THE EFFECT OF POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL 6000 AND OTHER CHEMICAL PREIREATMENT 0N ASPARAGUS SEED GERMINATION Thesis for the Degree of M. S. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY WAYNE BOYD COUSINS 1975 JME513 I N _ 9 ., I If,“ nzrs _ ' ' l" .‘ .',\ 7,». '4“ «,0 \ w -’ 1'" ‘ ' I. 31,, I '~. I “Itch/‘- 4' I . ..,~- . .'.. ‘.'.‘ ,’ .--....-- -.\ .Y- i’n ~. at . u,- I- .4 "', .- , , a“? 47;, M' I. j. g, A. . I.) ‘ -‘ _. 1' ‘1 .4. ‘ 'I. L l‘. ' .' é? a... «- vantalfi‘m? 1A ABSTRACT THE EFFECT OF POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL 6000 AND OTHER CHEMICAL PRETREATMENT ON ASPARAGUS SEED GERMINATION By Wayne B. Cousins Asparagus seeds (Asparagus officinalis L.) were pretreated in different chemical solutions to improve germination in cool sandy soils. Soaking seeds for sixteen days in an aerated polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 solution (40g/100 ml distilled water) enhanced speed of seedling emergence. Total emergence and total germination were also improved by soaking seeds in PEG 6000 for sixteen days. Pretreatment in CaCl2 (lO-ZM) solution for 24 hours improved speed of germination. When a CaCl2 (10-2M) solution soak followed sixteen days of PEG 6000 pretreatment, the greatest improvement in speed of emergence was obtained. When seeds were soaked in PEG 6000 for sixteen days followed by CaCl for one day, 44% emergence was obtained seventeen days 2 after sowing compared to 1% emergence for untreated seeds. Mbisture content of asparagus seeds soaked in PEG 6000 was inversely related to PEG 6000 concentration. It appears that PEG 6000 has an affinity for water. When the concentration of PEG 6000 increased, hydrogen bonding between water and the ether oxygens of PEG increased; in turn the amount of water imbibed by the seed is reduced. It appears that the percent water within the seed is critical for radicle emergence. If the concentration of PEG 6000 is 40g/100 ml distilled water, the critical percent moisture needed for radicle emergence is not obtained. This allows the seed to be presoaked for long periods of time (16 days) without germination or apparent detrimental effects. THE EFFECT OF POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL 6000 AND OTHER CHEMICAL PRETREATMENT ON ASPARAGUS SEED GERMINATION by Wayne Boyd Cousins A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Horticulture 1975 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to express his sincere appreciation to Professor Hugh Price for his help as advisor and Chairman of the advisory commit- tee, and to Professors Jim Notes and Clarence Hansen for their guidance as this work was being conducted and for their review and suggestions in the preparation of this manuscript. The author also wishes to thank those members of the Department of Horticulture who made their laboratory facilities available during this period. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page List of Tables iv List of Figures vi Introduction 1 Literature Review 1 Materials and Methods 7 Section I Chemical Pretreatment of Asparagus Seeds 7 Sections II and III Polyethylene Glycol Pretreatment of Asparagus Seeds 10 Results and Discussion 8 Section I Chemical Pretreatment of Asparagus Seeds 8 Section II Polyethylene Glycol Pretreatment of Asparagus Seeds 13 Section III PEG 6000 and CaCl Pretreatment of Asparagus Seeds 25 2 Summary and Conclusion 31 List of References 35 Appendix iii Title Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table of LIST OF TABLES Table Effect of chemical pretreatment of asparagus seed for 24 hours on subsequent develOpment after 36 days in a petri dish (50 seeds total per replication) Effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 pre- treatment of asparagus seeds on total percent seedling emergence after 50 days (25 seeds total per replication) Effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 pre- treatment of asparagus seeds on time to 50% of total emergence (25 seeds total per replic- ation) Effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 pre- treatment of asparagus seeds on time to 50% of total germination (25 seeds total per replication) Effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 and calcium chloride pretreatment of asparagus seeds on the number seedlings emerged after seven- teen days from sowing (100 seeds total per replication) Effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 and calcium