Monyaise as a Setswana Novelist: With particular reference to the novel Go Sa Baori by James Moi/wa The Novel Investigation of the novel as a genre has received attention of many scholars and as students and teachers of novels we should be interested in their findings. Because Monyaise is a novelist it would be interesting to consider him against the background of the tradition of the novel in its universal sense and for that purpose we shall use the statements of only three authorities from amongst the many, namely, E.J. Gordon, M.Z. Shroder, and W. Allen. a. A writer is creating a world and asking you to enter imaginatively into it. You hear a voice (point of view), saying that something is happening (plod, to someone (character) in some time and place (setting), and that the action of the story illustrates a meaning or dominating idea (theme),1 b. n_ the novel has a typical action, with a thematic value, which is characteristically its own.2 c. W. Allen's statement on what he regards as model novels - The classic novels are classics because of the illumination of life they offer. They are statements about human nature, made in terms of story and character, which have stood the test of time and have withstood the scrutiny of successive generations of readers.3 He further suggests that intelligent reading of a novel should prompt the following questions in a reader: Does this novelist's view of life as expressed in this book, square with the essential facts of life as I myself have known them? Does it seem false to them? Does it lead me to question my own experience of life? Shall I have to revise or amplify my view of life as a result of reading this novel? The above words invoke the sense of responsibility of both the author and the reader- !.e. sincerity in both writing and reading. As Gordon suggests, the novelist writes Imaginatively, creating a world, and asks the reader to read him imaginatively as well, for clear understanding and authentic interpretation. The most important thing about any novel is its meaning and value. Firstly, therefore, the reader must understand clearly the meaning of the experience of the author as communicated in .the novel before he can evaluate it. Appreciation of meaning leads to evaluatIOn, evaluation leads to the discrimination of the experience against the other experiences, and without discrimination, there can be no pleasure. In the view of W. Allen, pleasure is not the only entitlement of the reader. A reader ~imself has a duty to what he reads. A sportsman, e.g. a boxer or a footballer, who IS unsportmanlike and disregards the rules of the game is often checked by the. ref~ree or booed by the spectators. The novelist too has an obligation to the art, which IS as much as to say, to the tradition of the novel. Firstly, he should be honest to his life experience. This is called the novelist's integrity, and it is up to the reader 61 to see to it that the novelist maintains his integrity by shunning one who does not. If the novelist fakes the findings of his experience, whether for money or desire ~o please a large public, whether to make converts to his religion ~r .propa.8anda for his political pal;ty, he is being dishonest as a novelist and has lost his mtegrity, and must be shunned.5 What we observe as the point of convergence of the statements of the three authorities cited above is 'meaning'. Allen emphasises 'illumination of life and human nature' as the subject of the novel. Shroder stresses the thematic value of its action, and, Gordon suggests that all the elements of a novel are deployed to illustrate its meaning, which is the main thing about a novel. Briefly, they are saying, that a novel exists for conveying meaning of whatever aspect of life. One of the important considerations in reading a novel therefore is its world and the range of experience communicated within it. And in compliance with his integrity, the novelist must create the world in which he himself sincerely belieYeS, to be plausible nse of values) • Potso later realised from experience that his choice of Kerotse as a wife and the abandonment of Kedibone was not wise and to his disadvantage (Go ~a baori), Potso is assaulted by unknown people on his return from dancing, (black township life and its precariousness). Another way in which it is presented is where Potso is committed to his o,wn responsibility - where he has to choose between two objects which are both attractive but are unequal in value. This has to do with the making of important lifetime deCisions. The decisions taken are often wrong for the principle on which they are based - the pleasure principle which guides the populatilln of his fictive world. This brings out one of the author's intentions - to criticise and parody the life of the modern society' in the urban townships. What is reflected is a low sense of values on the part of the people portrayed in Monyaise's world. The error is often di~covered very late when nothing can be done to correct it. This ,is ~pt~r~ by ,the Image of the cross-roads (marakanelo a ditsela) which at the same time IS Ironical In effect: 65 Fa 0 fitlha mo marakanelong a ditsela 0 tsaya ya molema kgotsa "fa moja ya bokone kgotsa ya bonia. Mme fa 0 sena go tsamaya sekgala se seleele, e bile 0 lapile, 0 lemoga gore tsela ya gago ke e o e t10getseng kwa morago.9 [When one comes to the Cross-roads, he follows the one leading to the left or tte one leading to the right, the one leading to the north or the one leading to the South. But after having walked a long distance and even tired for that, one comes to realise that the road he should have followed was the one he avoided • The immediate meaning of the image is that when Potso had to choose for a. wife between Kerotse and Kedibone he chose Kerotse only to discover later that Kedlbone might have been a better choice. At one level (fate), it ~s.t? sa~ t~at life is unkind to some people sometimes, at another (character's responsibility) It IS to say that we approach life irresponsibly and therefore wrongly. We value the valueless an~ devalue the valuable as exemplified by Potso's sudden preference of Kerotse to Ked~bo~e.