lllllHlHI'llHllrlllll Hllr : Hl'illlill \ | HI! \ l TH _ THE FATTY ACED CGMPOSWON OF FREE AND BOUND LiP‘lDS iN FREEZEeQREED MEATS T319535 for flu; Deqrw of M. S. MECEIEGAN STM‘E {INNER-SET? Erene Siam 198.4 TH 5515 “was-- LIBRARY "” Michigan State University .J J 3 ABSTRACT THE FATTY ACID COMPOSITION OF FREE AND BOUND LIPIDS IN FREEZEFDRIED MEATS by Irene Giam The fatty acid composition of free and bound lipids in freeze-dried pork, lamb, and beef was determined by gas- liquid chromatography. The study was made on both raw and cooked samples to establish, if any, the effect of cooking on the fatty acid content, especially with reference to the bound lipids fraction. Sixteen acids were positively identified as being present in pork, lamb, and beef. In the bound lipids fraction, traces of saturated 013, 015, and 017 were evident. Three peaks remained unidentified. These unknown peaks are probably unsaturated acids, although the possibility that they be oxidation products cannot be entirely ruled out. The bound lipids fraction of the meat samples studied was found to be more polyunsaturated than the free lipids fraction. The linoleic, behenic, and arachidonic acid content of the bound lipids exceed that of the free lipids fraction. Irene Giam Cooking did not appear to have any significant influ- ence on the fatty acid composition. The fatty acid composition of lamb and beef are similar to each other but are quite different from that of pork. The myristic and myristoleic acid content are higher in lamb and beef than in pork. On the other hand, the linoleic and arachidonic acid Content of pork exceed that of lamb and beef. THE FATTY ACID COMPOSITION OF FREE AND BOUND LIPIDS IN FREEZE-DRIED MEATS by Irene Giam A THESIS Submitted to the School of Advanced Graduate Studies of Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Food Science 1964 v 13990, ? /;2~ " k L 6‘ ()\ 1.. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my very sincere appreciation and thanks to Dr. L. R. Dugan, Jr. for his constant help and guidance throughout the course of my studies here and during the preparation of this thesis. I am indebted to Dr. T. F. Irmiter, Associate Professor of Foods and Nutrition, and Prof. L. J. Bratzler, Professor of Food Science, for their critical reading of this manuscript. Acknowledgment is given to the Asia Foundation and The Singapore Government for the scholarship which made this study possible. It is with the utmost gratitude that I dedicate this thesis to my parents and members of my family for their encouragement and support in my studies. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii LIST OF TABLES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv LIST OF FIGURES O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 V INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE. . . . . . . . . 4 Preparation of Meat . . . . . . . 8 Moisture Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . 9 Lipid Extraction . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Total Lipids. . . . . . . . . . . 9 Free Lipids . . . . . . . . . . . ll Bound Lipids. . . . . . . . . . ll Fatty Acid Determinations . . . . . . . . ll Isolation of Fatty Acids. . . . . . . ll Preparation of Methyl Esters . . . . . 12 Gas Chromatographic Separation. . . . . 14 Identification of the Fatty Acids . . . 15 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . 1? Moisture Analysis. . . . . . . . . . 1? Fatty Acid Distribution. . . . 17 Free Lipids versus Bound Lipids in Raw Meat . . 19 Free Lipids versus Bound Lipids in Cooked Meat . 26 The Fatty Acid Composition of Meat from Different Animals . . . . . . . . . 27 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . 34 REFERENCES 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 36 iii IJST OF FIGURES Figures 1. The fatty acid composition of free and bound lipids Of freeze-dried raw pork 2. The fatty acid composition of free lipids Of freeze-dried raw pork, lamb, and beef . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. The fatty acid composition of bound lipids of freeze-dried raw pork, lamb, and beef . A. The fatty acid composition of bound lipids Of freeze—dried raw and cooked beef 5. Gas chromatographic separation of methyl esters of free fatty acids isolated from the bound lipids of freeze-dried raw pork Page D.) ‘O i A) R) w LU Tables I. II. III. IV. VI. LIST OF TABLES Fatty acid composition of lipid fractions (% of total fatty acids) obtained from freeze- dried raw pork. . . Fatty acid composition of lipid fractions (% of total fatty acids) obtained from freeze-dried cooked pork. . . . . Fatty acid composition of lipid fractions (% of total fatty acids) obtained from freeze- -dried raw lamb. . . Fatty acid composition of lipid fractions (% of total fatty acids) obtained from freeze- dried cooked lamb. . . . Fatty acid composition of lipid fractions (% of total fatty acids) obtained from freeze-dried raw beef. . . . . . Fatty acid composition of lipid fractions (% of total fatty acids) obtained from freeze- dried cooked beef. . . iv Page 2O 21 22 23 24 INTRODUCTION Among the dehydration methods applicable to foods, freeze-drying is one of the more expedient methods for the maintenance of the desirable functional and palata— bility characteristics. The freeze-drying of meat has the advantage of reduction of weight and long-term storage stability. However, freeze-dried meat is still subject to deterioration and this deterioration can be quite excessive under adverse conditions or extended storage. Deterioration in freeze-dried meat can be conveniently divided into oxidative deterioration and active carbonyl-amine browning. The former involves oxidation of the lipid fraction in meat and this results in rancidity. The susceptibility of any natural fat to oxidative rancidity depends upon its degree of unsaturation and upon its antioxidant content. The fatty acid composition is, then, one of the inherent characteristics of the fat which has an effect on rancidity. Comparisons of ran- cidity tests on extracted fat with those made on whole tissue show that the lipid fraction primarily involved in ‘the rapid oxidative reaction which takes place in cooked meats can be extracted with a mixture of chloroform and methanol but not with neutral fat solvents (52). n l The great variety of fatty acids found in meat makes the analysis Of fatty acid composition a major problem. Accurate analysis of all fatty acids in a fat cannot be expected from one method only. Combinations of methods are required. However, gas-liquid chromatography provides extraordinarily good resolution of components and is consequently employed, but it cannot be considered the ultimate answer