan Natural
Resources Trust Fund. This includes accessible vault toilets at four sites: Polk
Road trailhead, Buchanan Road trailhead, New Era rest area, and Meinert Road
rest area. It also includes several barrier-free picnic areas and tables, drinking
fountains, surfaced bench areas along certain stretches of trail near parking
areas, and water pumps.

Telephones: public phones are available near the trail in all towns. Area has 911
system. '

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

 

 

lnteroffice Communication ©K~C\
{3 \&:_,£ W \
W W hiLuWu
March 9, 1995 (Sui Kl - i .
V\I\C\.\.\.\C°§
c: Q
T0: Hector Chiunti, Section Leader, Recreation and Trails Section
FROM: Philip Wells, Trailsways Program Leader

SUBJECT: Proposed Process for Michigan Trailway Designation

Enclosed are Michigan Trailway (MT) designation materials for the Hart-Montague
Trail. Materials include a completed draft determination form, some attachments to
that form, and a draft designation agreement between the State Trails Coordinator
(STC) and the Parks and Recreation Division (P&RD).

The basic approach I am proposing is: the STC will agree to recommend immediate
designation of the trail as a MT; P&RD will agree to take certain steps to improve the
trail at specific locations as soon as the necessary funding and/or land can be secured.
I am recommending this because there are a few "areas of concern“ along the trail
that I believe may not fully meet MT designation requirements; these are not serious
enough to delay designation but should be addressed as soon as possible. These are
listed in the draft designation agreement. The agreement also says the STC will help
P&RD secure funding and design assistance to address these concerns.

The choice of Hart-Montague for this "trial run" is arbitrary. The situation will be
similar for the other DNR trailways we plan to designate in the first batch--Kal-Haven,
LakeLands, White Pine, and 0ttawa-Muskegon--so i think a similar approach will be
needed on those.

Proposed steps from here:
1. If this material meets with your approval, I would like to forward it to Pete
Lundborg for his review and comment. I think he deserves first crack at it

before it goes to higher levels for review.

2. Revise if necessary based on Pete’s input; forward to Chiefs Thiede and
Scherschligt for their review and comment.

3. If the basic approach is acceptable to the Chiefs, complete corresponding
material for the other four trails.

174

Hector Chiunti
Page 2
March 9, 1995

4. Hold local public hearings on proposed designations for all of those trails but
White Pine. (White Pine is taken care of, because the public meetings on the
master plan also covered MT designation. However, we cannot recommend
White Pine designation until the Director approves the master plan.)

5. Prepare NRC memols) recommending MT designation for the five trails.

Please advise how I should proceed on this. I would like to give the Michigan
Trailways-Advisory Council a proposal at their March 10 meeting.

Enclosure
PW:mlf

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 175

lnteroffice Communication

April 25, 1995
TO: 0.J. Scherschligt, Chief, Parks & Recreation Division
FROM: Hector Chiunti, State Trails Coordinator

Forest Management Division

SUBJECT: Proposed Process for First Set of Michigan Trailway Designations

Enclosed are draft Michigan Trailway (MT) designation materials for three State
Park trailways: Hart-Montague, Kal-Haven, and White Pine. Materials for each
trailway include'a draft designation agreement between the State Trails
Coordinator (STC) and the Parks and Recreation Division (P&RD), a trail map, a
completed draft determination form, and attachments to the form.

Our proposal is to present these three trails, as well as LakeLands and possibly
Ottawa-Muskegon, to the Natural Resources Commission for designation as a
package.

For the two developed State Park trails--Hart-Montague and Kal-Haven--the basic
proposed approach is: l will agree to recommend immediate designation of each
trail as 3 MT; P&RD will agree to take certain steps to improve the trail at specific
locations as soon as the necessary funding and/or land can be secured. Managers
of both trails have reviewed this material and their suggestions have been
incorporated. '

For the White Pine, the process is simpler because the trail isn't developed yet.
Our evaluation is based on the draft master plan, which promises to meet all MT
designation requirements. However, we will need adoption of the master plan
before we go to the NRC for MT designation. We also ask to be involved in
decisions on design and management of the trail to insure that MT designation
requirements are met.

Proposed steps from here:

1. Trails staff conduct LakeLands site visit as soon as possible and prepare
designation materials.

2. P&RD approve our proposed approach or suggest changes.

176

Mr. 0.J. Scherschligt

April 25. 1995

Page Two

3. Forest Management decide whether to include Ottawa-Muskegon Trail in this
first set of proposed designations.

4. Decide policy on temporary trailway closure for pesticide application.

5. Michigan Trailways Advisory Council review proposed designations.

6. As required by MT Act, hold local public hearings on proposed designations
for all trails but White Pine. We would ask that trail managers participate.
(White Pine is taken care of, because the public meetings on the master plan
also covered MT designation.)

7. We prepare NRC memolsl recommending MT designation for the trails.

Please let me know'your thoughts on this.

Hezsgmc \‘A‘Lb‘géh

Enclosures

CC:

Mr. Bob Wilson, DNR
Dr. Gerald J. Thiede, DNR
Mr. Philip Wells, DNR

”Sept. P&RD 8t State Trails Coordinator sign designation agreement

R1030E

/1-B'Sept. Get public hearings on DNR calendar f» 0 ‘9" I 6 C?)

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 177

 

INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION

September 14, 1995 (Q \\C/[Ié_

TO: Hector Chiunti, State Trails Coordinator
Forest Management Division

 

FROM: Phil Wells, Trailways Program Leader, Recreation & Trails Section
Forest Management Division

SUBJECT: Michigan Trailway Designation for Kal- Haven and
Hart- -Montague Trails

We are still trying to resolve the issue of a FMD/P&RD policy on temporary trail
closure for pesticide application on adjacent lands. Frank Sapio is checking with
the Department of Agriculture. -

However, I think we can go ahead with designation agreements for Kai-Haven and
Hart-Montague. Proposed agreements are attached. Trail managers and various
other staff have already agreed to the content of these documents. If we can get
your and OJ's signatures on these, we can probably have the NRC act on the
designations at their November 9 meeting.

 

My proposed schedule is as follows:

. arrange public hearings

7.37

 

7. od- WW5“ WAS

,24=Sept. Distribute news release on public hearings; send copies of agreements
to MTAC for comment

I UIJ'
..JJ—Oet—r Hart-Montague hearing-Shelby or New Era?

7, UoV- '
42—Oct”. Kal-Haven hearing-Bloomingdale?

/; r/tru '

Submit NRC memo w/ background info.

178

Mr. Hector Chiunti
September 14, 1995
Page Two

:70 1"” ‘
yak Complete transcripts of hearings; send to NRC

7 01-4. .
-9—Nev. NRC consider designations
Please advise if you think we can go ahead with the signing of the agreements.

PW:sgfh
Attachment

179

MICHIGAN TRAILWAY DESIGNATION AGREEMENT
for
KAL-HAVEN TRAIL SESQUICENTENNIAL STATE PARK
between
STATE TRAILS COORDINATOR
and
DNR PARKS & RECREATION DIVISION

This agreement between the State Trails Coordinator and the DNR Parks and Recreation
Division IP&RD) is entered into pursuant to the Michigan Trailways Act (Public Act 451 of
1994, as amended. Part 721).

The State Trails Coordinator (STC) agrees to recommend to the Natural Resources
Commission immediate designation of the Ital-Haven Trail Sesquicentennial State Park as a
Michigan Trailway. The STC also agrees to help P&RD secure funding and design
assistance to carry out trail improvements as described below.

If the Natural Resources Commission designates the trail as a Michigan Trailway, P&RD
agrees to meet, on a continuing basis. the requirements of Sec. 4(1) and B of the Michigan
Trailways Act, which become part of this agreement, and to meet design requirements on
any improvements to or extensions of the trail.

Permitted uses of the trail will include snowmobiling (except for east two miles of the trail)
and all nonmotorized uses including general bicycling. Horseback riding may be limited to
specified segments of the trail.

P&RD also agrees to the following:'

1. As soon as the necessary funds and/or lands can be secured:

A. Redesign and modify parking area at 66th St. (CREST) in Kibbie so trail does
not pass through parking lot. lb)

8. Provide direct trail connection to road at east trailhead so users arriving at
trailhead by bicycle do not have to go through parking lot to access trail. (bl

C. Explore and pursue options to reduce grades and increase curve radii on both
sides of Blue Star Highway underpass. (cl

D. Redesign and modify trail approaches to CR653 to reduce trail grades (to 5%
or less if possible from current 10-1296). (cl

Michigan Trailway Designation Agreement for Kai-Haven Trail: Page 2 130

E. Insure that east approach to railroad crossing in Grand Junction has grade of
less than 10% (from current 14%). (c)

F. Insure safest possible snowmobile route through Grand Junction. lb)

6. Add diagonal ”wings” to all four corners of bridge railing at Silver Saddle
Drain. lb)

H. Redesign and rebuild trail crossing of CRSBB (Phoenix Highway) just east of

Bloomingdale to increase inside curve radius of trail on both sides of crossing
to at least 40 feet (c)

I. When new west trailhead completed in So. Haven, eliminate nonaccessible
toilets at temporary trailhead on Blue Star Hwy. (i)

2. When railings are replaced or added in future on any trail bridges or along the trail,
build railing to height of 54", with rub-rail at 42" (as per AASHTO bicycle guidelines).
(c)

3. When camel-back bridge at Silver Saddle Drain is replaced in future, insure new bridge
deck has maximum grade of under 10% (from current 14% max.l. (cl

724030)

‘ Letters in parentheses following items identify requirements of Seem of the
Michigan Trailways Act.

State Trails Coordinator: ‘ Parks & Recreation Division Chief:

Name (typed) m .Namg (typed) 0.J. Scherschligt
O r ..

Signature Signature

Date a! ‘ [firig- Date 9-18-95

 

  

181

MICHIGAN TRAILWAY DESIGNATION AGREEMENT
for
HART-MONTAGUE BICYCLE TRAIL. STATE PARK
between
STATE TRAILS COORDINATOR
and

DNR PARKS II RECREATION DIVISION

This agreement between the State Trails Coordinator and the DNR Perks'and Recreation
Division (P&RD) is entered into pursuant to the Michigan Trailways Act (Public Act 451 of
\ 1994. as amended, Part 721).

The State Trails Coordinator (STC) agrees to recommend to the Natural Resources
Commission immediate designation of the Hart-Montague Bicycle Trail State Park as a
Michigan Trailway. The STC also agrees to help P&RD secure funding and design
assistance to carry out trail improvements as described below.

If the Natural Resources Commission designates the trail as a Michigan Trailway, P&RD
agrees to meet. on a continuing basis. the requirements of Sec. 4(1) and B of the Michigan
Trailways Act, which become part of this agreement, and to meet design requirements on
any improvements to or extensions of the trail.

Permitted uses of the trail will include snowmobiling and all nonmotorized uses including
general bicycling. Horseback riding may be limited to specified segments of the trail.

P&RD also agrees to the following:"

1. As soon as the necessary funds and/or lands can be secured:

A. Realign trail crossings of roads to improve crossing angle and decrease
crossing distance at three locations: lb)

Walsh Rd. just north of south trailhead

Old US-31 (Oceana Or.) on south side of Shelby (Land acquisition may be
necessary)

Buchanan Rd. no. of Shelby

 

‘r

 

.
.— .aa———-—- -- -— ..-..- -—--- » .. .-- fl-.-“ .- a

Michigan Trailway Designation Agreement for Hart-Montague Trail: Page 2 182

8. Add diagonal “wings” to ends of railings on two bridges: north of M-20 and
cattle crossing north of Shelby. (b)

C. Increase trail curve radius approaching Business 31 from south near north ‘
trailhead in Shelby. (c)

0. Increase curve radius of four curves around Kurdzick Co. parking lot in
Rothbury to at least 40 feet (inside radius). (c)

E. Increase parking at south trailhead. (i)

2. When trail is resurfaced in the future, increase surfaced trail width from B to at least
10 feet (as per AASHTO bicycle guidelines). In)

3. When railings are replaced or added in future on any trail bridges or along the trail,
build railing to height of 54", with rub-rail at 42" (as per AASHTO bicycle guidelines).
(cl

7Ho’J’C-l)
' Letters in parentheses following items identify requirements of Sechfilrl’) of the
Michigan Trailways Act.

 

 

 

State Trails Coordinator: Parks & Recreation Division Chief:
Name (typed) Hector Chianti Name (typed) 0.J. Scherschligt
Signature M L Signature _ -~.-—-A

  

Date 9-18-95 Date 9-18-95

 

.. .. " ‘ - ’m. -. . H
. -..... . ,__ ' - .
.—.
—‘_ -—_.- _. .

~— -. - -—--—-

183

D N R ‘ NEWS MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES,
PO BOX 30023 LANSING MI 48909-7528

.a‘

lC-m

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE RESOURCE CONTACT: Philip Wells
19 OCT 95 517-335-3038

DNR HOSTING PUBLIC HEARINGS ON MICHIGAN TRAILWAY DESIGNATIONS

The Michigan Department of Natural Resources will hold public hearings on Nov. 1 and 2 to
take public comment on the proposed designation of two State Park trails as "Michigan Trailways."
The Michigan Trailways Advisory Council, created by the Michigan Trailways Act, will chair the
hearings.

The first hearing concerns the Hart-Montague Bicycle Trail State Park, which follows a 21-
mile inactive railroad corridor from Hart (Oceana County) to Montague (Muskegon County). The
hearing will take place at 7 pm. on Wed. Nov. 1 at the Shelby Village Hall, 189 Maple, Shelby
(Oceana County).

The second hearing concerns the Kai-Haven Sesquicentennial Trail State Park, which follows
a 34-mile inactive railroad corridor fi'om just northwest of Kalamazoo (Kalamazoo County) to South
Haven (Van Buren County). The hearing will take place at 7 pm. on Thurs. Nov. 2 at the Goblcs
High School library, 409 N. State St., Gobles (Van Buren County).

The Michigan Trailways Act authorizes the Natural Resources Commission (NRC) to
designate a trail as a Michigan Trailway if the trail meets the requirements of the act. These
requirements involve statewide significance, design standards, trail management, and response to
concerns of adjacent landowners. DNR staff has tentatively found that these two trails meet the
requirements. 1

(more)

Rev. 0385

PageZ 184

Hart-Montague and Kai-Haven are the first trails proposed for Michigan Trailway designation.
if designated, the trails will carry a special logo and be publicized as part of the Michigan Trailway
system. Designation means the public can be assured that the trails meet, and will continue to meet,
high standards of design and management.

After the public hearings, the DNR will decide whether to recommend that the NRC designate
the two trails. The NRC is likely to consider designation at its Dec. 6-7 meeting in Lansing.

To obtain a copy of designation materials, call 517-373-9483. ’

###

 

fiat 185
DNRS /
Department Calendar .
Vol. 3 No. 22 W
October 30, 1995 / LI ?9

Publication Schedule
The DNR Calendar is published every two weeks, on alternate Mondays, by the Michigan Department
of Natural Resources. We welcome your comments on style. format and information to ensure that this

calendar is as informative as possible.

New DNR and DE 0 Calendars
Pursuant to Exécutive Order 1995-18, a new Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and a new

Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) are created, effective October 1, 1995. The DEQ has a
separate calendar dealing with matters pertaining to environmental issues, permitting and related
regulations. Both calendars will be sent to those on the "old' DNR Calendar mailing list except for
individuals who request otherwise.

Calendar Mailing Lists
For any changes or corrections to the DNR Calendar mailing list, call Tina Kellogg at 517-373-2997,

or send your correct name and address to:

DNR Calendar

Michigan Department of Natural Resources ,
PO. Box 30028

Lansing MI 48909-7528

For any changes or corrections to the DEQ Calendar mailing list, call 517-335-3153, or send your
correct name and address to:

DEQ Calendar

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
PO. Box 30473

Lansing MI 48909—7973

lntemet Access

The DNR Calendar is now available on the lntemet on the DNR home page. which is at
HTTP:INWWV.DNR.STATE.MI.US, and at the DNR's anonymous FTP site, which is
INFOLINEDNRSTATEMI.US. If you would like to remove your name from the "paper" mailing list,
call Tina Kellogg at 517-373-2997.

Dial-Up Bulletin Board System (BBS) Access

This calendar is also available on the DNR's dial-up bulletin board system (BBS). To use this system,
call 1-800-699-MDNR, or locally call 517-373-3081. Set your modem to no parity, 8 data bits and 1
stop bit. All speeds up to 14.4 are supported. ANSI BBS protocol works best, but most others are

supponed.

 

 

PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF: Michigan Department of Natural Resources TOTAL COST: $378.28
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES PRINTED: 3.600 COST PER COPY: $0.105

186

Timetable for Decisions
No decision listed in the DNR Calendar will be made prior to seven days after the initial calendar
publication date.

Game and Fish Orders -

1996 SPRING WILD TURKEY HUNTING SEASON. lnforrnation Contact: John Urbain, 517-373-1263.
Decision-maker: DNR Director.

DEER MANAGEMENT UNIT 215 REGULATIONS. lnfonnation Contact: Ed Langenau, 517-373-1263.
Decision-maker: DNR Director.

LEGALLY BLIND HUNTERS. lnforrnation Contact: David Purol, 517-335-3411. Decision-maker:
DNR Director.

USE OF GROUND BLINDS ON PUBLIC LANDS. Information Contact: Ed Langenau, 517-373-
1263. Decision-maker: DNR Director.

Land Transactions

DIRECT CONVEYANCE OF DEDICATED LAND: Pigeon River State Forest, Otsego County.
Information Contact: David A. Yankee, 517-373-1241. Decision-maker. DNR Director.

DIRECT OIL AND GAS LEASE (NONDEVELOPMENT): Rapid River Township, Kalkaska County;
Croton Township, Otsego County. Information Contact: Gina Parks cho, 517-373-7666. Decision-
maker. DNR Director.

EXCHANGES: Ottawa Muskegon Trail, Ottawa County. lnforrnation Contact: David A. Yankee, 517-
373-1241. Decision-maker: DNR Director.

FORESTRY LAND ACQUISITION: Pere Marquette State Forest, Wexford County. Information
Contact: David A. Yankee, 517-373-1241. Decision-maker. DNR Director.

MUNICIPAL CONVEYANCE OF UNDEDICATED STATE-OWNED LAND (326 LOTS & PARCELS):
City of Algonac, Port Huron Township, St. Clair County; Cities of Detroit, Ecorse, Melvindale, Wayne
and Wyandotte, Redford Township, Wayne County; Blue Lake Township, VIllage of Lakewood Club,
Muskegon County; VIllage of Mancelona, Antrim County; City of Saginaw and Carrollton Township,
Saginaw County; \fIllage of Marcellus and Newberg Township, Cass County; Cities of Mt. Clemens and
Warren, Macomb County; City of Jackson, Jackson County; Somerset Township, Hillsdale County.
Information Contact: Lois Hinkle, 517-373-1251. Decision-maker: DNR Director.

OIL AND GAS LEASE SALE, DECEMBER 12, 13, 14, 1995 - 26 COUNTIES. lnforrnation Contact:
Gina Parks cho, 517-373-7666. Decision-maker: DNR Director.

PARKS AND RECREATION LAND ACQUISITION: George Lake Access Site No. 65-9, Ogemaw
County. lnforrnation Contact: David A. Yankee, 517-373-1241. Decision-maker: DNR Director.

WILDLIFE LAND ACQUISITIONS: Rose Lake Vlfildlife Research Area, Clinton County. Allegan State
Game Area and Kalamazoo Mini-Wildlife Area, Allegan County; Maple RiverlGratiot-Saginaw

Connector, GratIot County Information Contact: David A Yankee, 517- 373- 1241. Decisidfilnaker:
DNR Director.

Other Decisions Before the Office of the Director

 

INTENT TO SELL STATE PARK USER DATA BASES. lnfonnation Contact: Neil LaCasse, 517-
335-3025. Decision-maker: DNR Director.

RECREATION BOND FUND APPLICATIONS FOR LOCAL RECREATION DEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS. Consideration of DNR staff recommendation to fund applications received April 1, 1995.
lnforrnation Contact: Michael McDonald, Administrative Services Division, 517-335-3042.
Decision-maker: DNR Director.

I

I
V-

s
H

Publrc Hearings Meetings Events

Note: Persons with disabilities needing accommodations for effective participation in any of the
meetings noted in this calendar should call or write the appropriate meeting information contact
listed below at least a week in advance to request mobility, visual, hearing, or other assistance.

NOVEMBER 1
BY THIS DATE, 165 SUCCESSFUL ELK HUNTERS WILL BE NOTIFIED THAT THEY CAN
PARTICIPATE IN THE DECEMBER 12-19 HUNT.

BY THIS DATE, APPROXIMATELY 295,000 SUCCESSFUL APPLICANTS WILL RECEIVE THEIR
ANTLERLESS DEER HUNTING LICENSES IN THE MAIL.

CANADA GOOSE SEASON CLOSES IN THE NORTH ZONE.

RESIDENT MUSKRAT AND MINK TRAPPING SEASON OPENS IN ZONE 2.
RESIDENT RACCOON TRAPPING SEASON OPENS IN ZONE 3.
RESIDENT BADGER TRAPPING SEASON OPENS IN ZONE 3.

roe-9:00 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED MICHIGAN TRAILWAY DESIGNATION FOR
HART-MONTAGUE BICYCLE TRAIL STATE PARK. Hearing to take public comment on proposed
designation of the trail as a Michigan Trailway under the Michigan Trailways Act, to be held at the
Shelby Village Hall, 189 Maple, Shelby (Oceana County). To obtain a copy of the designation
materials, call 517-373-9483. Information Contact: Philip Wells, 517-335-3038.

NOVEMBER 2
CANADA GOOSE SEASON CLOSES IN THE SOUTH ZONE, EAST OF US-27l127. (See exceptions
for goose management units in the Michigan Waterfowl Hunting Guide.)

7:00—9:00 pm. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED MICHIGAN TRAILWAY DESIGNATION FOR
KAL-HAVEN TRAIL SESQUICENTENNIAL STATE PARK. Hearing to take public comment on
proposed designation of the trail as a Michigan Trailway under the Michigan Trailways Act, to be held
at the Gables High School library, 409 North State Street, Gobles (Van Buren County). To obtain a
copy of the designation materials, call 517- 373.9483. Information Contact: Philip Wells, 517- 335-
3038.

188

NOVEMBER 7

4:30 pm. PUBLIC HEARING OF THE BETSIE RIVER ZONING REVIEW BOARD at the Weldon
Township Hall, Thompsonville, to decide on a request for variance from the Natural River Zoning
Standards on the Betsie River. Information Contact: Jan Fenske, 517-275-5151.

NOVEMBER 8 _

9:00 a.m. MICHIGAN FOREST ROUNDTABLE with objectives to develop a shared vision, a set of
principles, and a recommendation for action that will result in improved policies for our nation’s forests.
The roundtable will be held at Treetops Sylvan Resort, Gaylord (Otsego County). lnforrnation Contact:
Wanda Stevens, Forest Management Division, 517-373-1056.

6:30 pm. OFF-ROAD-VEHICLE (ORV) ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING at the Ralph A.
MacMulIan Conference Center, 104 Conservation Drive, Roscommon (Roscommon County).
Information Contact: Margo Fuller, Forest Management Division, 517-373-9483.

NOVEMBER 9

1:00 pm. NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING, Library of Michigan, 717 W. Allegan,
Lansing. Public appearances before the NRC may be scheduled by calling Teresa Gloden.
lnfonnation Contact: Teresa Gloden. 517-373-2352.

NOVEMBER 10
RESIDENT BEAVER AND OTTER TRAPPING SEASONS OPEN IN UNIT B. See Michigan Hunting and
Trapping Guide for Open and closed areas.

MUSKRAT AND MINK TRAPPING SEASON OPENS FOR RESIDENTS IN ZONE 3.

NOVEMBER 11
A DEER SEASON INFORMATION CENTER will be staffed by DNR personnel at the Carl T. Johnson
Center at Mitchell State Park, Cadillac, from 10: 00 a. m. to 5. 00 p. m.

NOVEMBER 12

DEER SEASON INFORMATION CENTERS will be staffed by DNR personnel at the Carl T. Johnson
Center at Mitchell State Park, Cadillac, from 10:00 am. to 5:00 pm, and at the Clare and St. Ignace
MDOT Welcome Centers from 8:00 am. to 5:00 pm.

CANADA GOOSE SEASON CLOSES IN THE SOUTH ZONE, WEST OF US-27/127. (See exceptions
for goose management units in the Michigan Waterfowl Hunting Guide.)

NOVEMBER 13 ,

DEER SEASON INFORMATION CENTERS will be staffed by DNR personnel at the Clare and St. Ignace
MDOT Welcome Centers from 8:00 am. To 5:00 pm.

NOVEMBER 14

DEER SEASON INFORMATION CENTERS will be staffed by DNR personnel at the Clare and St. Ignace
MDOT Welcome Centers from 8:00 am. to 5:00 pm.

ARCHERY DEER SEASON CLOSES UNTIL DECEMBER 1.

PHEASANT SEASON CLOSES IN ZONES 2 AND 3.

WOODCOCK, CROW, SHARPTAIL GROUSE, AND RUFFED GROUSE SEASONS CLOSE.

(NOVEMBER 14, continued) 189
COYOTE HUNTING SEASON CLOSES IN ZONE 1.

BADGER TRAPPING SEASON CLOSES IN ZONE 2.

CANADA AND OTHER GEESE SEASONS CLOSE IN THE MUSKEGON WASTEWATER GOOSE
MANAGEMENT UNIT. This area may be closed earlier if the quota has been reached.

RAILS AND COMMON SNIPE SEASONS CLOSE STATEWIDE.

NOVEMBER 15
FIREARMS DEER SEASON OPENS.

NONRESIDENT FUR HARVESTER SEASON OPENS. (See Michigan Hunting and Trapping Guide.)

NONRESIDENT BEAVER AND OTTER TRAPPING SEASONS OPEN IN UNIT A. See the Michigan
Hunting and Trapping Guide for open and closed areas.

CANADA GOOSE SEASON CLOSES IN THE MIDDLE ZONE.

9:30 am. MEETING OF THE MICHIGAN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FINANCIAL
ASSURANCE (MUSTFA) POLICY BOARD at the Lansing Center, 333 E. Michigan Avenue, Lansing.
Information Contact: Patty Morlock, 1-800-4-MUSTFA or 517-373-6247.

NOVEMBER 16 .
DEER CHECK STATIONS will be open November 16-19, 10:00 am. - 6:00 pm, at the Big Rapids and
Shepherd rest areas and the Birch Run weigh station.

NOVEMBER 17
DEER CHECK STATIONS will be open November 16-19, 10:00 am. - 6:00 pm, at the Big Rapids and
Shepherd rest areas and the Birch Run weigh station.

NOVEMBER 18
DEER CHECK STATIONS will be open November 16-19, 10:00 am. - 6:00 pm, at the Big Rapids and
Shepherd rest areas and the Birch Run weigh station.

NOVEMBER 19
DEER CHECK STATIONS will be open November 16-19, 10:00 am. - 6:00 pm, at the Big Rapids and
Shepherd rest areas and the Birch Run weigh station.

DECEMBER 6

4:30 pm. NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING, Lansing Center, 333 E. Michigan
Avenue, Lansing. Public appearances before the NRC may be scheduled by calling Teresa Gloden.
Information Contact: Teresa Gloden. 517-373-2352.

DECEMBER 7
9:00 am. NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING, Library of Michigan, 717 W. Allegan,
Lansing. lnforrnation Contact: Teresa Gloden. 517-373-2352.

DECEMBER 12

10:30 am. SNOWMOBILE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING at the Ralph A. MacMulIan
Conference Center, 104 Conservation Drive, Roscommon (Roscommon County). Information Contact:
Margo Fuller, Forest Management Division, 517-373-9483.

190

AGENDA
NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
December 6-7, 1995

Lansing Center
333 E. Michigan Avenue
Lansing, Michigan
-and-
Library of Michigan
717 W. Allegan
Lansing, Michigan

e

 

WEDNESDAY, December 6, 1995 - 1:00 pm. - 7th Floor Mason Building
Conference Room, 530 W. Allegan. Lansing

Fish, Wildlife and Law Policy Committee Meeting (Agenda Attached)

 

WEDNESDAY, December 6, 1995 - 2:30 pm. - 7th Floor Mason Building
Conference Room, 530 W. Allegan, Lansing

Forestry, Parks and Land Policy Committee Meeting (Agenda Attached)

 

WEDNESDAY, December 6, 1995 - 4:30 pm. - Lansing Center. Meeting
Rooms 204-205

Commission Discussion

1 A AR N. ' (The actual order of appearances MAY change
- and MAY BE grouped by subject matter.)

Maryann Noah, Chelsea - Sewer Development by Half Moon Lake and
Silver Lake‘ State Parks

Elaine Suppes, Lakeshore Convention and Visitor’s Bureau - Perch Fishing

Don Nichols, South Haven Perch Charter Boats - Perch Fishing

 

191
AGENDA
Page 2
December 6-7, 1995

 

WEDNESDAY, December 6, 1995 - 7:30 pm. - Lansing Center. Meeting
Rooms 204-205

Safari Club Award Presentation

P P A A ° (continued)

Denny Grinold, Lansing - Summer Perch Fishing

 

THURSDAY, DECEMBER 7, 1995 - 9:00 am. - Library of Michigan E

§IAEEBEEQBI§

Director’s Report - Michael D. Moore - Report of Activities including status
of organization, legislative activity, litigation, transition

 

and staffing.
I. W BABES
None
II. N AN l

1. NRC Committee Reports
2. Shikar-Safari Club International Award
III. L, 2 IN - ‘ 1.; i 0 ’ 0 I 0 . I'L

Approval of Minutes - October 25, 1995 Natural Resources Commission
Meeting

Approval of Minutes - November 9, 1995, Natural Resources Commission
Meeting

IV. NF RMATI N N Y-NA RAL R MMI

Designation of Hart-Montague and KaI-Haven Trails as
Michigan Trailways - For Information Only ................................... 1-2

 

STATE OF MICHIGAN A P P R O V a”
ATURAL RESOURCES 5:5. mi {I I‘(‘ ,c,_ {I /:L ' 1921

COMMISSION ) Zcannula"
JERRY c. BAR‘INIK @ 5’ Z. ’5} (”“12 I\.

KEITHJ. CHARTERS (men-rm am so an eta-tunes)

 

 

 

$233221?“ . JOHN ENGLER. Governor
mam: DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL R SOURCES
JOEYMSPANO STEVENSTMASONBUILOING.POBOX3m20.LANSINGMm7S29

MICHAEL D. MOORE. Director

November 9, 1995
Resubmitted: December 11, 1995

Memorandum to the Natural Resources Commission

SUBJECT: Designation of Hart-Montague and Kai-Haven Trails as Michigan Trailways

Authority:

The Michigan Trailways Act of 1993 (now Part 721 of PA 451 of 1994. as amended).
authorizes the Commission to designate a trailway in Michigan as a “Michigan Trailway" if it
meets the requirements of the act.

Discussion and Bagkgrggng:

The State Trails Coordinator has evaluated the Hart-Montague Bicycle Trail State Park and the
Kal-Haven Trail Sesquicentennial State Park, and found that they meet the requirements of
the act. These are the first trails proposed for Michigan Trailway designation. The State
Trails Coordinator and the Chief of the Parks and Recreation Division have signed a
designation agreement listing certain improvements to be made in both trails in the future.

The act requires the Commission, in consultation with the governmental agencies in which
the trailway is located, to establish uses to be permitted on the trailway. The act also
requires that a public hearing be held in the vicinity of the trail to take public testimony on the
proposed designation including, but not limited to, the proposed uses of the trailway and
whether or not motorized uses are appropriate for the trailway.

The Department conducted a public hearing for the Hart-Montague Trail in Shelby on
November 1, 1995. and for the Kai—Haven Trail in Gobles on November 2, 1995. The
hearings were publicized through the Department calendar, 3 general news release, and
special notification to local news media. All local units of government through which the trails
pass were invited to send representatives to the local public hearing and/or to submit written
comments.

No objections to designation were voiced, either at the hearings or in writing. No local unit
or citizen proposed changes in the current permitted uses of the trails. which are as described
in this memo.

The Michigan Trailways Advisory Council, appointed by the Commission. chaired the public
hearings and supports the proposed designations.

A report will be provided to the Commission presenting the text of the Michigan Trailways
Act, transcripts of the public hearing testimony, and other information supporting designation.

$3232. I

193

R mmn in:

The Director recommends that the Commission designate the Hart-Montague Bicycle Trail
State Park and the Kal-Haven Trail Sesquicentennial State Park as Michigan Trailways, and
that the Commission approve the following designated uses of the trails:

Hart-Montague: Snowmobiling and all nonmotorized uses. (Horseback riding may be limited
to specified segments of the trail.)

KaI-Haven: Snowmobiling and all nonmotorized uses. (Snomebiling and horseback riding
may be limited to specified segments of the trail.)

6.»? . (RM (AL/M934...

O. J. cherschligt. Chief Hector Chiunti. State rails Coordinator

Parks and Recreati n Division Forest Man 99 nt Division
| fq/ I
W W.,...“

Gerald J. Thiede. Chief C. Edwin Meadows. Jr.
Forest Management Division Deputy Director

 

 

 
     

l have analyzed and discussed this recommendation with staff and concur.

QILM9>ZW lZ/S/‘jf

ichael D. Moore
Director ' Date

 

194

AGENDA
NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
December 6-7, 1995

Lansing Center
333 E. Michigan Avenue
Lansing, Michigan
and—
Library of Michigan
717 W. Allegan
Lansing, Michigan

r

 

WEDNESDAY, December 6, 1995 - 1:00 p.m. - 7th Floor Mason Building
Conference Room. 530 W. Allegan, Lansing

Fish. Wildlife and Law Policy Committee Meeting (Agenda Attached)

 

WEDNESDAY. December 6, 1995 - 2:30 p.m. - 7th Floor Mason Building
Conference Room, 530 W. Allegan. Lansing

Forestry, Parks and Land Policy Committee Meeting (Agenda Attached)

 

WEDNESDAY, December 6, 1995 - 4:30 p.m. - Lansing Center, Meeting
Rooms 204-205

Commission Discussion

I P R N. ’ (The actual order of appearances MAY change
and MAY BE grouped by subject matter.)

Maryann Noah, Chelsea - Sewer Development by Half Moon Lake and
Silver Lake State Parks

Elaine Suppes, Lakeshore Convention and Visitor’s Bureau - Perch Fishing

Don Nichols, South Haven Perch Charter Boats - Perch Fishing

 

195
AGENDA
Page 2
December 6—7, 1995

 

WEDNESDAY, December 6, 1995 - 7:30 p.m. - Lansing Center, Meeting
Rooms 204-205

Safari Club Award Presentation

P A AN ° (continued)

Denny Grinold, Lansing - Summer Perch Fishing

 

THURSDAY. DECEMBER 7. 1995 - 9:00 a.m. - Library of Michigan i

W

Director’s Report - Michael D. Moore - Report of Activities including status
of organization, legislative activity, litigation. transition
and staffing.

 

I. W BASES
None

II. W
1. NRC Committee Reports
2. Shikar-Safari Club International Award

III. NW IN -NA 1:. ;. . 3 MW I'LAHI'L

Approval of Minutes - October 25, 1995 Natural Resources Commission
Meeting

Approval of Minutes - November 9, 1995, Natural Resources Commission
Meeting

IV. O'OOINFRMATIN N Y- T R ' 0 ' Jun I

Designation of Hart-Montague and Kal-Haven Trails as
Michigan Trailways - For Information Only ................................... 1-2

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATI86N

MIDLAND COUNTY SERVICES BUILDING - 220 WEST ELLSWORTH STREET
MIDLAND. MICHIGAN 48640-5194 0 PHONE (517) 832-6870

 

 

 

.LLIAM C. GIBSON
DIRECTOR

July 30, 1996

Philip Wells, Trailways Program Manager
Michigan Department of Natural Resources
Forest Management Division

PO. Box 30028
Lansing, MI 48909

DF\

MW

After review and discussion with the Midland County Parks and Recreation Commission, I am
pleased to request, on their behalf, that the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan be
considered for Michigan Trailways designation. The Commission feels that the Pete Marquette
fulfills the requirements for inclusion, and looks forward to providing you with any information
necessary to document same.

