K. Mogapi, Tsheka-lsheko Ya Dikwalo: Padi, Longman Botswana, Gaborone, 1982, pp.143, P4.50 M:>gapi's latest mok is an inportant additionandasignificant contriWtior, to the study and developnent of Tswana literature', especially in the areas of the oovel,drama and soort story. A fair numberof oovels, plays and soort stories have been published in Setswana rot until the appearance of Tsheka-tsheko Ya Dikwalo, Setswana had oothing written on literary theory and criticism. '!he bJok is written in Setswana \.\hich will ensure that it enjoys wide readership by the speakers of the language. It is the first time that seco~ scmols and first year Universi t¥ students studying Setswana have a literature textbook available for teaching and studying by direct metOOd. This is particularly crucial at secondary scOOol level \.\here teaching of Tswana literature is done through the rrediumof the hane language. '!he uniqueness of this bJok consists in the level of the audience it addresses, the medium of conmmication and the conprehensiveness of the scope of its coverage of the various genres of Tswana literature. The first part briefly reviews the develO(Xllentof the Tswanaoovel. In this part the develO(Xllentof the oovel is perceived in three stages according to thenatic content. The stages are as follows: oovels depicting traditional life; those portraying a clash between nodern and traditional life; and finally those that are confined to the portrayill or urban life. This survey and classification is however limited by the fact that it bases itself only on the popular content of the rovel, rot this the author made 00 reference to. WitOOutconsideration of this aspect of the develop- ment of the oovel, it Ci:J1OOt be correctly said that the statement of the author reflects the develcpnental picture adequately. The second part of the bJok is a sinple rot clear treatment of the follow- ing aspects: direction and style, characters and characterisation, t:l1E!m:!, plot, setting, conflict, plausibility, and climax. But again insufficient attention is given to questions of eJlI?Osi lion and points of view ~ich should also form essential elements of such analysis. The treatment of setting is rather controversial for the author merely adapts it to his thenatically biased review of oovel develO(Xllent. M:>gapi's treatment of plot is fresh and ccmnendable. It goes beyond that of Forster's in his classic Aspects of the ~vel1 ~ich accounts f