- a portrayal of a life which is guided by the pleasure principle and lack of self-dlsclplme; a life which takes no account of the happy and secure future. Potso's position between the two valences referred to above, represents a reaction to a life situation which besets the contemporary society, especially the modern young people in the urban setting. Setting The setting of the novel Go ~a Baori is in perfect harmony with the other features of the work and the manner in which it enhances them. The time setting is the present day and the place setting is Johannesburg, Sofia (Sophiatown), Mmasepala (Western Native Township), Matshaeneng (Newc!are), Benoni, Tshwane (Pretoria) Olanti (Orlando), Teemaneng (Kimberley) Matlosane (Klerksdorp). The many places at which the activities surrounding dancing are set suggests that the type of life portrayed is not peculiar to a specific township. Rather it suggests that the life portrayed is of the black urban townships in general. The events and characters are made plausible by the setting because they fit in with it and the themes are clearly illustrated by it. Occasionally, the action shifts to a hospital. Like in Nl!;aka Mosadi Mooka, the hospital symbolises illness - that of the society. The book portrays to us a life beset by social pathology in all its shades. Presentation The story has been presented through Potso's dream and semi-consciousness deliberately as an adaption of the stream of consciousness method. With this method the flow of thoughts is random. The thoughts and events are neither time nor space bound: The sequ.ence is that of a dream. According to Oaiches "The stream of conSCiousness, at ItS most subtle and most intense, is able to achieve by depth what the traditional. met~od achieves ?,y extension. It provides a method of presenting character outSide time and place 10 (Daiches, p.2~). In such a presentation there must be a unifying element. And such unifying elements are: a. Potso. He is the narrator as well as the character. He therefore straddles both plots. Thus he reduces the apparent fragmentation. b. The dancing activity. It is encountered in the first plot and it is continued in the second plot as the central activity which serves as the watershed of all other activities. Kerotse and Potso are actually involved in the dancing in the first plot; in the second part he dreams about the activities. What Kerotse indulges in, and later Potso, is repeated in the second part where it involves many people and at many places. It is around this activity (dance) that a lot is exposed. All the themes we have mentioned are revealed by what emanates from the dance activity. Exposition We find concentrated and delayed types of exposition have been used in connection with the following: Sekolo sa bana ba Mathabe, Diale, Kerotse, Kedibone, Mapule, Sello (concentrated) Monna wa peipi (delayed). Point of View Point of view is the way the actions of a story are reported to the reader. It is the perspective of the narrator toward the materials of the story that determines what information the reader is given, in what order, with what emphasis, and in what tone. >,/' There are many types of point of view. For the first plot of Go Sa Baori the point of view used is that of the First Person Central or 'I' as the Protagonist. In this type the author allows the characters to tell the story in their own words. These must be the main or important character(s). Hence Potso is the one who tells his own story. This type of point of view achieves a certain intimacy and a psychological closeness so that the reader identifies with the speaker easily. For a big fictive world with a big population of characters with a lot of action, it can prove to be limiting. After Potso's accident, the First Person Central Point of View is abandoned in favour of the omniscient one. Here the narrator knows everything. He can tell us what the characters think, what they do when they are alone, and he can follow one character and then another. He can go forward and backward in time. In the second plot are involved Olebile's group and many other dancing groups, the Magapela and Mawelana gangs. The multiplicity of these characters warrants t~ use of the omniscient point of view. The one used is the multiple selective omniSCience. Here the reader ostensibly listens to no one. The story comes directly through the minds of characters. As a result the tendency is almost wholly in the direction of scene, both inside the mind and externally with speech and action. Narr~tive summary where it appears it is either supplied unobtrusively by the author as if by way of 'stage direction' or it emerges through the thoughts a!1d words .of the characters themselves. Objectivity is achieved by the adoption of thiS perspective. In brief, the first plot point of view is restricted and that of the second plot is omniscient. Characters The characters are mainly presented through the dramatic method, the speeches of characters about others, created situations to which the characters are made to react so that inference about what type of people they are, is made from their reactions, and seldom by direct description by the author. They are dynamic and like real life and well matched with the action and setting of the book. They are neatly individualised and typified - all in one, and this lends them plausibility. This is for instance true of anyone of them such as Matong, Sello, Kerotse, Mapule, Monna wa Peipi and Ngaka Bodila. Each gives