It would be an honor for the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail to be part of the Michigan Trailways
system. I look forward to hearing from you on the Commission’s request.

Sincerely,

mass»;

William C. Gibson
Director

xc Craig Gosen, President, Parks and Recreation Commission
Marc McGill, Administrator/Controller

WCG

File: c:\..\pn.mtl

 

 

197

OFFICE OF THE MAYOR

91h Floor. City Hall
124 West Michigan Avenue
Lansrng. Michigan 48933-1694
(517) 483-4141 (Voice)
(517) 483-4088 (TDD)
(517) 483-7630 (FAX) "

 

July 21, 1993

Larry DeVuyst, Chairman

Natural Resources Commission

Michigan Department of Natural Resources
P.O. Box 30028

Lansing, MI 48909

Dear Mr. DeVuyst:

Pursuant to section 4 of the newly-enacted Michigan Trailways
Act, I am hereby submitting the City of Lansing's petition for
designation of the Lansing River Trail as a Michigan Trailway.

As you know, the Lansing River Trail is one of the country's
longest urban trails that offers users a variety of recreational
and educational opportunities.

The City of Lansing is also currently undertaking efforts to
expand the River Trail both at its northern trailhead near the
Grand River Bridge and at its eastern most location near Kalamazoo
Street and Clippert. -

The River Trail has proven to be one of the community's most
valuable assets drawing people from all parts of the state and has
the potential to be the genesis of the revitalization of the
downtown area.

The City of Lansing is prepared to work with both the
Department of Natural Resources and the Natural Resources
Commission in meeting the criteria for Michigan Trailway
designation as defined in section 4 of the Act, including the
requirements for a public hearing.

Please contact R. Eric Reickel, Director of the City‘s Parks

and Recreation Department for further discussion on this issue
(517-483-4275).

"Equal Opportunity Employer"

198

Mr. Larry DeVuyst
July 22, 1993
Page 2

I am hopeful that the Lansing River Trail will be one of the first
trails to receive the honored designation of a Michigan Trailway.

Sincerely, ~fl//
m. a/Zv/

James A. Crawford
Mayor

cc: Natural Resources Commission Members
Rollie Hermes, DNR Director
Jerry Thiede, Forest Management Division
Hector Chiunti, Forest Management Division
Phil Wells, Forest Management Division

STATE OF MICHIGAN

I
H ‘0'
.I'. '

\TURAL Resouncss @ 199
C OMMISSION
JERRY c. mmn
,“Aum'afi‘a'3m JOHN ENGLER, Governor *
313.2531. DEPARTMENT o F NATURAL RESOURCES.
JULY H. SPMO m 1’. an.» M no. I“ 3002.. m w 4000.
Donna» 3. until I}. ,

August 24, 1993

Mr. James A. Crawford, Mayor
Office of the Mayor

124 West Michigan Avenue
Lansing, Michigan 48933-1694

Dear Mayor Crawford:

I am responding on behalf of the Natural Resources Commission (NRC) to your letter
dated July 21 , 1993, to Larry DeVuyst, NRC Chairman. Your letter proposes
designation of the Lansing River Trail as a Michigan Trailway under the new Michigan
Trailways Act.

We agree that Lansing’s River Trail is an outstanding asset to the Lansing area. Be
assured your proposal will receive prompt and careful consideration. Over the next
few weeks, trails staff will be finalizing the criteria and procedures for Michigan
Trailway designation. We will then be glad to work with the City to assess Lansing's
River Trail in relationship to the criteria.

If you or your staff have any questions, please contact Hector Chiunti, State Trails
Coordinator, at 335- 3040.

Sincerely,

WW

Gerald J. Thiede
State Forester
517-373-1275

GJszlf
cc: Mr. R. Eric Reickel, Director of City Parks

Natural Resources Commission
Mr. Michael D. Moore, Deputy DireCtor, MDNR

I 10
It!)

- --‘---———. --*—“I—-

200

Appendix C

FRIENDS h tip/M2516". mm
A I or ' I N6+/ ((03er
F” IQUQ-I/zd, /l +m

 

 

The Friends of the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail support the development and enhancement of the Rail-Trail from Midland,
M] to Coleman, MI

 

 

 

Meet the Bgard Mgp

 

 

 

 

Pere Marquette Rail-Trail

 

 

Membership is $10 per year for an Individual, $25 per year for Family and $50 per year for Business.
Send Membership to:
Friends of the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail
PO. Box 505
Midland, MI 48640- 0505
Upcoming Activities
0 MARCH for PARKS April 19, 1997

0 Magic Ride My 31, 1997
0 Pete Marguene Summer Pegsg'yal August 10,1997
0 Pere Marquette Qenluy August 10, 1997

Come on back often for updates and additional information on what is happening with the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail.

Fun Sites to Visit

0 Rail Trail C e 202
0 Midlan Dail Ne TheS ure

 

 

 

 

 

 

O Tri-Cig Cyglists Le__ague of Michigan Bigyclists American ng'ls Kay Trail eat Rail T 'l
Informatign In Line Skater M azine

 

 

 

A ive k e i 'on.
White Pine Trail (Cadillac)
Pete Mar uette T '1 (Reed City)
If you have comments or suggestions, email us at fopmrt@mdn. net

 

 

 

This page created with Netscape Navigator Gold

Welcome to the Pere Marquette ,0,
Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan

The Pere Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan is a linear park that extends from downtown Midland to Clare. Currrently
the trail is fully paved from Midland to Coleman MI, 21 miles. The Park is situated on the abandoned CSX Railroad
property (originally the Pere Marquette Railroad). It is designated for year round non-motorized recreation and alternative
transportation. Those using the park are walkers, hikers, runners, bicyclists, wheelchairs, cross country skiers and roller
skates.

 

The trailhead Is situated In the downtown area of Midland at the
confluence of the Tittabawassee and Chrppewa Rivers. This area has become a central part of the Downtown with the
addition of the Tridge, (a unique three branched bridge) which Joins three park areas, the Chippewasee park, St Charles ,
Park and the Downtown area and Farmers Market. Farmer's Market is open on Wednesday morning and Saturday
morning during the spring and summer months. There are canoe rentals and fishing areas also located along the
rivers.Starting at the Farmers Market the trail winds northwesterly nmning parallel to Main Street It actually joins the
former railbed as it crosses under The Robinson Bridge (MZO) as it heads west from Midland.

 

 

 

go to: Next Stop M,

FOPMRT Home Page

FRIENDS
‘3"

m mmum
- .. RWi‘TWi-Ii i:

 

204

205

 

» - -- - - . ' . ~ .. ~ ' .. _. The first portion of the trail follows the
Tittebawassee River, until it reaches Emerson Park at Currie Parkway. Curry Parkway Is the first intersection, and crosses
the Tittabawassee river via the Upper Bridge. This Bridge 15 a State of Michigan Historical Site, and Is an example of
Pratt-through Trust design. The arches were added recently to provide additional re-enforcement to the bridge and-allow
its continued use to the recreational facilities across the Tittabawassee River. At one time this bridge was the main route
west of the city until the Robinson bridge was completed in 1956. The trail then goes across the north side of Emerson
Park. Emerson Park contains the Currie Stadium and additional Softball diamonds used extensively for tournaments and
championships from Scholastic, State, National and International. Emerson Park has been the Site of the ISF World
Championships in 1984 and again in 1996. Teams representing 22 countries competed for the World Championship. As
the trail continues from Emerson park two significant historical sites are on the left, The Bradley House, a turn of the
Century home that is often the center of many of the Midland Historical Society activities about early life in the Midland
Area. The Herbert H. Dow Museum is a replica of the first brine well and plant that was the beginnings of the Dow
Chemical Company.

 

The trail begins to show the natural settings as it leaves the city area and heads to Dublin Road. The Trail runs along the
Northwood University campus to the South and the H.H. Dow High School on the North. An observation platform is
located at a wetland site. This site is natures musical paradise in the spring as fiogs and birds are heard making their
seasonal calls in the evenings. It is quite common to see deer and wild turkeys along this portion of the trail, even though it i
technically within the city limits.

Next Stop Averill,

 

or back to FOPMRT Home Page _

 

As the park crosses Dublin Avenue (three miles from the Tridge) it leaves the City limits and becomes a Midland County
Park. From here on the trail parallels Saginaw Road for almost the entire. distance as it passes through a variety of
landscapes, over rivers and streams, along side existing parks and through small communities. Numerdiggmall businesses
are located along Saginaw Road and in the communities and provide services to Trail users.

9 . f, ’ ' ..
.>«
'5‘ "

‘ “ v). ‘3'} “5 24'. 5’31"
5‘1, gkyfi.‘ A, .“ . A“

.‘

 

Heading westward from Midland a Wooded Character is evident as there are woodlands on the side of the trail and the
north side of Saginaw Road. Adjacent to the Rail-Trail are woods rich in pine, maple, oak and birch with an interesting
understory.

 

 

About 5 miles from Midland is the Avril] rollway. A short gravel trail leads to the placard that celebrates this area. The
rollway is a cany over fom the lumbering days that lead to the railroad coming to this area originally. The Midland area was
a lumber center during the 19th century, and the Tittabawassee River was used to float the logs to Midland and on to
Saginaw, and Bay City. Logs were stored at the rollway during the winter months and the river was frozen. When spring
came and the thaw, the logs were rolled down the banks into the river, heading to the mills downstream

 

207

 

80 to Next Stop m

. '~'~,~~~_~~..-.‘..,s .

’2 tifi?~$éli:m,.

} ~ 933.513, 7;... 2., .

back to FOPMRT Home Page » -

 

 

 

 

The trail enters Sanford, Michigan on the South'Side and a staging area and rest area is located here. There are numerous
establishments where food and drink are available. After crossing the Tittabawassee River Bridge, several attractions are
near the intersection with 7 mile road. Across the road is the Sanford Historical Park. Several rehabilitggd historic buildings
fiom Midland Counties Past are here and are open to the pUblic at certain times. Also here is a steam locomotive and a
caboose from the Pete Marquette Railroad.Signs also point the way to Sanford Veterans Memorial Park, the entrance is a
short distance fi'om the Rail-Trail. Sanford Lake Park is on the North Side of Saginaw Road, signs also point the way.

Here swimming is available and picnic areas and a relaxing beach from on Sanford Lake. During the summer season a
refreshment stand is open. Admission is free although there is a parking fee for motorized vehicles.

Bridge over the Tlttabawassee River-Sanford MI

 

'..,‘ _ J“ ' f
..........

Sanford Veterans Memorial Park has a nature trail and has some of the few remaining Old Growth trees in this part of
Michigan. Pine Haven, Midland County Recreation Area This is a forested area with trails for mountain biking and cross
country skiers depending on the season. Wild flowers are prevalent in Pine Haven as they are along the Rail-TrailBetween
the crossing of 8 mile road and 9 mile road, a small gravel pathway leads to Arbutus Bog. This is a pristine floating Bog of
state wide significance. Please do not leave the wooden walkway and platform. The platform and walkway were
established to allow visitors to experience the bog with minimal damage or interference.

The next several miles of the Trail are evident of a Wet Sand Prairie that features a rare plant community with State
Threatened and special concern species, this is also of State-wide significance. Please do not pick or damage flowers along
the trail, efi‘orts are being extended to preserve this setting for future generations to enjoy. Please take plenty of pictures,
they do not wilt or change color.The wooded land continues to the North Bradley area. The trail has had a slight elevation
to it. Just before North Bradley is the West Salt River Bridge. This is the highest point on the Rail-Trail, not due to its
elevation, but because the West Salt River has cut a valley through this part of the county.From North Bradley to Coleman
the adjacent land use is primarily agricultural. There are some wooded areas along the fields. Pere Marquette Road now
runs parallel to the Rail-Trail South of the TrailAs you enter Coleman fiom the East you see the evidence of the agricultural
basis of the community. The silos of the grain elevator are observed from outside the city limits. The City of Coleman is
representative of a small agricultural community. Commercial development is along the North side of Saginaw Road, and
residential on the south side of the trail.

Several projects have recently enhanced the Coleman downtown area in addition to the Rail-Trail. A Streetscape project
was recently completed, and restoration of the old Railroad station is underway. A senior center has been constructed to

the south side of the Trail. A full staging area for the Rail-Trail is also in the Coleman areaThe Section of Trail through
Coleman is known as the Coleman Mile. This is in tribute to excellent participation of the citizens of Coleman in helping
develop the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail. A separate fund raising campaign was conducted by the citizens to Coleman to '
pave the one Mile Section of the trail passing through their community. A challenge grant from The Gerstacker Foundation
guaranteed '/2 the funding if the citizens could make up the second half. In a very short time they had reached their goal, and
the Coleman Mile was completed in 1994. It was in 1995 before the rest of the Trail connected to the Coleman Mile. The

paved portion of The Pere Marquette Rail-Trail now is 21 miles long.

The balance of the trail, about 8 miles will reach the Clare City limits. Construction plans for this sectiOOBf the trail are
incomplete, however fund raising efforts are underway to complete this portion in 98 or 99.

Thank you for enjoying our trail. The Pere Marquette Rail-Trail exists because the Citizens of Midland County, and now
Clare and Isabella County have worked hard to provide this unique recreational opportunity. The Rail-Trail has only begun
to make the connections to many of the previously underused recreational facilities available in our counties. The Friends of
The Pere Marquette Rail-Trail invite you to be part of the continued enhancement and improvement of our fine park. Join
the Friends by completing the membership form. Contributions can also be accepted, The Friends are an Not For Profit
Organization (501c(3 )) and can be deducted on your income tax. Donation boxes are also strategically located along the
trail.

 

Wamamnett I
'. 1..-'wltr‘138315

 

 

 

é??? lBack to FOPMRT Home Page '

DEPARTNIENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

MIDLAND COUNTY SERVICES BUILDING 0 220 WEST ELISWORTTI STREET
MIDLAND, MICHIGAN 48640-5194 0 PHONE (517) 832-6870

 

 

 

 

IILLIAM C. GIBSON
DIRECTOR
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 19, 1996
TO: Paul Pounders, Parks Manager

Bill Gibson, Parks & Recreation Director
FROM: Rick Sigsby, Seasonal Park Ranger
SUBJECT: Encounters with Rail Trail Users
As you know, Rail-Trails have seen a dramatic increase in popularity in recent years.

The Pere Marquette Rail-Trail is rapidly becoming a major attraction in Midland, Michigan and
throughout the Midwest. Word of mouth and promotions in regional/national publications have
provided a tremendous boost in exposure for Midland County.

Through my work on the PMRT, I’ve had the pleasure of meeting many interesting people on the
Trail enjoying “the sights”. They come from afar and close to home.

The distance record has to be a couple cycling from Vancouver, British Columbia on their way to
“probably Nova Scotia”. Twenty two miles of smooth pavement, after riding over hundreds
(many hundreds) of rough miles was a real treat.

A man riding a fold-up bicycle stopped me to ask directions just north of Sanford. Although he
was a veteran Rail-Trailer from Brainerd, Minnesota, he wasn’t lost but he didn’t know where
“the Trail” ended either. He and his wife were staying at the Ashman Court Hotel. The wife
went shopping so he went for a ride on the PMRT. Unfortunately his information came from a
1994 Rails-to-Trails book which showed the trail being only 3 miles long. I pointed out the book
was correct but out dated. In fact he had already traveled 9 miles and had still 12 miles to reach
trails end. He greeted the news with joy, as now he would be one adventure up on his wife.

An encounter with an elderly couple proved very informative. First, they were rollerblading -
second, they were from Petoskey and this was their third trip to the PMRT. They had bought
roller blades for their daughters who now lived in Massachusetts and they were going to visit
them soon. Their trips to the PMRT were to practice and develop their rollerblading skills so they
could keep up with their daughters. Although there is a Rail Trail from Petosky to Harbor

211

Springs I was told it is narrow and hilly. They liked the PMRT because it is much wider and
relatively flat. Easier going for the oldies!

Several Boy Scout Troops from the surrounding area, i.e., Saginaw, St Louis, Alma, Mt.
Pleasant, etc. have used the PMRT as proving grounds for their hiking and cycling merit badges.
The Trail is also quite popular with church youth groups for weekend outings. So far I’ve met
the Mennonites from Gratiot County; the Lutherans from Kent County and the Mormons from
Isabella County.

The PMRT has a excellent reputation for wheelchair users. Two individuals I’ve met are prime
examples. One gentleman from Alma is a regular - he uses two different wheelchairs. One is for
leisure trips with his wife, (she accompanies him on bicycle) the other is a racing wbelchair that
he uses on training trips from Coleman to Sanford and back. His wife follows in the car because
she can’t keep up!

I met a couple fiom Edmore who bought a special wheelchair for their handicapped son, onewith
a hand crank to help build up his upper body strength. The PMRT has provided an ideal setting
for family outings - their goal is a day trip from Coleman to Midland - maybe next year.

People with cottages at Sanfbrd, Wixom, Five Point, Smallwood and Secord Lakes all have made
summer side trips to the PMRT. Many seem to originate from the Southeast Michigan area. I
encounter quite a few Midlanders out showing visitors the Trail with many commenting on return
trips specifically to use the Trail. The Ashman Court Hotel has also used the PMRT effectively in
promoting weekend packages and rentals. '

Bicycling and rollerblading are the two most popular activities but a surprising number of hikers,
runners, bird watchers, berry pickers and sightseers have been spotted. I met a few patrons that
were there on doctors orders. Obviously, they recognize the benefits.

Overall, the comments most often heard are the PMRT is wider that most other trails; patrons are
impressed by the cleanliness and lack of ground litter; and the friendly atmosphere. Many 11“?
commented about looking forward to the next trip to use the Trail. That certainly is encouraging.

Tuesday. November )7, I987. Midland, Macargon

 

éTke, foot trail
iroposed to link
:ounty parks

By ROB BERG
Daily News eta! writer

Midland County park officials are
sing they can use a rail-
; ines for pedestrian and bike
I tolink City and county parks.
1..: local business community
esdy Is enthusiastic about the de-
rc- by CSX tion Corp.
I sndon its Midland lines. he-
I the removal of Racks will clear
.- way for increased development
ng the Tittabawassee riverfront
r as, William Gibson. county
- and recreation director. ssys

summation ofrsilwsy lines also
.Id be s boon to park operations.

T . abandoned right-of-wsy has
I dersble recreation potential.“
Turn said in s letter to county
mtssioners.
"' s right-of-wsy would provide s
' sl psdssa'isn and bicycle link
._ .en the developing downtown
affront ores and Emerson Park.
w Gardens and the Bradley
. s." Gibson wrote. “(It also)

I provide a link between city

Ieountypsrkssndsllpointsinbs-
rsn. including the historic Tit-
- Lessee River roll-sway near

'rroson said Mondsy no cost esti-

tss for such a project have been
sod and acknowledged it could
licult to obtain approval be-

. of the county's financial mn-

tints.

‘ his letter to commissioners.
rer. Gibson stressed the park

. ission's bsliet'ths availability

fi

of the right-of-wsy is s special oppor-
tunity and would be s meaningful

mvestmsntin theoommumty's qusl- ‘

ity of life.

“Such s link would be e monso-
dous asset for the community."Gib-
son wrote. regarding the propsssd
paths. “It would provides uniqueop-
portunityforbothresidsntssndvui-
tors to leisurely travel between
many of Midland County’s scenic.
recreational, cultural and historic
areas. The commission urges you to
explore the recessions) and econ-
omic benefits of the right-ofan,
with other potentially interested
parties in the mmmunity.’

TothstsndGibsonsentcopiegof
the lettsrtothsehsmbsrsofcosn-
mores in Midland. Sanford and Car;
emsn. as well as to the Midland
County Visitors and Convention Bu-
reau. the county's growth council
and economic development cor-
poration and the Midland Foun-
dstion.

Consider-ingthsommtybosrd'sbs-
liefit lacks the propsr finances to

W°
stingmoneyforssubstsntislrec-
restinnmojsetsppssrssremotess
oomsbschbythsrsilresdindusu-y.

Bypn-iafihIsvision'olsms-
l' . I . l-
wsymdviemhoweverflibson

ishopingsoumnrsgethstypsofen- '

mgmunnm
ofmoresoundflnsncislmsnding.

F 7‘ . EESE ? E El
rgiiéifiaririiriahg
.i Engz' 3s§§§i
{3% '~ iéfiiii PE "
a $3! i:'?§§s {a} 8
g8 3% Egg 3%: ,3 5
iii“ ital"? iii
to gifggegi; as: E
iagui 3855s! 39: I
EFEEE‘E iifi‘al. 5
{EEE rg258§:§_i. i
aggafigagg i r. 1
rgeriisésgigg‘; g
Sli§i€§§§igp~gg _
Eugiggi “in . &
~E£§is§§ isig'
l.§.=&§.'§é 53.2% g
§?§§gg§?§5§;§§g %
airfiii iitisir
rigsféfifiréagi
Eégiiriiaéié‘ri

g5. :giaégéi :3

iii gtgifegs 95
giiirieiiie§ g;
argrrrrr :5: s;
grasses; 'ng :=-
EEE§§r3géifiigégii
33 13:235-8- graw-3'8 “5'3
gggiiguir Z§§§§§i§§
séaiiiéii ”sir-Pig:
tseiiasri iti§éiiré
*g-grzrss g§=rr§st
EEET; ii =aiif'iii
ar.i§ a: Earls Tar

nnmmmmpunmmfluuoowu

eurso Inq ‘spueoe uo

season Kongo-gulp

”'IPI

.355“

quad pus snot;

MWBOICJ'POIWMMOWDWOH‘W

9030“ ”CM" comer

ssuolssiururoo Asia to man em
to uousuop Ill rdeooe or t or or sea egos sfispoj,
h

NLM‘N
'"'WR“

out
min

121 sideaae at: unoa

I

l

:flgw-mmga
PmkflfwwhHM)
awn-unnu»

DENNInNI

'qnor

urpso

"Pi
usdanou

91m 'WO'IS "'0

«wwnmwmdnnt

-e.redo no o) In
0!" luols selprrq
1““! P"- ml!- J"!

annuities lulu

\
\

'9? Army

[1911-01-9

[Es

‘ ll

SMI-IN A'l IVII IINV'III I N

Obfil

The conservancy does not pro-

; mote abandoning railroads. But as
- rail companies close lines, mem-
bers seek to create a transcontinen-

MICHIGAN PRESS
READING SERVICE ' tal trail system along the unused

268mm.WlW-M‘°“°‘8895 _= corridors.
, Michigan’s railroad tracks have
SAGINAW, Ml ' shrunk from 9,800 miles in 1927 to

_ 4,500 today, with about 1,500 miles
.. '3 lost since 1974. ‘

l . In the Lower Peninsula, commu-

. ,’ nities have converted 70 miles of

- : the abandoned tracks into trails,

l and 70 more miles are publicly

’. «3 owned and scheduled for develop

‘ ment, the report notes. In the Up-

per Peninsula, 300 miles of
f abandoned lines are part- of thew

. state’s snowmobile trail system.

"Midlands rail-trail a... is in its
infancy, says County Parks and Re—

NEWS
6.54.513: $57.5“

, Amaze-90 .
{A a doned track .
% “iched to trails 5 .-

 

.
l I .
"- 44..“

Other communities use tax money,
while some state and federal funds
are available.

l a national trend-ff-

‘BY CATHY HENG‘r’ -‘ 2 .-
13: News. Special Writer: 5 ~

' MIDLAND l— 1: Midland County ' . . '

.' decides to build a rails-to-trails
' “linear park,” itwill jom .an effort
to, criss-cross the nation with hiking

j and biking paths that follow aban- .

doned rail lines. - , ‘

“i? outlined in 'a‘ 284page‘ “Disco'ver
‘7, Michigan Trails”_ , report by the

. ' state chapter of the Rails to Trails '

‘ Conservancy, a nationwide, non-
profit organization. that promotes
' the conversion of abandoned rail-
road corridors to multiple-use
mails. ~ _- - -. -

' e ~
.9 c Q"

a“ TheMichigan part of the vision .

s
s
a A

creation Director William Gibson.
The Midland Foundation is acquir-
ing the right of way from CSX
-Transportation Inc. and formulat-

- ‘ ing plans.

County acceptance of the right of
way would cement the plan.

 

Nationally and state-
wide, the road to de-
velopment of rails-to-
. trails projects often is

 

“bu—v-

A__._a

bumpy.

 

' 7'. The county would then ask resi-
13dents what the project should in-

_'=L clude, Gibson said. Possibilities

include hard surface, gravel, equeso
trian and Tittabawassee River-
linked trails, he added.

No cost estimates are developed,
but work along the 26% miles of
abandoned railway likely must oc-
cur in phases, Gibson said.

Nationally and statewide, the
road to deveIOpment of railsto-
trails projects often is bumpy.

, Cost is a big concern, say Mid-

land County officials who point to

trails that now charge users. Ocea-

na County instituted a user fee this

year for its paved trail between
ontague and Hart.

Gibson said fees are a possibility
for funding a Midland County trail.

 

 

Trail system opponents cite
problems including trespassing,
vandalism and littering by users, a
decline in adjacent property values
and lack of control.

Gibson said- such concerns are
not well documented. .

On trails in operation, he said,
the users have not littered or tres-

assed. Citing the Paint Creek
all in Rochester, Gibson said the
trail-commission there found that
right-of-way abuses by motorized ‘
vehicles declined after the path
opened. Often, he added, trail users
are the best policemen in reporting
infractions.

Proponents say the. chance to
rovi e linear parks shielded by a
uffer of greenery is the wave of
the future for both urban and rural
areas. Just 200 acres of railroad
right of way can create a park 20
miles long for use by a variety of
outdoor enthusiasts. ‘

The state Department of Natural
Resources is taking inventor} of
Michigan trails to develop an co-
ordinate such efforts.

Midland 's proposal is a long wa
from Seattle’s Burke-Gilman Trailv,
which is dubbed an “interstate for
bicyclists” and features paving,
traffic signals, signs and police us-
ing radar guns to nab Speeders. '

But it is an initial step to provid-
ing new experiences in Michigan’s
outdoors. Gibson said.

.

. .00
.8050 ...:00.00 ..0 0:... .0... 0.0.0...
.2. 0.58.. .2... 0.. .090 2.. 0.3.0
0.5.8 5...... 00.0308 30.. 00..
30.0 0... ..0 .80 8.... 5 8:08.00
805008.00 30. 0.00 0000.0

5.05323 .380: 5 00.00.5008
800.050 00.2. 00.04 3...? 0... ..0
8.0050 05.00000 $020... 8:005
0.00 ..008 ..00 :0 80...... 05:0:
-000 02500.. 055.00 0 00.. 00..
:3... :3. 0000.82-08... 0.3...
.00000
0.. 5200000050... 00 0.8 00.8
..00 5 00.00 0.08:... .080 0.0.50.2
5.00.. 80.0 0.... 8.6 000500.. 5
0000.85 8008.. om 0 m.0..0:....0.:.
-00 000.00: 03.. 50... 0... .80:
0.30 .0008 00. :0 ..0 8:30 ”.80
0. 0.. 0.00 02 000500.. 8.. 0000

05000:... 0:0... 00000000 0.00... 00:00

I'll

 

.

:00.— 00: :0... 0... 0.00 0.0.32
. 030000
08000 5 0.0 302 .000 000..
00.... 0003:0538: 2.... .0080.
..:.00 ..0 820.050 0.0 302 0... ..0
800.00.... .0882 300m 0.00 ..000
-.0> 3.000.... 5 000085 03000..
-0: 0 0.00.8 9:300? .0850 0:0.
m50:00....00 05 3 0.00.. 00....0>0..
.. .0 $02.20 2.. 0.9... .82..

I-l.

 

$0.00.... 00.00.. 8050.8
0.80.. 0.00 .005... 000... 000.000
3 2.... ..s. 05...; .83. 2.03..
.080 :00...0 .300 :08... 98>
-0; 50.5... .00....03 ..0. 005.. 0:80
0... 5.3 .000 3 00.. 53:000..
000000 50...? £02.52 0.0.00?
5 :0... 0:08:02 -08... 0... ..0 0.80

9.00000 0.00 02 500000.... 0:0...

000:0. .050 0.0.8 .0088 5.3

  

:0300::00. 5 0000.80 00.. 0 3
.0000 0005 0.00 :00n.0 08.2.?
8000.5 00.80803 0:0 00—..0m
.0308. 0.. :05 80:0.
0: a. 0.0—0 3 08.0.2 0.0.... 0:0—
... 5...... 005-00 2.. .o 00.20
-030 ..0>0 000.0. 5:000 0...... .0...
.00.. 0... 0:0 50.00 .0000 00:80
-:00 0.0.0... 000 08000000 .08..
.800 00.00 0.0.... 05. 80:0 0080
00.. 0.0000...— 0_.0...-0.-0=0.. 0:...
000.302 00.83.
80:8... 080.. 0.00 2.00.1.0 0...
0.05... 0. 0.003 0>...0>0::. 0::
3 05>... 8.03.. 6:53:00;
. .000:0>0.. .8...
00000.85 5 2000.. :05 .530.»
85:00.00. 0:0 0.0.:0> :0.»
08:0000 0:00.04 05 ..0 00000
-0; 350:. .0000 8. 05000.85
:0 .0... 32.0 0003008.... 30000

 

lr bl'pl

.. p...» .000mm..02:..0:..3.m: 0.: .

 

-000 82:8... 080.. 0.00 .605...
:00. 0... 05.00 .00 0.03 .0...
0000.80 ..0 850.300.. 0.... 0?.00
-00 3:00.00. 3:000 08.0.2.
080% 30..
.00. 0... 05.00 .00 000380 00.8
-080. 0:0 00.80 5 000:. 0.00 0...
9.300.. 3 $0000.. 00000.85 :0
8.. 3:000 0... x00 3 0.0.05... 5
000.00 500005.03 0.80...— 0:...
.08—0 .80: 3 0020:).
so... 83.320... 02...... x00 2..
20 0.8.0 0.3.0.. 0...: .0... =0...
«50.... 0:0 “.50.... 000000.... 0...
5350:. 0.. x00 :05 3:000 0...
B0... 00 050.00— 08 8.050.500
:030080m 0:0 0.20m 3:000
0:0—0.2 0... ..0 0.2.0.02
03.0.3 .230 0302 2.09
000000200200. .03.... .0

3:000
0min -230
. m... R

0262 >.=<o
..2 .0239:

. 008w.§2.:§=_3.§0£.wowp
. 005000 02.90..
.0 0000.. 249:0... @W

JUIY )4! “’90

ll. NH DAILY NEWS

Co un ty: aébep ts rails— to- trails gift.

'00 hops-inf aim lid bani. -

E
m

22: ' ‘22! =3 3'1 ’

2325 12233522 2225232 -
32” 3230?; nifis‘igi
.22 235223525 222222222
g.; g 8:3 o .:' 3 i
2225:5222‘12222'22‘2;252
3% "i gifégéi’i‘ig’
£322 2.2 52222 22212
.33.: 22.232553224fi2-
2223 25222222222822
522%; 2134;353:2222!
22,92 23252 "9
£22 % jiizfijgé'égg
£5; 5 .0050.
22223 52322223232213?
ӣ259 {31:28:22,250
2235232 iii 322:? 21312
§§i5 f; ‘23 :222gg2 2:; 2
2222i2a’2 2222222122223
4 .21 25:. 2.1.; a

223322225222222222 22:02

' , W/mr
, f ' RECEIVED."

NOV .2 2 1991

BEL: ;-... iON DIV.

COMMUNITY MEETINGS

’ FOR

’

THE LINEAR PARK PROJECT

 

d

The Midland County Linear Park Advisory Committee invites you to
participate in a Community Meeting for the linear park being
planned for the former CSX railroad.right-of—way that runs parallel
to Saginaw Road between Midland and Clare.

Please come to contribute your visions, concerns and thoughts about
the linear park. , The discussions will be about the linear park as
a whole, and more specifically how\ the park relates to the
community in which the meeting is being held.

» There will be three public meetings:

In Coleman: Mondayk December 2, l991 at 7:00 p. m.
The meeting will be held at the High School
Auditorium (fi951 N. Lewis Road)

\

In Sanford: Tuesday, December 3, 1991 at 7:00 p.m.

The meeting will be held at the Sanford Senior
Center (113 w. Lincoln Street)

In Midland: Wednesday, December 4, 1991 at 7300 p.m.
The meeting will be held in the Board Room of

the County Services Building (220 w. Ellsworth
Street)

 

MIDLAND COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION

 

 

:i/G.

I

1:68
.53.. So
me: o...
..m._-.=m._ .H

3.5%
2.5.0.8353!

8.0%.. I £925: :8 .63
2.3.5.... 52.42... c. SE.
2.9.x... 51.0322... 0 .. .5...
25:5... 203...... .5: 2a..
2.58.. 35.5.»... .....38. p3
magnum.“ ... =8 .... ...»...- :3.
83:... v2.3?

.....o 23:5: 3.2.9.8.. .550: .
83.3.2.2. o. 5.. .....ao 3:..- o.
...... 355...: .3... ...—... ......:nn 8
95:: :23.

.....o 5... ...... ..3<.:n - .....3 .2.

nun... 5:82. 3:52.... 8......

a ...... 2.: 08.3.3.5: 2:20 8
3.2. 3.2:.

to... 2. :5 88.8.. 26.3.

a... .... ... >55: 052823.. :00:
... 3...: an... 2.: .330 33.2..
I ... .82. 33.22 .5. ...o .22...
(an ...... I a... ...»..u ..o. 53...:
39.2... 2.: ...-no... use...

:Etoor.8§.o:.u..ofl..o
. tuning—v.33:
gags-2:25:50.

...—695.95.. .58}... .6.
22.03: .... a... :5: ....o. no
.32.: ....a coin-:3...

1.2... 8: .2. ...o .3: I
3.35.5: 2. 2:52.50: 09.
33.835: :8. 32.3.: .328
I ... 2.6.2. 8 3:8 8 ...o 0.93
02:5. :30.

02652.2. 2. =5 .22.:
23.9 I .3... 95.... won: ...
5.2.5- Ioaoan. 12... ... 25.2.:
I .- 2250: .2. 55,255..

058.. :5. .

> 8.3.8: ...-.0 032.32.. 2
”agave; .....cu. 1..—r:

.0... 2.2.5.. 8.8.8.. u .....b: .
9...... ....o ...-8 502332.. o. ..
aqua-Eco: E... .512. ..5 . .
3...... 058.. 8...»

£925: 5. .3: .2... 8.2.. ..
3.82... 8.5. :63 ...... 3.3. .o
. are ..- .Q. I... .56.. F 3.5.2..

3322:: a...» whoa-.38 fl

023:2.-. .. .. . .

6583....- 5 2:2. Go... ..
3...... a... .. .. .. t

.... ...... 3.5 9...... 5.1.3.3.... .

 

 

..(uI, . . . ._ 2.1 R .s 41.
/. . z . .
00,, , /.. . .
00r/ .ul/x .
4.23:0 x/_ ..
.... 82.2 .5. oou/
. . 00,/
. . .. ......
...... .... . _ . . ,
. . . _ . 0/ .77
m . .. . . .. . . . . ...Uh/i /. «l/
. . 0000/0 , I
turn 8.50:5!» ...... ,
g,’-P 43,-F a“! on. ....s. .“h‘

_ :.U.l.0:_0>2

 

. --- 00320—8 $0.90.. .
333 Masonic: .0. >58.

