A History of the Xhosa Western Frontier J.B. Peires, TheHouseofPhalo. Ravan Press, Johannesburg, 1981,pp.x + 281, including maps, illustrations, footnotes, appendices and biblio- graphy 'New History of Southern Africa Series', Paperback, currently retailing at PII.50 Dr Peires's sub-title, A history of the Xhosa=le in the days of their independence, IX>intedly refers to the period fore 1850 rather than to any IlOre recent configuration on the SOUthAfrican map. This is rot a history of the Xb:>sa-speaking proples as a whole (which \'.OUl.dinclude the ThemJ:u,r-tx:>noo and so on eastwards as far as Natal), l:ut is confined to those who trace descent fJ:OIT1 an ancestor called Xhosa, namely the present- day Gcaleka and Rharhate peq:>les. The Phalo of the title, a Xhosa king of the mid-eighteenth century, was the father of Gcaleka and Rharhabe. As the author claims in his preface, this is the first CXJlIpletehistory of the Xhosa to have been written since T.H. SOga's The SOuth-Eastern Bantu, published in 1930. There is llUch to recornnend this new b:lok, especially the depth of research uIX>n\'.hich it is based. Dr Peires draws uIX>na wide range of sources, written and oral and is the first llOdern his- torian to use vernacular sources for the writing of Xhosa history. His essay on Xhosa historiography, inserted as an Appendix, reveals a thorough awareness of the rrodern problems of conducting oral research into pre- colonial society, especially in SOUthAfrica in the 1970s. And historians who intend enbarking uIX>noral field research elsev.here in southern Africa w:mld be well advised to add this insightful short essay to the growing historiography of oral research methodology. From the scure Appendix we learn that the first Xb:>sanewspaper Ikhwezi (The M;:>rningStar) appeared as long acp as 1844 (p 175). This first generation of literate Xhosa, th;)ugh convinced Christians were keenly interested in preserving their cultural heritage and romtitting Xhosa historical traditions to paper, and they have clearly provided a valuable collection of oral traditions, based much near- er to source than one can roI1l1ally expect in central and southern Africa. Having drawn upon such a wide range of raw materials, I:xJthoral and written, Dr Peires has produced an inpressively catprehensive coverage of many aspects of Xhosa history. A 'WOrdof warning, however. This is an unusually structured b:lok, and some may be put off by its awarent d iscon- tinuities. The author has interspersed narrative with thematic chapters, in order to avoid 'a generalised social and eroromi.c dlapter' \'.hich may have 'created a false inpression of stagnation' (p viii). Thanes d10sen cover erology, chieftaincy, religion, trade and warfare, and are interspersed at reasonably appropriate IX>ints in the narrative. It is an interesting ted1nique and unooubtably carefully applied, l:ut this kind 6f segregation of 'narrative' and 'theme' 00es have its own set of problems. It appears to the present reviewer that Dr Peires has been caught in his own trap. He has segregated and dispersed his 'thanes' in an attarpt to avoid a long, generalised, introductory chapter and, by dealing with than separately, to convey a better sense of change over time. On the \\t1ole these thematic d1apters achieve this sense of change and tie in well with the narrative. There is, lnwever, one rotable ~tion. Ironically it is 104 that very introductory thematic chapter rand and People' (FP 1-10) I \\hich (bes in fact oonvey just that 'false iItpression of stagnation' \\hich the author sought to awid. Like the other d1apters, it is an excellent piece of writing, providing a graphic picture of XOOsah:lne- steads and a clear exposition of Xhosa transhumance patterns. But there is 00 sense of change and I canoot believe that there was 00 change in land use and settlement patterns during the turrolent period fran the 17705 to 1850 Iohich is the oore period of the narrative. '!he sources for this chapter are nostly writings ranging fran early to late nineteenth century and one is thus left \\Ondering mether this is, perhaps, an idea1ised picture of Xhosa society, not necessarily closely oorresponding with reality. Secondly, stripperl of its supporting thanes, the bare skeleton of the narrative is at tines so highly oondensed and XOOsainternal and external politics so CCltplex that it is difficult to follow Ioho is