to all analytical problems. Gas chromatography is certainly one of the most valuable analytical tools ever to become available to the fat and oil field. This technique provides the most accurate, most precise and most rapid means of estimating fatty acid content yet devised. The method was introduced by James and Martin (26) when they separated the normal saturated carboxylic acids up to 12 carbon atoms in chain length. Cropper and Heywood (9) extended the method to the separation of the methyl esters of even-numbered fatty acids up to behenic. In general, the procedure involves the distribution of the material, volatilized at the column temperature, between a moving gas phase and a stationary liquid phase. Different constituents move through the column at differ- ent rates because of the difference in partition coeffi- cients. Using a suitable detection system, the concen- tration Of eluate in the effluent gas is plotted against time. The esters are ordinarily employed for this separa- tion because of their relatively lower boiling points. The application of Parks techniques to the deter- mination of fatty acid composition Of free and bound lipids from freeze-dried meats of three species of animals was made. In this study, the lipid fraction extractable by solvents such as petroleum ether, diethyl ether, or, chlor— oform is considered ”free lipids." In mammalian tissues the major portion of the lipids is present as lipoproteins. Bonding by water molecules plays an important part in this union between the lipids and the protein. Dehydrating agents such as methanol, ethanol, and acetone, which essentially rupture the lipid-protein linkage, may be included in the solvent used for extraction. The lipid fraction Obtained by this solvent mixture is regarded as "bound lipids." REVIEW OF LITERATURE Oxidative Rancidity in Meat Certain fats especially those of pork and poultry are much more easily oxidized than other animal fats. Rancidity in beef or lamb, by comparison, is not a pressing problem. These specie differences are probably attributed largely to the fatty acid composition. Chang and Watts (7), in agree- ment with earlier studies, found that pork and poultry fats were much more unsaturated than beef or lamb fats. Compari- sons on rancidity tests on extracted fat versus whole tissue shOwed the lipid fraction primarily involved in the rapid oxidative reaction taking place in cooked meats can be extracted with a mixture of chloroform and methanol but not with neutral fat solvents. The 2—thiobarbituric acid (TBA) tests performed on total lipids fractionated into triglycerides and proteolipids demonstrated that the latter are responsible for the intensive oxidative reaction induced by heating muscle tissue. ”Tissue rancidity" results because Of the highly unsaturated nature of bound lipids (52).t Protein bound phospholipids are important food constituents involved in the deteriorative reactions which take place during processing and storage. It was found that phos- pholipids from a particular tissue are appreciably more unsaturated than triglyceride fats from the same source. A Their presence renders lipid more susceptible to oxidation, which is a major factor in deteriorative reactions leading to strongly flavored degradative products (28).. Tappel (A5) found the oxidation of non-ether extrac- tetfle lipids of freeze-dried beefappearedtx>account for half of oxygen absorption. He noted that the oxidation of ether soluble lipids play a minor role, accounting, at the most, for 10% of total oxidative reaction. No studies have been reported which relate the changes in ”free" and "bound" lipids of freeze—dried meats to their fatty acid composition, and which indicate whether freeze-drying affects the proportion of free to bound lipids. LipidfiExtraction,WIsOlation and Purification In most cases, the extraction of lipids involves a solvent system, such as ethanol-ether (A) or chloroform- methanol (3, 15), to separate the lipids from the proteins and other components of a tissue. The contamination of lipid extracts with non—lipid compounds has long been recognized as a problem (16). v The procedure most commonly used for the removal of these impurities is based on partitioning chloroform- methanol solutions with water or salt (14, 15). Other methods include dialysis (A2) , adsorption on cellulose (29, A3), paper electrophoresis and chromatography (51), chromatography on silicic—acid impregnated paper (2), and sephadex (50). Separation of Fatty Acids and Preparation Of Methyl Esters The routine application Of gas chromatography to the determination of the fatty acid composition of a lipid makes it essential to prepare methyl esters rapidly and simply. Metcalfe and Schmitz (31) used an excess of boron trifluoride-methanol reagent in their method of esterification. Methylation of fatty acids was also accomplished with 2, 2—dimethoxypropane (DMP) in methanol and hydrochloric acid (33), with diazomethane (35), methanolysis with a large excess of sodium or potassium methoxide in absolute methanol (30), esterification with dimethyl sulphate (53), or methanol hydrochloric acid with microsublimation (AA), or with ethylene dichloride (8), or methanol—hydrochloric acid on ion exchange resin (23). The choice of the methylation procedure depends on the nature and composition of the sample (A7). Gas Chromatographic Separation Since the original application of gas-liquid chromatography by James and Martin (26), developments in instrumentation and in techniques and diversified applications have proceeded at a phenomenal pace. The efficiency Of a gas-liquid partition chromatographic column is influenced by many factors, such as the size of solid support, density of packing, and the amount Of liquid phase used (12). The discovery of new stationary liquid phases permitted the complete separation of satur- ated and unsaturated esters of the same chain length. succinate polyester'of diethylene glycol is one of the most effective stationary phases for separating fatty acid esters because of the stability of the polyester at the high column temperature required. The practical identification of components in a chromatogram is achieved by the use of standards. Members in a homologous group may be identified by plotting the logarithms of retention times, or retention volumes, versus some group quality, such as chain length or degree of unsaturation. "Carbon number" has been introduced for presenting qualitative data from gas-liquid chromatography of fatty acid esters (A9). James (25) has devised a method to determine the degree of unsaturation of straight- chain and simpler branched chain components by plotting the logarithms of the retention time measured on one stationary phase against similar values from a different stationary phase. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS AND PROCEDURE Preparation of Meat Commercial grade of pork (ham), lamb (leg), and beef (inside top round) were Obtained from the Food Stores and the Meats Laboratory, Michigan State University. Each meat sample was cut into slices of approximately one-half inch thick. The samples were trimmed free of all visible fat. The meat was divided into two portions and treated in one of two ways prior to freezing: a. The raw meat was diced into pieces of about I” x 3/A” x 1/2”. b. The meat was dropped into boiling water and cooked for 30 minutes at medium speed on an electric range. Then it was cut into pieces similar to those of the raw meat. The diced meat samples were frozen as single layers between aluminum foil on trays at —2OOF and then freeze-dried in a Stokes freeze-drier (Model 2003F—2, lot P6569l, serial P65753) for 20 hours. During the final 16 hours of freeze-drying the "Heat Control” guage, controlling the heating plate, was set at 150, which was equivalent to a plate temperature of A2OC. The internal vacuum was observed to fall to a minimum pressure of 70 microns. After freeze-drying, the meat was ground with a mortar and pestle and the finely divided tissue was subjected to lipid extraction. Moisture Analysis Approximately 3-A g. of the ground meat were placed in a 100 m1. beaker, which had previously been heated in an oven, cooled in the dessicator and its weight determined on an analytical balance. The beaker and its contents were weighed accurately and then put in a drying oven at a temperature of 10500 for A8 hours. After cooling for 30 minutes, the beaker was reweighed and the loss in weight was considered to be due to water loss. Lipid Extraction Total Lipids The extraction procedure was that Of Bligh and Dyer (3), modified to include the ”wash” procedure of Folch gt_§l. (15). A 10 g. sample of the ground meat was homogenized in a Waring Blender for two minutes with chloroform, methanol, and water. (Commercial reagent grade of chloroform and methanol were used.) It was imperative that the volumes of chloroform,methanol, and water, at this step, be kept in the proportions of l :2 :O.8. With this in mind, the amount of water actu- ally added was adjusted to take into consideration the water content of the meat sample. An equal volume of lO chloroform was then added and after blending for 30 seconds, water was added and the blending was continued for a further 30 seconds. After' this dilution, the chloroform, methanol, and water volumes must be in the proportions 2:2:1.8. Next, the homogenate was filtered with slight suction through a Whatman no. 1 filter paper on a Buchner funnel. Filtration was normally quite rapid and when the residue became dry, pressure was applied with the bottom Of a beaker to ensure maximum recovery Of solvent. The filtrate was transferred to a separatory funnel. More chloroform and methanol were added and the whole mixed well. This was the washing procedure of Folch et_gl. (15). The final proportions of the ternary mixture of chloroform, methanol, and water were kept at 8:A:3 (v/v/v), respectively. (Since chloroform was the more volatile of the 3 components, about 5% excess chloroform was added to compensate for losses during filtration so that the critical proportions of the system were kept.) The separatory funnel and its contents were allowed to stand overnight in a cold room to facilitate the for- mation Of a biphasic system. The chloroform layer con— tained the purified lipids. This layer was drained into a round bottom flask with ground glass joints. The solvent was removed by evaporation under vacuum, using a Rinco rotating evaporator. A warm water bath was used to facili— tate the removal of chloroform, especially at the last stages of evaporation under vacuum. 11 Free Lipids Another 10 g. sample of the ground meat was extracted with petroleum ether (b. p. 30-6000, analytical grade) in a Soxhlet type of glass apparatus. A paper thimble with porosity permitting rapid passage of the solvent was chosen. The extraction period was about 8 hours at a condensation rate of 1-2 drops per second. Heating of the solvent was kept as low as possible. At completion of extraction, the solvent was removed as before by evaporation under vacuum on the Rinco rotating evaporator. Bound Lipids The meat sample from which the free lipids had been entracted with petroleum ether was used for the bound lipids extraction. In the extraction of bound lipids, the method employed was that of the total lipids extraction explained above. The lipid extract was taken to dryness by evaporation of the solvent under vacuum in a Rinco rotating evaporator. Fatty Acid Determinations Isolation of Fatty Acids Dry lipid extracts were used for fatty acid deter- minations. The lipid extracts were saponified with 25 ml. of 0.5 N methanolic potassium hydroxide, per 200 mg. of lipid material. The mixture was gently refluxed for 6 hours. 12 The contents of the flask were transferred to a separatory funnel, 50 ml. of water were added, and the solution made acid to phenolphthalein, by dropwise addition Of concen- trated hydrochloric acid, and then 1 ml. excess acid was added. The solution was extracted with 3 successive 25-ml. portions Of petroleum ether, and the combined ether extracts were washed 3 times with 25-m1. portions of distilled water, and then dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate before being converted to methyl esters. Preparation of Methyl Esters Pretreatment of Resin.--Ten grams of Amberlite IRA- AOO or CG-AOO (Rohm & Haas Co., Philadelphia, Pa.) were stirred (magnetic stirrer) with 25 ml. of l N sodium hydroxide for 5 minutes. The resin was allowed to settle and the supernatant liquid was discarded. The resin was successively washed with several portions of distilled water to remove free alkali, then with three 25-ml. portions of anhydrous ethyl alcohol1 to remove water, and finally with three 25-m1. portions of petroleum ether to displace the alcohol. Preparation of Methyl Ester.