W ESTIMATION OF BOTTOM AREA IN AN. ARTIFICIAL STREAM. USING PHOSPHORUS-32 Thesis for the Degree of M. S. MiCHlGAN STATE UNIVERSITY IOHN PAUL GIESY JR. 197 1 “J LEBRARY Michigan Stab: University a; alumina BY» ‘5‘ ‘ HERE & SflNS' y 808K BINDER! INC. 7 LIBRARY BINDERS ESTIMATION OF BOTTOM AREA IN AN ARTIFICIAL STREAM, USING PHOSPHORUS-52 by JOHN PAUL GIESY jr. A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Fisheries and Wildlife 1971 1'.I‘.]n _~ HI!) “fill in epilitlic elynl comnunity, coznOos M mainly of dietoms, was allowed to colonize a lnborfitory stream, 21.9 meters in length. & phosphorus—32 tracer pulse of 7.721107 cpm was added in an attempt to determine the colonizable sur- face area of the stream by 52F sorption. Glass substrate placed in the stream removed an averepe of 1677.7 0pm or 87.58 cpm per cmg. ’1thouyh the weight of alfiae on the czrtii‘ic iel substrate varied from one part of the stream to another, the activity collected by the sub— stratn did not very "ignificnntly. This indi ted t} the streau bottom was uniformly covered end that the 32? sorption was a surface phenomenon, not effected t3 the swtaniin cron of algae, during a short contnct time in the lotic 3y tem. . - , ()1 92? added, only b.09XlO cpm or Cf the 7. 2’107 cnm of ap roximetely 12.5% of the init in] activity was removed. This coupled vith 2 large eaount of variation between the w ter ples t 'iken from the stream, made it imloesible to calcu- late an accurnte change in activity from the Leginnin; to the end of the stream. To be able to calculate v chen;e in activ— ity and hence the surface area, lens activity Fist he used in any further experiments. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express gratitude to my graduate committee, Dr. Robert Ball, Dr. Clarence McNabb, and especially the chairman, Dr. N.R. Kevern. Thanks are also due to Dr..Walter Conley for his help in processing and statistical analysis of data. I would also like to express my appreciation to David Jude, John Janssen, Lou Helfrich, David Rosenberger, and James Seelye for their help in data collection. Thanks also to my wife Susan for her patience and help in preparation of the manuscript. Financial support for this research was supplied by Federal Water Quality Administration grants 5Tl-WP109 and ITfi-WP246. Use of Michigan State University computing facilities was made possible through support, in part, from the National Science Foundation. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . . . . ARTIFICIAL STREAM Stream bed Reservoirs Lighting . . Temperature control Water and nutrient medium Alkalinity . . Hardness . . pH . . . Phgsphorus . Stream colonization DETERMINATION OF BOTTOM SURFACE AREA Tracer . . . . . Water sampling . . . . Algal sampling . . Detection of activity in samples . Weighing . . Calculation of activity in tracer pulse Calculation of bottom surface area RESULTS . . . Activity sorbed by algae . . Dry weight . . . . . Organic matter Relationship of activity to dry weight organic matter . Back calculation of total phosphorus removed. SUMMARY . . . . . . . LITERATURE CITED . . . . . iv and .‘ -‘J 0 Artificial stream dimensions and capacities . Nutrient medium . . . . . . . Algal genera present in the artificial stream . Animal {reups represented in the artificial stream at the time of the experiment. . . Mean activity per slide in each trough with the estimated standard error and coefficient of varience for oech trough. The been sctivities u compared by LS}. . . . . . . Penn dry weirht of alrae per seppling slide with stundard errors end coefficient of v~rietion . Correlation matrix of intercorrelitions between the dry weight, organic wetter, distance from source and activity of eech slide . . . Teen weirht of organic vet'er on ereh samplinp slide with standard error and coefficient of variation . . . . . . . . are 50 S4 10. ll. 1.: IX) 0 1'50 LIST OF FIGUHgS Page Diagram of artificial stream. . . . Photographs of artificial streem: (a) complete artificial stream; (b) insive of stream trough,v ‘ showing plastic lining and vertical cylinders 8 Photographs of the apparatus for crtchin. jLP after it passed through Jhe stream: (as auxiliary reservoir-and pump; (b) polyethylene holdinh tanks 0 o O O O O 0 ° 11 Diurnal temper ture fluctuation of stream water . . . . . . . . 14 Total slkalinitv of the stream meter for the two months preceding exoewimentation. . . 18 Free carbon dioyide concentrations for the two months preceding caperimentation. . . 21 Diurnal Carbon dioxide cycle for water in the reservoir just under the return pipe iron tee stream, on 21 June 1971. . . . . P.) ‘w Total dissolved orthophosphete in the stream wvter for the two months prec ding emperimen— 138131011 o o o o O o O 0 2L) Photorrrph of the epilithic elyal community and associated Tendipodidee l rvee . . . In u: Fhotoyrvqflu or (a) {JVMNTP delivrqulxyttle; (h) Person tnkin: a water Humyle. . . 55 Weduced verrfixurs of the lnr e {lvudns used to calculate the activity in the irncn- pulse at the end of ehch troueh . . . . . . 41 Activity in tracer pulse at the end of neck trough . . . . . . . . [H5 The activity per slide as a function of distance from the stream source with linoer regression laust sen res line (Y=1544.t9+l4.441). The regression line was not siynificant (C.Ol¢F420 138% to...» 3m; we; o o {H I... II IOOCCOO- 000...... I" Figure 23 livftographs .55ml/1 _.HO .55ml/l 17 Figure 5. Total alkalinity of the str«an water for the two months precedinv experimentation. is V 212: 111: 13: 3122 T ‘U I ‘ f V v '— - - - N (“‘ddMUNI'IVN'IV “I101 Ila DATE 19 pg. pH was determined, using a Leeds and Northrup pH meter. The pH varied between 7.9 and 8.5: Host of the variability was due to determinations being made at different time of day. The pH varied with the amount of CO2 dissolved in the water. I 992. The carbon dioxide concentrations in the water were determined from the pH and total alkalinity, using Moore's nomograph. The amount of free 002 held by the water decreased during the two months before experimentation (Fig- ure 6). This was probably due to the greater standing crop of the growing community. The carbon dioxide concentration showed a marked diurnal cycle (Figure 7). The concentration of free CO2 decreased at the onset of the photoperiod as the algae started photosynthesizing, until there was no free 002 in the water. After the photoperiod, the 002 concentration in- creased to a miximum of 5.5 ppm. Phosphorus. Total and dissolved orthophosphate was determined colorimetrically by the stannous chloride method (APHA, 1971). Total orthOphosphate was determined directly, while dissolved orthOphosphate was determinea after filtering water samples through a 0.45 u membrane filter. All phos- phorus was reported as P. The phosphorus concentration decreased from 0.20 ppm initially to 0.01 at the time of experimentation (Figure 8). The fluctuations and large in- crease in phosphorus between 4 June and 10 June may have been caused by sloughing off of some algae or mixing of the algal residue in the bottom of the reservoirs with 20 Figure 6. Free carbon dioxide concentrations for the two months precedinr experimentation. 21' 112: 111: 3321 I321 I-‘II :3: 2-‘1 DATE ‘ U' 22 Figure 7. Diurnal carbon dioxide cycle for water in the reservoir just under the return pipe from the stream, on 21 June 1971. 24 Figure 8. Totn and dissolv d orthoehosphate in the stream water for the two months preceding experimentation. 2 2 :1 E .F.~ mh:>:u< 47 Figure 15. The activity per slide as a function of distance from the stream source with a linear repression lsast souares line (Y=l544.€9+14-44X). The regression line was not considered to be signific nt (C.lO