chloride pretreatment of asparagus seeds on total percent emergence after 45 days from sowing (100 seeds total per replication) Effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 and calcium chloride pretreatment of asparagus seeds on total percent germination after 21 days in a petri dish (100 seeds total per replication) Effect of cold treatment of asparagus seeds on subsequent seedling development after 36 days in a petri dish (50 seeds total per replication) iv 16 l7 18 26 27 28 39 Title of Table Table 9. Table 10. Table 11. Effect of cold storage on asparagus seeds later soaked in gibberellic acid 4/7 on subsequent seedling development after 40 days in a petri dish (50 seeds total per replication) 40 Effect of Ethephon pretreatment of asp- aragus seeds on subsequent seedling deve- lopment after 40 days in a petri dish (50 seed total per replication) 41 Effect of concentrated H SO scarification of asparagus seeds on germination (33 seeds per replication) 42 LIST OF FIGURES Title of Figure Figure 1. Effect of pretreating asparagus seeds in polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 on percent moisture within the seed (10 seeds total per replication) Figure 2. Effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 pretreatment for sixteen days on asparagus seed germination (25 seeds total per replication) Figure 3. Effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 pretreatment for sixteen days on asparagus seedling emergence (25 seeds total per replication) Figure 4. Effect of pretreating asparagus seeds in 40g of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 per 100 ml of water for sixteen days and/or one day of soaking in calcium chloride on the emergence rate (100 seeds total per replication) vi INTRODUCTION In today's world of mechanization, producing crops efficiently is one of the main goals of a grower. Direct seeding has become a very important practice to increase efficiency for the grower. Compared to transplanting, direct seeding provides more disease free seedlings, more flexibility in planting schedules and plant population and greater speed in planting as well as lower establishment cost. (38). In Michigan 17,000 acres of asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) were harvested in 1974 producing 12,750 tons. This is an increase of 2,500 acres harvested over 1972. The market value of asparagus harvested in Michigan in 1974 was $8.6 million or greater than $500 an acre. The conventional method of establishing a field of asparagus is with one or two year old crowns planted in the bottom of a seven to eight inch trench. However, planting crowns is a very expensive operation costing approximately $258 an acre (2). Establishing an asparagus field by direct seeding has presented one major problem. It takes from three to six weeks for the seedlings to emerge from cool, sandy soils (7). When asparagus seeds are planted in the bottom of a six inch v-shaped trench, erosion of the sides of the trench often occurs prior to seedling emergence and covers the seed with four to six inches of soil. The seeds may never emerge from this depth resulting in a poor stand which is uneconomical to maintain. Asparagus spear diameter is affected by crown depth. If asparagus is direct seeded at .75 to 1.0 inch depth and not lowered, the average weight per spear is 40 to 50 percent less than the spear weight from 1 asparagus established by crowns at the same time (29). This reduction is not desirable because small spear size reduces the value and quality of the crop. To solve this problem, Michigan State University has deve10ped a Lister-transplanter (l) to lower direct seeded asparagus crowns to a desired depth. This machine lifts a ribbon of soil containing the crowns onto a conveyor belt. While the crowns are on the conveyor, a middle buster forms a trench nine to ten inches deep into which the ribbon of soil is lowered. Using the Lister—transplanter method for lowering crowns, the total cost of establishing an acre of asparagus is $174 (2). However, obtaining an adequate stand of field seedlings is still an important factor. Early work by Borthwick (7) on asparagus germination showed that if seeds were soaked in water for 110 hours at 30°C, then germinated at room temperature, 64% of the seeds had germinated after two days while none of the non-soaked seeds had germinated. Asparagus seeds showed no signs of dormancy and would germinate readily after harvesting. Borthwick also showed