Book Reviews
   Editor: Kirsten Holst Petersen
   Title: Critic/ani and Ideology
   Publisber: Scandinavian Institute of African Studies
   Date: 1988
   Reviewer: H.M. Njozi
        Criticism and Ideology is a collection of 16papers and highlights of the discussions
  at the second Stockholm Conference for African Writers, held in 1986. Writers who
  p~esented their papers include Wole Soyinka, winner of the Nobel Prize for literature
   in 1986.\MiriamTlali, Taban 10Liyong, Ama Ata Aidoo, Eldred Jones, Buchi Emeche-
  ia~andNgugi wa Thiong'o.
        Thematically, the papers published in this volume have little in common. The writers
  discuss a wide range of issues related to literature, criticism and society. It is also clear
  from the discussions that in most cases, they hold tiifferent or even conflicting views
  on a number of issues like feminism and the problem of language.
        Literature is all too frequently discussed and Ievaluatec :rrom the critic's point of
  view. Despite its advantage such a bias is not free trom limitations. Signficantly, this
  volume is a modest attempt to counter balance ~hat trend. In it, issues pertaining to
  literature, criticism and society are discused by, and from a decidedly standpoint of the
  writers themselves.
        In his paper, "Ethics, Ideology and the Critic" Wole SoyiDka voices his dissatis-
  faction with the quality of criticism flowing from critics of African literature. In his
  derision, Soyinka arranges those critics in a descending order beginning with the 'bad'
  whose only qualification is being 'lovers of literature' and ending with the 'worst' -
  "the chichidodo school of critics. In between, 'he places the Marxists and the neo-
  Tarzanist critics. Most Marxists he s~ys regard literature as 'a means of ooening up the
  material relations of the world. The work which illuminates this process is already on
 its way to beinp;a masterpiece'. Such critics consider cliches as substitutes for analytical
  vigour. Soyinka .seems to argue _that ideology is destructive of. criticism.
        on the  language  question, Soyinka and Ngugi was l'luong'o art>at 10ggerheads.Soyi-
 :nka argues that the choice of language will vary from one situation to another. There-
 fore no one should prescribe for the others. The change of language, he says, could
 threaten the political stability of Nigeria. Kole Omotoso supports Soyinka's position
 in his paper "The' Languages of our dreams or the dreams of our languages". They
 both however, support the furtherance and mastery of indigenous languages.
       Ngugi wa Thiong'o's paper "Writing against Neo-Colonialism" links the growth
of African literature to the continent's political development. He argues that the politi-
cal situation in Africa today demands that a writer make a choice; either to crusade
for justice and risk jail or exile or acquiesce to the status quo or embrace self-censorship
- the culture of silence cmd fear.
       Taban 10 Liyong's paper, "Reverend Doctor John S. Mbiti is a Thief of Gods"
is an,attempt to d~fend traditional r~ligion. This he does by w.J;itingII critiQue of Rev.
.is. Mbiti's bOoK; African Religions and Philosophy. He coriCludesby urging Africaii
\\-nters to ChampIOntheIr traCutJonal religions and advocating theIr case.
       IR her paper, "African Motherhood - M~11 and Reality", Lauretta Ngcobo 111 .
gues that most African traditions fetter tbf'development of women. Unfortunately,
the images of women in African literature s~ to perpetuate the oppression of women.
Women characters are often punished severely for any mistakes they commit while male
~~eLDO                 severe chastiscraent. NacobO says that an these crimes.~        women \
                                               68


emanate from one basic principle - 'the social and sexual subordination of 'Nomen-
 Writers have a responsibility to society, and in this instance, to women in parti~.   We
are looking for a changed portrayal of women in our books.'
      In her paper, "To be an African Woman Writer - an Overview and a Detail"
Ama Ata Aidoo laments the denial of serious critical attention to women writers. From
Gerald Moore onwards almost all critics have ignored women writers. Such critics in-
clude Neil McEwan. Africa and the Novel (1975), Charles Larson, The Emergence oj
African Fiction (1972), Eustace Palmer, Introduction to the African Novel (19(9), Chin-
weizu, Toward the Decolonization of African Litera{ure, Gerald Moore Twelve Afri-
can Writers, (1980) and Emmanuel Ngara, Art and Ideology in theA/rican Novel (1985).
     OJada Taiwo's book, Female Novelists of Modern Africa is severely criticized by
Aidoo because the author treat the women writers 'as if they were a bunch of preco-
cious six-year olds who had demonstrated some special abilities to the headteacher.' She
demands a serious literary criticism based on the text and the writer's intention and not.
on speculations about sideline issues.
     It is unfortunate that the conference missed the contributions of other literary gi.
ants like Ayi Kwei Armah, Chinua Achebe, Nurdin Farah and Sembene Ousmane.
Nevertheless, for all those who are interested in African literature, Criticism and Ideol-
ogy remains a rare book that at once delights and educates. It is a book worth reading.
                                             69.