A note on the 1982 Botswana Citizenship Act by Peter Nanyenya Takirambudde Introduction From a comparative law perspective, citizenship laws are designed to define and prescribe the conditions which connect or disconnect an individual with a given state or legal system. I In most legal systems, the term citizenship connotes a legal status which is derived from the existence of certain factual conditions such as birth within a given country. The existence of the factual conditions is treated as a qualification or legal condition for acquisition of nationality. The totality of such conditions, therefore, prescribes the nationality or citizenship law of a given state. Owing to the inevitable differences that obtain in various countries, the conditions governing the loss or acquisition of nationality vary in significant ways. Even within a single country, due to internal political, economic and social changes the concept of nationality does not remain static. Changes in circumstances lead to a redefinition of the law which gives birth to a new concept of nationality or citizenship) In Botswana, prior to the coming into force of the new Citizenship Act, the legal conditions for the acquisition and loss of nationality were contained. partly in the Constitution3 and partly in the Citizenship of Botswana (Supplementary Provisions) Act.4 The 1982 Citizenship Act effects substantial changes in the character of nationality particularly regarding the acquisition of nationality by naturalisation. The genesis of the new Act was a Parliamentary Motion by the Hon. Magang. The motion, inter alia, instructed the Minister of Home Affairs to refer the Citizenship Act to the Law Reform Committee.5 The 1982 Act is based upon the recommendations of the committee. International law concedes the right of each state to determine, under its own legal system, the persons who are going to be its citizens. The international community is obligated to recognise the law of each state so long as it is in line with international conventions, custom and the principles of law generally recognised with regard to nationality or citizenship.6 Regarding a state's right to ascribe nationality at birth, international law recognises two grounds upon which a state may confer its nationality at birth, that is to say, the fact of birth within its territory (otherwise known as the principle of jus soli) or of descent from a citizen (known as jus sanguinis).! The principle of jus sanguinis, which is said to have originated with membership in the family or tribe, is the older of the two principles and finds expression in the citizenship laws of countries in Europe, Africa and Asia. The principle of jus soli finds expression in the citizenship laws of Great Britain