that the optimum germination temperature for asparagus seeds was 86°F. Komoti (17) showed that placing asparagus seeds in a 0 to 5°C cold storage for two months resulted in better germination than was obtained from seeds that were not cold treated. Germination was also improved by scarifing the seeds in concentrated HZSOAfor ten minutes. After four days the acid treated seeds obtained 84% germination while only 5% of the untreated seeds germinated. In contrast to Borthwick, Komoti reports that there was dormancy present in asparagus seeds just after harvest and that the dormancy was intensified by drying. Growth regulators have been added to seeds to improve germination. Bradbeer gt §l° (8) showed that treating hazel nut seeds with gibberellic acid increased germination by substituting for stratification which is normally required for germination. In the case of hazel seeds abscisic acid was the chemical retarding germination. Treatment with gibberellic acid and/or stratification reduced the concentration of abscisic acid or gibberellic acid synthesis was increased. Ketring §£_al, (16) found that gibberellic acid treatment of peanut seeds increased the production of ethylene gas and increased germination. Toole 2; a1. (37) reported that an ethylene treatment for peanut seeds increased germination; however, when ethylene was combined with carbon dioxide the best germination rate was obtained. Work done on tomato seeds (32) also showed an improvement in germination rate with the addition of ethylene and carbon dioxide. Lettuce (3) and rape (35) were some of the other crops which ethylene has increased germination. 'Hardening' has improved germination. It is a process of soaking the seeds for 24 hours then drying the seeds for 24 hours. This cycle may be repeated three or four times. Austin gt El! (4) and Hegarty (9) reported that carrot seeds which were hardened had a higher rate of germination than did the untreated seeds. Hegarty also found that two of five cultivars of corn seed tested showed a significant improvement for hardened seeds compared to untreated seeds. Hegarty also reported that carrot seeds hardened in a solution of KZHPoainstead of water improved in germination rate. Inorganic salts have been used to improve seed germination. Oyer 33 El- (28) found that soaking tomato seeds in solutions of KNO3and K3P041mproved germination at suboptimal temperatures. Other work done with KNO3(10) showed an increase in germination for pigweed, yellow foxtail, timothy and barnyardgrass. Work done on pollen (6,19) showed that pretreating the spores with calcium increased germination. Water and polyethylene glycol 6000 have been used to increase germination. Bleak gt 31. (5) showed that emergence of several forage grasses was greatly improved by pretreatment for 30 to 60 hours in 16°C water. Heydecker g£_§1, (11) reported that presoaking onion, carrot, beet and celery seeds with polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 greatly improved the rate of germination. In the case of onion, seeds pretreatment for 23 days in 29g of PEG 6000 per 100 ml of distilled water, the treated seeds germinated in 20 hours at 10°C compared to 9.3 days for untreated seeds. These results were obtained by allowing seeds to air dry for one hour after their removal from the PEG 6000 solution. However, if the same onion seeds were allowed to air dry fully then the pretreated seeds required three days to germinate which was 6.3 days sooner than non-soaked seeds. Heydecker gt a1. (11) feels that PEG 6000 places an osmotic suction on the seed which counteracts the suction of the imbibing seed. In other words, if the osmotic potential of the solution was too weak then the seeds would germinate in the solution; however, if the osmotic potential was too high then insufficient water is absorbed and the seed's metabolism is not stimulated. One advantage for soaking seeds in PEG 6000 is that the molecule is very large and cannot pass into the plant cells (11,13,15,21,24,25,36). This permits prolonged pretreatment of seeds without chemical harm. However, the larger PEG molecules such as 6000 and 20,000 contain ions of aluminum and magnesium which may be toxic to the plants (13,20,21). Janes (13) reported that pepper roots placed in a solution from one particular lot of PEG 4000 were brown and appeared flaccid after 24 hours. If the same solution were passed through a column of standard Bantam demineralizing resin, the roots grown in the solution