OPTWEUM FEED PLATE LOCATiON IN MULTECGMPONfiNT DESTiLLAfiON Thain forhboguooéMJ. MICHQGAN STATE UNEVERSITY! Russell Howard Fey 1959i THESIS Rm??? ESE will“ 5% H 21011 OPTIMUM FEED PLATE LOCATION IN MULTICOHPONEHT DISTILLATION by RUSSELL HOWARD POY A THESIS Submitted to the College of Engineering Michigan State University of Agriculture end Applied Science in partial fulfillment of the requirement: for the degree of MASTER 0" SCIENCE Department of Chemical Engineering 1959 70 I1 v11 their patiencq DEDICATION TO‘IU'VIIO, Janet, and daughter, Beth, for their patience and understanding. OPTIMUM FEED PLATE LOCATION IN HULTICOMPONENT DISTILLATION by RUSSELL HOWARD POY AN ABSTRACT Sub-itted to the College of Engineering Michigan State Univereity of Agriculture and Applied Science in partial fulfillment of the require-ante for the degree of MASTER OI' SCIIIC'B Department of Chemical Engineering 1959 V f -1- ABSTRACT In a multiple component distillation design. it is evident that there exists an optimt- £eed plate location somewhere bemen the inaperative conditions of top or bottom plate, except in the ease of an abbreviated colts-n such as a stripper. The two most comly used -thods for locating the optin- teed plate are those of Gilliland and hontrose- Scheibei. Gilliland's method consists of choosing the feed plate so that the ratio of the key components on the feed plate is equal to the ratio of the key components in the feed. the method has been checked by far too few problems because of the long and tedious: plate to plate calculations required. Several problems involving eleven plates have been checked by Gilliland's method and an» fairly can with the correlation developed in this investigation. The method of Uontrose and Scheibel is based on an impirical equation which involves the use of the ratio of the key components on the feed plate at total and minimu- refln. The equation appears to be based on only semi- rigorous calculations since the simplifying «eruptions of constant relative volatility and latent heats were made to “I. I I»... n ...- {a . ‘4.|. 355: :...S wilting: -2. reduce the labor of calculation. This empirical equation also makes use of the less than rigorous terms of minimu- reflun and ninimm cider of plates. no attempt was made to check if the method agreed with the results of this investigation, as the Montrose and schema: assmptions are too general. It was the purpose of this work to obtain an npirical multicomponent opti-n teed plate location relation based upon a considerable order of truly rigorous plate to plate calculations. A rigorous plate to plate calculation is one vhich takes into consideration both the variation of equili- brit- oonstaat with temperature and an snthalpy or heat balance about each plate. ' To perform these rigorous cal- culations, a method of solution suited for a high speed computer was developed and programsd. The electronic digital computer used was the Michigan State University ao cathode ray tube, single address machine. The computer was used to solve several hundred problems rigorously. The results of these problems were than used to study the effect of certain variables such as reflux ratio. teed composition, and umber of plates upon the rela- tive optht- teed plate location. It was found that reflux nth, umber littls affect Hutton of various iced c Mud no rain: faction was I Although tin, so claim M mun 1'01:th vol“ lWins as fa e.u'eial up; a“ M non. N ’1'“ 10¢ “lieu: km. .3- ratio, nimber of plates, and feed temperature had very little effect on the location of the optimum feed plate. a function of In!“ I XL! was found to fit the data of la: " xu various feed compositions very well, and a correlation based on relative optinum feed plate location versus this faction was made. Although many problems were solved in this investiga- tion, no claim is made that all possible combinations of feed composition, as well as types of components, i.e.. relative volatilities. will have the optimum feed plate location as fond using this correlation. However, most co-ercial applications will be covered. It is probable that when non-adjacent key components are used the optima feed plate location is more sensitive than when employing adjacent keys. lince this investigation did not cover sen-adjacent keys, care should be exercised when attenting to use the correlation for such systems. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgement Introduction Statement of the Problem lead for High Speed Computer Derivation of Equations Computer Used Detailed Coding Procedure Beta and Discussion of Results Conclusions Appendix Nomenclature Bibliography 22 25 29 67 so 90 99 100 123 125 acmowmcmrr The author wishes to take this opportunity to thank Professor .1. H. Donnell for his helpful guidance and advice .. the many problems which arose during this investigation. Thanks are also extended to the Computer Labora- tory staff of Hichigan State University for their cooperation in making the HISTlC and the auxiliary equipment available for use in this investigation. INTRODUCTION -6- INTRODUCTION The unit operation of distillation is an old one, dating back to the early days of the alcohol stills. Through the years, the use of distillation as a means of separating a mixture of liquids into desired products has been growing steadily. The patrolm- industry, perhaps, has been the largest contributor in the expansion of dis- tillation techniques and applications. It has been estimated that two‘thirds of the total investment in petroleu refineries is in distillation equipment. The solution of binary distillation problems was first analysed and organised into a systematic approach by Sorel (15) in 1893. His solution consisted of making energy and mate- rial balances around each plate and naming that equilibriu is attained on each plate. Practically all distillation calculations today use the theoretical plate concept; that is, the “eruption that equi- libriu is attained on each calculated plate. Then one applies the theoretical calculations to actual design by using an efficiency factor to obtain the nfler of physical plates to use. For example, if 'a plate of certain design is been to give fifty per cut efficiency on the liquid-vapor \ mt. is que Mutual 0! mm. tbs! plate a Soul's 1 ad of the din (“tilted by 4 ‘0 calculate 4 db other and '1 the liquid WMIM a th "Pot an: “leuhtud b} tray 1‘ Mat. ““1“ . C4 hull lad t -7. system in question, then two plates mat be used for each theoretical one. Henceforth then, subsequent distillation discussions in this paper will be confined to the theore- tical plate approach. forel’s rigorous method involves starting at either and of the distillation tower and using and products (obtained by a material balance and product specification) te calculate downward (or upward) plate by plate until the other end of the tower is reached. The composition of the liquid on a tray is obtained from vapor-liquid _ equilibrii- data. Then the amount and composition of the vapor entering this tray from the tray below is calculated by a material and heat balance around the tray in question. This last calculation is made by seeming a certain vapor rate and checking from known latent and specific heat data for each component to see if this but data will allow the ancient of vapor assumed to enter the plate in question. This, then, issaentoinvolveatrialanderrorprocedure-a tedious process. Ponchon (14) however, developed a graphical method which can be used to execute the Coral plate to plate ulcuhtioa to is s relative}. tin as sathal emit fractio Istustsd vspo €011th re Tb ntbod tak vapor rates fr Itbod ICCOnpl ltCsbe an calculation for binary syst-a in a rigorous fashion in a relatively short time. The nethod involves plot- ting an enthalpy versus cognition (mole fraction or weight fraction) diagram for both saturated liquid and saturated vapor. This diagram is than used to satisfy equilibriu relationships and to make material balances. The method takes into account the change in liquid and vapor rates from plate to plate, which is what the Coral method accomplishes. llcCabe and Thiele's (13) graphical nethod has be- come the nest popular method of solution for binary mix- tures; in fact, it has become a classic. This method, as many others before and after it, makes certain simplifying assmptions to handle problems more easily. The primary assumptions one must make when applying a solution such as this are: l. legligibla sensible heat effects of liquids and vapors as compared to latent heats. 