an impression that he is an individual with his own idiosyncrasies while at the same time all of them can be identified as people whose behaviour is conditioned by the urban environment. Their outlook and general style of life is typical and coincides with such an environment - whether they be females or males, children or adults. Characters in this book are divided into main groups according to the two plots. The first plot has main and minor characters. The main characters are Potso, Kedibone and Kerotse. The themes of the book are revealed through their actions and interactions. In this plot unlike the second one, Potso is referred to by name. The minor characters are Potso's mother and sister, ngaka (doctor), and mooki (nurse). These are kept in the background and are not referred to by their names. The reader is not even given their description. They help to characterise the main characters and to unravel the plot through their actions and speeches. For instance, it is through nRaka and mooki that the reader is made aware that Potso had been talking in a dream or state of semi-consciousness since his admission to hospital after his assault by unknown people. The following words exemplify: --- Ka OOtsa mool4 gore ke tsile jang mo kokelong; mme ka utlwa mafoko a a gakgamatsang. Gore ka Matlhatso a beke e e ka kwa pele ke ne ka selwa mo mmileng gaufi Ie ntlo ya tshipi. Go bonala gore ke ketekilwe ke batho ... - - - - -. Fa a sena go tshega a ba a gelola keledi, are, "Dipuo tse o di buileng!" Ka tshoga. "Ntlha 0 ka bua Mmoni a seyo. Ke raya gore rona re tlwaetse dipuo tsa lona fa 10 tswa roo maibing-. "Ke buile ka reng?" "A wa re ke santse ke itse. Bangwe a ne e Ie OOKedibone Ie boKerotse Ie 00 ••• ke lebetse gore ba bangwe ke bomang. e ne e Ie maina a mantsi fela".ll [j asked the nurse how I carreto the hospital; and I heard amazing words. That on the Saturday of the week before the previous one I was picked up on the road near the church. The indication was that I had been assaulted by people - - -. After laughing thoroughly, she said, "Things you have said!" I got scared. "Why couldn't you have rather talked in Mmoni's absence. We nurses are used to the sort of things you say when you come to." "What did I say?" "Do you think I can still recall? Some were Kedibone's others were Kerotse's and - - - I can't recall who the others were. It were so many names".] (Author's translation) It is by ngaka and mooki that we get to know that the author's persona, namely Potso, had been dreaming 68 ---mme ka utlwa ba sebaseba ka lobaka 10 loleele gangwe Ie gape ngaka e botsa ka lentswe Ie Ie supang gore ga e dumele mafoko a mooki. Fa e sena go keleka dikwalo tsa me ya tswa. Le ena a e sala morago. Ka itse gore ga nkitla ke tlhola ke utlwa 0 ne a ya go reng ~onne tsotlhe ke maitlhomo - maitlhomo fela.I2 [;.--and I heard them whispering to each other for a long time, with the doctor now and again asking in a voice that showed that he did not believe what the nurse was saying. After inspecting my medical records he moved out •. And she followed him. I knew that I would never hear what she was going to say because all this is hallucination - mere hallucination.l2 J (Author's translation) The underlined words tell us that the story of th e book is a dream and they are the closing statement of the entire novel. In case the reader has not been aware that the narration has been couched in a dream, he is being alerted and made aware. The characters of the second plot are also divided into main and minor ones. The minors are further subdivided into two, those who support the main characters and those who oppose them. The main characters are bana ba sekolo sa Modikwadikwane sa Mathabe and Olebile, their leader, Mmoni, Diale, Motlagole, Leta, Mapule, and Mosimane wa Olanti. The minor ones are the two groups of gangsters, Magapela and Mawelana. The former were the supporters and the latter the antagonists of Olebile's party (main characters). The conflict between them develops the plot. The protagonists are: Same, Rooi, Shimane MmaagweShimane, MmaagweDiale, MmaagweMotlagole, and Ngaka Bodila. The antagonists are: Monna wa Peipe, Matlole, Matong (Morwa Matlole) Legae and Mmami. Conclusion In conclusion, we ask ourselves as to how Go sa Baori stands in relation to the statements of the three authorites cited at the beginning of the paper. All their statements accomodate it. The work has a rich meaning which is well supported by its structure - and also an action which has a thematic value and probability. There is a wide range of experience offered within its world and as such it sheds enough illumination on life. In it, the author does not fake the findings of his own experience hence his integrity as a novelist sticks out clearly. His view of life as expressed in it squares with the facts of life as they are. Its intelligent reader feels challenged to question his view of life and to revise and afTl)lify it after reading the text. For what it is,it has found itself a prominent position in the tradition of the Tswana novel. 69 Footnotes I. Gordon, E.J., Writing about Imaginative Literature, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc., New York, 1973, p.6. 2. Schroder, M.Z., "The Novel as a Genre", in P. Stevick (ed.), The Theory of the Novel, Collier Macmillan, London, 1967, p.12. 3. Allen, W., Reading a Novel, Dent, London, 1963, pp.31-32. 4. Ibid., p.32. 5. Allen, op.cit., p.33 6. d. with S.j.J. Lebetho, Mosele, Van Schaik 1972; Morabaraba, Van Schaik, 1974 and M.T. Manileng, MotlilogOje, Van Schaik 1977; Mangome, Van Schaik, 1975. 7. Go Sa Baori, p.118. 8. Ibid., p.74 9. Go Sa Baori, p.3. 10. Daiches, D., The Novel and the Modern World, University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London, 1973, p.24. II. Go Sa Baori, p.122 12. Ibid., p.123. 70