showed no signs of injury after seven days. Studies have been conducted where no toxic effects develop when the plants are grown in unpurified solutions of PEG 6000 and PEG 20,000 (15,25,26). Mexal 25 31. (24) reported that osmotic potentials of -12 bars for PEG 4000 and -7 bars for PEG 6000 decreased the oxygen availability severely. This may be the source of some toxic effects when seeds are soaked in PEG 6000 and not the aluminum and magnesium ions (12). Another problem is that the osmotic potential for polyethylene glycol changes inversely with temperature. Taking this into account Michel ggugl. (27) has developed an equation to calculate the osmotic potential. The equation is as follows: Osmotic potentia1= -(1.18x10‘2)C-(1.18x10-4)CZ+(2.67x10_4)CT +(8.39x10-7)C2T where, 0 II concentration of PEG in g/kg water T8 temperature in degrees C The changes in the osmotic potential as a function of temperature are speculated to be caused by hydrogen bonding between PEG and water, and as the temperature increases the hydrogen bonding is reduced producing a lower osmotic concentration. Work done on pea seeds (22), grown in a -506 joules/kg solution of PEG 6000 showed a decrease in germination rate. Similar results (14) were obtained for lettuce, sunflower and citrus seeds grown in -l.1, -2.3 and -4.1 bars of PEG 6000 solution. Even though very little work has been published dealing with pretreating asparagus seeds to improve germination rate, the work done with other seeds is enormous. However, most of the work has been in the area of dormancy breaking and light substitution. Still there are many ideas and treatments which have been tried on other crops which can be performed on asparagus to determine if the seeds will germinate faster. This thesis reports results of research conducted to achieve faster germination of asparagus seeds in cool soils. MATERIALS AND METHODS Section I Chemical pretreatment of asparagus seeds Asparagus officinalis L. (cv. Mary Washington) seeds were soaked in different chemical solutions for 24 hours. The four treatments were potassium nitrate (KNOB), calcium chloride (CaClz), gibberellic acid (GA 4/7) and Alar. Seeds that were not soaked before germination were the control. After 24 hours of soaking, the seeds were removed and allowed to air dry for 24 hours. Fifty seeds from each treatment were placed in a lO—cm petri dish which contained one 9-cm'Whatman #1 filter paper. Approximately five milliliters of distilled water was added to the seeds in each petri dish. The petri dishes were placed in a 68°F growth chambef and kept in total darkness. To assure an adequate water supply for the seeds, the dishes were checked daily. Each treatment was replicated five times. After 36 days the seeds were removed and fresh weight, shoot length and germination count were determined. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Section I Chemical pretreatment of aspargggs seeds Seedlings from asparagus seeds presoaked in CaCl2 at the highest concentration (lO-ZM) and seeds soaked in an intermediate concentration Alar (lo-3M) were greater in both fresh weight and shoot length than seedlings from seeds that were not pretreated (Table 1). Seedlings from seeds soaked in the highest concentration of Alar (lO-ZM) showed a marked improvement over untreated seeds in average shoot length; however, there was no significant difference in fresh weight compared to seedlings from untreated seeds. The rest of the treatments were not significantly different from untreated seeds except seeds soaked in the lowest concentration of Alar (lo-4M) which showed a significant decline in fresh weight. Total germination was not significantly different even though it varied from a low of 22.4 for seeds soaked in 10’3M of CaCl 2 of 32.4 for seeds soaked in 10- M of CaClz. 