2. Latent heats of vaporiaation per mole of both components are equal and do not vary with temperature. 3. legligible heat losses to surroundings. 1». lo heats of mixing. .9- The latter two assmptions are two which are standard assinptions to nearly all methods of solu- tion; and well they night be, for both effects are very small in comparison to the large amounts of heat being considered in a column. The first assimption is usually a good one to make. However, the second asst-ption is the one that could be greatly in error, and thus cause incorrect results. For nest mixtures of two components which are members of the cane homologous series, the assmption of equal nolal heats of vaporisation is a reasonable one, and the McCabe- Thiele method provides a very quick and accurate nethod of solution. The McCabe-Thiole method can also be Iodified to handle cases where the heats of vaporiaa- tion are man. In this case, the nethod is slower but still gives good results. The mechaniu of the McCaba-Thiele method consist of plotting the equilibriu diagram for the components in question on a vapor-liquid composition graph. Plotted on the sen graph are the operating lines, i.e. , the upper operating line starts with the top product -10. couposition and has a slope equal to the ratio of liquid to vapor rates in the top of the tower, while the bottom operating line starts with the coepoaie tion of the bottom product and has a slope equal to the ratio of liquid to vapor rates below the feed plate. The lines represent material balance equations and relate the composition of'the‘vapor leaving a plate to the composition of the liquid leaving the plate above it. The W of plates required can be determined by alternately'moving fren.the operating line horizontally to the equilibritaa line, and from the equilibrim line vertically downward to the operating line, and.so on Autil the button composition is reached. The procedure may be reversed and, starting with the bottom product, take vertical and horisontal steps until the top pro~ duct composition is reached. lither way, each pair of harisontal andnverticsl steps represent a plate. If constant heats of vaporiaation are assumed, the operating lines referred to above are straight lines. If the heats of veporisetiou are not assumed to be equal, than the operating lines*will not be straight, but curved. One method of plotting the curved operating lines would be .11- to make use of a Ponchon diagram in conjunction with the McCabe-Thiele diagran. But rather than do that, one might Just as well use a Ponchon diagram by itself, which accomplishes the same purpose in a simpler fashion. The solution of multicomponent distillation pro- blena is closely related to the solution of binary distillation prdblems, in that they are both based on theoretical plates, material balances, and heat balances. The procedure for the solution of a multi- component problem is different, however, because the boiling points of the liquids are no longer a function of one component composition as was the ease in binary mixtures. In nulticomponent nixtures (three or more cmonents) the liquid on a given plate nay have an infinite number of boiling points corresponding to a certain conposition for one component, depending upon the composition of the other components in the mixture. In the previous discussion of binary distillation, the lIcCabe-Thiele graphical method was referred to as a classic because it gives rigorous (if curved operating lines are used) yet rapid and clear solutions to most .12- binary distillation problems. There is no similar method which is simple enough for multicomponent cal- culations. Plate to plate calculations are therefore widely recognised as the standard method for multi0 component systems. The other methods of solution may be roughly broken down into the categories of l) graphical solutions, 2) overall equations, and 3) eqirical solutions. Several examples of each category will now be outlined briefly. The two most common plate to plate methods used are the lewis-hatheson (12) which makes the major assuption of constant liquid and vapor rates, and the Thiele-Geddes (16) which uses heat balances as a major calculating tool. The Lewis-Hatheson method consists of starting with the desired and products and calculating the oder of theoretical plates required. Plate to plate calculations from both extremes of the colin to the feed plate are carried out by using material balances and equilibriu relationships and by making successive approximations as to the temperature on each plate. The reflux ratio mist also be found by trial and error. -13- The calculations in detail are carried out as follows. The reflux ratio is first approximated and the com- position of the vapor leaving the top tray is calculated. Tor a total condenser this step would not be necessary, since the composition of the vapor would.be the same as that of the top product. By using some sort of equili- brium relationship such as Raoult's law, relative volatility, or K values (where y 3 K x and equilibrium is attained when X y = l, K 3 f(T,P) ) the liquid com- position and the temperature on the tap plate are found by asst-ing values for the temperature until the sun of the mole fractions, as calculated from the equili- brim relationship, is unity. Similarly, the temperature of the still and the composition of the vapors rising from it are calculated. Reflux is seemed not to change from.one end of the column to the other, except at the feed plate where the reflux is increased by the amount of liquid in the feed. By use of a material balance and the dew point equation, the temperatures and compositions on each plate are calculated plate by plate. By studying the composition determdned.by working up ft” the bottom, a suitable feed plate is chosen. -14. The composition of the light key (highest boiling comp ponent‘which.does not come out in bottomxproduot) on the toad plate is calculated. The computation is continued until the hoevy key (lowest boiling component which does not appear in appreciable amounts in the over- head product) is of negligible concentration. If the compositions thus determined correspond substantially with those determined by calculating down the coin, the problem is solved. If not, the composition on the feed plate must be re-estimated and the last series of calculations repeated. The‘most important contribution of Lewis andfllhtheson was to demonstrate that multicomponent systemm could.be solved.by using a plate to plate calculation similar to that used for binary mixtures. because the method starts with the distillate and bottoms maition, the method is not readily applicable to*miatures that have two or three components which appear . in both product streams. It will be pointed out later that there are not enough degrees of freedemnto specify the elect product composition together with the ads: of plates. This is the most serious disadvantage of the -15. method. The Lewisduatheson method can be madeamore rigorous by taking into consideration the changing liquid and'vapor rates by applying the principles used by Sorel, i.e., heat balances. The method introduced by Thiele and Geddee in 1933 is a rigorous plate to plate calculation in which it is not necessary to know or assume the products. It is, however, necessary to start with the nunber of equili- brit- plates and the reflux ratio. These constitute the primary assumptions. The secondary assumptions are the temperatures on each plate. The method makes use of mole fraction ratios; that is, the ratio of the mole fraction of a component in either the liquid or vapor phase to the mole fraction of the same component in the end product stream» Above the feed the ratios are with respect to the distillate, below the feed*with respect to the bottom product. Calculations are performed from both extremes of the tower toward the feed platen making use of the previously mentioned mole fraction ratios. When the feed plate is reached, these ratios are meshed to find the composition of the products. After the feed plate mesh .15. is accomplished, one must go back and calculate the compositions on each plate, which in turn are used to calculate the corresponding temperatures. If the calculated temperatures do not agree with those assuned, the process is repeated using the new assumptions, until the temperatures for all the plates agree on two successive trials. ‘It should be stressed that all temperatures must agree, since an incorrect tem- perature at any point will invalidate all of the calculations. The