--The dried petroleum ether extract of the fatty acids was decanted onto the alkali treated resin in a 250-ml. Erlenmeyer flask. Two .r lAnhydrous ethanol was prepared by refluxing ethanol with magnesium ribbon, 5 g. per liter of alcohol. After refluxing for A hours the alcohol was distilled. l3 5-ml. portions of petroleum ether were used to wash the residual solution into the flask. The solution, plus resin, was stirred for 5 minutes. The resin, plus adsorbed fatty acids, was allowed to settle and the supernatant liquid discarded. The residue was then washed free of fat by stirring with three successive 25-ml. por- tions of petroleum ether and the washings were discarded. A 25—ml. portion Of anhydrous methanol-hydrochloric acid (5-6%, w/w) was added to the resin and the mixture 3 stirred for 25 minutes. The methanol solution was decanted E through a rapid filter paper into a separatory funnel. The resin was washed by stiring for 5 minutes with two succes- sive fifteen—ml. portions of anhydrous methanol-hydrochloric acid, again decanting each wash through the filter. Then 10 m1. of distilled water were added to the combined methanol extracts and the solution was extracted with fifty ml. of petroleum ether. The aqueous phase was drained into a second separatory funnel and extracted twice with 20-ml. portions of petroleum ether. The combined petroleum ether extract was washed with 50-ml. portions of water until free of acid (blue-violet with bromophenol blue), dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate and then concentrated under a gentle stream of dry nitrogen on a steam bath. An aliquot of the fatty acid esters was used for the gas chromato- graphic separation. 1A Gas Chromatographic Spparation Gas-liquid chromatography was carried out on a F & M1 (Model 500) programmed high temperature gas chromatographic unit fitted with a Disc Chart Integrator (Model 201 B) and 2 The partitioning medium a thermal conductivity detector. was a polar ester (diethylene glycol succinate--LAC--3R-- 728) in a ratio of 1 to 5, (w/w) on Chromosorb W (F & M, 60-80 mesh). The resolution of the methyl esters of the fatty acids was observed to improve if the polar stationary phase was treated with phosphoric acid. Consequently, the Chromosorb W was mixed with a 1% solution of phosphoric acid, and the mixture dried in an oven. The column packing was prepared by slurrying the treated Chromo- sorb with the required amount of a 20% solution Of the polyester dissolved in chloroform. Additional chloroform was necessary to form a uniform slurry. The mixture was placed in a round bottom flask with ground glass joints and the chloroform removed under vacuum in a Rinco rotat- ing evaporator. The residual volatiles were removed by heating the packing mixture, spread out in a porcelain dish, in an air oven at about 110°C. A 6—foot coiled copper column (1/A inch in outside diameter and 0.03 inch wall 1F & M SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION. Avondale, Pennsylvania. 2MINNEAP0LIS_HONEYWELL REG. CO., BROWN INSTRUMENTS DIVISION, Philadelphia, Pa. Model No. 15307856-01—05—0— 000-790-07 009 Range -0.20 to +1.00 MV Rev. Inst. Ser. No. 12191056183. 15 thickness) was packed with the polyester packing. The column, with helium flowing through, was preconditioned by heating for several hours at the operating temperature of 210°C. The helium flow rate was 75-85 ml. per minute, as measured at room temperature by a soap bubble flow- meter at the column exit. The peak area was calculated from the pen trace made by the Disc Chart Integrator. The fatty acid com- position of each lipid fraction was calculated as area per cent of the total fatty acids. Identification of the Fatty Acids The saturated acids (8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, and 22 carbon atoms), monounsaturated acids, (12, 1A, 16, 18, 21, and 2A carbon atoms), and polyunsaturated acids (18:2, 18:3, and 20:A)l were identified by comparing the sample chromatograms with a standard chromatogram Of these known pure acids determined under the same isothermal conditions Of 210°C or by programming the operating temper- ature between lAO°C and 230°C at a constant rate of A°C 0r 7.9°C/minute. The gas chromatograms had a number of unknown peaks; an attemp was made to indentify these based on gas chromato- graphic data. For a homologous series of straight chain fatty acid methyl esters, the plot Of the logarithm of the 1The first figure denotes the number of carbon atoms, the second figure, the number of double bonds. l6 retention volume against the number of carbon atoms yields a straight line for the saturated fatty acids; those with one double bond fall along another line; and fatty acids with more unsaturation fall along other lines. With the polyester partitioning column used in this work, for a given chain length, the acids emerged from the column in the order of increasing unsaturation as exemplified by the series stearic, oleic, linoleic, and linolenic. On the basis of this information and a knowledge of the retention times for the methyl esters of the pure known acids, tentative assignments of chain length and degree of unsaturation were postulated for these unknown peaks. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Moisture Analysis The moisture content of the freeze-dried samples ranged from 3 to A% for the raw meat to 0.5 to 1.5% for the cooked meat. Fatty Acid Distribution It was not possible to identify all the peaks. The saturated acids (8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, and 22 carbon atoms), monounsaturated acids (12, 1A, 16, 18, 21, and 2A carbon atoms), and polyunsaturated acids (18:2, 18:3, and 20:A) were positively identified as being present in raw and cooked pork, lamb, and beef. In the bound lipids fraction of all samples traces of saturated C13, 015, and C17 were evident. Many workers have reported the appearance of odd-numbered straight chain aciis and/0r branched acids in sheep and 0x (18), butterfat (37, 38), mutton and beef fats (l9), lamb caul fat (39), and bovine- nm501e andliver (20). Capric and lauric acid were also isolated from the back fat Of buttermilk—fed bacon pigs (11) and mutton fat (17). Three peaks remained unidentified (Figure 5). One had a retention time after arachidonic and before nervonic, while the other two unkowns were eluted after nervonic acid. It was not fully established whether these unknown peaks 17 18 were those of oxidation products or acids. If they are acids it is probably that these peaks represent unsatu- rated rather than saturated acids. The fatty acid composition of lipid fractions extracted from raw and cooked pork, lamb, and beef are given in Tables 1 to 6.1 Since the meat samples were obtained from the University Food Stores and Meats Laboratory, it was not possible to get exactly identical samples, i.e., the cuts were approximately the inside top round (beef), leg (lamb), and ham (pork), and each sample was from a different animal, whose history and diet were unknown. Consequently, we may expect variations in the data since the composition of muscle tissue varies with species, breed, strain, age, and sex Of the animal. The composition may also be influenced by the type and quantity of feed (10, 13, 21, 46). There are differences in the data obtained from different samples but, for most cases, they are small. For purposes of comparison, the average value, which represents all samples quite well, is used. There are no other literature reports of a study on the fatty acid composition of the freeze-dried meats (pork, lamb, and beef) such as are considered here. Thus, it is difficult 1The data are the values from 3 different animals, and the average is the mean of these values. 