2 to a high Table 1. Effect of chemical pretreatment of asparagus seed for 24 hours on subsequent seedling development after 36 days in a petri dish (50 seed total per replication) Chemical Conc. Fresh Weight Average Shoot Number of (M) (gm) Length (mm) Seeds Germinated -2 * KNO3 10 0.38 ab 12.1 a 25.8 a KN03 10"3 0.33 ab 10.8 a 22.6 a 0a012 10‘2 0.92 d 31.2 c 32.4 a CaCl2 10"3 0.29 ab 12.2 a 22.4 a GA 4/7 10'3 0.55 be 14.5 a 27.8 a GA 4/7 10‘4 0.35 ab 15.5 a 24.0 a- Alar 10‘2 0.77 cd 24.1 b 29.0 a Alar 10'3 0.93 d 26.0 be 29.0 a Alar 10’4 0.21 a 8.4 a 28.0 a Alar 10"3 and _4 0.35 ab 11.4 a 26.2 a GA 4/7 10 Not Soaked (Control) 0.55 bc 14.3 a 30.6 a * Means within columns followed by common letters are not significantly different at the 5% level (Duncan's Multiple Range Test). MATERIALS AND METHODS Section II and III Polyethylene glycol pretreatment of asparagus seeds Asparaggs officinalis L. (cv. Mary Washington) seeds were presoaked in nine concentrations of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000. Flasks containing 150 ml of the PEG solution and 1000 seeds were aerated using compressed air passed through an aeration stone. The flow of air to each flask was kept constant by a clamp at the head of the line running to each flask. The air flow was adjusted so that small air bubbles could be seen saturating the solution. Water was added to flasks each day to replace evaporation loss. Solutions were thereby maintained at the desired concentration. In section II samples were taken periodically during the 30 days of pretreatment. At each sampling 60 seeds were removed from each of four replicated flasks. 0f the 60 seeds removed 25 seeds were used in a germination test, 25 seeds were used in an emergence test and the final 10 seeds were used to determine percent moisture. Seeds remaining in the flasks were placed in a fresh solution of PEG 6000. The seeds used for the germination and emergence studies were rinsed in distilled water to remove the excess PEG 6000 and allowed to air dry for 24 hours before being planted. The seeds for the percent moisture determinations were also rinsed with water, blotted dry and placed in crucibles and weighed. The seeds used for the emergence study were planted l/2 inch deep in 2 parts loam and a 1 part sand soil mix. The soil was sterilized 10 11 before being placed in a 20xl4x3 inch flat in a 65°F greenhouse. No fertilizer was added to the soil. The flats were watered twice a week and counts were made on the emerged seedlings when the shoots were 1/2 inch tall. Counts were made twice weekly for three weeks. Fifty days after sowing the shoots were counted and cut at the soil surface for fresh and dry weight determinations. The shoots were placed in a 150°F oven for 48 hours, removed, cooled for 30 mdnutes and weighed to determine dry weight. For the germination test petri dishes were covered with Parafilm with a 1 cm2 hole cut in the Parafilm on one side of the dish (18). Two pieces of 7-cm diameter Whatman #2 filter paper were placed on top of the Parafilm.with a small portion of the filter paper out and placed through the hole to act as a wick. Twenty five ml of distilled water was placed in the petri dish and 25 seeds were placed on top of the filter paper and covered with the petri dish lid. This method allowed the seeds to be in contact with water but not submerged. The dishes were then placed in a 18°C incubator. Counts of the germinated seeds started seven days after the seeds were placed in the petri dish and continued two to three times a week until 17 of the 25 seeds had germinated or 33 days had passed whichever came first. Seeds were counted as germinated if the radicle was visible. To determine percent moisture content (30), ten seeds per replication were placed in a crucible and weighed following their removal from the different PEG 6000 pretreatments. They were then placed in a 130°C oven for 60 minutes after which they were removed and allowed to air cool for 30 minutes before they were weighed. 12 In section III the PEG 6000 concentration giving the greatest increase in speed of seedling emergence was combined with the CaCl2 presoaking described in section I. The asparagus seeds were presoaked in a 40 gram/100 ml solution of PEG 6000 utilizing the aeration system described previously. Ten days after initiation of the presoaking treatments, the PEG 6000 solution in one-half of the aerated flasks was replaced with fresh solution; the remaining flasks retained the original PEG 6000 solution. At l6, l9, and 22 days after the presoaking treatments were initiated, samples of 600 seeds from each flask.were removed. Of the 600 seeds, 100 seeds were used for a germination test and an additional 100 seeds were used for an emergence test. The remaining 400 seeds were split into two lots and soaked for an additional day in two concentrations of CaCl2 before being prepared for a germination and emergence test. Four hundred additional seeds (not presoaked in PEG 6000) were also split in two lots and soaked in the different concentrations of CaClZ. Six replications were used per treatment. The experiment in section III was terminated after 45 days for the emergence test and after 21 days for the germination test. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Section II Polyethylene glycol pretreatment of asparagus seeds There was no significant difference in total seedling emergence (Table 2) for any treatment through the 13th day. After sixteen days of soaking the seeds soaked in 20 and 40 grams of PEG 6000, solutions had a 67 and 73% seedling stand respectively, while the untreated seeds had a seedling stand of only 44%. Seeds soaked in a 40 gram solution of PEG 6000 had significantly greater percent seedling emergence than untreated seeds after 20, 23, 27 and 30 days of presoaking. Seeds soaked in a 35 gram solution of PEG 6000 for 20, 23 and 30 days also had significantly greater percent seedling emergence than the untreated seeds. A11 seeds pretreated for 27 days required significantly less time for 50% of total seedling emergence (Table 3) than untreated seeds except seeds soaked in-a 20 and 25 gram solution of PEG 6000. Seeds presoaked for sixteen days in a 40 gram solution of PEG 6000 were not significantly different than untreated seeds. However, it took only 23.4 days for 9.1 seedlings (50% of seedlings emerged) to emerge while the untreated seeds took 25.5 days for only 5.5 seedlings (50% of seedlings emerged) to emerge. Although the results were not significantly different between seeds soaked in a 40 gram solution of PEG 6000 for sixteen days and untreated seeds, it did take less time for more seedlings from the treated seeds to emerge. Seeds presoaked for sixteen days in a 40 gram solution of PEG 6000 solution required significantly less time for 50% of total petri dish germination than untreated seeds (Table 4). 13 14 Percent moisture in seeds soaked in concentrations of 25 grams to 40 grams of PEG 6000/100 ml water showed that the higher the concentration of PEG the lower the amount of water imbibed by the seeds over a period of time (Figure 1). Seeds soaked in a 5 gram/100 ml water solution of PEG 6000 imbibed water faster than seeds soaked in distilled water. It is possible that PEG 6000 at a low concentration has very limited hydrogen bonding of water to ether oxygens of PEG 6000. Since the osmotic pressure in the PEG 6000 solution is less than distilled water, the seed will imbibe water faster in a 5 gram/100 ml water solution of PEG 6000 because of the greater diffusion pressure deficit. However, as the concentration of PEG 6000 increases the disruption within the PEG molecule increases, in turn, increasing the amount of hydrogen bonding of water to the ether oxygens of PEG 6000 (27). Even though the diffusion pressure deficit is also increasing, less water is available to be imbibed by the seed. The different pretreatment concentrations appeared to have a toxic effect deve10p (Table 2). Treatments underlined in Table 2 gave the best total emergence before a steady decline in total emergence occurred. If seeds presoaked in a 10 gram/100 ml water solution of PEG 6000 were used as the example, the best total emergence occurred after six days of pretreatment in PEG 6000 and steadily declined as the seeds remained in solution longer. It also appeared that as the solution concentration increased more days of presoaking were required before the toxic effect was induced. In the case of seeds presoaked for six days in a 10 gram solution of PEG 6000, the seeds internally probably 15 reached a critical point in their pregermdnation status. If the seeds were soaked longer than six days, damage to the seed probably resulted when the seed was air dried. Seeds soaked in a 5 gram/100 ml water solution of PEG 6000 attained a 70% total emergence after three days of presoaking. Soaking the seeds in the 5 gram/100 ml water solution of PEG 6000 longer than three days showed a steady decline in total emergence whereas seeds soaked in distilled water required eight days of soaking before they reached maximum total emergence. Asparagus seeds presoaked in 40 gram/100 ml water solution of PEG 6000 germinated in the petri dish much sooner than untreated seeds (Figure 2) and were significantly better than untreated seeds through the 12th day. For shoot emergence (Figure 3) the asparagus seeds presoaked in 40 gram/100 ml water solution of PEG 6000 emerged significantly better than untreated seeds for each day counted except the 20th day. Seeds presoaked in distilled water, 5 gram, 10 gram and 15 gram/ 100 ml water solution of PEG 6000 germinated while presoaking. This was why there was missing data for these pretreatments in Tables 2, 3 and 4. m.amossnv Ho>mH Nm may um uGoHoMMHv mHuamUHwfiswam uo: mum mumuuoa soaaoo hp moonHOM Aumma «wees .Hasuflsz QESHOU GH £UH3 md—Nwz a. a «q n mq n oq mu «c m mm m no can mm m mm vmxmom uoz ”Jed m 8 A. S 6 Q a S m 3 one 3 m S 3 pm mm o no m no com mm m um m no u on m an mm mm am no mm 3 Nu onm co m cm m oo ops mo m no on 9 am no mm on hm onm co m Ho m mm on em m mm mm A no no mm pm om am no m hm m am pm mm m we on n we a Na no Hm onm co m we m on on mm m we ma won as m mm m an m mm m we OH m am one no a on n v mm m mq m ac on Hm «m mm o S 2.. 