You are here
Search results
(1 - 2 of 2)
- Title
- Evolving Phenotypically Plastic Digital Organisms
- Creator
- Lalejini, Alexander
- Date
- 2021
- Collection
- Electronic Theses & Dissertations
- Description
-
The ability to dynamically respond to cues from the environment is a fundamental feature of most adaptive systems. In biological systems, changes to an organism based on environmental cues is called phenotypic plasticity. Indeed, phenotypic plasticity underlies many of the adaptive traits and developmental patterns found in nature and serves as a key mechanism for responding to spatially or temporally variable environments. Most computer programs require phenotypic plasticity, as they must...
Show moreThe ability to dynamically respond to cues from the environment is a fundamental feature of most adaptive systems. In biological systems, changes to an organism based on environmental cues is called phenotypic plasticity. Indeed, phenotypic plasticity underlies many of the adaptive traits and developmental patterns found in nature and serves as a key mechanism for responding to spatially or temporally variable environments. Most computer programs require phenotypic plasticity, as they must respond dynamically to stimuli such as user input, sensor data, et cetera. As such, phenotypic plasticity also has practical applications in genetic programming, wherein we apply the natural principles of evolution to automatically synthesize computer programs rather than writing them by hand. In this dissertation, I achieve two synergistic aims: (1) I use populations of self-replicating computer programs (digital organisms) to empirically study the conditions under which adaptive phenotypic plasticity evolves and how its evolution shapes subsequent evolutionary outcomes; and (2) I transfer insights from biology to develop novel genetic programming techniques in order to evolve more responsive (i.e., phenotypically plastic) computer programs. First, I illustrate the importance of mutation rate, environmental change, and partially-plastic building blocks for the evolution of adaptive plasticity. Next, I show that adaptive phenotypic plasticity stabilizes populations against environmental change, allowing them to more easily retain novel adaptive traits. Finally, I improve our ability to evolve phenotypically plastic computer programs with three novel genetic programming techniques: (1) SignalGP, which provides mechanisms to control code expression based on environmental cues, (2) tag-based genetic regulation to adjust code expression based on current context, and (3) tag-accessed memory to provide more dynamic mechanisms for storing data.
Show less
- Title
- Replaying Life's Virtual Tape : Examining the Role of History in Experiments with Digital Organisms
- Creator
- Bundy, Jason Nyerere
- Date
- 2021
- Collection
- Electronic Theses & Dissertations
- Description
-
Evolution is a complex process with a simple recipe. Evolutionary change involves three essential “ingredients” interacting over many generations: adaptation (selection), chance (random variation), and history (inheritance). In 1989’s Wonderful Life, the late paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould advocated for the importance of historical contingency—the way unique events throughout history influence future possibilities—using a clever thought experiment of “replaying life’s tape”. But not...
Show moreEvolution is a complex process with a simple recipe. Evolutionary change involves three essential “ingredients” interacting over many generations: adaptation (selection), chance (random variation), and history (inheritance). In 1989’s Wonderful Life, the late paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould advocated for the importance of historical contingency—the way unique events throughout history influence future possibilities—using a clever thought experiment of “replaying life’s tape”. But not everyone was convinced. Some believed that chance was the primary driver of evolutionary change, while others insisted that natural selection was the most powerful influence. Since then, “replaying life’s tape” has become a core method in experimental evolution for measuring the relative contributions of adaptation, chance, and history. In this dissertation, I focus on the effects associated with history in evolving populations of digital organisms—computer programs that self-replicate, mutate, compete, and evolve in virtual environments. In Chapter 1, I discuss the philosophical significance of Gould’s thought experiment and its influence on experimental methods. I argue that his thought experiment was a challenge to anthropocentric reasoning about natural history that is still popular, particularly outside of the scientific community. In this regard, it was his way of advocating for a “radical” view of evolution. In Chapter 2—Richard Lenski, Charles Ofria, and I describe a two-phase, virtual, “long-term” evolution experiment with digital organisms using the Avida software. In Phase I, we evolved 10 replicate populations, in parallel, from a single genotype for around 65,000 generations. This part of the experiment is similar to the design of Lenski’s E. coli Long-term Evolution Experiment (LTEE). We isolated the dominant genotype from each population around 3,000 generations (shallow history) into Phase I and then again at the end of Phase I (deep history). In Phase II, we evolved 10 populations from each of the genotypes we isolated from Phase I in two new environments, one similar and one dissimilar to the old environment used for Phase I. Following Phase II, we estimated the contributions of adaptation, chance, and history to the evolution of fitness and genome length in each new environment. This unique experimental design allowed us to see how the contributions of adaptation, chance, and history changed as we extended the depth of history from Phase I. We were also able to determine whether the results depended on the extent of environmental change (similar or dissimilar new environment). In Chapter 3, we report an extended analysis of the experiment from the previous chapter to further examine how extensive adaptation to the Phase I environment shaped the evolution of replicates during Phase II. We show how the form of pleiotropy (antagonistic or synergistic) between the old (Phase I) and new (Phase II) habitats was influenced by the depth of history from Phase I (shallow or deep) and the extent of environmental change (similar or dissimilar new environment). In the final chapter Zachary Blount, Richard Lenski, and I describe an exercise we developed using the educational version of Avida (Avida-ED). The exercise features a two-phase, “replaying life’s tape” activity. Students are able to explore how the unique history of founders that we pre-evolved during Phase I influences the acquisition of new functions by descendent populations during Phase II, which the students perform during the activity.
Show less