Thiele~ceddes method is a very good method for mlticomponent systems. Its main advantage over the Lewiséuhthoson method is the manner in which the unequal molal overflow is taken into account, as well as not ‘having to start with the composition of the products. In 1935, Gilliland (7) published a shortcut method for solution of mlticomponent problems by using relative volatility, as well as a new function of relative operability. Equilibrit- relationships are written for the two key components in terms of relative volatility. by writing component. material balances around a plate for each key component, and by dividing one component balance by the other, Gilliland uses the resulting ‘\‘_ .17. equation to define relative operability. as then codines the relative operability with relative volatility to give the relative changes in composition for one complete equilibrit- stage, i.e., from liquid on one plate to liquid on the neat. By expanding the above relationship for total plates in each section, he obtains relative composition changes across both the enriching and stripping sections. The method is a rapid approximation that can be used with a fair degree of accuracy for sharp separations. however, using this method, it is necessary to know the composition on the feed plate. The limitations of the method are that there are too many simplifying asst-ptions. for instance, if the relative volatility or operebility varies from one end of the calm to the other, as aritbetic average is used. it is, nevertheless, a good method for giving quick approximations, which could be used as a first . estimate in a more rigorous method. Some investigators, such as Lewis and tops (11) and Jenny (10), develOped graphical solutions conerable to the McCabe-Thiele method. .13. The Lewis and Cope method consists of constructing a separate plot of y vs. 1 for each component. Assuming an equilibriu relationship of y : Ix, with K dependent on temperature only, equilibrit- lines are plotted for several temperatures, and the correct temperature deter- mined by trial and error. This process is repeated for each plate. The method is very cuebersome and also requires a knowledge of the composition of the products. Jenny proposed a graphical'method.utilising a 3 vs. y diagram similar to the McCabe-Thiele diagram, which involves constructing a modified equilibrima . line, which is supposed to allow for the nonvvolatile lighter than hay and heavier than key components. The mums. line is 916cm by making a few plate to plate calculations. Separate diagrams are used for both the stripping and enriching sections, using the light key for the enriching section and the heavy key for the stripping section. The operating lines are seemed to be straight. This method requires knowing the composition on the feed plate. a method based on overall equations for both sections of the tower‘was proposed by ldmister (5). The equations are based on the use of absorption and stripping factors will: to those \ method at th‘ In, so-cal pond, based on “We After haul of these It 1939. 31': in: chum.“ a“ f" ‘ 31M scpm “WM isba similar to those used by Kremser in absorption calcu- lations. After evaluation of these equations, the results are meshed at the feed plate. Kaey so-called empirical solutions have been pro- posed, based on various correlations of past calculations. Several of these correlations will nov be discussed. In 1939, brown and Martin (1) proposed a method for obtaining the number of equilibriu plates required for a given separation at a specified reflux ratio. the method is based upon an eqirical correlation and the variables plotted are actual reflux divided by minin- reflun versus the actual plates divided by the mini- plates. Key components and pinch-point concepts are used. The correlation was developed from the results of rigorous calculations for a umber of separations. lost of the systems were binary, with some mlticomponent systems. About the same time that brown and Hartin published their method, Oilliland (0 proposed a method very si-ilar. although developed independently. this correlation plotted the actual minus the linin- plates divided by one plus the actual pie reflux dividec variables are Gillilan: rigorous calm The correlatic Went cyst Ilittle 31'.an In 1950, Mon which 1 Plates to mm ratio of “m {ions of Fans] "1““ for the h of th‘ ho: hum the :1. “link! re; ”‘1"- com "flu, Thus M “my. -20. the actual plates versus the actual minus the minimum reflux divided by one plus the actual reflux. The variables are plotted on log-log scales. Gilliland's correlation was also the result of rigorous calculations for a umber of binary mixtures. The correlation was also checked for a few multi- ement systems. The correlation of Gilliland is a little simpler to use than that of Brown and Martin. In 1950, Donnell and Cooper (4) proposed a corre- lation which involved plotting the ratio of actual plates to ninimus plates versus the logarithm of the ratio of actual boil up to ninim boil up. The equa- tions of Females (6) and Underwood (1?) are used to obtain values for the mini-um plates and minimum vapor load. One of the scat important advantages of this correlation is that the curve approaches a straight line in the region of liaison reflms. This is of inortance since nost optimal conditions lie in this range near the ninian- retlur. Thus. it is desirable to be able to read the graph easily, or even interpolate if necessary. Several other investigators made correlations sinilar to those already discussed. Included is the group fl correlati-.-l Fuhert (9)- In, 1915}. detenzining tie nth-:5. consists ratio of tin no the feed is be: the plate above Silliland's net. feed is partial Elcntmss a I” Optimum rec 0” an enzirica‘. M10 01' the 1.2 “i Eizliuurl ref 3&1: 86:21-p1.~;~. ”MEtions of ieea:a new We} )0 ‘ 4cm i. “‘3 aIthaca as 21.. are correlations presented by Colburn (3) and by Herbert (9). In, lQhO, Gilliland (8) published a.method for determining the optimum food plate location. This method consists of placing the feed plate so that the ratio of the mole fractions of the key components in the feed is between the ratio of the key components en the plate above and below the feed plate. According to Gilliland's method, there is a slight variation if the food is partially vaporized or all vapor. Hontrose and Scheibol in 19h6 (8a) offer a.mcthod for optimumgfood.plato location. This method is based on an.empirical equation which involves the use of the ratio of the key components on the feed plate at total and minimum reflux. The equation appears to be based on only semi-rigorous calculations since the simplifying assumptions of constant relative volatility and latent— heats‘uero made to reduce the labor of calculation. This empirical equation also makes use of the less than . rigorous terms of minimum reflux and minimum number of plates. No attempt was made to check if the method agreed with the results of this investigation, as the honorees and Scheibel assumptions are too general. sum 05' THE P3031311 .22. SIAM“? 0! m PROBLIH Tbs ossd o! s rigorous solution to uultioo-ponsut distillation problus is not s sow idss. It on ststod sols yssrs book by Gathers (2) thst shot ths sugisssris; protsssios ussds is ultioo-possot calculations is "sithsr so sssot solution. soon though it is difficult. or‘ss optimists solution. it it is sssy.” With tbs sdosst of‘high spssd.oosputors. tbs ohsllssgs to sss who could dsvsloprsu.sssot solution first‘hss gross consi- dsrsbly. This invsstisstios was unsortsksn.to: l) dsvslop’ so mot solution using s high spssd ooqutsr as s tool to potion tho osloulstious, sad 2) uss tbs usct solution to study tho offset of (sod troy loostiou on tho dsxros of sopsrstioo is sultico-poosut nixturss. Whoa s distillstios oolusn is assignsd sud built. it is dssirsd thst for s givsu snubs: of pistss. rsflus rstis. out food oospositios. ths1sssilus sspsrstios.bs obtsinsd. It is dssirsbls. thou. to loosts ths food pists so thst tbs options sspsrstiou is obtsissd. 