Task force to study women's status MRS BERNIE SMITH OFFICE OF SEC OF FAC EAST WING LIBRARY 003 010 An ombudswoman. A full - Health Center. time gynecologist in Olin More women in the admissions and fmancial the aids offices, and Counseling Center and Placement Bureau . . . a few of the suggestions made at a recent meeting called by the female members of the Committee Against Discrimination (CAD). in Purpose of the meeting was to establish a task force to study the status of women on campus. About 30 women and four men ~ attended. They - discussed areas in which they thought iiscriminati,QIl of women occurs, including academic and vocational counseling, recruitment, hiring, job. residency salaries and promotions, requirements and problems within certain divisions of the University (such as the case ~f no full - time gynecologist at Olin). While the suggestions called for more female representation in various units of the University, a member of the Schooi of Nursing faculty talked about that Wage report, bargaining on AAUP slate Faculty salaries and collective bargaining headline the agenda for the first open meeting of the MSU chapter the American Association of of University Professors, Thursday (Nov. 19) at 7:30 p.m. in the Gold Room of the Union. A brief review of current faculty salaries will be presented by Einar Hardin, professor of labor and industrial relations. Hardin will also discuss salary changes from previous years. Four faculty members from Michigan schools which now have collective bargaining agreements will speak at the meeting. for Profs. Jim McKay and Joe DeMent of Oakland University will discuss the situation at their school, where the AAUP was recently recognized as the bargaining agent faculty. Also speaking will be Tom Brite and Bob Clason of Central Michigan University, where a local unit of the Michigan Association for Higher' Education (an the Michigan Education arm of in Association) bargaining. represents faculty AAUP secretary W. Fred Graham associate professor in Justin Morrill College, said the open meeting is an effort the possibilitiesaD4 ,perils of collective bargaining at MSU. to bt:~ dialogue on school's experience as an all - female faculty and administration. She said that having women in administrative is no guarantee against positions discrimination, because of the the nursing school, experience where, she contended, there is "poor support from the University" in money or commitment. in She said examples included promised faculty and student enrollment increases (to come with the Life sciences Buildings) which have never been fulfilled, plus problems in acquiring needed equipment, even lightbulbs. She also cited a problem in wirming seats on college or University committees, since the nursing school is one of 17 (natural departments science) that is predominately male.' * * * the meeting included: OTHER suggestions by the women at in a college - A breakdown on jobs and salaries offered through the Placement Bureau (Continued on page 2) - Drawing by Bob Brent MSU Faculty News ' Vol. 2,No.8 Michigan State University Nov. 17 ,1970 Council set for another try '-a:rlne participation issue' The motion before the Academic Council when it reconvenes today at 3:15 p.m. in the Con Con Room of the International Center concerns decreasing the percentage vote required for Council actions to be referred to the Academic Senate. Currently, an action by the Council receiving a simple majority vote (51 per cent) is forwarded to the Senate. A motion from Thomas H. Greer, professor of humanities, would change that 51 per cent to 40 per cent. The Council will meet today in its fourth November session to resume consideration of the special Panel Report on Student Participation in Academic Governance. Concern over faculty prerogatives continued to prevail at the Nov. 10 meeting, as amendments to the document were approved to remove faculty affairs from the purview of the student affairs committee ( whose name was amended from its original title of Faculty..Student Affairs Committee). Faculty affairs are part of the current committee's charge, but with the student participation recommendations, the new committee would have a majority of student members (11 students to seven faculty). Paul M. Hurrell, professor in Justin Morrill College, offered a motion to deny faculty members on this committee voting privileges. The motion would have provided a parallel to previous Council action: If students are not to vote on faculty affairs, faculty would not vote on student affairs. The motion was defeated. A May 12 Council action which revised Article Seven of the Academic Freedom Report (pertaining to that amendment procedures for document) was rescinded on a motion by Charles Killingsworth, University professor of labor and industrial relations. The May 12 action had provided the committee on student affairs with veto power on amendments. In other action on the student participation report, the Council: - Increased the graduate student representation on the business affairs committee from one to two. - Changed the selection proce