8320......
coon caooafios: “.082.

 

q... .m .
......

......m .
J. .0 ..
ha 5
... ...:.

 

 

 

‘1» .. ... «a

 

 

 

 

”5.5!...

...—...»: man .. B n a»... Ewan ...
...:a ...a... ....8... ... a... 2.. ... ...o
2.2.5.. .325: (2.2.: 2.25....
1.5:... no.5.

1.5.2.6 «...... ..n 26 2 ...o .
2.2.3.... ... 9.5.9.2... a...» 93.:
...»... o. ...o 25.2.: 0...... 2.25.
a; 0258.

we: m3... .393 5.: 25:5.
SEQ 5282.2: ... Erma. 2.:
1.5.2. 0:: o9... ......st o. n
92...... an up... ... =5 3......
8.89:2. .3... ... PB. ... . ......

.25 .305. 022.2. 5: a... ....
.5 3.320 2.2.8. 83.....8 S...
230.... at... "5.... 2.: .339
2.39.0.6... ...n 2.2.... 1.5.52. 35.

Co... 0:212:09... E. 8.... E...

3:33. ...a 25.2.: $2.8

......332... ...o 3:33:32 E...
a. EEK... =3.an 83.2..
02.8.. .5: .3... 2d 5.. 952.
3...... P... 2.282...

> 8-3.x 9:52... 025.: .3...

.250: .3... m.. 0:2...“ 8

Quad .3532. 2. mucosa. 38:.
.8252. 9.8.. 2.: San. 3:9.
.5- 3.80: ...o 3:02. o. .250
3.9.83. (.... .2... :95. 5.. ......
Baggingngg. .

 

1.8.5..» :5. .. ..I. 8

88. . .. -82. 5...... 8.... .

 

.1 \UPM—. Id '0 u

. .e: t. . . .. t
. .. .—...}.u.we‘..fl.. u
. A. . ...‘a v\ . ....
. . .. .LL. . . ......

b...
..h. ..-.-I'._oo‘-

g... .. .
EL... . 0...»... £2... YET...» .

.Mscagw..r;~ ..iA~Hw»k ... .
...... . .. .. ...... we

.... ...... . . ...90.63 g
. ...... 1.6..

.....W....‘.._..._...

 

ft...

g... r a. . .
0, W . .H... .... . . ,3qu
.. v . «J... ., . ...... _

 

. .....&V<In“ .A. .. .....
. .............-... . ......x
_ ..c .1110».
m.» 3.1.0,.

o.
I... ...1 .

§
I . ~ .. r
.7... .59....

. 5

 

0...... 9030.5 5.33.
52.8 ..o. am...m-..o-:.m:m

§§fi§.fi$u
ESE-5.8.3....
‘32.... ... ...n .50 ...-...
3:39:

2.2.!

E

8.489.032.2953.

.....o an! .93. (Zn... .2... «no...
£3.83»... «.3 ...a 222.... a...
82.8» 0253.88: 5.. 2.52....
... 320.58 n 26:52 B m 3.2...
«.5 HES-....

02:35.5. ...... 8.03... :nni.
BiggEE-gasaq
.88 3.55:. t... ...... n .8833
.526} ... ......» 5.... .555: 2.0..
.2. 0.8.6.8.. 2.: 9.00.. .5: S:
:2... ...o 3.83.5.3. ... guano

uBS......-.2..S:..m2..8u.

...-8 . ESQ-:85...
nos-.8 ......Sn. 9......
ESE—8.903508%

.. ...... . ....
.u....§.......... ......
. :0. 5K? 3.x. “wife”:

.... ' ...
.. .. . o . . ‘mru.’ 4..1.JA..\..\LQ ..l..l-I w“....:“ 7
...... .. .... . . ......

. . .. ..13 ...... ...
..- WK. (was... ../..
.. r ... . . .

-_ $3....

. . s

.. . .. .. c . ....
. .l..\ u . .n 1.4 ' .
I .. I .I . . 5.. 3
...

. ....

x .
.

... : .. . ..
Exifiaixmn b.

..o-

. , a... o . o
J...“ 53.3.5...» 4... .

~ ..Y. yew-“UV v .
...... ,..............I. u. ...»

. .

.. 2...... .....L.

I

v .. ,. . .
. . a .. ._ . ...-... :35... I“. .....m. ...
. I... p. .Ha I m‘..fl.{r¥)—\‘.. “a “a. ‘C h‘t‘ovav.
r. IV 1.. A ... I. .91. ~ . . I
o. I y .MX..AJ“.W\K m.¢.r..4 . u
. . . v. ... .... x .4... r .. . o
u. . ._ . . A I. . u. ..
.. ’. .vtlu.‘ \’ .‘ $.v .

4:...

. . ... ... . a; . .u
vruu.sr.l..~ .zknamw. dfiu§xfill 10:4. .o . .
. c .. 1 .- ...:r: ..
.&V~.\.u0bhza-%1‘H a V; _ m ...

.+ .31.... cadrw‘srwfl {I .17.
mrfin a... ...\~.J.h a.
.. :z “9.. *th4ho-r .

...... L ..rmz. ......u..«...0.rww.‘u.3. ”a. ... ..
.. . .. v.’ x. .

f
,.

... k

\
......v. .. .
Q

. . _ ... c. n1,,.-M~“.C . 0..
..rh..-M.s:m.. mu.fl9fl.r~rp&nnw 5’... mm? x o

s

.w.
A. .,

 

(ES... 3.5.5.: ...o 3.3....
E22€uudn§§33.g
5.53.352...
gaunt-99......- 8.
gnaw—82.3.8.2. .029:
.7273... 35:. (in: (... .5...
:3 .... 83 5.....2. .9 .5...
. Egg-SEE...

.. v.2. 2.3.... 5.. 3.2.52. U...
v2.5.2: 0. 432323.83 ...
.2522. 3232...: ...... 8.4.2.3
.o 50 532.32.. o. 252.». m...
8.53. .2. ...»... can.

> «3.233.... .2. ...... 595....
0.5%.. ... ...... ...-5.82:3...» 02.-
2......an 8.: ...... .....u S: .8...
n3»... 2. 5882.588: $5.2: o.
2.2.?

one... I ....» 00. :1 t1. . , y.

. -55... A...“ 7' ...r
. 0 ... .. I.
On .. .

 

’t-Yb tflif‘lrl lCmno.\.A , RM‘DAI MHN‘Q'DD

'lo

A

2%

THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR

WASHINGTON

JULISIQKB

 

Midland Foundation
812 West Main Street
Midland, Michigan 48640

Dear Midland Foundation:

Congratulations! I applaud your hard work and dedication in developing the
Pere Marquette Rail-Trail, a 27-mile trail and greenway linking the cities of
Midland and Claire. By breathing new life into an abandoned rail corridor,
you have created a linear park which will be appreciated by thousands of
Michigan citizens, whether they are bicyclists, hikers, equestrians,
commuters, small business owners, or people with disabilities.

Over 500 rail-trails nationwide have been created, but the Pere Marquette
Rail-Trail is unique. The Pere Marquette is a key piece in The Discover
Michigan Trail - a visionary plan which foresees a system of interconnected
rail-trails, creating a series of greenways that link cities, suburbs, small
towns, and parks all over Michigan. Your success provides inspiration to
hundreds of other communities in the State embarking upon similar rail-trail
conversions, working toward the same vision. Visions of statewide greenway
systems have become popular in many States, but no State has progressed as far
as Michigan has in making this dream a reality. The Midland Foundation should
take pride in making Midland - and Michigan - a frontrunner!

You should be recognized not only for your accomplishment of building the Pere
Marquette but also for your trail planning process as woll. You forged an
effective partnership with the city of Midland, the county of Midland, the
State Department of Natural Resources, the National Park Service, the Rails-
to-Trails Conservancy, and local volunteer groups. To insure customer
satisfaction, you surveyed citizens, those who would ultimately use the trail,
for their preferences by using computer imagery, the latest in design
technology. Now, you've created a friends of the trail group to insure the
Pere Marquette remains a vibrant community asset. The Midland foundation has
established a new standard for developing rail-trail linear parks.

The Pere Marquette is a great rail-trail - and role model!

Sincerely,

2W

STATE OF MICHIGAN
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
LANSING

JOHN ENGLER
GOVERNOR

July 15, 1993

Dear Friends:

As Governor of the State of Michigan, it is my pleasure to celebrate with the
citizens of Midland as you dedicate the City of Midland section of the Pere
Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan.

I would like to congratulate the Midland Foundation and the citizens of
Midland in developing three miles of urban trails for outdoor enthusiasts of all
ages. Through your efforts, you have created an innovative way for your
community to use its abandoned rail corridors by providing a unique opportunity
for many to enjoy the beauty and solace of nature as well as becoming
reacquainted with the splendor of Midland and its neighboring communities.

You must be extremely proud of the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid-
Michigan as it has not only been a wonderful expansion for your community, but
has influenced many cities across our state to transform their abandoned rail
corridors into trail networks like the one in your community. In showing your
commitment and dedication to the City of Midland, you have provided your area
with state-wide recognition of its rails to trails system, a system that will be
enjoyed by the citizens of our state for many years to come.

Once again, on behalf of the citizens of the Great Lakes State, it is my
pleasure to congratulate the Midland Foundation, the City of Midland and
everyone else who was involved in making the Midland section of the Pere
Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan become a reality. Please accept my best
wishes for continued enjoyment on your trail system.

Sincerely,

John Engler
Governor

JE/sk

50‘;
ig"i

'a’\ Q. C)

 

 

 

DAVE CAMP ~ W.,..Iiléiifé 33233320.
4m DIs'rIucr, MICHIGAN ‘20:, 225.355:
mimosa: » ' , - - m (202) 225.9019
comma o~ Commas of the dilute!) étates msmcrosnces:
WAYS AND MEANS ' . 135 Assam
5mm..." .. knusc of Bcprzstntatmes mouuo. ... “m
Sstscr Rsvsuut Mmunss washingtnn, D¢ 2°515_2204 F3127: 7:36:3352271
33:31:33.3: 3508 Wu? Hso::‘m:u Lax! Dam
July 14 . 1993 Housman mu. Ml 48629
(517)355-4922

308 War Mun Sr.
Owosso. MI 48067
(517) 723-6759

Dear Friends : Tou m: moo-342.2455

.At this time, I would like to offer my sincerest congratulations to
the Midland Foundation, Mr. William C. Gibson, Director of the Midland
County Department of Parks & Recreation, and the hundreds of
volunteers who have worked to make this day, the opening of the Pere
Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid Michigan, a reality.

There are approximately 150 parks throughout the United States which
have converted unused railroads to the rails-to-trails program. In
fact, the idea is even catching on in Great Britain as more and more
individuals the world over are making use of the benefits of
recreation, paired with conservation and the appreciation of nature.
However, obtaining these old railways to convert them to parks can
sometimes be difficult, and the efforts that have gone into the Pere
Marquette Rail-Trail should be recognized.

Once again, I'd like to offer my sincere congratulations upon the
opening of this trail, and wish many years of fun and peaceful use for
the citizens of Midland Co nty and Mid Michigan.

'ncerely,

DAgé CAMP

Member of Congress

DLC:jem

THlS STAYIONERY PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

/
Z

 

2

 

 

 

8000.00.40

325.... 0000370.. N... .08

3.0.0:.— U05. 2050. 3.0.0:... 3.076.:

 

 

 

30.00 32.0.1.2. 00.33:...
20. 037.03. 02030: 03.0

00 GIN—05. SEN
.. 00:0 203 00.3 1100..

.0700 10:.» 00.0 .» .57. .03-
.30.. ....» 070 0000 0 0.. 00.03.:
70.3 0.30 070300700 . 08000»
07.» 1..... .»..0007 ..00 0 3:0
5.3.57 070.0 0.3.

00 »70 0.30 90 32.8. 8.5»-
.3.- ..000. 0000.0 .0 070 700.0 0.3.
t... 70.3 00.00.. «00.000 »0
«3.08 ..00 . 3:0 0.. 3:00....
0.... 07.0.0. 37.0. 0.0.» 0.. 070

00-303700 333.0000 »70»
70.00.. 070 9.7.0. .
.. ...}. 0.0% ...... 00.30.. 0.. «000.3
_ «50.80 ..2. 070 00.030: 3:0.
7.03 070 00...: 3. 00300070..
...000070700. .070 070:0:«0 .000
00.0.3 anmboo. w...» 070 83-
3.3.0. 30» 0:7 0000000.. 070»
070:0:«0. we :00» 00330... 070
00... 25003.3...?.. 0.. 3....
. 507.3: .5... ..0..0£ 070 0... 00k
00.00.002.200 002...: 70..
93:07 »70 0.»...
.. .07.. 03.0.6... 8:... 70 03.» 0...
00000300 8.083 070» i... 70:03»
7.70.0. 7:33. 3.700 0.88... 00..
030:0 0.00 5.70 (0:00 00 000 F
.070 00300.3 059...; 0:70..
0032.: 7..» »70 8.03.800 0...:
.800» 30:02 ... 0000.0 00... .507
.8 «70. >37... 00....
.-.-H» 7100.. 83007.3 »0 00.0-
.30: .0 700:.» 70.. .0 «0......
37.0 00.... I070 00:30.. .0? .»
80.. 0 ..»».0 7.» 00 070 0033030
....»7 .». . 7000 0.0. 30870:». .5:
70 .7.0 »0 0.0.»...00 0: ..»..

 

3.0 3.-.... 8:5 00 0...: o. m 0.082....
00.0.03 .70. .2... 70:0... 7:62... 7:83... .:._.:0
0.8.08 0:0 03.000 0.00 .270 £0.30 .0 :00 ...

 

.070 07.00 7390» n10... 0.03
00.03.: <08...:. 0.. 00.0.3
£0... 000» 8.: $.07 «Shoo.
0703.00. 00:.» 00.030: ......»7
8.000. .00.. «0030:» 00:0...
7.00.70 ....»7 «9000 .0».
»70 00.030: 7.000 0.07 1.07
00.000. .070 52.... 700.. 00.. C000
.0... 0.0000» 070.0 00:00.00. .0 . H
0.3. 800303. .» »70 Sui I... ...
00.03.: 07.0.0000.

”080.. 08.3. 00.00 0.000000 0..
070 70.07.00: 070000.. 0.. 070 ml...
8.03.... 000002000... 00:0». »70
3003 «0.030 200.000.. 0070..
8333.700 720 00:0»00 .0700
00.. 308...... 7..» 00.033... 30.
00% 3.03 00.20.. .0 #300000??-
70 0.3.

.453 070 000003.00 800...
0000.0 000 »7..0£.:n :0 2.0...
70:00 00300 »70.. 00:.» 70.0
000007 3000.... 000.3 00.... I00
720 . 03... 83300.8. 0030
002.2. .107 070 70070. »70» .0...
0 .00..

0.0.... a... 070 0000.0 0.. 00.030:
..0 .»..v .0700. 0.100.. c 070 000...»-
0Q I .0700... 07.0.0 00. 0300..
0.0.0.... 70030000.. >3. 070
000.» »70 ....000» .003007. ....»

30...:«0 0:». 0000000. 1..»...
37.0 00....

......0 00.80 ..00 000050 030.300
..33 75.08:» 03:00.. 70 00....
£0 50030.. 0703 07.» »7.0 03.
..00» .0 003007.45 07.» 0.03. 303.
700 0.. »70 83303.»! 00:... :00
00.. 030v...

.070 833.200 07000.. 0.300 0..
00700 ...:0... 0.0.8. .: »70 00000
0.... 0.0300. 0.. 3...»...... 8:00.00.
0.00 .: 3.0.0:...

£0 $0000... 0703 00 0:00...
08:. .70» »7..0 £000.» ......» 3....
.00.. 00.33}. 0...: ...»».0 008.02..
>320 00.... :07... 07.0%. «0.3 8
70 0 0.70:0. 02.01» ......»7 30:...
833.530. 03.3.. »70 C302.
m».»00.. .

.070 833.0000 0.0:.» 0.00...
37.0 00.... 7.0370... 05000000..
»70 ..0000. 00.. 070 0000.0 «0.0.

.070 0.3. 5... :00 0.. 070 30:00.
0000.0 71:0 .:. >37.0 0......
070.0 0.0 0.0:. ..00 0 2.2.000
N30...- 0 700.0 00...» ......»7 7000700
00.. 0.030 007.00.

A»... 70 0030:7000 .: 00:5-

00...: 00.030:.. 37.0 00.... £0
70.00.» 00» 70030.. 070 .00070: 0..
070 0.00..

 

 

 

1009000 0.
8.0.3.0 00:5
0:20 3 0:7.

00 9.3.0:. ink—um
Olav. 201. .0000 3102.
won: 083. 00.00 8.3002.

0.. 070 70.07. .0 07.0»... 0.. 070
0.00.8.5... 0 00000230.. .0
3.776 0.3.. 8 70.3 moo »0
0.000 300:»..: 7:8 100...
073.57 00.03.: 0.5.5 070
.00.... 3.0.7.0303 .....0. 000:.
0000». 7.. »70 60050.» 3.00 3.0.0
.0... 070 0»0»0 3.7.0.40. 00:-
00.4003. 07.0000. .070 0.0.0.0!
0.00 .0 .08 .....k i... 00...» 0»
m0=»7 ......0: 0:0 0:0 .0
7.3.0:...

083 00... 70 70000 0030 0..
070 3...»...0. 30:00. «0.00... S...
830 00 9.00» 070 1003 00 070V.
830 93.57 00.0300.

.50 £030.. »0 «0» 0000.0 0...
0.00». .0 83303.70. »70» 700
03.00.00 I 00 .0» 0703 .30...
070» $0.3 0..» 070.0. »70» 000-
0.0 .1: £00» 00 :00 »703 270
000...... 70 003.

 

 

 

OE. $.00... . _
00.030: 0000200.
00. 3.70.700: .

. 0.7.0 070. 0.0V. .0». .0233 00.0.70. . , . . .

... 0000.000». 07000 00070.. 00 0.0.00 398.. 8 70.0 0.0 no.
00.000.000.00 0». . 300 0». 0.3.00... 0700.57 070 0.»... .070
0050 3. 00009070.. 00.30.0000 .0 0.05% 00 «00.0.89. .0».
070 000.00» 000».. _ . . .

00.0300 00» 00.0. 00.00.. 070 398... 70» 0.30 00 1.07
.0 000... 3.80 0.. «0.80. >07 070 0.00 0000700.. .00 .00.
00..» 0.20 0 00370.. 0.. 30.0. 0007 .0 070 00.0300 <08...
0.00 0.. 02.0.00 «<3... 0703.00. 0007 00.0300 0.0.. 00.0.
3.0 7.000 0.07. 700.. 0003000 600.... 3007.0 00
0070... 0.00 000000.. 00 070 00000. .. . u

.. .> 00.00 07.0002. 0.. 070 507.30 070000.. 0». 070 00.7.00.
.03.... 0000020000 00:2. 070 3008.03.33 00.0..» ..00.
300... ”00.0.. 000.3 0.00 0000... .307 070 00002300 0070...
0000.0 ....0 0731.00 00 0707. 70.0... 0007.0 070... 000.» 70.0
000007 30000. .00 73.0 0 03... 003300.»... 0030 0030......
107 070 70070. 070» 0000 0 .00...

. 002.3 .0 «$70.. .070 00.2.» 00 070 00..» 0.. 00.0300 0.00.-
..0000 0000 000. 0 .00 .0700» 070 003300.00. >00 .0H .0
000070.. 00030.0 0.. 070 0.300 00.0.» 070» .0 0:07 0 0300a
00..» 0.. ....0 .0 3.0.3.. 000000..

.070 00.700... .0... 70 .0 .000» 00 00.0300. .0 .0 7.0
003.00 00 70 3 3.0.0:... 070070 »0 »7000 £70 0030 02.07

.1»... 00000.00. 00 3070 070 008.00» 0 «00.5..

353-0008035000

 

 

 

Z
2

30.77.... »0 0007...». 3700 2.0.0... . 007 »o .70 .550 c: 0 7.70

...70 7.8.0.0 00000.. 00 30. 30.: 32.0 0.
74.0000... 0. 0:00.00... .70 3030:» .
00007.00 37 2.7.00.0 700000.

7 £00 0030 3 «008 0w0 £70: 3w. 7.70»!
700.07.00.00 0.00 0507.0. 000» 007.0 ..0.. 0
5.. 70070 80.0.7.7.0.

3.. 00.. 0.00:.— 000. 7:» »70» 7.0:.» 30».
»0... ...70 7cm - :0 3070.. 70.... 0...... 0:: 0.0....
u 200 7070170: 0 7.70 7000700 .» 0.60:...
0.. 3.. 700003.

7:7. .70... 3v. 7.70 .000 0.. . :0070: ..0.. 0
030.. £01.. »70. 0.70000: 0030 .7000
3:00 7.03 3.. 70.702. 07.0 7030 .0 0
7200.0 05.3075 000» 0.30.. 7070
307057.

70073“ 7007 0. »7000 7......0 .300. .
0.: 0.0.3.0 »70 :0803 0.00m .70 07.0
8:30.030 0:: »70 000.. 0000 0. »70 7.0...
0.0.

> .0... ..003 0m0. . ...: 00300 0: 0.703
070.0 0. 30. 07. 7.70. .070: 00 .. 0.02. 77.
»70 30». - 7.07.70 07037300 0:: .2007
»0:

. 00:. p .00... £70 70077.» .» 0:: 0.0:. »

3007 00.0 0» .70 730 .50.. 0... .70 39.0
7.03 »70 7.00.0703 .0 080300 £700. ....00
0: 2.0.0080» 0.07.370...

0007.00. 0.0 72..» 000010000 0.0.0:.
070.0. :07. 3:07 ..»0.. .0 ...0.

> .500 07. 0000030.. 0:00 0:300. 30
..:0<0.. .007 7007... >0: . 77.0.».

:07. .00» ....0070:... .

> 3083207000 0. 0030 000.50: 0: 0
000007.. 00.0.. 07.087 .... 0...... 7.03 »70
007:7... 30.. . 700... 702.0 000 .0 0 v.23“.
£0...

.07... 730. »70 000» £00 3.0.2.0753...
00.0 3.2.0020 70:03... 2.. 70:000..»
.000 0: 030.00» 30.3.0.0 7.70 - 0 3.0073
.000 7.03 »70 000.0000... 00.... 2.070 <0...
03. 0. 07.7.78...

107. 2:0 00.. . £000 .370: 77 30:70 »0
07.0 .70 7.... 0 79.. 7 0.0.0.. 0 50.0030
070070 7.03 50 0007... 7,000.00 0:».
5000.003.“ 0000 0. .70 757......

00.700 .7000. 70.0.0.0... .007 0030 00.0%

> 03070: 0020 .0 10... 2:0... 07077.0...
033077. »70 05.07000 0. 0 62.00.... 7.70.

 

            

0:... 0:... 07. 0000......
= 000037.00 »70 7.700 ....0

3:07 .0 »70 07.9.... 0» 207..
607078.. 0.70 .0072. 0. 7.0 . 05.07000
00.. 030.030.. 7 ...—0.77... . ..

...70» £00 030.. .70» .73... . 00 @000 7...
07.0.0. .: 2... 0.30.7. .070 7.00 9.7.3?
30.: 0:: 00.0. ...0 0000.30 .

M030 050.. 5.0m. £03 0. . . ...» .0 .7....
0......07 ....

£70: . 00. 0..» .2. 30000.57 .0 »70 .0000
£77 30.. 7.7.07 7:03.. 0.. _ 5.000.. 00.0
0.3333“ 7.0070 .00.. 0 7:... .. 0‘77

...7000 :0... 7.8.0.0 00... r... ..0... 07.07.:

...70. 0750.. 1.»: 05.07.70 0. N70 007

....

0.012. »70 050307.? 7.... »0 ...—7:00..
...7000 »70 ...... 7.0.. 700.00 >3. .70...

:00. 0 .....0. 07. 77...: ...0... 7.70 0.070....

:2... 0.7.0 5..

...—70.0....

..2000... . 000:0...

50700 7...... 0030...

m0 ....0 ......

..£0»0.. 707.00 5..

... 5.07 00... . 007..

:00. .703...

>3. :0 07..

5.3700 0030...:

... no. 300...

... 0.7. 70500 02.00...

00. 0 7.70.0 000730 0.. »70 070707.. .770
00......0.

70070.... 070 007.. 00 a ....0 £000 @030 »0

.::0.. 007.2». :0» ......0. 90.2....

:70 00: :00 .70 07.. .0070. ...-.7000 »70
00373070? 70303700.... . 077..

..<0: 300: 0.0.. 00:. 00303701..

...... 0030372....

.777. 8:0» 0002...... 007. »70 0:0

5.70 7.7.0. 70 300000.. .00.. 3.73%

..>7 1... . 0333002.,

m70 70:70.. 30 0030 3:07.00 700:0 8
07.: .0 0 70370.... 7.70 70m.

.....0070: 070 0.0... 070..» »70 M00702.
007...... :20 :00: 07...... »0 00....

$0.050 00.07 »0 07.0 0» 200.0 70:07.0 .5
P332. 00.. 7.0.77.0»...

..30770 £0... :0» 73m... 770.. ..

m0 :0 70.57. 0 .00.. 00:830.. >2. 0
0000.0 0.. 93.20.23 0.30700 3 000.0 0»
.03. >00 70m 00...... >3. 0.5000000.

>0: £0 $2.0 0.... 0.00:...

7.0.0... :0 «0» 00.7.0: 007.0 »0 0.: 00...:
0: »70 77.77.0070 I £7.07 .....0 07.0.. .0000.
0.0.0 7:... »70 000.5. 0» 0 0.03:0 .....0 70..
7:... 000.00..

.077. £00.. 70 30. .00. 7.... 0: .70 0300»:
757...... 500020.. 8.. 7.8.0703 0. 0.. 0700
0:0 0.7.070 .: ..:0 07083..

7.7....' 930.0

7. 0 .. 0.0.0030 000000 7.03 »70 70070
7.07.70! 7. »70 32.0 7200...... 730 . .0.»
.2.“ 070 I

 

[MC

Midland County Youth Action Council
For A Better Tomorrow

 

 

 

 

Your School can help. the Pere Marquette Rail-
' Trail Close the
' GaP*
to Coleman!

.What is the Midland County Youth Action Council?

The Midland County Youth Action Council (MCYAC) is an organization afiliated
with the Midland Foundation established to promote philanthropy amongst the youth of
Midland County. Operating with an annual income generated by a $1,000,000 youth
endowment fund, MCYAC makes grants, sponsors events and helps raise' funds for
projects which efl‘ect the youth of Midland County.

Fundraising is an important aspect of philanthropy. Therefor MCYAC pledged to
aid the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail "Close the GaP” fund raising program.

0How can our school help Close the Gap?

To reach our goal of $10,000 from eleven schools in Midland County, MCYAC is
sponsoring a fund raising opportunity for all participating schools. Your school will reap
many benefits from this event. First, it will show your support for an innovative addition
to Midland County's park system. Raising fiinds will also provide an educational
opportunity for the student body. Students will be actively involved in firndraising, and
when the trail is complete, reap the rewards of philanthmpy.

(Page 1 of5)

Midland Foundation
P. O. Box 289 Telephone: (517) 839-9661
Midland. Michigan 48640 @ Fax: (517)832-8842

MC AC

Midland County Youth Action Council
For A Better Tomorrow

 

 

 

 

In addition, MCYAC is granting $1 to your student government for every $2
raised for the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail. Your student government will be eligible to
receive up to $750 if it can raise $1,500 or more! There is no minimum amount that must
be raised in order to-receive the MCYAC grant. The more money raised for the Rail-
Trail, the more you will receive (up to $750) from MCYAC! A pizza party will also be
sponsored for the room which raises the most money!

Your district superintendent and school principal have been notified and have
authorized a fund raising campaign. Except for two requirements, it is entirely up to your
school to determine the method by which the funds are raised. First, we require all
teachers be furnished with the supplied brochures. They are a vital part of informing your
students of the purpose of the campaign. Furthermore, you must keep a record of room
totals to determine the pizza party winner. To promote equity, we would like room totals
to be calculated on a per-capita basis. This way large classes such as hand or orchestra do
not have an unfair advantage over smaller classes.

The official deadline for the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail "Close the Gap" firnd
raising campaign is April 23. Your school's campaign must end on Friday, April 22, 1994.
Please submit your contribution in the form of a check made payable to Midland
Foundation / PMRT Fund no later than Friday, April 29, 1994. The MCYAC grant and
winning room pizza party will follow in May!

MCYAC is supporting all your efi‘orts. Ifthere are questions regarding any aspect
of the fund raising program, please contact your school's MCYAC representative, Mike
Rivard at 835-5077, or the Midland Foundation at 839-9661.

(Page 2 of 5)

Midland Foundation
P. O. Box 289 Telephone: (517) 839-9661
Midland. Michigan 48640 @ Fax: (517) 832-8842

 

 

 

Midland County Youth Action Council

 

 

For A Better Tomorrow

possibility that the Rail-Trail can eventually be extended through Clare, Farwell, Evart and
Reed City and on to Baldwin or even Ludington.

.Who Will pay for Building the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail?

The cost of constructing the Rail-Trail is being paid by a combination of state and
federal grants and local fimd raising efi‘orts. Local fund raising is the responsibility of the
Friends of the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail. Applications for state and federal funding are
managed by the Midland County Parks and Recreation Department.

State and federal grants and private contributions have already been received to
pay the $1,190,840 cost of construction from the Tridge in downtown Midland to Cedar
Street in Sanford. This phase of the project is scheduled for completion before June 30,
1994. In addition, local fimd raising efl'orts in Coleman have been successful and will the
cost of completing a one mile segment of the park. -

OHow much is still needed to Close the GaP?

The goal of the current fund raising campaign is to raise an additional $480,000
from individuals, schools, foundations and business organizations in Midland County.

The Rollin M. Gerstacker Foundation has ofi‘ered a challenge grant ‘to this
campaign. The Foundation will grant $1 for $2 received up to a maximum of $160,000.
When the $320,000 is raised and matched, the campaign will have reached its goal. The
$480,000 will be added to a $160,000 contribution already received. This will bring the
total raised from the community to $640,000, the amount required to qualify for $795,000
in grants fi'om the Michigan Department of Transportation and the Department of Natural
Resources. The $1,435,000 grand total will cover the cost of completing the Rail-Trail.

(Page 4 of 5)
Midland Foundation

P. O. Box 289 Telephone: (517) 839-9661
Midland, Michigan 48640 @ Fax: (517) 832-8842

 

 

MC AC

Midland County Youth Action Council
For A Better Tomorrow

 

 

 

PLEASE SEND YOUR CONTRIBUTION TO:

FRIENDS OF THE PERE MARQUETTE RAIL-TRAIL
P. 0. BOX 289
MIDLAND, MI 48640

(Page 5 of 5)

Midland Foundation
P. O. Box 289 Telephone: (517) 839-9661
Midland. Michigan 48640 @ Fax: (517) 832-8842

Show your School Spirit for Z 2 Q
Earth Day ’94

Help the Midland Volunteers For Recycling

   
 

4“
11I\\\" 1 5“; Edga- Z 3 mm
\\\GLASSANDPLASTII

PERE MARQUETTE
RAIL- -TRAIL

Closing the recycling G‘A I'P‘" is simple. Save plastics numbered 2, 4. 5, 6. and 7.
(Look on the bottom of plastic containers for the number inside the a )

   

Help your school win a recycled plastic lumber bench‘ that will be donated to the Rail-Trail.
A plaque on the bench will honor the school whose students, teachers, staff. and families bring the
most plastics to the collection sites.

What a great feeling to know that you have helped save landfill space, conserve natural resources
and . . . you get a chance to win great prizes!

You will receive a ticket for every five plastics you bring to a collection site (see other side for
complete details). Tickets filled out with name. phone number. and school affiliation will be entered
into a general drawing for gift certificates“ and T-shirts“, that will be held at the Chippewa Nature
Center’s Earth Festival, April 23 at 3:30 p.m. Tickets will be tallied according to school affiliation
before the drawing.

* Prizes donated by Dow Corningls' ”EARTH." recycling program.

(See other side for more information)

l)
\i)

 

(av 930d ..‘11841. 89$)

°3oaf01d uotutur 171$ out .103 papaau

SPU'U 311111918111 18001 U! 000‘
08 “IM Kauour 1131”, 000

00:30: wore-c tam-o o-Io
§§333§§8233§H3=553395
_. _, v...
35“;r§§9r 7 ngggfigau
.__i __ __,
rss=a~e~33€8§rzwmgafis
"gmfiowga 03.1 :"ow-"Q.
O < a ”ma ‘1 ”O: 1
ng’m mo' 3:: L<'° OUJ “Mm-1
w «W.,; ‘ =°< :- '50 xc:m
—‘=‘<"'m=o «‘0 a: in” - ~-
ouaggaaga‘mggg 3H3": El.
m “‘93 H n
ggwnn.7mn_7mm m=.oooo?z
0015:.it
Ca:
.0

5,.

 

‘
o .
-- . .1. u
l--.‘ r'~‘< .
. . ,
'
- c “I
' . n
' 1U
. m"-
’ .
' I

projuas

'uauralog pua

Butpaaq st '8661 nenuap u; pauqu ‘dnoaB at”,
uaamaq )1le man" out u;

o: qua/n

yen-[[91 10:]

.deo am 11M.

 

llnll'llall attanbmw 313d am )0 spuapg 3'41.
191§JM ”ms smaN Anna
11351.0 (151.1. Ka
I I I J

 

Trail

(Continued from page A1)

Gene Arnold, executive director of the Midland
Foundation and a member of the “Fill the Gap"
steering committee, said about $160,000, left over
from Phases I and II, is available. The Friends
group is hoping to get another $90,000 from indivi-
duals, $110,000 from foundations, $70,000 from
businesses and $50,000 from corporations.

_ People Wh‘l. don"t“ contribute _mo_ney,__still_can
help out by saving their glass and plastic.

Recycled plastic will be used to make the signs
at intersections, benches and the bollards, which
are the red poles used to keep motorized vehicles
off the trail. .

Esther Daugs, director of programs and opera-
tions for the Midland Volunteers For Recycling,
said three Saturdays in April — the 9th, 16th and
23rd — have been set aside for special collections
of the glass and plastic. -

“This will help teach people about closing the
loop with recycling, because the finished products
will be on the trail,” Daugs said. ‘It will be some-
thing they can see."

Cliff Miles, former Midland city manager and a
charter member of the Friends group, will direct
the fund-raising effort. He said the goal is to col-
lect a million pounds of glass and 4,500 pounds of
plastic.

The glass that is collected will be used in glass-
phalt, a product similar to asphalt that contains
crushed glass.

Janet Sand and Gravel, which has the contract
for the blacktop along the rail-trail, will make and
install the glassphalt. ’

“We replace up to 15 percent of the aggregate
material in asphalt with recycled glass,” said Jan

Birnbaum, president of Janet Sand and Gravel.
”The Wine: 1': finnlv crrnnnrl nn almner hurl: tn the

M o N gays/94

silica sand form it was originally made from.”

The glass replaces sand as an ingredient in
asphalt.

“It (the glass) is crushed into very fine particles
so it doesn’t pose any problems to toes or tires,"
Birnbaum said.

“Filling the Gap" ends April 23 and ties in with

Earth Day, which is April 22.

_~:---~-v-<'Not only does this mean-filling the gap in the

trail between Sanford and Coleman, but also in
the recycling effort,” Arnold said.

Another group involved in the project is the
Midland County Youth Action Council, which is
planning several fund-raising events.

Julie Mills, president of the Friends of the Pere
Marquette Rail-Trail and a member of the fund
drive steering committee, said the main goal is to
get the trail finished as fast as possible.