1's illustrsts tho uscsssity to: tho opti-n flood pasts loostiou, ooasidsr tbs following bissry’problss. -23- Figure 1 If the feed plate were not located on the fourth plate from the bottom, but higher up, it would require more plates to do the same Job of separation, or a worse separation would be obtained, if the same number of plates were used. The red line in Figure 1 illustrates the case where the feed plate is not the fourth but the sixth plate from the bottom. In this case, it would take two more plates to do the same Job of separation. Simdlarily, if the feed plate were located lower than the fourth plate from the bottom, the same situation would arise. -24- miticonponsnt systems are not so easy to illustrate as the foregoing binary one. but tbs sans type of relation- ship exists. That is, there exists an optinun feed plate location, or series of locations, so. that a sari-\- ssparstion is obtainable. In attempting to study the affect of feed tray location, it boconss necessary to work out nsny problans to ass how the option- vsriss vitb umber of plates. reflux ratio. and toad composition. In a study snob as this . a rigorous solution should be used in order to get a sore accurate picture of the variables involved. Thus. this investigation utilised a high spssd conutsr to solve my problsns in a rigorous fashion (that is, taking into account changing vapor and liquid rates and perfect latching at the {sod plats.) unto FOR HIGH SPEED COMPUTER NEED FOR HIGH SPEED CW The importance of greater and greater accuracy has been brought out as one reason why more rigorous methods of solution must be employed. The more rigorous a pro- blem, the more trial and error calculations are required, until finally it is conceivable that an engineer working a rigorous multicomponent distillation problem might take weeks to solve the problem. Most of that time would be spent doing the rather routine trial and error calculations to make sure that all compositions, amounts, and temperatures were consistent with the material balances, heat balances, and equilibrium data. The answer to the engineer’s dream is.- a high speed electronic computer. Of course. the engineer would still be required to set the problem up, but the computer would do all the calculations in a very short period of time. The same problem that might take an engineer a task to solve could be solved using a computer in a few hours or less. The great Speed at which computers operate is also inportant from an economic standpoint. Once a program has bsen written for a problem, it can be used over and over for the solution of nsny sinilar problems. Although ~26. the cost of buying or renting a computer is quite high (rentals run on the order of $200 per hour) the cost is still substantially lower than paying the salary of an engineer for the time necessary to work out the proble- by hand. As was pointed out previously. the study of the effect of feed tray location on the separation obtained is one which requires many problems to be solved. This lends itself to computer application very nicely. since the computer can perform a rigorous solution in a short period of time. Rot only does the computer provide a means of studying the effect of feed tray location, but also it affords a detailed study of other variables which enter into the problem. One of the variables now being studied is the effect of condition of feed, i.e.. pre- heated or cold, on the tower performance. Another _ inportant study is being made on the relationship between umber of plates and reflux ratio to obtain a desired separation. Another important advantage of the use of conputers is their reliability. Although some night argue this to -27. be a trivial point, it is nevertheless an important one. The reliability of computers is certainly better than an engineer running a slide rule or desk calculator. It must be admitted that computers do occasionally make a mistake. However, when a mistaae is made, it is almost always so obvious that it is immediately noticed. On the other hand, an engineer could easily carry a mistake on and on without it being noticed. In the discussion of previous methods used in solving multicomponent distillation problems, it was mentioned that some methods use the ratio of the so- called key components as a criterion for convergence of the feed plate meSh. This, of course, is only an approximation and serves to shorten the calculations. Once again, the compute- can perform these calculations exactly and thus eliminate the need for the assumption. It may be argued that this advantage of the computer ii merely due to the Speed at which the machine operates. However, there is more to a computer than speed and accuracy. It enables one to solve lengthy and complex problems that could not be worked without the use of such a computer. ‘Many of these seemingly {possible so 11¢er by con; There are Men of applyi problems. The one of tin welt presented by 01 alternative cow [Mrticularly 31 litter altema Iona 0f the ex ‘0 “Mastic cl ital: or b eta 'hich til. math to uh ~28- impossible solutions are now being handled very nicely by computers. There are two alternative approaches to the pro~ blen of applying computers to solve distillation problems. The first alternative would be to adapt one of the well-known and accepted calculation methods presented by other authors to a computer. The second alternative would be to develop a calculation method particularly suited to automatic calculation. The latter alternative was chosen since it is felt that none of the existing calculation methods are suitable to automatic computation, either because of the method itself or because of certain simplifying assmnptions which the method required, which were felt unnecessary to snake. DERIVATIOI or BQUA‘I'IOIS flu wlutio, is on of trial the Iiiplifying . m not side. 1'! obtain a solution 2) arterial bald: At this poi: “VII feed, the l lifferent in a In “mm. In a b: M *7 'PEley; -29- DERIVATIOI 0F EQUATIONS The solution of a multicomponent distillation problem is one of trial and error. This is even.more pronounced if the simplifying assumptions of constant liquid and vapor rates are not made. The three tools with which we are armed to obtain a solution are: l) Vapor-liquid equilibriumnconditions, 2) material'balances, and 3) energy balances. At this point, it is well to point out that from any given feed, the problem.of product specification is quite different in a multicomponent mixture than it is in a binary mixture. In a binary mixture, the product desired may be fixed by specifying the composition of one component, since the composition of the other component will then also be fixed. however, in a mlticomponent mixture the product cannot be specified for all the components. Instead, only the composition with respect to one component may be specified. The situation of not being able to specify the products and the fact that computers are limdted as to the number of simultaneous equations they can solve, leads directly to a trial and error solution. The solution becomes, then, an iterative process of assuming the composition of the products, working through the problem, and correcting the product com- positions until the asst-ptions prove correct. .30- The primary'variables which rust be known.before starting the solution of a problem are: 1) feed composi- tioe and condition of the feed, 2) Reflux ratio, LID, 3) number of plates above and below the feed plate, and ‘) tower pressure. The latter is necessary for equili- briun.and.emthelpy data. There are two types of problems whdchLmey'arise. The first would be the problem of designing a new calm with the proper number of plates to give a desired separation. The desired separation, of course, must be in accordance with the foregoing discussion on product specification. The second type of problem would be the utilisation of an existing calm and the desire to determine the products obtainable'with.a given feed. Actually, both types of pro~ blems would be solved utilising the same method of solution. The problem of determining the eI-ber of plates necessary to obtain a desired product requires an estimate of the lumber of plates, working through the problem» and checking the results*with the desired products. If the results agree, than the number of plates assumed*will be sufficient. If the results do not agree. then a new estimate of the number of plates must be‘made, and the problem reworked until the .31. products obtained are acceptable. The problem with the nfler of plates already known and the products unknown is solved using the same method of solution as for the above type prob]... except that the nfler of plates need not be assumed since it is already known. Therefore, 5‘1 the solution of both types of problems will be handled as ] one,andthem-berofplatesinthecolmwillbetaken 5 as a known variable. f; The general solution of the problem will be to asst-e —“ one of the product conceitions and quantities (the top product in this solution) and calculate from both extremities of the tower toward the middle util the feed plate is reached from both directions. At this point a mesh, or comparison, of the compositions obtained from both directions is made. If the compositions are equal, to a specified degree of accuracy, then the products asst-ed are correct and the solu- tion is complete. If the compositions do not nesh, then the ensued product is nodified in proportion to the variation of the mesh, and the calculations are carried out again until the feed plate mesh is satisfactory. In the development of the method, frequent reference to previous equations already developed will occur, and so are -32- numbered to help identify them. A diagram is provided to help picture the problem and also to refer to as to nomenclature. rj i - (L *L J ‘r v, F 1" £ i T; LO jVM‘Z J The. TV "’ ”’ m 7'" F' 3K: 1 ‘th Tn IwflvoLnJ' T -I t Ln-o‘ Ti 1.. Figure 2 For simplification purposes, a basis of one mole of feed is chosen. This allows the composition of the feed, expressed in mole fractions, to be the moles of each conr ponent in the food. It also provides an easy, quick estimate of the amount and composition of the top product by estimating -33.- the nfler of moles of each component which will be produced overhead. The first estimate of top product, as well as estimates of the top temperature, bottom temperature, and snout of vapor in the bottom section, are read into the computer as data. In the section on the actual computer progra-ing, the entire list of data necessary to work a problem will be outlined. The statement and derivation of the algebraic pro- cedure used in the problem follows: 1) Calculate the amount of overhead product. 9 3:59 a: bi for the first iteration this step is necessary, since the top product has been asst-ed. however, in later iterations the top product will be altered, making it necessary to perforn this calculation. 2) Calculate the amount of botton product. W O I - D 0 1 - D 3) Calculate the bottom composition. 1“ e "71 w l“Di 4) Using the assumed moles (sum) of each component and the B from step 1, calculate the overhad composition. X” II 22% -34. 5) Calculate V, and 1..o from given reflux ratio and D calculated in l. v, = D(R+l) L0 = RD 6) Determine the t-perature on the top and bottom plate, using the bubble point and dew point calculations as shown below. r, of 7‘0p WA... g. 7:1" = / Tsaf boHom when g KL Xw; =/ The values of K1 are obtained from a third degree polynonial in temperature. The R values are seemed to be dependent on temperature and pressure only. When the correct temperatures are found, then K12“. '3 T“ and each Tu is saved for later calculations. 7) Determine the dew point of the overhead product as follows: To when Z K; Km; = / d. 8) Calculate heat flux in top of coin by sub- tracting enthalpy of reflux from enthalpy of top vapor, thusly:_ h, = L, 2;. A“ X0; a." 7”c H, = V' Z '57:: xoi 4+ T, 4: On: HI“ A0. his hat Itwuld have ti- mm condens I ” Amanda Q: from of the the tan enthal; produm Meat calcul temper Hake a ‘ hilt ba] ”Nam, 81?! T09 se -35- Note that this solution is for a total condenser. It would have to be nodified slightly for the use of a partial condenser. 9) Meaning no heat losses to surroundings, calculate Q: from enthalpy of the feed and (2.. The enthalpy of the feed is read in as data and is calculated in the same manner as all other enthalpies, i.e., the enthalpy of a mixture is the ‘l- of the individual products of mole fraction and enthalpy of pure com- ponent. The enthalpy of each pure component is calculated fron a third degree polynomial in temperature. flake a heat balance around the entire colmn?’ hr"“s"“c“‘n“‘w 153(thrns)f(hcfho) (bs’hw)' zo_._._m0n_zoo ommu n UHDMHH 0.. _I—._i° O '0’ i O n “NWD'IOO JO "01.1.08 "08$ 1" 6 0 NOliVOO‘l 3iV'ld oaaa wneuao 3 2 / O a 'igurmé AVERAGE % KEY COMPONENTS RECOVERED -94- j 07 e4?- 02!- Ll 87 FEED PLATE LOCATION V8 KEY COMPONENTS RECOVERED mm“ \A «...... _ /\ GASES l-b _ FEED PLATE LOCATION -%FROM BOTTOM OF COLUMN- -95- coqonents. Figure 5 shows the results of plotting this faction versus optima feed plate location expressed in percentages from the bottom of the calm. The data does not cover the entire range of feed composition; but does, however, cover most cases which will normally be met (see Table l). The ends of the curve are dotted since they are strictly qirical. By enanining the abscissa of Figure 5, itcanheseenthetwhenthefeedisall lightkey (In-0) then the faction goes to l and the optiu- location of feed plate should approach the bottom of the col“. When thefeedisallheavykeyamI-O) thamthafmctiongoes to ears and the Optl-I feed plate location approaches the top of the cola. figure 3 was determined using the data of Table I! (see Appendix). The maria. separation, and thus the opti— location of feed plate, was determined by plotting the average of the per cent light hey recovered out the overhead and the percent heavy hey recovered out the bottom, versus feed pm. mam. mm: plots .2. shown in figure 6. The optima feed plate location was then plotted versus the function describing the feed composition in Figure 5. The band was drawn in to include the points scattered, due to changes in reflux ratio, feed condition, and calm pressure, as well as to include the "band" of optimum locations observed for several calms. It is felt that the most important variable not inves- tigated was that of variation of relative volatility between the key components. Although some problems were solved using a six-component feed, nearly all the problems solved in this investigation had a feed composed of the one five hydrocarbons. Any future work in this field should include this variable, as well as including components other than aliphatic hydrocarbons. £21.12. nae. by examining Table I: for canes 141 and cases ”-155, which illustrate variation of reflux ratio, it can be seen that the degree of separation increases with reflux ratio. Thisistrueuptoahighvalueofreflunrstio,andthenthe products obtained remain the same with increasing reflux ratio. From plots of the type shown in figure 6, it was feud that the optimtm feed plate location remained nearly the same for various reflux ratios. There is only a slight shift of the optima feed plate location upward in the calm with increased reflux ratio . Lee 2!. 1.1.19: Once again, the amber of plates in a column has very little effect on the relative optim\- feed plate location, that is, the feed plate location expressed as a percentage, such as used in figure 5. In towers with a small nueber of plates (11) the optima location sometimes resulted in a specific location, rather than a band of feed plate locations, which occurred in many columns with more plates. This band occurred due to the flat shape of the separation versus feed plate location curve (Figure 6.) The colt-e with 21 and 31 plates which were calculated often had pinch points where the composition and temperatures did ndt change from one plate to the next. One set of pro- blems was solved using 41 plates and the same relative optima feed plate location was obtained as for calms with 21 and 31 plates. However, because of the increased umber of plates in the pinch region, the aptim- location band was slightly widened. Condition 9; g_e_e_d_ To determine if the optimum feed plate location changed with the condition of feed, that is, hot or cold feed, the same feed composition was used at two different temperatures. feed I was at 137°? and Feed 1 at 100°P. Cases 211-222 and 254-268 -93. are the solutions applicable here. In this case, the optimum location was not affected by the change of feed condition. It seems safe to generalina that, at least for all liquid feed, the condition of the feed will not affect the relative optimum feed plate location. However, caution should be used in .....a... this generalisation to include vepor feeds. 3395 Pressure Since the tower pressure is not an independent variable in commercial design but‘muet be conpetible*with condenser temperature and product specifications, it is difficult to determine the effect of pressure on the optim feed plate location. The only check was the comparison of feed I with reed J (cases 211-222 and 269-262.) Feed J was used in.a column at 150 psi pressure while the colunn for feed.! and all other cases were at 100 psi. Although slightly different products were obtained, no appreciable change in optinun.feed plate location'wes found. C ONCLUSIORS l. 2. 3. A. .99. CONCLD810HS A rigorous method for the solution of multicomponent distillation problems has been developed and progra-ed for a high speed digital computer. Several hundred problems have been solved rigorously to use in making a correlation of optimi- feed plate location. From these onerous solutions, a correlation between the optima feed plate location and the feed composition hasbeenmede. The function wu’xH. was X31 ’ X“ fond to give a good correlation of feed composition. The effects of other variables such as reflux ratio, tower pressure, feed condition, and number of plates, upon relative opti-m feed plate location, have also been studied and found to be very small. APPENDIX ~100- E g3 SE3 Table II g <3 I): ma. mo. ” n E 3% gag - Hole traction of Distillate 3 E 2:,- Mb. T134 ‘34 1 5 C5 Ce D 1 A 2 3 7 .4525 .5095 .0263 .0111 .0007 .4261 2 A 2 4 6 .4397 .5194 .0307 .0099 .0003 .4441 3 A 2 5 5 .4257 .5130 .0476 .0136 .0002 .4604 4 A 2 6 4 .4065 .4935 .0763 .0236 .0002 .4812 5 A 2 7 3 .3813 .4639 .1106 .0440 .0002 .5100 6 A 6 3 7 .4532 .5345 .0095 .0027 .0001 .4359 7 A 6 4 6 .4418 .5394 .0157 .0031 .0000 .4499 8 A 6 5 5 .4297 .5327 .0319 .0056 .0000 .4642 9 A 6 6 4 .4094 .5075 .0680 .0151 .0000 .4861 10 A 6 7 3 .3805 .4719 .1130 .0345 .0001 .5220 11 A 10 3 7 .4534 .5385 .0065' .0016. .0001 .4370 12 A 10 4 6 .4422 .5424 .0131 .0023 .0000 .4504 13 A 10 5 5 .4297 .5327 .0319 .0056 .0000 .4642 14 A 10 6 4 .4098 .5095 .0067 .0140 .0000 .4867 15 A 10 7 3 .3803 .4731 .1137 .0328 .0001 .5239 16 A 14 3 7 .4534 .5401 .0053 .0011 .0000 .4374 17 A 14 4 6 .4424 .5437 .0120 .0019 .0000 .4506 18 A 14 5 5 .4299 .5336 .0312 .0053 .0000 .4643 19 A 14 6 4 .4100 .5103 .0662 .0136 .0000 .4869 20 21 22 23' 24- 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 > >3» > b b bib > >> > 5' h» h- h» h» h- b- >- :> ta rd #0 1d r4 r- a: a» 4» 1» c» J> O‘O‘NNNNNN 0‘ 10 10 10 10 10 wouJ-‘wu ”03“ 10 .12 14 10 12 10 12 wbuoxuw 16 14 12 10 16 14 12 10 16 14 12 10 .3801 .4535 .4425 .4300 .4100 .3800 .5337 .4438 .4375 .4178 .3842 .3661 .5230 .4450 .4421 .4267 .3829 .5225 .4450 .4425 .4274 .3821 -101. .4735 .5409 .5443 .5341 .5106 .4736 .4592 .5464 .5453 .5209 .4790 .4554 .4750 .5541 .5525 .5332 .4784 .4763 .5545 .5531 .5342 .4775 .1141 .0047 .0115 .0309 .0660 .1143 .0054 .0082 .0156 .0156 .1158 .1403 .0016 .0009 .0051 .0383 .1279 .0009 .0004 .0043 .0369 .1308 .0323 .0009 .0017 .0051 .0134 .0321 .0017 .0015 .0016 .0057* .0210 .0383 .0004 .0001 .0003 .0019 .0108 .0002 .0000 .0002 .0015 .0097 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0001 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .5247 .4376 .4506 .4644 .4871 .5253 .3672 .4501 .4569 .4785 .5201 .5450 .3790 .4494 .4524 .4687 .5223 .3801 .4494 .4520 .4679 .5235 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 .59 160 (51 (52 ‘53 >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> rd 9* rd rd 6* r- rd hi hi rd ”DOOmJ-‘J-‘bb& O‘O‘OO‘O‘NNNNNNN 10 12 10 12 12 15 18 12 15 16 14 12 10 16 14 12 10 25 24 23 21 18 12 24 21 18 -102- .4764 .5546 .5532 .5343 .4767 .4766 .5547 .5533 .5342 .4760 .5225 .5412 .5493 .5537 .5503 .5200 .4690 .5437 .5524 .5555 .5544 .5339 .0007 .0003 .0040 .0369 .1326 .0005 .0002 .0039 .0371 .1343 .0104 .0074 .0051 .0026 .0091 .0614 .1367 .0013 .0007 .0001 .0020 .0384 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .3802 .4493 .4519 .4679 .5243 .3804 .4493 .4518 .4680 .5252 .4300 .4442 .4496 .4510 .4542 .4807 .5329 .4397 .4475 .4500 .4509 .4682 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 ' 83 '85 UUUU>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10 10 10 10 10 14 14 14 14 14 18 18 18 18 18 NNNNNNN 12 15 12 16 “#UN 25 24 21 18 15 25 24 21 18 25 24 21 18 15 32 28 24 UO‘NN .4541 .4467 .4437 .4282 .4539 .4467 .4445 .4437 .4282 .4538 .4467 .4437 .4281 .4451 .4421 .2202 .2204 .2137 .2030 ~103- .5451 .5529 .5555 .5546 .5352 .5456 .5531 .5555 .5546 .5353 .5458 .5532 .5555 .5546 .5351 .5510 .5551 .5526 .6386 .6406 .6245 .5951 .0006 .0003 .0000 .0017 .0362 .0004 .0002 .0000 .0017 .0362 .0003 .0001 .0000 .0017 .0365 .0035 .0007 .0052 .1092 .1125 .1340 .1682 .0001 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0004 .0001 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0003 .0001 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0003 .0004 .0000 .0001 .0302 .0259 .0273 .0335 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0018 .0008 .0004 .0003 .4404 .4477 '.4500 .4508 .4671 .4405 .4477 .4500 .4508 .4671 .4406 .4477 .4500 .4508 .4672 .4493 .4503. .4524 .4498 .4486 .4624 .4861 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 GOOO‘O‘O‘N 10 10 10 10 10 14 14 14 14 18 18 18 18 18 OU§WNOU§UNO #NO‘UrFUNINUl-F-‘UN mb UbUGNUWUO‘NU5‘UGNUDUO‘N pa 0‘ .883 .2353 .2318 .2230 .2095 .1915 .1723 .2345 .2248 .2108 .1921 .1721 .2356 .2255 .2113 .1924 .1718 .2363 .2259 .2115 .1924 .1717 .2382 -104- .5532 .6917 .6859 .6626 .6237 .5706 .5135 .6960 .6700 .6294 .5740 .5142 .7004 .6729 .6314 .5752 .5139 .7029 .6743 .6323 .5758 .5140 .7028 .2122 .0608 .0716 .1014 .1479 .2073 .2628 .0619 .0947 .1433 .2060 .2658 .0577 .0922 .1419 .2058 .2680 .0552 .0910 .1414 .2057 .2687 .0497 .0460 .0117 .0105 .0130 .0189 .0305 .0514 .0075 .0105 .0164 .0278 .0479 .0062 .0094 .0154 .0266 .0462 .0055 .0088 .0148 .0261 .0455 .0091 .0002 .0005 .0002 .0001 .0001 .0001 .0001 .0001 .0001 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0001 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0001 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0002 .5225 .4231 .4298 .4471 .4757 .5200 .5770 .4255 .4734 .5192 .5792 .4236 .4428 .4726 .5190 .5807 .4225 .4422 .4724 .5190 .5812 .4193 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 125 126 127 128 129 130 O‘C‘O‘O‘O‘NNNNN 94 r4 r9 r9 e9 r9 r! r9 r9 r9 r9 as ca 9- a- e- c~ S: c» c: c: c: c: 10 12 14 10 12 10 12 10 12 14 12 10 16 14 12 10 16 14 12 10 16 14 12 10 16 14 .2356 .2224 .2023 .1791 .1634 .2484 .2468 .2362 .2111 .1761 .2495 .2480 .2379 .2122 .1750 .2499 .2484 .2383 .2124 .1742 .2500 .2486 ~105- .7031 .6653 .6054 .5359 .4884 .7420 .7399 .7084 .6330 .5280 .7459 .7437 .7135 .6365 .5249 .7471 .7449 .7148 .6371 .5224 .7477 .7455 .0550 .1024 .1740 .2492 .2867 .0084 .0126 .0532 .1500 .2788 .0041 .0081 .0472 .1468 .2858 .0027 .0065 .0458 .1466 .2903 .0020 .0057 .0064 .0098 .0182 .0358 .0615 .0011 .0007 .0021 .0060 .0172 .0005 .0003 .0015 .0045 .0143 .0003 .0002 .0012 .0039 .0013 .0002 .0002 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .4243 .4494 .4949 .5580 .6112 .4024 .4052 .4233 .4738 .5679 .4007 .4033 .4204 .4713 .5714 .4002 .4026 . .4197 .4708 .5741 .3999 .4023 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 14.5 146 147 14.8 149 waUUUUUCUUUUtflU’uUUUUUUU r4 #9 ea c» a: 6» O‘O‘O‘O‘O‘NNNNN 1d rd rt rt 1- hi r0 1d rd rd Oma'fiJ-‘J-‘OOOO 10 12 12 18 12 15 18 12 15 12 15 12 10 24 21 18 12 24 21 18 15 12 24 21 18 15 24 21 15 24 21 .2384 .2123 .1737 .2425 .2421 .2292 .2067 .1774 .2496 .2494 .2435 .2170 .1665 .2499 .2497 .2448 .2189 .2499 .2498 .2450 .2192 .2500 .2498 ~106- .7151 .6370 .5210 .7226 .7259 .6875 .6120 .5320 .7481 .7482 .7306 .6510 .4994 .7491 .7491 .7344 .6568 .7494 .7493 .7351 .6576 .7496 .7495 .0454 .1471 .2928 .0314 .0304 .0799 .1641 .2614 .0022 .0024 .0255 .1303 .3253 .0009 .0012 .0206 .1232 .0006 .0009 .0197 .1223 .0004 .0007 .0011 .0036 .0125 .0035 .0016 .0034 .0095 .0292 .0002 .0001 .0044 .0017 .0088 .0001 .0000 .0002 .0011 .0000 .0000 .0002 .0009 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .4195 .4709 .5757 .4124 .4130 .4362 .4839 .5637 .4007 .4010 .4106 .4608 .6007 .4002 .4005 .4085 .4568 .4000 .4003 .4081 .4562 .4000 .4003 155 156 157' 158! IHF9 1601 161. 1621 163! 1641 16d5 1615 lGfi? 1613 16!) 171) 171L 171! 13KB 17Hb 1735 17£5 UHOOOOOOOOOOOGGOGOOOOU' r- we a: «n O‘OO‘OOO‘OO‘GO‘C‘G‘OO‘O‘ONNNNN a!" OOUNO‘UG‘UNO‘UFU N pa 0 10 11 13 pa G GU8‘UO‘NU3‘UONG .2451 .2192 .1689 .1681 .1656 .1611 .1703 .1686 .1661 .1622 .1555 .1689 .1673 .1664 .1631 .1588 .1667 .1666 .1664 .1669 .1474 .1467 -107- .7353 .6575 .7972 .8010 .7974 .7823 .7512 .8176 .8192 .8159 .8021 .7711 .8293 .8317 .8315 .8153 .7940 .8332 .8332 .8318 .8331 .8381 .8413 .0194 .1225 .0293 .0278 .0340 .0525 .0871 .0110 .0114 .0171 .0339 .0690 .0017 .0010 .0021 .0213 .0465 .0001 .0002 .0019 .0000 .0111 .0101 .0001 .0008 .0043 .0031 .0030 .0041 .0077 .0011 .0008 .0009 .0018- .0044 .0001 .0001 .0003 .0007 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0032 .0020 .0000 .0000 .0003 .0001 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0001 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0002 .0001 .4080 .4563 .5822 .5846 .5932 .6092 .6346 .5826 .5890 .5987 .6134 .6388 .5917 .5977 .6011 .6131 .6297 .6001 .6001 .6011 .5991 .6690 .6731 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 189 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 000‘ GO‘O‘O‘O‘O‘O‘ O‘OO‘O‘O‘NNNNNO‘O‘ GOUNOU rd rt r9 F‘ 1— r- te u: r- 19 to c: N¢U§UNOU§U U§UO~NU9UO~NG .1447 .1422 .1388 .1456 .1438 .1429 .1422 .1375 .1429 .1429 .1428 .1425 .0708 .0704 .0698 .0690 .0681 .0708 .0700 .0692 .0682 .0673 ~108- .8414 .8277 .8536 .8557 .8567 .8533 .8251 .8571 .8571 .8571 .8548 .9166 .9201 .9217 .9214 .9176 .9252 .9271 .9281 .9281 .9258 .0121 .0121 .0300 .0007 .0004 .0004 .0366 .0000 .0000 .0001 .0027 .0097 .0079 .0074 .0086 .0130 .0032 .0025 .0025 .0034 .0064 .0018 .0011 .0035 .0001 .0000 .0000 .0001 .0008 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0028 .0017 .0011 .0010 .0013 .0007 .0002 .0003 .0005 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0001 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .6821 .7006 .7174 .6865 .6951 .6998 .7031 .7271 .7000 .7000 .7000 .7019 .6915 .6952 .7003 .7066 .7141 .6977 .7059 .7151 .7258 .7368 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218~ 219 220 ”N‘N‘N'IN'Q‘NNMHNNNNNIIHN O‘O‘O‘O‘OkO‘O‘O‘O‘O‘O‘O‘O‘O‘O‘O‘O‘O‘ O1 O‘O‘O‘ 10 12 14 10 11 13 17 19 10 12 11 13 15 14 10 20 19 17 13 11 14 12 10 23 21 19 17 -109- .0739 .0705 .0673 .0667 .0664 .0639 .0669 .0667 .0667 .0667 .0666 .0656 .5022 .4934 .5008 .4990 .4889 .4489 .5092 .5039 .5000 .4994 .9252 .9290 .9326 .9330 .9294 .8942 .9331 .9333 .9333 .9333 .9322 .9184 .4732 . .4876 .4986 .4989 .4888 .4488 .4905 .4961 .5000 .4994 .0007 .0004 .0001 0002 .0042 .0410 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0001 .0012 .0160 .0190 .0169 .0005 .0020 .0218 .0980 .0002 .0001 .0001 .0011 .0001 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0008 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0054 .0022 .0001 .0001 .0005 .4043 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0002 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .6743 .7074 .7431 .7495 .7530 .7823 .7474 .7493 .7499 .7500 .7509 .7622 .5875 .6063 .5989. .6011 .6136 .6682 .5890 .5953 .6000 .6007 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 lflflflflflflflflflfiflfififlflfifififi‘fl O‘GO‘O‘@GOOGO‘ OOO‘O‘O‘OC‘O‘O‘O‘O‘O‘ G 5 pa GO‘kO‘U‘FUNN F. 14 a» no G» 10 11 @UOUN ..a U #UO‘NQ 16 14 12 10 24 22 21 20 19 #UONQ .4937 .4608 .3022 .2983 .2936 .2890 .3275 .3269 .3240 .3199 .3143 .3318 .3323 .3322 .3320 .2962 .3681 .3643 .3591 .3531 .3470 -110- .4937 .4608 .5876 .5881 .5828 .5738 .5632 .6520 .6528 .6470 .6380 .6254 .6634 .6644 .6643 .6639 .5923 .5103 .5173 .5153 .5086 .4989 .0125 .0078 .0925 .0974 .1077 .1218 .1367 .0186 .0193 .0281 .0412 .0593 .0045 .0032 .0035 .0041 .1091 .1094 .1092 .1178 .1310 .1469 .0001 .0006 .0148 .0122 .0111 .0107 .0110 .0018 .0010 .0009 .0009 .0010 .0003 .0001 .0001 .0001 .0025 .0115 .0088 .0077 .0072 .0071 .0000 .0000 .0007 .0003 .0001 .0003 .0001 .0001 .0000 .6077 .6510 .3258 .3258 .3325 .3370 .3405 .3053 .3058 .3086 .3125 .3177 .3014 .3010 .3011 .3012 .3377 .2663 .2702 .2741 .2777 .2803 243 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 HHHHHHHHHHHIHMIEMHHIUMH O‘O‘O‘O‘GGO‘O‘O‘O‘O‘O‘OO‘O‘G‘GO‘OO‘OO‘ 10 12 rt 94 94 c: 19 GOUNOU§U #9 r9 P. ~u c: ~111- .3895 “.3876 .3825 .3754 .3662 .3957 .3959 .3956 .3942 .3942 .3426 .5056 .5041 .5024 .5010 .5001 .5044 .4992 .4897 .5012 .5000 .5781 .5793 .5718 .5601 .5443 .5933 .5938 .5933 .5911 .5911 .5138 .4860 .4883 .4893 .4894 .4887 .4946 .4986 .4990 .4896 .4986 .5000 .0304 .0319 .0634 .0884 .0107 .0100 .0109 .0145 .0145 .1413 .0068 .0067 .0075 .0088 .0104 .0008 .0005 .0018 .0203 .0002 .0001 .0019 .0011 .0010 .0010 .0010 .0004 .0003 .0002 .0002 .0002 .0023 .0013 .0009 .0008 .0008 .0009 .0001 .0000 .0000 .0005 .0000 .0000 .2566 .2579 .2613 .2661 .2723 .2527 .2526 .2528 .2537 .2537 .2919 .5885 .5909 .5928 .5937 .5926 .5944 .5988 .6010 .6127 .5986 .6000 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 NHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH U‘O‘O‘O‘O‘O‘O‘O‘O‘O‘O‘OO‘OGO‘O‘O‘ 13 17 19 CONGU‘U 10 12 11 13 17 19 17 15 13 11 U§UON 14 12 10 19 17 13 11 .4999 .4999 .4999 .4998 .4920 .4907 .4893 .4878 .4863 .5012 .4996 .4950 .4981 .5001 .5001 .5000 .5000 .5000 -112- .4999 .4999 .4999 .4998 .4872 .4864 .4851 .4834 .4811 .4984 .4994 .4949 .4977 .4999 .4999 .5000 .5000 .5000 .0001 .0002 .0003 .0004 .0154 .0174 .0196 .0223 .0253 .0003 .0009 .0089 .0038 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0053 .0055 .0059 .0066 .0073 .0001 .0001 .0011 .0004 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0001 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .6001 .6001 .6002 .6002 .6079 .6094 .6107 .6115 .6109 .5984 .6004 .6060 .6022 .5998 .5999 .6000 .6000 .5999 ~113~ CW LABORATORY 1.1an 110mm; A 1 - 6;! run Floetin; Deoi-ei Aritbetic Routine '1'!!! Interpretive routine vith 18 interpretive ordere, entered ee e cioeed routine. left by en 8.! interpretive order. m 0! wows 168 MP0.“ Thie routine Hamlet“ nubere in the tinting deci-el fore. thet ie, nubere Ihich ere represented ee A x 10’. It ie of the interpretive type. thie neene thet it eeleote perenetere celled inmguive 9.59.3.9. which ere written by the our one at e tine end perform e «1th correepondin; to eech interpretive order. Interpretive ordere any out nor-e1 eritbetio operation each ee eddi- tioe end mitipiicetion end lone red tepe operetione each u oomtin; end eddreee obenxiu. In general. one will nee thie routine to do ooqetetione which do not require the toll epeed of the counter but which ere too tile-mean; to be done by bend. 1t ie eepeoieuy effective for problem with ecelin; diffi- on1tiee. 111 e eenee, one my think of the floating deoi-el routine ee converting the 1118210 to e uediu epeed floetine ~114- deck-a1 coeputer having a very convenient order code. ACCURACY About 9 decimale mama! STORAGE o, 1, z PRESET’PARAMETERS 83 ie used to epecify two locatione of non-temporary etorage, 83 and 183, which are need for the floating decien1.accueulator. METHOD 0! USE The floating decfleel routine ie entered at a etendard eubroutine. Following the entry, i.e., after the tranefer of control to the subroutine, one begine‘writing interpretive ordere. Theee ordere each occupy one-half word and coneiet of a pair of function digite followed by a eingle addreu. They, therefore. have the ease for- ae etendard nechine ordere and my be read by the Decinal Order Input with full uee of the conventional tereineting eynbole. The first of the two function digite of an interpretive order deecribee the group characterietice of the order and eey take valuee 0, l. ..., 8. loneal aritheetic interpretive ordere have thie digit equal to 8. The eecond of the two function digite deecribee the type of interpretive order. IMPRET‘IV! ORDER LIST WITH FIRST MO! 0101‘! b t 8 let I be the floating deck-cl nueher in the floating acculetor and let 1(a) be the floating decimal mnber in location n. 80! 81h 82h 83h 8411 85:1 8611 87h 880 89h 8.1.1.6. 1r by I/I(n). Replace I by I - I(n). Replace I by -I(n). Tranefer control to the right hand interpretive order in n if I >.0. Tranefer control to the left hand interpretive order 1e 11 if ”,0. Replace I by I + I(n). Replace I by I(n). Replace I by I x I(n). Replace I by one ntnber read from the input tape punched ee eign, any umber of decinel digite, eigu, and two decinal digite to represent the exponent. Ior era-ple. .8971 x 10 4° would be punched ae + 8971 + 10. Punch or print I ae a eign, n decinel digite. eign, two decinel digite to repreeent the exponent and two epacee. Thie print out nay be reread by thie routine. After I ha been punched or printed, it my not rain in the floating acct-alator modified. n can tahe veluee 2 to 9. Replacerynifos n<200. ~116- 88 n Replace I(n) by I. 8! e Replace I by III - lI(n)|. 8.) n Tranafer control to the ordinary llliac order on thelefthandeideofn. Thieueedtoeecapefrol the floating deoinal aubroutine. 8I 11 Give a carriage return and line feed and etart a new block of printing having e colt-1a. Thie order in only obeyed mg for a particular block of printing. At thie tile, a counter ie net up which will cauee a carriage return and line feed to occur auto-eti- cally fro- then on after every eat of nubere that ia printed. W. If the firet faction digit of an interpretive order ia 0. l, .... 7. it will refer to one of a eat of control regietere or b- regietere in the floating decinal routine which are ainilerly Met-ed. Theee regietera are need for counting the ember of paaaagee through loopa or cyclea and for advancing addreeaee on aucceeeive paaaagee. Ior thie purpoae. a particular b- regieter which nay he need in a particular cycle containa two counting indicea g. and ob. Theaearebothintergeraintherangeo to1023. Theindex -117- ch ie need for counting purpoeee to deternine the nueber of paeaagea through a loop. The index gb ia need for advancing the addreeaea of interpretive aritl-etic ordere. Although the interpretive order with first function digit b ia not actually altered in the I-ory, it ie obeyed an if 'b ia inoreaaed by one upon each paaeage through the cycle. The multiplicity of b- regietera allowa one to progran nany loopa within loope. ORDIR LIST WIT)! n f 8 b0 :1 Replace I by I - I(n+gb). bl :1 Replace I by -I(n+gb). ‘2‘ Repl‘c. ‘b’cbbyab'. 1. cb'. 1e Then tranafer control to the right hand (if b2 u) or left hand interpretive (if b3 11) order in n if °b"' l b_3__n__+ in negative. Thia tranafer ie need at the end of a loop. b4 11 Replace I by I + I(n + g5). b5 u Replace I by Na 4» gb). b6 u Replace I by I/I(n+gb). b7 u Replace I by I x I(n+gb). b! n Replace ‘b’ c" by 0, -n. Thie interpretive order ia need for preparing to cycle around a loop 11 tinea. b8 :1 Replace I(n + ‘h’ by I. b8 u bLn 81.11 d ~118- Replace r by lrl - |I(n+gb)l. Replace 3b’ cbby 3b + n. °b' Thia interpretive order in need when one wiehea to atep addressee by none increment other than +1 in a loop. If one placea bl. 1022 in a loop, the effect will be to decreaee addreeeae by one on each paeaage. bl. 1 will increaae then by 2. etc. Replace gb ch by 11, ch. where b ie the hat b-regieter referred to by acne previoue interpretive order. yuan 0g mornnmnmmmgva ORDERS BI 80 84 81 85 82 83 87 86 8! 88 83‘ 81. 8.1 5 eilliaeconda + e x (3/2). where e ie the umber of ahifte required to convert A, p back to etandard fan. 2 nillieeconda 3 nilliaeconda 5 eilliaeconde 6 nillieeconda 3 sillieeconda 3 eilliaeconde 3 nilliaeconda 2 nilliaeconde 3 nilliaeconde ~119- When an interpretive order is preceded by b I 8, add one millioecondlto the above times. When one wiehee to repeat a cycle of interpretive ordere n tinee, the interpretive order bR 11 may be written before entering the loop to act the counter cb to .11. The inter- pretive ordere in the leap will be obeyed n times if the loop ia terminated by b2 or b3 interpretive order to tranefer control to the beginning of the loop. Thie tranafer of control interpretive order will be obeyed n-l tinee and dieobeyed the nth tine. M Auxiliary Routinee. It ie often convenient to be able to leave the floating decinal routine an an to Iodify interpretive ordere or to perfore calculatione which my be done nore effectively outside of floating point. To leave the floating decimal routine one ueee an 8.! 11 order. (All etandard floating decieal auxiliariee are entered in thie way.) To return to floating decinal, one ehould tranefer control to the left hand aide of word 29 of the floating decinal routine. The interpretive order following the 8.! n order which wee laet obeyed will then be obeyed and co on. In thie way, it ia not neceaeary to plant a link in auxiliary eubroutinee. One nay. in fact, think of the 81 11 order ae a eubroutine ~120 order. In case any changes are made in the floating decimal accumulator while outside the floating decimal routine, con- trol should be returned to the left hand side of word 19 rather than 29 so that this number may be standardized before re-entry. ‘ Handling of Numbers. Each number is represented in the form A x 101’ where l ) IA! ) 1/10, and 64 > p 7, -64. In a single register of the memory, the number A is placed in the 33 most significant binary digite (a0, a1, ..., 1132) in the eeee'way as an ordinary fraction is placed in the entire register. An accuracy of between 8 and 9 decimal digits is therefore achieved. The exponent p is stored as the interger p + 64 in the 7 least significant digits of the some register. Ior convenience, the floating decimal accumulator uses two registers 83 and 133 for holding the number A x 10?. The fraction a/2 is in S3 and the interger p -* 64 is in 153. The only exception to the above rules is the number zero which cannot, of course, be represented as A x 10p withIAl >,10. Ior this reason, zero is handled in a special way. It is represented as a number with.A I 0 and p 3 -64. This represen- tation happens to correspond exact1y*with the ordinary’nuchine representation of zero. ~121- After each aritt-etic interpretive order is obeyed, the afier in the floating decilel acctmlator is standardised, i.e., the amber in 83 representing A/2 is adjusted so 1 IAI b 1/ 10 and p is changed accordingly. To acconplieh this, control is transferred to word 19 in the floating deci-al ~ routine after each aritlmetic order. If an interpretive store order is atteqted when I has an exponent greater than 63, the nachine will stop on the order 34 p at location p, where p is word 72 of the routine. Imrtaet words in the Routine. Word 2 in the floating deci-el routine detereines the location of the current interpretive order. when obeying the left hand interpretive orderin locations, thiswordis50nI85 20Iendwben obeying the right hand interpretive order in location 11, it is 1.5 nI 00 20I. Other words of interest are the b-registers ...... start .6 word 158 (for .0 and co) and go to 165 (g7 and c7.) These registers hold gh and ch in the fore 80 “I 00 (2048 7‘ ch) I. Warngg. When the same nudeer is continually added to a am, such as when an argment is being increased, the error can be quite large, because it is additive over a decade. Ior eeanple, if we increase 10 to 100 by nits, we can get a eerie».- error of 90 x 2'33 because the errors all have the -122- same sign. If we increase 103 to 104, we can have a maximn error of 9000 x 2"”. This can easily be prevented by writing an auxiliary subroutine to stabilize the fractional part of I, i.e., to replace it by the nearest multiple of say 10‘7. I‘U claret!" 34H” ~123- NOMENCLATURE Holes of overhead product Holes of feed Rnthalpy of vapor stream 5 Rnthalpy of pure amount as vapor or liquid lquilibriu constant (y/x) holes of liquid Plates above feed Plates below feed Heat flux, enthalpy of vapor ninus enthalpy of liquid in passing streams Reflux ratio (L/p) Teeperature °I Holes of vapor Holes of botton product a ,b,c,d Constants h P 9 Rethalpy of liquid streae Partial derivatives used in rectifying section Partial derivatives used in stripping section Ratio of coepoaitioe of particular component on feed plate as calculated fro. opposite directions Hole fraction in liquid Hole fraction in vapor -114- SUBSCRIPTS Rectifying section Condenser Distillate teed or feed plate Constant of enthalpy polynonial Particular couponent Constant of equilibriun constant polync-ial Plate usher in rectifying section, nubered in Arabic nmsrals tron condenser to feed plate Plate nuber in stripping section. nubered in lonan nuarals fro- rehoiler to feed plate Ieboiler Stripping section 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) u) -125- BIBLIOGRAPHY Brown, C. 6., and Martin, R. A., Transactions of American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 332., 679, (1939). Colburn, A. P., Transactions cg:~ American Institute of Chemical Engineers, _3_‘_l_, 355, (1941). Colhurn, A. P... Transactions of American Institute of Chemical 3 ineers, 11, 805, (1941). Donnell, J. U., and Cooper, C. 3., Chenical Engineerm, 21, 131, (1950). Ebister, v. C., Transactions of American Institute of Chemical Engineers, {32, 15, (1946). Penske, H. 3., Industrial Engineering Chemistry, .231, 482, (1932). Cilliland, E. R., Industrial and Engineergg Chemistry, 3.2.: 260, (1935). Gilliland, E. R., Industrial and_!ngineering Chemistry, 3;, 918, 1101, and 1220, (1940). Harbert, W. 0., Industrial Engineering Chenistg, 2A, 482, (1932). Jenny, T. J., Transactions ogmrican Institute of Chemical Engineers, 3.3.0 635, (1939). Levis, V. K., and Cope, J. (2., Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, .23., 498, (1932). 12) 13) 14) 15) 16) 17) 8a) -125. Levis, W. 1., and Hatheson, C. 1... Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, ‘21:, 494, (1932). McCab’e, W. I... and Thiele, E. W., Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 11, 605, (1925). Ponchon, Tech. Moderne, g, 20, (1921). Sorel, E., "La Rectification do 1'Achol," Paris, 1893. Thiele, E. W., and Ceddos, R. L., Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 22, 289, (1933). Underwood, A. J. 0., Journal ognstitute of Petroleum (London) §_2_, 614, (1946). Montroso, C.F., and Scheibol, 3.8., gndustrialm Engineering. Chemistgz, 18, 263,. (191%). <.- ._..... "'TITIiWLWIL 17111911131117! IBM/WIT! filifififlilijfi/I‘m” 03056