8 3 2 m a m of :5on voxmom whom .usoo cum umwuofim unmouom . Aaoaumoaamou “on Hmuou mvoom mmv ammo om nouwm oucmwuoao wawawomm unmoumn Hmuou no ovoom mawmummmm mo ucoaummuuoum ooom Aommv Hoohaw oaoH%£uohHoa mo uoommm .N oHan l7 .Aumoa mwsmm onHuasz m.smu:=av Ho>oa Nm msu um ucouowuav maucmowmqswfim uoc mum muouuoa coaaoo an vmsoaaow mqaoaoo sHSuHB mcmon m m.m~ on w.mm on m.m~ mu m.m~ o w.o~ pm m.o~ m w.HN m o.H~ voxmom nos 9 q.a~ o «.6N o m.HN o ¢.n~ o n.0N n ¢.o~ m w.oN m m.HN 06 n ¢.NN on “.mm unm o.m~ won o.oN no w.m~ om m.NN m w.HN m o.HN mm a m.- an ¢.- com m.¢~ onm o.~N on m.H~ m m.m~ m m.NN m m.NN om pm N.mm m m.m~ m m.- as m.m~ m m.s~ a m.m~ .m w.HN m 3.NN mm mm w.¢N om o.w~ no m.m~ onm «.mm and m.N~ no m.NN m w.NN m m.m~ om a m.- on «.mm onm w.q~ onm «.mm onm w.NN on m Hm m m.- m w.om ma mun o.o~ no H.NN m o.m~ m w.HN m «.mm OH am m.NN m ~.~N m «.mm m m o.mm m q.q~ pm m.HN m H.mN «m ¢.NN 0 AN mu om SH «H w 6 m ems Haooa\m coxmom mkma .ocou 0mm moamwuoam Hmuoa mo Non ou mmmn Aaoaumoaaaou you Hmuou mmoom nuv ouomwuoao Hmuou mo Now on mean so mpmom mswmummmm mo uaoaummuumum oooo Aummv Hoohaw oaoahzuohaom mo uomwmm .m oHan 18 Hm>mH Nn was as .Aumoa mwzmm mamfiuflnz m.amo::nv uaoummmav %Huamoamaswam uoa mum mumuuma aoaaoo kn vo3oaaom mneoaoo afiauwz mama: a” m m.m Una m.HH m n.0H GA ©.HH on o.MH pm H.HH wmxmom uoz m m.m o H.0H m H.HH u n.0H v o.m n 0.0H co m n.0H cam N.HH m N.NH Unm ©.NH Una a.¢H 3m N.HH mm m n.0H Una m.NH m o.HH 9m m.¢H on H.mH no N.HH on m 0.0H m @.MH m N.MH m ¢.¢H o m.NH 9m N.HH mm m 5.0H am N.MH m m.NH 03 h.HH o w.NH m m.ma ON on n.0H m ©.NH am N.¢H m w.mH no m.HH ma am ©.mH m H.NH OH one 6.MH «m m.ma O on AN mm ON SH ma omm Haooa\m voxmom whoa .ocoo 0mm soaumcfiauou Hmuoe us Now cu whom Afloaumofiamou you Hmuou mooom mmv Gowumafiaumw Hmuou mo Now on mafia co mwmom mswmumamm mo uaoaumouumum coco Aommv Hoo%Hw mamahnuohaom mo uoomwm .6 oHAmB 19 Figure 1. Effect of pretreating asparagus seeds in polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 on percent moisture within the seed (10 seeds total per replication) aux<0m m>l> 8 20 dmh<3 Quad-hmzu 0"... S 3 IllfllSlOW lNiDlid 21 Figure 2. Effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 pretreatment for sixteen days on asparagus seed germination (25 seeds total per replication) 22 on h2m£hl> as: .5023: n9 10'. ON 0. N— .\ N NOILVNIWIIIS iAl 1v1nwna '2 ON 23 Figure 3. Effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 pretreatment for sixteen days on asparagus seedling emergence (25 seeds total per replication) 24 an 02—;Om duhu< m>oa mausmoamaawam uoa mum muouuoa coaaoo hp vmzoaaow maasaou sfinufia memo: um m o.wm m «.mm on n.m pm N.m n mm.o pm mm.o woxmom uoz m o.¢~ m n.mm opm H.m m m.¢ n 06.0 nm ~m.o mica m o.m~ m ~.om on H.NH pm m.n n n¢.o a ~q.o «lea m o.~m m ¢.~m w o.ma pm o.w m Hm.o «no Hm.o mica uwmuoum owmuoum owmuoum vaou Houucou vHoo Houucoo vaoo Houuaoo Aeav Aeaeemv Axe wmumsaahow mwoom numaoq uoonm uzwaoz smash couumuuaooaou mo uoaasz owmuo>< N\¢ <6 .Aooaumoaaaou “on Hmuou momma omV gnaw Huuom m cw whom 06 Means udmfimoao>ow mafiavoom uaosuomnsm so m\¢ vaum owaaouonnfiw aw poxmom Houma mmomm mswmummmm so owmuoum waoo mo uoommm .m oanma 41 Table 10. Effect of Ethephon pretreatment of asparagus seeds on subsequent seedling development after 40 days in a petri dish (50 seed total per replication) Average Shoot Number of Ethephon Fresh Weight Length Seeds Germinated (PPm) (gm) (mm) 1000 0.016 2.6 15.2 750 0.010 2.1 13.4 500 0.036 1.0 14.8 250 0.110 5.1 13.4 Not Soaked 0.110 5.1 22.8 42 Table 11. Effect of concentrated H 80 scarification of asparagus seeds on germination (33 seeds per replication) Percent Germination Time in H SO Days in Petri Dishes 2 4 (min) 11 28 5 0.1 0.3 10 0.0 0.0 15 0.0 0.3 Not Soaked 12.7 20.0 MIC CIH IGAN STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARIE