Regional Cooperation for Development: An analysis of the Southern African Develop- ment Coordination Conference David S. Cownie We, the undersigned, as the Heads of Government of majority-ruled States in Southern Africa, offer this declaration to our own peoples, to the peoples and Governments of the many countries who are interested in promoting popular welfare, justice and peace in Southern Afnca and to the international agencies who share this interest. I Introduction The term 'coordinated regIOnal development' has taken on a new meaning in Southern Afnca over the past five years. With the emergence of the Southern. Afnca~ Development Coordination Conference (SADCC) regional patterns of interactIOn hav evolved which are proving to be conducive to ~conomic development in the 'southern nine' states. The SADCC, as the name Implies, is a highly flexible organisatIOn dedicated to the economic development of member states and the reductIOn of dependence on South Africa. The nature of the SADCC's goals has been the source of some confuslOn Some commentators view the SADCC almost exclusively as an organisatIOn whlCh seeks to reduce ties with South Africa. This viewpoint is a misrepresentation of the objectives of the SADCC. As Weisfelder notes: To be sure SADCC is a reactIOn against South Afncan racism and economIC hegemony. But It IS also necessary to reiterate the predominantly positive character of SADCC goals, namely the promotIOn of economic independence, establIshment of mechanisms for eqUItable economic integration, mobilisatlOn of regIOnal resources, and solicitation of international support for these objectlves2 The Situation becomes even more clear when one recognlses that the. goals of economic development and dependence reductIOn on South Afnca are inevitably entWined, and that the former cannot occur without the latter. The nature of economic interaction in Southern Afirca is clearly illustrated in table two. As this table shows, the SADCC countries trade very little amongst themselves, while the Republic of South Africa is an important trading partner for all of the SADCC states except Tanzania, Zambia, and to a large extent Angola. The seventy of the problem IS further illustrated by the fact that South Africa's GNP is three tl;es that of the SADC~ states combined. 3 In addition, roughly seventy-five p cent of Southern Afnca s rail traffiC transits through South Africa~4 26 6L6 T '(SJ1?J10P) d:lU1?lSISS1?lUdW -dO[dAdP [1?DrnO N 0 0() - c; .,..; N N -~ C (]) '" . L.. - u u C .: o.E L.. (]) '" ~ ..c .0 E +-' '0 '" if) I u.l (]) a .0 :l ....; cO < ::2: (]) c (%) dll'J 4lft\OJll )1?nuul' d81?JdAI' N a\ I - 0 -D N ~ - 0 N "- '" 0 N 0() E o u E if) l- i. '[Elld1?:J Jdd dN9 ..... (]) o ..c (]) +-' ..2 .8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '"> '" 6L6) (SJI'IIoP) N 0 0 (]) ...5 '1?lldl':l Jdd dN9 ..". ..". "- ..". '" N '" '" N \D \D N '" -5 '" u 1:>", '0 .s u (SdJldWOJl>1 dJEnbs JO "- ..". - N~ 0 0 '" '" 0 -- 0() '" 0() "- - "- '" "- ~ ..". '" '" (])", :il- L.. (])'" -..". ~ 'Vi '" SPU1?sn04l) 1?dJ\f (])- u " cO c o uo. ,'" ~t; "0' (]) (]) o L.. :l 0- 1:> E EJS +-' o '" C a ii c E -'2 '" ii'" ;: a u Eo E(]) c "0'" ~'" .c +-' a '~ '" 'N '" .s u E Q.i u bO c '" +-' a '" (]) '" iU ~ ~ ~ N 0 N '" l-'"c '"E