0 mil 2?. ”a b j I U THE SEC: MERCANCE Oi: CORN. SE‘TECM: T133332 {m ‘m. Saga-a 5% M.. is S MASEEGAQ 3TATE 363;...3-42 2ft! 3: -,~-; :v-r':E ’3'" .fa- -- align La" 1.23“; aigt‘x‘é‘i THE-'3‘! s. I _-.,L- e- 5. -A h.-.‘ -- -‘ a - On 0. J an- .- an. .a‘- o a .——.—— -—--—-- - *-—l—_.— This is to certify that the thesis entitled ”The Significance of Oriented coral Sections" presented by Ian-en mm Grabau has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for [actor's degree“! Geology Major professor pm In: 25. 1950 0-169 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ORIENTED CORAL SECTIONS by warren Edward Grabau A THESIS Submitted to the Graduate School of Mich igan State College of Agriculture and Applied Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Geology and Geography 1950 THESIS 0leT ENTS Acknowledgments . . . . . . Introduction and Purpose . . . Stratigraphy . . . . . . . Techniques of Preparation . . . Definitions of Orientation . Interpretations of Structure . . Carinae . . . . Walls . . . . Septa . . . . Septal Dilation . Size and numbers of Dissepiments . . Orientation Criteria. emcee. epta Area Nomogram . . . . . . . Conclusions . . . . . . . Bibliography . . . . . . . Appendix (Derivation of Nomogram) (ii) 0 O 0 O O O O Page Q0303!“ PLATES LO 08131 on I‘n’Iap o e e e e o o e e 0 Index to Location Map . . . . . . . Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate I: Types of Carinae and Implantation II: III: Carinae MOdifications Due to Orientation Carinae masked by Dissepiments Section of wall Between Two Corallites Relation of Septa to Well Serration Pseudo-serrate wall . . . . Growth Rings and Septal Dilation Areas and Numbers of Septa. . Areas and Numbers of Septa. . Dissepiments . . . . . . Pseudo-concentration of Dissepi- me nt S Q O O O O O O O Dissepiments . . . . . . Nomogram. . . . . . . . Orientation of Sections Types of Carinae . . . . . Types of Carinae . . . . . Extended Carinae . . . . . Implanted Carinae , Carinae in Transverse-oblique Section masked Carinae . . . . . Carinae in Longitudinal-oblique section walls Growth Rings . . . .‘ . . (111) 20 24 27 27 30 32 34 59 46 47 48 49 PLATES (cont.) Page Plate XV: Area-septa Correlation Dissepiments and Tabellae Compound and Simple Dissepi- ments . . . . . . . . 50 Plate XVI: Dissepimental Chambers Dissepimental Size Range . . 51 Plate XVII: Dissepiments in transverse- oblique Section . . . . . 52 Plate XVIII: Serial Section . . . . . 53 (1V) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to Dr. William.A Kelly, of Midiigan State College, for his considerable assistance and cooperation. To Arthur Slaughter I am obligated, because of his enthusiastic collection of samples from areas which I was not able to reach. I am.grateful to Dr. B. M. Stewart, of the mathematics Department, for his aid in the solution of the homogram included in this paper. M1. E. J. wade is largely respons- ible for the photographic material included. (V) INTRUDUCTION AND PURPOSE In the examination of fossil animals, paleontologists are forced to rely on only a portion of the evidence available to biologists who study modern faunas. Specific determinations of contemporary animals are made on the basis of both soft and hard parts. Because paleontologists are restricted to skeletal characteristics alone, it is inevitable that their determinations will not have the precise values possessed by identifications made from soft parts as well as skeletons. This is especially true in those cases where skeletons exhibit convergent, or parallel features, presenting similiar characteristics in quite different groups. Closely allied species may have nearly or entirelyidentical skeletons, and paleon- .tologists cannot be expected to identify them as indi- viduals. Mbdern biologists, who work with the living fauna of the planet, are accustomed to the notion that wide vari- ation in morphological characteristics is possible within a given species. For instance, fishes of the same species not infrequently have different numbers of vertebral seg- ments. Corals exhibit quite different corallum shapes. within the same species, and.within very narrow areal limits. (1) These differences, in most cases, can be correlated with environmental factors (vaughan, 1917). The question was, how does one detect the difference between a variation within a species and a variation due to different species? The most obvious approach was to collect as many specimens as possible, and examine them for overlapping characteristics. In theory, there should be a consistent difference of some nature between two species. But if the forms are only variations with species, there ought to be a fairly consistent overlap of character- istics, such that Specimens would grade imperceptibly into each other. A plot of variation limits should then'be possible, and any breaks in the sequence could then be interpreted as specific breaks (Simpson, 1987). As a complicating factor, the theory suggested that some variation would be found within.a single corallum, because the environment would not be the same over the entire colony. For example, food supplies might not be uniform.because one side of the colony would be in.a ,more advantageous position.mith respect to the food-bearing currents. In the domal colonies, some corallites at the periphery would be bothered more by mud and absence of light than would those near the apex. These considerations made it necessary to examine each corallite of every colony individually. To insure that no portion of the coral skeleton was neglected, a system of oriented sections was designed. A series of four sectionS‘was found to be most useful. Study with the oriented sections revealed that the structure of the coral animal is exceedingly complex. Gradually this line of endeavor became a technique for the study of Hexagonaria, and it is this technique which furnishes the body of this paper. The descriptive terminology used in this paper is that used in Sanford's (1939) excellent summary of the families of tetracorals. Where new or modified terms are used, they are defined in the text, or illustrated,l OI‘ bOthm STRATIGRAPHY The fossil corals used in this study were collected from.outcrops of the Traverse group in the north-central part of the lower peninsula of Michigan. The locations of the various outcrops are noted on the accompanying map of portions of Cheboygan and Presque Isle counties. meat of the specimens were collected during the summer of 1949 by the writer, and by members of the student body of Mich- igan State College while on a field trip to the area. Additional material belonging to the collection of Henry Faul was later included.as better techniques for the inter- pretation of random.sections were developed. (3) one _ mNm m m_m _ szm _ awe I a. > , Egon Steam 1 ‘1; \ INVH NV h C. . II. .N. 138334.: 338 see r»; 1 _ _|1 ~ F X __ WV J m . .2330 £322wa 1,]. I L/ >41.ch e8 FEM _ J/ zoEmJ _ _ . Mr v}— _ . I \ r 323% 396.0.”MW .3330 . , , COskq flBu aw» 33m ASE xzok m_> .Nm. VNWMW .Cuoao PBSSMV .— _ led III! ozestablishing the section as transverse-oblique. (52) PLATE XVIII SERIAL SE CTI CNS Spec imen No . 450 (53) "in . . f «‘9‘; 'I: r‘t Oa-fl! I "A U "'l’ I Q l ‘r l ‘ ' ' ‘ i \ l 4 l 8 Remit um um.)