MSU News -Bulletin Inside . .. · .. F orum, page2 · .. Urban college, page 3 · . ~Community Chest, page 4 · .. EPC report, page 5 Vol. 3, No.3 Michigan State University Oct. 7,1971 . Board of Trustees asked to meet Friday to consider retroactive salary raises The Board of Trustees will meet Friaay at 6 p.m. in Kellogg Center to consider an administration recommendation that the University grant a 7 percent pay increase to faculty and staff "as originally planned, with no strings, making up any later internal deficit forced savings and perhaps painful program reallocations." President Wharton said in a statement Wednesday recommended the couse of action was "in the best interests of the University and its personnel. " through that amount MSU could lose from the state (thUS making a 3.5 to 4 percent wage . hike); to provide the 7 percent raise now with the understanding that it could be reduced later in the fiscal year; to provide the 7 percent raise and make up any deficit through saving and reallocation. In making up any deficits, Wharton said, the University will give priority to making severe economy measures in the area of personnel; operations and to cutting programs. "While there will be some economizing in through restrictions on short-term or temporary employment and the replacement of turnovers," he said, "no layoffs are contemplated. " The 7 percent wage increase for faculty would be an average figure, since deans a.l1J department heads have been urged to provide higher raises for senior faculty affairs and faculty. The suggestion odginated with the faculty compensation committee, which urged that pr.ofessors and associate professor be brought to a higher comparative_rank among Big Ten schools. If the Board approves the recommendations, attempts will be made- to provide payment of the retroactive raise amount in separate ;hecks, as soon as posSible. The Board had been scheduled to meet last week: to consider granting the 7 percent retroactive Increase, but the meeting was postponed in the wake of Gov. Milliken's announcement that he was authorizing cuts of up to 3 percent in state appropriations for a state "contingency fund." Faced with this uncertainty, Wharton said, the administration was faced with three . basic choices: To reduce the proposed pay raise by the maximum C.B. materials available Five sets of materials on collective bargaining in higher education, including a complete bibliography of all known publications on the subject, are being made available for faculty use by the Ad Hoc University Committee on Collective Bargaining. One set will be at the reference desk in the main library, one in the Chemistry sub-library, and one in the Wilson Hall sub-library. Two sets will be "roving", to be checked out for longer periods by departments or other groups. Thesemay be secured from the Receptionist in the faculty wing of East Akers Hall. Information on the roving sets is available from Mrs. Perry, 353-2930. Photo exhibit at I(resge An exhibit of photographs by members of the MSU Photo Laboratory is currently on display through Oct. 24 in the Kresge Art Center. It includes photos by William Mitcham (whose work is shown), manager of the lab, and by Robert Brown, Dick Wesley and Bob Smith. Other samples from the exhibit are printed elsewhere in today's paper. Also at Kresge is "Drawings USA." • • zssue sznce 1949 • Hearing is Oct. 14' The highway: An The proposal for a highway across the Michigan State campus dates back 22 years, to October of 1949 when the State Highway Department requested a right - of - way t'o extend Main Street eastward to then - U.S. 16 (Grand River Avenue). Here, based on excerpts from Board of Trustees is a chronology of the Board actions meetings, concerning the highway~ OCT. 20, 1949 The State Highway Department asked for some assurance that the Board of Trustees would make available a right - of - way for the extension of Main Street to U.S. 16, involving a right - of - way north of the Grand Trunk Railroad from Harrison Road to Hagadorn Road. The Board voted to instruct the secretary to notify State Highway Department officials that when they were ready, the right - of - way will be made available to them. OCT. 19, 1956 Highway Department met with the Board and proposed a preferred route for the new limited access U.S. 16 highway through the campus north of the Grand Trunk Railroad. Other possibilities were discussed, including a route parallel to Cavanaugh Road and then turning north between Lansing and East Lansing. . The Board voted unanimously to adVise the highway commissioner that it had no enthusiasm for U.S. 16 across University property;! that it would cooperate if the route were· parallel to and near Cavanaugh Road. The Board recorded its unanimous opposition to the more northerly route preferred by Foster and Bellenbaum. SEPT. I7.1964 Director Harold Lautner (of campus park and planning) appeared before the Board with charts and maps showing the probable effect on MSU's future develQpment if the proposed throughway on the north side of the Grand Trunk Railroad were eventually George Foster and E.A. Bellenbaum of the State (Continued oli page 3) Indications of extensive participation in next week's hearing on the proposed cross - campus highway has caused a shift in the hearing location to the Big Ten Room of Kellogg Center. The hearing had originally been set for the Lincoln Room. The public hearing will begin at 1 :30 p.m. next Thursday (Oct. 14). It is expected to last until about 6 p.m., but if all witnesses have not been heard, an additional hearing date will be set. This Sunday (Oct. 10), a group of 10 faculty and student naturalists will lead a walking tour of the route for the proposed cross - campus highway. The tour will begin at 9 a.m. from the Grand Trunk Railroad crossing at Hagadorn Road and will go west to the Harrison - Trowbridge intersection. The tour is not a protest against the proposed route, explained Paul Risk of fisheries and wildlife. Page 2, MSU News-Bulletin Oct. 7,1971 . The Forum The Forum is intended as a platform of opinion for readers of the News - Bulletin. Comments, and letters to the editor, may be addressed to the editor, Room 324, Linton Hall. We resen'e the right to edit contributions when necessary to meet space and other requirements. F acuIty 'sold down the river'? Note: Assistant Provost Herman King attended the September conference on collective bargaining for faculty ("Faculty Power") at the University of Michigan (News - Bulletin, Sept. 30). In the following point of view, he examines the suitability of collective bargaining for faculty. I have an uneasy feeling that Michigan State is about to be sold down the river with the best of intentions on the part of all concerned. Attendance at ~he "Faculty Power" seminar did not qualify me as an instant ~xpert on collectIVe bargaining, but it did provide some basic concepts around which my concern can be organized and expressed. . ' The traditional and perhaps mythical model of a university is the "corrnnunity of scholars" model in which it is assumed that the interests of the faculty and the interests of the administration are identical or nearly so. "Community of interest" is the key characteristic of this utopian institution. " . ' If "community of interest" represents one end of the scale, perhaps ,conflict of interest" represents tile other. It appears that there are many organizations, mostly industrial in nature, where conflict of interest .b~tween ?'lan.agement and labor is indeed a pervasive and continuing characteristic. Leg1slatlOn h~s. been enacted, conflicts have been adjudicated, precedents have been set, practitioners have been trained, and collective bargaininghas become the order of the day - all to resolve the inherent conficts of interest between labor and management. In the past few years several universities . ~eem to have decided that since they fall short of the "corrnnunity of interest" ideal, they must be at the other extreme. At any rate, they have adopted, for better or for worse, all the complex and expensive legalistic machinery that has been developed to deal with industrial conflict of interest. Maybe they were right. Maybe conflict of interest was their prevailing characteristic. 1 have no way of kn?win.g. . But I do kI10w something about tllis UJUVeruty. It would be n31ve to assume that there is a perfect community of interest between the faculty and the administration at MSU, but it is equally naive to assume that there is' a pervasive and continuing conflict of interest. After serving this institution 'for 26 years as extension specialist, classroom teacher researcher and administrator, I atn firmly convinced that at least 75 percent of our so-called conflicts are not reall~ conflicts at. all.' but. ~e misunderstandings based on inadequate or poorly tuned corrnnUnICatlOn WIthin our own system. Must we pay an outside organization to convert our misunderstandings into conflicts just because we don't take time to listen to each other? Is there no procedure which will improve communication rather than stifle it, and which "ill at the same time provide for the resolution of those few conflicts which prove to be real rather than apparent? Charles M. Rehmus, professor of political science at the University of Michigan , On other campuses in a ruling for Fordham University - CHAIRMEN IN FACULTY UNIT. The National Labor Relations Board has held for the fIrst time - that department chairmen may be included in a faculty bargaining unit. The NLRB also ruled that facu1ty members at a private university (also Fordhatn) are "entitled to all the benefits of collective bargaining if they so desire." And the board said that the Fordham law faculty cou1d have its own bargaining unit because it had an "identifiable group of employes" with a "separate corrnnunity of interests." The NLRB in a ruling last spring said that facu1ty members at C.W. Post Center of Long Island University had bargaining rights but that chairmen were supervisors and thus not eligible to join the facu1ty unit. * * * GRAD SCHOOL GROWTH HALTED. The State University of New York has imposed a moratorium on expansion of graduate progra~s, pending a review by a For the panel which is to develop recommendations for future growth. irrnnediate future, no new master's or doctor's programs will be approved except in compelling circumstances. Graduate enrollment at the SUNY campuses has increased from 16,725 in 1965 to more than 37,000 this year. * * * DELINQUENT FACULTY. Effective this fall, any overdue' account at the Harvard University Facu1ty Club may be deducted from the deliquent member's salary payment. The procedure is to enforce a regulation that "all indebtedness shall be paid on or before tile 20th of the month following the month the indebtedness has been contracted." * * * CONTRACT AT SUNY. The newly negotiated contract for some 15,000 teaching and nonteaching members of the Senate, Professional Association at the State University of New York calls for a 6 percent increase in basi(; salary and continuation of annual salary increments. The contract also includes guaranteed binorts, including status of imple~entation of increased student parti<;:ipation, status . of the prQ~osed *Campus highway hearing. grievance procedures, activities of the Faculty Affairs and Faculty Twenty-one individuals or groups have so far requested the opportunity to make Compensation Committee and remarks from President Wharton. presentations at the hearing Oct. 14 at (FAFCC), them. Wharton commented on three areas,;. Kellogg Center at 1 :30 p.m., *,The budget and proposed salary *Procedures for Selection of the Vice inc.reas~s. ; .The adminlStration did Presidentfbr·Student Affairs. Ptoposals develop a set of .:recommended raises from a committee chaired by John F. A. averaging 7 ~rcent , he said, closely Taylor, professor of philosophy, were recommendations. ' not accepted last year'by the Board of following FAFCC Difficulties now, he said, include the Trustees because the board preferred to element of uncertainty because ~f leave for administrative officers at the discretion Governor Milliken's proposed, percent cut in appropriations. The of the President. Wharton said that he University does not know when the had chosen to generally follow the contingency f':lnd will ~e withheld or the how much will be WIthheld, or the Taylor report, and that this is in disposition of the funds that will be process. withheld, Wharton said. Frederick Williams, professor of He said the administration has not history and chairman of FAFCC, spoke the committee's discarded hope for the original plan, and at that when involvement in the salary proposals and resolved a letter will be sent from his budgetary events of the last few weeks, including the governor's announcement office to faculty and staff on what their and the wage-price freeze. recommendations are and the basis for rating procedures proposed by selection procedures recommendations are length of . 3 Campus Community Chest opens campaign thIS week Last year more than 114,000 persons in the Lansing area used health, w~lfaie, and youth services provided by 54 United Community Chest-supported agencies. Some of those people and others like them still need the services. This week MSU kicks off its annual Community Chest Campaign its effort to help meet those needs. Tlle campaign runs through Nov. 3. in MSU, a unit of the government and education division of the United Community Chest, has its goal set at $202,000 olit of the total Lansing area quota of $2,180;000. this year as University Serving chairman for the Community Chest Campaign is John C. Howell, associate dean of hu'man medicine and of social science. Vice chairmen are: Thomas A. Dutch, manager, Brody Complex; Russell G. Hill, professor of resource development; Louis Ross, stockman, McDonel Hall; Kenneth B. Schram, assistant comptroller, business office; and Kermit Smith assistant to the In additio'n, 33 divisional provost. leaders and approximately 275 unit solicitors are giving their time and effort to the campaign. The services that the chest-supported agencies render complement those of they meet "needs government and expressed by a wide range of persons," Howell said. "Moreover, these voluntary agencies provide one significant avenue by which the concerned'· citizen can become more personally irtvolved - as a volunteer worker, as a participant in policy making, and as a donor - in improving the quality of life in our community." Howell explained that about one-third of chest contributions go for fanIily services, including parental and unwed mother counseling, adoption service, mother and child care, legal aid for low-income and minority groups, and blood collection. Another third is spent to promote health, social, educational and character development of boys and girls, with special attention t