‘We had some real crowds out there last sum-
mer on just three miles,” she said. “Our main
thrust is getting this thing done and enjoying it.”

Phase I of the trail, from the Tridge to Dublin
Road, was finished last spring. Phase II, from Du-
blin Road to Veterans Memorial Park in Sanford,
will be done this spring. The 30-mile linear park
eventually will stretch to Coleman, where it will
hook up with the “Coleman Mile.” That mile
through Coleman will be paid for by city residents.

The rest of the steering committee includes
Paul Hyun, Fred Kahn, Bev Lauer, Jim McKimmy
and Ron Schweigert.

Hyun and Kahn are with MCYAC, Lauer and
Schweigert are with Chemical Bank and McKim-
my is superintendent of the Midland County In-

fen-marl; an: Rnhnnl nictrir'f

'N'ct'w
Té/sr/e

 

...-— .- a.

.2130

GIT—“view 9/“0/94-

mow.

Everyone can help
with rail-trail project

Friends of the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail have come up
with a way everyone can take part in the linear park pm
ject — through recycling.

That’s right, recycling. The group announced its “Fill
the Gap” fund-raising project this week. Part of the project
includes a goal of collecting a million pounds of glass and
4,500 pounds of plastic. The glass will be used in what is
being called Hglassphalt, a form of blacktop using glass
instead of sand that will he used for the trail. The recycled“
plastic will be used to make signs and benches, and the
red poles used at intersections to keep motorized vehicles
of the rail-trail.

The "Fill the Gap” group hopes to raise $320,000 over ,
the next 10 weeks to pay the local match for the $1.4 mil- '
lion project. The money would he used. for Phases III and
IV of the project, which would allow for blacktopping and
signing of the park between Sanford and Coleman. If the
group raises the $320,000, the Roland M. Gerstacker
Foundation has agreed to contribute $160,000 toward the
project.

 

But money is not the only way Midland County resi-
dents can contribute. The recycling efi'ort also is of impor-
tance. The Midland Volunteers for Recycling have estab-
lished three dates — April 9, 16, and 23 — for collecting
the glass and plastic for the project.

80 mark your calendars and give the project a hand.
You’ll be helping the environment at the same time.

' .. rntnnns or ”run ’ Q LL 0
< a- parts manque-rm RAIL-TRAIL.

I I 151nm]

 

   

Box Number 505
-=.-.. Midland. MI 48640- 0505

'February 24, 1994

Dear; Friend',

we represent the Friends of the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail of

Mid-M1dhigan, an independent organization that includes all age
groups interested in financing, building and maintaining this ,
recreational rail- trail from Midland to Clare. . -

Our 1994 theme is, Close the Gap. You can help the Midland
County Parks and Recreation Department finance the construction
the PMRT to Coleman this year.

You are being asked to make a conhribution to develop the PMRT.
Please use the enClosed reply envelope for your check and make it
payable to the Midland Foundation/PMRT Fund.

Our goal is to raise $320,000 which will be matched with $160,000
from the Rollin M. Gerstacker Foundation for a total of $480,000.
With a successful campaign, plus state and federal grants
totaling $795, 000, and $160, 000 contributed so far, a grand total
of $1, 435, 000 would be available to construct the PMRT from
Sanford Veteran‘ 5 Memorial county Park to Coleman.-

To obtain the $795, 000 in -State and federal grants, $640, 000 of
local matching funds are required. ' ,

.we are pleased to’ report that recycled glass will be used for the

"glassphalt" base and recycled plastic for the signs, benches,
posts, that is why we say, Close the Gap, glass and plastic.

To receive the required local matching funds this campaign will
require fair share centributions from corporations, 1nd1v1duals,,
foundations, businesses, service clubs and secondary school '

. students.

’

Don't delay, send.your check in today, working together we are
creating wonderful opportunities for all age'groups.‘ Thank you
for your support. 1 , .

   

Enc: Brochure- please read for details
Reply envelope .

Printed on recycled paper.

XXXTTrIlIllLIX]1!?ixllxxllxxtulxntux111111xxYIILLIJJLIIIXYXXIiIXXifi‘IX—Ixlill‘ll’lLuinTllxXIXIIIIrrxzx‘fiu-mmmmtm
v v V g ' ‘

 

. . 0:33 326.09.
go €2on com.» 33 3.33 no??? go
. mozzon :255 go on: 5.: ggofiéoz
of go 29:22:.on .oznoE too was?

 

u=GEN~QU .
. . Pu.
3:30
0:“
, ~80
sauna—mum 6.3.6.8.: Eon. 2:

So: _ .

unnuannnuufinuuhau ...--..............u------..-.muuunuuuuuu....-.-.---..uuuuuuuuuuyuuu

. . 35$

,

:u...—..—mlfl 0:03—38: ouch 0.: mo minnow-h

 

AzanoU 22¢. poo «tom googonu
. .tow_m3;om com

. tofiéom ozozouoz Sum of go onset c5383

. .mEZ 2:...
. 3.23.5 gooxom
2235.125 3:on c.1532 .Eoozooztonzn
$25.53: 32.2

. xtonmtou 33¢. use «new gooquFu _

.333 .3 3.33m

=2.on roto< 53o» 558w 3:532
. 5:3. to:

:3on .823. 5.8» .3:on p253:

.29»: Eng .

mzugoaom Log 23338» 3.332 (Booth
. . . .mmsmo 35$.
:otoonzog b.1532 cocoon? 9:333

. .EoE< ocoo

aasz—flou "5.33m
33:32 5.6 «$332 goose:
. 5:536 3:2 22:6

0%.”. 3:: 3:
msgoozusoo 33.5389 2: to a... o5:

36:5 kmxiéozoozzog goofing: 2: o.
oEvom 3323 SEE 362%

some 535:2 .3222

. . mom xom .o .a
, sauna—mum

0303—9-82 muon—

d—a .0 mvuomuh

..ou msogoaaghsou
. . .. L=o3m==o=ou ‘3

...:G of 935:
.3 5o: sou so»

dew—-Ewk G E $.50 353
62:8 ammo—o ....oto 9:352

of Sons mcozmoso «>3 :9» =

.. 689331. 53:22 .3222
.mOm 6m .0... £225. 26.652
Bod 2: go accord ob 2:3 to

$6-2.”th 3 4:68:88
cos—12.0mm can 82mm Ecsou 9:222

go 532% domflo Em no

. _ _wom-mmw\=m Hm EoE< 250 :mu :3

Emumoto wEflE p23 .52 or. ..o
__m.:..-=mm 2.2652 Ema

. 2: 5on 22.2585

39: wEEmSo E US$82:
mcozmficmwuo pcm £2635:—

m& o: :3 g so: goes. so:
.338 2.. 98.: :3 g sou v.35:

  

’5/

 

. . . 2.2.9.888 m. 8.8.2.8
83.2 22:. .828 «2. 2 .vmm. .82

. -28>oz 2. 2mE«_oU .o :2... >:« 28.83 «2. .

. 2 28.2.2 23221.52 25: >2» «2. :2 «m:
3.222 5. >28.. 28 88.928 3.2288
-23 «2 o. :2. «.2. 5.. :8 82.2 .8226

88.2.2.8 02 rink-=2...

030-- L32. QLQE 0&1 =3 §Q£~$ .

...2mE«.oU 2 25.23 2..

«.82 >550 225282 m22«.«> 25... ..2-r
-..mm «2. 8.8.22.8 .o 88 «.58 «2. 8>8
...3 .So. 222» coo. mm... .a «2k .8258”.

.2282 5 2822880 «2. 28 22.2
-5822..- ..o ..8Etm8o 28.8.2 «2. 25...
.322“. 2. 000.33 5.2822 2 82.22

.2 .2288 «2. 6.5.83 2 3.22228
m.... 25: 8.22.22 «2. «2.5 :25 8;
.8282 >282? 8252.228 2. ooodm:

5:: «SE 9 ...-.2... 3 :5 8o. 83
«2..- ..8w 8. 888.. «>2. ...3 8.2.

-Emu or: .UUEUHWE Uta U0m_.~.— m. 000. ONMH .

823 .28. oo: .o .222..me .m o. 2: .828
.2 ma 5. .a .22» ...3 22:52.5. «2h
232.228 32. o. .22» 88:28 a 88.5

82 20.2528... 80.8880 .2 253. «Fr .

.>.2=ou. 22.2.2.2 2. 82.

-8285 88.82 28 6228528 .829

mu_>..0m dicta—US$05 .m_m=—u_>=u:_ E0:

2.56an 2.22.58 8 «£2 9 m. 8.2. .

2.8 w2.m.2 222.. .828 «2. ..o. .8» «....-

I

«.222 «.2 «85.
o. 2882 =8. a... 82.: 3o:

.22...- :5. «2. ..o .8288 «..E «8 a N2.
28.2.28 5 8.8 «2. 8>8 ...3 28 58888
282 «>2. 82850 2. 35.8 ”23.2 «.23
.82 .5258 2. 55.23 2. 0.8“. >.2=ou

225.82 m22«8> 8 28.2.2 2. «28>...
2.3.5 :5... 582.8285 88 3.2.8. .. a
«2. >8 3 8.88.. 2822828 «82.82.
22.228 «89.5 .68 222» .988. 28 «85

.ucvsuhaava GOZNOhUUm UCN mxhan—

. >22=ou 28.2.2 «2. >2 8882.. «8 8.22:...

. .228. 28 «:8 5. 82.82%? ...2...
-..S. «.8882 «8L «... .o 88.2... «2. 5 >2
-.....m2oo82 «28. ”Ev-.2 222.. .83 95.8
”2.22 22:. .82 8.228.. 28 222» .228.
. U8 «:2..- .o 5.82.2228 2 >2 2.2. w2.«2

...... ..2..-..3. «2. 882.828 .5 88 «2+

...—2:. ....RR 382.222 «8..
u... 2.32.... 3.. .2... =5 2:.

.22W253 8.8 5 2.32.8 ,

. 2 2o 28 >..U 83. 28 28>”. ...«38.
.226 85.2.. 828.8 «2 2.2288 28
..2.-..2 «... .22. 3.3.82. 2 m. «8.... .22.-
-..mm «.8582 «8n. «2. 5 22.52 828.2
2.828 «2. 5 5.82828 «8.22.8 ...3
8.23 82850 28 25.23 82582 .80 «2.

. «mop. 2 8.22.8 w2.«2 2.8.28 «2m 82:“.

g

..vmm. 2. ...-5
«n. ...3 >8 .2: 8:22. ..«..2 2~E«.ou.. «Fr

.2318 «22.. «582 228.2228 5. 8.:-

-.82«.o. m. 28 2252828 822: m. 25.23
..o «8:9 «2. .2. 822m 88U o. «2.. >228
\>..U 28.2.2 «2. 2o «28>... 2:220 25...
2288 «..E m. m 8258. ... m2.>oq8 28
M28: >.«>.m8.8 «8 «.282 U8 .8... .«23
2. 88.22.28 83 «=8>< 2.320 8 2.2... >..o
28.2.2 «.... 2 28.2.2 225.2252 2. «wot-r

«2. 25: :2. «2. .0 22.52 «..E. 8.2.. < .

4

8.2.... at: 5.5.2.2525: 8822.52

-. 2.8 «.2 go 85:. «.2 a. 55:

.8..E mm 2 «2o 25.: 2.28. 2. 22822
.22... «2. .5852. 2282.828 822:

5 «m: 2..m..2.....2 cm 88. 8 «8 «8....

.«E: Q: 3.. 28.8.2 .o «85 «2. 828

:2 >2» 5 32»: 82:2 8.2.5. m5...

. 3.27:2 .o «.5382 «2.328... a 2:3
.858 =3 59.2.2-2: .o .2253.

28228.2 «822.. $882.2... 28 .8>

. 88.3 825 2.
«...—22855: >22 08.... 95.

828.2 .8882 .o «82. «2 .....s

382 28 m2»?- .82o82 «2. ..< .8882.
m8.» .8.u>82 .o. 8252 22:2 «2o

22.. «52. 2.228 ...3 8.23.. 7.2.88.»
«2 ...3 25.28 2. «.82 m22«.«>

o. «:2«>< 2:220 25.: «8.5.... :2. «2..
.288. «228 m: w2o.m 825 .82 22.5
. 8282.8 «.88 .888 >888 .822;
282 82.3 a «5.8. ....3 2. ...-20222222.

./ 28 8028825 .2252 28. .2358...
.5. 82.23525 82.522 «.82 «2. $2.22.
2.228288 28 822? «2:2. 82.2..
«68.2 22.22.: $23.25 o. 22:28

2. 588:2? >=8..m>2o «2. 8.22.5.

. . .88 ..m .o «.282 5.. >582 8.8.5
>522 m m. :28 :3. «...«2282 «8.. «2...

8.85 .o >..U «2.
.o 8.8 .252 m o. 2222.2 225.2252 25.:
5829:. m3. 23o >52 >.2=oU 222.22

E... 8:358 2.222 «5 .2222

- .o 26 «5 .22 s 8523.. 2...;

>23 5 .....w... «... .22. 2. 2« 8.8225.
9525.: .o 8.2. 2: 22% :2...
582.3. «.8582 «82 22m .2... 825.
«2. 5 >55 5 Eu: «2. .o 2028... m5.

«:2. mm a w2o.a 822282 M282 m. 2323.

x82 «.32. 3282 .w2o. m m. ..2...-..m~. «......

5222.22.22.32 go rash-=2:
88:22.22 08.. u... a. .25:

£15.27.

we. .27... 6.2m?

62:7. 298 29...... 1..-.82

ZOCZ... 27w>m>za -|
2.7587 .9 .2 222.2522 .7.. .5..-
2553222 82 5...... «72 22.2 .52..
222.8 22.. -.....2. .m 728.....5
7.52... mm ...72 372.278.27.23 5.. ..-
.52.. 22...»...

5522.. m5.-.:. 2.328.. 5.. p72

22......

52.255.— ..3... ...-no a.

22.3.8 77 22.22:... 5.. a. wma
3:22. 5.. .72 8.5.. .2 ..2..- 98......

mag-... 8.2 ......- 3.2.... 2.22.2
2256.... 78.228 2227 8 7.72
27522. .22 2.22... 22.5.6 2....
«2252.228.

.08.. ... 082.5 0258.. .72
<23. 7...: noun-.752 2.222 5.22 2
9.2.22... 72... 127. 22.... 5 $2
......- 9.2.... mag-... 8.2. .522 ...
9.5: 02.8.... 2 72.2.22... 25....
:22. 2 ...... .72.... 2.2.8.. «2.7.5
7282 2.... 8.2 52.2 «7.2.. woo .72
78... 7.22....

meow... 22.2 ...-....2 2.8722 2.8 .

.2 7285.22 2522....- o: ..2..-...2..m.
2.... 82... 72 2 7.2 22:21.. 2.522
«227 22 3.2.2.... 8...

3.27.8: 22.2-5 2.2.2 0582...
<52... 8... ...72 22.... 32.2832 .2
.8722 m... 8 2 .522. 32-22..
9758752. .72 25......

m5...: 2.25.8 2123. 52.3.5 2.
02.3.2. 3.27.2... C3835. mm
22.... o.- .72 0.22." 72.82.8252
woo-8228... «7.2.28.5...

1.2.7 ...72 22222 .722 2.2 no.8

0222 .72 22.... 2.2.2832? m...
.272... 95...... 2 2.2.2 .2 .8522
322.22 5 22.2.5 .9 2.....7 2 252.
2.22 7.2.. .72. ...... 27.287 ...-5...
0.2.2 5 .322 05... 2.7... .8... .2 8

5882... 2.97 5:2 27..» 2.3878 .

....o... 0.3.... 222.22 8 0222.22.
2.7.2 ......w. .2...— 32... «72 .7....—

.....:.5. 72.27.8222... 2 ”mo-5....

7.72 :22 22.82 3.27.8... 2.7...
«2...... 22.2.... ...o..- «......2 ...... 3

 

 

272.» «25.5 .72. 25:2. ...... .72
52812.2973. 2.2 8.2m. .o .2 no"-
m... 83. 2522.2...- m5..... 8....

W2 2.9.2 32.2722. ... 5:28.22.
2 .5. 5.. 2252.2...

.272 22.2 32.22232. £7.27
2.... 2.2.287 ..5... 252252... .5...-
.....2 5 7252.. 05.2.22... .2 2.2 5..

.2283. 7:22.. 22.72 72.8 72...

222.... 2...... 972 ...22 3.... 2.... ..2
72.2 no ... 3.2.2.... 5.. .72 22.2
323832. 25.. 25.2 5.72....-

. no... 2.... was-... on .7.... wow-78».

.2523. ..m .72 .8. 23. 5.. 282.
2.2m ...... 2.2.... 2.... 28...... 5 72

.222... .... .72 ...»... .72 022.. 3....

22.2. 5 8.22.2.2 .72 222. .22...
N228 we... 23.... 272 N78... 8....

2 .82.. .... 28227.... 8 2.52 .72
......52 22...... ...... .72 2.82.2 .5... 72

2.2.2 2.2.28.5 .m m ..522. 8.7.8..

738.222 2.5.5 97.52582 ......- _
.7.... 722...

moon... 8... 3.27.2... 3......
2.83.172 82...... ... .228 o.- .72
:53 22.2.2.2. >22 .72 0.22.
72.32 2.22. 32.2.7.5 2727.22...
07.... 22.52.7281... 27.5.2. 2....-
..23»... 25288... ...... .22....5.

.. $8 259:... 2.52 >5

8.2. ... 327.72. 2.7:... 522
72.878.

0.222.223 2.2 2.2.22. 5 8:22.
. 55...... 25.5.... 5.. 2.8... ......
2.78 22.22.... 5.. 2.82.2. 032.5%.
......22. 522.. 7.5... 2 PS. 5 .55...
2.2.. 0723.2... 29.... .... 05.232...
07.2222. 22.52 022.2... 3.58..
3.2.2.... >22 223.2...8 022.2...
be... 052.....m 02.2. 2.2.2....
2.2.... 0.5.7.... 7972 05.5.2 2......
...... .72 2.2.27.2.

 

Tuesday. June 28. 1994

263

Midland Daily News

 

 

LOCAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Raleigh bicycles have been added to the show room of Coleman Auto Supply in anticipation of the extension of the Pere

Marquette Rail-Trail.

Coming

through

Coleman gets ready as rail-trail grows

By TED O'NEIL
Daily News staff writer

COLEMAN — Bicycles. like cars. tend to break down. But a busi-
ness here has expanded to specialize in fixing both in anticipa-
tion of more traffic through town.

Coleman Auto Supply. 113 Railway St., has added a bike sales
and repair shop to cater to future users of the Peas Marquette Rail-
1‘rail. The linear park will eventually stretch 22 miles from the
Tridge in downtown Midland to Coleman.

The second leg of the trail. from Dublin Avenue in Midland to
Cedar Street in Sanford. is scheduled to be completed Thursday.
Bill Gibson. director of parks and recreation for Midland Coun-
ty. said the entire trail. which will hook up with the Coleman Mile.
could be built by the end of

is a refurbished downtown area. similar to the streetscape pro-
ject that Midland went through.

It involves new sidewalks. lighting. benches and flowers. as well
as a greenway and gazebo. The rail-trail will be incorporated in
that as part of the Coleman Mile.

'1 am very optimistic about the effects this will have on our econ-
omy.‘ Mayor Gene Robinson said. “I'm surprised at the potential
it has for us."

Robinson said he was convinced about the rail-trail and
streetscape project after visiting Midland recently.

“My wife and l were down there one evening. and we took a walk
down to the Tridge." he said. ”I couldn‘t believe how many peo-
ple were on the trail and walking around looking in the stores."
obinson said he hopes

 

fall.

While construction crews
are putting the finishing
touches such as hydmseeding.
control signs and fencing on already,"
the leg to Sanford. it already
is possible to bike there from
Midland. Gibson said.

“As soon as they're completed and it's turned
over to us. it'll be opened. But they're using it

— Bill Gibson, county parks director

businesses in Coleman will
take advantage of the
increased traffic flow through
the cit y.

“We need more food ser-
vice businesses snd souvenir-
type places." he said. “Also
things like antique shops will

 

“As soon as they're com-
pleted and it's turned over to us. it'll be opened.“ Gibson said. 'But
they're using it already.‘

Meanwhile. the anticipation is growing in Coleman.

'We've had a pretty good response so far." said Dan Cassidy.
owner of Coleman Auto Supply. 'People around here are starting
to buy bikes and getting enthused about it."

The trail is being built along the abandoned CSX right of way.
It could eventually stretch through Clare and hook up with a rail-
trail that stretches to the south and west.

Cassidy said he has converted about one-third of his display area
to a bike shop.

'We keep 20 or 30 bikes on hand.“ he said. 'We are just now
getting our feet wet.”

Cassidy said he also carries accessories for bikes. such as tires
and inner-tubes.

'People are starting to get excited. and I think it'll be good for
the community." he said. 'A lot of businesses are thinking about
adging things. so we took the first jump on Memorial Day week-
en .

Also adding to the excitement of Coleman's economic outlook

go over big.”

Chuck Amble. treasurer of the Coleman Downtown Development
Authority. agrees that there will be more people passing through
Coleman than ever before. and that businesses need to adjust.

'I'm not making a prediction. but some trails get tens of thou-
sands of people a year.‘ he said. 'lt's going to mean a lot to the
local merchants.“

But not all businesses are so enthused.

Shirley Morrison. owner of the Coleman Restaurant. 300 Rail-
way St.. said she doesn't know what kind ofimpact the trail will
have on the city.

"I don't know if people will ride this far or not.’ she said. ‘But
if there is a big difference. I might put some money into my busi-
ness and make some changes if! think it will be worth it.‘

Even businesses 00" the main drag in Coleman are thinking of
ways to cater to the bikers.

‘We have a slush machine and popcorn and we sell snack food.“
said Ron Klump. manager of the Coleman Pharmacy. 201 N. Fourth
8;. 'We are also going to add juices and some healthier things like
t at.’

 

 

Midland Volunteers for Recgc

 

Ing___ inc

IOX128IMIDLANDMIOHIOAN l4864:/

For Immediate Release Contact: EstherDaugs,631-l668

You can help
the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail
Close the "Recycling" GAP“
to Coleman

‘Glass and Plastic. Construction of the Rail-Trail will use one million pounds of recycled
glass and 4,500 pounds of recycled plastic. The Midland Volunteers For Recycling will be
co-sponsoring a county-wide collection of glass and plastic to Close the Recycling GAP.

WHEN?

WHERE?

WHAT?

Three Saturdays, April 9, 16, and 23 from 9:00 am. until noon.

7 Collection Sites; 1) Midland Area Recycling Center, 4305 E. Ashman
, 2) Tridge, Pere Marquette Rail-Trail, Trail Head
3) Kroger, 2808 Ashman . - '
4) Dow Coming, 3901 S. Saginaw
5) Chippewa Nature Center, 400 S. Badour
6) Sanford Lake County Park
7) Coleman

Bring 1) Clean plastic #2, #4, #5, #6, and #7. (Please remove'lids)
2) Any color glass bottles, dishes, window glam. (No light bulbs. no mirrors)

This section of the Rail-Trail will be paved with Glassphalt, a paving material that
utilizes recycled crushed glass in place of sand. The signs along the Rail-Trail will
be made of recycled plastic lumber, using the plastic collected during this program.

As an added incentive, people will receive a ticket for every 5 plastics brought to a
collection site. Tickets filled out with name, phone number, (and school affiliation,
if applicable) will be entered into a drawing which will be held at 3:30 p.m. on April
23 at the Chippewa Nature Center. (Part of the Earth Festival, a free family event
featuring environmental activities). The prizes for the drawing will be gift certificates
and T-shirts donated by Dow Corning’s 'E.A.R.T.H." Recycling Program.

Schools can also get involved. Show your school spirit! Encourage your teachers,
students, andlor fellow students to bring plastics to the collection sites. Tickets will
be tallied according to school affiliation and winning schools will be announced at the
Chippewa Nature Center on April 23. (Dow Corning will donate recycled plastic
lumber benches to the Rail-Trail in honor of the winning schools)

GENERAL INFORMATION? The Pere Marquette Rail-Trail is a long, narrow public park which

is being developed along a 25 mile long section of the railroad right of way. People
will be able to enjoy walking, running, bicycle riding, skating and cross-country skiing,
and see their recycled glass and plastic in use along the Rail-Trail.

mate queIaIa war I' I rum and Inn tili‘ec IIII: punctures: agreement
children to vacate their home" In January, .401. They told me i would bar
she says, but they haven't paid for ,the ..in another week. i still has»
property yet .- nnythtns They haven't met

The U. S. Environmental- Protection -. tirebargain”. . . .I_ .

1

S3. 3 mrlllon path 255

Iran. ) cell ,3" ”i: II -. .. :H- ....n It

li-_':'-I

{ really sparkles.

' 't'u - lllt"'; “I! '2'. r: --

Class on Midland. Caunzyf3" figfigggflfiiflt 1:3 .

razl- trail 15 sending 501214 "' ‘ face my separate fmm the (98%: :
mmu'smls 17110. a S 1 :l' ' merit) during freeze/thaw cycles, —
[It 1 ' Robert J. Wantg'l,‘ a company engi-
'~~-'~- “w -,-.neerwratein report. " ....
' mcv cameras _'~ »W :1 .Wrius rocess is no diner-ant
Imnsacmhwms I" I m ~ -: S>than san or gravel applications,” .
It """ l" " .. ‘ I"? .he" added noting the mixture ,

MIDLAND Some peeple us-‘.; meets state Department of Trans-
ing the Pere Marquette Rail- Trail portation standards .
of Mid- Michigan are jarred by see- 7.“ “,However few bicyclists worry
ing chunks of glass on portions of. that an errant clump of sand or
the 26-mile pathWi t7" , _piece of gravel will ruin a tire,

‘giiowever 7most of the chunks Parks and Recreation Director
actually are in the $3.375- million-3 William C. Gibson said. ‘
trail. notonit."" "*3" W)" “Theglasshasbeentumbledso
‘ Users are fooled by the appear- the edges shouldn’t be real sharp
ance of 'the “glasphalt” laid down unless the pieces are broken," Gib-
over a Sta-mile stretch between son said .

Dublin Road and Cedar Street in ~ ' “We're hoping it will stabilize In
Sanford and another mile in Cole- two or three years."

man, said Paul Pounders, Midland Following the initial complaints
bounty parks manager. -' . ' . about glass coming out of the

“We didn’t realize there would pavement. Pounders devised a test
he pieces in there. We thought it by stretching duct tape across the
would be ground up,” Pounders 12- to It- foot-wide path.
said. "We did pick up some small par-

County crews use industrial- ticlas. but for the most part, all we
strength blowers once a week to gotwasdirtand stones, " Pounders
clear the path of debris, including said.

stones. twigs, dirt and leaves. County residents donated more
While on the trail. workerralsm~ than 1- millionpounds of glass-in
bollect glass pieces, he said. " various colors, which was mixed

° “Most of what we pick up is from‘ into standard paving material to
Broken bottles. it looks like glass create glasphalL -
from the trail. but it isn’t,” Pound- '- The proof Is in the pavement
ers said “We have a particular Bits of blue, green, brown and
roblem with broken bottles along; transparent glass are clearly visi-
{2:3 Coleman Mile for some ble on the trail.
°"-" ' "1".liowever the pieces remain em-
Officrals first "05°“ the 81335 bedded in the pavement evenI
thanks emetsigscfuvg the Path when scuffed with a shoe. ‘ "~ .
t spring. an 'in Wash.
naw Engineering Co. of Ann Ar- mimmfiwesmmufiedmg
r to inspect the pavement. . . . , ‘
. i’ “The surface will perform as in- glass.

but durin the firstseveral “TWP”? fixed one flat from
PM g . glass and i don't know if it came

out of the trail.” said Dean A. Retz-
loff, manager of Coleman Auto
Supply, which features a bicycle
~.sales and service shop.

, Retzlofl‘ said he repairs or re-
places 10 to 15 tires each week
during prime biking season. Most
were damaged by curbs, embank-
ments or logs.

“Most of what i see is human
error, not something ed the trail,"
he said.

At Ray's Bike Shop, on Carpen-
ter at Haley In Midland, few cus-
tomers complain about glass on
w" ”the rail- trail, said manager Brad

... ": } z3Chippi...tr ’ — .
' “We get a few people who talk
~ "about the glass. Last year it was-

 

James A Mertens, a member of
Tri-City Cyclists, said three or four
people told him glass caused their
flat tires on the trail.

L. -' ' ~whether it’s from the trail or a
' ' broken bottle," said Mertens, who
also is a Board of Directors mem-
mmmwm, her for the Friends of the Pere
we places of glass lie on the Rail- .Marquette Rail -Trail. volunteers
rail In Coleman. ' tho support the linear park. I

 

Z S Q
Michigan Society of Planning Officials

' 414 Main Street 0 Suite 202 0 Rochester. Ml 48307 . (810) 651-3339 0 Fax (810) 651-3649

’I'I" L.

-‘ ‘
Ht %.
’2 mi,
.. "
HI 3*.

a. 2».

I} I‘

   

‘ I -
s .'—
| l
“-.,‘_I an.
I.
I" ‘
f t
' I
I "

September 8, 1994 _ ’

 

County of Midland

Mr. Bill Gibson, Director of Parks and Recreation
220 West Ellsworth Street

Midland, MI 48640

Dear Mr. Gibson,
Congratulations! ! !

The Michigan Society of Planning Officials is pleased to announce the "Pete Marquette Rail-Trail
of Mid-Michigan," prepared by The City of Midland, The County of Midland and the Midland
Foundation for the Community of Midland, has been selected as one of five MSPO Community
Honor Award Winners for 1994.

The independent Jury, composed of professional planners from the State of Kentucky, selected
the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan from among a number of entries because it was
outstanding from several perspectives. Attached is a write-up which explains why the Jury
selected your project.

Two handsome identical plaques will be presented at the MSPO Annual Conference, September
29- October 1,1994 at the Amway Grand Plaza Hotel, Grand Rapids. The presentations will
be made following the Thursday banquet, September 29. We hope you will attend for the
presentation of the plaques. The Display Board describing the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail concept
will be on view during the entire conference and during the series of 1995 MSPO training
workshops to be conducted early next year.

In addition to the conference, a representative of the MSPO Board of Directors will present the
award a second time to the City Council/Planning Commission upon your request. Again,
congratulations on your achievement.

Sincerely,

two _ ,

David T. Downey
Deputy Director MSPO

attachments ' .- " '

:cc: Deborah Kay Schutt, President
Leslie Kettren, Chair, MSPO Honor Awards Committee

2’57

Pere Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan
State of Kentucky Award Jury Comments

This plan addresses conversion of a rail corridor to a pedestrian/bicycle trail
- a prospect that will become particularly prevalent in the future as the
Intermodal Surface'Transportation Efficiency Act takes deeper root. The use
of "glassphalt," by recycling glass products into the finished surface of the
rail-trail, demonstrates creativity and a local connectivity that causes the
project to be even more meaningful from an environmental standpoint
Because of these creative concepts, and the quality of both the plan and the
way it was presented, the Pere-Marquette Rail-Trail project has significant
transferability to areas, not only in Michigan but throughout the country. ,By
following the footsteps taken in this project, from planning through
implementation (including creation of a BOO-member citizen advocacy
group), planners elsewhere can use this mid-Michigan experience as a model
for their rail-to-trail conversion concepts.

H c.
Z 5 57 wk:
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION 55$.

 

 

 

MIDLAND COUNTY SERVICES BUILDING . 220 WEST ELLSWORTl-l STREET .
MIDLAND. MICHIGAN 48640-5194 - PHONE (5”) 832-6870 M 1'3 PW
.IAM C. GIBSON
DIRECTOR
MEMORANDUM
TO: Pollack Design Associates
Rails-to-Trails Conservancy of MiChigan i6 ‘
Michigan Trailways Advisory Council \33‘ '
FROM: William C. Gibson, Director, Parks and Recreation
DATE: September 13, 1994

SUBJECT: Michigan Society of Flaming Officials Award

We recently received some very good news. The Pere Marquette Rail—-
Trail of Mid-Michigan will soon receive an honor award from the
Michigan Society of Planning Officials. Details of the award are
attached.

In many ways, you have each contributed to the success of our
project. Our thanks to you. .

WCszlg

'14.. mo:

i

006'" ......I'."ICCICII’°“-"""

  

....

— .

9...... ...... ......AASSA

35:55. 32.....5 ....
. .3...

2‘3 Eamon
I25 «2:2; 293

18:... .3225 :5 again D.
:5 2.3.3 :52... E... 52.3.32...
:2... 3.... 332: 2.... 3.95::
:36 1..; =2: .21.

>5... :6 can... 238 I 3:.
2223: com»: o: :5 8:383:
e. Z. we .33 .2225»: 2.3... 8
a as... .88 3.23.3... =5 .33 737
28.3 ...... 4:... o. 2... 3.2.5::
3...... v.25. 3.5.3:... 0222.:
no. : 25.3.6. :2. ...... Marga...“
:53 n 52.3.2... 325. .o “co—Eon
I 5.3 :55. 22.8 2 a 32.2
:35...”

o > 3...... 5.332% ... 0391:
02...... 3.2.8.. ... can .32. 2...
26.32 $323...

0 62.32:...“ ... u: 25...... .8“.
3.8: ..o3.n...a 3:. .to E. .32..
......A .o 51.8: 3a ..3.

o .23 2:3 02:. o. >53»... 2..
.33.. 33:33:... 0. n 33.2...
2.24.7.3: o: 33.2.. «GED. 3:.
...... 1.2.2.... A. 22:. ...... 8A. .-
.7.......::. C256. 23:... .....m... ...u
cc

0 .32.; o. A. .2.» 3:03.33...
23 .: C391: C25. 2:38..
1.2. AAA—.5 3:8 5.28 ..2...: 3....
2.2.2.?

o ...2: ...—Ana... 02.:Q can»?
.33 3.2.2.... o— nions-— <33.
no.3 a. ...... «3...... can: 23:3.

n...

0:9: ...—83...... ....o. 8:23....
.... 82.2.93 32.5.2.5. 3...: o:
3.. $2.8...»

0 >= .252. :5: .8. ...... a... 3.. u
2.33 «2:22 o. ...—u ...... 3:32.... ...
. n 8.3 3:32. 9.623 :5 3n. :5

..<.n..3 u ennui: :32. ...A

223.8.

0 .23 caveman 833.333: o.
. 7.3.2... 025.2%. 3.... 258. ...u.
.. in; can... 23.3332 D:..
. 8:323.
. .33. a ...a v.2: .: 3195

A D .20 3:00. ...-2...".

3.35.... 732.... <22. €2.28.
.. o. 1332...». (:3: 28:2. 93.?
2.6. .882 3.. no.5... 32.3? 20.
«....9: 1:7...” mason—a 0:33..
5...... 2.2.3.5 23333 :33 ...
..m:_: E no.3;
. .28... .826... 32.32. D 3.5?
.. 5.... :3: 3 32d." :5 233:...
. 7.02.3? ...—.3»... 033. E... no.2
:5: 921...... :2. an... :53 m5...
. ...... ......EA ... ...o 3.33....
5...; ... 2... o. ...a .352.
52.... .....A... 8 2.2.25 :3 23.2.
. ...:r... 5...... £3.23 .65?
......o... .. 2...... . 25...:
iii... .

-'.,.. .

w...

...... : ......wmww.
. 3......

............A.......................... _ ......AA... ...... At... \.......a..tAw.L .
. l'

4.....1wflzxwmf ......A...

4 Al

I r, . “...?

.w. th.}... ....
.... 135:.

«Aral-....Mmou. lineal). ......IA. I. 3..
truth n... r m. .. 2...... .

