The creation and evaluation of known evolutionary histories and the implementation of student investigatory experiences on evolution are difficult endeavors that have only recently been feasible. The research presented in this dissertation is related in their shared use of digital evolution with Avidians as a model study system, both to conduct science research in experimental phylogenetics and to conduct education research in curricular intervention to aid student understanding.I first present background discussions on the Avidian digital evolution study system—as implemented in Avida and Avida-ED—and its favorable use in experimental phylogenetics and biology education owing to its greater biological realism than computational simulations, and greater utility and generality than biological systems. Prior work on conducting experimental evolution for use in phylogenetics and work on developing undergraduate lab curricula using experimental evolution are also reviewed. I establish digital evolution as an effective method for phylogenetic inference validation by demonstrating that results from a known Avidian evolutionary history are concordant, under similar conditions, to established biological experimental phylogenetics work. I then further demonstrate the greater utility and generality of digital evolution over biological systems by experimentally testing how phylogenetic accuracy may be reduced by complex evolutionary processes operating singly or in combination, including absolute and relative degrees of evolutionary change between lineages (i.e., inferred branch lengths), recombination, and natural selection. These results include that directional selection aids phylogenetic inference, while stabilizing selection impedes it. By evaluating clade accuracy and clade resolvability across treatments, I evaluate measures of tree support and its presentation in the form of consensus topologies and I offer several general recommendations for systematists. Using a larger and more biologically realistic experimental design, I systematically examine a few of the complex processes that are hypothesized to affect phylogenetic accuracy—natural selection, recombination, and deviations from the model of evolution. By analyzing the substitutions that occurred and calculating selection coefficients for derived alleles throughout their evolutionary trajectories to fixation, I show that molecular evolution in these experiments is complex and proceeding largely as would be expected for biological populations. Using these data to construct empirical substitution models, I demonstrate that phylogenetic inference is incredibly robust to significant molecular evolution model deviations. I show that neutral evolution in the presence of always-occurring population processes, such as clonal or Hill-Robertson interference and lineage sorting, result in reduced clade support, and that selection and especially recombination, including their joint occurrence, restore this otherwise-reduced phylogenetic accuracy. Finally, this work demonstrates that inferred branch lengths are often quite inaccurate despite clade support being accurate. While phylogenetic inference methods performed relatively well in both theoretically facile and challenging molecular evolution scenarios, their accuracy in clade support might be a remarkable case of being right for misguided reasons, since branch length inference were largely inaccurate, and drastically different models of evolution made little difference. This work highlights the need for further research that evaluates phylogenetic methods under experimental conditions and suggests that digital evolution has a role here. Finally, I examine student understanding of the importance of biological variation in the context of a course featuring a digital evolution lab. I first describe the Avida-ED lab curriculum and its fulfillment of calls for reform in education. Then I describe the specific education context and other course features that aim to address student conceptualization of variation. I present a modified published assessment on transformational and variational understanding and findings regarding student understanding of variation within an evolution education progression. Finally, I offer suggestions on incorporating course material to engage student understanding of variation.
Read