19 to compare values obtained in this study with those avail- able in literature, for example, for aged lean beef and pork (2A) or for the same meat tissues, but prepared differently (7). Free Lipids versus Bound Lipids in Raw Meat The bound lipids of the meat from the three species ! of animals studied contained a greater amount of polyun- saturated fatty acids than the free lipids fraction. Unsaturated acids containing two or more double bonds 3 make up 15.8, 7.0, and 6.3% of the free lipids fraction and about Al.1, 36.1, and 33.A% 0f the bound lipids fraction in raw pork, lamb, and beef, respectively. These results are in agreement with other studies (32) which indicate that the neutral fat fractions are less unsaturated than the phospholipids. Each class of lipid (free lipids, bound lipids) appears to have a characteristic fatty acid composition. (Figure l). The myristic, palmitoleic, and oleic acid content of pork, lamb, and beef are much higher in the free lipids than in the bound lipids fraction. 0n the other hand, the linoleic, behenic, and arachidonic acid content of the bound lipids exceed those of the free lipids. The major difference is the large amount of arachidonic acid (11.5, 8.8, 9.0% in pork, lamb, and beef, respectively) contributed by the bound lipids fraction that has no counterpart (1.1, trace, trace, for raw pork, 20 00 + 0.00m 00 + 00000 .00 .00o00oo0 0000 00 + 0000: 00.0 0000 0000 - 000000 00000 000000000000 -- 0 .0 .0* M0.0 0.0 0.0 .00 00000 .00 0.0 .00 M0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 *0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .00 00000 .00 0.0 0.0 0.0 .00 .00 0.0 *0 000000 0.0 .00 .00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 000000 0.0 .00 .00 0000 M0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .00 “0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 *0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 .00 0000 000000 0.0 .00 .00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 000000 0.0 .00 .00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 00 000000 .00 .00 .00 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 000000 .00 .00 .00 0000 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 00000 .00 .00 .00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 000000 .00 .00 .00 0000 momhu .cHu. .cHP 3H». momhu. .hnv [Hus .ch momhp .cHu. 3H». [Hp NH mompv {Hp [Hp CHO. wmomhp .cHu. .cHu. .90 @0605. 3.0.0 3H0. {HP OH 00000 .00 .00 .00 Am.o 0.0 0.0 .00 00000 .00 .00 0.00 w A0m0p0>0v A00000>0v mfl0mm00>0v 000000 00000 000000 00000 000000 0000 0000 .xhoa 300 00000n000000 8000 00000000 000000 00000 000o0 0o 00 000000000 00000 00 00000000000 0000 00000--.0 00000 mH + Humam . o o n 00 + H.00m m0 0 00000000 00mm m0 + 00:0: Wm.0 C000 0000 I 000000 00000 00000000000: 1: 0 an a0* 00. 0 0.0 0.0 .00 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00.0 0.0 0.0 .00 *0 00000 .00 .00 .00 Mm.0 .00 0.0 0.0 00000 0.0 .00 .00 *0 00000 .00 .00 .00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00000 .00 .0. .00 0H 0 00000 .00 .00 0. 0 Mm.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 *0 A0. 0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 00.0 0.0 0.0 .00 0000 M00000 .00 .00 .00 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100000 .00 .00 .s0 00 00000 .00 0.0 .00 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 000000 0.0 .00 .00 0000 M0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ”0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0H0 0. :0 0.00 0.00 .00 00.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0000 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 00.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0000 0. 00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 00.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 00 m. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0000 00. 00 0.00 0.00 0. :0 00.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 00.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 00 000000 .00 .00 .00 0 0.0 N 0.0 0.0 .00 000000 .00 .00 .00 0000 00. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 M00000 .00 .00 .00 000.0 M 0.0 0.0 .00 00000 0.0 .00 .00 0000 @000». [Hus .00 .Hp 0.000.000 .00» [HP 300 $00.00 .00. 300+ .00 NH M00000W .00 .00 00 A00000 .00 .00 .00 M00000 .00 .00 .00 00 00000 .00 .00 00 A©.© 0.0 0.0 .00 00000 .00 .00 0.00 m A00000>0V A00000>0v mfl0m000>0v 000000 00000 000000 00000 000000 0000 0000 .3000 003000 00000 000000 E000 00:00 00.0 A00000 00000 00000 00 0V0 00000000 00000 00 00000000E00 0000 00000-1. 0 mqmdB 22 m0 + 0 00m 00 + 0u©0m .Q0 .0 ..00000000 00mm m0 + 0:00..0 Rm.o 0000 0000 u 000000 00000 000000000000 In 0 .0 00* 000000 .00 0.0 .00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 M0.0 0.0 .00 0.0 *0 00000 .00 0.0 .00 0.0 0.0 m.m 0.m 0.0 0.0 .00 0.0 *0 00000 .00 .00 .00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 000000 .00 .00 .00 0000 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 00. 0 0.0 m.0 .00 *0 00.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 000000 .00 .00 .00 0 00 000000 0.0 .00 .00 00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 000000 .00 .00 .00 mm M0.0 0.0 0.0 .00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 000000 0.0 0.0 .00 0000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 m.m .0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 m000 m.0 020 mgw 0.0 0.00 m.mm mgflw 0.00 N0.m 000 0.0 0000 0000 0.0m 0.0m 0.0m m.0m Am.mm 0.00 0.00 0.00 00.0m 0.0m 0.0m 0.00 0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 m.00 00.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Mm.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 m.m 0M0.m m.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 m.0 0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.m0 0.00 00.00N 0.00 0.00 0.00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 .00 .00 00.0 0 m.0 0.0 0.0 0000 0.0 0.m m.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00.0 0.0 0.0 m.0 00 000,00 .00 3‘00 .000 M 00000 0.0 {‘00 3‘00 M00000 .000 3.00 .c00 HHNH 000.00 .00 3‘00 N..O 000.00 3.00 .00 .000 000.000 .c00 m.O .000. NH 0090.0 .000. 3.00 300‘ 000.00 .c00. 3‘00 .000 000.00 .000 .00 .00 OH 00000 .00 .00 .00 M00000 .00 .00 .00 M00000 .00 .00 0.00 m A00000>0V A00000>0v mA0w000>0v 000000 00000 000000 00000 000000 0000 0000 .0000 300 00000n0N0000 E000 00000000 000000 00000 00000 00 00 000000000 00000 00 00000000000 0000 0000--. m 00000 TABLE 4.——Fatty acid composition of lipid fractions (% of total fatty acids) obtained from freeze—dried cooked lamb. ipids Total L Bound Lipids (average) taverage) I \2 (average, Free Lipids Acid A A AMWMQJAAACDM OJNONOF—O ()me 0001—1 0 'm o . :T'HSNCIDFAONMS-«ONHWU hHH i ) trace trace trace trace OMF—UNONGNMMONCNQO 00H iHCDKO—ZI‘MOCUOOCUHi-«OH tr. tr. S—iS-q +>p HTM—IJ'MKOHONO ifKO HON —:rH(MOCNONOCn$4QCUHiLOJH H HNH pp p tr. tr. tr. tr. \ONONHOONCDKO ONCUON H MHNQOONMLOMOLHQ H mm P p tr. tr. tr. tr. UN xx 3 (l) (l) (D MMAAMAA OJAA OOOONOUNF—HNHHF—ONCDOONgkON (6mm 0 o o a o o SagfidoHOUNmNUNl—(NNOONHLIHO .p+ap rdOJN .A/\./\‘/\/\./\_, W NUNQNQOFimNNCIDOH QDCI) HQQQOO—IgCUHUNKONHOONN SJHO pup HNN [\HUNCDINHOHNCIDCDNH [\-\O FAQS—«OHOUNOICUOJCDNOOQDN hHO .p+ap rdOJN mathoonmoomlxooour Old) spagrariorxowwxo<>awococdwlprio p49+> H riNCU WA A AA (1) (1) Q) OJAAMAA ’\Q)/‘\Q) (Dz-\r'x OOOOmQHdmwmwOoNooww CUCUCUCU o o o ICU .LUCU o - QEQLJHONCDONMMDOJr—i 905145-100 -p4J+)p H H“) -p +Jp WVNHWV VW O-U‘J‘HUN\O—:1'O(\l N FAQS-«SAUNHOKDKHOKONHHOQL $454 pppp m Hm p pppp ONMOx-JONCUOHN C3 mm LES-{HS :f'r—iCDP-HCUP—MHLHFHLr—ir—i +Lp+ap mCH p +ap H :OOHmm UN[_\—-[\- LINK) ONCI) S—IS—«F-‘S-a—II'NONOOCUUNOJO 51—100 $400 pupw HHN w H r4 r4 HCUONH 3- r4 (IDONCU-Ir—KTKOKOOQCDCDCDHNO*-IT* * HHHHHHHHHHHNNNCUCUQO “14:1 + 15 trace - less than 0.5% l unidentified peaks b, c *a’ 2See footnote, p. 18. l + 13 312 24 ma + Humfim NH + HumHm .wH .Q soponOOH comm ma + Huaaa sm.o coco coca - ooosoH oxooo ooaoaosooacs -- o .o “as s.o s.o m.H .sp H.H .ap s.H a.a Ao.H W .ao .so s.m *o m.o .so m.H m.o o.m m.m s.m m.m Am.o .so s.o m.H so Aoomgp .Lp .hp .su m.o o.H 0.0 .pp “momspw .pp .hp .9p anm m.o .so m.H 0.0 0.: m.m m.m m.m Ao.H .ao m.o m.m so m.H s.H s.H :. m 0.0 m.oH o.s w.m AooosoM .so m.o .sp auom “comps .so m.o .ao Am.m m.m H.H m.m “compo .so .so .so mm “momsp .hp .9» .pp A©.o .pp w.o m.o Amompp .pp .pu .hp HuHm m.m m.H m.m .m Am.m w.m m.m a.m Am.H m.H m.m m.H mnwfi H.w m.m m.m o.mH H. Hmw m.mm m.am m.mfi M3,; m.a m.a m.a mama H.3m 0.3m H.mm m.:m m. mm m.mm a.mm m.mm o.am m.mm m.mm q.mm Huma m.sfi m.mH m.mH o.ma m.oH a.oH m.oH H.0H m.mfi :.sfi m.am m.mH ma No.s w.m H.s o.m m m.: m.m m.m m.m :.m d.mH m.m m.m Humfi Mo.om 0.0m s.mfi m.mH m.aH w.:H ©.:H m.aH m.om 0.0m s.mH m.om ma s.H m.H o.m H.H a m.o H.H v.0 s.o Ao.m m.m m.m H.H Huafl Am.m 0.: @.m m.m o.H m.H o.H s.o Am.: m.m m.a m.: aH oooso .sp .so m.o Am.o o.H s.o .ao compo .so .so .ao Humfl oomhp .pp .9» .pp oompp .pp .9p .9p oompu .9p .9p .hp NH wompp .9p .9p .9p mowhp .pp .hp .pu compo .pp . p .pp OH momhp .sp .pp .pp oompp .9p .9p .Lp oompp .pp .pp H.9p m Hommsm>wv Aommpo>mv mAmmmso>mV moaoaq Hoooe moaoaq ossom moaoaq oosm oaoa Amoaoo spams Hoooo so a .moop 3mg UoHsUImNoopm Song UoQHmppo V msoaoooao oaoafi so doapamoosoo oaoo spasm--.m mamas mH + Hanm NH + HumHm .wH .Q .mp02poom comm mH + HHHHHlH sm.o coco mmoH - oooaoH oxooo ooHHHocooHss -- o .p “as Amomhp .Hp .hp .hp Amowpp .Hp .pu .Lu Aw.o .Lp H.H ©.o *o Mooosp .so .so m.o Hm.H m.m m.H ©.H Hm.o .ao s.H m.o so moms» .hp .pp .Hp Amompp .hp .hp .pp Aoompp .9p .9p .9p Huzm m.o m.o H.H HH.m m.m :.m m.H Ho.H .so m.H m.H so Wm. H m.m o.H H.H H.m H.m s.m H.H As.o m.o m.o m.o :"om m. o 0.0 .sa s.o s.H :.m m.H H.H Hoooso .so m.o .sp mm Ms. 0 m.o m.o o.H Hooosp m.o .so .so Hoooso .so .so .ao HnHm m. m m.H H.m s.m Am.m m.m H.H a.m Am.m s.H w.m m.m man m.m H.H w.m H.m m.sH m.mH s.HH a.mH m.m m.a m.: m.m m.mH :.mm m.mm s.mm m.mm 0.0m o.©m m.mm m.mm o.mm m.mm m.mm s.om H. wH m.mH o.mH m.mH m.mH m.oH m.m o.m m.mH 0.0m m.sH o.Hm m.mm mH w.m 0.0 ©.w o.w m m.m H.H m.m H.s .m. o.HH a.s a.oH H. .oH m.Hm m.om m.mm w.om Am.sH m.mH m.sH m.wH Ho.mH o.om H.0H H.sH mH w.H H.m o.m H.H aMm.o 0.0 o.H w.o o.m H.m m.H H.m HnaH :.m m.: o.m m.m m.H o.H o.H s.H m.: m.: :.m 3.: :H Hoodoo .ao .so .so As.o v.0 .so H.H Moooso .so .ao .s» Han womcHu. .vHu .cHu .cHu. mmomcHus [Hus .ch .hp momhp .ch .pHp .ch NH momch .ch .cHu .cHus momch .aHus .Hp .99 momhp .ch .ch .ch OH momhp .9p .9p .pp Mmomhp .pp .hu .pp “oompp .Lp .Hu H.Hp w Ammmpm>mv Aommpo>mv mflmwmpm>mv moHoHH Hoooe moHoHH ossom moHoHH oosm oHo< .mmon ooxooo ooHnonmNmopH EOHH cochppo HmoHoo soomH Hopos Ho av acoHooosH oHdHH Ho soHonoosoo oHoo spasm--.m mque 26 lamb, and beef, respectively) in the free lipids fraction (Tables 1, 3, and 5). A similar trend was found for linoleic acid, with the bound lipids fraction contributing 29.5, 24.6, 21.1% as compared to 12.1, 5.1, 4.4% from the free lipids fraction of raw pork, lamb, and beef, respec- tively. These results are consistent with the observation of Kuchmak and Dugan (27). The same trend was found in aged lean beef and pork (24). Free Lipids versus Bound Lipids in Cooked Meat Polyunsaturated fatty acids make up 15.6, 9.6, and 8.2% of the free lipids fraction and about 42.3, 34.8, and 26.9% of the bound lipids fraction (in cooked pork, lamb, and beef, respectively). Arachidonic acid (12.3, 7.0, and 6.1% in cooked pork, lamb, and beef, respectively) in bound lipids fractions significantly exceeds the amount present in the free lipids fractions (0.7% for each of the meat samples) in the cooked samples. Linoleic acid was more abundant in the bound lipids fraction (29.0, 25.1, and 17.5%) than in the free lipids fractions (12.8, 6.3, and 5.2% in pork, lamb, and beef, respectively) in the cooked samples. There does not seem to be much difference in the fatty acid content of raw and cooked meat, either in the free lipids or bound lipids fraction, which may tend to indicate the liberation of more tightly bound lipids on cooking. Only in beef is the oleic acid content of the cooked sample 27 greater than that of the raw meat. However, this difference may be attributed to the variations in data rather than to the effect of cooking. In a study of the fatty acid content of meat and poultry before and after cooking, Chang and Watts (7) also concluded that the differences which they observed were not due to cooking. The Fatty Acid Composition of Meat from Different Animals Prominent differences appear in the myristic, myris- toleic, linoleic and arachidonic acid content of the free lipids fraction (Figure 2). The amounts of myristic and myristoleic acid are higher in lamb and beef than in pork. On the other hand, the linoleic and arachidonic acid content of pork exceed those of lamb and beef. In their studies on meat and poultry, Chang and Watts (7) observed the fatty acid distribution varied greatly from species to species. They found the linoleic acid content of beef and lamb was less than that of pork, which in turn was less than that of turkey and chicken. This trend was also evident in this study where linoleic acid of pork accounts for 29.5% of the bound lipids fraction as compared to 24.6% and 21.1% for the bound lipids of lamb and beef, respectively (Figure 3). Also, Ostrander and Dugan (32) observed that the linoleic acid of pork depot far was much higher than that of beef and lamb. 28 The fatty acid composition of beef and lamb are similar to each other but are quite different from that of pork. This is to be expected as the cow and the lamb are ruminant animals. Since the early work of Burr and Burr (5, 6), it has been recognized that animals are unable to synthesize fatty acids containing more than one double bond if none is supplied in their diet, although they apparently have the ability to utilize dietary foods containing di- or tri-unsaturated fatty acids to synthesize more highly unsaturated ones (48). Diets rich in unsat- urated oils modify depot fats of most animals to resemble dietary fat, but ruminant depot fats are relatively unaffected (22, 36, 40). This probably due to the hydro- genation of dietary unsaturated fatty acids by rumen microflora (34, 40, 41), giving rise to less unsaturated acids. .xsom 3mg cmHnouonmnm mo mcHQHH 0:509 vcm mopm Ho coHpHmoQEoo UHom prmm oLBII.H .mHm oHoa spasm o D Huzm m :"om mm HHHN man mumH HuwH wH HumH 0H HnsH :H HHNH NH OH , , p RVMJHV pH; H-gd-Ho‘JQ _—HH ——g p u o 29 :H H&.o Cusp mmoHv oompp n p monk E HHom chom (spice Kiieg {eioi JO %) uotitsodmoo ptoe Kiieg .3906 Soy ploonmNmmhm mo mUHmHH @2309 cam copy mo coHpHmOQEoo UHom Hupmm oQBII.H .me oHo< spasm on ace 29 : A&.o Cmcp mmmHv woman u mosh pcsom Ha! H . HuHN m :"ON mm HHHN muwH man HuwH wH HumH mH p H ":H p aH HumH H OH . p o p Lflp. o (sptoe Ride; Ieioi JO %) uotitsodmoo ptoe Kiieg .Hmop new .QEmH .xsog 3mg omeoumNoohH mo mUHQHH owpw Ho COHpHmogEoo oHow hpumm mfleun.m .me cHoo spasm Huzm o snow mm HHHN muwH muwH Han mH Han Izofl Em. oopzqufl on: 3 “— Ham.o O 3ocmcu wmoHv momsp n H god .0 nEoH mg .83 I 7”,!) "////”////””//””//””/l””l”””llA ””IIII””””””’”I W”””.”l§ 0H Inn/”Illunnllnn ' H a: 1? 3H H HNH NH OH w mfg pap “up pop poo L .0 .w TOH (spree K412; Ieio; JO g) uotixsodwoo ptoe Kiieg . mm cm . . m D c QEwH xsom 3mg omHhcamNmon mo mcHQHH cadon mo COHuHmOQEoo UHom Hpumm m:B::.m .me oHoo spoon o - Q Hmzm w :nom NN HHHN muwH NuwH Hum " u u 1.7 a J u m w.— z. M _ . H HMH Han an HamH ainH HENH “MM omw pmgo v , , n n , u r ” I , w I , . I is I I l . l I l l I : 0 n n , . , n , n a ” r ” 11OH Us ” , ” .wNH , w n a Ham.o 7 Camp mmoHV momhp u p .imH xsoma m Mama QEQH: w tam a... “a _ . (spree Edie; 1930; 30 %I) uotitsodwoo ptoe Kiieg .Hmwp Umxooo cum 3mg UmHHUIonon mo mUHQHH 0:309 Ho COHpHmOQEoo UHom prmm o:E::.: .me O oHow spasm o Huam o snow mm HnHm mumH mumH HuwH mH HumH our as 32 Hem.o cop mmmHV oomsp I p @3600 D sop..- as: mH HUSH :H HHNH NH OH O Hin- so pp pp irOH iuNH 11:H 0H wH LJON Hmm de om mm (sptoe K3193 Ieioi JO %) uotqtsodwoo ptoe Kiieg .meom oonHpcmchs udommpgop .o .9 qm .xpom 3mg UoHscnmempm mo moHQHH canon m£p Eopm cmpmHomH mOHom mppmm omsg mo mpmpmo Hmcme mo coHmeonm 0H£QmsmoumEop£o mmO|u.m .mHm AmopscHEv mEHB mm ON mH NH 3 OH w w 3 N O 1') (1 (fill i < l . o o. HZHHN w u ” mmHHmme J mam..- JHON _L i- % HuwH wH i. A a 1,! u 3 is 34 it Nan mH esuodsag aepaooeg SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION The fatty acid composition of free and bound lipids in freeze-dried pork, lamb, and beef (raw and cooked) was determined by gas-liquid chromatorgraphy. The saturated acids (8, 10, 12, 14, l6, l8, and 22 carbon atoms), monounsaturated acids (l2, l4, l6, and 18, 21, and 24 carbon atoms), and polyunsaturated acids (18:2, 18:3, and 20:4) were positively identified as being present in raw and cooked pork, lamb, and beef. In all the bound lipids fraction, traces of saturated C13, C15, and C17 were evi- dent. Three peaks remained unidentified. It was not fully established whether these unknown peaks were those of oxidation products or fatty acids. However, if they are acids it is probably that they are unsaturated rather than saturated acids. In each case, the bound lipids of the meat from the three species of animals studied contained a greater amount of polyunsaturated fatty acids than the free lipids fraction. Each class of lipids appears to have a characteristic fatty acid composition. The myristic, palmitoleic and oleic acid content are much higher in the free lipids than in the bound lipids fraction. 0n the other hand, the linoleic, behenic, and arachidonic acid composition of the bound lipids exceed those of the free lipids. 34 35 There does not seem to be any major quantitative dif- ference in the fatty acid content of the raw and cooked meat, either in the free lipids or bound lipids fraction, which may tend to indicate the liberation of more tightly bound lipids by cooking. Only in beef is the oleic acid content of the cooked samples greater than that of the raw meat. However this difference may be attributed to the variations in data rather than to the effect of cooking. In both raw and cooked meat, prominent differences appear in the myristic, myristoleic, linoleic and arachi— donic acid content of the free lipids fraction of the different meat samples. The amounts of myristic and myristoleic acid are higher in lamb and beef than in pork. But, the linoleic and arachidonic acid content of pork exceed those of lamb and beef. These data tend to support and identify the greater susceptibility of pork to oxidation than that encountered in lamb and beef. 10. 11. REFERENCES ASSOCIATION OF OFFICIAL AGRICULTURAL CHEMISTS. 1960. Methods of analysis, 9th ed., Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington D. C. BIEZENSKI,, J. J. 1962. A simple chromatographic technique for removal of non-lipid contaminants from lipid extracts. J. Lipid Res. 3, 120. BLIGH, E. G., and W. J. DYER. 1959. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Phsysiol. 37, 911. BLOOR, W. J. 1928. The determination of small amounts of lipid in blood plasma. J. Biol. Chem. 71, 53. BURR, G. 0., and M. M. BURR. 1929. A new deficiency disease produced by the rigid exclusion of fat from the diet. J. Biol. Chem. §g, 345. BURR, G. 0., and M. M. BURR. 1930. On the nature and role of the fatty acids essential in nutrition. J. Biol. Chem. 86, 587. CHANG, 1., and B. M. WATTS. 1952. The fatty acid content of meat and poultry before and after cooking. J. Am. Oil Chemists' Soc. 29, 334. CLINTON, R. 0., and s. C. LASKOWSKI. 1948. The preparation of methyl esters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 19; 3135- CROPPER, F. R., and A. HEYWOOD. 1953. Analytical separation of the methyl esters of the 012-022 fatty acids by vapour-phase chromatography. Nature 112, 1101. DAHLE, O. 1958. Influence of the basal diet on the quality of pig fat. 11. Feeding a diet low in fat. Acta Agr. Scand. VIII, 106. DE LA MARE, P. B. D., and F. B. SHORLAND. 1946. Some minor constituents of pig back fat. N. Z. J. Sci. Tech. (B) g1, 465. 36 12. 13. 14. 15. l6. l7. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 37 DE WET, W. J., and V. PRETORIUS. 1958. Some factors influencing the efficiency of gas-liquid partition chromatographic columns. Anal. Chem. 39, 325. ERWIN, E. S., W. STERNER, and G. J. MARCO. 1963. Effect of type of oil and site of administration on the fate of fatty acids in sheep. J. Am. Oil Chemists‘ Soc. 49, 345. FOLCH, J., I. ASCOLI, M. LEES, J. A. MEATH, and F. N. LEBARON. 1951. Preparation oflipideeaxtracts from brain tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 191, 833. FOLCH, J., M. LEES, and G. H. S. STANLEY. 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 226, 497. FOLCH, J., and D. D. VAN SLYKE. 1939. Nitrogenous contaminants in petroleum ether extracts of plasma lipids. J. Biol. Chem. 129, 539. HANSEN, R. P., and N. J. COOKE. 1953. The occurence of n-capric in mutton fat. Biochem. J. 54. 14. HARTMAN, L. 1957. Some recently discovered constituents of animal fats. J. Am. Oil Chemists' Soc. 34, 129. HARTMAN, L., and F. B. SHORLAND. 1961. Fatty acid composition and other characteristics of subcu- taneous fat from New Zealand oxen and sheep. N. Z. J. Sci. 4, l6. HAWKE, J. C. 1956. The volatile fatty acids of bovine- muscle and -liver phospholipids. Biochem. J. 64, 311. HELANDER, E. 1959. Fat content of skeletal muscular tissue. Acta Morp. Neer-Scand. 2, 230. HILDITCH, T. P. 1956. The chemical constitution of natural fats. 3rd ed. revised, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York. HORNSTEIN, 1., J. A. ALFORD, L. E. ELLIOT, and P. F. CROWE. 1960. Determination of free fatty acids in fat. Anal. Chem. 32, 540. HORNSTEIN, I., P. F. CROWE, and M. J. HEIMBERG. 1961. Fatty acid composition of meat tissue lipids. J. Food Sci. 26, 581. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35- 36. 38 JAMES, A. T. 1959. Determination of the degree of unsaturation of long chain fatty acids by gas- liquid chromatography. J. Chromatog. 2, 552. JAMES, A. T., and A. J. P. MARTIN. 1952. Gas- liquid partition chromatography: The separation and micro-estimation of volatile fatty acids from formic to dodecanoic acid. Biochem. J. 59, 679. KUCHMAK, M., and L. R. DUGAN. 1964. Private com- munication. LEA, C. H. 1957. Deteriorative reactions involving phospholipids and lipo-proteins. J. Sci. Food Agr. 6, 1. LEA, C. H., and D. N. RHODES. 1953. Phosphdipins 1. Partition chromatography of egg-yolk phospho-~ lipins on cellulose. Biochem. J. 54, 467. LUDDY, F. E., R. A. BARFORD, and R. W. RIEMENSCHNEIDER. 1960. Direct conversion of lipid components to their fatty acid methyl esters. J. Am. Oil Chemists' Soc. 37, 447. METCALFE, L. D., and A. A. SCHMITZ. 1961. The rapid preparation of fatty acid esters for gas chromato- graphic analysis. Anal. Chem. 33, 363. OSTRANDER, J., and L. R. DUGAN. 1962. Some differ- ences in composition of covering fat, inter-muscu- lar fat, and intra—muscular fat of meat animals. J. Am. Oil Chemists' Soc. 39, 178. RADIN, N. S., A. K. HAJRA, and Y. AKAHORI. 1960. Preparation of methyl esters. J. Lipid Research A, 250. REISER, R. 1951. Hydrogenation of polyunsaturated fatty acids by the ruminant. Fed. Proc. 39, 236. SCHLENK, H., and J. L. GELLERMAN. 1960. Esterifi- cation of fatty acids with diazomethane on a small scale. Anal. Chem. 32, 1412. SHORLAND, F. B. 1953. Animal fats: Recent researches in the fat research laboratory D. S. I. R., New Zealand. J. Sci. Food Agr. 4, 497. 37. 38. 39- 40. 41. 42. 43. an. 45. 46. 47. 39 SHORLAND, F. B., T. GERSON, and R. P. HANSEN. 1955. The branched-chain fatty acids of butterfat. 6. Further investigations on the C15 saturated fatty acids. Biochem. J. 59, 350. SHORLAND, F. B., T. GERSON, and R. P. HANSEN. 1955. The branched-chain fatty acids of butterfat. 7. Investigations of the C13 acids. Biochem. J. 61, 702. SHORLAND, F. B., and A. S. JESSOP. 1955. Isolation cfi'llg-heptadecenoic acid from lamb caul fat. Nature 116, 737. SHORLAND, F. B., R. 0. WEENINK, and A. T. JOHNS. 1955. Effect of the rumen on dietary fat. Nature, 115, 1129. SHORLAND, F. B., R. O. WEENINK, A. T. JOHNS, and I. R. C. MCDONALD. 1957. The effect of sheep— rumen contents on unsaturated fatty acids. Biochem. J. 61, 328. SINCLAIR, R. G. 1948. The lecithin, cephalin, and sphingomyelin content of serum. 1. As indicated by the choline-phosphorus and nitrogen-phosphorus ratios. J. Biol. Chem. 114, 343. SMITH, R. H. 1954. The phosphatides of the latex of Heavea brasiliensis. 3. Carbohydrat and poly- hydroxy constituents. Biochem. J. 51, 140. STOFFEL, W., F. CHU, and E. H. AHRENS, JR. 1959. Analysis of long-chain fatty acids by gas-liquid chromatography. Micromethod for preparation of methyl esters. Anal. Chem. 31, 307. TAPPEL, A. L. 1956. Freeze-dried meat. 11. The mechanism of oxidative deterioration of freeze- dried beef. Food Res. 21, 195. TOVE, S. B., and R. D. MOCHRIE. 1963. Effect of dietary and injected fat on the fatty acid composition of bovine depot fat and milk fat. J. Dairy Sci. 46, 686. VORBECK, M. L., L. R. MATTICK, F. A. LEE, and C. S. PEDERSON. 1961. Preparation of methyl esters of fatty acids for gas-liquid chromatography. Quantitative comparison of methylation technique. Anal. Chem. 3_, 1512. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 40 WIDMER, C., and R. T. HOLMAN. 1950. Polyethenoid fatty acid metabolism. Deposition of polyun- saturated fatty acids in fat-deficient rats upon single fatty acid supplementation. Arch. Biochem. g5, 1. WOODFORD, F. P., and c. M. VAN GENT. 1960. Gas-liquid chromatography of fatty acid methyl esters: The "carbon number" as a parameter for comparison of columns. J. Lipid Research 1, 188. WELLS, M. A., and J. C. DITTMER. 1963. The use of sephadex for the removal of non-lipid contaminants from lipid extracts. Biochemistry 2, 1259. WESTLEY, J., J. J. WREN, and H. K. MITCHELL. 1957. Phospholipids containing amino acids other than serine.‘ 1. Detection. J. Biol. Chem. 229, 131. YOUNATHAN, M. T., and B. M. WATTS. 1960. Oxidation of tissue lipids in cooked pork. Food Res. 25, 538. YOUNGS, C. G., and B. M. CRAIG. 1951. A note on the preparation of methyl esters of fatty acids. J. Am. Oil Chemists' Soc. 26, 521. ROOM USE ONLY 'e. ‘ \_ ' " ‘ ~" {51: 'F. 7‘ “'I k ' ' “(”1 '1. ‘, ._ 27.5. w: 1.- .‘ » -.. .. . I .fi JAN'6196‘5... ' {N553 2 5 .‘C: '~’. , .31L—d7 /.. Zifi‘) M 50