. .. . .A ......

1.5.). ......x. .... . ......

 

...oo :25 Afloamm ... 3.9.5.0563 .... .mmh

 

.593. $.23
mamas.“

0.... .o. 2.33:: mango:

\l LVN-iv.
Aw? 1...»... . .
A. .. .... J

...“...W.
8.11%.. . A.

is .

......AA... ..A.

m.
A now
A A {W .....HI...I

 

 

2:8 .5033... 3... 0. N58... 9.3.325... 3.. 2.2.. 3.19:... 2 2.3.3.. to... 5o 1!. I!

......

....

1...... ......AA.
....
...... ..

. .....m
.... >5..-

0:! ‘. 30.014.28... u)0.2><< 2. S w

 

2.2.. a... 2... :02 n3: so... ... 2.3.1.303...» 33:...- 5. 3.. a... o. 3.... .5369: I

3.3. o. 3590:... 3:3... :3..- .83 23.2... .o 0033.: 023.. .2 323.33. can I no. - coop. 5.. <9! .33 1:33.32...- 339.6: .72 230...... ... no...

.25 2.33.. 33.3. D. :5
.595 9.0 8 .8. (...... .35.

D 3:... Enact .2031.

=23... > Iona»? .- up. .23... ......
225. 224.: :5? £53.. 25.2...
o. ...... .3533... 92:26: .35.

.25 .33. in. (.... :2 52.5...
9.. .22.... .0... >5...- r..2..n.=.a.. ....
0.3.2.: 0259.... «2.2... 5.8. 2..
...—5... to: ......:n .33 7.295.
(:2: «.5 82.3.. 0. mafia.

:38»: ER. - 2583. 2.... cc.
32...... 3 3.8 3238 ...... ......
2:: 3:9.

=2.:...: c: :3 32...? .6
.83.... 8 5 .53.. o: 22... ...—......
are... :18 ... a... ....A 93.5.35...
«.... ..

--....n ... .. .. .2. . A.
....a. 3.. ....S. ...... g... :52... ....

326-: (.... u .93 3.53.3
:D:anc:.

.3 2.8 «.6. 3.2.3. .. mean...
8. 0. 0.33.3 .: ...a 6.3.. ... 2......
2.5.. 3.5a. cc. moan: I 2.... ......
«328.. 95.2.2. .3... ..2. 2....
32:52. 3 826.. i... ...a .63.

3.2.2.52. ...—833 U. 35:...
23.. ...-33cm: tum .3252. ...
:5 38.3%.

Do! roe... tots-Ea.

03.39.: (.5 3.3233 2..
2:58.. .: .8... Got 2.3....“ ....
25.. 2.... ...... 3 3.. (9.3.... ....u
«2:. 5...." 32...... ...aqeauea
23.38..

......” 25.. ......
...... ...... :2 2.2:: n55... .2. S...

A 2.... 3......
.3... ass—.33.... 2:: 12...:

A. $5.33....

22.3.5... 023:: ...... :23:
85:3,...

moan 3:29. .332“ 3.5.2.
”.22... 2: 3.33: ...... .523.
Sam—... cm. .0253 E .: .3... 2...
:0 2.32.2. 3 .58.. 3:. 323.3
.333 .3223 3 3.3.2 .853?

...m .8. 324.an 3 32:2.
9.69.333w 03:...» C32. 3.. =5
...—.... o. in ...—enza... 22.... :3
3.33.5 «a: ...—:52. :6 «3;. 2
53.393. Ch: .5 3....

.... 5a.. 3 v... =5. . 3:... Ann :5
3.56 «4.... a 81...: 2:25. a.
2.5.2... ..5 2.2.5.. 2252.3:
«...... :3... 5.33 .....A 3.3. ...: :c.
2.3...

9:3: Dove-... no... 2:

Z 02:... .. ......
.. .55.; > 22.... ......A .5. 3353..

8... .. £8 2:25 .833 85.:
...u .330. 3 £2.32. p.333.
.2538 F raga—0:.

2.:o ...: 3.2.. an..." D:.
3.53.. so .22.... .o. ..c...:..3:
3,322.3 maze: 3 :23... ...a no.
coca-:3 o. 5.23.3.3:

.25. 8.5 833: .A :2. :6 o:.w.
...:o «53: i... .232. .333 =5
:23: .: .oou.

WA... 0256. 0.3.... ......mo ......
=2: .. 053...... 3.2. E. 30:...
...... 9:8: 3:... 2.2... ...... o: 3....
3.58 o. .3321 En... 2. 2.932.
095.2 2332...: 22.32. «c.
02...? 53 22:3 :3. 9:3: :2.
9.2.... :5 53 5:. 2.5: :a ..o.
12. 2.22. ...63315 :3: 22....
A... 6...... .c ...: 3:55.... 2:53

mazc. 3:3. .. ..
...:g... ... .v .353 a 55...: .c 5....

.:...<...c~.u.

...—o 25.3.. .A :3 .....wa :72... :A
332...... :2. .6... :32... 32...:
5.... 313:6 ...... 5.23; 2......
33.2... 025; ...—«.8 E... :22...
.3: .2322. 5.....2: n .32.:
2:9

.2... :33... p.m.. 32.2. 5.2.:
Elana .5 :5 32:3 2 CD332.
1.3.5. 3...: :6: 32.2 2 35...:
.: «:53 .33 3:29:22: ...... :9.
2:33.? 8 so: a. a 28.8.. ...:
:23: .33 ...a 35: 23.23::
021.633. 2.92.?

.: 02:94. a: 2.337 :31... ...
:3... £2.22. :A.:o.AA 2.5.2....
is. :2: 2:3. 9:33. .A..: .... ::..A
...... 3:92.53...

.. .6 3c. ...... ...: :3. ...:r .A : ....

.29.? 2.1.... ..
55; 2.3.3.1... 35.5.: PE... ... .

Z06

 

mu. COCO SMZNM
30:0... 0. 30.0 1100..

 

.30300 .
3.0.0.... 000:- .w
n... 00 00..» 0.. 0
500300.30...
0.0.. 0..
08.000 8
0.00.08 0000.0
.00. 00200 00
3.00.000...
000.50.09.00.
0003-.

.2...» 3.3.03.
.5... 00 «00:3.
0... ~80 ... ..00
m033.m 50.0: .0 0: 00.00..
9.5.3 .0 8.00020 0.008.. 0.-
000 2.3.0.0 000:3. 08503.0
035... 050 000.0030... 020.

3.0.0:... 03. 0:0 mmflam£
000:...00. £0.00 .00 0 00.:-
0500 0000.080: 0.000...
30.08. 000 3.60.0 000 00.00
0030500 0000.02.03 .... .040.
20.3 .00 000.0: 000 9.0.0: 8
002.. $0.08 00. $0... ..
000.300 ..0 000... 000.000 0..
.80 0:0 000 «050.000 00.0-
90... 00005.5...

.....00 .00 .....m. 0.30 .... 0003..
£0.00 «0.00 8 000 0 9.050 ...
.00 01.005.300.- m9...» 00....
3.0.0.... 0258. £... N00... "00
30.00. 0... «000.00.. 2.5-2 ...
03-008. 00 00....

.. 00....» 000 .....0 000.0000 0..
3.0.000 00000.00... 0033. 00.0.
....<0...0 :0. «05m 8 .0.- 000.
00000:. .000 000...... 0.. 0000.0 .
00:... 000 00059.00. €0.00 .00..-
.Sm 3.. 0.00-0000 .000...

M030 0.. 00000 .000 0...: 0050
3.0:. .000 Uo£ 0003.00. 00.
0:0 00:. 003:5 0010.. "00
3.0.000 0.00.0 .0300. 030.3.-
03. m0<..-. 0.00.0.0 Do£. 3.-
0x030.0. £... 009: 0.15m .8
030.3000 0 .00...

...00 00300.3. 000 000 0 <1.
2.0. 0.10m ...-0000 0: 000 000
.0. 0.50.000 0.. 0000.0 no. ma...
0.000 2.0.0.0 00300300 003.
0500 000 00000 0: 00250 0..

900
003....

   

(t

woo 3000303....5 .000 0 v.00?
0033 00.0.

...-00 0<0J. 0:0 8000302.?
:5 ..00. v0: «0. 35-0.00 0000..
.000 ... 3.0.. 0.. 003000 00 00...
000.0: 0.. «9.03303... 0013
00.... .000 .000.- ..0000 .0 «do?
in ..00000 .00: 0:... 0.0.-.30:
0.000.... 0: 0.. U0£...

......0 0.3..0 .... 00.00.: .50.:-
0.0.E:0:.. ..000 0:0 90 00.5300
PM 00.00:. 000.000 .000. 00 on
290500... 000 000 .0£0u. ...
.0003 30303.. 00 00....

«$0.0 ....0 000.3000. .000
000 000.. «000 :0£m 30 3.0-
.000. 0033 0.00 .0 30.025 8
.000 0.. .000. 0:0 320 0.0 ...-A...
.0 .00 :02. 33.0 8 07.0005.
3.0.000... .00 0000.

005005.00 003200150
003:5 0.030 ... 3.0.030
..0:m0 ....03 0 00000 :00-(0.00 8 0
00003000500... 003003..
mg...» 00.0. :0. .0<00..:m 0:...
:0300. 0:0 00300.... £008 ...0
05.0 0 3... 0....0: 0.0.... £0.00
£0.00 035.00 .000 ..0 .9000
030.8000. «030.2003.

£000.00 03000.0 0 .000 000...
H 00.00:» 000500 2.0%.. 0080
2.000.... mg...» 0000.000...

ms» .00. .m 000 3.00 0.. 0707
0.0.0020: 3.0.0.00 00:03. .0
30.9.5 30. w0<...» 00.0. Uo£
0:0 Uo£ 003:5 0:00:00 mm
00.003 0. 2.0 .000 3.. 000
wwboo 70.0.0500; £00 £00
050.300 00 0.. 2.0.0 0.00.4.0.-
.ww... w0<...0 00.... .000; 02.5.
...-0.... mm 00000...- .0 $0..

..O0<.0..m..... 3.0350020:
.0. 0:0 0.- 2-: «00.0. 0000000 £0
0.000 0: 002.0030: 80:000....
00 00.0. .3000... 0.8000 £00
0.000 ... ..- 00301... ..0 010m :0£
.000 8 3.0.0:...

00. £00. £... 0.-0£ 0000.0
0:0 ..00... 005000.00 ..0 00.0
...-00..v

.00.- 0003000. "00 00.58. .0
0.00525 ..0 .8 000. 000.0505
£5. .8 00£=3£=P 003.4
00.0.

 

 

 

 

.550.

.3 0.00 00050003.

.000 00. <00...

.20 70.0520 Km...

00.:m Us...

 

300.0...030 0.0. 0000.0 32.0

.00 was? 0x00:..<0 0.80.0. o. ...0 3.0.0:...
00:2... m00303.n 0.95: 0:0. 005.0030...
00.0.. 0000 .00 .o_.o£.:m .... .00 0.00.0 30.0.

. 00090.6: 0. .00 ...-00.5.30 3.... .030 .83
+8.80 .0 60.200: 000.000 030. 0.5.000 CV.
0000. 3020.0 .00 0:0 0. Sam-.03. 0.003020:

. 700.030 5.... 00.0 000:. 000 30_.c.00.c::m

. 7.0.: 0:020 .: 7.3.030. 030 00.030: .2... .
003.300 n...0:m.:m. 5...... 7.5.0300 0055.02:
000.:m 30.0 000500000 .30. 00: 000.00... <3...

. 7.0.0 30.. 00.3020 s... 002.0 :0. £3. 0 Q:-
<Sm Amsmo 0:0 .00. 000000-560 80.0503.

. 9.95: o: ...-No .3 .00 39.. .0 .1000 £... .
0x002. .30. o. .00 000. .5 0.00.0.

 

 

 

 

 

430000.000 0.. £00" £0 03..
0000.0 .c0m0 0.... 008503300
0.... 0:0 50... 00.008... 00......»
00.0. .30.: 02.00. 3.0.000 .0
.0 0 00000 0.. "0.50.305...

.000. 20:03.0: 00%.: £30
020080000. 0 00£=8£0
003.0000 0.0.00. .00. 0.000....
000 010.. 20050:... .50 00.00..
.0300. 0000mm .0 00:30:...“
£20 .00 0000.00 0.. 00020.3.

000500000 .00. £... 000.00.
£00. :0. 02:00.0 3...... ..00
3.0.0.0 2.0...

$20... 000 3000 00000 ....0
.000. .Z .00.... .... 3.0.3.0...
mg...» 00.0. 400.0 3.0000...
«0.. 02.00090 «mmfimcwmsfi 0:0
.00 00....00 02.00 030000.:m 000-
0.0 000.585... .0000 0.0 30.0
0000.0 092.85.: .00: ... .0003
0.083....

003 0.. 000 ...-0:. .0 ..00 000..
9.0: 0.. .00 5.0030: 00:...
$000.. 000 ...—.0.- 30000 00£:..0£=
0000. 0.... 00:03.0: 003.0.-
.S....0:0 000 00... w033 00....

.000 000.30: 0.. 000 3.0.000
7.0.. .0 .00. 30v. :0.- 00 01.5-
50 3.0.0.0 000000.... 00£:-
8£P 0... .0 .0 ..000.=n 000:.
0.000 ..0 0030. 0100 8 «00 30...
3.0.0000; £000 000......5 mm
00.00:. 0.. .00... 0000.. 00:03 0.
0000.00 Mace-0 30.. ... M00..-
00£ 00550.0.

00......» 3000.008 2.300..
000.0050... :00.- 000 30..
00.0. 50.0005 0 013.00 .0500
90. 30v. no .0 000.50 ..0... 00:-
002. 00.000 0v. :0... 2.390...
Z0: 00.00.40 £... 0003 00 0.000
002.030.. ><0:..0 ... 000 0.00
0000 300000.00 200003. .50..
00 00.0.

:30... 000 30.0 00.5.00...
00159.3m :0 «am-<00 0 .-.<0-
0003. 0......00 05.0.00. 50000 :0.
2.0. 0.? £30 0 .00. ...-103.0 .0:
0 0.320: 00000025: .... .00
«00...... .300... main 00200000.

.500900 0.4.0100 0.. ...-000-
00300.0: 5.. .50 3.0.9.0 000-
0.0.8 0000.. 0.00.... 0.. 000 00:08..
w0<5 00.... 0:0 000... 500:0 0..
2.000. .0 000 00.. 000....

9000 00.. 2.0... ... .8 25. ...-
20 £00.. .0 0.1.5 000 000......
8000000... 003..» 00.... 0000.0
«000 00£0 30 005305.200
000.. 0.... 00.0800 000 0003.0.
£0.00 =0£ 0.0 5.0.01.5 000:.-
00.<00. 00......» 00....

400.0500. £00 «0.00 000
Edam £3. 3.. 0 .25 p.80...
w0<.3 00.0. ...... £00. .000 0.0£.v.
0000.00.03.53

man 000 0.3. ...-0.. £... 00 000-
000.00 .0 3.0.0.... 0... 000 00..
2.0.. 0v. 000.0. 05550: 000 0000
.00 0£= 020080000 0.... 000......
n..0£. 00 00.0. .000 0.3.. 00....
3.4000 0 00£=8£= 000.00-
30... 0000013. .50 002.000 ..0
..00 00.030: 00:03..

>00 M05300 .0 000.355 00

.00.. 0. 0 00.00.. 03.00.. ......»
000:... 50.3 .n 0 30.0 08.00-
0.00 0.000 8 ..00 E... ..0 000.-
5000. 00....» 00.0. 0.5.0.50 .0
3.0 .0000 000.0. .

£000.. £00... ....0 ..0 00.0 0
3.08.300 00:585. 0.. £0.....
00 00....

>530...- 0303. 80:0 000
00:53. 80090.. £... .00 2.»...
wail 00.... .000 «£9.00? 0.4.0..
0.0£ 025008.. 009.000: 000
00000.... 0.... £00.03 02.8 00
...-.0 00.53. .0 00.00 00.000000 ...
.30 .0000 0.... .80.

A... .....0 :0... 8 .003. £0 £..
000 320 9.0.5... ......000. ...-.0:
£0 00.0 000: ... 000 .00. ..o
0003... mg...» 00.0.

w0<.3 0.00.08 000.0030...
0.- ....0 0...... 0=n£0w0 £... 003.:-
00 ... 0 300.500 300.0...

..$0.00 00.. ...—m.- no00....n :0
305.00.. 8 0c. ... 50:0... ...0
00.0. $5.0: v60 0:. 50...... .5
000 5.00.0 0.. 02.0000. .6:
00.0 8 00.... 0.0.2.000 8
000......

.000 n...0£..0 0.. 00.0 0000 £0...
00 55.80 .0 3.0.0.0 00:08..
mos..." 00.0. mg. 0.3... ..00 0x0...
0.0. 000 ...-2.0..» .0 000.0. cm
0033:3030. 00000030:
5.00500. 0.0.008. 50.00.00 0
000003.. 00.0. 0 2.000 003050
0.... 0000000.. .000.

......0 0.8. .0 03.2.0.5 8 .0...
0038.000 0.- ....A 3.2.0000 0.000
90 mnfl=0£ ”7.0... 00 £0...
£5. 0 0000. 0:0 003000000
00:00.. .0 000 £028 0.... «0.0.-0
000005.509 03.008 000%
030000...

....- 0000. N0» 000... 00. 0000....-
0... 900. 000.0 00 0500.. 000:
mmfl=0£ ... 0 ..0£ .003... 00......
00....

Mmflsm£ :05. 000 0 0000.0-
0.00 0.. 000:. .....ooo £020 mg.
0.3. 0:0 3.0.0.0 000 0000.0.
20...... 0.. 000... umboo.

 

 

 

Ho-hum.
Rail-Trail
almost
finished

CATHY RING

.m rite shame unis

MIDLAND - With little tanlare.
Pena Marquette Rail-Trail users
soon will find they can travel from
the Tndge to Coleman without en-
countenng construction along the
wav

Crews \I‘lll finish concrete worlr
where the Rail-Trail crosses It
roads between Santord and Cole-
man by Saturday. July l

The only tasli remaining after
that ts erecting directional signs.
said William L' Gibson. Midland
County Parks and Recreation di-
rector

"We hope to ltlt't‘ the signs up
by mid-July and the actual trail
work completed." Gibson said.
"Were pretty proud ol the trail.
and a lot of people are using it."

Gibson said no ribbon-cutting
ceremony is planned. That was
done in “Mind upon completion
of the first three miles. tn Sanford
last summer and in Coleman last
week

"were pretty nbboned out." he
8.“!

The 2‘.‘ mile long trail stretches
lrom downtown .‘lldllfld to Cole-
man and was completed at a cost
$3175 nitllion. Pollock Desrgn As-
socrates of Ann Arbor designed the
"linear parlr "

"It is a Cadillac of a trail. but we
wanted to do it right the first
time." Gibson said

He hopes \ltdland's trail will
sene as a prototype for others.
noting it features recycled maten‘~
als. special bndae decking and
preseiyauve paint.

Towns welcome bi

CATHY HENO
I ran flit. s \titsi m \m

SANFORD - ch' signs grace
the baclts of businesses along the
Pere Marquette Rail-Trail. facing
its non-motorized travelers

A trash can carries the message.
"Watch for Bikers."

Business is picliing up the
nearly completed 12ml. il-
Trail. merchants say.

"The restaurants have definitely
seen an increase in business." said
Earl Crawford. president of the
Saniord Area Chamber of Corn-
merce.

"And it's not just local. We have
a group come regularly from -
naw who park their cars and bi
uie trail here. stopping for meals.“

Crawiord said the trail is "

for the community and all of id-
land County It is ting all the
units - Midland. lord. Cole-

man - together to form a bond.“
he said

Crawfordsaidheseesalotot
trail use and foresees no problems

Both the Coleman Restaurant
and the Cherry Lane \larhet tn
Coleman hate a "lot more activi-
t).' said Coleman Mayor Harvey
Gene Robinson

He said the Rail-Trail has put
his community tn an upbeat mood.

"One night on the trail. there
were more than a dozen hitters
and bikers at 930 p m. on iust our
single mile." Robinson said.

"I am just thnlled about it.“ he
said. noting that some people are

 

DONE A vean EARLY
Successlul lurid-t

"All. REVENUE

TOTAL: $3.37! million

 

 

aiainq slowed Crews to lintsn the Pete
Marouerle Flatt-Trail ol Mid-Michigan ahead at the ctciected
1990 completion Here s a tooti at various phases ot ital
won: and where the money mo horn:

PERE MARGUIT‘I’E RAIL-TRAIL

 

1995

I St 640 000 - Loci formations. businesses and
W8!

I 8905 000 - Federal Deoanment ct Tvansoodarnott
I $375 000 - Federal Land and water Conservation Fund
| $375 000 - Michigan Harold Resources Trust Fund

1993

DIV! "and! '-t H: an. 'JA‘

 

 

Gibson said the Midland County
trail is the widest in the state - ll
feet in the countyand t1 feet in the

city.

“Most people said. ‘Gosh. why
doynuneeditthatwide"Butwe
wanted to allow two bicycles riding
abreast to be able to pass." he
said

He said the signs are made from
recycled plastic. and will marl:
each road crossing. They will show
a location map with a dot. name
the road and indicate how far to
the nest trail marker both north
and south. he said

Both glass and plastic were re-
cycled for use in the trail. Local
volunteers collected t million
pounds of glass tn various colors
and recycled it lorusein the as.
little “glassphalt” stretch from
Dublin Avenue to Cedar Street

Glassphalt also is in the ”Cole-
man Mile" that was dedicated
June t1.

    

 

 

MIDLAND

Another £300 pounds of plastic
come from local homes. and was
recycled for use in road intersec-
tion mend traffic control pests
in .\t' County‘s section of the
trait. Benches along the trail also
are made of recycled plastic.

Planning for the Rail-Trail start-
edin I907 Thetormer railllnewas
built during the height of Michi-
gan‘s lumbering era in the "70s.
but the right ot way wu aban-
doned tn ”It

The Rail-Trail covers iso acres.
Plans are uncertain for developing
the remaining a miles lrom Cole—
man to the outslirta of Clare. Gib-

 

kers with open tills

 

 

GI“- noun!“ noun-mes

MCLopor.“.olICLConstrucnonlnSanlordtrowolsaconcroto

WNW,“

interested in developing the for-
mer Coleman railroad depot a a
trail-related attraction.

"We are the trail end right now
and are nul as an entrance to the
Rail-Trail." Robinson said

He is loolung lorward to con-
struction ol restroom tacilities and
other amenities tied to the trail.

Nancy Randolph. a cook at the
Coleman Restaurant. said she s
"busier" than ever worlong for
new owner \tilie Ortman.

"We definitely see bikers in
here. Saturdays and Sundays are

WMTMarCedarStraot-risword.

the busiest. and breahlut is al-
ways busy." she said

The restaurant is open daily
lrorn 7 am. to Taopm.

Denise Spencer. executive di-
rector of The Midland Foundation.
called the protect a "wonderful ex-
ample of partners coming together
to combine dollars in the best pos-
sible way to protnde a tactlity to
sente the entire community '

People ranging from school chil-
dren to senior citizens have con-
tributed money or materials to the
trail. she noted. I

son said.

Phase I in the C!“ was comolct
ed tn tm The Midland Founna-.
tion purchased about 3 miles of the
land. The county purchased the
remaining land from CSX Trans-
portation Inc. for 9225.000 with a
grant from the foundation

Crews completed another is
miles from Dublin to Cedar street
in Sanford in Ill” A lurid drite
that year to "Close the Gap‘ lo
Coleman raised mom. allowing
completion of the trail belore the
proyected I!” finish date

Friends of the Pere Marquette
Rail-Trail was formed in January
ms The nonprofit group norlis to
obtain local support and funding.
and oversees the maintenance and
use of the trail.

Bitters. hikers. walkers and in-
tlne skaters are usin the newest
ord even

"We have no real counts and
don't linow the turnover. But on
the city stretch. I recently counted
we could see With ideal condi-
20.000 a month will
' Gibson said.

55

"E.
iii;

3‘
ggigfiaz

gag???
{it

:3

l

5

the eye can see near Coleman.

Between Eight and Nine Mile
roads. construction is starting on s
865.000 boardwalk and observation
deck near the Arbutus Dog.

A bog is like a wetland but has
spony The ro-acre bog
dates to the glacial age. and 4
virtually untouched and in "pris-
tine" condition. Gibson said.

Also scheduled for completion
yet this year are additional res~
troom buildings in the tillage of
Sanford and city of Coleman Other
facilities are planned for Dublin
Avenue and between Nonh Brad-
ley and Coleman I

 

ac. omen and—.39. 009
..S .3265: E 3835 :n :03 3m: :38
: 305 of: .850 .359? o::.:_ 9.3 $35
Em: : 559:3 o5 S mmcommo: 5 .228
{3:0 ..nflEomm mENm—m .o=:m>< 53:0
.3: 93¢ Bacfiam :o 98:65: Be: <
.3533 En? acts: mmEEoE ucoxmoa
..o 3550 “.313 moi: mm 3 2 mm; 2.6:
nos: 05 3 a: 35:0. 55.: 6.5.:Em E 25
dz 1.32. SE 5:55:58: a 23 535
. mcc... «Ea mfimvo— ox: $55 .850 :o zocoE
Emam >65 cc: bEDEEou 05 35 2:8:
....En more: o5 as: 556:8 uuaxo o5 :0 >95
e wco: :26: 3.35.. .23 :8an ...mmoEmsp
: 333:: ems: a coma 98; 305 3:: :5:
85.22 o5 mcofi 35.538: 85 moon—ms
45:55am: m2 :0 3:on
2:38 o5 355 :m5 EESEES o5 SE
L23: 82: $53 Jinn 3:3 chowfiwm v5
«Ekémm 3:26.82 3mm o5 .Efloonmo .63
:9? 31:: .3:58 05 31:5 a; 33 5.0.80
...mmE5 «$5 E5038: no“ room a
PG 9.: x55 :5 5.3 :8— 018: one; a icon

 

m:o_ m»: m? :0; .3539: “555 95030.:—
82 m3. .23 535 53:93 on? :3 o: 5.:
.3: 25.: cc: doom—a ~85 9.6: 3 9:: m2:
41mm 50382 v:a ofim
$83. Sim 363.30 3.8m 3:500 9:222
“we? Jinn Sim ...—am m5 5m..— 529-com
335322 whom .32 :ozdobmm :33;
0:5 .xham SEA Beam .vgoEnEdo 5.9.0
xoflm €205 31:: :83 ...—8:525 :8
“:38 one .3353 m: 05: 05 m: 53 .813
3:58 33 :8an :5 .5835 mxonm
.55“ 834
585m 8 mom... :ommmmem Eot 95:8 35
go «:52 o5 5.5; .ooodwm E 2:53: couooaxm
.32 3.6 3.3.55 80.on o .ooodmmw
“scam mm coma .5.“ 33:5 31:: 9:.
.8259 m: mvoouxo
:8 .883 Sgt: o5 E 33.55% : oEouE
£23 .5836 o5 .29:on t ems? ..o 5.58
m EH5 32 E .315 Eofitnaoo :Buaouoom
ucm mxpnm .3550 3.232 o5 .3205?
2.32 be: 2: do
462.0 5:. a:

 

mmtm zockmcomm 05 9.1%
c.2300 0250.2 225 m1... ...—0 #24 < w. mam...

    

.32.: 852-: can .o
a... 8:5: u
an 882 a»... 2.63.8 c.
nan £58 222: .023
can .eé :8 Eu 5... ....
3.2

3:03:82". :25: ac... .w
.ee. icons: .ee-36>.»
...... 3:... 225m a
bemoan—£6 1.20 8020 .—

be.

           

o
$

 

 

Etcahago $23.5 5:98. 2mm: 9%

:gmmoom EoEmEm ..etmmH 5
.23m «A a: wEBEmE .29me
.835 52:3 .3 :53:
m5 :0 women ...o:30._ 98:0

per; 3:320 .52 E
.v:£m:m
EPc :Swom E edit: or? m2
v:m 582:5) Smom :55:

£5:on 5:55.. o5 4mm: 5
”Sn: £5 :0 55>.

05 E :2 man: 0mm 8: 82:.

>8me 5

.oam omen dean—585 .5
.5noB p.82 .mca BE 8 .832
05 E :93 5:55 253:.— in:
-...de :9: 3 8 m 553 “no?
-532 .321 m .80: 33 .29:
L26 Lao—o >538 mEEouon
$555 $5 nor—.3: 2:338
5c: 3520 .53.: .2959

..ofimmg

 

 

2:2... 5.8gg'trdwdr .lltli. .l. l 2.....1anHi... fig Hit-.5. 3...: all“ ten}... 4.. indict... . . l :15] . w..l.e..t.l..iqltl 1w. lidln. hit. Illa . . it «at

'
at
I
'0

no . no
a? It'll: 8N Zmnw_>

i
I
.. . .... ..t_\..u.E$L..e...: .... .§.,.V..!tn(rj.tn.uid..42.7. 2.. ...tt i«}ir..l....)$.h51.eitzo.ta«3 abet g.

 

.38 .8 98 5952.2 .2322 63. .m .8“. sauces.

 

ZéS

 

«(0:32—32:30 a. 30m 4...: 7:0 >302: .: a...» 6105:: #19:? o 4:0 9:30: @6030

”mm—-.Humm— >000w00m ”mam—u. Exocnmmcbm

a: 5:. ... #0:.
USE. F. 0203 5:3 0. 6:03. >:: . .
925:8: :33: 3. 0:30... N. 93.0.0 O:
4:0 ”gm—...»:

”0032.02.53. :3 35.5 3.0 3:.::: .30
.61..“ £5. 8:2 2.500. 3:5.“ «0:0 .5: 3.
8.0.09 maid: :8: 9.0500000 2.: onmwig-
:03 8.0 50 3:030:53 om 3:-5: .0050..-
scan—.0. «83:5 9.2 30 :00 08.5. 8:00.
808:3... ..oo: 9:: <58 8 ...0 $53.: 00:-
.02....— 350:3.

.....0 5500 O. .5: 9.5: r. 02.0w. 35:7.
.530 mac—=0 50 2:33: :: 732.5: 00.53..
..¢<0 m.£u<0 :00 50 B:-:::.: «a: 0:5» 0:83
......m 03.00.: .25 033. 3.3.;. :3. :00: 50 :5-
5.: 3:00 0:3. :50. .8: £70: :. 28:0: non
:00 9083 2:3 .30: .550 m: 90 9.5. wow:
80...

4:0 033% 28.0.0 o: 5:300: 3958:.
2.80. :20 £3.20 a. .0»: a 00:20 o. :38 a
£00... 20 330—0 38 0.0.6.2.: 3.59 ...
2.55:: .5: .o 000 .3. :uzmrfin o: 3005:?
no»? 20 mo .6 9.00 50 3&0 9:: 020:
$88250 ”8:. .20 33.0.0 3.: 920 m: 90
£55.00 £30: :4. 300 2.: £0 0:: m£::. 8 50 20.10.. «:20. 6:0... <u=00 020V. 8.: CM. 5 2...:
02:52.0 Euro : w 930:: :0? ...—4.0 8:.::: 33.0w : w .o. 320 1032...: :0 2.5. :0: ...0 8:-.2:
£0 :2... :30 8 mm... £3. 50 5.30 .5: :05...

.525: Z. 0505 N. 1:00 ...0 3:75.: :. a 9:: 0:300 £3. 20 «25:38:? :0 02.3.. a: .00 0.0.5.
02.0 m: 953.: ... ...0 0:: on 50 3:-55. ...—.30 3:..3: .0 3.05: «a: 0:5» 033.. .428 <2: {:0 2.08.
...m moo: ..on 52: .5: :5 3:...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

J¢/

 

     

<0_. .mm. 20. .00

 

  

         

   
 

q... (.....r... ~ ...vr

       

 

 

I 4

P‘..V Cg!

 

:0 1.; 5

20000003.. 00.002 2. Bow. $0.000. 3.0050:

3:33.83.» 08980 .0

.56 5...: 3.23: 5.0.30?

aw. HMO QZMF
. . 0.. ~00 Dune. 2080

325200 £0.13 ..on n00 Z.0_m:0 000:3. 001.0:
0.. ~00 mum; gang»? wafenm: Ed 052..

4.00 womn0 0.. 005803.038 €03.03. «.080 w-o 8
008.: 0 «000.000 «.5. ....08 p00 wozg E. 00332?
2. m.0::0030: ..0.. 8958:8000 0.. ~00 0.:mma 001”.

.35 5000:0000: 2.00500 90 m5 80m. 00 0.30 0.5.
..2. ":0 60.802000? 00.035500". 805.0258 9:0
0.0%.... 0.. ~00 30:30.

. a 80:3. 0.00 E 83993» 0 : Ba 80: ram .
SN 90 wacoboo 0:32. 0:0 0:_mm.:m n00 .wammm.

13.5 850.. 00.: 0.08 Em 30:3. .5 0 CE: ..000. 8.0.0.:
0.8 on: 0.08.00 0.0.6.. 00003000.
. .35 80:8. .935 0 500.013. 0.. 90 30-2.00. main..-
Sm 0.08.0005. w000 8 90 0.J. 0.. 00.080? .55 m3»
.025 .500». 0.. ~00 «30. ..35 "00 ...10mm ..0 000::
.300. mm 005.00 00. "00 3.0.30 .90000030? 00. 90»
9.00.0 .m Pinsm 90 0.3. 035.0050 8 £03 0<m~ 0.3:-
02.05 0.. "00» En.

....00 3.00.50 m.000002.0: m0<o ..00 8:53. «00 80:.
8. no 003003 .3 3-50m £38... 0: wao ..38 Omx
4403001030: .:n.

Ammo 4.9500305... tuna >5

m00:0m:0:.:

.Ooazucan— ...udE tuna >5

w00n0 008.300: 030 $000:
.0500 :5 n5 .0 0 {0:00}: 283.
0.0.. 0.. 0 won—.0. 8:300» 009200:
303003.. 0.. 3903..

4.00 0090. 8:303 003.00: :5
30:00:03 .50 p00 0.33:0 0..
Z.0_m:0 000 909.: in on: 000.
03.0 930 300033 ES 90 .026
70030030 Mai—93:... (5.00:
00.0. ...» .m 0 3005.8 90" an: 00
03.3.00 0w. 33. 0:0 00.53. 22....
00:8. 00 £0: 00 5.383...

.0 33.. 90 002.0 00035.0
«~9me 8 852. 50532500 0..
90 ~30. 2:02 99: 00.. m 002. ..mm
5 0.08. ...—5 mini—m 0.. ~00 v2.0
7003028 mam—0.4.3.. "00: $0180

I

 

 

... H _ was 02 003.

n ..0:0-..n.u.:w 35005: 3 20.3
0.5» 2000:". 00" 9o 002.0 0530
8 8.3.. 03. 0.2.2.33.

000:3. >03.:.m»3»0100:.
"3:2. 2.03 200.: «0.0 .....a «5 a
06.830 0:0 00039080 n03: 25
8:500:03 0.. «32.0. 2.3 .000.
008.00. .: 2.5 02100503 0.. :5
30.93:.

4.03. £03 50:45.39. 5 35
5.00.0 "Ian... 00 «0.0. ......00000-
0000 2.90000 203 ..0 00... 9a
..0:0m 030 8 00:0 ..00 2.0:...

.55 330.002. 0.. 25 30:3.
02:0 ..33 30.0.3. 000 3.0033
00:09.03 0:0 6...:8 ....03 9a
.38 0:0 .0026. 9225503.

. Cc. ta nit—=3.
“05 SE 33% g 5:530 23

a
35 8.. .. ...“: 222: 2: EB.
_m3=:_E uni-.." :uEBoQ 55»:

m .25.?» 8 Soda» a
m 585 22.026: omfio>a 2: c5

 

 

...cm:_:om 05¢ mots: :23: .meggtpw
..Eam E>om ...§::E—:8 See—aw“ , .. A
“9:: 278: a «£82. 3 33:3

 

88...: .5398... ..

H. M. 53....

m. ...:mE
..7 .390 3 5828 =3 8 on... 03..

.. .980 .55
w .3355 EB 5386 0.55:8“:
.0580 c5222 2: .o .8886 25
-898 4:33 .382. Sam ....taaa,
m:_=£ “8:...“ I 533:9: :_
was 9.5858 05 :5 .35 as:
-.B— :o 3.825: 36:39, .82.:
5. 525.00 .0 b? 05 .8 5.8:
3382 . 8.: 2 .m.: 22.3..

‘ w . $55: 35 539.538 3 :2:
. 198 :a :8 :33: a. fit 5:83
93:30 6:22: I 25.5300

a use: .2263 HE. :9. I
.... can... >33.» .

 

 

 

 

 

...:950... :23: E38 8. :o 3:0: 2 32 0:. 2.: ac: 052.2. 2: .0 to: 26:3: o. «:3: 3:26 2:. .5. con. a 093:: =3, «one: 32:: .250. < .

 

M :mEEoUmaE Econ m: . ......E < .

:50an 32:! ten no... .

vi.

.1105

fuNFJNkjcuru‘w ,. “x . . . . . . .. .. m?
h . .. h, .- . ‘. .-

. tfuét.‘ . v A \ n v
f. . q -vaKMth. ..r \Huv.
v ‘ g

u‘}

 

- ....838 2: __a 26.. $5 E8. .6» ..

.595 55:... .o :38 2: B .25 z
. c . V .8 g 388 2.8% _ .
2.3 :. .-.... 9.: .3152... ...

9.8 2:8 3.2m 0.:

6285.8 53¢ :53 not 32...: .2: 55:09.2. NE 8: 5...
:32: 05 ..o 8:82. 8: .voE8:8 as:
can 8:82. :29: 2: v2.33»

fun-.V :.

4:528 05 89: uExuo. a. “a5. .0 6:0 5.05
a 0E3 05 .3 tan «a: F: 60330.. ..:m
:5 >55: cw—aEam hop—OE 05 as
l i . x we. to...

03.. 3.3:: .3 EB
index“; .2.) 5 =5..va 5 $5.52.: .Vafl
. :1... 5:7. ._ .

Zéé

[0.352.

“008

@0200 0000000 £030 002:? 0000

aw. .005 0.20:;
on p70 Dim—w. 2093

> 3.000 2:07.00: 0800 00700
.0800: £030 8 70 0 303700 0..
97.0 300.0:0 00::3. 00000 00
0033.00.30.00.

00:3. 03000 00000 323703
$0.0:0 €00.00 0: 4000000.:
500:7:00: 01300. _.00 070 9030»
u 000... 20 00300008 200 8 0c: ..00
070 0300. 9050’ 0 09000 001. 00
000030 00307.0 0:0 0: 000000?
00.0. 000000 0:0 700 8£:m7000.

03.000 .0 p7... 000030 .00£:m7.0
07.07. 3:3:0 0.0030: 3 Ema 30
000—0020: 3 50».

m:<000 00.0 70 £050 70 3000
3800080 .: 00.2.30 0: ~70 70£
037000303 0:0 0000.00! 003-
3:80 7000:00 00 7.0 700703.30.

....3 <03. 000.0:7:0 0000?...
0:0000 00.0.

.. 03.000 0070 70 700:; 080.00
087078 0: 90 0<00000£03n 0007.
_.03 0p 90 :00—0:0 00:30 00:... 7:»
90" 03. 0:07 00:02 £050 70<0 8
30.000 0 .007 0. p70 00:.... 3.083.

H .. p737 £0 :000 0 75000 00:.

7:0 0.. »70: 003’ _.3 :00 «:00 £0
:000 0 :0£ 00:... 03.000 2:0. :20
0.00 :000 8 .007 00 ..70 00:10 0:0
£7v~ 073% 870 00 8:0 8 30.0
08:0 ..7000...

m:<000 00.0 70 0083 0: 0.000.
00 0000 0033.008?

...—.700 £00 3v. 000.30 700000 _
080.00 7:02.30 0: 00000. 7:.
9700.0 0.00 £709 0000.0 730
700: 8:3m 30... 70 00.0. ..—
p7.:r ..70 0000 0033.008: 303-
7000 70<0 8 70 0000::850 8
00307002...

0:30:23 ..70 00330008: .0
0000380 70. ..70 00.53: 70000. 7:"
.0 88830:: 3 ,8 0020:. 0:0
000.083..

10070 000030. _.00 308:00.
£7000 _ .70... 03.00.. 00.0. .5?
70:0 0 @000 E 7000. 7:9 .70 00000
000—7. .000 00300730 8 70
000.000....

0300.. 00.0 70 £00 .5032. ..70
1000 303.520 202.000: £70:
p70 .00: £00 00000000. 7:. :0£
00.60: m...

.0 £00 00030.. .0 7000000 8..

 

30:02 0.. 0030
000.. .0 07000.
3.0: 0. S 70:;
.000— 8200... 70

 

00.0. .05. ...
3:0 7% 30
70:00 0:0 03
0:001:00 70£

0000—00 = 00. _ 009:!
0.0:... 97.07 @3000
0709 30:0. 000.

0.0 £003 :00 z...

010:0 00 »70 00:1 £00 £050
00.. 03000.0 0.8::0?

£070 080. ..7000 00 070:" 00 0:00
00 0700 00: 70 8 30:. 0:0 0709.0
:00 1N7»... 70 00.0. 470w. 00.. :70
£030: 00: 00 :0 £030...

03000 0000 70 .0 00030. 0 0.0:
900 0050 0000.7; 000 003030 8
<0800:0 203008— 0007.

.€0.<0 no» 00700 000.8 3 ~70
00:32 ..700 :000 0000.0. 00 _ 00:0
000 0:5:n 3000 30:02 38 070..
0:0... 70 0000. ... 7070<0 3 00300.
330:. 7:, »70 00::5. 07050:; 70
38700. .08. 00:00: 07050 :0. 7..
3:00.80 0709 £02...

 

a! any OiM—F
00 ’70 50:0 20!-

wo_0:0 £00.30 02.36 7.0 00.0
0: "70.300730 000:? @0000 0..
0033.00.30; 0:0 £38 8 00:.
2:00 ..00 0:372. 83.

$0300. 0700030: 0.. ~70
>03.:.uo00:0: 0:0 0000020:-
0033380. .0 000—03 0 :77 "£0.
2000 803. :0 0000.. 00:3. 0300..
0: 0:000:07 ”00:772.: 01303.
000 070 902.00.. w 0000. £7.07 00<-
00m 003 0.. 000030 .00£:07.0 0:0
0: 000003010. 000000 0:0 700
81307.00.

:70 070,000 0 30000 0033500
000 .0 0.. «70 8 R003 70 700: 0:
»70 70000 0:0 70 0:03.00 ......
50000 00.0. .5000 70:00... 0: ..70
700 0:0 003.0008 _.00 070 0233.
0:0 ..70 80008303 £37 _0700
03:00...

£030.. :00 300, 0.. »70 .0700
300.8203 70.0 7000 00:200.
30000200 3 »70 no 8 Va 00000:—
00:00.

.5060 700: 00020 1:000:20:-
£=7 .70 8.7...- £005.... 2000.

£000: 000 070:. am 00000:, 0005.
00:. 00 x... 03008:. :0. 8 .0"
0703 00.. 0:» 0.. 70:0...

£00.00 .000 000400 00 070.030:
0.. p70 00::3. 70000 _.00 "£0 «0000.
:0 00.0 70 .100 8 080:0 0: .70
8£:u700 3002.50 3 7:. 0000100.

.03 07000 8 70.0. :0. 8 380-
..000 £37 83307.0 7:00:08... 70
0000. J 5 8 no» 7007 8 00:.
0280:”: £7.73 3 70:00 .0 p73.
00: 30 £37 0 0:00:09.

£00.00 0000 07000.: 80730
070:- »70 007 70 0003.. 0.03..

..=. _ 0.0:... 033. z. _ £0:_0:... 70
37.00 :0 m: S... 70 0000. .._.3 :00
3 mp _.00 070 30:00...

£00.00 200 70 0:0008 ..70 00:
>038J. .0003. £707 00 0803.3
..70 0.0: 0<00000£03m 0007—03.

...»... 0: 0.0 75—030.. $00.00
00.0. .30.: 73.0 8 390 002....

500.30 0.00 300008 _00<.:m
$0800?» 20300.0. 000.. 00 z .0.
30800 00 00.0.0030 003030
.7000.

.... £0 3000 .p 38 0 0030.
3.030. 7 £050 00:» :2 3000 .70:

.056 700.0 8.. 2000.00 0 002 0: 2.3.0:: 0032 70000 .
S0050 00000 0 03 0003 0: 00000

0» £0.00 3070...
70 00.0. .€0.0
:000 833:0
97000 8 £087
3 0:0 0.00: ms
:0...

£00.30 0:0.

   

0008 0.0080 ...

0000 00337.. mac—0:0

BIO—‘03. £3<OH
.00 :70 8

000 0.20 0.. p703

0.0080 70. 00090.0»... 70 0000. ...—.70»
.0 700:0 003000000 3 703.30
:0£. 7000:00 ... £0 0.0080 ..703
8002. 0702 £050 70<0 8 70 0?
.0000. = 073. 0: 0030 ..003 070
0:3 »70” £0:_0:.p 70 00.0 700080
3000 0.. 070 0000 00330008: £007
00 00:0 0: ~70 0:00. 00000...

50000 00.0 »70 70000 00 0
£720 :0 8:000:35 0:0 «00:00
30:02 £307..

...3 :0» 0000.0 8 3070 8:07
000.103.. 70 00.0. ...—.70! 00:...
3070 0000:... 70000. 7:» ...: 5:.
0:0 8 8:. z. 0.00 00 £0 003 0: up
03007.0 72:0...

[1‘01 , - -‘

. ' I ”.2
‘+ an 1.199% 11?“.
VOLUME 27 . NUMBER 15
WEDNESDAY. MAY 1, 1996

Zé7

;, The Sanford E

     
   
   

X

 

 

 

Rail-Trail Draws Family Groups
Photo and Text by: Kim .1. Kent

 

 

 

l

a family outing on the Rail-Trail.

Hikers. roller blades and bicyclists flowed along
the Rail-Trail in a steady stream in mid April sun-
shine.

Tim J. Little. of Midland County, brought his fam-
ily from his residence on Gratiot County Line Road
to the Sanford area for a recreational outing. “It was
a beautiful day and the girls wanted to roller blade
and ride their bikes. We don't have nice paved trails
like this where we live."

“This is our first time on the Rail-Trail in Sanford.
We've walked on it in Midland at Emerson Park but
we've never roller bladed or bicycled on it." he said.
“My wife rides bikes but we were too scared to try
roller blading but 1 think I may try it now. 1 see all of
these people out here roller bladin g and 1 think 1 can
do it too." Little's daughters had been roller blading

 

 

The Little family, Rachel M., 7, Charity J., 10, 'Il'acey J., 6, and Tim .1. Little enjoy

. Myrna. .
" "Sanford'f'f""’

 

in his 30x40 foot pole barn after Little vacated the
space but necessarily left the boat on the floor. "They
have a 30x30 foot strip to roller blade on."

Charity J. Little, 10. said. “l've been roller blading
ever since my feet were in a size three and my feet
are size six now." Charity. Breckenridge Elemen-
tary fifth grader, joined the Breckenridge Little
League softball team this year. Little has been wann-
ing his daughters up for the season. He pitches to
the girls.

Rachel M.. 7, will play ball for the first time this
year for the Breckenridge Little League. Tracey J ..
6. will play Tee Ball for Porter Township this sea-
son. “It’s my first time," she said. “1 like it up here
in Sanford on the Rail-Trail." she said.

 

 

      

Midland Community
Center Calendar

Wed. May 1
Building Hours 5:30
am. - 10:00 p.m..
Alanon 10:00 a.m..
Tops 11720 9 - 11 am.
Rec. Swim 5:30 - 8:15
am. length. 8 - 10 am.
50+,11:45 - 1:15 p.m.
length. 4:30 - 7 p.m.
length. 10 am. — 9 p.m.
all ages. 9 - 10 p.m.
adult. 10:45 - 12:45
.0. Dow Length
vim.
Thurs. May 2
Building Hours 5:30
ant-100000.109;

#84, 6-8 p.m.. A.A.
6:30 p.m., Rec. swim.
5:30 - 8:15 am. length.
8-10 am. 50+. 11:45 -
1:15 p.m. length, 4:30 -
6 p.m. length, 10:30 -
11:45 am. women’s
rec, 10 am. - 9 p.m. all
a es. 9-10 p.m. adult,
1 .45 - 12:45 p.m. Dow
le n g t h S w i m ,
Newcomers Club 9:30

am.
Friday, May 3
Buildin Hours 5:30
am. - 1 . p.m.. A.A.
7:30 - 9:1!) p.m.. Rec.

swim 5:30 - 8:15 arm.
length, 8-10 am. 50+,
11:45 - 1:15 p.m.
length. 4:30 - ‘7 p.m.
length. 10 am. - 9 p.m.
all ages. 8-9 p.m.
adults. 9-11 p.m. Teen
Swim. 10:45-12:45
p.m. Dow length swim.
Active 8's. 7:00 p.m.

is This How
You Feel About
Breast Cancer? ‘

Saturday, M8! 4
Building Hours 8:00 mem_.°ouu
a.m. - l .(X) p.m., Rec. mdteaworidol

Swim 11:15 - 2:15 p.m.
length, 1-9 p.m. all

ages.
Sunday, May 5
Building Hours 12

dllerence' .
CaI1-(800)221-2141
weekdays. 9:00 a.m. -

5:00 p.m.
(Central Time Zone).

noon - 6:00 .01.. Rec Y-ME
Swimming 1 - 3 p.m. NatlonalBreaet
lensth. .1 - 6 an all Cancerl'letllne
“my p.m.

 

P L E A S E
Check Your Subscription
Expiration Key Number
if it is Circled. Re-new Now!

(517) 828-6360
USPS MSSO

press

A GRIM PRINTING NEWSPAPER "YOUR COMMUNITY NEWSPAP
Business Ollice ~ 213 West Wright Avenue - Shepherd. Ml 48883
Serving Sanford-Averill-Edenvtlle ~ Hope ~ Olson - “11an Lake

PRICE 30¢

Meridian Supports
Students Who Excel

Meridian Public
Schools' new
Superintendent. William

Newkirk plans to
establish formal criteria
to recognize students
who excel. teachers and
support staff members.
A c c 0 rd i n g to
Newltirlt. recognition
programs have been
beneficial and have built
good public relations

where he has worked in
the past.

Board president Terry
Chrivia said Meridian
has many students. staff
members and com-
munity members who
should be recognized by
the board of education.
Presentation of
certificates may be
scheduled in the near
future.-

WMU Student
Win Scholarship

Rudy Stephen is
among the prospective
freshmen who have
been selected to receive
a share of $8 million in
academic scholarships
from Westan Michigan
Universitythisfall.

Syhen Rudy. the
son Michael J. and

M. Rud of
MU
Academic Scholarship.
Meridian High School.

The awards are part of
WMU's Medallion
Scholarship Program.
The recipients were
among more than 1,100
leading high school
seniors from 15 states
who competed for the
scholarships during
events this past winter
on campus. The
competition included
written testing and
group problem solving
activities for students
and information session
for parents.

 

May, 1996
Wed, May 1

Beef stroganoff.
beets, carrot pennies.
citrus fruit.

Thurs., May 2

Goulash. California
blend vegetables. tossed
salad. fruited gelatin.

Fri.. May 3

Cod Bela Vista.
honeycomb potatoes.
cauliflower with pea
salad. lemon pudding
cake.

Menus‘ are subject to
cha'n widtout notice.

Slttm millt. coffee.
bread and butter served
at each meal. Fruit
always available as a
deeeutehoice.

C"

~

To be eligible.
participants had to be
admitted to WMU by
January 10 with at least
a 3.7 grade point
average in high school.
or at least a 3.5 GPA
and an American
Colle e Test score of at
least .
.cfi'he students were
awarde “Medallion
Scholarships. Valued at
$25,000 over four
years. those scholar-
ships are among the
largest merit-based
awards in American
gublic higher education.

everal other top
participants won Board
of Trustees Scholarships
of $16,000 over four

years.

The rest of the
students received one of
three types of awards:
University Scholars
Awards of $12,000 over
four years; University
Excellence Awards of
58.1110 over four years;
or WMU Academic
Scholarships of $4.800
overfour years.

Sandra and John
Andrick of Sanford.
Michigan. a daughter,
April 12.

JodieandKen Klamer
of Gladwin. Michigan. a
daughter. April 12.

Heather and Robert
Dickinson of Coleman.
Michigan. a son April
15.

Joanne and Mark
Weidner of Gladwin.
Ngichigan. a son April
1 .

Shellie and James
Forbes of Beaverton.
Michigan. a daughter

Aril 15.

am and Michael
Cellan of Sanford.
Michigan. a son April

Zé?

FriendsFax b-26-96
FOPMRT

INFO:
FAX: 1-517-373-24 43
Philip A, Wells
JNR borest Management

FROM: Bill Wells
Friends of the PMRT
P.O. Box 505
Midland, M: 48640-0505

7 Page(s) including this page.

Although the fancy border is missing from the firs: page,
Lhis, oLherwise, duplicaLes Lhe CJrLen- “Friends”
newsletter that will be mailed out in a couple weeks.

19.8. This is faxed directly from my computer, not from
paper fed into a fax machine, so I'm no: sure how the two-
column news-etter might come out on you: end. Let me know
if it's a mess!

22cg‘?

Dav

 

 

[National Trail

mm.Am mmmm
new.” ewes
.m.mm. w.
Wm M a w
mmmwmmwmmfl
mmwmwwmme
MFWMdmmMMW
mmm mmMMIM
wmcmdemmm
mm¥.m.m.m.mm..mo
mnemmmmwmm
mmmmm mmmmo

onthetm'lJunel.

-JulieMills

 

Coleman Junefcst Bike Ride

The ride will be

Bring money for food.

Haveyoueverwsntedtoridethelengthofthe
Rail—Inil? Join the friends Saturday June 15th at

9:00AM at the Tridge trail head The ride will
cssc of “ifi'y” weather call Ed Elliot 832-2907, or

Julie Mills 835-1006.

We’ll spend some time in Coleman and then ride
cmceledhathecsseofrahaorbadweather. Inthe

(Maple St. parking lot) at 9:45AM, then on to the
back to Midland via the trail.

pick up those mien-mg to leave fiom Sanford
festivities in Colemm

I'l‘hanlullllllll Scot!

 

 

dedicated service on the board of directors for the

Friends of the Pete Marquette Rail-Trail. Scott is
responsible for the great T-shirts, their design,

Thanks to Scott Sandaude for 2 III! vests of

production and sales. Scott and his son Paul
spent mmy Saturdays on the trail selling Tashirts.

We are truly grateful to Scott for the success of

mg m...
one W.n
...“; mm

mmm MMm
m . .m
mwm Mia
Mme mom
.mm an.”
WNMMWWM
MMCWMWH

It .. l is. i ii.li‘l..l.ll¢iii0lu.llll§llllt Oi.i.l Grit” ill”

Hills ollfllllIilllileoll. oilsitil
s \ I VI . . . n I . . n u t . I
. . . n . n I s I A n l s s . . . . I

Kalil? 1'. Hi ? .itlilli. in. a

. . ,n H . . . . . . . y . , . . .
. v . . r l.|olli|or4lil4 it .itllli lnlltll.
, . . . . . . . . h u .. l. .U.” a H u . H u . n . .. .. .

....,.H...... .u,. .. .1...
., ‘ llaihl ..i. AlldlilJlillinl. i. lmlo i ii ix.l..l..lY.l.|lol.ll.lli 1.“:

No.2

Vol. 4

FRIENDSLETTER

 

 

 

IBoard MuunL

7:00pm in the Midland County Building 220 W.

Ellsworth, Midland. Times and locations are as

follows:

Bvexyone is mcwraged to attend our Board of
Directors meetings. The meetings are held at

3rd floor Cont Rm.
lst floor Conf. Rm.

3rd floor Conf. Rm.

lst floor Conf. Rm.
131 Door Conf. Rm.

lst floor Conf. Rm.
lst floor Conf. Rm.

June l9
July 24
Aug. 21
Sept. 17
Oct 15
Nov 19
Dec. 17

miss you, but look forward to seeing you on the
trail when you’re in town
- Julie Mills

 

—_7

 

 

 

—_

The Resignations of Scott Sander-ads, and earlier
this year Ann South- worth. l’mve created two
Bond of Directors vacancies Ifyou are interested
injoiningtheboard,orlmowsorneonewhois,
please contact one of the current Board members.

- Connie Good - President

 

 

 

 

[March For Parks |

ThreecoordinstedwalksinMidland, Sanfordand
Coleman tool: place at 10AM on April 20th.
These “Friends” sponsored walks were pm ofthe
national March For Parks promotion sponsored by
the National Parks and Conservation Association
The local organizing committee of Gale
Dickinson, Rd Elliot Jim Martens and Bill Wells
want to thank all of the marchers and volunteers
who participated in this fund raiser for the Pere
Marquette Rail-Trail. Dawn Dashner and Andy
Dashner were the champion fund raiser: for
Coleman. Each turned in over $50 for the trail.
JimHarniltonJr.wasthetopfmdraiserin
SanforimrninginovuSGO. I'haewereno
outstanding fund raisers from Midland
Each group of marchers met in their respective
towns at the trail and walked about 3 miles on the
trail, returning for a picnic lunch featurirg
vegetarian sloppy joe sandwiches. We will look
forwardtoseeingmoreofyouforthewalknext
year.

- Rd Elliot

I Menu ber-Get-A-Mem her I

At last report we were about 500 strong and still
growing. After you‘ve read this exciting
newsletter, pass it along to a friend! You might
discreetly point out that a membership blank
appears below.....

270

Your one-year membership begins when we ill
receive your applicationl

 

 

 

 

I

I l
: CIRCLE ONE: :
lIndividual Membership $10.00 I
I Family Membership $25.00 '
{We I
:ADDRESS :
:crrv smra_ zrp :
IPH l
IPH ONE l
:Malte CMck Payable to: FoPMRT :
l P.0. BOX 505 l
r. ________ It“)? Weflmn

 

I 1996 Rafl'le Ticket Drawim I

By the time you read this we should already have a
winner of the Hon folding bicycle! The drawing
was scheduled for June 8th at noon in Emerson
ParkAsstated inyom'lastnewsletter, all funds
received after that time are beirg considered as
donations. We will report the winner in the next
“Friends" newsletter.
- Bill Wells

I'l‘hursday N m Ride I

Every Thursday night at 6:30pm an informal group
ofthe“Friends”departfromtheTridgeareaand
travel via the trail to Sanford. Cyclists of all ages
and levels of ability are «managed to participate.
- You might want to bring a little money for a
snack or ice cream in downtown Sanford! -
Occasionally, riders have started in Coleman at
6:30, to rendezvous in Sanford Altanativcly,
riders have departed from Sanford early enough to
arrive at the Tridge at 6:30, rehrming with the
group to Sanford Could this become a really big
Thursday lappening?
- Bill Wells

 

I Pere Magnetic Calm Ride I

August 11, 1996 7 :30 AM

The Friends of the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail in
partnership with THE LIONS CLUB present the
Pen: Marquette Century Ride (PMC).

Join the Friends of the Per-e

Marquette Rail-Trail, arnd the Lions
ClubinthePere Marquette Century. The date is
Sunday, August 11, 1996. This year s 100 mile
cycling route is available for those who wish to do
a full century. The route will follow the Pere
Marquette Rail-Trail from Midlan-id to Coleman
ThenusingcomntyroadsmakcalooptoClarearnd

back to Colemarn, then follow the Rail-Trail beck '

to Midland Once back in Midland a final loop
arcurnd Midland an city arnd county roads will
complete the 100 miles. All shorter disumces are
also acceptable.

Optimal short routes and estimated riding times
(Times will depend upon the rider’s conditioning
and experierwe):

Midland-Sarnford—Mdlmd, 16 miles 1.5 to 2
hours; Midlmd-Coleman-Midlmd 40 miles, 3 to
5 hours; Niidland-Clare—Mdland, 70 miles 4.5 to
6.5 hours; Century route. 100 miles 5 to 8 hours.

Proceeds from the ride will support the Pen:
Marquette Rail-Trail, and the Charities of the
Lions Club.

The Pere Marquette Rail-Trail is approximately 22
miles from downtown Midland to Coleman A
scenic 30 mile county row loop has been selected
to reach Clare arnd return to Coleman. Another 30
mile loop arotmd Midland is available to complete
the 100 mile route. The pie-registration entrance
fee is $12.00 for individuals, $15.00 Day Of
Event ($10.00 for Members of the Friends of
PMRT). Commemorative 'T" Shirts are also
available for $12.00, and must be ordered with
pie-registration. See next two pages to pre-
register-

Accommodations:

27/

The Ashman Court Hotel in downtown Midland is
offering a special rate for participants in the Pets
Marquette Cerntury. A double occupancy room for
$69.00 for Saturday August 10, 1996. You must
make your reservations with the Hotel by July 20,
1996, torcccivc this special PMC rate.

Ashman Com't Hotel
111 Main St.
Midland, MI 48640
Phone (517) 839-0500

Checkinat'l'he'l‘ridgestartingat‘lz30AM
SurnchyAugll. Riderscmstartanytimcaftcr
this. Ridingtime will depernd upon distance and
averagespeedofthen'ders. Thelastsweepot'the
fullcoursewillbeginat2PMfromColemanto
Clare. TheClare reststopwill close at 2:30PM.
ColemmatllPMSanfardatSPMandMidlsnd
atGPM. Allridersnotdepartingfromtherest
matclosingwillbecfi'eredonednancefora
SAGn'dein.

 

 

 

 

.Pcre Marquette Century
Registration Form
Name:
Age:
Address:
City: State: Zip
HELMETS ARE REQUIRED
Individual Registrations:
Pre-registration $12.00
Day of event $15.00
Members of PMRT" $10.00
"'1'” Shirt $12.00
circle size: S M L XL XXL
Total: 3

"' Pere Marquette Rail-Trail member-ships
extending through Aug 1996.

Family Registrations:

First two family members same as above ($120)
each; $15.00 day-of-event; $10.00 for PMRT
members) Additional family members @ $2.00
each 3
”I" Shirts
Quantity:
_ S _M _L _XL _XXL
Total: 3

List all family names separately:

$12.00 each

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RELEASE AND WAIVER OF LIABILITY:

In consideration of being allowed to participate in
an activity sponsored by the Friends of the Pere
Marquette Rail-Trail (Friends):

1. I understand that participating in bicycling,
skating nmning, walking, or other activities of
similar nature (Activity) can be hazardous and
involve the risk of serious bodily injury. IFULLY
ASSUME ALL RISKS ASSCXL'LATED WITH

271

THE ACTIVITY SPONSORED BY THE
FRIENDS.

2. I understand I should not participate in any
Activity unless I am medically able and properly
trained; and by participating I represent That I am
qualified to pm‘ticipate in such Activity.

3. I HEREBY RELEASE THE FRIENDS.
OTHER PARTICIPANTS, ALL OTHER
SPONSORS OF THE ACTIVITY, AND THE
COUNTY OF MIDLAND. AND ITS AGENTS.
THE CITY OF MIDLAND, AND ITS AGENTS
OR OTHER OWNERS (put. present and future)
01" THE PROPERTY ON WHICH THE
ACTIVITY TAKES PLACE FROM ALL
LIABILITY FOR INJURIES OR DAMAGES.
AND HEREBY WAIVE ANY AND ALL
RIGHTS FOR CLAIMS FOR INILRY OR
DAMAGE.

I have read this Release and Waiver of Liability.
mdmtandthatlhavegivmupsubstantial rights
by signing it. and have signed it freely without any
inducement or assurance of any nature and intend
it to be a complete and uncmditional release of all
liabilitytothegrestestextentallowedbylsw.

Signed:
(ParasoerIdianifpaIticipamismder 18)

 

Printed Name:

 

Send to:

PMRT Celina-y Ride
Friends of the PMRT

P. O. Box 505

Midland, MI 48640-0505

 

32
as 8%: E... L #25... . .. . ...s N l\ W we; 32m
35%.m—U L . ,. . . .. .. c.m.%mw_w5m
..LLSLL . Lemma: 20. on
. ..PHL gHOHHHAWxVZ ......mfiwfimp...
I... .. 205m. summon.

 

 

 

 

 

\sz Nome . 4. Gears. 3.2%.... 2m§meeem§

 

mM—wLx—ZD um>wfirr>. Did—9A.. hunky—aw. zuU—EPZU. SEN—.1055. ZOZHIOew—tz >25 _S—wOOmde OOCZH—Ev

 

0335.5»... 93,532: 968.28% _OOOE

. ....1..I i... . . . . . .L

. ...... ......L .. . .. . ... . .
.. .. . ... v .. . .. u.
. . . .. ... t. ...o. a. . ..r ... . . . . . . . .. . ... . s . WLfflp’Ii
.... .....- ......... ... .. . ... . .. . .. . mm...“ 1&1»...
.» . t 7. . -

 

. no. So guinea Ewan.

phi:

             

PhOto by RODNEY BRAZEE

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

weft.“
Ln . a»... o. 0225.5. :8 88:.

. ......l... \.\l -.L aoEEoE: 3.6.332:
News... .... .. MA ...... - ._ .L 3mm com: o .qoaosaocm
r. ~......e...¢..... .. . . -. I. . ..

L ...... ., .. .-.. ..... .-....L coca. .0 5o .8».

L. .

“M L... .3... ......L . . 23:23?

.. . .OL W

A m ....L .

.L .... . 19:22. So 9:80..

W. 36.... no. to mo 33. 3.

5o 3:2..ch. amazon... o.
:6 of. = _u o .82. 2:3:

. .-.... sea coca. ace: .3 0.32
09:35:23 Scene :6
«...—8.

 

      

....LtffiwhyaFJl I ital... with...
.. K

’ sf. It In}

fl" - .
.IHV: L. ...I .....sqtav I.'. .‘f‘éfil‘bt‘ a _L . 3sg"§.ltzll“h‘

 
   

[.mhtr... . ... uggtulr. T ..
.. 5.. 0"... ....r

. .Cettt . ..oefiflhs-Erilseutté- 3....

 

275/

2.522 8588 m::2.

... 5 8:25 83 .5 85 2. :5 823.5. 3582.8 2. 58835 8858 5::
82:88... ... 5 833.35.. :5: :5 2c. 2. 0253:: 8a.: :5 2: ..2. 835 88:56.5
8::8 .: :5 :2... :88.

> 83:2 2. :5..< .2285 i:— 8 88325: 5:: 2.8—: 22.. ...—:5 8.85 3
02532. 3:» 8332. ...—:2. 3285 5 9-525 382:2 82x. 5 8...: 555: 5:: 5
:5... 822. 2:55: 5225. .

...—:5 8.5.8353 3:28 :5 555:. 8:258 on 5 :5 228: m: :5 85:85.:
28. :5 83.258: 2. 5 8:8: On :5 125 3285.5 .
”5:83: 2. 35.3.85»: .8. .52. 5:: a 58885
8.8838. o: 02535:... 32: 85:8 :8 .525 5:.

> 8322 2. .555 8:255 :25 285: .8. «8.. 8
£5... 85.8.5 :5 :2... :25: 228:5. m5:o£2.8
=2. 5:: 5 0.5525. 2: :52228.

.55 :5<2835:. On :5 :25 2.2825 822 mmn..."
12.25 8325.. 35... :5 :5 55:58.85 8 02538.5
8::85: 833.35. 85.838. 22.8.. ...—:5
8:25 :5 5885: 8 82 5882322.. «_.N 3.58.
5:: 9:: ::<5 3 85-7883 8:... 5:: ..oE :8-
8:283 2.58.

.25 32.2. 8:8: 2. :5 .3825 ..2. 2:... 882.8. 838 ....2: 88:5 58:3. 5::
:5 23. On 0253:: :8... ..8 833:5: 9.3.8: 8 £2.» ...:5 :5 252m. 888
2.: 2:55.28.

0.5.2.: 2:8. 5 8828:. ..on :5 85.838. 882.28: 3 5.555 2. 8:25
:5 822 838.5... 2:: :55 .... 5 :55: 8 8:22 8:25 5:2: :5 83385....
:35. .o 2.85. 5:58 ..33 :5 2.8 $8 2.52:8 .82: 39.5 o... 2. :5
8338.6. ..2 82:2 88 325 88:28 8 :5 :88 2. 8:88.

3:8 :88 :5 :55. 8:85 83.28. 5 52.5. 83.8825 8 28:35.8 £82..
3 3.2.5:. 5:. ..5 83.255: g 23. ..

.8." H58... 852:8. 2. :5 0253:: >5: 0.5322 2. 0o33255 8.: :5
8:25 2.: 23. 8.2838. :8 835 8 5 .58.. on. 5 8:8. :5 23.. ::

 

(C.¢§..(:C.- 1:: :7. ...:C-S:C (CC-.5H Cur»: :- 8:: t(¢(.C—=:f:v (r8?) rt. ...r.(c...r ...!
8:83.8— 82... 2. :5 833.35..

...—...... .... 5 8822 555 .5... 8:. 382.8 :58 2.5 3:3. .585 $8 8.3. :5
832.-.:i: 2382.25 .8: 52:5 28v. :2: =5 :5 2:8... 8.: .382. S8
.838 .o :5 252 58885 83.28. 8 u 55.. 522. 2: ..8225 8 =5 88...

.25 ”5:88: .5 5 No.3...“ .85 8:. £22. 2:... 32:55: 7:28: 5:: 02535:.
8: :5 5 .88: .8: =8: 3. 52:88 .8 .255. 255. 3:2 25:35 5:: 2:2
2:88 8.22:8. >3. 8:-32o28: 385 2. 8:82.58: .5 5:28: 2. :5 8:.
£25: .... 2:. 5 88.5 On v.85 55.3. ..83 :25 5.88:5: .o 325:5 5 .8: 8:255:
0253:: 8: 0.85.

OS
«1 ._.O<<:

_: :35. 888.5 8 .582. :5 8: 35... 5.5: ..2:
5:... :5 2c. 0.. 5.258: o: :5 £8. 2:5 2. :5 225.

..> _2 Om .585 :5 .3285: 3 288.. 8:2:8 2.:
25 .855 8 55. 8228 :58 :35... :5 52:. .... .8 85
2. :5 25:2 2888 2. 8:5 L: :5 8:8. .3: :8 825:

«3.025 8 5 382 ..2. 833:2:8 82:5 8 858:5 5 23:2
2:8 2: 52.. 88...
0253:: «<8 58285: 8 :5 5 83.5 8...: 3 :5
32:25 82.. 2. ...... 55:25. 8 325 52:58.. cm :5 255
.bm: 0:: 755:: .o 39.5 8 82:2: 258. _: .88 <88. :5

28.23. Ch. 5 8: :82; 385: 8.8.2:: 02535:.

_: :5 33.3%... CM. 3 :8 25:3. 5:855: .o 85 3:5 2:28 2. :5
:o£:.o..<: 28. 5:: ...... $8 8882.. a 32: 35.2 m: :5 5:88: 2. 82.5 2: 5:3
5:: 8 L. 58... 3:3. 53:: 5:: 8:85.: 2.35: 82888 .825 8:25 .o 8275.

_. :8 .25: 5 85 :35 m: :5 838: 2. 835 858.5 3.. 0253:: .o 38:35 L.
8:55:85: 522. .o .3838 :5 2.2.8 58835 8:528. 5:: 5.5: 58.5.. :55
2.5 .5... .555 882.288 2. 55: 228 £52: :5 55.. 35:: 833.35. .5858
..52 0253:: 828 8 L. :85 8:8 ..2. 82888 5:: 8:85 52:53....

...—5 8...: 585: 2.8.: 825 8 5 52.525 28 m2 =5 55.. 5:: £:_ 3285 ..

p.585 85 005252 -
p85 a

 

 

haw... : .

 

05.....:. 72.2.5.2. :8558 7:037... . .55 3...:

 

OOrm.s>Z .

.583 88 .

355 5:558 ... ...5 55:.2 2. 8.2:. .382. 8.: ..5
:88 ...2 .2255. .8 83.225: .... 8332 .8... ..
...... ..5..8:.5: .5255: ...5 x2. ...8: :8 7.2: 952.

.....2 :5: ...... 28 ..5 3:85:85... .....5 2.: .8 32?
35 ..2. 8:238 8 3:: ...5 555:5 55.8352. 8
£2. 8 83252 .88 8 822 (...... ...5 :5.::. 3::-
88.5 :8 ...:235. :35 (...... 2.5.. 328 2. 3:8-
:. .28... .

....<5 2... 2:2 8 .55.. : .85.. :2: 238.355... .5
8.:.

7.3:: o. ...5 :5:... 383588 8: 8.3358. «:2. 8

7.25338 .
35.8.2... 5... ...:

0:583 058.... m. c.3222:
22...... 5.1.2.82

...-:0 ......5 .3: 02532.. I. 2......
.m. V. 58.58....

 

 

55...: .35... m.8..

No. <<. 52.2.... m... 0253::. 7...
v . 0..... .88.... . . . ..

 

 

3.22..

 

 

 

...5 35:. <.....¢<. ..8. ..:<5 .55: 387.5: .2... 222:?
5. 352...; £35.. .55 .3885: ...5 8:85:55 2. ...5
82293.: 238.355.

.3: 02:0: .8 8:5 2. ..5 38:52... :8 3355 2.
0.2. 02:8: 0.5222. ...—.5: ..8 :52. 3 ...5 :5: ..8
: 83:2 2. :88. ..2 83.225: ...5 88.323: 2.
:55 :5:. 32...: .8. >58:

02.8: 8.: ...5 5.... o: 0253:: £8 <....::....
::.5 .58 3:: ...... :85 :5... ..2 ...5 .:55 83:2 2.
:5... 335: 3:85:35 3 ...5 85.222: :5: 8:8
«<2. ..8 :5 335225 385 2. ...5 85....

3.5.5 2.8:... ..55: 2. ...5 .255 ...2 .585 2...-
..o: ...85 «<8 88.8.. ...53... .5 8.:. 2.4:: :8
2.8:: ..55: : 58: 8...: ..2 2: 82:58. .3: £5 :5
5283.: .288: (...... ...5 5552 8.38%: 553..-
3528...

.....5 ..:<35 8: ...5 :5:. 0.2.38: x8: 2 ...5 8:...-
...8. 5:: o: 8...: ..8 5:25: 5:22 :88... .o E. 8
8.5: :28 2. ..:...5 58. :8 .o 8 .~ :28 2. .2.-
<:.5 3:: ..2. 85.8352 .8888. a... 0:525.
2522. o: .825 82.58 3. 0253::. 8.: ...5 :5:
.82: ..5 35:. ..8 83:: 3:832:25 82:88:
......5: $.82: 53.8: :::..<..55 ..83 we 8 .5
53.2358.

.058... ...5 8.8.23: 2. 0253:: ... 22.5. 8:
2.2.: ......2 £5 ...:2... .5 8.:. .é<5 .82: ....5 8 m5:-
225 58.5.. 78388: ...2 :5: 8:... 8.8:: 8:
.385... :8 :5 5.8.5 8...: .8 82-35:. : 8832-

:25 :382 2. 585... .82: ..5 : 82...... 52......

N _ . . J
0.5.... 00.5.0:

9.8.5..- ._ . ..

.....8 0.... ...o m8:
0...»... >. 00.2.02

..m 32.25: m..
0253::. 2.. a... 82.8.
32? ..-... m2. 928:. m<5:38 c< >2... .

 

.. . . ... 5.... a
..x. ... ...m.....1
I 11...;

 

 

.....55 :5 38: 3585 £35.. 82: 2......3 ....5 8-
8.5:. ....:::35 ..83: 3 ...5 :5:. 1.2... ...5 5883:
3 55:25. .5 3.5.2.5.: 58: 2.85 2 ...5 ..582
..35.

888. .8835 8.8 :5 58:. :8 3.2:. ...5
3523: 2.02532. .8 35:. 8 35:: 383588 2.:
52:52: 32:5 ..8 : 83:..-82: ...... £35.. 2... ..8
5.85 :88: 8 552 ...5 2:8 52:35
3 ...5 2.2.55 :5:.

......m ..83 38. ....5... i... 8. 2.55. ...5 5252......
3:82: 3 ...5 2.:. 88.2.5 8 W25: 33:2. 82:2
2. 33:: .583 ......5: ..8 : ..55: 3:832:25 32..-
.: 3 .8... 0253:: :2. ”85:8...

:5 8.: ...5 5:55.838. 2. 0253:: .... 08:23..
12.32.... 3 ...5 8.2283: :5:. 2.: ...... ...5 2.: .8
88...... 38.35 :8... :: 528.85. 8...: .o : .82-
88-2525: 833::..:.

......58 :5:. ...:58 :5 55235 : 22.25:. 3:: c:
78358 2382.25 3:: ...—.2 $5.5 85: 3 ...5
.82... 1..—.8. 8.... .....m 8: o.- ....5 «2.:. .5258: 3
......:..5:...:.... .....5 8.3.8.3 :5..<...8 22... 5......
:28. ...5 3:8.

 

                   

.3433... 33...... w.....~...===....... 2:35.... 3.1.2....
.2. Zita. 3:: 3.22:: 3.2:. - 1..... .32.... 23:53? A

...].i... a. I ..V...‘ '0... I“.‘

. 9.553.... 9.5.2...
5.5... $.25 ...... 2.:
3:5... ...:h... 3-.

5.2.5.... 3.2.5.5 . .52....»
C. V. «am-cum.

9"
59— .

 

 

 

1O

MICHIGAN PLANNER Fall 1996

27$

‘Rail-Trail’ Links Greenways

by Peter M. Pollack

' n many ways the Pere Marquette
Rail-Trail is the “ideal” community
project. Like the railroad track it fol-

lows, the trail is linear. collecting and
moving people through a variety of

Midland County and mid-Michigan

settings ranging from large to small
towns. including urban/built and rural/
natural landscapes.

This trail is designated for year-
round nonmotorized recreation and
alternative transportation. Those using
it include walkers, hikers. runners,
bicyclists, those in wheelchairs and
baby strollers as well as cross-country
skiers. The expected audience was.
and has proved to be, both residents
of adjacent communities and distant
visitors who come specifically to use
the trail.

By its very nature any rail-trail pro-
ject draws people together. The plan-
ning, designing and building of a linear
facility requires cooperation between
public and private entities, adjacent
governmental units and communities
setting priorities for using their varied
resources.

Midland's Pere Marquette Rail-Trail
is a successful adventure because of
the efforts of many citizens and agen-
cies.Butthebestisyettocome,for
as more people use the trail, more
ways for its use will be discovered.
Some positive community impacts al-
ready evident include an increase in
economic activity on adjacent property
in the towns and villages and the atti-
tude of those using the trail.

Historically Speaking

The 30-mile, 400-acre parcel was
bought soon alter the CSX Railroad
abandoned the route through Midland
and Isabella counties in 1987. The
Midland County Department of Parks
and Recreation saw the property's
potential and began to generate inter-
est within the local community. The
Midland Foundation became a sup-
porter of the project. purchased the

E r '“j. _ turf... , ~
Peter M. Pollack is Presidentof Fbllack
Design Associates of Ann Arbor, de-
signers of the Pere Marquette Rail-
Trail project.

 

   

property and gave it to the county to
develop into an all-season nonmotor-
ized recreational facility.

At the outset. a Linear Park Advisory
Committee was established to guide
the development of the trail. The Com-
mittee. which still functions today. has
broad representation from all the com-
munities along its route as well as
support from organizations and citi-
zens committed to seeing the project
through to a successful conclusion.

The master plan. A Vision for a
Unear Park in Midland County from
Midland to Clare, was completed in
early spring of 1992, which happily
coincided with both the availability of
lnterrnodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act (lSTEA) funds and the

Department of Natural Resources’

(DNR) giving higher priority to devel-
oping an extensive statewide trail
system.

The initial construction project.
generously funded by the Gerstacker
Foundation, was two and one-half
miles within the City of Midland. DNR,
Department of Transportation (DOT)
and local (but nongovernmental)
matching dollars for Phases ll, Ill and
N resulted in completion of a 20-mile
trail (Midland to Coleman) within three

L,

/ 7

- --uv‘

‘ 4‘

Construction of the Pere Marquette
in Emerson Park

‘A
V

    

7V

 

     

‘v‘ti‘r'v‘v "is;

u

Rail-Trail bridge over the Snake Creek

     
      
    

and one-half years. A trailhead exists
in Midland and two others are under-
way in downtown Coleman and San-
ford.

In addition, the DNR recently funded
Phase V, a grant for other recreational
amenities and support facilities to
serve the trall’s growing audbnce.

Putting It Together

The Pere Marquette Rail-Trail project
utilized several available, but not
usually included, procedures to evolve
its master plan. Throughout the plan-
ning process. a broad-based participa-
tion effort ranged from the Advisory
Committee and a Public Preference
Survey to an extensive schedule of
community meetings. Monthly meet-
ings were held with the Advisory
Committee to review progress and
approve proposals.

All governmental units, including
the villages. bwnships and cities which
the trail passes through. were con-
tacted for their development plans to
identify any potential conflicts and to
offer ideas. Comments were also re-
ceived from the general public through
meetings held in three locations -
Coleman. Sanford and Midland - where
design alternatives were presented. in

\

i
I

 

   

MICHIGAN PLANNER Fall 1996

addition, the Public Preference Survey
was conducted simultaneously with the
inventory and analysis phase of the
work.

The resulting master plan is activity-
based. lt is first. focused on providing
opportunities for recreation and second.
on putting facilities in place to support
those activities. As a result. the Linear
Park is a setting built for having fun.
for socializing. for health and exercise
and last. but not least. for experience
and ieaming.

The continued potential strength
and excitement of the Pere Marquette
Rail-Trail lies in its diversity. with indi-
vidual features along the trail linked
together and presented to the com-
munity as a park system. The linkage
exists not only in a linear manner in
distance. but through time as well.
where natural and built resources can
be combined to portray the economic

evolution from lumbering and agricul-
ture to modem-day manufacturing.

Expanding Usage

There is potential to expand the trail
system beyond the boundaries of the
old right-of-way and into area-wide
resources. Undeveloped utility corri-
dors. other abandoned rail corridors.
scenic roads. adjacent parks md state
‘and can all be used to advantage in
assembling a comprehensive green-
way network. Canoeing on rivers and
creeks that cross the rail-trail add yet
another means to view and experience
mid-Michigan landscape.

Existing stores and restaurants in
adjacent communities supplement the
basic services offered by the county
intheparkandexploringthesetowns
can be an interesting side trip. Rail-
road bridges and historic structures
can also be used to interpret the area’s
human history.

Current adjacent parks and natural
areas that were once seen as separate
entities can be linked by the rail-trail.
Byutilizingallthemourcesofthedif-
lerent parks and natural area. a
complete spectrum of recreational
opportunities can be represented.

One of the few site characteristics
of the linear park property that rema'ns
constant is the uniformity of the straight
and relatively level railroad grade. This
visually powerful remnant of the rail-
roaderaisthepointfromwhichone
sees the adjacent sites' characteristics
changing subtly and significantly from
one quality to another. This. in com-

 

 

 

-
.......

Completed rail-trail bridge
binationwiththevarietyofplantcom-
munities found in the mid-Michigan
north-to-south vegetative transition
zone.canprovideforrichandwonder-
fullandscapeandecosystemcompari—
sons.Thearbutusbogwalkwayisone
interpretive facility already in place.
'lhehearparkcmservetocoalesce
manyoftheamenitiesalongtheway
intoacriticalmassthat could attract
manyvisitorstremsoutheastemMich-
iganwhowanttoescape“upnorth”
foraweekendwithoutspending allof
their time traveling. it can also ac-
quaint the local population with un-
familiarandforgottenattractionsThe
linearpark.intotal.isanopportunity
to remind all who travel its booth
abouttheherltageofMidlandCounty.

Community Involvement

One should never underestimate
how much people who support a
projectwilldotomakeithappan.The
request for Opinions and preferences
earlier in the project was followed by
requestsforfnancialassistancedurhg
construction.

Two specific examples include: 1)
Colemani-lighSchoolstudents helda
fundraising dance and raised $1,600
fortheColeman Mile by selling paper
chain links usedtodecoratethegym
for the event and 2) The countywide
“Close the Gap" campaign where
huge amounts of Glass And Plastic
were collected for recycling into “glas-
phalt" to pave the “gap" in the trail
between Coleman and North Bradley
andhtoplasticbollardsmnewproduct

 

11

designed and developed specifically
for this project) that are part of the
warning devices at all road crossings.

Participation continues through a
“Friends" group. which has gained
over 450 families and business mem-
bers in its relatively short three-year
history. Their activities include fund-
raising. clean-up days and general
support for the county as it oversees
and maintains the rail-trail.

Linear Park and Greenway

The Pere Marquette Rail-Trail Team
set out to conceive and construct a
park where people could experience
what Midland had to offer. It took a
conscious and deliberate effort by all
those involved to convert the idea into
a reality specific to its location and
design philosophy. Project goals. as
evolved. are broad and can apply else-
where:

0 Create a regional outdoor recrea-
tional and educational resource

0 Link the adjacent available resources
into one cohesive and recognizable
unit

0 Provide full accessibility to a wide
range of opportunities

Design criteria for trail configuration.
width. surfacing. staging areas. main-
tenance considerations and public
and private road crossings may also
be transferable to other similar pro-
jects The DNR is currently considering
the rail-trail road crossing system and
the steel bridge painting system used
for restoration of four river crossings
as “standards."

Butthemostimportantpartofa
linear park’s or greenway's success is
local ownership. That happens as a
result of community involvement
throughout the process and the re-
sponse of committees and design
teams to issues raised.

The Pere Marquette Rail-Trail of
mid-Michigan is a county park. but
one with a regional audience. Perhaps
the most exciting visionary component
of this. and any other greenway pro-
ject. is lts potential to connect with a
state and national network of trails In
the not-too-distant future. it may be
possible to access this linear park and
travel throughout the State of Michigan
and the United sates on a continuous
system of trails. However. to first be
successful locally. the Pere Marquette
Rail-Trail has to reflect its own peOple
and its own place. [3

I Recreation news? Call Jeff
Aldrich at (517) 8139-4243

 

 

Sunday. March 30. 1997

 

‘Park has quickly
[become one of
;’area’s most popular

By JEFF ALDRICH

1 of the Daily News

r1. When the first signs of spring
.hit mid-Michigan — sometimes
:even before the first signs appear
'— area residents are headed for
the Pere Marquette Rail-Trail.

. In only a few short years. the
'27-mile-long rail-trail has become
one of the area's most popular
parks. attracting walkers. joggers,
;bikers and skaters. With the
warm weather of late. Midland
,Gounty Parks and Recreation
workers have been busy getting
the county portion of the trail
ready for the onslaught. ‘
“When we get a nice day. there
are people out there no matter
ywhat.” County Parks and Recre-
atition Director William Gibson
.said. 'In fact. they never really
stop. I've seen people out on the
city portion of the trial when the
snow is flying.”

>:- The trail has gained a large fol-
.- lbwing since first being discussed
L{in 1991. After CSX Transportation
{‘ibandoned its railroad tracks
.a'everal years ago. the land was
’Tpurchased by the Midland Foun-
;.'aation and later donated to Mid-

;of the park is some 400 acres. but
:lit runs in a strip less than 100 feet
{wide
The first section completed.
{.from the Tridge in downtown
{Midland west three miles to the
{city limits. was opened to the pub-
'-lic in June 1993. A grant from the
:istate allowed another 6.6 mile sec-
jtion to Cedar Street in Sanford to
“-be built the following year. and
itwo years ago. the trail was
{extended all the way to Coleman.
3 Last year. $500,000 was donat-
Zed towards the project by the
fiRollin M. Gerstacker Founda-
jétion. with interest from the mon-
Fey to be used in preservation,
improvements. maintenance and
repair of the park.
I “There is quite a bit to getting
the park ready for the spring."
..IGibson said. 'We've got crews
;cleaning all the road intersections.
_etting rid of the debris where
snow had piled up.
I 'Once we can get on the trail.
.We put a big blower behind a trac-
tor and get rid of any debris on
’ nd around the trail." he added.
And we have to make sure we
lind any trees that were blown
flown over the winter and that sort
bf thing."
1 More improvements are on the
‘Way for the rail-trail. as $167,000
jn grants from the state and the
Gerstacker Foundation were
H'iinnounced earlier this year. The

 

[land County. The total land area . V

‘ 'L‘.

 

Midland Daily News

.:;Spring time means Rail-T

‘ "I ”I V J. ' :f _. I, L; t.“ '_ I . . f? :6," -u_
,. in“ rely-W » V/ tilt - «a

‘ ; ~ I:

rail time

 

.P

. .310; . .« '
"Fg’IPIl-‘t" J.,". ‘

. .' "“550; '3
\.v- " . y ~

7 "' :" ' _ .r.
"runnewufew

 

I . ’1
. .-
‘Wfl‘fi --. .
.
_ ,.,, .
I _. .~ ' a
0"
.

“Cr . P ' . \
‘ \‘ If" . -‘ . ‘
é“; rfi 3.

..r- sag-5'»

duo‘s.)
~ r.

.... “lip-"1 “'2‘" .
“7‘9,“ \‘(tlh;.‘.2..

:
I §

 

..d—fi

Daily News/ELM suermxst

Children and adults took to the Pare Marquette Rail-flail in Midland on bikes. rollerskates and

on foot. Thursday afternoon.

grants will allow the construction
of two mini-bathrooms and four
weather shelters. among other
things.

“I'm not sure if we'll see any of
those things this year." Gibson
said. 'Right now. we're looking at

difTerent designs for the projects
and later they will be bid on. Some
of them may not be open until
1998."

Currently. a 2.5 mile gap exists
between the end ofthe Pere Mar-
quette Rail-Trail in Coleman and

the beginning ofa state trail just
west of Clare. In the future. as
those trails and others become
connected. outdoor enthusiasts
will be able to travel from Midland
to Ludington. Cadillac and even
Grand Rapids.

 

 

278

List of Figures and Tables

Type

Table 2.1

Table 2.2
Figure 3.1
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.2

Figure 4.3

Title Page

Differences Between Instrumental and Spiritual Views of People-

Environmental Relations ...................................................................... 9-A

Activity Expenditures ......................................................................... lO-A
Michigan Trailways Linking Opportunities .......................................... 25-A
County Map of Michigan .................................................................... 43-A
Midland County Map .......................................................................... 43-B

Pere Marquette Rail-Trail of Mid-Michigan ......................................... 44-A

SUPPLEMENT

 

ll‘lllllll llIlll

 

I HE PIONEER..-. --

 

. MAY3 & 4,1997- 7A

 

State parks are T.
just a stroll away

Often, outdoors people are thought
of anglers, hunters, or boaters, but

there are many, many more opportuni-

ties to enjoy Michigan outdoor scene.

For instance, hiking Michigan’s lin-

ear parks.

What’s a linear park? That’s a fancy

designation for an abandoned railroad

grade.

1’: According to information from the

Department of Natural Resources. sat

the present there are four such trails
a liqlChilng: fll‘hfiKal-Haven Trail,

.. e an ra1 , art-Manta ue Tr

and the White Pine Trail. g ail

.,-. Some. like the 22-mlle Hart- ,

Montague Trail are hard-surfaced and

  
    

and in the southern
part of the trail. '
horses. . '
The White Pine
Trail. at 92 miles
(76.5 open), is the
most rugged of all
g the existing trails
._ g . and is fit only for
. ~.;’ '_ ’ __ hiking or mountain
.~ " ,1“ bikes. (The trail is
covers with ravel
m and Cinders. g
W7 Warren Camping is not
f . allowed in any of
these trails (parks) but nearby camp-
.mg or lodging may be available.

 

 
 

allow hikers, wheelchairs, rollerblades,

“——

ft‘llm, and a tripod for close-up work.

 

7 - A few years ago my wife and I hiked
Ithe Hart-Montague Trail. We began
:where M-ZO intersects old US-31 just
‘south of Shelby. We walked a few miles
through wood lots, open farm country,
‘and over a small creek on a very nice
bridge. We photographed wild flowers
'and birds and saw field mice, deer, and
cows. We meet a couple from Germany,
Iwho were in Michigan on holiday. _‘

i:' We spoke to a trail ranger and
'asked if he’d ever run into strange sit-
.tiations along the trail. - ~- -'

i: ' He explained about a bicycle acci-
‘dent a few ago. A woman tipped over
from her bike and was unable to get .
tip. The ranger assisted. as well as he ,
bould. until thelladytold him to grab -
herleg. .' . ~ -~.‘ ‘
i ; -He seemed a little embarrassed as
be continued the story. , .. _

t .. “I grabbed her leg and (she said.
39:15]“ did and her leg came off,” he

a ' "-'"l'l_§ ......i. ,." i‘
3: The rangér'stood. shocked. as thrill-‘3‘??-

Iadyfifiplalned'that her prosthesis MW?"

'gotten caught in the bike chain and... ' 'n
Eemoving her leg was the only way‘to -
“..eeher'. ' .~— .
1}. , Other than that incident, the ranger
said. the trail was pretty quiet." -' ;.
2;. Trail passes are required to use the
linear state parks. An annual pass ' .
.costs $25 for a family or 810 for an indi-
:vldual. Dally trail passes cost $5 for a
:famlly or 82 per individual. ' . -
: More than 100 different types of
:wlldflowers grow along the White Pine
: Trail. The Kai-Haven Trail features
: seven (bridges, including a covered
:brldge and an old camelback bridge.
{Several scenic overlooks of valleys and
getreams provide picture-perfect picnic }
:spots along the Hart-Montague" Trail.
9 A high-point on the Lakelands Trail
:ts a field of black locust trees which
sbloomln the springtime. . .

' Don’t forget to bring your camera.

_____ -..-

. . -
I, w
_A- I‘ z .._...-.~.a.._..—~e
. _ *4

w

I -..-.—.—_

_-'*‘__-V

_._ ____~.___a~_-

v. .
‘ --. - v-IM~V‘

 

 

—_ - —— -—"

_'.....“—-‘

 

BthondaWeufal _
mammdm'uem-emhu
abandoned Central Michigan Railway line between
Owossoadlmiawasanswaedthispstw‘ j-
WMdfianepmof‘n-mspondonbmn
mats-mileareudwflimblfitmitwflll
acuitmdneDepamnelndNannthbrdevd-
opmentasanil-u'ail
“Theappnisalmfdieniiroadmputfihabm
mwmmmmmhMm

week.” Doug Fishcu. supervisor of the revenue and

mmtammmdrmspmmm.

pastThwsday. . ' .
“I'bedeparmtisgomg maimed”
kmmwmcumgflyofdcraflmidcrmwfllmtbe
mldtoducDNRforuscasarail-uail" ‘
murmtsassocialedwimuamhlwm
wheavanablcfordisdmcmfilfiiemiewmh
complete,l-'ishcllsai¢

Godboldofttham'sl-ianTnilBlamamngsbug
mmiduuwboisusistinginmefamafionofapo-nfl
mlocally,uidthedecisionwas“aqncted”
“What the Department of Transportation do: or
dom‘tdohasliuieimpaclonm,”beni¢“Wewillltifl
admtcfornil-trails,andwewilleufinmoplwflc
Wmmegauflwblicmmnflmnm
a t.
“Wedm’twanttogobad-to-badwithuyoppui-
6mm.Wejustmpeopletohawale
ingabouttlnbcncfitsofrail-trails.1‘lm’salotof
Wading’ ° ndmisinf «nation-mmn”
“misinformation " '

flag /7% iL‘L

#

‘1

      

' ”‘1'”
' ' [.71.

 

 

 

From Our Readers

57 ~/’ in V1.
I”! .0545". PU ”V"

 

Likes"‘Ftails to Trails"
I I'm writing tamponse to Don.

Klingshirn‘s letter in the December
issue of the Michigan Farmer. which

expressed opposition to the comer-.-
ston of abandoned railroad right-OF

ways to public hiking/biking trails.

1 am a fruit grower who owns .75
mile of property along the Hart-
Montague Bicycle Trail State Park in
bmutifuIOcatnacounty. Priorto the
development-of 'our trail during the
mid 1980:. there .were many con-
cerns about the pmblema that might
result with: the public having access
to the ”back 40'. To date. We have
not seen any evidence of trespassing
or the stealing of any of our produce
from our .lan adjacent to the trail.
Litter is nonoctstemt. Our liability in-
surance hasnot increased.

We have. however. seen a lot of
friendly to en the benefits
ofa beautiful place to eterctae with-
out the dangers of public roads. This
has been especially appreciated by

Z/Ia/GIL

hmtlioawtth difldm win can go br a
ridetogethermarelaxedmvtromnent.

Local businesses have enjoyed the
tnfluxoi‘ tourist dollars coating into
the am. There were approximately
58.000 users 01' the trail this past
summer. of which bun-thirds were
not local incidents. 1115 has been a
blessing to local motels. bed and
breakfasts. and eating establish-
ment-3. as most people travel light
and purchase what they need along
the trail.

Our trailwas not ‘t’oroed' on us by
the DNR. butwaa the result ofyeara
of work-by ioml citbens who could

seepasttheparanotawhichseemsto‘

follow new ideas at times. The DNR
has done every good job of maintatnv
infiand patrolling the trail.

your community is fortunate
enough to have an abandoned rail-
road which is being considered as n
‘raiitrail'. embrace the idea without.
far. If you are fortunate mom to

MtéHlé-Atxl Emma;

live next to a proposed tntl. start
maidngplansonhowtocapitalizemit.
’lhatrnay mmjuatdtantngupyour
bicycle. having a roadside stand. or
starting a bicycle rental shop. Ni Abe
Unmhtaaid.'Mostpeoplcmas happy
as they make up thdr mind to be.‘

—Dnvid mm
m. Mich.

 

' 0 women’s pa . '

I Th .ichtganFarmer . . always
beeno ‘ ot'out'favori tilithelaat
year or so. You - - that sub
scriptions : in by us wives.
Whereareso - : esforusn-rect-
peo,patte ome ‘- -- garticleu.
etc.? lw - expecting pickles.
mdg- .. v lpreservingreu - and
mayb . tnspirationaipoem. . .

or - rooming.
~80“: Pontoon
Cadillac. Inch.

 

 

 

...

nun-5.8.25.0... ‘nunlm‘fl. (‘25:: tHCQ-CG “flan-CH Ann-H“

Wu. Clank—i. «fr—u...”
55.7. 255.5 35.... 158..

. 5.5.5.5 32.18: 55.5 5.8.: ..5
.555... 8 528 .5 ... 3.5.555 558
5 5852.2. 555.2. 53.55: «55...»...
5.2. £255. 53.555 .5858 ....5.555

..5555.

A

558 .58 552.2552. <...5m5 ......
....5 3.55 5.8.5 am. $8.855 528

55535553 555 5...... €255 :58 5
5.555 ..2. ..2. 5.5.58: 8 58w. $5.55
:85 855 855 ..o...c<..5.8.. .

.....5 .555 8.555 4.52.5852. <...
.555. 8 8 .8585 £55... 2. ... I.
Do... $5.. 8.85.5252... 2.2.5
.125 5.555 2.8 ..2. 5 $5.- 353.
.5 8 53555. 5.5.555 52.5 ..o...
5522.5. > .5585 85.5 528
.58 5: 55535553 £55: ..5 2. 5:5
..5 85.5.3 55» 52.5.8.5 55 5555.
55. 555 3.5: 528 .58 5 4.55.5.
.8581... ..o... 855.58. 558.. D555.
88 ...... 5.5 5.5.53 555.." ...8 8 :55
. $58.55 .855: 8 8.5.2.8. .....5

3.5.5 5855 2. 558. . . .
23.5 .55 5 .5588 5:5 85.63.

 

 

55.5 ..55..:m 2.53. ... ...o: 52.5 ....
.52. $55.5 :58 52.5 2.5 5385.8:
.5 5: 2.55 {52.5 5.2. £25
....5225. 55.5 32.5.85. 3.8. .5 o:
......5 82.5 2. 5.85.8551 ...o... 2.8 e...
.555. . .

.. 55:. 3. 5o 5 .2. en 85.55% 555
5.55555 ..2. 555 52.85... 555
..55555 .5: 33:85.35? 555.5 :5
.5555 ..on :5... .

> 2.2.5 2. 3.5.55. «55.555
....o...555.. 5 51.58 55:58:38.5?
.5355. 3.5.555 255.5. 555 02.5
0555.558. 8 55.8 5.555 ......
55885.55 :8 am... 5 5:8: ......
.555. mom—.... 55552.5 55.5 2.5..
5.5:" 8 585.. 2.255 3. 8: .555.
5.8.. 5.8. 8.8 35 5.52.5 8 5.55
:5 58555558 85.5558. 255

8:32 5.32... .2... 5.... 2.8.
£5... 25552.... 2.... 52.25

355585.. an. 55.5. 555.5 ...8 8.

..35 52. En 85.588. 52.55 8 5: .

O

 

..C...

Talc»...

cf... uof.

 

W.,... ‘fl‘w‘iflé E...
...“...F...” ......”

  

5.55

it
. .....n.

. - .. .5... .. .
.3 7.1... 51.33.56.

.....«...«:..n... 4... ”3““. 3x.

...«nvué ..c.

. .\.U‘v.-\.

x... ,. o .u.... ..
.

 

5.5.1.5.. .uv: «5...... ......u...

 

1. .... or”. ‘5 .

 

5...... 2.326%? 10228:.

_ .....5. .5 ...—.5. ...5 ......:m 855 2.55 o... 5 555 555855. 55: 2... 5.: .8.» ...8 5. ...—5:258... ..<.:5m.5.

.— ..5 8555.... :55 5. 5.85.. 55535.55. 52 :5 855.25 5.... .5822. ...—5.5.5:“? .

55.558... >555 555.55.. . ..

. ...} m8.m:2. .3. 5552.5 ..2.
5552.5. ..5..5 55.5. 25.5.. 3.8.... ..5
526555.55. .5 5 ....5 .5555. .55 5
855.85 .5555 5:5 .... 5552.55 v.2.
5 5.5355 85.5553. 5.. 5.5.5.55-
2. 5:555 ..o.. $5588.. .58. 8..
62.5.. .5 555.555. ..

$5.. ..25 ..to...». ......5 855.2.

........ ..."..........

.85... 555: 3. .58.. .53. 55.5

82.5 55.585 5555 8.5.8:.

.....5 5555 8555 ....55 .8 .85.
no: :52. 5.5 52.5 35352.8 55:.
.555: 5.. 3.5. .3558? 55.5. 82.5
555.52. 255 9.555....

m8... ..cc .288 ..58 «2.5 o...
8 52.2 558.... .5228 .... E...

.8585". 5.55.2.5 :58 85: 5.5.
5555.5“ 2.5 .555 5.58 5 5553.55

3.2. 55 585.5 .5 55...! .555.

.55....15. 5.8555 ..55 55.. e5 :2.

52.8555 2.5.55. 53 an» 2. m5m-
.558. .855.

. ....65 555.. 3-»... 5 555.85 2.
5 655585805 5553553 5....

555:. ..2: 55...... 55553.05. 281.55.

$.53. .58 82.5 5:: 55.. 5.2..
5555: 8 ....ccc 585.5 5: 5 5:...
2.5555 :2. 2. 55555. 855 3.55
.5 2.5 :23 5... 555355. 2.5 m8.
555.5 02.585553 O2.52.5...o5
5.. 2.5 02.58.. 2. 3.5.555 5855.
Eu. :5: 55588 5 85.55525: 2.
855.8553 555 5.5.5.8553
8555. 55.5 $50003 585.5553

m5... 32.35. . . ... .

> 52.8: ...—.5 £558 5: 5553..
55:3 5555 «a. mac 8 «5:. 8o.
555555.55 e: 5.8. 5.55 555 5.5.5..

.825558 5:8...5n 5.5.5.5555
85.5 55.55... 55535558 5555.55
.5 5.55 ....25 of. 8 H. mam 5555:.
..553. .....25 2.5 2.55.: 55535558.
555. .555 88. 8.5855
555...:«5. 9.555555 5: =8 52.-
5.. 55535558 55.. :58 .555-
....oo55. . 5.8.5.5555. 55.585559 2....
.5555. . ..

5.555 55: ..2. SN 55535558
...... 555555553 5552.5. 8......
555.585 .5555 555 an ..2. 55:55
25.5. .....5 52:5 ..55 v.53 8 .55...
588 5553.5. ..2. 5.5 55:55.88

85:...5... $2.5: 585.5 52.5 :25
...... 55555555555 8 555.585 .7..
.59 $.55. «53 8 5532.3 2. 2.5?
25555. 55535553 _.55 555.» ......
55v. 5 5.2.2.55... ..5.5 ..on 2.5 5552.
52.5. .

5:555 555.2... s... :58 :55
2. 5 .255 855555. .585 858:-
«559.5855 5.5.55 ..85. 525.8
5.5.55 ..85 ..2. 553.55. 55...
5585555. 5: 22.5.55 2.55 555 ...n.
5555 532.25 555 55535558

$52.5 ...-5:5. 555. .....5555 53.

585.355: 5.3. .55.».

.825558 5.8 $2.... 53.
55535.5. ..555 8 88.. 5: 5:355
2855" 8.55855. 5.552. 553...
555. 52.55.855.55 5:5 :55: 53.
<85. 55.52:. 55813. 555 85:5.
5535.8: 8 .555. 2.558.

.8558: 3.55.8 58:258.. <2.
.555 .55: 55555. 8 585.5 5...:
:58 :85 5 .555 555 .5 35:2...
555 558 858.5585 8 .8 8.:.
55:5. ....5. 35:... as 2.555 52.5...
55:.» £55.. 8 525 8 55.....2. a...
5585 .5 :8 £58.. 555 558:8
55525.55. ..5 55.5.

:35 55:.» 555555 2.5 £552..._..
.53 85 55: 55.8 .3 555.2. 8 .e_.
2.58. :8 £3. .55 .58 1:35..
555.552.... 8.585 55.5.

32.83 52.585 55.885 2:.
5.2.5.58... .852. 85.5 ...:5
552.5: 585.5 .5 5 5.58 555.7.
5.. 3.5.555 8,—7.5 .5 .mc 55......
55:8 ..2. 555555553 5252.5.
..o—.550: 55.5. .....53 5653. 8.2.1.
.58 5585:... A 5585:» on ....5 52.-
5.5 £55 2.5 53 .5553 an 555 .52..
2.2.8.5855 8 52.5 5.58. .2...
82.5 555.55 ....5 53:5. 5:52... 2.
55535558 8 5.. £52. 952.2:
5:58 @5885. 5: 5558.5 8.:.
5.2. 55... :5 3. ....5 885:2. :5.
2.2.5 3.538.555: 25.52.... 7.....-
.55. 02.8... 555.5 5: ....5 58:...

473-433

(J
Ul

Paul E. Inglis

Oceana County
Administrator Fiscal Officer

P.O. Box 14
Hart. Michigan 49420

September 24, 1991

Mr. Joel .‘vlilckelsen, Vice-Chairperson .
Michigan Chapter of. Rails to Trails Conservancy
Stony Lake Road

"'-30 F..- “n.-..:-.. J .‘l¢
l'-:\»‘ 1..: L." althougun 155-8'.)

RE: Montague - Hart Rail Trail-Impact
on Oceana County .

Dear Joel:

I have been requested to relate, from the County’s perspective, how the
Montague-Hart Rail Trail has impacted Oceana County during the past 2 - 3 years.
Several things come to mind as I think about all the negative reasons that were offered
several years ago for opposing the development and operation of the trail. '

First, it was feared that users would litter the trails, trespass on private property
and not respect the rights of others to use the trail. To the best of my knowledge,
there have been no reported incidents of trespassing, vandalism or rights violations
since the development and opening of the trail in Oceana County. I am quite certain
that the Sheriff's Department has not been required to respond to any situations or
incidents on the trail because of the dramatic increase in utilization. I have checked
with the 79th District Court staff and they have not had any influx of misdemeanants
in their system due to the issuance of citations on the trail for not securing a user
permit or for failing to use the trail in the proper manner.

Second, the presence of the trail in Oceana County has provided a safe haven
for bicyclists, joggers, walkers and snowmobile enthusiasts who do not have to fear
being run over by a drunken, speeding or unattentive motorist.

Third, while I have not personally conducted a survey of the impact on the local
merchants, the trail certainly has brought thousands of visitors to the communities
of Rothbury, New Era, Shelby, Mears, Hart and even Pentwater beyond the end of
the trail. These are people who would never have stopped to visit local attractions
or shop in the local stores and retail businesses because the expressway would have
taken them elsewhere for their recreational pursuits. It appears to me that the local
gas stations, ice cream parlors and grocery stores have benefitted from the influx
of trail users. I know for a fact that 'Postema Brothers Hardware in New Era sold
bicycles for the first time this year and they even opened up a bike repair shop in
conjunction with their lawn mower repair business (that is where I took my bicycle
for a "tune-up").

Fourth, some start up businesses and business expansions have become reality
due to the utilization of the rail trail. This includes bike sales and service and ice

 

cream shops along the trail.

Finally, and most significantly, the rail trail has provided thousands of people
with an outlet for a healthy form of exercise arid family recreation. Countless people
in and out of Oceana County who have not exercised in years (or not at all) have taken
the opportunity to improve their health with many hours of bicycling, walking or
jogging in a safe environment while enjoying the beautiful scenery in Oceana County.
No one can argue against the impact of the trail on the health and safety of the
community as evidenced by the numbers of users ranging in age from 3" 35 years.

It took some time and a great deal of perserverance on the part of you’ and
several others but it appears that it has all paid off in the end given the heavy use
of the trail. I have not heard one negative comment about its appearance or its

location. My mother’s property in the Village of Shelby abuts the trail and it has
or- “creed "‘9 smear-m- a of the area (9 arms-r3}; .deep and weed illed ditch abutted

‘( dOV‘h .0 ”Pk” sou-8" .-

her property). There has never been a problem with weeds or unmowed grass on the
right-of-way and litter has never been left on the neighboring lawns.

If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,

{:hL...

Paul E. Inglis

Oceana County

Administrator/Fiscal Officer
PEI/s,"

cc: File

HERALD JOURNAL
W-6,450

FEB" 9'89

Fiel‘”

.713

 

presemng ral

Oceana's William Field has been
named a Michiganian of the Year. and
the Hart-Montague Bicycle Trail re-
ceived a big' boost 1n circulation when
the two of them were featiued 1n this
past Sunday' 5 Michigan Magazine edi-
tion of The Detroit News.

Field was one of 15 residents:
saluted across the state by the newspa-'

per in its llth annual awards program.
“In each caSe. large or small,
someone went further than need be.

.vent beyond -the call,- for the better?

nent of the community and of each of
"the magazine said.

Field was chosen for his successful,

truggle to save the abandoned Chesa-
1eake and Ohio Railroad right- of-way
or Michigan's first linear park, the
iart Montague Bicycle Trail“

The Shelby man lust discovered the
dea‘ while on a family vacation in
Visconsin in the late 19605. He saw
vhat that state had done with its aban-

gttt HELP

”...—...-..g—u—d

 

‘—

.~

’CLAMWE LOPEZ
‘ WNW- '°F SPUR, use 70 W

'honore d, for
ltrail

 

Bill Field

doned tracks and he hung on to the idea
until the C&O announced it would be
tearing tip the tracks between Hart and

- Montague.

Field's proposal for the county to
own the '22-mile rail corridor for a
biking and hiking trail met with more
than a little opposition. And when his
fellow county commissioners formally
rejected the idea, “I went out the next
day and bought the property myself."

Field put up $175,000 of his own
money to save his 20-year dream, and

' then sold off excess property to recoup

his investment.

The controversial .trail probably
cost him another term on the county
board, but looking back he said this
week it was probably a “godsend" the
county turned him down. “It never

 

v

m

 

would have worked at the countyI
level, " _he said. “The trail would havt.
become politically fractionalized anc-
broken up.

“I' m very pleased with the way it|
came out as a state park,” he contin-
ued. “That answered all our insurance
questions and they (the state parks)!

. have a very good track record. I think it

will be very. well run."
Field noted the key support the
trail project received from Joel

197:? fMikkelsen and Barney Steen and

“many" others. as well as the City of

4 EHan who threw its political weight

behind the project and brief] y took over
ownership to pave the way for the state
accepting it.

A fruit farmer by trade, the 61 year-
old Field has been behind other preser-
vation projects of Oceana County's
history.

Today the trail is graded from

3 Montague to Hart and 15 being used by

snowmobilers and cross-country skiers.
it]; the sprig aontractors, paidfibg' the

ic igan n jlfrust Fund, wi egin
laying an etght-foot wide asphalt bicy-
cle path between Hart and New Era,
while funds are being sought to com-
plete the paving to Montague.

The trail runs through many of
Oceana's prettiest and most unspoiled
spats through the quiet places and near
the villages which were once served by
the C&O. A dedication of the trail is
planned for early summer.

Field the husband of recently re:
tired county Clerk Elizabeth Field, said
family'members have been invited to
an awards ceremony hosted by The
Detroit News, but a date has not yet
been set.

“Right now I'm just excited about
spring coming and we can get some
blacktop down," he said. . <

 

 

4 i

 

PAUL E. lNGLlS

OCEANA COUNTY P.O. Box 14. Hart, Ml 49420

ADMINISTRATOR/FISCAL OFFICER Phone (616) 873-4835
September 15, 1993

Mr. Joel hikkelsen

hichigan Chapter of Rails to Trails Conservancy
Box 269. Stony Lake Road

New Era. Michigan 49446

RE: Montague - Hart Rail Trail
Impact on Oceana County

Dear Joel:

I have been requested to relate. from the County’s perspective.
how the Montague - Hart Rail Trail has impacted Oceana County during
the past 4 - 5 years. Several things come to mind as I think about
all the negative reasons that were offered several years ago for
opposing the development and operation of the trail.

It was feared that users would litter the trails, trespass on
private property and not respect the rights of others to use the
trail. First, the trail was developed and is maintained and patrolled
by the Department of Natural Resources. To the best ofgmx_kngxlgfige.
there have been no reported incidents of trespasSingL vandalism_on
EFSEESUMNEPlatlonS since the dQXQLQQmRfll_anfimQflEflAnQ_.OimfihemL£a&l_Ln
Oceana__Couflty. In one (i) instance of alleged trespassing. it was
determined that the complaining party did not own the property:
rather, the property was part of trail right-of-way.

.Neither the Sheriff's Department nor the Hichigap State Police
have had to respond to any situations or incidents on the trail due to
its increased utilization. I have discussed the matter with 79th
District Court staff and they have not had any influx of misdemeanants
come through their system due to the issuance of citations on the
trail for not purchaSing a user permit or for failing to use the trail

in the proper manner. The DNR staff are responsible for writing
permits and issuing citations. No local law enforcement personnel are
involved.

Some other concerns raised were:

1. Increased Taxes - the DNR purchased. developed and maintains

 

 

the complete 21 mile rail trail at State expense. No local tax
dollars were spent on the process. There has been no increase in
costs to the County for law enforcement or fire protection
services. The land removed from the tax base of the County was
minimal.

2. Decreased Wildlife - much of the trail traverses portions of
the County that are populated or on the fringe of populated
areas. The wildlife have not been affected by the trail. Their
routines may have been altered slightly but groups such as the
Audobon Society report sightings of many birds and animals on the

 

 

 

 

 

 

trail.

3. Increase in Crime Rate - this is probably the most often used
reason given for objecting to the rail trail. As stated. t§£;g__
have been no incidents on the trail that would r_equire increased
_lay enforcement protection or activity. _Tmhe trail is patrolled
regularly by DNR staff. With—respec€~to utilization. over SQZ of
the trail users are families from all parts of the country --
City and rural residents alike. There are no unauthorized

 

 

vehicles on _the_ traiml and_ t_here have been no holdups or ambushes _
of_ mt_r_a:i_l users by thieves or petty criminals. There have been no

 

 

 

 

_reports of theft of farm produc_e malong_pr near the trail Eight-_
of- _way. Litter has never b_een_ wa_promblem. The trail users are
people who seek recreational enjoyment and exercise as their
purpose 'for being on the trail. As Oceana County's Emergency
Ambulance Services Director, our EMS personnel have never been

dispatched to the trail to treat or transport patients.

Who would pay for the purchase. development and maintenance of
the trail? Response -- the DNR with State Recreation Fund or State
General Fund monies. The DNR would be responsible for policing the
trail for permit sales and other law enforcement matters. Usage on
the trail from Hart - Montague has been determined by the DNR.
Bicyclers. joggers, walkers. cross-country skiers. horseback riders
and snowmobilers are allowed. No motor driven vehicles are allowed.
All pOints on the trail that intersect a public road are clearly
marked with stop signs. Several parking areas have been developed at
each end of the trail and in the municipalities through which the
trail runs. Shelters for rest stops and picnics exisiyghroughout the
course of the trail.

The presence of the trail in Oceana County has provided a safe
and enjoyable haven for bicyclists, Joggers. walkers and snow sports
enthusiasts who do not have to fear being run over by a drunken.
speeding or inattentive motorist.

The DNR and local merchants have confirmed that the trail has

brought thousands of viSitors to the communities of Montague,
Rothbury, New Era. Shelby, Mears, Hart and even Pentwater beyond the
end of the trail. These are people who would never have stopped to

visit local attractions or shop in the local stores and retail
businesses because the US 31 expressway would have taken them
elsewhere for their recreational pursuits. The local gas stations..

 

convenience stores. ice ream parlors and grocery Stores have-
benefitted from the influx of trail users. Bike sales. bike rental
and bike repair shops are open for business and all oi them appear to
be thriving.

host significantly. the Hart - hontague Rail Trail has provided
thousands of people with an outlet for a healthy iorm oi exercise and
family recreation. Countless people in and out of Oceana County who
did not exercise for years (or not at all) because they had no outlet
have taken advantage of the opportunity to improve their health with
hours of bicycling, walking or jogging in a safe environment while
enjoying the scenic beauty of Oceana County. No one can argue against
the impact of the trail on the health and saiety of people in and out
of the community as evidenced by the number of users ranging in age

from infant to 85 years.

I have not heard one (1) negative comment about the trail's
appearance or its location. My mother's property in the Village of
Shelby abuts the trail and it has enhanced the appearance of the area
(formerly, a deep, weed-filled. mosquito-infested ditch abutted her
property). There has never been a problem with weeds or unmoved grass

on the right-oi-vay and litter and broken glass have never been left
on the neighboring lawns.

If there is any additional information that I can provide you,
please feel free to contact me.

Sincerely,

flitgfl'

Paul E. Inglis
Oceana County
Administrator/Fiscal Officer

PEI/sj

cc: File

 

TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMINGDALE

POST OFFICE BOX 11
BLOOMINGDALE. MICHIGAN 49026

OFFICE 62l-3800 FAX 521-3534
Dmo E. Bur . Lam M. Sums Geese: Scmeuoeu
Swanson Cue: 1m
521-32.» can-«32 52:44“

November 23, 1994

Gerald Henshaw, Chairperson
Leelanau County Commission
C/O Village of Suttons Bay
P.o. Box 85 '
Suttons Bay. MI 49682

Dear Mr. Henshaw.

We understand that you are considering a linear trail
in your area. We have the Kai-Haven Trail crossing our n
township. using the road bed of an abandoned rail road.

Most people residing_in this area consider'the trailflag
asset.

When the Kai-Haven Trail was first prOposed some of the.
land owners with property adjacent to the former rail road
were concerned. They anticipated problems when the trail
would be opened to public use. I'm happy to report that
these fears were unfounded.

The DNRgprovides regular supervision of the trail.

They check for trail condition. passes and any use not
conforming to that which is approved. We rarely hear of
problems.

Our trail is extensively used by families and groups
such as scouts, churches. clubs. etc. The hikers and bikers
are people who seem to take care of the property and are
concerned about the environment. They are people we like
to have passing through the area.

In conclusion. I believe the trail is a benefit to
our community; It serves its intended purpose and has side
benefits such as bringing business to the retail businesses.
I would not hesitate to recommend such a trail if it func-
tions as ours does.

Good luck in your endeavor.

CC; Richard Bahle. Supervisor Sincerely.

. W2! 87$

David E. Bly, Supervisor

 

 

DEC

13

.Jflanua exhawuwéfifi

Immidflhdfiéfifififlkni
W., 4632.9“ 4.90.9.9

(6‘14?) “24.966

hR. DAVID HARSH 12-9-94

SUPERIHTENDENT KA; HAVEN TRAIL

REF. THE KAL HAVEN TRAiL in ALAHU Twr.
THE TRAIL HA? seen GOING son 4-5 YEARS THERE HAS BEEN no
Paustsn on IT 1N ALAhO Twp. IN FACT IT HAS BEEN A LARGE

SUCCESS IN THE THP. 1T GET A LOT OF YEAR AROUND USE, EVEN Th8

 

SHOHHOHLIERS mun THE SKIERS GET ALONG TOGETH‘W. THERE "A5
BEEN NO Cfllflfl ON THK TRAIL AflD THE PEOPLE HHO USE THE TRAIL

AHL veer uuuu AbUUI THE ulTTru. Tun? rvsu PICK IT UP IF

THEY FIND ANY.

 

we nave A RESTAURANT NEAR Tam TRAIL THAT 3A3 PICKED ur
BUQINESS FRON THE TRAIL. IT HAS use» 0000 roe THP AND THE
PEOPLE IN THE AREA.

yARRY HBLHBR
ALAHO THP SUPERVISOR

’94 17:81 613 8377734 PRGE.003

 

 

Pine CEFrove Township

 

 

P.0. Box 20 KENDALL. MICHIGAN 49062
SUPERVISOR cusm; Taeasumzn Tammie TRUSTEE
1..-9,. Judah emu Van. Huincunan Mm Rand-I Cue Coon»
£$iw£fif7méfla¥3

DECEMBER 6, 1994

DAVID MARSH. UNIT SUPERVISOR
23960 RUGGLES
SOUTH HAVEN, MI 49090

DEAR MR. MARSH,

THIS LETTER IS TO SUPPLY YOU WITH INFORMATION AS TO THE IMPACT
THE KAL-HAVEN TRAIL HAS MADE TO RESIDENTS OF PINE GROVE TOWNSHIP.

PINE GROVE HAS ATTEMPTED TO MAINTAIN A RURAL ATMOSPHERE. BY SO
DOING, THIS HAS PROVIDED THE USERS OF THE TRAIL AN OPPORTUNITY TO
VIEW THIS RURAL SETTING.. WE HAVE FOUND THIS TO BE OF GREAT
BENEFIT TO RETIRED INDIVIDUALS. BY BIKING ON THE TRAIL THEY CAN
SEE NATURE AT IT’S BEST AND ALSO HAVE A SAFER AREA TO RIDE THAN
THE HIGHWAY. THE USERS ALSO HAVE BROUGHT ADDITIONAL BUSINESS IN
THE FOOD AND LODGING AREAS. WE HAVE RECEIVED LITTLE

NEGATIVE REPORTS FROM OUR RESIDENTS. WE CAN ONLY REPORT THAT THE
TRAIL HAS BEEN A BENE ‘

RES I Dab-11:5 ,

 

Y.

   

 

S CEREL

_sx’ ELENOR RICHARD , SUPERVISOR
PINE GROVE TO SHIP

DEC ‘3 '94 '7=01 313 6377734 PfiGE.002

 

CHIEF OILPOLIICE, JOHN J'DSTIBN

 

‘1
VILLAGE OF BLOOMINCDALI:
P.O. Box 69. UlomnlnguIIale, MI 4909.6
Phone (616) 521-3100 .
-— - . “II—I“

 

 

 

Date: 12/6/94
Subj: Kal Haven Trail

To: David Marsh
23960 Ruggles Rd.
South Haven Mi. 49090

Dear Mr. Marsh,

The Village President has asked me to comment on vandalism on
the Kal Haven Trail.

It has been my ob.3ervation as being Chief 0f Police for the Village

of Bloomingdale for nearly two years that a »rob '
originating from the trail which paszses direc:tly through the V lla e

'of Bloomingdale i.s negligible.

In fact the trail brings numerous amounts of bikers whom stop at
Village convience stores in the summer time and make purchases.
In the winter time we have numerous amounts of snowmobiles which
pass through the village and make purchases as well.

Bob Lagay owner of the Four Way Convience store in Bloomingdale
adds: “The Kal Haven trail is a major part of our business, I'd
like to see more events on the trail.“

Most persons using the trail are there to enjoy nature .and being
out of doors. If I can be any further assistance in thi.3 matter
please feel free to call.

Re ectfull Submitxed,

no

ohn Jost n Village Police Chief

Richard Dickerson Village President

  
  

DEC 12 ’94 17:02 SHE. 5377734 PRGE.004

 

 

ME’IgER

Navember , 1994

Mr . Roland Harmes

Director of Michigan Dept of
Natural Resources

P. O. Box 30028

Lansing, MI 48909

Dear Mr. Hermes:

I read with much interest the enclosed article concerning the
DNR and the Leelanau rail-to-trails project. I am so pleased
with your decision; not only is it right, but it reinforces our
Montcalm County efforts and the White Pine trail efforts.

I'm 75 years old and I remember when our fields were 3-10 acres;
now with the big farm equipment the fields are 15-30 times that
size, eliminating most of the nesting fence-foilage row areas.
No wonder after spending 8 million dollars in ten years in
Michigan, we couldn’t bring back the pheasants.

Also with larger farm equipment and larger fields, there are
less farmers doing the same amount of production. Those eac-farmers
who are now city folk need a place for recreation in the country.

With every mile of rail-to-trail saved, we save 2 miles of foilage
counting both sides. I hope we get all possible help from our
Legislature for any and all of these projects.

These trails are a big plus for the tourist industry. I read where
Canada is converting all vacated rail area possible to trails to
assist their tourist industry. The Michigan economy needs our
tourists.

Of course you know all these and many more reasons why these
projects are so vital. I just wanted to encourage you to keep
up the good work. Thank you for your efforts.

Sincerely,

   

h..-

CC: Larry DeVuyst
Tom Washington

P.S. Furthermore, I have over $265,000 invested toward the
Montcalm Hartland trail, plus I've pledged at least another $25,000
and some matching funds. I’m committed for a lot of money for our
common, very worthwhile goal.

Meijer. Inc. 2929 Walket Avenue. NW. Grand Raplds. Michigan 49504 - 9428 Telephone (616) 453-6711

“"4i”’r Office of Village President
Shelby Village

P.O. Box 86

Shelby. MI 69455

October 15, 1991

‘bflr. .Joel Mikkelsen
Rails to Trails Conservancy
S91L3 W. Holmes, Suite 227-D
Lansing, MI 148910

Dear Joel ,

As requested, I have taken a few minutes to reflect on the impact of
tflne Oceana/Muskegon-Hart to Montague Rail Trail which runs right through the
\Eillage of Shelby. This trail runs along/through the old industrial section
(of Shelby Village next to Oceana Foods, the former Shelby Saw Mill. the former
Tharris Pie Co. and a busy feed and chemical vendor called Cheevers. In addition
t1) the old industrial section of town, the trail runs next to the new industrial

:section of town but the trail is some distance from these buildings whereas
the trail is next to the old buildings in the old section of town. (One can
see loading docks etc. in the old section of town)

There were several business/industries which never gained support for
the rail trail concept. It is my opinion that these industries generallv

are in the business of processing or selling commodities such as chemicals
or fertilizers which may pose as a minimal risk to rail trail users in the
event of leakage or i‘ there was a tresspass problem with rail trail users.

I am not aware of any problems in the 6 years with any of these older or newer
industries and rail trail users.

J-

Most of the food vendors have really appreciated the rail trail and the

added tourists to the area. A bed and breakfast business was recently established
next to the trail in response for increased demand for rooms.

The village in
cooperation with the local Chamber of Commerce and Rotary Club have built a
pavilion for local use and rail trail users.

The public bathroom situation continues to be a problem in our local parks
including the rail trail area. It appears that por-ti-jons are the best way to
go at this point.

Overall I have to say that the trail has had a real positive impact on
our community including the elderly who enjoy walking, the young children who
are first learning how to ride bikes, and all those in between. I guess if I
were in the business of selling chemicals and fertilizers I would have some
second thoughts about thousands of trail users next to my business but the
overall benefit outweighs any potential problems that I have seen.

Sincerely,
-- 7%?494/ 5“ —/'
“/kawrence Byl '
Shelby Village President

 

 

 

 

Oceana County- SherIff Department

FREDS. KORE. SHERIFF

KENNETH M. PRINCE; UNDERSHERIFF
" ' PHONE (616) 873-2121

P.O. BOX 32 1-800-442-0043
HART. Ml 49420

October 21, 1991

Mr. Joel Mikkelsen. Vice Chairman

Michigan Chapter, Rails to Trails Conservancy
Box 259 '

New Era, MI 49446

Dear Mr. Mikkelsen:

In referbnce your letter requesting I
the rail trail and the impact it
department, please be advised that 5'
Park, and is patrolled by the DNR,
noticeable inp act on our department.

' We have had occasion to assist the DNR on a couple of
occasions. but neither time has it been of any
significance, and we have not had any enforcement problems
of any kind.

If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to
contact me.

Sincer‘el r, j

/,/ /g //

@v
Fred S.
Sheriff
stzab

3.;
l...e.:.
a.
s Ii; ;;J% .1 1
+ “‘3" ~ '51-;
‘. I.‘
1‘“? ”j ‘3’}1flrl' ‘.

.1 £23 It“ my ' .

 

‘I- I!!! K”

 

 

STATE OF MICHIGAN -..

~ Q
“-221
ounces commssuou db.4‘f'
J. FLUHARTY 3:}
. GUYER
IT MYERS
poupone JOHN ENGLER. Governor

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

DELBERT HECTOR. Director
NEWAYGO STATE PARK
SILVER LAKE STATE PARK
HARTfiVDNTAGUE BICYCLE TRAIL STATE PARK

September 30, 1991

Mr. Joel Mikkelsen, Vice-Chairman
Michigan Chapter .
Rails-To—Trails Conservancy

Box 269

New Era, Michigan 49446

Dear Joel,

Our attendance for the Hart-Montague Bicycle Trail State Park this year has
been just a bit over 58,000 ccmpared with 42,000 last season. This figure is a
guess based on hourly counts of users taken at different times over the period.
A better gauge of activities are our permit sales records. Last year 1,340 daily

and 533 annual type permits were sold. This year we have sold 5,800 dailies and
nearly 1,200 annuals! ‘ '

The year's sales have generated an inccme of about $31,000. Our costs to
operate the trail were about $35,000/$36,000. Those figures include salaries
and wages; employee benefits; vehicle rental, maintenance, and gasoline; and
trail maintenance costs.

Law enforcement problems have. involved motor vehicle traffic on the trail,
trespass by adjacent property owners, and vandalism to trail signs and facilities.
The motor vehicle violations have been minimal for the last year as have other
safer-cm-‘It prcbletre . With any new park facil 'ty, such "as this , the vandalisn
rate for the first year or so always seems to be the greatest. Once people

beccme use to the facility's existence damage decreases and that has been the
case with this trail.

The trail's heavy use can probably be based on strong local support and the
paved riding surface. Although ther much skepticism in the beginning, the

trail has been a great success and brought much business and tourism to the
area.

   
  
   

er

-Montague Bicycle Tra' Stat Park
ute 1, Box 254

Mears, Michigan 49436
616f873-3083

PGL/ cs -

1 1 1 II II

 

 

WALKIIVMI Oceana County
goat-a, o/ Commiddionerd

COUNTY BUILDING

K
3
8

 

HISDRM

 

IOTNOUIY

 

HART, MICHIGAN 49420

 

 

 

September 26, 1991

Joel Mil-dielsen, Vice Chair
Michigan Chapter, Rails to Trails Conservancy
R1? 1

New Era, Michigan 49446
RE: Hart-Montague Rail Trail
Dear Joel: .

As you had much to do with development of the Rail Trail, I want to
take this means to conmend you and your organization on the great
success of the project. As I drive along Oceans Drive betueen Shelby
and New Era I am continually amazed at the number of Trail users. As
the shelter building is going up behind my office, I have been keeping
track of its progress, and have taken several photos of it at different
stages of construction. It will be a fine addition to the Trail in
Shelby.

Some friends in Lakeview told me that they had tried to organize a
Rail Trail there, but with no success. They were very envious of what
we now have.

Again, congratulations on a fine job.

very truly,

l/‘3 .
, (mg/IV

R Wheeler
na County Commission

  
   

RRW/pa

 

 

 

 

k—‘W

lai/s to trails shows it can work in west Michigan

 

7 MAR! 23
Dolly Newo eta“ w'rltor
SHELBY — For 100 you-o. o
bonoloteolronl‘roml-lartto
.ntague 1n weotorn Michigan]
aana and Huahagon oounneo.
day. the Met 12 mtleo of a tab-
1 of aophalt rune along the
no mute. the old Chooopoaho
! Ohio Railroad right of way.
the Harvflontaguo Rail Trail
nned laat oummor and more
Ln «.ooo bicycle ridon uaod
» trail the Met year it woo open.
ording to Dole McDonald. flio
gan State Park ranger. The
to part oyeban adnnniotoro the
relootaguo Trail.
\ olnn'lar bicycle trail ha been
poood to uao the old CSX n’ t
pay born downtown Midlan to
.r Clare. Olflcialo of the Mid-
d Foundation have been talk-
rswwtr a“;
o ut anng rig to
v. Iidland County Parka and
nation Common
'.""“['.?“’l“‘ I“. m :
a mi t o oi t on

n
. group of 2.3 Illdlanbrl. In-
h‘ng mombore o! the Porto
muooloo. the Midland Pound.

ana County b Ifldo the trail.
n how it operate and learn
a M made in boiling
wont liclu'gan rul trail.

the the propooed Hidland
nty trail. the Hart-Montague
I oparted lla ohare of con-
'oroy. occerdia&.to Roger
m. a member of chhl
o-to-‘l‘ru'lo Con-enemy. 'o
up bacho elforta to turn aban-
od railroad nghta o! way into
ng. bliking. oiling and ego-h
tral o.

tom ooid former Ooooaa
nty comnuoolonor Willia-
do But propoood the county
hue the weat “igan right
ley alter the railroad w.
sdonod in not. The other
[a oommlaoionero refined.

tolt oo otrongly about
i.- bo bought the right of
bin-elf.

flip of land to the otah.
hpatitnndortboalnbrellael‘

“panama-In.

they and tbapooolbillty e!
e-etreopaaomgoona'nuob
oaoorao of oome adjacent
awnore.
'hooonooptlobhavenaaand
eationandlt‘ogoiagbooaao
octeochinghaltwboaoouo-
gebhutorhlhd'aaid'fll-
Peuhrhganaqanguofar-

    

. (I .
Mldland’o 'Ctll

notuly
more'thon you’d get from the

Pouhflngou'dobiggerpmblon
cornea from ooowlnoblloro. who
ooodtbenilreodrlfitdwaybo-
lore it woo outed“ okyde
inflJWoVebadmtmflle:

winter hemp-Ida flag
thou-'1'? d

K
SbobyMomdowl-Idnarhahglbo

“;

I

elder rider- reutlaey take the
tingle wide-tired Rood-
Inaolar her tamilybaa tor
mateotontbotrall.
‘Tbflayeue

bdao-eporotoro who
ddodtboteioabllartobolnab

chlgon. (Dolly New
W)

   

   

o photo by Mort

oome area. aooordblg to Lund-
borg.Parfloghaotbopohnnalh
booonaeobeadacbolnooonoareao.
'We nlymmnmmaomp
ofland lOOfootwldof
oald'lndeovlllogeo. it'oenlyJO
f mmh.‘ Eat dooo aloe“
In room path

Local ddoo and val-goo. lite
Hart. Shelby. loan and loo-
manoowloohingatwayeh
developmereparflngforrall-mll
oeon.

It one not choa b pave the
trail. aocordingto nald. Ha

  

 

“Thorowaolhloloarol

pooplo beopoaolng on
me odlooont property,
but It tumo out the
odlaoont properly ownore
want people to come oll
the troll."
— Roget Storm
“chlgan Ralle-to-Trollo
Coneowency

 

 

oaid the that 12 mlloo coo:
8500.000 to pave; thu year. enga-
noonng oonmatoo put :he pnce
tag of paying the next 9 J mice at
8312.000. State quahty-of-Ilfe
bond money paid the cool. the ran-
goro and.

The law enforcement ol'ficero
and development of the troll hat
actually reduced none and van-
daliom problemo {or ad;acont
Iandownero. All-terrain vehicles
are banned from unng the ml
trul and are rarely oeon now.
The ATVo lea alter the bicyloo
came in.‘ McDonald and.

rangera have gwen out eo-
ven o'ckoeo l‘or motorized VOI’IICIO.
nolotlooo thlo year. moody on the
unpaved oocnon of troll. The ack-
eto carry a $100 fine and ranges
have the outhonty to confiscate
the machine unnl the actor :o

'd

Vandallom along the trail hao
boon ourpnnngly low. accordxng
to McDonald. Who patrol: the
bail. Ho oald a number of own:
ldono'fyin the wall ouddenly due-
appoored oat oummer. ‘Z‘d bet If
you looked in oome college dorm
rooma. you'd find a lot of Hart-
Hontague Bail Troll ugno.‘
McDonald oond.

Fouhrlng. the aoparagua I'ar-
mer who englnally oppoaod the
wall and «ill maintalno eke oc-
ionl about It. told the Mid and
group. 'I Inohod they would have
oolved the problomo bolero they
opened lt.‘

Hanagero o! the Hart-
llootague Trail admit they are
«ill learning how to odnumoter a
rail troll and mate it work. But
they ooy the problemo have been
few. and the benefit- and poten-
tial bonoflta for recreonon and
local bunnooo are many.

 

Roger Storm

 

Bike trail.
13ers logged
nanyflrniles

- WILLA KENOYER
'ronicle correspondent

SHELBY — Snow may have
niied Verna Crakcr to logging
ly 1.630 miles on the Hart-Mon-
gue Bicycle Trail this season.
i she plans to be back for more
iles next season.

Mrs.

‘aker. who
11] celebrate
-r 70th birth-
.y later this

onth. began
ding the 17-
ilc round
ip from
ielby to Hart
'ery day

 

on after the
cycle frail

 

iened in
ay. "1 was
.ming for
500 miles.
1'. the weafh~
'stayed good
) I kept on
ding." she
iid last week.
When she
nd her hus-
and. Earl.

 

of to Harlin-
en. Texas. sometime within the
exi two weeks. she plans to con-
nue her daily bicycle rides.

Mrs. Craker was among the esti-
iafed 45.550 cyclists that used the
art-Montague Bicycle Trail this
.immer. according to Peter

.undBorg. manager of Silver Lake
fate Park.

"We came to that estimate by
bunting from 30 lo 45 riders per
our who passed a given point be-
ween 10 am. and 8 p.m. each
3y." LundBorg said.

l-SlllRLEY MCKAY. who opcr-
IleS McKay Scenic Trail Bicycle
’~cnial in Mears with her husband.
erry. has watched a steady in-
.rease in the number of cvclists
ismg frail since Memorial Dav
"cekend. "During tho summer.
'affic on the trail would be hcavv
y 7 mm." she said. .

' By summer's end the guest book I
left on the counter of the bike rent-
al shop contained the names of rd '-
ei's from 45 different states includ- g
ing Alaska and Hawaii. several
provinces of Canada. Venezuela y
and West Germany. “I didn't put .
the book out until the end of .luly. _.
and not everyone who came in to _I
rent bicycles signed." she said. ‘

Most of the people who rented

bicycles came during the middle of .
the week and often used the them :
for less than two hours, she said.

“FOR MANY of these people. _if I
was their first time on a bicycle in .
20 years." she said. "And we re- 1
minded them that they were gomg .
to have to make a round trip — I‘
they'd have to ride back as far as-
they rode out." ;

The quick turn-around of bicy-,
cles meant that the McKays never,
had to turn anyone away who
wanted to rent a bike. but at oncl

point on Julv 3 lhev out an»... o... ,

two cycles left in the bar :Tllzl
was our busiest weeken . s c
said. . . . .
The McKays saw many 'families
and vacationers at the picnic fa- .
bles near their shop. :‘And we nev- ‘
or heard one negative comment

‘ from all the people we talked ‘0'" .

Mrs. McKay said-

he '.
MRS. CRAKER was one of t .
people Mrs. McKay saw often on

the trail. .
"During the summer Id make
the trip to Hart alone in the mor‘n-
ing." Mrs. Craker said. Late y.
my friend Mary Morningsfar has

; been riding with me in the after-

’ noon. She has ridden 1.470 miles on .

the trail since if Opened.“

. Mrs. Craker first learned to ride
I a bicycle when she was 50 years

'. old. "When my husband retired. he -

said he was going to lake up bicy-

cling." she said. “I thought I was ;
going to break my neck before I

' learned. l was black and blue all
over." She persuaded her husband

to make her a set of training-
wheels to make learning easier. '

she said.

“WE RIDE the frail together.
sometimes." Mrs. Craker said.
“My husband doesn‘t ride as much
as I do. but he's seven years older
than I am." Mrs. Craker enjoys the
exercise and the scenery along the
trail. "One day we saw seven deer.
and another time a family of rac-
coons." she said. “And there are
always the rabbits. Mrs.
Morningsiar once saw a fox."

'LundBorg said he expects trail
use to drop slightly when park
rangers begin selling user permits
in the spring. "There is always re-
sistance to user permits at first."
he said. "But we have no other
wayfo raise operating revenue for
the frail." If is expected users will
be able to buy individual. family.
daily and season permits from pri-
vale vendors or from park
rangers.

“The fee schedule we have re-
ceived from the Natural Re-
sources Commission lisfs Individ-
ual annual permits at $10. and
individual daily permits 32."
LundBorg said. “Family annual
permits will be $25. and daily 85."

COLD WEATHER will change
frail use. but won't end if.
LundBorg said. With deer season
starting Nov. 15. LundBorg
stressed that hunting from the
trail is banned.

“We will be patrolling the trail."
be said. “Hunters will be able to
use the trail to get where they are
going. but they cannot hunt from
the frail. You can’t drive down the
frail. They can carry guns as long
as they are unloaded. just as they
have been carrying their bows in a
case."

Once a four-inch pack of snow
has been developed. snowmobiling

.. will be allowed along the frail.

"We will have to resolve the ques-
tion of who will be grooming the
trail." LundBorg said.

0
-..-a—o— -.. M ...—“~— .